Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty Database
Psychology and Neuroscience
Arts & Sciences
Duke University

 HOME > Arts & Sciences > pn > Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications of Francis J. Keefe    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds376035,
   Author = {Hooker, JE and Brewer, JR and McDermott, KA and Kanaya, M and Somers,
             TJ and Keefe, F and Kelleher, S and Fisher, HM and Burns, J and Jeddi, RW and Kulich, R and Polykoff, G and Parker, RA and THRIVE Study Team, and Greenberg, J and Vranceanu, A-M},
   Title = {Improving multimodal physical function in adults with
             heterogeneous chronic pain; Protocol for a multisite
             feasibility RCT.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {138},
   Pages = {107462},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2024.107462},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is associated with substantial
             impairment in physical function, which has been identified
             as a top concern among persons with pain. GetActive-Fitbit,
             a mind-body activity program, is feasible, acceptable, and
             associated with improvement in physical function among
             primarily White, sedentary individuals with pain. In
             preparation for a multisite efficacy trial, we must examine
             feasibility across multiple sites with diverse patient
             populations. Here we describe the protocol of a multisite,
             feasibility RCT comparing GetActive-Fitbit with a time- and
             attention-matched educational comparison (Healthy Living for
             Pain). We aim to 1) test multisite fidelity of clinician
             training; 2) evaluate multisite feasibility benchmarks,
             including recruitment of chronic pain patients taking <5000
             steps/day and racial and ethnic minorities; and 3) optimize
             fidelity and study protocol in preparation for a future
             multisite efficacy trial. METHODS: Clinician training
             fidelity was assessed via roleplays and mock group sessions.
             Feasibility (i.e., recruitment, acceptability, credibility,
             adherence, satisfaction), multimodal physical function
             (e.g., self-report, 6-Minute Walk Test, step-count), and
             other psychosocial outcomes are assessed at baseline,
             posttest, and 6 months. Protocol optimization will be
             assessed using exit interviews and cross-site meetings.
             RESULTS: The trial is ongoing. Clinician training is
             complete. 87 participants have been recruited. 54 completed
             baseline assessments and randomization, 44 are
             mid-intervention, and 9 have completed the intervention and
             posttest. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses the critical
             need for feasible, acceptable mind-body-activity
             interventions for chronic pain that follow evidence-based
             guidelines and improve all aspects of physical function
             across diverse populations. Results will inform a future
             fully-powered multisite efficacy trial. CLINICAL TRIAL
             REGISTRATION: NCT05700383.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2024.107462},
   Key = {fds376035}
}

@article{fds373556,
   Author = {Cook, CE and O'Halloran, B and McDevitt, A and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Specific and shared mechanisms associated with treatment for
             chronic neck pain: study protocol for the SS-MECH
             trial.},
   Journal = {J Man Manip Ther},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {85-95},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2267391},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Treatment mechanisms involve the steps or
             processes through which an intervention unfolds and produces
             change in an outcome variable. Treatment mechanisms can be
             specific to the intervention provided (i.e. pain modulation)
             or shared with other treatments (i.e. reduced fear of
             movement). Whether specific and shared treatment mechanisms
             are different across interventions and whether they lead to
             the outcomes seen in trials is largely unknown. The
             management of individuals with chronic neck pain routinely
             include manual therapy (MT) and resistance exercise (RE), as
             both approaches are included in clinical practice guidelines
             and both yield similar outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Our study plans
             to answer two research questions: 1) what are the specific
             mechanisms associated with MT versus interventions (and are
             these different), and 2) what are the shared mechanisms
             associated with these interventions, and do specific or
             shared mechanisms mediate clinical outcomes? METHODS: This
             study will involve a 2-group parallel (1:1) single-blinded
             randomized trial to compare the specific and potential
             shared treatment mechanisms between these two approaches. We
             will enroll individuals with a history of chronic neck pain
             and evaluate whether specific or shared mechanisms mediate
             clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We hypothesize that MT and RE
             approaches will both exhibit different specific treatment
             mechanisms, and that both approaches will exhibit shared
             treatment mechanisms, which will notably influence outcomes
             at both discharge and 6-months. CONCLUSIONS: This study is
             important because it will help identify what specific or
             shared treatment mechanisms are associated with different
             interventions and, how different treatment mechanisms
             influence clinical outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1080/10669817.2023.2267391},
   Key = {fds373556}
}

@article{fds376088,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Jensen, MP and Thorn, BE and Lillis, TA and Carmody, J and Gerhart, J and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Cognitive Therapy, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, and
             Behavior Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Pain:
             Predictors and Moderators of Treatment Response.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2024.01.003},
   Abstract = {Psychosocial interventions for people with chronic pain
             produce significant improvements in outcomes, but these
             effects on average are modest with much variability in the
             benefits conferred on individuals. To enhance the magnitude
             of treatment effects, characteristics of people that might
             predict the degree to which they respond more or less well
             could be identified. People with chronic low back pain
             (N = 521) participated in a randomized controlled trial
             which compared cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress
             reduction, behavior therapy and treatment as usual.
             Hypotheses regarding predictors and/or moderators were based
             on the Limit, Activate, and Enhance model; developed to
             predict and explain moderators/predictors of psychosocial
             pain treatments. Results were: 1) low levels of
             cognitive/behavioral function at pre-treatment predicted
             favorable pre- to post-treatment outcomes; 2) favorable
             expectations of benefit from treatment and sound working
             alliances predicted favorable pre- to post-treatment
             outcomes; 3) women benefited more than men. These effects
             emerged without regard to treatment condition. Of note, high
             levels of cognitive/behavioral function at pre-treatment
             predicted favorable outcomes only for people in the
             treatment as usual condition. Analyses identified a set of
             psychosocial variables that may act as treatment predictors
             across cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction
             and behavior therapy, as hypothesized by the Limit,
             Activate, and Enhance model if these 3 treatments operate
             via similar mechanisms. Findings point toward people who may
             and who may not benefit fully from the 3 psychosocial
             treatments studied here, and so may guide future research on
             matching people to these kinds of psychosocial approaches or
             to other (eg, forced-based interventions) non-psychosocial
             approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ClinicalTrials.gov
             Identifier is NCT02133976. PERSPECTIVE: This article
             examines potential predictors/moderators of response to
             psychosocial treatments for chronic pain. Results could
             guide efforts to match people to the most effective
             treatment type or kind.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2024.01.003},
   Key = {fds376088}
}

@article{fds372549,
   Author = {LaRowe, LR and Miaskowski, C and Miller, A and Mayfield, A and Keefe,
             FJ and Smith, AK and Cooper, BA and Wei, L-J and Ritchie,
             CS},
   Title = {Chronic Pain and Pain Management in Older Adults: Protocol
             and Pilot Results.},
   Journal = {Nurs Res},
   Volume = {73},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {81-88},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000683},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Chronic pain occurs in 30% of older adults. This
             prevalence rate is expected to increase, given the growth in
             the older adult population and the associated growth of
             chronic conditions contributing to pain. No population-based
             studies have provided detailed, longitudinal information on
             the experience of chronic pain in older adults; the
             pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies that older
             adults use to manage their chronic pain; and the effect of
             chronic pain on patient-reported outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This
             article aims to describe the protocol for a
             population-based, longitudinal study focused on
             understanding the experience of chronic pain in older
             adults. The objectives are to determine the prevalence and
             characteristics of chronic pain; identify the
             pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain treatments used;
             evaluate for longitudinal differences in biopsychosocial
             factors; and examine how pain types and pain trajectories
             affect important patient-reported outcomes. Also included
             are the results of a pilot study. METHODS: A
             population-based sample of approximately 1,888 older adults
             will be recruited from the National Opinion Research Center
             at the University of Chicago's AmeriSpeak Panel to complete
             surveys at three waves: enrollment (Wave 1), 6 months (Wave
             2), and 12 months (Wave 3). To determine the feasibility, a
             pilot test of the enrollment survey was conducted among 123
             older adults. RESULTS: In the pilot study, older adults with
             chronic pain reported a range of pain conditions, with
             osteoarthritis being the most common. Participants reported
             an array of pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain
             strategies. Compared to participants without chronic pain,
             those with chronic pain reported lower physical and
             cognitive function and poorer quality of life. Data
             collection for the primary, longitudinal study is ongoing.
             DISCUSSION: This project will be the first longitudinal
             population-based study to examine the experience and overall
             effect of chronic pain in older adults. Pilot study results
             provide evidence of the feasibility of study methods.
             Ultimately, this work will inform the development of
             tailored interventions for older patients targeted to
             decrease pain and improve function and quality of
             life.},
   Doi = {10.1097/NNR.0000000000000683},
   Key = {fds372549}
}

@article{fds372966,
   Author = {Kenney, MO and Wilson, S and Shah, N and Bortsov, A and Smith, WR and Little, J and Lanzkron, S and Kanter, J and Padrino, S and Owusu-Ansah,
             A and Cohen, A and Desai, P and Manwani, D and Rehman, SSU and Hagar, W and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Pain and
             Pain-Related Outcomes in Adults and Children With Sickle
             Cell Disease: A Multivariable Analysis of the GRNDaD
             Multicenter Registry.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {153-164},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.029},
   Abstract = {Pain is the primary symptomatic manifestation of sickle cell
             disease (SCD), an inherited hemoglobinopathy. The
             characteristics that influence pain experiences and outcomes
             in SCD are not fully understood. The primary objective of
             this study was to use multivariable modeling to examine
             associations of biopsychosocial variables with a
             disease-specific measure of pain interference known as pain
             impact. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the
             Global Research Network for Data and Discovery national SCD
             registry. A total of 657 children and adults with SCD were
             included in the analysis. This sample was 60% female with a
             median age of 34 (interquartile range 26-42 years) and a
             chronic pain prevalence of 64%. The model accounted for 58%
             of the variance in pain impact. Low social (P < .001) and
             emotional (P < .001) functioning, increasing age
             (P = .004), low income (P < .001), and high acute
             painful episodes (P = .007) were most strongly associated
             with high pain impact in our multivariable model.
             Additionally, multivariable modeling of pain severity and
             physical function in 2 comparable samples of registry
             participants revealed that increasing age and low social
             functioning were also strongly associated with higher pain
             severity and low physical functioning. Overall, the results
             suggest that social and emotional functioning are more
             strongly associated with pain impact in individuals with SCD
             than previously studied biological modifiers such as SCD
             genotype, hemoglobin, and percentage fetal hemoglobin.
             Future research using longitudinally collected data is
             needed to confirm these findings. PERSPECTIVE: This study
             reveals that psychosocial (ie, social and emotional
             functioning) and demographic (ie, age) variables may play an
             important role in predicting pain and pain-related outcomes
             in SCD. Our findings can inform future multicenter
             prospective longitudinal studies aimed at identifying
             modifiable psychosocial predictors of adverse pain outcomes
             in SCD.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.029},
   Key = {fds372966}
}

@article{fds375365,
   Author = {Dember, LM and Hsu, JY and Bernardo, L and Cavanaugh, KL and Charytan,
             DM and Crowley, ST and Cukor, D and Doorenbos, AZ and Edwards, DA and Esserman, D and Fischer, MJ and Jhamb, M and Joffe, S and Johansen, KL and Kalim, S and Keefe, FJ and Kimmel, PL and Krebs, EE and Kuzla, N and Mehrotra, R and Mishra, P and Pellegrino, B and Steel, JL and Unruh, ML and White, DM and Yabes, JG and Becker, WC and HOPE Consortium},
   Title = {The design and baseline characteristics for the HOPE
             Consortium Trial to reduce pain and opioid use in
             hemodialysis.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {136},
   Pages = {107409},
   Year = {2024},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2023.107409},
   Abstract = {The HOPE Consortium Trial to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use in
             Hemodialysis (HOPE Trial) is a multicenter randomized trial
             addressing chronic pain among patients receiving maintenance
             hemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. The trial uses a
             sequential, multiple assignment design with a randomized
             component for all participants (Phase 1) and a
             non-randomized component for a subset of participants (Phase
             2). During Phase 1, participants are randomized to Pain
             Coping Skills Training (PCST), an intervention designed to
             increase self-efficacy for managing pain, or Usual Care.
             PCST consists of weekly, live, coach-led cognitive
             behavioral therapy sessions delivered by video- or
             tele-conferencing for 12 weeks followed by daily
             interactive voice response sessions delivered by telephone
             for an additional 12 weeks. At 24 weeks (Phase 2),
             participants in both the PCST and Usual Care groups taking
             prescription opioid medications at an average dose of ≥20
             morphine milligram equivalents per day are offered
             buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist with a more
             favorable safety profile than full-agonist opioids. All
             participants are followed for 36 weeks. The primary outcome
             is pain interference ascertained, for the primary analysis,
             at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include additional
             patient-reported measures and clinical outcomes including
             falls, hospitalizations, and death. Exploratory outcomes
             include acceptability, tolerability, and efficacy of
             buprenorphine. The enrollment target of 640 participants was
             met 27 months after trial initiation. The findings of the
             trial will inform the management of chronic pain, a common
             and challenging issue for patients treated with maintenance
             hemodialysis. NCT04571619.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2023.107409},
   Key = {fds375365}
}

@article{fds373557,
   Author = {Fisher, HM and Check, DK and Somers, TJ and Kelleher, SA and Majestic,
             C and Yu, JA and Reed, SD and Li, Y and Olsen, MK and Lerebours, R and Keefe,
             FJ and Steinhauser, KE and Breitbart, WS and Winger,
             JG},
   Title = {Meaning-centered pain coping skills training for patients
             with metastatic cancer: Protocol for a randomized controlled
             efficacy trial.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {135},
   Pages = {107363},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2023.107363},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Many patients with advanced cancer describe pain
             as a debilitating symptom that greatly interferes with daily
             activities and enjoyment of life. Psychosocial interventions
             can improve cancer-related pain but rarely address spiritual
             concerns (e.g., loss of meaning, peace), which can influence
             the pain experience for those facing life-threatening
             illness. To address these needs, we systematically developed
             and pilot tested a novel psychosocial intervention called
             Meaning-Centered Pain Coping Skills Training (MCPC). In this
             randomized controlled trial, we aim to determine MCPC's
             efficacy for reducing pain interference (primary outcome)
             and improving secondary outcomes. We will also estimate
             MCPC's cost-effectiveness. METHOD/DESIGN: Patients (target
             N = 210) with advanced solid tumor malignancies (Stage IV)
             and clinically-elevated pain interference will be enrolled
             and block randomized with equal allocation to MCPC +
             enhanced usual care or enhanced usual care alone. MCPC's
             four, videoconferenced, 45-60 min weekly sessions will be
             individually delivered by trained study therapists. Primary
             (pain interference) and secondary (pain severity, anxiety
             and depressive symptoms, pain self-efficacy, social support,
             spiritual well-being) patient-reported outcomes will be
             assessed at baseline, and 8-weeks (primary endpoint) and
             12-weeks after baseline. CONCLUSION: Our MCPC intervention
             is the first to systematically address the
             biopsychosocial-spiritual aspects of pain in patients with
             advanced cancer. If MCPC demonstrates efficacy, next steps
             will involve hybrid efficacy-effectiveness and
             implementation work to broaden access to this brief,
             manualized, remotely-delivered intervention, with the goal
             of reducing suffering in patients with life-threatening
             illness.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2023.107363},
   Key = {fds373557}
}

@article{fds374397,
   Author = {Myers, H and Keefe, FJ and George, SZ and Kennedy, J and Lake, AD and Martinez, C and Cook, CE},
   Title = {Effect of a Patient Engagement, Education, and Restructuring
             of Cognitions (PEERC) approach on conservative care in
             rotator cuff related shoulder pain treatment: a randomized
             control trial.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {930},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07044-y},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Despite similar outcomes for surgery and
             physical therapy (PT), the number of surgeries to treat
             rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is increasing.
             Interventions designed to enhance treatment expectations for
             PT have been shown to improve patient expectations, but no
             studies have explored whether such interventions influence
             patient reports of having had surgery, or being scheduled
             for surgery. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial
             was to examine the effect of a cognitive behavioral
             intervention aimed at changing expectations for PT on
             patient-report of having had or being scheduled for surgery
             and on the outcomes of PT. METHODS: The Patient Engagement,
             Education, and Restructuring of Cognitions (PEERC)
             intervention, was designed to change expectations regarding
             PT. PEERC was evaluated in a randomized, pragmatic "add-on"
             trial in by randomizing patients with RCRSP to receive
             either PT intervention alone (PT) or PT + PEERC.
             Fifty-four (54) individuals, recruited from an outpatient
             hospital-based orthopedic clinic, were enrolled in the trial
             (25 randomized to PT, 29 randomized to PT + PEERC).
             Outcomes assessed at enrollment, 6 weeks, discharge, and
             six months after discharge included the patient report of
             having had surgery, or being scheduled for surgery (primary)
             and satisfaction with PT outcome, pain, and function
             (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: The average age of the 54
             participants was 51.81; SD = 12.54, and 63% were female.
             Chronicity of shoulder pain averaged 174.61 days;
             SD = 179.58. Study results showed that at the time of
             six months follow up, three (12%) of the participants in the
             PT alone group and one (3.4%) in the PT + PEERC group
             reported have had surgery or being scheduled for surgery
             (p = .32). There were no significant differences between
             groups on measures of satisfaction with the outcome of PT
             (p = .08), pain (p = .58) or function (p = .82).
             CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RCRSP, PT plus the cognitive
             behavioral intervention aimed at changing expectations for
             PT provided no additional benefit compared to PT alone with
             regard to patient report of having had surgery, or being
             scheduled to have surgery, patient reported treatment
             satisfaction with the outcome of PT, or improvements in
             pain, or function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is
             registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03353272
             (27/11/2017).},
   Doi = {10.1186/s12891-023-07044-y},
   Key = {fds374397}
}

@article{fds374570,
   Author = {McDermott, K and Keefe, F and Vranceanu, A-M},
   Title = {Bridging the gap: Utilizing insights from exposure therapy
             in the innovation of chronic musculoskeletal pain
             treatment.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {91},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {681-682},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000855},
   Abstract = {For some time, the gold standard treatment for anxiety
             disorders has been exposure therapy, defined as the repeated
             approach of anxiety-inducing situations, memories, or
             physiological sensations. Existing treatments to target fear
             and avoidance of pain can be augmented by innovations from
             exposure research in the anxiety disorders, including
             greater emphasis on safety learning, the utilization of
             imaginal exposure to catastrophic fears, and exposure to
             contrasting emotions. Given that treatments to target core,
             maintaining mechanisms of anxiety, including imaginal
             exposures, can be administered as self-directed treatments
             without therapist involvement, they represent important
             avenues for ensuring the millions of people with chronic
             musculosketal pain can gain access to psychosocial treatment
             and reduce the interference of pain in their lives.
             (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights
             reserved).},
   Doi = {10.1037/ccp0000855},
   Key = {fds374570}
}

@article{fds372009,
   Author = {Rubenstein, D and McClernon, FJ and Powers, JM and Aston, ER and Keefe,
             FJ and Sweitzer, MM},
   Title = {Pain is associated with exclusive use and co-use of tobacco
             and cannabis: Findings from Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the
             Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health
             Study.},
   Journal = {Addict Behav},
   Volume = {146},
   Pages = {107814},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107814},
   Abstract = {INTRODUCTION: Rates of tobacco and cannabis use are
             disproportionately high among individuals with pain, and
             evidence suggests that pain may engender greater likelihood
             of substance co-use, yielding additive risk. This study
             examined national associations of pain with past-month
             tobacco use, cannabis use, and co-use of tobacco and
             cannabis. METHODS: Data came from a nationally
             representative US sample of adults in Wave 5 (2018-2019) of
             the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study
             (N = 32,014). The sample included civilian,
             non-institutionalized people who use tobacco and people who
             do not use tobacco. Past-week pain intensity (0-10) was
             dichotomized (0-4 no/low pain; 5-10 moderate/severe pain).
             Multinomial models adjusted for demographics examined
             substance use category membership (no tobacco or cannabis
             use, exclusive cannabis use, exclusive tobacco use, co-use)
             as a function of pain status. RESULTS: Moderate/severe pain
             was associated with increased relative risk of exclusive
             tobacco use (RRR [CI] 2.26 [2.05, 2.49], p <.001),
             exclusive cannabis use (1.49 [1.22, 1.82], p <.001), and
             co-use of tobacco and cannabis (2.79 [2.51, 3.10],
             p <.001), in comparison to no tobacco or cannabis use.
             Additionally, moderate/severe pain was associated with
             increased risk of co-use compared to exclusive tobacco use
             (1.23 [1.11, 1.37], p <.001) and exclusive cannabis use
             (1.88 [1.54, 2.29], p <.001). DISCUSSION: Findings suggest
             that not only is pain independently associated with greater
             risk of exclusively using tobacco or cannabis, but pain is
             also associated with heightened risk of co-using both
             products. Future work should examine the dynamic and
             potentially bidirectional relationships between pain and use
             of cannabis and tobacco.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107814},
   Key = {fds372009}
}

@article{fds373697,
   Author = {Basbaum, AI and Jensen, TS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Fifty years of pain research and clinical advances:
             highlights and key trends.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {164},
   Number = {11S},
   Pages = {S11-S15},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003058},
   Abstract = {This article highlights advances in basic science
             preclinical pain research, clinical research, and
             psychological research occurring over the 50 years since the
             International Association for the Study of Pain was founded.
             It presents important findings and key trends in these 3
             areas of pain science: basic science preclinical research,
             clinical research, and psychological research.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003058},
   Key = {fds373697}
}

@article{fds371045,
   Author = {Li, Y and Reed, SD and Winger, JG and Hyland, KA and Fisher, HM and Kelleher, SA and Miller, SN and Davidian, M and Laber, EB and Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Evaluating Delivery Strategies
             for Pain Coping Skills Training in Women With Breast
             Cancer.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1712-1720},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2023.05.004},
   Abstract = {Pain coping skills training (PCST) is efficacious in
             patients with cancer, but clinical access is limited. To
             inform implementation, as a secondary outcome, we estimated
             the cost-effectiveness of 8 dosing strategies of PCST
             evaluated in a sequential multiple assignment randomized
             trial among women with breast cancer and pain (N = 327).
             Women were randomized to initial doses and re-randomized to
             subsequent doses based on their initial response (ie, ≥30%
             pain reduction). A decision-analytic model was designed to
             incorporate costs and benefits associated with 8 different
             PCST dosing strategies. In the primary analysis, costs were
             limited to resources required to deliver PCST.
             Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were modeled based on
             utility weights measured with the EuroQol-5 dimension
             5-level at 4 assessments over 10 months. A probabilistic
             sensitivity analysis was performed to account for parameter
             uncertainty. Implementation of PCST initiated with the
             5-session protocol was more costly ($693-853) than
             strategies initiated with the 1-session protocol ($288-496).
             QALYs for strategies beginning with the 5-session protocol
             were greater than for strategies beginning with the
             1-session protocol. With the goal of implementing PCST as
             part of comprehensive cancer treatment and with
             willingness-to-pay thresholds ranging beyond $20,000 per
             QALY, the strategy most likely to provide the greatest
             number of QALYs at an acceptable cost was a 1-session PCST
             protocol followed by either 5 maintenance telephone calls
             for responders or 5 sessions of PCST for nonresponders. A
             PCST program with 1 initial session and subsequent dosing
             based on response provides good value and improved outcomes.
             PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the results of a cost
             analysis of the delivery of PCST, a nonpharmacological
             intervention, to women with breast cancer and pain. Results
             could potentially provide important cost-related information
             to health care providers and systems on the use of an
             efficacious and accessible nonmedication strategy for pain
             management. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov:
             NCT02791646, registered 6/2/2016.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2023.05.004},
   Key = {fds371045}
}

@article{fds371046,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Winger, JG and Fisher, HM and Hyland, KA and Davidian, M and Laber, EB and Miller, SN and Kelleher, SA and Plumb Vilardaga and JC and Majestic, C and Shelby, RA and Reed, SD and Kimmick, GG and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Behavioral cancer pain intervention dosing: results of a
             Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized
             Trial.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {164},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1935-1941},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002915},
   Abstract = {Behavioral pain management interventions are efficacious for
             reducing pain in patients with cancer. However, optimal
             dosing of behavioral pain interventions for pain reduction
             is unknown, and this hinders routine clinical use. A
             Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) was
             used to evaluate whether varying doses of Pain Coping Skills
             Training (PCST) and response-based dose adaptation can
             improve pain management in women with breast cancer.
             Participants (N = 327) had stage I-IIIC breast cancer and a
             worst pain score of > 5/10. Pain severity (a priori primary
             outcome) was assessed before initial randomization (1:1
             allocation) to PCST-Full (5 sessions) or PCST-Brief (1
             session) and 5 to 8 weeks later. Responders ( > 30% pain
             reduction) were rerandomized to a maintenance dose or no
             dose and nonresponders (<30% pain reduction) to an increased
             or maintenance dose. Pain severity was assessed again 5 to 8
             weeks later (assessment 3) and 6 months later (assessment
             4). As hypothesized, PCST-Full resulted in greater mean
             percent pain reduction than PCST-Brief (M [SD] = -28.5%
             [39.6%] vs M [SD]= -14.8% [71.8%]; P = 0.041). At assessment
             3 after second dosing, all intervention sequences evidenced
             pain reduction from assessment 1 with no differences between
             sequences. At assessment 4, all sequences evidenced pain
             reduction from assessment 1 with differences between
             sequences ( P = 0.027). Participants initially receiving
             PCST-Full had greater pain reduction at assessment 4 ( P =
             0.056). Varying PCST doses led to pain reduction over time.
             Intervention sequences demonstrating the most durable
             decreases in pain reduction included PCST-Full. Pain Coping
             Skills Training with intervention adjustment based on
             response can produce sustainable pain reduction.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002915},
   Key = {fds371046}
}

@article{fds371049,
   Author = {Dorfman, CS and Shelby, RA and Stalls, JM and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Vilardaga, JP and Winger, JG and Mitchell, K and Ehren, C and Oeffinger,
             KC},
   Title = {Improving Symptom Management for Survivors of Young Adult
             Cancer: Development of a Novel Intervention.},
   Journal = {J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {472-487},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2022.0100},
   Abstract = {Purpose: Improved symptom management is a critical although
             unmet post-treatment need for young adult (YA) cancer
             survivors (aged 18-39 at diagnosis). This study aimed to
             develop and refine a behavioral symptom management
             intervention for YA survivors. Methods: Phase I: YA
             survivors (N = 21) and oncology providers (N = 11)
             completed individual interviews and an online, self-report
             assessment to examine symptom experiences, the need for a
             behavioral symptom management intervention for YAs, and
             perceptions about potential intervention components,
             structure, and format. Phase II: YA survivors (N = 10)
             completed user testing sessions, providing feedback on the
             prototype intervention materials (paper manual and mobile
             application), and completed an online assessment.
             Quantitative data were examined using descriptive
             statistics. Rapid qualitative analysis, a methodologically
             rigorous standardized approach, was used. Results: Pain,
             fatigue, and distress were ranked as top concerns by most
             YAs and providers. Phase I interviews underscored the need
             for a symptom management intervention for YAs. YAs and
             providers highlighted potential coping strategies and
             program format/structure suggestions (e.g., small group
             format) to best meet YAs' needs. A prototype intervention
             was developed combining the following: traditional
             behavioral symptom coping skills; home-based physical
             activity; strategies from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
             and Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy; and strategies to foster
             self-compassion. Phase II user testing sessions highlighted
             strengths and suggestions for refining the prototype
             materials. Conclusion: Post-treatment symptoms are common
             for YAs. A tailored behavioral symptom management program
             was developed and refined with input from YAs and providers
             and will be examined for feasibility and acceptability in a
             pilot randomized controlled trial. Clinical Trial:
             Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04035447.},
   Doi = {10.1089/jayao.2022.0100},
   Key = {fds371049}
}

@article{fds370880,
   Author = {Winger, JG and Kelleher, SA and Ramos, K and Check, DK and Yu, JA and Powell, VD and Lerebours, R and Olsen, MK and Keefe, FJ and Steinhauser,
             KE and Porter, LS and Breitbart, WS and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Meaning-centered pain coping skills training for patients
             with metastatic cancer: Results of a randomized controlled
             pilot trial.},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {1096-1105},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.6151},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: For patients with advanced cancer, pain is a
             common and debilitating symptom that can negatively impact
             physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. This trial
             examined the feasibility and initial effects of
             Meaning-Centered Pain Coping Skills Training (MCPC), a
             cognitive-behavioral pain management intervention with an
             emphasis on enhancing meaning (i.e., a personal sense of
             purpose, worth, and significance) and peace. METHODS: We
             enrolled 60 adults with stage IV solid tumor cancers and
             moderate-severe pain between February 2021 and February
             2022. Participants were randomized 1:1 to MCPC + usual
             care or usual care alone. Meaning-Centered Pain Coping
             Skills Training consisted of four weekly 60-min individual
             sessions via videoconference or telephone, delivered by a
             trained therapist using a manualized protocol. Participants
             completed validated measures of pain severity, pain
             interference, pain self-efficacy, spiritual well-being
             (i.e., meaning, peace, and faith), and psychological
             distress at baseline and 5-week and 10-week follow-ups.
             RESULTS: All feasibility metrics exceeded prespecified
             benchmarks. Fifty-eight percent of screened patients were
             eligible, and 69% of eligible patients consented. Of those
             assigned to MCPC, 93% completed all sessions and 100% of
             those who completed follow-ups reported using coping skills
             weekly. Retention was strong at 5-week (85%) and 10-week
             (78%) follow-ups. Meaning-Centered Pain Coping Skills
             Training participants reported better scores than control
             participants across outcome measures, including
             moderate-to-large sized differences at 10-week follow-up in
             pain severity (Cohen's d = -0.75 [95% confidence interval:
             -1.36, -0.14]), pain interference (d = -0.82 [-1.45,
             -0.20]), and pain self-efficacy (d = 0.74 [0.13, 1.35]).
             CONCLUSIONS: MCPC is a highly feasible, engaging, and
             promising approach for improving pain management in advanced
             cancer. Future efficacy testing is warranted. TRIAL
             REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04431830,
             registered 16 June 2020.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.6151},
   Key = {fds370880}
}

@article{fds370237,
   Author = {Hyland, KA and Amaden, GH and Diachina, AK and Miller, SN and Dorfman,
             CS and Berchuck, SI and Winger, JG and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Uronis,
             HE and Kelleher, SA},
   Title = {mHealth Coping Skills Training for Symptom Management
             (mCOPE) for colorectal cancer patients in early to
             mid-adulthood: Study protocol for a randomized controlled
             trial.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials Commun},
   Volume = {33},
   Pages = {101126},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101126},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in early to
             mid-adulthood (≤50 years) are challenged by high symptom
             burden (i.e., pain, fatigue, distress) and age-related
             stressors (e.g., managing family, work). Cognitive
             behavioral theory (CBT)-based coping skills training
             interventions reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in
             cancer patients. However, traditional CBT-based
             interventions are not accessible to these patients (e.g.,
             in-person sessions, during work day), nor designed to
             address symptoms within the context of this stage of life.
             We developed a mobile health (mHealth) coping skills
             training program for pain, fatigue and distress (mCOPE) for
             CRC patients in early to mid-adulthood. We utilize a
             randomized controlled trial to test the extent to which
             mCOPE reduces pain, fatigue and distress (multiple primary
             outcomes) and improves quality of life and symptom
             self-efficacy (secondary outcomes). METHODS/DESIGN: Patients
             (N = 160) ≤50 years with CRC endorsing pain, fatigue
             and/or distress are randomized 1:1 to mCOPE or standard
             care. mCOPE is a five-session CBT-based coping skills
             training program (e.g., relaxation, activity pacing,
             cognitive restructuring) that was adapted for CRC patients
             in early to mid-adulthood. mCOPE utilizes mHealth technology
             (e.g., videoconference, mobile app) to deliver coping skills
             training, capture symptom and skills use data, and provide
             personalized support and feedback. Self-report assessments
             are completed at baseline, post-treatment (5-8 weeks
             post-baseline; primary endpoint), and 3- and 6-months later.
             CONCLUSIONS: mCOPE is innovative and potentially impactful
             for CRC patients in early to mid-adulthood. Hypothesis
             confirmation would demonstrate initial efficacy of a mHealth
             cognitive behavioral intervention to reduce symptom burden
             in younger CRC patients.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101126},
   Key = {fds370237}
}

@article{fds371125,
   Author = {Hohenschurz-Schmidt, D and Vase, L and Scott, W and Annoni, M and Ajayi,
             OK and Barth, J and Bennell, K and Berna, C and Bialosky, J and Braithwaite, F and Finnerup, NB and Williams, ACDC and Carlino, E and Cerritelli, F and Chaibi, A and Cherkin, D and Colloca, L and Côté, P and Darnall, BD and Evans, R and Fabre, L and Faria, V and French, S and Gerger, H and Häuser, W and Hinman, RS and Ho, D and Janssens, T and Jensen, K and Johnston, C and Juhl Lunde and S and Keefe, F and Kerns, RD and Koechlin, H and Kongsted, A and Michener, LA and Moerman, DE and Musial,
             F and Newell, D and Nicholas, M and Palermo, TM and Palermo, S and Peerdeman, KJ and Pogatzki-Zahn, EM and Puhl, AA and Roberts, L and Rossettini, G and Tomczak Matthiesen and S and Underwood, M and Vaucher,
             P and Vollert, J and Wartolowska, K and Weimer, K and Werner, CP and Rice,
             ASC and Draper-Rodi, J},
   Title = {Recommendations for the development, implementation, and
             reporting of control interventions in efficacy and
             mechanistic trials of physical, psychological, and
             self-management therapies: the CoPPS Statement.},
   Journal = {BMJ},
   Volume = {381},
   Pages = {e072108},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072108},
   Doi = {10.1136/bmj-2022-072108},
   Key = {fds371125}
}

@article{fds371126,
   Author = {Bronfort, G and Delitto, A and Schneider, M and Heagerty, PJ and Chou,
             R and Connett, J and Evans, R and George, S and Glick, RM and Greco, C and Hanson, L and Keefe, F and Leininger, B and Licciardone, J and McFarland, C and Meier, E and Schulz, C and Turk,
             D},
   Title = {Effectiveness of spinal manipulation and biopsychosocial
             self-management compared to medical care for low back pain:
             a randomized trial study protocol.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {415},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06549-w},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is widespread,
             costly, and burdensome to patients and health systems.
             Little is known about non-pharmacological treatments for the
             secondary prevention of cLBP. There is some evidence that
             treatments addressing psychosocial factors in higher risk
             patients are more effective than usual care. However, most
             clinical trials on acute and subacute LBP have evaluated
             interventions irrespective of prognosis. METHODS: We have
             designed a phase 3 randomized trial with a 2 × 2
             factorial design. The study is also a Hybrid type 1 trial
             with focus on intervention effectiveness while
             simultaneously considering plausible implementation
             strategies. Adults (n = 1000) with acute/subacute LBP at
             moderate to high risk of chronicity based on the STarT Back
             screening tool will be randomized in to 1 of 4 interventions
             lasting up to 8 weeks: supported self-management (SSM),
             spinal manipulation therapy (SMT), both SSM and SMT, or
             medical care. The primary objective is to assess
             intervention effectiveness; the secondary objective is to
             assess barriers and facilitators impacting future
             implementation. Primary effectiveness outcome measures are:
             (1) average pain intensity over 12 months post-randomization
             (pain, numerical rating scale); (2) average low back
             disability over 12 months post-randomization (Roland-Morris
             Disability Questionnaire); (3) prevention of cLBP that is
             impactful at 10-12 months follow-up (LBP impact from the
             PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0). Secondary outcomes include:
             recovery, PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0 measures to assess pain
             interference, physical function, anxiety, depression,
             fatigue, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in
             social roles and activities. Other patient-reported measures
             include LBP frequency, medication use, healthcare
             utilization, productivity loss, STarT Back screening tool
             status, patient satisfaction, prevention of chronicity,
             adverse events, and dissemination measures. Objective
             measures include the Quebec Task Force Classification, Timed
             Up & Go Test, the Sit to Stand Test, and the Sock Test
             assessed by clinicians blinded to the patients' intervention
             assignment. DISCUSSION: By targeting those subjects at
             higher risk this trial aims to fill an important gap in the
             scientific literature regarding the effectiveness of
             promising non-pharmacological treatments compared to medical
             care for the management of patients with an acute episode of
             LBP and the prevention of progression to a severe chronic
             back problem. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov
             Identifier: NCT03581123.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s12891-023-06549-w},
   Key = {fds371126}
}

@article{fds370043,
   Author = {Simon, CB and Hicks, GE and Pieper, CF and Byers Kraus and V and Keefe, FJ and Colón-Emeric, C},
   Title = {A Novel Movement-Evoked Pain Provocation Test for Older
             Adults With Persistent Low Back Pain: Safety, Feasibility,
             and Associations With Self-reported Physical Function and
             Usual Gait Speed.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {39},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {166-174},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001101},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent and
             disabling for older adults. Movement-evoked pain is an
             emerging measure that may help to predict disability; but is
             not currently a part of geriatric LBP clinical care. This
             study tested the safety and feasibility of a new
             Movement-Evoked Provocation Test for Low Back Pain in Older
             Adults (MEPLO). We also compared associations between
             movement-evoked pain via 2 different scoring methods and
             disability-associated outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
             Thirty-nine older adults with persistent LBP provided
             baseline recalled and resting pain ratings, self-reported
             physical function, and usual gait speed. Participants then
             completed MEPLO, involving 4 tasks essential for functional
             independence: chair rises, trunk rotation, reaching, and
             walking. Movement-evoked pain was then quantified using the
             traditional change score (delta) method of pain premovement
             to postmovement; and also, a new aggregate method that
             combines pain ratings after the 4 tasks. RESULTS: No safety
             or feasibility issues were identified. Compared with the
             delta score, the aggregate score was more strongly
             associated with self-reported physical function (beta:
             -0.495 vs. -0.090) and usual gait speed (beta: -0.450 vs.
             -0.053). Similarly, the aggregate score was more strongly
             associated with self-reported physical function than
             recalled and resting pain (beta: -0.470, -0.283, and 0.136,
             respectively). DISCUSSION: This study shows the safety and
             feasibility of testing movement-evoked pain in older adults
             with persistent LBP, and its potential superiority to
             traditional pain measures. Future studies must validate
             these findings and test the extent to which MEPLO is
             implementable to change with geriatric LBP standard of
             care.},
   Doi = {10.1097/AJP.0000000000001101},
   Key = {fds370043}
}

@article{fds370161,
   Author = {Palermo, TM and Davis, KD and Bouhassira, D and Hurley, RW and Katz, JD and Keefe, FJ and Schatman, M and Turk, DC and Yarnitsky,
             D},
   Title = {Promoting inclusion, diversity and equity in pain
             science.},
   Journal = {Eur J Pain},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {451-456},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2087},
   Doi = {10.1002/ejp.2087},
   Key = {fds370161}
}

@article{fds371047,
   Author = {Kerns, RD and Davis, AF and Fritz, JM and Keefe, FJ and Peduzzi, P and Rhon, DI and Taylor, SL and Vining, R and Yu, Q and Zeliadt, SB and George,
             SZ},
   Title = {Intervention Fidelity in Pain Pragmatic Trials for
             Nonpharmacologic Pain Management: Nuanced Considerations for
             Determining PRECIS-2 Flexibility in Delivery and
             Adherence.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {568-574},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.12.008},
   Abstract = {Nonpharmacological treatments are considered first-line pain
             management strategies, but they remain clinically underused.
             For years, pain-focused pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs)
             have generated evidence for the enhanced use of
             nonpharmacological interventions in routine clinical
             settings to help overcome implementation barriers. The
             Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2)
             framework describes the degree of pragmatism across 9 key
             domains. Among these, "flexibility in delivery" and
             "flexibility in adherence," address a key goal of pragmatic
             research by tailoring approaches to settings in which people
             receive routine care. However, to maintain scientific and
             ethical rigor, PCTs must ensure that flexibility features do
             not compromise delivery of interventions as designed, such
             that the results are ethically and scientifically sound. Key
             principles of achieving this balance include clear
             definitions of intervention core components, intervention
             monitoring and documentation that is sufficient but not
             overly burdensome, provider training that meets the demands
             of delivering an intervention in real-world settings, and
             use of an ethical lens to recognize and avoid potential
             trial futility when necessary and appropriate. PERSPECTIVE:
             This article presents nuances to be considered when applying
             the PRECIS-2 framework to describe pragmatic clinical
             trials. Trials must ensure that patient-centered treatment
             flexibility does not compromise delivery of interventions as
             designed, such that measurement and analysis of treatment
             effects is reliable.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2022.12.008},
   Key = {fds371047}
}

@article{fds370044,
   Author = {Mayhew, M and Balderson, BH and Cook, AJ and Dickerson, JF and Elder,
             CR and Firemark, AJ and Haller, IV and Justice, M and Keefe, FJ and McMullen, CK and O'Keeffe-Rosetti, MC and Owen-Smith, AA and Rini, C and Schneider, JL and Von Korff and M and Wandner, LD and DeBar,
             LL},
   Title = {Comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of remote
             (telehealth and online) cognitive behavioral therapy-based
             treatments for high-impact chronic pain relative to usual
             care: study protocol for the RESOLVE multisite randomized
             control trial.},
   Journal = {Trials},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {196},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07165-8},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain
             (CBT-CP) is an effective but underused treatment for
             high-impact chronic pain. Increased access to CBT-CP
             services for pain is of critical public health importance,
             particularly for rural and medically underserved populations
             who have limited access due to these services being
             concentrated in urban and high income areas. Making CBT-CP
             widely available and more affordable could reduce barriers
             to CBT-CP use. METHODS: As part of the National Institutes
             of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term® (NIH HEAL)
             initiative, we designed and implemented a comparative
             effectiveness, 3-arm randomized control trial comparing
             remotely delivered telephonic/video and online CBT-CP-based
             services to usual care for patients with high-impact chronic
             pain. The RESOLVE trial is being conducted in 4 large
             integrated healthcare systems located in Minnesota, Georgia,
             Oregon, and Washington state and includes demographically
             diverse populations residing in urban and rural areas. The
             trial compares (1) an 8-session, one-on-one, professionally
             delivered telephonic/video CBT-CP program; and (2) a
             previously developed and tested 8-session online
             CBT-CP-based program (painTRAINER) to (3) usual care
             augmented by a written guide for chronic pain management.
             Participants are followed for 1 year post-allocation and
             are assessed at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months
             post-allocation. The primary outcome is minimal clinically
             important difference (MCID; ≥ 30% reduction) in pain
             severity (composite of pain intensity and pain-related
             interference) assessed by a modified 11-item version of the
             Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form at 3 months. Secondary
             outcomes include pain severity, pain intensity, and
             pain-related interference scores, quality of life measures,
             and patient global impression of change at 3, 6, and
             12 months. Cost-effectiveness is assessed by incremental
             cost per additional patient with MCID in primary outcome and
             by cost per quality-adjusted life year achieved. Outcome
             assessment is blinded to group assignment. DISCUSSION: This
             large-scale trial provides a unique opportunity to
             rigorously evaluate and compare the clinical and
             cost-effectiveness of 2 relatively low-cost and scalable
             modalities for providing CBT-CP-based treatments to persons
             with high-impact chronic pain, including those residing in
             rural and other medically underserved areas with limited
             access to these services. TRIAL REGISTRATION:
             ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04523714. This trial was registered on
             24 August 2020.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s13063-023-07165-8},
   Key = {fds370044}
}

@article{fds370045,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Jensen, MP and Gerhart, J and Thorn, BE and Lillis, TA and Carmody, J and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and
             behavior therapy for people with chronic low back pain: A
             comparative mechanisms study.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {91},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {171-187},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000801},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness-based stress
             reduction (MBSR), and behavior therapy (BT) for chronic pain
             treatment produce outcome improvements. Evidence also
             suggests that changes in putative therapeutic mechanisms are
             associated with changes in outcomes. Nonetheless,
             methodological limitations preclude clear understanding of
             how psychosocial chronic pain treatments work. In this
             comparative mechanism study, we examined evidence for
             specific and shared mechanism effects across the three
             treatments. METHOD: CT, MBSR, BT, and treatment as usual
             (TAU) were compared in people with chronic low back pain (N
             = 521). Eight individual sessions were administered with
             weekly assessments of "specific" mechanisms (pain
             catastrophizing, mindfulness, behavior activation) and
             outcomes. RESULTS: CT, MBSR, and BT produced similar pre- to
             posttreatment effects on all mechanism variables, and all
             three active treatments produced greater improvements than
             TAU. Participant ratings of expectations of benefit and
             working alliance were similar across treatments. Lagged and
             cross-lagged analyses revealed that prior week changes in
             both mechanism and outcome factors predicted next week
             changes in their counterparts. Analyses of variance
             contributions suggested that changes in pain catastrophizing
             and pain self-efficacy were consistent unique predictors of
             subsequent outcome changes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support
             the operation of shared mechanisms over specific ones. Given
             significant lagged and cross-lagged effects, unidirectional
             conceptualizations-mechanism to outcome-need to be expanded
             to include reciprocal effects. Thus, prior week changes in
             pain-related cognitions could predict next week changes in
             pain interference which in turn could predict next week
             changes in pain-related cognitions, in what may be an upward
             spiral of improvement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023
             APA, all rights reserved).},
   Doi = {10.1037/ccp0000801},
   Key = {fds370045}
}

@article{fds368120,
   Author = {Palermo, TM and Davis, KD and Bouhassira, D and Hurley, RW and Katz, JD and Keefe, FJ and Schatman, M and Turk, DC and Yarnitsky,
             D},
   Title = {Promoting Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity in Pain
             Science.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {187-191},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.005},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.005},
   Key = {fds368120}
}

@article{fds369116,
   Author = {Palermo, TM and Davis, KD and Bouhassira, D and Hurley, RW and Katz, JD and Keefe, FJ and Schatman, M and Turk, DC and Yarnitsky,
             D},
   Title = {Promoting Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity in Pain
             Science.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {39},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {55-59},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001094},
   Doi = {10.1097/AJP.0000000000001094},
   Key = {fds369116}
}

@article{fds369117,
   Author = {Palermo, TM and Davis, KD and Bouhassira, D and Hurley, RW and Katz, JD and Keefe, FJ and Schatman, M and Turk, DC and Yarnitsky,
             D},
   Title = {Promoting Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity in Pain
             Science.},
   Journal = {Pain Med},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {105-109},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnac204},
   Doi = {10.1093/pm/pnac204},
   Key = {fds369117}
}

@article{fds368585,
   Author = {Garland, EL and Roberts, RL and Hanley, AW and Zeidan, F and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {The Mindful Reappraisal of Pain Scale (MRPS): Validation of
             a New Measure of Psychological Mechanisms of
             Mindfulness-Based Analgesia.},
   Journal = {Mindfulness (N Y)},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {192-204},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-02034-y},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: Mindfulness is theorized to decrease the
             affective amplification of chronic pain by facilitating a
             shift from emotionally-laden, catastrophic pain appraisals
             of nociceptive input to reappraising chronic pain as an
             innocuous sensory signal that does not signify harm.
             Understanding of these hypothetical psychological mechanisms
             of mindfulness-based analgesia has been limited by a lack of
             direct measures. We conducted a series of psychometric and
             experimental studies to develop and validate the Mindful
             Reappraisal of Pain Sensations Scale (MPRS). METHODS: After
             item generation, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory
             factor analyses of the MRPS in samples of opioid-treated
             chronic pain patients both before (n=450; n=90) and after
             (n=222) participating in Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery
             Enhancement (MORE). We then examined the convergent and
             divergent validity of the MRPS. Finally, in data from a
             randomized clinical trial (n=250), the MRPS was tested as a
             mediator of the effects of MORE on reducing chronic pain
             severity. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor
             analyses demonstrated the single-factor structure of the
             MRPS. The MRPS also evidenced convergent and divergent
             validity. Mindfulness training through MORE significantly
             increased MRPS scores relative to supportive psychotherapy
             (F4,425.03 = 16.15, p < .001). Changes in MRPS scores
             statistically mediated the effect of MORE on reducing
             chronic pain severity through 9-month follow-up.
             CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these studies demonstrate that
             the MRPS is a psychometrically sound and valid measure of
             novel analgesic mechanisms of mindfulness including
             attentional disengagement from affective pain appraisals and
             interoceptive exposure to pain sensations.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12671-022-02034-y},
   Key = {fds368585}
}

@article{fds369142,
   Author = {Palermo, TM and Davis, KD and Bouhassira, D and Hurley, RW and Katz, JD and Keefe, FJ and Schatman, M and Turk, DC and Yarnitsky,
             D},
   Title = {Promoting inclusion, diversity, and equity in pain
             science.},
   Journal = {Pain reports},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {e1063},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pr9.0000000000001063},
   Doi = {10.1097/pr9.0000000000001063},
   Key = {fds369142}
}

@article{fds369397,
   Author = {Palermo, TM and Davis, KD and Bouhassira, D and Hurley, RW and Katz, JD and Keefe, FJ and Schatman, ME and Turk, DC and Yarnitsky,
             D},
   Title = {Promoting Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity in Pain
             Science.},
   Journal = {J Pain Res},
   Volume = {16},
   Pages = {301-306},
   Year = {2023},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S401985},
   Doi = {10.2147/JPR.S401985},
   Key = {fds369397}
}

@article{fds369895,
   Author = {Palermo, TM and Davis, KD and Bouhassira, D and Hurley, RW and Katz, JD and Keefe, FJ and Schatman, M and Turk, DC and Yarnitsky,
             D},
   Title = {Promoting inclusion, diversity, and equity in pain
             science.},
   Journal = {Can J Pain},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {2161272},
   Year = {2023},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2022.2161272},
   Doi = {10.1080/24740527.2022.2161272},
   Key = {fds369895}
}

@article{fds372550,
   Author = {Martin, S and Arthur, SS and Bovbjerg, DH and Huang, M and Keefe, FJ and Manculich, J and Soo, MSC and Zuley, ML and Shelby,
             RA},
   Title = {The Role Of Psychological Factors As Predictors Of
             Mammography Pain Experienced By Breast Cancer Survivors
             During Their First Surveillance Screening After
             Breast-Conserving Surgery},
   Journal = {JOURNAL OF PAIN},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {100-100},
   Year = {2023},
   Key = {fds372550}
}

@article{fds373698,
   Author = {Winger, JG and Kelleher, SA and Ramos, K and Check, DK and Lerebours,
             RC and Olsen, MK and Keefe, FJ and Steinhauser, KE and Porter, LS and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {MEANING-CENTERED PAIN COPING SKILLS TRAINING FOR PATIENTS
             WITH ADVANCED CANCER: RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED
             PILOT TRIAL},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {57},
   Pages = {S285-S285},
   Year = {2023},
   Key = {fds373698}
}

@article{fds359927,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Weiner, DK and Ramos, K and Barnes, DE and Schmader, KE and Gwyther, L and Ritchie, CS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Partnering to cope with pain: A pilot study of a
             caregiver-assisted pain coping skills intervention for
             patients with cognitive impairment and dementia.},
   Journal = {Palliat Support Care},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {785-793},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1478951521001747},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To develop a new caregiver-assisted pain coping
             skills training protocol specifically tailored for
             community-dwelling persons with cognitive impairment and
             pain, and assess its feasibility and acceptability. METHOD:
             In Phase I, we conducted interviews with 10
             patient-caregiver dyads to gather feedback about
             intervention content and delivery. Phase II was a single-arm
             pilot test to evaluate the intervention's feasibility and
             acceptability. Dyads in the pilot study (n = 11) completed
             baseline surveys, received five intervention sessions, and
             then completed post-intervention surveys. Analyses focused
             on feasibility and acceptability. RESULTS: Dyads responded
             positively to the pain coping skills presented in the
             interviews; their feedback was used to refine the
             intervention. Findings from the pilot study suggested that
             the intervention was feasible and acceptable. 69% of
             eligible dyads consented, 82% completed all five
             intervention sessions, and 100% completed the post-treatment
             assessment. Caregivers reported high satisfaction ratings.
             They also reported using the pain coping skills on a regular
             basis, and that they found most of the skills helpful and
             easy to use. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: These preliminary
             findings suggest that a caregiver-assisted pain coping
             skills intervention is feasible and acceptable, and that it
             may be a promising approach to managing pain in patients
             with cognitive impairment.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1478951521001747},
   Key = {fds359927}
}

@article{fds371048,
   Author = {Benes, LL and Keefe, FJ and DeBar, LL},
   Title = {Treating Persistent Pain: A Nurse Co-Led, Interdisciplinary
             Model for Primary Care.},
   Journal = {Pain Manag Nurs},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {728-736},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2022.07.004},
   Abstract = {The public health crisis of chronic pain has only increased
             in recognition since the Institute of Medicine's (IOM)
             Relieving Pain in America (2011) called for a cultural
             transformation in the way pain is viewed, treated, and put
             forward specific recommendations for action. The National
             Pain Strategy (NPS) provides a roadmap for putting these
             recommendations into practice. We implemented a program that
             placed nurses and behavioral specialists at the head of an
             interdisciplinary team utilizing best practices. In this
             program, nurses enacted the NPS recommendations to advance
             care for patients with persistent pain on long-term opioid
             treatment. This program promoted professional growth in
             nurses along with fostering success for patients. Compared
             with patients receiving usual care, patients in the program
             achieved greater reductions in pain severity, pain-related
             disability, and pain-related functional interference and
             reported greater satisfaction with pain-related care and
             primary care services. This article will detail the
             NPS-aligned practice approaches these nurses and their teams
             used, describe the training for the nurses, and speak to
             opportunities to enhance the nurse's capacity for this role
             in hopes of providing a model for the future implementation
             of an NPS-based approach by nurses.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pmn.2022.07.004},
   Key = {fds371048}
}

@article{fds367347,
   Author = {Stalls, JM and Bovbjerg, DH and Somers, TJ and Plumb Vilardaga and JC and Kimmick, GG and McAuliffe, PF and Keefe, FJ and Posluszny, DM and Sullivan, MJL and Erkanli, A and Reed, SD and Sutton, L and Owen, L and Massa, L and Shelby, RA},
   Title = {Improving well-being for individuals with persistent pain
             after surgery for breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ,
             or ductal carcinoma in situ: A randomized clinical
             trial.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {122},
   Pages = {106934},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106934},
   Abstract = {>276,000 Americans will be diagnosed with invasive breast
             cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in
             situ this year and most will undergo breast surgery as part
             of their care. Although prognosis is excellent, many
             patients experience persistent post-surgical pain (PSP),
             which has no satisfactory pharmacological treatment. The
             causal contributions of pain-associated psychological
             factors (e.g., catastrophic thoughts about pain,
             psychological flexibility, self-efficacy) to the continuing
             burden of PSP have not yet been determined and may be
             opportune intervention targets. The randomized trial
             described here will compare the benefits of three manualized
             behavioral interventions for individuals with PSP.
             Participants will receive either: 1) self-guided health
             education (SGHE); 2) interventionist-guided health education
             (IGHE); or 3) interventionist-guided pain coping skills
             training with elements of acceptance and commitment therapy
             that specially target catastrophic thoughts about pain,
             self-efficacy, and psychological flexibility (CST-PSP).
             Participants will prospectively complete validated
             assessments of primary outcomes (PSP severity and
             interference) at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3-, 6-, and
             12-months later. Validated measures of emotional distress
             and cancer-specific distress will be assessed as secondary
             outcomes. To test their roles as drivers of PSP,
             catastrophic thoughts about pain, self-efficacy, and
             psychological flexibility, will be assessed and
             statistically analyzed as mediators of hypothesized
             beneficial effects. The interventions' impacts on pain
             sensitivity and central sensitization will be investigated
             to test these physiological pathways as proximal drivers of
             PSP. To better characterize the patient experience,
             additional validated measures will be explored for
             associations with PSP, along with demographic and clinical
             factors. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04225585,
             registered January 13, 2020.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2022.106934},
   Key = {fds367347}
}

@article{fds367653,
   Author = {Gilron, I and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {An introduction to the biennial review of
             pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {163},
   Number = {Suppl 1},
   Pages = {S1-S2},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002774},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002774},
   Key = {fds367653}
}

@article{fds367413,
   Author = {Post, KM and Smith, DA and Burns, JW and Porter, LS and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {A Dyadic Investigation of Depressed Affect and Interspousal
             Behavior in Couples With Chronic Back Pain.},
   Journal = {Ann Behav Med},
   Volume = {56},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1002-1013},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab100},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Depression and marital discord are
             characteristic not only of individuals with chronic low back
             pain (ICPs) but also of their spouses. PURPOSE: We examined
             actor-partner interdependence models to evaluate
             associations among depressed affect and criticism and
             support of partners at the same time point (concurrent
             effects) and 3 hr later (lagged effects). Fully dyadic
             models were used to account for both within-person and
             cross-spouse associations among depressed affect, criticism,
             and support for ICPs and spouses. We also examined the
             direction of the relationships (depressed affect predicting
             behavior and behavior predicting depressed affect) all while
             controlling for pain intensity, pain behavior, and the prior
             dependent variable. METHODS: ICPs (n = 105) and their
             spouses completed electronic diary measures of depressed
             affect and behavior (criticism and support) five times a day
             for 2 weeks. Hierarchical linear modeling with person-mean
             centering was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Within the
             same 3 hr epoch, more depressed affect was related to higher
             criticism and generally less support. Lagged analyses
             suggested bidirectional relationships between spouse's own
             depressed affect and spouse's own criticism of ICPs. Spouse
             depressed affect was also associated with decreased support
             received from ICPs. Pain behavior and pain intensity were
             also related to depressed affect, criticism, and support
             especially concurrently. CONCLUSIONS: Theories and
             interventions need to address not only ICP depressed affect
             but also spouse depressed affect, as spouse depressed affect
             may be a stress generating precursor to criticism and
             support.},
   Doi = {10.1093/abm/kaab100},
   Key = {fds367413}
}

@article{fds366144,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Ramos, K and Baucom, DH and Steinhauser, K and Erkanli,
             A and Strauman, TJ and Zafar, SY and Check, DK and Leo, K and Liu, E and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Evaluating a couple communication skills training (CCST)
             intervention for advanced cancer: study protocol for a
             randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Trials},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {712},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06656-4},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: For patients and their intimate partners,
             advanced cancer poses significant challenges that can
             negatively impact both individuals and their relationship.
             Prior studies have found evidence that couple-based
             communication skills interventions can to be beneficial for
             patients and partners. However, these studies have been
             limited by reliance on in-person treatment delivery and have
             not targeted couples at high risk for poor outcomes. This
             study tests the efficacy of a Couples Communication Skills
             Training (CCST) intervention delivered via videoconference
             for couples reporting high levels of holding back from
             discussing cancer-related concerns, a variable associated
             with poorer psychological and relationship functioning.
             METHODS: This RCT is designed to evaluate the efficacy of
             CCST in improving patient and partner relationship
             functioning (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes include
             patient and partner psychological functioning and patient
             symptoms and health care use. We also examine the role of
             objective and self-reported communication behaviors as
             mediators of treatment effects. Two hundred thirty patients
             with advanced lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and
             breast cancer and their partners will be randomized to CCST
             or an education control intervention. Participants in both
             conditions complete self-reported outcome measures at
             baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 3 months
             post-treatment. Objective measures of communication are
             derived from video-recorded couple conversations collected
             at baseline and post-treatment. An implementation-related
             process evaluation (assessing implementation outcomes and
             potential barriers to/facilitators of implementation) will
             be conducted to inform future efforts to implement CCST in
             real-world settings. DISCUSSION: This trial can yield
             important new knowledge about effective ways to improve
             patient and partner adjustment to advanced cancer. TRIAL
             REGISTRATION: This study trial is registered at
             clinicaltrials.gov (Trial # NCT04590885); registration date:
             October 19, 2020.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s13063-022-06656-4},
   Key = {fds366144}
}

@article{fds362557,
   Author = {Kelleher, SA and Fisher, HM and Winger, JG and Miller, SN and Amaden,
             GH and Somers, TJ and Colloca, L and Uronis, HE and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Virtual reality for improving pain and pain-related symptoms
             in patients with advanced stage colorectal cancer: A pilot
             trial to test feasibility and acceptability.},
   Journal = {Palliat Support Care},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {471-481},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1478951521002017},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Virtual reality (VR) has the potential to improve
             pain and pain-related symptoms. We examined the feasibility,
             acceptability, safety, and impact of a 30-min virtual
             underwater/sea environment (VR Blue) for reducing pain and
             pain-related symptoms in advanced colorectal cancer
             patients. A qualitative exit interview was conducted to
             understand preferences, thoughts, and feelings about the VR
             session. METHOD: Participants (N = 20) had stage IV
             colorectal cancer and moderate-to-severe pain. Participants
             completed a 30-min VR Blue session that visually and aurally
             immersed them in virtual ocean scenarios. Feasibility was
             assessed by accrual (N = 20), protocol adherence (≥80%
             completing VR Blue), and completed data (≥80% assessment
             completion). Acceptability was determined by patients
             reporting ≥80% intervention satisfaction. Safety was
             determined by ≥80% of patients completing the session
             without self-reported side effects. Measures of pain,
             tension, relaxation, stress, anxiety, and mood were
             collected before, during, and after the VR Blue session. A
             semi-structured qualitative interview was conducted after VR
             Blue to assess participants' VR experiences. RESULTS: All
             participants (100%) completed the VR Blue session. There was
             100% data collection at the pre- and post-assessments.
             Satisfaction with VR Blue was high M = 3.3 (SD = 0.4) (83%).
             No significant side effects were reported. Pain decreased by
             59% (Pre-M = 3 [1]; Post-M = 1 [1]). Tension decreased by
             74% (Pre-M = 30 [24]; Post-M = 8 [13]). Relaxation improved
             by 38% (Pre-M = 62 [21]); Post-M = 86 [17]). Stress
             decreased by 68% (Pre-M = 24 [24]; Post-M = 8 [14]). Anxiety
             decreased by 65% (Pre-M = 20 [23]; Post-M = 7 [13]). Mood
             improved by 70% (Pre-M = 13 [16]; Post-M = 4 [11]).
             Qualitative data suggested a positive response to the VR
             Blue protocol. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This work supports
             the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of VR Blue for
             advanced colorectal cancer patients. Participants showed
             significant pre-post improvement in pain and pain-related
             symptoms hinting to the potential feasibility of VR
             interventions in this population. Larger, randomized trials
             with a control condition are needed to examine the efficacy
             of VR-based interventions for patients with advanced
             colorectal cancer and pain.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1478951521002017},
   Key = {fds362557}
}

@article{fds364087,
   Author = {Parmelee, PA and Behrens, EA and Costlow Hill and K and Cox, BS and DeCaro,
             JA and Keefe, FJ and Smith, DM},
   Title = {Momentary Associations of Osteoarthritis Pain and Affect:
             Depression as Moderator.},
   Journal = {J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci},
   Volume = {77},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {1240-1249},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab221},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: This research examined main and moderating
             effects of global depressive symptoms upon in-the-moment
             associations of pain and affect among individuals with knee
             osteoarthritis (OA). Effects of depression on short-term
             change in pain and affect were also examined. METHOD: Older
             adults with physician-confirmed OA (N = 325) completed a
             baseline interview tapping global depressive symptoms,
             followed by an experience sampling protocol that captured
             momentary pain and affect 4 times daily for 7 days.
             Multilevel models controlling demographics and health
             conditions examined main and moderating effects of
             depression on momentary associations of pain with positive
             affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). Similar methods
             addressed short-term change in pain and affect. Auxiliary
             analyses explored broad associations of depressive symptoms
             with person-level averages and variability in pain and
             affect. RESULTS: Global depression predicted current pain,
             PA, and NA, as well as change in pain and affect over a 3-
             to 8-h period. Furthermore, both in the moment and over
             short periods, the association of pain and NA was stronger
             among persons higher in depressive symptoms. No moderating
             effect for the PA-pain association was found. Depressive
             symptoms were also associated with variability in pain and
             affect, particularly NA. DISCUSSION: Results confirm
             previous work on the relation of chronic pain with both
             global depressive symptoms and short-term affect. This
             research further demonstrates a unique moderating role of
             depression on the association of momentary pain with NA and
             suggests that the causal path may be stronger from pain to
             affect than vice versa.},
   Doi = {10.1093/geronb/gbab221},
   Key = {fds364087}
}

