Publications of Bruce W. Jentleson
%%
@article{fds317781,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {From Consensus to Conflict: The Domestic Political Economy
of East-West Energy Trade Policy},
Journal = {International organization},
Volume = {38},
Number = {4},
Pages = {625-660},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1984},
Month = {January},
Doi = {10.1017/S0020818300026898},
Key = {fds317781}
}
@article{fds317780,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Economic Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: Implications of
Case Studies from the Johnson Administration. Edited by
Weintraub Sidney. (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1982. Pp.
xvii + 234. $23.00.)},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Volume = {78},
Number = {02},
Pages = {576-577},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1984},
Month = {June},
Doi = {10.2307/1963459},
Key = {fds317780}
}
@article{fds317779,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {From consensus to conflict: the domestic political economy
of East-West energy trade policy},
Journal = {International Organization},
Volume = {38},
Number = {04},
Pages = {625-660},
Year = {1984},
Month = {September},
Abstract = {Changes in the domestic politics of East-West energy trade
policy indicate a more general transformation of the
domestic politics of American foreign policy. In the postwar
period the basic, consensual pattern of congressional
bipartisanship, executivebranch unity, interest-group
collaboration, and a supportive public has been replaced by
the conflictual pattern of an assertive Congress, a
fragmented executive branch, antagonistic interest groups,
and a divided public. These contrasting patterns are
manifestations of structural changes in the domestic
political economy. Along both political and economic
dimensions, and differentiated according to whether the
locus of pressure was group-specific or more general, what
had been basic foundations of consensus became by the early
1970s fissures of conflict. Of particular significance were
the weakening of the macropolitical foundations (the basic
accord on foreignpolicy objectives and strategies) in the
wake of both Vietnam and detente and the increased marginal
value of the economic costs, both diffuse (macroeconomic)
and particularistic (microeconomic), to be paid for economic
coercion. In this transformed context, the state's
support-building instruments of ideology and economic
compensation were insufficient to build consensus. As a
result, in this issue area and perhaps more generally, high
levels of domestic constraints on the conduct of American
foreign policy have become the rule rather than the
exception.},
Key = {fds317779}
}
@article{fds317778,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Making of America's Soviet Policy. Edited by Joseph S.
NyeJr. (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984. Pp. x
+ 369. $27.50.)},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Volume = {79},
Number = {1},
Pages = {271-272},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1985},
Month = {March},
Doi = {10.2307/1956215},
Key = {fds317778}
}
@article{fds317774,
Author = {JENTLESON, BW},
Title = {THE POLITICAL BASIS FOR TRADE IN UNITED-STATES-SOVIET
RELATIONS},
Journal = {MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES},
Volume = {15},
Number = {1},
Pages = {27-47},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {1986},
Month = {Spring},
Doi = {10.1177/03058298860150010401},
Key = {fds317774}
}
@book{fds19259,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Pipeline Politics: The Complex Political Economy of
East-West Energy Trade},
Publisher = {Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press},
Year = {1986},
Key = {fds19259}
}
@article{fds317777,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Strategic Choices and Dangerous Traps},
Journal = {PS: Political Science & Politics},
Volume = {19},
Number = {1},
Pages = {69-70},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1986},
Month = {Winter},
Doi = {10.1017/S1049096500017212},
Key = {fds317777}
}
@article{fds317773,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {American commitments in the Third World: Theory vs.
practice},
Journal = {International organization},
Volume = {41},
Number = {4},
Pages = {667-704},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1987},
Month = {January},
Doi = {10.1017/S0020818300027648},
Key = {fds317773}
}
@article{fds317772,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {American commitments in the Third World: theory vs.
