Political Science Faculty Database
Political Science
Arts & Sciences
Duke University

 HOME > Arts & Sciences > Political Science > Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications of Karen L. Remmer    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Books   
@book{fds250303,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Military rule in Latin America},
   Publisher = {Boston: Unwin Hyman},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {December},
   ISBN = {0044454791},
   Abstract = {The first part of the book provides a broad overview of
             military rule in Latin America, asking what the political
             and economic consequences of military rule are, and
             investigating the factors which shape the functioning,
             dynamics and outcomes of military regimes. The role of
             institutional forces and state actors are explicitly
             addressed. The second part is a detailed case study of Chile
             under the Pinochet regime, showing how social class forces
             and institutional structures interacted to produce a durable
             and personal regime with an unusually profound social
             impact. The final chapter explores the shift away from
             authoritarianism in Latin America during the late 1970s and
             speculates on the course of future political events. -from
             Author},
   Key = {fds250303}
}

@book{fds250302,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Party Competition and Public Policy: Argentina and Chile,
             1890-1930},
   Publisher = {Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press},
   Year = {1984},
   Key = {fds250302}
}


%% Chapters in Books   
@misc{fds339485,
   Author = {K.L. Remmer},
   Title = {The Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration: A
             Reassessment},
   Pages = {144-172},
   Booktitle = {Yearbook of International Law and Policy
             2015-16},
   Publisher = {New York: Oxford University Press},
   Editor = {Lisa Sachs and Lise Johnson},
   Year = {2018},
   Key = {fds339485}
}

@misc{fds250283,
   Author = {Perrin, EM},
   Title = {Commentary},
   Volume = {30},
   Pages = {356-362},
   Booktitle = {Contemporary Political Systems: Classifications and
             Typologies},
   Publisher = {Boulder: Lynne Rienner},
   Editor = {Bebler, A and Seroka, J},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds250283}
}

@misc{fds250286,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Elections and Economics in Contemporary Latin
             America},
   Booktitle = {Post-Reform Politics in Latin America: Competition,
             Transition, Collapse [Spanish version: La politica posterior
             a la reforma de mercado en america latina: competencia,
             transicion, colapso, 2003]},
   Publisher = {Brookings},
   Editor = {Wise, C and Roett, R},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds250286}
}

@misc{fds250285,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Democratization in Latin America},
   Booktitle = {Global Transformation and the Third World},
   Publisher = {Boulder: Lynne Rienner},
   Editor = {Slater, RO and Schutz, BM and Dorr, SR},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds250285}
}

@misc{fds250284,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Debt or Democracy? The Political Impact of the Debt Crisis
             in Latin America},
   Pages = {63-78},
   Booktitle = {Financing Latin American Growth: Prospects for the
             1990s},
   Publisher = {Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe},
   Editor = {Felix, D},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds250284}
}

@misc{fds250282,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Evaluating the Policy Impact of Military Regimes in Latin
             America},
   Booktitle = {Armies and Politics in Latin America, rev.
             ed.},
   Publisher = {New York: Homes and Meier},
   Editor = {Lowenthal, AF and Fitch, JS},
   Year = {1986},
   Key = {fds250282}
}

@misc{fds250281,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Chile: The Breakdown of Democracy},
   Booktitle = {Latin America: Its Problems and Its Promise},
   Publisher = {Boulder: Westview Press},
   Editor = {Black, JK},
   Year = {1984},
   Key = {fds250281}
}

@misc{fds250280,
   Author = {Merkx, G and Remmer, K},
   Title = {Mobilization and Demobilization in Latin America: The Role
             of Bureaucratic-Authoritarian Regimes},
   Pages = {249-255},
   Booktitle = {Proceedings of the Rocky Mountain Council on Latin American
             Studies},
   Publisher = {Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press},
   Editor = {Brasch, JJ},
   Year = {1979},
   Key = {fds250280}
}

@misc{fds250279,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Chile and the ’Peaceful’ Road to Socialism},
   Booktitle = {New Perspectives on Latin America},
   Publisher = {New York: MSS Information Corp.},
   Editor = {Remmer, KL and Merkx, GW},
   Year = {1976},
   Key = {fds250279}
}


%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds355203,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Stability and change in party preferences: Evidence from
             Latin America},
   Journal = {Electoral Studies},
   Volume = {70},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102283},
   Abstract = {Why do voters shift partisan allegiances between elections
             and/or within electoral cycles? Drawing on panel survey
             data, this study is designed to enhance our understanding of
             shifting partisan preferences byexploring vote switching and
             split-ticket voting inthe Latin American context. Its main
             finding and contribution to the existing literature on
             stability and change in partisan preferences centers around
             the importance of candidate viability relative to party
             identification and other individual characteristics shaping
             vote choice.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102283},
   Key = {fds355203}
}

