Political Science Faculty Database
Political Science
Arts & Sciences
Duke University

 HOME > Arts & Sciences > Political Science > Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications of Melanie Manion    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Books   
@book{fds226751,
   Author = {Melanie Manion},
   Title = {Information for Autocrats: Representation in Chinese Local
             Congresses},
   Volume = {In Production},
   Publisher = {New York: Cambridge University Press, Studies in Comparative
             Politics Series},
   Year = {2015},
   Key = {fds226751}
}

@book{fds318593,
   Author = {Carlson, A and Gallagher, ME and Lieberthal, K and Manion,
             M},
   Title = {Contemporary Chinese politics: New sources, methods, and
             field strategies},
   Pages = {1-328},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780521197830},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762512},
   Abstract = {Contemporary Chinese Politics: Sources, Methods, and Field
             Strategies considers how new and diverse sources and methods
             are changing the study of Chinese politics. Contributors
             spanning three generations in China studies place their
             distinct qualitative and quantitative methodological
             approaches in the framework of the discipline and point to
             challenges or opportunities (or both) of adapting new
             sources and methods to the study of contemporary China. How
             can we more effectively use new sources and methods of data
             collection? How can we better integrate the study of Chinese
             politics into the discipline of political science, to the
             betterment of both? How can we more appropriately manage the
             logistical and ethical problems of doing political research
             in the challenging Chinese environment? In addressing these
             questions, this comprehensive methodological survey will be
             of immense interest to graduate students heading into the
             field for the first time and experienced scholars looking to
             keep abreast of the state of the art in the study of Chinese
             politics.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511762512},
   Key = {fds318593}
}


%% Chapters in Books   
@misc{fds370235,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {The Information Politics of COVID-19 in China},
   Pages = {69-75},
   Booktitle = {The Coronavirus: Human, Social and Political
             Implications},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9789811593611},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9362-8_8},
   Abstract = {This chapter documents two information failures in China in
             early stages of the coronavirus that became the COVID-19
             pandemic. First is the failure of timely and truthful upward
             reporting from Wuhan in December 2019 and early January
             2020, which kept Beijing ignorant of the outbreak and spread
             of the virus. Second is the official misinformation to
             ordinary citizens in mid-January, even after Beijing
             understood the risk of transmission; this was accompanied by
             an aggressive campaign of censorship and intimidation of
             netizens who posted news about the virus on social media.
             Both failures were also evident in China’s SARS crisis of
             2002-2003 and stem from systemic problems of information
             politics. China followed these failures with responses that
             are unusually sensitive to the tradeoffs between
             centralization and decentralization. With the draconian
             lockdown of Wuhan, Beijing exercised effective leadership by
             directly taking charge. Then, by invoking the Emergency
             Response Law, which mandates highly localized response, it
             permitted localities down to the county level to exercise
             discretion in choosing a policy response suited to local
             conditions and report upward ex post. With its capable
             response, Beijing has deflected attention from early
             failures, especially by comparison with bungling by
             governments elsewhere in the world.},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-981-15-9362-8_8},
   Key = {fds370235}
}

@misc{fds356991,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Institutional design and anti-corruption in mainland
             China},
   Pages = {242-252},
   Booktitle = {Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {December},
   ISBN = {9780415617789},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315739175-28},
   Abstract = {In 1980, communist revolutionary veteran Chen Yun, second
             only to Deng Xiaoping in status, characterised the problem
             of corruption as ‘a matter of life and death’ for the
             Chinese communist party. Other Chinese leaders acknowledged
             corruption as more serious than at any time since 1949, when
             the communists won power on the main land in a protracted
             civil war. Yet, despite an anti-corruption effort that now
             extends back several decades, includes more campaigns than
             found anywhere else in the world and metes out the death
             penalty to corrupt officials, experts agree that corruption
             in China remains wide spread and serious (Deng et al. 2010;
             Manion 2004; Shieh 2005; Wedeman 2004, 2005, 2012). Indeed,
             as best we can tell, corruption seems to have increased in
             incidence, scope and sever ity since 1980. 1 Compared to the
             past, it involves higher stakes and implicates a greater
             number of higherlevel officials.},
   Doi = {10.4324/9781315739175-28},
   Key = {fds356991}
}

@misc{fds318588,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {The challenge of corruption},
   Pages = {125-138},
   Booktitle = {China's Challenges},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780812223125},
   Key = {fds318588}
}

