Politics, Philosophy & Economics Certificate Politics, Philosophy & Economics Certificate
Arts & Sciences
Duke University

 HOME > Arts & Sciences > ppae    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications of Michael C. Munger    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Books   
@book{fds327639,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Tomorrow 3.0: The Sharing-Middleman Economy},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2018},
   Key = {fds327639}
}

@book{fds302178,
   Author = {Anomaly, J and Brennan, G and Brennan, POSAPTG and Munger, MC and Sayre-McCord, G},
   Title = {Philosophy, Politics, and Economics An Anthology},
   Pages = {672 pages},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press, USA},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {June},
   ISBN = {0190207310},
   Abstract = {The only book on the market to include classical and
             contemporary readings from key authors in Philosophy,
             Politics, and Economics (PPE), this unique anthology
             provides a comprehensive overview of the central topics in
             this rapidly ...},
   Key = {fds302178}
}

@book{fds250200,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Munger, KM},
   Title = {Choosing in groups: Analytical politics revisited},
   Pages = {1-255},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781107070035},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707153},
   Abstract = {© Michael C. Munger and Kevin M. Munger 2015. This book is
             an introduction to the logic and analytics of group choice.
             To understand how political institutions work, it is
             important to isolate what citizens - as individuals and as
             members of society - actually want. This book develops a
             means of “representing” the preferences of citizens so
             that institutions can be studied more carefully. This is the
             first book to integrate the classical problem of
             constitutions with modern spatial theory, connecting
             Aristotle and Montesquieu with Arrow and
             Buchanan.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9781107707153},
   Key = {fds250200}
}

@book{fds312800,
   Title = {Future of the Economy: Fifty Years},
   Publisher = {Independent Institute},
   Editor = {Whaples, R and Munger, MC and Coyne, C},
   Year = {2015},
   Abstract = {Authored essays on "Tomorrow 3.0" and "Concluding
             Essay."},
   Key = {fds312800}
}

@book{fds314265,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {The Thing Itself: Essays on Academics, Economics, and
             Policy},
   Pages = {188 pages},
   Publisher = {Mungerella Publishing},
   Year = {2015},
   ISBN = {0692364153},
   Key = {fds314265}
}

@book{fds318622,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Hinich, M},
   Title = {Political Economy},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2010},
   Abstract = {Originally published in 1997. Reprinted in new Chinese
             language edition, and in new Korean edition.},
   Key = {fds318622}
}

@book{fds302177,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Analyzing Policy Choices, Conflicts, and
             Practices},
   Pages = {430 pages},
   Publisher = {W.W. Norton},
   Year = {2000},
   ISBN = {0393973999},
   Abstract = {Introduction to the conceptual foundations of policy
             analysis including the basics of the welfare-economics
             paradigm and cost-benefit analysis.},
   Key = {fds302177}
}

@book{fds312801,
   Author = {Hinich, MJ and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Empirical studies in comparative politics},
   Volume = {97},
   Pages = {219-227},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005057920748},
   Doi = {10.1023/A:1005057920748},
   Key = {fds312801}
}

@book{fds19836,
   Title = {Empirical Studies in Comparative Public Choice},
   Editor = {M. Munger and Melvin J. Hinich},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds19836}
}

@book{fds250197,
   Author = {Munger, M and Hinich, MJ},
   Title = {Analytical Politics},
   Pages = {253 pages},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds250197}
}

@book{fds250196,
   Author = {Munger, M and Hinich, MJ},
   Title = {Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice},
   Pages = {267 pages},
   Publisher = {University of Michigan Press},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds250196}
}


%% Monographs   
@misc{fds142637,
   Author = {M.C. Munger},
   Title = {"They Clapped: Can Price-Gouging Laws Prohibit Scarcity?”
             Econlib, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN,},
   Year = {2007},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2007/Mungergouging.html},
   Key = {fds142637}
}


%% Chapters in Books   
@misc{fds312942,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Russell, D},
   Title = {Business and Virtue},
   Booktitle = {Routledge Handbook of Business Ethics},
   Publisher = {Routledge/Taylor and Francis},
   Editor = {Heath, E and et al.},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds312942}
}

@misc{fds312939,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Market Failure and Government Failure (forthcoming)},
   Booktitle = {Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism},
   Editor = {Brennan, J},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds312939}
}

@misc{fds312940,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Larson, J},
   Title = {Reimagine What You Already Know: Toward New Solutions to
             Longstanding Problems (forthcoming)},
   Booktitle = {Digital Kenya},
   Editor = {Weiss, T},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds312940}
}

@misc{fds250123,
   Author = {Couyoumdjian, JP and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Entrepreneurial Virtues},
   Booktitle = {Perspectives on Character},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   Editor = {Fileva, I},
   Year = {2016},
   Key = {fds250123}
}

@misc{fds312937,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Hayek’s Political Insights: Emergent Orders and Laid-on
             Laws},
   Booktitle = {40 years after the Nobel: F.A. Hayek and Political Economy
             as a Progressive Research Program},
   Editor = {Boetke, P},
   Year = {2016},
   Key = {fds312937}
}

@misc{fds313173,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Public Choice Economics},
   Volume = {19},
   Pages = {534-539},
   Booktitle = {International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral
             Sciences: Second Edition},
   Publisher = {Elsevier},
   Editor = {Wright, JD},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {March},
   ISBN = {9780080970868},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.71071-3},
   Abstract = {© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Public choice is
             the application of economic methods and behavioral
             assumptions to nonmarket collective choice institutions.
             There are six major questions that public choice has focused
             on: collective action, controlling Leviathan, delegation,
             democratic coherence, information problems, and
             rent-seeking. Public choice has important implications for
             institutional design, particularly under the assumption that
             political actors may be motivated by interests other than
             the public interest. Public choice has given rise to
             important areas of study in empirical behavioral economics,
             including experimental economics, and to the study of common
             pool resource management institutions.},
   Doi = {10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.71071-3},
   Key = {fds313173}
}

@misc{fds313178,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Coase and the ‘Sharing Economy},
   Pages = {187-208},
   Booktitle = {Forever Contemporary: The Economics of Ronald
             Coase},
   Publisher = {Institute for Economic Affairs},
   Editor = {Veljanovski, C},
   Year = {2015},
   Key = {fds313178}
}

@misc{fds313179,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Editor’s Introduction: The Basic-Income
             Debate},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {485-488},
   Publisher = {The Independant Institute},
   Year = {2015},
   ISSN = {1086-1653},
   url = {http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/toc.asp?issueID=81},
   Key = {fds313179}
}

@misc{fds303786,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Chadha v. I.N.S. and the Legislative Veto},
   Pages = {93-105},
   Booktitle = {Creating Constitutional Change},
   Publisher = {Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press},
   Editor = {Ivers, G and McGuire, K},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds303786}
}

@misc{fds312952,
   Author = {Gerard, D and Keech, W and Munger, M},
   Title = {The Political Economy of Sustainability (forthcoming)},
   Booktitle = {Introduction to Sustainable Engineering},
   Publisher = {Prentice Hall},
   Editor = {Davidson, C},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds312952}
}

@misc{fds250122,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Kaldor-Hicks Coercion, Coasian Bargaining, and the
             State},
   Pages = {117-135},
   Booktitle = {Coercion and Social Welfare in Public Finance: Economic and
             Political Dimensions},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Martinez, J and Winer, S},
   Year = {2014},
   Abstract = {Conference volume for Evergreen Resort Coercion Conference,
             Oct. 1-2, 2010.},
   Key = {fds250122}
}

@misc{fds312958,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Political science and public choice},
   Pages = {39-53},
   Booktitle = {The Elgar Companion to Public Choice, Second
             Edition},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {July},
   ISBN = {9781849802857},
   Key = {fds312958}
}

@misc{fds318619,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Everything You Know About Recycling is Wrong},
   Booktitle = {The Political Economy of Recycling},
   Editor = {Kuznicki, J},
   Year = {2013},
   Abstract = {Cato Unbound Symposium},
   Key = {fds318619}
}

@misc{fds250118,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Hayek’s Insight: Order Without Direction, Benefit Without
             Intent},
   Booktitle = {Political Economy in Philosophic Perspective},
   Publisher = {University Press of America},
   Editor = {Butler, G},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds250118}
}

@misc{fds250119,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Euvoluntary Exchange and the Creation of
             Wealth},
   Booktitle = {Wealth Creation: Ethical & Economic Perspectives},
   Publisher = {Cognella Academic Publishing},
   Editor = {Schmidtz, D},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds250119}
}

@misc{fds250120,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Political Science and Public Choice},
   Pages = {81-106},
   Booktitle = {Elgar Companion to Public Choice II},
   Publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishers},
   Editor = {Reksulak, M and Razzolini, L and Shughart, W},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds250120}
}

@misc{fds250124,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {“How to Write Less Badly” (Reprint 2010 article as book
             chapter)},
   Booktitle = {Top Ten Productivity Tips for Professors, Edward Elgar
             Publishers},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds250124}
}

@misc{fds318621,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Euvoluntary or Not, Exchange is Just},
   Booktitle = {Liberalism and Capitalism},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Paul, EF and Miller, Jr., FD and Paul, J},
   Year = {2011},
   Key = {fds318621}
}

@misc{fds250116,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {I have a real meeting at 10:30: Running for Office as a
             Third Party Candidate},
   Pages = {203-222},
   Booktitle = {Inside Political Campaigns: Chronicles—And Lessons–From
             the Trenches},
   Publisher = {Lynne Rienner Publishers},
   Editor = {Bowers, J and Daniels, S},
   Year = {2010},
   Key = {fds250116}
}

@misc{fds250117,
   Author = {Keech, W and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Political Economy},
   Booktitle = {International Encyclopedia of Political Science},
   Publisher = {Congressional Quarterly Press},
   Editor = {Garrett, L and McClain, A and Chambers},
   Year = {2010},
   Abstract = {Originally published in 1997. Reprinted in new Chinese
             language edition, and in new Korean edition.},
   Key = {fds250117}
}

@misc{fds312951,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Orange blossom special: Externalities and the coase
             theorem},
   Pages = {192-196},
   Booktitle = {Readings in Applied Microeconomics: The Power of the
             Market},
   Publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
   Editor = {Newmark, C},
   Year = {2009},
   ISBN = {0203878469},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2008/Mungerbees.html},
   Doi = {10.4324/9780203878460},
   Key = {fds312951}
}

@misc{fds250115,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Regulation},
   Pages = {418-420},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Libertarianism},
   Publisher = {Cato Institute},
   Editor = {Hanowy, R},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds250115}
}

@misc{fds340067,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Culture, order, and virtue},
   Pages = {177-195},
   Booktitle = {Liberalism, Conservatism, and Hayek's Idea of Spontaneous
             Order},
   Publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan US},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {October},
   ISBN = {9781403984258},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230609228},
   Doi = {10.1057/9780230609228},
   Key = {fds340067}
}

@misc{fds250114,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Culture, Order, and Virtue},
   Pages = {267-291},
   Booktitle = {LIBERALISM, CONSERVATISM, AND HAYEK’S IDEA OF SPONTANEOUS
             ORDER},
   Publisher = {Palgrave},
   Editor = {Hunt, L and McNamara, P},
   Year = {2007},
   ISBN = {9780230609228},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230609228},
   Doi = {10.1057/9780230609228},
   Key = {fds250114}
}

@misc{fds250113,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {A Retrospective Assessment of Tullock’s THE VOTE
             MOTIVE},
   Pages = {131-138},
   Booktitle = {The Vote Motive},
   Publisher = {Institute of Economic Affairs},
   Editor = {Kurrild-Klitgaard, P},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds250113}
}

@misc{fds314206,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Denzau, AT},
   Title = {Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests
             Get Represented},
   Pages = {338-357},
   Booktitle = {The Classics of Interest Group Behavior},
   Publisher = {Wadsworth Higher Ed Publishing},
   Editor = {Wadsworth, RM},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds314206}
}

@misc{fds312954,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Nineteenth-century voting procedures in a twenty-first
             century world},
   Pages = {115-133},
   Booktitle = {Policy Challenges and Political Responses: Public Choice
             Perspectives on the Post-9/11 World},
   Publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {December},
   ISBN = {0387280375},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28038-3_7},
   Abstract = {Voting procedures nowadays are anachronistic on two counts:
             the technology of recording and counting votes often is
             outmoded and too much is expected from the mechanisms of
             democratic choice. Even if votes always and everywhere were
             counted perfectly, election outcomes would still be
             arbitrary since no collective choice process can divine the
             "general will". The crucial line in any state is the one
             dividing private decisions from collective decisions.
             Democracy is part of the package for nations freeing
             themselves from totalitarianism's grip, but it may be the
             last, rather than the first thing that should be added to
             the mix. © 2005 Springer.},
   Doi = {10.1007/0-387-28038-3_7},
   Key = {fds312954}
}

