Publications of Edward J. Balleisen    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Books   
@book{fds321502,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Fraud: An American History from Barnum to
             Madoff},
   Pages = {i-479},
   Publisher = {Princeton University Press},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {February},
   ISBN = {978-0-691-16455-7},
   Abstract = {Economic duplicity has bedeviled American markets from the
             founding of the Republic. This wide-ranging history
             emphasizes the enduring connections between capitalist
             innovation and business fraud, as well as the vexed efforts
             by private organizations and state agencies to curb the
             worst economic deceptions. Placing recent fraud scandals in
             long-term context, the book argues that we rely solely on a
             policy of caveat emptor at our peril; and that a mixture of
             public education, sensible disclosure rules, and targeted
             enforcement campaigns can contain the problem of business
             fraud.},
   Key = {fds321502}
}

@book{fds321503,
   Title = {Business Regulation},
   Volume = {Three volume set},
   Editor = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {June},
   ISBN = {9781781951590},
   Abstract = {This comprehensive collection conveys leading scholarly
             ideas on modern regulatory governance since 1871. The first
             two volumes lay out the rationales for and critiques of
             technocratic governance in industrialized societies. They
             trace the evolution of regulatory institutions, highlighting
             the most recent era of globalization, deregulation,
             privatization and regulatory innovation. The third volume
             presents influential frameworks for understanding regulatory
             culture in action, assessing the impacts of regulatory
             policies, and explaining regulatory change. With an original
             introduction by the editor, this set is a definitive
             compendium for libraries, regulators, administrative
             lawyers, regulated businesses, NGOs and scholars of
             regulation from across the social sciences.},
   Key = {fds321503}
}

@book{fds286593,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Business Regulation (3 volumes)},
   Publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing},
   Year = {2015},
   Abstract = {Research Collection},
   Key = {fds286593}
}

@book{fds286620,
   Author = {E.J. Balleisen and D. Moss},
   Title = {Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of
             Regulation},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Balleisen, EJ and Moss, DA},
   Year = {2009},
   ISBN = {9780511657504},
   url = {http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/search/searchresults/?site_locale=en_GB},
   Abstract = {After two generations of emphasis on governmental
             inefficiency and the need for deregulation, we now see
             growing interest in the possibility of constructive
             governance, alongside public calls for new, smarter
             regulation. Yet there is a real danger that regulatory
             reforms will be rooted in outdated ideas. As the financial
             crisis has shown, neither traditional market failure models
             nor public choice theory, by themselves, sufficiently inform
             or explain our current regulatory challenges. Regulatory
             studies, long neglected in an atmosphere focused on
             deregulatory work, is in critical need of new models and
             theories that can guide effective policy-making. This
             interdisciplinary volume points the way toward the
             modernization of regulatory theory. Its essays by leading
             scholars move past predominant approaches, integrating the
             latest research about the interplay between human behavior,
             societal needs and regulatory institutions. The book
             concludes by setting out a potential research agenda for the
             social sciences.},
   Doi = {10.1017/cbo9780511657504},
   Key = {fds286620}
}

@book{fds286613,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Scenes from a Corporate Makeover: Columbia/HCA and Heathcare
             Fraud, 1992-2001},
   Publisher = {Fuqua School of Business, Duke University},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/9278 Duke open
             access},
   Key = {fds286613}
}

@book{fds286612,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Balleisen EJ},
   Title = {Navigating Failure: Bankruptcy and Commercial Society in
             Antebellum America},
   Publisher = {University of North Carolina Press},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://uncpress.unc.edu/browse/book_detail?title_id=732},
   Key = {fds286612}
}


%% Books in Progress   
@misc{fds225605,
   Author = {E.J. Balleisen},
   Title = {Business Regulation, 3 volumes},
   Publisher = {Elgar},
   Year = {2015},
   Key = {fds225605}
}


%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds372812,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {AMERICA’S ANTI-FRAUD ECOSYSTEM AND THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL
             TRUST: PERSPECTIVES FROM LEGAL PRACTITIONERS},
   Journal = {Northwestern University Law Review},
   Volume = {118},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {51-88},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {August},
   Abstract = {This contribution revives an autobiographical genre present
             in law reviews roughly a half-century ago, in which seasoned
             legal practitioners offered perspective on vital issues.
             Here, a senior deputy attorney general, a former federal
             prosecutor, a corporate defense attorney, and a legal aid
             lawyer each draw on their career experience to explore what
             they see as significant problems related to the law of
             consumer and investor fraud and the nature of consumer and
             investor trust. Their reflections emphasize the significance
             of law in action—how key actors seek to deploy legal
             mechanisms related to fraud and adjust their strategies in
             light of institutional changes, with powerful implications
             for legal culture and the practical workings of the legal
             system. They also offer sometimes conflicting
             recommendations for how American law might better respond to
             the enduring, thorny problem of deception in marketplaces.
             The practitioners all agree about the importance of
             leveraging data analytics to focus attention on the most
             problematic practices and firms, as well as the need to
             design disclosure rules that take behavioral realities into
             account. But there is instructive disagreement about the
             extent to which current rules appropriately balance the
             capacity of individuals who have experienced fraud-related
             harms to gain redress, against the imperative of shielding
             innocent firms from abusive allegations of wrongdoing. A
             brief analytical introduction emphasizes the advantages of
             an ethnographic approach as a means of understanding both
             positive and normative dimensions of fraud
             law.},
   Key = {fds372812}
}