@misc{fds318589,
   Author = {Jackman, S and Manion, M},
   Title = {Politics after the digital revolution},
   Journal = {PS - Political Science and Politics},
   Volume = {46},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {916},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001455},
   Abstract = {<jats:p>For the APSA 2014 Annual Meeting, we ask political
             scientists to consider politics and the study of politics in
             an age now long characterized by the widespread use of
             digital technologies.</jats:p>},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1049096513001455},
   Key = {fds318589}
}

@misc{fds318590,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Beyond enforcement: Anticorruption reform as a problem of
             institutional design},
   Pages = {1-11},
   Booktitle = {Preventing Corruption in Asia: Institutional Design and
             Policy Capacity},
   Publisher = {Routledge},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780203879764},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203879764},
   Doi = {10.4324/9780203879764},
   Key = {fds318590}
}

@misc{fds318592,
   Author = {Shen, M and Yang, M and Manion, M},
   Title = {Measuring change and stability over a decade in the Beijing
             area study},
   Pages = {236-245},
   Booktitle = {Contemporary Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods, and
             Field Strategies},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780521197830},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762512.017},
   Abstract = {Descriptive statistics from representative sample surveys
             conducted in mainland China provide a static picture that is
             often soon overtaken by the impact of rapid socioeconomic
             change. The importance of longitudinal data generally, but
             especially in such a context, cannot be overstated. Survey
             researchers seem to recognize this: as discussed in Chapter
             10, a remarkable number of surveys conducted in mainland
             China have a longitudinal component. By far the most
             ambitious of these is the Beijing Area Study (BAS), an
             ongoing annual representative sample survey of Beijing
             residents, designed and conducted since 1995 by the Research
             Center for Contemporary China (RCCC) at Peking University.
             This chapter begins with an introduction to the underlying
             vision and goals of the BAS, as conceived in the early
             1990s. It then turns to specific issues of questionnaire
             content, sampling design, and survey implementation. We pay
             particular attention to the challenges and changes faced
             over the first decade of the BAS; major changes in sampling
             were made in 2007, however, and we review these here. For
             the most part, we do not present survey findings, except to
             illustrate particular points in the discussion of methods.
             Vision and Goals The BAS focuses mostly on socioeconomic
             rather than explicitly political issues. Indeed,
             “politics” does not even appear in the full project
             title: Beijing Annual Survey of Social and Economic
             Development (北京社会经济发展年度调查). This is
             not simply because political topics are more sensitive than
             social or economic topics, with implications for survey
             implementation, although this is certainly a serious
             consideration for a project with a long projected life span
             as opposed to a one-shot effort. It also has much to do with
             the context of the early 1990s, when the vision of the BAS
             initially emerged. After 1992, with a renewed policy
             emphasis promoted by Deng Xiaoping on the role of the
             private sector in the economy, the pace of economic and
             accompanying social change in China increased rapidly. In
             the new historic period of “reform and opening,” the
             broad goal of the BAS designers was to capture, with a
             continually updated dataset, the impact of the major ongoing
             reforms on the everyday lives of ordinary
             Chinese.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511762512.017},
   Key = {fds318592}
}

@misc{fds318594,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {A survey of survey research on Chinese politics: What have
             we learned?},
   Pages = {181-199},
   Booktitle = {Contemporary Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods, and
             Field Strategies},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780521197830},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762512.014},
   Abstract = {In a political environment that remains (at best) officially
             skeptical about the enterprise, representative sample
             surveys on Chinese politics have nonetheless grown
             substantially in number in the past two decades: political
             scientists trained and based outside mainland China
             conducted a mere two such surveys in the 1980s, but the
             number increased more than tenfold in the 1990s and
             continues to rise steadily. By mid-2008, some sixty
             articles, books, and book chapters drawing from original
             representative sample surveys on Chinese politics had
             appeared – including many articles in top-tier journals of
             political science and area studies alike. This chapter
             surveys the surveys and their products. It briefly explains
             the focus here on probability sample surveys and describes
             the changing regulatory context within which researchers
             conduct their surveys. Most of all, it evaluates their
             achievements, with attention to their cumulativeness,
             contributions to knowledge, and fit in Chinese area studies.
             The chapter is not a primer on the conduct of survey
             research on Chinese politics in mainland China. It is
             instead a status report and reflection on this research,
             aimed as much (or more) at its consumers (and nonconsumers)
             as at survey researchers themselves. From the corpus of
             English-language monographs and peer-reviewed journal
             articles authored by political scientists and published in
             nonmainland sources through mid-2008, I identify studies
             that exploit original probability sample survey data. In
             coauthored works, I include studies that meet these criteria
             so long as at least one of the authors is a political
             scientist. I have surely missed some relevant surveys in my
             search – but not, I think, any represented in studies
             published in major journals of political science or Chinese
             area studies or organized by any of the roughly half-dozen
             major players in the enterprise of survey research on
             Chinese politics. I focus in this chapter on original
             surveys, not the small literature by political scientists
             who analyze datasets produced wholly or mainly by others. At
             the same time, the paucity of studies analyzing existing
             datasets is a sign of the relative immaturity of survey
             research on Chinese politics, a topic that merits discussion
             and is taken up below.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511762512.014},
   Key = {fds318594}
}