@misc{fds303785,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Regulation},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Libertarianism},
   Publisher = {CATO Institute, Washington, D.C.},
   Editor = {Palmer, T},
   Year = {2005},
   Key = {fds303785}
}

@misc{fds14591,
   Author = {M. Munger},
   Title = {Chadha v. I.N.S. and the Legislative Veto},
   Pages = {93-105},
   Booktitle = {Creating Constitutional Change},
   Publisher = {Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press},
   Editor = {Gregg Ivers and Kevin McGuire},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {Spring},
   Key = {fds14591}
}

@misc{fds250274,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Commentary on 'The Quest for Meaning in Public
             Choice},
   Volume = {63},
   Pages = {280 pages},
   Booktitle = {The Production and Diffusion of Public Choice Political
             Economy: Reflections on the VPI Center},
   Publisher = {WILEY-BLACKWELL},
   Editor = {Pitt, JC and Salehi-Isfahani, D and Eckel, DW},
   Year = {2004},
   ISBN = {978-1-4051-2453-9},
   Key = {fds250274}
}

@misc{fds313453,
   Author = {Munger, MC and McKay, A},
   Title = {Chadha v. INS: Policy-making Outside the
             Constitution},
   Pages = {93-105},
   Booktitle = {Creating Constitutional Change},
   Publisher = {University of Virginia Press},
   Editor = {Ivers, G and McGuire, K},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds313453}
}

@misc{fds250110,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Demobilized and Demoralized: Negative Ads and Loosening
             Bonds},
   Pages = {15-29},
   Booktitle = {Rational Foundations of Democratic Politics},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Breton, A and Galeotti, G and Salmon, P and Wintrobe,
             R},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds250110}
}

@misc{fds250111,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Committee Assignments},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {95-98},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Public Choice},
   Publisher = {Kluwer Academic Press},
   Editor = {Frey, B and Rowley, C and Schneider, F},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds250111}
}

@misc{fds250112,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Voting},
   Booktitle = {Public Choice Handbook},
   Publisher = {Edward Elgar Press},
   Editor = {Shughart, W and Razzolini, L},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds250112}
}

@misc{fds313758,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Committee Jurisdictions and PACs},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {98-100},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Public Choice},
   Publisher = {Kluwer Academic Press},
   Editor = {Frey, B and Rowley, C and Schneider, F},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds313758}
}

@misc{fds313755,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Hinich, M},
   Title = {Spatial Theory},
   Volume = {II},
   Pages = {305-312},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Public Choice},
   Publisher = {Kluwer Academic Press},
   Editor = {Frey, B and Rowley, C and Schneider, F},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds313755}
}

@misc{fds313756,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Hinich, M},
   Title = {Scholarly Legacy of Mancur Olson},
   Volume = {II},
   Pages = {284-286},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Public Choice},
   Publisher = {Kluwer Academic Press},
   Editor = {Frey, B and Rowley, C and Scheider, F},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds313756}
}

@misc{fds313757,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Interest Groups},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {307-312},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Public Choice},
   Publisher = {Kluwer Academic Press},
   Editor = {Frey, B and Rowley, C and Schneider, F},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds313757}
}

@misc{fds250109,
   Author = {Brewster, R and Munger, M and Oatley, T},
   Title = {Widening vs. Deepening the European Union: An Institutional
             Analysis},
   Pages = {48-64},
   Booktitle = {Institutional Challenges in the European
             Union},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Hosli, M and van Deemen, A},
   Year = {2002},
   Key = {fds250109}
}

@misc{fds250107,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Voting},
   Pages = {197-239},
   Booktitle = {Elgar Companion to Public Choice},
   Publisher = {Edward Elgar Press},
   Editor = {Shughart, W and Razzolini, L},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds250107}
}

@misc{fds250108,
   Author = {Munger, M and Ensley, M},
   Title = {Institutions, Ideology, and the Transmission of Information
             Across Generations},
   Pages = {107-122},
   Booktitle = {Constitutional Political Economy},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Mudambi, R},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds250108}
}

@misc{fds250106,
   Author = {Munger, M and Brewster, R and Oatley, T},
   Title = {The European Court of Justice: An Agenda Control Analysis of
             the Implications of EU Enlargement},
   Booktitle = {Institutional Challenges in The European
             Union},
   Publisher = {Kluwer Academic Press},
   Editor = {canDeemen, A and Hosli, M},
   Year = {2000},
   Key = {fds250106}
}

@misc{fds250097,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Why People Don’t Trust Government},
   Booktitle = {Regulation},
   Editor = {Joseph S Nye and J and Zelikow, P},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds250097}
}

@misc{fds250233,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Editors' Introduction: Empirical Studies in Comparative
             Politics},
   Volume = {97},
   Pages = {219-227},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1998},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Key = {fds250233}
}

@misc{fds250104,
   Author = {Munger, M and Enelow, J and Endersby, J},
   Title = {A Revised Probabilistic Spatial Model of Elections: Theory
             and Evidence},
   Pages = {125-140},
   Booktitle = {An Economic Theory of Democracy in Contemporary
             Perspective},
   Publisher = {University of Michigan Press},
   Editor = {Grofman, B},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds250104}
}

@misc{fds250105,
   Author = {Munger, M and Hinich, M},
   Title = {Political Ideology, Communication, and Community},
   Pages = {25-50},
   Booktitle = {Political Economy: Institutions, Competion, and
             Representation},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Barnett, W and Hinich, M and Schofield, N},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds250105}
}

@misc{fds250099,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Roberts, BE},
   Title = {Political and Economic Control of the Federal Reserve: A
             Review of the Literature},
   Booktitle = {The Political Economy of Monetary Policy},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Mayer, T},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250099}
}

@misc{fds250103,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Roberts, BE},
   Title = {Political and Economic Control of the Federal Reserve: A
             Review of the Literature},
   Booktitle = {The Political Economy of Monetary Policy},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Mayer, T},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250103}
}

@misc{fds250102,
   Author = {Munger, M and Hinich, M},
   Title = {Political Investment, Voter Perceptions, and Candidate
             Strategy: An Equilibrium Spatial Analysis},
   Pages = {49-68},
   Booktitle = {Models of Strategic Choice in Politics},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Editor = {Ordeshook, P},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds250102}
}

@misc{fds250101,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {The Cost of Protectionism: Estimates of the Hidden Tax of
             Trade Restraints},
   Booktitle = {World Trade and Trade Finance},
   Publisher = {Matthew Bender},
   Editor = {Norton, JJ},
   Year = {1985},
   Key = {fds250101}
}

@misc{fds250100,
   Author = {Munger, M and Grier, KB},
   Title = {The Empirical Accuracy of Sargent’s New Classical Macro
             Model: Some Simulation Evidence},
   Booktitle = {A Comparison of the Predictive Performance of Small
             Macroeconometric Models},
   Publisher = {St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American
             Business},
   Editor = {Meyer, L},
   Year = {1983},
   Key = {fds250100}
}


%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds341734,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Vilarreal-Diaz, M},
   Title = {The Road to Crony Capitalism},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {331-344},
   Publisher = {INDEPENDENT INST},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds341734}
}

@article{fds339419,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Tullock and the welfare costs of corruption: there is a
             “political Coase Theorem”},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {181},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {83-100},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature America, Inc},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0610-9},
   Abstract = {© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of
             Springer Nature. Gordon Tullock developed an approach to
             understanding dynamic processes of political change and
             policy outcomes. The key insight is the notion that
             political insiders have a comparative advantage—because
             they face lower transaction costs—in manipulating rules.
             The result is that political actors can collect revenues
             from threatening to restrict, or offering to loosen, access
             to valuable permissions, permits, or services. To the extent
             that the ability to pay for such favorable treatment is a
             consequence of private activities that produce greater
             social value, there is a “political Coase theorem”:
             corruption makes bad systems more efficient. But the dynamic
             consequences are extremely negative, because of the
             inability to institute reforms resulting from application of
             Tullock’s “transitional gains trap.”.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-018-0610-9},
   Key = {fds339419}
}

@article{fds342604,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Making the Voluntaryist Venn Work for Us, Not against
             Us},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {503-520},
   Publisher = {INDEPENDENT INST},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds342604}
}

@article{fds343718,
   Author = {Kiesling, LL and Munger, MC and Theisen, A},
   Title = {From Airbnb to Solar: Toward a Transaction Cost Model of a
             Retail Electricity Distribution Platform},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds343718}
}

@article{fds342282,
   Author = {Guzmán, RA and Munger, MC},
   Title = {A Theory of Just Market Exchange},
   Journal = {Journal of Value Inquiry},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10790-019-09686-5},
   Doi = {10.1007/s10790-019-09686-5},
   Key = {fds342282}
}

@article{fds331467,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {On the origins and goals of public choice: Constitutional
             conspiracy?},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {359-382},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds331467}
}

@article{fds338183,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {What Is "Actually Existing Socialism"?},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {297-299},
   Publisher = {INDEPENDENT INST},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds338183}
}

@article{fds332797,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {30 years after the nobel: James Buchanan’s political
             philosophy},
   Journal = {The Review of Austrian Economics},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {151-167},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11138-018-0418-3},
   Abstract = {© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of
             Springer Nature. There are three main foundations of Public
             Choice theory: methodological individualism, behavioral
             symmetry, and “politics as exchange.” The first two are
             represented in nearly all work that identifies as “Public
             Choice,” but politics as exchange is often forgotten or
             de-emphasized. This paper—adapted from a lecture given on
             the occasion of the 30th year after Buchanan’s Nobel
             Prize—fleshes out Buchanan’s theory of politics as
             exchange, using four notions that are uniquely central to
             his thought: philosophical anarchism, ethical neutrality,
             subjectivism, and the “relatively absolute absolutes.” A
             central tension in Buchanan’s work is identified, in which
             he seems simultaneously to argue both that nearly anything
             agreed to by a group could be enforced within the group as a
             contract, and that there are certain types of rules and
             arrangements, generated by decentralized processes, that
             serve human needs better than state action. It is argued
             that it is a mistake to try to reconcile this tension, and
             that both parts of the argument are important.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11138-018-0418-3},
   Key = {fds332797}
}

@article{fds343478,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {On the contingent vice of corruption},
   Journal = {Social Philosophy and Policy},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {158-181},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052519000153},
   Abstract = {© 2019 Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation. Printed in
             the USA. This essay develops a notion of “functional
             corruption,” adapted from sociology, to note that the harm
             of corruption appears to be contingent. In a system of
             dysfunctional institutions, corruption can improve the
             efficiency and speed of allocative mechanisms of the
             bureaucracy, possibly quite substantially. The problem is
             that this “short run” benefit locks in the long run harm
             of corruption by making institutions much more difficult to
             reform. In particular, a nation with bad institutions but
             without bureaucracy may be much more open to reform than a
             nation with similarly bad institutions but with
             “efficiently corrupt” bureaucrats. The idea of a “long
             run” is developed using the North, Wallis, and Weingast
             conception of open access orders. Corrupt systems are likely
             to be locked into closed access orders indefinitely, even
             though everyone knows there are better institutions
             available.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0265052519000153},
   Key = {fds343478}
}

@article{fds312938,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Human agency and convergence: Gaus’s Kantian
             Parliamentarian},
   Journal = {The Review of Austrian Economics},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {353-364},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0889-3047},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11138-016-0357-9},
   Abstract = {© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York. Public
             reason is justified to the extent that it uses (only)
             arguments, assumptions, or goals that are allowable as
             “public” reasons. But this exclusion requires some prior
             agreement on domains, and a process that disallows new
             unacceptable reasons by unanimous consent. Surprisingly,
             this problem of reconciliation is nearly the same, mutatis
             mutandis, as that faced by micro-economists working on
             general equilibrium, where a conceit—tâtonnement,
             directed by an auctioneer—was proposed by Leon Walras.
             Gaus’s justification of public reason requires the “as
             if” solution of a Kantian Parliamentarian, who rules on
             whether a proposal is “in order.” Previous work on
             public reason, by Rousseau, Kant, and Rawls, have all
             reduced decision-making and the process of “reasoning”
             to choice by a unitary actor, thereby begging the questions
             of disagreement, social choice, and reconciliation. Gaus, to
             his credit, solves that problem, but at the price of
             requiring that the process “knows” information that is
             in fact indiscernible to any of the participants. In fact,
             given the dispersed and radical situatedness of human aims
             and information, it is difficult for individuals, much less
             groups, to determine when norms are publicly justified or
             not. More work is required to fully take on Hayek’s
             insight that no person, much less all people, can have
             sufficient reasons to endorse the relevant norm, rule or
             law.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11138-016-0357-9},
   Key = {fds312938}
}