@article{fds355025,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Investment treaty arbitration in latin America},
   Journal = {Latin American Research Review},
   Volume = {54},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {795-811},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.25222/larr.154},
   Abstract = {This study analyzes variations in the incidence of state
             involvement in investment treaty arbitration in Latin
             America and the Caribbean over the 1987-2014 period. Its
             main contributions are fourfold. First, by focusing on the
             balance of incentives and opportunities facing political
             leaders and foreign investors, the study establishes a new
             basis for understanding the reasons actors opt for the risks
             and uncertainties of international arbitration instead of
             resolving international investment disputes via alternative
             means. Second, by restricting the focus of research to the
             Latin American region, the study is able to move beyond the
             analysis of relatively time-invariant structural and
             institutional conditions and crude indicators to address the
             role played by the preferences of political actors. Third,
             by disaggregating disputes by sector of investment, the
             analysis documents the variable role of ideology and
             electoral incentives in investment treaty arbitration.
             Finally, by underlining the distinctiveness of the Latin
             American experience with investment treaty arbitration, the
             study offers new insights into the global backlash against
             investment treaty arbitration, which has gone farther in the
             region than anywhere else. Overall, the results underline
             the potential payoffs of breaking down the international
             experience with investment treaty arbitration into regional
             patterns to obtain a deeper and more granular understanding
             of the political economy of investor-state dispute
             settlement.},
   Doi = {10.25222/larr.154},
   Key = {fds355025}
}

@article{fds337062,
   Author = {Minhas, S and Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The Reputational Impact of Investor-State
             Disputes},
   Journal = {International Interactions},
   Volume = {44},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {862-887},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2018.1492384},
   Abstract = {To what extent do alleged violations of international
             commitments damage state reputation? This article explore
             this question with specific reference to investor-state
             disputes arising under the protection of international
             investment agreements. Its main contributions are threefold.
             First, building on the political institutions literature,
             the study places the theoretical importance of information
             about the rules of the game, and the actions of the
             participants at the center of analysis. Second, in contrast
             to prior empirical research, the study systematically
             analyzes the costs of state involvement in investment treaty
             arbitration by examining all known disputes. Third, the
             study addresses the impact of investment disputes on both
             foreign investment flows and state reputational rankings. We
             show that the consequences of investment disputes vary with
             the transparency of the investor-state dispute settlement
             process. The central implication of these findings for the
             broader body of literature on international institutions is
             that reputational mechanisms for effective treaty
             enforcement cannot be taken as given but instead need to be
             explored on the basis of a nuanced approach that addresses
             the pivotal issues of institutional design and information
             costs.},
   Doi = {10.1080/03050629.2018.1492384},
   Key = {fds337062}
}

@article{fds354954,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The Political Economy of Investor-State Disputes},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds354954}
}

@article{fds318631,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Exogenous shocks and democratic accountability: Evidence
             from the Caribbean},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {47},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1158-1185},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488563},
   Abstract = {This study attempts to contribute to the growing debate over
             democratic accountability by focusing on the electoral
             impact of natural disasters and economic crises in the
             Caribbean. Although largely ignored by political science,
             the polities in the region share a long history of
             democratic governance as well as extreme vulnerability to
             adverse weather conditions and global economic fluctuations.
             The Caribbean thus offers unusually fertile opportunities
             for research on the capacity of voters to make rational
             electoral decisions. Two key questions are addressed. First,
             to what extent do citizens of the Caribbean punish
             incumbents for exogenous economic and climatic shocks?
             Second, what factors, if any, help to insulate democratic
             leaders from blame for conditions largely outside their
             control? Contrary to recent research on natural disasters
             and economic downturns in other contexts, the analysis
             provides no evidence that voting in the Caribbean has been
             characterized by systematic attribution errors or electoral
             myopia. The pattern of citizen attribution of responsibility
             to policy makers, however, has varied significantly with
             national independence and political scale. © The Author(s)
             2013.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414013488563},
   Key = {fds318631}
}

@article{fds250301,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Exogenous Shocks and Democratic Accountability},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {forthcoming},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds250301}
}

@article{fds250305,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The Rise of Leftist- Populist Governance in Latin America:
             The Roots of Electoral Change},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {45},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {947-972},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414011428595},
   Abstract = {Over the past decade the contours of political party
             competition in Latin America have been dramatically altered
             by an upsurge of support for leftist-populist parties and
             the related weakening of established parties on the center
             and right end of the political spectrum. Drawing on both
             aggregate and individual-level evidence, this article
             explores the roots of this swing of the political pendulum.
             Contrary to the conventional wisdom, which attributes the
             rising "pink tide" to citizen dissatisfaction with
             market-oriented policies, economic performance, and/or
             social inequality, the analysis focuses on the role played
             by improving external economic conditions during the early
             2000s, which relaxed the preexisting constraints on policy
             choice, enhanced the credibility of anti-status quo
             political actors, and created new opportunities for the
             pursuit of statist, nationalist, and redistributive
             political projects and associated challenges to U.S.
             hegemony. Consistent with this line of theoretical argument,
             the macro-level evidence indicates that the odds of electing
             a leftist-populist president in the region rose with
             improvements in the terms of trade. At the micro level,
             survey data also show that support for leftist-populist
             presidents in the region has been positively associated with
             citizen satisfaction with democracy and the state of the
             economy as well as with anti-Americanism. The results
             underline the potential significance of economic
             fluctuations for understanding electoral dynamics and party
             system change, particularly under conditions in which
             government policy choice is constrained by the operation of
             international markets. © The Author(s) 2012.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414011428595},
   Key = {fds250305}
}

