Religious Studies Faculty Database
Religious Studies
Arts & Sciences
Duke University

 HOME > Arts & Sciences > Religious Studies > Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications [#357260] of Mark S. Goodacre

search markgoodacre.org.

Papers Published

  1. Goodacre, M. "How Empty Was the Tomb?." Journal for the Study of the New Testament 44:1 (September, 2021): 134-148. [doi]

    Abstract:
    Although the term ‘empty tomb’ is endemic in contemporary literature, it is never used in the earliest Christian materials. The term makes little sense in the light of first-century Jerusalem tombs, which always housed multiple people. One absent body would not leave the tomb empty. The gospel narratives presuppose a large, elite tomb, with multiple loculi, and a heavy rolling stone to allow repeated access for multiple burials. The gospels therefore give precise directions about where Jesus’ body lay in this large tomb. Apologetic anxiety leads to the characterization of the tomb as ‘new’ (Matthew and John), ‘in which no one had been laid’ (Luke and John), but it is possible that the appearance of Mark’s young man ‘on the right’ is significant. The anachronistic question ‘Was the tomb empty?’ should be replaced by the accurate question, ‘How empty was the tomb?’


Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Religious Studies * Faculty * Secondary * Affliates * Staff * Grad * Reload * Login