@article{fds327640,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Egalitarianism, properly conceived: We all are "Rawlsekians"
             now!},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {59-70},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds327640}
}

@article{fds327641,
   Author = {Grynaviski, JD and Munger, MC},
   Title = {RECONSTRUCTING RACISM: TRANSFORMING RACIAL HIERARCHY from
             "nECESSARY EVIL" into "pOSITIVE GOOD"},
   Journal = {Social Philosophy and Policy},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {144-163},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052517000073},
   Abstract = {Copyright © 2017 Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation.
             Our theoretical claim is that racism was consciously (though
             perhaps not intentionally) devised, and later evolved, to
             serve two conflicting purposes. First, racism served a
             legal-economic purpose, legitimating ownership and savage
             treatment of slaves by southern whites, preserving the value
             of property rights in labor. Second, racism allowed slave
             owners to justify, to themselves and to outsiders, how a
             morally "good" person could own slaves. Racism portrayed
             African slaves as being less than human (and therefore
             requiring care, as a positive duty of the slave owner, as a
             man cares for his children, who cannot care for themselves),
             or else as being other than human (and therefore being
             spiritually no different from cattle or horses, and
             therefore requiring only the same considerations for
             maintenance and husbandry). The interest of the historical
             narrative presented here is the emergence of racial chattel
             slavery as a coherent and fiercely defended ideal, rather
             than the "necessary evil" that had been the perspective of
             the Founders. The reason that this is important is that the
             ideology of racism persisted far beyond the destruction of
             the institution of slavery, through Reconstruction, Jim
             Crow, and in some ways persisting even today. This work is
             an example of the problems of assuming that there is a
             "feedback" mechanism by which moral intuitions are updated
             and perfected; to the contrary, as suggested by Douglass
             North, even socially inferior ideologies can prove extremely
             persistent.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0265052517000073},
   Key = {fds327641}
}

@article{fds312945,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Leadership Crisis and the Free Market Cure: Why the
             Future of Business Depends on the Return to Life, Liberty,
             and the Pursuit of Happiness},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {466-469},
   Publisher = {INDEPENDENT INST},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1086-1653},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000367025200021&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds312945}
}

@article{fds312944,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Tomorrow 3.0 the sharing economy},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {391-395},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1086-1653},
   Abstract = {A third great economic revolution will come about as the
             sharing economy slashes transaction costs and turns almost
             every product into an asset with the potential to earn
             rental income for its owner. Although the demand for
             manufactured goods will fall, costing many people their
             jobs, the quality-adjusted price level will also fall and
             pressures on the environment will lessen. All of us will
             rent more and own less. Some of us may specialize in being
             sellers in these new rental markets for things we do own.
             But, overall, each of us will have actual possession of far,
             far less stuff at any given time. But the bad news is that
             an economy in which entrepreneurs have always been focused
             on making new products or on making more old products more
             inexpensively will be shaken to its foundations.},
   Key = {fds312944}
}

@article{fds327642,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Douglass C. North: The answer is "transactions
             costs"},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {143-146},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {June},
   Abstract = {Michael C. Munger found during conducting economic research
             that professor Douglass C. North emphasized on the concept
             of transactions costs as an answer to most of the economic
             problems, suggesting that transactions costs played a
             central role in solving most of the economic questions. The
             problem was that ideology cannot be both a summary, an
             information shortcut, which would have to be correct on
             average, and a substitute for facts and reason. Once one
             recognized that institutional arrangements were in part the
             product of and in part supported ex post by ideologies, the
             rational choice view of mass politics became much harder to
             sustain. This recognition led Doug on a path that took him
             away from traditional economics, which adopted its own
             ideological requirement that incentives, not tastes, must be
             the force that animated choices and changes in
             choices.},
   Key = {fds327642}
}

@article{fds312941,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Vanberg, G},
   Title = {Gordon Tullock as a Political Scientist (forthcoming)},
   Journal = {Constitutional Political Economy},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds312941}
}

@article{fds340538,
   Author = {Munger, M and Vanberg, G},
   Title = {Gordon Tullock as a political scientist},
   Journal = {Constitutional Political Economy},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {194-213},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10602-016-9214-x},
   Abstract = {© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York. We
             consider Gordon Tullock’s impact in political science,
             focusing on his influence as a scholar and as an academic
             entrepreneur. It is common to think of Tullock as a
             “natural economist,” but his formal training at Chicago
             encompassed considerable coursework related to political
             science. We consider three sources of information to draw
             conclusions about Tullock’s contributions in political
             science: (1) Course syllabi; (2) Citations in academic
             political science journals; and (3) Impact on the careers of
             important political scientists, and shaping the intellectual
             agenda. Our conclusion is that, while Tullock’s work is
             clearly significant for central questions in political
             science, and has received some attention, his primary legacy
             lies in the impact he had on launching and shaping the
             careers of prominent political scientists, and thus the
             development of political science scholarship.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s10602-016-9214-x},
   Key = {fds340538}
}

@article{fds312935,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Grynaviski, G},
   Title = {Pathologies of Political Authority: Constructed Racism is
             'Public Reason' Gone Wrong (forthcoming)},
   Journal = {Social Philosophy and Policy},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals - No
             Cambridge Open},
   Year = {2016},
   ISSN = {1471-6437},
   Key = {fds312935}
}

@article{fds312946,
   Author = {Potthoff, RF and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Condorcet polling can yield serendipitous clues about voter
             views},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {165},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {1-12},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0285-4},
   Abstract = {© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York. Condorcet
             polling provides additional information about pairwise
             rankings often obscured in standard polls when there are
             three or more candidates. This paper analyzes an original
             dataset collected from Duke University students in North
             Carolina concerning the 2014 Senate race, wherein a
             Democrat, a Republican, and a Libertarian contested the
             election. The results illustrate that Condorcet polling is
             feasible in such a context, and that the information
             provided changes the strategic calculus of voters in ways
             that may have a positive impact on the way votes are cast
             and choices considered.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-015-0285-4},
   Key = {fds312946}
}

@article{fds312947,
   Author = {Keech, WR and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Erratum to: The anatomy of government failure(Public Choice,
             (2015), DOI 10.1007/s11127-015-0262-y)},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {164},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {43-44},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0268-5},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-015-0268-5},
   Key = {fds312947}
}

@article{fds312948,
   Author = {Guzmán, RA and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Erratum to: Euvoluntariness and just market exchange: moral
             dilemmas from Locke’s Venditio(Public Choice, (2014), 158,
             39-49, DOI 10.1007/s11127-013-0090-x)},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {164},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {189},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0269-4},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-015-0269-4},
   Key = {fds312948}
}

@article{fds312950,
   Author = {Keech, WR and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The anatomy of government failure},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {164},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {1-42},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0262-y},
   Abstract = {© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
             Government failure is a much bigger problem than its
             contemporary treatment implies. Setting aside natural
             disasters, most of the great catastrophes of human history
             have been government failures of one sort or another. We
             argue that many so-called market failures are government
             failures because government defines the institutions in
             which markets succeed or fail. The concept of government
             failure has been trapped in the cocoon of the theory of
             perfect markets. Narrowly defined deviations from market
             perfection have been designated market failures, for which
             government corrections may or may not really be a solution.
             Government failure in the contemporary context means failing
             to resolve a classic market failure. We propose an
             alternative approach for evaluating whether government
             fails: the Pareto standard. If an available Pareto
             improvement is not chosen, or is not implemented, that is a
             government failure. We organize government failure into two
             types: substantive and procedural. Substantive failures
             include the inability or unwillingness to maintain order, to
             maintain sound fiscal and monetary policies, and to reduce
             risks of transaction costs, which we classify as corruption,
             agency and rent-seeking. Procedural failures are
             inadequacies of available social choice mechanisms, causing
             collective decisions to be arbitrary, capricious, or
             manipuated. We conclude with some reflections on human
             rationality and the implications of behavioral
             economics.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-015-0262-y},
   Key = {fds312950}
}

@article{fds313172,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Empowering, Not Enfeebling: Beyond the ‘Market v. State’
             Dichotomy},
   Journal = {Conversations on Philanthropy},
   Volume = {10},
   Publisher = {Conversations on Philanthropy},
   Year = {2015},
   Key = {fds313172}
}

@article{fds313180,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {One and One-Half Cheers for Basic-Income Guarantee: We Could
             Do Worse, and Already Have},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {503-513},
   Publisher = {The Independant Institute},
   Year = {2015},
   ISSN = {1086-1653},
   url = {http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/toc.asp?issueID=81},
   Key = {fds313180}
}

@article{fds250185,
   Author = {Brennan, G and Munger, M},
   Title = {The soul of James Buchanan?},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {331-342},
   Publisher = {The Independant Institute},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {Winter},
   ISSN = {1086-1653},
   Abstract = {The article reflects on the views and life of James M.
             Buchanan. The Buchanan family had a political past:
             Buchanan's grandfather had briefly been governor of
             Tennessee in the early 1890s as a member of the populist
             People's Party. This party was a coalition of agrarian
             interests mainly poor cotton and wheat farmers from the
             South and the West. Throughout his professional career,
             Buchanan called himself a classical liberal. As indicated,
             this was something he learned from Frank Knight and that he
             held accordingly as a matter of intellectual conviction
             rather than personal inclination, which he always
             acknowledged was closer to 'libertarian socialist.'. He
             viewed politics as arising from agreements. But the
             agreements were founded in a notion of exchange rather than
             in some fixed notion of consensus on a single policy or
             choice. As a consequence, his conception of politics was
             encompassing and multidimensional, allowing agreement to be
             achieved through accommodations or compromises such as
             logrolls.},
   Key = {fds250185}
}

@article{fds312953,
   Author = {Aldrich, J and Reifler, J and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Sophisticated and myopic? Citizen preferences for Electoral
             College reform},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {158},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {541-558},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0056-z},
   Abstract = {Different institutions can produce more (or less) preferred
             outcomes, in terms of citizens' preferences. Consequently,
             citizen preferences over institutions may "inherit"-to use
             William Riker's term-the features of preferences over
             outcomes. But the level of information and understanding
             required for this effect to be observable seems quite high.
             In this paper, we investigate whether Riker's intuition
             about citizens acting on institutional preferences is borne
             out by an original empirical dataset collected for this
             purpose. These data, a survey commissioned specifically for
             this project, were collected as part of a larger nationally
             representative sample conducted right before the 2004
             election. The results show that support for a reform to
             split a state's Electoral College votes proportionally is
             explained by (1) which candidate one supports, (2) which
             candidate one thinks is likely to win the election under the
             existing system of apportionment, (3) preferences for
             abolishing the Electoral College in favor of the popular
             vote winner, and (4) statistical interactions between these
             variables. In baldly political terms, Kerry voters tend to
             support splitting their state's Electoral College votes if
             they felt George W. Bush was likely to win in that state.
             But Kerry voters who expect Kerry to win their state favor
             winner-take-all Electoral College rules for their state. In
             both cases, mutatis mutandis, the reverse is true for Bush
             voters. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New
             York.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-013-0056-z},
   Key = {fds312953}
}

@article{fds340539,
   Author = {Aldrich, J and Munger, M and Reifler, J},
   Title = {Institutions, information, and faction: An experimental test
             of Riker's federalism thesis for political
             parties},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {158},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {577-588},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-0040-z},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-012-0040-z},
   Key = {fds340539}
}

