Philosophy Faculty Database
Arts & Sciences
Duke University

 HOME > Arts & Sciences > Philosophy > Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications [#287449] of Felipe De Brigard

Duke :: Philosophy :: Faculty :: Felipe De Brigard

Papers Published

  1. De Brigard, F; Brady, WJ, The Effect of What We Think may Happen on our Judgments of Responsibility, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, vol. 4 no. 2 (January, 2013), pp. 259-269, Springer Nature [doi].
    (last updated on 2019/07/21)

    Recent evidence suggests that if a deterministic description of the events leading up to a morally questionable action is couched in mechanistic, reductionistic, concrete and/or emotionally salient terms, people are more inclined toward compatibilism than when those descriptions use non-mechanistic, non-reductionistic, abstract and/or emotionally neutral terms. To explain these results, it has been suggested that descriptions of the first kind are processed by a concrete cognitive system, while those of the second kind are processed by an abstract cognitive system. The current paper reports the results of three studies exploring whether or not considerations about possible future consequences of holding an agent responsible at a present time affect people's judgments of responsibility. The results obtained suggest first that the concrete system does not produce compatibilist judgments of responsibility unconditionally, even when facing appropriately mechanistic, reductionistic, emotionally loaded and concretely worded deterministic scenarios. Second, these results suggest that considerations about possible future consequences for innocent third parties that may follow as a result of holding an agent responsible affect people's judgment as to whether or not the agent is responsible for what she did. Finally, it is proposed that these results compliment extant evidence on the so-called "Side-effect effect", as they suggest that emotional reactions toward possible future side effects influence people's judgment of responsibility. The impact of these results for philosophy and moral psychology is discussed. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Philosophy * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Reload * Login