@article{fds318632,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Political scale and electoral turnout: Evidence from the
             less industrialized world},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {275-303},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414009352638},
   Abstract = {This article attempts to bring the politics of scale back
             into the study of comparative politics. Explicitly focusing
             on the question of electoral turnout in the less
             industrialized world, it explores the impact of variations
             in community size relative to other influences on citizen
             participation. The findings, which draw on both aggregate
             and individual-level data at the subnational level of
             analysis, offer considerable evidence that electoral
             participation declines with community size, but for reasons
             largely neglected by most prior literature on electoral
             turnout. The central theoretical conclusion is that future
             comparative research needs to address the role of political
             scale more directly and systematically. © 2010 SAGE
             Publications.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414009352638},
   Key = {fds318632}
}

@article{fds250306,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Why Do Small States have Big Governments?},
   Journal = {European Political Science Review},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {49-71},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2010},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909990221},
   Abstract = {Building on the literature on public finance, this article
             explores the consequences of political scale for government
             spending. The central argument is that the tendency for
             small political units to have big governments is not merely
             the result of economies of scale in the provision of public
             goods, but a reflection of the greater pressures for public
             spending faced by politicians in smaller and more
             homogeneous political units. The importance of such
             political pressures relative to other influences on spending
             is assessed on the basis of subnational data by comparing
             the relationship between size and spending under democracy
             and dictatorship. To the extent that government expansion is
             driven by citizen demands, the impact of size on spending
             may be expected to be more pronounced under democratic than
             authoritarian governance. Results from a time-series
             cross-sectional analysis of growth in government spending
             are consistent with this expectation. Government growth is
             shaped not only by the population size of political units
             but also by the interaction between regime and size.
             Analysis of spending patterns under democratic rule further
             indicates that size is an important determinant of spending
             even after controlling for variations in citizen
             preferences, political institutions, electoral
             competitiveness, and economic performance. The results have
             important theoretical implications for the study of fiscal
             policy and democratic governance around the world because
             they suggest that political scale conditions the linkages
             between citizens and the state, creating widely varying
             incentives for government growth across differently sized
             political units. © 2010, European Consortium for Political
             Research. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1755773909990221},
   Key = {fds250306}
}

@article{fds250308,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {The Impact of Political Scale on Turnout},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {3},
   Year = {2010},
   Key = {fds250308}
}

@article{fds250307,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The politics of institutional change: Electoral reform in
             Latin America, 1978-2002},
   Journal = {Party Politics},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {5-30},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1354-0688},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000252846300001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Building on the growing body of research on political
             institutions, this article explores the causes of electoral
             reform, with specific reference to Latin America. What
             factors account for the extensive array of electoral reforms
             adopted in the region since the return to democracy? How are
             shifting patterns of political representation related to
             institutional change? In addressing these questions, I
             develop an account of electoral reform that places shifting
             partisan political fortunes at the center of analysis and
             show that changes in the rules of the electoral game tend to
             reflect the political self-interest of dominant political
             parties as defined in relation to mounting electoral
             uncertainty. The evidence regarding the impact of electoral
             reforms on party system change is less consistent with the
             expectations derived from the comparative institutional
             literature. Over the past two decades, party system change
             in Latin America has generated institutional change more
             predictably than vice versa. Copyright © 2008 SAGE
             Publications.},
   Doi = {10.1177/1354068807083821},
   Key = {fds250307}
}

@article{fds250310,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The political economy of patronage: Expenditure patterns in
             the Argentine Provinces, 1983-2003},
   Journal = {Journal of Politics},
   Volume = {69},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {363-377},
   Publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0022-3816},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000245675400006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Under what conditions do politicians emphasize patronage
             allocations over the provision of public goods? Building
             upon research on democratic policy management, this paper
             aims to improve our understanding of patronage politics by
             focusing upon the political incentives influencing the
             ability and willingness of politicians to target public
             sector allocations to political supporters. Drawing upon
             data on spending priorities at the provincial level in
             post-1983 Argentina, the statistical analysis provides
             evidence that the relative importance of patronage
             allocations fluctuates with partisanship, electoral cycles,
             revenue sources, and public sector investment in economic
             development. The findings underline important and largely
             neglected parallels between clientelistic and programmatic
             politics and thereby have important implications for the
             study of the political economy of democracy. © 2007
             Southern Political Science Association.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00537.x},
   Key = {fds250310}
}