@article{fds312956,
   Author = {Guzmán, RA and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Euvoluntariness and just market exchange: Moral dilemmas
             from Locke's Venditio},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {158},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {39-49},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0090-x},
   Abstract = {It is a maxim of Public Choice that voluntary exchanges
             should not be interfered with by the state. But what makes a
             voluntary market exchange truly voluntary? We suggest,
             contra much of the economics literature, that voluntary
             exchange requires consent uncoerced by threats of harm, but
             that this is not sufficient. In particular, a person
             pressured to exchange by the dire consequences of failing to
             exchange-e.g., dying of thirst or hunger-is still coerced,
             and coerced exchange cannot be voluntary. The weaker party's
             desperation gives the other party unconscionable bargaining
             power. We argue for a distinction, based on a neologism: in
             the case of coercion by circumstance but not by threat,
             exchange is still voluntary in the conventional sense, but
             it is not euvoluntary (i.e., truly voluntary). We will argue
             that all euvoluntary exchanges are just, while
             non-euvoluntary exchanges may or may not be unjust; that in
             competitive markets all exchanges are just, even those that
             are not euvoluntary, while in bilateral monopolies some
             exchanges are neither euvoluntary nor just. We will propose
             a mental device, the "fictitious negotiation", to determine
             the just price in non-euvoluntary market exchanges. A
             primitive version of these ideas can be found in a little
             known monograph by John Locke, which we will analyze in
             detail. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New
             York.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-013-0090-x},
   Key = {fds312956}
}

@article{fds250186,
   Author = {Grynaviski, JD and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Did Southerners Favor Slavery? Inferences from an Analysis
             of Prices in New Orleans, 1805-1860},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {159},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {341-361},
   Year = {2014},
   Key = {fds250186}
}

@article{fds313213,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {A Moral Basis for Markets},
   Journal = {Public Discourse},
   Publisher = {Witherspoon Institute},
   Year = {2014},
   url = {http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2014/01/11845/},
   Abstract = {Debate with James Stoner},
   Key = {fds313213}
}

@article{fds312955,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Strength in Numbers: The Political Power of Weak Interests
             by GunnarTrumbull. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press,
             2012. 264 pp. $49.95.},
   Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
   Volume = {128},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {785-786},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0032-3195},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000328494200029&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1002/polq.12124},
   Key = {fds312955}
}

@article{fds250182,
   Author = {Munger, KM and Munger, MC},
   Title = {'Competencia Spatial en América Latina: Una visión general
             de algunos modelos ilustrativos' (Spatial Competition in
             Latin America: A Review of Some Illustrative
             Models)},
   Journal = {Revista Mexicana De Analisis Politico Y Administracion
             Publica},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {33-40},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds250182}
}

@article{fds250183,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Salsman, R},
   Title = {Is ‘Too Big to Fail’ Too Big?},
   Journal = {Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy},
   Volume = {11},
   Pages = {433-456},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds250183}
}

@article{fds250184,
   Author = {Guzman, RA and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Freedom of Contract and the Morality of Exchange: Examples
             From Locke’s Venditio},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Year = {2013},
   Abstract = {(with Ricardo Guzman). Public Choice.},
   Key = {fds250184}
}

@article{fds312957,
   Author = {Guzmán, RA and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Euvoluntariness and just market exchange: moral dilemmas
             from Locke's Venditio},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Pages = {1-11},
   Year = {2013},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   Key = {fds312957}
}

@article{fds250171,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {War, the American State, and Politics since
             1898},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {301-304},
   Publisher = {INDEPENDENT INST},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {1086-1653},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000309028100015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds250171}
}

@article{fds250206,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Coercion, the state, and the obligations of
             citizenship},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {152},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {415-421},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000306791200030&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-012-9992-2},
   Key = {fds250206}
}

@article{fds250209,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Voting methods, problems of majority rule, and
             demand-revealing procedures},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {152},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {61-72},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000304170600004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Gordon Tullock made fundamental conceptual contributions to
             the understanding of collective choices. Tullock balanced an
             optimism about the capacity of political choices to
             facilitate gains from exchange with a pessimism about the
             negative externalities attending having majorities control
             power and dictate choices for all. Tullock's work on both
             sides of this divide is surveyed, examining both the
             problems of voting procedures, and the promise of the
             demand-revealing process he helped invent, in guiding the
             choice of political institutions. © 2011 Springer
             Science+Business Media, LLC.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-011-9856-1},
   Key = {fds250209}
}

@article{fds318620,
   Author = {Mayer, SA and Wischmeyer, P},
   Title = {Editorial introductions},
   Journal = {Current Opinion in Critical Care},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {v-vi},
   Publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e328352c6d6},
   Doi = {10.1097/MCC.0b013e328352c6d6},
   Key = {fds318620}
}

@article{fds250213,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Basic Income Is Not an Obligation, But It Might Be a
             Legitimate Choice},
   Journal = {Basic Income Studies},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {1-13},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {A distinction is made between libertarian destinations and
             libertarian directions. Basic income cannot be part of a
             truly libertarian state unless it could be accomplished
             entirely through voluntary donations. But basic income is an
             important step in a libertarian direction because it
             improves core values such as self-ownership, liberty and
             efficiency of transfers while reducing coercion and
             increasing procedural fairness. Practical approaches to
             achieving basic income are compared to proposals by Milton
             Friedman and Charles Murray.},
   Key = {fds250213}
}

@article{fds250208,
   Author = {Aldrich, J and Munger, MC and Reifler, J},
   Title = {Institutions, Information, and Faction: An Experimental Test
             of Riker’s Federalism Thesis for Political
             Parties},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds250208}
}

@article{fds312976,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Persuasion, psychology and public choice},
   Journal = {Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
   Volume = {80},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {290-300},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0167-2681},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000296682100004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {There has been a division of labor in the "behavioral
             sciences" This is perhaps most striking in two of the
             largest behavioral disciplines, economics and psychology.
             Since 1990, a number of economists have crossed this
             boundary. But James Buchanan was one of the first economists
             to take the problem of moral intuitions and the origins of
             preferences seriously, and to treat them analytically. ©
             2011 Elsevier B.V.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.012},
   Key = {fds312976}
}

@article{fds312971,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Self-interest and public interest: The motivations of
             political actors},
   Journal = {Critical Review},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {339-357},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0891-3811},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000300165700005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Self-Interest and Public Interest in Western Politics showed
             that the public, politicians, and bureaucrats are often
             public spirited. But this does not invalidate public-choice
             theory. Public-choice theory is an ideal type, not a claim
             that self-interest explains all political behavior. Instead,
             public-choice theory is useful in creating rules and
             institutions that guard against the worst case, which would
             be universal self-interestedness in politics. In contrast,
             the public-interest hypothesis is neither a comprehensive
             explanation of political behavior nor a sound basis for
             institutional design. © 2011 Copyright Critical Review
             Foundation.},
   Doi = {10.1080/08913811.2011.635871},
   Key = {fds312971}
}

@article{fds312943,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {‘Euvoluntary’ Exchange and the ‘Difference
             Principle’},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {August},
   Abstract = {Takes up the problem of “truly voluntary” (euvoluntary)
             exchange argued in Munger (Social Philosophy and Policy,
             Summer 2011) and extends it to apply to the problem of
             inequality of income. In particular, it is argued that there
             exists a link between Rawls’ difference principle and
             Hayek’s conception of a safety net within an otherwise
             pure free market.},
   Key = {fds312943}
}

@article{fds250205,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Euvoluntary or not, exchange is just},
   Journal = {Social Philosophy and Policy},
   Volume = {28},
   Series = {Summer},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {192-211},
   Booktitle = {Liberalism and Capitalism},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Editor = {EF Paul and FD Miller, Jr. and J Paul},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0265-0525},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000292247500008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The arguments for redistribution of wealth, and for
             prohibiting certain transactions such as price-gouging, both
             are based in mistaken conceptions of exchange. This paper
             proposes a neologism, "euvoluntary" exchange, meaning both
             that the exchange is truly voluntary and that it benefits
             both parties to the transaction. The argument has two parts:
             First, all euvoluntary exchanges should be permitted, and
             there is no justification for redistribution of wealth if
             disparities result only from euvoluntary exchanges. Second,
             even exchanges that are not euvoluntary should generally be
             permitted, because access to market exchange may be the only
             means by which people in desperate circumstances can improve
             their position. © Copyright Social Philosophy and Policy
             Foundation 2011.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0265052510000269},
   Key = {fds250205}
}

@article{fds250210,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Social Science of Democracy},
   Journal = {Perspectives on Politics},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {374-376},
   Year = {2011},
   Abstract = {Symposium on Jon Elster’s Tocqueville: The First Social
             Scientist},
   Key = {fds250210}
}

@article{fds250221,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {’Basic Income’ is Not an Obligation, But It Might Be a
             Legitimate Choice},
   Journal = {Basic Income Studies},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {2},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {Winter},
   Key = {fds250221}
}

@article{fds313211,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {How to Write Less Badly},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0009-5982},
   Key = {fds313211}
}

@article{fds312975,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful: Elinor
             Ostrom and the diversity of institutions},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {143},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {263-268},
   Publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000277556500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-010-9629-2},
   Key = {fds312975}
}

@article{fds250217,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {'Thinking About Order Without Thought' In Tullock's
             Contributions to Spontaneous Order Studies},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {135},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {79-88},
   Year = {2010},
   Abstract = {"Thinking About Order Without Thought." In Tullock's
             Contributions to Spontaneous Order Studies, Public Choice
             Special Issue, 135: 79-88.},
   Key = {fds250217}
}

@article{fds312965,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Donald G. Saari, Disposing Dictators, Demystifying Voting
             Paradoxes: Social Choice Analysis},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {140},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {539-542},
   Publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000268281200014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-009-9435-x},
   Key = {fds312965}
}

@article{fds250219,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {The principal difficulty: Besley’s neo-Rousseavian
             aspirations},
   Journal = {The Review of Austrian Economics},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {169-175},
   Publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0889-3047},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11138-009-0075-7},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11138-009-0075-7},
   Key = {fds250219}
}

@article{fds250170,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Saari’s "Disposing Dictators, Demystifying Voting
             Paradoxes"},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {140},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {539-543},
   Publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
   Year = {2009},
   Key = {fds250170}
}

@article{fds250218,
   Author = {Hinich, MJ and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The dynamics of issue introduction: A model based on the
             politics of ideology},
   Journal = {Mathematical and Computer Modelling},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {9-10},
   Pages = {1510-1518},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0895-7177},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000259637500019&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Many topics might be discussed in the course of any
             election, but problems that are in fact discussed, and which
             affect the electorate's choice, are located in the issue
             space of a relatively small dimension. Two factors
             contribute to this phenomenon: (a) party platforms are
             usually presented to the electorate as packages of issues,
             and (b) candidates tend to emphasize only a few particular
             issues in the campaign. We model a dynamic process of
             changing the issue space by candidates as a matter of their
             campaign strategy and study factors causing changes in the
             dimensionality or/and in the structure of the set of issues
             shaping the political conflict in the election. We show how
             particular features of an added new issue can change voter
             perceptions of the candidates or the structure of the
             political conflict in the election when the new issue is
             such that (1) voters care about it, (2) a majority of voters
             are interested changing the status quo of anything
             associated with this issue, and (3) the existing ideological
             differences among the candidates have clear reflections in
             voters' minds. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights
             reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.022},
   Key = {fds250218}
}

@article{fds312963,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Estimating market power and strategies},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {134},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {495-500},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000252801100024&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds312963}
}

@article{fds312964,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Industrial organization and the digital economy},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {134},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {495-500},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000252801100023&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds312964}
}

@article{fds312968,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {New publications},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {134},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {495-500},
   Publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000252801100022&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-007-9225-2},
   Key = {fds312968}
}

@article{fds340335,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Blogging and political information: Truth or
             truthiness?},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {134},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {125-138},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9205-6},
   Abstract = {Does the blogosphere generate truth, or what Stephen Colbert
             calls 'truthiness,' facts or concepts one only wishes or
             believes were true? Bloggers and the mainstream media face
             the same difficulties if they wish to rely on the
             blogosphere as a generator of truth. First, both bloggers
             and media converge on a small number of key blogs as sources
             of information. But the proprietors of these elite blogs are
             likely to resist information that doesn't conform to their
             existing attitudes and beliefs, precisely because they are
             already highly aware of politics. Second, blogs and blog
             readers are likely to separate themselves into smaller
             networks according to their particular tastes. However,
             under some circumstances the blogosphere may still
             approximate a parallel processing statistical estimator of
             the truth with 'nice' properties. The key to this outcome is
             that judgments are independent, and that problems of
             polarization are mitigated. © 2007 Springer
             Science+Business Media, BV.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-007-9205-6},
   Key = {fds340335}
}

@article{fds337962,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Blogging and Political Information: Truth or
             ‘Truthiness’?},
   Journal = {Public Choice: the Power and Political Science of
             Blogs.},
   Volume = {134},
   Pages = {125-138},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds337962}
}