@article{fds363084,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Jensen, MP and Williams, ACDC and George,
             SZ},
   Title = {The yin and yang of pragmatic clinical trials of behavioral
             interventions for chronic pain: balancing design features to
             maximize impact.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {163},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {1215-1219},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002546},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002546},
   Key = {fds363084}
}

@article{fds372010,
   Author = {Smith, DH and O'Keeffe-Rosetti, M and Leo, MC and Mayhew, M and Benes,
             L and Bonifay, A and Deyo, RA and Elder, CR and Keefe, FJ and McMullen, C and Owen-Smith, A and Trinacty, CM and Vollmer, WM and DeBar,
             L},
   Title = {Economic Evaluation: A Randomized Pragmatic Trial of a
             Primary Care-based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for
             Adults Receiving Long-term Opioids for Chronic
             Pain.},
   Journal = {Medical care},
   Volume = {60},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {423-431},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001713},
   Abstract = {<h4>Background</h4>Chronic pain is prevalent and costly;
             cost-effective nonpharmacological approaches that reduce
             pain and improve patient functioning are
             needed.<h4>Objective</h4>Report the incremental
             cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), compared with usual care,
             of cognitive behavioral therapy aimed at improving
             functioning and pain among patients with chronic pain on
             long-term opioid treatment.<h4>Design</h4>Economic
             evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic cluster
             randomized trial.<h4>Subjects</h4>Adults with chronic pain
             on long-term opioid treatment (N=814).<h4>Intervention</h4>A
             cognitive behavioral therapy intervention teaching pain
             self-management skills in 12 weekly, 90-minute groups
             delivered by an interdisciplinary team (behaviorists,
             nurses) with additional support from physical therapists,
             and pharmacists.<h4>Outcome measures</h4>Cost per quality
             adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and cost per additional
             responder (≥30% improvement on standard scale assessment
             of Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity, and Sleep). Costs were
             estimated as-delivered, and replication.<h4>Results</h4>Per
             patient intervention replication costs were $2145 ($2574
             as-delivered). Those costs were completely offset by lower
             medical care costs; inclusive of the intervention, total
             medical care over follow-up was $1841 lower for intervention
             patients. Intervention group patients also had greater QALY
             and responder gains than did controls. Supplemental analyses
             using pain-related medical care costs revealed ICERs of
             $35,000, and $53,000 per QALY (for replication, and
             as-delivered intervention costs, respectively); the ICER
             when excluding patients with outlier follow-up costs was
             $106,000.<h4>Limitations</h4>Limited to 1-year follow-up;
             identification of pain-related utilization potentially
             incomplete.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The intervention was the
             optimal choice at commonly accepted levels of
             willingness-to-pay for QALY gains; this finding was robust
             to sensitivity analyses.},
   Doi = {10.1097/mlr.0000000000001713},
   Key = {fds372010}
}

@article{fds364086,
   Author = {Hurka-Richardson, K and Platts-Mills, TF and McLean, SA and Weinberger, M and Stearns, SC and Bush, M and Quackenbush, E and Chari,
             S and Aylward, A and Kroenke, K and Kerns, RD and Weaver, MA and Keefe, FJ and Berkoff, D and Meyer, ML},
   Title = {Brief Educational Video plus Telecare to Enhance Recovery
             for Older Emergency Department Patients with Acute
             Musculoskeletal Pain: an update to the study protocol for a
             randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Trials},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {400},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06310-z},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: This update describes changes to the Brief
             Educational Tool to Enhance Recovery (BETTER) trial in
             response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS/DESIGN: The
             original protocol was published in Trials. Due to the
             COVID-19 pandemic, the BETTER trial converted to remote
             recruitment in April 2020. All recruitment, consent,
             enrollment, and randomization now occur by phone within 24 h
             of the acute care visit. Other changes to the original
             protocol include an expansion of inclusion criteria and
             addition of new recruitment sites. To increase recruitment
             numbers, eligibility criteria were expanded to include
             individuals with chronic pain, non-daily opioid use within 2
             weeks of enrollment, presenting musculoskeletal pain (MSP)
             symptoms for more than 1 week, hospitalization in past 30
             days, and not the first time seeking medical treatment for
             presenting MSP pain. In addition, recruitment sites were
             expanded to other emergency departments and an orthopedic
             urgent care clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting from an
             orthopedic urgent care clinic and transitioning to remote
             operations not only allowed for continued participant
             enrollment during the pandemic but also resulted in some
             favorable outcomes, including operational efficiencies,
             increased enrollment, and broader generalizability. TRIAL
             REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04118595 . Registered on
             October 8, 2019.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s13063-022-06310-z},
   Key = {fds364086}
}

@article{fds360048,
   Author = {Scullin, MK and Jones, WE and Phenis, R and Beevers, S and Rosen, S and Dinh, K and Kiselica, A and Keefe, FJ and Benge, JF},
   Title = {Using smartphone technology to improve prospective memory
             functioning: A randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {J Am Geriatr Soc},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {459-469},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17551},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: A decline in the ability to perform daily
             intentions-known as prospective memory-is a key driver of
             everyday functional impairment in dementia. In the absence
             of effective pharmacological treatments, there is a need for
             developing, testing, and optimizing behavioral interventions
             that can bolster daily prospective memory functioning. We
             investigated the feasibility and efficacy of
             smartphone-based strategies for prospective memory in
             persons with cognitive impairment. METHODS: Fifty-two older
             adults (74.79 ± 7.20 years) meeting diagnostic
             criteria for mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia were
             enrolled in a 4-week randomized controlled trial.
             Participants were trained to use a digital voice recorder
             app or a reminder app to off-load prospective memory
             intentions. Prospective memory was assessed using
             experimenter-assigned tasks (e.g., call the laboratory on
             assigned days), standardized questionnaires, and structured
             interviews. Secondary dependent measures included days of
             phone and app usage, acceptability ratings, quality of life,
             and independent activities of daily living. RESULTS:
             Participant ratings indicated that the intervention was
             acceptable and feasible. Furthermore, after the four-week
             intervention, participants reported improvements in daily
             prospective memory functioning on standardized
             questionnaires (p < 0.001, ηp2  = 0.285) and the
             structured interview (p < 0.001, d = 1.75).
             Participants performed relatively well on
             experimenter-assigned prospective memory tasks
             (51.7% ± 27.8%), with performance levels favoring the
             reminder app in Week 1, but reversing to favor the digital
             recorder app in Week 4 (p = 0.010, ηp2  = 0.079).
             Correlational analyses indicated that greater usage of the
             digital recorder or reminder app was associated with better
             prospective memory performance and greater improvements in
             instrumental activities of daily living (completed by care
             partners), even when controlling for condition, age,
             baseline cognitive functioning, and baseline smartphone
             experience. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with cognitive
             disorders can learn smartphone-based memory strategies and
             doing so benefits prospective memory functioning and
             independence.},
   Doi = {10.1111/jgs.17551},
   Key = {fds360048}
}

@article{fds362179,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Managing Acute Pain With Opioids in the Emergency
             Department: A Teachable Moment?},
   Journal = {Am J Public Health},
   Volume = {112},
   Number = {S1},
   Pages = {S9-S11},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306748},
   Doi = {10.2105/AJPH.2022.306748},
   Key = {fds362179}
}

@article{fds362832,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Jensen, MP and Thorn, B and Lillis, TA and Carmody, J and Newman, AK and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and
             behavior therapy for the treatment of chronic pain:
             randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {163},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {376-389},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002357},
   Abstract = {Trials of cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness-based stress
             reduction (MBSR), and behavior therapy (BT) suggest that all
             3 treatments produce reductions in pain and improvements in
             physical function, mood, and sleep disturbance in people
             with chronic pain conditions. Fewer studies have compared
             the relative efficacies of these treatments. In this
             randomized controlled study, we compared CT, MBSR, BT, and
             treatment as usual (TAU) in a sample of people with chronic
             low back pain (N = 521). Eight individual sessions were
             administered with weekly assessments of outcomes. Consistent
             with the prior work, we found that CT, MBSR, and BT produced
             similar pretreatment to posttreatment effects on all
             outcomes and revealed similar levels of maintenance of
             treatment gains at 6-month follow-up. All 3 active
             treatments produced greater improvements than TAU. Weekly
             assessments allowed us to assess rates of change; ie, how
             quickly a given treatment produced significant differences,
             compared with TAU, on a given outcome. The 3 treatments
             differed significantly from TAU on average by session 6, and
             this rate of treatment effect was consistent across all
             treatments. Results suggest the possibility that the
             specific techniques included in CT, MBSR, and BT may be less
             important for producing benefits than people participating
             in any techniques rooted in these evidence-based
             psychosocial treatments for chronic pain.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002357},
   Key = {fds362832}
}

@article{fds359697,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Blumenthal, JA and Dorfman, CS and Huffman, KM and Edmond, SN and Miller, SN and Wren, AA and Caldwell, D and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Effects of a Weight and Pain Management Program in Patients
             With Rheumatoid Arthritis With Obesity: A Randomized
             Controlled Pilot Investigation.},
   Journal = {J Clin Rheumatol},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {7-13},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000001793},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with poor outcomes for
             patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Effective weight
             management is imperative. Although traditional lifestyle
             behavioral weight loss programs have demonstrated efficacy
             for reducing weight, these interventions do not meet the
             pain-related weight loss challenges of RA patients with
             obesity. OBJECTIVE: A 12-session group program (90 minutes
             per session) was developed integrating pain coping skills
             training into a lifestyle behavioral weight loss
             intervention. In addition to the weekly group sessions,
             participants engaged in supervised exercise sessions 3 times
             per week. METHODS: Through a small, pilot randomized trial,
             50 participants were randomized to receive the intervention
             (n = 29) or standard care of RA (n = 21). Feasibility data
             (i.e., accrual, attrition, adherence) was examined using
             descriptive statistics (e.g., percent). We examined patterns
             of change in study outcomes from baseline to follow-up
             separately for the intervention and standard care arms using
             descriptive statistics and paired t tests. Effect sizes are
             also presented. RESULTS: Of those randomized to the
             intervention group,79.3% initiated treatment, with
             participants attending 74.3% of group skills sessions and
             64.2% of exercise sessions. Intervention participants
             evidenced reductions in weight (mean, -2.28 kg) and waist
             circumference (mean, -4.76 cm) and improvements in physical
             functioning, eating behaviors, pain, and self-efficacy for
             weight control. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that
             incorporating a combined pain coping skills training and
             behavioral weight loss intervention into medical management
             of RA may improve outcomes. Study accrual and attrition, as
             well as intervention adherence, will inform future, larger
             randomized efficacy trials of the intervention.Retrospectively
             registered: January 29, 2020, NCT04246827.},
   Doi = {10.1097/RHU.0000000000001793},
   Key = {fds359697}
}

@article{fds362590,
   Author = {DeBar, L and Mayhew, M and Benes, L and Bonifay, A and Deyo, RA and Elder,
             CR and Keefe, FJ and Leo, MC and McMullen, C and Owen-Smith, A and Smith,
             DH and Trinacty, CM and Vollmer, WM},
   Title = {A Primary Care-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
             Intervention for Long-Term Opioid Users With Chronic Pain :
             A Randomized Pragmatic Trial.},
   Journal = {Ann Intern Med},
   Volume = {175},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {46-55},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M21-1436},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is common, disabling, and costly.
             Few clinical trials have examined cognitive behavioral
             therapy (CBT) interventions embedded in primary care
             settings to improve chronic pain among those receiving
             long-term opioid therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the
             effectiveness of a group-based CBT intervention for chronic
             pain. DESIGN: Pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled
             trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02113592). SETTING: Kaiser
             Permanente health care systems in Georgia, Hawaii, and the
             Northwest. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (aged ≥18 years) with
             mixed chronic pain conditions receiving long-term opioid
             therapy. INTERVENTION: A CBT intervention teaching pain
             self-management skills in 12 weekly, 90-minute groups
             delivered by an interdisciplinary team (behaviorist, nurse,
             physical therapist, and pharmacist) versus usual care.
             MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported pain impact (primary outcome, as
             measured by the PEGS scale [pain intensity and interference
             with enjoyment of life, general activity, and sleep]) was
             assessed quarterly over 12 months. Pain-related disability,
             satisfaction with care, and opioid and benzodiazepine use
             based on electronic health care data were secondary
             outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 850 patients participated,
             representing 106 clusters of primary care providers (mean
             age, 60.3 years; 67.4% women); 816 (96.0%) completed
             follow-up assessments. Intervention patients sustained
             larger reductions on all self-reported outcomes from
             baseline to 12-month follow-up; the change in PEGS score was
             -0.434 point (95% CI, -0.690 to -0.178 point) for pain
             impact, and the change in pain-related disability was -0.060
             point (CI, -0.084 to -0.035 point). At 6 months,
             intervention patients reported higher satisfaction with
             primary care (difference, 0.230 point [CI, 0.053 to 0.406
             point]) and pain services (difference, 0.336 point [CI,
             0.129 to 0.543 point]). Benzodiazepine use decreased more in
             the intervention group (absolute risk difference, -0.055
             [CI, -0.099 to -0.011]), but opioid use did not differ
             significantly between groups. LIMITATION: The inclusion of
             only patients with insurance in large integrated health care
             systems limited generalizability, and the clinical effect of
             change in scores is unclear. CONCLUSION: Primary care-based
             CBT, using frontline clinicians, produced modest but
             sustained reductions in measures of pain and pain-related
             disability compared with usual care but did not reduce use
             of opioid medication. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National
             Institutes of Health.},
   Doi = {10.7326/M21-1436},
   Key = {fds362590}
}

@article{fds362793,
   Author = {Winger, JG and Ramos, K and Kelleher, SA and Somers, TJ and Steinhauser,
             KE and Porter, LS and Kamal, AH and Breitbart, WS and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Meaning-Centered Pain Coping Skills Training: A Pilot
             Feasibility Trial of a Psychosocial Pain Management
             Intervention for Patients with Advanced Cancer.},
   Journal = {J Palliat Med},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {60-69},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2021.0081},
   Abstract = {Background: Pain from advanced cancer can greatly reduce
             patients' physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being.
             Objective: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a
             behavioral pain management intervention, Meaning-Centered
             Pain Coping Skills Training (MCPC). Design: This trial used
             a single-arm feasibility design. Setting/Subjects: Thirty
             participants with stage IV solid tumor cancer,
             moderate-to-severe pain, and clinically elevated distress
             were enrolled from a tertiary cancer center in the United
             States. The manualized protocol was delivered across four
             45- to 60-minute videoconference sessions. Measurements:
             Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through accrual,
             session/assessment completion, intervention satisfaction,
             and coping skills usage. Participants completed validated
             measures of primary outcomes (i.e., pain severity, pain
             interference, and spiritual well-being) and secondary
             outcomes at baseline, post-intervention, and four-week
             follow-up. Results: Eighty-eight percent (38/43) of patients
             who completed screening met inclusion criteria, and 79%
             (30/38) consented and completed baseline assessment.
             Sixty-seven percent (20/30) of participants were female
             (mean age = 57). Most participants were White/Caucasian
             (77%; 23/30) or Black/African American (17%; 5/30) with at
             least some college education (90%; 27/30). Completion rates
             for intervention sessions and both post-intervention
             assessments were 90% (27/30), 87% (26/30), and 77% (23/30),
             respectively. At the post-intervention assessment,
             participants reported a high degree of intervention
             satisfaction (mean = 3.53/4.00; SD = 0.46), and 81%
             (21/26) reported weekly use of coping skills that they
             learned. Participants also showed improvement from baseline
             on all primary outcomes and nearly all secondary outcomes at
             both post-intervention assessments. Conclusions: MCPC
             demonstrated strong feasibility and acceptability. Findings
             warrant further evaluation of MCPC in a randomized
             controlled trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
             NCT03207360.},
   Doi = {10.1089/jpm.2021.0081},
   Key = {fds362793}
}

@article{fds363083,
   Author = {Dorfman, CS and Somers, TJ and Shelby, RA and Winger, JG and Patel, ML and Kimmick, G and Craighead, L and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {DEVELOPMENT, FEASIBILITY, AND ACCEPTABILITY OF A BEHAVIORAL
             WEIGHT AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION FOR BREAST CANCER
             SURVIVORS AND INTIMATE PARTNERS.},
   Journal = {J Cancer Rehabil},
   Volume = {5},
   Pages = {7-16},
   Year = {2022},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.48252/JCR57},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Weight gain is common for breast cancer
             survivors and associated with disease progression,
             recurrence, and mortality. Traditional behavioral programs
             fail to address symptoms (i.e., pain, fatigue, distress)
             experienced by breast cancer survivors that may interfere
             with weight loss and fail to capitalize on the concordance
             in weight-related health behaviors of couples. This study
             aimed to develop and examine the feasibility and
             acceptability of a behavioral weight and symptom management
             intervention for breast cancer survivors and their intimate
             partners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interviews were conducted
             with N=14 couples with overweight/obesity to develop the
             intervention. Intervention feasibility and acceptability
             were examined through a single-arm pilot trial (N=12
             couples). Patterns of change in intervention targets were
             examined for survivors and partners. RESULTS: Themes derived
             from interviews were used to develop the 12-session
             couple-based intervention, which included components from
             traditional behavioral weight management interventions,
             appetite awareness training, and cognitive and behavioral
             symptom management protocols. Couples also worked together
             to set goals, create plans for health behavior change, and
             adjust systemic and relationship barriers to weight loss.
             Examples were tailored to the experiences and symptom
             management needs of breast cancer survivors and partners.
             The intervention demonstrated feasibility (attrition: 8%;
             session completion: 88%) and acceptability (satisfaction).
             Survivors and partners experienced reductions in weight and
             improvements in physical activity, eating behaviors,
             emotional distress, and self-efficacy. Survivors evidenced
             improvements in fatigue and pain. CONCLUSIONS: A behavioral
             weight and symptom management intervention for breast cancer
             survivors and partners is feasible, acceptable, and is
             potentially efficacious.},
   Doi = {10.48252/JCR57},
   Key = {fds363083}
}

@article{fds371050,
   Author = {Colloca, L and Murthi, S and Keefe, FJ and Varshney,
             A},
   Title = {VIRTUAL REALITY: FROM PAIN TO RACIAL BIASES},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {56},
   Number = {SUPP 1},
   Pages = {S604-S604},
   Year = {2022},
   Key = {fds371050}
}

@article{fds376459,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {VIRTUAL REALITY: AN APPROACH TAILORED TO SPECIFIC PAIN
             DISORDERS},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {56},
   Number = {SUPP 1},
   Pages = {S604-S604},
   Year = {2022},
   Key = {fds376459}
}

@article{fds361414,
   Author = {Eccleston, C and Keefe, FJ and de C Williams and AC},
   Title = {Basic and applied psychology in PAIN: where we have been and
             where we are headed.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {162},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {2785-2788},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002414},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002414},
   Key = {fds361414}
}

@article{fds359696,
   Author = {Sterling, M and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Physical rehabilitation research and pain
             science.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {162},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {2621-2624},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002326},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002326},
   Key = {fds359696}
}

@article{fds358053,
   Author = {Kelleher, SA and Fisher, HM and Winger, JG and Somers, TJ and Uronis,
             HE and Wright, AN and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Feasibility, engagement, and acceptability of a behavioral
             pain management intervention for colorectal cancer survivors
             with pain and psychological distress: data from a pilot
             randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {5361-5369},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06126-8},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer survivors report pain and
             psychological distress to be burdensome long-term cancer
             consequences. Quality cancer survivorship care includes
             interventions for managing these symptoms. Yet, no studies
             have tested the efficacy of an accessible behavioral
             intervention for colorectal cancer survivors with pain and
             comorbid psychological distress. This paper reports on the
             feasibility (i.e., accrual, attrition, and adherence to
             study procedures), engagement, acceptability, and
             descriptive outcomes of a telephone-based coping skills
             training (CST) intervention. METHODS: This randomized pilot
             trial assigned colorectal cancer patients (N=31) to 5
             sessions of CST or standard care. CST sessions focused on
             cognitive-behavioral theory-based coping skills tailored to
             colorectal cancer symptoms of pain and psychological
             distress. Participants completed assessments of pain
             severity, self-efficacy for pain management, health-related
             quality of life, and psychological distress at baseline,
             post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Data
             indicated strong feasibility, evidenced by high completion
             rates for intervention sessions and assessments (93%
             completed all sessions; M=48.7 days; baseline=100%;
             post-treatment=97%; 3-month follow-up=94%). Participants
             demonstrated robust engagement with CST (M days per week
             with reported skills use=3.8) and reported high protocol
             satisfaction (M=3.6/4.0). Descriptive statistics showed
             self-efficacy for pain management and health-related quality
             of life improved for all participants. CONCLUSION: Findings
             suggest that a telephone-based CST intervention has strong
             feasibility, evidenced by accrual, low attrition, and
             adherence to intervention sessions and assessments.
             Likewise, participant engagement and acceptability with CST
             were high. These data provide a foundation for larger
             randomized efficacy trials of the telephone-based CST
             intervention.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-021-06126-8},
   Key = {fds358053}
}

@article{fds359064,
   Author = {Myers, H and Keefe, F and George, SZ and Kennedy, J and Lake, AD and Martinez, C and Cook, C},
   Title = {The influence of a cognitive behavioural approach on
             changing patient expectations for conservative care in
             shoulder pain treatment: a protocol for a pragmatic
             randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {727},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04588-9},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Despite similar outcomes for surgery and
             conservative care, the number of surgeries to treat rotator
             cuff related shoulder pain has increased. Interventions
             designed to enhance treatment expectations for conservative
             care have been shown to improve patient expectations, but no
             studies have yet explored whether such interventions
             influence patient decisions to pursue surgery. The purpose
             of this randomized clinical trial is to examine the effect
             of an intervention designed to improve expectations of
             conservative care on the decision to have surgery. METHODS:
             We will test the effectiveness of the Patient Engagement, Education,
             and Restructuring of Cognitions (PEERC) intervention which
             is intended to change expectations regarding conservative
             care. The PEERC intervention will be evaluated in a
             randomized, pragmatic "add-on" trial, to better understand
             the effect the intervention has on outcomes. Ninety-four
             (94) participants with rotator cuff related shoulder pain
             referred for physical therapy will be randomized to receive
             either impairment-based care or impairment-based care plus
             PEERC. Both groups will receive impairment-based
             conservative treatment created by compiling the evidence
             associated with established, effective interventions.
             Participants assigned to the impairment-based care plus
             PEERC condition will also receive the PEERC intervention.
             This intervention, informed by principles of cognitive
             behavioral therapy, involves three components: (1)
             strategies to enhance engagement, (2) education and (3)
             cognitive restructuring and behavioral activation. Outcomes
             will be assessed at multiple points between enrolment and
             six months after discharge. The primary outcome is patient
             reported decision to have surgery and the secondary outcomes
             are pain, function, expectations and satisfaction with
             conservative care. DISCUSSION: Rotator cuff related shoulder
             pain is highly prevalent, and because conservative and
             surgical treatments have similar outcomes, an intervention
             that changes expectations about conservative care could
             alter patient reports of their decision to have surgery and
             ultimately could lead to lower healthcare costs and
             decreased risk of surgical complications. TRIAL
             REGISTRATION: This study is registered as NCT03353272 at
             ClincialTrials.gov.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s12891-021-04588-9},
   Key = {fds359064}
}

@article{fds353293,
   Author = {Rini, C and Katz, AWK and Nwadugbo, A and Porter, LS and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Changes in Identification of Possible Pain Coping Strategies
             by People with Osteoarthritis who Complete Web-based Pain
             Coping Skills Training.},
   Journal = {Int J Behav Med},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {488-498},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09938-w},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that automated,
             Web-based pain coping skills training (PCST) can reduce
             osteoarthritis pain. The present secondary analyses examined
             whether this program also changed coping strategies
             participants identified for use in hypothetical pain-related
             situations. METHOD: People with hip/knee osteoarthritis
             (n = 107) were randomized to Web-based PCST or standard
             care control. At baseline and post-intervention, they
             reported their pain severity and impairment, then completed
             a task in which they described how they would cope with pain
             in four hypothetical pain-related situations, also reporting
             their perceived risk for pain and self-efficacy for managing
             it. We coded the generated coping strategies into counts of
             adaptive behavioral, maladaptive behavioral, adaptive
             cognitive, and discrete adaptive coping strategies (coping
             repertoire). RESULTS: Compared to the control arm, Web-based
             PCST decreased the number of maladaptive behavioral
             strategies generated (p = 0.002) while increasing the
             number of adaptive behavioral strategies generated
             (p = 0.006), likelihood of generating at least one
             adaptive cognitive strategy (p = 0.01), and the size of
             participants' coping repertoire (p = 0.009). Several of
             these changes were associated with changes in pain outcomes
             (ps = 0.01 to 0.65). Web-based PCST also reduced perceived
             risk for pain in the situations (p = 0.03) and increased
             self-efficacy for avoiding pain in similar situations
             (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Salutary changes found in this
             study appear to reflect intervention-concordant
             learning.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12529-020-09938-w},
   Key = {fds353293}
}

@article{fds357342,
   Author = {Allen, KD and Beauchamp, T and Rini, C and Keefe, FJ and Bennell, KL and Cleveland, RJ and Grimm, K and Huffman, K and Hu, DG and Santana, A and Saxena Beem and S and Walker, J and Sheikh, SZ},
   Title = {Pilot study of an internet-based pain coping skills training
             program for patients with systemic Lupus
             Erythematosus.},
   Journal = {BMC Rheumatol},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {20},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-021-00191-6},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
             often experience pain and other symptoms that negatively
             impact quality of life. Interventions that enhance the use
             of behavioral and cognitive coping strategies may lead to
             improved outcomes among patients with SLE. Pain coping
             skills training (PCST) programs have been shown to improve
             outcomes among patients with other rheumatic conditions, but
             there have been no trials of PCST among patients with SLE.
             This study was a preliminary assessment of the feasibility
             and efficacy of painTRAINER, an automated, internet-based
             PCST program, among patients with SLE. METHODS: Participants
             (n = 60) with SLE from one health care system were
             randomly assigned with equal allocation to painTRAINER or a
             wait list control group. PainTRAINER involves 8 modules;
             participants were instructed to complete one module weekly,
             along with practice activities for each cognitive or
             behavioral coping skill. Outcome measures were assessed at
             baseline and 9-week follow-up, including the Pain
             Catastrophizing Scale, PROMIS Subscales (Pain Interference,
             Physical Function, Sleep Disturbance, Anxiety, Depression,
             Fatigue and Participation), and the LupusPRO questionnaire.
             Mean changes in outcomes from baseline to follow up and
             Cohen's d effect sizes were computed. RESULTS: Effect sizes
             for the painTRAINER group (relative to the wait list group)
             were small, with changes being greatest for the PROMIS
             Depression score (d = - 0.32). Among those randomized
             to the painTRAINER group, 50% accessed the program
             ("painTRAINER users"). Most of those who did not access the
             program stated that they did not receive instructions via
             email. Effect sizes for "painTRAINER users" (relative to
             wait list) were larger than for the whole painTRAINER group:
             Pain Catastrophizing d = - 0.60, PROMIS Pain
             Interference d = - 0.3., PROMIS Depression
             d = - 0.44, LupusPRO Health-Related Quality of Life
             d = 0.30. CONCLUSIONS: PainTRAINER users reported
             meaningful improvements in multiple physical and
             psychological outcomes, supporting the potential of PCST
             programs to benefit individuals with SLE. However,
             strategies are needed to improve engagement with the program
             and tailor content to comprehensively address key SLE
             symptoms and challenges. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03933839 ,
             May 1, 2019.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s41927-021-00191-6},
   Key = {fds357342}
}

@article{fds353294,
   Author = {Carson, JW and Carson, KM and Olsen, M and Sanders, L and Westbrook, K and Keefe, FJ and Porter, LS},
   Title = {Yoga Practice Predicts Improvements in Day-to-Day Pain in
             Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {61},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {1227-1233},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.009},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
             experience a significant symptom burden, including cancer
             pain. Yoga is a mind-body discipline that has shown promise
             for alleviating cancer pain, but few studies have included
             patients with metastatic disease or examined the acute
             effects of yoga practice. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether
             daily pain changed significantly during a randomized
             controlled trial of the Mindful Yoga program among women
             with MBC and whether time spent in yoga practice was related
             to daily pain. METHODS: On alternate weeks during the
             intervention period, we collected daily measures of pain
             from a subset of 48 women randomized to either yoga
             (n = 30) or a support group condition (n = 18). We also
             assessed daily duration of yoga practice among patients
             randomized to yoga. RESULTS: Pain levels were low for women
             in both conditions, and no differential treatment effects
             were found on daily pain. However, among women randomized to
             yoga, a dose/response relationship was found between yoga
             practice duration and daily pain. When patients had spent
             relatively more time practicing yoga across two consecutive
             days, they were more likely to experience lower pain on the
             next day. This finding is consistent with an earlier MBC
             study. Meditation practice showed the strongest association
             with lower daily pain. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that
             yoga practice (meditation practice in particular) is
             associated with acute improvements in cancer pain, and that
             yoga interventions may be more impactful if tested in a
             sample of patients with advanced cancer in which pain is
             relatively elevated.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.009},
   Key = {fds353294}
}

@article{fds356950,
   Author = {Riddle, DL and Slover, J and Keefe, FJ and Ang, DC and Dumenci, L and Perera, RA},
   Title = {Racial Differences in Pain and Function Following Knee
             Arthroplasty: A Secondary Analysis From a Multicenter
             Randomized Clinical Trial.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)},
   Volume = {73},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {810-817},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.24177},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The assessment of racial differences in pain and
             function outcome following knee arthroplasty (KA) has
             received little attention despite very substantial
             literature exploring a variety of other prognostic factors.
             The present study was undertaken to determine whether race
             was associated with KA outcome after accounting for
             potential confounding factors. METHODS: We conducted a
             secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of 384
             participants with moderate-to-high pain catastrophizing who
             underwent KA. Preoperative measures included race/ethnicity
             status as well as a variety of potential confounders,
             including socioeconomic status, comorbidity, and bodily
             pain. Outcome measures were Western Ontario and McMaster
             Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function
             scales as well as performance measures. Linear mixed-effects
             models compared outcomes over a 1-year follow-up period for
             African American versus non-African American participants.
             RESULTS: WOMAC pain scores differences for African American
             versus non-African American participants averaged ~2 points
             in unadjusted analyses and 1-1.5 points in adjusted
             analyses. In adjusted analyses, follow-up WOMAC function
             scores differed by 6 points for African Americans compared
             to non-African Americans (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: African
             Americans generally had worse pain, function, and
             performance prior to KA and worse scores after surgery, but
             differences were small and attenuated by ~25-50% after
             adjustment for potential confounding. Only WOMAC function
             scores showed clinically important postsurgical differences
             in adjusted analyses. Clinicians should be aware that after
             adjustment for potential confounders, African Americans have
             approximately equivalent outcomes compared to others, with
             the exception of WOMAC function score.},
   Doi = {10.1002/acr.24177},
   Key = {fds356950}
}

@article{fds355883,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Steel, JL and Fairclough, DL and LeBlanc, TW and Bull, J and Hanson, LC and Fischer, S and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients
             with advanced cancer: Results from a randomized clinical
             trial.},
   Journal = {Palliat Med},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {952-961},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163211004216},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Pain is a major concern among patients with
             advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Evidence
             suggests that pain coping skills training interventions can
             improve outcomes, however they have rarely been tested in
             this population. AIM: To test the efficacy of a
             caregiver-guided pain coping skills training intervention.
             The primary outcome was caregiver self-efficacy for helping
             the patient manage pain. DESIGN: A randomized controlled
             trial compared the intervention to an enhanced
             treatment-as-usual control. Dyads in both conditions
             received pain education, and those in the intervention
             received three sessions of pain coping skills training.
             Caregiver outcomes (self-efficacy; caregiver strain,
             caregiving satisfaction, psychological distress) and patient
             outcomes (self-efficacy, pain intensity and interference,
             psychological distress) were collected at baseline and
             post-intervention. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred two
             patients with stage III-IV cancer and pain and their family
             caregivers were enrolled from four outpatient oncology
             clinics and a free-standing hospice/palliative care
             organization. RESULTS: Compared to those in the control arm,
             caregivers in the intervention reported significant
             increases in caregiving satisfaction (p < 0.01) and
             decreased anxiety (p = 0.04). In both conditions,
             caregivers reported improvements in self-efficacy, and
             patients reported improvements in self-efficacy, pain
             severity and interference, and psychological distress.
             CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to test a pain coping
             skills intervention targeted to patients and caregivers
             facing advanced cancer. Findings suggest that pain education
             provides benefits for patients and caregivers, and coping
             skills training may be beneficial for caregivers. Further
             research is needed to optimize the benefits of education and
             pain coping skills training for improving cancer pain
             outcomes.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02430467,
             Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training in Palliative
             Care.},
   Doi = {10.1177/02692163211004216},
   Key = {fds355883}
}

@article{fds358054,
   Author = {Kelleher, SA and Winger, JG and Fisher, HM and Miller, SN and Reed, SD and Thorn, BE and Spring, B and Samsa, GP and Majestic, CM and Shelby, RA and Sutton, LM and Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Behavioral cancer pain intervention using videoconferencing
             and a mobile application for medically underserved patients:
             Rationale, design, and methods of a prospective multisite
             randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {102},
   Pages = {106287},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106287},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Women with breast cancer in medically
             underserved areas are particularly vulnerable to persistent
             pain and disability. Behavioral pain interventions reduce
             pain and improve outcomes. Cancer patients in medically
             underserved areas receive limited adjunctive cancer care, as
             many lack access to pain therapists trained in behavioral
             interventions, face travel barriers to regional medical
             centers, and may have low literacy and limited resources.
             mHealth technologies have the potential to decrease barriers
             but must be carefully adapted for, and efficacy-tested with,
             medically underserved patients. We developed an mHealth
             behavioral pain coping skills training intervention
             (mPCST-Community). We now utilize a multisite randomized
             controlled trial to: 1) test the extent mPCST-Community
             reduces breast cancer patients' pain severity (primary
             outcome), pain interference, fatigue, physical disability,
             and psychological distress; 2) examine potential mediators
             of intervention effects; and 3) evaluate the intervention's
             cost and cost-effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: Breast cancer
             patients (N = 180) will be randomized to mPCST-Community
             or an attention control. mPCST-Community's four-session
             protocol will be delivered via videoconferencing at an
             underserved community clinic by a remote pain therapist at a
             major medical center. Videoconference sessions will be
             supplemented with a mobile application. Participants will
             complete self-report measures at baseline,
             post-intervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-ups.
             CONCLUSIONS: mPCST-Community has the potential to reduce
             pain and disability, and decrease barriers for cancer
             patients in medically underserved areas. This is one of the
             first trials to test an mHealth behavioral cancer pain
             intervention developed specifically for medically
             underserved communities. If successful, it could lead to
             widespread implementation and decreased health
             disparities.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2021.106287},
   Key = {fds358054}
}

@article{fds355632,
   Author = {Griesemer, I and Hausmann, LR and Arbeeva, L and Campbell, LC and Cené,
             CW and Coffman, CJ and Keefe, FJ and Oddone, EZ and Somers, TJ and Allen,
             KD},
   Title = {Discrimination Experiences and Depressive Symptoms among
             African Americans with Osteoarthritis Enrolled in a Pain
             Coping Skills Training Randomized Controlled
             Trial.},
   Journal = {J Health Care Poor Underserved},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {145-155},
   Year = {2021},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2021.0014},
   Abstract = {African Americans are more likely than members of other
             racial groups to report perceived discrimination in health
             care settings, and discrimination is linked to depression.
             Using data from a randomized controlled trial of pain coping
             skills training (PCST) for African Americans with
             osteoarthritis (N=164), we evaluated the interaction between
             discrimination experiences and experimental condition (PCST
             or control group) in linear regression models predicting
             depressive symptoms. There was a significant interaction
             between personal discrimination and experimental condition
             on depressive symptoms (interaction term coefficient:
             b=-3.2, 95% CI [- 6.4, - .02], p=.05). Discrimination was
             associated with depressive symptoms among those in the
             control group but not among those who received PCST.
             Participation in a PCST intervention may have reduced the
             association between discrimination experiences and
             depressive symptoms among participants in this sample.
             Future research should explore whether interventions aimed
             at teaching coping skills may be effective in ameliorating
             the harmful mental health effects of perceived
             discrimination.},
   Doi = {10.1353/hpu.2021.0014},
   Key = {fds355632}
}

@article{fds362376,
   Author = {Langer, SL and Romano, JM and Keefe, F and Baucom, DH and Strauman, T and Syrjala, KL and Bolger, N and Burns, J and Bricker, JB and Todd, M and Baucom, BRW and Fischer, MS and Ghosh, N and Gralow, J and Shankaran, V and Zafar, SY and Westbrook, K and Leo, K and Ramos, K and Weber, DM and Porter, LS},
   Title = {Couple Communication in Cancer: Protocol for a Multi-Method
             Examination.},
   Journal = {Front Psychol},
   Volume = {12},
   Pages = {769407},
   Year = {2021},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769407},
   Abstract = {Cancer and its treatment pose challenges that affect not
             only patients but also their significant others, including
             intimate partners. Accumulating evidence suggests that
             couples' ability to communicate effectively plays a major
             role in the psychological adjustment of both individuals and
             the quality of their relationship. Two key conceptual models
             have been proposed to account for how couple communication
             impacts psychological and relationship adjustment: the
             social-cognitive processing (SCP) model and the relationship
             intimacy (RI) model. These models posit different mechanisms
             and outcomes, and thus have different implications for
             intervention. The purpose of this project is to test and
             compare the utility of these models using comprehensive and
             methodologically rigorous methods. Aims are: (1) to examine
             the overall fit of the SCP and RI models in explaining
             patient and partner psychological and relationship
             adjustment as they occur on a day-to-day basis and over the
             course of 1 year; (2) to examine the fit of the models for
             different subgroups (males vs. females, and patients vs.
             partners); and (3) to examine the utility of various methods
             of assessing communication by examining the degree to which
             baseline indices from different measurement strategies
             predict self-reported adjustment at 1-year follow up. The
             study employs a longitudinal, multi-method approach to
             examining communication processes including: standard
             self-report questionnaires assessing process and outcome
             variables collected quarterly over the course of 1 year;
             smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments to sample
             participant reports in real time; and laboratory-based
             couple conversations from which we derive observational
             measures of communicative behavior and affective expression,
             as well as vocal indices of emotional arousal. Participants
             are patients with stage II-IV breast, colon, rectal, or lung
             cancer and their spouses/partners, recruited from two
             NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers. Results will be
             published in scientific journals, presented at scientific
             conferences, and conveyed to a larger audience through
             infographics and social media outlets. Findings will inform
             theory, measurement, and the design and implementation of
             efficacious interventions aimed at optimizing both patient
             and partner well-being.},
   Doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769407},
   Key = {fds362376}
}

@article{fds371051,
   Author = {Winger, JG and Somers, TJ and Steinhauser, KE and Porter, LS and Ramos,
             K and Kamal, AH and Breitbart, WS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {MEANING-CENTERED PAIN COPING SKILLS TRAINING: A PILOT TRIAL
             OF A PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTION FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED
             CANCER},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {55},
   Pages = {S302-S302},
   Year = {2021},
   Key = {fds371051}
}

@article{fds371052,
   Author = {Porter, LS and McDaniel, H and Keefe, FJ and Langer,
             S},
   Title = {PARENTING CONCERNS IN COUPLES COPING WITH CANCER:
             ASSOCIATIONS WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL AND RELATIONSHIP
             FUNCTIONING},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {55},
   Pages = {S540-S540},
   Year = {2021},
   Key = {fds371052}
}

@article{fds371053,
   Author = {Van Denburg and AN and Porter, LS and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Rini,
             CM},
   Title = {SOCIAL SUPPORT AND HINDRANCE AMONG PATIENTS WITH
             OSTEOARTHRITIS COMPLETING WEB-BASED PAIN COPING SKILLS
             TRAINING},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {55},
   Pages = {S424-S424},
   Year = {2021},
   Key = {fds371053}
}

@article{fds371054,
   Author = {Van Denburg and AN and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Soo, MS and McDaniel,
             H},
   Title = {IMPACT OF CONTROLLED BREATHING AND MUSIC ON PAIN IN WOMEN
             UNDERGOING MRI-GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED
             TRIAL},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {55},
   Pages = {S269-S269},
   Year = {2021},
   Key = {fds371054}
}

@article{fds372551,
   Author = {Dorfman, CS and Stalls, J and Shelby, RA and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Oeffinger, KC},
   Title = {DEVELOPMENT OF A BEHAVIORAL SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION
             FOR SURVIVORS OF YOUNG ADULT CANCER},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {55},
   Pages = {S144-S144},
   Year = {2021},
   Key = {fds372551}
}

@article{fds354531,
   Author = {George, SZ and Coffman, CJ and Allen, KD and Lentz, TA and Choate, A and Goode, AP and Simon, CB and Grubber, JM and King, H and Cook, CE and Keefe,
             FJ and Ballengee, LA and Naylor, J and Brothers, JL and Stanwyck, C and Alkon, A and Hastings, SN},
   Title = {Improving Veteran Access to Integrated Management of Back
             Pain (AIM-Back): Protocol for an Embedded Pragmatic
             Cluster-Randomized Trial.},
   Journal = {Pain Med},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {Suppl 2},
   Pages = {S62-S72},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa348},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Coordinated efforts between the National
             Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense, and the
             Department of Veterans Affairs have built the capacity for
             large-scale clinical research investigating the
             effectiveness of nonpharmacologic pain treatments. This is
             an encouraging development; however, what constitutes best
             practice for nonpharmacologic management of low back pain
             (LBP) is largely unknown. DESIGN: The Improving Veteran
             Access to Integrated Management of Back Pain (AIM-Back)
             trial is an embedded pragmatic cluster-randomized trial that
             will examine the effectiveness of two different care
             pathways for LBP. Sixteen primary care clinics will be
             randomized 1:1 to receive training in delivery of 1) an
             integrated sequenced-care pathway or 2) a coordinated pain
             navigator pathway. Primary outcomes are pain interference
             and physical function (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement
             Information System Short Form [PROMIS-SF]) collected in the
             electronic health record at 3 months (n=1,680). A subset of
             veteran participants (n=848) have consented to complete
             additional surveys at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months
             for supplementary pain and other measures. SUMMARY: AIM-Back
             care pathways will be tested for effectiveness, and
             treatment heterogeneity will be investigated to identify
             which veterans may respond best to a given pathway. Health
             care utilization patterns (including opioid use) will also
             be compared between care pathways. Therefore, the AIM-Back
             trial will provide important information that can inform the
             future delivery of nonpharmacologic treatment of
             LBP.},
   Doi = {10.1093/pm/pnaa348},
   Key = {fds354531}
}

@article{fds353849,
   Author = {Lawford, BJ and Hinman, RS and Nelligan, RK and Keefe, F and Rini, C and Bennell, KL},
   Title = {"I Could Do It in My Own Time and When I Really Needed It":
             Perceptions of Online Pain Coping Skills Training For People
             With Knee Osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)},
   Volume = {72},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1736-1746},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.24093},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively explore the perceptions and
             experiences of people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who used
             an online automated pain coping skills training program
             (PCST). METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study
             (based on interpretivist methodology) embedded within a
             randomized controlled trial. Individual semistructured
             interviews were conducted with 12 people with knee OA who
             had participated in an 8-week automated online PCST program
             while also receiving exercise advice and support from a
             physical therapist via Skype. Interviews in this study
             focused specifically on the online PCST program, rather than
             the physical therapy component. Interviews were
             audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically
             analyzed. RESULTS: Five themes arose: 1) easy to understand
             and follow (clearly explained, presented well), 2) better
             able to cope with pain (controlling pain, helping relax,
             pacing self, incorporating skills into exercise program), 3)
             anonymity and flexibility (no judgement by clinician, work
             at own pace, accessibility), 4) not always relatable or
             engaging (some techniques not useful, Americanization of the
             program, annoying character examples, time consuming and
             slow-paced), and 5) support from clinician desirable
             (follow-up from a clinician would be beneficial, worked in
             tandem with physical therapist-prescribed exercise, desire
             referral to the program by a trusted source). CONCLUSION:
             People with knee OA had generally positive experiences using
             an online PCST program, suggesting that online PCST is a
             broadly acceptable and accessible way to help people with OA
             to manage their pain. User engagement may be enhanced by
             redesigning some aspects of the program and by provision of
             support from a clinician.},
   Doi = {10.1002/acr.24093},
   Key = {fds353849}
}

@article{fds350569,
   Author = {Dumenci, L and Kroenke, K and Keefe, FJ and Ang, DC and Slover, J and Perera, RA and Riddle, DL},
   Title = {Disentangling trait versus state characteristics of the Pain
             Catastrophizing Scale and the PHQ-8 Depression
             Scale.},
   Journal = {Eur J Pain},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1624-1634},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1619},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Research on the role of trait versus state
             characteristics of a variety of measures among persons
             experiencing pain has been a focus for the past few decades.
             Studying the trait versus state nature of the Pain
             Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Patient Health
             Questionnaire (PHQ-8) depression scale would be highly
             informative given both are commonly measured in pain
             populations and neither scale has been studied for
             trait/state contributions. METHODS: The PHQ-8 and PCS were
             obtained on persons undergoing knee arthroplasty at
             baseline, 2-, 6- and 12-month post-surgery (N = 402). The
             multi-trait generalization of the latent trait-state model
             was used to partition trait and state variability in PCS and
             PHQ-8 item responses simultaneously. A set of variables were
             used to predict trait catastrophizing and trait depression.
             RESULTS: For total scores, the latent traits and latent
             states explain 63.2% (trait = 43.2%; state = 20.0%) and
             50.2% (trait = 29.4%; state = 20.8%) of the variability
             in PCS and PHQ-8, respectively. Patients with a high number
             of bodily pain sites, high levels of anxiety, young patients
             and African-American patients had high levels of trait
             catastrophizing and trait depression. The PCS and the PHQ-8
             consist of both enduring trait and dynamic state
             characteristics, with trait characteristics dominating for
             both measures. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and researchers using
             these scales should not assume the obtained measurements
             solely reflect either trait- or state-based characteristics.
             SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians and researchers using the PCS or
             PHQ-8 scales are measuring both state and trait
             characteristics and not just trait- or state-based
             characteristics.},
   Doi = {10.1002/ejp.1619},
   Key = {fds350569}
}

@article{fds352322,
   Author = {Ramos, K and Langer, SL and Todd, M and Romano, JM and Ghosh, N and Keefe,
             FJ and Baucom, DH and Syrjala, KL and Porter, LS},
   Title = {Attachment Style, Partner Communication, and Physical
             Well-Being among Couples Coping with Cancer.},
   Journal = {Pers Relatsh},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {526-549},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pere.12330},
   Abstract = {Attachment styles may influence interpersonal strategies
             used to cope with stress. We examined links between
             attachment style, communicative behaviors, and physical
             well-being among 166 couples coping with cancer. Results of
             actor-partner interdependence mediation models indicated
             that insecure attachment styles were associated with greater
             self-report of two different and seemingly contradictory
             communicative behaviors (disclosure and holding back), which
             in turn were associated with poorer physical well-being.
             These effects were intrapersonal for both patients and
             spouses, with the exception of anxious attachment and
             holding back for spouses. They were also interpersonal in
             that spouse insecure attachment was associated with poorer
             patient physical well-being through spouse communication
             (greater holding back and disclosure). Couple-based
             communication interventions to support adjustment should
             consider attachment style.},
   Doi = {10.1111/pere.12330},
   Key = {fds352322}
}

@article{fds352470,
   Author = {Aaron, RV and Finan, PH and Wegener, ST and Keefe, FJ and Lumley,
             MA},
   Title = {Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic factor underlying
             co-occurring chronic pain and problematic opioid
             use.},
   Journal = {Am Psychol},
   Volume = {75},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {796-810},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000678},
   Abstract = {Chronic pain is a common and costly condition, and some
             people with chronic pain engage in problematic opioid use.
             There is a critical need to identify factors underlying this
             co-occurrence, so that treatment can be targeted to improve
             outcomes. We propose that difficulty with emotion regulation
             (ER) is a transdiagnostic factor that underlies the
             co-occurrence of chronic pain and problematic opioid use
             (CP-POU). In this narrative review, we draw from prominent
             models of ER to summarize the literature characterizing ER
             in chronic pain and CP-POU. We conclude that chronic pain is
             associated with various ER difficulties, including emotion
             identification and the up- and down-regulation of both
             positive and negative emotion. Little research has examined
             ER specifically in CP-POU; however, initial evidence
             suggests CP-POU is characterized by difficulties with ER
             that are similar to those found in chronic pain more
             generally. There is great potential to expand the treatment
             of ER to improve pain-related outcomes in chronic pain and
             CP-POU. More research is needed, however, to elucidate ER in
             CP-POU and to determine which types of ER strategies are
             optimal for different clinical presentations and categories
             of problematic opioid use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c)
             2020 APA, all rights reserved).},
   Doi = {10.1037/amp0000678},
   Key = {fds352470}
}

@article{fds353024,
   Author = {Rice, ASC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {An introduction to the Biennial Review of
             Pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {161 Suppl 1},
   Pages = {S1-S2},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001979},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001979},
   Key = {fds353024}
}

@article{fds355225,
   Author = {Raja, SN and Carr, DB and Cohen, M and Finnerup, NB and Flor, H and Gibson,
             S and Keefe, FJ and Mogil, JS and Ringkamp, M and Sluka, KA and Song, X-J and Stevens, B and Sullivan, MD and Tutelman, PR and Ushida, T and Vader,
             K},
   Title = {The revised International Association for the Study of Pain
             definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and
             compromises.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {161},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1976-1982},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939},
   Abstract = {The current International Association for the Study of Pain
             (IASP) definition of pain as "An unpleasant sensory and
             emotional experience associated with actual or potential
             tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage" was
             recommended by the Subcommittee on Taxonomy and adopted by
             the IASP Council in 1979. This definition has become
             accepted widely by health care professionals and researchers
             in the pain field and adopted by several professional,
             governmental, and nongovernmental organizations, including
             the World Health Organization. In recent years, some in the
             field have reasoned that advances in our understanding of
             pain warrant a reevaluation of the definition and have
             proposed modifications. Therefore, in 2018, the IASP formed
             a 14-member, multinational Presidential Task Force
             comprising individuals with broad expertise in clinical and
             basic science related to pain, to evaluate the current
             definition and accompanying note and recommend whether they
             should be retained or changed. This review provides a
             synopsis of the critical concepts, the analysis of comments
             from the IASP membership and public, and the committee's
             final recommendations for revisions to the definition and
             notes, which were discussed over a 2-year period. The task
             force ultimately recommended that the definition of pain be
             revised to "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience
             associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual
             or potential tissue damage," and that the accompanying notes
             be updated to a bulleted list that included the etymology.
             The revised definition and notes were unanimously accepted
             by the IASP Council early this year.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939},
   Key = {fds355225}
}

@article{fds371055,
   Author = {Miaskowski, C and Blyth, F and Nicosia, F and Haan, M and Keefe, F and Smith, A and Ritchie, C},
   Title = {A Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain for Older
             Adults.},
   Journal = {Pain Med},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1793-1805},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz329},
   Abstract = {POPULATION: Comprehensive evaluation of chronic pain in
             older adults is multifaceted. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS:
             Research on chronic pain in older adults needs to be guided
             by sound conceptual models. The purpose of this paper is to
             describe an adaptation of the Biopsychosocial Model (BPS) of
             Chronic Pain for older adults. The extant literature was
             reviewed, and selected research findings that provide the
             empiric foundation for this adaptation of the BPS model of
             chronic pain are summarized. The paper concludes with a
             discussion of specific recommendations for how this adapted
             model can be used to guide future research. CONCLUSIONS:
             This adaptation of the BPS model of chronic pain for older
             adults provides a comprehensive framework to guide future
             research in this vulnerable population.},
   Doi = {10.1093/pm/pnz329},
   Key = {fds371055}
}

@article{fds351497,
   Author = {Dharmasri, CJ and Griesemer, I and Arbeeva, L and Campbell, LC and Cené, CW and Keefe, FJ and Oddone, EZ and Somers, TJ and Allen,
             KD},
   Title = {Acceptability of telephone-based pain coping skills training
             among African Americans with osteoarthritis enrolled in a
             randomized controlled trial: a mixed methods
             analysis.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {545},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03578-7},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) disproportionately impacts
             African Americans compared to Caucasians, including greater
             pain severity. The Pain Coping Skills Training for African
             Americans with Osteoarthritis (STAART) study examined a
             culturally enhanced Pain Coping Skills Training (CST)
             program among African Americans with OA. This mixed methods
             study evaluated the acceptability of the Pain CST program
             among STAART participants. METHODS: STAART was a randomized
             controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an
             11-session, telephone-based pain CST program, compared to a
             usual care control group. Participants were from the
             University of North Carolina and Durham Veterans Affairs
             Healthcare Systems. The present analyses included 93
             participants in the CST group who completed a questionnaire
             about experiences with the program. Descriptive statistics
             of the questionnaire responses were calculated using SAS
             software. Thematic analysis was applied to open-response
             data using Dedoose software. RESULTS: Participants' mean
             rating of overall helpfulness of the pain CST program for
             managing arthritis symptoms was 8.0 (SD = 2.2) on a
             scale of 0-10. A majority of participants reported the
             program made a positive difference in their experience with
             arthritis (83.1%). Mean ratings of helpfulness of the
             specific skills ranged from 7.7 to 8.8 (all scales 0-10).
             Qualitative analysis of the open-response data identified
             four prominent themes: Improved Pain Coping, Mood and
             Emotional Benefits, Improved Physical Functioning, and
             experiences related to Intervention Delivery. CONCLUSIONS:
             The high ratings of helpfulness demonstrate acceptability of
             this culturally enhanced pain CST program by African
             Americans with OA. Increasing access to cognitive-behavioral
             therapy-based programs may be a promising strategy to
             address racial disparities in OA-related pain and associated
             outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02560922 , registered
             September 25, 2015.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s12891-020-03578-7},
   Key = {fds351497}
}

@article{fds350254,
   Author = {Gilam, G and Gross, JJ and Wager, TD and Keefe, FJ and Mackey,
             SC},
   Title = {What Is the Relationship between Pain and Emotion? Bridging
             Constructs and Communities.},
   Journal = {Neuron},
   Volume = {107},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {17-21},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.024},
   Abstract = {Although pain is defined as a sensory and emotional
             experience, it is traditionally researched and clinically
             treated separately from emotion. Conceptual and mechanistic
             relationships between these constructs highlight the need
             for better understanding of their bi-directional influences
             and the value of bridging the pain and emotion research and
             clinical communities.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.024},
   Key = {fds350254}
}

@article{fds350815,
   Author = {Platts-Mills, TF and McLean, SA and Weinberger, M and Stearns, SC and Bush, M and Teresi, BB and Hurka-Richardson, K and Kroenke, K and Kerns,
             RD and Weaver, MA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Brief educational video plus telecare to enhance recovery
             for older emergency department patients with acute
             musculoskeletal pain: study protocol for the BETTER
             randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Trials},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {615},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04552-3},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (MSP) affects more
             than 40% of adults aged 50 years and older and is the
             leading cause of disability in the USA. Older adults with
             chronic MSP are at risk for analgesic-related side effects,
             long-term opioid use, and functional decline. Recognizing
             the burden of chronic MSP, reducing the transition from
             acute to chronic pain is a public health priority. In this
             paper, we report the protocol for the Brief EducaTional Tool
             to Enhance Recovery (BETTER) trial. This trial compares two
             versions of an intervention to usual care for preventing the
             transition from acute to chronic MSP among older adults in
             the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Three hundred sixty
             patients from the ED will be randomized to one of three
             arms: full intervention (an interactive educational video
             about pain medications and recovery-promoting behaviors, a
             telecare phone call from a nurse 48 to 72 h after
             discharge from the ED, and an electronic communication
             containing clinical information to the patient's primary
             care provider); video-only intervention (the interactive
             educational video but no telecare or primary care provider
             communication); or usual care. Data collection will occur at
             baseline and at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after
             study enrollment. The primary outcome is a composite measure
             of pain severity and interference. Secondary outcomes
             include physical function, overall health, opioid use,
             healthcare utilization, and an assessment of the economic
             value of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This trial is the
             first patient-facing ED-based intervention aimed at helping
             older adults to better manage their MSP and reduce their
             risk of developing chronic pain. If effective, future
             studies will examine the effectiveness of implementation
             strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov
             NCT04118595 . Registered on 8 October 2019.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s13063-020-04552-3},
   Key = {fds350815}
}

@article{fds348807,
   Author = {Winger, JG and Ramos, K and Steinhauser, KE and Somers, TJ and Porter,
             LS and Kamal, AH and Breitbart, WS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Enhancing meaning in the face of advanced cancer and pain:
             Qualitative evaluation of a meaning-centered psychosocial
             pain management intervention.},
   Journal = {Palliat Support Care},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {263-270},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1478951520000115},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to obtain
             patient evaluations of the content, structure, and delivery
             modality of Meaning-Centered Pain Coping Skills Training
             (MCPC), a novel psychosocial intervention for patients with
             advanced cancer and pain. MCPC aims to help patients connect
             with valued sources of meaning in their lives (e.g., family
             relationships), while providing training in evidence-based
             cognitive and behavioral skills (e.g., guided imagery) to
             reduce pain. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were
             conducted with 12 patients with stage IV solid tumor cancers
             and persistent pain. Transcripts were analyzed using methods
             from applied thematic analysis. RESULTS: When evaluating
             MCPC's educational information and skills training
             descriptions, participants described ways in which this
             content resonated with their experience. Many coped with
             their pain and poor prognosis by relying on frameworks that
             provided them with a sense of meaning, often involving their
             personally held religious or spiritual beliefs. They also
             expressed a need for learning ways to cope with pain in
             addition to taking medication. A few participants offered
             helpful suggestions for refining MCPC's content, such as
             addressing common co-occurring symptoms of sleep disturbance
             and fatigue. Concerning MCPC's structure and delivery
             modality, most participants preferred that sessions include
             their family caregiver and described remote delivery (i.e.,
             telephone or videoconference) as being more feasible than
             attending in-person sessions. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS:
             Participants were interested in an intervention that
             concurrently focuses on learning pain coping skills and
             enhancing a sense of meaning. Using remote delivery
             modalities may reduce access barriers (e.g., travel) that
             would otherwise prevent many patients from utilizing
             psychosocial services.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1478951520000115},
   Key = {fds348807}
}

@article{fds348808,
   Author = {Winger, JG and Nunez, C and Kelleher, SA and Ingle, KK and Gandhi, V and Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Predictors of Intervention Session Completion in a
             Randomized Clinical Trial of a Behavioral Cancer Pain
             Intervention.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {59},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {1268-1277},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.020},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Some patients with cancer are able to complete
             psychosocial pain management intervention sessions, and
             others find it difficult to do so. OBJECTIVES: Conduct a
             secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial
             (N = 178) that compared delivery formats (in-person vs.
             videoconference) of a pain coping skills training (PCST)
             intervention for patients with cancer to examine if
             intervention session completion predicts postintervention
             outcomes of pain severity and interference, psychological
             distress, physical well-being, and pain self-efficacy; and
             identify predictors (i.e., demographics, medical
             characteristics, baseline outcome scores) of session
             completion. METHODS: Session completion (i.e., completing
             all four sessions vs. missing at least one session) was
             tested as a predictor of postintervention outcomes.
             Predictors of session completion were then examined.
             RESULTS: In both study conditions combined, PCST session
             completion predicted improvement from baseline to
             postintervention in pain severity (β = -0.27;
             P = 0.03), pain interference (β = -0.25; P = 0.048),
             and pain self-efficacy (β = 0.23; P = 0.07).
             Participants in the videoconference condition were
             significantly more likely than those in the in-person
             condition to complete all sessions (83% vs. 65%;
             P = 0.006). Participants with at least some college
             education (odds ratio [OR] 4.36; P = 0.04), a diagnosis of
             breast cancer (OR 6.73; P = 0.04), and higher levels of
             pain self-efficacy (OR 2.32; P = 0.02) were more likely to
             complete videoconference sessions. Participants who lived
             closer to the medical center (OR 0.64; P = 0.07), had
             early stage cancer (OR 3.82; P = 0.07), and fewer medical
             comorbidities (OR 0.59; P = 0.04) were more likely to
             complete in-person sessions. CONCLUSION: Completing PCST
             sessions is important for improving pain outcomes. Efforts
             to increase session completion (e.g., videoconference
             delivery) should be considered.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.020},
   Key = {fds348808}
}

@article{fds349319,
   Author = {Eccleston, C and Blyth, FM and Dear, BF and Fisher, EA and Keefe, FJ and Lynch, ME and Palermo, TM and Reid, MC and Williams,
             ACDC},
   Title = {Managing patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19
             outbreak: considerations for the rapid introduction of
             remotely supported (eHealth) pain management
             services.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {161},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {889-893},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001885},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001885},
   Key = {fds349319}
}

@article{fds349349,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Dorfman, CS and Arthur, SS and Bosworth, HB and Corsino,
             L and Sutton, L and Owen, L and Erkanli, A and Keefe, F and Corbett, C and Kimmick, G},
   Title = {Improving health engagement and lifestyle management for
             breast cancer survivors with diabetes.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {92},
   Pages = {105998},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.105998},
   Abstract = {Breast cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes are at high
             risk for cancer recurrence, serious health complications,
             more severe symptoms, psychological distress, and premature
             death relative to breast cancer survivors without diabetes.
             Maintaining glycemic control is critical for decreasing
             symptoms and preventing serious health problems. Many breast
             cancer survivors with type 2 diabetes have difficulty
             maintaining diabetes self-management behaviors and achieving
             glycemic control. Both cancer and diabetes-related symptoms
             (e.g., physical symptoms and psychological distress) are
             often barriers to engaging in diabetes self-management
             strategies. This study evaluates a novel diabetes coping
             skills training (DCST) intervention for improving breast
             cancer survivors' abilities to manage symptoms and adhere to
             recommended diabetes self-management behaviors. The
             telephone-based DCST protocol integrates three key
             theory-based strategies: coping skills training for managing
             symptoms, adherence skills training, and healthy lifestyle
             skills training. A randomized clinical trial will test the
             DCST intervention plus diabetes education by comparing it to
             diabetes education alone. Symptoms, distress, diabetes
             self-management behaviors, and self-efficacy will be
             assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Glycosylated
             hemoglobin (HbA1c) will be assessed at baseline, 6, and
             12 months. This study addresses a critical gap in the care
             of breast cancer survivors by evaluating a novel behavioral
             intervention to improve the management of symptoms,
             adherence, and glycemic control in breast cancer survivors
             with type 2 diabetes. Special considerations for this
             medically underserved population are also provided. The
             findings of this study could lead to significant
             improvements in clinical care and beneficial outcomes for
             breast cancer survivors. Trials registration:
             ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02970344, registered
             11/22/2016.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2020.105998},
   Key = {fds349349}
}

