Publications of John E. Staddon    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Books   
@book{fds365866,
   Author = {Honig, WK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Introduction},
   Pages = {1-6},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {February},
   ISBN = {9781032188645},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003256670-1},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781003256670-1},
   Key = {fds365866}
}

@book{fds365868,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Handbook of operant behavior},
   Pages = {1-710},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {February},
   ISBN = {9781032188645},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003256670},
   Abstract = {This classic edition of the Handbook of Operant Behavior
             presents seminal work in the field of learning and behavior,
             foreshadowing a new direction for learning research, and
             presenting many questions that remain unanswered. Featuring
             impressive contributions from leading figures across the
             field-ranging from N. J. Mackintosh from what was to become
             the cognitive school through Morse, Kelleher, Hutchinson,
             and Hineline on the neglected topic of aversive control to
             Blough and Blough on psychophysics to Philip Teitelbaum on
             behavioral physiology-the book is a must-read for anyone
             interested in human and animal learning. In a newly written
             introduction, J. E. R. Staddon highlights several issues
             that deserve more attention: how language is learned and
             syntax evolves, how animals choose, and a new paradigm for
             the study of learning in general. The book is essential
             reading for all students and researchers of learning and
             behavior, and aims to encourage researchers to revisit some
             of the fascinating behavioral questions raised by the
             original book.},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781003256670},
   Key = {fds365868}
}

@book{fds365869,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Introduction to the classic edition: Handbook of operant
             behavior},
   Pages = {ix-xiii},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {February},
   ISBN = {9781032188645},
   Key = {fds365869}
}

@book{fds362350,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {The New Behaviorism: Foundations of Behavioral
             Science},
   Pages = {1-314},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {May},
   ISBN = {9780367745813},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003158578},
   Abstract = {This ground-breaking book presents a brief history of
             behaviorism, along with a critical analysis of radical
             behaviorism, its philosophy and its applications to social
             issues. This third edition is much expanded and includes a
             new chapter on experimental method as well as longer
             sections on the philosophy of behaviorism. It offers
             experimental and theoretical examples of a new approach to
             behavioral science. It provides an alternative philosophical
             and empirical foundation for a psychology that has rather
             lost its way. The mission of the book is to help steer
             experimental psychology away from its current undisciplined
             indulgence in "mental life" toward the core of science,
             which is an economical description of nature: parsimony,
             explain much with little. The elementary philosophical
             distinction between private and public events, even biology,
             evolution and animal psychology are all ignored by much
             contemporary cognitive psychology. The failings of radical
             behaviorism as well as a philosophically defective cognitive
             psychology point to the need for a new theoretical
             behaviorism, which can deal with problems such as
             "consciousness" that have been either ignored, evaded or
             muddled by existing approaches. This new behaviorism
             provides a unified framework for the science of behavior
             that can be applied both to the laboratory and to broader
             practical issues such as law and punishment, the health-care
             system, and teaching.},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781003158578},
   Key = {fds362350}
}

@book{fds332757,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Scientific method: How science works, fails to work, and
             pretends to work},
   Pages = {1-148},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {December},
   ISBN = {9781138295353},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315100708},
   Abstract = {This book shows how science works, fails to work, or
             pretends to work, by looking at examples from such diverse
             fields as physics, biomedicine, psychology, and economics.
             Social science affects our lives every day through the
             predictions of experts and the rules and regulations they
             devise. Sciences like economics, sociology and health are
             subject to more 'operating limitations' than classical
             fields like physics or chemistry or biology. Yet, their
             methods and results must also be judged according to the
             same scientific standards. Every literate citizen should
             understand these standards and be able to tell the
             difference between good science and bad. Scientific Method
             enables readers to develop a critical, informed view of
             scientific practice by discussing concrete examples of how
             real scientists have approached the problems of their
             fields. It is ideal for students and professionals trying to
             make sense of the role of science in society, and of the
             meaning, value, and limitations of scientific methodology in
             the social sciences.},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781315100708},
   Key = {fds332757}
}

@book{fds313403,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Unlucky Strike: Private Health and the Science, Law and
             Politics of Smoking. Buckingham, UK: University of
             Buckingham Press.},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {April},
   url = {https://ubpl.buckingham.ac.uk/?s=staddon},
   Key = {fds313403}
}

@book{fds335755,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Adaptive Behavior and Learning: Second Edition},
   Pages = {1-599},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {March},
   ISBN = {9781107082472},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139998369},
   Abstract = {Every day at about 4:30, Jazz, a Hungarian Vizsla dog, leaps
             up on the sofa and looks out for his owner who always comes
             home at 5:00. He doesn't need an internal clock because he
             has an acute sense of smell that allows him to measure how
             long his master has been absent. Explaining complex behavior
             in simple ways, this book is a fascinating exploration of
             the evolution, development and processes of learning in
             animals. Now in its second edition, there is increased
             emphasis on development, evolution and dynamics; new
             accounts of taxic orientation, reflex induction, habituation
             and operant learning in organisms; more discussion of
             spatial learning and the processes underlying it; expanded
             chapters on choice and completely new chapters on molar
             laws, classical conditioning theories and comparative
             cognition. J. E. R. Staddon provides a definitive summary of
             contemporary theoretical understanding suitable for
             graduates and advanced undergraduates.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9781139998369},
   Key = {fds335755}
}

@book{fds318787,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Adaptive Behavior and Learning},
   Pages = {608 pages},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {February},
   ISBN = {9781107082472},
   Abstract = {Summarizes the current state of both theoretical and
             experimental knowledge about learning in
             animals.},
   Key = {fds318787}
}

@book{fds365541,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Scientific Method},
   Year = {2015},
   Abstract = {How science works, fails to work or pretends to
             work.},
   Key = {fds365541}
}

@book{fds328629,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {The new behaviorism, second edition},
   Pages = {1-282},
   Publisher = {PSYCHOLOGY PRESS},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781315798172},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315798172},
   Abstract = {This second edition is a completely rewritten and much
             expanded version of the first edition, published nearly 15
             years earlier. It surveys what changes have occurred within
             behaviorism and whether it has maintained its influence on
             experimental cognitive psychology or other
             fields.},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781315798172},
   Key = {fds328629}
}

@book{fds313405,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The New Behaviorism},
   Publisher = {Psychology Press},
   Year = {2014},
   url = {http://www.psypress.com/books/details/9781848726888/},
   Key = {fds313405}
}

@book{fds352588,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {The Malign Hand of the Markets: The Insidious Forces on Wall
             Street that are Destroying Financial Markets – and What We
             Can Do About it},
   Pages = {304 pages},
   Publisher = {McGraw Hill Professional},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {June},
   ISBN = {9780071797412},
   Abstract = {But Duke University professor John Staddon is here to tell
             that there’s also another, darker force at work on Wall
             Street—a “Malign Hand” that guides all human
             interactions, including our finances.},
   Key = {fds352588}
}

@book{fds313404,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The Malign Hand of the Markets},
   Publisher = {McGraw-Hill},
   Year = {2012},
   url = {http://www.amazon.com/The-Malign-Hand-Markets-Destroying/dp/B00FKZ8624/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1396619492&sr=8-3&keywords=malign+hand},
   Key = {fds313404}
}

@book{fds204528,
   Author = {J. E. R. Staddon},
   Title = {Adaptive behavior and learning.},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press. New (updated internet
             edition)},
   Year = {2010},
   url = {http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/2878},
   Key = {fds204528}
}

@conference{fds14388,
   Author = {Staddon, J. E. R.},
   Title = {Adaptive behavior and learning.},
   Journal = {New York: Cambridge University Press (1st edition.
             1983)},
   Series = {Second (internet) edition},
   Year = {2003},
   url = {http://psychweb.psych.duke.edu/department/jers/abl/TableC.htm},
   Abstract = {psychweb.psych.duke.edu/department/jers/abl/TableC.htm},
   Key = {fds14388}
}

@book{fds41034,
   Author = {J. E. R. Staddon},
   Title = {Adaptive Behavior and Learning},
   Series = {New Edition of 1983 Cambridge U. P. book},
   Publisher = {Internet Edition},
   Year = {2003},
   url = {http://psychweb.psych.duke.edu/department/jers/abl/TableC.htm},
   Key = {fds41034}
}

@book{fds14394,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R.},
   Title = {The New Behaviorism: Mind, Mechanism and
             Society},
   Pages = {xiii, 1-211},
   Publisher = {Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds14394}
}

@book{fds14395,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R.},
   Title = {Adaptive Dynamics: The Theoretical Analysis of
             Behavior},
   Pages = {xiv, 1-423},
   Publisher = {Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds14395}
}

@book{fds41344,
   Author = {J. Staddon and J.E.R},
   Title = {Behaviorism: Mind, Mechanism and Society},
   Pages = {1-128},
   Publisher = {London: Duckworth},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds41344}
}

@book{fds41377,
   Author = {Staddon, J. E. R. and Ettinger, R. H},
   Title = {Learning: An introduction to the principles of adaptive
             behavior},
   Pages = {i-ix, 1-436},
   Publisher = {San Diego: Harcourt-Brace-Jovanovich},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds41377}
}

@book{fds41428,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Adaptive behavior and learning},
   Pages = {xiii, 1-555},
   Publisher = {New York: Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {1983},
   Key = {fds41428}
}


%% Papers Published   
@article{fds373392,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Diverse Identities are Irrelevant to Science},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {43-46},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.51845/36.2.8},
   Doi = {10.51845/36.2.8},
   Key = {fds373392}
}

@article{fds375292,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {The Diversity Dilemma},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {109-111},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.51845/34.3.17},
   Doi = {10.51845/34.3.17},
   Key = {fds375292}
}

@article{fds375293,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {The Devolution of Psychological Science: Memes, Culture, and
             Systemic Racism},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {42-47},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.51845/34.3.6},
   Doi = {10.51845/34.3.6},
   Key = {fds375293}
}

@article{fds373553,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {The Behaviorist Plot},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {57-63},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.51845/34su.2.8},
   Doi = {10.51845/34su.2.8},
   Key = {fds373553}
}

@article{fds375294,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Can Science be Saved?},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {89-97},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.51845/34su.2.11},
   Doi = {10.51845/34su.2.11},
   Key = {fds375294}
}

@article{fds373393,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {History of Science: Politicizing a Discipline},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {20-30},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.51845/34s.1.4},
   Doi = {10.51845/34s.1.4},
   Key = {fds373393}
}

@article{fds350253,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The Role of Theory in Behavior Analysis: A Response to
             Unfinished Business, Travis Thompson's Review of
             Staddon's New Behaviorism (2nd
             edition).},
   Journal = {The Psychological record},
   Volume = {71},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {473-479},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00409-y},
   Abstract = {Travis Thompson's lengthy review of Staddon's <i>The New
             Behaviorism</i> requires several corrections and extensions.
             This response discusses Staddon's analysis of Herrnstein's
             matching law and concludes that Thompson misinterprets a
             gentle critique as a paean. The response goes on to defend
             the utility of models and "internal states" (i.e.,
             postulated processes that are not directly measurable) as
             "formal representation[s] of the data reduced to a minimal
             number of terms," a position similar to one of B. F.
             Skinner's statements. The response ends with a defense of
             Skinner's empirical brilliance, but a critique of his
             sweeping societal prescriptions.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s40732-020-00409-y},
   Key = {fds350253}
}

@article{fds352794,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {What’s Really Wrong with America},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {586-591},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12129-020-09930-6},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12129-020-09930-6},
   Key = {fds352794}
}

@article{fds350868,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Variation and Diversity: A Tribute to Freeman
             Dyson},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {436-447},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12129-020-09892-9},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12129-020-09892-9},
   Key = {fds350868}
}

@article{fds349752,
   Author = {Staddon, J and Morcombe, P},
   Title = {The Case for Carbon Dioxide},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {246-258},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12129-020-09871-0},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12129-020-09871-0},
   Key = {fds349752}
}

@article{fds348992,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The dynamics of behavior: Review of Sutton and Barto:
             Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
             (2nd ed.)},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {113},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {485-491},
   Publisher = {Wiley},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeab.587},
   Doi = {10.1002/jeab.587},
   Key = {fds348992}
}

@article{fds349306,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Facts vs. Passion: The Debate over Science-Based
             Regulation},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {101-110},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12129-019-09861-x},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12129-019-09861-x},
   Key = {fds349306}
}

@article{fds347649,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {College Admissions Ride the Equality Roundabout},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {487-496},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12129-019-09831-3},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12129-019-09831-3},
   Key = {fds347649}
}

@article{fds342723,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Object of Inquiry: Psychology’s Other (Non-replication)
             Problem},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {246-256},
   Publisher = {National Association of Scholars},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12129-019-09778-5},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12129-019-09778-5},
   Key = {fds342723}
}

@article{fds341517,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {What's in the journals?},
   Journal = {Economist (United Kingdom)},
   Volume = {414},
   Number = {9096},
   Pages = {9BDUMMY},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds341517}
}

@article{fds329016,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Simply Too Many Notes.},
   Journal = {The Behavior analyst},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {101-106},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0086-9},
   Doi = {10.1007/s40614-017-0086-9},
   Key = {fds329016}
}

@article{fds328628,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Theoretical behaviorism, economic theory, and
             choice},
   Journal = {History of Political Economy},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {suppl 1},
   Pages = {316-331},
   Publisher = {Duke University Press},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3619334},
   Abstract = {Choice behavior is studied differently in humans and in
             animals, and different theories have arisen to explain the
             results. I suggest that an approach derived from animal
             studies is also appropriate for human choice. Daniel
             Kahneman and Amos Tversky’s prospect theory, a popular
             two-part account of human choice, is a functional theory
             amounting, after some years of evolution, to a
             classification of types of deviation from “rational”
             reward maximization. Animal choice, on the other hand, can
             be explained causally as the outcome of competition between
             a set of possible responses with different “strengths."
             The strength of each response is directly related to its
             historical payoff probability, and responses compete in
             winner-take-all fashion. An “active” response occurs and
             is strengthened or weakened depending on its outcome. If it
             is sufficiently weakened, it will be supplanted by the
             strongest “silent” response. This cumulative effects
             (CE) model has been tested in operant conditioning
             experiments that show, for example, that when choosing
             between two identical probabilistic choices in a
             “two-armed bandit” situation, animals will fixate on one
             if the payoff probabilities are high, but be indifferent if
             they are low, a pattern not easily deducible from any kind
             of optimality theory. Kahneman’s distinction between
             “fast” and “slow” systems is indistinguishable from
             the distinction between active and silent responses in the
             CE model, which therefore offers a causal account of human
             as well as animal choice behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1215/00182702-3619334},
   Key = {fds328628}
}

@article{fds355274,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {The Englishman: Memoirs of a psychobiologist},
   Publisher = {University of Buckingham Press},
   Year = {2016},
   Key = {fds355274}
}

@article{fds287963,
   Author = {Cerutti, DT and Jozefowiez, J and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Rapid, accurate time estimation in zebrafish (Danio
             rerio).},
   Journal = {Behavioural processes},
   Volume = {99},
   Pages = {21-25},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0376-6357},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000326133400004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Zebrafish were tested in an appetitive Pavlovian delayed
             conditioning task. After an intertrial interval of k*T s
             (k=11.25; T=8, 16 or 32 s), a small, translucent vertical
             pole was illuminated (CS) for T s. Food was presented at T/2
             s. Pole-biting response latencies from CS onset were a
             linear function of the food delay T/2, with slope
             approximating unity (proportional timing), and standard
             deviation proportional to latency (scalar timing). Response
             latencies tracked changes in food delays even when they
             changed every other day. These findings are significant
             because the zebrafish genome has recently been sequenced,
             opening the door to studies in the genetics of interval
             timing.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.beproc.2013.06.007},
   Key = {fds287963}
}

@article{fds340473,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {B. F. Skinner: Mistaken – or Misunderstood?},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {July},
   Abstract = {The chief offense of “political correctness” is its
             unreflective certainty – about which causes to hail or
             demonize and about the necessity to take sides on every
             issue. Science has no room for such dogmatism, of course.
             Yet, human nature being what it is, in the softer sciences,
             at least, demonization of “outs” and automatic
             acceptance of “ins” is the rule rather than the
             exception. For many years in experimental psychology, the
             “ins” have been the “cognitive” psychologists and
             the “outs” the behaviorists, especially the radical
             behaviorist followers of B. F. Skinner, whose life and work
             are the topics of these two books...},
   Key = {fds340473}
}

@article{fds287962,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Faith, Fact, and Behaviorism.},
   Journal = {The Behavior analyst},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {229-238},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0738-6729},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000327582400005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {David Hume argued that <i>ought</i> cannot be derived from
             <i>is</i>. That is, no set of facts, no amount of scientific
             knowledge, is by itself sufficient to urge us to action. Yet
             generations of well-meaning scientists (more and more as
             secular influences grow in the West) seem to have forgotten
             Hume's words of wisdom. All motivated action depends
             ultimately on beliefs that cannot be proved by the methods
             of science, that is, on faith.},
   Doi = {10.1007/bf03392309},
   Key = {fds287962}
}

@article{fds355275,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Unlucky Strike: Private Health and the Science, Law and
             Politics of Smoking.},
   Publisher = {University of Buckingham Press},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds355275}
}

@article{fds287975,
   Author = {Jozefowiez, J and McDowell, JJ and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Editorial: choice studies in transition.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {94},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {159-160},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000281618800004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.2010.94-159},
   Key = {fds287975}
}

@article{fds288029,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and MacPhail, RC and Padilla, S},
   Title = {The dynamics of successive induction in larval
             zebrafish.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {94},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {261-266},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000281618800011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Charles Sherrington identified the properties of the synapse
             by purely behavioral means-the study of reflexes-more than
             100 years ago. They were subsequently confirmed
             neurophysiologically. Studying reflex interaction, he also
             showed that activating one reflex often facilitates another,
             antagonistic one: successive induction, which has since been
             demonstrated in a wide range of species, from aphids to
             locusts to dogs and humans. We show a particularly orderly
             example in zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae; the behavior
             (locomotion) of larvae is low in dark and intermediate in
             light, but low in light and substantially higher in dark
             when dark followed light. A quantitative model of a simple
             dynamic process is described that readily captures the
             behavior pattern and the effects of a number of
             manipulations of lighting conditions.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.2010.94-261},
   Key = {fds288029}
}

@article{fds325718,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Faith and goodness: A reply to Hocutt},
   Journal = {Behavior and Philosophy},
   Volume = {37},
   Pages = {181-185},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/3391},
   Abstract = {Professor Hocutt and I agree that David Hume first pointed
             out that "ought"-what should be done-cannot be derived from
             "is"-what is the case. Hocutt goes on to claim that "ought,"
             in fact, derives from factual observation of "what we care
             about," which amounts to saying "you should do what you want
             to do." This seems to me unsatisfactory as moral philosophy.
             © 2009 Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.},
   Key = {fds325718}
}

@article{fds288022,
   Author = {Jozefowiez, J and Staddon, JER and Cerutti, DT},
   Title = {The behavioral economics of choice and interval
             timing.},
   Journal = {Psychological review},
   Volume = {116},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {519-539},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000268263800004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The authors propose a simple behavioral economic model (BEM)
             describing how reinforcement and interval timing interact.
             The model assumes a Weber-law-compliant logarithmic
             representation of time. Associated with each represented
             time value are the payoffs that have been obtained for each
             possible response. At a given real time, the response with
             the highest payoff is emitted. The model accounts for a wide
             range of data from procedures such as simple bisection,
             metacognition in animals, economic effects in free-operant
             psychophysical procedures, and paradoxical choice in
             double-bisection procedures. Although it assumes logarithmic
             time representation, it can also account for data from the
             time-left procedure usually cited in support of linear time
             representation. It encounters some difficulties in complex
             free-operant choice procedures, such as concurrent mixed
             fixed-interval schedules as well as some of the data on
             double bisection, which may involve additional processes.
             Overall, BEM provides a theoretical framework for
             understanding how reinforcement and interval timing work
             together to determine choice between temporally
             differentiated reinforcers.},
   Doi = {10.1037/a0016171},
   Key = {fds288022}
}

@article{fds204525,
   Author = {Jozefowiez, J and Staddon, J. E. R. and Cerutti, D.
             T.},
   Title = {Metacognition in animals: how do we know that they
             know?},
   Journal = {Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews,
             2009.},
   Volume = {4},
   Pages = {29-39},
   Year = {2009},
   Abstract = {Research on animal metacognition has typically used choice
             discriminations whose difficulty can be varied. Animals are
             given some opportunity to escape the discrimination task by
             emitting a so-called uncertain response. The usual claim is
             that an animal possesses metacognition if (a) the
             probability of picking the uncertain response increases with
             task difficulty, and (b) animals are more accurate on
             “free-choice” trials —i.e., trials where the uncertain
             response was available but was not chosen—than on
             “forced-choice” trials, where the uncertain response is
             unavailable. We describe a simple behavioral economic model
             (BEM), based on familiar learning principles, and thus
             lacking any metacognition construct, which is able to meet
             both criteria in most of these tasks. We conclude that
             rather than designing ever more complex experiments to
             identify “metacognition,” a necessarily ill-defined
             concept, knowledge might better be advanced not by further
             refining behavioral criteria for the concept, but by the
             development and testing of theoretical models for the clever
             behavior that many animals show in these
             experiments.},
   Key = {fds204525}
}

@article{fds288031,
   Author = {John Staddon},
   Title = {Distracting Miss Daisy},
   Journal = {The Atlantic},
   Pages = {102-104},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/traffic/1},
   Abstract = {Why stop signs and speed limits endanger
             Americans.},
   Key = {fds288031}
}

@article{fds288032,
   Author = {John Staddon},
   Title = {Gridlock: Research, teaching, curriculum, and the faculty in
             the modern university.Review of Whatever Happened to the
             Faculty? Drift and Decision in Higher Education, by Mary
             Burgan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,
             2006},
   Journal = {Academic Questions},
   Volume = {20},
   Pages = {370-381},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds288032}
}

@article{fds330412,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Born to govern [4]},
   Journal = {Economist},
   Volume = {382},
   Number = {8522},
   Pages = {16},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds330412}
}

@article{fds157137,
   Author = {J. E. R. Staddon and Jozefowiez, J. and Cerutti, D.
             T.},
   Title = {Staddon, J. E. R., (2007) Metacognition: A Problem not a
             Process. PsyCrit, April. http://psycrit.com/Articles},
   Journal = {PsyCrit},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://psycrit.com/Articles},
   Keywords = {metacognition • timing},
   Abstract = {"Metacognition" in animals can be explained by familiar
             learning principles...},
   Key = {fds157137}
}

@article{fds288026,
   Author = {Zanutto, BS and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Correction: Bang-Bang Control of Feeding: Role of
             Hypothalamic and Satiety Signals},
   Journal = {PLoS Computational Biology},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {e127-e127},
   Publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
   Year = {2007},
   ISSN = {1553-734X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000249105500022&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030127},
   Key = {fds288026}
}

@article{fds288030,
   Author = {Zanutto, BS and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Bang-bang control of feeding: Role of hypothalamic and
             satiety signals},
   Journal = {PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {924-931},
   Year = {2007},
   ISSN = {1553-734X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000249105100015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Keywords = {feeding • hypothalamus},
   Abstract = {Rats, people, and many other omnivores eat in meals rather
             than continuously. We show by experimental test that eating
             in meals is regulated by a simple bang-bang control system,
             an idea foreshadowed by Le Magnen and many others, shown by
             us to account for a wide range of behavioral data, but never
             explicitly tested or tied to neurophysiological facts. The
             hypothesis is simply that the tendency to eat rises with
             time at a rate determined by satiety signals. When these
             signals fall below a set point, eating begins, in on-off
             fashion. The delayed sequelae of eating increment the
             satiety signals, which eventually turn eating off. Thus,
             under free conditions, the organism eats in bouts separated
             by noneating activities. We report an experiment with rats
             to test novel predictions about meal patterns that are not
             explained by existing homeostatic approaches. Access to food
             was systematically but unpredictably interrupted just as the
             animal tried to start a new meal. A simple bang-bang model
             fits the resulting meal-pattern data well, and its elements
             can be identified with neurophysiological processes.
             Hypothalamic inputs can provide the set point for
             longer-term regulation carried out by a comparator in the
             hindbrain. Delayed gustatory and gastrointestinal
             aftereffects of eating act via the nucleus of the solitary
             tract and other hindbrain regions as neural feedback
             governing short-term regulation. In this way, the model
             forges real links between a functioning feedback mechanism,
             neuro-hormonal data, and both short-term (meals) and
             long-term (eating-rate regulation) behavioral
             data.},
   Doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030097},
   Key = {fds288030}
}