@article{fds250216,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Economic Choice, Political Decision, and the Problem of
             Limits},
   Journal = {Public Choice: Homo Economicus, Homo Politicus},
   Volume = {137},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {507-522},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2008},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000260378900008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Assesses the arguments for the use of market, or political,
             processes for making collective choices. The border between
             "what is mine" and "what is ours" is contested, but it is
             unguarded. Where should it lie? How would we know when it
             should be adjusted? I uncover an old paradox: A society can
             never use political means to guard against incursions across
             the border for political ends. Some other mechanism, such as
             constitutional or other extra-statutory rules, are required.
             © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media,
             LLC.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-008-9353-3},
   Key = {fds250216}
}

@article{fds313456,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Thinking About Order Without Thought},
   Journal = {Public Choice: Tullock'S Contributions to Spontaneous Order
             Studies},
   Volume = {135},
   Pages = {79-88},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds313456}
}

@article{fds312959,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Preferences and situations: Points of intersection between
             historical and rational choice institutionalism},
   Journal = {Independent Review},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {623-626},
   Publisher = {Independent Institute},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1086-1653},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000245521900015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds312959}
}

@article{fds250223,
   Author = {M.C. Munger and Ensley, MJ and Munger, MC and de Marchi, S},
   Title = {Candidate Uncertainty, Mental Models, and Complexity: Some
             Experimental Results},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {132},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {231-246},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2007},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000247657500016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Since the work of Downs (1957), spatial models of elections
             have been a mainstay of research in political science and
             public choice. Despite the plethora of theoretical and
             empirical research involving spatial models, researchers
             have not considered in great detail the complexity of the
             decision task that a candidate confronts. Two facets of a
             candidate's decision process are investigated here, using a
             set of laboratory experiments where subjects face a fixed
             incumbent in a two-dimensional policy space. First, we
             analyze the effect that the complexity of the electoral
             landscape has on the ability of the subject to defeat the
             incumbent. Second, we analyze the impact that a subject's
             "mental model" (which we infer from a pre-experiment
             questionnaire) has on her performance. The experimental
             results suggest that the complexity of a candidate's
             decision task and her perception of the task may be
             important factors in electoral competition.},
   Doi = {10.2307/27698137},
   Key = {fds250223}
}

@article{fds250224,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Public Policy Informatics: Does Better Information Produce
             Better Public Policy?},
   Journal = {International Journal of Public Policy},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {343-354},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds250224}
}

@article{fds250173,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Rent Seek and You Will Find},
   Journal = {Econlib},
   Series = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Mungerrentseeking.html},
   Publisher = {EconLib, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {Spring},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Mungerrentseeking.html},
   Key = {fds250173}
}

@article{fds250174,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {A Fable of the OC},
   Series = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Mungeropportunitycost.html},
   Publisher = {EconLib, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {Summer},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Mungeropportunitycost.html},
   Key = {fds250174}
}

@article{fds250175,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Unintended Consequences 1, Good Intentions
             0},
   Journal = {Econlib},
   Series = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Mungergood
             intentions.html},
   Publisher = {EconLib, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {Fall},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Mungergoodintentions.html},
   Key = {fds250175}
}

@article{fds250176,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Two Steves and One Soichiro: Why Politicians Can’t Judge
             Innovation},
   Journal = {Econlib},
   Series = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Mungercollectivism.html},
   Publisher = {EconLib, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {Winter},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Mungercollectivism.html},
   Key = {fds250176}
}

@article{fds250225,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Preference modification vs. incentive manipulation as tools
             of terrorist recruitment: The role of culture},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {128},
   Pages = {131-146},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds250225}
}

@article{fds250226,
   Author = {Potthoff, R and Munger, M},
   Title = {Voter Uncertainty Can Produce Non-Single-Peaked But Not
             Cyclic Preferences: A Clue to the Fate of Ross
             Perot?},
   Journal = {Journal of Politics},
   Volume = {67},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {429-453},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds250226}
}

@article{fds250172,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Regulation},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Libertarianism},
   Publisher = {CATO Institute, Washington, D.C.},
   Editor = {Palmer, T},
   Year = {2005},
   Key = {fds250172}
}

@article{fds250181,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {19th Century Voting Procedures in a 21st Century
             World},
   Journal = {Public Choice: Public Chpoce Perspectives at the Dawn of the
             21st Century},
   Volume = {124},
   Series = {Special Issue on "Public Choice Perspectives at the Dawn of
             the 21st Century"},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {115-133},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Editor = {Shughat, W and Tollison, R},
   Year = {2005},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000231472200007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Voting procedures nowadays are anachronistic on two counts:
             the technology of recording and counting votes often is
             outmoded and too much is expected from the mechanisms of
             democratic choice. Even if votes always and everywhere were
             counted perfectly, election outcomes would still be
             arbitrary since no collective choice process can divine the
             "general will". The crucial line in any state is the one
             dividing private decisions from collective decisions.
             Democracy is part of the package for nations freeing
             themselves from totalitarianism's grip, but it may be the
             last, rather than the first thing that should be added to
             the mix. © Springer 2005.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-005-4749-9},
   Key = {fds250181}
}

@article{fds313454,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Merolla, J and Tofias, M},
   Title = {In play: a commentary on strategies in the 2004 U.S.
             presidential election},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {123},
   Pages = {19-37},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {2005},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Key = {fds313454}
}

@article{fds250272,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Economists and fiscal policy advice: A deficit or a
             deficiency?},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {118},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {235-249},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000220250100002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1023/b:puch.0000019988.50722.13},
   Key = {fds250272}
}

@article{fds250273,
   Author = {Banerjee, SG and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Move to markets? An empirical analysis of privatization in
             developing countries},
   Journal = {Journal of International Development},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {213-240},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jid.1072},
   Abstract = {Aspects of the privatization experience are analysed for a
             group of 35 low or middle-income developing countries, over
             the period 1982 through 1999. The theory turns on net
             political benefits, which in our model are the primary
             determinant of privatization policies. The decision to
             privatize is captured here in three related, but distinct,
             dependent variables: (i) timing; (ii) pace; and (iii)
             intensity. Our notion of the independent variable, 'net
             political benefits', is not measured directly, but is
             instead proxied by an array of macroeconomic, political, and
             institutional variables. Our key finding is that, though
             political benefits turn out to explain the timing, pace, and
             intensity of privatization, the effects are very different
             in each case. The timing hypothesis is tested using a Cox
             proportional hazard model, the pace hypothesis is tested
             using a random effects negative binomial model and the
             intensity hypothesis is tested using the random effects
             model. We find that the factors that improve timing delay
             intensity-early adopters are later implementers.
             Furthermore, we find that a privatization policy is much
             more likely to be a crisis-driven, last ditch effort to turn
             the economy around, rather than a carefully chosen policy
             with explicit, long-term goals. A related, and very
             important, finding in our analysis has to do with the
             'lock-in' of institutions. The particular form of political
             institutions, foreign aid regimes, and level of development
             of property rights systems in the nation have significant
             conditioning influences on the extent of lock-in. These
             relationships may be important for informing policy
             decisions, and for understanding apparent 'failures' of
             privatization policies. © 2004 John Wiley and Sons,
             Ltd.},
   Doi = {10.1002/jid.1072},
   Key = {fds250273}
}

@article{fds312972,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Commentary on "The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice" by
             Elinor Ostrom and Vincent Ostrom},
   Journal = {American Journal of Economics and Sociology},
   Volume = {63},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {149-160},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0002-9246},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000189098600008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The Ostroms have created a paper that goes to the very heart
             of the public choice enterprise. They suggest that we should
             conceive of the evolution of constitutional procedures and
             laws in analogy with biological evolution. One of the
             paper's central goals is to establish the logical
             foundations of political order. I take this goal seriously
             and compare explicitly the task of explaining order in
             biology and politics. In the case of biology, the task of
             evolutionary theory has been to give an account of why there
             are complex arrangements of genetic material called
             "organisms" (including humans, giraffes, and whales) rather
             than just a nutrient-rich primordial ooze with no apparent
             structure. For the social scientist, the task is to explain
             why there are rules, structure, and stability in
             societies.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00278.x},
   Key = {fds312972}
}

@article{fds250275,
   Author = {Potthoff, RF and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Use of integer programming to optimize the scheduling of
             panels at annual meetings of the Public Choice
             Society},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {117},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {163-175},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000185858600007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1023/A:1026101608593},
   Key = {fds250275}
}

@article{fds312960,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Voting with dollars: A new paradigm for campaign
             finance.},
   Journal = {Journal of Economic Literature},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {904-906},
   Publisher = {AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0022-0515},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000185575200009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds312960}
}

@article{fds312974,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Long divisions},
   Journal = {New Republic},
   Volume = {229},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {4-4},
   Publisher = {NEW REPUBLIC INC},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0028-6583},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000183855700002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds312974}
}

@article{fds312961,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Political competition: Theory and applications},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {116},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {241-243},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000183564500017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1023/A:1024267025881},
   Key = {fds312961}
}

@article{fds250276,
   Author = {Gottlieb, NH and Goldstein, AO and Flynn, BS and Cohen, EJE and Bauman,
             KE and Solomon, LJ and Munger, MC and Dana, GS and McMorris,
             LE},
   Title = {State legislators' beliefs about legislation that restricts
             youth access to tobacco products.},
   Journal = {Health Education & Behavior : the Official Publication of
             the Society for Public Health Education},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {209-224},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {1090-1981},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000181791100006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Better understanding of the cognitive framework for decision
             making among legislators is important for advocacy of
             health-promoting legislation. In 1994, the authors surveyed
             state legislators from North Carolina, Texas, and Vermont
             concerning their beliefs and intentions related to voting
             for a hypothetical measure to enforce legislation preventing
             the sale of tobacco to minors, using scales based on the
             theory of planned behavior. Attitude (importance),
             subjective norm (whether most people important to you would
             say you should or should not vote for the law), perceived
             behavioral control (ability to cast one's vote for the law),
             and home state were independently and significantly related
             to intention to vote for the law's enforcement. The results,
             including descriptive data concerning individual beliefs,
             suggest specific public health strategies to increase
             legislative support for passing legislation to restrict
             youth tobacco sales and, more generally, a framework for
             studying policy making and advocacy.},
   Doi = {10.1177/1090198102251033},
   Key = {fds250276}
}

@article{fds314436,
   Author = {Jenkins, JA and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Investigating the incidence of killer amendments in
             congress},
   Journal = {Journal of Politics},
   Volume = {65},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {498-517},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-3-00012},
   Abstract = {While much empirical research has been devoted to the study
             of "killer amendments" in recent years, few studies have
             explicitly examined the theoretical foundations of the
             phenomenon. The goal of this paper is to investigate why
             some killer amendment attempts are successful, when theory
             suggests that they should always fail. More specifically, we
             examine the practical political constraints on legislators'
             abilities to neutralize the imminent threat of killer
             amendments through sophisticated voting. We also present two
             new cases, both occurring during the Reconstruction era, in
             which killer amendments were used successfully. In the end,
             our findings support previous research on all successful
             killer amendments detailed in the congressional literature:
             race was the issue under consideration at the amendment
             stage.},
   Doi = {10.1111/1468-2508.t01-3-00012},
   Key = {fds314436}
}

@article{fds312970,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {A Logic of Expressive Choice. By Alexander A. Schuessler.
             Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 177p.
             $49.50 cloth, $16.95 paper.},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {96},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {218-219},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0003-0554},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000174946100065&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {<jats:p>An interesting aspect of life at Duke is the annual
             construction of our local Brigadoon. The well-ordered but
             ephemeral tent city is named “Krzyzewskiville,” after
             Duke's head basketball coach. K-ville appears once a year in
             the weeks before the game against UNC-Chapel Hill, our arch
             rival. So many students want to see this game that an
             elaborate nonprice rationing scheme, based on a queue, has
             evolved to allocate tickets. “Tenting” students may have
             to wait two weeks or more to get tickets. The game is in
             January or early February, so they sleeping outside and try
             to keep up with their school work despite rain, snow, and
             subfreezing temperatures at night. Random checks (even in
             the middle of the night) are conducted by student
             representatives; if a tent is empty too often it is taken
             down, and the residents lose their place in the
             queue.</jats:p>},
   Doi = {10.1017/s0003055402394322},
   Key = {fds312970}
}

@article{fds250277,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Comment on 'Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law' by
             John Ferejohn},
   Journal = {Law and Contemporary Problems},
   Volume = {65},
   Pages = {87-94},
   Publisher = {Duke University School of Law},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0023-9186},
   Key = {fds250277}
}