@article{fds348878,
   Author = {Bennell, KL and Keating, C and Lawford, BJ and Kimp, AJ and Egerton, T and Brown, C and Kasza, J and Spiers, L and Proietto, J and Sumithran, P and Quicke, JG and Hinman, RS and Better Knee and Better Me™ study
             team and Harris, A and Briggs, AM and Page, C and Choong, PF and Dowsey,
             MM and Keefe, F and Rini, C},
   Title = {Better Knee, Better Me™: effectiveness of two scalable
             health care interventions supporting self-management for
             knee osteoarthritis - protocol for a randomized controlled
             trial.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {160},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3166-z},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Although education, exercise, and weight loss
             are recommended for management of knee osteoarthritis, the
             additional benefits of incorporating weight loss strategies
             into exercise interventions have not been well investigated.
             The aim of this study is to compare, in a private health
             insurance setting, the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a
             remotely-delivered, evidence- and theory-informed, behaviour
             change intervention targeting exercise and self-management
             (Exercise intervention), with the same intervention plus
             active weight management (Exercise plus weight management
             intervention), and with an information-only control group
             for people with knee osteoarthritis who are overweight or
             obese. METHODS: Three-arm, pragmatic parallel-design
             randomised controlled trial involving 415 people aged ≥45
             and ≤ 80 years, with body mass index ≥28 kg/m2
             and < 41 kg/m2 and painful knee osteoarthritis.
             Recruitment is Australia-wide amongst Medibank private
             health insurance members. All three groups receive access to
             a bespoke website containing information about
             osteoarthritis and self-management. Participants in the
             Exercise group also receive six consultations with a
             physiotherapist via videoconferencing over 6 months,
             including prescription of a strengthening exercise and
             physical activity program, advice about management, and
             additional educational resources. The Exercise plus weight
             management group receive six consultations with a dietitian
             via videoconferencing over 6 months, which include a very
             low calorie ketogenic diet with meal replacements and
             resources to support behaviour change, in addition to the
             interventions of the Exercise group. Outcomes are measured
             at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes are
             self-reported knee pain and physical function at 6 months.
             Secondary outcomes include weight, physical activity levels,
             quality of life, global rating of change, satisfaction with
             care, knee surgery and/or appointments with an orthopaedic
             surgeon, and willingness to undergo surgery. Additional
             measures include adherence, adverse events, self-efficacy,
             and perceived usefulness of intervention components.
             Cost-effectiveness of each intervention will also be
             assessed. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic study will determine
             whether a scalable remotely-delivered service combining
             weight management with exercise is more effective than a
             service with exercise alone, and with both compared to an
             information-only control group. Findings will inform
             development and implementation of future remotely-delivered
             services for people with knee osteoarthritis. TRIAL
             REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials
             Registry: ACTRN12618000930280 (01/06/2018).},
   Doi = {10.1186/s12891-020-3166-z},
   Key = {fds348878}
}

@article{fds349544,
   Author = {Blumenthal, JA and Smith, PJ and Sherwood, A and Mabe, S and Snyder, L and Frankel, C and McKee, DC and Hamilton, N and Keefe, FJ and Shearer, S and Schwartz, J and Palmer, S},
   Title = {Remote Therapy to Improve Outcomes in Lung Transplant
             Recipients: Design of the INSPIRE-III Randomized Clinical
             Trial.},
   Journal = {Transplant Direct},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {e535},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000979},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Impaired functional capacity and emotional
             distress are associated with lower quality of life (QoL) and
             worse clinical outcomes in post lung transplant patients.
             Strategies to increase physical activity and reduce distress
             are needed. METHODS: The Investigational Study of
             Psychological Interventions in Recipients of Lung
             Transplant-III study is a single site, parallel group
             randomized clinical trial in which 150 lung transplant
             recipients will be randomly assigned to 3 months of
             telephone-delivered coping skills training combined with
             aerobic exercise (CSTEX) or to a Standard of Care plus
             Education control group. The primary endpoints are a global
             measure of distress and distance walked on the 6-Minute Walk
             Test. Secondary outcomes include measures of
             transplant-specific QoL, frailty, health behaviors, and
             chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival. RESULTS:
             Participants will be evaluated at baseline, at the
             conclusion of 3 months of weekly treatment, at 1-year
             follow-up, and followed annually thereafter for clinical
             events for up to 4 years (median = 2 y). We also will
             determine whether functional capacity, distress, and health
             behaviors (eg, physical activity, medication adherence, and
             volume of air forcefully exhaled in 1 second (FEV1), mediate
             the effects of the CSTEX intervention on clinical outcomes.
             CONCLUSIONS: Should the CSTEX intervention result in better
             outcomes compared with the standard of care plus
             post-transplant education, the remotely delivered CSTEX
             intervention can be made available to all lung transplant
             recipients as a way of enhancing their QoL and improving
             clinical outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1097/TXD.0000000000000979},
   Key = {fds349544}
}

@article{fds366292,
   Author = {Von Korff and M and DeBar, LL and Krebs, EE and Kerns, RD and Deyo, RA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Graded chronic pain scale revised: mild, bothersome, and
             high-impact chronic pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {161},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {651-661},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001758},
   Abstract = {Drawing on advances in chronic pain metrics, a simplified
             Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised was developed to
             differentiate mild, bothersome, and high-impact chronic
             pain. Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised was validated among
             adult enrollees of 2 health plans (N = 2021). In this
             population, the prevalence of chronic pain (pain present
             most or every day, prior 3 months) was 40.5%: 15.4% with
             mild chronic pain (lower pain intensity and interference);
             10.1% bothersome chronic pain (moderate to severe pain
             intensity with lower interference with life activities); and
             15.0% high-impact chronic pain (sustained pain-related
             activity limitations). Persons with mild chronic pain vs
             those without chronic pain showed small differences on 10
             health status indicators (unfavorable health perceptions,
             activity limitations, and receiving long-term opioid
             therapy), with nonsignificant differences for 7 of 10
             indicators. Persons with bothersome vs mild chronic pain
             differed significantly on 6 of 10 indicators (eg, negative
             pain coping beliefs, psychological distress, unfavorable
             health perceptions, and pain-related interference with
             overall activities). Persons with high-impact chronic pain
             differed significantly from those with mild chronic pain on
             all 10 indicators. Persons with high-impact chronic pain,
             relative to those with bothersome chronic pain, were more
             likely to have substantial activity limitations (significant
             differences for 4 of 5 disability indicators) and more often
             received long-term opioid therapy. Graded Chronic Pain
             Scale-Revised strongly predicted 5 activity-limitation
             indicators with area under receiver operating characteristic
             curve coefficients of 0.76 to 0.89. We conclude that the
             5-item Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised and its scoring
             rules provide a brief, simple, and valid method for
             assessing chronic pain.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001758},
   Key = {fds366292}
}

@article{fds346728,
   Author = {Plumb Vilardaga and JC and Winger, JG and Teo, I and Owen, L and Sutton,
             LM and Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Coping Skills Training and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
             for Symptom Management: Feasibility and Acceptability of a
             Brief Telephone-Delivered Protocol for Patients With
             Advanced Cancer.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {59},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {270-278},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.005},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Patients with advanced cancer face a life-limiting
             condition that brings a high symptom burden that often
             includes pain, fatigue, and psychological distress.
             Psychosocial interventions have promise for managing
             symptoms but need additional tailoring for these patients'
             specific needs. Patients with advanced cancer in the
             community also face persistent barriers-availability of
             interventions in community clinics as well as financial and
             illness-related factors-to accessing psychosocial
             interventions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was
             to assess the feasibility and acceptability of telephone
             implementation of Engage, a novel brief combined Coping
             Skills Training and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
             protocol, for reducing symptoms and increasing quality of
             life in community patients with advanced cancer. METHODS:
             Adult patients with advanced cancer receiving care in the
             community received Engage, four 60-minute manualized
             telephone sessions delivered by a trained psychotherapist
             and completed pretreatment and post-treatment assessments.
             RESULTS: Engage was feasible, achieving 100% accrual
             (N = 24) of a heterogeneous sample of patients with
             advanced cancer, with good retention (88% completed).
             Acceptability was demonstrated via satisfaction (mean 29 of
             32; SD 2), engagement (95% attendance), and use of skills.
             Secondary analyses pointed to reductions in pain
             interference, fatigue, psychological distress, and
             improvements in psychological acceptance and engagement in
             value-guided activity after treatment. CONCLUSION: Engage,
             our brief novel combined Coping Skills and Acceptance and
             Commitment Therapy intervention, demonstrated initial
             feasibility and acceptability when delivered over the
             telephone and increased access for community clinic patients
             with advanced cancer. Future research will assess the
             comparative efficacy of Engage in larger randomized
             trials.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.005},
   Key = {fds346728}
}

@article{fds346903,
   Author = {Zimmaro, LA and Carson, JW and Olsen, MK and Sanders, LL and Keefe, FJ and Porter, LS},
   Title = {Greater mindfulness associated with lower pain, fatigue, and
             psychological distress in women with metastatic breast
             cancer.},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {263-270},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5223},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) report
             high levels of disease-related symptoms including pain,
             fatigue, psychological distress, and sleep disturbance.
             Mindfulness may be particularly relevant to women with MBC
             given the high symptom burden and psychological toll of this
             disease; however, the topic is understudied among this
             patient population. Therefore, we aimed to test the
             associations between mindfulness and patient-reported
             symptoms among a sample of women with MBC. METHODS:
             Sixty-four women with MBC completed baseline questionnaires
             of mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short
             Form [FFMQ-SF]) and symptoms of pain severity and
             interference, fatigue, psychological distress, and sleep
             disturbance as part of a randomized controlled trial of a
             Mindful Yoga intervention. Correlational analyses of data
             collected at baseline tested associations between the five
             mindfulness facets (observing, describing, acting with
             awareness, nonjudging, and nonreactivity) and
             patient-reported measures of symptoms. RESULTS: Overall,
             higher mindfulness was associated with lower symptom levels
             including lower pain severity, pain interference, fatigue,
             anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance. However, degree
             of association varied by mindfulness facet. Nonreactivity,
             nonjudging, and describing showed the most frequent
             associations and largest effect sizes across symptoms, while
             observing showed the least frequent associations and lowest
             effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Mindfulness-and in particular
             nonreactivity, nonjudging, and describing-may be a personal
             resource for women with MBC in coping with complex symptoms
             of this life-threatening illness. Findings are discussed
             relative to their implications for interventions aimed at
             increasing mindfulness in this vulnerable
             population.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.5223},
   Key = {fds346903}
}

@article{fds347049,
   Author = {Garland, EL and Brintz, CE and Hanley, AW and Roseen, EJ and Atchley,
             RM and Gaylord, SA and Faurot, KR and Yaffe, J and Fiander, M and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Mind-Body Therapies for Opioid-Treated Pain: A Systematic
             Review and Meta-analysis.},
   Journal = {JAMA Intern Med},
   Volume = {180},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {91-105},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4917},
   Abstract = {IMPORTANCE: Mind-body therapies (MBTs) are emerging as
             potential tools for addressing the opioid crisis. Knowing
             whether mind-body therapies may benefit patients treated
             with opioids for acute, procedural, and chronic pain
             conditions may be useful for prescribers, payers, policy
             makers, and patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association
             of MBTs with pain and opioid dose reduction in a diverse
             adult population with clinical pain. DATA SOURCES: For this
             systematic review and meta-analysis, the MEDLINE, Embase,
             Emcare, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases
             were searched for English-language randomized clinical
             trials and systematic reviews from date of inception to
             March 2018. Search logic included (pain OR analgesia OR
             opioids) AND mind-body therapies. The gray literature,
             ClinicalTrials.gov, and relevant bibliographies were also
             searched. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials that
             evaluated the use of MBTs for symptom management in adults
             also prescribed opioids for clinical pain. DATA EXTRACTION
             AND SYNTHESIS: Independent reviewers screened citations,
             extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses
             were conducted using standardized mean differences in pain
             and opioid dose to obtain aggregate estimates of effect size
             with 95% CIs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary
             outcome was pain intensity. The secondary outcomes were
             opioid dose, opioid misuse, opioid craving, disability, or
             function. RESULTS: Of 4212 citations reviewed, 60 reports
             with 6404 participants were included in the meta-analysis.
             Overall, MBTs were associated with pain reduction (Cohen
             d = -0.51; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.26) and reduced opioid
             dose (Cohen d = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.08). Studies
             tested meditation (n = 5), hypnosis (n = 25),
             relaxation (n = 14), guided imagery (n = 7),
             therapeutic suggestion (n = 6), and cognitive behavioral
             therapy (n = 7) interventions. Moderate to large effect
             size improvements in pain outcomes were found for meditation
             (Cohen d = -0.70), hypnosis (Cohen d = -0.54),
             suggestion (Cohen d = -0.68), and cognitive behavioral
             therapy (Cohen d = -0.43) but not for other MBTs.
             Although most meditation (n = 4 [80%]),
             cognitive-behavioral therapy (n = 4 [57%]), and hypnosis
             (n = 12 [63%]) studies found improved opioid-related
             outcomes, fewer studies of suggestion, guided imagery, and
             relaxation reported such improvements. Most MBT studies used
             active or placebo controls and were judged to be at low risk
             of bias. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings suggest
             that MBTs are associated with moderate improvements in pain
             and small reductions in opioid dose and may be associated
             with therapeutic benefits for opioid-related problems, such
             as opioid craving and misuse. Future studies should
             carefully quantify opioid dosing variables to determine the
             association of mind-body therapies with opioid-related
             outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4917},
   Key = {fds347049}
}

@article{fds352471,
   Author = {Greenberg, J and Mace, RA and Popok, PJ and Kulich, RJ and Patel, KV and Burns, JW and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Schatman, ME and Vranceanu,
             A-M},
   Title = {Psychosocial Correlates of Objective, Performance-Based, and
             Patient-Reported Physical Function Among Patients with
             Heterogeneous Chronic Pain.},
   Journal = {J Pain Res},
   Volume = {13},
   Pages = {2255-2265},
   Year = {2020},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S266455},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Improving all aspects of physical function is an
             important goal of chronic pain management. Few studies
             follow recent guidelines to comprehensively assess physical
             function via patient-reported, performance-based, and
             objective/ambulatory measures. PURPOSE: To test 1) the
             interrelation between the 3 types of physical function
             measurement and 2) the association between psychosocial
             factors and each type of physical function measurement.
             METHODS: Patients with chronic pain (N=79) completed
             measures of: 1) physical function (patient-reported
             disability; performance-based 6-minute walk-test; objective
             accelerometer step count); 2) pain and non-adaptive coping
             (pain during rest and activity, pain-catastrophizing,
             kinesiophobia); 3) adaptive coping (mindfulness, general
             coping, pain-resilience); and 4) social-emotional
             dysfunction (anxiety, depression, social isolation and
             emotional support). First, we tested the interrelation among
             the 3 aspects of physical function. Second, we used
             structural equation modeling to test associations between
             psychosocial factors (pain and non-adaptive coping, adaptive
             coping, and social-emotional dysfunction) and each
             measurement of physical function. RESULTS: Performance-based
             and objective physical function were significantly
             interrelated (r=0.48, p<0.001) but did not correlate with
             patient-reported disability. Pain and non-adaptive coping
             (β=0.68, p<0.001), adaptive coping (β=-0.65, p<0.001) and
             social-emotional dysfunction (β=0.65, p<0.001) were
             associated with patient-reported disability but not to
             performance-based or objective physical function (ps>0.1).
             CONCLUSION: Results suggest that patient-reported physical
             function may provide limited information about patients'
             physical capacity or ambulatory activity. While pain and
             non-adaptive reactions to it, adaptive coping, and
             social-emotional dysfunction may potentially improve
             patient-reported physical function, additional targets may
             be needed to improve functional capacity and ambulatory
             activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov
             NCT03412916.},
   Doi = {10.2147/JPR.S266455},
   Key = {fds352471}
}

@article{fds372552,
   Author = {Pita, MG and Coleman, JN and Kimmick, G and Keefe, FJ and Bosworth, HB and Sutton, LM and Owen, L and Gandhi, V and Shelby, RA},
   Title = {ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERCEIVED DISCRIMINATION IN MEDICAL CARE
             AND SELF-EFFICACY FOR PURSUING BREAST CANCER FOLLOW-UP
             CARE},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {S702-S702},
   Year = {2020},
   Key = {fds372552}
}

@article{fds372553,
   Author = {Coleman, JN and Kimmick, G and Keefe, FJ and Bosworth, HB and Sutton,
             LM and Owen, L and Gandhi, V and Shelby, RA},
   Title = {PERCEPTIONS OF FOLLOW-UP CARE AMONG BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS:
             ASSOCIATIONS WITH COMMUNICATION AND TRUST IN MEDICAL
             CARE},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {S279-S279},
   Year = {2020},
   Key = {fds372553}
}

@article{fds372554,
   Author = {Rini, CM and Kashikar-Zuck, S and DeBar, L and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {NEW EVIDENCE FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL AND OTHER NON-PHARMACOLOGIC
             APPROACHES FOR MANAGING CHRONIC PAIN},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {S203-S203},
   Year = {2020},
   Key = {fds372554}
}

@article{fds372555,
   Author = {Arthur, SS and Bovbjerg, DH and Keefe, FJ and Kimmick, G and Sutton, LM and Owen, L and Hwang, E-SS and Raybon, KB and Coleman, JN and Shelby,
             RA},
   Title = {FEASIBILITY TRIAL OF TARGETED PAIN COPING SKILLS TRAINING
             FOR PERSISTENT PAIN AFTER BREAST CANCER SURGERY},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {S548-S548},
   Year = {2020},
   Key = {fds372555}
}

@article{fds372556,
   Author = {Langer, S and Todd, M and Romano, JM and Bolger, N and Bricker, J and Syrjala, KL and Burns, J and Keefe, FJ and Strauman, T and Gralow, J and Westbrook, K and Shankaran, V and Zafar, SY and Martins, R and Ghosh, N and Porter, LS},
   Title = {THE RELATIONSHIP INTIMACY MODEL OF COUPLE ADAPTATION TO
             CANCER: SUPPORT FROM A PROSPECTIVE, LONGITUDINAL,
             SMARTPHONE-ENABLED ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT
             STUDY},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {S142-S142},
   Year = {2020},
   Key = {fds372556}
}

@article{fds372557,
   Author = {Rini, CM and Katz, A and Nwadugbo, A and Porter, LS and Somers, T and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {WEB-BASED PAIN COPING SKILLS TRAINING CHANGES COPING
             STRATEGIES PEOPLE WOULD USE IN HYPOTHETICAL SITUATIONS
             LIKELY TO INCREASE PAIN},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {54},
   Pages = {S203-S203},
   Year = {2020},
   Key = {fds372557}
}

@article{fds342180,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Carson, JW and Olsen, M and Carson, KM and Sanders, L and Jones, L and Westbrook, K and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Feasibility of a mindful yoga program for women with
             metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized pilot
             study.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {4307-4316},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04710-7},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
             experience high levels of symptoms. Yoga interventions have
             shown promise for improving cancer symptoms but have rarely
             been tested in patients with advanced disease. This study
             examined the acceptability of a comprehensive yoga program
             for MBC and the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial
             testing the intervention. METHODS: Sixty-three women with
             MBC were randomized with a 2:1 allocation to yoga or a
             support group comparison condition. Both interventions
             involved eight weekly group sessions. Feasibility was
             quantified using rates of accrual, attrition, and session
             attendance. Acceptability was assessed with a standardized
             self-report measure. Pain, fatigue, sleep quality,
             psychological distress, mindfulness, and functional capacity
             were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 and
             6 months post-intervention. RESULTS: We met goals for
             accrual and retention, with 50% of eligible patients
             enrolled and 87% of randomized participants completing
             post-intervention surveys. Sixty-five percent of women in
             the yoga condition and 90% in the support group attended
             ≥ 4 sessions. Eighty percent of participants in the yoga
             condition and 65% in the support group indicated that they
             were highly satisfied with the intervention. Following
             treatment, women in the yoga intervention had modest
             improvements in some outcomes; however, overall symptom
             levels were low for women in both conditions. CONCLUSIONS:
             Findings suggest that the yoga intervention content was
             highly acceptable to patients with MBC, but that there are
             challenges to implementing an intervention involving eight
             group-based in-person sessions. Alternative modes of
             delivery may be necessary to reach patients most in need of
             intervention.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-019-04710-7},
   Key = {fds342180}
}

@article{fds346729,
   Author = {Winger, JG and Plumb Vilardaga and JC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Indices of pain variability: a paradigm shift.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {160},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {2411-2412},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001627},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001627},
   Key = {fds346729}
}

@article{fds344584,
   Author = {Hung, A and Li, Y and Keefe, FJ and Ang, DC and Slover, J and Perera, RA and Dumenci, L and Reed, SD and Riddle, DL},
   Title = {Ninety-day and one-year healthcare utilization and costs
             after knee arthroplasty.},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis Cartilage},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1462-1469},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.019},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: This study examined ninety-day and one-year
             postoperative healthcare utilization and costs following
             total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the health sector and
             patient perspectives. DESIGN: This study relied on: 1)
             patient-reported medical resource utilization data from
             diaries in the Knee Arthroplasty Pain Coping Skills Training
             (KASTPain) trial; and 2) Medicare fee schedules. Medicare
             payments, patient cost-sharing, and patient time costs were
             estimated. Generalized linear mixed models were used to
             identify baseline predictors of costs. RESULTS: In the first
             ninety days following TKA, patients had an average of 29.7
             outpatient visits and 6% were hospitalized. Mean total costs
             during this period summed to $3,720, the majority attributed
             to outpatient visit costs (84%). Over the year following
             TKA, patients had an average of 48.9 outpatient visits,
             including 33.2 for physical therapy. About a quarter (24%)
             of patients were hospitalized. Medical costs were incurred
             at a decreasing rate, from $2,428 in the first six weeks to
             $648 in the last six weeks. Mean total medical costs across
             all patients over the year were $8,930, including $5,328 in
             outpatient costs. Total costs were positively associated
             with baseline Charlson comorbidity score (P < 0.01).
             Outpatient costs were positively associated with baseline
             Charlson comorbidity score (P = 0.03) and a bodily pain
             burden summary score (P < 0.01). Mean patient cost-sharing
             summed to $1,342 and time costs summed to $1,346.
             CONCLUSIONS: Costs in the ninety days and year after TKA can
             be substantial for both healthcare payers and patients.
             These costs should be considered as payers continue to
             explore alternative payment models.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.019},
   Key = {fds344584}
}

@article{fds342792,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Post, KM and Smith, DA and Porter, LS and Buvanendran, A and Fras, AM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Spouse and Patient Beliefs and Perceptions About Chronic
             Pain: Effects on Couple Interactions and Patient Pain
             Behavior.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1176-1186},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.04.001},
   Abstract = {Patient beliefs and perceptions about the causes and meaning
             of their chronic pain are related to their psychosocial
             functioning. Beliefs and perceptions about chronic pain held
             by spouses may also be related to patient functioning. We
             used a laboratory procedure to evaluate whether spouse
             beliefs about and perceptions of chronic pain were related
             to spouse negative responses toward patients with chronic
             low back pain during a conflictual discussion and to their
             attributions about patient pain behavior during a subsequent
             pain-induction task. Patients (n = 71) and their spouses
             (n = 71) participated in a 10-minute discussion followed
             by the patient undergoing a 10-minute structured pain
             behavior task. Findings were that a) spouse perceptions that
             patient's pain was a mystery were significantly related to
             greater patient perceived spouse critical/invalidating
             responses toward the patient during the discussion; and b)
             spouse perceptions that patient's pain was a mystery were
             related to internal and negative attributions spouses made
             while observing patients display pain behaviors during the
             structured pain behavior task. Inasmuch as both spouse
             critical/invalidating speech toward patients and negative
             attributions regarding the cause of patient behavior are
             related to poor patient functioning, spouse uncertainty
             about the source and potential legitimacy of their partner's
             pain may play crucial roles in affecting patient well-being.
             PERSPECTIVE: Spouse beliefs about and perceptions of patient
             chronic pain were related to spouse behavior toward patients
             during a discussion and to attributions explaining patient
             pain during physical activity. If spouse confusion and doubt
             about patient pain is related to negative behavior and
             attributions, then modifying these perceptions may be a
             fundamental intervention target.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2019.04.001},
   Key = {fds342792}
}

@article{fds341763,
   Author = {Wren, AA and Shelby, RA and Soo, MS and Huysmans, Z and Jarosz, JA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Preliminary efficacy of a lovingkindness meditation
             intervention for patients undergoing biopsy and breast
             cancer surgery: A randomized controlled pilot
             study.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {3583-3592},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-4657-z},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: Despite more women undergoing treatment for breast
             cancer and increased survival rates, many women suffer from
             anxiety and physical symptoms (e.g., pain, fatigue)
             surrounding diagnosis and surgery. Research investigating
             the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for breast cancer
             patients during this period is limited. This randomized
             controlled pilot study examined the effect of a brief
             lovingkindness meditation intervention on these key
             outcomes. METHODS: Participants were 60 women who underwent
             core needle breast biopsy, received an abnormal biopsy
             result, and underwent breast surgery (White = 73.6%; African
             American = 22.6%; Asian American = 3.8%; Age M = 56).
             Participants were randomly assigned to one of three
             treatment conditions at breast biopsy: (1) lovingkindness
             meditation, (2) music, and (3) usual care. Assessments of
             anxiety, pain, fatigue, physiologic reactivity, and
             self-compassion occurred prior to patients' biopsy,
             following biopsy, 1 week after receipt of biopsy results,
             and 1 week following breast surgery. RESULTS: Multilevel
             modeling analyses demonstrated that lovingkindness
             meditation significantly improved pain (p = 0.02),
             self-compassion (p = 0.004), and heart rate
             (p = 0.02) over time compared to control conditions.
             There was a trend for anxiety (p = 0.05). Music
             significantly improved pain (p = 0.04) compared to usual
             care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide preliminary
             evidence for the feasibility and efficacy of a
             lovingkindness meditation intervention for breast cancer
             patients during the diagnostic and surgical period.
             Improving psychological and physical well-being during this
             time frame has the potential to improve longer-term health
             outcomes during adjuvant treatment and survivorship.
             Interventions that cultivate positive adjustment during the
             diagnostic and surgical period of breast cancer are an
             important area of future research.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-019-4657-z},
   Key = {fds341763}
}

@article{fds344585,
   Author = {Kelleher, SA and Winger, JG and Dorfman, CS and Ingle, KK and Moskovich,
             AA and Abernethy, AP and Keefe, FJ and Samsa, GP and Kimmick, GG and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {A behavioral cancer pain intervention: A randomized
             noninferiority trial comparing in-person with
             videoconference delivery.},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1671-1678},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5141},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Behavioral cancer pain interventions are
             efficacious for improving important pain outcomes; yet,
             traditional in-person delivery limits patient access. This
             study compared videoconference-delivered mobile health pain
             coping skills training (mPCST) to in-person pain coping
             skills training (PCST-traditional). METHODS: This study was
             a randomized, noninferiority trial with cancer patients.
             Participants (N = 178) were randomly assigned to four,
             45-minute sessions of mPCST or PCST-traditional. Session
             content focused on evidence-based cognitive and behavioral
             pain management skills. Assessments were completed at
             baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month posttreatment, and
             included measures of primary intervention outcomes (ie, pain
             severity and pain interference) and secondary intervention
             outcomes (ie, physical symptoms, psychological distress,
             physical well-being, and self-efficacy). The main study aim
             tested whether mPCST was more accessible (defined as
             feasibility, acceptability, patient burden, and engagement)
             than PCST-traditional. The second aim tested whether mPCST
             was noninferior to PCST-traditional. RESULTS: mPCST
             demonstrated significantly greater feasibility (ie,
             attrition, adherence, and time to completion) than
             PCST-traditional. Both groups reported similar patient
             burden and engagement as well as a high degree of
             acceptability. All intervention outcomes demonstrated
             noninferiority at posttreatment and, with the exception of
             physical symptoms, 3-month posttreatment. Concerning the
             primary intervention outcomes, 95% CIs for the mean
             differences (d) were below the noninferiority margin of 1
             for pain severity (posttreatment d = 0.09, 95% CI,
             -0.63-0.81; 3 months d = -0.43 95% CI, -1.22-0.36) and pain
             interference (posttreatment d = -0.11, 95% CI, -0.99-0.76; 3
             months d = -0.26 95% CI, -1.14-0.62). CONCLUSION: mPCST is
             highly accessible and noninferior to PCST-traditional.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.5141},
   Key = {fds344585}
}

@article{fds345843,
   Author = {Simmons, LA and Williams, H and Silva, S and Keefe, F and Tanabe,
             P},
   Title = {Acceptability and Feasibility of a Mindfulness-Based
             Intervention for Pain Catastrophizing among Persons with
             Sickle Cell Disease.},
   Journal = {Pain Manag Nurs},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {261-269},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2018.10.002},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Few investigators have developed and tested
             nonpharmacological interventions for helping persons with
             sickle cell disease (SCD) manage persistent pain. AIMS: The
             purpose of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility
             and acceptability of a mindfulness-based intervention (MBI)
             in adults with SCD and chronic pain and to gather
             preliminary data on its efficacy. DESIGN: Data on
             feasibility and acceptability, including recruitment,
             retention, and attendance rates, were collected during a
             single-site, randomized control trial. Participants were
             randomly assigned to either a 6-session group telephonic MBI
             or a wait-listed control. Pain catastrophizing was assessed
             at baseline and at weeks 1, 3, and 6. SETTING: Outpatient,
             comprehensive, interdisciplinary sickle cell disease center
             in the Southeast. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Adults at least 18
             years of age with a self-reported diagnosis of sickle cell
             disease who self-identified as having chronic, non-cancer
             pain that persisted on most days for at least 6 months and
             adversely affected function and/or well-being. METHODS:
             Seventy-eight adults were recruited; 18 (23%) declined to
             participate; 60 were randomly assigned to either the MBI
             (N = 40) or control (N = 20). Of those, 14 (35%) from
             the MBI and 12 (60%) from the control group withdrew
             immediately after random allocation, resulting in 34
             evaluable cases (MBI: N = 26; control: N = 8). RESULTS:
             Among the 26 assigned to MBI, the median number of sessions
             attended per person was 4; 7 (27%) attended all six
             sessions. Qualitative findings indicated that MBI
             participants viewed the program as acceptable and liked the
             telephonic format, community, and content. Reductions in
             pain catastrophizing outcomes were identified after
             intervention. CONCLUSIONS: An MBI is feasible and acceptable
             for persons with SCD experiencing chronic pain. A larger
             randomized controlled trial to establish MBI efficacy on
             pain and related outcomes for SCD will provide
             nonpharmacologic, behavioral pain management options for
             nurses and other clinicians caring for persons with SCD and
             chronic pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pmn.2018.10.002},
   Key = {fds345843}
}

@article{fds341764,
   Author = {Dumenci, L and Perera, RA and Keefe, FJ and Ang, DC and Slover, J and Jensen, MP and Riddle, DL},
   Title = {Model-based pain and function outcome trajectory types for
             patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a secondary analysis
             from a randomized clinical trial.},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis Cartilage},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {878-884},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.004},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Knee arthroplasty (KA) is an effective surgical
             procedure. However, clinical studies suggest that a
             considerable number of patients continue to experience
             substantial pain and functional loss following surgical
             recovery. We aimed to estimate pain and function outcome
             trajectory types for persons undergoing KA, and to determine
             the relationship between pain and function trajectory types,
             and pre-surgery predictors of trajectory types. DESIGN:
             Participants were 384 patients who took part in the KA
             Skills Training randomized clinical trial. Pain and function
             were assessed at 2-week pre- and 2-, 6-, and 12-months
             post-surgery. Piecewise latent class growth models were used
             to estimate pain and function trajectories. Pre-surgery
             variables were used to predict trajectory types. RESULTS:
             There was strong evidence for two trajectory types, labeled
             as good and poor, for both Western Ontario and McMaster
             Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain and Function
             scores. Model estimated rates of the poor trajectory type
             were 18% for pain and function. Dumenci's latent kappa
             between pain and function trajectory types was 0.71 (95% CI:
             0.61-0.80). Pain catastrophizing and number of painful body
             regions were significant predictors of poor pain and
             function outcomes. Outcome-specific predictors included low
             income for poor pain and baseline pain and younger age for
             poor function. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults undergoing KA,
             approximately one-fifth continue to have persistent pain,
             poor function, or both. Although the poor pain and function
             trajectory types tend to go together within persons, a
             significant number experience either poor pain or function
             but not both, suggesting heterogeneity among persons who do
             not fully benefit from KA.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.004},
   Key = {fds341764}
}

@article{fds343560,
   Author = {Allen, KD and Somers, TJ and Campbell, LC and Arbeeva, L and Coffman,
             CJ and Cené, CW and Oddone, EZ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain coping skills training for African Americans with
             osteoarthritis: results of a randomized controlled
             trial.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {160},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {1297-1307},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001525},
   Abstract = {African Americans bear a disproportionate burden of
             osteoarthritis (OA), but they have been underrepresented in
             trials of behavioral interventions for pain. This trial
             examined a culturally tailored pain coping skills training
             (CST) program, compared to a wait list control group, among
             248 African Americans with knee or hip OA. The pain CST
             program involved 11 telephone-based sessions over 3 months.
             Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 months (primary), and
             9 months, and included the Western Ontario and McMaster
             Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale
             (primary outcome), WOMAC total score and function subscale,
             PROMIS Pain Interference, Short-Form 12 Mental and Physical
             Composite Subscales, Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Total
             Coping Attempts, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Patient Health
             Questionnaire-8, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, and Patient
             Global Impression of Arthritis Symptom Change. Linear mixed
             models were fit for all outcomes. There were no significant
             between-group differences in WOMAC pain score at 3 months
             (-0.63 [95% confidence interval -1.45, 0.18]; P = 0.128) or
             9 months (-0.84 [95% confidence interval -1.73, 0.06]; P =
             0.068). Among secondary outcomes, at 3 months, there were
             significant differences, in favor of the CST group, for
             Coping Strategies Questionnaire Total Coping Attempts, Pain
             Catastrophizing Scale, Arthritis Self-Efficacy, and Patient
             Global Impression of Arthritis Symptom Change (P < 0.01).
             Coping Strategies Questionnaire Total Coping Attempts,
             Arthritis Self-Efficacy, and Patient Global Assessment
             Change were also significantly improved at 9 months in the
             CST group, compared with wait list (P < 0.01). The
             culturally tailored pain CST program did not significantly
             reduce pain severity but did improve key measures of pain
             coping and perceived ability to manage pain among African
             Americans with OA.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001525},
   Key = {fds343560}
}

@article{fds341832,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Samsa, G and Steel, JL and Hanson, LC and LeBlanc, TW and Bull, J and Fischer, S and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients
             with advanced cancer: Background, design, and challenges for
             the CaringPals study.},
   Journal = {Clin Trials},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {263-272},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774519829695},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pain is a major concern of patients with
             advanced cancer and their caregivers. There is strong
             evidence that pain coping skills training interventions
             based on cognitive-behavioral principles can reduce pain
             severity and pain interference. However, few such
             interventions have been tested for patients with advanced
             cancer and their family caregivers. This study aims to test
             the efficacy of a caregiver-guided pain coping skills
             training protocol on patient and caregiver outcomes.
             METHODS: A total of 214 patients age ≥18 with Stage
             III-Stage IV cancer and moderate to severe pain, along with
             their family caregivers, are being identified and randomized
             with a 1:1 allocation to the caregiver-guided pain coping
             skills training intervention or enhanced treatment-as-usual.
             Dyads in both conditions receive educational resources on
             pain management, and the caregiver-guided pain coping skills
             training intervention includes three weekly 60-min sessions
             conducted with the patient-caregiver dyad via
             videoconference. Measures of caregiver outcomes
             (self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain,
             caregiver strain, caregiving satisfaction, psychological
             distress) and patient outcomes (self-efficacy for pain
             management, pain intensity and interference, psychological
             distress) are collected at baseline and post-intervention.
             Caregiver outcomes are also collected 3 and 6 months
             following the patient's death. The study is enrolling
             patients from four tertiary care academic medical centers
             and one free-standing hospice and palliative care
             organization. The primary outcome is caregiver self-efficacy
             for helping the patient manage pain. RESULTS: This article
             describes challenges in the design and implementation of the
             CaringPals trial. Key issues for trial design include the
             identification and recruitment of patients with advanced
             cancer and pain, and the follow-up and collection of data
             from caregivers following the patient's death. CONCLUSION:
             The CaringPals trial addresses a gap in research in pain
             coping skills training interventions by addressing the
             unique needs of patients with advanced cancer and their
             caregivers. Findings from this study may lead to advances in
             the clinical care of patients with advanced cancer and pain,
             as well as a better understanding of the effects of training
             family caregivers to help patients cope with
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1177/1740774519829695},
   Key = {fds341832}
}

@article{fds341561,
   Author = {Bovbjerg, DH and Keefe, FJ and Soo, MS and Manculich, J and Van Denburg,
             A and Zuley, ML and Ahrendt, GM and Skinner, CS and Edmond, SN and Shelby,
             RA},
   Title = {Persistent breast pain in post-surgery breast cancer
             survivors and women with no history of breast surgery or
             cancer: associations with pain catastrophizing, perceived
             breast cancer risk, breast cancer worry, and emotional
             distress.},
   Journal = {Acta Oncol},
   Volume = {58},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {763-768},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1574023},
   Abstract = {Background: Persistent breast pain (PBP) is prevalent among
             breast cancer survivors and has powerful negative
             psychological consequences. The present study provided a
             first test of the hypothesis that: (a) pain catastrophizing,
             (b) heightened perceived risk of cancer, and (c) worry that
             pain indicates cancer may be independent mediating links
             between breast cancer survivors' experiences of PBP and
             heightened emotional distress. Methodology: We assessed
             levels of PBP and psychological factors in breast cancer
             survivors (Survivor Group: n = 417; Stages I-IIIA; White
             = 88.7%; Age M = 59.4 years) at their first surveillance
             mammogram post-surgery (6-15 months). A comparison group of
             women without histories of breast surgery or cancer
             (Non-cancer Group: n = 587; White = 78.7%; Age
             M = 57.4 years) was similarly assessed at the time of a
             routine screening mammogram. All women completed measures of
             breast pain, pain catastrophizing, perceived breast cancer
             risk, and worry that breast pain indicates cancer, as well
             as measures of emotional distress (symptoms of anxiety,
             symptoms of depression, and mammography-specific distress).
             Analyses included race, age, BMI, education, and menopausal
             status as covariates, with significance set at 0.05.
             Results: As expected, PBP prevalence was significantly
             higher in the Survivor Group than in the Non-cancer Group
             (50.6% vs. 17.5%). PBP+ survivors also had significantly
             higher levels of emotional distress, pain catastrophizing,
             mammography-specific distress, and worry that breast pain
             indicates cancer, compared to PBP- survivors. Structural
             equation modeling results were significant for all
             hypothesized mediational pathways. Interestingly,
             comparisons of PBP+ to PBP- women in the Non-cancer
             Group showed similar results. Conclusion: These findings
             suggest the importance of (a) pain catastrophizing, (b)
             perceived breast cancer risk and, (c) worry that breast pain
             may indicate cancer, as potential targets for interventions
             aimed at reducing the negative psychological impact of PBP
             in post-surgery breast cancer survivors, as well as in
             unaffected women with PBP due to unknown
             reasons.},
   Doi = {10.1080/0284186X.2019.1574023},
   Key = {fds341561}
}

@article{fds372558,
   Author = {Hung, A and Li, Y and Keefe, FJ and Ang, D and Slover, J and Jensen, MP and Bair, MJ and Kroenke, K and Perera, RA and McKee, D and Dumenci, L and Reed, SD and Riddle, DL},
   Title = {PMS17 ONE-YEAR HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION AND COSTS AFTER KNEE
             ARTHROPLASTY},
   Journal = {Value in Health},
   Volume = {22},
   Pages = {S241-S241},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1127},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1127},
   Key = {fds372558}
}

@article{fds372559,
   Author = {Allen, KD and Arbeeva, L and Campbell, L and Cené, C and Keefe, FJ and Oddone, E and Somers, T and Coffman, C},
   Title = {Identifying subgroups of African American patients with
             differential improvement following a pain coping skills
             training program for osteoarthritis},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis and Cartilage},
   Volume = {27},
   Pages = {S489-S489},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.02.543},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2019.02.543},
   Key = {fds372559}
}

@article{fds372560,
   Author = {Dumenci, L and Perera, RA and Keefe, FJ and Ang, DC and Slover, J and Jensen, MP and Riddle, DL},
   Title = {Pain and function trajectory types of knee arthroplasty
             patients},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis and Cartilage},
   Volume = {27},
   Pages = {S401-S402},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.02.403},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2019.02.403},
   Key = {fds372560}
}

@article{fds340442,
   Author = {Sitlinger, A and Shelby, RA and Van Denburg and AN and White, H and Edmond,
             SN and Marcom, PK and Bosworth, HB and Keefe, FJ and Kimmick,
             GG},
   Title = {Higher symptom burden is associated with lower function in
             women taking adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast
             cancer.},
   Journal = {J Geriatr Oncol},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {317-321},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2018.11.008},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of symptoms on physical
             function in women on adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast
             cancer. METHODS: Eligible women were postmenopausal, had
             hormone receptor positive, stage I-IIIA breast cancer,
             completed surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and on adjuvant
             endocrine therapy. At a routine follow-up visit, women
             (N = 107) completed standardized symptom measures: Brief
             Fatigue Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory, Menopause Specific
             Quality of Life Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of
             Cancer Therapy Neurotoxicity scales. Two performance
             measures assessed function: grip strength (Jamar
             dynamometer; n = 71) and timed get-up-and-go (TUG;
             n = 103). Analyses were performed with an overall
             symptom composite score. Correlations and multiple linear
             regression analyses were performed to test adverse effects
             on physical function. RESULTS: The mean age was 64 years
             (range 45-84), 81% white, 84% on an aromatase inhibitor, and
             on endocrine therapy for mean 35 months (range
             1-130 months). Dominant hand grip strength was inversely
             correlated with symptom composite scores (r = -0.29,
             p = .02). Slower TUG was positively correlated with
             higher Charlson comorbidity level (r = 0.36,
             p < .001) and higher symptom composite scores
             (r = 0.24, p = .01). In multivariate analyses,
             weaker dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength were
             significantly associated with greater symptom composite
             scores (β = -0.27, t = 2.43, p = .02 and
             β = -0.36, t = 3.15, p = .003, respectively)
             and slower TUG was associated with higher symptom composite
             scores (β = 0.18, t = 1.97, p = .05).
             CONCLUSIONS: Higher symptom burden is associated with worse
             physical function, as measured by hand grip strength and
             TUG. Further study to determine the impact of endocrine
             therapy and its side effects on function is
             warranted.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jgo.2018.11.008},
   Key = {fds340442}
}

@article{fds372561,
   Author = {Winger, JG and Dorfman, CS and Steinhauser, KE and Kamal, AH and Keefe,
             FJ and Somers, TJ and Breitbart, WS},
   Title = {QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK ON A PSYCHOSOCIAL PAIN MANAGEMENT
             INTERVENTION FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CANCER},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {53},
   Pages = {S264-S264},
   Publisher = {OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds372561}
}

@article{fds372562,
   Author = {Dorfman, CS and Winger, JG and Somers, T and Shelby, RA and Kimmick, G and Craighead, L and Patel, ML and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {WEIGHT-RELATED BEHAVIORS OF CANCER SURVIVORS & PARTNERS:
             INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT AND RESULTS OF A PILOT DYADIC
             INTERVENTION},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {53},
   Pages = {S709-S709},
   Publisher = {OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds372562}
}

@article{fds372563,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Todd, M and Keefe, FJ and Strauman, T and Baucom, D and Bricker, JB and Burns, J and Ghosh, N and Puleo, B and Langer,
             S},
   Title = {COUPLE COMMUNICATION IN CANCER: A COMPARISON OF GLOBAL AND
             ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT REPORTS},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {53},
   Pages = {S268-S268},
   Publisher = {OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds372563}
}

@article{fds341762,
   Author = {Riddle, DL and Keefe, FJ and Ang, DC and Slover, J and Jensen, MP and Bair,
             MJ and Kroenke, K and Perera, RA and Reed, SD and McKee, D and Dumenci,
             L},
   Title = {Pain Coping Skills Training for Patients Who Catastrophize
             About Pain Prior to Knee Arthroplasty: A Multisite
             Randomized Clinical Trial.},
   Journal = {J Bone Joint Surg Am},
   Volume = {101},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {218-227},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00621},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Pain catastrophizing has been identified as a
             prognostic indicator of poor outcome following knee
             arthroplasty. Interventions to address pain catastrophizing,
             to our knowledge, have not been tested in patients
             undergoing knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was
             to determine whether pain coping skills training in persons
             with moderate to high pain catastrophizing undergoing knee
             arthroplasty improves outcomes 12 months postoperatively
             compared with usual care or arthritis education. METHODS: A
             multicenter, 3-arm, single-blinded, randomized comparative
             effectiveness trial was performed involving 5
             university-based medical centers in the United States. There
             were 402 randomized participants. The primary outcome was
             the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
             Index (WOMAC) Pain Scale, measured at baseline, 2 months, 6
             months, and 12 months following the surgical procedure.
             RESULTS: Participants were recruited from January 2013 to
             June 2016. In 402 participants, 66% were women and the mean
             age of the participants (and standard deviation) was 63.2 ±
             8.0 years. Three hundred and forty-six participants (90% of
             those who underwent a surgical procedure) completed a
             12-month follow-up. All 3 treatment groups had large
             improvements in 12-month WOMAC pain scores with no
             significant differences (p > 0.05) among the 3 treatment
             arms. No differences were found between WOMAC pain scores at
             12 months for the pain coping skills and arthritis education
             groups (adjusted mean difference, 0.3 [95% confidence
             interval (CI), -0.9 to 1.5]) or between the pain coping and
             usual-care groups (adjusted mean difference, 0.4 [95% CI,
             -0.7 to 1.5]). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant
             differences (p > 0.05) among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS:
             Among adults with pain catastrophizing undergoing knee
             arthroplasty, cognitive behaviorally based pain coping
             skills training did not confer pain or functional benefit
             beyond the large improvements achieved with usual surgical
             and postoperative care. Future research should develop
             interventions for the approximately 20% of patients
             undergoing knee arthroplasty who experience persistent
             function-limiting pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level
             I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description
             of levels of evidence.},
   Doi = {10.2106/JBJS.18.00621},
   Key = {fds341762}
}

@article{fds341765,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Dorfman, CS and Bosworth, HB and Keefe, F and Sutton, L and Owen, L and Corsino, L and Erkanli, A and Reed, SD and Arthur, SS and Somers, T and Barrett, N and Huettel, S and Gonzalez, JM and Kimmick,
             G},
   Title = {Testing a behavioral intervention to improve adherence to
             adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET).},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {76},
   Pages = {120-131},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2018.11.010},
   Abstract = {Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is used to prevent
             recurrence and reduce mortality for women with hormone
             receptor positive breast cancer. Poor adherence to AET is a
             significant problem and contributes to increased medical
             costs and mortality. A variety of problematic symptoms
             associated with AET are related to non-adherence and early
             discontinuation of treatment. The goal of this study is to
             test a novel, telephone-based coping skills training that
             teaches patients adherence skills and techniques for coping
             with problematic symptoms (CST-AET). Adherence to AET will
             be assessed in real-time for 18 months using wireless
             smart pill bottles. Symptom interference (i.e., pain,
             vasomotor symptoms, sleep problems, vaginal dryness) and
             cost-effectiveness of the intervention protocol will be
             examined as secondary outcomes. Participants (N = 400)
             will be recruited from a tertiary care medical center or
             community clinics in medically underserved or rural areas.
             Participants will be randomized to receive CST-AET or a
             general health education intervention (comparison
             condition). CST-AET includes ten nurse-delivered calls
             delivered over 6 months. CST-AET provides systematic
             training in coping skills for managing symptoms that
             interfere with adherence. Interactive voice messaging
             provides reinforcement for skills use and adherence that is
             tailored based on real-time adherence data from the wireless
             smart pill bottles. Given the high rates of non-adherence
             and recent recommendations that women remain on AET for
             10 years, we describe a timely trial. If effective, the
             CST-AET protocol may not only reduce the burden of AET use
             but also lead to cost-effective changes in clinical care and
             improve breast cancer outcomes. Trials registration:
             ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02707471, registered
             3/3/2016.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2018.11.010},
   Key = {fds341765}
}

@article{fds336942,
   Author = {Whitney, CA and Dorfman, CS and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Gandhi, V and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Reminders of cancer risk and pain catastrophizing:
             relationships with cancer worry and perceived risk in women
             with a first-degree relative with breast
             cancer.},
   Journal = {Fam Cancer},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {9-18},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-018-0082-6},
   Abstract = {First-degree relatives of women with breast cancer may
             experience increased worry or perceived risk when faced with
             reminders of their own cancer risk. Worry and risk reminders
             may include physical symptoms (e.g., persistent breast pain)
             and caregiving experiences. Women who engage in pain
             catastrophizing may be particularly likely to experience
             increased distress when risk reminders are present. We
             examined the degree to which persistent breast pain and
             experience as a cancer caregiver were related to cancer
             worry and perceived risk in first-degree relatives of women
             with breast cancer (N = 85) and how catastrophic
             thoughts about breast pain could impact these relationships.
             There was a significant interaction between persistent
             breast pain and pain catastrophizing in predicting cancer
             worry (p = .03); among women who engaged in pain
             catastrophizing, cancer worry remained high even in the
             absence of breast pain. Pain catastrophizing also moderated
             the relationships between caregiving involvement and cancer
             worry (p = .003) and perceived risk (p = .03). As
             the degree of caregiving responsibility increased, cancer
             worry and perceived risk increased for women who engaged in
             pain catastrophizing; levels of cancer worry and perceived
             risk remained low and stable for women who did not engage in
             pain catastrophizing regardless of caregiving experience.
             The results suggest that first-degree relatives of breast
             cancer survivors who engage in pain catastrophizing may
             experience greater cancer worry and perceived risk and may
             benefit from interventions aimed at reducing catastrophic
             thoughts about pain.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s10689-018-0082-6},
   Key = {fds336942}
}

@article{fds371056,
   Author = {Merlin, JS and Patel, K and Thompson, N and Kapo, J and Keefe, F and Liebschutz, J and Paice, J and Somers, T and Starrels, J and Childers,
             J and Schenker, Y and Ritchie, CS},
   Title = {Managing Chronic Pain in Cancer Survivors Prescribed
             Long-Term Opioid Therapy: A National Survey of Ambulatory
             Palliative Care Providers.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {20-27},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.493},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Chronic pain, or pain lasting more than
             three months, is common among cancer survivors, who are
             often prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). OBJECTIVE:
             Our objective was to explore palliative care providers'
             experiences with managing chronic pain in cancer survivors
             prescribed LTOT, specifically in ambulatory palliative care
             settings, and their strategies for overcoming challenges.
             METHODS: We recruited providers through leading national
             palliative care organizations who manage chronic pain in
             cancer survivors. Asked to consider only cancer survivors
             with chronic pain when responding, participants completed an
             online survey that included questions about use of opioid
             risk mitigation tools, confidence in addressing opioid
             misuse behaviors and discussing/recommending management
             approaches, and access to addiction treatment. RESULTS: Of
             157 participants, most were physicians (83%) or nurse
             practitioners (15%). Most reported using opioid risk
             mitigation tools such as urine drug testing (71%), opioid
             treatment agreements (85%), and practitioner database
             monitoring programs (94%). Participants were confident
             (7-8/10) managing the most commonly encountered opioid
             misuse behaviors (missing appointments, marijuana use, and
             using more opioids than prescribed) and in their ability to
             recommend nonpharmacologic and nonopioid pharmacologic
             treatments for chronic pain (10/10). They were least
             confident prescribing naloxone or managing addiction (5/10);
             only 27% reported having training or systems in place to
             address addiction. Only 13% had a waiver to prescribe
             buprenorphine. CONCLUSION: Palliative care providers are
             comfortable with many aspects of managing chronic pain in
             cancer survivors on LTOT, although challenges persist,
             including the lack of systems-based approaches and training
             in addiction treatment.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.493},
   Key = {fds371056}
}

@article{fds340525,
   Author = {Dorfman, CS and Kelleher, SA and Winger, JG and Shelby, RA and Thorn,
             BE and Sutton, LM and Keefe, FJ and Gandhi, V and Manohar, P and Somers,
             TJ},
   Title = {Development and pilot testing of an mHealth behavioral
             cancer pain protocol for medically underserved
             communities.},
   Journal = {J Psychosoc Oncol},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {335-349},
   Year = {2019},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2018.1479327},
   Abstract = {The purpose of this study was to refine and test a
             mobile-health behavioral cancer pain coping skills training
             protocol for women with breast cancer and pain from
             medically underserved areas. Three focus groups (Phase 1)
             were used to refine the initial protocol. A single-arm pilot
             trial (Phase 2) was conducted to assess feasibility,
             acceptability, and changes in outcomes. The intervention was
             delivered at a community-based clinic via videoconferencing
             technology. Participants were women (N = 19 for Phase 1
             and N = 20 for Phase 2) with breast cancer and pain in
             medically underserved areas. Major themes from focus groups
             were used to refine the intervention. The refined
             intervention demonstrated feasibility and acceptability.
             Participants reported significant improvement in pain
             severity, pain interference, and self-efficacy for pain
             management. Our intervention is feasible, acceptable, and
             likely to lead to improvement in pain-related outcomes for
             breast cancer patients in medically underserved areas.
             Implications for Psychosocial Oncology Practice Breast
             cancer patients being treated in medically underserved areas
             have a dearth of exposure to behavioral interventions that
             may improve their ability to manage pain. Evidence from this
             single-arm pilot trial suggests that our mobile-health
             behavioral cancer pain coping skills training protocol is
             acceptable and feasible in this vulnerable population.
             Appropriately adapted mobile-health technologies may provide
             an avenue to reach underserved patients and implement
             behavioral interventions to improve pain
             management.},
   Doi = {10.1080/07347332.2018.1479327},
   Key = {fds340525}
}

@article{fds345914,
   Author = {Gewandter, JS and Eisenach, JC and Gross, RA and Jensen, MP and Keefe,
             FJ and Lee, DA and Turk, DC},
   Title = {Checklist for the preparation and review of pain clinical
             trial publications: a pain-specific supplement to
             CONSORT.},
   Journal = {Pain Rep},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {e621},
   Year = {2019},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000621},
   Abstract = {INTRODUCTION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are
             considered the gold standard when assessing the efficacy of
             interventions because randomization of treatment assignment
             minimizes bias in treatment effect estimates. However, if
             RCTs are not performed with methodological rigor, many
             opportunities for bias in treatment effect estimates remain.
             Clear and transparent reporting of RCTs is essential to
             allow the reader to consider the opportunities for bias when
             critically evaluating the results. To promote such
             transparent reporting, the Consolidated Standards of
             Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group has published a series of
             recommendations starting in 1996. However, a decade after
             the publication of the first CONSORT guidelines, systematic
             reviews of clinical trials in the pain field identified a
             number of common deficiencies in reporting (e.g., failure to
             identify primary outcome measures and analyses, indicate
             clearly the numbers of participants who completed the trial
             and were included in the analyses, or report harms
             adequately). METHODS: Qualitative review of a diverse set of
             published recommendations and systematic reviews that
             addressed the reporting of clinical trials, including those
             related to all therapeutic indications (e.g., CONSORT) and
             those specific to pain clinical trials. RESULTS: A checklist
             designed to supplement the content covered in the CONSORT
             checklist with added details relating to challenges specific
             to pain trials or found to be poorly reported in recent pain
             trials was developed. CONCLUSIONS: Authors and reviewers of
             analgesic RCTs should consult the CONSORT guidelines and
             this checklist to ensure that the issues most pertinent to
             pain RCTs are reported with transparency.},
   Doi = {10.1097/PR9.0000000000000621},
   Key = {fds345914}
}

@article{fds337361,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Gerhart, J and Post, KM and Smith, DA and Porter, LS and Buvanendran, A and Fras, AM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Spouse Criticism/Hostility Toward Partners With Chronic
             Pain: The Role of Spouse Attributions for Patient Control
             Over Pain Behaviors.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1308-1317},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.05.007},
   Abstract = {Spouse attributions regarding displays of pain behaviors by
             their partners with chronic pain may account for subsequent
             increases in spouse critical/hostile responses toward their
             partners. People with chronic low back pain (n = 105)
             and their pain-free spouses (n = 105) completed
             electronic diary measures 5 times per day for 14 consecutive
             days. Key items assessed spouse observations of patient pain
             behavior, attributions regarding these behaviors, and spouse
             critical/hostile responses toward patients. Results were 1)
             spouse observations of patient pain behavior at time 1
             predicted high levels of spouse critical/hostile responses
             toward the patient at time 2. 2) "Internal" attributions
             (eg, the patient was attempting to influence spouse's
             feelings) at time 1 predicted high levels of spouse
             critical/hostile responses toward the patient at time 2. 3)
             Internal attributions mediated links between spouse-observed
             pain behaviors at time 1 and levels of spouse
             critical/hostile responses at time 2. Spouse observations of
             patient pain behavior was also related to an "external"
             attribution (ie, patient pain behavior was due to pain
             condition), but this attribution was not a significant
             mediator. A vital factor linking spouse scrutiny to spouse
             critical/hostile responses may be the spouse's ascribed
             reasons for the patient's grimacing, bracing, complaining,
             and so forth. Perspective: Results indicate that spouse
             internal and negative attributions for pain behaviors of
             their partners with chronic pain may influence subsequent
             spouse critical/hostile reactions to them. Findings suggest
             that replacing spouse internal and negative attributions
             with external, compassionate, and accepting explanations may
             be useful therapeutic targets for couples coping with
             chronic pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2018.05.007},
   Key = {fds337361}
}

@article{fds339861,
   Author = {Cole, LJ and Bennell, KL and Ahamed, Y and Bryant, C and Keefe, F and Moseley, GL and Hodges, P and Farrell, MJ},
   Title = {Determining Brain Mechanisms that Underpin Analgesia Induced
             by the Use of Pain Coping Skills.},
   Journal = {Pain Med},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {2177-2190},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx301},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Cognitive behavioral therapies decrease pain and
             improve mood and function in people with osteoarthritis.
             This study assessed the effects of coping strategies on the
             central processing of knee pain in people with
             osteoarthritis of the knees. METHODS: Mechanical pressure
             was applied to exacerbate knee pain in 28 people with
             osteoarthritis of the knee. Reports of pain intensity and
             functional magnetic resonance imaging measures of
             pain-related brain activity were recorded with and without
             the concurrent use of pain coping skills. RESULTS: Coping
             skills led to a significant reduction in pain report (Coping
             = 2.64 ± 0.17, Not Coping = 3.28 ± 0.15,
             P < 0.001). These strategies were associated with
             increased activation in pain modulatory regions of the brain
             (medial prefrontal and rostral anterior cingulate cortices,
             Pcorrected < 0.05) and decreased pain-related activation
             in regions that process noxious input (midcingulate cortex,
             supplementary motor area, secondary somatosensory cortex,
             and anterior parietal lobule, Pcorrected < 0.05). The
             magnitude of the decrease in pain report during the use of
             pain coping strategies was found to be proportional to the
             decrease in pain-related activation in brain regions that
             code the aversive/emotional dimension of pain (anterior
             insula, inferior frontal gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex,
             Pcorrected < 0.05) but did not differ between groups
             with and without training in coping skills. However,
             training in coping skills reduced the extent to which brain
             responses to noxious input were influenced by anxiety.
             CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support previous
             reports of pain modulation by cognitive pain coping
             strategies and contribute to the current understanding of
             how analgesia associated with the use of pain coping
             strategies is represented in the brain.},
   Doi = {10.1093/pm/pnx301},
   Key = {fds339861}
}

@article{fds338437,
   Author = {Allen, KD and Arbeeva, L and Cené, CW and Coffman, CJ and Grimm, KF and Haley, E and Keefe, FJ and Nagle, CT and Oddone, EZ and Somers, TJ and Watkins, Y and Campbell, LC},
   Title = {Pain coping skills training for African Americans with
             osteoarthritis study: baseline participant characteristics
             and comparison to prior studies.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {337},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2249-6},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: The Pain Coping Skills Training for African
             Americans with OsteoaRTthritis (STAART) trial is examining
             the effectiveness of a culturally enhanced pain coping
             skills training (CST) program for African Americans with
             osteoarthritis (OA). This disparities-focused trial aimed to
             reach a population with greater symptom severity and risk
             factors for poor pain-related outcomes than previous
             studies. This paper compares characteristics of STAART
             participants with prior studies of CST or cognitive
             behavioral therapy (CBT)-informed training in pain coping
             strategies for OA. METHODS: A literature search identified
             10 prior trials of pain CST or CBT-informed pain coping
             training among individuals with OA. We descriptively
             compared characteristics of STAART participants with other
             studies, in 3 domains of the National Institutes of Minority
             Health and Health Disparities' Research Framework:
             Sociocultural Environment (e.g., age, education, marital
             status), Biological Vulnerability and Mechanisms (e.g, pain
             and function, body mass index), and Health Behaviors and
             Coping (e.g., pain catastrophizing). Means and standard
             deviations (SDs) or proportions were calculated for STAART
             participants and extracted from published manuscripts for
             comparator studies. RESULTS: The mean age of STAART
             participants, 59 years (SD = 10.3), was lower than 9 of
             10 comparator studies; the proportion of individuals with
             some education beyond high school, 75%, was comparable to
             comparator studies (61-86%); and the proportion of
             individuals who are married or living with a partner, 42%,
             was lower than comparator studies (62-66%). Comparator
             studies had less than about 1/3 African American
             participants. Mean scores on the Western Ontario and
             McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and function
             scales were higher (worse) for STAART participants than for
             other studies, and mean body mass index of STAART
             participants, 35.2 kg/m2 (SD = 8.2), was higher than
             all other studies (30-34 kg/m2). STAART participants' mean
             score on the Pain Catastrophizing scale, 19.8
             (SD = 12.3), was higher (worse) than other studies
             reporting this measure (7-17). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with
             prior studies with predominantly white samples, STAART
             participants have worse pain and function and more risk
             factors for negative pain-related outcomes across several
             domains. Given STAART participants' high mean pain
             catastrophizing scores, this sample may particularly benefit
             from the CST intervention approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION:
             NCT02560922.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s12891-018-2249-6},
   Key = {fds338437}
}

@article{fds336943,
   Author = {Van Denburg and AN and Shelby, RA and Caldwell, DS and O'Sullivan, ML and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Self-Efficacy for Pain Communication Moderates the Relation
             Between Ambivalence Over Emotional Expression and Pain
             Catastrophizing Among Patients With Osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1006-1014},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.001},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: Pain catastrophizing (ie, the tendency to focus
             on and magnify pain sensations and feel helpless in the face
             of pain) is one of the most important and consistent
             psychological predictors of the pain experience. The present
             study examined, in 60 patients with osteoarthritis pain who
             were married or partnered: 1) the degree to which
             ambivalence over emotional expression and negative network
             orientation were associated with pain catastrophizing, and
             2) whether self-efficacy for pain communication moderated
             these relations. Hierarchical multiple linear regression
             analyses revealed a significant main effect for the
             association between ambivalence over emotional expression
             and pain catastrophizing; as ambivalence over emotional
             expression increased, the degree of pain catastrophizing
             increased. In addition, the interaction between ambivalence
             over emotional expression and self-efficacy for pain
             communication was significant, such that as self-efficacy
             for pain communication increased, the association between
             ambivalence over emotional expression and pain
             catastrophizing became weaker. Negative network orientation
             was not significantly associated with pain catastrophizing.
             Findings suggest that higher levels of self-efficacy for
             pain communication may help weaken the effects of
             ambivalence over emotional expression on pain
             catastrophizing. In light of these results, patients may
             benefit from interventions that target pain communication
             processes and emotion regulation. PERSPECTIVE: This article
             examines interpersonal processes involved in pain
             catastrophizing. This study has the potential to lead to
             better understanding of maladaptive pain coping strategies
             and possibly better prevention and treatment
             strategies.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.001},
   Key = {fds336943}
}

@article{fds341013,
   Author = {Bennell, KL and Nelligan, RK and Rini, C and Keefe, FJ and Kasza, J and French, S and Forbes, A and Dobson, F and Abbott, JH and Dalwood, A and Harris, A and Vicenzino, B and Hodges, PW and Hinman,
             RS},
   Title = {Effects of internet-based pain coping skills training before
             home exercise for individuals with hip osteoarthritis (HOPE
             trial): a randomised controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {159},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1833-1842},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001281},
   Abstract = {This assessor-, therapist-, and participant-blinded
             randomised controlled trial evaluated the effects of an
             automated internet-based pain coping skills training (PCST)
             program before home exercise for people with clinically
             diagnosed hip osteoarthritis. One hundred forty-four people
             were randomised to either the PCST group or the comparator
             group. In the first 8 weeks, the PCST group received online
             education and PCST, whereas the comparison group received
             online education only. From weeks 8 to 24, both groups
             visited a physiotherapist 5 times for home exercise
             prescription. Assessments were performed at baseline, 8, 24,
             and 52 weeks. Primary outcomes were hip pain on walking
             (11-point numerical rating scale) and physical function
             (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
             Index [WOMAC]) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were other
             measures of pain, quality-of-life, global change,
             self-efficacy, pain coping, pain catastrophizing,
             depression, anxiety, stress, physical activity, and adverse
             events. Primary outcomes were completed by 137 (95%), 131
             (91%), and 127 (88%) participants at 8, 24, and 52 weeks,
             respectively. There were no significant between-group
             differences in primary outcomes at week 24 (change in:
             walking pain [mean difference 0.5 units; 95% confidence
             interval, -0.3 to 1.3] and function [-0.9 units; 95%
             confidence interval, -4.8 to 2.9]), with both groups showing
             clinically relevant improvements. At week 8, the PCST group
             had greater improvements in function, pain coping, and
             global improvement than comparison. Greater pain coping
             improvements persisted at 24 and 52 weeks. In summary,
             online PCST immediately improved pain coping and function
             but did not confer additional benefits to a subsequent
             exercise program, despite sustained pain coping
             improvements.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001281},
   Key = {fds341013}
}