practice},
Journal = {International Organization},
Volume = {41},
Number = {04},
Pages = {667-704},
Year = {1987},
Month = {September},
Abstract = {Amidst their other differences, the defeats suffered by the
United States in Vietnam, Iran, and Lebanon have a common
explanation. In all three cases American strategy was based
on “global commitments theory.” Interests were to be
defended and global credibility strengthened by the making,
maintaining, reinforcing, and sustaining of American
commitments to Third World allies. However, the core
assumptions on which the logic of global commitments theory
rests are plagued with inherent fallacies. These fallacies
can be identified analytically as patterns of dysfunction
along four dimensions of foreign policy: decision-making,
diplomacy, military strategy, and domestic politics. They
also can be shown empirically to have recurred across the
Vietnam, Iran, and Lebanon cases. The central theoretical
conclusion questions the fundamental validity of global
commitments theory as it applies to the exercise of power
and influence in the Third World. Important prescriptive
implications for future American foreign policy are also
discussed.},
Key = {fds317772}
}
@article{fds317771,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Deadly Paradigms: The Failure of U.S. Counterinsurgency
Policy. By D. Michael Shafer. Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 1988. 331p. $34.50.},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Volume = {83},
Number = {02},
Pages = {705-706},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1989},
Month = {June},
Doi = {10.2307/1962481},
Key = {fds317771}
}
@article{fds317769,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Reflections on Praxis and Nexus},
Journal = {PS: Political Science & Politics},
Volume = {23},
Number = {3},
Pages = {434-436},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1990},
Month = {January},
Doi = {10.2307/419802},
Key = {fds317769}
}
@article{fds317770,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Discrepant Responses to Falling Dictators: Presidential
Belief Systems and the Mediating Effects of the Senior
Advisory Process},
Journal = {Political Psychology},
Volume = {11},
Number = {2},
Pages = {353-353},
Publisher = {JSTOR},
Year = {1990},
Month = {June},
Doi = {10.2307/3791694},
Key = {fds317770}
}
@article{fds317767,
Author = {Sorenson, DS},
Title = {Arms Control during the Pre-Nuclear Era: The United States
and Naval Limitations between the Two World Wars. By Robert
Gordon Kaufman. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
289p. $40.00.},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Volume = {85},
Number = {1},
Pages = {338-339},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1991},
Month = {March},
Doi = {10.2307/1962958},
Key = {fds317767}
}
@article{fds317768,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Reagan Administration and Coercive Diplomacy:
Restraining More Than Remaking Governments},
Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
Volume = {106},
Number = {1},
Pages = {57-82},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {1991},
Month = {Spring},
Doi = {10.2307/2152174},
Key = {fds317768}
}
@article{fds346635,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Conflicts Unending: The United States and Regional Disputes.
By Richard N. Haass. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
184p. $22.50.},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Volume = {85},
Number = {01},
Pages = {337-338},
Year = {1991},
Month = {March},
Key = {fds346635}
}
@book{fds19258,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Foreign Military Intervention: The Dynamics of Protracted
Conflict},
Publisher = {New York: Columbia University Press},
Editor = {editor and contributor and Ariel Levite and Larry
Berman},
Year = {1992},
Key = {fds19258}
}
@article{fds317765,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Philippines: U.S. policy during the Marcos years,
1956–1986},
Journal = {Government Publications Review},
Volume = {19},
Number = {1},
Pages = {85-86},
Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
Year = {1992},
Month = {January},
Doi = {10.1016/0277-9390(92)90113-p},
Key = {fds317765}
}
@article{fds317764,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American
Opinion on the Use of Military Force},
Journal = {International Studies Quarterly},
Volume = {36},
Number = {1},
Pages = {49-49},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {1992},
Month = {March},
Doi = {10.2307/2600916},
Key = {fds317764}
}
@article{fds317766,
Author = {JENTLESON, BW},
Title = {EAST-WEST-TRADE AND THE ATLANTIC ALLIANCE - BALDWIN,DA,
MILNER,HV},
Journal = {POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY},
Volume = {106},
Number = {4},
Pages = {733-735},
Publisher = {ACAD POLITICAL SCIENCE},
Year = {1992},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds317766}
}
@book{fds19257,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {With Friends Like These: Reagan, Bush and Saddam,
1982-1990},
Publisher = {New York: W.W. Norton and Co.},
Year = {1994},
Key = {fds19257}
}
@book{fds19256,
Title = {Encyclopedia of U.S. Foreign Relations, four
volumes},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press and Council on Foreign
Relations},
Editor = {Bruce W. Jentleson and Thomas G. Paterson},
Year = {1997},
Key = {fds19256}
}
@article{fds269976,
Author = {Jentleson, BW and Britton, RL},
Title = {Still pretty prudent: Post-cold war American public opinion
on the use of military force},
Journal = {Journal of Conflict Resolution},
Volume = {42},
Number = {4},
Pages = {395-417},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {1998},
Month = {January},
Abstract = {Extending and further testing the theory advanced by Bruce
Jentleson with post-cold war data, variations in U.S. public
support for the use of military force are shown to be best
explained by the principal policy objective for which
military force is being used, with a third category of
"humanitarian intervention" added to the previous two of
"foreign policy restraint" and "internal political change."