@article{fds312967,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {From Subsistence to Exchange, and Other Essays. Peter
             Bauer},
   Journal = {Journal of Politics},
   Volume = {63},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1273-1275},
   Publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0022-3816},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000172085500015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1086/jop.63.4.2691819},
   Key = {fds312967}
}

@article{fds312966,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Comment on Michael C. Munger's "Political Science and
             Fundamental Research" - Reply to Roelofs},
   Journal = {Ps: Political Science & Politics},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {518-519},
   Publisher = {AMER POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOC},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {1049-0965},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000088910500002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1049096500063162},
   Key = {fds312966}
}

@article{fds250270,
   Author = {Cooper, A and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The (un)predictability of primaries with many candidates:
             Simulation evidence},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {103},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {337-355},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000086965800008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1023/A:1005150101110},
   Key = {fds250270}
}

@article{fds250201,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Politics by principle, not interest: Towards
             nondiscriminatory democracy},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {102},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {377-379},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000085579600012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1023/A:1005114018018},
   Key = {fds250201}
}

@article{fds250203,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Political Science and Fundamental Research},
   Journal = {Ps: Political Science & Politics},
   Volume = {33},
   Series = {Special Issue: The Public Value of Political Science
             Research},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {25-25},
   Publisher = {JSTOR},
   Editor = {Arthur Lupia},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1049-0965},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000085998600006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.2307/420773},
   Key = {fds250203}
}

@article{fds335630,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Reply to Roelofs},
   Journal = {Ps: Political Science & Politics},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {518-519},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500063162},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1049096500063162},
   Key = {fds335630}
}

@article{fds250269,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Cooper, A},
   Title = {Five Questions: An Integrated Research Agenda in
             Public},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {103},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {1-12},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {2000},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000086020100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1023/A:1005048904160},
   Key = {fds250269}
}

@article{fds250271,
   Author = {Munger, M and Berger, M and Potthoff, R},
   Title = {The Downsian Model Predicts Divergence},
   Journal = {Journal of Theoretical Politics},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {78-90},
   Year = {2000},
   ISSN = {0951-6298},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000086986700005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1177/0951692800012002005},
   Key = {fds250271}
}

@article{fds250169,
   Author = {Poole, K and Rosenthal, H},
   Title = {Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call
             Voting},
   Journal = {The Independent Review},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds250169}
}

@article{fds250180,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Presidential Address: Give Questions for the Public Choice
             Society},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds250180}
}

@article{fds250232,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Pangloss was right: Reforming congress is useless,
             expensive, or harmful},
   Journal = {Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {133-146},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1064-3958},
   Key = {fds250232}
}

@article{fds250268,
   Author = {Hinich, MJ and Munger, MC and De Marchi and S},
   Title = {Ideology and the construction of nationality: The Canadian
             elections of 1993},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {97},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {401-428},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000078315900008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1023/A:1005089925291},
   Key = {fds250268}
}

@article{fds250202,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Wintrobe, R},
   Title = {The Political Economy of Dictatorship},
   Journal = {The Canadian Journal of Economics},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {992-992},
   Publisher = {JSTOR},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0008-4085},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000077736800018&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.2307/136507},
   Key = {fds250202}
}

@article{fds312962,
   Author = {Berger, MM and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Congressional parties and primary election
             challenges.},
   Journal = {Legislative Studies Quarterly},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {450-450},
   Publisher = {COMPARATIVE LEGISLATIVE RES CENTER},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0362-9805},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000075223300012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds312962}
}

@article{fds250267,
   Author = {Flynn, BS and Goldstein, AO and Solomon, LJ and Bauman, KE and Gottlieb,
             NH and Cohen, JE and Munger, MC and Dana, GS},
   Title = {Predictors of state legislators' intentions to vote for
             cigarette tax increases.},
   Journal = {Preventive Medicine},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {157-165},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0091-7435},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000073317500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: This study analyzed influences on state
             legislators' decisions about cigarette tax increase votes
             using a research strategy based on political science and
             social-psychological models. METHODS: Legislators from three
             states representing a spectrum of tobacco interests
             participated in personal interviews concerned with tobacco
             control legislation (n = 444). Measures of potential
             predictors of voting intention were based on the consensus
             model of legislative decision-making and the theory of
             planned behavior. Multiple logistic regression methods were
             used to identify social-psychological and other predictors
             of intention to vote for cigarette tax increases. RESULTS:
             General attitudes and norms concerning cigarette tax
             increases predicted legislators' intention to vote for
             cigarette tax increases. More specific predictors included
             perceptions of public health impact and retail sales impact
             of cigarette tax increases. Constituent pressure was the
             strongest perceived social influence. Political party and
             state also were strong predictors of intention. Results were
             consistent with related research based on political science
             models. CONCLUSIONS: Legislators' votes on cigarette tax
             increases may be influenced by their perceptions of positive
             and negative outcomes of a cigarette tax increase and by
             perceived constituent pressures. This research model
             provides useful insights for theory and practice and should
             be refined in future tobacco control research.},
   Doi = {10.1006/pmed.1998.0308},
   Key = {fds250267}
}

@article{fds250204,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Odd Markets in Japanese History: Law and Economic Growth. J.
             Mark Ramseyer},
   Journal = {Journal of Politics},
   Volume = {60},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {289-291},
   Publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0022-3816},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000072897400038&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.2307/2648028},
   Key = {fds250204}
}

@article{fds42295,
   Author = {M.C. Munger and Melvin Hinich and Scott de
             Marchi},
   Title = {Ideology and the Construction of Nationality: The Canadian
             Elections of 1993},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds42295}
}

@article{fds42296,
   Author = {M.C. Munger and Irwin Morris},
   Title = {First Branch, or Root? Congress, the President, and Federal
             Reserve},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds42296}
}

@article{fds250167,
   Author = {Dixit, AK},
   Title = {The Making of Economic Policy: A Transactions-Cost Politics
             Perspective},
   Journal = {Regulation},
   Volume = {21},
   Pages = {73-76},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds250167}
}

@article{fds250168,
   Author = {Taylor, A},
   Title = {Mathematics and Politics},
   Journal = {Chance, Magazine of the American Statiscal
             Association},
   Volume = {11},
   Pages = {44-45},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds250168}
}

@article{fds250177,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Morris, I},
   Title = {First Branch, or Root? Congress, the President, and Federal
             Reserve},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {96},
   Pages = {363-380},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1998},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Key = {fds250177}
}

@article{fds250263,
   Author = {Munger, M and Schaller, T},
   Title = {The prohibition-repeal amendments: A natural experiment in
             interest group influence},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {90},
   Number = {1-4},
   Pages = {139-163},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {December},
   Abstract = {The pattern of state support for Prohibition (18th
             Amendment, 1919) and Repeal (21st Amendment, 1933) is
             analyzed and compared. This comparison is important because
             Prohibition is the only amendment ever to be repealed. The
             main thesis is that there was no wholesale change in
             preferences of citizens. Instead, producer interests failed
             to mobilize effectively in 1919, and the coupling of moral
             and economic arguments that worked in 1919 broke apart in
             1933. Regression analysis is conducted on state legislatures
             (for Prohibition) and state referenda on convention
             delegates (for Repeal), so states are observations in the
             cross-sectional regression analysis. The results broadly
             support the main thesis.},
   Key = {fds250263}
}

@article{fds313753,
   Author = {Cohen, JE and Goldstein, AO and Flynn, BS and Munger, MC and Gottlieb,
             NH and Solomon, LJ and Dana, GS},
   Title = {State legislators' perceptions of lobbyists and lobbying on
             tobacco control issues},
   Journal = {Tobacco Control},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {332-336},
   Publisher = {BMJ},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0964-4563},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.6.4.332},
   Doi = {10.1136/tc.6.4.332},
   Key = {fds313753}
}

@article{fds250265,
   Author = {Munger, M and Goldstein, A and Cohen, J and Flynn, B and Gottlieb, N and Solomon, L and Dana, G and Baumann, K},
   Title = {State Legislators' Attitudes and Voting Intentions about
             Tobacco Control Legislation},
   Journal = {American Journal of Public Health},
   Volume = {87},
   Pages = {11-7-2000},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds250265}
}

@article{fds250164,
   Author = {Gais, T},
   Title = {Improper Influence: Campaign Finance Law, Political Interest
             Groups, and the Problem of Equality},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {92},
   Pages = {442-446},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds250164}
}

@article{fds250165,
   Author = {Teske, P and Best, S and Mintrom, M},
   Title = {Deregulation Freight Transportation: Delivering the
             Goods},
   Journal = {Regulation},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {Summer},
   Key = {fds250165}
}

@article{fds250166,
   Author = {Klein, DB and Moore, AT and Reja, B},
   Title = {Curb Rights: A Foundation for Free Enterprise in Urban
             Transit},
   Journal = {Regulation},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {Summer},
   Key = {fds250166}
}

@article{fds250264,
   Author = {Munger, M and Flynn, B and Dana, G and Goldstein, A and Cohen, J and Gottlieb, N and Solomon, L and Baumann, K},
   Title = {State Legislators' Intentions to Vote and Subsequent Votes
             on Tobacco Control Legislation},
   Journal = {Health Psychology},
   Volume = {16},
   Pages = {401-404},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds250264}
}

@article{fds250163,
   Author = {Ferguson, T},
   Title = {Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and
             the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems},
   Journal = {The Independent Review},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {198-201},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds250163}
}

@article{fds250161,
   Author = {Holcombe, R},
   Title = {The Economic Foundations of Government},
   Journal = {Southern Economic Journal},
   Volume = {61},
   Pages = {892-894},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds250161}
}

@article{fds250162,
   Author = {Bianco, W},
   Title = {Trust: Representatives and Constituencies},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {85},
   Pages = {395-397},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds250162}
}

@article{fds250260,
   Author = {Coates, D and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Strategizing in Small Group Decision Making: Host State
             Identification in the Southeast Compact},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {82},
   Pages = {1-16},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1995},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Key = {fds250260}
}

@article{fds250261,
   Author = {Coates, D and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Legislative Voting and the Economic Theory of
             Politics},
   Journal = {Southern Economic Journal},
   Volume = {61},
   Pages = {861-873},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1995},
   ISSN = {0038-4038},
   Key = {fds250261}
}

@article{fds250262,
   Author = {Coates, D and Munger, M},
   Title = {Win, Lose, or Withdraw: A Categorical Analysis of Career
             Patterns in the House of Representatives,
             1948-1978},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {83},
   Pages = {91-115},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1995},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Abstract = {Winner of the "Duncan Black Award" for best paper published
             in Public Choice for 1995.},
   Key = {fds250262}
}

@article{fds250160,
   Author = {Mitnick, EBB},
   Title = {Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition
             in Public Affairs},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {88},
   Pages = {1000-1001},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds250160}
}

@article{fds250256,
   Author = {Collier, K and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Comparing Reelection Rates in the House and
             Senate},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {78},
   Pages = {45-54},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1994},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Key = {fds250256}
}

@article{fds250257,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Judicial Interpretation in the Face of Uncertainty: A
             Comment on Schwartz, Spiller, and Urbiztondo},
   Journal = {Law and Contemporary Problems},
   Volume = {57},
   Pages = {87-90},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds250257}
}

@article{fds250258,
   Author = {Coates, D and Heid, V and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Not Equitable, Not Efficient: U.S. Policy on Low-Level
             Radioactive Waste Disposal},
   Journal = {Journal of Policy Analysis and Management},
   Volume = {13},
   Pages = {526-541},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1994},
   ISSN = {1520-6688},
   Key = {fds250258}
}

@article{fds250259,
   Author = {Grier, K and Roberts, B and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Determinants of Industry Political Activity,
             1978-1986},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {88},
   Pages = {911-932},
   Booktitle = {Business and Government},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals},
   Editor = {Coen, D and Grant, W},
   Year = {1994},
   ISSN = {1537-5943},
   Key = {fds250259}
}

@article{fds250157,
   Author = {Schlesinger, J},
   Title = {Political Parties and the Winning of Office},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {75},
   Pages = {99-101},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds250157}
}

@article{fds250158,
   Author = {Mizruchi, M},
   Title = {The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm
             Relations and Their Consequences},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {87},
   Pages = {219-221},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds250158}
}

@article{fds250159,
   Author = {Parker, G},
   Title = {Institutional Change, Discretion, and the Making of Modern
             Congress},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {76},
   Pages = {397-398},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds250159}
}

@article{fds250252,
   Author = {Torrent, GM and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Committee Power and Value in the U.S. Senate: Implications
             for Policy},
   Journal = {Journal of Public Administration Research and
             Theory},
   Volume = {3},
   Pages = {46-65},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   Year = {1993},
   ISSN = {1477-9803},
   Key = {fds250252}
}

