Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty Database
Psychology and Neuroscience
Arts & Sciences
Duke University
 HOME > Arts & Sciences > pn > Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications of Neil J Vidmar    :chronological  combined  bibtex listing:

search PubMed.

Journal Articles

  1. Vidmar, N.J. (2005). Juries Around the Globe. ABA Insights. (in press).
  2. Vidmar, N.J. (2004). Experimental Simulations and Tort Reform: Avoidance, Error and Overreaching in Sunstein et al.s Punitive Damages. Emory Law Journal, 53, 1359.
  3. Diamond, Vidmar, Rose, Ellis & Murphy (September-October, 2003). Inside the Jury Room: Evaluating Juror Discussions During Trial. Judicature, 87, 54.
  4. Vidmar, N.J. (2003). The American Civil Jury for Auslander (Foreigners). Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 13, 92. (Special Issue in honor of Herbert Bernstein).
  5. Diamond, Vidmar, Rose, Ellis & Murphy (2003). Juror Discussions During Trials: Studying an Arizona Innovation. Arizona Law Review, 45, 1.
  6. Saks & Vidmar (2003). Asserted but Unproven: A Further Response to the Lindgren Study’s Claim that the American Bar Association’s Ratings of Judicial Nominees Are Biased. Journal of Law and Politics, 19, 177.
  7. Vidmar, N.J. (2003). When All of Us Are Victims: Juror Prejudice and “Terrorist” Trials. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78, 1143.
  8. Vidmar, N.J. (August, 2002). Listening to Jurors and Asking Them Questions. Trial Briefs, 9.
  9. Diamond & Vidmar and others (April, 2002). Juror discussion during civil trials: A study of Arizona's rule 39(F)Innovation. [pdf]
  10. Vidmar, N.J. (2002). Case Studies of Pre-and Midtrial Prejudice in Criminal and Civil Litigation. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 73. [pdf]
  11. Sanders, Diamond & Vidmar (2002). Legal Perceptions of Science and Expert Knowledge. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 8, 139.
  12. Vidmar, N.J. (2002). Juries and Lay Assessors in the Commonwealth of Nations. Criminal Law Forum, 13, 385.
  13. Rose & Vidmar (2002). Bronx ABronx Juries@: A Profile of Jury awards In New York Counties. Texas Law Review, 80, 1889.
  14. Vidmar, N. & Brown, Leigh Ann (2002). Tort Reform and the Medical Liability Insurance Crisis in Mississippi: Diagnosing the Disease and Prescribing a Remedy. Mississippi College Law Review, 22, 9-46.
  15. Vidmar & Diamond (2001). Juries and Experts. Brooklyn Law Review, 66, 1123-1182.
  16. Diamond & Vidmar (2001). Jury Room Ruminations on Forbidden Evidence. Virginia Law Review, 87, 1857.
  17. Vidmar & Rose (2001). Punitive Damages; In Terrorem and in Reality. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 38, 489-511.
  18. Vidmar, N.J. (2001). Review of Jury Systems Abroad Can Provide Helpful Insights Into American Practices. New York State Bar Association Journal, 73, 23.
  19. Saks & Vidmar (2001). A Flawed Search for Bias in the American Bar Association=s Ratings of Judicial Nominees: A Critique of the Lindgren / Federalist Society Study. Journal of Law and Politics, 17(2), 219-254.
  20. Vidmar, N.J. (2000). The origin and outcome of the Kumbo Amicus brief. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 383-400.
  21. Vidmar, N.J. (1999). Juries don't make legal decisions! And other problems: A critique of Hastie et al. on punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 705.
  22. Vidmar, N.J. (1998). The performance of American civil jury: An empirical perspective. Arizona Law Review, 40, 849.
  23. Vidmar, N., Gorss, F., & Rose, M. (1998). Jury awards for medical malpractice and post-verdict adjustment of those awards. DePaul Law Review, 48, 265.
  24. (1998). The Common Law Jury. Law & Contemporary Problems, 62.
  25. Vidmar, N., Beale, S., Rose, M. & Donnelly, L. (May-June, 1997). Should We Rush to Reform the Criminal Jury? Consider Conviction Rate Data. Judicature, 80, 286-290.
  26. Vidmar, N.J. (February, 1997). Generic prejudice and the presumption of guilt in sex abuse trials. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 5.