@misc{fds318591,
   Author = {Arjomand, SA and Tiryakian, EA},
   Title = {Introduction},
   Pages = {1-13},
   Booktitle = {Rethinking Civilizational Analysis},
   Publisher = {Sage Publications},
   Editor = {Arjomand, SA and Tiryakian, EA},
   Year = {2004},
   ISBN = {9780521197830},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762512.001},
   Abstract = {At a workshop at the University of Michigan in November
             2006, three generations of scholars met to discuss and
             debate the study of Chinese politics and how new and diverse
             sources and methods are changing the field. This volume is
             the culmination of that workshop. Drawing on diverse
             research experiences, we present a wide range of sources,
             methods, and field strategies for the study of Chinese
             politics in the new era. As political scientists, we place
             our distinct methodological approaches in the framework of
             the discipline and point to particular challenges or
             opportunities (or both) of adaptation in the context of
             contemporary China. With the main focus on methodological
             concerns and the discovery of new data sources, the chapters
             in this volume are also richly substantive illustrations
             that demonstrate how to adapt method to context innovatively
             and appropriately. Thus, this book illustrates the benefits
             of the emerging cross-pollination between China studies and
             the broader discipline. Three major themes emerged from our
             workshop discussions: (1) how to effectively use new sources
             and data collection methods, (2) how to integrate the study
             of Chinese politics into the discipline of political science
             to the betterment of both, and (3) how to deal with
             logistical and ethical problems of doing research in a
             challenging environment. In this Introduction, we discuss
             these themes in the sections below in the context of the
             initial workshop, the substantive chapters in this volume,
             and the field more generally. As only sporadic attention has
             been paid to the nuts and bolts of the study of Chinese
             politics, we hope this volume will spark future debates and
             other publications, conferences, and graduate training on
             research design and methodology in challenging fieldwork
             sites. We recognize that this volume joins an existing
             ongoing debate (Baum, 2007; Harding, 1994; Heimer and
             Thøgersen, 2006; Manion, 1994; Perry, 2007 and 1994b;
             Shambaugh, 1993; Wank, 1998). Collectively the following
             chapters illustrate that although much has changed in the
             realm of studying Chinese politics, many of the fundamentals
             that previous scholars learned about this endeavor still
             apply. Language skills and familiarity with China strike us
             as remaining core prerequisites for scholars wishing to make
             sense of any given aspect of Chinese politics. Moreover,
             local knowledge – that is, knowing China – is
             increasingly insufficient. Each of the contributors to this
             volume has also utilized a wide variety of research skills
             in his or her work. These skills cover a broad set of
             approaches to politics and include the use of sophisticated
             quantitative techniques, the production and utilization of
             survey data, the application of new technologies, searching
             out and making use of previously closed archival sources,
             and even conducting quasi-experiments. Although such
             approaches cover many tools in the political science kit,
             and are illustrative of the impressive and at times
             conflicting directions in which the study of Chinese
             politics is headed, all contributors to this volume have
             made use of such methods with a common purpose in mind: to
             amplify their ability to describe and explain key aspects of
             politics in contemporary China. As such, the volume shows
             the rewards of bringing together scholars with diverse
             backgrounds, yet who share a collective commitment to
             pushing both China studies and the discipline forward in an
             inclusive and mutually beneficial manner. Thus, although the
             volume focuses on mainland China almost exclusively, we
             believe that the methodology and research design strategies
             presented here are relevant to scholars in many other places
             around the globe.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511762512.001},
   Key = {fds318591}
}