@article{fds328630,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Did Skinner miss the point about teaching?},
   Journal = {International Journal of Psychology},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {555-558},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207590500492708},
   Abstract = {The Darwinian metaphor, to which Skinner was an early
             contributor, has been a commonplace for several years.
             Skinner was sure that much can be learned from experiments
             with animals, and those strategies that work best for the
             training of animals can and should be applied to the
             education of humans. However, his claims about how best to
             teach people, especially intelligent people who are learning
             difficult things, have several problems. Operant behaviour
             is emitted (it is spontaneous, at least on first
             occurrence). Emitted behaviour selected by reinforcement can
             be compared to the Darwinian idea of selection and
             variation. Operant learning is seen as interplay between
             response emission (variation) and reinforcement (selection).
             In applying his ideas to teaching, Skinner emphasized
             selection almost exclusively. But the real puzzle posed by
             non-rote learning, in both animals and humans, is not
             selection but the sources of variation that cause an action
             or an idea to appear for the first time. It is in this sense
             that Skinner's whole discussion of teaching missed the
             point. The Darwinian framework for behaviour analysis points
             to the fact that processes of variation exist, even though
             they have been neglected in favour of an almost exclusive
             focus on reinforcement and selection. © 2006 International
             Union of Psychological Science.},
   Doi = {10.1080/00207590500492708},
   Key = {fds328630}
}

@article{fds287965,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and higa, JJ},
   Title = {Interval timing},
   Journal = {NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {5 pages},
   Publisher = {NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {1471-0048},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000239653800017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1038/nrn1796-c1},
   Key = {fds287965}
}

@article{fds287995,
   Author = {Jozefowiez, J and Cerutti, DT and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.},
   Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior
             processes},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {229-238},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0097-7403},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000239045200003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to concurrent schedules for which
             reinforcement was alternately available at different times
             for each of two choices. In Experiment 1 (in which
             reinforcement times progressed arithmetically), overall, but
             not relative, response rate was timescale invariant. In
             Experiment 2 (in which reinforcement times progressed
             geometrically and were more spaced out), there was temporal
             control at all reinforcement times, but the amplitude of
             left-right response alternation decreased as time in the
             trial increased. These results indicate that the temporal
             regulation of both overall and relative response rates
             conforms to Weber's law although relative rate is heavily
             influenced by processes other than timing. It also adds
             support to the idea that overall and relative response rate
             reflects the operation of two independent
             processes.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0097-7403.32.3.229},
   Key = {fds287995}
}

@article{fds288034,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Interval timing: memory, not a clock.},
   Journal = {Trends in cognitive sciences},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {312-314},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {1364-6613},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000230777900003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Anticipation of periodic events signalled by a time marker,
             or interval timing, has been explained by a separate
             pacemaker-counter clock. However, recent research has added
             support to an older idea: that memory strength can act as a
             clock. The way that memory strength decreases with time can
             be inferred from the properties of habituation, and the
             underlying process also provides a unified explanation for
             proportional timing, the Weber-law property and several
             other properties of interval timing.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.013},
   Key = {fds288034}
}

@article{fds288133,
   Author = {Ludvig, EA and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The effects of interval duration on temporal tracking and
             alternation learning.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {83},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {243-262},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000229710900005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {On cyclic-interval reinforcement schedules, animals
             typically show a postreinforcement pause that is a function
             of the immediately preceding time interval (temporal
             tracking). Animals, however, do not track single-alternation
             schedules-when two different intervals are presented in
             strict alternation on successive trials. In this experiment,
             pigeons were first trained with a cyclic schedule consisting
             of alternating blocks of 12 short intervals (5 s or 30 s)
             and 12 long intervals (180 s), followed by three different
             single-alternation interval schedules: (a) 30 s and 180 s,
             (b) 5 s and 180 s, and (c) 5 s and 30 s. Pigeons tracked
             both schedules with alternating blocks of 12 intervals. With
             the single-alternation schedules, when the short interval
             duration was 5 s, regardless of the duration of the longer
             interval, pigeons learned the alternation pattern, and their
             pause anticipated the upcoming interval. When the shorter
             interval was 30 s, even when the ratio of short to long
             intervals was kept at 6:1, pigeons did not initially show
             anticipatory pausing-a violation of the principle of
             timescale invariance.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.2005.88-04},
   Key = {fds288133}
}

@article{fds288135,
   Author = {Jozefowiez, J and Cerutti, DT and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Timing in choice experiments.},
   Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior
             processes},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {213-225},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0097-7403},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000228674900008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In Experiment 1, pigeons chose between variable- and
             fixed-interval schedules. The timer for 1 schedule was reset
             by a reinforcement on that schedule or on either schedule.
             In both cases, the pigeons timed reinforcement on each
             schedule from trial onset. The data further suggest that
             their behavior reflects 2 independent processes: 1 deciding
             when a response should be emitted and responsible for the
             timing of the overall activity, and the other determining
             what this response should be and responsible for the
             allocation of behavior between the 2 response keys. Results
             from Experiment 2, which studied choice between 2
             fixed-interval schedules, support those 2 conclusions. These
             results have implications for the study of operant choice in
             general.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.213},
   Key = {fds288135}
}

@article{fds335756,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Fair Profiling},
   Year = {2005},
   Abstract = {There are several strategies available to police
             “stopping” suspects. Most efficient is to stop only
             members of the group with the highest a priori probability
             of guilt; least efficient is indiscriminate stopping. An
             efficient option that satisfies one criterion for fairness
             is a strategy that matches stop probability to risk
             probability. But a strategy that chooses stop probabilities
             so that the absolute number of innocents stopped is equal
             for all groups is close to maximally efficient and seems
             fair by almost any criterion.},
   Key = {fds335756}
}

@article{fds288038,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology},
   Journal = {Behavior and Philosophy},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {231-242},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1053-8348},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000224037200013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {E.O. Wilson and B.F. Skinner have argued for an evolutionary
             ethics that allows what ought to be to be derived from what
             is-ethics from science. Evolution is inherently
             unpredictable, however, and some practices whose benefits
             cannot be proved might nevertheless turn out to be good for
             the survival of a culture or the race. Other practices that
             seem to be good might turn out to be bad. Consequently, the
             evolutionary - argument implies that a successful culture
             will believe some things that cannot be proved, and it tells
             us that we cannot know in advance what those things will
             be.},
   Key = {fds288038}
}

@article{fds288134,
   Author = {Ludvig, EA and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The conditions for temporal tracking under interval
             schedules of reinforcement.},
   Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior
             processes},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {299-316},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0097-7403},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000224464700005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {On many cyclic-interval schedules, animals adjust their
             postreinforcement pause to follow the interval duration
             (temporal tracking). Six pigeons were trained on a series of
             square-wave (2-valued) interval schedules (e.g., 12
             fixed-interval [FI] 60, 4 FI 180). Experiment 1 showed that
             pigeons track square-wave schedules, except those with a
             single long interval per cycle. Experiments 2 and 3
             established that tracking and nontracking are learned and
             both can transfer from one cyclic schedule to another.
             Experiment 4 demonstrated that pigeons track a schedule with
             a single short interval per cycle, suggesting that a dual
             process--cuing and tracking--is necessary to explain
             behavior on these schedules. These findings suggest a
             potential explanation for earlier results that reported a
             failure to track square-wave schedules.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0097-7403.30.4.299},
   Key = {fds288134}
}

@article{fds287997,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {RESPONSE TO COMMENTATORS},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {82},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {121-124},
   Publisher = {Wiley},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000223829500013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.2004.82-121},
   Key = {fds287997}
}

@article{fds288027,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {THE OLD BEHAVIORISM: A RESPONSE TO WILLIAM BAUM'S REVIEW
             OF THE NEW BEHAVIORISM},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {82},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {79-83},
   Publisher = {Wiley},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000223829500008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.2004.82-79},
   Key = {fds288027}
}

@article{fds340474,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {A Remarkable Book},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {May},
   Abstract = {Winston Churchill in old age was presented by the House of
             Commons with his portrait, painted by Graham Sutherland, a
             well-known British artist. When the picture was unveiled in
             Westminster Hall, Churchill looked at it for a few seconds
             and then commented: “The portrait is a remarkable example
             of modern art!” Just what he meant by “remarkable” may
             be inferred from the fact that the picture has never been
             seen again (Clementine Churchill evidently burnt it). It is
             in this sense that The Myth of Ownership is a remarkable
             book...},
   Key = {fds340474}
}

@article{fds288147,
   Author = {Cerutti, DT and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Time and rate measures in choice transitions.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {81},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {135-154},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000221963000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Three experiments with pigeons studied the relation between
             time and rate measures of behavior under conditions of
             changing preference. Experiment 1 studied a concurrent chain
             schedule with random-interval initial links and
             fixed-interval terminal links; Experiment 2 studied a
             multiple chained random-interval fixed-interval schedule;
             and Experiment 3 studied simple concurrent random-interval
             random-interval schedules. In Experiment 1, and to a lesser
             extent in the other two experiments, session-average
             initial-link wait-time differences were linearly related to
             session-average response-rate differences. In Experiment 1,
             and to a lesser extent in Experiment 3, ratios of
             session-average initial-link wait times and response rates
             were related by a power function. The weaker relations
             between wait and response measures in Experiment 2 appear to
             be due to the absence of competition between responses. In
             Experiments 1 and 2, initial-link changes lagged behind
             terminal-link changes. These findings may have implications
             for the relations between fixed- and variable-interval
             procedures and suggest that more attention should be paid to
             temporal measures in studies of free-operant
             choice.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.2004.81-135},
   Key = {fds288147}
}

@article{fds287973,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {A call to arms.},
   Journal = {The Behavior analyst},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {117-118},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0738-6729},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000221605300014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/bf03392098},
   Key = {fds287973}
}

@article{fds288138,
   Author = {Cerutti, DT and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Immediacy versus anticipated delay in the time-left
             experiment: a test of the cognitive hypothesis.},
   Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior
             processes},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {45-57},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0097-7403},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000187957300004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In the time-left experiment (J. Gibbon & R. M. Church,
             1981), animals are said to compare an expectation of a fixed
             delay to food, for one choice, with a decreasing delay
             expectation for the other, mentally representing both
             upcoming time to food and the difference between current
             time and upcoming time (the cognitive hypothesis). The
             results of 2 experiments support a simpler view: that
             animals choose according to the immediacies of reinforcement
             for each response at a time signaled by available time
             markers (the temporal control hypothesis). It is not
             necessary to assume that animals can either represent or
             subtract representations of times to food to explain the
             results of the time-left experiment.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0097-7403.30.1.45},
   Key = {fds288138}
}

@article{fds328631,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Editor: Fact, value, and science},
   Journal = {Behavior and Philosophy},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {193},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds328631}
}

@article{fds288004,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Cerutti, DT},
   Title = {Operant conditioning.},
   Journal = {Annual review of psychology},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {115-144},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0066-4308},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000181435000006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Operant behavior is behavior "controlled" by its
             consequences. In practice, operant conditioning is the study
             of reversible behavior maintained by reinforcement
             schedules. We review empirical studies and theoretical
             approaches to two large classes of operant behavior:
             interval timing and choice. We discuss cognitive versus
             behavioral approaches to timing, the "gap" experiment and
             its implications, proportional timing and Weber's law,
             temporal dynamics and linear waiting, and the problem of
             simple chain-interval schedules. We review the long history
             of research on operant choice: the matching law, its
             extensions and problems, concurrent chain schedules, and
             self-control. We point out how linear waiting may be
             involved in timing, choice, and reinforcement schedules
             generally. There are prospects for a unified approach to all
             these areas.},
   Doi = {10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145124},
   Key = {fds288004}
}

@article{fds288145,
   Author = {Dragoi, V and Staddon, JER and Palmer, RG and Buhusi,
             CV},
   Title = {Interval timing as an emergent learning property.},
   Journal = {Psychological review},
   Volume = {110},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {126-144},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.126},
   Abstract = {Interval timing in operant conditioning is the learned
             covariation of a temporal dependent measure such as wait
             time with a temporal independent variable such as
             fixed-interval duration. The dominant theories of interval
             timing all incorporate an explicit internal clock, or
             "pacemaker," despite its lack of independent evidence. The
             authors propose an alternative, pacemaker-free view that
             demonstrates that temporal discrimination can be explained
             by using only 2 assumptions: (a) variation and selection of
             responses through competition between reinforced behavior
             and all other, elicited, behaviors and (b) modulation of the
             strength of response competition by the memory for recent
             reinforcement. The model departs radically from existing
             timing models: It shows that temporal learning can emerge
             from a simple dynamic process that lacks a periodic time
             reference such as a pacemaker.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.126},
   Key = {fds288145}
}

@article{fds26688,
   Author = {Staddon, J. E. R. and Cerutti, D. T.},
   Title = {Operant behavior.},
   Journal = {Annual Review of Psychology},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {115-144},
   Year = {2003},
   Abstract = {Operant behavior is behavior “controlled” by its
             consequences. In practice operant conditioning is the study
             of reversible behavior maintained by reinforcement
             schedules. We review empirical studies and theoretical
             approaches to two large classes of operant behavior:
             interval timing and choice. We discuss cognitive vs.
             behavioral approaches to timing, the “gap” experiment
             and its implications, proportional timing and Weber’s law,
             temporal dynamics and linear waiting and the problem of
             simple chain-interval schedules. We review the long history
             of research on operant choice: the matching law, its
             extensions and problems, concurrent chain schedules and self
             control. We point out how linear waiting may be involved in
             timing, choice and reinforcement schedules generally. There
             are prospects for a unified approach to all these
             areas.},
   Key = {fds26688}
}

@article{fds288146,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Cerutti, DT},
   Title = {Operant behavior},
   Journal = {Annual Review of Psychology},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {115-144},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds288146}
}

@article{fds288037,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Chelaru, IM and Higa, JJ},
   Title = {Habituation, memory and the brain: the dynamics of interval
             timing.},
   Journal = {Behavioural processes},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {2-3},
   Pages = {71-88},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0376-6357},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000175259400002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Memory decay is rapid at first and slower later-a feature
             that accounts for Jost's memory law: that old memories gain
             on newer ones with lapse of time. The rate-sensitive
             property of habituation-that recovery after spaced stimuli
             may be slower than after massed-provides a clue to the
             dynamics of memory decay. Rate-sensitive habituation can be
             modeled by a cascade of thresholded integrator units that
             have a counterpart in human brain areas identified by
             magnetic source imaging (MSI). The memory trace component of
             the multiple-time-scale model for habituation can provide a
             'clock' that has the properties necessary to account for
             both static and dynamic properties of interval timing:
             static proportional and Weber-law timing as well as dynamic
             tracking of progressive, 'impulse' and periodic interval
             sequences.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00006-2},
   Key = {fds288037}
}

@article{fds328632,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Behavioural Processes: Editorial},
   Journal = {Behavioural Processes},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {iv-iv},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00019-0},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00019-0},
   Key = {fds328632}
}

@article{fds287968,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Up close: Impersonal.},
   Journal = {The Behavior analyst},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {121-122},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0738-6729},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000175867100011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/bf03392051},
   Key = {fds287968}
}

@article{fds288144,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Chelaru, IM and Higa, JJ},
   Title = {A tuned-trace theory of interval-timing dynamics.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {77},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {105-124},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000173523300007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Animals on interval schedules of reinforcement can rapidly
             adjust a temporal dependent variable, such as wait time, to
             changes in the prevailing interreinforcement interval. We
             describe data on the effects of impulse, step, sine-cyclic,
             and variable-interval schedules and show that they can be
             explained by a tuned-trace timing model with a one-back
             threshold-setting rule. The model can also explain
             steady-state timing properties such as proportional and
             Weber law timing and the effects of reinforcement magnitude.
             The model assumes that food reinforcers and other time
             markers have a decaying effect (trace) with properties that
             can be derived from the rate-sensitive property of
             habituation (the multiple-time-scale model). In timing
             experiments, response threshold is determined by the trace
             value at the time of the most recent reinforcement. The
             model provides a partial account for the learning of
             multiple intervals, but does not account for scalloping and
             other postpause features of responding on interval schedules
             and has some problems with square-wave schedules.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.2002.77-105},
   Key = {fds288144}
}

@article{fds288143,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Machado, A and Lourenço, O},
   Title = {Plus ça change...: Jost, Piaget, and the dynamics of
             embodiment},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {63-65},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000170177700030&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The "A-not-B" error is consistent with an old memory
             principle, Jost's Law. Quantitative properties of the effect
             can be explained by a dynamic model for habituation that is
             also consistent with Jost. Piaget was well aware of the
             resemblance between adult memory errors and the "A-not-B"
             effect and, contrary to their assertions. Thelen et al.'s
             analysis of the object concept is much the same as his,
             though couched in different language.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0140525X0150391X},
   Key = {fds288143}
}

@article{fds328633,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Editorial note},
   Journal = {Behavioural Processes},
   Volume = {52},
   Number = {2-3},
   Pages = {61},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00140-6},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00140-6},
   Key = {fds328633}
}

@article{fds288142,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Consciousness and theoretical behaviorism},
   Journal = {American Zoologist},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {874-882},
   Publisher = {Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0003-1569},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000168132000006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {SYNOPSIS. There are three domains of experience that concern
             students of behavior: Domain 1. The domain of felt
             experience, the phenomenological domain. Domain, 2. The
             domain of physiology, the real-time functioning of the
             brain. Domain 3. The domain of behavioral data,
             "intersubjectively verifiable" reports and judgments by
             experimental subjects. Consciousness has meanings in each of
             these domains. Domain 1 consciousness is beyond the reach of
             science as public knowledge. Empathy and plausible inference
             may tell us that our spouse, or our dog, is as conscious as
             we are. Science cannot. Research in Domains 2 and 3 permits
             us to infer similarities and differences between human and
             non-human psychology. Unfortunately, these will never permit
             us to know 'what it is like' to be another creature. An
             example from the study of motion perception illustrates the
             point that the fruitless attempt to answer this question can
             actually impede the objective study of behavioral processes
             we share with non-human animals.},
   Doi = {10.1093/icb/40.6.874},
   Key = {fds288142}
}

@article{fds288139,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Higa, JJ},
   Title = {The choose-short effect and trace models of
             timing.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {72},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {473-478},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000084038300018&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The tuned-trace multiple-time-scale (MTS) theory of timing
             can account both for the puzzling choose-short effect in
             time-discrimination experiments and for the complementary
             choose-long effect. But it cannot easily explain why the
             choose-short effect seems to disappear when the intertrial
             and recall intervals are signaled by different stimuli. Do
             differential stimuli actually abolish the effect, or merely
             improve memory? If the latter, there are ways in which an
             expanded MTS theory might explain differential-context
             effects in terms of reduced interference. If the former,
             there are observational and experimental ways to determine
             whether differential context favors prospective encoding or
             some other nontemporal discrimination.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1999.72-473},
   Key = {fds288139}
}

@article{fds288137,
   Author = {Talton, LE and Higa, JJ and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Interval schedule performance in the goldfish Carassius
             auratus.},
   Journal = {Behavioural processes},
   Volume = {45},
   Number = {1-3},
   Pages = {193-206},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0376-6357},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000079593700014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In experiment 1, five goldfish (Carassius auratus)
             paddle-pressed on fixed-interval (FI) and variable-interval
             (VI) schedules for food pellet reinforcement. The order of
             conditions was FI 60 s, FI 240 s, FI 30 s, FI 60 s, and VI
             60 s. FI responding showed a scalloped pattern and
             response-rate break points were proportional to interval
             duration. Post-food wait times varied with interval
             duration, but were not proportional. Response rate on VI was
             constant. Experiment 2 studied the properties of food
             reinforcement as a time marker. The same five fish were
             presented an FI 60 s schedule of reinforcement with 25% of
             intervals ending in non-reinforcement (N). The fish
             responded faster and paused less following the omission
             stimulus (omission effect) and response rate was flat or
             declined through post-N intervals.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0376-6357(99)00018-2},
   Key = {fds288137}
}

@article{fds288035,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Higa, JJ},
   Title = {Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval
             timing.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {71},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {215-251},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000079889500007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {A popular view of interval timing in animals is that it is
             driven by a discrete pacemaker-accumulator mechanism that
             yields a linear scale for encoded time. But these mechanisms
             are fundamentally at odds with the Weber law property of
             interval timing, and experiments that support linear encoded
             time can be interpreted in other ways. We argue that the
             dominant pacemaker-accumulator theory, scalar expectancy
             theory (SET), fails to explain some basic properties of
             operant behavior on interval-timing procedures and can only
             accommodate a number of discrepancies by modifications and
             elaborations that raise questions about the entire theory.
             We propose an alternative that is based on principles of
             memory dynamics derived from the multiple-time-scale (MTS)
             model of habituation. The MTS timing model can account for
             data from a wide variety of time-related experiments:
             proportional and Weber law temporal discrimination,
             transient as well as persistent effects of reinforcement
             omission and reinforcement magnitude, bisection, the
             discrimination of relative as well as absolute duration, and
             the choose-short effect and its analogue in
             number-discrimination experiments. Resemblances between
             timing and counting are an automatic consequence of the
             model. We also argue that the transient and persistent
             effects of drugs on time estimates can be interpreted as
             well within MTS theory as in SET. Recent real-time
             physiological data conform in surprising detail to the
             assumptions of the MTS habituation model. Comparisons
             between the two views suggest a number of novel
             experiments.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1999.71-215},
   Key = {fds288035}
}

@article{fds288140,
   Author = {Staddon, J and Higa, J and Chelaru, I},
   Title = {Time, trace, memory.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {71},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {293-301},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000079889500016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1999.71-293},
   Key = {fds288140}
}

@article{fds288009,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Animal rights.},
   Journal = {Science (New York, N.Y.)},
   Volume = {283},
   Number = {5400},
   Pages = {327},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0036-8075},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000078067000014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1126/science.283.5400.327d},
   Key = {fds288009}
}

@article{fds288141,
   Author = {Dragoi, V and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {The dynamics of operant conditioning.},
   Journal = {Psychological review},
   Volume = {106},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {20-61},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000079107200002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Existing models of operant learning are relatively
             insensitive to historical properties of behavior and
             applicable to only limited data sets. This article proposes
             a minimal set of principles based on short-term and
             long-term memory mechanisms that can explain the major
             static and dynamic properties of operant behavior in both
             single-choice and multiresponse situations. The critical
             features of the theory are as follows: (a) The key property
             of conditioning is assessment of the degree of association
             between responses and reinforcement and between stimuli and
             reinforcement; (b) the contingent reinforcement is
             represented by learning expectancy, which is the combined
             prediction of response-reinforcement and
             stimulus-reinforcement associations; (c) the operant
             response is controlled by the interplay between facilitatory
             and suppressive variables that integrate differences between
             expected (long-term) and experienced (short-term) events;
             and (d) very-long-term effects are encoded by a consolidated
             memory that is sensitive to the entire reinforcement
             history. The model predicts the major qualitative features
             of operant phenomena and then suggests an experimental test
             of theoretical predictions about the joint effects of
             reinforcement probability and amount of training on operant
             choice. We hypothesize that the set of elementary principles
             that we propose may help resolve the long-standing debate
             about the fundamental variables controlling operant
             conditioning.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.20},
   Key = {fds288141}
}

