Papers Published
Abstract:
Abstract — Sugar growers have been capturing substantial
rents from the U.S. sugar program. Despite well-documented
huge welfare losses of this program, legislators have
always voted against phasing it out. This paper uses Tobit
analysis to explore the determinants of campaign
contributions from the sugar industry to Senators from 1989
to 2002. It finds that the power and willingness of the
Senators to protect sugar influence the campaign
contributions significantly: Membership of the Senate
Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee attracts
$4,266 of sugar contributions per two-year election cycle.
Membership of the relevant subcommittee that deals with
sugar legislation is even more profitable than membership
of the agriculture committee alone: membership of the
Agricultural Production, Marketing, and Stabilization of
Prices Subcommittee is worth an additional $2179 for a
total of $6,445. These results suggest the strength of the
subcommittee in drafting specialized legislation and
attracting interested members. Moreover, while the
particular party affiliation does not make any difference,
membership of the majority party is worth $1,235. Finally,
an impressionable freshman Senator from a sugar cane state
receives $8,366 more than a more senior senator from a non-
sugar state.