%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds371894,
   Author = {Li, Z and Manion, M},
   Title = {The Decline of Factions: The Impact of a Broad Purge on
             Political Decision Making in China},
   Journal = {British Journal of Political Science},
   Volume = {53},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {815-834},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000712342200062X},
   Abstract = {We conceptualize broad purges, which extend far below top
             powerholders in authoritarian regimes and operate according
             to a logic fundamentally different from coup-proofing purges
             that target rivals to the supreme leader. Broad purges
             induce risk reduction in decision making because they
             grossly exacerbate uncertainty and raise the likelihood and
             cost of political error. Empirically, we analyze political
             appointment decisions before and during a massive corruption
             crackdown in China. We estimate purge impact on appointments
             of prefectural Communist Party secretaries during 2013-17.
             To signal to Beijing that they are not building factions,
             party bosses of these officials can be expected to reduce
             risk by biasing appointments against their own clients, with
             variation in bias reflecting geographic heterogeneity in
             purge intensity. We find a large effect of purge intensity
             on anti-client bias during this broad purge but not in
             previous smaller-scale anticorruption crackdowns. This study
             contributes to knowledge about purges under
             authoritarianism.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S000712342200062X},
   Key = {fds371894}
}

@article{fds362980,
   Author = {Manion, M and Rothschild, V and Zhu, H},
   Title = {Dual Mandates in Chinese Congresses: Information and
             Cooptation},
   Journal = {Issues and Studies},
   Volume = {58},
   Number = {1},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1013251121500193},
   Abstract = {Survey data suggest that a high proportion of Chinese
             congress delegates sit concurrently in two or more
             congresses. While dual mandates are not unusual in
             democracies, the literature has failed to notice their
             existence in China, let alone theorize or analyze them. We
             turn to the political science literature on assemblies under
             authoritarianism to guide our analysis of survey data for
             3,008 county congress delegates, half of whom are concurrent
             ones. We show that dual mandates amplify some voices and not
             others in ways consistent with two perspectives in the
             literature. Dual mandates amplify information from citizens
             at the grassroots upward toward governments: More delegates
             with deep community roots representing poor, rural, remote
             districts sit concurrently in county and lower-level
             congresses. Dual mandates also coopt influential groups
             posing a potential challenge to ruling party power: They
             amplify the influence of private entrepreneurs, more of whom
             sit concurrently in county and prestigious higher-level
             congresses.},
   Doi = {10.1142/S1013251121500193},
   Key = {fds362980}
}

@article{fds355148,
   Author = {Chang, C and Manion, M},
   Title = {Political Self-Censorship in Authoritarian States: The
             Spatial-Temporal Dimension of Trouble},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {54},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1362-1392},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414021989762},
   Abstract = {We theorize and measure a situational self-censorship that
             varies across spatial-temporal political contexts.
             Schelling’s insight that distinctive times and places
             function as focal points has generated a literature
             explaining how activists coordinate for protest in
             authoritarian states. Our population of interest is not
             activists but ordinary citizens, who, we assume, are
             risk-averse and prefer to avoid trouble. Focal points rally
             activists for political expression. By contrast, we
             theorize, ordinary citizens exercise greater than usual
             political self-censorship at focal points, to avoid
             punishment as troublemakers. We test our theory by
             leveraging geotagged smartphone posts of Beijing netizens on
             Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, to estimate precisely
             if, when, where, and how citizens engage in political talk.
             We use a difference-in-differences strategy that compares
             smartphone political talk at and away from focal places
             before and after focal times. We find netizens self-censor
             political talk significantly more at potentially troublesome
             spatial-temporal focal points.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414021989762},
   Key = {fds355148}
}

@article{fds355559,
   Author = {Fravel, MT and Manion, M and Wang, Y},
   Title = {A "China in the World" Paradigm for Scholarship.},
   Journal = {Studies in comparative international development},
   Volume = {56},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-17},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09317-w},
   Abstract = {In this introduction to the special issue, we use the
             expression "China in the world" paradigm to define
             scholarship that purposefully migrates across the
             traditional borders of comparative politics and
             international relations in the study of China. We argue that
             such a paradigm represents a view that many issues of
             Chinese domestic politics are now issues of international
             politics; as a result, domestic politics in a globalized
             contemporary China often cannot be sufficiently understood
             without considering international consequences. More than
             this, the paradigm is about scholarly attentiveness to the
             fact that the politics in China that we study also shapes
             how the rest of the world views China. We describe the
             paradigm and its antecedents in the scholarly literature. We
             then illustrate, with reference to three momentous events
             that captured public attention around the world in 2020, the
             paradigm's usefulness as a perspective to scholars reaching
             out to engage intellectually on contemporary affairs in an
             environment in which global responses to China require
             nuanced knowledge as all parties seek to avoid dangerous
             pitfalls. We conclude by summarizing the five articles
             included in the special issue and the broader implications
             of the "China in the world" paradigm.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12116-021-09317-w},
   Key = {fds355559}
}

