Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics
Pratt School of Engineering
Duke University

 HOME > pratt > FIP    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications [#134269] of Mark W. Dewhirst

Papers Published

  1. DE Thrall, DM Prescott, TV Samulski, GL Rosner, DL Denman, RL Legorreta, RK Dodge, RL Page, JM Cline, J Lee, BC Case, SM Evans, JR Oleson, MW Dewhirst, Radiation plus local hyperthermia versus radiation plus the combination of local and whole-body hyperthermia in canine sarcomas., International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, UNITED STATES, vol. 34 no. 5 (March, 1996), pp. 1087-96, ISSN 0360-3016
    (last updated on 2004/03/30)

    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of increasing intratumoral temperatures by the combination of local hyperthermia (LH) and whole body hyperthermia (WBH) on the radiation response of canine sarcomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dogs with spontaneous soft tissue sarcomas and no evidence of metastasis were randomized to be treated with radiation combined with either LH alone or LH + WBH. Dogs were accessioned for treatment at two institutions. The radiation dose was 56.25 Gy, given in 25 2.25 Gy daily fractions. Two hyperthermia treatments were given; one during the first and one during the last week of treatment. Dogs were evaluated after treatment for local recurrence, metastasis, and complications. RESULTS: Sixty-four dogs were treated between 1989 and 1993. The use of LH+WBH resulted in statistically significant increases in the low and middle regions of the temperature distributions. The largest increase was in the low temperatures with median CEM 43 T90 values of 4 vs. 49 min for LH vs. LH + WBH, respectively (p<0.001). There was no difference in duration of local tumor control between hyperthermia groups (p = 0.59). The time to metastasis was shorter for dogs receiving LH + WBH (p = 0.02); the hazard ratio for metastatic disease for dogs in the LH + WBH group was 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.4) with respect to dogs in the LH group. Complications were greater in larger tumors and in tumors treated with LH + WBH, CONCLUSION: The combination of LH + WBH with radiation therapy, as described herein, was not associated with an increase in local tumor control in comparison to use of LH with radiation therapy. The combination of LH + WBH also appeared to alter the biology of the metastatic process and was associated with more complications than LH. We identified no rationale for further study of LH + WBH in combination with radiation for treatment of solid tumors.

    Keywords:
    Animals • Combined Modality Therapy • Dog Diseases • Dogs • Hyperthermia, Induced • Radiotherapy Dosage • Sarcoma • Temperature • Treatment Failure • pathology • radiotherapy • radiotherapy* • secondary • veterinary*


Duke University * Pratt * Reload * Login