The principal policy objective theory is shown through a
series of tests, including regression and logistic analyses,
to offer the most powerful and parsimonious explanation,
both directly superseding and indirectly subsuming such
other alternative variables as interests, elite cues, risk,
and multilateralism. These findings support the broader
theoretical view of a rational public purposive and not
purely reactive in its opinion formulation and have
important implications for the basic dispositions of the
types of military interventions the American public will and
will not support in the post-cold war era.},
Doi = {10.1177/0022002798042004001},
Key = {fds269976}
}
@article{fds269977,
Author = {Stein, JG and Barnett, M and Frankel, B and Gause, G and Gerner, DJ and Herrmann, R and Jentleson, BW and Kaye, DD and Lebow, RN and Lynch, M and Solingen, E and Spiro, DE and Sylvan, DA and Weber,
S},
Title = {Five scenarios of the Israel-Palestinian relationship in
2002: Works in progress},
Journal = {Security Studies},
Volume = {7},
Number = {4},
Pages = {195-208},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {1998},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0963-6412},
Doi = {10.1080/09636419808429362},
Key = {fds269977}
}
@article{fds269978,
Author = {Jentleson, BW and Kaye, DD},
Title = {Security status: Explaining regional security cooperation
and its limits in the Middle East},
Journal = {Security Studies},
Volume = {8},
Number = {1},
Pages = {204-238},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {1998},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0963-6412},
Doi = {10.1080/09636419808429369},
Key = {fds269978}
}
@book{fds47980,
Title = {Opportunities Missed, Opportunities Seized: Diplomacy in the
Post-Cold War World},
Publisher = {Rowman and Littlefield and Carnegie Commission on Preventing
Deadly Conflict},
Editor = {B.W. Jentleson and editor and contributor},
Year = {1999},
Key = {fds47980}
}
@article{fds317763,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Strategic Coercion: Concepts and Cases. Edited by Freedman
Lawrence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. 400p.
$92.00.},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Volume = {93},
Number = {04},
Pages = {1012-1013},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {1999},
Month = {December},
Doi = {10.2307/2586189},
Key = {fds317763}
}
@book{fds349803,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Perspectives on American Foreign Policy Readings and
Cases},
Pages = {326 pages},
Publisher = {W. W. Norton},
Year = {2000},
ISBN = {9780393975642},
Abstract = {The readings delve deeper into theoretical, historical and
policy debates discussed in American Foreign Policy:
Dynamics of Choice, and icons in the textbook margins link
the broader points to related articles and case studies in
...},
Key = {fds349803}
}
@article{fds269979,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The need for praxis: Bringing policy relevance back
in},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {26},
Number = {4},
Pages = {169-183},
Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
Year = {2002},
Month = {Spring},
ISSN = {0162-2889},
Doi = {10.1162/016228802753696816},
Key = {fds269979}
}
@article{fds269993,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Tough Love Multilateralism},
Journal = {The Washington Quarterly},
Volume = {27},
Number = {1},
Pages = {5-24},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2003},
Month = {Winter},
ISSN = {0163-660X},
Doi = {10.1162/016366003322596882},
Key = {fds269993}
}
@article{fds269987,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Who 'Won' Libya? The Force-Diplomacy Debate and Its
Implications for Theory and Policy},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {30},
Number = {3},
Pages = {47-86},
Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
Year = {2005},
Month = {Winter},
ISSN = {0162-2889},
Doi = {10.1162/016228805775969582},
Key = {fds269987}
}
@article{fds269992,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {"A Responsibility to Protect: The Defining Challenge for
Global Community"},
Journal = {Harvard International Review},
Volume = {Winter 2007},
Number = {4},
Pages = {18-23},
Year = {2006},
ISSN = {0739-1854},
Key = {fds269992}
}
@misc{fds155149,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Yet Again: Humanitarian Intervention and the Challenges of
'Never Again'},
Booktitle = {Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided
World},
Publisher = {U. S. Institute of Peace Press},
Editor = {Chester Crocker and Fen Osler Hampson and Pamela
Aall},
Year = {2006},
Key = {fds155149}
}
@misc{fds52349,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Sanctions Against Iran: Key Issues},
Journal = {Century Foundation Report},
Publisher = {Century Foundation},
Year = {2006},
Key = {fds52349}
}
@misc{fds52350,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Coercive Diplomacy: Scope and Limits in the Contemporary
World},
Series = {Policy Analysis Briefs},
Publisher = {The Stanley Foundation},
Year = {2006},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds52350}
}
@misc{fds155148,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {“Force and Legitimacy: Terrorism Scenarios”},
Booktitle = {Force and Legitimacy in the Evolving International
System},
Publisher = {Brookings Institution Press},
Editor = {Ivo H. Daalder},
Year = {2007},
Key = {fds155148}
}
@article{fds269991,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {America's Global Role After Bush},
Journal = {Survival},
Volume = {49},
Number = {3},
Pages = {179-200},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2007},
Month = {Fall},
ISSN = {0039-6338},
Doi = {10.1080/00396330701564802},
Key = {fds269991}
}
@article{fds269974,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Military force against terrorism: Questions of legitimacy,
dilemmas of efficacy},
Pages = {40-58},
Year = {2007},
Month = {December},
Abstract = {It is true that terrorism goes way back in history, "as far
back as does human conflict itself," as Caleb Carr has
written.1 It also is true that much of the world had been
suffering from terrorism for a long time before September
11.2 Still, the issue did change dramatically after the
United States made it its top national security priority and
the Bush administration decided on its particular "war on
terrorism" approach, with its heavy emphasis on the use of
military force. Copyright © 2007 the brookings institution.