@article{fds328634,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {On responsibility in science and law},
   Journal = {Social Philosophy and Policy},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {146-174},
   Booktitle = {Responsibility},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {E.F. Paul and F.D. Miller and J. Paul},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265052500002429},
   Doi = {10.1017/s0265052500002429},
   Key = {fds328634}
}

@article{fds288036,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Higa, JJ},
   Title = {Time and memory: Towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval
             timing.},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {71},
   Pages = {293-301},
   Year = {1999},
   Abstract = {A popular view of interval timing in animals is that it is
             driven by a discrete pacemaker-accumulator (PA) mechanism
             that yields a linear scale for encoded time. But PA
             mechanisms are fundamentally at odds with the Weber-law
             property of interval timing and experiments supporting
             linear encoded time can be interpreted in other ways. We
             argue that the dominant PA theory, scalar expectancy theory
             (SET), fails to explain some basic properties of operant
             behavior on interval-timing procedures and can only
             accommodate a number of discrepancies by modifications and
             elaborations that raise questions about the entire theory.
             We propose an alternative that is based on principles of
             memory dynamics derived from the multiple-time-scale (MTS)
             model of habituation. The MTS timing model can account for
             data from a wide variety of time-related experiments:
             proportional and Weber-law temporal discrimination,
             transient as well as persistent effects of reinforcement
             omission and reinforcement magnitude, bisection, the
             discrimination of relative as well as absolute duration, the
             choose-short effect and its analogue in number-discrimination
             experiments. Resemblances between timing and counting are an
             automatic consequence of the model. We also argue that the
             transient and persistent effects of drugs on time estimates
             can be interpreted as well within MTS theory as in SET.
             Recent real-time physiological data conform in surprising
             detail to the assumptions of the MTS habituation model.
             Comparisons between the two views suggest a number of novel
             experiments.},
   Key = {fds288036}
}

@article{fds304745,
   Author = {Reid, AK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {A Dynamic Route Finder for the Cognitive
             Map},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {105},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {585-601},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000075015100007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Cognitive behaviorist E. C. Tolman (1932) proposed many
             years ago that rats and men navigate with the aid of
             cognitive maps, but his theory was incomplete. Critic E. R.
             Guthrie (1935) pointed out that Tolman's maps lack a rule
             for action, a route finder. We show that a dynamic model for
             stimulus generalization based on an elementary diffusion
             process can reproduce the qualitative properties of spatial
             orientation in animals: area-restricted search in the open
             field, finding shortcuts, barrier learning (the Umweg
             problem), spatial "insight" in mazes, and radial maze
             behavior. The model provides a behavioristic reader for
             Tolman's cognitive map.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.585},
   Key = {fds304745}
}

@article{fds288151,
   Author = {Reid, A and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {A dynamic route-finder for the cognitive
             map},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {105},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {385-601},
   Year = {1998},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000075015100007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1037//0033-295X.105.3.585},
   Key = {fds288151}
}

@article{fds325719,
   Author = {Higa, JJ and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Chapter 1 Dynamic models of rapid temporal control in
             animals},
   Journal = {Advances in Psychology},
   Volume = {120},
   Number = {C},
   Pages = {1-40},
   Publisher = {Elsevier},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80053-2},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80053-2},
   Key = {fds325719}
}

@article{fds288136,
   Author = {Gelenbe, E and Schmajuk, N and Staddon, J and Reif,
             J},
   Title = {Autonomous search by robots and animals: A
             survey},
   Journal = {Robotics and Autonomous Systems},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {23-34},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(97)00014-6},
   Abstract = {This paper is a survey of research on autonomous search
             strategies which originate in engineering and biology. Our
             motivation is to identify methods of search in an
             essentially two-dimensional Euclidean space, which can be
             applied to the area of demining. Such search strategies are
             based on spatio-temporal distributions. These distributions
             may be known in advance, because of prior intelligence or
             through the use of remote sensing, or they may be the result
             of on-line gathering of information as the search
             progresses, or of both. We first review the literature on
             search and coordination which emanates from the field of
             robotics, we then summarize significant research in the
             field of animal search, and also discuss relevant results in
             robotics which are inspired by animal behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0921-8890(97)00014-6},
   Key = {fds288136}
}

@article{fds287983,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Theory and behavior analysis: commentary on donahoe, palmer,
             and burgos.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {67},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {245-246},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1997WP06100014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1997.67-245},
   Key = {fds287983}
}

@article{fds288148,
   Author = {Manabe, K and Staddon, JER and Cleaveland, JM},
   Title = {Control of Vocal Repertoire by Reward in Budgerigars
             (Melopsittacus undulatus)},
   Journal = {Journal of Comparative Psychology},
   Volume = {111},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {50-62},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0735-7036},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1997WK57700005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The calls of some bird species may be modified by reward and
             punishment. However, the operant control of vocal
             topographies (i.e., the effect of reward or punishment on
             the physical dimensions of a vocal response) in such species
             has not been extensively explored. Using a computer-based,
             real-time system for rewarding vocalizations with food, the
             authors placed 3 budgerigars under a frequency-dependent
             reward schedule. During a session, the budgerigars received
             food for each vocalization that differed from the last N
             rewarded vocalizations. It was found that each of the
             budgerigars adapted their vocalizations to this procedure.
             When the value of N was 1 or 2, the birds "solved" the
             frequency-dependent schedule by developing N + 1 call types
             and used a simple "win stay, lose switch" sequencing
             strategy. At N = 3, 1 of the birds again produced N + 1
             (i.e., 4) call types, and another solved the criterion by
             markedly increasing call variability. New calls developed
             from the elements of old call types and using
             multidimensional scaling techniques, the authors traced the
             evolution of each new call type from the previous
             experimental call repertoire.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0735-7036.111.1.50},
   Key = {fds288148}
}

@article{fds288149,
   Author = {Reid, AK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {A reader for the Cognitive map},
   Journal = {Information Sciences},
   Volume = {100},
   Number = {1-4},
   Pages = {217-228},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0020-0255},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1997XA26700009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {A local diffusion model (Staddon and Reid, 1990) can
             reproduce exponential and Gaussian stimulus-generalization
             gradients. We show that a two-dimensional diffusion model,
             together with simple reinforcement assumptions, can
             reproduce many of the empirical properties of goal-directed
             spatial search, including area-restricted search, open-field
             foraging, barrier and detour problems, maze learning and
             spatial "insight." The model provides a simple,
             associationistic "reader" for Tolman's cognitive map. ©
             Elsevier Science Inc. 1997.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0020-0255(97)00042-X},
   Key = {fds288149}
}

@article{fds288150,
   Author = {Horner, JM and Staddon, JER and Lozano, KK},
   Title = {Integration of reinforcement effects over
             time},
   Journal = {Animal Learning and Behavior},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {84-98},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0090-4996},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1997WJ81400008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Two accounts of how density of reinforcement affects
             steady-state performance on probabilistic schedules were
             compared: the real-time linear operator (RTLO) model and a
             temporal control model (in which response strength is
             determined by reinforcement probability as a function of
             postreinforcement time). In Experiment 1, the probability of
             reinforcement repeatedly cycled between extinction and a
             random-ratio 10 schedule. Response-rate gain and phase did
             not change with period of the cycle as predicted by the RTLO
             model, nor did either model predict the differences in
             response rate following reinforcement at different points in
             the cycle. In Experiment 2, the probability of reinforcement
             was elevated immediately following a reinforcement but fell
             after a few seconds. Previous reinforcements had no effect
             upon responding. An extension of the temporal control model,
             the cumulative impulse model, allowed for the summing of
             response strength over successive reinforcements and was
             consistent with the data of both experiments.},
   Doi = {10.3758/BF03199027},
   Key = {fds288150}
}

@article{fds288003,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Zayan, R},
   Title = {Editorial.},
   Journal = {Behavioural processes},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {203},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0376-6357},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996VZ05900001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0376-6357(96)90001-7},
   Key = {fds288003}
}

@article{fds288132,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Higa, JJ},
   Title = {Multiple time scales in simple habituation.},
   Journal = {Psychological review},
   Volume = {103},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {720-733},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996VM90000005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Habituation is the waning of a reflex response to repeated
             stimulation. Habituation to closely spaced stimuli is faster
             and more complete than to widely spaced stimuli, but
             recovery is also more rapid (rate sensitivity). We show that
             a 2-unit, cascaded-integrator dynamic model can explain in
             detail an extensive data set on rate-sensitive habituation
             in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Many apparently
             complex properties of habituation and learning dynamics may
             reflect interactions among a small number of processes with
             different time scales.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.720},
   Key = {fds288132}
}

@article{fds288131,
   Author = {Wynne, CD and Staddon, JE and Delius, JD},
   Title = {Dynamics of waiting in pigeons.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {65},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {603-618},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996UK80700008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Two experiments used response-initiated delay schedules to
             test the idea that when food reinforcement is available at
             regular intervals, the time an animal waits before its first
             operant response (waiting time) is proportional to the
             immediately preceding interfood interval (linear waiting;
             Wynne & Staddon, 1988). In Experiment 1 the interfood
             intervals varied from cycle to cycle according to one of
             four sinusoidal sequences with different amounts of added
             noise. Waiting times tracked the input cycle in a way which
             showed that they were affected by interfood intervals
             earlier than the immediately preceding one. In Experiment 2
             different patterns of long and short interfood intervals
             were presented, and the results implied that waiting times
             are disproportionately influenced by the shortest of recent
             interfood intervals. A model based on this idea is shown to
             account for a wide range of results on the dynamics of
             timing behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1996.65-603},
   Key = {fds288131}
}

@article{fds288014,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The dynamics of memory in animal learning},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {5611-5611},
   Publisher = {PSYCHOLOGY PRESS},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0020-7594},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996VE85704206&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288014}
}

@article{fds288010,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {AAUP AND POLITICS},
   Journal = {ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP},
   Volume = {81},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {5-5},
   Publisher = {AMER ASSN UNIV PROFESSORS},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0190-2946},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1995TF77300010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288010}
}

@article{fds288128,
   Author = {Delius, JD and Ameling, M and Lea, SEG and Staddon,
             JER},
   Title = {Reinforcement Concordance Induces and Maintains Stimulus
             Associations in Pigeons},
   Journal = {The Psychological Record},
   Volume = {45},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {283-297},
   Publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0033-2933},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1995QV87100007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/bf03395933},
   Key = {fds288128}
}

@article{fds376688,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {On responsibility and punishment},
   Journal = {The Atlantic Mointhly},
   Volume = {1995, Feb.},
   Pages = {88-94},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {February},
   Key = {fds376688}
}

@article{fds340476,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {On Responsibility and Punishment},
   Volume = {1995, Feb.},
   Pages = {88-94},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {February},
   Abstract = {The litany of social dysfunction is now familiar. The rates
             of violent crime are higher than they have ever been:
             Americans kill and maim one another at per-capita rates an
             order of magnitude higher than other industrialized nations.
             The rate of marriage has been generally declining and the
             rate of illegitimacy hits new highs each year. Tens of
             thousands of children have no fathers and no family member
             or close acquaintance who has a regular job. This pattern is
             now repeat-ing into a second and third generation...},
   Key = {fds340476}
}

@article{fds340477,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {On Responsibility and Punishment},
   Publisher = {The Atlantic Monthly},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {February},
   Abstract = {The litany of social dysfunction is now familiar. The rates
             of violent crime are higher than they have ever been:
             Americans kill and maim one another at per-capita rates an
             order of magnitude higher than other industrialized nations.
             The rate of marriage has been generally declining and the
             rate of illegitimacy hits new highs each year. Tens of
             thousands of children have no fathers and no family member
             or close acquaintance who has a regular job. This pattern is
             now repeating into a second and third generation. Illiteracy
             is becoming a problem and schools have so lost authority
             that the accepted response to armed pupils is to install
             metal detectors. Senator Moynihan in a celebrated article
             recently pointed out how we cope with social disintegration
             by redefining deviancy, so that crimes become "normal"
             behavior...},
   Key = {fds340477}
}

@article{fds288127,
   Author = {Manabe, K and Kawashima, T and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Differential vocalization in budgerigars: towards an
             experimental analysis of naming.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {63},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {111-126},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1995QF47700007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In Experiment 1, 3 budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)
             were trained with food reinforcement to make low- or
             high-frequency calls in response to different color stimuli,
             C1 and C2 (a color-naming task), using a gradual
             response-differentiation procedure and an automatic
             call-recognition system. Thus, a call within a certain
             frequency band was reinforced in the presence of C1 ("C1
             call"), and a call within a different band was reinforced in
             the presence of C2 ("C2 call"). In Experiment 2, all 3
             budgerigars were trained in a form-to-color
             matching-to-sample task, alternating trial by trial with
             either the color-naming task (2 birds) or an identity color
             matching-to-sample task (1 bird). Sample stimuli for the new
             matching-to-sample task were forms (F1 or F2) and
             comparisons were the same two colors (C1 and C2). Given
             Sample F1 or F2, birds had to make a call to produce
             Comparison Pair C1 and C2. With F1 as the sample, a peck on
             C1 was reinforced; with F2 as the sample, a peck on C2 was
             reinforced. Although no particular call was specified in the
             presence of F1 and F2, 2 birds made the C1 call in the
             presence of F1 and the C2 call in the presence of F2. In
             Experiment 3, the bird that failed to match form and color
             calls in Experiment 2 and another bird were first trained in
             a color-to-form matching-to-sample task: C1 to F3 and C2 to
             F4. In this task, to produce the comparison pair of forms, a
             high call (or low for the other bird) was required in the
             presence of C1, and a low call (or high) was required in the
             presence of C2. Both birds were then trained with an
             identity matching-to-sample task in which sample and
             comparison stimuli were the same two forms, F3 and F4.
             Trials on the identity task alternated with the
             color-to-form trials. Although no particular call was
             required in the presence of Samples F3 and F4, both birds
             came to make the C1 call in the presence of F3 and the C2
             call in the presence of F4. Our technique promises to be
             useful for the study of emergent vocal relations in
             budgerigars and other animals.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1995.63-111},
   Key = {fds288127}
}

@article{fds288129,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Combinaciones de programas y elección: experimentos y
             teoria},
   Journal = {Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta},
   Volume = {21},
   Pages = {169-281},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds288129}
}

@article{fds288130,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Schedule combinations and choice: experiment and
             theory},
   Journal = {Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis},
   Volume = {21},
   Pages = {163-274},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds288130}
}

@article{fds288028,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Davis, DG and Machado, A and Palmer,
             RG},
   Title = {Cumulative effects model: a response to Williams
             (1994)},
   Journal = {Psychological review},
   Volume = {101},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {708-710},
   Publisher = {AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1994PM91500009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The cumulative effects (CE) model explains free-operant
             choice by the ratio of total numbers of responses and
             reinforcements, a probability-like variable. Williams (1994)
             argues that the model is vulnerable to experiments that
             disprove melioration, a local probability model. The authors
             note critical differences between the nonlocal CE model and
             local probability models that allow the CE model to handle
             some data with which they are incompatible. All models are
             simplifications of reality; hence, a model's failures are as
             revealing as its successes. Williams suggests that simple
             models may need to be abandoned in favor of a
             "representational" account. The authors point out that
             representations must be both acquired and acted on.
             Acquisition requires processing of responses and
             reinforcers; action requires decision rules. Models are
             simply testable suggestions for what these rules and
             processes might be.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.708},
   Key = {fds288028}
}

@article{fds288124,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {The conventional wisdom of behavior analysis.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {60},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {439-447},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993LX29300011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1993.60-439},
   Key = {fds288124}
}

@article{fds288125,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {The conventional wisdom of behavior analysis: Response to
             comments.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {60},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {489-494},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993LX29300022&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1993.60-489},
   Key = {fds288125}
}

@article{fds288126,
   Author = {Innis, NK and Mitchell, SK and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Temporal control on interval schedules: what determines the
             postreinforcement pause?},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {60},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {293-311},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993LX29300003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {On fixed-interval or response-initiated delay schedules of
             reinforcement, the average pause following food presentation
             is proportional to the interfood interval. Moreover, when a
             number of intervals of different durations occur in a
             programmed cyclic series, postreinforcement pauses track the
             changes in interval value. What controls the duration of
             postreinforcement pauses under these conditions? Staddon,
             Wynne, and Higa (1991), in their linear waiting model,
             propose control by the preceding interfood interval. Another
             possibility is that delay to reinforcement, signaled by a
             key peck and/or stimulus change, determines the subsequent
             pause. The experiments reported here examined the role of
             these two possible time markers by studying the performance
             of pigeons under a chained cyclic fixed-interval procedure.
             The data support the linear waiting model, but suggest that
             more than the immediately preceding interfood interval plays
             a role in temporal control.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1993.60-293},
   Key = {fds288126}
}

@article{fds288121,
   Author = {Higa, JJ and Thaw, JM and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Pigeons' wait-time responses to transitions in
             interfood-interval duration: Another look at cyclic schedule
             performance.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {59},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {529-541},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993LB40200007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Recent developments reveal that animals can rapidly learn
             about intervals of time. We studied the nature of this
             fast-acting process in two experiments. In Experiment 1
             pigeons were exposed to a modified fixed-time schedule, in
             which the time between food rewards (interfood interval)
             changed at an unpredictable point in each session, either
             decreasing from 15 to 5 s (step-down) or increasing from 15
             to 45 s (step-up). The birds were able to track under both
             conditions by producing postreinforcement wait times
             proportional to the preceding interfood-interval duration.
             However, the time course of responding differed: Tracking
             was apparently more gradual in the step-up condition.
             Experiment 2 studied the effect of having both kinds of
             transitions within the same session by exposing pigeons to a
             repeating (cyclic) sequence of the interfood-interval values
             used in Experiment 1. Pigeons detected changes in the input
             sequence of interfood intervals, but only for a few
             sessions-discrimination worsened with further training. The
             dynamic effects we observed do not support a linear waiting
             process of time discrimination, but instead point to a
             timing mechanism based on the frequency and recency of prior
             interfood intervals and not the preceding interfood interval
             alone.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1993.59-529},
   Key = {fds288121}
}

@article{fds288123,
   Author = {Davis, DG and Staddon, JE and Machado, A and Palmer,
             RG},
   Title = {The process of recurrent choice.},
   Journal = {Psychological review},
   Volume = {100},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {320-341},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8483986},
   Abstract = {Recurrent choice has been studied for many years. A static
             law, matching, has been established, but there is no
             consensus on the underlying dynamic process. The authors
             distinguish between dynamic models in which the model state
             is identified with directly measurable behavioral properties
             (performance models) and models in which the relation
             between behavior and state is indirect (state models). Most
             popular dynamic choice models are local, performance models.
             The authors show that behavior in different types of
             discrimination-reversal experiments and in extinction is not
             explained by 2 versions of a popular local model and that
             the nonlocal cumulative-effects model is consistent with
             matching and that it can duplicate the major properties of
             recurrent choice in a set of discrimination-reversal
             experiments. The model can also duplicate results from
             several other experiments on extinction after complex
             discrimination training.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.320},
   Key = {fds288123}
}

@article{fds288120,
   Author = {Higa, JJ and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {"Transitive inference" in multiple conditional
             discriminations.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {59},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {265-291},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993KQ28800002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {We used multiple conditional discriminations to study the
             inferential abilities of pigeons. Using a five-term stimulus
             series, pigeons were trained to respond differentially to
             four overlapping pairs of concurrently presented stimuli: A+
             B-, B+ C-, C+ D-, and D+ E-, where plus and minus indicate
             the stimulus associated with reinforcement and extinction,
             respectively. Transitive inference in such situations has
             been defined as a preference for Stimulus B over Stimulus D
             in a transfer test. We measured this and other untrained
             preferences (A vs. C, A vs. D, B vs. E, etc.) during
             nonreinforced test trials. In three experiments using a
             novel, rapid training procedure (termed autorun), we
             attempted to identify the necessary and sufficient
             conditions for transitive inference. We used two versions of
             autorun: response-based, in which the subject was repeatedly
             presented with the least well-discriminated stimulus pair;
             and time-based, in which the subject was repeatedly
             presented with the least-experienced stimulus pair. In
             Experiment 1, using response-based autorun, we showed that
             subjects learned the four stimulus pairs faster than, but at
             a level comparable to, a previous study on transitive
             inference in pigeons (Fersen, Wynne, Delius, & Staddon,
             1991), but our animals failed to show transitive inference.
             Experiments 2 and 3 compared time- and response-based
             autorun. Discrimination performance was maintained, but
             transitive inference was observed only on the second
             exposure to the response-based procedure. These results show
             that inferential behavior in pigeons is not a reliable
             concomitant of good performance on a series of overlapping
             discriminations. The necessary and sufficient conditions for
             transitive inference in pigeons remain to be fully
             defined.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1993.59-265},
   Key = {fds288120}
}

@article{fds288008,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Pepper with a pinch of psalt.},
   Journal = {The Behavior analyst},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {245-250},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0738-6729},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993MX35800014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/bf03392632},
   Key = {fds288008}
}

@article{fds288122,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {On rate-sensitive habituation},
   Journal = {Adaptive Behavior},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {421-436},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1993},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105971239300100402},
   Abstract = {The responses elicited by many stimuli diminish in strength
             with repeated stimulus presentation (habituation). This
             property is consistent with models in which short-term
             memory for recent stimuli suppresses the current response.
             Habituation also depends on stimulus spacing: It occurs more
             rapidly when interstimulus intervals (ISIs) are short than
             when they are long, but also recovers more rapidly after
             short ISIs (rate sensitivity). The effect of ISI on
             habituation rate is consistent with a simple one-stage
             process, but the effect of ISI on recovery rate seems to
             require a serial process in which two or more habituating
             units are cascaded, with earlier (peripheral) units in the
             series having shorter time constants than later (central)
             units. Rate-sensitive habituation may underlie puzzling
             effects of reinforcement learning such as the
             partial-reinforcement and successive-contrast effects. ©
             1993, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1177/105971239300100402},
   Key = {fds288122}
}

@article{fds288118,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {The 'superstition' experiment: a reversible
             figure.},
   Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. General},
   Volume = {121},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {270-272},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0096-3445},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1992JK13600003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1037//0096-3445.121.3.270},
   Key = {fds288118}
}

@article{fds288119,
   Author = {Wynne, CD and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Waiting in pigeons: the effects of daily intercalation on
             temporal discrimination.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {58},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {47-66},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1992JE41800005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons trained on cyclic-interval schedules adjust their
             postfood pause from interval to interval within each
             experimental session. But on regular fixed-interval
             schedules, many sessions at a given parameter value are
             usually necessary before the typical fixed-interval
             "scallop" appears. In the first case, temporal control
             appears to act from one interfood interval to the next; in
             the second, it appears to act over hundreds of interfood
             intervals. The present experiments look at the intermediate
             case: daily variation in schedule parameters. In Experiments
             1 and 2 we show that pauses proportional to interfood
             interval develop on short-valued response-initiated-delay
             schedules when parameters are changed daily, that additional
             experience under this regimen leads to little further
             improvement, and that pauses usually change as soon as the
             schedule parameter is changed. Experiment 3 demonstrates
             identical waiting behavior on fixed-interval and
             response-initiated-delay schedules when the food delays are
             short (less than 20 s) and conditions are changed daily. In
             Experiment 4 we show that daily intercalation prevents
             temporal control when interfood intervals are longer (25 to
             60 s). The results of Experiment 5 suggest that downshifts
             in interfood interval produce more rapid waiting-time
             adjustments than upshifts. These and other results suggest
             that the effects of short interfood intervals seem to be
             more persistent than those of long intervals.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1992.58-47},
   Key = {fds288119}
}

@article{fds287982,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {BEHAVIORISM - EDSEL, OR CAR OF THE FUTURE},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {519-519},
   Publisher = {PSYCHOLOGY PRESS},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0020-7594},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1992JF42002767&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287982}
}