@article{fds250253,
   Author = {Enelow, J and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Elements of Candidate Reputation: The Effect of Record
             and Credibility on Optimal Spatial Location},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {77},
   Pages = {757-772},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1993},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Key = {fds250253}
}

@article{fds250254,
   Author = {Mitchell, WC and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Doing Well While Intending Good: Exploitation and the Pareto
             Criterion},
   Journal = {Journal of Theoretical Politics},
   Volume = {5},
   Pages = {34-79},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications (UK and US)},
   Year = {1993},
   ISSN = {1460-3667},
   Key = {fds250254}
}

@article{fds250255,
   Author = {Grier, KB and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Corporate, Labor, and Trade Association Contributions to the
             U.S. House and Senate, 1978-1986},
   Journal = {Journal of Politics},
   Volume = {55},
   Pages = {615-644},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds250255}
}

@article{fds250250,
   Author = {Hinich, MJ and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Spatial Theory of Ideology},
   Journal = {Journal of Theoretical Politics},
   Volume = {4},
   Pages = {5-27},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications (UK and US)},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1460-3667},
   Key = {fds250250}
}

@article{fds250156,
   Author = {Alt, J and Shepsle, K},
   Title = {Perspectives on Positive Political Economy},
   Journal = {Southern Economic Journal},
   Volume = {58},
   Pages = {1944-6},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds250156}
}

@article{fds250249,
   Author = {Endersby, J and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Impact of Legislator Attributes on Union PAC
             Contributions},
   Journal = {Journal of Labor Research},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {79-97},
   Year = {1992},
   ISSN = {1936-4768},
   Key = {fds250249}
}

@article{fds250251,
   Author = {Coates, DC and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Guessing and Choosing: A Multicriterion Decision on a
             Dispoal Technology for Low Level Radioactive
             Waste},
   Journal = {Journal of Public Policy},
   Volume = {11},
   Pages = {275-289},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals},
   Year = {1992},
   ISSN = {1469-7815},
   Key = {fds250251}
}

@article{fds250151,
   Author = {Magee, S and Brock, W and Young, L},
   Title = {Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy
             Theory},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {70},
   Pages = {108-110},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds250151}
}

@article{fds250152,
   Author = {Spulber, N},
   Title = {Managing the American Economy from Roosevelt to
             Reagan},
   Journal = {The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
             Science},
   Volume = {513},
   Pages = {200-202},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds250152}
}

@article{fds250153,
   Author = {Schwartzman, D},
   Title = {Economic Policy: An Agenda for the 1990s},
   Journal = {The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
             Science},
   Volume = {513},
   Pages = {200-202},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds250153}
}

@article{fds250154,
   Author = {Sullivan, EBNO},
   Title = {The Structure of Modern Ideology: Critical Perspectives on
             Social and Political Theory},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {72},
   Pages = {95-96},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds250154}
}

@article{fds250155,
   Author = {North, DC},
   Title = {Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic
             Performance},
   Journal = {Southern Economic Journal},
   Volume = {58},
   Pages = {296-297},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds250155}
}

@article{fds250246,
   Author = {Grier, K and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Committee Assignments, Constituent Preferences, and Campaign
             Contributions to House Incumbents},
   Journal = {Economic Inquiry},
   Volume = {29},
   Pages = {24-43},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1991},
   ISSN = {1465-7295},
   Key = {fds250246}
}

@article{fds250247,
   Author = {Grier, K and Roberts, B and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Industrial Organization of Corporate Political
             Activity},
   Journal = {Southern Economics Journal},
   Volume = {57},
   Pages = {727-738},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds250247}
}

@article{fds250248,
   Author = {Mitchell, W and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Economic Models of Interest Groups: An Introductory
             Survey},
   Journal = {American Journal of Political Science},
   Volume = {35},
   Pages = {512-546},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1991},
   ISSN = {1540-5907},
   Key = {fds250248}
}

@article{fds250244,
   Author = {Richardson, LE and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Shirking, representation, and Congressional behavior: Voting
             on the 1983 amendments to the Social Security
             Act},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {67},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {11-33},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1990DY91500002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Our central goals at the outset of the paper were three: (1)
             to report on the relative significance of a sophisticated
             measure of constituent economic interest and a commonly used
             variable, ADA score, that purports to measure the personal
             ideology of the candidate; (2) demonstrate that the
             constituent economic interest variable should be adjusted to
             account for the fact that voters, not citizens, are the only
             effective principals in influencing a legislator's voting
             activities; and (3) call into question, on both theoretical
             and empirical grounds, the claim that legislators shirk
             their responsibilities to voters by voting their own
             ideological preferences.[Figure not available: see
             fulltext.] In order to evaluate our efforts, consider Table
             5. For a large majority (15) of the 18 relevant runs, the
             ideological variable is significant. Our measure of
             constituent economic interests does not eliminate the
             explanatory power of the ideological voting variable, but
             this does not indicate shirking. As opposed to shirking, we
             may observe ideological voting because (1) it provides brand
             name capital, (2) it represents the ideological preferences
             of the constituents, or (3) it acts as a measure of median
             voter economic preferences. Further, ADA scores do not allow
             us to differentiate between these competing explanations.
             Table 5. Comparison of House and Senate resultsEconomic
             variableIdeological variableHouseSenateTotalSignificantNot
             significantSignificantNot significantKalt-Zupan
             Insignificant--4-4Kalt-Zupan Significant332-8Peltzman
             Insignificant--3-3Peltzman Significan--3-3Total3312018 For
             11 of the 18 models one of the economic variables accounts
             for a significant portion of the variance in the dependent
             variables. The results derived from our measure of
             constituent economic interests contradict most findings of
             the LASI school and raise questions about the validity of
             the empirical characterization of constituent interests in
             that research. A breakdown of the results by chamber
             indicates that significant differences in the degree of
             ideological voting between the House and Senate may exist.
             This is important in that most research has focused only on
             the Senate where ideological voting is more prevalent. For
             the House, Table 5 reveals the constituent economic interest
             variable is always significant, and in fully one-half of the
             relevant regressions it is the only significant variable,
             knocking ADA out of the race. As noted earlier, the
             insignificance of ADA is some indication of the absence of
             ideological shirking though its significance may indicate
             only measurement error, voter ideology, or reputational
             capital. In the Senate, the results are more evenly split,
             though it is clear that the adjusted (for reelection
             constituency) economic interest variable is an improvement.
             ADA is significant in all 12 Senate regressions, and the
             respective economic variables are significant in 5, or just
             under half. This side-by-side comparison is provocative,
             though it remains to be tested in detail. But our
             preliminary conclusions can be stated as follows. First, as
             Peltzman (1984) suggested, a better specification of
             economic interest and constituency representation reduces,
             though it does not eliminate, the role of the ADA variable
             in the Senate. Second, we find evidence that ideological
             shirking, if it exists, is much smaller in the House. In
             fact, from an institutional perspective, it can be argued
             that economic interests are dominant, since House districts
             are smaller and more homogeneous. Further, the shorter terms
             for House members may make them more directly accountable to
             voters, and smaller groups of voters may force a lesser
             reliance on pure ideological campaigning and require a more
             personal presentation of self. © 1990 Kluwer Academic
             Publishers.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF01890154},
   Key = {fds250244}
}

@article{fds250146,
   Author = {Coase, RH},
   Title = {The Firm, The Market, and the Law},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {65},
   Pages = {295-296},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250146}
}

@article{fds250147,
   Author = {Taagepera, R and Shugart, M},
   Title = {Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral
             Systems},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {84},
   Pages = {676-677},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250147}
}

@article{fds250148,
   Author = {Eismeier, T and III, PP},
   Title = {Business, Money, and the Rise of Corporate PACs in American
             Elections},
   Journal = {Journal of Policy Analysis and Management},
   Volume = {9},
   Pages = {577-581},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250148}
}

@article{fds250149,
   Author = {Alexander, H},
   Title = {Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s},
   Journal = {Journal of Policy Analysis and Management},
   Volume = {9},
   Pages = {577-581},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250149}
}

@article{fds250150,
   Author = {Sabato, L},
   Title = {Paying for Elections},
   Journal = {Journal of Policy Analysis and Management},
   Volume = {9},
   Pages = {577-581},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250150}
}

@article{fds250243,
   Author = {Grier, K and Torrent, G and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Allocation Patterns of PAC Monies: The U.S.
             Senate},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {67},
   Pages = {111-128},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1990},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Key = {fds250243}
}

@article{fds250245,
   Author = {Dow, J and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Public Choice in Political Science},
   Journal = {Ps: Political Science and Politics},
   Volume = {23},
   Pages = {604-610},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250245}
}

@article{fds250144,
   Author = {Kelly, JS},
   Title = {Social Choice Theory: An Introduction},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {62},
   Pages = {97-98},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds250144}
}

@article{fds250145,
   Author = {Meier, K},
   Title = {Regulation: Politics, Bureaucracy, and Economics and The
             Political Economy of Regulation: The Case of
             Insurance},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {62},
   Pages = {192-195},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds250145}
}

@article{fds250239,
   Author = {Dougan, WR and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Rationality of Ideology},
   Journal = {Journal of Law and Economics},
   Volume = {32},
   Pages = {213-239},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds250239}
}

@article{fds250240,
   Author = {Cox, G and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Contributions, Expenditure, Turnout: The 1982 U.S. House
             Elections},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {83},
   Pages = {217-231},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals},
   Year = {1989},
   ISSN = {1537-5943},
   Key = {fds250240}
}

@article{fds250241,
   Author = {Hart, D and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Declining Electoral Competitiveness in the House of
             Representatives: the Differential Impact of Improved
             Transportation Technology},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {61},
   Pages = {217-231},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1989},
   ISSN = {1573-7101},
   Key = {fds250241}
}

@article{fds250242,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {A Simple Test of the Thesis that Committee Assignments Shape
             the Pattern of Corporate PAC Contributions},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {62},
   Pages = {181-186},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds250242}
}

@article{fds250238,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Allocation of Desirable Committee Assignments: Extended
             Queues vs. Committee Expansion},
   Journal = {American Journal of Political Science},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {317-344},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds250238}
}

@article{fds250237,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {On the Political Participation of the Firm in the Electoral
             Process: An Update},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {56},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {295-298},
   Year = {1988},
   Key = {fds250237}
}

@article{fds250142,
   Author = {Dumas, LJ},
   Title = {The Over-Burdened Economy},
   Journal = {The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
             Science},
   Volume = {494},
   Pages = {205-206},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {November},
   Key = {fds250142}
}

@article{fds250143,
   Author = {Minsky, HP},
   Title = {Stabilizing and Unstable Economy},
   Journal = {The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
             Science},
   Volume = {494},
   Pages = {205-206},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {November},
   Key = {fds250143}
}

@article{fds250141,
   Author = {Ravenhill, J},
   Title = {Collective Clientelism: The Lome Conventions and North-South
             Relations},
   Journal = {The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
             Science},
   Volume = {493},
   Pages = {219-220},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds250141}
}

@article{fds250140,
   Author = {Hughes, JJ and Perlman, R},
   Title = {The Economics of Unemployment: A Comparative Analysis of
             Britain and the United States},
   Journal = {Journal of Labor Research},
   Volume = {7},
   Pages = {381-382},
   Year = {1986},
   Key = {fds250140}
}

@article{fds250235,
   Author = {Denzau, AT and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests
             Get Represented},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {80},
   Pages = {89-106},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals},
   Year = {1986},
   ISSN = {1537-5943},
   Key = {fds250235}
}

@article{fds250236,
   Author = {Grier, KB and Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Impact of Legislative Attributes on Interest Group
             Contributions},
   Journal = {Journal of Labor Research},
   Volume = {7},
   Pages = {349-361},
   Publisher = {Springer Verlag (Germany)},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {Fall},
   ISSN = {1936-4768},
   Key = {fds250236}
}

@article{fds250231,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Adjustment to Global Economy},
   Journal = {Business and Society Review},
   Volume = {55},
   Pages = {8-9},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {Fall},
   Key = {fds250231}
}

@article{fds250230,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Destroy Trade Barriers},
   Journal = {Business and Society Review},
   Volume = {53},
   Pages = {10-11},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {Spring},
   Key = {fds250230}
}

@article{fds250229,
   Author = {Rehbein, MMWKA},
   Title = {The High Cost of Protectionism},
   Journal = {Europe},
   Volume = {243},
   Pages = {10-11},
   Year = {1984},
   Key = {fds250229}
}