@article{fds250309,
   Author = {Gélineau, F and Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Political decentralization and electoral accountability: The
             argentine experience, 1983-2001},
   Journal = {British Journal of Political Science},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {133-157},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0007-1234},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000235074400007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {To what extent does public support for subnational officials
             fluctuate in response to local rather than national
             performance? Are the policy failures of subnational
             officials reliably punished by voters? Drawing upon both
             individual and aggregate level data, this article attempts
             to shed new light on these questions about the politics of
             decentralization by exploring electoral outcomes and public
             opinion at the subnational level in Argentina. Consistent
             with referendum voting models, this analysis suggests that
             the fate of candidates in both national and subnational
             elections is shaped by the performance of the incumbent
             presidential administration. Moreover, to the extent that
             subnational performance has an electoral impact, voters do
             not necessarily respond in ways that enhance electoral
             accountability. Voters not only blame and reward subnational
             officials for national performance, but also attribute
             responsibility for subnational performance to national
             authorities. The implications with respect to the impact of
             decentralized decision making on democratic accountability
             are decidedly mixed and anything but consistent with the
             argument that decentralization results in a closer match
             between citizen preferences and the allocation of public
             resources. © 2005 Cambridge University Press.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S000712340600007X},
   Key = {fds250309}
}

@article{fds250338,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Does Foreign Aid Promote the Expansion of
             Government?},
   Journal = {American Journal of Political Science},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {77-92},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0092-5853},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000187786200006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Building on the literature on public finance, I seek to
             advance our understanding of variations in government size
             by exploring the impact of official development assistance
             on fiscal policy. I hypothesize that foreign aid operates in
             accordance with the "flypaper effect," systematically
             generating incentives and opportunities for the expansion of
             government spending. Results from a time-series
             cross-sectional regression analysis of growth in government
             spending over the 1970-99 time period are consistent with
             the hypothesis. For middle- and lower-income nations, aid
             represents an important determinant of government expansion.
             Looking at the tax and revenue side of the equation,
             however, reveals a more perverse pattern of response: aid
             promotes not only increased spending but also reduced
             revenue generation. The results have important implications
             from both a theoretical and policy perspective. Inter alia
             they point to the potentially self-defeating nature of
             efforts to promote market-oriented programs of state
             retrenchment via development assistance as well as to the
             importance of incorporating international transfers into
             future research on government spending.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00057.x},
   Key = {fds250338}
}

@article{fds318633,
   Author = {Remmer, KL and Gélineau, F},
   Title = {Subnational electoral choice: Economic and referendum voting
             in Argentina, 1983-1999},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {801-821},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414003255105},
   Abstract = {Are the policy failures of subnational officials reliably
             punished by voters, or do subnational elections instead
             pivot around national trends? This study attempts to shed
             new light on these questions by exploring subnational
             elections in the Argentine context. Building on a modified
             version of the referendum-voting model, our analysis
             suggests that the fate of candidates in both national and
             subnational elections is shaped by the performance of the
             incumbent presidential administration. At the same time,
             however, we also find evidence that voters respond to the
             policy choices of subnational governments, albeit in ways
             that attenuate, rather than strengthen, the nexus between
             policy responsibility and electoral accountability.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414003255105},
   Key = {fds318633}
}

@article{fds250336,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {The Politics of Economic Policy and Performance in Latin
             America},
   Journal = {Journal of Public Policy},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {29-59},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2002},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X02001022},
   Abstract = {This study explores variations in macroeconomic policy and
             performance in contemporary Latin America on the basis of a
             theoretical model that emphasizes the complex interplay of
             partisan control of the government, labor strength, and
             electoral competition. The plausibility of the model is
             assessed on the basis of a cross-national time series
             analysis of economic policy choice and performance in
             nineteen nations. Contrary to the view that
             internationalization of the world economy leaves limited
             room for domestic actors and institutions to influence
             public policy, the findings suggest that macroeconomic
             performance in contemporary Latin America reflects eminently
             political processes of policy formation shaped by
             partisanship, electoral competition, and union strength. The
             study thereby points to the broader relevance of the
             literature on the political economy of the advanced
             industrial democracies, which has emphasized the impact of
             domestic political institutions, particularly political
             parties and trade unions, on policy choice and
             performance.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0143814X02001022},
   Key = {fds250336}
}

@article{fds250335,
   Author = {Wibbels, KRWE},
   Title = {The Political Economy of Decentralization in Latin
             America},
   Journal = {APSA-CP Newsletter},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {28-31},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {Winter},
   Key = {fds250335}
}