  27. Vidmar,N., Beale, S., Rose, M. & Donnelly, L. (1997). Rushing to reform the criminal jury? First consider conviction rate data. Judicature, 80, 286-290.
  28. Vidmar, N.J. (1996). Pretrial Prejudice in Canada: A Comparative Perspective on the Criminal Jury,. Judicature, 79, 249.
  29. Ogloff, J. R. P. & Vidmar, N. (1994). The Impact of Pretrial Publicity on Jurors: A Study to Compare the Relative Effects of Television and Print Media in a Child Sex Abuse Case. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 507.
  30. Vidmar, Lee, Cohen, & Stewart (1994). Damage Awards and Jurors' Responsibility Ascriptions in Medical Versus Automobile Negligence Cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 149.
  31. Ellis, R., Ravindra, G., Vidmar, N., & Davis, T. (1994). The Reversal Arbitration Board: An ADR Model for Resolving Intra-Corporate Disputes. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 93.
  32. Vidmar, N.J. (1994). Are Juries Competent to Decide Liability in Tort Cases Involving Scientific/Medical Issues? Some Data from Medical Malpractice. Emory Law Journal, 43, 885.
  33. N.J. Vidmar (1994). Making Inferences About Jury Behavior from Jury Verdict Statistics: Cautions About The Lorelei's Lied. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 599.
  34. Vidmar, N.J. (1994/1996). Pap and Circumstance: What Jury Verdict Statistics Can Tell Us about Jury Behavior and the Tort System. Suffolk University Law Review 1205 (1994/1996)., XXVII, 1205.
  35. Vidmar, N.J. (1993). The unfair criticism of medical malpractice juries (Reprint). Trial Lawyers Forum, 27, 5.
  36. Vidmar, N.J. (1993). The unfair criticism of medical malpractice juries (Reprint). Trial Talk, 42, 5.
  37. Vidmar, N.J. (1993). The unfair criticism of medical malpractice juries (Reprint). Trial Lawyers Quarterly, 23, 9.
  38. Ellis, Ravindra, Vidmar, & Davis (1993). Toyota's Arbitration Board: A Conflict Resolution Model for Intra-Corporate Disputes. Alternatives, 11, 44.
  39. Vidmar, N.J. (1993). Verfahrensgerechtigkeit und Alternative Konfliktbewältigung. Zeitschrift für Rechts-Soziologie, 14, 35-46.
  40. Vidmar, N. & Rice, J. (1993). Assessments of non-economic damage awards in medical negligence: a comparison of jurors with legal professionals. Iowa Law Review, 78, 883.
  41. Fischer, Vidmar and Ellis (1993). The "Culture of Battering" and the Role of Mediation in Domestic Violence Cases. Southern Methodist University (SMU) Law Review, 46, 2117-2174.
  42. Vidmar, N.J. (1993). Empirical Evidence on the "Deep Pockets" Hypothesis: Jury Awards for Pain and Suffering in Medical Malpractice Cases. Duke Law Journal, 43, 217.
  43. Vidmar, N., Donnelly, L., Metzloff, T. & Warren, D. (1992). An Empirical Examination of a Legislated Procedural Reform: Court-based Management of Medical Malpractice Litigation. (Technical Research Report).
  44. Schuller, R. & Vidmar, N. (1992). Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence in the Courtroom: A Review of the Literature. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 273.
  45. Vidmar, N.J. (1992). Procedural Justice and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Psychological Science, 3, 224.
  46. Vidmar, N.J. (1992). The unfair criticism of medical malpractice juries. Judicature, 76, 118.
  47. Vidmar, N. & Rice, J. (1991). Jury determined settlements and summary jury trials: Observations about ADR in an adversary culture. Florida State Law Review 89., 19, 89.
  48. Hans, V. & Vidmar, N. (1991). The American Jury: Twenty-five Years Later. Law and Social Inquiry, 16, 401.
  49. Vidmar, N.J. (1991). Medical Malpractice Juries. Duke Law Magazine, 8, 8.
  50. Kritzer, H., Bogart, W.A., & Vidmar, N. (1991). The Aftermath of Injury: Cultural Factors in Compensation Seeking in Canada and the United States. Law and Society Review, 25, 499.
  51. Kritzer, H., Vidmar, N. & Bogart, W.A. (1991). To Confront or Not to Confront: Measuring Claiming Rates in Discrimination Grievances. Law and Society Review, 25, 875.