@article{fds250234,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {On the Mutuality of Interest Between Bureaus and High Demand
             Review Committees: The Case of Joint Production},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {211-216},
   Year = {1984},
   Key = {fds250234}
}

@article{fds250227,
   Author = {Weidenbaum, ML and Munger, MC},
   Title = {Protection At Any Price?},
   Journal = {Regulation},
   Number = {July/August},
   Pages = {54-61},
   Year = {1983},
   url = {http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/1983/7/v7n4-3.pdf},
   Key = {fds250227}
}


%% Other   
@misc{fds314266,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Beauty of the Virtual Discussion Section},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0009-5982},
   url = {http://chronicle.com/article/The-Beauty-of-the-Virtual/236065},
   Key = {fds314266}
}

@misc{fds314204,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {L'Affaire LaCour: What it can teach us about academic
             integrity and 'truthiness'},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0009-5982},
   Key = {fds314204}
}

@misc{fds314338,
   Author = {Prins, AD and Tamayo, AP and et. al., and Munger,
             MC},
   Title = {Sensational Smiles, LLC, dba Smile Bright v. Mullen, No.
             15-507, “Brief of Public Choice Economics Scholars as
             Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner”},
   Year = {2015},
   url = {http://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ct-teeth-whitening-brief-of-public-choice-economics-scholars-as-amici-curiae-in-support-of-petitioner-11-18-2015.pdf},
   Abstract = {Amicus Brief: Supreme Court of the United
             States},
   Key = {fds314338}
}

@misc{fds314339,
   Author = {Mellor, WH and Berliner, D and Sherman, PM and et. al., and Munger,
             MC},
   Title = {NC Dental Examiners v FTC, "Scholars of Public Choice
             Economics in Support of FTC"},
   Year = {2014},
   url = {http://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/nc-teeth-whitening-amicus.pdf},
   Abstract = {Amicus Brief: Supreme Court of the United
             States},
   Key = {fds314339}
}

@misc{fds250195,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Everything You Know About Recycling is Wrong},
   Journal = {Cato Unbound (On Line Journal, Not Refereed)},
   Series = {Symposium, The Political Economy of Recycling, edited by
             Jason Kuznicki.},
   Booktitle = {The Political Economy of Recycling},
   Editor = {J Kuznicki},
   Year = {2013},
   url = {http://www.cato-unbound.org/issues/june-2013/political-economy-recycling},
   Abstract = {Cato Unbound Symposium},
   Key = {fds250195}
}

@misc{fds314340,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {“Many Cultures, One Message,” et al. v. Clements, et
             al.},
   Year = {2012},
   Abstract = {Amicus Brief: Washington Western District
             Court},
   Key = {fds314340}
}

@misc{fds250211,
   Author = {Ordeshook, P and Munger, M and Lin, TM and Jones,
             B},
   Title = {In memoriam: Melvin J. Hinich, 1939-2010},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {146},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-8},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0048-5829},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000285103500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11127-010-9743-1},
   Key = {fds250211}
}

@misc{fds314341,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Idaho Republican Party v Ysursa},
   Publisher = {Idaho Gov},
   Year = {2011},
   url = {http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/ClosedPrimaryOrder.pdf},
   Key = {fds314341}
}

@misc{fds314203,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {10 Tips on How to Write Less Badly},
   Journal = {The Chronicle},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0030-2201},
   url = {http://chronicle.com/article/10-Tips-on-How-to-Write-Less/124268},
   Key = {fds314203}
}

@misc{fds314202,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Lean on Your Staff},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://chronicle.com/article/Lean-on-Your-Staff/65699},
   Key = {fds314202}
}

@misc{fds314201,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {10 Suggestions for a New Department Chair},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0009-5982},
   url = {http://chronicle.com/article/10-Suggestions-for-a-New/64963},
   Key = {fds314201}
}

@misc{fds314200,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Right Kind of Nothing},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0009-5982},
   url = {http://chronicle.com/article/The-Right-Kind-of-Nothing/63344},
   Key = {fds314200}
}

@misc{fds314199,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Sorry I'm Late},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0009-5982},
   url = {http://chronicle.com/article/Sorry-Im-Late/49148},
   Key = {fds314199}
}

@misc{fds314268,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {No Turtles: Faculty-Media Relations},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0009-5982},
   url = {http://chronicle.com/article/No-Turtles-Faculty-Media/44489},
   Key = {fds314268}
}

@misc{fds250194,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Locking Up Political Speech: How Electioneering
             Communications Laws Stifle Free Speech and Civic
             Engagement},
   Publisher = {Institute for Justice},
   Address = {Arlington, VA},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ij.org/images/pdf_folder/other_pubs/locking_up_political_speech.pdf},
   Abstract = {Amicus Brief: Broward County v. Browning
             (Florida)},
   Key = {fds250194}
}

@misc{fds314393,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Locking Up Political Speech: How Electioneering
             Communications Laws Stifle Free Speech and Civic
             Engagement},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ij.org/images/pdf_folder/other_pubs/locking_up_political_speech.pdf},
   Abstract = {Amicus Brief: Broward County v. Browning
             (Florida)},
   Key = {fds314393}
}

@misc{fds250193,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Market Makers or Parasites?},
   Publisher = {Liberty Fund, Inc.},
   Address = {Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2009/Mungermiddlemen.html},
   Key = {fds250193}
}

@misc{fds250192,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Planning Order, Causing Chaos: Transantiago},
   Publisher = {EconLib, OLL, Liberty Fund},
   Year = {2009},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2008/Mungerbus.html},
   Key = {fds250192}
}

@misc{fds314342,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Libertarian Party, et al v. State, et al},
   Publisher = {Southern Coalition for Social Justice},
   Year = {2009},
   url = {https://www.southerncoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/LPNCamicusbrief.pdf},
   Abstract = {Amicus Brief: Supreme Court of North Carolina},
   Key = {fds314342}
}

@misc{fds314267,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {'A' Hire vs. 'the' Hire},
   Journal = {Chronicle of Higher Education},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0009-5982},
   url = {http://chronicle.com/article/A-Hire-vs-the-Hire/45775},
   Key = {fds314267}
}

@misc{fds250188,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Five Sorry Rules of Lateness},
   Publisher = {Econlib, Liberty Fund},
   Year = {2007},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2007/Mungerlateness.html},
   Key = {fds250188}
}

@misc{fds250189,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {I’ll Stick With These: Some Sharp Observations on the
             Division of Labor},
   Publisher = {EconLib, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2007},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2007/Mungerpins.html},
   Key = {fds250189}
}

@misc{fds250190,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {They Clapped: Can Price-Gouging Laws Prohibit
             Scarcity?},
   Publisher = {Econlab},
   Year = {2007},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2007/Mungergouging.html},
   Key = {fds250190}
}

@misc{fds250191,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Think Globally, Act Irrationally: Recycling},
   Publisher = {Econlib, Liberty Fund},
   Year = {2007},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2007/Mungerrecycling.html},
   Key = {fds250191}
}

@misc{fds250215,
   Author = {Hinich, MJ and Munger, MC},
   Title = {In Memoriam: Otto "Toby" Davis},
   Journal = {Public Choice},
   Volume = {128},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {357-359},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds250215}
}

@misc{fds250137,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Democracy is a Means, Not an End},
   Journal = {Econ Lib.},
   Publisher = {Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2005},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2005/Mungerdemocracy.html},
   Key = {fds250137}
}

@misc{fds250138,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {The Thing Itself},
   Journal = {Econ Lib.},
   Publisher = {Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2005},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2005/Mungerthing.html},
   Key = {fds250138}
}

@misc{fds250139,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Everybody Loves Mikey},
   Publisher = {Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2005},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2005/Mungerinvisiblehand.html},
   Key = {fds250139}
}

@misc{fds250136,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Tragedy of the Malecon: Is Cuba ’Domestic
             Politics?},
   Journal = {Econ Lib.},
   Publisher = {Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN},
   Year = {2004},
   url = {http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2004/MungerCuba.html},
   Key = {fds250136}
}

@misc{fds314343,
   Author = {Hayward, A and Dimino, M and Jones, CA and La Raja and RJ and Milyo, J and Munger, MC and New, NJ and Primo, DM and Samples,
             J},
   Title = {Brief Amicus Campaign Finance Scholars in Support of
             Appellant, Citizens United},
   Publisher = {Wilson - Epes Printing Co., Inc},
   Year = {2002},
   url = {http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/CU-SuppABrief-Aplt17.pdf},
   Abstract = {Supreme Court of the United States: Citizens United v.
             Federal Elections Commission},
   Key = {fds314343}
}

@misc{fds313754,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Political Parties and Campaign Finance},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://rules.senate.gov/hearings/2000/04500hrg.htm},
   Key = {fds313754}
}

@misc{fds250135,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Political Parties and Campaign Finance, Written
             Testimony},
   Publisher = {Rules and Administration Committee, U.S.
             Senate},
   Year = {2000},
   Key = {fds250135}
}

@misc{fds250134,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Forum: The Dead Cats of November},
   Journal = {Ps: Political Science and Politics},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds250134}
}

@misc{fds250133,
   Author = {Munger, M and Stockard, W},
   Title = {The Environmental Protection Agency in the
             Triangle},
   Publisher = {Center for Urban and Regional Studies, University of North
             Carolina-Chapel Hill},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds250133}
}

@misc{fds250132,
   Author = {Munger, M and Bluestein, F},
   Title = {Single Prime and Multi-Prime Contracting in North Carolina
             Public Construction: A Report Submitted Under Contract to
             the N.C. State Building Commission},
   Pages = {43-43},
   Publisher = {Raleigh, NC: State Building Commission},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds250132}
}

@misc{fds313830,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Bluestein, F},
   Title = {Single Prime and Multi-Prime Contracting in North Carolina
             Public Construction},
   Pages = {43 pages},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds313830}
}

@misc{fds250131,
   Author = {Munger, M and Coates, D and Heid, V},
   Title = {The Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste in America:
             Gridlock in the States},
   Publisher = {St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American Business,
             Occasional Paper No. 119},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds250131}
}

@misc{fds318627,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Coates, D and Heid, V},
   Title = {The Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste in America:
             Gridlock in the States},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds318627}
}

@misc{fds250130,
   Author = {Munger, M and Coates, D},
   Title = {Nuclear Waste and the Bug Letter},
   Pages = {7J-7J},
   Publisher = {Raleigh News and Observer},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds250130}
}

@misc{fds250129,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {A Time-series Investigation into Factors Influencing U.S.
             Auto Assembly Employment},
   Booktitle = {Bureau of Economics Staff Report to the Federal Trade
             Commission},
   Publisher = {Bureau of Economics Staff Report to the Federal Trade
             Commission},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {February},
   Key = {fds250129}
}

@misc{fds318628,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {A Time-series Investigation into Factors Influencing U.S.
             Auto Assembly Employment},
   Booktitle = {Bureau of Economics Staff Report to the Federal Trade
             Commission},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {February},
   Key = {fds318628}
}

@misc{fds250128,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {Tax Implications of Reagan’s Trade Policy},
   Journal = {Policy Report},
   Publisher = {Cato Institute},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {February},
   Key = {fds250128}
}

@misc{fds314205,
   Author = {Munger, MC},
   Title = {Trade Barriers and Deficits: The Hidden Tax of
             Protectionism},
   Booktitle = {Policy Report},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://www.cato.org/policy-report/february-1984},
   Key = {fds314205}
}

@misc{fds250127,
   Author = {Munger, M and Weidenbaum, ML},
   Title = {Protectionism: Who Gets Protected?},
   Pages = {16-19},
   Publisher = {Consumer’s Research Magazine},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds250127}
}

@misc{fds250126,
   Author = {Munger, M and Weidenbaum, ML and Penoyer, RJ},
   Title = {Toward a More Open Trade Policy},
   Booktitle = {Formal Publication No. 53},
   Publisher = {St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American Business,
             Formal Publication No. 53},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds250126}
}

@misc{fds318629,
   Author = {Munger, MC and Weidenbaum, ML and Penoyer, RJ},
   Title = {Toward A More Open Trade Policy},
   Booktitle = {Formal Publication No. 53},
   Year = {1983},
   Key = {fds318629}
}

@misc{fds250125,
   Author = {Munger, M},
   Title = {America’s Costly Trade Barriers},
   Pages = {F29-F29},
   Publisher = {The New York Times},
   Year = {1983},
   Key = {fds250125}
}


Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Reload * Login