@article{fds371250,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Howes, L and Wibbels, E},
   Title = {The impact of applied project-based learning on
             undergraduate student development},
   Journal = {Higher Education},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01057-1},
   Abstract = {A growing body of research suggests that “high-impact
             practices” such as project-based and experiential learning
             make important contributions to undergraduate student
             development and outcomes. However, most attempts to evaluate
             such programs are based on qualitative or self-reported data
             generated from small samples. This study examines the impact
             on student development of a large university program that
             incorporates project-based learning into applied, vertically
             integrated, interdisciplinary research teams. We deploy a
             range of evidence, including self-reported assessments with
             a comparison group, a matched-pairs analysis of educational
             outcomes, participant surveys, and an alumni survey. By
             including a counterfactual comparison, our study
             demonstrates that applied projects can foster intellectual
             growth and positive academic outcomes among undergraduate
             students by: (1) contributing to skill development in
             relation to research, teamwork, and critical thinking; (2)
             developing closer relationships among students, faculty, and
             others within the university; (3) increasing the likelihood
             that a student graduates with distinction; and (4)
             contributing to career discernment that shapes students’
             post-graduate trajectories, often predisposing students
             toward careers in public service. We comment on the most
             important factors for faculty and universities seeking to
             replicate this model: an emphasis on team organization and
             operations; the opportunity for students to develop close
             relationships aided by layered mentoring; and applied
             research. We also lay out the case for developing a general
             structure of evaluation for such programs to facilitate
             comparisons across educational contexts.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s10734-023-01057-1},
   Key = {fds371250}
}

@article{fds367403,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Chin, R},
   Title = {The Case for Bringing Experiential Learning into the
             Humanities},
   Journal = {Daedalus},
   Volume = {151},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {138-152},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01934},
   Abstract = {Drawing on innovative programs at the University of Michigan
             and Duke University, this essay explores an important trend
             in humanistic education: the provision of opportunities for
             experiential learning, whether for undergraduates or
             graduate students. Avenues for applied humanistic research,
             such as research-based internships and courses structured
             around collaborative, client-inflected research projects,
             provide numerous benefits. In addition to cultivating
             teamwork, leadership, and communications skills, such
             experiences build intellectual confidence, expand horizons,
             and foster motivation to pursue additional research
             challenges. Although humanistic experiments with
             experiential learning now abound across higher education,
             pedagogical conservatism among faculty has slowed the pace
             of change, with pilots often occurring outside the
             frameworks of standard curricular structures. We call on
             departments in the humanities and interpretive social
             sciences to embrace the promise of engaged, public-facing
             scholarly endeavor, and to make collaborative research a
             core feature of curricular expectations for students at all
             levels.},
   Doi = {10.1162/daed_a_01934},
   Key = {fds367403}
}

@article{fds369688,
   Author = {Balleisen, E},
   Title = {Public Purpose in the Evolution of American Higher
             Education},
   Journal = {Labor: Studies in Working-Class History},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {103-112},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/15476715-9361835},
   Doi = {10.1215/15476715-9361835},
   Key = {fds369688}
}

@article{fds354582,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The Prospects for Collaborative Research in Business
             History},
   Journal = {Enterprise and Society},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {824-852},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/eso.2020.68},
   Abstract = {After reflecting on the thematic evolution of business
             history as a field over the past 50 years, this revised
             presidential address invites readers to consider the
             potential payoffs of expanding the contexts in which
             business historians work together on research projects, as
             well as with colleagues from cognate fields and with
             students. In addition to charting the steady growth in
             collaborative research among business historians since 2000,
             the essay also identifies areas that especially lend
             themselves to this mode of historical inquiry, including
             comparative or transnational analysis that requires detailed
             knowledge of multiple societies, the development of oral
             history projects, and the use of data science techniques. It
             concludes by exploring the advantages of incorporating
             interdisciplinary research teams into curricular structures,
             using the example of the Bass Connections program at Duke
             University.},
   Doi = {10.1017/eso.2020.68},
   Key = {fds354582}
}

@article{fds347543,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Sven Beckert and Christine Desan, editors. American
             Capitalism: New Histories.},
   Journal = {The American Historical Review},
   Volume = {124},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {1112-1114},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhz485},
   Doi = {10.1093/ahr/rhz485},
   Key = {fds347543}
}

@article{fds342624,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Jacoby, MB},
   Title = {Consumer Protection after the Global Financial
             Crisis},
   Journal = {Georgetown Law Journal},
   Volume = {107},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {813-843},
   Publisher = {GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL ASSOC},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {A full decade has passed since the Global Financial Crisis
             (GFC) triggered a flood of foreclosures, crushed real estate
             and stock market valuations, and destroyed a number of
             leading financial service corporations. Freezing credit
             flows throughout North America and beyond, the GFC prompted
             a sharp eco-nomic slowdown, with the unemployment rate in
             the United States ticking up over ten percent. Crisis events
             that generate such substantial economic harms and attendant
             social pain typically prompt wide-ranging policy responses
             from legislators, regulators, and other governmental
             officials. The GFC was no exception. In the parlance of
             political science, the GFC represents a "focusing event" or
             a "policy shock," as described by one of us in a recent
             volume, along with Lori Bennear, Kim Krawiec, and Jonathan
             Wiener.1 Attracting attention from the press, experts,
             politicians, and voters, a policy shock prompts "policy
             autopsies," governmental explanations of what went wrong.
             Official investigations are undertaken by legis-lative
             committees, administrative agencies, interagency task
             forces, and/or inde-pendent commissions of inquiry,
             supplemented by the work of nongovernmental organizations
             and academics. Often, such endeavors involve extensive
             fact-finding and pursue careful analysis; always, they bear
             the mark of prior beliefs and political calculations.2 In
             some cases, policy autopsies lead policymakers to adjust
             their views about the nature of risks and revise their sense
             of how to bal-ance conflicting policy goals. In others,
             decisionmakers perceive the benefits of attempts to prevent
             future reoccurrences to be outweighed by the costs
             associated with proposed reforms. Crises, and the policy
             autopsies they produce, may also generate significant shifts
             in public opinion and influence stakeholders' under-standing
             of their longer term interests. All such aftershocks
             contribute to the na-ture of post-crisis policy
             responses.},
   Key = {fds342624}
}