@article{fds324769,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {“Good Types” in Authoritarian Elections: The Selectoral
             Connection in Chinese Local Congresses},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {362-394},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414014537027},
   Abstract = {A new electoral design for subnational congress elections in
             China allows me to investigate the informational utility of
             authoritarian elections. Authoritarian regimes are
             notoriously bad at solving the moral hazard problem in the
             voter’s agency relationship with politicians. Borrowing
             from the literature on political selection, I theorize that
             authoritarian elections can nonetheless solve the adverse
             selection problem: Chinese voters can use their electoral
             power to select “good types,” with personal qualities
             that signal they will reliably represent local interests. I
             analyze original data from a survey of 4,071 Chinese local
             congressmen and women, including voter nominees and
             communist party nominees. I find that voters do in fact
             overcome coordination difficulties to nominate and elect
             “good types.” In contacting politicians about local
             problems after the elections, however, voters hedge their
             bets by contacting regime insiders too. At these very local
             levels, congressional representation by means of political
             selection co-exists with communist party nominating and veto
             power in the electoral process.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414014537027},
   Key = {fds324769}
}

@article{fds339915,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Introduction},
   Journal = {Economic and Political Studies},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-2},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2016.1152677},
   Doi = {10.1080/20954816.2016.1152677},
   Key = {fds339915}
}

@article{fds339916,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Taking China’s anticorruption campaign
             seriously},
   Journal = {Economic and Political Studies},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {3-18},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2016.1152094},
   Abstract = {This article draws on a rich empirical literature on
             comparative corruption and rich theoretical literatures on
             the related topics of institutions and credible commitment
             to analyze China’s newest anticorruption campaign, ongoing
             today. It argues that the campaign differs notably from
             previous efforts. In addition to its most obvious features
             of longer duration and higher reach, the campaign has
             significantly changed the structure of Party and government
             incentives so as to reduce bureaucratic opportunities for
             corruption and structural obstacles to anticorruption
             enforcement. These features constitute important steps
             toward anticorruption institutionalisation and credible
             commitment to good governance. The article concludes by
             proposing some strategic policy choices to promote and
             protect anticorruption gains.},
   Doi = {10.1080/20954816.2016.1152094},
   Key = {fds339916}
}

@article{fds226753,
   Author = {Melanie Manion},
   Title = {’Good Types’ in Authoritarian Elections: The Selectoral
             Connection in Chinese Local Congresses},
   Volume = {Forthcoming},
   Series = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Publisher = {Pre-published 10 June 2014 as DOI 10.1177/0010414014537027},
   Year = {2015},
   Key = {fds226753}
}

@article{fds318587,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Authoritarian parochialism: Local congressional
             representation in China},
   Journal = {China Quarterly},
   Volume = {218},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {311-338},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741014000319},
   Abstract = {This article draws on evidence from loosely structured
             interviews and data from original surveys of 5,130 delegates
             in township, county and municipal congresses to argue that
             congressional representation unfolds as authoritarian
             parochialism in China. It makes three new arguments. First,
             popularly elected local congresses that once only
             mechanically stood in for the Chinese mass public, through
             demographically descriptive and politically symbolic
             representation, now work as substantively representative
             institutions. Chinese local congressmen and women view
             themselves and act as delegates, not Burkean trustees or
             Leninist party agents. Second, this congressional
             representation is not commonly expressed in the
             quintessentially legislative activities familiar in other
             regime types. Rather, it is an extra-legislative variant of
             pork-barrel politics: parochial activity by delegates to
             deliver targeted public goods to the geographic
             constituency. Third, this authoritarian parochialism is due
             to institutional arrangements and regime priorities, some
             common to single-party dictatorships and some distinct to
             Chinese authoritarianism.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0305741014000319},
   Key = {fds318587}
}