@article{fds250312,
   Author = {Remmer, KL and Wibbels, E},
   Title = {The subnational politics of economic adjustment: Provincial
             politics and fiscal performance in Argentina},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {419-451},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0010-4140},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000086872700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Existing research has failed to address the impact of
             subnational politics on economic adjustment. This article
             attempts to fill this gap by outlining theoretical reasons
             for anticipating policy divergences across levels of
             government and by offering three hypotheses to account for
             variation at the subnational level. The authors explore
             these ideas on the basis of the Argentine experience. The
             study traces the impact of subnational policy on Argentine
             economic adjustment and tests hypotheses about subnational
             policy variation on the basis of provincial fiscal data. The
             authors' findings underline the importance of subnational
             policy choice for national performance and suggest a revised
             understanding of the role of political competition in the
             economic adjustment process. The authors find considerable
             evidence that interactions between party competition and the
             structure of the public sector shape provincial fiscal
             performance and thereby condition the capacity for economic
             adjustment at the national level.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414000033004001},
   Key = {fds250312}
}

@article{fds250334,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Regime sustainability in the Latin Caribbean,
             1944-1994},
   Journal = {Journal of Developing Areas},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {331-354},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {Spring},
   ISSN = {0022-037X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000084739800001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {This study attempts to compare the strength of institutional
             explanations for regime change and stability with other
             lines of analysis on the basis of data drawn from the Latin
             Caribbean. At the current stage of research, the pivotal
             theoretical question is not whether institutions matter,
             which they clearly do, but rather how much they matter
             relative to other sets of explanatory variables. Only by
             broadening the horizons of comparative research in ways that
             do not automatically privilege one line of explanation,
             whether structural, cultural, or institutional in nature,
             can we begin to develop a more unified and consensual
             understanding of the processes shaping regime
             sustainability. What has enhanced the sustainability of
             democratic rule in the region is the level of economic
             development. Consistent with the extended body of research
             on the relationship between development and democracy, the
             higher the per capita income, the greater the sustainability
             of political democracy. For authoritarianism, the
             relationship runs in the opposite direction. Also relevant
             to understanding the sustainability of both types of regimes
             are regional political trends. The final set of findings of
             major theoretical significance are those relating to the
             role of political institutions. Although the evidence
             linking the relative competitiveness of democracies with
             regime sustainability is weak, authoritarian regimes whose
             political institutions include elections and legislative
             bodies have been less vulnerable to overthrow than their
             counterparts in the Latin Caribbean. To put it another way,
             the more authoritarian regimes have resembled democracies,
             the greater their viability, presumably because competitive
             institutions, no matter how limited, enhance international
             and domestic perceptions of political legitimacy and dampen
             the incentives and opportunities for regime opponents to
             pursue strategies of regime overthrow. Thus variations
             within the authoritarian category as well as between
             authoritarian and democratic regimes speak more to the
             robustness than the fragility of democracy as a form of
             governance.},
   Key = {fds250334}
}

@article{fds250299,
   Author = {Faundez, J},
   Title = {Marxism and Democracy in Chile: 1932 to the Fall of
             Allende},
   Journal = {Studies in Comparative International Development},
   Volume = {25},
   Pages = {126-127},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds250299}
}

@article{fds250332,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Does Democracy Promote Interstate Cooperation? Lessons from
             the Mercosur Region},
   Journal = {International Studies Quarterly},
   Volume = {42},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {25-51},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0020-8833},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000071944800002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {A rapidly growing body of research suggests that democracy
             enhances prospects for the peaceful settlement of interstate
             conflicts. To what extent can democracy also be linked with
             increased international cooperation? Building upon the
             literature on political cooperation as well as recent
             discussions of the "democratic peace," this study offers a
             plausibility probe of the hypothesis that democracy
             increases the likelihood of interstate agreement. The
             analysis, which draws upon a data set covering dyadic
             interactions among Mercosur nations during the 1947-1985
             period, utilizes both logistic regression and negative
             binomial regression methods to assess the relationship
             between democracy and cooperation. The findings offer only
             limited support for the hypothesis that democracy promotes
             cooperation and challenge the recent literature on the
             relative peace among democracies in several theoretically
             suggestive ways. The study points to the potential
             fruitfulness of more extensive and rigorous research on the
             nexus between domestic institutions and international
             cooperation.},
   Doi = {10.1111/0020-8833.00068},
   Key = {fds250332}
}