@article{fds342625,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The "sucker list" and the evolution of American business
             fraud},
   Journal = {Social Research},
   Volume = {85},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {699-726},
   Publisher = {NEW SCHOOL UNIV},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds342625}
}

@article{fds342626,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Risk and Ruin: Enron and the Culture of American Capitalism.
             ByGavin Benke. Philadelphia: University of
             Pennsylvania Press, 2018. 272 pp. Figures, tables, notes,
             index. Cloth, $34.95. ISBN: 978-0-8122-5020-6.},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {92},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {772-774},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2018},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007680519000114},
   Doi = {10.1017/s0007680519000114},
   Key = {fds342626}
}

@article{fds330695,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, LS and Krawiec, KD and Wiener,
             JB},
   Title = {Introduction},
   Pages = {1-39},
   Booktitle = {Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil
             Spills, Nuclear Accidents, and Financial
             Crises},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, LS and Krawiec, KD and Wiener,
             JB},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {November},
   ISBN = {978-1107140219},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316492635},
   Doi = {10.1017/9781316492635},
   Key = {fds330695}
}

@article{fds330696,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, LS and Cheang, D and Free, J and Hayes, M and Pechar, E and Preston, AC},
   Title = {Institutional Mechanisms for Investigating the Regulatory
             Implications of a Major Crisis: The Commission of Inquiry
             and the Safety Board},
   Pages = {485-539},
   Booktitle = {Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil
             Spills, Nuclear Accidents, and Financial
             Crises},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, LS and Krawiec, KD and Wiener,
             JB},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {November},
   ISBN = {978-1107140219},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316492635},
   Doi = {10.1017/9781316492635},
   Key = {fds330696}
}

@article{fds330697,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, LS and Krawiec, KD and Wiener,
             JB},
   Title = {Recalibrating Risk: Crises, Learning, and Regulatory
             Change},
   Pages = {540-561},
   Booktitle = {Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil
             Spills, Nuclear Accidents, and Financial
             Crises},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, LS and Krawiec, KD and Wiener,
             JB},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {November},
   ISBN = {978-1107140219},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316492635},
   Doi = {10.1017/9781316492635},
   Key = {fds330697}
}

@article{fds305444,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, L and Cheang, D and Free, J and Hayes, M and Pechar, E and Preston, AC},
   Title = {Institutional Mechanisms for Investigating the Regulatory
             Implications of a Major Crisis: The Commission of Inquiry
             and the Safety Board},
   Pages = {485-539},
   Booktitle = {Policy Shock: Regulatory Responses to Nuclear Accidents,
             Offshore Oil Spill, and Financial Crises},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781107140219},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316492635.017},
   Abstract = {As we have seen, events like the 2008 financial crash, the
             BP- Deepwater Horizon Gulf oil spill, or the Fukushima
             nuclear accident trigger massive public attention and often
             significant regulatory reactions. Once media coverage and
             the crystallization of public opinion anoint such events as
             crises that require priority consideration, policy-makers
             have to discern a way forward. This process typically
             involves some effort to investigate the recent events and
             identify their causes. The bodies responsible for such
             retrospective analysis usually look ahead as well as back.
             They make judgments about whether policy-makers should
             revise their risk assessments in light of events,
             recalibrate their views of trade-offs among competing policy
             goals, and reconstruct strategies of risk management. There
             are many ways to structure investigation into the causes and
             policy implications of crisis events. In some cases,
             governments rely on the standard institutions of
             policy-making. Investigatory bodies at every level of
             government pride themselves in their ability to perform
             probing, incisive studies that reveal pivotal evidence and
             offer relevant analysis for the formulation of policy
             recommendations. The applicable legislative committees ask
             staff to undertake extensive background studies and hold a
             series of hearings in the usual course of business. They
             then publish extensive reports to guide and justify
             legislature reforms, or legislative inaction. Executive
             agencies responsible for mitigating or preventing relevant
             risks may pursue similar inquiries, whether based on staff
             research or the work of outside experts, and either alone or
             through the auspices of cross-agency task forces. The
             “normal” channels of policy assessment, however, have
             limitations. They sometimes lack expertise with regard to
             the issues at hand, and inevitably take place in a context
             of partisan politics. They also place the responsibility for
             policy analysis in the hands of the very institutions whose
             prior choices failed to prevent the crisis event. Officials
             within those institutions have strong incentives to shape
             explanatory narratives so as to deflect blame for the events
             that have brought such significant social and economic
             costs. These shortcomings have frequently led governments to
             shy away from the typical institutional channels of
             democratic governance as the most appropriate policy
             coroners to undertake a crisis event “autopsy.” On many
             occasions, governments have instead turned to ostensibly
             more independent mechanisms of investigation and policy
             analysis.},
   Doi = {10.1017/9781316492635.017},
   Key = {fds305444}
}