@article{fds318595,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {How to assess village elections in China},
   Journal = {Journal of Contemporary China},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {60},
   Pages = {379-383},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10670560902770214},
   Abstract = {In assessing Chinese village elections we must sort and
             discriminate as we consult the 'mountain of evidence' that
             has accumulated over the past two decades. We can find
             anecdotal evidence to support practically any claim about
             village democratization, but from such stories we can learn
             nothing about the status, trends, or patterns of village
             democratization. This article evaluates what we can learn
             and have learned about grassroots democratization in the
             Chinese countryside from nationally and locally
             representative sample survey data. © 2009 Taylor &
             Francis.},
   Doi = {10.1080/10670560902770214},
   Key = {fds318595}
}

@article{fds318596,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {An introduction to survey research on Chinese
             politics},
   Journal = {China Quarterly},
   Volume = {196},
   Number = {196},
   Pages = {755-758},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741008001100},
   Abstract = {In a political environment that remains (at best) officially
             sceptical about the enterprise, representative surveys on
             Chinese politics have nevertheless grown substantially in
             number in the past two decades: political scientists trained
             and based outside mainland China conducted a mere two such
             surveys in the 1980s, but the number increased more than
             tenfold in the 1990s and continues to rise steadily. © The
             China Quarterly, 2008.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0305741008001100},
   Key = {fds318596}
}

@article{fds318597,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {When communist party candidates can lose, who wins?
             Assessing the role of local people's congresses in the
             selection of leaders in China},
   Journal = {China Quarterly},
   Volume = {195},
   Number = {195},
   Pages = {607-630},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741008000799},
   Abstract = {This article draws on Party and government documents,
             Chinese-language books and articles, interviews and
             firsthand observation, and electoral outcome data to
             contribute to the emerging literature on the changing role
             of people's congresses in mainland China. It focuses on the
             crucially important but neglected relationship between local
             congresses and local Communist Party committees in the
             selection of congress and government leaders. It analyses
             the 1995 reforms to Party regulations and the law, which
             resulted in electoral losses of more than 17,000 Communist
             Party candidates in the first set of elections after 1995.
             It concludes that the reforms created the conditions for
             local congress delegates to matter - and delegates
             responded. More broadly, it concludes that congressional
             assertiveness has significant (although not radical)
             implications for the relationship between the congresses and
             Party committees. The winners in the broader (not narrowly
             electoral) sense of the term are both the congresses and the
             ruling Communist Party, strengthened as an organization with
             selection of leaders opened up to more players. © 2008 The
             China Quarterly.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0305741008000799},
   Key = {fds318597}
}

@article{fds318598,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Democracy, community, trust: The impact of elections in
             rural China},
   Journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
   Volume = {39},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {301-324},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414005280852},
   Abstract = {This article systematically investigates the impact of
             elections in rural China on a basic element of the
             elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that
             their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two
             surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57
             villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately
             collected data detailing features of elections in these
             villages during the same period of time. The analyses take
             advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization
             and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across
             villages is associated with variation in changed views about
             the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly
             suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy
             matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage
             voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that
             leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to
             the importance of informal community institutions of lineage
             relationships. © 2006 Sage Publications.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0010414005280852},
   Key = {fds318598}
}

@article{fds318599,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Chinese democratization in perspective: Electorates and
             selectorates at the township level},
   Journal = {China Quarterly},
   Number = {163},
   Pages = {764-782},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {September},
   Abstract = {The most recent round of township-level elections in China
             began in mid-1998. By the end of the year, 24 provinces had
             already completed elections at this level. In Chongqing
             municipality, which acquired its provincial-level status in
             1997, the election of people's congress delegates began in
             October 1998. The entire electoral process at the township
             level (election of more than 75,000 delegates and 8,000
             congress and government leaders) was scheduled to be
             completed in all 830 townships and 648 towns by the end of
             February 1999. By law, the first meeting of delegates
             elected to a local people's congress is convened within two
             months of their election. To observe, within a week,
             election of delegates to the township people's congress and
             election of leaders by township people's congress delegates
             required that our delegation visit localities at different
             stages in the electoral processes. We first observed
             grassroots elections of delegates in voting districts of
             Changyuan town in Rongchang county. We then travelled to
             Dazu county to observe the first session of the 14th
             people's congress of Baoding town, at which delegates
             elected leaders of their people's congress and government.
             At our request, we were given access to original electoral
             records for each voting district in Baoding, which allows
             reconstruction of grassroots elections of delegates there.
             We were also provided with the package of documents received
             by each congress delegate. Of course a few districts and a
             single town are not a representative sample of elections
             that take place in some 45,000 Chinese towns and townships.
             The account below is based on observations, interviews,
             documents and reports from our delegation visit. Broader
             conclusions are formed by placing field observations in the
             context of existing knowledge about the Chinese cadre
             management system.},
   Key = {fds318599}
}

