Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty Database
Psychology and Neuroscience
Arts & Sciences
Duke University

 HOME > Arts & Sciences > pn > Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications [#252777] of Elizabeth J. Marsh

search PubMed.

Journal Articles

  1. Marsh, EJ; Roediger, HL; Bjork, RA; Bjork, EL (2007). The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing.. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(2), 194-199. [17694900]
    (last updated on 2018/01/17)

    Abstract:
    The present article addresses whether multiple-choice tests may change knowledge even as they attempt to measure it. Overall, taking a multiple-choice test boosts performance on later tests, as compared with non-tested control conditions. This benefit is not limited to simple definitional questions, but holds true for SAT II questions and for items designed to tap concepts at a higher level in Bloom's (1956) taxonomy of educational objectives. Students, however, can also learn false facts from multiple-choice tests; testing leads to persistence of some multiple-choice lures on later general knowledge tests. Such persistence appears due to faulty reasoning rather than to an increase in the familiarity of lures. Even though students may learn false facts from multiple-choice tests, the positive effects of testing outweigh this cost.


Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Postdocs * Reload * Login