@article{fds336380,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, LS and Krawiec, KD and Wiener,
             JB},
   Title = {Introduction},
   Pages = {1-40},
   Booktitle = {Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil
             Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781107140219},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316492635.001},
   Abstract = {Crises punctuate our world. Their causes and consequences
             are woven through complex, interconnected social and
             technological systems. Consider these three recent events,
             each of which dramatically upended expectations about risk:
             • In the fall of 2008, the global financial system
             experienced a full-blown panic. Credit flows seized up,
             ushering in the worst global recession since the 1930s and
             leading newspapers to convey the resulting “shocks” to
             financial markets. • In April 2010, a blowout at the
             British Petroleum Deepwater Horizon drilling platform killed
             eleven workers and triggered a three-month-long oil spill,
             sending nearly five million barrels of crude into the
             Northern Gulf of Mexico, which fouled beaches, estuaries,
             and fishing grounds. • In March 2011, an earthquake and a
             resulting tsunami killed 20,000 people in Japan. The natural
             disaster also caused reactor meltdowns at the Fukushima
             nuclear power plant, forcing the evacuation of tens of
             thousands of people, unleashing a long-term leak of
             radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean and creating a
             daunting set of challenges as officials sought to stabilize
             pools of spent fuel rods and protect local populations from
             radioactive fallout. Each of these three recent events
             attracted extraordinary attention from the media and the
             global public, raising concerns about dangers that may lurk
             within the complex technological and social systems on which
             we depend to sustain our economy and way of life. They also
             generated criticisms of the regulatory systems that were
             supposed to prevent such failures, as well as demands for
             new regulatory actions to reduce the risks that the crises
             had brought into sharp relief. In the aftermath, policy
             elites and the broader public ponder the meaning of such
             events and look for appropriate responses. Once a consensus
             emerges that they indeed constitute crises (and sometimes
             even before), government agencies, legislative committees,
             think tanks, citizens’ groups, scholars, and often
             official commissions begin to investigate their causes,
             consider whether better policy might have prevented them,
             and debate what regulatory adjustments governments should
             adopt, if any.},
   Doi = {10.1017/9781316492635.001},
   Key = {fds336380}
}

@article{fds336379,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Bennear, LS and Krawiec, KD and Wiener,
             JB},
   Title = {Recalibrating risk: Crises, learning, and regulatory
             change},
   Pages = {540-561},
   Booktitle = {Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil
             Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781107140219},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316492635.018},
   Abstract = {It is often observed that crisis events spur new regulation.
             An extensive literature focuses on the role of disasters,
             tragedies, scandals, shocks, and other untoward events in
             stimulating regulatory responses (Baumgartner and Jones
             1993; Percival 1998; Kuran and Sunstein 1999; Birkland 2006;
             Repetto 2006; Wiener and Richman 2010; Wuthnow 2010). We
             have highlighted numerous examples of arguably crisis-driven
             regulation in the introductory chapter (Balleisen et al.,
             this volume) and in the several case study chapters in this
             book. The notion that crises spur regulation has become a
             “commonplace assertion,” and yet one that is “so
             widely held … that it remains virtually unexamined in
             empirical and historical analyses” (Carpenter and Sin
             2007, 149). Observing this relationship does not itself
             explain what causal mechanisms may be driving it (Carpenter
             and Sin 2007, 154). And the relationship does not always
             hold (Kahn 2007). We do not claim that all crises spur
             regulatory change, nor that all regulatory changes arise
             from crises. Some crisis events do not produce significant
             regulatory change – perhaps including mass shootings in
             the United States, and Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. Some
             regulatory changes occur without preceding crisis events –
             such as the Acid Rain Program of the 1990 Clean Air Act.
             This volume has sought to enrich the empirical understanding
             of how the process of crisis stimulus and regulatory
             response unfolds. Our main question has been not whether,
             but rather how, regulatory systems change in response to
             crises. Going beyond the generic assertion that crises spur
             regulation, we have explored diverse ways in which
             regulatory change may play out: how different types of
             regulatory responses may follow from different kinds of
             crises. In this volume, we have studied a set of cases in
             which some regulatory change typically did follow a crisis
             event, in order to understand how that process led to
             different types of regulatory changes in different contexts.
             The case studies in this volume – focusing on oil spills,
             nuclear power accidents, and financial crashes, with
             regulatory responses in the United States, Europe, and Japan
             – illustrate a wide array of crises, institutions, actors,
             countries, time periods, and policy changes.},
   Doi = {10.1017/9781316492635.018},
   Key = {fds336379}
}

@article{fds325686,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {American Better Business Bureaus, the Truth-in-Advertising
             Movement, and the Complexities of Legitimizing Business
             Self-Regulation over the Long Term},
   Journal = {Politics & Governance},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {42-53},
   Publisher = {Cogitato},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.790},
   Abstract = {This essay considers the question of how strategies of
             legitimatizing private regulatory governance evolve over the
             long term. It focuses on the century-long history of the
             American Better Business Bureau (BBB) network, a linked set
             of business-funded non-governmental organizations devoted to
             promoting truthful marketing. The BBBs took on important
             roles in standard-setting, monitoring, public education, and
             enforcement, despite never enjoying explicit delegation of
             authority from Congress or state legislatures. This effort
             depended on building legitimacy with three separate groups
             with very different perspectives and interests—the
             business community, a fractured American state, and the
             American public, in their roles as consumers and investors.
             The BBBs initially managed to build a strong reputation with
             each constituency during its founding period, from 1912 to
             1933. The Bureaus then in many ways adapted successfully to
             the emergence of a more assertive regulatory state from the
             New Deal through the mid 1970s. Eventually, however, the
             resurgence of conservative politics in the United States
             exposed the challenges of satisfying such divergent
             stakeholders, and led the BBBs to focus resolutely on
             shoring up its support from the business establishment. That
             choice, over time, undercut the Bureaus standing with other
             stakeholders, and especially the wider public. This history
             illustrates: the salience of generational amnesia within
             private regulatory institutions; the profound impact that
             the shifting nature of public faith in government can have
             on the strategies and reputation of private regulatory
             bodies; and the extent to which private regulators face
             long-term trade-offs among strategies to sustain legitimacy
             with different audiences. It also suggests a rich set of
             research questions for longer-term histories of other
             private regulatory institutions, in the United States, other
             societies, and at the international level.},
   Doi = {10.17645/pag.v5i1.790},
   Key = {fds325686}
}