All rights reserved.},
Key = {fds269974}
}
@article{fds269990,
Author = {Jentleson, BW and Weber, S},
Title = {America's Hard Sell},
Journal = {Foreign Policy},
Volume = {169},
Number = {169},
Pages = {43-49},
Year = {2008},
ISSN = {0015-7228},
Abstract = {For more than half a century, the United States ensured that
five Big Ideas shaped international politics. Now, as the
Big Ideas of the 21st century are formed, just who will
corner the new global market of ideology is anyone's guess.
One thing is certain, though: If the United States wants to
remain a player, it's going to have to refine its sales
pitch.},
Key = {fds269990}
}
@misc{fds155147,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Strategic Leadership: Framework for a 21st Century National
Secuirty Strategy},
Publisher = {Phoenix Initiative},
Year = {2008},
Month = {July},
url = {http://www.cnas.org/PhoenixInitiative},
Key = {fds155147}
}
@article{fds317761,
Author = {Lorber, E and Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Military Power and the Capabilities-Utility Gap: Lessons of
the 2006 Israel-Lebanon War},
Year = {2009},
Abstract = {In recent years, an emerging pattern in the use of military
force has become apparent: though the capability gap between
advanced powers and non-state and insurgent actors has
increased, the efficacy of achieving strategic goals with
this power has decreased. To name a few, the United States,
Israel, and Ethiopia have used overwhelming military power
to achieve their goals in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and
Somalia. Yet, in each case, the result has been an inability
to restore order, remove insurgent or terrorist forces, and
establish responsive governments. What explains the
inability of these stronger states to transform their power
into outcomes? This paper explores this capability-increase/result-decrease
dynamic and address its causes. Using George Kennan’s
analytic framework of flaws in execution versus flaws in
concept, we examine whether the inability to achieve these
strategic goals with military force is a function of poor
execution or inherent limits on hard, preponderant power. To
the extent it is the former, this portends a focus on
military reform and tactical adjustment, whereas if the
latter, it suggests the need to rely more heavily on other
forms of coercive diplomacy. We test these competing
explanations using a representative case: Israeli’s use of
force against Lebanon in the summer of 2006. Providing a net
assessment of short, medium and long-term effects of the
war, we find that though the Israeli Defense Forces did
achieve limited successes, its inability to inflict
long-term damage on Hezbollah decreased its overall level of
deterrence vis-a-vis non-state actors. Using empirical data
on combat operations as well as extensive accounts of the
Israeli leadership’s decision-making processes, we
conclude that though the IDF could have improved its
operations on the margins, the Israeli leadership’s
failure to consider Hezbollah’s response and international
constraints complicating conflict escalation ultimately
prevented Israel from achieving its goals of weakening
Hezbollah and re-establishing its deterrent. These
constraints, including international public opinion and the
difficulty in waging a restricted war against an
unrestricted enemy, are not limited to the Israeli case, but
are rather key characteristics of many recent asymmetric
military operations. We conclude with a discussion of the
implications of our findings, focusing on the need to
re-balance the use of force and diplomacy to achieve
strategic goals.},
Key = {fds317761}
}
@misc{fds155145,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Coercive Diplomacy: Scope and Limits, Theory and
Policy},
Booktitle = {The Routledge Companion to Security Studies},
Editor = {Victor Mauer and Myriam Dunn Cavelty},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds155145}
}
@misc{fds155146,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Policy Planning: An Integrative Executive Branch
Strategy},
Booktitle = {Avoiding Trivia: The Role of Strategic Planning in American
Foreign Policy},
Publisher = {Brookings Institution Press},
Editor = {Daniel W. Drezner},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds155146}
}
@article{fds269988,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Atlantic Alliance in a Post-America World},
Journal = {Journal of Trans-Atlantic Studies},
Year = {2009},
Month = {March},
Key = {fds269988}
}
@article{fds317762,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Lessons in Disaster: McGeorge Bundy and the Path to War in
Vietnam by Gordon M. Goldstein},
Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
Volume = {124},
Number = {3},
Pages = {540-541},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {2009},
Month = {September},
Doi = {10.1002/j.1538-165x.2009.tb01906.x},
Key = {fds317762}
}
@book{fds155141,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson and Steven Weber},
Title = {The End of Arrogance: America in the Global Competition of
Ideas},
Publisher = {Harvard University Press},
