Management and Organizations Tenure Track Faculty Database
Management and Organizations
Fuqua School of Business
Duke University

 HOME > Fuqua > Management > Tenure Track Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications [#273286] of Aaron C. Kay

Journal Articles

  1. Gaucher, D; Friesen, J; Kay, AC, Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 101 no. 1 (July, 2011), pp. 109-128, ISSN 0022-3514 [doi]
    (last updated on 2022/08/14)

    Abstract:
    Social dominance theory (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) contends that institutional-level mechanisms exist that reinforce and perpetuate existing group-based inequalities, but very few such mechanisms have been empirically demonstrated. We propose that gendered wording (i.e., masculine- and feminine-themed words, such as those associated with gender stereotypes) may be a heretofore unacknowledged, institutional-level mechanism of inequality maintenance. Employing both archival and experimental analyses, the present research demonstrates that gendered wording commonly employed in job recruitment materials can maintain gender inequality in traditionally male-dominated occupations. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated the existence of subtle but systematic wording differences within a randomly sampled set of job advertisements. Results indicated that job advertisements for male-dominated areas employed greater masculine wording (i.e., words associated with male stereotypes, such as leader, competitive, dominant) than advertisements within female-dominated areas. No difference in the presence of feminine wording (i.e., words associated with female stereotypes, such as support, understand, interpersonal) emerged across male- and female-dominated areas. Next, the consequences of highly masculine wording were tested across 3 experimental studies. When job advertisements were constructed to include more masculine than feminine wording, participants perceived more men within these occupations (Study 3), and importantly, women found these jobs less appealing (Studies 4 and 5). Results confirmed that perceptions of belongingness (but not perceived skills) mediated the effect of gendered wording on job appeal (Study 5). The function of gendered wording in maintaining traditional gender divisions, implications for gender parity, and theoretical models of inequality are discussed.


Duke University * Management * Faculty * Affiliated * Staff * Reload * Login