@article{fds286586,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The Dialectics of Modern Regulatory Governance},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {xvi-xcviii},
   Booktitle = {Business Regulation},
   Publisher = {Elgar Publishing},
   Year = {2015},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/11557 Duke open
             access},
   Key = {fds286586}
}

@article{fds286607,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Rights of Way, Red Flags, and Safety Valves: Regulated
             Business Self-Regulation in America, 1850-1940},
   Pages = {75-126},
   Booktitle = {Regulierte Selbstregulierung in der westlichen Welt des
             späten 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhunderts / Regulated
             Self-Regulation in the Western World in the Late 19th and
             the Early 20th Century},
   Publisher = {Klostermann},
   Editor = {Collin, P and Bender, G and Ruppert, S and Seckelmann, M and Stolleis,
             M},
   Year = {2014},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/9279 Duke open
             access},
   Key = {fds286607}
}

@article{fds286623,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Brake, EK},
   Title = {Historical Perspective and Better Regulatory Governance: An
             Institutional Agenda for Reform},
   Journal = {Regulation & Governance},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {222-245},
   Year = {2014},
   url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rego.12000/abstract},
   Keywords = {historical analysis
 • institutional culture

             • institutional design
 • policy assessment

             • regulatory agencies},
   Abstract = {Compared to economics, sociology, political science, and
             law, the discipline of history has had a limited role in the
             wide-ranging efforts to reconsider strategies of regulatory
             governance, especially inside regulatory institutions. This
             article explores how more sustained historical perspective
             might improve regulatory decisionmaking. We first survey how
             a set of American regulatory agencies currently rely on
             historical research and analysis, whether for the purposes
             of public relations or as a means of supporting
             policymaking. We then consider how regulatory agencies might
             draw on history more self-consciously, more strategically,
             and to greater effect. Three areas stand out in this regard
             – the use of history to improve understanding of
             institutional culture; reliance on historical analysis to
             test the empirical plausibility of conceptual models that
             make assumptions about the likelihood of potential economic
             outcomes; and integration of historical research methods
             into program and policy evaluation.},
   Doi = {10.1111/rego.12000},
   Key = {fds286623}
}

@article{fds286614,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The ambiguities of business fraud and entrepreneurial
             reputation in progressive-era america},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {87},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {627-629},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0007-6805},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007680513001062},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0007680513001062},
   Key = {fds286614}
}

@article{fds286608,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Building a Doctoral Program in Business History},
   Pages = {54-67},
   Booktitle = {Teaching Business History: Insights and Ideas},
   Year = {2012},
   url = {http://http//www.hbs.edu/businesshistory/pdf/00-final-volume-1-report-Oct},
   Key = {fds286608}
}

@article{fds286624,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The Global Financial Crisis and Responsive Regulation: Some
             Avenues for Historical Inquiry},
   Journal = {University of British Columbia Law Review},
   Volume = {44},
   Pages = {557-587},
   Year = {2011},
   Key = {fds286624}
}

@article{fds286611,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The prospects for effective coregulation in the United
             States: A historian's view from the early twenty - first
             century},
   Pages = {443-481},
   Booktitle = {Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of
             Regulation},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Edward J. Balleisen and David Moss},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780521118484},
   url = {http://http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/economics/public-economics-and-public-policy/government-and-markets-toward-new-theory-regulation},
   Abstract = {As just about any observer of the American political scene
             over the past thirty years can attest, traditional modes of
             economic regulation by administrative agencies fell sharply
             out of favor in the United States in the quarter century
             after 1975. In areas as various as transportation, workplace
             safety, the environment, banking, and labor standards,
             skepticism about regulatory agencies became a dominant
             premise of policy debates. The assumptions and precepts of
             public choice scholarship, so carefully laid out by Jessica
             Leight in her contribution to this volume, filtered into the
             conceptual assumptions of elected officials and leading
             political commentators alike. Politicians and governmental
             officials increasingly worried about the “capture” of
             public agencies by private interests, leading to the
             latter's unjust enrichment; they grew ever more disquieted
             by the possibility that regulatory action would produce
             unanticipated outcomes that would harm economic growth; they
             feared that the enduring shortcomings of government –
             venal officialdom and tangled bureaucracy – would
             hamstring regulatory responses to even substantial
             socioeconomic problems. Although the critiques of the
             regulatory state emanated most consistently from political
             conservatives and libertarians, as well as business groups
             that viewed particular regulatory regimes as antithetical to
             their interests, they significantly shaped the worldview of
             many moderates and liberals as well. The most prominent
             consequence of the intellectual and political on-slaught
             against the administrative state has been deregulation –
             the selective dismantling of legal restrictions, mechanisms
             of governmental price/rate/fare setting, and systems of
             administrative monitoring that had previously structured
             market activity.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511657504.015},
   Key = {fds286611}
}