Year = {2010},
Key = {fds155141}
}
@book{fds212608,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st
Century},
Volume = {4th edition},
Publisher = {W.W. Norton},
Year = {2010},
Key = {fds212608}
}
@misc{fds189081,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Effective Multilateralism: US Perspectives},
Booktitle = {Effective Multilateralism: Through the Looking Glass of East
Asia},
Publisher = {Palgrave MacMillan},
Editor = {Jochen Prantl},
Year = {2011},
Key = {fds189081}
}
@article{fds203486,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Normative Future: A U.S. Perspective},
Booktitle = {Transatlantic 2020: A Tale of Four Futures},
Publisher = {SAIS Center for Transatlantic Relations (Brookings
Institution Press)},
Editor = {Daniel Hamilton and Kurt Volker},
Year = {2011},
Key = {fds203486}
}
@misc{fds203493,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {The Bi-Sectoralists},
Year = {2011},
Key = {fds203493}
}
@article{fds269989,
Author = {Jentleson, BW and Ratner, E},
Title = {Bridging the Beltway-Ivory Tower Gap},
Journal = {International Studies Review},
Volume = {13},
Number = {1},
Pages = {6-11},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {2011},
Month = {March},
ISSN = {1521-9488},
Abstract = {While some gap between the academic and policy worlds is
inherent, it is neither necessary nor beneficial for the
"Beltway-Ivory Tower" to be as wide as it is. Three
principal factors explain the extent of the gap: academia's
dominant organizational culture, which devalues policy
relevance; increased role of think tanks as research
transmission belts to the policy world; and limited interest
of the policy community in academic research. The case for
the value of greater policy relevance for the international
relations scholarly community is based on the intellectual
pluralism of bringing policy relevance in while not driving
theory out, intellectual complementarity in the different
relative strengths of scholars and policy professionals, and
self-interest both in what individual scholars can learn and
in being true to the mission of universities. We make three
principal bridging the gap recommendations: increase
disciplinary incentives for policy relevant scholarship,
more programmatic and project-based connectivity, and more
policy world experiential opportunities. © 2011
International Studies Association.},
Doi = {10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00992.x},
Key = {fds269989}
}
@article{fds269986,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Metternich of Arabia},
Journal = {National Interest Online},
Year = {2011},
Month = {June},
url = {http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/metternich-arabia-5543},
Key = {fds269986}
}
@article{fds269984,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Beware the Duck Test},
Journal = {Washington Quarterly},
Volume = {34},
Number = {3},
Pages = {137-149},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2011},
Month = {Summer},
ISSN = {0163-660X},
Doi = {10.1080/0163660X.2011.588169},
Key = {fds269984}
}
@article{fds269985,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Remaking of the Middle East},
Journal = {Duke Magazine},
Year = {2011},
Month = {Summer},
Key = {fds269985}
}
@article{fds269982,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Obama Administration and R2P: Progress, Problems and
Prospects},
Journal = {Global Responsibility to Protect},
Volume = {Winter 2012-13},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds269982}
}
@misc{fds212609,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson and A. Exum et al},
Title = {Strategic Adaptation: Towards a New U.S. Strategy in the
Middle East},
Volume = {June 2012},
Publisher = {Center for a New American Security (CNAS)},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds212609}
}
@article{fds212610,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {Theories of International Relations and Zombies, Daniel
Drezner},
Journal = {Perspectives on Politics},
Volume = {March 2012},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds212610}
}
@article{fds212611,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {How We Fight: Crusades, Quagmires and the American Way of
War, Dominic Tierney},
Journal = {H-DIPLO/ISSF,},
Volume = {Vol. III, No. 9 (March 2012)},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds212611}
}
@article{fds269980,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The John Holmes memorial lecture: Global governance in a
Copernican world},
Journal = {Global Governance},
Volume = {18},
Number = {2},
Pages = {133-148},
Publisher = {BRILL},
Year = {2012},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {1075-2846},
Doi = {10.1163/19426720-01802001},
Key = {fds269980}
}
@article{fds269981,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Global Governance in a Copernican World},
Journal = {Global Governance},
Volume = {17},
Year = {2012},
Month = {March},
Key = {fds269981}
}
@article{fds317758,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Theories of International Politics and Zombies. By Daniel W.
