Refereed Publications
Abstract:
Learning commonly refers to the modification of behavior
through experience, whereby an animal gains information
about stimulus-response contingencies from interacting
with its physical environment. Social learning, on the
other hand, occurs when the same information originates,
not from the animal’s personal experience, but from the
actions of others. Socially biased learning is the ‘collective
outcome of interacting physical, social, and individual
factors’ [1, p. 24]. Mounting interest in animal social
learning has brought with it certain innovations in animal
testing procedures. Variants of the observer-
demonstrator and cooperation paradigms, for instance,
have been used widely in captive settings to examine the
transmission or coordination of behavior, respectively,
between two animals. Relatively few studies, however,
have examined social learning in more complex group
settings and even fewer have manipulated the social
environment to empirically test the effect of group
dynamics on problem solving. The present paper outlines
procedures for group testing captive nonhuman primates,
in spacious arenas, to evaluate the social modulation of
learning and performance. These methods are illustrated
in the context of (1) naturalistic social foraging problems,
modeled after traditional visual discrimination paradigms,
(2) response to novel objects and novel extractive
foraging tasks, and (3) cooperative problem solving. Each
example showcases the benefits of experimentally
manipulating social context to compare an animal’s
performance in intact groups (or even pairs) against its
performance under different social circumstances. Broader
application of group testing procedures and manipulation
of group composition promise to provide meaningful
insight into socially biased learning.
Keywords:
Primate cognition; Social learning; Social foraging; Discrimination learning; Response to novelty; Neophobia; Cooperation; Problem-solving