@article{fds318224,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Moss, DA},
   Title = {Introduction},
   Pages = {1-10},
   Booktitle = {Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of
             Regulation},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780521118484},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657504.001},
   Abstract = {After more than a generation of deregulation and a
             presidential declaration that the “era of big government
             is over, ” the political pendulum has apparently begun to
             swing back toward regulation. Calls for effective government
             action, long subdued, have grown louder and more numerous.
             The provocations are not hard to find: the financial crisis
             first and foremost, but also accounting scandals at some of
             the nation's largest corporations (Enron, WorldCom, etc.);
             lead-tainted toys from China; E. coli outbreaks in the
             domestic food supply; collapsing levees and bridges; rising
             global temperatures and the threat of fundamental climate
             change. One might expect that American lawmakers, confronted
             by these many challenges, could turn to experts in the
             academy for guidance. Yet to a surprisingly large extent,
             the academic discussion has remained stuck in a deregulatory
             mindset, more focused on government failure than on the
             ingredients of government effectiveness or success. As a
             result, there is a real danger that the new round of
             regulation will be rooted not in new research and new
             thinking, but rather in old ideas that are conveniently
             dusted off and reused in the absence of anything better.
             This book represents an attempt by concerned academics to
             begin moving beyond old ideas about regulation – very old
             ones that informed earlier rounds of regulatory activity as
             well as more recent ones that drove a wave of deregulation
             beginning in the late 1970s.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511657504.001},
   Key = {fds318224}
}

@article{fds318225,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Moss, DA},
   Title = {Toward a new theory of regulation: A research agenda for the
             future},
   Pages = {538-544},
   Booktitle = {Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of
             Regulation},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780521118484},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657504.018},
   Abstract = {As the global economy confronts its worst downturn since the
             Great Depression, and America begins to undertake some of
             the most ambitious policy initiatives since the New Deal,
             the country is urgently in need of fresh ideas about
             economic regulation. The financial crisis has shaken many
             core assumptions of the prevailing academic view of
             regulation, while popular attitudes toward government are
             shifting as well. Abundant evidence from polling data and
             the discussions surrounding the 2008 election suggest that a
             great many Americans want to see new approaches for
             addressing the nation's most pressing challenges. The
             deregulatory mindset that most influenced American
             policymakers over the last three decades seems to have given
             way to a new openness about the role of government in the
             market. What we need now are compelling conceptual
             frameworks for fashioning public policy that can encourage
             innovation while maintaining long-term financial stability,
             optimize both economic growth and shared prosperity, and
             strike sensible and cooperative balances between public and
             private governance. The necessity for such innovative
             thinking motivated the conference that in turn gave rise to
             the essays in this volume. In February of 2008, as the true
             significance of the emerging global financial crisis was
             just becoming visible, more than fifty scholars and
             policymakers met for several days to begin the work of
             fashioning a new research agenda on regulation and the
             economic role of the state.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511657504.018},
   Key = {fds318225}
}

@article{fds286587,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Conclusion},
   Pages = {538-544},
   Booktitle = {Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of
             Regulation},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Balleisen, E and Moss, D},
   Year = {2009},
   Key = {fds286587}
}

@article{fds286588,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Moss, D},
   Title = {Introduction},
   Volume = {85},
   Pages = {1-12},
   Booktitle = {Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of
             Regulation},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Balleisen, E and Moss, D},
   Year = {2009},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11120-004-3465-5},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11120-004-3465-5},
   Key = {fds286588}
}

@article{fds286610,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ and Eisner, M},
   Title = {The Promise and Pitfalls of Co-Regulation: How Governments
             Can Draw on Private Governance for Public
             Purpose},
   Pages = {127-149},
   Booktitle = {New Perspectives on Regulation},
   Publisher = {The Tobin Project},
   Editor = {Moss, D and Cisternino, J},
   Year = {2009},
   url = {http://tobinproject.org/books-papers/new-perspectives-regulation},
   Key = {fds286610}
}

@article{fds286621,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Private Cops on the Fraud Beat: The Limits of American
             Business Self-Regulation, 1895-1932},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {83},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {113-160},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2009},
   ISSN = {0007-6805},
   url = {http://http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8204904},
   Abstract = {<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>From the late 1890s
             through the 1920s, a new set of nonprofit, business-funded
             organizations spearheaded an American campaign against
             commercial duplicity. These new organizations shaped the
             legal terrain of fraud, built massive public-education
             campaigns, and created a private law-enforcement capacity to
             rival that of the federal government. Largely born out of a
             desire among business elites to fend off proposals for
             extensive regulatory oversight of commercial speech, the
             antifraud crusade grew into a social movement that was
             influenced by prevailing ideas about social hygiene and
             emerging techniques of private governance. This initiative
             highlighted some enduring strengths of business
             self-regulation, such as agility in responding to regulatory
             problems; it also revealed a key weakness, which was the
             tendency to overlook deceptive marketing when practiced by
             firms that were members of the business establishment.</jats:p>},
   Doi = {10.1017/s0007680500000222},
   Key = {fds286621}
}

@article{fds286594,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Bankruptcy and Bondage: The Ambiguities of Economic Freedom
             in the Civil War Era},
   Pages = {276-286},
   Booktitle = {The Problem of Evil: Slavery, Freedom, and the Ambiguities
             of American Reform},
   Publisher = {University of Massachussetts Press},
   Editor = {Mintz, S and Forbes, R and Stauffer, J},
   Year = {2007},
   Key = {fds286594}
}

@article{fds321504,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped
             American Independence},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {79},
   Number = {02},
   Pages = {353-363},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {Spring},
   Key = {fds321504}
}