Drezner. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. 136p.
$14.95.},
Journal = {Perspectives on Politics},
Volume = {10},
Number = {1},
Pages = {212-213},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {2012},
Month = {March},
Doi = {10.1017/s1537592711004749},
Key = {fds317758}
}
@article{fds317760,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming
Global Turn},
Journal = {FOREIGN AFFAIRS},
Volume = {91},
Number = {3},
Pages = {173-173},
Publisher = {COUNCIL FOREIGN RELAT IONS INC},
Year = {2012},
Month = {May},
Key = {fds317760}
}
@article{fds317759,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy: Iraq, 9/11, and
Misguided Reform by Paul R. Pillar},
Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
Volume = {127},
Number = {3},
Pages = {477-478},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {2012},
Month = {September},
Doi = {10.1002/j.1538-165x.2012.tb02280.x},
Key = {fds317759}
}
@article{fds269983,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Accepting Limits: How to Adapt to a Copernican
World},
Journal = {Democracy: A Journal of Ideas},
Year = {2012},
Month = {Winter},
Key = {fds269983}
}
@book{fds47921,
Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
Title = {American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st
Century},
Series = {New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 5th edition
forthcoming},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds47921}
}
@book{fds349802,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st
Century (Fifth Edition)},
Pages = {768 pages},
Publisher = {W. W. Norton},
Year = {2013},
Month = {July},
ISBN = {9780393919431},
Abstract = {A balanced and contemporary introduction to U.S. foreign
policy, with a built-in reader.},
Key = {fds349802}
}
@article{fds269975,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Strategic Recalibration: Framework for a 21st-Century
National Security Strategy},
Journal = {Washington Quarterly},
Volume = {37},
Number = {1},
Pages = {115-136},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2014},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0163-660X},
Doi = {10.1080/0163660X.2014.893178},
Key = {fds269975}
}
@misc{fds317753,
Author = {Pauly, LW and Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Preface},
Journal = {Power in a Complex Global System},
Volume = {1-2},
Pages = {xiii-xiv},
Year = {2014},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780415738798},
Doi = {10.1002/9781444345148},
Key = {fds317753}
}
@book{fds317754,
Author = {Pauly, LW and Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Power in a complex global system},
Pages = {1-260},
Year = {2014},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780415738798},
Abstract = {© 2014 Louis W. Pauly and Bruce W. Jentleson, selection and
editorial matter. Can twenty-first century global challenges
be met through the limited adaptation of existing political
institutions and prevailing systemic norms, or is a more
fundamental reconstitution of governing authority
unavoidable? Are the stresses evident in domestic social
compacts capable of undermining the fundamental policy
capacity of contemporary governments? This book, inspired by
the work of the distinguished scholar Peter J. Katzenstein,
examines these important and pressing questions. In a period
of complex political transition, the authors combine
original research and intensive dialogue to build on
Katzenstein’s innovative insights. They highlight his
seminal work on variations in domestic structures, on the
role of ideologies of social partnership, on the regionally
differentiated foundations of political legitimation, on
diverse conceptions of "civilization," and on the idea and
practice of power in a tenuous American imperium. Together,
the chapters map the complex terrain upon which legitimate
political authority and effective policy capacity will have
to be reconstituted to address twenty-first-century global,
regional and state-level challenges. The book will be of
great interest to students and scholars in international
organization, global governance, foreign policy analysis,
and comparative politics.},
Key = {fds317754}
}
@misc{fds317757,
Author = {Jentleson, BW and Pauly, LW},
Title = {Political Authority, Policy Capacity, and
Twenty-First-Century Governance},
Pages = {3-16},
Booktitle = {Power in a Complex Global System},
Year = {2014},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780415738798},
Key = {fds317757}
}
@misc{fds345653,
Author = {Frankel, B and Levite, A and Hamza, K and Jentleson,
B},
Title = {Middle east arms control and regional security
dilemmas},
Pages = {195-204},
Booktitle = {Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of
Mass Destruction},
Year = {2014},
Month = {April},