@article{fds336940,
   Author = {Cook, CE and George, SZ and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Different interventions, same outcomes? Here are four good
             reasons.},
   Journal = {Br J Sports Med},
   Volume = {52},
   Number = {15},
   Pages = {951-952},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098978},
   Doi = {10.1136/bjsports-2017-098978},
   Key = {fds336940}
}

@article{fds337107,
   Author = {Parmelee, PA and Scicolone, MA and Cox, BS and DeCaro, JA and Keefe, FJ and Smith, DM},
   Title = {Global Versus Momentary Osteoarthritis Pain and Emotional
             Distress: Emotional Intelligence as Moderator.},
   Journal = {Ann Behav Med},
   Volume = {52},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {713-723},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax044},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Pain and emotional well-being are complexly
             associated both globally and in the moment. Emotional
             regulation strategies may contribute to that complexity by
             shaping the pain-well-being association. PURPOSE: Using
             emotional intelligence (EI) as an integrative conceptual
             framework, this study probed the role of emotional
             regulation in the associations of osteoarthritis pain with
             emotional well-being in varying time frames. Perceived
             attention to, clarity, and regulation of emotions were
             examined as predictors of well-being, and as moderators of
             the well-being-pain association, at global and momentary
             (within-day) levels. METHODS: In a microlongitudinal study,
             218 older adults with physician-diagnosed knee
             osteoarthritis self-reported global pain, depressive
             symptoms, and EI (mood attention, clarity, and repair).
             Momentary pain and positive and negative affect were then
             assessed four times daily for 7 days. EI subscales were
             examined as moderators of the pain-well-being association at
             global and momentary levels, controlling demographics and
             general health. RESULTS: Global and momentary pain were
             positively associated with mood clarity and negatively with
             attention, but not with repair. Clarity and repair
             negatively predicted depression, and buffered effects of
             pain on depression. Momentary negative affect was negatively
             predicted by mood clarity and repair; again, clarity and
             mood repair buffered effects of momentary pain on negative
             affect. Only mood repair predicted positive affect, with no
             interactions emerging. CONCLUSIONS: Attention to mood states
             exacerbates the experience of pain in both short and long
             terms. In contrast, both mood clarity and ability to repair
             moods appear important to both momentary and longer-term
             emotional well-being.},
   Doi = {10.1093/abm/kax044},
   Key = {fds337107}
}

@article{fds336945,
   Author = {Lawford, BJ and Hinman, RS and Kasza, J and Nelligan, R and Keefe, F and Rini, C and Bennell, KL},
   Title = {Moderators of Effects of Internet-Delivered Exercise and
             Pain Coping Skills Training for People With Knee
             Osteoarthritis: Exploratory Analysis of the IMPACT
             Randomized Controlled Trial.},
   Journal = {J Med Internet Res},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {e10021},
   Publisher = {JMIR Publications Inc.},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10021},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Internet-delivered exercise, education, and pain
             coping skills training is effective for people with knee
             osteoarthritis, yet it is not clear whether this treatment
             is better suited to particular subgroups of patients.
             OBJECTIVE: The aim was to explore demographic and clinical
             moderators of the effect of an internet-delivered
             intervention on changes in pain and physical function in
             people with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Exploratory
             analysis of data from 148 people with knee osteoarthritis
             who participated in a randomized controlled trial comparing
             internet-delivered exercise, education, and pain coping
             skills training to internet-delivered education alone.
             Primary outcomes were changes in knee pain while walking
             (11-point Numerical Rating Scale) and physical function
             (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
             Index function subscale) at 3 and 9 months. Separate
             regression models were fit with moderator variables (age,
             gender, expectations of outcomes, self-efficacy [pain],
             education, employment status, pain catastrophizing, body
             mass index) and study group as covariates, including an
             interaction between the two. RESULTS: Participants in the
             intervention group who were currently employed had
             significantly greater reductions in pain at 3 months than
             similar participants in the control group (between-group
             difference: mean 2.38, 95% CI 1.52-3.23 Numerical Rating
             Scale units; interaction P=.02). Additionally, within the
             intervention group, pain at 3 months reduced by mean 0.53
             (95% CI 0.28-0.78) Numerical Rating Scale units per unit
             increase in baseline self-efficacy for managing pain
             compared to mean 0.11 Numerical Rating Scale units (95% CI
             -0.13 to 0.35; interaction P=.02) for the control group.
             CONCLUSIONS: People who were employed and had higher
             self-efficacy at baseline were more likely to experience
             greater improvements in pain at 3 months after an
             internet-delivered exercise, education, and pain coping
             skills training program. There was no evidence of a
             difference in the effect across gender, educational level,
             expectation of treatment outcome, or across age, body mass
             index, or tendency to catastrophize pain. Findings support
             the effectiveness of internet-delivered care for a wide
             range of people with knee osteoarthritis, but future
             confirmatory research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION:
             Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry
             ACTRN12614000243617; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=365812&isReview=true
             (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6z466oTPs).},
   Doi = {10.2196/10021},
   Key = {fds336945}
}

@article{fds331439,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Couple-based communication interventions for cancer: moving
             beyond a 'one size fits all' approach.},
   Journal = {Acta Oncol},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {693-695},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2017.1400687},
   Doi = {10.1080/0284186X.2017.1400687},
   Key = {fds331439}
}

@article{fds337030,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Main, CJ and George, SZ},
   Title = {Advancing Psychologically Informed Practice for Patients
             With Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain: Promise, Pitfalls, and
             Solutions.},
   Journal = {Phys Ther},
   Volume = {98},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {398-407},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy024},
   Abstract = {There has been growing interest in psychologically oriented
             pain management over the past 3 to 4 decades, including a
             2011 description of psychologically informed practice (PIP)
             for low back pain. PIP requires a broader focus than
             traditional biomechanical and pathology-based approaches
             that have been traditionally used to manage musculoskeletal
             pain. A major focus of PIP is addressing the behavioral
             aspects of pain (ie, peoples' responses to pain) by
             identifying individual expectations, beliefs, and feelings
             as prognostic factors for clinical and occupational outcomes
             indicating progression to chronicity. Since 2011, the
             interest in PIP seems to be growing, as evidenced by its use
             in large trials, inclusion in scientific conferences,
             increasing evidence base, and expansion to other
             musculoskeletal pain conditions. Primary care physicians and
             physical therapists have delivered PIP as part of a
             stratified care approach involving screening and targeting
             of treatment for people at high risk for continued
             pain-associated disability. Furthermore, PIP is consistent
             with recent national priorities emphasizing
             nonpharmacological pain management options. In this
             perspective, PIP techniques that range in complexity are
             described, considerations for implementation in clinical
             practice are offered, and future directions that will
             advance the understanding of PIP are outlined.},
   Doi = {10.1093/ptj/pzy024},
   Key = {fds337030}
}

@article{fds336941,
   Author = {Jensen, MP and Thorn, BE and Carmody, J and Keefe, FJ and Burns,
             JW},
   Title = {The Role of Cognitive Content and Cognitive Processes in
             Chronic Pain: An Important Distinction?},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {391-401},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000559},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: Pain-related cognitive content (what people
             think about pain) and cognitive processes (how people think
             about pain; what they do with their pain-related thoughts)
             and their interaction are hypothesized to play distinct
             roles in patient function. However, questions have been
             raised regarding whether it is possible or practical to
             assess cognitive content and cognitive process as distinct
             domains. The aim of this study was to determine the extent
             to which measures that seem to assess mostly pain-related
             cognitive content, cognitive processes, and content and
             process, are relatively independent from each other and
             contribute unique variance to the prediction of patient
             function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals with chronic
             low back pain (N=165) participating in an ongoing RCT were
             administered measures of cognitions, pain, and function
             (depressive symptoms and pain interference) pretreatment.
             RESULTS: Analyses provided support for the hypothesis that
             cognitive content and cognitive process, while related, can
             be assessed as distinct components. However, the measure
             assessing a cognitive process-mindfulness-evidenced
             relatively weak associations with function, especially
             compared with the stronger and more consistent findings for
             the measures of content (catastrophizing and self-efficacy).
             DISCUSSION: The results provide preliminary evidence for the
             possibility that mindfulness could have both benefits and
             costs. Research to evaluate this possibility is
             warranted.},
   Doi = {10.1097/AJP.0000000000000559},
   Key = {fds336941}
}

@article{fds330575,
   Author = {O'Sullivan, ML and Shelby, RA and Dorfman, CS and Kelleher, SA and Fisher, HM and Rowe Nichols and KA and Keefe, FJ and Sung, AD and Somers,
             TJ},
   Title = {The effect of pre-transplant pain and chronic disease
             self-efficacy on quality of life domains in the year
             following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1243-1252},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3947-6},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: Pain is common for hematopoietic stem cell
             transplant (HSCT) patients and may be experienced
             pre-transplant, acutely post-transplant, and for months or
             years following transplant. HSCT patients with persistent
             pain may be at risk for poor quality of life following
             transplant; however, the impact of pre-transplant pain on
             quality of life post-transplant is not well understood.
             Self-efficacy for chronic disease management is associated
             with quality of life among cancer patients and may impact
             quality of life for HSCT patients. The primary aim was to
             examine the effect of pre-transplant pain and self-efficacy
             on quality of life domains in the year following transplant.
             METHODS: One hundred sixty-six HSCT patients completed
             questionnaires providing information on pain, self-efficacy,
             and quality of life prior to transplant, at discharge, and
             3-, 6-, and 12-months post-transplant as part of a
             longitudinal, observational study. Linear mixed modeling
             examined the trajectories of these variables and the effect
             of pre-transplant pain and self-efficacy on post-transplant
             quality of life. RESULTS: Pain and social and emotional
             quality of life remained stable in the year following
             transplant while self-efficacy and physical and functional
             quality of life improved. Pre-transplant pain was
             significantly related to lower physical well-being
             post-transplant. Lower pre-transplant self-efficacy was
             related to lower quality of life across all domains
             post-transplant. CONCLUSION: Above and beyond the effect of
             pre-transplant pain, self-efficacy for managing chronic
             disease is important in understanding quality of life
             following transplant. Identifying patients with pain and/or
             low self-efficacy pre-transplant may allow for early
             intervention with self-management strategies.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-017-3947-6},
   Key = {fds330575}
}

@article{fds330868,
   Author = {Rini, C and Vu, MB and Lerner, H and Bloom, C and Carda-Auten, J and Wood,
             WA and Basch, EM and Voorhees, PM and Reeder-Hayes, KE and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {A qualitative study of patient and provider perspectives on
             using web-based pain coping skills training to treat
             persistent cancer pain.},
   Journal = {Palliat Support Care},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {155-169},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517000086},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Persistent pain is common and inadequately
             treated in cancer patients. Behavioral pain interventions
             are a recommended part of multimodal pain treatments, but
             they are underused in clinical care due to barriers such as
             a lack of the resources needed to deliver them in person and
             difficulties coordinating their use with clinical care. Pain
             coping skills training (PCST) is an evidence-based
             behavioral pain intervention traditionally delivered in
             person. Delivering this training via the web would increase
             access to it by addressing barriers that currently limit its
             use. We conducted a patient pilot study of an 8-week
             web-based PCST program to determine the acceptability of
             this approach to patients and the program features needed to
             meet their needs. Focus groups with healthcare providers
             identified strategies for coordinating the use of web-based
             PCST in clinical care. METHOD: Participants included 7
             adults with bone pain due to multiple myeloma or
             metastasized breast or prostate cancer and 12 healthcare
             providers (4 physicians and 8 advanced practice providers)
             who treat cancer-related bone pain. Patients completed
             web-based PCST at home and then took part in an in-depth
             qualitative interview. Providers attended focus groups led
             by a trained moderator. Qualitative analyses identified
             themes in the patient and provider data. RESULTS: Patients
             reported strongly favorable responses to web-based PCST and
             described emotional and physical benefits. They offered
             suggestions for adapting the approach to better fit their
             needs and to overcome barriers to completion. Focus groups
             indicated a need to familiarize healthcare providers with
             PCST and to address concerns about overburdening patients.
             Providers would recommend the program to patients they felt
             could benefit. They suggested applying a broad definition of
             cancer pain and having various types of providers help
             coordinate program its use with clinical care. SIGNIFICANCE
             OF RESULTS: Web-based PCST was acceptable to patients and
             providers. Our findings suggest that patients could benefit
             from this approach, especially if patient and provider
             barriers are addressed.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1478951517000086},
   Key = {fds330868}
}

@article{fds333734,
   Author = {DeBar, L and Benes, L and Bonifay, A and Deyo, RA and Elder, CR and Keefe,
             FJ and Leo, MC and McMullen, C and Mayhew, M and Owen-Smith, A and Smith,
             DH and Trinacty, CM and Vollmer, WM},
   Title = {Interdisciplinary team-based care for patients with chronic
             pain on long-term opioid treatment in primary care (PPACT) -
             Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized
             trial.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {67},
   Pages = {91-99},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2018.02.015},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is one of the most common,
             disabling, and expensive public health problems in the
             United States. Interdisciplinary pain management treatments
             that employ behavioral approaches have been successful in
             helping patients with chronic pain reduce symptoms and
             regain functioning. However, most patients lack access to
             such treatments. We are conducting a pragmatic clinical
             trial to test the hypothesis that patients who receive an
             interdisciplinary biopsychosocial intervention, the Pain
             Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT), at their
             primary care clinic will have a greater reduction in pain
             impact in the year following than patients receiving usual
             care. METHODS/DESIGN: This is an effectiveness-implementation
             hybrid pragmatic clinical trial in which we randomize
             clusters of primary care providers and their patients with
             chronic pain who are on long-term opioid therapy to 1)
             receive an interdisciplinary behavioral intervention in
             conjunction with their current health care or 2) continue
             with current health care services. Our primary outcome is
             pain impact (a composite of pain intensity and pain-related
             interference) measured using the PEG, a validated three-item
             assessment. Secondary outcomes include pain-related
             disability, patient satisfaction, opioids dispensed and
             health care utilization. An economic evaluation assesses the
             resources and costs necessary to deliver the intervention
             and its cost-effectiveness compared with usual care. A
             formative evaluation employs mixed methods to understand the
             context for implementation in the participating health care
             systems. DISCUSSION: This trial will inform the feasibility
             of implementing interdisciplinary behavioral approaches to
             pain management in the primary care setting, potentially
             providing a more effective, safer, and more satisfactory
             alternative to opioid-based chronic pain treatment. Clinical
             Trials Registration Number: NCT02113592.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2018.02.015},
   Key = {fds333734}
}

@article{fds336944,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Kelleher, SA and Dorfman, CS and Shelby, RA and Fisher,
             HM and Rowe Nichols and K and Sullivan, KM and Chao, NJ and Samsa, GP and Abernethy, AP and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {An mHealth Pain Coping Skills Training Intervention for
             Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients:
             Development and Pilot Randomized Controlled
             Trial.},
   Journal = {JMIR Mhealth Uhealth},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {e66},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8565},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Pain is a challenge for patients following
             hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). OBJECTIVE:
             This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility,
             acceptability, and initial efficacy of a Web-based mobile
             pain coping skills training (mPCST) protocol designed to
             address the needs of HCT patients. METHODS: Participants had
             undergone HCT and reported pain following transplant (N=68).
             To guide intervention development, qualitative data were
             collected from focus group participants (n=25) and
             participants who completed user testing (n=7). After their
             input was integrated into the mPCST intervention, a pilot
             randomized controlled trial (RCT, n=36) was conducted to
             examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy
             of the intervention. Measures of acceptability, pain
             severity, pain disability, pain self-efficacy, fatigue, and
             physical disability (self-report and 2-min walk test [2MWT])
             were collected. RESULTS: Participants in the focus groups
             and user testing provided qualitative data that were used to
             iteratively refine the mPCST protocol. Focus group
             qualitative data included participants' experiences with
             pain following transplant, perspectives on ways to cope with
             pain, and suggestions for pain management for other HCT
             patients. User testing participants provided feedback on the
             HCT protocol and information on the use of
             videoconferencing. The final version of the mPCST
             intervention was designed to bridge the intensive outpatient
             (1 in-person session) and home settings (5 videoconferencing
             sessions). A key component of the intervention was a website
             that provided personalized messages based on daily
             assessments of pain and activity. The website also provided
             intervention materials (ie, electronic handouts, short
             videos, and audio files). The intervention content included
             pain coping advice from other transplant patients and
             instructions on how to apply pain coping skills while
             engaging in meaningful and leisure activities. In the RCT
             phase of this research, HCT patients (n=36) were randomized
             to receive the mPCST intervention or to proceed with the
             treatment as usual. Results revealed that the mPCST
             participants completed an average of 5 out of 6 sessions.
             The participants reported that the intervention was highly
             acceptable (mean 3/4), and they found the sessions to be
             helpful (mean 8/10) and easy to understand (mean 7/7). The
             mPCST participants demonstrated significant improvements in
             pre- to post-treatment pain, self-efficacy (P=.03, d=0.61),
             and on the 2MWT (P=.03, d=0.66), whereas the patients in the
             treatment-as-usual group did not report any such
             improvements. Significant changes in pain disability and
             fatigue were found in both groups (multiple P<.02); the
             magnitudes of the effect sizes were larger for the mPCST
             group than for the control group (pain disability: d=0.79 vs
             0.69; fatigue: d=0.94 vs 0.81). There were no significant
             changes in pain severity in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Using
             focus groups and user testing, we developed an mPCST
             protocol that was feasible, acceptable, and beneficial for
             HCT patients with pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION:
             ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01984671; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01984671
             (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xbpx3clZ).},
   Doi = {10.2196/mhealth.8565},
   Key = {fds336944}
}

@article{fds342507,
   Author = {Van Denburg and AN and Vilardaga, JP and Shelby, RA and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Opioid therapy and persistent pain: can cognitive behavioral
             therapy help?},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {159},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {411-415},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001091},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001091},
   Key = {fds342507}
}

@article{fds342508,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Ballantyne, J and Blyth, F and Coghill, RC and Dickenson,
             A and Dionne, CE and Eccleston, C and Finnerup, NB and Kuner, R and Seminowicz, DA and Sluka, K},
   Title = {Publishing the best basic and applied pain science: open
             science and PAIN.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {159},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {405-406},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001166},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001166},
   Key = {fds342508}
}

@article{fds337362,
   Author = {Janke, EA and Cheatle, M and Keefe, FJ and Dhingra, L and Society of
             Behavioral Medicine Health Policy Committee},
   Title = {Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement:
             improving access to psychosocial care for individuals with
             persistent pain: supporting the National Pain Strategy's
             call for interdisciplinary pain care.},
   Journal = {Transl Behav Med},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {305-308},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx043},
   Abstract = {Policy makers have articulated a need for clear,
             evidence-based guidance to help inform pain policy.
             Persistent pain is common, expensive, and debilitating, and
             requires comprehensive assessment and treatment planning.
             Recently released opioid prescribing guidelines by the CDC
             (2016) emphasize the importance of using nonopioid therapies
             before considering opioid treatment for those without a
             malignant illness. The National Pain Strategy (2016)
             underscores the importance of comprehensive,
             interdisciplinary pain care. Unfortunately, despite
             persuasive evidence supporting the efficacy of psychosocial
             approaches, these interventions are inaccessible to the
             majority of Americans. Psychosocial approaches to pain
             management should be available for all individuals with
             persistent pain and in all health care settings and contexts
             as part of the comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach to
             pain care as outlined in the National Pain Strategy. To
             achieve this, we must prioritize reimbursement of
             evidence-based psychosocial approaches for pain assessment
             and management and improve provider training and
             competencies to implement these approaches.},
   Doi = {10.1093/tbm/ibx043},
   Key = {fds337362}
}

@article{fds333735,
   Author = {Gerhart, JI and Burns, JW and Bruehl, S and Smith, DA and Post, KM and Porter, LS and Schuster, E and Buvanendran, A and Fras, AM and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Variability in negative emotions among individuals with
             chronic low back pain: relationships with pain and
             function.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {159},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {342-350},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001102},
   Abstract = {Chronic pain is associated with elevated negative emotions,
             and resources needed to adaptively regulate these emotions
             can be depleted during prolonged pain. Studies of links
             between pain, function, and negative emotions in people with
             chronic pain, however, have focused almost exclusively on
             relationships among mean levels of these factors. Indexes
             that may reflect aspects of emotion regulation have
             typically not been analyzed. We propose that 1 index of
             emotion regulation is variability in emotion over time as
             opposed to average emotion over time. The sample was 105
             people with chronic low back pain and 105 of their pain-free
             spouses. They completed electronic diary measures 5x/d for
             14 consecutive days, producing 70 observations per person
             from which we derived estimates of within-subject variance
             in negative emotions. Location-scale models were used to
             simultaneously model predictors of both mean level and
             variance in patient negative emotions over time. Patients
             reported significantly more variability in negative emotions
             compared to their spouses. Patients who reported higher
             average levels of pain, pain interference, and downtime
             reported significantly higher levels of variability in
             negative emotions. Spouse-observed pain and pain behaviors
             were also associated with greater variability in patients'
             negative emotions. Test of the inverse associations between
             negative emotion level and variability in pain and function
             were significant but weaker in magnitude. These findings
             support the notion that chronic pain may erode negative
             emotion regulation resources, to the potential detriment of
             intra- and inter-personal function.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001102},
   Key = {fds333735}
}

@article{fds333736,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Post, KM and Smith, DA and Porter, LS and Buvanendran, A and Fras, AM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Spouse criticism and hostility during marital interaction:
             effects on pain intensity and behaviors among individuals
             with chronic low back pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {159},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {25-32},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001037},
   Abstract = {Individuals with chronic pain may experience negative
             responses from spouse, family, and friends. Responses such
             as overt criticism and hostility may be associated with
             worsening pain and function for chronic pain sufferers. We
             used a laboratory procedure to evaluate whether variability
             in spouse criticism/hostility exhibited toward chronic low
             back pain (CLBP) patients during a conflictual discussion
             predicted variability in patient pain and function during a
             subsequent pain-induction task. Chronic low back pain
             patients (n = 71) and their spouses (n = 71) participated in
             a 10-minute discussion followed by the patient undergoing a
             10-minute structured pain behavior task (SPBT). Spouse
             criticism/hostility perceived by patients and patient Beck
             Depression Inventory-II (BDI) scores correlated
             significantly and positively with pain intensity during the
             SPBT, whereas perceived spouse hostility, patient BDI
             scores, and spouse trait hostility correlated significantly
             and positively with observed pain behaviors during the SPBT.
             Spouse criticism/hostility coded by raters from video
             recordings interacted significantly with patient BDI scores,
             such that observed spouse criticism/hostility was related
             significantly and positively with pain behaviors only for
             patients with high BDI scores. Patient sex interacted
             significantly with observed spouse criticism/hostility, such
             that observed spouse criticism/hostility was related
             significantly and positively with pain behaviors only for
             female patients. Results support the hypothesis that spouse
             criticism and hostility-actually expressed or perceived-may
             worsen CLBP patient symptoms. Further, women patients and
             patients high in depressive symptoms appeared most
             vulnerable to spouse criticism/hostility. Thus, negative
             marital communication patterns may be appropriate targets
             for intervention, especially among these 2 at risk
             groups.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001037},
   Key = {fds333736}
}

@article{fds332333,
   Author = {Lumley, MA and Anderson, T and Ankawi, B and Goldman, G and Perri, LM and Bianco, JA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The working alliance and Clinician-assisted Emotional
             Disclosure for rheumatoid arthritis.},
   Journal = {J Psychosom Res},
   Volume = {104},
   Pages = {9-15},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.11.004},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: The working alliance predicts improvement
             following general psychotherapy, but how it operates in
             brief interventions conducted with medically ill patients is
             unknown. Also, the role of the working alliance may differ
             in emotion-focused versus educational interventions.
             METHODS: We report secondary analyses of a randomized
             clinical trial (Keefe et al.) [35], in which patients with
             rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received four nurse-provided
             sessions of either a) Clinician-assisted Emotional
             Disclosure (CAED), which emphasized the disclosure,
             expression, and processing of emotions related to stressful
             events; or b) Arthritis Education (AE), which provided basic
             education about RA. The Working Alliance Inventory was
             completed by both patient and nurse after each session.
             Patients were evaluated on multiple health measures at
             baseline and 1, 3, and 12months post-treatment. RESULTS:
             Analyses compared the alliance between interventions and
             related the alliance to outcomes within interventions.
             Patients in CAED reported a lower alliance than patients in
             AE. Interestingly, in CAED, lower alliance ratings predicted
             better outcomes (improved functioning, lower pain behaviors,
             lower inflammation, lower daily stress), whereas in AE, the
             working alliance was largely not predictive of outcomes.
             CONCLUSION: Having nurses encourage emotional disclosure
             among patients with RA reduced the patients' working
             alliance, but a lower alliance nonetheless predicted better
             patient outcomes, perhaps reflecting successful engagement
             in an intervention that is emotionally and relationally
             challenging. The level and predictive validity of the
             working alliance likely depends on patient, provider, and
             intervention factors, and further study of the working
             alliance in psychosocial interventions in the medical
             context is needed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.11.004},
   Key = {fds332333}
}

@article{fds339268,
   Author = {Langer, SL and Romano, JM and Todd, M and Strauman, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Syrjala, KL and Bricker, JB and Ghosh, N and Burns, JW and Bolger, N and Puleo, BK and Gralow, JR and Shankaran, V and Westbrook, K and Zafar,
             SY and Porter, LS},
   Title = {Links Between Communication and Relationship Satisfaction
             Among Patients With Cancer and Their Spouses: Results of a
             Fourteen-Day Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary
             Assessment Study.},
   Journal = {Front Psychol},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {OCT},
   Pages = {1843},
   Year = {2018},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01843},
   Abstract = {Cancer treatment poses significant challenges not just for
             those diagnosed with the disease but also for their intimate
             partners. Evidence suggests that couples' communication
             plays a major role in the adjustment of both individuals and
             in the quality of their relationship. Most descriptive
             studies linking communication to adjustment have relied on
             traditional questionnaire methodologies and cross-sectional
             designs, limiting external validity and discernment of
             temporal patterns. Using the systemic-transactional model of
             dyadic coping as a framework, we examined intra- and
             inter-personal associations between communication (both
             enacted and perceived) and relationship satisfaction (RS)
             among patients with stage II-IV breast or colorectal cancer
             and their spouses (N = 107 couples). Participants (mean age
             = 51, 64.5% female patients, and 37.4% female spouses)
             independently completed twice-daily ecological momentary
             assessments (EMA) via smartphone for 14 consecutive days.
             Items assessed RS and communication (expression of feelings,
             holding back from expression, support and criticism of
             partner, and parallel ratings of partner behavior). Linear
             mixed models employing an Actor Partner Interdependence
             Model were used to examine concurrent, time-lagged, and
             cross-lagged associations between communication and RS.
             Expressing one's feelings was unassociated with RS. Holding
             back from doing so, in contrast, was associated with lower
             RS for both patients and spouses in concurrent models. These
             effects were both intrapersonal and interpersonal, meaning
             that when individuals held back from expressing their
             feelings, they reported lower RS and so too did their
             partner. Giving and receiving support were associated with
             one's own higher RS for both patients and spouses in
             concurrent models, and for patients in lagged models.
             Conversely, criticizing one's partner and feeling criticized
             were maladaptive, associated with lower RS (own and in some
             cases, partner's). Cross-lagged analyses (evening RS to
             next-day afternoon communication) yielded virtually no
             effects, suggesting that communication may have a stronger
             influence on short-term RS than the reverse. Findings
             underscore the importance of responsive communication, more
             so than expression per se, in explaining both concurrent and
             later relationship adjustment. In addition, a focus on
             holding back from expressing feelings may enhance the
             understanding of RS for couples coping with
             cancer.},
   Doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01843},
   Key = {fds339268}
}

@article{fds371057,
   Author = {Vlaeyen, JW and Keefe, FJ and Main, CJ and Eccleston, C and Williams,
             ACDC},
   Title = {In memoriam: Professor Stephen J. Morley
             (1950-2017).},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {158},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {2057-2058},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001017},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001017},
   Key = {fds371057}
}

@article{fds371058,
   Author = {Main, CJ and Burton, AK and Keefe, FJ and Nicholas, MK and Watson,
             PJ},
   Title = {In memoriam: Gordon Waddell 1942 to 2017},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {158},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1625-1626},
   Publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000958},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000958},
   Key = {fds371058}
}

@article{fds330576,
   Author = {Lefebvre, JC and Jensen, MP and Waters, SJ and Molton, IR and Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS},
   Title = {The development and assessment of the Worry About Pain
             Questionnaire.},
   Journal = {Eur J Pain},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {1154-1164},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1015},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Worry can be conceptualized as a
             cognitive-affective automatic process initiated in order to
             address uncertainty and potential personal inadequacies that
             could result in negative outcomes. The purpose of the
             current study was to develop a measure of pain-specific
             worry - the Worry About Pain Questionnaire (WAPQ). METHOD:
             In study 1, responses of 335 pain-free participants were
             used to complete an item analysis and exploratory factors
             analysis to develop and assess the internal structure of the
             WAPQ. Study 2 included 224 pain-free participants who
             completed the WAPQ in order to confirm its factor structure,
             and to examine its relation to the experience of acute
             experimental pain. In study 3, 137 individuals with
             persistent pain were asked to complete the WAPQ as well as
             measures of pain and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: The
             resulting 15-item measure assesses uncertainties and
             potential negative outcomes related to the experience of
             pain. The results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor
             analyses showed a two-factor structure. Across all studies,
             the WAPQ was found to be related to measures of pain in
             clinical and non-clinical samples, acute experimental pain
             stimuli, as well as pain anxiety, pain catastrophizing, fear
             of pain, rumination and depressive symptomatology.
             CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the WAPQ is a reliable
             and valid measure for the assessment of worry about pain
             that can be used to understand how pain-specific worries are
             related to the experience and impact of pain across
             different populations. SIGNIFICANCE: Worry has been assessed
             in pain populations using measures that assess worry in
             general. The current study shows a relationship between
             pain-specific worry and the experience of pain. Further,
             worry about pain is related to but not synonymous with pain
             catastrophizing.},
   Doi = {10.1002/ejp.1015},
   Key = {fds330576}
}

@article{fds371059,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Kelleher, SA and Dorfman, CS and Shelby, RA and Fisher,
             HM and Rowe Nichols and K and Sullivan, KM and Chao, NJ and Samsa, GP and Abernethy, AP and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {An mHealth Pain Coping Skills Training Intervention for
             Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients:
             Development and Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
             (Preprint)},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/preprints.8565},
   Abstract = {<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>Pain is a challenge for
             patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
             (HCT).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>This
             study aimed to develop and test the feasibility,
             acceptability, and initial efficacy of a Web-based mobile
             pain coping skills training (mPCST) protocol designed to
             address the needs of HCT patients.</p> </sec> <sec>
             <title>METHODS</title> <p>Participants had undergone HCT and
             reported pain following transplant (N=68). To guide
             intervention development, qualitative data were collected
             from focus group participants (n=25) and participants who
             completed user testing (n=7). After their input was
             integrated into the mPCST intervention, a pilot randomized
             controlled trial (RCT, n=36) was conducted to examine the
             feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of the
             intervention. Measures of acceptability, pain severity, pain
             disability, pain self-efficacy, fatigue, and physical
             disability (self-report and 2-min walk test [2MWT]) were
             collected.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title>
             <p>Participants in the focus groups and user testing
             provided qualitative data that were used to iteratively
             refine the mPCST protocol. Focus group qualitative data
             included participants’ experiences with pain following
             transplant, perspectives on ways to cope with pain, and
             suggestions for pain management for other HCT patients. User
             testing participants provided feedback on the HCT protocol
             and information on the use of videoconferencing. The final
             version of the mPCST intervention was designed to bridge the
             intensive outpatient (1 in-person session) and home settings
             (5 videoconferencing sessions). A key component of the
             intervention was a website that provided personalized
             messages based on daily assessments of pain and activity.
             The website also provided intervention materials (ie,
             electronic handouts, short videos, and audio files). The
             intervention content included pain coping advice from other
             transplant patients and instructions on how to apply pain
             coping skills while engaging in meaningful and leisure
             activities. In the RCT phase of this research, HCT patients
             (n=36) were randomized to receive the mPCST intervention or
             to proceed with the treatment as usual. Results revealed
             that the mPCST participants completed an average of 5 out of
             6 sessions. The participants reported that the intervention
             was highly acceptable (mean 3/4), and they found the
             sessions to be helpful (mean 8/10) and easy to understand
             (mean 7/7). The mPCST participants demonstrated significant
             improvements in pre- to post-treatment pain, self-efficacy
             (P=.03, d=0.61), and on the 2MWT (P=.03, d=0.66), whereas
             the patients in the treatment-as-usual group did not report
             any such improvements. Significant changes in pain
             disability and fatigue were found in both groups (multiple
             P&lt;.02); the magnitudes of the effect sizes were larger
             for the mPCST group than for the control group (pain
             disability: d=0.79 vs 0.69; fatigue: d=0.94 vs 0.81). There
             were no significant changes in pain severity in either
             group.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> <p>Using
             focus groups and user testing, we developed an mPCST
             protocol that was feasible, acceptable, and beneficial for
             HCT patients with pain.</p> </sec> <sec>
             <title>CLINICALTRIAL</title> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov
             NCT01984671; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01984671
             (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xbpx3clZ)</p>
             </sec>},
   Doi = {10.2196/preprints.8565},
   Key = {fds371059}
}

@article{fds319635,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Baucom, DH and Olsen, M and Zafar, SY and Uronis, H},
   Title = {A randomized pilot trial of a videoconference couples
             communication intervention for advanced GI
             cancer.},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {1027-1035},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4121},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test the feasibility and
             preliminary efficacy of a couple-based communication
             intervention for advanced GI cancer delivered via
             videoconference. METHODS: Thirty-two couples were randomly
             assigned to either couples communication skills training
             (CCST) or an education comparison intervention, both
             delivered via videoconference. Participation was limited to
             couples who reported communication difficulties at
             screening. Patients and partners completed measures of
             relationship functioning and individual functioning at
             baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: Eighty-eight
             percent of randomized dyads completed all six sessions and
             reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention.
             Between-group effect sizes suggested that the CCST
             intervention led to improvements in relationship
             satisfaction for patients and partners and to improvements
             in intimacy and communication for patients. CONCLUSIONS: A
             couples-based communication intervention delivered via
             videoconference is feasible and acceptable in the context of
             advanced cancer. Preliminary findings suggest that the
             intervention shows promise in contributing to enhanced
             relationship functioning. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &
             Sons, Ltd.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.4121},
   Key = {fds319635}
}

@article{fds330867,
   Author = {Parmelee, PA and Cox, BS and DeCaro, JA and Keefe, FJ and Smith,
             DM},
   Title = {Racial/ethnic differences in sleep quality among older
             adults with osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Sleep Health},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {163-169},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2017.03.010},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine racial/ethnic differences in sleep
             quality and the pain-sleep association among older adults
             with osteoarthritis of the knee. DESIGN: Baseline interview
             followed by a 7-day microlongitudinal study using
             accelerometry and self-reports. SETTING: Participants were
             community residents in western Alabama and Long Island, NY.
             PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six African Americans (AAs) and 128
             non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) with physician-diagnosed knee
             osteoarthritis, recruited from a variety of clinical and
             community settings. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reports yielded
             demographics, body mass index, physical health problems, and
             depressive symptoms. Sleep quality was measured for 3 to 7
             nights using wrist-worn accelerometers; pain was
             self-reported daily over the same period. RESULTS: With
             demographics and health controlled, AAs displayed poorer
             sleep efficiency, greater time awake after sleep onset and
             sleep fragmentation, and marginally more awakenings during
             the night, but no differences in total sleep time. AAs also
             showed greater night-to-night variability in number of
             awakenings and sleep fragmentation, and marginally greater
             variability in total sleep time and sleep efficiency. Sleep
             quality was not associated with pain either the day before
             sleep or the day after. Average daily pain interacted with
             race, whereas AAs displayed no effect of pain on sleep
             efficiency, NHWs exhibited better sleep efficiency at higher
             levels of average pain. CONCLUSIONS: These data corroborate
             previous studies documenting poorer sleep among AAs vs NHWs.
             The findings of greater night-to-night variability in sleep
             among AAs, as well as a negative association of pain with
             sleep quality among NHWs, are unique. Further study is
             needed to elucidate these findings.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.sleh.2017.03.010},
   Key = {fds330867}
}

@article{fds330577,
   Author = {Gerhart, JI and Burns, JW and Post, KM and Smith, DA and Porter, LS and Burgess, HJ and Schuster, E and Buvanendran, A and Fras, AM and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Relationships Between Sleep Quality and Pain-Related Factors
             for People with Chronic Low Back Pain: Tests of Reciprocal
             and Time of Day Effects.},
   Journal = {Ann Behav Med},
   Volume = {51},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {365-375},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9860-2},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Poor sleep quality among people with chronic low
             back pain appears to be related to worse pain, affect, poor
             physical function, and pain catastrophizing. The causal
             direction between poor sleep and pain remains an open
             question, however, as does whether sleep quality exerts
             effects on low back pain differently across the course of
             the day. PURPOSE: This daily diary study examined lagged
             temporal associations between prior night sleep quality and
             subsequent day pain, affect, physical function and pain
             catastrophizing, the reverse lagged temporal associations
             between prior day pain-related factors and subsequent night
             sleep quality, and whether the time of day during which an
             assessment was made moderated these temporal associations.
             METHODS: Chronic low back pain patients (n = 105)
             completed structured electronic diary assessments five times
             per day for 14 days. Items included patient ratings of
             their pain, affect, physical function, and pain
             catastrophizing. RESULTS: Collapsed across all observations,
             poorer sleep quality was significantly related to higher
             pain ratings, higher negative affect, lower positive affect,
             poorer physical function, and higher pain catastrophizing.
             Lagged analyses averaged across the day revealed that poorer
             prior night sleep quality significantly predicted greater
             next day patient ratings of pain, and poorer physical
             function and higher pain catastrophizing. Prior poorer night
             sleep quality significantly predicted greater reports of
             pain, and poorer physical function, and higher pain
             catastrophizing, especially during the early part of the
             day. Sleep quality × time of day interactions showed that
             poor sleepers reported high pain, and negative mood and low
             function uniformly across the day, whereas good sleepers
             reported relatively good mornings, but showed pain, affect
             and function levels comparable to poor sleepers by the end
             of the day. Analyses of the reverse causal pathway were
             mostly nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality appears
             related not only to pain intensity but also to a wide range
             of patient mood and function factors. A good night's sleep
             also appears to offer only temporary respite, suggesting
             that comprehensive interventions for chronic low back pain
             not only should include attention to sleep problems but also
             focus on problems with pain appraisals and
             coping.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12160-016-9860-2},
   Key = {fds330577}
}

@article{fds372564,
   Author = {Kimmick, GG and Bosworth, HB and Keefe, FJ and Sutton, L and Owen, L and Erkanli, A and Reed, SD and Staley, SA and Pak, S and Barrett, N and Huettel, S and Shelby, RA},
   Title = {Testing a behavioral intervention to improve adherence to
             adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET).},
   Journal = {Journal of Clinical Oncology},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {15_suppl},
   Pages = {TPS10128-TPS10128},
   Publisher = {American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.tps10128},
   Abstract = {<jats:p> TPS10128 </jats:p><jats:p> Background: Adjuvant
             endocrine therapy (AET) is a crucial component of treatment
             used to prevent recurrence and reduce mortality for women
             with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Poor adherence
             to AET is a significant problem, with rates of non-adherence
             ranging from 28% to 59%. Non-adherence to AET contributes to
             increased medical costs and increased mortality. Symptoms
             (e.g., pain, hot flashes, sleep problems, vaginal dryness)
             associated with AET are related to non-adherence and early
             discontinuation of treatment. Our goal is to test the
             efficacy of a novel self-management intervention (SMAET)
             that teaches patients skills for enhancing adherence to AET
             and coping with AET-related symptoms. Methods: Trial
             participants will be recruited from a tertiary care medical
             center and community clinics that are located in medically
             underserved areas. Target enrollment is 400 patients.
             Prospective participants must meet the following criteria:
             diagnosis of Stage I to III breast cancer; hormone receptor
             positive tumor; local definitive cancer treatment complete;
             within 12 months of beginning AET; have at least 18 months
             of AET recommended; and at least 21 years of age. We will
             test the effects of the SMAET intervention (n = 200) by
             comparing it to a general health education intervention (n =
             200; attention control). The SMAET protocol includes 7
             sessions providing systematic training in coping skills for
             managing symptoms that interfere with adherence and 3
             maintenance calls delivered over 6 months by a nurse via the
             phone. The intervention also includes interactive voice
             messaging that is tailored based on real-time adherence
             data. The primary study outcome, adherence to AET, will be
             assessed in real-time for 18 months using wireless smart
             pill bottles (i.e., bottle opening and percent of pills
             remaining). Symptom interference will be examined as a
             secondary outcome and will be assessed over 18 months. If
             effective, the intervention may reduce the burden of AET
             use. Clinical trial information: NCT02707471.
             </jats:p>},
   Doi = {10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.tps10128},
   Key = {fds372564}
}

@article{fds331440,
   Author = {Bennell, KL and Nelligan, R and Dobson, F and Rini, C and Keefe, F and Kasza, J and French, S and Bryant, C and Dalwood, A and Abbott, JH and Hinman, RS},
   Title = {Internet-delivered exercise and pain-coping skills training
             for chronic knee pain},
   Journal = {Annals of Internal Medicine},
   Volume = {166},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {I13},
   Publisher = {American College of Physicians},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/P17-9031},
   Doi = {10.7326/P17-9031},
   Key = {fds331440}
}

@article{fds333024,
   Author = {Bennell, KL and Nelligan, R and Dobson, F and Rini, C and Keefe, F and Kasza, J and French, S and Bryant, C and Dalwood, A and Abbott, JH and Hinman, RS},
   Title = {Effectiveness of an Internet-Delivered Exercise and
             Pain-Coping Skills Training Intervention for Persons With
             Chronic Knee Pain: A Randomized Trial.},
   Journal = {Ann Intern Med},
   Volume = {166},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {453-462},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M16-1714},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Effective, accessible biopsychosocial treatments
             are needed to manage chronic knee pain on a population
             level. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of
             Internet-delivered, physiotherapist-prescribed home exercise
             and pain-coping skills training (PCST). DESIGN: Pragmatic
             parallel-group randomized, controlled trial. (Australian New
             Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000243617).
             SETTING: Community (Australia). PATIENTS: 148 persons aged
             50 years or older with chronic knee pain. INTERVENTION: The
             intervention was delivered via the Internet and included
             educational material, 7 videoconferencing (Skype
             [Microsoft]) sessions with a physiotherapist for home
             exercise, and a PCST program over 3 months. The control was
             Internet-based educational material. MEASUREMENTS: Primary
             outcomes were pain during walking (11-point numerical rating
             scale) and physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster
             Universities Osteoarthritis Index) at 3 months. Secondary
             outcomes were knee pain, quality of life, global change
             (overall, pain, and functional status), arthritis
             self-efficacy, coping, and pain catastrophizing. Outcomes
             were also measured at 9 months. RESULTS: Of participants
             enrolled, 139 (94%) completed primary outcome measures at 3
             months and 133 (90%) completed secondary outcome measures at
             9 months; multiple imputation was used for missing data. The
             intervention group reported significantly more improvement
             in pain (mean difference, 1.6 units [95% CI, 0.9 to 2.3
             units]) and physical function (mean difference, 9.3 units
             [CI, 5.9 to 12.7 units]) than the control group at 3 months,
             and improvements were sustained at 9 months (mean
             differences, 1.1 units [CI, 0.4 to 1.8 units] and 7.0 units
             [CI, 3.4 to 10.5 units], respectively). Intervention
             participants showed significantly more improvement in most
             secondary outcomes than control participants. At both time
             points, significantly more intervention participants
             reported global improvements. LIMITATION: Participants were
             unblinded. CONCLUSION: For persons with chronic knee pain,
             Internet-delivered, physiotherapist-prescribed exercise and
             PCST provide clinically meaningful improvements in pain and
             function that are sustained for at least 6 months. PRIMARY
             FUNDING SOURCE: National Health and Medical Research
             Council.},
   Doi = {10.7326/M16-1714},
   Key = {fds333024}
}

@article{fds333023,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Sommer, C},
   Title = {An introduction to the Biennial Review of
             Pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {158 Suppl 1},
   Pages = {S1},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000877},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000877},
   Key = {fds333023}
}

@article{fds330906,
   Author = {Edmond, SN and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Fisher, HM and Schmidt, JE and Soo, MS and Skinner, CS and Ahrendt, GM and Manculich, J and Sumkin, JH and Zuley, ML and Bovbjerg, DH},
   Title = {Persistent Breast Pain Among Women With Histories of
             Breast-conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer Compared With
             Women Without Histories of Breast Surgery or
             Cancer.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {51-56},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000377},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: This study compared persistent breast pain among
             women who received breast-conserving surgery for breast
             cancer and women without a history of breast cancer.
             METHODS: Breast cancer survivors (n=200) were recruited at
             their first postsurgical surveillance mammogram (6 to 15 mo
             postsurgery). Women without a breast cancer history (n=150)
             were recruited at the time of a routine screening mammogram.
             All women completed measures of breast pain, pain
             interference with daily activities and intimacy, worry about
             breast pain, anxiety symptoms, and depression symptoms.
             Demographic and medical information were also collected.
             RESULTS: Persistent breast pain (duration ≥6 mo) was
             reported by 46.5% of breast cancer survivors and 12.7% of
             women without a breast cancer history (P<0.05). Breast
             cancer survivors also had significantly higher rates of
             clinically significant persistent breast pain (pain
             intensity score ≥3/10), as well as higher average breast
             pain intensity and unpleasantness scores. Breast cancer
             survivors with persistent breast pain had significantly
             higher levels of depressive symptoms, as well as pain worry
             and interference, compared with survivors without persistent
             breast pain or women without a breast cancer history.
             Anxiety symptoms were significantly higher in breast cancer
             survivors with persistent breast pain compared with women
             without a breast cancer history. DISCUSSION: Results
             indicate that persistent breast pain negatively impacts
             women with a history of breast-conserving cancer surgery
             compared with women without that history. Strategies to
             ameliorate persistent breast pain and to improve adjustment
             among women with persistent breast pain should be explored
             for incorporation into standard care for breast cancer
             survivors.},
   Doi = {10.1097/AJP.0000000000000377},
   Key = {fds330906}
}

@article{fds333025,
   Author = {Paice, JA and Portenoy, R and Lacchetti, C and Campbell, T and Cheville,
             A and Citron, M and Constine, LS and Cooper, A and Glare, P and Keefe, F and Koyyalagunta, L and Levy, M and Miaskowski, C and Otis-Green, S and Sloan, P and Bruera, E},
   Title = {Management of Chronic Pain in Survivors of Adult Cancers:
             American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice
             Guideline.},
   Journal = {J Clin Oncol},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {27},
   Pages = {3325-3345},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5206},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based guidance on the optimum
             management of chronic pain in adult cancer survivors.
             METHODS: An ASCO-convened expert panel conducted a
             systematic literature search of studies investigating
             chronic pain management in cancer survivors. Outcomes of
             interest included symptom relief, pain intensity, quality of
             life, functional outcomes, adverse events, misuse or
             diversion, and risk assessment or mitigation. RESULTS: A
             total of 63 studies met eligibility criteria and compose the
             evidentiary basis for the recommendations. Studies tended to
             be heterogeneous in terms of quality, size, and populations.
             Primary outcomes also varied across the studies, and in most
             cases, were not directly comparable because of different
             outcomes, measurements, and instruments used at different
             time points. Because of a paucity of high-quality evidence,
             many recommendations are based on expert consensus.
             RECOMMENDATIONS: Clinicians should screen for pain at each
             encounter. Recurrent disease, second malignancy, or
             late-onset treatment effects in any patient who reports
             new-onset pain should be evaluated, treated, and monitored.
             Clinicians should determine the need for other health
             professionals to provide comprehensive pain management care
             in patients with complex needs. Systemic nonopioid
             analgesics and adjuvant analgesics may be prescribed to
             relieve chronic pain and/or to improve function. Clinicians
             may prescribe a trial of opioids in carefully selected
             patients with cancer who do not respond to more conservative
             management and who continue to experience distress or
             functional impairment. Risks of adverse effects of opioids
             should be assessed. Clinicians should clearly understand
             terminology such as tolerance, dependence, abuse, and
             addiction as it relates to the use of opioids and should
             incorporate universal precautions to minimize abuse,
             addiction, and adverse consequences. Additional information
             is available at www.asco.org/chronic-pain-guideline and
             www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.},
   Doi = {10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5206},
   Key = {fds333025}
}

@article{fds330869,
   Author = {Yarnitsky, D and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Access to PAIN Reports is now open: IASP inaugurates a new
             journal.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {157},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1835},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000645},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000645},
   Key = {fds330869}
}

@article{fds322119,
   Author = {Huebner, JL and Landerman, LR and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Guilak,
             F and Blumenthal, JA and Caldwell, DS and Kraus, VB},
   Title = {Exploratory secondary analyses of a cognitive-behavioral
             intervention for knee osteoarthritis demonstrate reduction
             in biomarkers of adipocyte inflammation.},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis Cartilage},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1528-1534},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.002},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of pain coping skills
             training (PCST) and a lifestyle behavioral weight management
             (BWM) program on inflammatory markers and biomarker
             associations with pain and function in the OA LIFE study.
             METHOD: Serum samples were available from a subset
             (N = 169) of the overweight or obese knee OA participants
             in the OA LIFE study that evaluated: PCST, BWM, combined
             PCST + BWM, or standard care (SC). Inflammatory markers
             (hsCRP, IL-1ra, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, TNFRI, TNFRII,
             and hyaluronic acid (HA)), and adipokines (leptin and
             adiponectin) were measured before and after the 24-week
             treatment period. Biomarkers were assessed for effects of
             treatment and for associations with change in weight, pain
             and disability (unadjusted and adjusted for age, race, sex,
             baseline body mass index (BMI), and baseline biomarker
             concentration). RESULTS: PCST + BWM was associated with
             significant reductions in hsCRP (P = 0.0014), IL-6
             (P = 0.0075), and leptin (P = 0.0001). After adjustment,
             there was a significant effect of PCST + BWM on changes in
             leptin (b = -0.19, P = 0.01) and IL-6 (b = -0.25,
             P = 0.02) relative to SC. Reductions in leptin and IL-6
             were significantly correlated with reductions in weight, BMI
             and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis
             Index (WOMAC) pain; reductions in IL-6 were correlated with
             improvements in WOMAC and Arthritis Impact Measurement
             Scales (AIMS) physical function. By mediation analyses,
             weight loss was responsible for 54% of the change in IL-6
             and all of the change in leptin. CONCLUSIONS: OA-related
             inflammatory markers were reduced by a 24-week combined
             PCST + BWM intervention. This suggests that the
             inflammatory state can be successfully modified in the
             context of a readily instituted clinical intervention with a
             positive clinical outcome.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.002},
   Key = {fds322119}
}

@article{fds319633,
   Author = {Broderick, JE and Keefe, FJ and Schneider, S and Junghaenel, DU and Bruckenthal, P and Schwartz, JE and Kaell, AT and Caldwell, DS and McKee, D and Gould, E},
   Title = {Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain is effective,
             but for whom?},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {157},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {2115-2123},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000626},
   Abstract = {Moderator analyses are reported for posttreatment outcomes
             in a large, randomized, controlled effectiveness trial for
             chronic pain for hip and knee osteoarthritis (N = 256). Pain
             Coping Skills Training, a form of cognitive behavioral
             therapy, was compared to usual care. Treatment was delivered
             by nurse practitioners in patients' community doctors'
             offices. Consistent with meta-analyses of pain cognitive
             behavioral therapy efficacy, treatment effects in this trial
             were significant for several primary and secondary outcomes,
             but tended to be small. This study was designed to examine
             differential response to treatment for patient subgroups to
             guide clinical decision-making for treatment. Based on
             existing literature, demographic (age, sex, race/ethnicity,
             and education) and clinical variables (disease severity,
             body mass index, patient treatment expectations, depression,
             and patient pain coping style) were specified a priori as
             potential moderators. Trial outcome variables (N = 15)
             included pain, fatigue, self-efficacy, quality of life,
             catastrophizing, and use of pain medication. Results yielded
             5 significant moderators for outcomes at posttreatment: pain
             coping style, patient expectation for treatment response,
             radiographically assessed disease severity, age, and
             education. Thus, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and
             depression at baseline were not associated with level of
             treatment response. In contrast, patients with interpersonal
             problems associated with pain coping did not benefit much
             from the treatment. Although most patients projected
             positive expectations for the treatment prior to
             randomization, only those with moderate to high expectations
             benefited. Patients with moderate to high osteoarthritis
             disease severity showed stronger treatment effects. Finally,
             the oldest and most educated patients showed strong
             treatment effects, while younger and less educated did
             not.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000626},
   Key = {fds319633}
}

@article{fds322120,
   Author = {Schrubbe, LA and Ravyts, SG and Benas, BC and Campbell, LC and Cené,
             CW and Coffman, CJ and Gunn, AH and Keefe, FJ and Nagle, CT and Oddone, EZ and Somers, TJ and Stanwyck, CL and Taylor, SS and Allen,
             KD},
   Title = {Pain coping skills training for African Americans with
             osteoarthritis (STAART): study protocol of a randomized
             controlled trial.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {359},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1217-2},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: African Americans bear a disproportionate burden
             of osteoarthritis (OA), with higher prevalence rates, more
             severe pain, and more functional limitations. One key
             barrier to addressing these disparities has been limited
             engagement of African Americans in the development and
             evaluation of behavioral interventions for management of OA.
             Pain Coping Skills Training (CST) is a cognitive-behavioral
             intervention with shown efficacy to improve OA-related pain
             and other outcomes. Emerging data indicate pain CST may be a
             promising intervention for reducing racial disparities in OA
             symptom severity. However, there are important gaps in this
             research, including incorporation of stakeholder
             perspectives (e.g. cultural appropriateness, strategies for
             implementation into clinical practice) and testing pain CST
             specifically among African Americans with OA. This study
             will evaluate the effectiveness of a culturally enhanced
             pain CST program among African Americans with OA.
             METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized controlled trial among
             248 participants with symptomatic hip or knee OA, with equal
             allocation to a pain CST group and a wait list (WL) control
             group. The pain CST program incorporated feedback from
             patients and other stakeholders and involves 11 weekly
             telephone-based sessions. Outcomes are assessed at baseline,
             12 weeks (primary time point), and 36 weeks (to assess
             maintenance of treatment effects). The primary outcome is
             the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
             Index, and secondary outcomes include self-efficacy, pain
             coping, pain interference, quality of life, depressive
             symptoms, and global assessment of change. Linear mixed
             models will be used to compare the pain CST group to the WL
             control group and explore whether participant
             characteristics are associated with differential improvement
             in the pain CST program. This research is in compliance with
             the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the
             Institutional Review Boards of the University of North
             Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical
             Center, East Carolina University, and Duke University Health
             System. DISCUSSION: This culturally enhanced pain CST
             program could have a substantial impact on outcomes for
             African Americans with OA and may be a key strategy in the
             reduction of racial health disparities. TRIAL REGISTRATION:
             ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02560922 , registered
             9/22/2015.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s12891-016-1217-2},
   Key = {fds322120}
}

@article{fds273587,
   Author = {Waters, SJ and Strauman, TJ and McKee, DC and Campbell, LC and Shelby,
             RA and Dixon, KE and Fras, AM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Self-system therapy for distress associated with persistent
             low back pain: A randomized clinical trial.},
   Journal = {Psychother Res},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {472-483},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {1050-3307},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1040485},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Persistent low back pain (PLBP) is associated
             with vulnerability to depression. PLBP frequently requires
             major changes in occupation and lifestyle, which can lead to
             a sense of failing to attain one's personal goals
             (self-discrepancy). METHOD: We conducted a clinical trial to
             examine the efficacy of self-system therapy (SST), a brief
             structured therapy for depression based on self-discrepancy
             theory. A total of 101 patients with PLBP and clinically
             significant depressive symptoms were randomized either to
             SST, pain education, or standard care. RESULTS: Patients
             receiving SST showed significantly greater improvement in
             depressive symptoms. Reduction in self-discrepancy predicted
             reduction in depressive symptoms only within the SST
             condition. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the utility of SST
             for individuals facing persistent pain and associated
             depression.},
   Doi = {10.1080/10503307.2015.1040485},
   Key = {fds273587}
}

@article{fds362180,
   Author = {Yarnitsky, D and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Access to PAIN Reports is now open: IASP inaugurates a new
             journal.},
   Journal = {Pain Rep},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {e563},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000563},
   Doi = {10.1097/PR9.0000000000000563},
   Key = {fds362180}
}

@article{fds319634,
   Author = {Soo, MS and Jarosz, JA and Wren, AA and Soo, AE and Mowery, YM and Johnson,
             KS and Yoon, SC and Kim, C and Hwang, ES and Keefe, FJ and Shelby,
             RA},
   Title = {Imaging-Guided Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Impact of
             Meditation and Music Interventions on Patient Anxiety, Pain,
             and Fatigue.},
   Journal = {J Am Coll Radiol},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {526-534},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.12.004},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of guided meditation and
             music interventions on patient anxiety, pain, and fatigue
             during imaging-guided breast biopsy. METHODS: After giving
             informed consent, 121 women needing percutaneous
             imaging-guided breast biopsy were randomized into three
             groups: (1) guided meditation; (2) music; (3) standard-care
             control group. During biopsy, the meditation and music
             groups listened to an audio-recorded, guided,
             loving-kindness meditation and relaxing music, respectively;
             the standard-care control group received supportive dialogue
             from the biopsy team. Immediately before and after biopsy,
             participants completed questionnaires measuring anxiety
             (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale), biopsy pain (Brief
             Pain Inventory), and fatigue (modified Functional Assessment
             of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue). After biopsy,
             participants completed questionnaires assessing
             radiologist-patient communication (modified Questionnaire on
             the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction), demographics,
             and medical history. RESULTS: The meditation and music
             groups reported significantly greater anxiety reduction (P
             values < .05) and reduced fatigue after biopsy than the
             standard-care control group; the standard-care control group
             reported increased fatigue after biopsy. The meditation
             group additionally showed significantly lower pain during
             biopsy, compared with the music group (P = .03). No
             significant difference in patient-perceived quality of
             radiologist-patient communication was noted among groups.
             CONCLUSIONS: Listening to guided meditation significantly
             lowered biopsy pain during imaging-guided breast biopsy;
             meditation and music reduced patient anxiety and fatigue
             without compromising radiologist-patient communication.
             These simple, inexpensive interventions could improve
             women's experiences during core-needle breast
             biopsy.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jacr.2015.12.004},
   Key = {fds319634}
}

@article{fds311139,
   Author = {Bennell, KL and Ahamed, Y and Jull, G and Bryant, C and Hunt, MA and Forbes, AB and Kasza, J and Akram, M and Metcalf, B and Harris, A and Egerton, T and Kenardy, JA and Nicholas, MK and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Physical Therapist-Delivered Pain Coping Skills Training and
             Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Controlled
             Trial.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)},
   Volume = {68},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {590-602},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {2151-464X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22744},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a 12-week physical
             therapist-delivered combined pain coping skills training
             (PCST) and exercise (PCST/exercise) is more efficacious and
             cost effective than either treatment alone for knee
             osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: This was an assessor-blinded,
             3-arm randomized controlled trial in 222 people (73
             PCST/exercise, 75 exercise, and 74 PCST) ages ≥50 years
             with knee OA. All participants received 10 treatments over
             12 weeks plus a home program. PCST covered pain education
             and training in cognitive and behavioral pain coping skills,
             exercise comprised strengthening exercises, and
             PCST/exercise integrated both. Primary outcomes were
             self-reported average knee pain (visual analog scale, range
             0-100 mm) and physical function (Western Ontario and
             McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, range 0-68) at
             week 12. Secondary outcomes included other pain measures,
             global change, physical performance, psychological health,
             physical activity, quality of life, and cost effectiveness.
             Analyses were by intent-to-treat methodology with multiple
             imputation for missing data. RESULTS: A total of 201
             participants (91%), 181 participants (82%), and 186
             participants (84%) completed week 12, 32, and 52
             measurements, respectively. At week 12, there were no
             significant between-group differences for reductions in pain
             comparing PCST/exercise versus exercise (mean difference 5.8
             mm [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -1.4, 13.0]) and
             PCST/exercise versus PCST (6.7 mm [95% CI -0.6, 14.1]).
             Significantly greater improvements in function were found
             for PCST/exercise versus exercise (3.7 units [95% CI 0.4,
             7.0]) and PCST/exercise versus PCST (7.9 units [95% CI 4.7,
             11.2]). These differences persisted at weeks 32 (both) and
             52 (PCST). Benefits favoring PCST/exercise were seen on
             several secondary outcomes. Cost effectiveness of
             PCST/exercise was not demonstrated. CONCLUSION: This model
             of care could improve access to psychological treatment and
             augment patient outcomes from exercise in knee OA, although
             it did not appear to be cost effective.},
   Doi = {10.1002/acr.22744},
   Key = {fds311139}
}

@article{fds323405,
   Author = {Platts-Mills, TF and Nicholson, RJ and Richmond, NL and Patel, KV and Simonsick, EM and Domeier, RM and Swor, RA and Hendry, PL and Peak, DA and Rathlev, NK and Jones, JS and Lee, DC and Weaver, MA and Keefe, FJ and McLean, SA},
   Title = {Restricted activity and persistent pain following motor
             vehicle collision among older adults: a multicenter
             prospective cohort study.},
   Journal = {BMC Geriatr},
   Volume = {16},
   Pages = {86},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0260-z},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Restricted physical activity commonly occurs
             following acute musculoskeletal pain in older adults and may
             influence long-term outcomes. We sought to examine the
             relationship between restricted physical activity after
             motor vehicle collision (MVC) and the development of
             persistent pain. METHODS: We examined data from a
             prospective study of adults ≥65 years of age presenting to
             the emergency department (ED) after MVC without
             life-threatening injuries. Restricted physical activity 6
             weeks after MVC was defined in three different ways: 1) by a
             ≥25 point decrease in Physical Activity Scale in the
             Elderly (PASE) score, 2) by the answer "yes" to the
             question, "during the past two weeks, have you stayed in bed
             for at least half a day?", and 3) by the answer "yes" to the
             question, "during the past two weeks, have you cut down on
             your usual activities as compared to before the accident?"
             We examined relationships between each definition of
             restricted activity and pain severity, pain interference,
             and functional capacity at 6 months with adjustment for
             confounders. RESULTS: Within the study sample (N = 164),
             adjusted average pain severity scores at 6 months did not
             differ between patients with and without restricted physical
             activity based on decreased PASE score (2.54 vs. 2.07, p =
             0.32). In contrast, clinically and statistically important
             differences in adjusted average pain severity at 6 months
             were observed for patients who reported spending half a day
             in bed vs. those who did not (3.56 vs. 1.91, p < 0.01). In
             adjusted analyses, both decreased PASE score and cutting
             down on activity were associated with functional capacity at
             6 months, but only decreased PASE score was associated with
             increased ADL difficulty at 6 months (0.70 vs. -0.01, p =
             0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults experiencing MVC,
             those reporting bed rest or reduced activity 6 weeks after
             the collision reported higher pain and pain interference
             scores at 6 months. More research is needed to determine if
             interventions to promote activity can improve outcomes after
             MVC in older adults.},
   Doi = {10.1186/s12877-016-0260-z},
   Key = {fds323405}
}