@article{fds286625,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Bankruptcy and the Entrepreneurial Ethos in Antebellum
             American Law},
   Journal = {Australian Journal of Legal History},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {61-82},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/6681 Duke open
             access},
   Key = {fds286625}
}

@article{fds321505,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Victorian Insolvency: Bankruptcy, Imprisonment for Debt, and
             Company Winding-Up in Nineteenth-Century England. By V.
             Markham Lester · New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
             354 pp. Table, charts, appendix, index, notes, and
             bibliography. $69.00, ISBN 0-19-820518-X},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {03},
   Pages = {426-428},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {Fall},
   Key = {fds321505}
}

@article{fds286626,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Vulture Capitalism in Antebellum America: The 1841 Federal
             Bankruptcy Act and the Exploitation of Financial
             Distress},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {473-516},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1996},
   ISSN = {0007-6805},
   url = {http://http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8335593&fileId=S000768050004397X},
   Abstract = {<jats:p>There is, on an average, annually wrecked upon the
             Florida coast, about fifty vessels…. The great destruction
             of property consequent upon this state of things, and the
             hope of gain, have induced a settlement at Key West, where,
             to adjudicate upon the wrecked property, a court of
             admiralty has been established. A large number of vessels,
             from 20 to 30, are annually engaged as wreckers, lying about
             this coast to “help the unfortunate,” and to help
             themselves. These vessels are in many instances owned in
             whole or in part by the merchants of Key West; the same
             merchant frequently acts in quadruple capacity of owner of
             die wrecker, agent for the wreckers, consignee of the
             captain, and<jats:italic>agent for the underwriters</jats:italic>.
             Whose business he transacts with most assiduity, his own, or
             that of others, may be readily inferred.</jats:p><jats:p>—“Wrecks,
             Wrecking, and Wreckees, on Florida Reef,”<jats:italic>Hunt's
             Merchants' Magazine</jats:italic>6 (1842):
             349.</jats:p>},
   Doi = {10.2307/3117313},
   Key = {fds286626}
}


%% Articles in a Collection   
@article{fds225612,
   Author = {E.J. Balleisen and D. Moss},
   Title = {"Introduction" and "Conclusion"},
   Pages = {1-12, 538-44},
   Booktitle = {Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of
             Regulation},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Edward J. Balleisen and David Moss},
   Year = {2009},
   url = {http://http://www.tobinproject.org/books-papers/government-markets},
   Key = {fds225612}
}


%% Book Reviews   
@article{fds286597,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Review of "The Science of Deception: Psychology and Commerce
             in America" by Michael Pettit},
   Journal = {Law and History Review},
   Volume = {32},
   Pages = {215-217},
   Year = {2014},
   ISSN = {1939-9022},
   Key = {fds286597}
}

@article{fds286598,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Review of "Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of
             Capitalism and Risk in America" by Jonathan
             Levy},
   Journal = {American Historical Review},
   Number = {118},
   Pages = {1182-1184},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {2013},
   ISSN = {1937-5239},
   Key = {fds286598}
}

@article{fds177786,
   Author = {Review of Stephen Mihm},
   Title = {A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men, and the
             Making the United States},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {82},
   Pages = {369-72},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds177786}
}

@article{fds286605,
   Author = {Balleisen EJ},
   Title = {Review of "A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men,
             and the Making the United States" by Stephen
             Mihm},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {82},
   Pages = {369-372},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds286605}
}

@article{fds286606,
   Author = {Balleisen EJ},
   Title = {Review essay on "Andrew Carnegie" by David Nasaw and
             "Mellon: An American Life" by David Cannadine},
   Journal = {Historically Speaking},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {Jan/Feb},
   Pages = {39-43},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds286606}
}

@article{fds177784,
   Author = {Review Essay on Roy Kreitner},
   Title = {Calculating Promises: The Emergence of Modern American
             Contract Doctrine},
   Journal = {Law and Politics Book Review},
   Volume = {17},
   Pages = {705-12},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {August},
   Key = {fds177784}
}

@article{fds286604,
   Author = {Balleisen EJ},
   Title = {Review essay on "Calculating Promises: The Emergence of
             Modern American Contract Doctrine" by Roy
             Kreitner},
   Journal = {Law and Politics Book Review},
   Volume = {17},
   Pages = {705-712},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {August},
   Key = {fds286604}
}

@article{fds286603,
   Author = {Balleisen EJ},
   Title = {Review of "A Culture of Credit: Embedding Trust and
             Transparency in American Business" by Rowena
             Olegario},
   Journal = {Journal of American History},
   Volume = {93},
   Pages = {304-305},
   Year = {2007},
   Key = {fds286603}
}

@article{fds51951,
   Author = {Review of Jocelyn Wills},
   Title = {Boosters, Hustlers, and Speculators: Entrepreneurial Culture
             and the Rise of Minneapolis and St. Paul,
             1849-1883},
   Journal = {American Historical Review},
   Volume = {111},
   Pages = {196-97},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds51951}
}

@article{fds51952,
   Author = {Review of Scott Sandage},
   Title = {Born Losers: A History of Failure in America},
   Journal = {Journal of the Early Republic},
   Volume = {26},
   Pages = {139-42},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds51952}
}

@article{fds286602,
   Author = {Balleisen EJ},
   Title = {Review of "Born Losers: A History of Failure in America" by
             Scott Sandage},
   Journal = {Journal of the Early Republic},
   Volume = {26},
   Pages = {139-142},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds286602}
}