  52. Kritzer, H., Bogart, W.A., & Vidmar, N. (1990). The Aftermath of Injury: Compensation Seeking in Canada and the United States. (Technical Research Report).
  53. Vidmar, N. & Feldthusen, B. (1990). Exemplary Damages in Ontario: An Empirical Study. Canadian Business Law Review, 16, 262-268.
  54. Vidmar, N.J. (1989). Is The Jury Competent?. Law and Contemporary Problems, 52(4).
  55. Vidmar, N. & Shuller, R. (1989). Juries and Expert Evidence: Social Framework Testimony. Law and Contemporary Problems, 52, 133-176.
  56. Vidmar, N.J. (1988). Seeking and finding justice: An empirical map of Canadian consumer problems and responses. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 26, 757-798.
  57. Rowe, T. & Vidmar, N. (1988). Empirical Research on Offers of settlement: A Preliminary Report. Law and Contemporary Problems, 51, 13-39.
  58. Samuels, J., & Vidmar, N. (1987). Consumer complaints and the Ontario Business Practices Act: An empirical study. University of Western Ontario Law Review, 24, 83-101.
  59. Vidmar, N.J. (1987). Assessing the contributions of case characteristics and settlement forums on dispute outcomes and compliance. Law and Society Review, 21, 155-164.
  60. Vidmar, N., & Schuller, R. A. (1987). Individual differences and the pursuit of legal rights: A preliminary inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 299-317.
  61. Vidmar, N., & Lawrence, C. (April 30, 1985). The impact of statistical evidence on the legal system. (Technical Research Report. Prepared for (U.S.) National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences).
  62. Vidmar, N., & Flaherty, D. (1985). Concern for personal privacy in an electronic age. Journal of Communication, 35, 91-103.
  63. Vidmar, N.J. (1985). An assessment of mediation in a small claims court. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 127-144.
  64. Vidmar, N.J. (1984). The small claims court: A reconceptualization of disputes and an empirical investigation. Law and Society Review, 18, 515-550.
  65. Vidmar, N., & Melnitzer, J. (1984). Juror prejudice: An empirical study of a challenge for cause. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 22, 487-511.
  66. Vidmar, N.J. (May, 1983). Privacy and Two-way Cable Television: A Study of Canadian Public Opinion. (Technical Research Report. Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communication).
  67. Vidmar, N. & Laird, N. (1983). Adversary social roles: Their effects on witnesses' communication of evidence and the assessments of adjudicators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 888-898.
  68. Vidmar, N. & Short, J. A. (1982). The effects of criminal justice issues on voting behavior. (Technical Research Report. Federal Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada).
  69. Vidmar, N. & Judson, J. (1981). The use of survey research in a change of venue motion: A case study. Canadian Bar Review, 59, 76-102.
  70. Vidmar, N. & Dittenhoffer, A. (1981). Canadian public opinion and the death penalty: The effects of knowledge on attitudes. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 23, 43-56.
  71. Vidmar, N. & Miller, D. T. (1980). Social psychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law and Society Review, 14, 401-438.
  72. Sheppard, B. & Vidmar, N. (1980). Adversary pretrial procedures and testimonial eviedence: Effects of lawyers' role and machiavellianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 320-332.
  73. Vidmar, N.J. (1979). The other issues in jury simulation research: A commentary with particular reference to defendant character studies. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 95-106.
  74. Vidmar, N.J. (April, 1978). Implementing the information/education campaign on firearms control: A literature review. (Technical Research Report. Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada).
  75. Sarat, A. & Vidmar, N. (1976). Public opinion, the death penalty, and the eighth amendment: testing the Marshall hypothesis. Wisconsin Law Review, 171-206.
  76. Berg, K. & Vidmar, N. (1975). Authoritarianism and recall of evidence about criminal behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 147-157.
  77. Vidmar, N.J. (1974). Effects of group discussion on category width judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 187-195.
  78. Vidmar, N. & Rokeach, M (1974). Archie Bunker's bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication, 24, 36-47.
  79. Vidmar, N. & Crinklaw, L (1974). Attributing responsibility for an accident: a methodological and conceptual critique. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 6, 113-130.
  80. Sorrentino, R. & Vidmar, N. (1974). Research note: the short-term and long-term effects of a crisis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 271-279.