@article{fds250333,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The politics of neoliberal economic reform in South America,
             1980-1994},
   Journal = {Studies in Comparative International Development},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {3-29},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0039-3606},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000079548500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {What political conditions facilitate market-oriented reform?
             Prior research suggests that neoliberal policies are
             inherently unpopular, politically hazardous, and
             consequently dependent upon the existence of strong and
             relative autonomous governments. This study reassesses the
             political costs and benefits of market-oriented reform and
             attempts to offer insights for future theory building by
             exploring five hypotheses on the basis of the post-1980
             South American experience. The findings suggest that the
             political obstacles to reform have been exaggerated and
             theoretically misspecified. Neoliberal policies are less the
             product of the triumph of technocratic expertise over
             political calculus than of the structure of political
             incentives and opportunities created by broader sets of
             factors, including economic circumstances, structural
             conditions, pluralist pressures, institutional constraints,
             and international linkages.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF02687406},
   Key = {fds250333}
}

@article{fds250331,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Theoretical decay and theoretical development: The
             resurgence of institutional analysis},
   Journal = {World Politics},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {34-61},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0043-8871},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1997YD38300003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {<jats:p>Research on the less industrialized regions of the
             world has undergone major changes in terms of theoretical
             rigor, methodological sophistication, and the
             diversification of analytical approaches since the
             publication of Samuel P. Huntingdon's essay, “Political
             Development and Political Decay,” in<jats:italic>World
             Politics</jats:italic>in 1965. Yet more than three decades
             later, comparativists are rediscovering political
             institutions, highlighting the originality of Huntington's
             scholarly contribution. The resurgence of institutional
             analysis has redirected attention to the potential
             variability of political outcomes in the face of sweeping
             global currents, generated important theoretical insights,
             and created new bases for dialogue across disparate research
             traditions. Nevertheless, the horizons of institutional
             research need to be broadened to address the challenges
             posed by international influences, two-way interactions
             between politics and society, and institutional
             fluidity.</jats:p>},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0043887100014714},
   Key = {fds250331}
}

@article{fds250311,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The sustainability of political democracy lessons from South
             America},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {611-634},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0010-4140},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996VX07200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Recent literature emphasizes the fragility of newly emerging
             democracies and the importance of economic performance to
             their survival. The analysis reevaluates this conventional
             wisdom and tests a theoretical alternative that takes into
             account the differential strengths and weaknesses of
             democracy and authoritarianism as well as institutional
             variations among democratic regimes. South American data for
             the post-1944 period form the empirical basis for the study.
             © 1996 Sage Publications, Inc.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414096029006001},
   Key = {fds250311}
}

@article{fds250330,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Theoretical Perspectives on Democratization},
   Journal = {Comparative Politics},
   Pages = {103-122},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds250330}
}

@article{fds250300,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The Political Economy of Elections in Latin America,
             1980–1991.},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {87},
   Number = {02},
   Pages = {393-407},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {1537-5943},
   Abstract = {The process of political democratization in Latin America
             during the 1980s created a rare opportunity to explore the
             political economy of elections outside of the North Atlantic
             basin. Using interrupted time-series analysis, I explore the
             impact of elections on macroeconomic performance in eight
             Latin American nations. The findings indicate that
             macroeconomic performance has fluctuated with the electoral
             calendar but that contrary to the traditional business cycle
             literature, as well as the conventional wisdom about Latin
             America, competitive elections have enhanced, rather than
             undermined, the capacity of political leaders to address
             outstanding problems of macroeconomic management. The
             analysis suggests that the relationship between democracy
             and economics is captured more adequately by a “political
             capital” model than by its traditional theoretical
             alternative.},
   Key = {fds250300}
}

@article{fds318634,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The process of democratization in Latin America},
   Journal = {Studies In Comparative International Development},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {3-24},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02687137},
   Abstract = {During the 1980s, Latin America experienced the longest and
             deepest wave of democratization in its history. The origins
             of this process of transformation are to be found in the
             interaction between domestic and international forces. At
             the international level, the key events were the oil shocks
             of the 1970s, the related expansion of international
             lending, and the subsequent debt crisis. The speed and
             extent to which these changes were translated into
             democratization were conditioned by the political alignments
             of the private sector and structural fragilities of
             authoritarianism at the national level. The persistence of
             the democratization trend through time reflects the
             importance of other factors, including global political
             change, the receding threat of the revolutionary left, the
             internationalization of capital markets, constraints on
             domestic policy choice, and political learning, which have
             converged at the domestic level to reduce the incentives and
             opportunities for authoritarian reversals. © 1993
             Springer.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF02687137},
   Key = {fds318634}
}

@article{fds250329,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {The Process of Democratization in Latin America},
   Journal = {Studies in Comparative International Development},
   Volume = {27},
   Pages = {1-24},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds250329}
}

@article{fds250328,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Economic Crisis and Elections in Latin America,
             1982-1990},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {85},
   Pages = {777-800},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds250328}
}

@article{fds250327,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {New Wine or Old Bottlenecks? The Study of Latin American
             Democracy},
   Journal = {Comparative Politics},
   Volume = {23},
   Pages = {479-495},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds250327}
}