@article{fds286616,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Review of "Boosters, hustlers, and speculators:
             Entrepreneurial culture and the rise of Minneapolis and St.
             Paul, 1849-1883" by Jocelyn Wills},
   Journal = {American Historical Review},
   Volume = {111},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {196-197},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {2006},
   ISSN = {1937-5239},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000235511000100&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1086/ahr.111.1.196},
   Key = {fds286616}
}

@article{fds286609,
   Author = {Balleisen EJ},
   Title = {Review of "The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer
             Politics Shaped American Independence" by T.H.
             Breen},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {29},
   Pages = {353-363},
   Year = {2005},
   Key = {fds286609}
}

@article{fds6608,
   Author = {Review of David Skeel},
   Title = {Debt's Dominion: A History of Bankruptcy Law in
             America},
   Journal = {Law and History Review},
   Volume = {22},
   Pages = {190-91},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds6608}
}

@article{fds16619,
   Author = {Review of Bruce Mann},
   Title = {Republic of Debtors: Bankruptcy in the Age of American
             Independence},
   Journal = {Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography},
   Volume = {128},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {204-06},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds16619}
}

@article{fds286601,
   Author = {Balleisen EJ},
   Title = {Review of "Debt’s Dominion: A History of Bankruptcy Law in
             America" by David Skeel},
   Journal = {Law and History Review},
   Volume = {22},
   Pages = {190-191},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds286601}
}

@article{fds286615,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Review of "Republic of Debtors: Bankruptcy in the Age of
             American independence" by Bruce Mann},
   Journal = {Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography},
   Volume = {128},
   Pages = {204-205},
   Year = {2004},
   ISSN = {0031-4587},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000220818800007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds286615}
}

@article{fds16618,
   Author = {Review of Jonathan Glickstein},
   Title = {American Exceptionalism, American Anxiety: Wages,
             Competition and Degraded Labor in the Antebellum United
             States},
   Journal = {American Historical Review},
   Volume = {108},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {1448-49},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds16618}
}

@article{fds286618,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Review of "American Exceptionalism, American Anxiety: Wages,
             Competition, and Degraded Labor in the Antebellum United
             States" by Jonathan Glickstein},
   Journal = {American Historical Review},
   Volume = {108},
   Pages = {1448-1449},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {2003},
   ISSN = {1937-5239},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000187424800045&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1086/530011},
   Key = {fds286618}
}

@article{fds286617,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The Celebrated Showman Unmasked, Review Essay of The Showman
             and the Slave: Race, Death and Memory in Barnum’s America
             by Benjamin Reiss},
   Journal = {Reviews in American History},
   Volume = {30},
   Pages = {393-400},
   Publisher = {Johns Hopkins University Press},
   Year = {2002},
   ISSN = {1080-6628},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000178023400009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1353/rah.2002.0047},
   Key = {fds286617}
}

@article{fds286619,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Review of "Victorian Insolvency: Bankruptcy, Imprisonment
             for Debt, and Company Winding-up in Nineteenth-Century
             England" by V. Markham Lester},
   Journal = {Business History Review},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {Fall},
   Pages = {426-427},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1996},
   ISSN = {0007-6805},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=A1996WW74100015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.2307/3117255},
   Key = {fds286619}
}


%% Other   
@misc{fds286590,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {An Education They Won’t Forget},
   Journal = {Duke Magazine},
   Volume = {101},
   Number = {Special Issue},
   Pages = {38-39},
   Year = {2015},
   url = {http://dukemagazine.duke.edu/article/an-education-they-wont-forget},
   Key = {fds286590}
}

@misc{fds286589,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Submitting Proposals to the Business History Conference: A
             Guide to the Process},
   Journal = {The Business History Conference},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds286589}
}

@misc{fds286596,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The First 'Voice of Wall Street' A Study in
             Risk},
   Journal = {Echoes Business History Blog, Bloomberg News},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2012-06-22/downfall-of-first-voice-of-wall-street-a-study-in-risk},
   Key = {fds286596}
}

@misc{fds305445,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Building a Doctoral Program in Business History},
   Journal = {Teaching Business History: Insights and Debates},
   Pages = {54-67},
   Editor = {Friedman, W and Jones, G},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds305445}
}

@misc{fds286622,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {The Career Question in History},
   Journal = {Perspectives (Magazine of the American Historical
             Association)},
   Volume = {49},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {20-22},
   Year = {2011},
   url = {http://http//www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2011/1112/The-Career-Question-in-History.cfm},
   Key = {fds286622}
}

@misc{fds286600,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Regulation},
   Journal = {The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal
             History},
   Booktitle = {The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal
             History},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   Year = {2009},
   Key = {fds286600}
}

@misc{fds286584,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Bankrupt: Maxed out in America},
   Journal = {American RadioWorks},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds286584}
}

@misc{fds286599,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Reshaping Doctoral Education for the Next Generation: An
             Update on History’s Participation in the Carnegie
             Initiative on the Doctorate},
   Journal = {Perspectives},
   Volume = {44},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {49-51},
   Publisher = {American Historical Association},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds286599}
}

@misc{fds51950,
   Author = {E.J. Balleisen and Mitchell Fraas},
   Title = {Legal History on the Web},
   Year = {2006},
   url = {http://www.law.duke.edu/legal_history/portal/},
   Abstract = {web gateway to legal history in cyberspace.},
   Key = {fds51950}
}

@misc{fds286595,
   Author = {Balleisen, EJ},
   Title = {Bankruptcy Bill Is Where It Belongs: Shelved},
   Journal = {American Banker},
   Pages = {13},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds286595}
}