  81. Sorrentino, R., Vidmar, N. & Goodstadt, M. (1974). Opinion change in a crisis: Effects of the 1970 Canadian kidnapping crisis on political and ethnic attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 6, 199-218.
  82. Vidmar, N. & Ellsworth, P. (1974). Public opinion and the death penalty. Stanford Law Review, 26, 1245-1270.
  83. Vidmar, N.J. (1974). Retributive and utilitarian motives and other correlates of Canadian attitudes toward the death penalty. Canadian Psychologist, 15, 337-356.
  84. Rokeach, M. & Vidmar, N. (1973). Testimony concerning possible jury bias in a Black Panther murder trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 19-29.
  85. Crinklaw, L. & Vidmar, N. (1972). Inferential Sets, Locus of Control and Attribution of Responsibility for an Accident. U.W.O. Research Bulletin #246. (Technical Research Report).
  86. Vidmar, N.J. (1972). Effects of decision alternatives on the verdicts and perceptions of simulated jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 211-218.
  87. Jackson, D., Hourany, L. & Vidmar, N (1972). A four-dimensional interpretation of risk taking. Journal of Personality, 40, 483-501.
  88. Crinklaw, L. & Vidmar, N. (1971). Attribution of Responsibility for an Accident. U.W.O. Research Bulletin #186. (Technical Research Report).
  89. Vidmar, N. & Hackman, J.R (1971). Inter-laboratory generalizability of small group research: an experimental study. Journal of of Social Psychology, 83, 129-139.
  90. Vidmar, N.J. (1971). Effects of representational roles and mediators on negotiation effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 48-58.
  91. Ferguson, D.A. & Vidmar, N. (1971). Effects of group discussion on estimates of culturally appropriate risk levels.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 436-445.
  92. Vidmar, N. & Burdeny, T.C. (1971). Effects of group size and item type in the "group shift" effect. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 4, 393-407.
  93. Vidmar, N.J. (1970). Group composition and the risky shift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 153-166.
  94. Vidmar, N. & McGrath, J. E. (1970). Forces affecting success in negotiation groups. Behavioral Science, 15, 154-163.
  95. Hackman, J.R. & Vidmar, N. (1970). Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociometry, 33, 37-54.
  96. Vidmar, N.J. (August, 1969). Perceptions of Patient Behavior and Effects of Environmental Change. T.R. #601. (Technical Research Report).
  97. McGrath, J. E., Vidmar, N. & Weidemann, S. (April, 1967). Social and Psychological Factors in Human Stress. Program Report: Phase I. (Technical Research Report).

Books

  1. (2000). World jury systems.. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  2. Vidmar, N.J. (October, 1995). Malpractice and the American jury: Confronting the myths about jury incompetence, deep pockets, and outrageous damage awards.. University of Michigan Press.
  3. Hans, V., & Vidmar, N. (March, 1986). Judging the jury.. Plenum Press.  (Published in the Japanese language by Gendaijinbun Publishing (2000).)
  4. (1976). Psychology and the law: Research frontiers.. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Chapters in Books

  1. Vidmar, N., Gross, F., & Rose, M. "Jury Awards for Medical Malpracticeand Post-verdict Adjustment of Those Awards." Civil Procedure:Doctrine, Practice, and Context. Ed. in S Salvin et. al 2nd editionAspen, 2004
  2. Hans, V. & Vidmar, N. "Jurors and Juries." The Blackwell companion to law and society. Ed. A. Sarat Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004: 195-211.
  3. Eisenberg and Vidmar (drafters) "Brief Amici Curiae of Certain Leading Social Scientists and Scholars in Support of Respondents in State Farm Mutual Automobile Company v. Campbell." Supreme Court of the United States , No. 01-1289. October, 2002
  4. Vidmar, N.J. "Juries." Legal systems of the world: A political, social, and cultural encyclopedia. Ed. Herbert Kritzer Santa Barbara , CA: ABC-CLIO, 2002
  5. Vidmar, N.J. "Retribution and Revenge." Handbook of justice research in law. Ed. J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton 2001
  6. Vidmar, N. & Schuller, R. "The Jury: Selecting Impartial Peers." Psychology and Law: Canadian Perspectives. Ed. R. Schuller & J. Ogloff University of Toronto Press, 2001
  7. Vidmar, N.J. "Retributive Justice: Its Social Context." The justice motive in everyday life. Ed. M. Ross & D.T. Miller Cambridge University Press, 2001: 291.