@article{fds273588,
   Author = {Platts-Mills, TF and Flannigan, SA and Bortsov, AV and Smith, S and Domeier, RM and Swor, RA and Hendry, PL and Peak, DA and Rathlev, NK and Jones, JS and Lee, DC and Keefe, FJ and Sloane, PD and McLean,
             SA},
   Title = {Persistent Pain Among Older Adults Discharged Home From the
             Emergency Department After Motor Vehicle Crash: A
             Prospective Cohort Study.},
   Journal = {Ann Emerg Med},
   Volume = {67},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {166-176.e1},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0196-0644},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.05.003},
   Abstract = {STUDY OBJECTIVE: Motor vehicle crashes are the second most
             common form of trauma among older adults. We seek to
             describe the incidence, risk factors, and consequences of
             persistent pain among older adults evaluated in the
             emergency department (ED) after a motor vehicle crash.
             METHODS: We conducted a prospective longitudinal study of
             patients aged 65 years or older who presented to one of 8
             EDs after motor vehicle crash between June 2011 and June
             2014 and were discharged home after evaluation. ED
             evaluation was done through in-person interview; follow-up
             data were obtained through mail-in survey or telephone call.
             Pain severity (0 to 10 scale) overall and for 15 parts of
             the body were assessed at each follow-up point. Principal
             component analysis was used to assess the dimensionality of
             the locations of pain data. Participants reporting pain
             severity greater than or equal to 4 attributed to the motor
             vehicle crash at 6 months were defined as having persistent
             pain. RESULTS: Of the 161 participants, 72% reported
             moderate to severe pain at the ED evaluation. At 6 months,
             26% of participants reported moderate to severe motor
             vehicle crash-related pain. ED characteristics associated
             with persistent pain included acute pain severity; pain
             located in the head, neck, and jaw or lower back and legs;
             poor self-rated health; less formal education; pre-motor
             vehicle crash depressive symptoms; and patient's expected
             time to physical recovery more than 30 days. Compared with
             individuals without persistent pain, those with persistent
             pain were substantially more likely at 6-month follow-up to
             have also experienced a decline in their capacity for
             physical function (73% versus 36%; difference=37%; 95%
             confidence interval [CI] 19% to 52%), a new difficulty with
             activities of daily living (42% versus 17%; difference=26%;
             95% CI 10% to 43%), a 1-point or more reduction in overall
             self-rated health on a 5-point scale (54% versus 30%;
             difference=24%; 95% CI 6% to 41%), and a change in their
             living situation to obtain additional help (23% versus 8%;
             difference=15%; 95% CI 2% to 31%). CONCLUSION: Among older
             adults discharged home from the ED post-evaluation after a
             motor vehicle crash, persistent pain is common and
             frequently associated with functional decline and
             disability.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.05.003},
   Key = {fds273588}
}

@article{fds273568,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Gerhart, JI and Bruehl, S and Post, KM and Smith, DA and Porter, LS and Schuster, E and Buvanendran, A and Fras, AM and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Anger arousal and behavioral anger regulation in everyday
             life among people with chronic low back pain: Relationships
             with spouse responses and negative affect.},
   Journal = {Health Psychol},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {29-40},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0278-6133},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000221},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree to which anger arousal
             and anger regulation (expression, inhibition) in the daily
             lives of people with chronic pain were related to spouse
             support, criticism, and hostility as perceived by patients
             and as reported by spouses. METHOD: Married couples (N =
             105, 1 spouse with chronic low back pain) completed
             electronic daily diaries, with assessments 5 times/day for
             14 days. On these diaries, patients completed items on their
             own anger arousal, anger expression, and inhibition, and on
             perceived spouse support, criticism, and hostility. Spouses
             reported on their responses toward patients and their
             negative affect. Hierarchical linear modeling tested
             concurrent and lagged relationships. RESULTS:
             Patient-reported increases in anger arousal and anger
             expression were predominantly related to concurrent
             decreases in patient-perceived and spouse-reported spouse
             support, concurrent increases in patient-perceived and
             spouse-reported spouse criticism and hostility, and
             increases in spouse-reported negative affect. Relationships
             for anger expression remained significant with anger arousal
             controlled. These effects were especially strong for male
             patients. Spouses reported greater negative affect when
             patients were present than when they were not. CONCLUSIONS:
             Social support may facilitate adjustment to chronic pain,
             with declining support and overt criticism and hostility
             possibly adversely impacting pain and function. Results
             suggest that patient anger arousal and expression may be
             related to a negative interpersonal environment for married
             couples coping with chronic low back pain.},
   Doi = {10.1037/hea0000221},
   Key = {fds273568}
}

@article{fds273586,
   Author = {Hendrix, CC and Bailey, DE and Steinhauser, KE and Olsen, MK and Stechuchak, KM and Lowman, SG and Schwartz, AJ and Riedel, RF and Keefe,
             FJ and Porter, LS and Tulsky, JA},
   Title = {Effects of enhanced caregiver training program on cancer
             caregiver's self-efficacy, preparedness, and psychological
             well-being.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {327-336},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0941-4355},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2797-3},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: We examined the effects of an enhanced informal
             caregiver training (Enhanced-CT) protocol in cancer symptom
             and caregiver stress management to caregivers of
             hospitalized cancer patients. METHODS: We recruited adult
             patients in oncology units and their informal caregivers. We
             utilized a two-armed, randomized controlled trial design
             with data collected at baseline, post-training, and at 2 and
             4 weeks after hospital discharge. Primary outcomes were
             self-efficacy for managing patients' cancer symptoms and
             caregiver stress and preparedness for caregiving. Secondary
             outcomes were caregiver depression, anxiety, and burden. The
             education comparison (EDUC) group received information about
             community resources. We used general linear models to test
             for differences in the Enhanced-CT relative to the EDUC
             group. RESULTS: We consented and randomized 138 dyads:
             Enhanced-CT = 68 and EDUC = 70. The Enhanced-CT
             group had a greater increase in caregiver self-efficacy for
             cancer symptom management and stress management and
             preparation for caregiving at the post-training assessment
             compared to the EDUC group but not at 2- and 4-week
             post-discharge assessments. There were no intervention group
             differences in depression, anxiety, and burden. CONCLUSION:
             An Enhanced-CT protocol resulted in short-term improvements
             in self-efficacy for managing patients' cancer symptoms and
             caregiver stress and preparedness for caregiving but not in
             caregivers' psychological well-being. The lack of sustained
             effects may be related to the single-dose nature of our
             intervention and the changing needs of informal caregivers
             after hospital discharge.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-015-2797-3},
   Key = {fds273586}
}

@article{fds273589,
   Author = {Naylor, JC and Kilts, JD and Szabo, ST and Dunn, CE and Keefe, FJ and Tupler, LA and Shampine, LJ and Morey, RA and Strauss, JL and Hamer, RM and Wagner, HR and MIRECC Workgroup, and Marx, CE},
   Title = {Allopregnanolone Levels Are Inversely Associated with
             Self-Reported Pain Symptoms in U.S. Iraq and Afghanistan-Era
             Veterans: Implications for Biomarkers and
             Therapeutics.},
   Journal = {Pain Med},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {25-32},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1526-2375},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/10962 Duke open
             access},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain symptoms are common among
             Iraq/Afghanistan-era veterans, many of whom continue to
             experience persistent pain symptoms despite multiple
             pharmacological interventions. Preclinical data suggest that
             neurosteroids such as allopregnanolone demonstrate
             pronounced analgesic properties, and thus represent logical
             biomarker candidates and therapeutic targets for pain.
             Allopregnanolone is also a positive GABAA receptor modulator
             with anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, and neuroprotective actions
             in rodent models. We previously reported inverse
             associations between serum allopregnanolone levels and
             self-reported pain symptom severity in a pilot study of 82
             male veterans. METHODS: The current study investigates
             allopregnanolone levels in a larger cohort of 485 male
             Iraq/Afghanistan-era veterans to attempt to replicate these
             initial findings. Pain symptoms were assessed by items from
             the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R) querying headache,
             chest pain, muscle soreness, and low back pain over the past
             7 days. Allopregnanolone levels were quantified by gas
             chromatography/mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Associations
             between pain ratings and allopregnanolone levels were
             examined with Poisson regression analyses, controlling for
             age and smoking. Bivariate nonparametric Mann–Whitney
             analyses examining allopregnanolone levels across high and
             low levels of pain were also conducted. Allopregnanolone
             levels were inversely associated with muscle soreness [P =
             0.0028], chest pain [P = 0.032], and aggregate total pain
             (sum of all four pain items) [P = 0.0001]. In the bivariate
             analyses, allopregnanolone levels were lower in the group
             reporting high levels of muscle soreness [P = 0.001].
             CONCLUSIONS: These findings are generally consistent with
             our prior pilot study and suggest that allopregnanolone may
             function as an endogenous analgesic. Thus, exogenous
             supplementation with allopregnanolone could have therapeutic
             potential. The characterization of neurosteroid profiles may
             also have biomarker utility.},
   Doi = {10.1111/pme.12860},
   Key = {fds273589}
}

@article{fds273590,
   Author = {Buchheit, T and Van de Ven and T and Hsia, H-LJ and McDuffie, M and MacLeod, DB and White, W and Chamessian, A and Keefe, FJ and Buckenmaier, CT and Shaw, AD},
   Title = {Pain Phenotypes and Associated Clinical Risk Factors
             Following Traumatic Amputation: Results from Veterans
             Integrated Pain Evaluation Research (VIPER).},
   Journal = {Pain Med},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {149-161},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1526-2375},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pme.12848},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To define clinical phenotypes of postamputation
             pain and identify markers of risk for the development of
             chronic pain. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of military
             service members enrolled 3-18 months after traumatic
             amputation injury. SETTING: Military Medical Center.
             SUBJECTS: 124 recent active duty military service members.
             METHODS: Study subjects completed multiple pain and
             psychometric questionnaires to assess the qualities of
             phantom and residual limb pain. Medical records were
             reviewed to determine the presence/absence of a regional
             catheter near the time of injury. Subtypes of residual limb
             pain (somatic, neuroma, and complex regional pain syndrome)
             were additionally analyzed and associated with clinical risk
             factors. RESULTS: A majority of enrolled patients (64.5%)
             reported clinically significant pain (pain score ≥ 3
             averaged over previous week). 61% experienced residual limb
             pain and 58% experienced phantom pain. When analysis of pain
             subtypes was performed in those with residual limb pain, we
             found evidence of a sensitized neuroma in 48.7%, somatic
             pain in 40.8%, and complex regional pain syndrome in 19.7%
             of individuals. The presence of clinically significant
             neuropathic residual limb pain was associated with symptoms
             of PTSD and depression. Neuropathic pain of any severity was
             associated with symptoms of all four assessed clinical risk
             factors: depression, PTSD, catastrophizing, and the absence
             of regional analgesia catheter. CONCLUSIONS: Most military
             service members in this cohort suffered both phantom and
             residual limb pain following amputation. Neuroma was a
             common cause of neuropathic pain in this group. Associated
             risk factors for significant neuropathic pain included PTSD
             and depression. PTSD, depression, catastrophizing, and the
             absence of a regional analgesia catheter were associated
             with neuropathic pain of any severity.},
   Doi = {10.1111/pme.12848},
   Key = {fds273590}
}

@article{fds291329,
   Author = {Balderson, BH and McCurry, SM and Vitiello, MV and Shortreed, SM and Rybarczyk, BD and Keefe, FJ and Korff, MV},
   Title = {Information without Implementation: A Practical Example for
             Developing a Best Practice Education Control
             Group.},
   Journal = {Behav Sleep Med},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {514-527},
   Year = {2016},
   ISSN = {1540-2002},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2015.1036271},
   Abstract = {This article considers methodology for developing an
             education-only control group and proposes a simple approach
             to designing rigorous and well-accepted control groups. This
             approach is demonstrated in a large randomized trial. The
             Lifestyles trial (n = 367) compared three group
             interventions: (a) cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for
             osteoarthritis pain, (b) CBT for osteoarthritis pain and
             insomnia, and (c) education-only control (EOC). EOC emulated
             the interventions excluding hypothesized treatment
             components and controlling for nonspecific treatment
             effects. Results showed this approach resulted in a control
             group that was highly credible and acceptable to patients.
             This approach can be an effective and practical guide for
             developing high-quality control groups in trials of
             behavioral interventions.},
   Doi = {10.1080/15402002.2015.1036271},
   Key = {fds291329}
}

@article{fds330870,
   Author = {Askew, RL and Cook, KF and Keefe, FJ and Nowinski, CJ and Cella, D and Revicki, DA and Morgan DeWitt and EM and Michaud, K and Trence, DL and Amtmann, D},
   Title = {A PROMIS Measure of Neuropathic Pain Quality.},
   Journal = {Value Health},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {623-630},
   Year = {2016},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.009},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a consequence of many
             chronic conditions. This study aimed to develop an
             unidimensional NP scale with scores that represent levels of
             NP and distinguish between individuals with NP and non-NP
             conditions. METHODS: A candidate item pool of 42 pain
             quality descriptors was administered to participants with
             osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic neuropathy,
             and cancer chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. A
             subset of pain quality descriptors (items) that best
             distinguished between participants with and those without NP
             conditions were identified. Dimensionality of pain
             descriptors was evaluated in a development sample and
             cross-validated in a holdout sample. Item responses were
             calibrated using an item response theory model, and scores
             were generated on a T-score metric. NP scale scores were
             evaluated in terms of the reliability, validity, and ability
             to distinguish between participants with and without
             conditions typically associated with NP. RESULTS: Of the 42
             initial items, 5 were identified for the Patient-Reported
             Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Neuropathic
             Pain Quality Scale. T scores exhibited good discriminatory
             ability on the basis of receiver-operator characteristic
             analysis. Score thresholds that optimize sensitivity and
             specificity were identified. Construct, criterion, and
             discriminant validity, and reliability of scale scores were
             supported. CONCLUSIONS: The five-item Patient-Reported
             Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS PQ-Neuro)
             Neuropathic Pain Quality Scale is a short and practical
             measure that can be used to identify patients more likely to
             have NP and to distinguish levels of NP. The data collected
             will support future research that targets other
             unidimensional pain quality domains (e.g., nociceptive
             pain).},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.009},
   Key = {fds330870}
}

@article{fds322121,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Kelleher, SA and Westbrook, KW and Kimmick, GG and Shelby, RA and Abernethy, AP and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {A Small Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial Comparing Mobile
             and Traditional Pain Coping Skills Training Protocols for
             Cancer Patients with Pain.},
   Journal = {Pain Res Treat},
   Volume = {2016},
   Pages = {2473629},
   Year = {2016},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2473629},
   Abstract = {Psychosocial pain management interventions are efficacious
             for cancer pain but are underutilized. Recent advances in
             mobile health (mHealth) technologies provide new
             opportunities to decrease barriers to access psychosocial
             pain management interventions. The objective of this study
             was to gain information about the accessibility and efficacy
             of mobile pain coping skills training (mPCST) intervention
             delivered to cancer patients with pain compared to
             traditional in-person pain coping skills training
             intervention. This study randomly assigned participants (N =
             30) to receive either mobile health pain coping skills
             training intervention delivered via Skype or traditional
             pain coping skills training delivered face-to-face
             (PCST-trad). This pilot trial suggests that mPCST is
             feasible, presents low burden to patients, may lead to high
             patient engagement, and appears to be acceptable to
             patients. Cancer patients with pain in the mPCST group
             reported decreases in pain severity and physical symptoms as
             well as increases in self-efficacy for pain management that
             were comparable to changes in the PCST-trad group (p's <
             0.05). These findings suggest that mPCST, which is a highly
             accessible intervention, may provide benefits similar to an
             in-person intervention and shows promise for being feasible,
             acceptable, and engaging to cancer patients with
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1155/2016/2473629},
   Key = {fds322121}
}

@article{fds273592,
   Author = {Bastian, LA and Fish, LJ and Gierisch, JM and Stechuchak, KM and Grambow, SC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Impact of Smoking Cessation on Subsequent Pain Intensity
             Among Chronically Ill Veterans Enrolled in a Smoking
             Cessation Trial.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {822-829},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.012},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Prior cross-sectional studies have reported greater
             pain intensity among persistent smokers compared with
             nonsmokers or former smokers; yet, few prospective studies
             have examined how smoking abstinence affects pain intensity.
             OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of smoking cessation on
             subsequent pain intensity in smokers with chronic illness
             enrolled in a smoking cessation trial. METHODS: We recruited
             veteran smokers with chronic illness (heart disease, cancer,
             chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, or
             hypertension) for a randomized controlled smoking cessation
             trial and prospectively examined pain intensity and smoking
             status. Participants (n = 380) were asked to rate their pain
             in the past week from 0 to 10 at baseline and the five-month
             follow-up. The primary outcome measure was self-reported
             pain intensity at the five-month follow-up survey.
             Self-reported smoking status was categorized as an abstainer
             if patients reported no cigarettes in the seven days before
             the follow-up survey. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses,
             abstainers reported significantly lower pain levels at the
             five-month follow-up compared with patients who continued to
             smoke (parameter estimate = -1.07; 95% CI = -1.77, -0.36).
             In multivariable modeling, abstaining from cigarettes was
             not associated with subsequent pain intensity at five-month
             follow-up (parameter estimate = -0.27; 95% CI = -0.79,
             0.25). CONCLUSION: Participants who were classified as
             abstainers did not report significantly different levels of
             pain intensity than patients who continued to smoke. Future
             studies should expand on our findings and monitor pain
             intensity in smoking cessation trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION:
             ClinicalTrials.govNCT00448344.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.012},
   Key = {fds273592}
}

@article{fds311140,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Gerhart, JI and Post, KM and Smith, DA and Porter, LS and Schuster, E and Buvanendran, A and Fras, AM and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {The Communal Coping Model of Pain Catastrophizing in Daily
             Life: A Within-Couples Daily Diary Study.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1163-1175},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.005},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: The Communal Coping Model characterizes pain
             catastrophizing as a coping tactic whereby pain expression
             elicits assistance and empathic responses from others.
             Married couples (N = 105 couples; 1 spouse with chronic low
             back pain) completed electronic daily diary assessments 5
             times/day for 14 days. In these diaries, patients reported
             pain catastrophizing, pain, and function, and perceived
             spouse support, perceived criticism, and perceived
             hostility. Non-patient spouses reported on their support,
             criticism, and hostility directed toward patients, as well
             as their observations of patient pain and pain behaviors.
             Hierarchical linear modeling tested concurrent and lagged (3
             hours later) relationships. Principal findings included the
             following: a) within-person increases in pain
             catastrophizing were positively associated with spouse
             reports of patient pain behavior in concurrent and lagged
             analyses; b) within-person increases in pain catastrophizing
             were positively associated with patient perceptions of
             spouse support, criticism, and hostility in concurrent
             analyses; c) within-person increases in pain catastrophizing
             were negatively associated with spouse reports of criticism
             and hostility in lagged analyses. Spouses reported patient
             behaviors that were tied to elevated pain catastrophizing,
             and spouses changed their behavior during and after elevated
             pain catastrophizing episodes. Pain catastrophizing may
             affect the interpersonal environment of patients and spouses
             in ways consistent with the Communal Coping Model.
             PERSPECTIVE: Pain catastrophizing may represent a coping
             response by which individuals' pain expression leads to
             assistance or empathic responses from others. Results of the
             present study support this Communal Coping Model, which
             emphasizes interpersonal processes by which pain
             catastrophizing, pain, pain behavior, and responses of
             significant others are intertwined.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.005},
   Key = {fds311140}
}

@article{fds372565,
   Title = {PAIN AND EMOTIONAL WELL-BEING AS VARIABILITY PREDICTORS AND
             THE ROLE OF MINDFULNESS IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER
             ADULTS},
   Journal = {The Gerontologist},
   Volume = {55},
   Number = {Suppl_2},
   Pages = {491-491},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv210.02},
   Doi = {10.1093/geront/gnv210.02},
   Key = {fds372565}
}

@article{fds273565,
   Author = {Bennell, KL and Rini, C and Keefe, F and French, S and Nelligan, R and Kasza, J and Forbes, A and Dobson, F and Abbott, JH and Dalwood, A and Vicenzino, B and Harris, A and Hinman, RS},
   Title = {Effects of Adding an Internet-Based Pain Coping Skills
             Training Protocol to a Standardized Education and Exercise
             Program for People With Persistent Hip Pain (HOPE Trial):
             Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.},
   Journal = {Phys Ther},
   Volume = {95},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1408-1422},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0031-9023},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150119},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Persistent hip pain in older people is usually
             due to hip osteoarthritis (OA), a major cause of pain,
             disability, and psychological dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The
             purpose of this study is to evaluate whether adding an
             Internet-based pain coping skills training (PCST) protocol
             to a standardized intervention of education followed by
             physical therapist-instructed home exercise leads to greater
             reductions in pain and improvements in function. DESIGN: An
             assessor-, therapist-, and participant-blinded randomized
             controlled trial will be conducted. SETTING: The study will
             be conducted in a community setting. PARTICIPANTS: The
             participants will be 142 people over 50 years of age with
             self-reported hip pain consistent with hip OA. INTERVENTION:
             Participants will be randomly allocated to: (1) a control
             group receiving a 24-week standardized intervention
             comprising an 8-week Internet-based education package
             followed by 5 individual physical therapy exercise sessions
             plus home exercises (3 times weekly) or (2) a PCST group
             receiving an 8-week Internet-based PCST protocol in addition
             to the control intervention. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes will be
             measured at baseline and 8, 24, and 52 weeks, with the
             primary time point at 24 weeks. Primary outcomes are hip
             pain on walking and self-reported physical function.
             Secondary outcomes include health-related quality-of-life,
             participant-perceived treatment response, self-efficacy for
             pain management and function, pain coping attempts, pain
             catastrophizing, and physical activity. Measurements of
             adherence, adverse events, use of health services, and
             process measures will be collected at 24 and 52 weeks.
             Cost-effectiveness will be assessed at 52 weeks.
             LIMITATIONS: A self-reported diagnosis of persistent hip
             pain will be used. CONCLUSIONS: The findings will help
             determine whether adding an Internet-based PCST protocol to
             standardized education and physical therapist-instructed
             home exercise is more effective than education and exercise
             alone for persistent hip pain. This study has the potential
             to guide clinical practice toward innovative modes of
             psychosocial health care provision.},
   Doi = {10.2522/ptj.20150119},
   Key = {fds273565}
}

@article{fds273585,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Abernethy, AP and Edmond, SN and Kelleher, SA and Wren,
             AA and Samsa, GP and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {A Pilot Study of a Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training
             Protocol for Patients With Persistent Cancer
             Pain.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {553-558},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.04.013},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Pain coping skills training (PCST) interventions
             have shown efficacy for reducing pain and providing other
             benefits in patients with cancer. However, their reach is
             often limited because of a variety of barriers (e.g.,
             travel, physical burden, cost, time). OBJECTIVES: This study
             examined the feasibility and acceptability of a brief PCST
             intervention delivered to patients in their homes using
             mobile health (mHealth) technology. Pre-to-post intervention
             changes in pain, physical functioning, physical symptoms,
             psychological distress, self-efficacy for pain management,
             and pain catastrophizing also were examined. METHODS:
             Patients with a diagnosis of breast, lung, prostate, or
             colorectal cancer who reported persistent pain (N = 25)
             participated in a four-session intervention delivered using
             mHealth technology (videoconferencing on a tablet computer).
             Participants completed measures of pain, physical
             functioning, physical symptoms, psychological distress,
             self-efficacy for pain management, and pain catastrophizing.
             We also assessed patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Participants
             completed an average of 3.36 (SD = 1.11) of the four
             intervention sessions for an overall session completion rate
             of 84%. Participants reported that the program was of
             excellent quality and met their needs. Significant
             preintervention to postintervention differences were found
             in pain, physical symptoms, psychological distress, and pain
             catastrophizing. CONCLUSION: The use of mHealth technology
             is a feasible and acceptable option for delivery of PCST for
             patients with cancer. This delivery mode is likely to
             dramatically increase intervention access for cancer
             patients with pain compared to traditional in-person
             delivery. Preliminary data also suggest that the program is
             likely to produce pretreatment to post-treatment decreases
             in pain and other important outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.04.013},
   Key = {fds273585}
}

@article{fds273591,
   Author = {Kimmick, G and Edmond, SN and Bosworth, HB and Peppercorn, J and Marcom,
             PK and Blackwell, K and Keefe, FJ and Shelby, RA},
   Title = {Medication taking behaviors among breast cancer patients on
             adjuvant endocrine therapy.},
   Journal = {Breast},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {630-636},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0960-9776},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2015.06.010},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: To explore how symptoms and psychosocial factors
             are related to intentional and unintentional non-adherent
             medication taking behaviors. METHODS: Included were
             postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive, stage
             I-IIIA breast cancer, who had completed surgery,
             chemotherapy, and radiation, and were taking endocrine
             therapy. Self-administered, standardized measures were
             completed during a routine clinic visit: Brief Fatigue
             Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory, Menopause Specific Quality
             of Life Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Cancer
             Therapy General and Neurotoxicity scales, and Self-Efficacy
             for Appropriate Medication Use Scale. Regression analyses
             were performed to determine the degree to which demographic,
             medical, symptom, and psychosocial variables, explain
             intentional, such as changing one's doses or stopping
             medication, and unintentional, such as forgetting to take
             one's medication, non-adherent behaviors. RESULTS:
             Participants were 112 women: mean age 64 (SD = 9) years; 81%
             white; mean time from surgery 40 (SD = 28) months; 49%
             received chemotherapy (39% including a taxane); mean time on
             endocrine therapy, 35 (SD = 29.6) months; 82% taking an
             aromatase inhibitor. Intentional and unintentional
             non-adherent behaviors were described in 33.9% and 58.9% of
             participants, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed
             that higher self-efficacy for taking medication was
             associated with lower levels of unintentional (p = 0.002)
             and intentional (p = 0.004) non-adherent behaviors. The
             presence of symptoms (p = 0.03) and lower self-efficacy for
             physician communication (p = 0.009) were associated with
             higher levels of intentional non-adherent behaviors.
             CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that women who report
             greater symptoms, lower self-efficacy for communicating with
             their physician, and lower self-efficacy for taking their
             medication are more likely to engage in both intentional and
             unintentional non-adherent behaviors.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.breast.2015.06.010},
   Key = {fds273591}
}

@article{fds273639,
   Author = {Dalton, JA and Higgins, MK and Miller, AH and Keefe, FJ and Khuri,
             FR},
   Title = {Pain Intensity and Pain Interference in Patients With Lung
             Cancer: A Pilot Study of Biopsychosocial
             Predictors.},
   Journal = {Am J Clin Oncol},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {457-464},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24064756},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To explore biopsychosocial factors (beliefs,
             depression, catastrophizing cytokines) in individuals newly
             diagnosed with lung cancer and no pain to determine their
             relationship at diagnosis and across time and to determine
             whether these factors contribute to pain intensity or pain
             interference with function at pain onset. MATERIALS AND
             METHODS: A longitudinal, exploratory, pilot study was
             implemented in a private medical center and a VA medical
             center in the southeast. Twelve subjects not experiencing
             pain related to cancer of the lung or its treatment were
             recruited. A Karnofsky status of 40% and hemoglobin of 8 g
             were required. Five questionnaires were completed and 10 mL
             of blood was drawn at baseline; 4 questionnaires and blood
             draws were repeated monthly for 5 months. One baseline
             questionnaire and a pain assessment were added at final.
             Demographic, clinical, and questionnaire data were
             summarized; standardized scale scores were calculated.
             RESULTS: Biopsychosocial scores that were low at baseline
             increased from T1-T4 but decreased slightly T5-T6.
             Individuals with higher pain intensity and higher pain
             interference at final had higher psychosocial scores at
             baseline than individuals with lower pain intensity and
             lower pain interference at final. CONCLUSIONS: Unrelated to
             disease stage, metastasis, or treatment, unique levels of
             biopsychosocial factors are observed in patients newly
             diagnosed with lung cancer who report higher levels of pain
             intensity and higher levels of pain interference at the time
             pain occurs. Replication studies are needed to validate this
             response pattern and determine the value of repeated
             individual assessments.},
   Doi = {10.1097/COC.0b013e3182a79009},
   Key = {fds273639}
}

@article{fds273571,
   Author = {Tsai, P-F and Chang, JY and Beck, C and Kuo, Y-F and Keefe, FJ and Rosengren, K},
   Title = {A supplemental report to a randomized cluster trial of a
             20-week Sun-style Tai Chi for osteoarthritic knee pain in
             elders with cognitive impairment.},
   Journal = {Complement Ther Med},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {570-576},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0965-2299},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.06.001},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This was a secondary data analysis of a
             cluster-randomized clinical trial that tested the efficacy
             of a 20-week Sun-style Tai Chi (TC) program in reducing pain
             in community-dwelling elders with cognitive impairment and
             knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study also examined whether
             elders' level of cognitive function was related to the
             outcomes of the TC program. METHOD: Elders (N=55) were
             recruited from 8 study sites. Each site was randomly
             assigned to participate in either a 20-week TC or an
             education program. Verbal report of pain was measured by a
             Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS) at weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17 and
             21 (designated as times 1-6). Pain behaviors and analgesic
             intake were also recorded at times 1-6. RESULTS: At
             post-test, scores on the VDS and observed pain behaviors
             were significantly better in the TC group than in the
             control group (p=0.008-0.048). The beneficial effects of TC
             were not associated with cognitive ability. CONCLUSION:
             These results suggest that TC can be used as an adjunct to
             pharmacological intervention to relieve OA pain in elders
             with cognitive impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical
             Trial.gov NCT01528566.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.ctim.2015.06.001},
   Key = {fds273571}
}

@article{fds273576,
   Author = {Campbell, L and Stalls-Jernigan, J and Thornton, S and Keefe, FJ and McKee, D},
   Title = {Relationship Intimacy and Quality of Life in Black Prostate
             Cancer Survivors and Partners},
   Journal = {PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY},
   Volume = {24},
   Pages = {330-330},
   Publisher = {WILEY-BLACKWELL},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {1057-9249},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000358255000601&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds273576}
}

@article{fds372566,
   Author = {Sitlinger, AP and Shelby, RA and White, HK and Edmond, SN and Bosworth,
             HB and Keefe, FJ and Kimmick, GG},
   Title = {Grip strength and timed get-up-and-go: Associations with
             symptoms among women taking adjuvant endocrine
             therapy.},
   Journal = {Journal of Clinical Oncology},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {15_suppl},
   Pages = {e11564-e11564},
   Publisher = {American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e11564},
   Doi = {10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e11564},
   Key = {fds372566}
}

@article{fds273584,
   Author = {Messier, SP and Callahan, LF and Golightly, YM and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Design and conduct of
             clinical trials of lifestyle diet and exercise interventions
             for osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis Cartilage},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {787-797},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {1063-4584},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.008},
   Abstract = {The objective was to develop a set of "best practices" for
             use as a primer for those interested in entering the
             clinical trials field for lifestyle diet and/or exercise
             interventions in osteoarthritis (OA), and as a set of
             recommendations for experienced clinical trials
             investigators. A subcommittee of the non-pharmacologic
             therapies committee of the OARSI Clinical Trials Working
             Group was selected by the Steering Committee to develop a
             set of recommended principles for non-pharmacologic
             diet/exercise OA randomized clinical trials. Topics were
             identified for inclusion by co-authors and reviewed by the
             subcommittee. Resources included authors' expert opinions,
             traditional search methods including MEDLINE (via PubMed),
             and previously published guidelines. Suggested steps and
             considerations for study methods (e.g., recruitment and
             enrollment of participants, study design, intervention and
             assessment methods) were recommended. The recommendations
             set forth in this paper provide a guide from which a
             research group can design a lifestyle diet/exercise
             randomized clinical trial in patients with
             OA.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.008},
   Key = {fds273584}
}

@article{fds273597,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Gerhart, JI and Bruehl, S and Peterson, KM and Smith, DA and Porter, LS and Schuster, E and Kinner, E and Buvanendran, A and Fras,
             AM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Anger arousal and behavioral anger regulation in everyday
             life among patients with chronic low back pain:
             Relationships to patient pain and function.},
   Journal = {Health Psychol},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {547-555},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0278-6133},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000091},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the
             degree to which patient anger arousal and behavioral anger
             regulation (expression, inhibition) occurring in the course
             of daily life was related to patient pain and function as
             rated by patients and their spouses. METHOD: Married couples
             (N = 105) (one spouse with chronic low back pain) completed
             electronic daily diaries, with assessments 5 times/day for
             14 days. Patients completed items on their own state anger,
             behavioral anger expression and inhibition, and pain-related
             factors. Spouses completed items on their observations of
             patient pain-related factors. Hierarchical linear modeling
             was used to test concurrent and lagged relationships.
             RESULTS: Patient-reported increases in state anger were
             related to their reports of concurrent increases in pain and
             pain interference and to spouse reports of patient pain and
             pain behavior. Patient-reported increases in behavioral
             anger expression were related to lagged increases in pain
             intensity and interference and decreases in function. Most
             of these relationships remained significant with state anger
             controlled. Patient-reported increases in behavioral anger
             inhibition were related to concurrent increases in pain
             interference and decreases in function, which also remained
             significant with state anger controlled. Patient-reported
             increases in state anger were related to lagged increases in
             spouse reports of patient pain intensity and pain behaviors.
             CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that in patients with chronic
             pain, anger arousal and behavioral anger expression and
             inhibition in everyday life are related to elevated pain
             intensity and decreased function as reported by patients.
             Spouse ratings show some degree of concordance with patient
             reports.},
   Doi = {10.1037/hea0000091},
   Key = {fds273597}
}

@article{fds311141,
   Author = {Rini, C and Porter, LS and Somers, TJ and McKee, DC and DeVellis, RF and Smith, M and Winkel, G and Ahern, DK and Goldman, R and Stiller, JL and Mariani, C and Patterson, C and Jordan, JM and Caldwell, DS and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Automated Internet-based pain coping skills training to
             manage osteoarthritis pain: a randomized controlled
             trial.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {156},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {837-848},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000121},
   Abstract = {Osteoarthritis (OA) places a significant burden on worldwide
             public health because of the large and growing number of
             people affected by OA and its associated pain and
             disability. Pain coping skills training (PCST) is an
             evidence-based intervention targeting OA pain and
             disability. To reduce barriers that currently limit access
             to PCST, we developed an 8-week, automated, Internet-based
             PCST program called PainCOACH and evaluated its potential
             efficacy and acceptability in a small-scale, 2-arm
             randomized controlled feasibility trial. Participants were
             113 men and women with clinically confirmed hip or knee OA
             and associated pain. They were randomized to a group
             completing PainCOACH or an assessment-only control group.
             Osteoarthritis pain, pain-related interference with
             functioning, pain-related anxiety, self-efficacy for pain
             management, and positive and negative affect were measured
             before intervention, midway through the intervention, and
             after intervention. Findings indicated high acceptability
             and adherence: 91% of participants randomized to complete
             PainCOACH finished all 8 modules over 8 to 10 weeks. Linear
             mixed models showed that, after treatment, women who
             received the PainCOACH intervention reported significantly
             lower pain than that in women in the control group (Cohen d
             = 0.33). Intervention effects could not be tested in men
             because of their low pain and small sample size.
             Additionally, both men and women demonstrated increases in
             self-efficacy from baseline to after intervention compared
             with the control group (d = 0.43). Smaller effects were
             observed for pain-related anxiety (d = 0.20), pain-related
             interference with functioning (d = 0.13), negative affect (d
             = 0.10), and positive affect (d = 0.24). Findings underscore
             the value of continuing to develop an automated
             Internet-based approach to disseminate this empirically
             supported intervention.},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000121},
   Key = {fds311141}
}

@article{fds273579,
   Author = {Raja, SN and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {An introduction to the biennial review of
             pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {156 Suppl 1},
   Pages = {S1},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000112},
   Doi = {10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000112},
   Key = {fds273579}
}

@article{fds371060,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Kelleher, SA and Edmond, SN and Wren, AA and Fisher, HM and Abernethy, AP and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {TWO PHASES OF PILOTING A MHEALTH BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION FOR
             CANCER PAIN},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {49},
   Pages = {S217-S217},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371060}
}

@article{fds371061,
   Author = {Kelleher, SA and Fisher, HM and Shelby, RA and Sullivan, KM and Abernethy, AP and Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {A HYBRID IN-PERSON AND MHEALTH PAIN COPING SKILLS
             INTERVENTION FOR STEM CELL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {49},
   Pages = {S216-S216},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371061}
}

@article{fds371062,
   Author = {Edmond, SN and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Soo, MS and Skinner, CS and Ahrendt, G and Manculich, J and Sumkin, JH and Zuley, M and Bovbjerg,
             DH},
   Title = {ANXIETY AND NEGATIVE MOOD FOLLOWING MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING
             FOR BREAST CANCER},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {49},
   Pages = {S6-S6},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371062}
}

@article{fds372567,
   Author = {Nicholson, RJ and Hunold, KM and Weaver, MA and Lytle, LA and Keefe, FJ and McLean, SA and Plans-Mills, TF},
   Title = {Effect of Reduced Physical Activity on the Development of
             Persistent Pain After Motor Vehicle Collision in Older
             Adults: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis},
   Journal = {JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY},
   Volume = {63},
   Pages = {S102-S102},
   Publisher = {WILEY-BLACKWELL},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372567}
}

@article{fds372568,
   Author = {Nilsen, W and Stirrat, M and Atienza, AA and Elwood, W and Fitzsimmons,
             S and Davidson, KW and Keefe, FJ and Spruijt-Metz,
             D},
   Title = {NIH GRANTWRITING WORKSHOP},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {49},
   Pages = {S1-S1},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372568}
}

@article{fds372569,
   Author = {Burns, J and Gerhart, J and Bruehl, S and Smith, D and Post, K and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {SLEEP QUALITY, PAIN AND FUNCTION IN PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC LOW
             BACK PAIN: A DAILY DIARY STUDY},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {49},
   Pages = {S168-S168},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372569}
}

@article{fds372570,
   Author = {Butryn, ML and Forman, E and Keefe, FJ and Sherwood, NE and Stevens,
             VJ},
   Title = {BUILDING AND MANAGING A CLINICAL RESEARCH
             TEAM},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {49},
   Pages = {S53-S53},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372570}
}

@article{fds273583,
   Author = {Edmond, SN and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Validating pain communication: current state of the
             science.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {156},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {215-219},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460301.18207.c2},
   Doi = {10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460301.18207.c2},
   Key = {fds273583}
}

@article{fds273615,
   Author = {Golightly, YM and Allen, KD and Stechuchak, KM and Coffman, CJ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Associations of coping strategies with diary based pain
             variables among Caucasian and African American patients with
             osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Int J Behav Med},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {101-108},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {1070-5503},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9365-3},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: The purposes of this study are to examine the
             associations between pain coping strategies and daily
             diary-based pain measures and to determine whether these
             associations differed by race (African American and
             Caucasian). METHODS: Primary care patients from the Durham
             Veterans Affairs and Duke University Medical Centers
             (N = 153) with hand, hip, or knee osteoarthritis (OA)
             completed electronic pain diaries on a one-weekend day and
             one weekday. The maximum, range (maximum minus minimum
             pain), and area under the curve (AUC) of joint pain ratings
             were calculated. Pain coping (Coping Strategies
             Questionnaire (CSQ) coping attempts, catastrophizing, and
             praying/hoping subscale scores) was assessed prior to diary
             entries and at the end of each diary day (total,
             problem-focused, and emotion-focused scores from Stone and
             Neale's Daily Coping Inventory). Pearson correlations
             between pain variables and coping measures were examined.
             Linear mixed models were fit including age, race,
             weekend/weekday, study enrollment site, education level,
             pain medication use, self-rated health, Arthritis Impact
             Measurement Scales affect and function subscales, and
             interactions of coping measures with race and weekend
             day/weekday status. RESULTS: Correlations between coping and
             pain measures were 0.12-0.45. In adjusted models, maximum
             pain and pain range were associated with all three
             diary-based coping measures; maximum pain was associated
             with CSQ coping attempts; and AUC was associated with CSQ
             praying/hoping. Interactions were not significant.
             CONCLUSIONS: Among participants with OA, pain coping
             strategies were related to important aspects of the pain
             experience, particularly pain range and maximum pain.
             However, race did not modify associations of pain coping
             strategy use and the pain experience.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12529-013-9365-3},
   Key = {fds273615}
}

@article{fds273582,
   Author = {Coghill, RC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Quantitative sensory testing in predicting persistent pain
             after joint replacement surgery: promise and
             challenges.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {156},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {4-5},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000025},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000025},
   Key = {fds273582}
}

@article{fds322762,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {PAIN®: our "new look".},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {156},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-2},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000029},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000029},
   Key = {fds322762}
}

@article{fds330872,
   Author = {Trost, Z and Zielke, M and Guck, A and Nowlin, L and Zakhidov, D and France, CR and Keefe, F},
   Title = {The promise and challenge of virtual gaming technologies for
             chronic pain: the case of graded exposure for low back
             pain.},
   Journal = {Pain Manag},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {197-206},
   Year = {2015},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pmt.15.6},
   Abstract = {Virtual reality (VR) technologies have been successfully
             applied to acute pain interventions and recent reviews have
             suggested their potential utility in chronic pain. The
             current review highlights the specific relevance of VR
             interactive gaming technologies for pain-specific
             intervention, including their current use across a variety
             of physical conditions. Using the example of graded-exposure
             treatment for pain-related fear and disability in chronic
             low back pain, we discuss ways that VR gaming can be
             harnessed to optimize existing chronic pain therapies and
             examine the potential limitations of traditional VR
             interfaces in the context of chronic pain. We conclude by
             discussing directions for future research on VR-mediated
             applications in chronic pain.},
   Doi = {10.2217/pmt.15.6},
   Key = {fds330872}
}

@article{fds330578,
   Author = {Rini, C and Porter, LS and Somers, TJ and McKee, DC and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Retaining critical therapeutic elements of behavioral
             interventions translated for delivery via the Internet:
             recommendations and an example using pain coping skills
             training.},
   Journal = {J Med Internet Res},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {e245},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3374},
   Abstract = {Evidence supporting the efficacy of behavioral interventions
             based on principles of cognitive behavioral therapies has
             spurred interest in translating these interventions for
             delivery via the Internet. However, the benefits of this
             dissemination method cannot be realized unless the
             translated interventions are as effective as possible. We
             describe a challenge that must be overcome to ensure this
             occurs--Internet interventions must retain therapeutic
             components and processes underlying the success of
             face-to-face interventions on which they are based. These
             components and processes vary in the ease with which they
             can be translated to the online environment. Moreover, some
             are subtle and may be overlooked, despite being recognized
             as essential to the success of face-to-face interventions.
             We provide preliminary guidance for retaining critical
             therapeutic components and processes in the translation
             process, using Pain Coping Skills Training for
             osteoarthritis pain to illustrate methods. Directions for
             future research are also discussed.},
   Doi = {10.2196/jmir.3374},
   Key = {fds330578}
}

@article{fds273612,
   Author = {Gere, J and Martire, LM and Keefe, FJ and Stephens, MAP and Schulz,
             R},
   Title = {Spouse confidence in self-efficacy for arthritis management
             predicts improved patient health.},
   Journal = {Ann Behav Med},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {337-346},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0883-6612},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9608-9},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: In addition to patient self-efficacy, spouse
             confidence in patient efficacy may also independently
             predict patient health outcomes. However, the potential
             influence of spouse confidence has received little research
             attention. PURPOSE: The current study examined the influence
             of patient and spouse efficacy beliefs for arthritis
             management on patient health. METHODS: Patient health (i.e.,
             arthritis severity, perceived health, depressive symptoms,
             lower extremity function), patient self-efficacy, and spouse
             confidence in patients' efficacy were assessed in a sample
             of knee osteoarthritis patients (N = 152) and their
             spouses at three time points across an 18-month period. Data
             were analyzed using structural equation models. RESULTS:
             Consistent with predictions, spouse confidence in patient
             efficacy for arthritis management predicted improvements in
             patient depressive symptoms, perceived health, and lower
             extremity function over 6 months and in arthritis severity
             over 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings add to a growing
             literature that highlights the important role of spouse
             perceptions in patients' long-term health.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12160-014-9608-9},
   Key = {fds273612}
}

@article{fds273578,
   Author = {Musey, PI and Linnstaedt, SD and Platts-Mills, TF and Miner, JR and Bortsov, AV and Safdar, B and Bijur, P and Rosenau, A and Tsze, DS and Chang, AK and Dorai, S and Engel, KG and Feldman, JA and Fusaro, AM and Lee, DC and Rosenberg, M and Keefe, FJ and Peak, DA and Nam, CS and Patel,
             RG and Fillingim, RB and McLean, SA},
   Title = {Gender differences in acute and chronic pain in the
             emergency department: results of the 2014 Academic Emergency
             Medicine consensus conference pain section.},
   Journal = {Acad Emerg Med},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1421-1430},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1069-6563},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12529},
   Abstract = {Pain is a leading public health problem in the United
             States, with an annual economic burden of more than $630
             billion, and is one of the most common reasons that
             individuals seek emergency department (ED) care. There is a
             paucity of data regarding sex differences in the assessment
             and treatment of acute and chronic pain conditions in the
             ED. The Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference
             convened in Dallas, Texas, in May 2014 to develop a research
             agenda to address this issue among others related to sex
             differences in the ED. Prior to the conference, experts and
             stakeholders from emergency medicine and the pain research
             field reviewed the current literature and identified eight
             candidate priority areas. At the conference, these eight
             areas were reviewed and all eight were ratified using a
             nominal group technique to build consensus. These priority
             areas were: 1) gender differences in the pharmacological and
             nonpharmacological interventions for pain, including
             differences in opioid tolerance, side effects, or misuse; 2)
             gender differences in pain severity perceptions, clinically
             meaningful differences in acute pain, and pain treatment
             preferences; 3) gender differences in pain outcomes of ED
             patients across the life span; 4) gender differences in the
             relationship between acute pain and acute psychological
             responses; 5) the influence of physician-patient gender
             differences and characteristics on the assessment and
             treatment of pain; 6) gender differences in the influence of
             acute stress and chronic stress on acute pain responses; 7)
             gender differences in biological mechanisms and molecular
             pathways mediating acute pain in ED populations; and 8)
             gender differences in biological mechanisms and molecular
             pathways mediating chronic pain development after trauma,
             stress, or acute illness exposure. These areas represent
             priority areas for future scientific inquiry, and gaining
             understanding in these will be essential to improving our
             understanding of sex and gender differences in the
             assessment and treatment of pain conditions in emergency
             care settings.},
   Doi = {10.1111/acem.12529},
   Key = {fds273578}
}

@article{fds273581,
   Author = {Blumenthal, JA and Emery, CF and Smith, PJ and Keefe, FJ and Welty-Wolf,
             K and Mabe, S and Martinu, T and Johnson, JJ and Babyak, MA and O'Hayer,
             VF and Diaz, PT and Durheim, M and Baucom, D and Palmer,
             SM},
   Title = {The effects of a telehealth coping skills intervention on
             outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: primary
             results from the INSPIRE-II study.},
   Journal = {Psychosom Med},
   Volume = {76},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {581-592},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0033-3174},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000101},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is
             associated with increased morbidity and mortality and
             reduced quality of life (QoL). Novel interventions are
             needed to improve outcomes in COPD patients. The present
             study assessed the effects of a telephone-based coping
             skills intervention on psychological and somatic QoL and on
             the combined medical end point of COPD-related
             hospitalizations and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We
             conducted a dual-site, randomized clinical trial with
             assessments at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment. The
             study population comprised 326 outpatients with COPD aged 38
             to 81 years, randomized to coping skills training (CST) or
             to COPD education (COPD-ED). Patients completed a battery of
             QoL instruments, pulmonary function tests, and functional
             measures and were followed up for up to 4.4 years to assess
             medical outcomes. RESULTS: The CST group exhibited greater
             improvements in psychological QoL compared with controls (p
             = .001), including less depression (Cohen d = 0.22 [95%
             confidence interval, or CI = 0.08-0.36]) and anxiety (d =
             0.17 [95% CI = 0.02-0.33]), and better overall mental health
             (d = 0.17 [95% CI = 0.03-0.32]), emotional role functioning
             (d = 0.29 [95% CI = 0.10-0.48]), vitality (d = 0.27 [95% CI
             = 0.11, 0.42]), and social functioning (d = 0.21 [95% CI =
             0.03-0.38]). A significant baseline psychological QoL by
             treatment group interaction revealed that CST with lower QoL
             at baseline achieved even greater improvements in
             psychological QoL compared with COPD-ED. CST participants
             also exhibited greater improvements in somatic QoL (p =
             .042), including greater improvements in pulmonary QoL (d =
             0.13 [95% CI = 0.01-0.24]), less fatigue (d = 0.34 [95% CI =
             0.18-0.50]), and less shortness of breath (d = 0.11 [95% CI
             = -0.01 to 0.23]) and greater improvement in distance walked
             on the Six-Minute Walk test (d = 0.09 [95% CI = 0.01-0.16]).
             However, there was no significant difference in risk of time
             to COPD-related hospitalization or all-cause mortality
             between CST (34 events) and COPD-ED (32 events; p = 0.430).
             CONCLUSIONS: A telehealth CST intervention produced
             clinically meaningful improvements in QoL and functional
             capacity, but no overall improvement in risk of COPD-related
             hospitalization and all-cause mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION:
             clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00736268.},
   Doi = {10.1097/PSY.0000000000000101},
   Key = {fds273581}
}

@article{fds273595,
   Author = {Boeding, SE and Pukay-Martin, ND and Baucom, DH and Porter, LS and Kirby, JS and Gremore, TM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Couples and breast cancer: women's mood and partners'
             marital satisfaction predicting support perception.},
   Journal = {J Fam Psychol},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {675-683},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0893-3200},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/fam0000019},
   Abstract = {Women who are diagnosed with breast cancer can experience an
             array of psychosocial difficulties; however, social support,
             particularly from a spouse, has been shown to have a
             protective function during this time. This study examined
             the ways in which a woman's daily mood, pain, and fatigue,
             and her spouse's marital satisfaction predict the woman's
             report of partner support in the context of breast cancer.
             Pretest data from a larger intervention study and multilevel
             modeling were used to examine the effects of women's daily
             mood, pain, and fatigue and average levels of mood, pain,
             and fatigue on women's report of social support received
             from her partner, as well as how the effects of mood
             interacted with partners' marital satisfaction. Results show
             that on days in which women reported higher levels of
             negative or positive mood, as well as on days they reported
             more pain and fatigue, they reported receiving more support.
             Women who, on average, reported higher levels of positive
             mood tended to report receiving more support than those who,
             on average, reported lower positive mood. However, average
             levels of negative mood were not associated with support.
             Higher average levels of fatigue but not pain were
             associated with higher support. Finally, women whose
             husbands reported higher levels of marital satisfaction
             reported receiving more partner support, but husbands'
             marital satisfaction did not moderate the effect of women's
             mood on support. Implications of these findings are
             discussed relative to assisting couples during this
             difficult time in their lives.},
   Doi = {10.1037/fam0000019},
   Key = {fds273595}
}

@article{fds273605,
   Author = {Bryant, C and Lewis, P and Bennell, KL and Ahamed, Y and Crough, D and Jull, GA and Kenardy, J and Nicholas, MK and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Can physical therapists deliver a pain coping skills
             program? An examination of training processes and
             outcomes.},
   Journal = {Phys Ther},
   Volume = {94},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1443-1454},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0031-9023},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130444},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Physical therapists are well established as
             providers of treatments for common, painful, and disabling
             conditions, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). Thus, they are
             well placed to deliver treatments that integrate physical
             and psychosocial elements. Attention is usually given to
             outcomes of such programs, but few studies have examined the
             processes and outcomes of training physical therapists to
             deliver such treatments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study
             was to describe the processes in training physical
             therapists: (1) to deliver a standardized pain coping skills
             treatment and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of that
             training. DESIGN: This study was an analysis of data
             relating to therapist performance in a randomized clinical
             trial. METHODS: Eleven physical therapists were trained to
             deliver a 10-session pain coping skills training program for
             people with knee OA as part of a randomized controlled trial
             (N=222). The initial training was provided in a workshop
             format and included extensive, ongoing supervision by a
             psychologist and rigorous use of well-defined performance
             criteria to assess competence. Adherence to the program,
             ratings of performance, and use of advanced skills were all
             measured against these criteria in a sample (n=74, 10%) of
             the audio recordings of the intervention sessions. RESULTS:
             Overall, the physical therapists achieved a very high
             standard of treatment delivery, with 96.6% adherence to the
             program and mean performance ratings all in the satisfactory
             range. These results were maintained throughout the
             intervention and across all sessions. LIMITATIONS: Only 10%
             of the delivered sessions were analyzed, and the physical
             therapists who took part in the study were a self-selected
             group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a
             systematic approach to training and accrediting physical
             therapists to deliver a standardized pain coping skills
             program can result in high and sustained levels of adherence
             to the program. Training fidelity was achieved in this group
             of motivated clinicians, but the supervision provided was
             time intensive. The data provide a promising indicator of
             greater potential for psychologically informed practice to
             be a feature of effective health care.},
   Doi = {10.2522/ptj.20130444},
   Key = {fds273605}
}

@article{fds273608,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Edmond, SN and Wren, AA and Keefe, FJ and Peppercorn, JM and Marcom, PK and Blackwell, KL and Kimmick, GG},
   Title = {Self-efficacy for coping with symptoms moderates the
             relationship between physical symptoms and well-being in
             breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine
             therapy.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {2851-2859},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0941-4355},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2269-1},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: This study examined the relationships between
             physical symptoms, self-efficacy for coping with symptoms,
             and functional, emotional, and social well-being in women
             who were taking adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast
             cancer. METHODS: One hundred and twelve women who were
             taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or an aromatase
             inhibitor) for breast cancer completed measures of physical
             symptoms, self-efficacy for coping with symptoms, and
             functional, social, and emotional well-being at the time of
             routine medical follow-up (women were on average 3.4 years
             post-surgery; range 3 months to 11 years). RESULTS: Multiple
             linear regression analyses showed that higher self-efficacy
             for coping with symptoms was associated with greater
             functional, emotional, and social well-being after
             controlling for physical symptoms (p < 0.05).
             Self-efficacy for coping with symptoms moderated the
             relationship between physical symptoms and functional
             (B = 0.05, SE = 0.02, t = 2.67, p = 0.009)
             and emotional well-being (B = 0.03, SE = 0.01,
             t = 2.45, p = 0.02). As self-efficacy increased, the
             relationship between greater physical symptoms and lower
             well-being became weaker. Among women with high levels of
             self-efficacy, physical symptoms were not related to
             functional and emotional well-being. CONCLUSIONS:
             Self-efficacy for coping with symptoms may reduce the
             negative impact of physical symptoms and contribute to
             well-being in breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant
             endocrine therapy. Future studies could examine whether
             psychosocial interventions aimed at increasing self-efficacy
             for managing symptoms help women better cope with treatment
             side effects and improve quality of life.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-014-2269-1},
   Key = {fds273608}
}

@article{fds273596,
   Author = {Barsky Reese and J and Porter, LS and Regan, KR and Keefe, FJ and Azad, NS and Diaz, LA and Herman, JM and Haythornthwaite, JA},
   Title = {A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples
             intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in
             colorectal cancer.},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1005-1013},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {1057-9249},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.3508},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: We previously developed and piloted a
             telephone-based intimacy enhancement (IE) intervention
             addressing sexual concerns of colorectal cancer patients and
             their partners in an uncontrolled study. The current study
             tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary
             efficacy of the IE intervention in a randomized, controlled
             trial. METHODS: Twenty-three couples were randomized to
             either the four-session IE condition or to a wait list
             control condition and completed sexual and relationship
             outcomes measures. The IE intervention teaches skills for
             coping with sexual concerns and improving intimacy.
             Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through
             enrollment and post-treatment program evaluations,
             respectively. Effect sizes were calculated by comparing
             differences in average pre/post change scores across
             completers in the two groups (n = 18 couples). RESULTS:
             Recruitment and attrition data supported feasibility.
             Program evaluations for process (e.g., ease of
             participation) and content (e.g., relevance) demonstrated
             acceptability. Engaging in intimacy-building activities and
             communication were the skills rated as most commonly
             practiced and most helpful. For patients, positive effects
             of the IE intervention were found for female and male sexual
             function, medical impact on sexual function, and
             self-efficacy for enjoying intimacy (≥.58); no effects
             were found on sexual distress or intimacy and small negative
             effects for sexual communication, and two self-efficacy
             items. For partners, positive IE effects were found for all
             outcomes; the largest were for sexual distress (.69), male
             sexual function (1.76), communication (.97), and two
             self-efficacy items (≥.87). CONCLUSIONS: The
             telephone-based IE intervention shows promise for couples
             facing colorectal cancer. Larger multi-site intervention
             studies are necessary to replicate findings.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.3508},
   Key = {fds273596}
}

@article{fds273606,
   Author = {Broderick, JE and Keefe, FJ and Bruckenthal, P and Junghaenel, DU and Schneider, S and Schwartz, JE and Kaell, AT and Caldwell, DS and McKee,
             D and Reed, S and Gould, E},
   Title = {Nurse practitioners can effectively deliver pain coping
             skills training to osteoarthritis patients with chronic
             pain: A randomized, controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {155},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1743-1754},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.024},
   Abstract = {A multisite, randomized, controlled clinical effectiveness
             trial was conducted for osteoarthritis patients with chronic
             pain of the knee or hip. Adult health nurse practitioners
             provided a 10-session intervention, pain coping skills
             training (PCST), in patients' doctors' offices (N=129
             patients); the control group received usual care (N=127
             patients). Primary outcomes assessed at baseline,
             posttreatment, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up
             were: pain intensity, physical functioning, psychological
             distress, self-efficacy, catastrophizing, use of coping
             strategies, and quality of life. Secondary measures included
             fatigue, social functioning, health satisfaction, and use of
             pain medication. Methods favoring external validity,
             consistent with pragmatic, effectiveness research, were
             utilized. Primary ITT and secondary per-protocol analyses
             were conducted. Attrition was within the expected range: 11%
             at posttreatment and 29% at 12-month follow-up; rates did
             not differ between groups. Omnibus ITT analyses across all
             assessment points indicated significant improvement for the
             PCST group compared with the control group for pain
             intensity, physical functioning, psychological distress, use
             of pain coping strategies, and self-efficacy, as well as
             fatigue, satisfaction with health, and reduced use of pain
             medication. Treatment effects were robust to covariates
             (demographics and clinical sites). Trends in the outcomes
             across the assessments were examined. All outcomes, except
             for self-efficacy, were maintained through the 12-month
             follow-up; effects for self-efficacy degraded over time.
             Per-protocol analyses did not yield greater effect sizes.
             Comparisons of PCST patients who were more vs less treatment
             adherent suggested greater effectiveness for patients with
             high adherence. Results support the effectiveness of nurse
             practitioner delivery of PCST for chronic osteoarthritis
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.024},
   Key = {fds273606}
}

@article{fds273618,
   Author = {Bartley, EJ and Edmond, SN and Wren, AA and Somers, TJ and Teo, I and Zhou,
             S and Rowe, KA and Abernethy, AP and Keefe, FJ and Shelby,
             RA},
   Title = {Holding back moderates the association between health
             symptoms and social well-being in patients undergoing
             hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {374-384},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.09.019},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Holding back, or withholding discussion of
             disease-related thoughts and emotions, is associated with
             negative outcomes including lower quality of life,
             diminished well-being, and relational distress. For patients
             undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT),
             the degree to which one holds back from discussing
             illness-related concerns may be an important determinant of
             social well-being and health; however, this has not been
             systematically assessed in this population. OBJECTIVES: The
             purpose of the present study was to assess the moderating
             effects of holding back discussion of disease-related
             concerns on the relationship between health-related symptoms
             and social well-being in adult patients undergoing HSCT.
             METHODS: Seventy autologous (n = 55) and allogeneic (n = 15)
             HSCT patients completed measures of holding back, social
             well-being, and health symptoms (i.e., pain, fatigue, sleep
             problems, cognitive problems) both before and after
             transplantation (i.e., three months after transplantation
             and six months after transplantation). RESULTS: In patients
             with average to high levels of holding back, health symptoms
             were significantly related to lower levels of social
             well-being; however, for patients with low levels of holding
             back, the relationship between health symptoms and social
             well-being was not significant. CONCLUSION: The results of
             the present study suggest that the level of holding back may
             be important in understanding how health-related symptoms
             relate to social well-being in patients undergoing HSCT.
             These findings underscore the importance of addressing how
             patients undergoing HSCT communicate about their disease
             with others as this may be related to their adjustment to
             illness and treatment.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.09.019},
   Key = {fds273618}
}

@article{fds273593,
   Author = {Dobson, F and Hinman, RS and French, S and Rini, C and Keefe, F and Nelligan, R and Abbott, JH and Bryant, C and Staples, MP and Dalwood, A and Bennell, KL},
   Title = {Internet-mediated physiotherapy and pain coping skills
             training for people with persistent knee pain (IMPACT - knee
             pain): a randomised controlled trial protocol.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {15},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {279},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {1471-2474},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-279},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Persistent knee pain in people over 50 years of
             age is often attributable to knee osteoarthritis (OA), a
             common joint condition that causes physical and
             psychological dysfunction. Exercise and pain coping skills
             training (PCST) can help reduce the impact of persistent
             knee pain, however, access to health professionals who
             deliver these services can be challenging. With increasing
             access to the Internet, remotely delivered Internet-based
             treatment approaches may provide alternatives for healthcare
             delivery. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial will
             investigate whether an Internet-delivered intervention that
             combines PCST and physiotherapist-guided exercise (PCST +
             Ex) is more effective than online educational material
             (educational control) in people with persistent knee pain.
             METHODS/DESIGN: We will recruit 148 people over 50 years of
             age with self-reported persistent knee pain consistent with
             knee OA from the Australian community. Following completion
             of baseline questionnaires, participants will be randomly
             allocated to access a 3-month intervention of either (i)
             online educational material, or (ii) the same online
             material plus an 8-module (once per week) Internet-based
             PCST program and seven Internet-delivered physiotherapy
             sessions with a home exercise programs to be performed 3
             times per week. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 3
             months and 9 months with the primary time point at 3 months.
             Primary outcomes are average knee pain on walking (11-point
             numeric rating scale) and self-reported physical function
             (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
             Index subscale). Secondary outcomes include additional
             measures of knee pain, health-related quality-of-life,
             perceived global change in symptoms, and potential
             moderators and mediators of outcomes including self-efficacy
             for pain management and function, pain coping attempts and
             pain catastrophising. Other measures of adherence, adverse
             events, harms, use of health services/co-interventions, and
             process measures including appropriateness and satisfaction
             of the intervention, will be collected at 3, 6 and 9 months.
             DISCUSSION: The findings will help determine the
             effectiveness and acceptability of Internet access to a
             combination of interventions that are known to be beneficial
             to people with persistent knee pain. This study has the
             potential to guide clinical practice towards innovative
             modes of healthcare provision. TRIAL REGISTRATION:
             Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry reference:
             ACTRN12614000243617.},
   Doi = {10.1186/1471-2474-15-279},
   Key = {fds273593}
}

@article{fds273600,
   Author = {Lumley, MA and Keefe, FJ and Mosley-Williams, A and Rice, JR and McKee,
             D and Waters, SJ and Partridge, RT and Carty, JN and Coltri, AM and Kalaj,
             A and Cohen, JL and Neely, LC and Pahssen, JK and Connelly, MA and Bouaziz,
             YB and Riordan, PA},
   Title = {The effects of written emotional disclosure and coping
             skills training in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized
             clinical trial.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {82},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {644-658},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036958},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Two psychological interventions for rheumatoid
             arthritis (RA) are cognitive-behavioral coping skills
             training (CST) and written emotional disclosure (WED). These
             approaches have developed independently, and their
             combination may be more effective than either one alone.
             Furthermore, most studies of each intervention have
             methodological limitations, and each needs further testing.
             METHOD: We randomized 264 adults with RA in a 2 × 2
             factorial design to 1 of 2 writing conditions (WED vs.
             control writing) followed by 1 of 2 training conditions (CST
             vs. arthritis education control training). Patient-reported
             pain and functioning, blinded evaluations of disease
             activity and walking speed, and an inflammatory marker
             (C-reactive protein) were assessed at baseline and 1-, 4-,
             and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Completion of each
             intervention was high (>90% of patients), and attrition was
             low (10.2% at 12-month follow-up). Hierarchical linear
             modeling of treatment effects over the follow-up period, and
             analyses of covariance at each assessment point, revealed no
             interactions between writing and training; however, both
             interventions had main effects on outcomes, with small
             effect sizes. Compared with control training, CST decreased
             pain and psychological symptoms through 12 months. The
             effects of WED were mixed: Compared with control writing,
             WED reduced disease activity and physical disability at 1
             month only, but WED had more pain than control writing on 1
             of 2 measures at 4 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The
             combination of WED and CST does not improve outcomes,
             perhaps because each intervention has unique effects at
             different time points. CST improves health status in RA and
             is recommended for patients, whereas WED has limited
             benefits and needs strengthening or better targeting to
             appropriate patients.},
   Doi = {10.1037/a0036958},
   Key = {fds273600}
}