@article{fds318635,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in
             the 1980s},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {85},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {777-800},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963850},
   Abstract = {Research on the political implications of economic
             conditions is separated into two relatively distinct bodies
             of literature. I bridge the theoretical gap between them by
             examining the effects of economic crisis on electoral
             outcomes in Latin America from 1982 to 1990. An analysis of
             21 competitive elections indicates that crisis conditions
             undermine support for incumbents and provoke high levels of
             electoral volatility but without necessarily fostering the
             growth of political extremism or the exhaustion of elite
             consensus associated with the breakdown of democracy. The
             results also suggest that the relationship between economic
             conditions and electoral instability is mediated by party
             system structure rather than democratic age. Paradoxically,
             the findings buttress prior research on electoral outcomes
             in the comparatively stable and homogeneous Organization for
             Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) nations while
             undercutting theoretical frameworks elaborated with specific
             reference to the breakdown and consolidation of Third World
             democracy. © 1991, American Political Science Association.
             All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.2307/1963850},
   Key = {fds318635}
}

@article{fds250326,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Democracy and economic crisis: The Latin American
             Experience},
   Journal = {World Politics},
   Volume = {42},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {315-335},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0043-8871},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1990CZ90500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.2307/2010414},
   Key = {fds250326}
}

@article{fds250325,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {State change in Chile, 1973-1988},
   Journal = {Studies In Comparative International Development},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {5-29},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {Fall},
   ISSN = {0039-3606},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1989AY60200002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {All of the Southern Cone military regimes of the 1970s
             articulated a commitment to a neoconservative program of
             state change. Nowhere, however, was the commitment
             translated into policy with greater zeal, speed, and
             consistency than in Chile. What differed in Chile was less a
             lack of resistance to neoconservatism than the capacity of
             the economic team to ignore or override that resistance due
             to the extreme concentration of political power achieved by
             General Augusto Pinochet. The Chilean experience
             consequently underlines the importance of institutional
             arrangements for understanding variations in policy
             outcomes. © 1990 Springer.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF02686988},
   Key = {fds250325}
}

@article{fds250324,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Neopatrimonialism: The Politics of Military Rule in Chile,
             1973-1987},
   Journal = {Comparative Politics},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {149-149},
   Publisher = {JSTOR},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0010-4159},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1989R793300002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.2307/422042},
   Key = {fds250324}
}

@article{fds332753,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Military rule in Latin America},
   Journal = {Military rule in Latin America},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {The first part of the book provides a broad overview of
             military rule in Latin America, asking what the political
             and economic consequences of military rule are, and
             investigating the factors which shape the functioning,
             dynamics and outcomes of military regimes. The role of
             institutional forces and state actors are explicitly
             addressed. The second part is a detailed case study of Chile
             under the Pinochet regime, showing how social class forces
             and institutional structures interacted to produce a durable
             and personal regime with an unusually profound social
             impact. The final chapter explores the shift away from
             authoritarianism in Latin America during the late 1970s and
             speculates on the course of future political events. -from
             Author},
   Key = {fds332753}
}

@article{fds250298,
   Author = {Martz, JD},
   Title = {Politics and Petroleum in Ecuador},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {82},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {1017-1018},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds250298}
}

@article{fds250323,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {The Chilean Military under Authoritarian
             Rule},
   Journal = {Occasional Papers},
   Publisher = {Latin American Institute, University of New
             Mexico},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds250323}
}

@article{fds250297,
   Author = {Kaufman, E},
   Title = {Crisis in Allende’s Chile: New Perspectives},
   Journal = {Inter-American Review of Bibliography},
   Volume = {XXXVIII},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {216-218},
   Year = {1988},
   Key = {fds250297}
}

@article{fds250296,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Military Rule in Chile: Dictatorship and
             Oppositions},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {81},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {667-669},
   Editor = {Valenzuela, JS and Valenzuela, A},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds250296}
}

@article{fds250295,
   Author = {Drake, P and Silva, E},
   Title = {Elections and Democratization in Latin America,
             1980-1985},
   Journal = {Hispanic American Historical Review},
   Volume = {67},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {341-341},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds250295}
}

@article{fds250322,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {The Politics of Economic Stabilization: IMF Standby Programs
             in Latin America, 1954-1984},
   Journal = {Comparative Politics},
   Volume = {XIX},
   Pages = {1-24},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds250322}
}

@article{fds250321,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Exclusionary democracy},
   Journal = {Studies In Comparative International Development},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {64-85},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0039-3606},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02717356},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF02717356},
   Key = {fds250321}
}

@article{fds250320,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Redemocratization and the Impact of Authoritarian Rule in
             Latin America},
   Journal = {Comparative Poltiics},
   Volume = {XVII},
   Pages = {253-275},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds250320}
}

@article{fds250294,
   Author = {Wright, TC},
   Title = {Landowners and Reform in Chile: The Sociedad Nacional de
             Argicultura},
   Journal = {South Eastern Latin Americanist},
   Volume = {XXVI},
   Pages = {42-42},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds250294}
}