@article{fds318600,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Issues in Corruption Control in Post-Mao
             China},
   Journal = {Issues and Studies},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1-21},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {This article examines two issues in corruption control in
             post-Mao China: a double standard of criminal justice and
             the politicized pattern of anti-corruption enforcement in
             the criminal justice system. The author makes two arguments:
             First, despite the widely publicized principle that
             officials, as communist party members, are held to a higher
             standard of conduct than ordinary citizens, the criminal
             justice system has still punished corrupt officials less
             harshly than ordinary citizens who commit similar crimes.
             Second, anti-corruption enforcement has followed patterns of
             intensive campaigns that reflect shifts in political
             attention at the top of the system. These two features have
             undoubtedly contributed to public cynicism about the
             official effort to control corruption and have, in turn,
             hampered that effort.},
   Key = {fds318600}
}

@article{fds318601,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Corruption by design: Bribery in Chinese enterprise
             licensing},
   Journal = {Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {167-195},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023356},
   Abstract = {This article analyzes as a game a common form of corruption
             in Chinese bureaucracies: payment of bribes to officials for
             a standard good that is not in fixed supply and to which
             those paying bribes are, in principle, fully entitled.
             Formal structures and informal expectations have been
             identified through field research as features of
             "institutional design" that indicate an asymmetric
             information game. Bribery is derived as an equilibrium
             solution in the game. Exercises in comparative statics
             reveal the robustness of bribery when game parameter values
             are altered to reflect changes in institutional design. The
             exercises indicate that reducing corruption, in the sense of
             reducing bribe sizes, is relatively unproblematic. To move
             away entirely from corrupt equilibria, however, requires
             very substantial changes in institutional design and may not
             be feasible through changes in formal structures
             alone.},
   Doi = {10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023356},
   Key = {fds318601}
}

@article{fds318602,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {The electoral connection in the Chinese countryside},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {90},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {736-748},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2945839},
   Abstract = {A 1987 law established popularly elected milage committees
             in the Chinese countryside. This article analyzes a unique
             set of survey data to describe and explain the connection
             between village leaders and those who choose them, in terms
             of orientation to the role of the state in the economy. It
             compares positions of village leaders with positions of
             respondents sampled from their selectorates of
             township-level leaders and electorates of ordinary
             villagers. Results of multivariate regression analyses
             indicate that: (1) village leaders are responsive to both
             old and newly emerging constituencies, as reflected in
             significant congruence between village leaders and their
             selectorates above and electorates below; (2) congruence
             between village leaders and their electorates is not
             exclusively the result of shared local environment, informal
             influence or socialization but is significantly associated
             with the electoral process; and (3) the causal mechanism
             underlying the electoral connection in the Chinese
             countryside is the familiar one of voter
             choice.},
   Doi = {10.2307/2945839},
   Key = {fds318602}
}

@article{fds318603,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Concepts and Methods Survey Research in the Study of
             Contemporary China: Learning from Local Samples},
   Journal = {The China Quarterly},
   Volume = {139},
   Pages = {741-765},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000043149},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0305741000043149},
   Key = {fds318603}
}

@article{fds318604,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Politics and Policy in Post-Mao Cadre Retirement},
   Journal = {The China Quarterly},
   Volume = {129},
   Pages = {1-25},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000041205},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0305741000041205},
   Key = {fds318604}
}

@article{fds318605,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Policy Implementation In The People'S Republic Of China:
             Authoritative Decisions Versus Individual
             Interests},
   Journal = {The Journal of Asian Studies},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {253-279},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2057208},
   Doi = {10.2307/2057208},
   Key = {fds318605}
}

@article{fds318606,
   Author = {Manion, M},
   Title = {Cadre Recruitment and Management in the People's Republic of
             China},
   Journal = {Chinese Law & Government},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {3-15},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/CLG0009-460917033},
   Doi = {10.2753/CLG0009-460917033},
   Key = {fds318606}
}


Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Political Science * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Master * Foreign Exchange * Reload * Login