@article{fds288024,
   Author = {Wynne, CDL and von Fersen, L and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Pigeons' Inferences Are Transitive and the Outcome of
             Elementary Conditioning Principles: A Response},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior
             Processes},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {313-315},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0097-7403},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1992HZ49300012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Contrary to Markovits and Dumas (1992), this article
             maintains that, although semantically questionable, the
             transitive-inference performance in pigeons demonstrated by
             Fersen, Wynne, Delius, and Staddon (1991) was impeccably
             transitive. Fersen et al. proposed a local rule to account
             for performance. Couvillon and Bitterman (1992) provided a
             rationale for such a rule by pointing out that the equally
             reinforced central stimuli, B, C, and D, are unequally
             unreinforced. This article shows that many models that
             recognize an effect of nonreinforcement on stimulus value
             give similar results. Therefore, Couvillon and Bitterman's
             argument that nothing beyond conventional conditioning
             principles is necessary to account for the
             transitive-inference effect in pigeons is
             supported.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0097-7403.18.3.313},
   Key = {fds288024}
}

@article{fds288116,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Rationality, Melioration, and Law-of-Effect Models for
             Choice},
   Journal = {Psychological Science},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {136-141},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0956-7976},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1992HL76700015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Economists usually assume that human choice behavior is
             rational, by which they mean that it maximizes some utility
             function. Psychologists are more impressed by the evident
             irrationality of behavior and tend to look for choice
             mechanisms (which cannot act rationally under alt
             conditions). Richard Herrnstein (1990 a) has recently argued
             that the choices of pigeons and people are dynamically
             driven by a moment-by-moment tendency to equalize payoff per
             unit of activity invested, a mechanism he terms melioration.
             I argue that economic models are not so bad, and melioration
             is not so good, as Herrnstein contends. The problem with
             rational choice is not that it is wrong but that it is too
             flexible. The problems with melioration are that it is
             poorly defined and refers only to events in the recent past
             (local events). © 1992, Association for Psychological
             Science. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00013.x},
   Key = {fds288116}
}

@article{fds288117,
   Author = {Kohn, A and Kohn, WK and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Preferences for constant duration delays and constant sized
             rewards in human subjects.},
   Journal = {Behavioural processes},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {2-3},
   Pages = {125-142},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0376-6357},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1992HP85400007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In four experiments, human subjects played a simple video
             game in which they chose between two buttons that provided
             reinforcement either on constant or variable schedules. In
             one condition of Experiment 1, subjects strongly preferred
             constant sized rewards over variable sized rewards. In the
             two other conditions, subjects preferred constant duration
             delays-to-reinforcement over variable duration
             delays-to-reinforcement. In Experiment 2, subjects were
             exposed to different parameters and, in Experiment 3, they
             were exposed to a modified temporal procedure. In each case,
             subjects continued to prefer constant sized rewards and
             constant duration delays. The preference for constant
             duration delays contradicts analogous research showing that
             pigeons and rats prefer variable duration delays over
             constant duration delays. In Experiment 4, we explored this
             difference by omitting the prompts that segmented the phases
             of the procedure. Under these conditions, the subjects
             preferred the variable duration delays. Based on these
             results, we argue that in the absence of effective signals,
             both people and animals may be forced to use secondary
             choice strategies such as a proportional waiting rule. The
             presence of prompts, however, enables people to segment the
             choice phase and directly choose between the fixed and
             variable duration delays.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0376-6357(92)90008-2},
   Key = {fds288117}
}

@article{fds325721,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Zayan, R},
   Title = {Editorial},
   Journal = {Behavioural Processes},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {2-3},
   Pages = {63},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(92)90001-T},
   Doi = {10.1016/0376-6357(92)90001-T},
   Key = {fds325721}
}

@article{fds288000,
   Author = {WYNNE, CDL and STADDON, JER},
   Title = {INTRASESSION DYNAMICS OF WAITING IN PIGEONS},
   Journal = {BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {487-487},
   Publisher = {PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0090-5054},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1991GL11500161&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288000}
}

@article{fds288115,
   Author = {Higa, JJ and Wynne, CD and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Dynamics of time discrimination.},
   Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior
             processes},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {281-291},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0097-7403},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1991FV32900006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons tracked sinusoidal sequences of interfood intervals
             (IFIs) by pausing in each interval for a time proportional
             to the preceding interval. Schedules with either long (30-90
             s) or short (5-15 s) values, with variable numbers of cycles
             and starting phase each day, were tracked about equally
             well. Tracking was apparently immediate and did not improve
             across sessions. Experiment 2, in which long and short
             series were presented on alternate days, showed that
             tracking on long was more impaired than on short. Experiment
             3 showed that occasional presentation of a short IFI in a
             series of fixed, longer IFIs caused a reduction in waiting
             time in the next IFI. These effects are evidence for a
             fast-acting timing mechanism in which waiting time in the
             IFI N + 1 is strongly determined by the preceding IFI, N.
             Earlier IFIs have some cumulative effect, but the details
             remain to be elucidated.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0097-7403.17.3.281},
   Key = {fds288115}
}

@article{fds287992,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Selective Choice: A Commentary on Herrnstein
             (1990)},
   Journal = {American Psychologist},
   Volume = {46},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {793-797},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0003-066X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1991FV82300012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1037/0003-066X.46.7.793},
   Key = {fds287992}
}

@article{fds288001,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Higa, JJ},
   Title = {Temporal Learning},
   Journal = {Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research
             and Theory},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {C},
   Pages = {265-294},
   Booktitle = {The Psychology of Learning and Motivation},
   Publisher = {Elsevier},
   Editor = {G. Bower},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0079-7421},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1991GW09800007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {This chapter discusses the history of the problem of
             temporal learning. There is also a discussion about the work
             in progress on it that is intended to : (1)describe a set of
             rather elegant experimental data that are probably novel to
             most psychologists and cognitive scientists, (2) show how
             dynamic modeling helps to appreciate the remarkable
             complexity of what has often been presented either as a
             “given” needing no further analysis or as an essentially
             static problem suitable mainly for psychophysical treatment,
             and (3) describe a particular real-time model for temporal
             learning, the diffusion-generalization model. It describes a
             phenomena, pigeons adaptation to different kinds of cyclic
             schedules of reinforcement were originally studied 20 or
             more years ago with the aid of primitive technology that
             made anything but aggregate measurements difficult and
             error-prone. Some sequential data were obtained and they
             were remarkably orderly, although very hard to explain.
             Theorizing, which is never easy, was also harder then than
             it is at present because computers, those lifesavers for the
             mathematically impaired, were slow and difficult to use-and
             the behavioristic temper of the times was implacably hostile
             to modeling of any sort. © 1991, Elsevier Inc. All rights
             reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60126-7},
   Key = {fds288001}
}

@article{fds288112,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Wynne, CDL and Higa, JJ},
   Title = {The role of timing in reinforcement schedule
             performance},
   Journal = {Learning and Motivation},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {200-225},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0023-9690},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1991EX02600010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Reinforcement schedules produce distinctive and reliable
             temporal patterns of behavior. Temporal discrimination is
             known to be an important ingredient in these patterns. We
             sketch a simple dynamic model for the discrimination of
             short time intervals, linear waiting, in terms of four
             assumptions: that the time before the onset of the
             reinforced response, waiting time, is determined by the food
             delay in the just-preceding interfood interval; that waiting
             is triggered by the most recent time marker; that different
             delays signaled by the same time marker are averaged; and
             that the effectiveness of a given stimulus as a time marker
             is limited by memory constraints. We show that recursive
             application of linear waiting can generate contiguity
             learning and many molecular patterns of behavior on interval
             schedules, such as the fixed-interval "scallop" and
             interresponse times on variable-interval schedules, as well
             as molar properties such as the hyperbolic relation between
             response and reinforcement rates on variable-interval
             schedules. Linear waiting also implies the high response
             rates on ratio schedules and their instability. Linear
             waiting does not seem able to account for differences in
             response rates between ratio and interval schedules equated
             for reinforcement rate, molar response functions on ratio
             schedules, and some features of responding on cyclic
             schedules. These failures highlight our limited
             understanding of the role of memory in timing and hint at
             additional mechanisms. © 1991.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0023-9690(91)90023-2},
   Key = {fds288112}
}

@article{fds288113,
   Author = {von Fersen, L and Wynne, CDL and Delius, JD and Staddon,
             JER},
   Title = {Transitive Inference Formation in Pigeons},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior
             Processes},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {334-341},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0097-7403},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1991FV32900011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were trained with 4 pairs of visual stimuli in a
             5-term series- A+ B-, B+ C-, C+ D-, and D+ E- (in which plus
             [+] denotes reward and minus [-] denotes nonreward)-before
             the unreinforced test pair B D was presented. All pigeons
             chose Item B, demonstrating inferential choice. A novel
             theory (value transfer theory), based on reinforcement
             mechanisms, is proposed. In Experiment 2, the series was
             extended to 7 terms. Performance on test pairs was
             transitive, and performance on training pairs accorded with
             the theory. The 7-term series was closed in Experiment 3 by
             training the first and last items together. In accordance
             with the theory, the Ss could not solve the circular series.
             The authors suggest that primates, including humans, also
             solve these problems using the value transfer mechanism,
             without resorting to the symbolic processes usually
             assumed.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0097-7403.17.3.334},
   Key = {fds288113}
}

@article{fds288114,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Bueno, JLO},
   Title = {ON MODELS, BEHAVIORISM AND THE NEURAL BASIS OF
             LEARNING},
   Journal = {Psychological Science},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {3-11},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0956-7976},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1991EW99700002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The history of psychology is full of disputes among various
             “‐isms”: behaviorism, cognitivism. functionalism, and
             many others. Nevertheless, all are unanimous in their
             opposition to one other ‐ism: reductionism. From Skinner
             to Simon, there is tacit agreement that behavior (or mind)
             is a subject matter in its own right that need not, perhaps
             cannot, be “reduced to” neurophysiology. This consensus
             has begun to crack in recent decades, with advances in
             neurobiology and the growth of understanding of the
             properties of brainlike theoretical systems. What. then, is
             the status of the study of behavior in its own right? This
             paper proposes a framework in which realtime theoretical
             models provide the link between behavioral research and the
             structure and function of the nervous system. We argue that
             such models arise most naturally from studies at the
             behavioral level, especially when the behavior under study
             depends on context and remote past history, as in learning
             and memory. We conclude that Skinner was probably right to
             argue that behavior must he understood in its own right
             before we can expect to understand brain‐behavior
             relations. But he was wrong in limiting behavioral science
             to descriptive laws and catalogs of input‐output
             relationships. Copyright © 1991, Wiley Blackwell. All
             rights reserved},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00086.x},
   Key = {fds288114}
}

@article{fds288111,
   Author = {von Fersen, L and Wynne, CD and Delius, JD and Staddon,
             JE},
   Title = {Deductive reasoning in pigeons.},
   Journal = {Die Naturwissenschaften},
   Volume = {77},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {548-549},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0028-1042},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1990EL14400011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/bf01139271},
   Key = {fds288111}
}

@article{fds288110,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Reid, AK},
   Title = {On the dynamics of generalization.},
   Journal = {Psychological review},
   Volume = {97},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {576-578},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1990ED24100007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.576},
   Key = {fds288110}
}

@article{fds288109,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Zhang, Y},
   Title = {Response selection in operant learning.},
   Journal = {Behavioural processes},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {1-3},
   Pages = {189-197},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0376-6357},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1989CV07400015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {We show that simple, contiguity-based, nonassociative
             response-selection process provides a qualitative account
             for both anomalous and nonanomalous properties of operant
             conditioning. The process can easily be extended to permit
             associative effects; it may therefore represent the initial
             processing stage for all conditioning in higher
             vertebrates.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0376-6357(89)90022-3},
   Key = {fds288109}
}

@article{fds287974,
   Author = {STADDON, JER and DAVIS, DG},
   Title = {LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM-MEMORY IN DISCRIMINATION-REVERSAL
             PERFORMANCE},
   Journal = {BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {509-509},
   Publisher = {PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0090-5054},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1989AV54900241&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287974}
}

@article{fds287977,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSES OF BEHAVIOR - FORAGING, VOL 6 -
             COMMONS,ML, KACELNIK,A, SHETTLEWORTH,SJ},
   Journal = {CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {682-683},
   Publisher = {AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0010-7549},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1989AC49200051&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287977}
}

@article{fds288107,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Horner, JM},
   Title = {Stochastic choice models: A comparison between
             Bush-Mosteller and a source-independent reward-following
             model.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {52},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {57-64},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1989AH69700006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Horner and Staddon (1987) argued that a class of
             reward-following processes defined by a property they termed
             ratio invariance is a better model for the probabilistic
             choice performance of pigeons than competing molecular
             accounts such as momentary maximizing, melioration, and the
             Bush-Mosteller model. The critical data were provided by
             choice distributions-distributions of a variable S, the
             proportion of Right choices, defined on a moving window
             typically 32 choices long-obtained under a
             frequency-dependent schedule. The schedule prescribed equal
             payoff probabilities, p(S), for both choices. p(S) was a
             maximum when S = 0.5 and declined linearly for S values
             above and below 0.5. Pigeons showed generally bimodal choice
             distributions with the modes at equal p(S) values. These
             data do not follow easily from melioration or momentary
             maximizing and are inconsistent with molar maximizing, but
             they may be consistent with Bush-Mosteller. We present here
             the results of computer simulations showing that the
             ratio-invariance model studied yields, as expected, choice
             modes at equal p(S) values, but that Bush-Mosteller,
             although capable of generating bimodal choice distributions,
             does not have choice modes at equal p(S)
             values.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1989.52-57},
   Key = {fds288107}
}

@article{fds288108,
   Author = {Innis, NK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {What should comparative psychology compare?},
   Journal = {International Journal of Comparative Psychology},
   Volume = {2},
   Pages = {145-156},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds288108}
}

@article{fds287967,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {A RECURSIVE THEORY FOR PERFORMANCE ON REINFORCEMENT
             SCHEDULES},
   Journal = {BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {497-497},
   Publisher = {PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0090-5054},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1988Q329700145&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287967}
}

@article{fds288105,
   Author = {Wynne, CD and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Typical delay determines waiting time on periodic-food
             schedules: Static and dynamic tests.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {197-210},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1988Q421700007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons and other animals soon learn to wait (pause) after
             food delivery on periodic-food schedules before resuming the
             food-rewarded response. Under most conditions the
             steady-state duration of the average waiting time, t, is a
             linear function of the typical interfood interval. We
             describe three experiments designed to explore the limits of
             this process. In all experiments, t was associated with one
             key color and the subsequent food delay, T, with another. In
             the first experiment, we compared the relation between t
             (waiting time) and T (food delay) under two conditions: when
             T was held constant, and when T was an inverse function of
             t. The pigeons could maximize the rate of food delivery
             under the first condition by setting t to a consistently
             short value; optimal behavior under the second condition
             required a linear relation with unit slope between t and T.
             Despite this difference in optimal policy, the pigeons in
             both cases showed the same linear relation, with slope less
             than one, between t and T. This result was confirmed in a
             second parametric experiment that added a third condition,
             in which T + t was held constant. Linear waiting appears to
             be an obligatory rule for pigeons. In a third experiment we
             arranged for a multiplicative relation between t and T
             (positive feedback), and produced either very short or very
             long waiting times as predicted by a quasi-dynamic model in
             which waiting time is strongly determined by the
             just-preceding food delay.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1988.50-197},
   Key = {fds288105}
}

@article{fds288025,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {The functional properties of feeding, or why we still need
             the black box.},
   Journal = {Appetite},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {54-61},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0195-6663},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1988P957000007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0195-6663(88)80023-0},
   Key = {fds288025}
}

@article{fds288104,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Quasi-dynamic choice models: Melioration and ratio
             invariance.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {49},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {303-320},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1988M576800010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {There is continuing controversy about the behavioral process
             or processes that underlie the major regularities of
             free-operant choice such as molar matching and systematic
             deviations therefrom. A recent interchange between Vaughan
             and Silberberg and Ziriax concerned the relative merits of
             melioration, and a computer simulation of molecular
             maximizing. There are difficulties in evaluating theories
             expressed as computer programs because many arbitrary
             decisions must often be made in order to get the programs to
             operate. I therefore propose an alternative form of model
             that I term quasi-dynamic as a useful intermediate form of
             theory appropriate to our current state of knowledge about
             free-operant choice. Quasi-dynamic models resemble the
             game-theoretic analyses now commonplace in biology in that
             they can predict stable and unstable equilibria but not
             dynamic properties such as learning curves. It is possible
             to interpret melioration as a quasi-dynamic model. An
             alternative quasi-dynamic model for probabilistic choice,
             ratio invariance, has been proposed by Horner and Staddon.
             The present paper compares the predictions of melioration
             and ratio invariance for five experimental situations:
             concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules,
             concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules, the
             two-armed bandit (concurrent random-ratio schedules), and
             two types of frequency-dependent schedule. Neither approach
             easily explains all the data, but ratio invariance seems to
             provide a better picture of pigeons' response to
             probabilistic choice procedures. Ratio invariance is also
             more adaptive (less susceptible to "traps") and closer to
             the original expression of the law of effect than pure
             hill-climbing processes such as momentary maximizing and
             melioration, although such processes may come in to play on
             more complex procedures that provide opportunities for
             temporal discrimination.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1988.49-303},
   Key = {fds288104}
}

@article{fds288106,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {On the process of reinforcement},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {467-469},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1988Q445200050&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0140525X00058507},
   Key = {fds288106}
}

@article{fds41378,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Trial-and-error learning as a scheduling
             problem},
   Journal = {Proceedings of the Fourth Annual AAAIC Conference},
   Volume = {2},
   Pages = {295-303},
   Year = {1988},
   Key = {fds41378}
}

@article{fds287971,
   Author = {WYNNE, CL and STADDON, JER},
   Title = {LINEAR WAITING - A SIMPLE RULE FOR BEHAVIOR IN PERIODIC FOOD
             SITUATIONS},
   Journal = {BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {351-351},
   Publisher = {PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0090-5054},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1987J947100336&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287971}
}

@article{fds288102,
   Author = {Reid, AK and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Within-session meal-size effects on induced
             drinking.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {289-301},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1987K295200008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {As a control for the effects of session duration and hunger
             on the relation between food magnitude and induced drinking,
             four food-deprived rats were exposed to a variable-time 50-s
             schedule of food delivery in which the size of each food
             delivery varied randomly within sessions. Food-related
             behavior and schedule-induced drinking per opportunity were
             examined as functions of meal size and postfood time. All
             rats showed an inverted-U-shaped relation between drinking
             per opportunity and meal size. This relation was caused by
             variation in the percentage of intervals that contained
             drinking and by variation in the number of drinking bouts
             per interval, rather than by bout duration or by the amount
             of drinking within those intervals that actually contained
             drinking. Head-in-feeder time increased linearly with meal
             size. Schedule-induced drinking was entrained by food
             delivery in 3 of 4 subjects; the entrainment was due to
             regulation of the starting time of each drinking bout rather
             than to regulation of bout duration.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1987.48-289},
   Key = {fds288102}
}

@article{fds288101,
   Author = {Horner, JM and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Probabilistic choice: A simple invariance.},
   Journal = {Behavioural processes},
   Volume = {15},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {59-92},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0376-6357},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1987J787900006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {When subjects must choose repeatedly between two or more
             alternatives, each of which dispenses reward on a
             probabilistic basis (two-armed bandit ), their behavior is
             guided by the two possible outcomes, reward and nonreward.
             The simplest stochastic choice rule is that the probability
             of choosing an alternative increases following a reward and
             decreases following a nonreward (reward following ). We show
             experimentally and theoretically that animal subjects behave
             as if the absolute magnitudes of the changes in choice
             probability caused by reward and nonreward do not depend on
             the response which produced the reward or nonreward (source
             independence ), and that the effects of reward and nonreward
             are in constant ratio under fixed conditions (effect-ratio
             invariance )--properties that fit the definition of
             satisficing . Our experimental results are either not
             predicted by, or are inconsistent with, other theories of
             free-operant choice such as Bush-Mosteller, molar
             maximization, momentary maximizing, and melioration
             (matching).},
   Doi = {10.1016/0376-6357(87)90034-9},
   Key = {fds288101}
}

@article{fds288019,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {VEHICLES - BRAITENBERG,V},
   Journal = {BEHAVIORISM},
   Volume = {15},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {63-66},
   Publisher = {CAMBRIDGE CTR BEHAV STUDIES},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0090-4155},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1987H571300007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288019}
}

@article{fds288100,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Science and pseudoscience},
   Journal = {Interdisciplinary Science Reviews},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {114-116},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0308-0188},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1987H822200005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1179/isr.1987.12.2.114},
   Key = {fds288100}
}

@article{fds288103,
   Author = {Ettinger, RH and Reid, AK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Sensitivity to Molar Feedback Functions: A Test of Molar
             Optimality Theory},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior
             Processes},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {366-375},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0097-7403},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1987K244900004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Molar optimality models assume that any reward schedule can
             be described by a molar feedback function, which is the
             relation between average response rates and average
             reinforcement rates enforced by that particular schedule.
             This molar feedback function is considered, by optimality
             models, to be a sufficient description of the schedule for
             the prediction of steady-state molar performance. In this
             article we challenge the fundamental assumption of all molar
             optimality models-that animals are directly sensitive to
             this molar feedback function. We found that animals were
             sensitive to the schedule conditions in effect, especially
             at the molecular level of postfood time, but they were not
             directly sensitive to the slopes of any of the molar
             feedback functions that we manipulated. Our data do not
             simply represent a failure to maximize a particular utility
             function so that this form of the function requires
             alteration. Rather, they demonstrate that animals may not be
             sensitive to the molar rates of responding and reinforcement
             described by the molar feedback functions. Our animals were
             sensitive to the schedules at a molecular level, and it is
             to this molecular level that we should direct our attention.
             © 1987 American Psychological Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0097-7403.13.4.366},
   Key = {fds288103}
}

@article{fds287985,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {EQUALIZATION, MAXIMIZATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF REWARD
             SCHEDULES},
   Journal = {REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {367-386},
   Publisher = {REV LATINOAMER PSICOL},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0034-978X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1986F188600002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287985}
}

@article{fds287998,
   Author = {Ettinger, RH and Thompson, S and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Cholecystokinin, diet palatability, and feeding regulation
             in rats.},
   Journal = {Physiology & behavior},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {801-809},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0031-9384},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1986A675200002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Rats ate less food than normal on cyclic-ratio schedules
             following cholecystokinin and lithium chloride injections.
             Nevertheless, they defended this lower eating rate in the
             same way as under control conditions. The pattern of effects
             produced by cholecystokinin and lithium chloride resembled
             those following diet adulteration with citric acid and
             sucrose octa acetate and differed from the effects produced
             by increases in body weight. Cholecystokinin and lithium
             chloride injections also produced similar changes in the
             free-feeding patterns of non-deprived rats: Both meal size
             and intermeal intervals decreased in manner similar to the
             effects of citric acid and sucrose octa acetate
             adulteration. Interpreted in terms of a static regulatory
             model, these results suggest that cholecystokinin and
             lithium chloride suppress feeding by degrading the
             palatability of food, not by promoting satiety, discomfort,
             or illness.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0031-9384(86)90435-x},
   Key = {fds287998}
}

@article{fds288098,
   Author = {Ettinger, RH and Thompson, S and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Cholecystokinin, lithium chloride, and feeding regulation in
             rats},
   Journal = {Physiology and Behavior},
   Volume = {36},
   Pages = {801-809},
   Year = {1986},
   Key = {fds288098}
}

@article{fds288099,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Igualación, maximización y seguimiento de la
             recompensa},
   Journal = {Revista Latinamericana Psicologia},
   Volume = {18},
   Pages = {367-386},
   Year = {1986},
   Key = {fds288099}
}

@article{fds287972,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Behavioral Economics: A Partial View},
   Journal = {Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {465-466},
   Publisher = {Portico},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0010-7549},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1985AKV6200022&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1037/023846},
   Key = {fds287972}
}