@article{fds273601,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Wren, AA and Blumenthal, JA and Caldwell, D and Huffman,
             KM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain, physical functioning, and overeating in obese
             rheumatoid arthritis patients: do thoughts about pain and
             eating matter?},
   Journal = {J Clin Rheumatol},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {244-250},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {1076-1608},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000124},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Obese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have
             higher levels of pain, disability, and disease activity than
             do nonobese patients with RA. Patients' health-related
             thoughts about arthritis and weight may be important to
             consider in obese patients with RA who face the dual
             challenge of managing RA and weight. OBJECTIVES: The
             objective of this study was to examine the relationships of
             pain catastrophizing, self-efficacy (ie, confidence) for
             arthritis management and self-efficacy for weight management
             to important outcomes in obese patients with RA. We expected
             that after controlling for demographic and medical
             variables, higher levels of pain catastrophizing and lower
             levels of confidence would account for significant and
             unique variance in pain, physical functioning, and
             overeating. METHODS: Participants had a diagnosis of RA and
             a body mass index of 28 kg/m or greater and completed
             self-report questionnaires assessing pain, physical
             functioning, overeating, pain catastrophizing, self-efficacy
             for arthritis management, self-efficacy for weight
             management, and a 6-minute walk test. RESULTS: Pain
             catastrophizing, self-efficacy for arthritis, and
             self-efficacy for weight management were significantly and
             uniquely related to RA-related outcomes. Pain
             catastrophizing was a significant independent predictor of
             pain severity (β = 0.38); self-efficacy for arthritis was a
             significant independent predictor of self-report physical
             functioning (β = -0.37) and the 6-minute walk performance
             (β = 0.44), and self-efficacy for weight management was a
             significant independent predictor of overeating (β =
             -0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Pain catastrophizing, self-efficacy for
             arthritis, and self-efficacy for weight management each
             contributed uniquely to relate to key outcomes in obese
             patients with RA. Clinicians should consider assessment of
             thought processes when assessing and intervening with
             patients who face dual health challenges; unique
             intervention approaches may be needed for addressing the
             challenges of arthritis and weight.},
   Doi = {10.1097/RHU.0000000000000124},
   Key = {fds273601}
}

@article{fds273604,
   Author = {Alexander, AM and Flynn, KE and Hahn, EA and Jeffery, DD and Keefe, FJ and Reeve, BB and Schultz, W and Reese, JB and Shelby, RA and Weinfurt,
             KP},
   Title = {Improving patients' understanding of terms and phrases
             commonly used in self-reported measures of sexual
             function.},
   Journal = {J Sex Med},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1991-1998},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {1743-6095},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12599},
   Abstract = {INTRODUCTION: There is a significant gap in research
             regarding the readability and comprehension of existing
             sexual function measures. Patient-reported outcome measures
             may use terms not well understood by respondents with low
             literacy. AIM: This study aims to test comprehension of
             words and phrases typically used in sexual function measures
             to improve validity for all individuals, including those
             with low literacy. METHODS: We recruited 20 men and 28 women
             for cognitive interviews on version 2.0 of the
             Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System(®)
             (PROMIS(®) ) Sexual Function and Satisfaction measures. We
             assessed participants' reading level using the word reading
             subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test. Sixteen
             participants were classified as having low literacy. MAIN
             OUTCOME MEASURES: In the first round of cognitive
             interviews, each survey item was reviewed by five or more
             people, at least two of whom had lower than a ninth-grade
             reading level (low literacy). Patient feedback was
             incorporated into a revised version of the items. In the
             second round of interviews, an additional three or more
             people (at least one with low literacy) reviewed each
             revised item. RESULTS: Participants with low literacy had
             difficulty comprehending terms such as aroused, orgasm,
             erection, ejaculation, incontinence, and vaginal
             penetration. Women across a range of literacy levels had
             difficulty with clinical terms like labia and clitoris. We
             modified unclear terms to include parenthetical descriptors
             or slang equivalents, which generally improved
             comprehension. CONCLUSIONS: Common words and phrases used
             across measures of self-reported sexual function are not
             universally understood. Researchers should appreciate these
             misunderstandings as a potential source of error in studies
             using self-reported measures of sexual function. This study
             also provides evidence for the importance of including
             individuals with low literacy in cognitive pretesting during
             the measure development.},
   Doi = {10.1111/jsm.12599},
   Key = {fds273604}
}

@article{fds273610,
   Author = {Vitiello, MV and McCurry, SM and Shortreed, SM and Baker, LD and Rybarczyk, BD and Keefe, FJ and Von Korff and M},
   Title = {Short-term improvement in insomnia symptoms predicts
             long-term improvements in sleep, pain, and fatigue in older
             adults with comorbid osteoarthritis and insomnia.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {155},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1547-1554},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.032},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: In a primary care population of 367 older adults
             (aged ⩾60 years) with osteoarthritis (OA) pain and
             insomnia, we examined the relationship between short-term
             improvement in sleep and long-term sleep, pain, and fatigue
             outcomes through secondary analyses of randomized controlled
             trial data. Study participants, regardless of experimental
             treatment received, were classified either as improvers
             (⩾30% baseline to 2-month reduction on the Insomnia
             Severity Index [ISI]) or as nonimprovers. After controlling
             for treatment arm and potential confounders, improvers
             showed significant, sustained improvements across 18 months
             compared with nonimprovers in pain severity (P<0.001,
             adjusted mean difference=-0.51 [95% CI: -0.80, -0.21),
             arthritis symptoms (P<0.001, 0.63 [0.26, 1.00]), and fear
             avoidance (P=0.009, -2.27 [-3.95, -0.58]) but not in
             catastrophizing or depression. Improvers also showed
             significant, sustained improvements in ISI (P<0.001, -3.03
             [-3.74, -2.32]), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Total
             (P<0.001, -1.45 [-1.97, -0.93]) and general sleep quality
             (P<0.001, -0.28 [-0.39, -0.16]) scores, Flinders Fatigue
             Scale (P<0.001, -1.99 [-3.01, -0.98]), and Dysfunctional
             Beliefs About Sleep Scale (P=0.037, -2.44 [-4.74, -0.15]),
             but no improvements on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep
             Questionnaire or the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. We conclude
             that short-term (2-month) improvements in sleep predicted
             long-term (9- and 18-month) improvements for multiple
             measures of sleep, chronic pain, and fatigue. These
             improvements were not attributable to nonspecific benefits
             for psychological well-being, such as reduced depression.
             These findings are consistent with benefits of improved
             sleep for chronic pain and fatigue among older persons with
             osteoarthritis pain and comorbid insomnia if robust
             improvements in sleep are achieved and sustained. TRIAL
             REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
             NCT01142349.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.032},
   Key = {fds273610}
}

@article{fds273602,
   Author = {Soo, AE and Shelby, RA and Miller, LS and Balmadrid, MH and Johnson, KS and Wren, AA and Yoon, SC and Keefe, FJ and Soo, MS},
   Title = {Predictors of pain experienced by women during percutaneous
             imaging-guided breast biopsies.},
   Journal = {J Am Coll Radiol},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {709-716},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {1546-1440},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.01.013},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate pain
             experienced during imaging-guided core-needle breast
             biopsies and to identify factors that predict increased pain
             perception during procedures. METHODS: In this institutional
             review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol, 136 women
             undergoing stereotactically or ultrasound-guided breast
             biopsy or cyst aspiration were recruited and provided
             written informed consent. Participants filled out
             questionnaires assessing anticipated biopsy pain, ongoing
             breast pain, pain experienced during biopsy, catastrophic
             thoughts about pain during biopsy, anxiety, perceived
             communication with the radiologist, chronic life stress, and
             demographic and medical information. Procedure type,
             experience level of the radiologist performing the biopsy,
             number of biopsies, breast density, histology, and tumor
             size were recorded for each patient. Data were analyzed
             using Spearman's ρ correlations and a probit regression
             model. RESULTS: No pain (0 out of 10) was reported by 39.7%
             of women, mild pain (1-3 out of 10) by 48.5%, and moderate
             to severe pain (≥4 out of 10) by 11.8% (n = 16).
             Significant (P < .05) predictors of greater biopsy pain in
             the probit regression model included younger age, greater
             prebiopsy breast pain, higher anticipated biopsy pain, and
             undergoing a stereotactic procedure. Anticipated biopsy pain
             correlated most strongly with biopsy pain (β = .27, P =
             .004). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients report minimal pain during
             imaging-guided biopsy procedures. Women experiencing greater
             pain levels tended to report higher anticipated pain before
             the procedure. Communication with patients before biopsy
             regarding minimal average pain reported during biopsy and
             encouragement to make use of coping strategies may reduce
             patient anxiety and anticipated pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jacr.2014.01.013},
   Key = {fds273602}
}

@article{fds273609,
   Author = {Syrjala, KL and Jensen, MP and Mendoza, ME and Yi, JC and Fisher, HM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Psychological and behavioral approaches to cancer pain
             management.},
   Journal = {J Clin Oncol},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {16},
   Pages = {1703-1711},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0732-183X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4825},
   Abstract = {This review examines evidence for psychological factors that
             affect pain across the cancer continuum from diagnosis
             through treatment and long-term survivorship or end of life.
             Evidence is convincing that emotional distress, depression,
             anxiety, uncertainty, and hopelessness interact with pain.
             Unrelieved pain can increase a desire for hastened death.
             Patients with cancer use many strategies to manage pain,
             with catastrophizing associated with increased pain and
             self-efficacy associated with lower pain reports. A variety
             of psychological and cognitive behavioral treatments can
             reduce pain severity and interference with function, as
             indicated in multiple meta-analyses and high-quality
             randomized controlled trials. Effective methods include
             education (with coping skills training), hypnosis, cognitive
             behavioral approaches, and relaxation with imagery. Exercise
             has been tested extensively in patients with cancer and
             long-term survivors, but few exercise studies have evaluated
             pain outcomes. In survivors post-treatment, yoga and
             hypnosis as well as exercise show promise for controlling
             pain. Although some of these treatments effectively reduce
             pain for patients with advanced disease, few have been
             tested in patients at the end of life. Given the clear
             indicators that psychological factors affect cancer pain and
             that psychological and behavioral treatments are effective
             in reducing varying types of pain for patients with active
             disease, these methods need further testing in cancer
             survivors post-treatment and in patients with end-stage
             disease. Multidisciplinary teams are essential in oncology
             settings to integrate analgesic care and expertise in
             psychological and behavioral interventions in standard care
             for symptom management, including pain.},
   Doi = {10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4825},
   Key = {fds273609}
}

@article{fds273611,
   Author = {Sparling, TL and Schmitt, D and Miller, CE and Guilak, F and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Queen, RM},
   Title = {Energy recovery in individuals with knee
             osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis Cartilage},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {747-755},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {1063-4584},
   url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10161/8901 Duke open
             access},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Pathological gaits have been shown to limit
             transfer between potential (PE) and kinetic (KE) energy
             during walking, which can increase locomotor costs. The
             purpose of this study was to examine whether energy exchange
             would be limited in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
             METHODS: Ground reaction forces during walking were
             collected from 93 subjects with symptomatic knee OA
             (self-selected and fast speeds) and 13 healthy controls
             (self-selected speed) and used to calculate their center of
             mass (COM) movements, PE and KE relationships, and energy
             recovery during a stride. Correlations and linear
             regressions examined the impact of energy fluctuation phase
             and amplitude, walking velocity, body mass, self-reported
             pain, and radiographic severity on recovery. Paired t-tests
             were run to compare energy recovery between cohorts.
             RESULTS: Symptomatic knee OA subjects displayed lower
             energetic recovery during self-selected walking speeds than
             healthy controls (P = 0.0018). PE and KE phase
             relationships explained the majority (66%) of variance in
             recovery. Recovery had a complex relationship with velocity
             and its change across speeds was significantly influenced by
             the self-selected walking speed of each subject. Neither
             radiographic OA scores nor subject self-reported measures
             demonstrated any relationship with energy recovery.
             CONCLUSIONS: Knee OA reduces effective exchange of PE and
             KE, potentially increasing the muscular work required to
             control movements of the COM. Gait retraining may return
             subjects to more normal patterns of energy exchange and
             allow them to reduce fatigue.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.004},
   Key = {fds273611}
}

@article{fds372571,
   Author = {Edmond, SN and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Soo, MS and Skinner, CS and Stinnett, S and Ahrendt, GM and Manculich, J and Sumkin, JH and Zuley,
             ML and Bovbjerg, DH},
   Title = {Persistent pain following breast cancer surgery: A
             case-control study.},
   Journal = {Journal of Clinical Oncology},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {15_suppl},
   Pages = {9579-9579},
   Publisher = {American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.9579},
   Doi = {10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.9579},
   Key = {fds372571}
}

@article{fds273617,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The changing face of PAIN: New opportunities and new
             directions.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {155},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {839-840},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.02.010},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2014.02.010},
   Key = {fds273617}
}

@article{fds371063,
   Author = {Huysmans, ZZ and Wren, AA and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Soo,
             MS},
   Title = {IMPACT OF EXPERIENCES AT THE TIME OF BREAST BIOPSY ON
             KNOWLEDGE OF RECOMMENDED FOLLOW-UP, PERCEIVED CANCER RISK,
             BELIEFS ABOUT MAMMOGRAPHY, AND PREFERENCES FOR
             SUPPORT},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {47},
   Pages = {S190-S190},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371063}
}

@article{fds371064,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Edmond, SN and Soo, MS and Keefe, FJ and Ahrendt, GM and Sumkin, J and Zuley, M and Bovbjerg, DH},
   Title = {PERSISTENT POST-SURGICAL PAIN FOLLOWING BREAST CONSERVING
             SURGERY: LEVELS OF PAIN AND PSYCHOSOCIAL
             FACTORS},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {47},
   Pages = {S189-S189},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371064}
}

@article{fds273616,
   Author = {Nielsen, M and Keefe, FJ and Bennell, K and Jull,
             GA},
   Title = {Physical therapist-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy: a
             qualitative study of physical therapists' perceptions and
             experiences.},
   Journal = {Phys Ther},
   Volume = {94},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {197-209},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0031-9023},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130047},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: The importance of the biopsychosocial model in
             assessment and management of chronic musculoskeletal
             conditions is recognized. Physical therapists have been
             encouraged to develop psychologically informed practice.
             Little is known about the process of physical therapists'
             learning and delivering of psychological interventions
             within the practice context. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this
             study was to investigate physical therapists' experiences
             and perspectives of a cognitive-behavioral-informed training
             and intervention process as part of a randomized controlled
             trial (RCT) involving adults with painful knee
             osteoarthritis. DESIGN: A qualitative design was used.
             Participants were physical therapists trained to deliver
             pain coping skills training (PCST). METHODS: Eight physical
             therapists trained to deliver PCST were interviewed by
             telephone at 4 time points during the 12-month RCT period.
             Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim into
             computer-readable files, and analyzed using Framework
             Analysis. RESULTS: Thematic categories identified were:
             training, experience delivering PCST, impact on general
             clinical practice, and perspectives on PCST and physical
             therapist practice. Physical therapists reported positive
             experiences with PCST and program delivery. They thought
             that their participation in the RCT had enhanced their
             general practice. Although some components of the PCST
             program were familiar, the therapists found delivering the
             program was quite different from regular practice. Physical
             therapists believed the PCST program, a 3- to 4-day workshop
             followed by formal mentoring and performance feedback from a
             psychologist for 3 to 6 months and during the RCT, was
             critical to their ability to effectively deliver the PCST
             intervention. They identified a number of challenges in
             delivering PCST in their normal practice. CONCLUSION:
             Physical therapists can be trained to confidently deliver a
             PCST program. The physical therapists in this study believed
             that training enhanced their clinical practice.
             Comprehensive training and mentoring by psychologists was
             crucial to ensure treatment fidelity.},
   Doi = {10.2522/ptj.20130047},
   Key = {fds273616}
}

@article{fds273625,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Mogil, JS},
   Title = {Introducing Pain Classics: a special review series for
             PAIN®.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {155},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {207},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24342466},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.019},
   Key = {fds273625}
}

@article{fds273642,
   Author = {Revicki, DA and Cook, KF and Amtmann, D and Harnam, N and Chen, W-H and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS
             pain quality item bank.},
   Journal = {Qual Life Res},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {245-255},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0962-9343},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0467-9},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: The assessment of pain sensation and quality is a
             key component in understanding the experience of individuals
             with chronic pain. This study evaluated the factor structure
             of the patient-reported outcome measurement information
             system (PROMIS) pain quality item bank. METHODS: As part of
             the PROMIS project, we developed a pool of 37 pain quality
             items, based on a review of existing pain questionnaires and
             development of new items. A web-based survey was designed
             and completed by 845 members of the general population and
             967 individuals with different types of chronic pain.
             Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on a random
             split-half sample of the data to examine the factor
             structure of the 37 PROMIS pain quality items in the general
             population and in a chronic pain sample. A confirmatory
             factor analysis was conducted in the holdout sample.
             RESULTS: The EFA of the pain quality items resulted in
             comparable six-factor solutions for the general and chronic
             pain samples: (1) pulling/tugging pain; (2)
             tingling/numbness pain; (3) sharp/stabbing pain; (4)
             dull/aching pain; (5) pounding/pulsing pain; and (6)
             affective pain. The confirmatory factor analysis in the
             holdout sample supported this factor structure. CONCLUSIONS:
             Further research is needed to evaluate the psychometric
             characteristics of the derived scales based on their factor
             scores.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11136-013-0467-9},
   Key = {fds273642}
}

@article{fds273637,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Introducing Bridging the Gaps: a new form of special
             commentary for PAIN®.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {155},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24157893},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.019},
   Key = {fds273637}
}

@article{fds273577,
   Author = {Choi, KW and Somers, TJ and Babyak, MA and Sikkema, KJ and Blumenthal,
             JA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The relationship between pain and eating among overweight
             and obese individuals with osteoarthritis: an ecological
             momentary study.},
   Journal = {Pain Res Manag},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {e159-e163},
   Year = {2014},
   ISSN = {1203-6765},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/598382},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) patients who are overweight
             or obese report higher levels of pain compared with their
             normal-weight OA counterparts. Evidence suggests that
             overweight or obese OA patients also experience pain relief
             from eating foods high in calories, fat or sugar. Eating to
             alleviate pain may be problematic because it can lead to
             additional weight gain, which may contribute to heightened
             pain. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between
             pain and food intake using ecological momentary assessments
             in a sample of 71 overweight and obese OA patients. METHODS:
             Participants completed two consecutive days of diary entries
             in which they recorded their levels of pain, mood and food
             intake throughout the day. Data were analyzed using
             generalized estimating equations that modelled pain as a
             predictor of calorie, fat and sugar intake. All models were
             adjusted for sex, body mass index, negative mood, time and
             treatment history. RESULTS: Pain significantly predicted
             calorie (Z=2.57; P=0.01) and fat intake (Z=1.99; P=0.05).
             CONCLUSIONS: Using ecological momentary assessments as a
             novel approach, the present study provides preliminary data
             supporting a relationship between pain and food intake among
             overweight and obese OA patients. Continued advances in our
             understanding of the relationship between pain and eating
             behaviour may help to optimize intervention strategies for
             these patients.},
   Doi = {10.1155/2014/598382},
   Key = {fds273577}
}

@article{fds273594,
   Author = {Shpaner, M and Kelly, C and Lieberman, G and Perelman, H and Davis, M and Keefe, FJ and Naylor, MR},
   Title = {Unlearning chronic pain: A randomized controlled trial to
             investigate changes in intrinsic brain connectivity
             following Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.},
   Journal = {Neuroimage Clin},
   Volume = {5},
   Pages = {365-376},
   Year = {2014},
   ISSN = {2213-1582},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.008},
   Abstract = {Chronic pain is a complex physiological and psychological
             phenomenon. Implicit learning mechanisms contribute to the
             development of chronic pain and to persistent changes in the
             central nervous system. We hypothesized that these central
             abnormalities can be remedied with Cognitive Behavioral
             Therapy (CBT). Specifically, since regions of the anterior
             Default Mode Network (DMN) are centrally involved in
             emotional regulation via connections with limbic regions,
             such as the amygdala, remediation of maladaptive behavioral
             and cognitive patterns as a result of CBT for chronic pain
             would manifest itself as a change in the intrinsic
             functional connectivity (iFC) between these prefrontal and
             limbic regions. Resting-state functional neuroimaging was
             performed in patients with chronic pain before and after
             11-week CBT (n = 19), as well as a matched (ages 19-59, both
             sexes) active control group of patients who received
             educational materials (n = 19). Participants were randomized
             prior to the intervention. To investigate the differential
             impact of treatment on intrinsic functional connectivity
             (iFC), we compared pre-post differences in iFC between
             groups. In addition, we performed exploratory whole brain
             analyses of changes in fractional amplitude of low frequency
             fluctuations (fALFF). The course of CBT led to significant
             improvements in clinical measures of pain and self-efficacy
             for coping with chronic pain. Significant group differences
             in pre-post changes in both iFC and fALFF were correlated
             with clinical outcomes. Compared to control patients, iFC
             between the anterior DMN and the amygdala/periaqueductal
             gray decreased following CBT, whereas iFC between the basal
             ganglia network and the right secondary somatosensory cortex
             increased following CBT. CBT patients also had increased
             post-therapy fALFF in the bilateral posterior cingulate and
             the cerebellum. By delineating neuroplasticity associated
             with CBT-related improvements, these results add to mounting
             evidence that CBT is a valuable treatment option for chronic
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.008},
   Key = {fds273594}
}

@article{fds273614,
   Author = {Reese, JB and Porter, LS and Regan, KR and Keefe, FJ and Azad, NS and Diaz,
             LA and Herman, JM and Haythornthwaite, JA},
   Title = {A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples
             intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in
             colorectal cancer},
   Journal = {Psycho-Oncology},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1005-1013},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2014},
   ISSN = {1057-9249},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.3508},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.3508},
   Key = {fds273614}
}

@article{fds273626,
   Author = {Tracey, I and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Introducing the Biennial Review of Pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {154 Suppl 1},
   Pages = {S1},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.017},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.017},
   Key = {fds273626}
}

@article{fds273632,
   Author = {Seminowicz, DA and Shpaner, M and Keaser, ML and Krauthamer, GM and Mantegna, J and Dumas, JA and Newhouse, PA and Filippi, CG and Keefe,
             FJ and Naylor, MR},
   Title = {Cognitive-behavioral therapy increases prefrontal cortex
             gray matter in patients with chronic pain.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1573-1584},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2013.07.020},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: Several studies have reported reduced cerebral
             gray matter (GM) volume or density in chronic pain
             conditions, but there is limited research on the plasticity
             of the human cortex in response to psychological
             interventions. We investigated GM changes after
             cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in patients with chronic
             pain. We used voxel-based morphometry to compare anatomic
             magnetic resonance imaging scans of 13 patients with mixed
             chronic pain types before and after an 11-week CBT treatment
             and to 13 healthy control participants. CBT led to
             significant improvements in clinical measures. Patients did
             not differ from healthy controls in GM anywhere in the
             brain. After treatment, patients had increased GM in the
             bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal, posterior parietal,
             subgenual anterior cingulate/orbitofrontal, and sensorimotor
             cortices, as well as hippocampus, and reduced GM in
             supplementary motor area. In most of these areas showing GM
             increases, GM became significantly higher than in controls.
             Decreased pain catastrophizing was associated with increased
             GM in the left dorsolateral prefrontal and ventrolateral
             prefrontal cortices, right posterior parietal cortex,
             somatosensory cortex, and pregenual anterior cingulate
             cortex. Although future studies with additional control
             groups will be needed to determine the specific roles of CBT
             on GM and brain function, we propose that increased GM in
             the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices reflects
             greater top-down control over pain and cognitive reappraisal
             of pain, and that changes in somatosensory cortices reflect
             alterations in the perception of noxious signals.
             PERSPECTIVE: An 11-week CBT intervention for coping with
             chronic pain resulted in increased GM volume in prefrontal
             and somatosensory brain regions, as well as increased
             dorsolateral prefrontal volume associated with reduced pain
             catastrophizing. These results add to mounting evidence that
             CBT can be a valuable treatment option for chronic
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2013.07.020},
   Key = {fds273632}
}

@article{fds273633,
   Author = {Burns, JW and Peterson, KM and Smith, DA and Keefe, FJ and Porter, LS and Schuster, E and Kinner, E},
   Title = {Temporal associations between spouse criticism/hostility and
             pain among patients with chronic pain: a within-couple daily
             diary study.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {154},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {2715-2721},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.053},
   Abstract = {Chronic musculoskeletal pain can strain marriages, perhaps
             even to the point of engendering spouse criticism and
             hostility directed toward patients. Such negative spouse
             responses may have detrimental effects on patient
             well-being. While results of cross-sectional studies support
             this notion, we extended these efforts by introducing
             expressed emotion (EE) and interpersonal theoretical
             perspectives, and by using electronic diary methods to
             capture both patient and spouse reports in a prospective
             design. Patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and their
             spouses (N = 105 couples) reported on perceived spouse
             behavior and patient pain 5 times/day for 14 days using
             Personal Data Assistants (PDAs). Concurrent and lagged
             within-couple associations between patient's perceptions of
             spouse criticism/hostility and patient self-reported pain
             and spouses' observations of patient pain behaviors revealed
             that (1) patient perceived spouse criticism and hostility
             were correlated significantly with pain intensity, and
             spouse observed patient pain behavior was related
             significantly with patient perceived hostility at the same
             time point; (2) patient perceived spouse hostility
             significantly predicted patient pain intensity 3 hours
             later, and spouse observed pain behaviors significantly
             predicted patient perceived spouse hostility 3 hours later.
             Results support both EE and interpersonal models, and imply
             that a comprehensive model would combine these
             conceptualizations to fully illustrate how spouse
             criticism/hostility and patient pain interact to produce a
             negative spiral. Given that marital interactions are
             amenable to clinical intervention, improved insight into how
             spouse behavior and patient pain are tightly linked will
             encourage productive translational efforts to target this
             neglected area.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.053},
   Key = {fds273633}
}

@article{fds273634,
   Author = {Cook, KF and Keefe, F and Jensen, MP and Roddey, TS and Callahan, LF and Revicki, D and Bamer, AM and Kim, J and Chung, H and Salem, R and Amtmann,
             D},
   Title = {Development and validation of a new self-report measure of
             pain behaviors.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {154},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {2867-2876},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.08.024},
   Abstract = {Pain behaviors that are maintained beyond the acute stage
             after injury can contribute to subsequent psychosocial and
             physical disability. Critical to the study of pain behaviors
             is the availability of psychometrically sound pain behavior
             measures. In this study we developed a self-report measure
             of pain behaviors, the Pain Behaviors Self Report (PaB-SR).
             PaB-SR scores were developed using item response theory and
             evaluated using a rigorous, multiple-witness approach to
             validity testing. Participants included 661 survey
             participants with chronic pain and with multiple sclerosis,
             back pain, or arthritis; 618 survey participants who were
             significant others of a chronic pain participant; and 86
             participants in a videotaped pain behavior observation
             protocol. Scores on the PaB-SR were found to be measurement
             invariant with respect to clinical condition. PaB-SR scores,
             observer reports, and the videotaped protocol yielded
             distinct, but convergent views of pain behavior, supporting
             the validity of the new measure. The PaB-SR is expected to
             be of substantial utility to researchers wishing to explore
             the relationship between pain behaviors and constructs such
             as pain intensity, pain interference, and
             disability.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2013.08.024},
   Key = {fds273634}
}

@article{fds273641,
   Author = {Wilson, SJ and Martire, LM and Keefe, FJ and Mogle, JA and Stephens,
             MAP and Schulz, R},
   Title = {Daily verbal and nonverbal expression of osteoarthritis pain
             and spouse responses.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {154},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {2045-2053},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.023},
   Abstract = {The current study applied a model of pain communication to
             examine the distinction between verbal and nonverbal pain
             expression in their prediction of punishing, empathic, and
             solicitous spouse responses to patient pain. It was
             hypothesized that on days when patients engaged in more
             nonverbal expression, spouses would respond more positively
             (ie, with less punishing and more solicitous and empathic
             behavior). The same pattern was predicted for verbal
             expression. In addition, it was expected that associations
             between patient nonverbal pain expression and positive
             spouse responses would be strengthened, and that the
             association with punishing responses would be weakened, on
             days when levels of verbal pain expression were higher than
             usual, regardless of daily pain severity. In a 22-day diary
             study, 144 individuals with knee osteoarthritis and their
             spouses completed daily measures of pain expression, spouse
             responses, health, and affect. The predicted positive main
             effect of nonverbal expression on empathic and solicitous
             responses was supported by the data, as was the positive
             main effect for verbal pain expression. Results from
             moderation analyses partially supported our hypothesis in
             that patients' nonverbal pain expression was even more
             strongly related to empathic and solicitous spouse responses
             on days of high verbal pain expression, and patients were
             buffered from spouse punishing responses on days when both
             nonverbal and verbal expression were high. These findings
             suggest that pain expression in both verbal and nonverbal
             modes of communication is important for positive and
             negative spousal responses.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.023},
   Key = {fds273641}
}

@article{fds371065,
   Author = {Weinfurt, KP and Lin, L and Reese, JB and Bruner, DW and Dombeck, C and Keefe, FJ and Moore, A and Porter, L and Flynn, KE},
   Title = {Reasons for sexual inactivity in a US national survey of
             adults},
   Journal = {QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH},
   Volume = {22},
   Pages = {1 pages},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds371065}
}

@article{fds371066,
   Author = {Flynn, KE and Lin, L and Keefe, FJ and Reese, JB and Weinfurt,
             KP},
   Title = {The vulvar discomfort domain of the PROMIS (R) sexual
             function and satisfaction measure},
   Journal = {QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH},
   Volume = {22},
   Pages = {1 pages},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds371066}
}

@article{fds273640,
   Author = {Martire, LM and Keefe, FJ and Schulz, R and Parris Stephens and MA and Mogle, JA},
   Title = {The impact of daily arthritis pain on spouse
             sleep.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {154},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1725-1731},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000323600000030&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Although chronic pain has been linked to poorer psychosocial
             well-being in the spouse, the extent to which patient pain
             affects spouse sleep is unknown. The aim of the present
             study was to test the hypothesis that greater daily knee
             pain would be associated with poorer sleep for the spouse
             that evening. We also tested the hypothesis that this pain
             contagion is exacerbated in couples who have a close
             relationship. A total of 138 knee osteoarthritis (OA)
             patients and their spouses completed baseline interviews and
             a 22-day diary assessment. Multilevel lagged models
             indicated that greater knee OA pain at the end of the day
             was associated with spouses' poorer overall sleep quality
             that night and feeling less refreshed after sleep. In
             contrast, there was no evidence that spouse sleep was
             related to greater patient pain the next day. The effects of
             patient pain on spouse sleep were not due to disturbances in
             patient sleep and were also independent of spouse sex,
             depressive symptoms, and physical comorbidities; both
             partners' negative affect; and the quality of marital
             interactions throughout the day. As predicted, we also found
             that patient pain was more strongly related to less
             refreshing sleep for spouses who were in a close
             relationship. Findings illustrate that chronic pain may
             place the spouse's health at risk and suggest an important
             target for couple-oriented interventions.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2013.05.020},
   Key = {fds273640}
}

@article{fds273646,
   Author = {Lefebvre, JC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The effect of neuroticism on the recall of persistent
             low-back pain and perceived activity interference.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {948-956},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2013.03.006},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: The assessment of persistent pain often relies
             on recalling and then summarizing the entire pain experience
             using a single rating. Newer methodologies, such as the
             Original Pain Recall Assessment, ask people to recall the
             pain they experienced over a specific period of time by
             tracing a single line in a graph to represent their pain
             levels. One advantage of this approach is that one can
             compare recalled levels of pain with actual daily diary pain
             ratings. This methodology was used to investigate the
             effects of neuroticism on the recall of levels and patterns
             of persistent pain. The study involved 70 participants who
             completed a measure of neuroticism, depressive symptoms, and
             up to 15 daily diaries that asked for ratings of pain
             intensity, pain unpleasantness, and activity interference
             due to pain. Following completion of the daily diary period,
             the participants were asked to recall the entire diary
             period using the Original Pain Recall Assessment
             methodology. The analyses revealed that higher levels of
             neuroticism were related to significantly better recall of
             the variability of pain unpleasantness over time.
             Furthermore, individuals who reported higher levels of
             depressive symptoms were less accurate in the recall of pain
             in general. PERSPECTIVE: Memory for pain is crucial in the
             assessment of pain, with little research devoted to the
             study of this topic. The current study demonstrates that
             people higher on neuroticism had better recall of pain
             unpleasantness, and people with higher levels of depressive
             symptoms had poorer recall of pain in general.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2013.03.006},
   Key = {fds273646}
}

@article{fds273724,
   Author = {Cook, KF and Roddey, TS and Bamer, AM and Amtmann, D and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Validity of an observation method for assessing pain
             behavior in individuals with multiple sclerosis.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {46},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {413-421},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.08.006},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Pain is a common and complex experience for
             individuals who live with multiple sclerosis (MS) and it
             interferes with physical, psychological, and social
             function. A valid and reliable tool for quantifying observed
             pain behaviors in MS is critical to understand how pain
             behaviors contribute to pain-related disability in this
             clinical population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability
             and validity of a pain behavioral observation protocol in
             individuals who have MS. METHODS: Community-dwelling
             volunteers with MS (N=30), back pain (N=5), or arthritis
             (N=8) were recruited based on clinician referrals,
             advertisements, fliers, web postings, and participation in
             previous research. Participants completed the measures of
             pain severity, pain interference, and self-reported pain
             behaviors and were videotaped doing typical activities
             (e.g., walking and sitting). Two coders independently
             recorded frequencies of pain behaviors by category (e.g.,
             guarding and bracing) and interrater reliability statistics
             were calculated. Naïve observers reviewed videotapes of
             individuals with MS and rated their pain. The Spearman's
             correlations were calculated between pain behavior
             frequencies and self-reported pain and pain ratings by
             naïve observers. RESULTS: Interrater reliability estimates
             indicated the reliability of pain codes in the MS sample.
             Kappa coefficients ranged from moderate (sighing=0.40) to
             substantial agreements (guarding=0.83). These values were
             comparable with those obtained in the combined back pain and
             arthritis sample. Concurrent validity was supported by
             correlations with self-reported pain (0.46-0.53) and with
             self-reports of pain behaviors (0.58). Construct validity
             was supported by a finding of 0.87 correlation between total
             pain behaviors observed by coders and mean pain ratings by
             naïve observers. CONCLUSION: Results support the use of the
             pain behavior observation protocol for assessing pain
             behaviors of individuals with MS. Valid assessments of pain
             behaviors of individuals with MS could lead to creative
             interventions in the management of chronic pain in this
             population.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.08.006},
   Key = {fds273724}
}

@article{fds273645,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Kurakula, PC and Criscione-Schreiber, L and Keefe, FJ and Clowse, MEB},
   Title = {Reply: To PMID 22505314.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)},
   Volume = {65},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {1205},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23371927},
   Doi = {10.1002/acr.21960},
   Key = {fds273645}
}

@article{fds273648,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Porter, L and Somers, T and Shelby, R and Wren,
             AV},
   Title = {Psychosocial interventions for managing pain in older
             adults: outcomes and clinical implications.},
   Journal = {Br J Anaesth},
   Volume = {111},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {89-94},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794650},
   Abstract = {Interest in the use of psychosocial interventions to help
             older adults manage pain is growing. In this article, we
             review this approach. The first section reviews the
             conceptual background for psychosocial interventions with a
             special emphasis on the biopsychosocial model of pain. The
             second section highlights three psychosocial interventions
             used with older adults: cognitive behavioural therapy,
             emotional disclosure, and mind-body interventions
             (specifically mindfulness-based stress reduction and yoga).
             The final section of the paper highlights important future
             directions for work in this area.},
   Doi = {10.1093/bja/aet129},
   Key = {fds273648}
}

@article{fds273647,
   Author = {Vitiello, MV and McCurry, SM and Shortreed, SM and Balderson, BH and Baker, LD and Keefe, FJ and Rybarczyk, BD and Von Korff,
             M},
   Title = {Cognitive-behavioral treatment for comorbid insomnia and
             osteoarthritis pain in primary care: the lifestyles
             randomized controlled trial.},
   Journal = {J Am Geriatr Soc},
   Volume = {61},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {947-956},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0002-8614},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12275},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: To assess whether older persons with
             osteoarthritis (OA) pain and insomnia receiving
             cognitive-behavioral therapy for pain and insomnia (CBT-PI),
             a cognitive-behavioral pain coping skills intervention
             (CBT-P), and an education-only control (EOC) differed in
             sleep and pain outcomes. DESIGN: Double-blind,
             cluster-randomized controlled trial with 9-month follow-up.
             SETTING: Group Health and University of Washington, 2009 to
             2011. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred sixty-seven older adults
             with OA pain and insomnia. INTERVENTIONS: Six weekly group
             sessions of CBT-PI, CBT-P, or EOC delivered in participants'
             primary care clinics. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were
             insomnia severity and pain severity. Secondary outcomes were
             actigraphically measured sleep efficiency and arthritis
             symptoms. RESULTS: CBT-PI reduced insomnia severity (score
             range 0-28) more than EOC (adjusted mean difference = -1.89,
             95% confidence interval = -2.83 to -0.96; P < .001) and
             CBT-P (adjusted mean difference = -2.03, 95% CI = -3.01 to
             -1.04; P < .001) and improved sleep efficiency (score range
             0-100) more than EOC (adjusted mean difference = 2.64, 95%
             CI = 0.44-4.84; P = .02). CBT-P did not improve insomnia
             severity more than EOC, but improved sleep efficiency
             (adjusted mean difference = 2.91, 95% CI = 0.85-4.97; P =
             .006). Pain severity and arthritis symptoms did not differ
             between the three arms. A planned analysis in participants
             with severe baseline pain revealed similar results.
             CONCLUSION: Over 9 months, CBT of insomnia was effective for
             older adults with OA pain and insomnia. The addition of CBT
             for insomnia to CBT for pain alone improved
             outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1111/jgs.12275},
   Key = {fds273647}
}

@article{fds273580,
   Author = {Evon, DM and Golin, CE and Fried, MW and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Chronic hepatitis C and antiviral treatment regimens: where
             can psychology contribute?},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {81},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {361-374},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000316908500014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate the existing literature
             on psychological, social, and behavioral aspects of chronic
             hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection and antiviral treatment;
             provide the state of the behavioral science in areas that
             presently hinder HCV-related health outcomes; and make
             recommendations for areas in which clinical psychology can
             make significant contributions. METHOD: The extant
             literature on HCV and antiviral therapy was reviewed as
             related to biopsychosocial factors such as mental health,
             substance/alcohol use, quality of life, coping, stigma,
             racial disparities, side effects, treatment adherence,
             integrated care, and psychological interventions. RESULTS:
             For reasons that have not been well elucidated, individuals
             infected with HCV experience psychological and somatic
             problems and report poor health-related quality of life.
             Preexisting conditions, including poor mental health and
             alcohol/substance use, can interfere with access to and
             successful completion of HCV treatment. Perceived stigma is
             highly prevalent and associated with psychological distress.
             Racial disparities exist for HCV prevalence, treatment
             uptake, and treatment success. During HCV treatment,
             patients experience exacerbation of symptoms, treatment side
             effects, and poorer quality of life, making it difficult to
             complete treatment. Despite pharmacological advances in HCV
             treatment, improvements in clinical and public health
             outcomes have not been realized. The reasons for this lack
             of impact are multifactorial, but include suboptimal
             referral and access to care for many patients,
             treatment-related side effects, treatment nonadherence, and
             lack of empirically based approaches. CONCLUSIONS:
             Biomedical advances in HCV and antiviral treatment have
             created a fertile field in which psychologists are uniquely
             positioned to make important contributions to HCV management
             and treatment.},
   Doi = {10.1037/a0029030},
   Key = {fds273580}
}

@article{fds273725,
   Author = {Tsai, P-F and Chang, JY and Beck, C and Kuo, Y-F and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {A pilot cluster-randomized trial of a 20-week Tai Chi
             program in elders with cognitive impairment and
             osteoarthritic knee: effects on pain and other health
             outcomes.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {45},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {660-669},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.04.009},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Because Tai Chi (TC) is beneficial to elders
             without cognitive impairment (CI), it also may benefit
             elders with CI. But elders with CI have generally been
             excluded from TC studies because many measurement tools
             require verbal reports that some elders with CI are unable
             to provide. OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy of a TC program
             in improving pain and other health outcomes in
             community-dwelling elders with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and
             CI. METHODS: This pilot cluster-randomized trial was
             conducted between January 2008 and June 2010
             (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01528566). The TC group
             attended Sun style TC classes, three sessions a week for 20
             weeks; the control group attended classes providing health
             and cultural information for the same length of time.
             Measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster
             Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, physical
             function and stiffness subscales; the Get Up and Go test;
             the Sit-to-Stand test; and the Mini-Mental State Examination
             (MMSE), administered at baseline, every four weeks during
             the intervention and at the end of the study (post-test).
             RESULTS: Eight sites participated in either the TC group
             (four sites, 28 participants) or control group (four sites,
             27 participants). The WOMAC pain (P = 0.006) and stiffness
             scores (P = 0.010) differed significantly between the two
             groups at post-test, whereas differences between the two
             groups in the WOMAC physical function score (P = 0.071) and
             the MMSE (P = 0.096) showed borderline significance at the
             post-test. WOMAC pain (P = 0.001), physical function (P =
             0.021), and stiffness (P ≤ 0.001) scores improved
             significantly more over time in the TC group than in
             controls. No adverse events were found in either group.
             CONCLUSION: Practicing TC can be efficacious in reducing
             pain and stiffness in elders with knee OA and
             CI.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.04.009},
   Key = {fds273725}
}

@article{fds273726,
   Author = {Martire, LM and Stephens, MAP and Mogle, J and Schulz, R and Brach, J and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Daily spousal influence on physical activity in knee
             osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Ann Behav Med},
   Volume = {45},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {213-223},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0883-6612},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9442-x},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Physical activity is critical for the management
             of knee osteoarthritis, and the spouse may play a role in
             encouraging or discouraging physical activity. PURPOSE: The
             purpose of this study was to examine four types of spousal
             influence-spouses' daily activity, autonomy support,
             pressure, and persuasion-on the daily physical activity of
             adults living with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: A total of
             141 couples reported their daily experiences for 22 days
             using a handheld computer and wore an accelerometer to
             measure moderate activity and steps. RESULTS: Spouses'
             autonomy support for patient physical activity, as well as
             their own level of activity, was concurrently associated
             with patients' greater daily moderate activity and steps. In
             addition, on days when male patients perceived that spouses
             exerted more pressure to be active, they spent less time in
             moderate activity. CONCLUSIONS: Couple-oriented
             interventions for knee osteoarthritis should target physical
             activity in both partners and spousal strategies for helping
             patients stay active.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12160-012-9442-x},
   Key = {fds273726}
}

@article{fds372572,
   Author = {Carty, JN and Latsch, DV and Lumley, MA and Keefe, FJ and Mosley-Williams, A},
   Title = {DOES CONTENT OF WRITTEN EMOTIONAL DISCLOSURE PREDICT HEALTH
             IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS?},
   Journal = {PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE},
   Volume = {75},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {A109-A110},
   Publisher = {LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372572}
}

@article{fds273723,
   Author = {Hunt, MA and Keefe, FJ and Bryant, C and Metcalf, BR and Ahamed, Y and Nicholas, MK and Bennell, KL},
   Title = {A physiotherapist-delivered, combined exercise and pain
             coping skills training intervention for individuals with
             knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study.},
   Journal = {Knee},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {106-112},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0968-0160},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.07.008},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is associated
             with a number of physical and psychological impairments.
             Unfortunately, very few treatment strategies are capable of
             addressing both types of impairments concurrently. We
             performed a pilot, randomized controlled, proof of principle
             trial investigating the feasibility and effects of an
             intervention combining physical exercise and pain coping
             skills training (PCST). METHODS: Twenty patients with a
             clinical and radiographical diagnosis of tibiofemoral OA
             were randomized to receive either 10 weeks of
             physiotherapist supervised exercises (lower limb
             strengthening and walking) combined with non-directive
             counseling (NDC) or the same exercise program delivered
             concurrently with PCST. Primary outcomes included
             self-reported pain and pain coping, while secondary outcomes
             included self efficacy and self-reported physical function.
             RESULTS: Ten participants were randomized to each group and
             both groups exhibited significant improvements in isometric
             knee strength, self-reported knee pain and physical
             function, self efficacy for control of pain management and
             other arthritis symptoms. Only those in the exercise + PCST
             group reported statistically significant improvements in
             pain control coping and rational thinking. No between-group
             differences existed in any outcome (0.07 < p < 0.98). Based
             on our findings, 63 participants per group would be needed
             for future large-scale studies using similar outcome
             measures and design. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that an
             intervention that combines exercise and PCST within the same
             treatment session and delivered by specially-trained
             physiotherapists is feasible and can improve both physical
             and psychological outcomes in individuals with knee OA.
             LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II Clinical Trials Registry number:
             ACTRN12609000623291.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.knee.2012.07.008},
   Key = {fds273723}
}

@article{fds371067,
   Author = {Edmond, SN and Farquhar, JM and Shelby, RA and Kimmick, GG and Marcom,
             PK and Peppercorn, JM and Blackwell, KL and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SELF-EFFICACY FOR COMMUNICATION WITH
             ONE'S PHYSICIAN AND MEASURES OF WELL-BEING, CONCERNS ABOUT
             TAKING MEDICATIONS, AND MEDICATION ADHERENCE IN BREAST
             CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE
             THERAPY},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {45},
   Pages = {S178-S178},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds371067}
}

@article{fds372573,
   Author = {Wong, K and Somers, TJ and Babyak, M and Sikkema, KJ and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {PAIN AND EATING IN OVERWEIGHT AND OBESE INDIVIDUALS WITH
             OSTEOARTHRITIS: AN ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY STUDY},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {45},
   Pages = {S95-S95},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds372573}
}

@article{fds273652,
   Author = {Flynn, KE and Lin, L and Cyranowski, JM and Reeve, BB and Reese, JB and Jeffery, DD and Smith, AW and Porter, LS and Dombeck, CB and Bruner, DW and Keefe, FJ and Weinfurt, KP},
   Title = {Development of the NIH PROMIS ® Sexual Function and
             Satisfaction measures in patients with cancer.},
   Journal = {J Sex Med},
   Volume = {10 Suppl 1},
   Number = {0 1},
   Pages = {43-52},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23387911},
   Abstract = {INTRODUCTION: We describe the development and validation of
             the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information
             System(®) Sexual Function and Satisfaction (PROMIS(®)
             SexFS; National Institutes of Health) measures, version 1.0,
             for cancer populations. AIM: To develop a customizable
             self-report measure of sexual function and satisfaction as
             part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health PROMIS
             Network. METHODS: Our multidisciplinary working group
             followed a comprehensive protocol for developing
             psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures
             including qualitative (scale development) and quantitative
             (psychometric evaluation) development. We performed an
             extensive literature review, conducted 16 focus groups with
             cancer patients and multiple discussions with clinicians,
             and evaluated candidate items in cognitive testing with
             patients. We administered items to 819 cancer patients.
             Items were calibrated using item-response theory and
             evaluated for reliability and validity. MAIN OUTCOME
             MEASURES: The PROMIS SexFS measures, version 1.0, include 81
             items in 11 domains: Interest in Sexual Activity,
             Lubrication, Vaginal Discomfort, Erectile Function, Global
             Satisfaction with Sex Life, Orgasm, Anal Discomfort,
             Therapeutic Aids, Sexual Activities, Interfering Factors,
             and Screener Questions. RESULTS: In addition to content
             validity (patients indicate that items cover important
             aspects of their experiences) and face validity (patients
             indicate that items measure sexual function and
             satisfaction), the measure shows evidence for discriminant
             validity (domains discriminate between groups expected to be
             different) and convergent validity (strong correlations
             between scores on PROMIS and scores on conceptually similar
             older measures of sexual function), as well as favorable
             test-retest reliability among people not expected to change
             (interclass correlations from two administrations of the
             instrument, 1 month apart). CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS SexFS
             offers researchers a reliable and valid set of tools to
             measure self-reported sexual function and satisfaction among
             diverse men and women. The measures are customizable;
             researchers can select the relevant domains and items
             comprising those domains for their study.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02995.x},
   Key = {fds273652}
}

@article{fds273740,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Wren, AA},
   Title = {Optimism and pain: a positive move forward.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {154},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {7-8},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23159574},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.005},
   Key = {fds273740}
}

@article{fds273638,
   Author = {Edmond, SN and Shelby, RA and Kimmick, GG and Marcom, PK and Peppercorn,
             JM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Symptom communication in breast cancer: relationships of
             holding back and self-efficacy for communication to symptoms
             and adjustment.},
   Journal = {J Psychosoc Oncol},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {698-711},
   Year = {2013},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24175903},
   Abstract = {Adjuvant endocrine therapy improves overall survival for
             women with breast cancer. However, side effects may
             compromise patients' quality of life (QOL). This study
             examined how two communication variables (self-efficacy for
             symptom communication [SE] and holding back from discussing
             cancer-related concerns [HB]) relate to QOL, pain and
             menopausal symptoms. Participants with breast cancer (N =
             61) completed questionnaires regarding symptoms,
             communication, and QOL. SE was positively related to QOL and
             negatively related to pain interference. HB from discussing
             cancer-related concerns was related negatively to QOL and
             positively to pain interference. HB mediated the
             relationship between SE and QOL as well as between SE and
             pain interference. Increased SE is beneficial among women on
             endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Future research should
             determine if interventions to improve SE are feasible and
             can improve QOL and symptom tolerability.},
   Doi = {10.1080/07347332.2013.835023},
   Key = {fds273638}
}

@article{fds273649,
   Author = {Schroeder, D and Korsakov, F and Jolton, J and Keefe, FJ and Haley, A and Keefe, DF},
   Title = {Creating widely accessible spatial interfaces: mobile VR for
             managing persistent pain.},
   Journal = {IEEE Comput Graph Appl},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {82-89},
   Year = {2013},
   ISSN = {0272-1716},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000318469500012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Using widely accessible VR technologies, researchers have
             implemented a series of multimodal spatial interfaces and
             virtual environments. The results demonstrate the degree to
             which we can now use low-cost (for example, mobile-phone
             based) VR environments to create rich virtual experiences
             involving motion sensing, physiological inputs, stereoscopic
             imagery, sound, and haptic feedback. Adapting spatial
             interfaces to these new platforms can open up exciting
             application areas for VR. In this case, the application area
             was in-home VR therapy for patients suffering from
             persistent pain (for example, arthritis and cancer pain).
             For such therapy to be successful, a rich spatial interface
             and rich visual aesthetic are particularly important. So, an
             interdisciplinary team with expertise in technology, design,
             meditation, and the psychology of pain collaborated to
             iteratively develop and evaluate several prototype systems.
             The video at http://youtu.be/mMPE7itReds demonstrates how
             the sine wave fitting responds to walking motions, for a
             walking-in-place application.},
   Doi = {10.1109/MCG.2013.38},
   Key = {fds273649}
}

@article{fds273653,
   Author = {Bastian, LA and Fish, LJ and Peterson, BL and Biddle, AK and Garst, J and Lyna, P and Molner, S and Bepler, G and Kelley, M and Keefe, FJ and McBride, CM},
   Title = {Assessment of the impact of adjunctive proactive telephone
             counseling to promote smoking cessation among lung cancer
             patients' social networks.},
   Journal = {Am J Health Promot},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {181-190},
   Year = {2013},
   ISSN = {0890-1171},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23286595},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: When a patient is diagnosed with lung cancer,
             members of his/her social network may be more likely to
             engage in smoking cessation efforts. Proactive telephone
             counseling combined with a tailored self-directed
             intervention may be more effective at promoting smoking
             cessation than a tailored self-directed intervention alone.
             DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Four clinical
             sites. SUBJECTS: Current smokers who are family members and
             close friends of patients with lung cancer. INTERVENTION:
             Six counselor-initiated counseling calls using motivational
             interviewing techniques and focusing on teaching adaptive
             coping skills based on the transactional model of stress and
             coping along with tailored self-directed materials
             (including nicotine patches, if not contraindicated) (n
              =  245) vs. tailored self-directed materials (including
             nicotine patches, if not contraindicated) (n  =  251).
             MEASURES: Participants were surveyed at baseline and at 2
             weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postintervention. The outcome
             was 7-day point prevalent abstinence. ANALYSIS: The
             objective of this study was to test for arm differences in
             smoking cessation rates at 2 weeks and 6 months
             postintervention (primary) and at 12 months postintervention
             (secondary). RESULTS: We found no overall effect of the
             proactive intervention on cessation rates. Among younger
             participants (age <50), the cessation rate in the
             intervention group was higher than in the control group at 2
             weeks postintervention (16% vs. 4%, p  =  .046). For
             older participants (age >50), there were no group
             differences. CONCLUSION: Proactive telephone counseling
             focusing on adaptive coping skills was difficult to
             implement among smokers in lung cancer patients' social
             network. Although this study did not demonstrate any added
             benefit to cessation rates, this null finding may be a
             result of an intervention that was weaker than intended,
             owing to difficulties in completing the counseling phone
             calls. We discuss lessons learned and areas for future
             research in this special population.},
   Doi = {10.4278/ajhp.101122-QUAN-387},
   Key = {fds273653}
}

@article{fds273728,
   Author = {Debar, LL and Kindler, L and Keefe, FJ and Green, CA and Smith, DH and Deyo, RA and Ames, K and Feldstein, A},
   Title = {A primary care-based interdisciplinary team approach to the
             treatment of chronic pain utilizing a pragmatic clinical
             trials framework.},
   Journal = {Transl Behav Med},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {523-530},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1869-6716},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0163-2},
   Abstract = {Chronic pain affects at least 116 million adults in the USA
             and exacts a tremendous cost in suffering and lost
             productivity. While health systems offer specialized pain
             services, the primary care setting is where most patients
             seek and receive care for pain. Primary care-based treatment
             of chronic pain by interdisciplinary teams (including
             behavioral specialists, nurse case managers, physical
             therapists, and pharmacists) is one of the most effective
             approaches for improving outcomes and managing costs. To
             ensure robust integration of such services into sustainable
             health-care programs, evaluations must be conducted by
             researchers well versed in the methodologies of clinical
             trials, mixed methods and implementation research,
             bioinformatics, health services, and cost-effectiveness.
             Recent national health policy changes, in addition to the
             increasing recognition of the high prevalence and cost of
             chronic pain conditions, present a unique opportunity to
             shift the care paradigm for patients with chronic
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s13142-012-0163-2},
   Key = {fds273728}
}

@article{fds273738,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Huling, DA and Coggins, MJ and Keefe, DF and Rosenthal,
             ZM and Herr, NR and Hoffman, HG},
   Title = {Virtual reality for persistent pain: a new direction for
             behavioral pain management.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {153},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {2163-2166},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22770840},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.030},
   Key = {fds273738}
}

@article{fds273739,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Davis, D and Rumble, M and Scipio, C and Garst, J},
   Title = {Attachment styles in patients with lung cancer and their
             spouses: associations with patient and spouse
             adjustment.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {2459-2466},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22246596},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: This study examined attachment styles in patients
             with lung cancer and their spouses and associations between
             attachment styles and patient and spouse adjustment.
             METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven patients with early stage
             lung cancer completed measures of attachment style, marital
             quality, self-efficacy, pain, depression, anxiety, and
             quality of life. Their spouses completed measures of
             attachment style, marital quality, self-efficacy, caregiver
             strain, and mood. RESULTS: Analyses indicated that, among
             patients, those high in either attachment anxiety or
             avoidance had significantly higher levels of anxiety and
             poorer social well-being. Attachment avoidance was also
             significantly associated with higher levels of depression
             and poorer marital quality and functional well-being. Spouse
             avoidant attachment was significantly associated with
             patient reports of increased pain and poorer functional
             well-being, and spouse anxious attachment was associated
             with poorer patient marital quality. Among spouses, those
             high in attachment avoidance reported significantly higher
             levels of caregiver strain, anger, depressed mood, and
             poorer marital quality; those high in attachment anxiety
             reported higher anxious mood. Dyads in which both partners
             were insecurely attached had significantly poorer adjustment
             compared to dyads in which both partners reported secure
             attachment. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings raise
             the possibility that attachment styles of cancer patients
             and their spouses as individuals and as a dyad may be
             important factors affecting adjustment in multiple
             domains.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-011-1367-6},
   Key = {fds273739}
}

@article{fds273654,
   Author = {Campbell, LC and Keefe, FJ and McKee, DC and Waters, SJ and Moul,
             JW},
   Title = {Masculinity beliefs predict psychosocial functioning in
             African American prostate cancer survivors.},
   Journal = {Am J Mens Health},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {400-408},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22691305},
   Abstract = {Research examining psychosocial functioning in African
             American prostate cancer survivors has been limited, in
             spite of documented higher mortality from prostate cancer
             and worse long-term physical and emotional outcomes from
             prostate cancer treatment reported by this group of
             survivors. In addition, the role of masculinity in
             psychosocial adjustment among prostate cancer survivors is
             not well understood. In this study, 59 African American
             prostate cancer survivors completed a questionnaire
             assessing masculinity beliefs related to self-reliance,
             emotional control, and dominance, as well as measures of
             psychosocial functioning (i.e., symptom distress, negative
             mood, and functional and social well-being). Results of
             regression analyses indicated that masculinity beliefs
             predicted negative mood, functional well-being, and social
             well-being, controlling for age, income, and medical
             comorbidities. The findings reported here, although
             preliminary, suggest that masculinity beliefs could be
             important therapeutic targets for improving the efficacy of
             cognitive-behavioral interventions for men adjusting to
             prostate cancer survivorship.},
   Doi = {10.1177/1557988312450185},
   Key = {fds273654}
}

@article{fds273759,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Kurakula, PC and Criscione-Schreiber, L and Keefe, FJ and Clowse, MEB},
   Title = {Self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing in systemic lupus
             erythematosus: relationship to pain, stiffness, fatigue, and
             psychological distress.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)},
   Volume = {64},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1334-1340},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505314},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To determine how self-efficacy for pain control
             and pain catastrophizing, both potentially modifiable pain
             coping cognitions, are related to pain, stiffness, fatigue,
             and psychological distress in patients with systemic lupus
             erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional
             study of patients with SLE who completed measures of pain
             coping cognitions (i.e., self-efficacy for pain control,
             pain catastrophizing), symptom ratings (i.e., pain,
             stiffness, fatigue), and psychological distress. RESULTS:
             Correlational analyses revealed that self-efficacy for pain
             control and pain catastrophizing were associated with the
             patients' physical symptom reports and psychological
             distress. After controlling for age, race, and disease
             activity, patients with lower levels of self-efficacy for
             pain control reported much higher levels of pain, stiffness,
             and fatigue. Patients with higher levels of pain
             catastrophizing reported much lower positive mood. SLE
             activity as assessed by the rheumatologist was not
             associated with physical symptoms, psychological distress,
             self-efficacy for pain control, or pain catastrophizing.
             CONCLUSION: These results suggest that pain coping
             cognitions (i.e., either self-efficacy for pain control or
             pain catastrophizing) are significantly related to physical
             symptoms and psychological distress in patients with SLE.
             This finding is important because the results of studies
             from other samples of patients with persistent pain
             conditions have shown that these pain coping variables can
             be modified using psychological interventions, and that such
             treatment-related changes in pain cognitions are related to
             improved patient outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1002/acr.21686},
   Key = {fds273759}
}

@article{fds273799,
   Author = {Riddle, DL and Keefe, FJ and Ang, D and J, K and Dumenci, L and Jensen, MP and Bair, MJ and Reed, SD and Kroenke, K},
   Title = {A phase III randomized three-arm trial of physical therapist
             delivered pain coping skills training for patients with
             total knee arthroplasty: the KASTPain protocol.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {13},
   Pages = {149},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {1471-2474},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-149},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients report persistent
             and disabling pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
             despite an apparently normally functioning prosthesis. One
             potential risk factor for unexplained persistent pain is
             high levels of pain catastrophizing. We designed a three-arm
             trial to determine if a pain coping skills training program,
             delivered prior to TKA, effectively reduces
             function-limiting pain following the procedure in patients
             with high levels of pain catastrophizing. METHODS/DESIGN:
             The trial will be conducted at four University-based sites
             in the US. A sample of 402 patients with high levels of pain
             catastrophizing will be randomly assigned to either a pain
             coping skills training arm, an arthritis education control
             arm or usual care. Pain coping skills will be delivered by
             physical therapists trained and supervised by clinical
             psychologist experts. Arthritis education will be delivered
             by nurses trained in the delivery of arthritis-related
             content. The primary outcome will be change in Western
             Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
             (WOMAC) Pain scale score 12 months following surgery. A
             variety of secondary clinical and economic outcomes also
             will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: The trial will be conducted
             at four University-based sites in the US. A sample of 402
             patients with high levels of pain catastrophizing will be
             randomly assigned to either a pain coping skills training
             arm, an arthritis education control arm or usual care. Pain
             coping skills will be delivered by physical therapists
             trained and supervised by clinical psychologist experts.
             Arthritis education will be delivered by nurses trained in
             the delivery of arthritis-related content. The primary
             outcome will be change in Western Ontario and McMaster
             Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain scale score
             12 months following surgery. A variety of secondary clinical
             and economic outcomes also will be evaluated.},
   Doi = {10.1186/1471-2474-13-149},
   Key = {fds273799}
}

@article{fds273655,
   Author = {Abbasi, M and Dehghani, M and Keefe, FJ and Jafari, H and Behtash, H and Shams, J},
   Title = {Spouse-assisted training in pain coping skills and the
             outcome of multidisciplinary pain management for chronic low
             back pain treatment: a 1-year randomized controlled
             trial.},
   Journal = {Eur J Pain},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {1033-1043},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {1090-3801},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000305903800011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {This study examined the comparative efficacy of three
             interventions: a spouse-assisted coping skills training
             protocol for patients undergoing a multidisciplinary pain
             management programme (SA-MPMP), conventional
             patient-oriented multidisciplinary pain management programme
             (P-MPMP) and standard medical care (SMC). Thirty-six chronic
             low back pain (CLBP) patients and their spouses were
             randomly assigned to one of the three conditions. The
             SA-MPMP condition consisted of seven, weekly, 2-h, group
             sessions of training in dyadic pain coping and couple
             skills, delivered by a clinical psychologist with support of
             a multidisciplinary team of specialists, to patients
             together with their spouses. P-MPMP consisted of the SA-MPMP
             training delivered to the patient only (i.e., no spouse
             participation and assistance). The SMC condition entailed
             continuation of routine treatment, entailing medical care
             only. Data analysis revealed that, at the 12-month follow-up
             time point, patients receiving SA-MPMP had significant
             improvements in kinesiophobia and rumination about pain
             compared to those receiving P-MPMP and SMC. In patients
             suffering from CLBP, an intervention that combines
             spouse-assisted coping skills training with a
             multidisciplinary pain management programme can improve fear
             of movement and rumination about low back
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00097.x},
   Key = {fds273655}
}