ISBN = {9780415925952},
Key = {fds345653}
}
@article{fds269973,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Bridging the Gap Initiative and Programs},
Journal = {PS - Political Science and Politics},
Volume = {48},
Number = {S1},
Pages = {108-114},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {2015},
Month = {August},
ISSN = {1049-0965},
Doi = {10.1017/S1049096515000529},
Key = {fds269973}
}
@article{fds333292,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The United States and R2P: Challenges of Policy
Prioritization, Bureaucratic Institutionalization, Strategy,
and International Collaboration},
Journal = {The Oxford Handbook on the Responsibility to
Protect},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
Editor = {Bellamy, A and Dunne, T},
Year = {2016},
Key = {fds333292}
}
@article{fds332214,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Public Opinion and Donald Trump's Foreign Policy: Initial
Assessment},
Journal = {H-Diplo/International Securities Study Forum},
Volume = {Policy Roundtable},
Number = {Public Opinion and the Trump administrat},
Editor = {Kreps, S},
Year = {2017},
Month = {September},
Key = {fds332214}
}
@article{fds333291,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {'The Liberal Order Isn't Coming Back' What
Next?},
Journal = {Democracy: A Journal of Ideas},
Year = {2018},
Key = {fds333291}
}
@article{fds332326,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Strategic Recalibration: A Palmerstonian Middle East
Strategy},
Journal = {Order from Ashes: New Foundations for Security in the Middle
East},
Publisher = {The Century Foundation and Brookings Institution},
Editor = {Hann, MW and Cambanis, T},
Year = {2018},
Key = {fds332326}
}
@book{fds332325,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {The Peacemakers: Leadership Lessons from Twentieth-Century
Statesmanship},
Pages = {416 pages},
Publisher = {W. W. Norton & Company},
Year = {2018},
Month = {April},
ISBN = {9780393249576},
Abstract = {The stories are fascinating: Henry Kissinger, Zhou Enlai,
and the U.S.-China opening; Mikhail Gorbachev and the end of
the Cold War; Dag Hammarskjöld’s exceptional
effectiveness as United Nations secretary-general; Nelson
Mandela and ...},
Key = {fds332325}
}
@misc{fds349801,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {Millennials are so over US domination of world
affairs},
Publisher = {The Conversation},
Year = {2018},
Month = {July},
Key = {fds349801}
}
@misc{fds349800,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {That Post-Liberal Order International World: Some Core
Characteristics},
Publisher = {Lawfare},
Year = {2018},
Month = {September},
Key = {fds349800}
}
@article{fds346523,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {Right-Sizing Foreign Policy},
Journal = {Democracy},
Volume = {54},
Publisher = {Democracy: A Journal of Ideas},
Year = {2019},
Key = {fds346523}
}
@misc{fds348882,
Author = {Jentleson, B and Levite, A and Berman, L},
Title = {Protracted foreign military intervention: A structured,
focused comparative analysis},
Pages = {229-254},
Booktitle = {Diplomacy, Force, and Leadership: Essays in Honor of
Alexander L. George},
Year = {2019},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780367007676},
Abstract = {This chapter focuses on a larger study involving several
case studies, covering the several stages of intervention in
each case, as well as cross-case assessments on each of the
stages. It explains key concepts and definitions to
establish the basis for the comparative case analysis. The
chapter considers the significance of the study, both with
respect to the prospects of military intervention in the
post-Cold War era and in defining a broader continuing
research agenda related to force and diplomacy. It focuses
on three clusters of factors: The international (strategic,
regional), the domestic (intervening state), and the
indigenous (target state). The target countries have been
both distant ones and neighbors. The local allies have been
both incumbent regimes and insurgents. The key commonality
is that each involved a protracted foreign military
intervention —longer, more costly, and less successful
than expected based on the power preponderance of the
intervenor.},
Doi = {10.4324/9780429037535-15},
Key = {fds348882}
}
@article{fds349799,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {Roundtable 11-8 on The Back Channel: A Memoir of American
Diplomacy and the Case for Its Renewal},
Journal = {Review by Bruce W. Jentleson, Duke University},
Publisher = {The International Security Studies Forum},
Year = {2019},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds349799}
}
@misc{fds349798,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {Weaponized Interdependence, The Dynamics of 21st Century