@article{fds288013,
   Author = {HORNER, JM and STADDON, JER},
   Title = {CHOICE ON PROBABILISTIC SCHEDULES - A REWARD-FOLLOWING
             ANALYSIS},
   Journal = {BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {304-304},
   Publisher = {PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0090-5054},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1985ASX7400369&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288013}
}

@article{fds287978,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Reinforcement is the problem, not the solution: Variation
             and selection of behavior},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {697-699},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1984ACF9400152&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1017/s0140525x00028235},
   Key = {fds287978}
}

@article{fds288021,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Skinner's behaviorism implies a subcutaneous
             homunculus},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {647-647},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1984ACF9400118&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1017/s0140525x00027898},
   Key = {fds288021}
}

@article{fds287969,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {STATIC AND DYNAMIC COMPETITION},
   Journal = {BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {98-99},
   Publisher = {ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0376-6357},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1984SH79600021&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287969}
}

@article{fds288095,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Time and memory.},
   Journal = {Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences},
   Volume = {423},
   Number = {MAY},
   Pages = {322-334},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0077-8923},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1984SY97900030&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Standard animal memory tasks require judgments of event
             recency: Delayed matching to sample (DMTS) requires that the
             animal identify the stimulus seen most recently;
             radial-maze-type (RM) tasks require that the animal identify
             the place visited least recently. Delayed-reaction tasks are
             intermediate. I argue that time discrimination (temporal
             control) and event memory call on the same processes:
             Proactive and retroactive effects occur in both, brief
             events have less effect than protracted events, and
             increases in event duration have smaller and smaller
             effects. If the "ages" of past events are represented by
             animals in a way consistent with Weber's and Jost's laws,
             and if there is a limit to the number of different recencies
             that can be discriminated, then the major differences
             between these three types of memory task can be explained.
             DMTS performance is poor because the animal must
             discriminate between two sets of recencies (memory arrays)
             that differ only in respect of the most recent event; RM
             performance is good because the recencies of places visited
             on the current versus earlier trials are always clearly
             discriminable.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23441.x},
   Key = {fds288095}
}

@article{fds288097,
   Author = {Gendron, RP and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {A laboratory simulation of foraging behavior: the effect of
             search rate on the probability of detecting
             prey.},
   Journal = {American Naturalist},
   Volume = {124},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {407-415},
   Publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0003-0147},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1984TK71300007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Human subjects searched for a target character ("prey')
             among an array of background characters displayed on the
             screen of a small computer. The search rate was controlled
             by changing the display duration while prey crypticity was
             varied by changing the background. The results of these
             experiments provide support for a model we previously
             developed to elucidate the behavior of predators searching
             for cryptic prey. -from Authors},
   Doi = {10.1086/284281},
   Key = {fds288097}
}

@article{fds328635,
   Author = {Thinés, G and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Editorial.},
   Journal = {Behavioural processes},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(84)90002-0},
   Doi = {10.1016/0376-6357(84)90002-0},
   Key = {fds328635}
}

@article{fds288016,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {ITS ALL A GAME},
   Journal = {BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {116-117},
   Publisher = {CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS},
   Year = {1984},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1984SK80900061&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0140525X00026480},
   Key = {fds288016}
}

@article{fds288096,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Social learning theory and the dynamics of
             interaction.},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {91},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {502-507},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1984},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1984TM30900007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The recent controversy between A. Bandura (see record
             1983-22326-001) and D. C. Phillips and R. Orton (see record
             1983-22341-001) about the causal relations involved in
             social interactions prompted a discussion of the proper role
             for formal models in the analysis of social interactions.
             The present author argues that (a) Bandura's attempt at
             formal modeling of patterns of causation is vague and
             misleading; (b) internal variables, such as expectation and
             self-monitoring, can easily be handled by formal models; (c)
             simple deterministic models can behave in unexpectedly
             complex ways and cannot be ruled out in principle as
             explanations for social interaction; and (d) unaided verbal
             reasoning cannot hope to come to grips with the dynamics of
             even simple interacting systems. (7 ref) (PsycINFO Database
             Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).},
   Doi = {10.1037//0033-295x.91.4.502},
   Key = {fds288096}
}

@article{fds288091,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Gendron, RP},
   Title = {Optimal Detection of Cryptic Prey May Lead to Predator
             Switching},
   Journal = {The American Naturalist},
   Volume = {122},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {843-848},
   Publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0003-0147},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983RS58900013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1086/284179},
   Key = {fds288091}
}

@article{fds288088,
   Author = {Hinson, JM and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Matching, maximizing, and hill-climbing.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {321-331},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983RR16100011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In simple situations, animals consistently choose the better
             of two alternatives. On concurrent variable-interval
             variable-interval and variable-interval variable-ratio
             schedules, they approximately match aggregate choice and
             reinforcement ratios. The matching law attempts to explain
             the latter result but does not address the former.
             Hill-climbing rules such as momentary maximizing can account
             for both. We show that momentary maximizing constrains molar
             choice to approximate matching; that molar choice covaries
             with pigeons' momentary-maximizing estimate; and that the
             "generalized matching law" follows from almost any
             hill-climbing rule.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1983.40-321},
   Key = {fds288088}
}

@article{fds288005,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Alexander, RM},
   Title = {Optima for Animals},
   Journal = {BioScience},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {522-522},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0006-3568},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983RE10600016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.2307/1309154},
   Key = {fds288005}
}

@article{fds288092,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Hinson, JM},
   Title = {Optimization: a result or a mechanism?},
   Journal = {Science (New York, N.Y.)},
   Volume = {221},
   Number = {4614},
   Pages = {976-977},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0036-8075},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983RE06400037&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1126/science.6879199},
   Key = {fds288092}
}

@article{fds288089,
   Author = {Ettinger, RH and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Operant regulation of feeding: a static analysis.},
   Journal = {Behavioral neuroscience},
   Volume = {97},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {639-653},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0735-7044},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983RC65500013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Cyclic-ratio schedules are a rapid method for studying the
             operant regulation of feeding rate. The cyclic method
             produces results comparable to traditional but
             time-consuming parametric methods. Performance on
             cyclic-ratio schedules is well described by a linear
             regulatory model that embodies three quantitative feedback
             assumptions: (a) that rate of feeding is regulated by the
             rate of operant behavior, (b) that taste factors have an
             additive effect on the rate of the operant response, and (c)
             that regulatory "gain" is inversely related to body weight.
             This model accurately describes poorer regulatory
             performance at high body weights and following amphetamine
             administration, and the effects of altered diet palatability
             on preferred feeding rates.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0735-7044.97.4.639},
   Key = {fds288089}
}

@article{fds288093,
   Author = {Innis, NK and Simmelhag-Grant, VL and Staddon,
             JE},
   Title = {Behavior induced by periodic food delivery: The effects of
             interfood interval.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {39},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {309-322},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983QE26100010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to fixed-time schedules of food
             presentation ranging from five to 300 seconds. Although
             consistent, stereotyped response patterns developed during
             interfood intervals on all schedules, there were distinct
             differences in the behavior observed on schedules with
             short, as opposed to long, intervals. During the shorter
             intervals, responses were performed quite vigorously, a
             feeder-directed terminal response was observed, and most
             activities were localized near the feeder. On the longer
             schedules, no feeder-directed terminal response developed,
             although the birds were usually near the feeder at the end
             of intervals. The predominant response involved moving about
             the chamber, often pacing along one of the walls.
             Performance during short intervals is accounted for quite
             well by the antagonistic-motivational state hypothesis
             suggested by Staddon (1977); however, performance during
             longer intervals is not. Behavior during interfood intervals
             may more accurately be classified as reflecting a single
             (food) motivational state and described simply in terms of
             Craig's (1918) appetitive behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1983.39-309},
   Key = {fds288093}
}

@article{fds287986,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {How Animals Detect Causes},
   Journal = {Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {121-123},
   Publisher = {Portico},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0010-7549},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983QD95900017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1037/021792},
   Key = {fds287986}
}

@article{fds287991,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {NEBRASKA SYMPOSIUM ON MOTIVATION 1981, VOL 29, RESPONSE
             STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION - BERNSTEIN,DJ},
   Journal = {CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {795-797},
   Publisher = {AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0010-7549},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983RN29100051&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287991}
}

@article{fds288087,
   Author = {Hinson, JM and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Hill-climbing by pigeons.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {39},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {25-47},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983PX69000002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to two types of concurrent
             operant-reinforcement schedules in order to determine what
             choice rules determine behavior on these schedules. In the
             first set of experiments, concurrent variable-interval,
             variable-interval schedules, key-peck responses to either of
             two alternative schedules produced food reinforcement after
             a random time interval. The frequency of food-reinforcement
             availability for the two schedules was varied over different
             ranges for different birds. In the second series of
             experiments, concurrent variable-ratio, variable-interval
             schedules, key-peck responses to one schedule produced food
             reinforcement after a random time interval, whereas food
             reinforcement occurred for an alternative schedule only
             after a random number of responses. Results from both
             experiments showed that pigeons consistently follow a
             behavioral strategy in which the alternative schedule chosen
             at any time is the one which offers the highest momentary
             reinforcement probability (momentary maximizing). The
             quality of momentary maximizing was somewhat higher and more
             consistent when both alternative reinforcement schedules
             were time-based than when one schedule was time-based and
             the alternative response-count based. Previous attempts to
             provide evidence for the existence of momentary maximizing
             were shown to be based upon faulty assumptions about the
             behavior implied by momentary maximizing and resultant
             inappropriate measures of behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1983.39-25},
   Key = {fds288087}
}

@article{fds288090,
   Author = {Gendron, RP and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Searching for cryptic prey: the effect of search
             rate.},
   Journal = {American Naturalist},
   Volume = {121},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {172-186},
   Publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0003-0147},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1983QA63500003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Developed a model, based on Holling's disc equation, of a
             predator searching for cryptic prey, assuming that the
             probability of a predator detecting an encountered prey item
             is inversely related to both prey crypticity and search
             rate. The optimal search rate will then reflect a trade-off
             between prey detection and the frequency of encounter. As
             prey become more cryptic this optimal search rate drops. If
             the energetic cost of locomotion is taken into account the
             optimal search rate is somewhat lower, but in general this
             additional effect is negligible. When a predator is
             searching for 2 prey types which differ in crypticity the
             optimal search rate increases with the relative density of
             the more conspicuous species. This increase in search rate
             may result in a dramatic drop in the probability of
             detecting the more cryptic prey, so that even when it is
             relatively abundant it may be virtually excluded from the
             diet. This model can be modified to simulate the formation
             of a search image and to generate density-dependent
             predation.-from Author},
   Doi = {10.1086/284049},
   Key = {fds288090}
}

@article{fds288094,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Sobre a nocão de causa: aplicacões ao caso do
             Behaviorismo},
   Journal = {. Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência},
   Volume = {4},
   Pages = {48-92},
   Year = {1983},
   Key = {fds288094}
}

@article{fds288084,
   Author = {Ettinger, RH and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Decreased feeding associated with acute hypoxia in
             rats.},
   Journal = {Physiology & behavior},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {455-458},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0031-9384},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1982PJ21700010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Rats obtained less food than normal on a cyclic-ratio
             schedule during brief, 1-hr exposure to either moderate
             hypobaric hypoxia (BP = 435 Torr, PO2 approximately equal to
             91 Torr) or to hypoxic hypoxia (BP = 750 Torr, PO2,
             approximately equal to 90 Torr), but not during hypobaric
             exposure with 36.5% oxygen (BP = 435 Torr, PO2 approximately
             equal to 159 Torr). The depressed rate of feeding associated
             with hypoxia was nevertheless well regulated. Interpreted in
             terms of a regulatory model, these results suggest that
             hypoxia suppresses eating because it degrades the taste of
             food, not because it impairs feeding regulation or general
             activity.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0031-9384(82)90266-9},
   Key = {fds288084}
}

@article{fds288085,
   Author = {Reid, AK and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Schedule-induced drinking: Elicitation, anticipation, or
             behavioral interaction?},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-18},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1982NW16500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {We carried out five experiments with rats on fixed-time
             schedules in order to define the relation between drinking
             and individual food-pellet presentations. In Experiment 1,
             unsignaled extra food occurred at the end of occasional
             fixed intervals, and we compared subsequent drinking
             patterns with drinking before the extra food presentation.
             In Experiment 2 we presented signaled and unsignaled extra
             food and measured elicited and anticipatory drinking
             patterns. In Experiment 3, we observed the persistence of
             modified drinking patterns when several consecutive
             intervals ended with extra pellets. In Experiments 4 and 5,
             we varied the magnitude of food delivery across (rather than
             within) sessions to replicate published findings. Results
             show that schedule-induced drinking is neither elicited by
             food presentations nor induced by stimuli associated with a
             high food rate. All subjects seemed to follow a simple rule:
             during any stimulus signaling an increase in the local
             probability of food delivery within a session, engage in
             food-related behavior to the exclusion of drinking.
             Schedule-induced drinking appears to be the result of
             dynamic interactions among food-related behavior, drinking,
             and other motivated behavior, rather than a direct effect of
             the contingencies of food reinforcement.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1982.38-1},
   Key = {fds288085}
}

@article{fds288086,
   Author = {Starr, BC and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Sensory superstition on multiple interval
             schedules.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {267-280},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1982NG79700010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to multiple schedules in which an
             irregular repeating sequence of five stimulus components was
             correlated with the same reinforcement schedule throughout.
             Stable, idiosyncratic, response-rate differences developed
             across components. Components were rank-ordered by response
             rate; an approximately linear relation was found between
             rank order and the deviation of mean response rate from the
             overall mean rate. Nonzero slopes of this line were found
             for multiple fixed-interval and variable-time schedules and
             for multiple variable-interval schedules both when number of
             reinforcements was the same in all components and when it
             varied. The steepest function slopes were found in the
             variable schedules with relatively long interfood intervals
             and relatively short component durations. When just one
             stimulus was correlated with all components of a multiple
             variable-interval schedule, the slope of the line was close
             to zero. The results suggest that food-rate differences may
             be induced initially by different reactions to the stimuli
             and subsequently maintained by food.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1982.37-267},
   Key = {fds288086}
}

@article{fds287979,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {On the dangers of demand curves: A comment of Lea and
             Tarpy},
   Journal = {Behaviour Analysis Letters},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {321-325},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0166-4794},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1982PU42300002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287979}
}

@article{fds287993,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {In the beginning was the word},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {390-391},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1982PR89500022&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0140525X00012693},
   Key = {fds287993}
}

@article{fds288015,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {THE NEW WORLD OF ECONOMICS - EXPLORATIONS INTO THE
             HUMAN-EXPERIENCE - MCKENZIE,RB, TULLOCK,GG},
   Journal = {BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS LETTERS},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {62-64},
   Publisher = {ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0166-4794},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1982MZ52800008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288015}
}

@article{fds288018,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {BRAINSTORMS - PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAYS ON MIND AND PSYCHOLOGY -
             DENNETT,DC},
   Journal = {BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS LETTERS},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {123-125},
   Publisher = {ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0166-4794},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1982NF84400008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288018}
}

@article{fds288083,
   Author = {Ettinger, RH and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Behavioral competition, component duration and
             multiple-schedule contrast},
   Journal = {Behaviour Analysis Letters},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {31-38},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0166-4794},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1982MZ52800004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Four pigeons pecked keys on multiple variable - interval
             variable-interval schedules of food reinforcement. When the
             duration of each component was varied independently,
             response rates during the rich component of a multiple VI
             60-sec VI 240-sec schedule were inversely related to its
             duration, whereas rates during the lean component were
             directly related to its duration. These findings are
             consistent with the view that behavioral contrast on
             multiple schedules is a result of the reallocation of
             competing interim and terminal activities. The size of
             contrast is a function of the competitiveness of interim
             activities, which is governed by dynamic satiation and
             deprivation processes.},
   Key = {fds288083}
}

@article{fds288078,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Cognition in animals: learning as program
             assembly.},
   Journal = {Cognition},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {1-3},
   Pages = {287-294},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0010-0277},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1981MN54100042&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1016/0010-0277(81)90059-7},
   Key = {fds288078}
}

@article{fds288082,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Hinson, JM and Kram, R},
   Title = {Optimal choice.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {397-412},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1981LP13200011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {We present a classification and theoretical analysis of
             discrete-trial and free-operant choice procedures in which
             reinforcement is assigned to one alternative only, or
             independently to both, is either always available or
             conditionally available, and is either "held" or not from
             trial to trial. Momentary-maximizing and (globally) optimal
             choice sequences are defined in terms of initializing and
             marker events. Free-operant choice is analyzed in terms of a
             clock space whose axes are the times since the last A and B
             choices. The analysis shows that most molar matching data
             are derivable from momentary maximizing, and that the
             momentary-maximizing hypothesis has not been adequately
             tested in either discrete-trial or free-operant
             situations.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1981.35-397},
   Key = {fds288082}
}

@article{fds288020,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {CITATION CLASSIC - THE SUPERSTITION EXPERIMENT - A
             REEXAMINATION OF ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PRINCIPLES OF
             ADAPTIVE-BEHAVIOR},
   Journal = {CURRENT CONTENTS/SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {20-20},
   Publisher = {INST SCI INFORM INC},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0092-6361},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1981LF07000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288020}
}

@article{fds288079,
   Author = {Hinson, JM and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Some temporal properties of local contrast},
   Journal = {Behaviour Analysis Letters},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {275-281},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0166-4794},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1981MJ25600005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons received variable-interval food reinforcement for
             key pecking during one line-orientation stimulus while key
             pecking during another line orientation was extinguished
             (mult VI EXT); the duration of the extinction component was
             either fixed or variable. When the duration of the
             extinction stimulus was variable, stable response rate was
             highest during the initial part of the VI component
             (positive local contrast) and lowest early in the extinction
             component (negative local contrast). Early in training the
             magnitude of positive local contrast was directly related to
             the duration of the preceding extinction stimulus, but this
             dependence eventually disappeared. When the duration of the
             preceding extinction stimulus was constant, positive local
             contrast disappeared, but was reinstated by a long time-out
             period introduced part way through each experimental
             session. These data suggest that local contrast effects
             represent a temporary disequilibrium between competing
             activities and the instrumental response.},
   Key = {fds288079}
}

@article{fds288080,
   Author = {Houston, AI and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Optimality principles and behavior: It's all for the
             best},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {395-396},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1981MN23200039&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0140525X0000947X},
   Key = {fds288080}
}

@article{fds288081,
   Author = {King, AP and West, MJ and Eastzer, DH and Staddon,
             JER},
   Title = {An experimental investigation of the bioacoustics of cowbird
             song},
   Journal = {Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {211-217},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature America, Inc},
   Year = {1981},
   ISSN = {0340-5443},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1981MQ15900008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Female cowbirds (Molothrus ater ater), maintained in
             isolation from males during the breeding season, respond to
             the playback of male song with copulatory postures. They
             respond to some songs more than to others. Cowbird song
             potency can thus be operationally defined by the proportion
             of copulatory postures a song elicits across multiple
             playbacks. The purpose of the present study was to explore
             whether song potency changes with distance in the field. No
             field recordings elicited high levels of responding by the
             females. When songs of known high potency are systematically
             degraded, the results indicate that female cowbirds are
             sensitive to small changes in signal to noise ratio and to
             atmospheric attenuation. The data suggest that cowbird song
             potency degrades very rapidly with transmission distance in
             the field. © 1981 Springer-Verlag.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF00302940},
   Key = {fds288081}
}

@article{fds288077,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and King, M and Lockhead, GR},
   Title = {On sequential effects in absolute judgment
             experiments},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
             Performance},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {290-301},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1980},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0096-1523},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1980JR95800007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In absolute judgment experiments with feedback, the events
             on a given trial, n, exert a biphasic effect on succeeding
             responses: The response on trial n + 1 is displaced toward
             the stimulus (or feedback) on trial n (assimilation), and
             the response on each of several subsequent trials is
             displaced in the opposite direction (contrast). The
             possibility that the response on trial n + k can be
             explained as the weighted sum of events on that and
             preceding trials (linear model) was examined. It is
             concluded that (a) data from a typical absolute judgment
             experiment are not clearly consistent with the linear
             approach; (b) a 1st-order (1 trial back) linear model cannot
             account for the typical biphasic weighting sequence, but a
             2nd-order model can do so; and (c) the possibility of real
             effects extending over several preceding trials cannot be
             excluded. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA,
             all rights reserved). © 1980 American Psychological
             Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0096-1523.6.2.290},
   Key = {fds288077}
}

@article{fds287999,
   Author = {Blaine, C and Innis, NK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Stimulus control of behavior induced by a periodic schedule
             of food presentation in pigeons},
   Journal = {Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {131-134},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1980},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0090-5054},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1980KH13400017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Four pigeons were exposed to a fixed-time (FT) 27-sec
             schedule of food presentation in a large chamber partitioned
             into several areas. Each area provided different
             environmental support stimuli, such as water, nesting
             material, or the opportunity to observe another bird. A
             stereotyped pattern of behavior developed, with the birds
             leaving the food area early in intervals (interim activity)
             and returning to perform a food-related behavior (terminal
             response) toward the end of intervals. Unlike rats under
             similar conditions, the pigeons’ interim activities did
             not seem to be under the direct control of environmental
             stimuli. Early in intervals, the birds simply turned and
             walked away from the food area for a few seconds, before
             returning to perform the terminal response. © 1980, The
             Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.3758/BF03334460},
   Key = {fds287999}
}

@article{fds288076,
   Author = {Blaine, C and Innis, NK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Stimulus control of behavior induced by a schedule of
             periodic food presentation in pigeons},
   Journal = {Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society},
   Volume = {16},
   Pages = {131-134},
   Year = {1980},
   Key = {fds288076}
}

@article{fds288074,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Motheral, S},
   Title = {Response independence, matching and maximizing: A reply to
             Heyman},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {86},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {501-505},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1979HN33600006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {G. Heyman's (see record 1980-00325-001) major criticism of
             the present authors' (see record 1979-22914-001)
             reinforcement maximization model is that it does not
             consider "local" and "interchangeover" interresponse times
             separately. The present authors show that this separation
             may not be necessary, since their assumption of independent,
             random responding to each alternative can account both for
             the observed equality of local response rates and, when the
             constraint on total responding is included, for the inverse
             relation between changeover rates and the degree of
             disparity between overall response rates to the 2
             alternatives. (10 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006
             APA, all rights reserved).},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.501},
   Key = {fds288074}
}

@article{fds288007,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Motheral, S},
   Title = {"On Matching and Maximizing in Operant Choice Experiments":
             Correction.},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {86},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {156-156},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1979GR78800006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1037/h0077952},
   Key = {fds288007}
}

@article{fds288072,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Conservation and consequences--theories of behavior under
             constraint: An overview},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: General},
   Volume = {108},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-3},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0096-3445},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1979GU39600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Introduces a group of articles on related topics in operant
             conditioning research: (a) the relativity of reinforcement,
             (b) choice, (c) the quantitative law of effect, and (d)
             optimal behavior. The focus is on the functional relations
             between response and reinforcement rates in ratio and
             interval schedules of reinforcement. (8 ref) (PsycINFO
             Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1979
             American Psychological Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0096-3445.108.1.1},
   Key = {fds288072}
}

@article{fds288073,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Operant behavior as adaptation to constraint},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: General},
   Volume = {108},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {48-67},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0096-3445},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1979GU39600006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Reinforcement schedules restrict an organism's access to 1
             activity (the contingent response, or reinforcer) by
             requiring it to engage in a 2nd activity (the instrumental
             response) for access to the 1st one. Behavior is also
             constrained by limitations of time, so that an increase in
             an activity entails a decrease in some others. If an
             organism's repertoire consists of N independent, mutually
             exclusive and exhaustive activities, these 2 constraints can
             be represented as surfaces in an N-dimensional space whose
             axes are the levels of the N activities. The distribution of
             activities under free conditions is represented by a point
             (the free-behavior point) in such a space. Functional
             relations between the equilibrium levels of the instrumental
             and contingent responses under different schedules of
             reinforcement can be generated by the homeostatic assumption
             that organisms act to minimize the distance between the
             point representing their distribution of activities under
             schedule conditions and the free-behavior point. This
             simplified approach predicts the form of the functional
             relations obtained on ratio, interval, and several other
             schedules, as well as the differences between them. (51 ref)
             (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights
             reserved). © 1979 American Psychological
             Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0096-3445.108.1.48},
   Key = {fds288073}
}