@article{fds273743,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Baucom, DH and Hurwitz, H and Moser, B and Patterson, E and Kim, HJ},
   Title = {Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with GI
             cancer: 8-week follow-up and processes associated with
             change.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1755-1762},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21947440},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: We recently reported that a partner-assisted
             emotional disclosure intervention for gastrointestinal
             cancer led to improvements in relationship quality and
             intimacy for couples in which the patient initially reported
             higher levels of holding back from discussing cancer-related
             concerns. The purposes of the present study were to examine
             outcomes at 8-week follow-up and process variables that may
             influence treatment effects. METHODS: One hundred thirty
             couples were randomly assigned to either partner-assisted
             emotional disclosure or an education/support control
             condition. Participants completed measures of relationship
             quality, intimacy, and psychological distress before
             randomization, post-treatment, and 8 weeks later. Patients
             in the disclosure intervention completed measures of
             negative affect immediately following each treatment
             session, and their level of expressiveness during the
             sessions was rated by trained observers. Data were analyzed
             using multilevel modeling. RESULTS: Among couples in which
             the patient initially reported higher levels of holding
             back, the disclosure intervention led to improvements in
             relationship quality and intimacy that were maintained at
             8-weeks follow-up. High levels of patient expressiveness
             during the disclosure sessions were associated with
             improvements in relationship quality and intimacy, and high
             levels of patient negative affect immediately following the
             sessions were associated with reductions in psychological
             distress at the post-test assessment. CONCLUSIONS: For
             couples in which the patient tends to hold back from
             discussing concerns, partner-assisted emotional disclosure
             is a beneficial intervention leading to improvements in
             relationship functioning that maintain over time. Future
             research is needed to examine methods of enhancing
             intervention effects, including encouraging patient
             expressiveness and negative affect during the
             sessions.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-011-1272-z},
   Key = {fds273743}
}

@article{fds273757,
   Author = {Cox, CE and Porter, LS and Hough, CL and White, DB and Kahn, JM and Carson,
             SS and Tulsky, JA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Development and preliminary evaluation of a telephone-based
             coping skills training intervention for survivors of acute
             lung injury and their informal caregivers.},
   Journal = {Intensive Care Med},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1289-1297},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22527082},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: Survivors of acute lung injury (ALI) and their
             informal caregivers have difficulty coping with the physical
             and emotional challenges of recovery from critical illness.
             We aimed to develop and pilot test a telephone-based coping
             skills training intervention for this population. METHODS:
             Fifty-eight participants were enrolled overall. A total of
             21 patients and 23 caregivers participated in a
             cross-sectional study to assess coping and its association
             with psychological distress. This also informed the
             development of an ALI coping skills training intervention in
             an iterative process involving content and methodological
             experts. The intervention was then evaluated in seven
             patients and seven caregivers in an uncontrolled,
             prospective, pre-post study. Outcomes included
             acceptability, feasibility, and symptoms of psychological
             distress measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression
             Scale (HADS) and Post-Traumatic Symptom Scale (PTSS).
             RESULTS: Survivors and their caregivers used adaptive coping
             infrequently, a pattern that was strongly associated with
             psychological distress. These findings informed the
             development of a 12-session intervention for acquiring,
             applying, and maintaining coping skills. In the evaluation
             phase, participants completed 77 (92 %) of a possible 84
             telephone sessions and all (100 %) reported the
             intervention's usefulness in their daily routine. Mean
             change scores reflecting improvements in the HADS (7.8 U)
             and PTSS (10.3 U) were associated with adaptive coping (r =
             0.50-0.70) and high self-efficacy (r = 0.67-0.79).
             CONCLUSIONS: A novel telephone-based coping skills training
             intervention was acceptable, feasible, and may have been
             associated with a reduction in psychological distress among
             survivors of ALI and their informal caregivers. A randomized
             trial is needed to evaluate the intervention.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00134-012-2567-3},
   Key = {fds273757}
}

@article{fds273727,
   Author = {Bennell, KL and Ahamed, Y and Bryant, C and Jull, G and Hunt, MA and Kenardy, J and Forbes, A and Harris, A and Nicholas, M and Metcalf, B and Egerton, T and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {A physiotherapist-delivered integrated exercise and pain
             coping skills training intervention for individuals with
             knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial
             protocol.},
   Journal = {BMC Musculoskelet Disord},
   Volume = {13},
   Pages = {129},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {1471-2474},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-129},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent chronic
             musculoskeletal condition with no cure. Pain is the primary
             symptom and results from a complex interaction between
             structural changes, physical impairments and psychological
             factors. Much evidence supports the use of strengthening
             exercises to improve pain and physical function in this
             patient population. There is also a growing body of research
             examining the effects of psychologist-delivered pain coping
             skills training (PCST) particularly in other chronic pain
             conditions. Though typically provided separately, there are
             symptom, resource and personnel advantages of exercise and
             PCST being delivered together by a single healthcare
             professional. Physiotherapists are a logical choice to be
             trained to deliver a PCST intervention as they already have
             expertise in administering exercise for knee OA and are
             cognisant of the need for a biopsychosocial approach to
             management. No studies to date have examined the effects of
             an integrated exercise and PCST program delivered solely by
             physiotherapists in this population. The primary aim of this
             multisite randomised controlled trial is to investigate
             whether an integrated 12-week PCST and exercise treatment
             program delivered by physiotherapists is more efficacious
             than either program alone in treating pain and physical
             function in individuals with knee OA. METHODS/DESIGN: This
             will be an assessor-blinded, 3-arm randomised controlled
             trial of a 12-week intervention involving 10 physiotherapy
             visits together with home practice. Participants with
             symptomatic and radiographic knee OA will be recruited from
             the community in two cities in Australia and randomized into
             one of three groups: exercise alone, PCST alone, or
             integrated PCST and exercise. Randomisation will be
             stratified by city (Melbourne or Brisbane) and gender.
             Primary outcomes are overall average pain in the past week
             measured by a Visual Analogue Scale and physical function
             measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
             Osteoarthritis Index subscale. Secondary outcomes include
             global rating of change, muscle strength, functional
             performance, physical activity levels, health related
             quality of life and psychological factors. Measurements will
             be taken at baseline and immediately following the
             intervention (12 weeks) as well as at 32 weeks and 52 weeks
             to examine maintenance of any intervention effects. Specific
             assessment of adherence to the treatment program will also
             be made at weeks 22 and 42. Relative cost-effectiveness will
             be determined from health service usage and outcome data.
             DISCUSSION: The findings from this randomised controlled
             trial will provide evidence for the efficacy of an
             integrated PCST and exercise program delivered by
             physiotherapists in the management of painful and
             functionally limiting knee OA compared to either program
             alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical
             Trials Registry reference number: ACTRN12610000533099.},
   Doi = {10.1186/1471-2474-13-129},
   Key = {fds273727}
}

@article{fds273736,
   Author = {Von Korff and M and Vitiello, MV and McCurry, SM and Balderson, BH and Moore, AL and Baker, LD and Yarbro, P and Saunders, K and Keefe, FJ and Rybarczyk, BD},
   Title = {Group interventions for co-morbid insomnia and
             osteoarthritis pain in primary care: the lifestyles cluster
             randomized trial design.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {759-768},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {1551-7144},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.010},
   Abstract = {Six weekly sessions of group cognitive-behavioral therapy
             for insomnia and osteoarthritis pain (CBT-PI), and for
             osteoarthritis pain alone (CBT-P) were compared to an
             education only control (EOC). Basic education about pain and
             sleep was comparable, so EOC controlled for information and
             group participation. Active interventions differed from EOC
             in training pain coping skills (CBT-P and CBT-PI) and sleep
             enhancement techniques (CBT-PI). Persons with osteoarthritis
             age 60 or older were screened for osteoarthritis pain and
             insomnia severity via mailed survey. Primary outcomes were
             pain severity (pain intensity and interference ratings from
             the Graded Chronic Pain Scale) and insomnia severity
             (Insomnia Severity Index). Secondary outcomes were arthritis
             pain (AIMS-2 symptom scale) and sleep efficiency assessed by
             wrist actigraphy. Ancillary outcomes included: cognitive
             function, depression, and health care use. A clustered
             randomized design provided adequate power to identify
             moderate effects on primary outcomes (effect size>0.35).
             Modified intent to treat analyses, including all
             participants who attended the first session, assessed
             effects across CBT-PI, CBT-P, and EOC groups. Treatment
             effects were assessed post-intervention (2 months) and at 9
             months, with durability of intervention effects evaluated at
             18 months. The trial was executed in 6 primary clinics,
             randomizing 367 participants, with 93.2% of randomized
             patients attending at least 4 group sessions. Response rates
             for post-intervention and 9 month assessments were 96.7% and
             92.9% respectively. This hybrid efficacy-effectiveness trial
             design evaluates whether interventions yield specific
             benefits for clinical and behavioral outcomes relative to an
             education only control when implemented in a primary care
             setting.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.010},
   Key = {fds273736}
}

@article{fds273734,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Baucom, DH and Keefe, FJ and Patterson,
             ES},
   Title = {Reactions to a partner-assisted emotional disclosure
             intervention: direct observation and self-report of patient
             and partner communication.},
   Journal = {J Marital Fam Ther},
   Volume = {38 Suppl 1},
   Pages = {284-295},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22765340},
   Abstract = {Partner-assisted emotional disclosure is a couple-based
             intervention designed to help patients disclose
             cancer-related concerns to their spouses-partners. We
             previously found that, compared with an education/support
             control condition, partner-assisted emotional disclosure led
             to significant improvements in relationship quality and
             intimacy for couples in which the patient initially reported
             holding back from discussing cancer-related concerns (Porter
             et al., 2009, Cancer, 115, 4326-4338). The purpose of this
             study was to examine the process data from couples who
             participated in the disclosure sessions including (a)
             observational ratings of couples' communication during the
             sessions; (b) couples' ratings of their communication during
             the sessions; and (c) associations between participants'
             observed communication and their baseline
             psychological/relationship functioning. As rated by trained
             observers, couples' communication was in the moderate range
             of adaptive skills. Self-report data indicated that
             participants had positive perceptions of their
             communication. Observational and self-report ratings were
             weakly associated. Patients reporting lower levels of
             relationship quality, higher levels of holding back, and
             higher partner avoidance at baseline were rated by observers
             as more expressive during the sessions. Overall, these
             findings suggest that the intervention was acceptable to
             couples and was particularly helpful for patients who had
             difficulty talking with their partners on their own without
             skills training.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00278.x},
   Key = {fds273734}
}

@article{fds273735,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and DeVellis, BM and Patterson,
             C and Renner, JB and Jordan, JM},
   Title = {Brief Fear of Movement Scale for osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)},
   Volume = {64},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {862-871},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22290689},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Fear of movement has important clinical
             implications for individuals with osteoarthritis (OA). This
             study aimed to establish a brief fear of movement scale for
             use in OA. Items from the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
             (TSK) were examined. METHODS: The English version of the TSK
             was examined in a community-based sample (n = 1,136) of
             individuals with OA of the hip or knee. Exploratory and
             confirmatory factor analyses were used to determine the
             number and content of the dimensions of fear of movement.
             Factorial invariance was tested across subgroups of sex,
             race, education, and OA severity. Convergent validity with
             measures of pain, physical functioning, and psychological
             functioning was examined. RESULTS: Factor analyses
             identified a single-factor 6-item scale that measures
             activity avoidance due to pain-related fear of movement
             (confirmatory factor analysis indices of model fit: root
             mean square error of approximation = 0.04, standardized root
             mean square residual = 0.01, comparative fit index = 0.99,
             and Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.99). The 6-item scale
             demonstrated factorial invariance across sex, race, levels
             of education, and OA severity, suggesting that this scale
             performs consistently across diverse groups of individuals
             with OA. Convergent validity with measures of pain (β =
             0.30-0.41), physical functioning (β = 0.44-0.48), and
             psychological functioning (β = 0.36-0.37) was also
             demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The Brief Fear of Movement Scale
             identified in this study provides a promising and valid
             approach for assessing fear of movement in individuals with
             OA. This brief scale demonstrated several important
             strengths, including a small number of items, sound
             psychometric properties, and consistent performance across
             diverse groups of individuals with OA.},
   Doi = {10.1002/acr.21626},
   Key = {fds273735}
}

@article{fds273779,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Blumenthal, JA and Guilak, F and Kraus, VB and Schmitt,
             DO and Babyak, MA and Craighead, LW and Caldwell, DS and Rice, JR and McKee, DC and Shelby, RA and Campbell, LC and Pells, JJ and Sims, EL and Queen, R and Carson, JW and Connelly, M and Dixon, KE and LaCaille, LJ and Huebner, JL and Rejeski, JW and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain coping skills training and lifestyle behavioral weight
             management in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a
             randomized controlled study.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {153},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {1199-1209},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22503223},
   Abstract = {Overweight and obese patients with osteoarthritis (OA)
             experience more OA pain and disability than patients who are
             not overweight. This study examined the long-term efficacy
             of a combined pain coping skills training (PCST) and
             lifestyle behavioral weight management (BWM) intervention in
             overweight and obese OA patients. Patients (n=232) were
             randomized to a 6-month program of: 1) PCST+BWM; 2)
             PCST-only; 3) BWM-only; or 4) standard care control.
             Assessments of pain, physical disability (Arthritis Impact
             Measurement Scales [AIMS] physical disability, stiffness,
             activity, and gait), psychological disability (AIMS
             psychological disability, pain catastrophizing, arthritis
             self-efficacy, weight self-efficacy), and body weight were
             collected at 4 time points (pretreatment, posttreatment, and
             6 months and 12 months after the completion of treatment).
             Patients randomized to PCST+BWM demonstrated significantly
             better treatment outcomes (average of all 3 posttreatment
             values) in terms of pain, physical disability, stiffness,
             activity, weight self-efficacy, and weight when compared to
             the other 3 conditions (Ps<0.05). PCST+BWM also did
             significantly better than at least one of the other
             conditions (ie, PCST-only, BWM-only, or standard care) in
             terms of psychological disability, pain catastrophizing, and
             arthritis self-efficacy. Interventions teaching overweight
             and obese OA patients pain coping skills and weight
             management simultaneously may provide the more comprehensive
             long-term benefits.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.023},
   Key = {fds273779}
}

@article{fds273731,
   Author = {Schneider, S and Junghaenel, DU and Keefe, FJ and Schwartz, JE and Stone, AA and Broderick, JE},
   Title = {Individual differences in the day-to-day variability of
             pain, fatigue, and well-being in patients with rheumatic
             disease: associations with psychological
             variables.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {153},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {813-822},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.001},
   Abstract = {This report examines day-to-day variability in rheumatology
             patients' ratings of pain and related quality-of-life
             variables as well as predictors of that variability. Data
             from 2 studies were used. The hypothesis was that greater
             psychological distress (i.e., depression and anxiety) and
             poorer coping appraisals (i.e., higher pain catastrophizing
             and lower self-efficacy) are associated with more
             variability. Electronic daily diary ratings were collected
             from 106 patients from a community rheumatology practice
             across 28 days (study 1) and from 194 osteoarthritis
             patients across 7 days (study 2). In multilevel modeling
             analyses, substantial day-to-day variability was evident for
             all variables in both studies, and individual patients
             differed considerably and somewhat reliably in the magnitude
             of their variability. Higher levels of depression
             significantly predicted greater variability in pain, as well
             as in happiness and frustration (study 1). Lower
             self-efficacy was associated with more variability in
             patients' daily satisfaction with accomplishments and in the
             quality of their day (study 2). Greater pain catastrophizing
             and higher depression predicted more variability in
             interference with social relationships (study 2). Anxiety
             was not significantly associated with day-to-day
             variability. The results of these studies suggest that
             individual differences in the magnitude of symptom
             fluctuation may play a vital role in understanding patients'
             adjustment to pain. Future research will be needed to
             examine the clinical utility of measuring variability in
             patients' pain and well-being, and to understand whether
             reducing variability may be an important treatment
             target.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.001},
   Key = {fds273731}
}

@article{fds273733,
   Author = {Baucom, DH and Kirby, JS and Pukay-Martin, ND and Porter, LS and Fredman, SJ and Gremore, TM and Keefe, FJ and Atkins,
             D},
   Title = {Men's psychological functioning in the context of women's
             breast cancer.},
   Journal = {J Marital Fam Ther},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {317-329},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0194-472X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00133.x},
   Abstract = {Previous research indicates that men are affected when their
             female partners have breast cancer. However, little is known
             about what predicts men's psychological well-being in this
             context. The current investigation involved couples in which
             the woman had early stage breast cancer and explored the
             degree to which men's positive and negative well-being was
             related to women's well-being, women's physical symptoms,
             relationship functioning, and relationship duration. The
             findings indicate that all of these factors play a role and
             interact in predicting men's well-being. In particular, when
             women have a high level of physical symptoms, the typical
             associations between men's well-being with women's
             well-being and relationship adjustment no longer persist.
             Implications for working with couples addressing health
             problems are provided.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00133.x},
   Key = {fds273733}
}

@article{fds273748,
   Author = {Wren, AA and Somers, TJ and Wright, MA and Goetz, MC and Leary, MR and Fras, AM and Huh, BK and Rogers, LL and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Self-compassion in patients with persistent musculoskeletal
             pain: relationship of self-compassion to adjustment to
             persistent pain.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {759-770},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22071165},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Self-compassion entails qualities such as kindness
             and understanding toward oneself in difficult circumstances
             and may influence adjustment to persistent pain.
             Self-compassion may be a particularly influential factor in
             pain adjustment for obese individuals who suffer from
             persistent pain, as they often experience heightened levels
             of pain and lower levels of psychological functioning.
             OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to examine
             the relationship of self-compassion to pain, psychological
             functioning, pain coping, and disability among patients who
             have persistent musculoskeletal pain and who are obese.
             METHODS: Eighty-eight obese patients with persistent pain
             completed a paper-and-pencil self-report assessment measure
             before or after their appointment with their
             anesthesiologist. RESULTS: Hierarchical linear regression
             analyses demonstrated that even after controlling for
             important demographic variables, self-compassion was a
             significant predictor of negative affect (β=-0.48,
             P<0.001), positive affect (β=0.29, P=0.01), pain
             catastrophizing (β=-0.32, P=0.003), and pain disability
             (β=-0.24, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study
             indicate that self-compassion may be important in explaining
             the variability in pain adjustment among patients who have
             persistent musculoskeletal pain and are obese.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.014},
   Key = {fds273748}
}

@article{fds371068,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Abernethy, A},
   Title = {ELECTRONIC PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES (EPRO) TO GUIDE THE
             IMPLEMENTATION OF BEHAVIORAL CANCER PAIN
             INTERVENTIONS},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {43},
   Pages = {S222-S222},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371068}
}

@article{fds372574,
   Author = {Czajkowski, SM and Davidson, KW and Fitz-Simmons, SC and Keefe, FJ and Nilsen, WJ and Stirratt, MJ and Wiebe, DJ},
   Title = {NIH GRANT WRITING SEMINAR FOR EARLY CAREER
             RESEARCHERS},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {43},
   Pages = {S1-S1},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372574}
}

@article{fds372575,
   Author = {Campbell, L and Keefe, FJ and McKee, DC and Waters,
             SL},
   Title = {COMPARING PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS FOR IMPROVING QUALITY
             OF LIFE OUTCOMES AMONG AFRICAN AMERICAN PROSTATE CANCER
             SURVIVORS},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {43},
   Pages = {S281-S281},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372575}
}

@article{fds372576,
   Author = {Ahamed, Y and Egerton, T and Hunt, MA and Keefe, FJ and Bryant, C and Jull,
             G and Connellan, P and Bennell, KL},
   Title = {Psychological factors associated with daily step count in
             knee osteoarthritis},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis and Cartilage},
   Volume = {20},
   Pages = {S191-S192},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.305},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.305},
   Key = {fds372576}
}

@article{fds372577,
   Author = {Huebner, JL and Landerman, LR and Somers, TJ and Kraus, VB and Guilak,
             F and Blumenthal, JA and Caldwell, DS and Rice, JR and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Inflammatory biomarkers of OA, IL-6 and leptin are
             modifiable in overweight/obese OA patients with a protocol
             that combines training in pain coping skills and weight
             management},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis and Cartilage},
   Volume = {20},
   Pages = {S38-S38},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.570},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.570},
   Key = {fds372577}
}

@article{fds273732,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Scipio, CD and Somers, TJ and Soo, MS and Weinfurt, KP and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Prospective study of factors predicting adherence to
             surveillance mammography in women treated for breast
             cancer.},
   Journal = {J Clin Oncol},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {813-819},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22331949},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: This prospective study examined the factors that
             predicted sustained adherence to surveillance mammography in
             women treated for breast cancer. METHODS: Breast cancer
             survivors (N = 204) who were undergoing surveillance
             mammography completed questionnaires assessing
             mammography-related anticipatory anxiety, persistent breast
             pain, mammography pain, and catastrophic thoughts about
             mammography pain. Adherence to mammography in the following
             year was assessed. RESULTS: In the year after study entry,
             84.8% of women (n = 173) returned for a subsequent
             mammogram. Unadjusted associations showed that younger age,
             shorter period of time since surgery, and having upper
             extremity lymphedema were associated with lower mammography
             adherence. Forty percent of women reported moderate to high
             levels of mammography pain (score of ≥ 5 on a 0 to 10
             scale). Although mammography pain was not associated with
             adherence, higher levels of mammography-related anxiety and
             pain catastrophizing were associated with not returning for
             a mammogram (P < .05). The impact of anxiety on mammography
             use was mediated by pain catastrophizing (indirect effect, P
             < .05). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that women who are
             younger, closer to the time of surgery, or have upper
             extremity lymphedema may be less likely to undergo repeated
             mammograms. It may be important for health professionals to
             remind selected patients directly that some women avoid
             repeat mammography and to re-emphasize the value of
             mammography for women with a history of breast cancer.
             Teaching women behavioral techniques (eg, redirecting
             attention) or providing medication for reducing anxiety
             could be considered for women with high levels of anxiety or
             catastrophic thoughts related to mammography.},
   Doi = {10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4333},
   Key = {fds273732}
}

@article{fds273729,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Translational behavioral pain management: new directions and
             new opportunities.},
   Journal = {Transl Behav Med},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {19-21},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1869-6716},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0117-8},
   Doi = {10.1007/s13142-012-0117-8},
   Key = {fds273729}
}

@article{fds273730,
   Author = {Rini, C and Williams, DA and Broderick, JE and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Meeting them where they are: Using the Internet to deliver
             behavioral medicine interventions for pain.},
   Journal = {Transl Behav Med},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {82-92},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1869-6716},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0107-2},
   Abstract = {Pharmacological and interventional pain medicine treatments
             are emphasized in the routine treatment of chronic pain
             despite strong evidence for the efficacy and safety of
             behavioral approaches. Most medical professionals have not
             incorporated behavioral pain treatments into their
             practices. Internet-based interventions have the potential
             to increase clinical use of these treatments. We discuss the
             strengths and weaknesses of current Internet-based
             behavioral pain management interventions, focusing on three
             broad intervention categories: therapist-guided
             interventions, unguided (automated) interventions, and
             pain-relevant applications for mobile platforms. Examples of
             each category are discussed, revealing a high degree of
             variation in approaches, user interfaces, and components as
             well as variability in the degree to which these
             interventions have been subjected to empirical testing.
             Finally, we highlight key issues for research and clinical
             implementation, with the goal of advancing this field so
             that it can meet its potential to increase access to
             evidence-based behavioral medicine treatments for chronic
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s13142-011-0107-2},
   Key = {fds273730}
}

@article{fds372578,
   Author = {Chen, W-H and Revicki, DA and Amtmann, D and Jensen, MP and Keefe, FJ and Cella, D},
   Title = {Development and Analysis of PROMIS Pain Intensity
             Scale},
   Journal = {QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH},
   Volume = {20},
   Pages = {18-18},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds372578}
}

@article{fds372579,
   Author = {Vitiello, MV and McCurry, SM and Von Korff and M and Shortreed, SM and Balderson, BH and Baker, LD and Keefe, FJ and Rybarczyk,
             B},
   Title = {COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY FOR SLEEP AND PAIN IN OLDER
             ADULTS WITH CO-MORBID INSOMNIA AND OSTEOARTHRITIS: RESULTS
             OF THE LIFESTYLES RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL},
   Journal = {SLEEP},
   Volume = {35},
   Pages = {A217-A218},
   Publisher = {OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds372579}
}

@article{fds273737,
   Author = {Reese, JB and Porter, LS and Somers, TJ and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Pilot feasibility study of a telephone-based couples
             intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in
             colorectal cancer.},
   Journal = {J Sex Marital Ther},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {402-417},
   Year = {2012},
   ISSN = {0092-623X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.606886},
   Abstract = {No studies have tested interventions addressing the sexual
             concerns of colorectal cancer patients and their partners.
             The authors reported findings from a pilot feasibility study
             of a novel telephone-based intimacy enhancement protocol
             that addresses the intimacy and sexual concerns of couples
             facing colorectal cancer. On the basis of a flexible coping
             model, the intervention was designed to help couples make
             cognitive and behavioral shifts in their intimate
             relationships. Participants were 18 individuals (9 dyads)
             who completed the intervention and measures of feasibility
             (frequency, ease of use, helpfulness of skills, ratings of
             rapport), program evaluations, and measures of sexual and
             relationship functioning. Most participants reported that
             the intervention was "quite a bit" or "extremely" helpful
             and that they had used the skills taught within the past
             week. The skills most commonly practiced and perceived as
             most helpful tended to be behavioral (e.g., trying a new
             sexual activity). The authors found the largest effect sizes
             (≥.60) for sexual distress, sexual function (female), and
             sexual communication. Findings from this pilot study suggest
             that the intimacy enhancement protocol is feasible and holds
             promise for improving sexual and intimacy outcomes in
             colorectal cancer patients and their partners. The authors
             discuss the research and clinical implications.},
   Doi = {10.1080/0092623X.2011.606886},
   Key = {fds273737}
}

@article{fds273631,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Moseley, GL and Keefe, FJ and Kothadia,
             SM},
   Title = {Neuroimaging of pain: A psychosocial perspective},
   Pages = {275-292},
   Publisher = {Springer New York},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6373-4_17},
   Abstract = {The past 60 years has witnessed major changes in the way
             that pain is conceptualized and treated. In the 1950s, pain
             was generally conceptualized using a sensory model that
             maintained that pain is a simple sensory event that warned
             of tissue damage. Treatments for pain were biomedical and
             consisted mainly of attempts to identify underlying tissue
             damage and treat it medically or surgically. In the 1960s,
             clinicians and researchers expressed growing dissatisfaction
             with the sensory model of pain. In particular, it became
             increasingly clear that the sensory model failed to explain
             phenomena often seen in patients experiencing chronic pain:
             pain persisting despite multiple medical and surgical
             treatments aimed at correcting underlying tissue damage,
             reports of pain showing poor correlation with underlying
             evidence of tissue damage, pain being modified by
             psychosocial factors such as anxiety, social support, or
             expectations. Melzack and Wall's gate control theory was one
             of the first to maintain that pain was complex in that it
             not only had a sensory component but also
             affective,-cognitive, and behavioral components (Science
             150(699):971-979, 1965). A key tenet of the gate control
             theory was that the brain could play a major role in
             modulating nociceptive signals at the spinal cord, through
             descending pathways from brain areas thought to be involved
             in affect, cognition, and behavior. The gate control theory
             also led to renewed interest in expanding pain treatments
             beyond traditional medical and surgical approaches to a wide
             array of-interventions that could alter pain by modifying
             sensation (e.g.,-transcutaneous nerve stimulation, massage),
             or affective (e.g., antianxiety and antidepressant
             medications), cognitive (e.g., cognitive therapy,
             distraction techniques), and behavioral processes (e.g.,
             exercise, graded activation). © 2011 Springer
             Science+Business Media, LLC.},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-1-4419-6373-4_17},
   Key = {fds273631}
}

@article{fds273749,
   Author = {Wright, MA and Wren, AA and Somers, TJ and Goetz, MC and Fras, AM and Huh,
             BK and Rogers, LL and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain acceptance, hope, and optimism: relationships to pain
             and adjustment in patients with chronic musculoskeletal
             pain.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1155-1162},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21820969},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: There is growing interest in the role that
             positive aspects of psychological adjustment, such as pain
             acceptance, hope, and optimism, may play in explaining
             adjustment in persons suffering from persistent pain. This
             study conducted in obese patients with persistent
             musculoskeletal pain (N = 89) examined the degree to which
             pain acceptance and hope explained pain intensity, pain
             unpleasantness, psychological distress, and pain-related
             disability, after controlling for the effects of optimism.
             In correlational analyses, pain acceptance and optimism were
             associated with psychological distress and pain disability
             with hope being related to only psychological distress. Pain
             acceptance, optimism, and hope were not significantly
             associated with pain. Hierarchical linear regression (HLR)
             analyses found that pain acceptance remained a significant
             predictor of psychological distress and pain disability
             after controlling for optimism, demographic, and medical
             variables. HLR analyses found that hope was not a
             significant predictor of psychological distress after
             controlling for optimism, pain acceptance, and demographic
             and medical variables. The results of this study are
             important because they indicate that pain acceptance, hope,
             and optimism are all related to pain adjustment. They also
             highlight the importance of controlling for optimism when
             examining the effects of pain acceptance and hope on pain
             adjustment. PERSPECTIVE: In a sample of obese patients with
             persistent musculoskeletal pain, pain acceptance was a
             significant predictor of psychological distress and pain
             disability even after controlling for optimism, demographic,
             and medical variables. These results add to the growing
             literature on the importance of pain acceptance in
             understanding adjustment to persistent pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2011.06.002},
   Key = {fds273749}
}

@article{fds371069,
   Author = {Clowse, MEB and Criscione-Schreiber, LG and Jolly, M and Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Memory Complaints in Lupus Patients: Relationship to Lupus
             Activity, Symptoms, Quality of Life, Psychological Distress,
             and Coping},
   Journal = {ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM},
   Volume = {63},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {S556-S556},
   Publisher = {WILEY-BLACKWELL},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds371069}
}

@article{fds372580,
   Author = {Kurakula, P and Somers, TJ and Criscione-Schreiber, LG and Keefe, FJ and Clowse, MEB},
   Title = {The Relationship Between Pain Coping Skills and Pain,
             Fatigue, Mood, and Lupus Activity},
   Journal = {ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM},
   Volume = {63},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {S555-S556},
   Publisher = {WILEY-BLACKWELL},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds372580}
}

@article{fds273721,
   Author = {Lumley, MA and Cohen, JL and Borszcz, GS and Cano, A and Radcliffe, AM and Porter, LS and Schubiner, H and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain and emotion: a biopsychosocial review of recent
             research.},
   Journal = {J Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {67},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {942-968},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0021-9762},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20816},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: Research on emotion and pain has
             burgeoned. We review the last decade's literature, focusing
             on links between emotional processes and persistent pain.
             RESULTS: Neurobiological research documents the neural
             processes that distinguish affective from sensory pain
             dimensions, link emotion and pain, and generate central
             nervous system pain sensitization. Psychological research
             demonstrates that greater pain is related to emotional
             stress and limited emotional awareness, expression, and
             processing. Social research shows the potential importance
             of emotional communication, empathy, attachment, and
             rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Emotions are integral to the
             conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of persistent
             pain. Research should clarify when to eliminate or attenuate
             negative emotions, and when to access, experience, and
             express them. Theory and practice should integrate emotion
             into cognitive-behavioral models of persistent
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1002/jclp.20816},
   Key = {fds273721}
}

@article{fds371070,
   Author = {Cox, CE and Porter, LS and Hough, CL and Kahn, JM and Carson, SS and Curtis, JR and White, DB and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {TELEPHONE-BASED COPING SKILLS TRAINING FOR ACUTE LUNG INJURY
             SURVIVORS & THEIR INFORMAL CAREGIVERS},
   Journal = {INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE},
   Volume = {37},
   Pages = {S135-S135},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds371070}
}

@article{fds273720,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Psychosocial issues in cancer pain.},
   Journal = {Curr Pain Headache Rep},
   Volume = {15},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {263-270},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21400251},
   Abstract = {Cancer pain is a complex and multidimensional experience
             that affects and is affected by psychological and social
             factors. This article reviews recent research that points to
             a number of key psychosocial factors associated with pain,
             including psychological distress, coping, and social
             support, as well as the impact of socioeconomic factors on
             barriers to pain management. We also review recent research
             suggesting that psychosocial interventions, including
             education, coping-skills training, and hypnosis, may be
             useful adjuncts to medical management of pain. Clinical
             implications and recommendations for future research are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11916-011-0190-6},
   Key = {fds273720}
}

@article{fds273754,
   Author = {Bastian, LA and Fish, LJ and Peterson, BL and Biddle, AK and Garst, J and Lyna, P and Molner, S and Bepler, G and Kelley, M and Keefe, FJ and McBride, CM},
   Title = {Proactive recruitment of cancer patients' social networks
             into a smoking cessation trial.},
   Journal = {Contemp Clin Trials},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {498-504},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21382509},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: This report describes the characteristics
             associated with successful enrollment of smokers in the
             social networks (i.e., family and close friends) of patients
             with lung cancer into a smoking cessation intervention.
             METHODS: Lung cancer patients from four clinical sites were
             asked to complete a survey enumerating their family members
             and close friends who smoke, and provide permission to
             contact these potential participants. Family members and
             close friends identified as smokers were interviewed and
             offered participation in a smoking cessation intervention.
             Repeated measures logistic regression model examined
             characteristics associated with enrollment. RESULTS: A total
             of 1062 eligible lung cancer patients were identified and
             516 patients consented and completed the survey. These
             patients identified 1325 potentially eligible family and
             close friends. Of these, 496 consented and enrolled in the
             smoking cessation program. Network enrollment was highest
             among patients who were white and had late-stage disease.
             Social network members enrolled were most likely to be
             female, a birth family, immediate family, or close friend,
             and live in close geographic proximity to the patient.
             CONCLUSIONS: Proactive recruitment of smokers in the social
             networks of lung cancer patients is challenging. In this
             study, the majority of family members and friends declined
             to participate. Enlisting immediate female family members
             and friends, who live close to the patient as agents to
             proactively recruit other network members into smoking
             cessation trials could be used to extend reach of cessation
             interventions to patients' social networks. Moreover,
             further consideration should be given to the appropriate
             timing of approaching network smokers to consider
             cessation.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cct.2011.03.006},
   Key = {fds273754}
}

@article{fds273718,
   Author = {Tsai, P-F and Kuo, Y-F and Beck, C and Richards, K and Means, KM and Pate,
             BL and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Non-verbal cues to osteoarthritic knee and/or hip pain in
             elders.},
   Journal = {Res Nurs Health},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {218-227},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0160-6891},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20432},
   Abstract = {Behavioral cues are believed to be useful to identify pain
             among elders who may be experiencing pain but unable to
             express it. To examine this assumption, we recruited 192
             elders who could verbally express pain to determine whether
             regression models combining behavioral cues (motor and gait
             patterns) predicted verbal pain reports. In the best model,
             age (p < .01) and subscales that measured guarding
             (p < .001) and joint flexion (p < .01) motor
             patterns were significant predictors of verbal pain reports.
             The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that
             the best cutoff for predictive probability was 40-44%, with
             a fair to good C statistic of .78 (SD = .04). With a 40%
             cutoff, sensitivity and specificity were 71.6% and 71.0%,
             respectively. The investigators concluded that the final
             model could serve as a building block for the development of
             a tool using behavioral cues to identify elders'
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1002/nur.20432},
   Key = {fds273718}
}

@article{fds273780,
   Author = {Riddle, DL and Keefe, FJ and Nay, WT and McKee, D and Attarian, DE and Jensen, MP},
   Title = {Pain coping skills training for patients with elevated pain
             catastrophizing who are scheduled for knee arthroplasty: a
             quasi-experimental study.},
   Journal = {Arch Phys Med Rehabil},
   Volume = {92},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {859-865},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530943},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: To (1) describe a behavioral intervention
             designed for patients with elevated pain catastrophizing who
             are scheduled for knee arthroplasty, and (2) use a
             quasi-experimental design to evaluate the potential efficacy
             of the intervention on pain severity, catastrophizing
             cognitions, and disability. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental
             nonequivalent control group design with a 2-month follow-up.
             SETTING: Two university-based orthopedic surgery
             departments. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=63) scheduled for knee
             replacement surgery who reported elevated levels of pain
             catastrophizing. Patients were recruited from 2 clinics and
             were assessed prior to surgery and 2 months after surgery.
             INTERVENTIONS: A group of 18 patients received a
             psychologist-directed pain coping skills training
             intervention comprising 8 sessions. The other group, a
             historical cohort of 45 patients, received usual care. MAIN
             OUTCOME MEASURES: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
             Arthritis Index Pain and Disability scores, as well as
             scores on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. RESULTS: Two
             months after surgery, the patients who received pain coping
             skills training reported significantly greater reductions in
             pain severity and catastrophizing, and greater improvements
             in function as compared to the usual care cohort.
             CONCLUSIONS: Pain catastrophizing is known to increase risk
             of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty. The findings
             provide preliminary evidence that the treatment may be
             highly efficacious for reducing pain, catastrophizing, and
             disability, in patients reporting elevated catastrophizing
             prior to knee arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial is
             warranted to confirm these effects.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.003},
   Key = {fds273780}
}

@article{fds371071,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Red, SN and Blackwell, KL and Peppercorn,
             JM and Marcom, PK and Kimmick, GG},
   Title = {Symptom experiences and nonadherent medication-taking
             behaviors of breast cancer patients taking adjuvant hormone
             therapy.},
   Journal = {Journal of Clinical Oncology},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {15_suppl},
   Pages = {524-524},
   Publisher = {American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.524},
   Doi = {10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.524},
   Key = {fds371071}
}

@article{fds371072,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Red, SN and Blackwell, KL and Peppercorn,
             JM and Marcom, PK and Kimmick, GG},
   Title = {Symptom experiences and nonadherent medication-taking
             behaviors of breast cancer patients taking adjuvant hormone
             therapy.},
   Journal = {J Clin Oncol},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {15_suppl},
   Pages = {524},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {May},
   Abstract = {524 Background: Many breast cancer patients do not adhere to
             prescribed adjuvant hormone therapy. This pilot study
             explored symptom experiences and medication adherence
             behaviors. METHODS: Eligible women were postmenopausal, had
             hormone receptor positive stage I-IIIA breast cancer,
             completed surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, and were
             taking adjuvant hormonal therapy. Standardized instruments
             were used: Brief Fatigue Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory,
             Menopause Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Pain
             Catastrophizing Scale, Modified Morisky Medication Adherence
             Scale, and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. T-tests
             were used to compare symptoms by type of medication. Pearson
             correlations examined associations between medication taking
             behaviors and symptoms. RESULTS: 108 women enrolled: mean
             age 64 (SD 9) years, 81% white. Mean time from surgery was
             46 (SD 29) months and on hormonal therapy, overall and
             current, was 41 (SD 30) and 26 (SD 20) months, respectively.
             19% were taking tamoxifen and 81% an AI (30% anastrozole;
             18% exemestane; 33% letrozole). 27% changed therapy. Reasons
             for change were pain (tamoxifen n=8 vs AI n=20), vasomotor
             symptoms (1 vs 1), osteoporosis (1 vs 3), and rash (1 vs 1).
             Significantly (p<.05) more fatigue, pain intensity, and pain
             interference were reported with AI compared to tamoxifen.
             Significant (p<.05) predictors of nonadherent medication
             taking behaviors were: greater fatigue (r=.28), pain
             intensity (r=.28), pain interference (r=.35), pain
             catastrophizing (r=.30), menopausal symptoms (r=.41), and
             medication concerns (r=.29). Type of medication and
             perceived medication necessity were not associated with
             nonadherent medication taking behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Side
             effects and perceived side effect severity are associated
             with nonadherent medication taking behavior. Interventions
             to address perceived side effects may improve adherence to
             therapy. [Table: see text].},
   Key = {fds371072}
}

@article{fds273719,
   Author = {Broderick, JE and Junghaenel, DU and Schneider, S and Bruckenthal, P and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Treatment expectation for pain coping skills training:
             relationship to osteoarthritis patients' baseline
             psychosocial characteristics.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {315-322},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182048549},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: This study examined predictors of treatment
             expectation among osteoarthritis (OA) patients in a
             multisite clinical trial of pain coping skills training
             (CST). METHODS: Patients (N=171) completed a pretreatment
             assessment battery that asked questions about treatment
             expectations, pain coping variables, pain, physical
             function, psychological distress, quality of life, and
             depression as well as background demographic and medical
             variables. RESULTS: Regression analyses indicated that
             several variables accounted for 21% of the variance in
             treatment expectations (P<0.0001). Patients who were
             classified as adaptive copers, reported higher self-efficacy
             and social interaction, had higher quality of life, and who
             had lower levels of affective distress and depression had
             more positive expectations about engaging in pain CST.
             Variables that were not associated with treatment
             expectation were level of pain and physical dysfunction,
             duration of disease, and disability status as well as
             demographic variables. DISCUSSION: Although many OA patients
             will approach pain CST with positive expectations, others
             have lower expectations. This study suggests that a
             multidimensional assessment of OA patients with chronic pain
             can identify those who have higher expectations versus lower
             expectations. The results suggest that patients who are
             psychologically distressed are less optimistic about
             engaging in treatment and that these patients, in
             particular, may benefit from and need pretreatment
             motivational interviewing to enhance their uptake of pain
             coping skills.},
   Doi = {10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182048549},
   Key = {fds273719}
}

@article{fds273717,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Behavioral medicine: a voyage to the future.},
   Journal = {Ann Behav Med},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {141-151},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21264691},
   Abstract = {This paper discusses trends and future directions in
             behavioral medicine. It is divided into three sections. The
             first briefly reviews key developments in the history of
             behavioral medicine. The second section highlights trends
             and future directions in pain research and practice as a way
             of illustrating future directions for behavioral medicine.
             Consistent with the biopsychosocial model of pain, this
             section focuses on trends and future directions in three key
             areas: biological, psychological, and social. The third
             section describes recent Society of Behavioral Medicine
             initiatives designed to address some of the key challenges
             facing our field as we prepare for the future.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s12160-010-9239-8},
   Key = {fds273717}
}

@article{fds273752,
   Author = {Flynn, KE and Jeffery, DD and Keefe, FJ and Porter, LS and Shelby, RA and Fawzy, MR and Gosselin, TK and Reeve, BB and Weinfurt,
             KP},
   Title = {Sexual functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group
             results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement
             Information System (PROMIS®).},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {378-386},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20878833},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Cancer and treatments for cancer affect specific
             aspects of sexual functioning and intimacy; however, limited
             qualitative work has been done in diverse cancer
             populations. As part of an effort to improve measurement of
             self-reported sexual functioning, we explored the scope and
             importance of sexual functioning and intimacy to patients
             across cancer sites and along the continuum of care.
             METHODS: We conducted 16 diagnosis- and sex-specific focus
             groups with patients recruited from the Duke University
             tumor registry and oncology/hematology clinics (N=109). A
             trained note taker produced field notes summarizing the
             discussions. An independent auditor verified field notes
             against written transcripts. The content of the discussions
             was analyzed for major themes by two independent coders.
             RESULTS: Across all cancers, the most commonly discussed
             cancer- or treatment-related effects on sexual functioning
             and intimacy were fatigue, treatment-related hair loss,
             weight gain and organ loss or scarring. Additional barriers
             were unique to particular diagnoses, such as shortness of
             breath in lung cancer, gastrointestinal problems in
             colorectal cancers and incontinence in prostate cancer.
             Sexual functioning and intimacy were considered important to
             quality of life. While most effects of cancer were
             considered negative, many participants identified
             improvements to intimacy after cancer. CONCLUSION: Overall
             evaluations of satisfaction with sex life did not always
             correspond to specific aspects of functioning (e.g. erectile
             dysfunction), presenting a challenge to researchers aiming
             to measure sexual functioning as an outcome. Health-care
             providers should not assume that level of sexual impairment
             determines sexual satisfaction and should explore cancer
             patients' sexual concerns directly.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.1738},
   Key = {fds273752}
}

@article{fds273772,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Shelby, RA and Somers, TJ and Varia, I and Blazing, M and Waters, SJ and McKee, D and Silva, S and She, L and Blumenthal, JA and O'Connor, J and Knowles, V and Johnson, P and Bradley,
             L},
   Title = {Effects of coping skills training and sertraline in patients
             with non-cardiac chest pain: a randomized controlled
             study.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {152},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {730-741},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21324590},
   Abstract = {Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a common and distressing
             condition. Prior studies suggest that psychotropic
             medication or pain coping skills training (CST) may benefit
             NCCP patients. To our knowledge, no clinical trials have
             examined the separate and combined effects of CST and
             psychotropic medication in the management of NCCP. This
             randomized clinical trial examined the separate and combined
             effects of CST and antidepressant medication (sertraline) in
             participants with non-cardiac chest pain. A sample of
             individuals diagnosed with NCCP was randomly assigned to one
             of four treatments: (1) CST plus sertraline
             (CST+sertraline), (2) CST plus placebo (CST+placebo), (3)
             sertraline alone, or (4) placebo alone. Assessments of pain
             intensity, pain unpleasantness, anxiety, pain
             catastrophizing, depression, and physical disability were
             collected prior to treatment, and at 10- and 34-weeks
             following randomization. Data analyses revealed that CST and
             sertraline either alone or in combination significantly
             reduced pain intensity and pain unpleasantness. The
             combination of CST plus sertraline may have the greatest
             promise in that, when compared to placebo alone, it not only
             significantly reduced pain but also pain catastrophizing and
             anxiety. Overall, these findings support the importance of
             further research on the effects of CST and sertraline for
             non-cardiac chest pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.040},
   Key = {fds273772}
}

@article{fds371073,
   Author = {Wren, AA and Somers, TJ and Wright, MA and Goetz, MC and Leary, MR and Fras, AM and Huh, BK and Rogers, LL and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {SELF-COMPASSION IN PATIENTS WHO ARE OBESE AND HAVE
             PERSISTENT MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN: RELATIONSHIP OF
             SELF-COMPASSION TO PAIN- AND WEIGHT-RELATED
             FACTORS},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {41},
   Pages = {S217-S217},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371073}
}

@article{fds371074,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Soo, MS and Skinner, CS and Stinnett, S and Luce, MF and Zuley, ML and Sumkin, JH and Bovbjerg,
             DH},
   Title = {PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SELF-REPORTED BREAST
             PAIN PRIOR TO ROUTINE MAMMOGRAPHY IN BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS
             AND WOMEN WITHOUT A HISTORY OF CANCER},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {41},
   Pages = {S160-S160},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371074}
}

@article{fds273716,
   Author = {Wren, AA and Wright, MA and Carson, JW and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Yoga for persistent pain: new findings and directions for an
             ancient practice.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {152},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {477-480},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21247696},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.017},
   Key = {fds273716}
}

@article{fds273790,
   Author = {Abernethy, AP and Wheeler, JL and Courtney, PK and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Supporting implementation of evidence-based behavioral
             interventions: the role of data liquidity in facilitating
             translational behavioral medicine.},
   Journal = {Transl Behav Med},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {45-52},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1869-6716},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0024-4},
   Abstract = {The advancement of translational behavioral medicine will
             require that we discover new methods of managing large
             volumes of data from disparate sources such as disease
             surveillance systems, public health systems, and health
             information systems containing patient-centered data
             informed by behavioral and social sciences. The term
             "liquidity," when applied to data, refers to its
             availability and free flow throughout human/computer
             interactions. In seeking to achieve liquidity, the focus is
             not on creating a single, comprehensive database or set of
             coordinated datasets, nor is it solely on developing the
             electronic health record as the "one-stop shopping" source
             of health-related data. Rather, attention is on ensuring the
             availability of secure data through the various methods of
             collecting and storing data currently existent or under
             development-so that these components of the health
             information infrastructure together support a liquid data
             system. The value of accessible, interoperable, high-volume,
             reliable, secure, and contextually appropriate data is
             becoming apparent in many areas of the healthcare system,
             and health information liquidity is currently viewed as an
             important component of a patient-centered healthcare system.
             The translation from research interventions to behavioral
             and psychosocial indicators challenges the designers of
             healthcare systems to include this new set of data in the
             correct context. With the intention of advancing
             translational behavioral medicine at the local level, "on
             the ground" in the clinical office and research institution,
             this commentary discusses data liquidity from the patient's
             and clinician's perspective, requirements for a liquid
             healthcare data system, and the ways in which data liquidity
             can support translational behavioral medicine.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s13142-011-0024-4},
   Key = {fds273790}
}

@article{fds273715,
   Author = {Prasertsri, N and Holden, J and Keefe, FJ and Wilkie,
             DJ},
   Title = {Repressive coping style: relationships with depression,
             pain, and pain coping strategies in lung cancer
             outpatients.},
   Journal = {Lung Cancer},
   Volume = {71},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {235-240},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0169-5002},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.05.009},
   Abstract = {Researchers have shown that coping style is related to pain
             and adjustment in people with chronic illness. This study
             was the first to examine how coping style related to pain,
             pain coping strategies, and depression in lung cancer
             outpatients. We conducted a comparative, secondary data
             analysis of 107 lung cancer patients (73% male, mean age
             61.4±10.43 years, 88% Caucasian). As in prior studies, we
             classified patients into four coping style groups based on
             Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and trait anxiety
             scores. The coping style groups were low-anxious (n=25);
             high-anxious (n=31); defensive high-anxious (n=21); and
             repressive (n=30). Compared to other coping style groups,
             the repressive group reported statistically significant
             lower mean scores for pain quality, pain catastrophizing,
             and depression. Assessing coping style by measuring personal
             characteristics such as social desirability and trait
             anxiety may help clinicians to identify vulnerable
             individuals with lung cancer who may be candidates for early
             and timely intervention efforts to enhance adjustment to
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.05.009},
   Key = {fds273715}
}

@article{fds273712,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Wren, AA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Understanding chronic pain in older adults: abdominal fat is
             where it is at.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {152},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {8-9},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20952130},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.022},
   Key = {fds273712}
}

@article{fds273713,
   Author = {Gremore, TM and Baucom, DH and Porter, LS and Kirby, JS and Atkins, DC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Stress buffering effects of daily spousal support on women's
             daily emotional and physical experiences in the context of
             breast cancer concerns.},
   Journal = {Health Psychol},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {20-30},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0278-6133},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021798},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether the relationship
             between daily spousal support and daily psychological and
             physical outcomes varied as a function of level of breast
             cancer related concern (stress buffering model). DESIGN:
             Ninety-five women with early stage breast cancer completed
             daily reports of emotional and physical experiences and
             satisfaction with spousal support for 30 days. Women also
             rated problems dealing with three types of cancer specific
             concerns: emotional, physical, and social. MAIN OUTCOME
             MEASURES: Women's positive and negative affect and cancer
             related pain and fatigue. RESULTS: Multilevel analyses
             supported a stress buffering effect for social concerns and
             a reverse stress buffering effect for emotional and physical
             concerns. CONCLUSION: Daily spousal support appears to be an
             important contributor to the daily emotional and physical
             wellbeing of women with breast cancer. Contrary to the
             tenets of the stress buffering model, these data suggest
             that the buffering effect of spousal support is attenuated
             when breast cancer related emotional and physical concerns
             reach high levels.},
   Doi = {10.1037/a0021798},
   Key = {fds273713}
}

@article{fds273714,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Garst, J and Baucom, DH and McBride, CM and McKee, DC and Sutton, L and Carson, K and Knowles, V and Rumble, M and Scipio, C},
   Title = {Caregiver-assisted coping skills training for lung cancer:
             results of a randomized clinical trial.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-13},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20832982},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in
             the United States and is associated with high levels of
             symptoms, including pain, fatigue, shortness of breath, and
             psychological distress. Caregivers and patients are
             adversely affected. However, previous studies of coping
             skills training (CST) interventions have not been tested in
             patients with lung cancer nor have systematically included
             caregivers. OBJECTIVES: This study tested the efficacy of a
             caregiver-assisted CST protocol in a sample of patients with
             lung cancer. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three lung cancer
             patients and their caregivers were randomly assigned to
             receive 14 telephone-based sessions of either
             caregiver-assisted CST or education/support involving the
             caregiver. Patients completed measures assessing pain,
             psychological distress, quality of life (QOL), and
             self-efficacy for symptom management; caregivers completed
             measures assessing psychological distress, caregiver strain,
             and self-efficacy for helping the patient manage symptoms.
             RESULTS: Patients in both treatment conditions showed
             improvements in pain, depression, QOL, and self-efficacy,
             and caregivers in both conditions showed improvements in
             anxiety and self-efficacy from baseline to four-month
             follow-up. Results of exploratory analyses suggested that
             the CST intervention was more beneficial to
             patients/caregivers with Stage II and III cancers, whereas
             the education/support intervention was more beneficial to
             patients/caregivers with Stage I cancer. CONCLUSION: Taken
             together with the broader literature in this area, results
             from this study suggest that psychosocial interventions can
             lead to improvements in a range of outcomes for cancer
             patients. Suggestions for future studies include the use of
             three-group designs (e.g., comparing two active
             interventions with a standard-care control) and examining
             mechanisms of change.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.014},
   Key = {fds273714}
}

@article{fds273722,
   Author = {Naylor, MR and Krauthamer, GM and Naud, S and Keefe, FJ and Helzer,
             JE},
   Title = {Predictive relationships between chronic pain and negative
             emotions: a 4-month daily process study using Therapeutic
             Interactive Voice Response (TIVR).},
   Journal = {Compr Psychiatry},
   Volume = {52},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {731-736},
   Year = {2011},
   ISSN = {0010-440X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.11.008},
   Abstract = {This article examines temporal relationships between
             negative emotions and pain in a cohort of 33 patients with
             chronic musculoskeletal pain enrolled in a telephone-based
             relapse prevention program (Therapeutic Interactive Voice
             Response [TIVR]), after 11 weeks of group cognitive
             behavioral therapy (CBT). Patients were asked to make daily
             reports to the TIVR system for 4 months after CBT. Patients'
             daily reports were analyzed with path analysis to examine
             temporal relationships between 3 emotion variables (anger,
             sadness, and stress) and 2 pain variables (pain and pain
             control). As expected, same-day correlations were
             significant between emotion variables and both pain and pain
             control. The lagged associations revealed unidirectional
             relationships between pain and next-day emotions: increased
             pain predicted higher reports of sadness the following day
             (P < .05). Conversely, increased pain control predicted
             decreased sadness and anger the following day (P < .05).
             Unlike some previous studies, this study did not reveal that
             an increase of negative emotions predicted increased
             next-day pain. We speculate that CBT treatment followed by
             the relapse prevention program teaches patients how to
             modulate negative emotions such that they no longer have a
             negative impact on next-day pain perception. The clinical
             implications of our findings are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.11.008},
   Key = {fds273722}
}

@article{fds273620,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Chronic pain and adherence},
   Pages = {179-214},
   Publisher = {Springer New York},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5866-2_8},
   Abstract = {Chronic pain of non-malignant etiology is a significant
             problem. Chronic non-malignant pain is typically defined as
             pain that persists for 3 months or longer and that is
             non-life threatening [1, 2]. Among the most common chronic
             pain conditions are chronic back pain, migraine headaches,
             and tension headaches. Chronic pain is very common. In the
             United States, 17% of patients seen in primary care report
             chronic pain [3], and chronic pain accounts for almost 80%
             of all physician visits [4]. A review of 15 epidemiologic
             studies found that the prevalence of chronic pain ranges
             from 2 to 40% in the adult population, with a median point
             prevalence of 15% [5]. The personal and economic costs of
             chronic pain are substantial. A study of primary care
             patients found that 13% of headache patients and 18% of back
             pain patients were unable to maintain full-time work over a
             3-year period due to pain [6]. Chronic pain is often
             accompanied by substantial decreases in physical
             functioning, disruption of social and family roles, and
             psychological distress [4]. © 2010 Springer
             Science+Business Media, LLC.},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-1-4419-5866-2_8},
   Key = {fds273620}
}

@article{fds273710,
   Author = {Naylor, MR and Naud, S and Keefe, FJ and Helzer, JE},
   Title = {Therapeutic Interactive Voice Response (TIVR) to reduce
             analgesic medication use for chronic pain
             management.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1410-1419},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.03.019},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: This paper examines whether a telephone-based,
             automated maintenance enhancement program can help to reduce
             opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflamatory drugs (NSAID)
             analgesic use in patients with chronic pain. Following 11
             weeks of group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), 51
             subjects with chronic musculoskeletal pain were randomized
             to 1 of 2 study groups. Twenty-six subjects participated in
             4 months of a Therapeutic Interactive Voice Response (TIVR)
             program in addition to standard follow-up care, while a
             control group of 25 subjects received standard follow-up
             care only. TIVR is an automated, telephone-based tool
             developed for the maintenance and enhancement of CBT skills.
             Opioid analgesic use decreased in the experimental group in
             both follow-ups: 4 and 8 months postCBT. In addition, at
             8-month follow-up, 21% of the TIVR subjects had discontinued
             the use of opioid analgesics, 23% had discontinued NSAIDS,
             and 10% had discontinued antidepressant medications. In
             contrast, the control group showed increases in opioid and
             NSAIDS use. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed
             significant between-group differences in opioid analgesic
             use at 8-month follow up (P = .004). We have previously
             demonstrated the efficacy of TIVR to decrease pain and
             improve coping; this analysis demonstrates that the use of
             TIVR may also result in concurrent reductions in opioid
             analgesic and NSAID medications use. PERSPECTIVE: This
             article demonstrates that the Therapeutic Interactive Voice
             Response maintenance enhancement program can help to reduce
             opioid analgesic use in patients with chronic pain. This
             automated maintenance enhancement program could potentially
             assist patients not only to decrease pain and improve
             coping, but also to diminish the likelihood of opioid
             dependence.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2010.03.019},
   Key = {fds273710}
}

@article{fds273709,
   Author = {Riddle, DL and Johnson, RE and Jensen, MP and Keefe, FJ and Kroenke, K and Bair, MJ and Ang, DC},
   Title = {The Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary
             (PRECIS) instrument was useful for refining a randomized
             trial design: experiences from an investigative
             team.},
   Journal = {J Clin Epidemiol},
   Volume = {63},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1271-1275},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0895-4356},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.006},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: A recently published instrument (PRECIS) was
             designed to assist investigative teams in understanding the
             various design decisions that need to be made regarding
             pragmatic vs. explanatory trials. Our team used this
             instrument during an investigators' meeting to organize our
             discussion regarding the design of a planned trial and to
             determine the extent of consensus among the study
             investigators. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was
             descriptive in nature and occurred during an investigator
             meeting. After reading and reviewing the 10 PRECIS criteria,
             the team made quantitative judgments of the planned study
             regarding each PRECIS criteria to reflect initial, ideal,
             and final study design perceptions. RESULTS: Data indicated
             that the final study design was more explanatory in nature
             than the preliminary plan. Evidence of consensus was
             obtained. CONCLUSION: The investigative team found that
             applying PRECIS principles were useful for (1) detailing
             points of discussion related to trial design, (2) making
             revisions to the design to be consistent with the project
             goals, and (3) achieving consensus. We believe our
             experiences with PRECIS may prove valuable for trial
             researchers in much the same way that case reports can
             provide valuable insights for clinicians.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.006},
   Key = {fds273709}
}

@article{fds273711,
   Author = {Rumble, ME and Keefe, FJ and Edinger, JD and Affleck, G and Marcom, PK and Shaw, HS},
   Title = {Contribution of cancer symptoms, dysfunctional sleep related
             thoughts, and sleep inhibitory behaviors to the insomnia
             process in breast cancer survivors: a daily process
             analysis.},
   Journal = {Sleep},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1501-1509},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0161-8105},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21102992},
   Abstract = {STUDY OBJECTIVES: using a comprehensive cognitive-behavioral
             model of insomnia and a daily process approach, this study
             was conducted to examine the contribution of cancer symptoms
             and dysfunctional sleep related thoughts and behaviors to
             the process of insomnia in breast cancer survivors. DESIGN:
             within-group longitudinal research design. SETTING: an
             academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 41 women with breast
             cancer who had completed their primary cancer treatment and
             met Research Diagnostic Criteria for primary insomnia or
             insomnia comorbid with breast cancer. INTERVENTIONS: NA.
             MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: for 28 days, participants
             completed morning diaries assessing sleep, nighttime pain
             and hot flashes, and dysfunctional sleep related thoughts
             and behaviors during the day and night, and evening diaries
             assessing daytime pain, fatigue, hot flashes, and mood. All
             diaries were collected using an automated telephone-based
             system. Results revealed that poorer sleep was related to
             nighttime pain and hot flashes in breast cancer patients.
             Time-lagged effects were also found. The current study
             identified higher levels of dysfunctional sleep related
             thoughts and sleep inhibitory behaviors during the day and
             night as antecedents of insomnia, and higher levels of pain,
             fatigue, and hot flashes and lower levels of positive mood
             and dysfunctional sleep related thoughts as consequences of
             insomnia in this population. CONCLUSIONS: the current study
             found support for a comprehensive cognitive-behavioral model
             of insomnia, which has several theoretical, practice, and
             research implications.},
   Doi = {10.1093/sleep/33.11.1501},
   Key = {fds273711}
}

@article{fds273707,
   Author = {Reese, JB and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Mosley-Williams, A and Lumley, MA},
   Title = {Pain and functioning of rheumatoid arthritis patients based
             on marital status: is a distressed marriage preferable to no
             marriage?},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {958-964},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.01.003},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: Relationships may influence adjustment to
             chronic pain conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
             We examined how both marital status and marital adjustment
             were related to pain, physical disability, and psychological
             disability in 255 adults with RA. Among married participants
             (n = 158), better marital adjustment (assessed using the
             Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Scale) was correlated with
             less pain and physical and psychological disability (all P
             values < .05). Married participants were divided into
             distressed (n = 44) and nondistressed (n = 114) subgroups
             and compared with unmarried participants (n = 97).
             Controlling for demographics and disease severity, unmarried
             participants had higher affective pain (P = .009) and higher
             psychological disability (P = .02) than only the
             nondistressed married participants, but unmarried
             participants did not differ from distressed married
             participants. These findings suggest that being married in
             itself is not associated with better health in RA but that
             being in a well-adjusted or nondistressed marriage is linked
             with less pain and better functioning. PERSPECTIVE: This
             study examined relationships of marital status and marital
             adjustment to pain and physical and psychological disability
             in RA. Findings underscore the importance of considering not
             only marital status but also degree of marital adjustment in
             RA and may inform clinical interventions in this
             population.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2010.01.003},
   Key = {fds273707}
}

@article{fds273708,
   Author = {Kilts, JD and Tupler, LA and Keefe, FJ and Payne, VM and Hamer, RM and Naylor, JC and Calnaido, RP and Morey, RA and Strauss, JL and Parke, G and Massing, MW and Youssef, NA and Shampine, LJ and tVeterans Affairs
             Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness and Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup, and Marx, CE},
   Title = {Neurosteroids and self-reported pain in veterans who served
             in the U.S. Military after September 11,
             2001.},
   Journal = {Pain Med},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1469-1476},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20735755},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Nearly half of Operation Enduring
             Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans experience
             continued pain post-deployment. Several investigations
             report analgesic effects of allopregnanolone and other
             neurosteroids in animal models, but few data are currently
             available focusing on neurosteroids in clinical populations.
             Allopregnanolone positively modulates GABA(A) receptors and
             demonstrates pronounced analgesic and anxiolytic effects in
             rodents, yet studies examining the relationship between pain
             and allopregnanolone in humans are limited. We thus
             hypothesized that endogenous allopregnanolone and other
             neurosteroid levels may be negatively correlated with
             self-reported pain symptoms in humans. DESIGN: We determined
             serum neurosteroid levels by gas chromatography/mass
             spectrometry (allopregnanolone, pregnenolone) or
             radioimmunoassay (dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA],
             progesterone, DHEA sulfate [DHEAS]) in 90 male veterans who
             served in the U.S. military after September 11, 2001.
             Self-reported pain symptoms were assessed in four areas (low
             back pain, chest pain, muscle soreness, headache). Stepwise
             linear regression analyses were conducted to investigate the
             relationship between pain assessments and neurosteroids,
             with the inclusion of smoking, alcohol use, age, and history
             of traumatic brain injury as covariates. SETTING: Durham VA
             Medical Center. RESULTS: Allopregnanolone levels were
             inversely associated with low back pain (P=0.044) and chest
             pain (P=0.013), and DHEA levels were inversely associated
             with muscle soreness (P=0.024). DHEAS levels were positively
             associated with chest pain (P=0.001). Additionally, there
             was a positive association between traumatic brain injury
             and muscle soreness (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Neurosteroids
             may be relevant to the pathophysiology of self-reported pain
             symptoms in this veteran cohort, and could represent future
             pharmacological targets for pain disorders.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00927.x},
   Key = {fds273708}
}

