![]() |
Education Arts & Sciences Duke University |
|
HOME > Arts & Sciences > Education | Search Help Login ![]() ![]() |
| Education : Publications since January 2020List all publications in the database. :recent first alphabetical combined listing:%% Ferraro, Thomas J. @book{fds350080, Author = {Ferraro, TJ}, Title = {Transgression and Redemption in American Fiction}, Pages = {272 pages}, Publisher = {Oxford University Press}, Year = {2020}, Month = {October}, ISBN = {0198863055}, Abstract = {This book looks at modern American fiction in its own Italianate coloration: the interplay of sex (the red of passion), violence (the black of violence), and sanctity (the gold of redemption). Its purpose is to involve the reader in the mythopoetics of American narrative, long-lived and well overdue, in which Marian Catholicism is seen as integral to apprehending the nexus among eros, grace, and sacrifice in U.S. self-making—especially for Protestants! It starts with Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, the primary instigator, as well as with Frederic’s ingenious retelling, The Damnation of Theron Ware, a second persisting prism. Sustained revisionist accounts of five major novels (and several stories) follow: Chopin’s The Awakening, James’ The Wings of the Dove, Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, Cather’s The Professor’s House, and Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises. Each novel is revealed not only as a melodrama of beset sexuality, as long recognized, but also as a martyr tale of forbidden love—successive, self-aware courtings of devotional Catholicism that the critical and teaching establishment has found too mysterious and too dangerous to recognize, never mind sanction. In counterpoint, Transgression & Redemption illuminates each tale in its own terms, which are often surprising yet almost always common-sensical; it identifies the special senses—beauty, courage, and wisdom—that emerge, often in the face of social terror and moral darkness, under Marian-Catholic pedagogy; and it yields an overview of the mainline of the modern American novel in which sexual transgression (including betrayal) and graced redemption (the sanctification of passion, mediated confession, martyring sacrifice) go hand in hand, syncretically.}, Key = {fds350080} } %% Noor, Mohamed A. @article{fds349407, Author = {Samuk, K and Manzano-Winkler, B and Ritz, KR and Noor, MAF}, Title = {Natural Selection Shapes Variation in Genome-wide Recombination Rate in Drosophila pseudoobscura.}, Journal = {Current Biology : Cb}, Volume = {30}, Number = {8}, Pages = {1517-1528.e6}, Year = {2020}, Month = {April}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.053}, Abstract = {While recombination is widely recognized to be a key modulator of numerous evolutionary phenomena, we have a poor understanding of how recombination rate itself varies and evolves within a species. Here, we performed a comprehensive study of recombination rate (rate of meiotic crossing over) in two natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura from Utah and Arizona, USA. We used an amplicon sequencing approach to obtain high-quality genotypes in approximately 8,000 individual backcrossed offspring (17 mapping populations with roughly 530 individuals each), for which we then quantified crossovers. Interestingly, variation in recombination rate within and between populations largely manifested as differences in genome-wide recombination rate rather than remodeling of the local recombination landscape. Comparing populations, we discovered individuals from the Utah population displayed on average 8% higher crossover rates than the Arizona population, a statistically significant difference. Using a QST-FST analysis, we found that this difference in crossover rate was dramatically higher than expected under neutrality, indicating that this difference may have been driven by natural selection. Finally, using a combination of short- and long-read whole-genome sequencing, we found no significant association between crossover rate and structural variation at the 200-400 kb scale. Our results demonstrate that (1) there is abundant variation in genome-wide crossover rate in natural populations, (2) at the 200-400 kb scale, recombination rate appears to vary largely genome-wide, rather than in specific intervals, and (3) interpopulation differences in recombination rate may be the result of local adaptation.}, Doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.053}, Key = {fds349407} } @article{fds354324, Author = {Korunes, KL and Myers, RB and Hardy, R and Noor, MAF}, Title = {PseudoBase: A genomic visualization and exploration resource for the Drosophila pseudoobscura subgroup.}, Journal = {Fly}, Year = {2020}, Month = {December}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2020.1864201}, Abstract = {<i>Drosophila pseudoobscura</i> is a classic model system for the study of evolutionary genetics and genomics. Given this long-standing interest, many genome sequences have accumulated for <i>D. pseudoobscura</i> and closely related species <i>D. persimilis, D. miranda</i>, and <i>D. lowei</i>. To facilitate the exploration of genetic variation within species and comparative genomics across species, we present PseudoBase, a database that couples extensive publicly available genomic data with simple visualization and query tools via an intuitive graphical interface, amenable for use in both research and educational settings. All genetic variation (SNPs and indels) within the database is derived from the same workflow, so variants are easily comparable across data sets. Features include an embedded JBrowse interface, ability to pull out alignments of individual genes/regions, and batch access for gene lists. Here, we introduce PseudoBase, and we demonstrate how this resource facilitates use of extensive genomic data from flies of the <i>Drosophila pseudoobscura</i> subgroup.