@article{fds328636,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Regulation and time allocation: Comment on "Conservation in
             behavior"},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: General},
   Volume = {108},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {35-40},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.1.35},
   Abstract = {Comments on an article by J. Allison et al (see record
             1980-27214-001). Conservation theory in either its 1- or
             2-parameter form predicts a linear relation with negative
             slope between measures of the instrumental and contingent
             response. Empirical results from ratio schedule experiments
             conform to the linear prediction over a limited range, but
             results from experiments with VI schedules are not
             consistent with the linear model. (13 ref) (PsycINFO
             Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1979
             American Psychological Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0096-3445.108.1.35},
   Key = {fds328636}
}

@article{fds288075,
   Author = {West, MJ and King, AP and Eastzer, DH and Staddon,
             JE},
   Title = {A bioassay of isolate cowbird song},
   Journal = {Journal of Comparative and Physiological
             Psychology},
   Volume = {93},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {124-133},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0021-9940},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1979GL69400007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In 2 experiments, captive female cowbirds, both isolation
             reared and wild caught, were exposed during the breeding
             season to experimentally manipulated versions of isolate
             male song. Data show that a single song element, a brief
             note between the song phrases, played a pivotal role in
             eliciting the female's copulatory response to song. Data
             also demonstrate that relative amplitude variation and the
             fine structure within the interphrase unit affected the
             potency of a given song. Results suggest that the acoustic
             properties of this unit may account for the enhanced
             effectiveness of isolate song over normal cowbird song as a
             sexual releaser. (14 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006
             APA, all rights reserved). © 1979 American Psychological
             Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/h0077577},
   Key = {fds288075}
}

@article{fds287990,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {CONSERVATION IN BEHAVIOR - COMMENT},
   Journal = {JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL},
   Volume = {108},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {35-40},
   Publisher = {AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0096-3445},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1979GU39600003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287990}
}

@article{fds288012,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Thirst - a static analysis},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {120-121},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1979HJ63900095&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0140525X00061355},
   Key = {fds288012}
}

@article{fds288069,
   Author = {Hinson, JM and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Behavioral competition: a mechanism for schedule
             interactions.},
   Journal = {Science (New York, N.Y.)},
   Volume = {202},
   Number = {4366},
   Pages = {432-434},
   Year = {1978},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0036-8075},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1978FT07600026&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Rats pressing a lever for food reinforcement showed large
             positive-contrast effects when provided with the opportunity
             for a competing wheel-running response. Positive and
             negative behavioral contrast may reflect reallocation of
             competing interim and terminal responses between schedule
             components following changes in the reinforcement conditions
             in one component.},
   Doi = {10.1126/science.705334},
   Key = {fds288069}
}

@article{fds288071,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and McGeorge, LW and Bruce, RA and Klein,
             FF},
   Title = {A Simple Method for the Rapid Analysis of Animal
             Sounds},
   Journal = {Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {306-330},
   Year = {1978},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0044-3573},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1978GP49800005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {A simple, real‐time method for displaying the information
             contained in the zero‐crossings of acoustic signals is
             described. The method can be used even with many signals
             that have harmonics, and reveals a wealth of fine structure
             in bird song. Some of this structure may serve a
             communicatory function. 1978 Blackwell Verlag
             GmbH},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb00262.x},
   Key = {fds288071}
}

@article{fds288068,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Theory of behavioral power functions.},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {85},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {305-320},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1978},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1978FE49700003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Data in operant conditioning and psychophysics are often
             well fitted by functions of the form y = qxs. A simple
             theory derives these power functions from the simultaneous
             equations dx/x = a1f(z)dz and dy/y = a2f(z)dz, where z is a
             comparison variable that is equated for the effects of x
             and) y, and a1 and a2 are sensitivity parameters. In operant
             conditioning, x and y are identified with response rates; in
             psychophysics, with measures of stimulus and response. The
             theory can explain converging sets of power functions,
             solves the dimensional problems with the standard power
             function, and can account for the relation between Type I
             and Type II psychophysical scales. (64 ref) (PsycINFO
             Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1978
             American Psychological Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0033-295x.85.4.305},
   Key = {fds288068}
}

@article{fds288070,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Motheral, S},
   Title = {On matching and maximizing in operant choice
             experiments},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {85},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {436-444},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1978},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1978FR31000004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Animals match relative response rate to relative
             reinforcement rate in 2-choice situations where each
             alternative provides reinforcement according to a VI
             schedule. It is shown that matching, and a model proposed
             for it by R. J. Herrnstein (1961), can both be derived from
             reinforcement maximization under a linear response
             constraint. Empirical results are consistent with the
             constraint assumption, but they fail to support an extension
             of the approach to choice situations in which one
             alternative dispenses reinforcement according to a ratio
             schedule. Neither matching nor maximizing may be a
             fundamental principle. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record
             (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1978 American
             Psychological Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.436},
   Key = {fds288070}
}

@article{fds304744,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Motheral, S},
   Title = {On matching and maximizing in operant choice
             experiments.},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {85},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {436-444},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1978},
   ISSN = {0033-295X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1978FR31000004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1037//0033-295x.85.5.436},
   Key = {fds304744}
}

@article{fds288006,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {On Herrnstein's equation and related forms.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {163-170},
   Year = {1977},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1977DT78000007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In 1970, Herrnstein proposed a simple equation to describe
             the relation between response and reinforcement rates on
             interval schedules. Its empirical basis is firm, but its
             theoretical foundation is still uncertain. Two approaches to
             the derivation of Herrnstein's equation are discussed. It
             can be derived as the equilibrium solution to a process
             model equivalent to familiar linear-operator learning
             models. Modifications of this approach yield competing
             power-function formulations. The equation can also be
             derived from the assumption that response strength is
             proportional to reinforcement rate, given that there is a
             ceiling on response rate. The proportional relation can, in
             turn, be derived from a threshold assumption equivalent to
             Shimp's "momentary maximizing". This derivation implies that
             the two parameters of Herrnstein's equation should be
             correlated, and may explain its special utility in
             application to internal schedules.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1977.28-163},
   Key = {fds288006}
}

@article{fds41516,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Temporal fine structure of bird song},
   Journal = {Proceedings of the XVth International Ethological
             Conference},
   Pages = {156},
   Year = {1977},
   Key = {fds41516}
}

@article{fds41541,
   Author = {Staddon, J. E. R. and Simmelhag, V},
   Title = {The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its
             implications for the principles of adaptive
             behavior},
   Booktitle = {Behavior and learning},
   Publisher = {San Francisco: W. H. Freeman},
   Editor = {H. Rachlin},
   Year = {1976},
   Key = {fds41541}
}

@article{fds41544,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Darwin explained: An object-lesson in theory construction.
             [Review of M. T. Ghiselin (Ed.), The Triumph of the
             Darwinian Method [Reprinted as Explanation and
             proof]},
   Pages = {358-361},
   Booktitle = {Theories in contemporary psychology},
   Publisher = {New York: Macmillan},
   Editor = {M. H. Marx and F. E. Goodson},
   Year = {1976},
   Key = {fds41544}
}

@article{fds287994,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {A Note on the Evolutionary Significance of "Supernormal"
             Stimuli},
   Journal = {The American Naturalist},
   Volume = {109},
   Number = {969},
   Pages = {541-545},
   Publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
   Year = {1975},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0003-0147},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1975AS73000004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1086/283025},
   Key = {fds287994}
}

@article{fds287996,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Autocontingencies: Special contingencies or special stimuli?
             A review of Davis, Memmott, and Hurwitz},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: General},
   Volume = {104},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {189-191},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1975},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0096-3445},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1975AN63700002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Comments on the article by H. Davis (see record
             1975-20006-001) which proposed the concept of
             "autocontingencies" to describe the unscheduled and
             unintended relations that exist between important
             experimental events. The need for the term "autocontingency"
             is questioned, the Davis proposal that contingencies related
             to postfood and postshock time are subtle in their effects
             is challenged, and the alternative possibility that the
             fixed CS duration means that time since CS onset is a
             predictor of CS offset is suggested. (PsycINFO Database
             Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1975 American
             Psychological Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.189},
   Key = {fds287996}
}

@article{fds288067,
   Author = {Kello, JE and Innis, NK and Staddon, JE},
   Title = {Eccentric stimuli on multiple fixed-interval
             schedules.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {233-240},
   Year = {1975},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1975V890100009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The effects of presenting a different ("eccentric") stimulus
             for one interval during either or both components of a
             cyclic multiple fixed-interval fixed-interval schedule, with
             12 short and four long intervals per cycle, were studied in
             three experiments. Eccentric stimuli in the short-interval
             component reliably produced a persistent, substantial
             elevation in key-peck rate. The effect appears to depend on
             schedule context and an initial "disinhibiting" effect of
             the eccentric stimulus.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1975.23-233},
   Key = {fds288067}
}

@article{fds288063,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {LIMITATIONS ON TEMPORAL CONTROL: GENERALIZATION AND THE
             EFFECTS OF CONTEXT},
   Journal = {British Journal of Psychology},
   Volume = {66},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {229-246},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1975},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0007-1269},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1975AD11400013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {On fixed‐interval reinforcement schedules, the
             time‐marker initiating each interval produces a pause
             before the terminal response begins (inhibitory temporal
             control). In four experiments on temporal control, two kinds
             of interaction in intercalated stimulus sequences were
             identified: confusion effects, reflecting similarities among
             stimuli, and attention (overshadowing) effects, reflecting
             differential memorability. 1975 The British Psychological
             Society},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01459.x},
   Key = {fds288063}
}

@article{fds288064,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Ayres, SL},
   Title = {Sequential and Temporal Properties of Behavior Induced by a
             Schedule of Periodic Food Delivery},
   Journal = {Behaviour},
   Volume = {54},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {26-49},
   Publisher = {BRILL},
   Year = {1975},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7959},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1975AN77800002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {1. Five hungry rats were exposed to a schedule of periodic
             food presentation, receiving a single pellet every 30 sec.,
             in an apparatus that permitted drinking, running, and other
             activities. The development, extinction, and structure of
             behavior sequences under this regimen was studied in three
             experiments. 2. All the rats developed a stable pattern of
             behavior after twenty or so half-hour sessions. The modal
             pattern was drinking early in the interfood interval,
             running in the middle, and food anticipation at the end.
             This temporal pattern was associated with different
             sequential patterns in different individuals. 3. Elimination
             of opportunity to engage in one or more activities resulted
             in an increase in other activities, but the increase was not
             in simple proportion to their frequency under baseline
             conditions. 4. In the steady state the sequence of behaviors
             in each interval appeared to be determined by two main
             factors: (a) post-eating time, and (b) the “momentum”
             associated with an ongoing activity. Differences among
             individual rats appeared to be due largely to differences in
             the second factor. © 1975, Brill. All rights
             reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1163/156853975X00317},
   Key = {fds288064}
}

@article{fds288065,
   Author = {Staddon, JE and Frank, JA},
   Title = {The role of the peck-food contingency on fixed-interval
             schedules.},
   Journal = {Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {17-23},
   Year = {1975},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0022-5002},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1975V247400002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were trained to peck on a fixed-interval schedule of
             food reinforcement and then exposed to three schedules in
             which there was either no, or an indirect, relation between
             pecking and food delivery: (a) a conjunctive schedule in
             which food was delivered at fixed intervals, providing at
             least one peck was emitted in the interval; (b) a recycling
             version of the conjunctive schedule that essentially
             eliminated occasional peck-food contiguities (recycling
             conjunctive); (c) delivery of food at fixed intervals
             independently of the birds' behavior (fixed time). The rates
             and patterns of pecking sustained by these procedures
             depended on interfood interval and relative proximity of
             pecks to food.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1975.23-17},
   Key = {fds288065}
}

@article{fds288066,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Frank, JA},
   Title = {Temporal control on periodic schedules: Fine
             structure},
   Journal = {Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {536-538},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1975},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0090-5054},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1975AZ17100028&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The temporal pattern of the terminal response on periodic
             schedules depends on when responding begins. Pigeons pecking
             on fixed-interval and fixed-time schedules of food
             reinforcement responded, or accelerated, faster the later in
             an interval they began responding. © 1975, The Psychonomic
             Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.3758/BF03337561},
   Key = {fds288066}
}

@article{fds340478,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Temporal control on periodic schedules: Fine
             structure},
   Publisher = {Psychonomic Society},
   Year = {1975},
   Abstract = {The temporal pattern of the terminal response on periodic
             schedules depends on when responding begins. Pigeons pecking
             on fixed-interval and fixed-time schedules of food
             reinforcement responded, or accelerated, faster the later in
             an interval they began responding.},
   Key = {fds340478}
}

@article{fds328637,
   Author = {Staddon, JE},
   Title = {A note on behavioural contrast and frustation.},
   Journal = {The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {285-292},
   Year = {1974},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640747408400414},
   Doi = {10.1080/14640747408400414},
   Key = {fds328637}
}

@article{fds288058,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Temporal control, attention and memory},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {81},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {375-391},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1974},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036998},
   Abstract = {Notes that animals do not usually respond for food at times
             when it is not available (e.g., the time just after food
             delivery on periodic schedules). Consequently, food acquires
             inhibitory aftereffects (inhibitory temporal control) on
             such schedules so that its omission elevates subsequent
             response rate (omission effect). Previous data, results of
             an experiment with 4 male White Carneaux pigeons, and
             arguments are presented to show that temporal control
             depends on the properties of memory and attention.
             Maintained reinforcement-omission effects reflect temporal
             overshadowing of neutral events (e.g., food omission) by
             more salient and memorable events (e.g., food).
             Disinhibition of delay and reinforcement-magnitude context
             effects can also be analyzed in these terms. (65 ref)
             (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights
             reserved). © 1974 American Psychological
             Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/h0036998},
   Key = {fds288058}
}

@article{fds288059,
   Author = {Frank, J and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The effects of restraint on temporal discrimination
             behavior},
   Journal = {Psychological Record},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {123-130},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1974},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03394224},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF03394224},
   Key = {fds288059}
}

@article{fds288060,
   Author = {Kello, JE and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Control of long-interval performance on mixed cyclic-
             interval schedules},
   Journal = {Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-4},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1974},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334173},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to a series of cyclic-interval food
             reinforcement schedules in which each cycle comprised 12
             1-min intervals followed by 2 2-min intervals, 2 6-min
             intervals, or 6 6-min intervals. Response rate was higher
             and postfood pause shorter in the long (2- or 6-min) than in
             the short (1-min) intervals. Response rate decreased and
             pause generally increased across successive 2-min intervals,
             but response rate increased and pause generally decreased
             across successive 6-min intervals. Performance in the 2-min
             intervals is consistent with a temporal discrimination
             account, but performance in the 6-min intervals supports
             earlier suggestions that some other factor (response
             “momentum”) may be involved when the long intervals are
             sufficiently longer than the short. © 1974, The Psychonomic
             Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.3758/BF03334173},
   Key = {fds288060}
}

@article{fds288061,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Frank, J},
   Title = {Mechanisms of discrimination reversal},
   Journal = {Animal Behaviour},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {PART 4},
   Pages = {802-828},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1974},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(74)90004-9},
   Abstract = {Groups of pigeons were trained on a successive
             discrimination procedure (multiple variable-interval,
             extinction schedule, with correction in S-), and then
             exposed to successive reversals, either daily, or less
             frequently. At asymptote the birds made more than 90 per
             cent of their responses to S+, and showed good transfer to a
             'learning set' series. Three factors were involved in
             discrimination reversal performance: (a) a tendency to
             respond to only one of the two stimuli presented each day;
             (b) control of 'choice' by food delivery and by procedural
             cues; (c) a tendency to respond to the prior S+ (negative
             transfer). Transfer effects showed themselves in two main
             ways: (a) by impaired performance on the first reversal
             following manipulations that increased the salience in
             memory of S+ on a given day, such as a shift to a new pair
             of stimuli, or a gap (days off) in a series of daily
             reversals. The new-problem effect was quite robust, but the
             days-off effect was observed only when other controlling
             factors were relatively weak; (b) by impaired performance on
             the first reversal following learning set training
             interpolated into a series of reversals. Reversal
             performance seems to represent a balance among a number of
             controlling factors, and the factors involved may be
             different for different individuals, even though the final
             performances appear similar. © 1974.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0003-3472(74)90004-9},
   Key = {fds288061}
}

@article{fds288062,
   Author = {Starr, B and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Temporal control on fixed-interval schedules: Signal
             properties of reinforcement and blackout},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {535-545},
   Year = {1974},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.22-535},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to periodic food-reinforcement
             schedules in which intervals ended with equal probability in
             either reinforcement or brief blackout. The effects on the
             pattern of key pecking of sequential probability of
             reinforcement, interval duration, and time to reinforcement
             opportunity were investigated in three experiments. The
             major results were: (1) at short absolute interval
             durations, time to reinforcement opportunity determined both
             postreinforcement and postblackout pause (time to first key
             peck within an interval); (2) at long intervals,
             postblackout pause was consistently shorter than
             postreinforcement pause, even if both events signalled the
             same time to the next reinforcement opportunity (omission
             effect); (3) when reinforcement and blackout signalled
             different times to the next reinforcement opportunity,
             within the same experiment, there was some evidence for
             interactions analogous to behavioral contrast.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1974.22-535},
   Key = {fds288062}
}

@article{fds288057,
   Author = {Malone, JC and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Contrast effects in maintained generalization
             gradients},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {167-179},
   Year = {1973},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1973.19-167},
   Abstract = {In Experiment I, pigeons were given equal reinforcement
             (variable-interval 1-min) for responding during randomized
             presentations of eight line-orientation stimuli. Then, only
             responding in the vertical orientation was reinforced.
             Stable generalization gradients soon formed and persistent
             behavioral and local (transient) contrast effects appeared.
             Local contrast effects were not a function of relative
             reinforcement frequency or of any other variable known to
             produce contrast. Instead, they were related to average
             response rates associated with each stimulus. Experiment II
             showed that local contrast effects represent increases and
             decreases in response rates relative to baseline responding,
             and that these effects are relative; a given stimulus might
             enhance responding during a subsequent presentation of one
             stimulus, but depress responding when followed by another.
             These data indicate that discrimination learning is not
             adequately described as the acquisition of excitatory
             properties by some stimuli and inhibitory properties by
             others. A more adequate account implies that stimuli exert
             both excitatory and inhibitory effects related to their
             value.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1973.19-167},
   Key = {fds288057}
}

@article{fds328638,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {On the notion of cause, with applications to
             behaviorism},
   Journal = {Behaviorism},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {25-63},
   Year = {1972},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds328638}
}

@article{fds288055,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {A note on the analysis of behavioral sequences in Columba
             livia},
   Journal = {Animal Behaviour},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {284-292},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1972},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80050-2},
   Abstract = {Regularity of temporal succession is not sufficient to infer
             a causal relationship between two acts. Regularly-occurring
             consummatory responses, such as eating, provide 'time
             markers' which may allow regular succession due to an
             internal clock to be distinguished from sequential
             regularity due to causal relationships between successive
             acts. These points are illustrated by an analysis of
             behavioural sequences observed in an experiment on
             superstitious behaviour in pigeons. © 1972.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80050-2},
   Key = {fds288055}
}

@article{fds288056,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Reinforcement omission on temporal go–no-go
             schedules},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {223-229},
   Year = {1972},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1972.18-223},
   Abstract = {Either a partial blackout, or the blackout plus a "feeder
             flash", occurred in lieu of reinforcement on two procedures
             that produced opposite patterns of responding after
             reinforcement. Response rate was elevated after
             reinforcement omission on the procedure that produced a
             "pause-and-respond" pattern following reinforcement, but
             depressed after reinforcement omission on the procedure that
             produced a "respond-and-pause" pattern. The effect of
             blackout plus feeder flash was generally intermediate
             between the effects of blackout and the effects of
             reinforcement. These results are consistent with an
             interpretation of reinforcement omission effects in terms of
             the discriminative temporal control exerted by reinforcement
             and stimuli similar to it.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1972.18-223},
   Key = {fds288056}
}

@article{fds288053,
   Author = {Innis, NK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Temporal tracking on cyclic-interval reinforcement
             schedules},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {411-423},
   Year = {1971},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1971.16-411},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to four cycles per session of a
             schedule in which the duration of successive
             interreinforcement intervals differed by t-sec. A cycle was
             composed of seven increasing and seven decreasing intervals,
             from 2t to 8t sec in length. In Exp. 1, postreinforcement
             pause tracked interval duration on five cyclic schedules,
             with values of t ranging from 2 to 40 sec. Tracking was
             better at shorter t values, and when discriminative stimuli
             signalled increasing and decreasing parts of the cycle.
             Pooled data for the whole experiment showed
             postreinforcement pause to bear a power function
             relationship to interval length, with a smaller exponent
             than the comparable function for fixed-interval schedules.
             Tests in a second experiment showed that pigeons trained on
             an arithmetic progression could also track schedules in
             which successive intervals followed either a logarithmic or
             a geometric progression, although tracking was more stable
             in the logarithmic case.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1971.16-411},
   Key = {fds288053}
}

@article{fds288054,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Simmelhag, V},
   Title = {The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its
             implications for the principles of adaptive
             behavior},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {78},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {3-43},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1971},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0030305},
   Abstract = {Replication and extension of Skinner's "supersitition"
             experiment showed the development of 2 kinds of behavior at
             asymptote: (a) interim activities, related to adjunctive
             behavior, which occurred just after food delivery; and (b)
             the terminal response, a discriminated operant, which
             occurred toward the end of the interval and continued until
             food delivery. These data suggest a view of operant
             conditioning (the terminal response) in terms of 2 sets of
             principles: principles of behavioral variation that describe
             the origins of behavior appropriate to a situation, in
             advance of reinforcement; and principles of reinforcement
             that describe the selective elimination of behavior so
             produced. This approach was supported by (a) an account of
             the parallels between the law of effect and evolution by
             means of natural selection; (b) its ability to elucidate
             persistent problems in learning, e.g., continuity vs.
             noncontinuity, variability associated with extinction, the
             relationship between classical and instrumental
             conditioning, the controversy between behaviorist and
             cognitive approaches to learning; and (c) its ability to
             deal with a number of recent anomalies in the learning
             literature (instinctive drift, auto-shaping, and
             auto-maintenance). The interim activities are interpreted in
             terms of interactions among motivational systems, and this
             view is supported by a review of the literature on
             adjunctive behavior and by comparison with similar phenomena
             in ethology (displacement, redirection, and vacuum
             activities). The proposed theoretical scheme represents a
             shift away from hypothetical laws of learning toward an
             interpretation of behavioral change in terms of interaction
             and competition among tendencies to action according to
             principles evolved in phylogeny. (4 p. ref.) (PsycINFO
             Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights
             reserved).},
   Doi = {10.1037/h0030305},
   Key = {fds288054}
}

@article{fds41554,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {The effect of information feedback on temporal tracking in
             pigeons},
   Pages = {256-267},
   Booktitle = {Festschrift for B. F. Skinner},
   Publisher = {New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts},
   Editor = {P. B. Dews},
   Year = {1970},
   Key = {fds41554}
}

@article{fds288049,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Effect of reinforcement duration on fixed-interval
             responding.},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {9-11},
   Year = {1970},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1970.13-9},
   Abstract = {Five different reinforcement durations occurred randomly
             within each session on fixed interval 60-sec.
             Postreinforcement pause was directly related (and "running"
             rate inversely related) to the duration of reinforcement
             initiating each fixed interval.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1970.13-9},
   Key = {fds288049}
}