  8. Vidmar, N.J. "Jury's Comprehension of Scientific Evidence." National conference on science and the law NCJ 179630. Ed. U.S. Dept of Justice and National Institute of Justice July, 2000
  9. Corbin, R.M. & Vidmar, N. "Survey Research Goes to Court." Marketing Research: State of the Art Perspective. Ed. Chuck Chakrapani Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 2000
  10. Vidmar, N.J. "Maps, gaps, socio-legal scholarship and tort reform debate." Social Science, Legal Scholarship and the Law. Ed. A. Sarat et al New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999
  11. Corbin, R. M., & Vidmar, N. "Survey Research Goes to Court." Marketing Research: State of the Art Perspective. Ed. Chuck Chakrapan Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 1999
  12. Vidmar , principal author "amicus brief on behalf of respondent in Kumho Tire Company v. Patrick Carmichael et. al." No.97-109 Supreme Court of the United States, October 1998 term. 1998 on the subject of how juries evaluate expert testimony
  13. Berg, K. & Vidmar, N. "Authoritarianism and recall of evidence about criminal behavior (Reprint)." Readings in Trial Advocacy and The Social Sciences. Ed. R. Krivoshey Garland Publishing, 1993
  14. Sarat, A. & Vidmar, N. "Public opinion, the death penalty, and the eighth amendment: testing the Marshall hypothesis (Reprint)." A Capital Punishment Anthology. Ed. Victor Streib Springfield, IL: Anderson, 1993
  15. Vidmar, N.J. "How Many Words for a Camel? A Perspective on Judicial Evaluation of Social Science Evidence." Filtering and Analyzing Evidence in an Age of Diversity. Ed. Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice 1993
  16. Vidmar, N.J. "Social Science Evidence and Data." Forensic Evidence in Canada. Ed. G. M. Chayko, E. D. Gulliver and D. V. MacDougall Canada Law Book, 1991
  17. Vidmar, N. & van Koppen, P. J., "Gedraqswetenschappelijk bewijs: een overzicht." De Menselijke Factor: Psychologie voor Juristen. Ed. P. J. van Koppen & H. F. M. Crombag Arnhem: Gouda Quint BV, 1991
  18. Bogart, W.A. & Vidmar, N. "Problems and Experience with the Ontario Civil Justice System." Access To Justice: Bridges and Barriers. Ed. A. Hutchinson Carswell, 1990
  19. Vidmar, N.J. "The impact of statistical evidence in the legal system." The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in the Courts. National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education: Springer-Verlag, 1989
  20. Vidmar, N.J. "The mediation of small claims disputes: A critical perspective." Research on negotiation in organizations. Ed. M. Bazerman, R. Lewicki, & B. Sheppard JAI Press, 1986
  21. Vidmar, N.J. "An assessment of mediation in a small claims court (Reprint)." Readings in social psychology: Classic and Canadian contributions. Ed. B. Earn & S. Towson Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press Ltd., 1985
  22. Vidmar, N. & Short, J. A. "Social psychological dynamics in the settlement of small claims court cases." Perspectives in Psychology and Law. Ed. D. Muller, D. Blackman, & A. Chapman London: Wiley, 1984
  23. Vidmar, N.J. "Social psychology and the legal process." Social psychology. Ed. A.S. Kahn Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown & Co., 1984
  24. Vidmar, N. & Ellsworth, P. "Public opinion and the death penalty (Reprint)." The Death Penalty in America. Ed. H. Bedau 3rd editionNew York: Oxford, 1982
  25. Vidmar, N. & Miller, D. T. "Social psychological motives underlying punishment reactions." Social Psychology: XXIInd International Congress of Psychology. Ed. H. Hiebsch Berlin, Germany: VEB DeutscherVerlag, 1982: 195-202.
  26. Saunders, D., Vidmar, N., & Hewitt, E. "Eyewitness testimony and the discrediting effect." Evaluating Witness Evidence. Ed. S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. Clifford London: Wiley, 1982
  27. Miller, D. T. & Vidmar, N. "The social psychology of punishment reactions." The Justice Motive in Social Behavior. Ed. M. Lerner & S. Lerner New York: Plenum, 1981
  28. Vidmar, N.J. "Justice motives and other psychological factors in the development and resolution of disputes." The Justice Motive in Social Behavior. Ed. M. Lerner & S. Lerner New York: Plenum, 1981
  29. Hans, V. & Vidmar, N. "Jury selection." The Psychology of the Courtroom. Ed. N. Kerr & R. Bray Academic Press, 1981: 39-82.