Power, and U.S. Grand Strategy},
Booktitle = {The Uses and Abuses of Weaponized Interdependence},
Publisher = {Brookings Institution Press},
Editor = {Drezner, D and Farrell, H and Newman, A},
Year = {2020},
Key = {fds349798}
}
@misc{fds349797,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {Burying and Unburying History: American Strategy in a
Faulknerian World},
Publisher = {War on the Rocks},
Year = {2020},
Month = {January},
Key = {fds349797}
}
@misc{fds356348,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {Lincoln, FDR and Sizing Up Donald Trump},
Publisher = {The Globalist},
Year = {2020},
Month = {April},
Key = {fds356348}
}
@article{fds352368,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Refocusing US Grand Strategy on Pandemic and Environmental
Mass Destruction},
Journal = {Washington Quarterly},
Volume = {43},
Number = {3},
Pages = {7-29},
Year = {2020},
Month = {July},
Doi = {10.1080/0163660X.2020.1813977},
Key = {fds352368}
}
@misc{fds356347,
Author = {Jentleson, B and Goldgeier, J},
Title = {The United States Is Not Entitled to Lead the
World},
Journal = {Foreign affairs (Council on Foreign Relations)},
Publisher = {Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.},
Year = {2020},
Month = {September},
Key = {fds356347}
}
@misc{fds356346,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {American Foreign Policy and the 2020 Presidential
Election},
Journal = {Strategic and Defense Studies Center},
Publisher = {Australia National University, Coral Bell School of Asia
Pacific Affairs, Strategic and Defence Studies
Center,},
Year = {2020},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds356346}
}
@book{fds349796,
Author = {Jentleson, B},
Title = {Economic Sanctions: What Everyone Needs to
Know},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
Year = {2021},
Key = {fds349796}
}
@article{fds326878,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Global Governance, the United Nations, and the challenge of
trumping Trump},
Journal = {Global Governance},
Volume = {23},
Number = {2},
Pages = {143-149},
Year = {2021},
Month = {January},
Doi = {10.1163/19426720-02302001},
Key = {fds326878}
}
@misc{fds356345,
Author = {Jentleson, B and Goldgeier, J},
Title = {The United States Needs a Democracy Summit at
Home},
Journal = {Foreign affairs (Council on Foreign Relations)},
Publisher = {Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.},
Year = {2021},
Month = {January},
Key = {fds356345}
}
@misc{fds356344,
Author = {Jentleson, B and Goldgeier, J},
Title = {A Democracy Summit Is Not What the Doctor
Ordered},
Journal = {Foreign affairs (Council on Foreign Relations)},
Publisher = {Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.},
Year = {2021},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds356344}
}
@article{fds373517,
Author = {Jentleson, BW},
Title = {Beyond the Rhetoric: A Globally Credible US Role for a
“Rules-Based Order”},
Journal = {Washington Quarterly},
Volume = {46},
Number = {3},
Pages = {83-102},
Year = {2023},
Month = {January},
Doi = {10.1080/0163660X.2023.2257967},
Key = {fds373517}
}
@article{fds371305,
Author = {Tama, J and Barma, NH and Durbin, B and Goldgeier, J and Jentleson,
BW},
Title = {Bridging the Gap in a Changing World: New Opportunities and
Challenges for Engaging Practitioners and the
Public},
Journal = {International Studies Perspectives},
Volume = {24},
Number = {3},
Pages = {285-307},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {2023},
Month = {August},
Abstract = {In recent years, an array of initiatives has sought to
bridge widely recognized gaps separating international
studies scholars from policymakers and the public. While
such gaps persist, changes in society, the media, and
academia have altered the context for scholars seeking to
make their research known to public and policy communities.
On the one hand, the emergence on the public agenda of new
policy concerns, proliferation of public-facing outlets
seeking to feature scholarly expertise, and growing
attention to diversity and inclusion have reduced some of
the barriers to gap-bridging work. On the other hand, tenure
and promotion standards continue to place limited weight on
public engagement, political attacks on experts have raised
new barriers to bridging, and social media often serve as
sites of discrimination and harassment. We take stock of
these shifts and use a scenario exercise to consider how the
landscape for bridging the gap might evolve further in the
years ahead. Focusing on potential changes in research
funding models and the relationship between international
studies scholarship and geopolitics, we highlight new
bridging opportunities and challenges that may emerge over
the next decade.},
Doi = {10.1093/isp/ekad003},
Key = {fds371305}
}