}, Doi = {10.1080/19336934.2020.1864201}, Key = {fds354324} } %% Reynolds, Julie @article{fds348773, Author = {Ahern-Dodson, J and Clark, CR and Mourad, T and Reynolds, JA}, Title = {Beyond the numbers: understanding how a diversity mentoring program welcomes students into a scientific community}, Journal = {Ecosphere}, Volume = {11}, Number = {2}, Year = {2020}, Month = {February}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3025}, Abstract = {© 2020 The Authors. Programs designed to broaden participation in science are often deemed “successful” based on quantitative evidence such as student participation rates, retention, and persistence. These numbers alone only explain that a program met its goals; they seldom critically explain how, specifically, the program achieved its success. To address this gap, we studied students’ perspectives about and experiences with the Ecological Society of America's award-winning education and diversity mentoring program, Strategies for Ecology Education, Diversity and Sustainability (SEEDS). The persistence rate in ecology by SEEDS participants is three times greater than the national average, but the numbers alone do not explain the program's impact. We explored the reasons why this program has been so successful by gathering qualitative data as direct evidence explaining how SEEDS influenced participants’ decisions to study science and pursue science careers, and the resulting integration into a scientific community. We coded open-ended survey responses from SEEDS alumni against a social influence theoretical framework that proposes three dominant processes that predict students’ integration into a scientific community: scientific self-efficacy, scientific identity, and shared values with the scientific community. We not only found emergent evidence for all three processes, but we also gained a deeper understanding of how—in participants’ own words—SEEDS achieves its success. Specifically, SEEDS successfully welcomes students into a science community by (1) providing both breadth and depth of programming that offers flexible, multilayered approaches to developing self-efficacy to fit the needs of diverse students, (2) enabling participants to integrate a science identity into other preexisting identities, and (3) implementing programming that intentionally helps participants to consciously connect their values with those of their communities.}, Doi = {10.1002/ecs2.3025}, Key = {fds348773} } @article{fds352757, Author = {Reynolds, JA and Cai, V and Choi, J and Faller, S and Hu, M and Kozhumam, A and Schwartzman, J and Vohra, A}, Title = {Teaching during a pandemic: Using high-impact writing assignments to balance rigor, engagement, flexibility, and workload.}, Journal = {Ecology and Evolution}, Year = {2020}, Month = {October}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6776}, Abstract = {The COVID-19 pandemic has created new challenges for instructors who seek high-impact educational practices that can be facilitated online without creating excessive burdens with technology, grading, or enforcement of honor codes. These practices must also account for the possibility that some students may need to join courses asynchronously and have limited or unreliable connectivity. Of the American Association of Colleges and University's list of 11 high-impact educational practices, writing-intensive courses may be the easiest for science faculty to adopt during these difficult times. Not only can writing assignments promote conceptual learning, they can also deepen student engagement with the subject matter and with each other. Furthermore, writing assignments can be incredibly flexible in terms of how they are implemented online and can be designed to reduce the possibility of cheating and plagiarism. To accelerate the adoption of writing pedagogies, we summarize evidence-based characteristics of effective writing assignments and offer a sample writing assignment from an introductory ecology course. We then suggest five strategies to help instructors manage their workload. Although the details of the sample assignment may be particular to our course, this framework is general enough to be adapted to most science courses, including those taught in-person, those taught online, and those that must be able to switch quickly between the two.}, Doi = {10.1002/ece3.6776}, Key = {fds352757} } %% Stephens, Kristen R. @article{fds348480, Author = {Stephens, KR}, Title = {Gifted education policy and advocacy: Perspectives for school psychologists}, Journal = {Psychology in the Schools}, Volume = {57}, Number = {10}, Pages = {1640-1651}, Publisher = {WILEY}, Year = {2020}, Month = {October}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.22355}, Abstract = {© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Education laws and policies serve to guide the way programs and services are implemented in schools. The transition from law or policy to implementation can be fraught with complications that impact the education system across many levels. According to Viennet and Pont (2017), one of the areas that can either hinder or support the transition from policy to practice is “inclusive stakeholder engagement” (p. 3). School psychologists are an important stakeholder in the education system thus they should have familiarity with gifted education policy to ensure students are being served appropriately—both academically and socio-emotionally. This article will introduce school psychologists to (a) federal and state laws impacting gifted students, (b) the role litigation, due process, and research has in shaping policy, and (c) relevant gifted education policy considerations.}, Doi = {10.1002/pits.22355}, Key = {fds348480} } @book{ED47551620020101, Author = {Karnes, F. A. and Stephens, K. R.}, Title = {Young Women of Achievement: A Resource for Girls in Science, Math, and Technology.}, Year = {20020101}, ISBN = {1-57392-965-4}, url = {http://proxy.lib.duke.edu:2164/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED475516&site=ehost-live&scope=site}, Abstract = {This book is intended to be a resource guide for girls and young women considering careers in science, math, and technology. An introductory chapter considers the status of girls and women in these fields, the importance of role models, and suggestions for using the book. Part 1 introduces readers to the various career opportunities available in the sciences and suggests strategies for career planning in these areas. Sections consider job availability, career choice, classes to take, the importance of reading, instructional materials, special clubs, and finding a mentor. Part 2 recounts true stories of girls (18 and under) and young women (19 and older) in the sciences, detailing how they got involved and what they have accomplished. Part 3 offers timelines of extraordinary women throughout history, inspiring quotations, a list of Web sites specifically geared toward women in the sciences, suggestions for science-oriented computer software, and other resources. (DB)}, Key = {ED47551620020101} } | |
Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Education * Faculty * Staff * Students * Reload * Login |