  30. Vidmar, N.J. "Observations on dispute dynamics and resolution hearing outcomes in a small claims court." Law & Psychology: Oxford University Centre for Socio-legal Studies Proceedings. Ed. S. Lloyd-Bostock December, 1980
  31. Vidmar, N. & Rokeach, M "Archie Bunker's bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure (Reprint)." All in the Family: A Critical Appraisal. Ed. P. Adler 1979
  32. Vidmar, N.J. "Social science and jury selection." Psychology and the Litigation Process. Law Society of Upper Canada, 1977
  33. Sorrentino, R., Vidmar, N. & Goodstadt, M. "Opinion change in a crisis: Effects of the 1970 Canadian kidnapping crisis on political and ethnic attitudes (Reprint)." Canada; A Sociological Profile. Ed. W. E. Mann & L. Wheatcroft Toronto, Canada: Copp Clark, 1976
  34. Vidmar, N. & Ellsworth, P. "Public opinion and the death penalty (Reprint)." Capital Punishment in the United States. Ed. H. Bedau & C. Pierce New York: AMS Press, 1976
  35. Sarat, A. & Vidmar, N. "Public opinion, the death penalty, and the eighth amendment: testing the Marshall hypothesis (Reprint)." Capital Punishment in the United States. Ed. H. Bedau and C. Pierce New York: AMS Press, 1976
  36. Vidmar, N. & Rokeach, M "Archie Bunker's bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure (Reprint)." Mass Media and Society. Ed. A. Wells 1975
  37. Vidmar, N. & Rokeach, M "Archie Bunker's bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure (Reprint)." Mind over Message. Ed. C. Wilson 1975
  38. Vidmar, N.J. "Effects of decision alternatives on the verdicts and perceptions of simulated jurors (Reprint)." Readings in social psychology. Ed. Kaufmann and Solomon 1973
  39. Hackman, J.R. & Vidmar, N. "Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions (Reprint)." Basic topics in social psychology. Ed. L. Marlowe Holbrook Press, 1972
  40. Hackman, J.R. & Vidmar, N. "Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions (Reprint)." Readings in organizational behavior and human performance. Ed. Cummings and Scott 1972
  41. Hackman, J.R. & Vidmar, N. "Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions (Reprint)." Small group communication: A reader. Ed. Cathcart, Samovar, & Lustig 4th edition1972
  42. Hackman, J.R. & Vidmar, N. "Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions (Reprint)." Interpersonal behavior in small groups. Ed. R. Ofshe Prentice Hall, 1970

Articles Submitted

  1. Vidmar, Lee, MacKillop , McCarthy & McGwinn (2005). , Uncovering the “Invisible “ Profile of Medical Malpractice Litigation: Insights from Florida. DePaul Law Review.
  2. Vidmar, N.J. (2005). Medical Malpractice Lawsuits: An Essay on Patient Interests, the Contingency Fee System, Juries and Social Policy. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review.

Book Reviews

  1. Vidmar, N.J. (February 3, 2005). [First, Do No Harm: The Cure for Medical Malpractice (Book Review)]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 521.
  2. Vidmar, N.J. (1994). [An Antidote To Anecdotes (Book review of Frank A. Sloan, et al., Suing for Medical Malpractice, 1993)]. Judicature, 77, 330.
  3. Vidmar, N.J. (1993). [Comparative Lessons from the Hong Kong Jury Study (Book Review)]. Asia Pacific Law Review, 2, 110.
  4. Vidmar, N.J. (1990). [The Origins and Consequences of Procedural Fairness (Book Review and Essay)]. Law and Social Inquiry, 15, 877-892.
  5. Vidmar, N.J. (1986). [The Legal System as Social: A review of Lempert and Sanders' "An Invitation to Law and Social Science"]. Science, 234, 93-94.
  6. Vidmar, N.J. (1976). [Choosing, finding and evaluating methods of obtaining legal justice: a review of Thibaut and Walker's "Procedural Justice Contemporary Psychology"]. 21, 773-774.
Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Pn * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Postdocs * Reload * Login