@article{fds250319,
   Author = {Merkx, KRWG},
   Title = {Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism Revisited},
   Journal = {Latin American Research Review},
   Volume = {XXVI},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {3-40},
   Year = {1982},
   Key = {fds250319}
}

@article{fds250293,
   Author = {Dinges, J and Landau, S},
   Title = {Assassination on Embassy Row},
   Journal = {Hispanic American Historical Review},
   Volume = {61},
   Pages = {784-786},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {November},
   Key = {fds250293}
}

@article{fds250292,
   Author = {Chaney, E},
   Title = {Supermadre: Women in Politics in Latin America},
   Journal = {Journal of Politics},
   Volume = {XLIII},
   Pages = {613-613},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds250292}
}

@article{fds250318,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Political Demobilization in Chile, 1973-1978},
   Journal = {Comparative Politics},
   Volume = {XII},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {275-301},
   Publisher = {JSTOR},
   Year = {1980},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/421927},
   Doi = {10.2307/421927},
   Key = {fds250318}
}

@article{fds250291,
   Author = {Botana, NR},
   Title = {El orden conservador: La politica argentina entre 1880 y
             1916},
   Journal = {Hispanic American Historical Review},
   Volume = {59},
   Pages = {760-761},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {November},
   Key = {fds250291}
}

@article{fds250290,
   Author = {Booth, JA and Seligson, MA},
   Title = {Political Participation in Latin America: Vol. I: Citizen
             and State},
   Journal = {Journal of the Developing Areas},
   Volume = {13},
   Pages = {82-83},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds250290}
}

@article{fds250317,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Pinochet's Chile},
   Journal = {Worldview},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {36-40},
   Publisher = {COUNC RELIGION INT AFFAIRS},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0084255900051123},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0084255900051123},
   Key = {fds250317}
}

@article{fds250289,
   Author = {Stallings, B},
   Title = {Class Conflict and Economic Development in Chile,
             1958-1973},
   Journal = {South Eastern Latin Americanist},
   Volume = {23},
   Pages = {10-11},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds250289}
}

@article{fds250316,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Public Policy and Regime Consolidation: The First Five Years
             of the Chilean Junta},
   Journal = {Journal of the Developing Areas},
   Volume = {XIII},
   Pages = {441-461},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds250316}
}

@article{fds250288,
   Author = {Lowenthal, AF},
   Title = {Armies and Politics in Latin America},
   Journal = {Journal of Politics},
   Volume = {40},
   Pages = {570-570},
   Year = {1978},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds250288}
}

@article{fds250315,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {Evaluating the Policy Impact of Military Regimes in Latin
             America},
   Journal = {Latin American Research Review},
   Volume = {XIII},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {39-54},
   Year = {1978},
   Key = {fds250315}
}

@article{fds250314,
   Author = {Remmer, K},
   Title = {The Timing, Pace and Sequence of Political Change: Chile,
             1891-1925},
   Journal = {Hispanic American Historical Review},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {205-230},
   Year = {1977},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds250314}
}

@article{fds250287,
   Author = {Weinstein, M},
   Title = {Uruguay: The Politics of Failure},
   Journal = {Journal of the Developing Areas},
   Volume = {X},
   Pages = {518-519},
   Year = {1976},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds250287}
}

@article{fds250313,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Economic dependency and political conflict: Chile and
             Argentina, 1900-1925},
   Journal = {Studies In Comparative International Development},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {3-24},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {1976},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0039-3606},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1976CH78800001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF02686439},
   Key = {fds250313}
}

@article{fds318636,
   Author = {Remmer, KL},
   Title = {Development and strategy in latin america},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {548-550},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1976},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000305540029922X},
   Doi = {10.1017/S000305540029922X},
   Key = {fds318636}
}

@article{fds250304,
   Author = {REMMER, KL},
   Title = {Review of Peasants, Politics, and Revolution: JS
             Midgal},
   Journal = {WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {159-160},
   Publisher = {JSTOR},
   Year = {1976},
   ISSN = {0043-4078},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=A1976BL78200025&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.2307/447603},
   Key = {fds250304}
}


%% Book Reviews   
@article{fds20188,
   Author = {Julio Faundez},
   Title = {Marxism and Democracy in Chile: 1932 to the Fall of
             Allende},
   Journal = {Studies in Comparative International Development},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {126-127},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {Summer},
   Key = {fds20188}
}

@article{fds20200,
   Author = {Joel S. Migdal},
   Title = {Peasants, Politics and Revolution: Pressures toward
             Political and Social Change in the Third
             World},
   Journal = {Western Political Quarterly},
   Volume = {XXIX},
   Pages = {159-160},
   Year = {1976},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds20200}
}


Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Political Science * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Master * Foreign Exchange * Reload * Login