@article{fds288050,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Temporal effects of reinforcement: A negative
             “frustration” effect},
   Journal = {Learning and Motivation},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {227-247},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1970},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/3230 Duke open
             access},
   Abstract = {Reinforcement omission in situations that show positive
             goal-gradients elevates subsequent responding (positive
             "frustration" effect). In this experiment, in a situation
             showing a negative goal-gradient, reinforcement omission
             depressed subsequent responding (negative "frustration"
             effect). A simple hypothesis in terms of discriminative
             after-effects of reinforcement accounts for both effects.
             The same interpretation is adequate to describe frustration
             effects in runways and avoids problems faced by frustration
             theory. Some further tests of the hypothesis are proposed.
             © 1970.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0023-9690(70)90148-7},
   Key = {fds288050}
}

@article{fds288051,
   Author = {Innis, NK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Sequential effects in cyclic-interval schedules},
   Journal = {Psychonomic Science},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {313-315},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1970},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03328834},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to two cyclic-interval schedules
             involving a cycle of 12 1-min fixed intervals followed by
             either 6 2-min intervals or 2 6-min intervals. Response rate
             was higher during the longer intervals in both cases.
             Comparison between these results and data from a previous
             experiment with a FI 1 FI 3 schedule suggests that three
             factors underlie responding to these schedules: the duration
             of the long intervals, the number of successive long
             intervals in a cycle (run length), and a factor involving
             the interaction between interval length and the pigeon’s
             own behavior (“momentum”). © 1970, Psychonomic
             Journals, Inc.. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.3758/BF03328834},
   Key = {fds288051}
}

@article{fds288052,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Simmelhag, V},
   Title = {“Superstitious” sequences},
   Journal = {Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American
             Psychological Association},
   Pages = {757-758},
   Year = {1970},
   Key = {fds288052}
}

@article{fds328639,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {INHIBITION AND THE OPERANT: A review of Sensory Inhibition,
             by G. v. Békésy, and Mach Bands: quantitative studies on
             neural networks in the retina, by Floyd Ratliff},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {481-487},
   Publisher = {Society for the Experimental Analysis of
             Behavior},
   Year = {1969},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-481},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1969.12-481},
   Key = {fds328639}
}

@article{fds288045,
   Author = {Innis, NK and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Scopolamine and reinforcement omission on fixed-interval
             schedules},
   Journal = {Psychonomic Science},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {43-45},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1969},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03336417},
   Abstract = {Two rats were run on a fixed-interval schedule with
             occasional blackouts (2–32 sec) substituted for
             reinforcement. Injections of scopolamine eliminated the
             fixed-interval scallop and substantially reduced the
             elevation in response rate which typically follows
             reinforcement ommission. This result is in agreement with a
             nonmotivational interpretation of interval-schedule
             “frustration” effects. © 1969, Psychonomic Journals,
             Inc.. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.3758/BF03336417},
   Key = {fds288045}
}

@article{fds288046,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The effect of informative feedback on temporal tracking in
             the pigeon},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {27-38},
   Year = {1969},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/5994 Duke open
             access},
   Abstract = {Pigeons emitted interresponse times that were reinforced if
             they fell between an upper and a lower bound (t<IRT<t+t/10).
             Brief stimuli followed each response; under some
             experimental conditions the color of these stimuli was
             correlated with whether the preceding interresponse time was
             longer or shorter than that specified by the schedule.
             Preliminary experiments indicated that these "feedback"
             stimuli acquired no discriminative properties even after
             prolonged training. A modified procedure, in which t varied
             cyclically throughout each experimental session, allowed the
             stimuli to acquire such properties: stimulus control was
             demonstrated under the training conditions, for two of the
             pigeons, and under transfer conditions for all three birds.
             A series of probe conditions, followed by a replication of
             the simple procedure using a multiple schedule, indicated
             that the controlling property of the stimuli was not the
             relation between stimuli, interresponse time, and value of
             t, but a variable determined by the interaction between the
             animals' responding and the cyclic procedure. This variable
             was probably the relative frequency of the less-frequent
             feedback stimulus.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1969.12-27},
   Key = {fds288046}
}

@article{fds288047,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Multiple fixed-interval schedules: Transient contrast and
             temporal inhibition},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {583-590},
   Year = {1969},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-583},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to four cycles per session of a
             multiple schedule in which each cycle involved twelve 60-sec
             fixed intervals followed by four 180-sec intervals [(12 FI
             60-sec)(4 FI 180-sec) schedule]. Post-reinforcement pauses
             were shorter during the first few short intervals of each
             cycle than during later short intervals, and increased over
             the four long intervals of each cycle (positive and negative
             transient contrast). A (12 FI 15-sec)(4 FI 45-sec) schedule
             showed similar results. These two schedules differed in some
             other respects indicating effects of absolute FI duration on
             stimulus control. Differences in contrast properties between
             both these procedures and multiple variable-interval
             schedules were related to the pause-producing property of
             reinforcement on FI (temporal inhibition). Behavior under
             two other multiple fixed-interval schedules-(2 FI 360-sec)(1
             FI 720-sec) and (3 FI 360-sec)(1 FI 720-sec)-differed in
             certain respects from both the (12 FI x-sec)(4 FI 3x-sec)
             schedules. These differences may be related to differences
             in the number of successive fixed intervals within a
             component (run length).},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1969.12-583},
   Key = {fds288047}
}

@article{fds288048,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Innis, NK},
   Title = {Reinforcement omission on fixed-interval
             schedules},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {689-700},
   Year = {1969},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-689},
   Abstract = {EXPERIMENTS WITH PIGEONS AND RATS SHOWED THAT: (1) When a
             brief blackout was presented in lieu of reinforcement at the
             end of 25% of intervals on a fixed-interval 2-min schedule,
             response rate was reliably and persistently higher during
             the following 2-min intervals (omission effect). This effect
             was largely due to a decrease in time to first response
             after reinforcement omission. (2) When blackout duration was
             varied, within sessions, over the range 2 to 32 sec, time to
             first response was inversely related to the duration of the
             preceding blackout, for pigeons, and for rats during the
             first few sessions after the transition from FI 2-min to FI
             2-min with reinforcement omission. Post-blackout pause was
             independent of blackout duration for rats at asymptote.
             These results were interpreted in terms of differential
             depressive effects of reinforcement and blackout on
             subsequent responding.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1969.12-689},
   Key = {fds288048}
}

@article{fds288044,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Spaced responding and choice: A preliminary
             analysis},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {669-682},
   Year = {1968},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/5995 Duke open
             access},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to reinforcement both for short (2 <
             IRT < 3 sec) and long (10 < IRT < 11 sec) interresponse
             times. They developed bimodal interresponse-time
             distributions, which were decomposable into two independent
             component distributions under the control of the short and
             long contingencies respectively. The birds' allocation of
             responses between these two distributions was determined by
             a simple power-law relationship between reinforcement
             ratios, and response ratios derived from the component
             distributions. Comparison between this situation and
             concurrent choice situations raises the possibility that the
             power-law relation between ratios may be a more general law
             of choice than the matching of relative frequencies
             (probabilities).},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1968.11-669},
   Key = {fds288044}
}

@article{fds288042,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Attention and temporal discrimination: Factors controlling
             responding under a cyclic-interval schedule},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {349-359},
   Year = {1967},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1967.10-349},
   Abstract = {Pigeons were exposed to a cyclic schedule in which each
             cycle was composed of twelve 1-min fixed intervals followed
             by four 3-min fixed intervals; four such cycles comprised an
             experimental session. The pigeons responded at a much higher
             average rate during the 3-min intervals than during the
             1-min intervals. Other effects were a depression of
             responding during the first short interval of each cycle and
             a shortening of postreinforcement pause during the second
             short interval. The main effect is attributable to a
             relatively fixed pattern of responding after reinforcement;
             this pattern consisted in a pause of approximately constant
             duration followed by responding at an approximately constant
             rate until the next reinforcement, resulting in much higher
             average response rates during the longer interreinforcement
             intervals. The other effects seem attributable to relatively
             slight differences between the pattern of responding
             characteristic of later long intervals and the pattern
             during later short intervals of each cycle. A major
             implication is that the pigeon is largely insensitive to the
             sequential properties of many interval-reinforcement
             schedules. A description of interval-schedule "frustration"
             phenomena in terms of the inhibitory effects of
             reinforcement is discussed in relation to these
             results.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1967.10-349},
   Key = {fds288042}
}

@article{fds288043,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Asymptotic behavior: The concept of the operant},
   Journal = {Psychological Review},
   Volume = {74},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {377-391},
   Year = {1967},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0024877},
   Doi = {10.1037/h0024877},
   Key = {fds288043}
}

@article{fds288040,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Innis, NK},
   Title = {An effect analogous to “frustration” on interval
             reinforcement schedules},
   Journal = {Psychonomic Science,},
   Volume = {4},
   Pages = {287-288},
   Year = {1966},
   Key = {fds288040}
}

@article{fds288041,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Innis, NK},
   Title = {Preference for fixed vs. variable amounts of
             reward},
   Journal = {Psychonomic Science},
   Volume = {4},
   Pages = {193-194},
   Year = {1966},
   Key = {fds288041}
}

@article{fds288039,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Some properties of spaced responding in pigeons},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {8},
   Pages = {19-27},
   Year = {1965},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1965.8-19},
   Abstract = {Pigeons exposed to a schedule which reinforces interresponse
             times (IRTs) longer than a given value (DRL schedule)
             eventually reach a stable pattern of responding which is
             shown to be a function both of the DRL value and of previous
             experience with other DRL values. On any given DRL schedule,
             the stable performance of most pigeons which have been
             previously exposed to a variety of such schedules, shows an
             IRT distribution with median equal to the DRL value. For DRL
             values longer than about 30 sec, however, the median IRT
             falls short of the DRL value; this failure of adjustment to
             longer values appears to be a species characteristic of
             pigeons. The function relating reinforcement rate to 1/DRL
             value is also shown to be approximately linear over the same
             range, with variable slope (less than 45 degrees ) and a
             downturn in the vicinity of DRL 30.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jeab.1965.8-19},
   Key = {fds288039}
}

@article{fds288033,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Reinforcement as input: Cyclic variable-interval
             schedule},
   Journal = {Science},
   Volume = {145},
   Number = {3630},
   Pages = {410-412},
   Year = {1964},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3630.410},
   Abstract = {Daily exposure of pigeons to four cycles of a reinforcement
             schedule in which the density of reinforcements varied
             cyclically as a function of time induced a periodicity in
             their responding matching that of the schedule, but out of
             phase with it. The technique used of presenting the same
             sequence of interreinforcement intervals in every session
             may have useful application in determining animals'
             adjustment to more complex temporal patterns of
             reinforcement. Investigation of animals' response to cyclic
             schedules of different frequencies suggests links with
             engineering methods of frequency analysis.},
   Doi = {10.1126/science.145.3630.410},
   Key = {fds288033}
}


%% Book Chapters   
@misc{fds376836,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Summing Up},
   Pages = {189-197},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-16},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-16},
   Key = {fds376836}
}

@misc{fds376843,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Science and Diversity},
   Pages = {96-102},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-8},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-8},
   Key = {fds376843}
}

@misc{fds376844,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {The Object of Inquiry Problem},
   Pages = {159-165},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-13},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-13},
   Key = {fds376844}
}

@misc{fds376845,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Science and AI},
   Pages = {89-95},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-7},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-7},
   Key = {fds376845}
}

@misc{fds376846,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing},
   Pages = {44-53},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-4},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-4},
   Key = {fds376846}
}

@misc{fds376847,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Efficient Markets, I},
   Pages = {166-175},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-14},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-14},
   Key = {fds376847}
}

@misc{fds376848,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {What Is Science?},
   Pages = {1-10},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-1},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-1},
   Key = {fds376848}
}

@misc{fds376849,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Behavioral Economics},
   Pages = {135-147},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-11},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-11},
   Key = {fds376849}
}

@misc{fds376850,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Models and Incentives},
   Pages = {54-68},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-5},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-5},
   Key = {fds376850}
}

@misc{fds376851,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Economics and Equilibria},
   Pages = {111-134},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-10},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-10},
   Key = {fds376851}
}

@misc{fds376837,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Social Science},
   Pages = {69-88},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-6},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-6},
   Key = {fds376837}
}

@misc{fds376838,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Some Science History},
   Pages = {11-30},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-2},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-2},
   Key = {fds376838}
}

@misc{fds376839,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Social Science},
   Pages = {103-110},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-9},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-9},
   Key = {fds376839}
}

@misc{fds376840,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Animal Economics},
   Pages = {148-158},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-12},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-12},
   Key = {fds376840}
}

@misc{fds376841,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Experiment},
   Pages = {31-43},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-3},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-3},
   Key = {fds376841}
}

@misc{fds376842,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Efficient Markets, II Event Studies and the
             CAPM},
   Pages = {176-188},
   Booktitle = {Scientific Method},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032683874-15},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781032683874-15},
   Key = {fds376842}
}

@misc{fds372779,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Ideological Corruption of Science: Is the Right Always
             Wrong?},
   Pages = {327-341},
   Booktitle = {The Palgrave Handbook of Left-Wing Extremism, Volume
             2},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature Switzerland},
   Year = {2023},
   ISBN = {9783031362675},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36268-2_18},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-36268-2_18},
   Key = {fds372779}
}

@misc{fds367261,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The comparative psychology of operant behaviour},
   Pages = {83-94},
   Booktitle = {Behaviour Analysis and Contemporary Psychology},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {September},
   ISBN = {9781032327853},
   Key = {fds367261}
}

@misc{fds365867,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Schedule-induced behavior},
   Pages = {125-152},
   Booktitle = {Handbook of Operant Behavior},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {February},
   ISBN = {9781032188645},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003256670-6},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781003256670-6},
   Key = {fds365867}
}

@misc{fds368527,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Learning as Adaptation},
   Pages = {37-98},
   Booktitle = {Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781848723474},
   Key = {fds368527}
}

@misc{fds370042,
   Author = {Machado, A and Staddon, J},
   Title = {Learning from a behaviorist perspective},
   Pages = {12-21},
   Booktitle = {International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth
             Edition},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780128186299},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.14002-3},
   Abstract = {Behaviorism began with a persuasive 1913 polemic by John B.
             Watson which identified scientific psychology as part of
             biology. Watson was succeeded by neo-behaviorists Clark
             Hull, E. C. Tolman and, a little later, by radical
             behaviorist B. F. Skinner, who became the most influential.
             All behaviorists were strongly influenced by the work of the
             Russian physiologist IP. Pavlov and the field soon split
             between those who studied Pavlovian (classical) and operant
             (instrumental, Skinnerian) conditioning, primarily with
             animals as subjects. Skinner discovered new experimental
             methods which led to the discovery of reinforcement
             schedules. Behaviorism was over-shadowed in the 1960s by the
             cognitive movement, whose proponents nevertheless strove to
             stick with third-party-accessible data although they largely
             abandoned work with animals and were less finicky about
             theory than the behaviorists. Cognitive psychology rarely
             aspired to practical application where radical behaviorism,
             particularly, scored some successes. If psychology is ever
             to be a science of practical use, it will be
             behavioristic.},
   Doi = {10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.14002-3},
   Key = {fds370042}
}

@misc{fds371646,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Theoretical behaviorism},
   Pages = {79-95},
   Booktitle = {Contemporary Behaviorisms in Debate},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {August},
   ISBN = {9783030773946},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77395-3_7},
   Abstract = {Theoretical behaviorism has evolved from radical
             behaviorism. To stimulus and response it adds the idea of
             state: the state (conceptual, not physiological) of the
             organism defines the repertoire of responses available in a
             given stimulus context. Classical and operant conditioning
             are just different faces of the same coin. Classical
             conditioning is a process that detects correlations between
             environmental features and something of value, positive or
             negative, to the organism. This correlation induces a
             repertoire from which operant reinforcement can select. If
             the correlation is very strong and the unconditioned
             stimulus is imminent, then the induced repertoire may be
             limited-to pecking (in a hungry pigeon) or to salivation (in
             a restrained dog). Selection, in the sense of a response
             contingency, may be unnecessary. The result may look like a
             reflex, but isn't, although restricted behavioral options
             and extreme motivation may make it appear
             so.},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-77395-3_7},
   Key = {fds371646}
}

@misc{fds371647,
   Author = {Staddon, J},
   Title = {Theory: A response to lopes},
   Pages = {107-110},
   Booktitle = {Contemporary Behaviorisms in Debate},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {August},
   ISBN = {9783030773946},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77395-3_9},
   Abstract = {Response to Carlos Eduardo Lopes' comments: "What Is the
             Theory of Theoretical Behaviorism?"},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-77395-3_9},
   Key = {fds371647}
}

@misc{fds373022,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Learning, III: procedures},
   Pages = {532-562},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373022}
}

@misc{fds373031,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Template learning},
   Pages = {445-456},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373031}
}

@misc{fds373035,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Variation and selection: kineses},
   Pages = {24-37},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373035}
}

@misc{fds373026,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Reward and punishment},
   Pages = {135-174},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373026}
}

@misc{fds373033,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Stimulus control and performance},
   Pages = {345-376},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373033}
}

@misc{fds373034,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The optimal allocation of behavior},
   Pages = {205-241},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373034}
}

@misc{fds373032,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Time and memory, II},
   Pages = {421-444},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373032}
}

@misc{fds373023,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Operant behavior},
   Pages = {102-134},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373023}
}

@misc{fds373024,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Molar laws},
   Pages = {377-397},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373024}
}

@misc{fds373029,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Learning, II},
   Pages = {501-531},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373029}
}

@misc{fds373030,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING SECOND EDITION
             Preface},
   Pages = {XIII-XV},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373030}
}

@misc{fds373027,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Foraging and behavioral ecology},
   Pages = {287-312},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373027}
}

@misc{fds373028,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Choice: dynamics and decision rules},
   Pages = {242-286},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373028}
}

@misc{fds373025,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Time and memory, I},
   Pages = {398-420},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373025}
}

@misc{fds373021,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Models of classical conditioning},
   Pages = {486-500},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373021}
}

@misc{fds373018,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The evolution, development, and modification of
             behavior},
   Pages = {1-23},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373018}
}

@misc{fds373019,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Reflexes},
   Pages = {38-66},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373019}
}

@misc{fds373020,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Learning, I},
   Pages = {457-485},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373020}
}

@misc{fds373036,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Stimulus control and cognition},
   Pages = {313-344},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds373036}
}

@misc{fds374167,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Direct orientation and feedback},
   Pages = {67-101},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds374167}
}

@misc{fds374168,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Feeding regulation: a model motivational
             system},
   Pages = {175-204},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds374168}
}

@misc{fds374169,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Comparative cognition},
   Pages = {563-578},
   Booktitle = {ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR AND LEARNING, 2ND EDITION},
   Year = {2016},
   ISBN = {978-1-107-44290-0},
   Key = {fds374169}
}

@misc{fds325716,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Learning as adaptation},
   Pages = {37-98},
   Booktitle = {Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes: Volume 2:
             Conditioning and Behavior Theory},
   Publisher = {PSYCHOLOGY PRESS},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781848723900},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315770437},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781315770437},
   Key = {fds325716}
}

@misc{fds325717,
   Author = {Jozefowiez, J and Machado, A and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Cognitive versus associative decision rules in
             timing},
   Pages = {355-377},
   Booktitle = {Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and
             Neuroscience of Temporality},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780262019941},
   Key = {fds325717}
}

@misc{fds373037,
   Author = {Zanutto, BS and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Dynamics of Feeding Behavior: Role of Hypothalamic and
             Satiety Signals},
   Pages = {929-939},
   Booktitle = {Handbook of Behavior, Food and Nutrition},
   Publisher = {Springer New York},
   Editor = {V.R. Preedy and Watson, R.R and Martin, C.R. et
             al.},
   Year = {2011},
   ISBN = {9780387922706},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_61},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_61},
   Key = {fds373037}
}

@misc{fds157140,
   Author = {John Staddon},
   Title = {Epilogue},
   Pages = {389-390},
   Booktitle = {Reflections on Adaptive Behavior: Essays in Honor of J. E.
             R. Staddon},
   Editor = {N. K. Innis},
   Year = {2008},
   ISBN = {978-0-262-09044-5},
   Key = {fds157140}
}

@misc{fds287988,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Is animal learning optimal?},
   Journal = {Constructal Theory of Social Dynamics},
   Pages = {161-167},
   Publisher = {Springer US},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780387476803},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000250287000008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-47681-0_8},
   Key = {fds287988}
}

@misc{fds349307,
   Author = {Jozefowiez, J and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Operant behavior},
   Pages = {75-101},
   Booktitle = {Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780123705099},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00087-5},
   Abstract = {Operant behavior is behavior guided by its consequences.
             Conditioning operant behavior requires making a biologically
             important event, or a stimulus signaling such an event,
             depend on the occurrence of a target operant response. If
             this arrangement leads to an increase in the probability of
             the target response, the contingent event is termed a
             reinforcer and the associated process reinforcement. In this
             chapter, we review the conditions under which reinforcement
             takes place, that is, how an animal is able to detect that a
             reinforcer is delivered as the consequence of the emission
             of a behavior (operant learning). We look at how behavior is
             modulated by its consequences in situations in which
             reinforcement occurs at a fixed time after a specific event
             (interval timing) and situations in which the animal has the
             choice between several response alternatives, each
             reinforced according to a different rule (operant choice).
             Finally, we review theories that explain why some events
             have reinforcing properties (reinforcement
             theory).},
   Doi = {10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00087-5},
   Key = {fds349307}
}

@misc{fds287981,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Humanism and Skinner's radical behaviorism},
   Journal = {BEHAVIOR THEORY AND PHILOSOPHY},
   Pages = {129-146},
   Booktitle = {Behavior theory and philosophy},
   Publisher = {KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBL},
   Editor = {Lattal, KA and Chase, PN},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-306-47780-7},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000189346100007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287981}
}

@misc{fds287989,
   Author = {Cerutti, DL and Chelaru, IM and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Detecting mine-like targets: Synergistic effects of
             correlated and uncorrelated sensor channels},
   Journal = {Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical
             Engineering},
   Volume = {4394},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {859-867},
   Publisher = {SPIE},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {December},
   ISBN = {0-8194-4089-2},
   ISSN = {0277-786X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000175016500084&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {We report results from an experiment designed to study the
             perceptual and learning processes involved in the detection
             of land mines. Subjects attempted to identify the location
             of spatially distributed targets identified by a sweeping a
             cursor across a computer screen. Invisible screen "objects"
             were identified by either tones (A) or clicks (B) or both.
             Objects defined by a tone or a click only are distracters;
             the single object defined by both is the target (mine). We
             looked at the effect on target detectability of the number
             and spatial distribution of distracters. As expected from
             theoretical analysis, target detectability was highest when
             A and B distracters were negatively correlated; lowest when
             they were positively correlated. Under these conditions,
             detectability is was also inversely related to the number of
             A distracters (which were spatially diffuse) but was largely
             unaffected by the number of B distracters (which were
             punctate). Adding a second sensor channel greatly enhanced
             target detectability, especially if A and B distracters were
             spatially uncorrelated or negatively correlated.},
   Doi = {10.1117/12.445414},
   Key = {fds287989}
}

@misc{fds288023,
   Author = {Cerutti, DT and Chelaru, IM and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Detecting hidden targets: a procedure for studying
             performance in a mine-detection-like task},
   Journal = {Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical
             Engineering},
   Volume = {4038},
   Pages = {102-109},
   Booktitle = {Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and
             Minelike Targets},
   Publisher = {Washington, D.C.: SPIE},
   Editor = {Abinash, C. Dubey and James F. Harvey and J. Thomas Broach and Regina E. Dugan},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-8194-3664-X},
   ISSN = {0277-786X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000166957700010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {We report preliminary results from an experiment designed to
             study the perceptual and learning processes involved in the
             detection of land mines. Subjects attempted to identify the
             location of spatially distributed targets identified by a
             sweeping a cursor across a computer screen. Each point on
             the screen was associated with a certain tone intensity;
             targets were louder than 'distractor' objects. We looked at
             the effects on target detection and false-alarm rates of the
             intensity difference between target and distractor signals,
             the number of distractors and training order. The time to
             detect 50% of targets (threshold detection time) was
             measured by a rapid adaptive technique (PEST) which
             generated reliable thresholds within few trials. The results
             are consistent with a simple model for the detection of
             cryptic prey by foraging predators: search was slower with
             more distractors, and the effect of distractors was greater
             when S/N ratio was lower. Although subjects got no accuracy
             feedback, performance improved somewhat with experience and
             was slightly better in the low S/N condition when it
             followed the high S/N condition. The procedure seems to be a
             useful one for studying more complex mine-related detection
             tasks with a range of signal types and numbers of concurrent
             detection signals.},
   Doi = {10.1117/12.396222},
   Key = {fds288023}
}

@misc{fds25809,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Theoretical Behaviorism},
   Pages = {217-241},
   Booktitle = {Handbook of Behaviorism},
   Publisher = {New York: Academic Press},
   Editor = {W. O'Donohus and R. Kitchener},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds25809}
}

@misc{fds287970,
   Author = {Staddon, JER and Chelaru, IM},
   Title = {A diffusion-based guidance system for autonomous
             agents},
   Journal = {Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical
             Engineering},
   Volume = {3390},
   Pages = {404-411},
   Publisher = {SPIE},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {March},
   ISBN = {0-8194-2839-6},
   ISSN = {0277-786X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000073452600042&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Search strategy is an important component of any system that
             uses autonomous agents to detect and neutralize mines. We
             describe a simple and efficient search strategy derived from
             research on the adaptive spatial behavior of animals.
             Electromagnetic sensor data are processed to obtain a
             discrete spatial target distribution. The target
             distribution is used as input for a dynamic diffusion
             process. The diffusion surface is used by the demining agent
             to optimize its spatial moves through a hill climbing
             technique. The agent chooses to move to the position with
             the highest diffusion surface value. If the same diffusion
             surface is available to all agents, the system can be scaled
             to guide an indefinite number of independent,
             non-interfering agents.},
   Doi = {10.1117/12.304848},
   Key = {fds287970}
}

@misc{fds287987,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {The dynamics of memory in animal learning},
   Journal = {ADVANCES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, VOL 2},
   Series = {Vol. 2. Proceedings of the XXVI International Congress of
             Psychology},
   Pages = {259-274},
   Booktitle = {Advances in Psychological Science},
   Publisher = {PSYCHOLOGY PRESS},
   Editor = {Sabourin, M and Craik, F and Robert, M},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-86377-471-7},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000084945800011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287987}
}

@misc{fds25811,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R. and I.M. Chelaru},
   Title = {Diffusion-based guidance systems for autonomous
             agents},
   Series = {SPIE Proceedings},
   Booktitle = {Applications and Science of Computational
             Intelligence},
   Editor = {S.K. Rogers and D.B. Fogel and J.C. Bezdek and B.
             Bosacchi},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds25811}
}

@misc{fds25813,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R. and Zanutto, B.S.},
   Title = {In praise of parsimony},
   Booktitle = {Models for Action: Mechanisms for Adaptive
             Behavior},
   Publisher = {New York: Erlbaum},
   Editor = {C.D.L. Wynne and J.E.R. Staddon},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds25813}
}

@misc{fds287976,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Why behaviorism needs internal states},
   Journal = {INVESTIGATIONS IN BEHAVIORAL EPISTEMOLOGY},
   Pages = {107-119},
   Booktitle = {Investigations in behavioral epistemology},
   Publisher = {CONTEXT PRESS},
   Editor = {Hayes, LJ and Ghezzi, PM},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {1-878978-29-2},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000088060500011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287976}
}

@misc{fds25817,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R. and Zanutto, B.S},
   Title = {Feeding dynamics: why rats eat in meals and what this means
             for foraging and feeding regulation},
   Booktitle = {Learning, motivation and cognition: the functional
             behaviorism of Robert C. Bolles},
   Publisher = {Washington: American Psychological Association},
   Editor = {M.E. Bouton and M.S. Fanselow},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds25817}
}

@misc{fds25818,
   Author = {Higa, J.J. and Staddon, J.E.R.},
   Title = {Dynamic models of rapid temporal control in
             animals},
   Booktitle = {Time and behavior: psychological and neurobehavioral
             analysis},
   Publisher = {Elsevier Science},
   Editor = {C.M. Bradshaw and E. Szabadi},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds25818}
}

@misc{fds288011,
   Author = {DRAGOI, V and STADDON, JER},
   Title = {A COMPETITIVE NEURAL-NETWORK MODEL FOR THE PROCESS OF
             RECURRENT CHOICE},
   Journal = {PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1993 CONNECTIONIST MODELS SUMMER
             SCHOOL},
   Pages = {65-72},
   Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 1993 Connectionist Models Summer
             School},
   Publisher = {LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC PUBL},
   Editor = {Mozer, MC and Smolensky, P and Touretzky, DS and Elman, JL and Weigend,
             AS},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-8058-1590-2},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1994BA72D00008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288011}
}

@misc{fds41337,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Verstärkungsverzögerung und Wahl},
   Pages = {208-233},
   Booktitle = {Operantes lernen},
   Publisher = {München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag},
   Editor = {W. F. Angermeier and P. Bednorz and S. R. Hursh},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds41337}
}

@misc{fds41338,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Optimierungs-Analysen des operanten Verhaltens},
   Pages = {179-207},
   Booktitle = {Operantes lernen},
   Publisher = {München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag},
   Editor = {W. F. Angermeier and P. Bednorz and S. R. Hursh},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds41338}
}

@misc{fds41339,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Ketten-programme und konditionierte Verstärkung},
   Pages = {167-178},
   Booktitle = {Operantes lernen},
   Publisher = {München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag},
   Editor = {W. F. Angermeier and P. Bednorz and S. R. Hursh},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds41339}
}

@misc{fds287984,
   Author = {STADDON, JER},
   Title = {A NOTE ON RATE-SENSITIVE HABITUATION},
   Journal = {FROM ANIMALS TO ANIMATS 2},
   Pages = {203-207},
   Booktitle = {Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the
             Simulation of Adaptive Behavior},
   Publisher = {M I T PRESS},
   Editor = {Meyer, JA and Roitblat, HL and Wilson, SW},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-262-63149-0},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993BA26G00024&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds287984}
}

@misc{fds325720,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Reinforcement learning: Reverse-engineering the behavior of
             pigeons},
   Journal = {International Conference on Fuzzy Theory and Technology
             Proceedings, Abstracts and Summaries},
   Pages = {8},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {December},
   Abstract = {Understanding how the brain works is in principles just like
             understanding any other complex mechanism. Human brains and
             human beings are hard to work with, so the lower animals
             provide a better starting place. There are two parts to the
             problem: How do the pieces function individually
             (neuroscience)? And, How does the system work as a whole
             (experimental psychology)? We work on the second problem by
             devising, and testing experimentally, simple dynamic models
             for the behavior of pigeons in learning tasks. I will give
             examples from recent work on reinforcement
             learning.},
   Key = {fds325720}
}

@misc{fds287966,
   Author = {Davis, DGS and Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Memory for Reward in Probabilistic Choice: Markovian and
             Non-Markovian Properties},
   Journal = {Behaviour},
   Volume = {114},
   Number = {1-4},
   Pages = {37-64},
   Publisher = {BRILL},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7959},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1990EA06900004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Pigeons
             were rewarded with food for pecking keys in various forms of
             two-armed bandit situation for an extended series of daily
             sessions in two experiments. The average daily preference
             (S=R/[R+L]) is very well fit by a markovian linear model in
             which predicted preference today is an average of predicted
             preference yesterday and reinforcement conditions today:
             s(N+1) = as(N) + (1-a)A(N+1), where A(N+1) is set equal to 1
             when all rewards are for the Right response, and 0 when all
             are for the Left, and a is a longterm memory parameter. This
             linear model explains some apparent paradoxes in earlier
             reports of memory effects in two-armed bandit experiments.
             Nevertheless, closer examination of the details of
             preference changes within each experimental session showed
             several kinds of non-markovian effects. The most important
             was a regression at the beginning of each experimental
             session towards a preference characteristic of earlier
             sessions (spontaneous recovery). This effect, but not a
             smaller, less reliable non-markovian reminiscence effect, is
             consistent with a very simple rule, namely that the effect
             on preference of each individual reward for a Right or Left
             response is inversely related to how long ago the reward
             occurred. Thus, animals learn to prefer the rewarded side
             each day because these rewards are recent; but they regress
             to earlier preferences overnight because the most recent
             rewards become relatively less recent with lapse of
             time.</jats:p> </jats:sec>},
   Doi = {10.1163/156853990X00040},
   Key = {fds287966}
}

@misc{fds288017,
   Author = {STADDON, JER and ZHANG, Y},
   Title = {ON THE ASSIGNMENT-OF-CREDIT PROBLEM IN OPERANT
             LEARNING},
   Journal = {IJCNN-90-WASH DC : INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL
             NETWORKS, VOLS 1 AND 2},
   Pages = {A122-A125},
   Booktitle = {Neural networks of conditioning and action, the XIIth
             Harvard Symposium},
   Publisher = {LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC PUBL},
   Editor = {CAUDILL, M},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-8058-0754-3},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1990BS92H00031&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds288017}
}

@misc{fds41371,
   Author = {Reid, A. K. and Staddon, J. E. R},
   Title = {Mechanisms of schedule entrainment},
   Booktitle = {Neurobiology of behavioural stereotypy},
   Publisher = {New York: Oxford University Press},
   Editor = {S. J. Cooper and C. T. Dourish},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds41371}
}

@misc{fds41380,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Animal psychology: The tyranny of anthropocentrism},
   Series = {Perspectives in ethology, Vol. 8},
   Pages = {123-135},
   Booktitle = {Whither ethology?},
   Publisher = {London: Plenum},
   Editor = {P. Klopfer and P. P. G. Bateson},
   Year = {1988},
   Key = {fds41380}
}

@misc{fds41384,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Learning as inference},
   Pages = {59-77},
   Booktitle = {Evolution and learning},
   Publisher = {Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum},
   Editor = {R. C. Bolles, and M.D. Beecher},
   Year = {1988},
   Key = {fds41384}
}

@misc{fds41396,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Optimality theory and behavior},
   Pages = {179-198},
   Booktitle = {The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and
             optimality},
   Publisher = {Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press},
   Editor = {J. Dupré},
   Year = {1987},
   Key = {fds41396}
}

@misc{fds41399,
   Author = {Staddon, J. E. R. and Reid, A. K},
   Title = {Adaptation to reward},
   Pages = {497-523},
   Booktitle = {Foraging behavior},
   Publisher = {New York: Plenum},
   Editor = {A. C. Kamil and J. R. Krebs and H. R. Pulliam},
   Year = {1987},
   Key = {fds41399}
}

@misc{fds41400,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Principles of database management},
   Pages = {55-81},
   Booktitle = {Microcomputers in medicine},
   Publisher = {Amsterdam: Elsevier},
   Editor = {M.J. Geisow and A.N. Barrett},
   Year = {1987},
   Key = {fds41400}
}

@misc{fds41405,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {The comparative psychology of operant behavior},
   Pages = {83-94},
   Booktitle = {Behavior analysis and contemporary psychology},
   Publisher = {Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum},
   Editor = {C. F. Lowe and M. Richelle and D. E. Blackman and C. M.
             Bradshaw},
   Year = {1985},
   Key = {fds41405}
}

@misc{fds41406,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Inference, memory and representation},
   Pages = {287-295},
   Booktitle = {Memory systems of the brain: Animal and human cognitive
             processes},
   Publisher = {New York: Guilford Publications},
   Editor = {N.M. Weinberger and J.L. McGaugh and G. Lynch},
   Year = {1985},
   Key = {fds41406}
}

@misc{fds41414,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {On discrimination},
   Booktitle = {How to think straight},
   Publisher = {Durham, NC: Duke University Press},
   Year = {1984},
   Key = {fds41414}
}

@misc{fds41419,
   Author = {Staddon, J. E. R. and Gendron, R. P},
   Title = {Search image and the optimal detection of cryptic
             prey},
   Pages = {269},
   Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 18th International Ethological
             Conference},
   Year = {1983},
   Key = {fds41419}
}

@misc{fds41487,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Behavioral competition, contrast, and matching},
   Series = {Vol. 2 of Quantitative analyses of behavior, a five-volume
             series},
   Pages = {243- 261},
   Booktitle = {Quantitative analyses of operant behavior: Matching and
             maximizing accounts},
   Publisher = {Cambridge, MA: Ballinger},
   Editor = {M. L. Commons and R. J. Herrnstein and H. Rachlin},
   Year = {1982},
   Key = {fds41487}
}

@misc{fds41492,
   Author = {Hinson, J. M. and Staddon, J. E. R},
   Title = {Maximizing on interval schedules},
   Booktitle = {Recent developments in the quantification of steady-state
             operant behavior},
   Publisher = {Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland},
   Editor = {C. M. Bradshaw and C. F. Lowe and E. Szabadi},
   Year = {1981},
   Key = {fds41492}
}

@misc{fds41494,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Reinforcement schedules},
   Booktitle = {The Oxford companion to animal behaviour},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   Editor = {D. J. McFarland},
   Year = {1981},
   Key = {fds41494}
}

@misc{fds41495,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Operant behavior},
   Booktitle = {The Oxford companion to animal behaviour},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   Editor = {D. J. McFarland},
   Year = {1981},
   Key = {fds41495}
}

@misc{fds41496,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {On a possible relation between cultural transmission and
             genetical evolution},
   Series = {Perspectives in ethology: Vol. 4},
   Booktitle = {Advantages of diversity},
   Publisher = {London: Plenum},
   Editor = {P. Klopfer and P. P. G. Bateson},
   Year = {1981},
   Key = {fds41496}
}

@misc{fds41502,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Obesity and the operant regulation of feeding},
   Booktitle = {The analysis of motivational processes},
   Publisher = {London: Academic Press},
   Editor = {F. M. Toates and T. R. Halliday},
   Year = {1980},
   Key = {fds41502}
}

@misc{fds287961,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {Optimality Analyses of Operant Behavior and their Relation
             to Optimal Foraging},
   Pages = {101-141},
   Booktitle = {Limits to Action: The Allocation of Individual
             Behavior},
   Publisher = {Academic Press},
   Editor = {J. E. R. Staddon},
   Year = {1980},
   ISBN = {0-12-662650-2},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/8397 Duke open
             access},
   Key = {fds287961}
}

@misc{fds41517,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Schedule-induced behavior},
   Booktitle = {Handbook of operant behavior},
   Publisher = {Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall},
   Editor = {W. K. Honig and J. E. R. Staddon},
   Year = {1977},
   Key = {fds41517}
}

@misc{fds41519,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Behavioral competition in conditioning situations: Notes
             toward a theory of generalization and inhibition},
   Booktitle = {Operant-Pavlovian interactions. Hillsdale},
   Publisher = {Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum},
   Editor = {H. Davis and H. M. B. Hurwitz},
   Year = {1977},
   Key = {fds41519}
}

@misc{fds41526,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Learning as adaptation},
   Volume = {2},
   Pages = {37-98},
   Booktitle = {Handbook of learning and cognitive processes},
   Publisher = {New York: Erlbaum},
   Editor = {W. K. Estes},
   Year = {1975},
   Key = {fds41526}
}

@misc{fds41537,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Temporal control and the theory of reinforcement
             schedules},
   Pages = {209-262},
   Booktitle = {Reinforcement: Behavioral analyses},
   Publisher = {New York: Academic Press},
   Editor = {R. M. Gilbert and J. R. Millenson},
   Year = {1972},
   Key = {fds41537}
}

@misc{fds41551,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Reinforcement omission and contrast on fixed- interval
             schedules},
   Booktitle = {Proceedings of the XIX International Congress of
             Psychology},
   Publisher = {London, England.},
   Year = {1969},
   Key = {fds41551}
}


%% Edited Volumes   
@misc{fds25815,
   Author = {Wynne, C.D.L. and Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Models for Action: Mechanisms for Adaptive
             Behavior},
   Publisher = {New York: Erlbaum},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds25815}
}

@misc{fds41367,
   Author = {Commons, M. L. and Grossberg, S. and Staddon, J. E.
             R},
   Title = {Neural networks of conditioning and action, the XIIth
             Harvard Symposium},
   Pages = {xx, 359},
   Publisher = {Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds41367}
}

@misc{fds41422,
   Author = {Honig, W. K. and Staddon, J. E. R},
   Title = {Manual de la conducta operante},
   Publisher = {Mexico: Editorial Trillas},
   Year = {1983},
   Key = {fds41422}
}

@misc{fds41503,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Limits to action: The allocation of individual
             behavior},
   Publisher = {New York: Academic Press},
   Year = {1980},
   Key = {fds41503}
}

@misc{fds41515,
   Author = {Honig, W. K. and Staddon, J. E. R},
   Title = {Handbook of operant behavior},
   Publisher = {Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall},
   Year = {1977},
   Key = {fds41515}
}


%% Book Reviews   
@article{fds25806,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Review of The myth of ownership: taxes and
             justice},
   Journal = {Society},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {90-92},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds25806}
}

@article{fds41282,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Scientific Imperialism and Behaviorist Epistemology},
   Journal = {Behavior and Philosophy},
   Volume = {32},
   Pages = {231-242},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds41282}
}

@article{fds42076,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {The future},
   Journal = {Behavior and Philosophy},
   Volume = {32},
   Pages = {243-245},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds42076}
}

@article{fds25822,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Memories of Memorial Hall},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {77},
   Pages = {392},
   Year = {2002},
   Key = {fds25822}
}

@article{fds25820,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {The Trouble with Stanley...A Review of The Trouble with
             Principle by Stanley Fish},
   Journal = {Behavior and Philosophy},
   Volume = {29},
   Pages = {63-74},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds25820}
}

@article{fds25823,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Science as Politics by Other Means: Fact and Analysis in an
             Ethical World},
   Journal = {Behavior & Philosophy},
   Volume = {29},
   Pages = {i-iii},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds25823}
}

@article{fds340475,
   Author = {Staddon, JER},
   Title = {On Responsibility in Science and Law},
   Volume = {16},
   Pages = {146-174},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {1999},
   Abstract = {Respon’sible, liable to be called to account or render
             satisfaction: answerable: capable of dis-charging duty: able
             to pay.2 The old Chambers’s dictionary gives a
             behavioristic view of re-sponsibility: in terms of action,
             not thought or belief. “Lust in the heart” is not
             equated to lust in flagrante. It is this view I shall
             explore in this paper, rather than the more subjective
             notion of moral responsibility, as in “I feel moral
             responsibility (i.e., guilt) for not doing anything to save
             the Tutsis [Hutus, ethnic Albanians, etc.].”...},
   Key = {fds340475}
}

@article{fds25812,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Instinct and the operant (Editorial)},
   Journal = {Behavior and Philosophy},
   Volume = {26},
   Pages = {1-2},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds25812}
}

@article{fds25824,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Creativity is first criterion},
   Journal = {Journal of NIH Research (Advise and Dissent)},
   Volume = {13},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds25824}
}

@article{fds25816,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Who should pay for science? Essay review of The Economic
             Laws of Scientific Research by T. Kealey},
   Journal = {Reason},
   Pages = {64-65},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {February},
   Key = {fds25816}
}

@article{fds41284,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Theory and behavior analysis: comment on The S-R Issue: Its
             status in behavior analysis and in Donahoe and Palmer's
             Learning and Complex Behavior},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {67},
   Pages = {245-246},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds41284}
}

@article{fds41287,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Freedom from fear?},
   Journal = {The Oxford American},
   Pages = {103-106},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {Spring},
   Key = {fds41287}
}

@article{fds41340,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Review of B. F. Skinner: A life by D. W. Bjork and B. F.
             Skinner: A reappraisal, by M. N. Richelle},
   Journal = {American Scientist},
   Volume = {82},
   Pages = {584-585},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds41340}
}

@article{fds41343,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Pepper with a pinch of psalt: A comment on Contextualistic
             Mechanism or Mechanistic Contextualism},
   Journal = {The Behavior Analyst},
   Volume = {16},
   Pages = {245-250},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds41343}
}

@article{fds41356,
   Author = {'Group, L. A. B.'},
   Title = {Omnium Skinnerium: everything you ever wanted to know about
             the experimental analysis of behavior. Collective review of
             Experimental Analysis of Behavior, (I. H. Iversen & K. A.
             Lattal, Eds.)},
   Journal = {Behavioural Processes},
   Volume = {xx},
   Pages = {209-217},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds41356}
}

@article{fds41360,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Review of Bionomics: The inevitability of capitalism, by
             Michael Rothschild (New York: Henry Holt,
             1990)},
   Journal = {Quarterly Review of Biology},
   Volume = {67},
   Pages = {95-96},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds41360}
}

@article{fds41364,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {“The distemper of learning...” A review of S. B. Klein
             and R. R. Mowrer (Eds.) Contemporary Learning Theories:
             Instrumental Conditioning Theory and the Impact of
             Biological Constraints on Learning},
   Journal = {Contemporary Psychology},
   Volume = {36},
   Pages = {506-507},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds41364}
}

@article{fds41401,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Review of Issues in the Ecological Study of Learning. Edited
             by T. D. Johnston, & A. T. Pietrewicz. Hillsdale, New
             Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. (1985)},
   Journal = {Animal Behaviour},
   Volume = {34},
   Pages = {304},
   Year = {1986},
   Key = {fds41401}
}

@article{fds41404,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Review of The Evolution of Operant Learning and Memory, by
             W. F. Angermeier. Basel: S. Karger, 1984},
   Journal = {Quarterly Review of Biology},
   Volume = {60},
   Pages = {114-115},
   Year = {1985},
   Key = {fds41404}
}

@article{fds41484,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {L'Animal-machine. Review of D. McFarland & A. Houston
             (Eds.), Quantitative ethology: The state space approach.
             London: Pitman Advanced Publishing, 1981},
   Journal = {Nature},
   Volume = {296},
   Pages = {274-275},
   Year = {1982},
   Key = {fds41484}
}

@article{fds41493,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {The science of the bottom line. Review of R. B. McKenzie &
             G. Tullock (Eds.), The new world of economics},
   Journal = {Behaviour Analysis Letters},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {62-64},
   Year = {1981},
   Key = {fds41493}
}

@article{fds41504,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Action and reaction},
   Journal = {Duke University Letters},
   Volume = {5},
   Pages = {1-3},
   Year = {1980},
   Key = {fds41504}
}

@article{fds41508,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Regulation and time allocation: A commentary on
             “conservation in behavior”},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: General},
   Volume = {108},
   Pages = {35-40},
   Year = {1979},
   Key = {fds41508}
}

@article{fds41518,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {On Herrnstein's equation and related forms},
   Journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
   Volume = {28},
   Pages = {163-170},
   Year = {1977},
   Key = {fds41518}
}

@article{fds41534,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {A note on behavioral contrast and frustration},
   Journal = {Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
   Volume = {26},
   Pages = {285-292},
   Year = {1974},
   Key = {fds41534}
}

@article{fds41538,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Review of R. Borger & F. Cioffi (Eds.), Explanation in the
             behavioural sciences. Cambridge University Press,
             1970},
   Journal = {American Journal of Psychology},
   Volume = {85},
   Pages = {605-611},
   Year = {1972},
   Key = {fds41538}
}

@article{fds41545,
   Author = {Staddon, J.E.R},
   Title = {Darwin explained: An object-lesson in theory construction.
             Review of M. T. Ghiselin (Ed.), The Triumph of the Darwinian
             Method},
   Journal = {Contemporary Psychology},
   Volume = {16},
   Pages = {689-691},
   Year = {1971},
   Key = {fds41545}
}