@article{fds273753,
   Author = {Flynn, KE and Shelby, RA and Mitchell, SA and Fawzy, MR and Hardy, NC and Husain, AM and Keefe, FJ and Krystal, AD and Porter, LS and Reeve, BB and Weinfurt, KP},
   Title = {Sleep-wake functioning along the cancer continuum: focus
             group results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement
             Information System (PROMIS(®)).},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1086-1093},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20013938},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Cancer and its treatments disturb sleep-wake
             functioning; however, there is little information available
             on the characteristics and consequences of sleep problems
             associated with cancer. As part of an effort to improve
             measurement of sleep-wake functioning, we explored the scope
             of difficulties with sleep in a diverse group of patients
             diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: We conducted 10 focus groups
             with patients recruited from the Duke University tumor
             registry and oncology/hematology clinics. Separate groups
             were held with patients scheduled to begin or currently
             undergoing treatment for breast, prostate, lung, colorectal,
             hematological, and other cancer types and with patients who
             were in posttreatment follow-up. The content of the focus
             group discussions was transcribed and analyzed for major
             themes by independent coders. RESULTS: Participants not only
             reported causes of sleep disturbance common in other
             populations, such as pain and restless legs, but they also
             reported causes that may be unique to cancer populations,
             including abnormal dreams, anxiety about cancer diagnosis
             and recurrence, night sweats, and problems with sleep
             positioning. Many participants felt that sleep problems
             reduced their productivity, concentration, social
             interactions, and overall quality of life. Many also shared
             beliefs about the increased importance of sleep when
             fighting cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the
             need for interventions that minimize the negative impact of
             cancer and its treatments on sleep. This study will inform
             efforts now underway to develop a patient-reported measure
             of sleep-wake functioning that reflects the breadth of
             concepts considered important by patients with
             cancer.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.1664},
   Key = {fds273753}
}

@article{fds372581,
   Author = {Riddle, DL and Keefe, FJ and Nay, WT and McKee, D and Attarian, DE and Jensen, MP},
   Title = {495 PAIN COPING SKILLS TRAINING FOR PATIENTS WITH ELEVATED
             PAIN CATASTROPHIZING WHO ARE SCHEDULED FOR KNEE
             ARTHROPLASTY: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis and Cartilage},
   Volume = {18},
   Pages = {S222-S223},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1063-4584(10)60522-5},
   Doi = {10.1016/s1063-4584(10)60522-5},
   Key = {fds372581}
}

@article{fds273789,
   Author = {Reese, JB and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Porter, LS and Abernethy,
             AP},
   Title = {Sexual concerns in cancer patients: a comparison of GI and
             breast cancer patients.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1179-1189},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19777269},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: Although sexual concerns have been examined in
             breast cancer (BC), these concerns remain understudied and
             undertreated for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.
             Objectives were to: (1) assess sexual concerns in GI cancer
             patients compared with breast cancer patients; (2) examine
             whether sexual concerns are stable over time in GI and
             breast cancer patients; and (3) evaluate whether sexual
             concerns in GI and breast cancer are significantly
             associated with quality of life, symptom severity, and
             disease interference, and whether these associations change
             over time. METHODS: Data were collected from GI and breast
             cancer patients during four outpatient clinic visits over 6
             months. Measures included sexual concerns (reduced sexual
             enjoyment, interest, or performance), quality of life
             (FACT-G), symptom severity, disease interference (MD
             Anderson Symptom Inventory), and disease-related distress
             (NCCN Distress Scale). Linear mixed model analyses were
             conducted. RESULTS: Sexual concerns were common in both
             samples, with 57% of GI cancer patients and 53% of breast
             cancer patients reporting at least mild sexual concerns.
             Sexual concerns were stable over time and were significantly
             associated with lower levels of functioning in multiple
             domains (e.g., quality of life, symptom severity, disease
             interference, and disease-related distress), irrespective of
             length of time since diagnosis. Cancer type (GI/breast
             cancer) was not a moderator of this relationship.
             CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported sexual concerns were common,
             stable, and related significantly to quality of life,
             symptom severity, disease interference, and disease-related
             distress for both GI and breast cancer patients. Limitations
             and implications for future research are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-009-0738-8},
   Key = {fds273789}
}

@article{fds273706,
   Author = {Berendes, D and Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ and Kothadia, SM and Porter,
             LS and Cheavens, JS},
   Title = {Hope in the context of lung cancer: relationships of hope to
             symptoms and psychological distress.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {174-182},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579840},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: Hope may be important in explaining the variability
             in how patients adjust to lung cancer. OBJECTIVES: The aim
             of this study was to examine how hope, as conceptualized by
             Snyder et al., is associated with multiple indices of
             adjustment to lung cancer. This theoretical model of hope
             suggests that people with high levels of hope are able to
             think about the pathways to goals (pathways) and feel
             confident that they can pursue those pathways to reach their
             goals (agency). METHODS: We hypothesized that higher levels
             of hope, as measured by Snyder et al.'s hope scale, would be
             related to lower levels of pain and other lung cancer
             symptoms (i.e., fatigue and cough) and lower psychological
             distress (i.e., depression). Participants in this study
             included patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer (n=51).
             All participants provided demographic and medical
             information and completed measures of hope, lung cancer
             symptoms, and psychological distress. RESULTS: Data analyses
             found that hope was inversely associated with major symptoms
             of cancer (i.e., pain, fatigue, and cough) and psychological
             distress (i.e., depression), even after accounting for
             important demographic and medical variables (i.e., age and
             cancer stage). CONCLUSION: The findings of this
             cross-sectional study highlight the potential importance of
             hope in understanding adjustment to lung cancer. Future
             longitudinal research could help reveal how hope and
             adjustment interact over the course of cancer
             survivorship.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.014},
   Key = {fds273706}
}

@article{fds371076,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Bovbjerg, DH and Skinner, CS and Somers,
             TJ and Soo, MS and Red, S and Stinnett, S and Luce, MF and Sumkin,
             J},
   Title = {PERCEIVED RISK OF BREAST CANCER, BELIEFS ABOUT MAMMOGRAPHY,
             AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS IN BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS AND
             HEALTHY WOMEN AT THE TIME OF MAMMOGRAPHY},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {SUPPL 1},
   Pages = {278-278},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {August},
   Key = {fds371076}
}

@article{fds371077,
   Author = {Red, SN and Shelby, RA and Kimmick, GG and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {SYMPTOM COMMUNICATION IN BREAST CANCER: RELATIONSHIPS OF
             HOLDING BACK AND SELF EFFICACY FOR COMMUNICATION TO SYMPTOMS
             AND ADJUSTMENT},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {17},
   Pages = {27-27},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {August},
   Key = {fds371077}
}

@article{fds376460,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Bovbjerg, DH and Skinner, CS and Somers,
             TJ and Soo, MS and Red, S and Stinnett, S and Luce, MF and Sumkin,
             J},
   Title = {PERCEIVED RISK OF BREAST CANCER, BELIEFS ABOUT MAMMOGRAPHY,
             AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS IN BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS AND
             HEALTHY WOMEN AT THE TIME OF MAMMOGRAPHY},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {SUPPL 1},
   Pages = {278-278},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {August},
   Key = {fds376460}
}

@article{fds371075,
   Author = {Red, SN and Shelby, RA and Kimmick, GG and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {SYMPTOM COMMUNICATION IN BREAST CANCER: RELATIONSHIPS OF
             HOLDING BACK AND SELF EFFICACY FOR COMMUNICATION TO SYMPTOMS
             AND ADJUSTMENT},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {SUPPL 1},
   Pages = {27-27},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {August},
   Key = {fds371075}
}

@article{fds372582,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {PAIN COPING IN OSTEOARTHRITIS: CURRENT STATE OF THE
             SCIENCE},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {17},
   Pages = {123-124},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {August},
   Key = {fds372582}
}

@article{fds372583,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {PAIN COPING IN OSTEOARTHRITIS: CURRENT STATE OF THE
             SCIENCE},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {SUPPL 1},
   Pages = {123-124},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {August},
   Key = {fds372583}
}

@article{fds273705,
   Author = {Amtmann, D and Cook, KF and Jensen, MP and Chen, W-H and Choi, S and Revicki, D and Cella, D and Rothrock, N and Keefe, F and Callahan, L and Lai, J-S},
   Title = {Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain
             interference.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {150},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {173-182},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025},
   Abstract = {This paper describes the psychometric properties of the
             PROMIS-pain interference (PROMIS-PI) bank. An initial
             candidate item pool (n=644) was developed and evaluated
             based on the review of existing instruments, interviews with
             patients, and consultation with pain experts. From this
             pool, a candidate item bank of 56 items was selected and
             responses to the items were collected from large community
             and clinical samples. A total of 14,848 participants
             responded to all or a subset of candidate items. The
             responses were calibrated using an item response theory
             (IRT) model. A final 41-item bank was evaluated with respect
             to IRT assumptions, model fit, differential item function
             (DIF), precision, and construct and concurrent validity.
             Items of the revised bank had good fit to the IRT model (CFI
             and NNFI/TLI ranged from 0.974 to 0.997), and the data were
             strongly unidimensional (e.g., ratio of first and second
             eigenvalue=35). Nine items exhibited statistically
             significant DIF. However, adjusting for DIF had little
             practical impact on score estimates and the items were
             retained without modifying scoring. Scores provided
             substantial information across levels of pain; for scores in
             the T-score range 50-80, the reliability was equivalent to
             0.96-0.99. Patterns of correlations with other health
             outcomes supported the construct validity of the item bank.
             The scores discriminated among persons with different
             numbers of chronic conditions, disabling conditions, levels
             of self-reported health, and pain intensity (p<0.0001). The
             results indicated that the PROMIS-PI items constitute a
             psychometrically sound bank. Computerized adaptive testing
             and short forms are available.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025},
   Key = {fds273705}
}

@article{fds273788,
   Author = {Reese, JB and Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ and Abernethy,
             AP},
   Title = {Coping with sexual concerns after cancer: the use of
             flexible coping.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {785-800},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165890},
   Abstract = {INTRODUCTION: Although cancer treatment commonly has a
             negative impact on sexual functioning, sexual concerns are
             still largely undertreated in routine cancer care. The
             medical model that guides current approaches to sexual care
             in cancer does not adequately address key patient needs.
             METHODS: In this paper, we describe a broader approach to
             understanding and treating sexual concerns in cancer that
             focuses on the construct of flexibility in behavioral and
             cognitive coping strategies. We previously presented this
             model in the context of general medical conditions. We now
             adapt this model to the context of cancer, focusing on
             issues related to the benefits of flexible coping,
             interventions that shift perspectives following cancer, and
             on coping as a couple. RESULTS: We argue that coping
             flexibly with sexual concerns is likely to lead to
             improvements in mood and sexual and relationship
             satisfaction. We present clinical applications of the
             flexible coping model, including suggestions for assessment
             and sexual concerns and methods of introducing flexible
             coping into both the content and process of clinical
             interactions with patients. DISCUSSION: Finally, we discuss
             areas for future research, including the development of a
             validated instrument, the use of electronic methods of
             assessment, and intervention trials directly addressing
             flexibility in coping.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-010-0819-8},
   Key = {fds273788}
}

@article{fds273766,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Godiwala, N and Lumley, MA and Mosley-Williams, A and Rice, JR and Caldwell, D},
   Title = {Disease severity and domain-specific arthritis
             self-efficacy: relationships to pain and functioning in
             patients with rheumatoid arthritis.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)},
   Volume = {62},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {848-856},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20535796},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which disease severity
             and domains of self-efficacy (pain, function, and other
             symptoms) explain pain and functioning in rheumatoid
             arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Patients (n = 263)
             completed the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 to
             assess pain and functioning (physical, affective, and
             social), the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale to assess 3
             self-efficacy domains (pain, physical function, and other).
             Disease severity was assessed with C-reactive protein level,
             physician's rating, and abnormal joint count. Structural
             equation modeling was used to examine 3 hypotheses: does
             disease severity have a direct relationship with pain and
             each area of functioning, does disease severity have a
             direct relationship with each arthritis self-efficacy
             domain, and do the self-efficacy domains mediate the
             relationship between disease severity and RA pain and each
             area of functioning. RESULTS: Disease severity was related
             to pain, physical functioning, and each self-efficacy domain
             (beta = 0.28-0.56, P < 0.001). Each self-efficacy domain was
             related to its respective domain of functioning (e.g.,
             self-efficacy for pain was related to pain; beta =
             0.36-0.54, P < 0.001). Self-efficacy mediated the
             relationship between disease severity and pain and
             functioning (beta = 0.12-0.19, P < 0.001). Self-efficacy for
             pain control and to perform functional tasks accounted for
             32-42% of disease severity's total effect on their
             respective outcomes (e.g., self-efficacy for pain control
             accounted for 32% of disease severity's total effect on
             pain). Variance accounted for by the total model was 52% for
             pain, 53% for physical functioning, and 44% for affective
             and social functioning. CONCLUSION: Disease severity and
             self-efficacy both impact RA functioning, and intervening in
             these areas may lead to better outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1002/acr.20127},
   Key = {fds273766}
}

@article{fds273783,
   Author = {Allen, KD and Coffman, CJ and Golightly, YM and Stechuchak, KM and Voils, CI and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Comparison of pain measures among patients with
             osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {522-527},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20096640},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: This study compared recalled average pain,
             assessed at the end of the day, with the average of
             real-time pain ratings recorded throughout the day among
             patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Participants (N = 157)
             with hand, hip, or knee OA completed electronic pain diaries
             on 1 weekend day and 1 weekday. Diaries included at least 7
             pain ratings per day, immediately after waking and every 2
             hours following, using a visual analog scale (VAS) scored as
             1 to 100 (scores not seen by participants). At the end of
             each diary day, participants rated their average pain that
             day on the same VAS. Pearson correlations examined
             associations between recalled average pain and the average
             of real-time pain ratings that day. Mixed models, including
             interaction terms, examined whether associations between
             recalled and actual average pain ratings differed according
             to the following patient characteristics: joint site, age,
             race, gender, study enrollment site, and pain
             catastrophizing. Correlations between recalled and actual
             average pain ratings were r = .88 for weekdays and r = .86
             for weekends (P < .0001). In mixed models, there were no
             significant interaction terms for any patient
             characteristics. In summary, patients with OA accurately
             recalled their average pain over a 1-day period, and this
             did not differ according to any patient characteristics
             examined. PERSPECTIVE: This study showed that patients with
             OA accurately recalled their average pain over a single-day
             period, and this did not differ according to patient
             characteristics. Results of this study indicate that
             end-of-day recall is a practical and valid method for
             assessing patients' average pain during a
             day.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2009.09.007},
   Key = {fds273783}
}

@article{fds273703,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Shelby, RA and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Catastrophizing and pain coping: moving forward.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {149},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {165-166},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20211526},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.030},
   Key = {fds273703}
}

@article{fds273630,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ and Abernethy, A},
   Title = {Psychologic Interventions for Cancer Pain},
   Pages = {337-347},
   Publisher = {JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444314380.ch26},
   Doi = {10.1002/9781444314380.ch26},
   Key = {fds273630}
}

@article{fds273704,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ},
   Title = {Psychological approaches to understanding and treating
             arthritis pain.},
   Journal = {Nat Rev Rheumatol},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {210-216},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20357790},
   Abstract = {Arthritis pain has traditionally been evaluated from a
             biomedical perspective, but there is increasing evidence
             that psychological factors have an important role in
             patients' adjustment to arthritis pain. The evolution of
             pain theories has led to the development of models, such as
             the cognitive-behavioral model, which recognize the
             potential involvement of psychological factors in pain.
             Emotional, cognitive, behavioral and social context
             variables are useful in understanding pain in patients with
             arthritis, and have led to the development of psychological
             approaches for treating arthritis pain. These include pain
             coping skills training, interventions that include patients'
             partners, and emotional disclosure strategies.},
   Doi = {10.1038/nrrheum.2010.22},
   Key = {fds273704}
}

@article{fds371078,
   Author = {Reese, JB and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Mosley-Williams, A and Lumley, MA},
   Title = {PAIN IN SOCIAL CONTEXT: PAIN AND FUNCTIONING OF RHEUMATOID
             ARTHRITIS PATIENTS BASED ON MARITAL STATUS AND MARITAL
             ADJUSTMENT},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {39},
   Pages = {150-150},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds371078}
}

@article{fds372584,
   Author = {Cheatle, M and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {"PAIN MANAGEMENT IN THE PRIMARY CARE SETTING: AN OPPORTUNITY
             FOR BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE"},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {39},
   Pages = {117-117},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372584}
}

@article{fds372585,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {PAIN MANAGEMENT IN THE PRIMARY CARE SETTING: AN OPPORTUNITY
             FOR BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE-DISCUSSANT},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {39},
   Pages = {118-118},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds372585}
}

@article{fds273782,
   Author = {Allen, KD and Oddone, EZ and Coffman, CJ and Keefe, FJ and Lindquist,
             JH and Bosworth, HB},
   Title = {Racial differences in osteoarthritis pain and function:
             potential explanatory factors.},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis Cartilage},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {160-167},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19825498},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This study examined factors underlying racial
             differences in pain and function among patients with hip
             and/or knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Participants were
             n=491 African Americans and Caucasians enrolled in a
             clinical trial of telephone-based OA self-management.
             Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales-2 (AIMS2) pain and
             function subscales were obtained at baseline. Potential
             explanatory variables included arthritis self-efficacy,
             AIMS2 affect subscale, problem- and emotion-focused pain
             coping, demographic characteristics, body mass index,
             self-reported health, joint(s) with OA, symptom duration,
             pain medication use, current exercise, and AIMS2 pain
             subscale (in models of function). Variables associated with
             both race and pain or function, and which reduced the
             association of race with pain or function by >or=10%, were
             included in final multivariable models. RESULTS: In simple
             linear regression models, African Americans had worse scores
             than Caucasians on AIMS2 pain (B=0.65, P=0.001) and function
             (B=0.59, P<0.001) subscales. In multivariable models race
             was no longer associated with pain (B=0.03, P=0.874) or
             function (B=0.07, P=0.509), indicating these associations
             were accounted for by other covariates. Variables associated
             with worse AIMS2 pain and function were: worse AIMS2 affect
             scores, greater emotion-focused coping, lower arthritis
             self-efficacy, and fair or poor self-reported health. AIMS2
             pain scores were also significantly associated with AIMS2
             function. CONCLUSION: Factors explaining racial differences
             in pain and function were largely psychological, including
             arthritis self-efficacy, affect, and use of emotion-focused
             coping. Self-management and psychological interventions can
             influence these factors, and greater dissemination among
             African Americans may be a key step toward reducing racial
             disparities in pain and function.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2009.09.010},
   Key = {fds273782}
}

@article{fds273701,
   Author = {Junghaenel, DU and Keefe, FJ and Broderick, JE},
   Title = {Multi-modal examination of psychological and interpersonal
             distinctions among MPI coping clusters: a preliminary
             study.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {87-96},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.006},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: The Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) is a
             widely used instrument to characterize distinct psychosocial
             subgroups of patients with chronic pain: Adaptive (AC),
             Dysfunctional (DYS), and Interpersonally Distressed (ID). To
             date, several questions remain about the validity and
             distinctiveness of the patient clusters, and continued
             scientific attention has strongly been recommended. It is
             unclear if AC patients experience better adjustment or
             merely present themselves favorably. Moreover, differences
             in psychological distress and interpersonal relations
             between DYS and ID patients are equivocal. The present study
             is the first to utilize comprehensive informant ratings to
             extend prior validity research on the MPI. We employed a
             multimodal methodology consisting of patient self-report,
             parallel informant ratings, and behavioral measures.
             Ninety-nine patients with chronic pain, their partners, and
             providers participated. They completed measures of patients'
             psychological distress and social relations. We also
             systematically observed patients' pain behavior. Results
             provided strong support for the validity of the AC cluster
             in that patients' positive adaptation was reliably
             corroborated by informants. The differentiating
             characteristics between the 2 maladaptive clusters, however,
             remain elusive. We found evidence that DYS patients'
             distress appeared to be illness specific rather than
             generalized; however, both clusters were equally associated
             with social distress and partner/caregiver burden.
             PERSPECTIVE: An adaptive style of coping with chronic pain
             is reliably recognized by patients' partners and healthcare
             providers. Differences between a dysfunctional and an
             interpersonally distressed coping style, however, remain
             unclear. Patients with a dysfunctional style appear more
             distressed by their illness but both styles are
             characterized by social difficulties.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.006},
   Key = {fds273701}
}

@article{fds273702,
   Author = {Cassileth, BR and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Integrative and behavioral approaches to the treatment of
             cancer-related neuropathic pain.},
   Journal = {Oncologist},
   Volume = {15 Suppl 2},
   Pages = {19-23},
   Year = {2010},
   ISSN = {1549-490X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-S504},
   Abstract = {Integrative oncology is the synthesis of mainstream cancer
             care and evidence-based complementary therapies.
             Complementary strategies include massage therapies,
             acupuncture, fitness, and mind-body techniques, which take
             advantage of the reciprocal relationship between the mind
             and body. Neuropathic pain--and pain more generally--is part
             of a complex process involving the whole physical and
             psychosocial being, therefore requiring an integrative
             management approach. Several studies have demonstrated, for
             example, that social context plays an important role in the
             perception of pain and that a patient's coping strategies
             can influence the persistence of pain. In this article, we
             briefly describe research illustrating the promise of
             integrative approaches for the treatment of cancer-related
             neuropathic pain.},
   Doi = {10.1634/theoncologist.2009-S504},
   Key = {fds273702}
}

@article{fds273619,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Porter, L},
   Title = {Understanding and enhancing patient and partner adjustment
             to disease-related pain: A biopsychosocial
             perspective},
   Pages = {95-124},
   Publisher = {Springer New York},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78323-9_6},
   Abstract = {Persistent, disease-related pain is a challenge not only for
             patients who experience it, but also for their loved ones.
             There is growing interest in involving partners and
             caregivers in pain management efforts. The purpose of this
             chapter is to discuss factors that influence patient and
             partner adjustment to diseaserelated pain within a
             biopsychosocial framework and provide an overview of
             biopsychosocial approaches involving partners in pain
             management. The chapter is divided into three sections. In
             the first section, we present a biopsychosocial model that
             can be used to understand how patients and their partners
             adjust to disease-related pain. In the second section, we
             discuss factors that influence patient and partner
             adjustment to both arthritis pain and cancer pain and how
             these factors are influenced by patient and partner pain
             management interventions. Finally, we highlight important
             future directions for clinical and research efforts in this
             area.},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-78323-9_6},
   Key = {fds273619}
}

@article{fds273700,
   Author = {Lai, Y-H and Guo, S-L and Keefe, FJ and Tsai, L-Y and Shun, S-C and Liao,
             Y-C and Li, I-F and Liu, C-P and Lee, Y-H},
   Title = {Multidimensional Pain Inventory-Screening Chinese version
             (MPI-sC): psychometric testing in terminal cancer patients
             in Taiwan.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1445-1453},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0941-4355},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0597-3},
   Abstract = {INTRODUCTION: Cancer pain is identified as a
             multidimensional experience, but relatively few brief
             instruments are available for assessing the complex
             pain-related experiences of terminal cancer patients in
             Taiwan. The purposes of this study were to (1) translate and
             examine the feasibility and psychometric characteristics of
             the eight-item Multidimensional Pain Inventory-Screening
             Chinese (MPI-sC) when used with patients having terminal
             cancer and (2) apply the MPI-sC to examine multidimensional
             pain-related experiences of terminal cancer patients in
             Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MPI-sC was tested in 106
             terminal cancer inpatients at a hospice setting in Taipei.
             RESULTS: The results showed that the MPI-sC has satisfactory
             face and content validity, feasibility, acceptable internal
             consistency reliability (overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.75),
             and overall support of theoretical assumptions. However,
             instead of the four-factor structure of the original
             instrument, we found a three-factor structure (with pain
             intensity and pain interference merged into one factor) that
             explained 76.73% of the variance. Close to half the patients
             (48.1%) had considerable levels of pain interference, and a
             majority (72.6%) reported not having control in life based
             on the cut-point of MPI-sC categorization. CONCLUSION: Our
             results support the brief MPI-sC as a feasible and valid
             tool for assessing and representing multidimensional pain
             experiences in terminal cancer patients. The MPI-sC could
             help clinicians and researchers assess the complex
             multidimensional pain experiences of terminal cancer
             patients, including Chinese-speaking cancer
             populations.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-009-0597-3},
   Key = {fds273700}
}

@article{fds273746,
   Author = {Sims, EL and Keefe, FJ and Kraus, VB and Guilak, F and Queen, RM and Schmitt, D},
   Title = {Racial differences in gait mechanics associated with knee
             osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Aging Clin Exp Res},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {463-469},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1594-0667},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20154517},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study examines racial differences
             in gait mechanics in persons with knee osteoarthritis and
             the influence of anthropometrics, educational level,
             radiographic disease severity (rOA), and self-report
             measures of pain and disability on racial differences in
             gait. METHODS: One hundred seventy five (64 black and 111
             white) adults with radiographic knee OA were tested. 3-D
             kinematic and kinetic data were collected while subjects
             walked at two self-selected speeds (normal and fast).
             Anthropometric data, radiographic level of OA, and
             self-report measures of pain and disability were also
             collected. Gait patterns were compared across groups and
             within groups. RESULTS: Black and white subjects did not
             differ significantly in radiographic OA. However, blacks
             walked significantly more slowly when asked to walk fast. At
             the normal speed, blacks had a smaller knee range of motion
             and loading rate than whites. Blacks also took longer to
             reach their peak maximum ground reaction force than whites.
             Within black subjects variations in gait mechanics were
             primarily explained by BMI, rOA, selfreported psychological
             disability, and pain self-efficacy. In white subjects,
             variations in gait mechanics were primarily explained by
             weight, age, velocity, psychological disability, and
             self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Blacks in this study had a
             pattern of gait mechanics generally associated with high
             levels of osteoarthritis, though they did not differ
             significantly in rOA from whites. The variability in gait
             patterns exhibited by blacks was most strongly related to
             variance in walking speed, anthropometrics, and perceived
             physical ability. Taken together, these results suggest that
             race is an important factor that must be considered in the
             treatment and study of osteoarthritis.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF03327442},
   Key = {fds273746}
}

@article{fds273698,
   Author = {Revicki, DA and Chen, W-H and Harnam, N and Cook, KF and Amtmann, D and Callahan, LF and Jensen, MP and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain
             behavior item bank.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {146},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {158-169},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.07.029},
   Abstract = {The measurement of pain behavior is a key component of the
             assessment of persons with chronic pain; however, few
             self-reported pain behavior instruments have been developed.
             We developed a pain behavior item bank as part of the
             Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System
             (PROMIS). For the Wave I testing, because of the large
             number of PROMIS items, a complex sampling approach was used
             where participants were randomly assigned to either respond
             to two full-item banks or to multiple 7-item blocks of
             items. A web-based survey was designed and completed by
             15,528 members of the general population and 967 individuals
             with different types of chronic pain. Item response theory
             (IRT) analysis models were used to evaluate item
             characteristics and to scale both items and individuals on
             the pain behavior domain. The pain behavior item bank
             demonstrated good fit to a unidimensional model (Comparative
             Fit Index = 0.94). Several iterations of IRT analyses
             resulted in a final 39-item pain behavior bank, and
             different IRT models were fit to the total sample and to
             those participants who experienced some pain. The results
             indicated that these items demonstrated good coverage of the
             pain behavior construct. Pain behavior scores were strongly
             related to pain intensity and moderately related to
             self-reported general health status. Mean pain behavior
             scores varied significantly by groups based on pain severity
             and general health status. The PROMIS pain behavior item
             bank can be used to develop static short-form and dynamic
             measures of pain behavior for clinical studies.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2009.07.029},
   Key = {fds273698}
}

@article{fds273767,
   Author = {Nebel, MB and Sims, EL and Keefe, FJ and Kraus, VB and Guilak, F and Caldwell, DS and Pells, JJ and Queen, R and Schmitt,
             D},
   Title = {The relationship of self-reported pain and functional
             impairment to gait mechanics in overweight and obese persons
             with knee osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Arch Phys Med Rehabil},
   Volume = {90},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1874-1879},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19887211},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which 2 commonly used
             measures of pain and disability, the Arthritis Impact
             Measurement Scales (AIMS) and the Western Ontario and
             McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), relate
             to objective gait measurements. DESIGN: A descriptive study
             of the influence of self-reported pain and perceived
             functional impairment on gait mechanics in osteoarthritic
             adults. SETTING: A university clinical research laboratory.
             PARTICIPANTS: Overweight/obese adults with radiographic knee
             osteoarthritis (OA) as well as pain and disability
             associated with the disease (N=179). INTERVENTIONS: Not
             applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The AIMS and WOMAC were
             administered to determine self-report measures of pain and
             disability. Speed, stride length, support time, knee angle,
             and peak vertical force (PVF) were determined from
             3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data collected on
             subjects walking at self-selected normal and fast speeds.
             Anthropometric data and radiographic levels of OA were also
             collected. RESULTS: Pearson correlation analysis showed that
             the AIMS physical disability score was inversely correlated
             with speed, stride length, and knee range of motion at both
             speeds and PVF at the fast speed. The WOMAC function score
             was inversely correlated with speed and stride length at
             both speeds and with PVF at fast speed. The WOMAC pain score
             was inversely correlated with speed and PVF at the fast
             speed. Regression analysis revealed that the AIMS physical
             disability score and body mass index accounted for the
             greatest variation in speed at the normal speed. Overall,
             AIMS physical disability and WOMAC function explained a
             larger proportion of variance in gait mechanics than
             radiographic measures of OA disease severity. CONCLUSIONS:
             Taken together, the results suggest that the AIMS physical
             disability and WOMAC function scores are associated with
             some important measures of gait impairment.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.010},
   Key = {fds273767}
}

@article{fds273697,
   Author = {Carson, JW and Carson, KM and Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Seewaldt,
             VL},
   Title = {Yoga of Awareness program for menopausal symptoms in breast
             cancer survivors: results from a randomized
             trial.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1301-1309},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19214594},
   Abstract = {GOAL OF WORK: Breast cancer survivors have limited options
             for the treatment of hot flashes and related symptoms.
             Further, therapies widely used to prevent recurrence in
             survivors, such as tamoxifen, tend to induce or exacerbate
             menopausal symptoms. The aim of this preliminary, randomized
             controlled trial was to evaluate the effects of a yoga
             intervention on menopausal symptoms in a sample of survivors
             of early-stage breast cancer (stages IA-IIB). MATERIALS AND
             METHODS: Thirty-seven disease-free women experiencing hot
             flashes were randomized to the 8-week Yoga of Awareness
             program (gentle yoga poses, meditation, and breathing
             exercises) or to wait-list control. The primary outcome was
             daily reports of hot flashes collected at baseline,
             posttreatment, and 3 months after treatment via an
             interactive telephone system. Data were analyzed by
             intention to treat. MAIN RESULTS: At posttreatment, women
             who received the yoga program showed significantly greater
             improvements relative to the control condition in hot-flash
             frequency, severity, and total scores and in levels of joint
             pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, symptom-related bother,
             and vigor. At 3 months follow-up, patients maintained their
             treatment gains in hot flashes, joint pain, fatigue,
             symptom-related bother, and vigor and showed additional
             significant gains in negative mood, relaxation, and
             acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study provides promising
             support for the beneficial effects of a comprehensive yoga
             program for hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms in
             early-stage breast cancer survivors.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-009-0587-5},
   Key = {fds273697}
}

@article{fds273751,
   Author = {Fortune-Greeley, AK and Flynn, KE and Jeffery, DD and Williams, MS and Keefe, FJ and Reeve, BB and Willis, GB and Weinfurt, KP and PROMIS
             Sexual Function Domain Committee},
   Title = {Using cognitive interviews to evaluate items for measuring
             sexual functioning across cancer populations: improvements
             and remaining challenges.},
   Journal = {Qual Life Res},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1085-1093},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19672697},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: One goal of the Patient-Reported Outcomes
             Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is to develop a
             measure of sexual functioning that broadens the definition
             of sexual activity and incorporates items that reflect
             constructs identified as important by patients with cancer.
             We describe how cognitive interviews improved the quality of
             the items and discuss remaining challenges to assessing
             sexual functioning in research with cancer populations.
             METHODS: We conducted 39 cognitive interviews of patients
             with cancer and survivors on the topic of sexual experience.
             Each of the 83 candidate items was seen by 5-24
             participants. Participants included both men and women and
             varied by cancer type, treatment trajectory, race, and
             literacy level. Significantly revised items were retested in
             subsequent interviews. RESULTS: Cognitive interviews
             provided useful feedback about the relevance, sensitivity,
             appropriateness, and clarity of the items. Participants
             identified broad terms (e.g., "sex life") to assess sexual
             experience and exposed the challenges of measuring sexual
             functioning consistently, considering both adjusted and
             unadjusted sexual experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive
             interviews were critical for item refinement in the
             development of the PROMIS measure of sexual function.
             Efforts are underway to validate the measure in larger
             cancer populations.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11136-009-9523-x},
   Key = {fds273751}
}

@article{fds273755,
   Author = {Campbell, LC and Andrews, N and Scipio, C and Flores, B and Feliu, MH and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain coping in Latino populations.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1012-1019},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19595635},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: Although there has been a rapid increase in
             Latino populations in the United States over the last 10
             years, health research with Latino cultural groups is sorely
             lacking. In the area of pain-coping research, one
             consequence of the limited research is that very little is
             known about pain coping among Latinos. The purpose of this
             paper is to review the existing literature on pain coping in
             Latino populations, and to propose new directions for the
             future study of pain coping in Latino populations. This
             review is divided into 4 sections. In the first section, the
             challenges of defining Latino populations are discussed. In
             the second section, the current literature on pain coping in
             Latinos is reviewed. Third, we discuss the implications of
             existing findings for pain-coping assessment and pain
             treatment. Finally, we offer ideas for future research on
             pain coping in Latino populations. PERSPECTIVE: In this
             review article, we identify gaps in our current
             understanding of pain coping in Latino cultural groups, and
             associated implications for pain assessment and treatment.
             We also highlight potential directions for future
             pain-coping research with Latino populations.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.004},
   Key = {fds273755}
}

@article{fds273771,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Silva, SG and McKee, DC and She, L and Waters, SJ and Varia, I and Riordan, YB and Knowles, VM and Blazing, M and Blumenthal, JA and Johnson, P},
   Title = {Pain catastrophizing in patients with noncardiac chest pain:
             relationships with pain, anxiety, and disability.},
   Journal = {Psychosom Med},
   Volume = {71},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {861-868},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19737857},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the contributions of chest pain,
             anxiety, and pain catastrophizing to disability in 97
             patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) and to test
             whether chest pain and anxiety were related indirectly to
             greater disability via pain catastrophizing. METHODS:
             Participants completed daily diaries measuring chest pain
             for 7 days before completing measures of pain
             catastrophizing, trait anxiety, and disability. Linear path
             model analyses examined the contributions of chest pain,
             trait anxiety, and catastrophizing to physical disability,
             psychosocial disability, and disability in work, home, and
             recreational activities. RESULTS: Path models accounted for
             a significant amount of the variability in disability scales
             (R(2) = 0.35 to 0.52). Chest pain and anxiety accounted for
             46% of the variance in pain catastrophizing. Both chest pain
             (beta = 0.18, Sobel test Z = 2.58, p < .01) and trait
             anxiety (beta = 0.14, Sobel test Z = 2.11, p < .05)
             demonstrated significant indirect relationships with
             physical disability via pain catastrophizing. Chest pain
             demonstrated a significant indirect relationship with
             psychosocial disability via pain catastrophizing (beta =
             0.12, Sobel test Z = 1.96, p = .05). After controlling for
             the effects of chest pain and anxiety, pain catastrophizing
             was no longer related to disability in work, home, and
             recreational activities. CONCLUSIONS: Chest pain and anxiety
             were directly related to greater disability and indirectly
             related to physical and psychosocial disability via pain
             catastrophizing. Efforts to improve functioning in patients
             with NCCP should consider addressing pain
             catastrophizing.},
   Doi = {10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181b49584},
   Key = {fds273771}
}

@article{fds273781,
   Author = {Allen, KD and Coffman, CJ and Golightly, YM and Stechuchak, KM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Daily pain variations among patients with hand, hip, and
             knee osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {Osteoarthritis Cartilage},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1275-1282},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19410670},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This study examined within-day osteoarthritis
             (OA)-related pain patterns and associated patient
             characteristics. METHODS: Participants with physician
             diagnoses and self-reported symptoms of hand (N=40), hip
             (N=32), and knee (N=85) OA recorded pain using a handheld
             computer on one weekday and one weekend day, with ratings
             beginning immediately after waking, then approximately every
             2h following. Pain was rated on a sliding visual analog
             scale with hidden coding of 1-100. Multivariable linear
             mixed models examined associations of patient demographic
             characteristics, enrollment site (Durham VA Medical Center
             vs Duke University Medical Center), joint site, body mass
             index, and pain medication use with within-day pain range
             (maximum minus minimum pain rating) and area under the curve
             (AUC) of pain ratings, which incorporates the magnitude of
             all pain measurements. RESULTS: Pain patterns differed
             substantially across individuals. The sample means of the
             average, maximum, and minimum weekday pain scores were 35.3,
             54.4, and 17.9, respectively. The mean pain range was 36.4,
             and the mean pain AUC was 564.3 (possible range: 16-1600).
             Pain scores were similar on weekends. In multivariable mixed
             models, both knee and hip OA were associated with a greater
             within-day pain range than hand OA. Only VA enrollment site
             was associated with a significantly greater pain AUC.
             CONCLUSION: There is substantial within-day range in
             OA-related pain. Both pain range and overall within-day
             magnitude vary according to patient characteristics.
             Patients' records of within-day pain patterns could be used
             in clinical encounters to tailor recommendations for the
             timing of medication use and behavioral strategies.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.joca.2009.03.021},
   Key = {fds273781}
}

@article{fds372586,
   Author = {Martire, LM and Stephens, M and Brach, J and Keefe, FJ and Schulz,
             R},
   Title = {SPOUSAL INFLUENCE ON DAILY FUNCTIONING IN KNEE
             OSTEOARTHRITIS},
   Journal = {GERONTOLOGIST},
   Volume = {49},
   Pages = {509-509},
   Publisher = {GERONTOLOGICAL SOC AMER},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds372586}
}

@article{fds273742,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Baucom, DH and Hurwitz, H and Moser, B and Patterson, E and Kim, HJ},
   Title = {Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with
             gastrointestinal cancer: results from a randomized
             controlled trial.},
   Journal = {Cancer},
   Volume = {115},
   Number = {18 Suppl},
   Pages = {4326-4338},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0008-543X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19731357},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: For patients with cancer who are married or in
             an intimate relationship, their relationships with their
             partners play a critical role in their adaptation to
             illness. However, cancer patients and their partners often
             have difficulty in talking with each other about their
             cancer-related concerns. Difficulties in communication
             ultimately may compromise both the patient-partner
             relationship and the patient's psychological adjustment. The
             current study tested the efficacy of a novel
             partner-assisted emotional disclosure intervention in a
             sample of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.
             METHODS: One hundred thirty patients with GI cancer and
             their partners were assigned randomly to receive 4 sessions
             of either partner-assisted emotional disclosure or a couples
             cancer education/support intervention. Patients and partners
             completed measures of relationship quality, intimacy with
             their partner, and psychological distress before
             randomization and at the end of the intervention sessions.
             Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. RESULTS:
             Compared with an education/support condition, the
             partner-assisted emotional disclosure condition led to
             improvements in relationship quality and intimacy for
             couples in which the patient initially reported higher
             levels of holding back from discussing cancer-related
             concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Partner-assisted emotional disclosure
             is a novel intervention that builds on both the private
             emotional disclosure and the cognitive-behavioral marital
             literature. The results of this study suggested that this
             intervention may be beneficial for couples in which the
             patient tends to hold back from discussing concerns. The
             authors concluded that future research on methods of
             enhancing the effects of partner-assisted emotional
             disclosure is warranted.},
   Doi = {10.1002/cncr.24578},
   Key = {fds273742}
}

@article{fds273696,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Godiwala, N and Hoyler,
             GH},
   Title = {Psychosocial factors and the pain experience of
             osteoarthritis patients: new findings and new
             directions.},
   Journal = {Curr Opin Rheumatol},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {501-506},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19617836},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present paper reviews recent
             psychosocial research in the area of osteoarthritis pain.
             First, the review highlights studies of psychosocial factors
             that can influence osteoarthritis pain. Next, research
             testing the efficacy of psychosocial treatments for
             osteoarthritis pain is summarized. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent
             studies suggest that asking osteoarthritis patients to
             recall pain experiences may not be as accurate as having
             them keep daily pain records. New studies also support the
             notion that fatigue and increased weight are linked to
             higher osteoarthritis pain. Osteoarthritis patients who
             report higher levels of depression are more prone to report
             increased osteoarthritis pain. New studies also indicate
             that social factors such as ethnic background, ability to
             communicate pain to others, and participation in social
             activities can influence osteoarthritis pain and disability.
             Cognitions about pain (i.e. pain catastrophizing,
             acceptance, self-efficacy for pain) also have been found to
             relate to pain in patients with osteoarthritis. Recent,
             randomized controlled studies suggest that psychosocial
             interventions (i.e. self-management programs, exercise) can
             decrease osteoarthritis pain and disability. SUMMARY:
             Several psychosocial variables have been suggested as
             influencing osteoarthritis pain and disability. There is
             evidence that psychosocial interventions may decrease
             osteoarthritis pain and disability.},
   Doi = {10.1097/BOR.0b013e32832ed704},
   Key = {fds273696}
}

@article{fds273787,
   Author = {Dixon, KE and Keefe, FJ and Scipio, CD and Perri, LCM and Abernethy,
             AP},
   Title = {Response to Knittle},
   Journal = {Health Psychology},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {647-648},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0278-6133},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017217},
   Doi = {10.1037/a0017217},
   Key = {fds273787}
}

@article{fds273695,
   Author = {Saab, PG and Bang, H and Williams, RB and Powell, LH and Schneiderman,
             N and Thoresen, C and Burg, M and Keefe, F and ENRICHD
             Investigators},
   Title = {The impact of cognitive behavioral group training on
             event-free survival in patients with myocardial infarction:
             the ENRICHD experience.},
   Journal = {J Psychosom Res},
   Volume = {67},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {45-56},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0022-3999},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.015},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Although the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart
             Disease (ENRICHD) treatment was designed to include
             individual therapy and cognitive behavioral group training
             for patients with depression and/or low perceived social
             support, only 31% of treated participants received group
             training. Secondary analyses classified intervention
             participants into two subgroups, (1) individual therapy only
             or (2) group training (i.e., coping skills training) plus
             individual therapy, to determine whether medical outcomes
             differed in participants who received the combination of
             group training and individual therapy compared to
             participants who received individual therapy only or usual
             care. METHODS: Secondary analyses of 1243 usual care, 781
             individual therapy only, and 356 group plus individual
             therapy myocardial infarction (MI) patients were performed.
             Depression was diagnosed using modified Diagnostic and
             Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition
             (DSM-IV) criteria; low perceived social support was
             determined by the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument.
             Psychosocial treatment followed MI, and for participants
             with severe or unremitting depression, was supplemented with
             a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Cox proportional
             hazards regression was used to estimate intervention effects
             on time to first occurrence of the composite end point of
             death plus nonfatal MI. To control for confounding of group
             participation with survival (because individual sessions
             preceded group), we used risk set sampling to match minimal
             survival time of those receiving or not receiving group
             training. RESULTS: Analyses correcting for differential
             survival among comparison groups showed that group plus
             individual therapy was associated with a 33% reduction
             (hazard ratio=0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.92,
             P=.01) in medical outcome compared to usual care. No
             significant effect on event-free survival was associated
             with individual therapy alone. The group training benefit
             was reduced to 23% (hazard ratio=0.77; 95% confidence
             interval: 0.56-1.07, P=.11) in the multivariate-adjusted
             model. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that adding group
             training to individual therapy may be associated with
             reduction in the composite end point. A randomized
             controlled trial is warranted to definitively resolve this
             issue.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.015},
   Key = {fds273695}
}

@article{fds273694,
   Author = {Sullivan, M and Tanzer, M and Stanish, W and Fallaha, M and Keefe, FJ and Simmonds, M and Dunbar, M},
   Title = {Psychological determinants of problematic outcomes following
             Total Knee Arthroplasty.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {143},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {123-129},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.011},
   Abstract = {The primary objective of the present study was to examine
             the role of pain-related psychological factors in predicting
             pain and disability following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).
             The study sample consisted of 75 (46 women, 29 men)
             individuals with osteoarthritis of the knee who were
             scheduled for TKA. Measures of pain severity, pain
             catastrophizing, depression, and pain-related fears of
             movement were completed prior to surgery. Participants
             completed measures of pain severity and self-reported
             disability 6 weeks following surgery. Consistent with
             previous research, cross-sectional analyses revealed
             significant correlations among measures of pre-surgical pain
             severity, pain catastrophizing, depression and pain-related
             fears of movement. Prospective analyses revealed that
             pre-surgical pain severity and pain catastrophizing were
             unique predictors of post-surgical pain severity (6-week
             follow-up). Pain-related fears of movement were predictors
             of post-surgical functional difficulties in univariate
             analyses, but not when controlling for pre-surgical
             co-morbidities (e.g. back pain). The results of this study
             add to a growing literature highlighting the prognostic
             value of psychological variables in the prediction of
             post-surgical health outcomes. The results support the view
             that the psychological determinants of post-surgical pain
             severity differ from the psychological determinants of
             post-surgical disability. The results suggest that
             interventions designed to specifically target pain-related
             psychological risk factors might improve post-surgical
             outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.011},
   Key = {fds273694}
}

@article{fds273770,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Pells, JJ and Dixon, KE and Waters, SJ and Riordan, PA and Blumenthal, JA and McKee, DC and LaCaille, L and Tucker,
             JM and Schmitt, D and Caldwell, DS and Kraus, VB and Sims, EL and Shelby,
             RA and Rice, JR},
   Title = {Pain catastrophizing and pain-related fear in osteoarthritis
             patients: relationships to pain and disability.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {863-872},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19041218},
   Abstract = {This study examined the degree to which pain catastrophizing
             and pain-related fear explain pain, psychological
             disability, physical disability, and walking speed in
             patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Participants
             in this study were 106 individuals diagnosed as having OA of
             at least one knee, who reported knee pain persisting for six
             months or longer. Results suggest that pain catastrophizing
             explained a significant proportion (all Ps < or = 0.05) of
             variance in measures of pain (partial r(2) [pr(2)] = 0.10),
             psychological disability (pr(2) = 0.20), physical disability
             (pr(2) = 0.11), and gait velocity at normal (pr(2) = 0.04),
             fast (pr(2) = 0.04), and intermediate speeds (pr(2) = 0.04).
             Pain-related fear explained a significant proportion of the
             variance in measures of psychological disability (pr(2) =
             0.07) and walking at a fast speed (pr(2) = 0.05). Pain
             cognitions, particularly pain catastrophizing, appear to be
             important variables in understanding pain, disability, and
             walking at normal, fast, and intermediate speeds in knee OA
             patients. Clinicians interested in understanding variations
             in pain and disability in this population may benefit by
             expanding the focus of their inquiries beyond traditional
             medical and demographic variables to include an assessment
             of pain catastrophizing and pain-related
             fear.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.05.009},
   Key = {fds273770}
}

@article{fds273778,
   Author = {Blumenthal, JA and Keefe, FJ and Babyak, MA and Fenwick, CV and Johnson,
             JM and Stott, K and Funk, RK and McAdams, MJ and Palmer, S and Martinu, T and Baucom, D and Diaz, PT and Emery, CF},
   Title = {Caregiver-assisted coping skills training for patients with
             COPD: background, design, and methodological issues for the
             INSPIRE-II study.},
   Journal = {Clin Trials},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {172-184},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {1740-7745},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19342470},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is
             a progressive illness characterized by airflow obstruction
             and dyspnea that afflicts over 12 million people and
             represents a leading cause of death in the United States.
             Not surprisingly, COPD is often associated with emotional
             distress and reduced psychosocial adjustment, which can
             negatively impact physical functioning and impair quality of
             life. However, the psychosocial consequences of COPD remain
             largely untreated. A previous randomized trial from our
             research team demonstrated that coping skills training (CST)
             can improve pulmonary-specific quality of life among
             pulmonary patients awaiting lung transplant (the INSPIRE
             study). To date, however, no studies have examined the
             effects of a caregiver-assisted CST intervention in patients
             with COPD with less severe disease. PURPOSE: INSPIRE II is a
             randomized clinical trial (RCT) funded by the NHLBI to
             evaluate the effects of telephone-based enhanced CST for
             patients with COPD and their caregivers compared to
             standardized medical care (SMC) including COPD education and
             symptom monitoring on medical outcomes, physical
             functioning, and quality of life. METHODS: Six hundred COPD
             patients and their respective caregivers recruited from Duke
             University and Ohio State University will be evaluated and
             randomized (in a 1:1 ratio) to enhanced CST (including
             sessions promoting physical activity, relaxation, cognitive
             restructuring, communication skills, and problem solving) or
             to SMC. The primary outcomes include all-cause mortality,
             COPD-related hospitalizations/ physician visits, and quality
             of life. These endpoints will be measured through
             self-report questionnaires, behavioral measures of
             functional capacity (i.e., accelerometer and six minute walk
             test) and pulmonary function tests (e.g., FEV(1)). RESULTS:
             This article reviews prior studies in the area and describes
             the design of INSPIRE-II. Several key methodological issues
             are discussed including the delivery of CST over the
             telephone, encouraging physical activity, and inclusion of
             caregivers as patient coaches to enhance the effectiveness
             of the intervention. LIMITATIONS: We recognize that SMC does
             not adequately control for attention, support, and
             non-specific factors, and that, in theory, non-specific
             effects of the intervention could account for some, or all,
             of the observed benefits. However, our fundamental question
             is whether the telephone intervention produces benefits
             over-and-above the usual care that patients typically
             receive. The SMC condition will provide education and
             additional weekly telephone contact, albeit less than the
             attention received by the CST group. We recognize that this
             attention control condition may not provide equivalent
             patient contact, but it will minimize group differences due
             to attention. We considered several alternative designs
             including adding a third usual care only arm as well as an
             education only control arm. However, these alternatives
             would require more patients, reduce the power to detect
             significant effects of our primary medical endpoints, and
             add a significant additional expense to the cost of the
             study that would make such an undertaking neither
             scientifically or financially viable. CONCLUSIONS: We
             believe that this novel approach to patient care in which
             caregivers are used to assist in the delivery of coping
             skills training to patients with COPD has the potential to
             change the way in which COPD patients are routinely managed
             in order to reduce distress, enhance quality of life, and
             potentially improve medical outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1177/1740774509102565},
   Key = {fds273778}
}

@article{fds273750,
   Author = {Jeffery, DD and Tzeng, JP and Keefe, FJ and Porter, LS and Hahn, EA and Flynn, KE and Reeve, BB and Weinfurt, KP},
   Title = {Initial report of the cancer Patient-Reported Outcomes
             Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sexual function
             committee: review of sexual function measures and domains
             used in oncology.},
   Journal = {Cancer},
   Volume = {115},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {1142-1153},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0008-543X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19195044},
   Abstract = {For this report, the authors described the initial
             activities of the Cancer Patient-Reported Outcomes
             Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sexual Function
             domain group, which is part of the National Institutes of
             Health Roadmap Initiative to develop brief questionnaires or
             individually tailored assessments of quality-of-life
             domains. Presented are a literature review of sexual
             function measures used in cancer populations and
             descriptions of the domains found in those measures. By
             using a consensus-driven approach, an electronic
             bibliographic search was conducted for articles that were
             published from 1991 to 2007, and 486 articles were
             identified for in-depth review. In total, 257 articles
             reported the administration of a psychometrically evaluated
             sexual function measure to individuals who were diagnosed
             with cancer. Apart from the University of California-Los
             Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, the International Index of
             Erectile Function, and the Female Sexual Function Index, the
             31 identified measures have not been tested widely in cancer
             populations. Most measures were multidimensional and
             included domains related to the sexual response cycle and to
             general sexual satisfaction. The current review supports the
             need for a flexible, psychometrically robust measure of
             sexual function for use in oncology settings and strongly
             justifies the development of the PROMIS-Sexual Function
             instrument. When the PROMIS-Sexual Function instrument is
             available publicly, cancer clinicians and researchers will
             have another measure with which to assess patient-reported
             sexual function outcomes in addition to the few legacy
             measures that were identified through this
             review.},
   Doi = {10.1002/cncr.24134},
   Key = {fds273750}
}

@article{fds273692,
   Author = {Daniel, M and Keefe, FJ and Lyna, P and Peterson, B and Garst, J and Kelley, M and Bepler, G and Bastian, LA},
   Title = {Persistent smoking after a diagnosis of lung cancer is
             associated with higher reported pain levels.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {323-328},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19254679},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
             impact of smoking status after a diagnosis of lung cancer on
             reported pain levels. We conducted a telephone survey of
             patients with lung cancer identified from 4 participating
             sites between September 2004 and July 2006. Patients were
             asked to rate their usual pain level over the past week on a
             0 to 10 rating scale on which 0 was "no pain" and 10 "pain
             as bad as you can imagine." We operationally defined
             persistent smokers as patients who reported continuing to
             smoke after their lung cancer diagnosis. A logistic
             regression analysis was used to test the hypothesis that
             persistent smokers report higher usual pain levels than
             nonsmokers. Overall, 893 patients completed the survey. The
             majority (76%) was found to have advanced cancer (stages
             IIIb and IV). The mean age was 63 years (SD = 10). Seventeen
             percent of the patients studied were categorized as
             persistent smokers. The mean pain score for the study sample
             was 3.1 (SD = 2.7) and 41% reported moderate (4 to 6) or
             severe pain (7 to 10). A greater proportion of persistent
             smokers reported moderate or severe pain than nonsmokers or
             former smokers (P < .001). Logistic regression analysis
             revealed that smoking status was associated with the usual
             pain even after adjusting for age, perceived health status,
             and other lung cancer symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, and
             trouble eating. In conclusion, patients who continue to
             smoke after a diagnosis of lung cancer report higher levels
             of usual pain than nonsmokers or former smokers. More
             research is needed to understand the mechanisms that relate
             nicotine intake to pain and disease progression in
             late-stage lung cancer. PERSPECTIVE: This article examines
             the relationship between pain and persistent smoking in
             patients with lung cancer. Although more research is needed
             to understand the mechanisms that relate nicotine intake to
             pain and disease progression, physicians can promote smoking
             cessation in patients with lung cancer to improve health and
             quality of life.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.006},
   Key = {fds273692}
}

@article{fds273693,
   Author = {Baucom, DH and Porter, LS and Kirby, JS and Gremore, TM and Wiesenthal,
             N and Aldridge, W and Fredman, SJ and Stanton, SE and Scott, JL and Halford, KW and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {A couple-based intervention for female breast
             cancer.},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {276-283},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1057-9249},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.1395},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Although women's breast cancer affects both women
             and their male partners, as well as their relationships, few
             interventions have been developed to work with couples
             confronting breast cancer. The current investigation
             presents the pilot results from a new couple-based
             intervention program for breast cancer that teaches couples
             how to minimize negative effects and maximize positive
             functioning during this difficult time. METHOD: In this
             pilot study, 14 couples in which the wife had early stage
             breast cancer were randomly assigned to one of the two
             treatment conditions: Couple-based relationship enhancement
             (RE) or treatment-as-usual (TAU). RESULTS: The results from
             this study suggest that compared with couples receiving
             treatment-as-usual, both women and men in the RE condition
             experienced improved functioning on individual psychological
             variables as well as relationship functioning at posttest
             and 1-year follow-up. In addition, women in RE show fewer
             medical symptoms at both time periods. CONCLUSIONS: In this
             pilot study, the couple-based intervention, RE, has shown
             promise in improving individual, medical, and relationship
             functioning for couples in which the woman is facing breast
             cancer, and therefore merits further investigation on a
             larger scale.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.1395},
   Key = {fds273693}
}

@article{fds273691,
   Author = {Hunter, DJ and McDougall, JJ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The symptoms of osteoarthritis and the genesis of
             pain.},
   Journal = {Med Clin North Am},
   Volume = {93},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {83-xi},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0025-7125},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2008.08.008},
   Abstract = {This article delineates the characteristic symptoms and
             signs associated with OA and how they can be used to make
             the clinical diagnosis. The predominant symptom in most
             patients is pain. The remainder of the article focuses on
             what we know causes pain in OA and contributes to its
             severity. Much has been learned over recent years; however,
             for the budding researcher much of this puzzle remains
             unexplored or inadequately understood.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.mcna.2008.08.008},
   Key = {fds273691}
}

@article{fds273699,
   Author = {Verra, ML and Angst, F and Brioschi, R and Lehmann, S and Keefe, FJ and Staal, JB and de Bie, RA and Aeschlimann, A},
   Title = {Does classification of persons with fibromyalgia into
             Multidimensional Pain Inventory subgroups detect differences
             in outcome after a standard chronic pain management
             program?},
   Journal = {Pain Res Manag},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {445-453},
   Year = {2009},
   ISSN = {1203-6765},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/137901},
   Abstract = {INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to replicate and
             validate the empirically derived subgroup classification
             based on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) in a
             sample of highly disabled fibromyalgia (FM) patients.
             Second, it examined how the identified subgroups differed in
             their response to an intensive, interdisciplinary inpatient
             pain management program. METHODS: Participants were 118
             persons with FM who experienced persistent pain and were
             disabled. Subgroup classification was conducted by cluster
             analysis using MPI subscale scores at entry to the program.
             At program entry and discharge, participants completed the
             MPI, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, Hospital Anxiety
             and Depression Scale and Coping Strategies Questionnaire.
             RESULTS: Cluster analysis identified three subgroups in the
             highly disabled sample that were similar to those described
             by other studies using less disabled samples of FM. The
             dysfunctional subgroup (DYS; 36% of the sample) showed the
             highest level of depression, the interpersonally distressed
             subgroup (ID; 24%) showed a modest level of depression and
             the adaptive copers subgroup (AC; 38%) showed the lowest
             depression scores in the MPI (negative mood), Medical
             Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (mental health), Hospital
             Anxiety and Depression Scale (depression) and Coping
             Strategies Questionnaire (catastrophizing). Significant
             differences in treatment outcome were observed among the
             three subgroups in terms of reduction of pain severity (as
             assessed using the MPI). The effect sizes were 1.42 for DYS,
             1.32 for AC and 0.62 for ID (P=0.004 for pairwise comparison
             of ID-AC and P=0.018 for ID-DYS). DISCUSSION: These findings
             underscore the importance of assessing individuals'
             differences in how they adjust to FM.},
   Doi = {10.1155/2009/137901},
   Key = {fds273699}
}

@article{fds273745,
   Author = {Sims, EL and Carland, JM and Keefe, FJ and Kraus, VB and Guilak, F and Schmitt, D},
   Title = {Sex differences in biomechanics associated with knee
             osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {J Women Aging},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {159-170},
   Year = {2009},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20183142},
   Abstract = {Osteoarthritis of the knee is seen more frequently in
             females than males. However, few studies have examined the
             interplay of gender, gait mechanics, pain, and disability in
             persons with osteoarthritis. This study examines the
             influence of anthropometrics, radiographic disease severity,
             pain, and disability on gender differences in gait mechanics
             in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Gait mechanics for 26
             men and 30 women were collected using 3-D kinematics and
             kinetics. Women had a significantly lower knee adduction
             moment than men and a significantly higher stride frequency.
             Within female subjects, variations in gait mechanics were
             primarily explained by weight, BMI, pain, and disability. In
             males, variations in gait mechanics were primarily explained
             by age and disability.},
   Doi = {10.1080/08952840903054856},
   Key = {fds273745}
}

@article{fds273690,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Wellington, C and de Williams,
             A},
   Title = {Pain communication in the context of osteoarthritis: patient
             and partner self-efficacy for pain communication and holding
             back from discussion of pain and arthritis-related
             concerns.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {662-668},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18806530},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: This preliminary study examined aspects of pain
             communication (self-efficacy for pain communication and
             holding back from discussing pain and arthritis-related
             concerns) among patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and their
             partners, and associations between patient and partner pain
             communication and measures of patient and partner
             adjustment. METHODS: A sample of 38 patients with OA and
             their partners completed measures of self-efficacy for pain
             communication and holding back from discussion of pain and
             arthritis-related concerns. Patients completed measures of
             pain, physical and psychologic disability, and pain
             catastrophizing, and partners completed measures of
             caregiver strain and positive and negative affect. RESULTS:
             Correlation analyses indicated that, among patients, higher
             levels of self-efficacy for pain communication were
             associated with significantly lower levels of pain, physical
             and psychologic disability, and pain catastrophizing, and
             with lower levels of partner negative affect. Among
             partners, high self-efficacy for pain communication was
             associated with higher levels of positive affect. Among
             patients, higher levels of holding back were significantly
             correlated with higher levels of psychologic disability and
             catastrophizing. Higher levels of partner holding back were
             associated with significantly higher levels of caregiver
             strain, and with higher levels of patient psychologic
             disability and catastrophizing. DISCUSSION: Taken together,
             results from this preliminary study suggest that
             self-efficacy for pain communication and holding back from
             discussions of pain and arthritis-related concerns may be
             important in understanding how patients with OA and their
             partners adjust to the demands of the patient's
             disease.},
   Doi = {10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816ed964},
   Key = {fds273690}
}

@article{fds273769,
   Author = {Shelby, RA and Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Pells, JJ and Dixon, KE and Blumenthal, JA},
   Title = {Domain specific self-efficacy mediates the impact of pain
             catastrophizing on pain and disability in overweight and
             obese osteoarthritis patients.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {912-919},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18602871},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: This study examined whether self-efficacy
             mediated the relationship between pain catastrophizing and
             pain and disability. Participants were 192 individuals
             diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knees who were
             overweight or obese. Multiple mediator analyses were
             conducted to simultaneously test self-efficacy for pain
             control, physical function, and emotional symptoms as
             mediators while controlling for demographic and medical
             status variables. Higher pain catastrophizing was associated
             with lower self-efficacy in all 3 domains (Ps < .05).
             Self-efficacy for pain control fully mediated the
             relationship between pain catastrophizing and pain (beta =
             .08, Sobel test Z = 1.97, P < .05). The relationship between
             pain catastrophizing and physical disability was fully
             mediated by self-efficacy for physical function (beta = .06,
             Sobel test Z = 1.95, P = .05). Self-efficacy for emotional
             symptoms partially mediated the relationship between pain
             catastrophizing and psychological disability (beta = .12,
             Sobel test Z = 2.92, P < .05). These results indicate that
             higher pain catastrophizing contributed to greater pain and
             disability via lower domain-specific self-efficacy. Efforts
             to reduce pain and improve functioning in OA patients should
             consider addressing pain catastrophizing and domain specific
             self-efficacy. Pain catastrophizing may be addressed through
             cognitive therapy techniques and self-efficacy may be
             enhanced through practice of relevant skills and personal
             accomplishments. PERSPECTIVE: This study found that higher
             pain catastrophizing contributed to greater pain and
             disability via domain specific self-efficacy. These results
             suggest that treatment efforts to reduce pain and improve
             functioning in OA patients who are overweight or obese
             should consider addressing both pain catastrophizing and
             self-efficacy.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2008.05.008},
   Key = {fds273769}
}

@article{fds273688,
   Author = {Shega, JW and Rudy, T and Keefe, FJ and Perri, LC and Mengin, OT and Weiner, DK},
   Title = {Validity of pain behaviors in persons with mild to moderate
             cognitive impairment.},
   Journal = {J Am Geriatr Soc},
   Volume = {56},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1631-1637},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0002-8614},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01831.x},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of traditional pain
             behaviors (guarding, bracing, rubbing, grimacing, and
             sighing) in persons with and without cognitive impairment
             and chronic low back pain (CLBP). DESIGN: Prospective
             observational study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics.
             PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven cognitively intact and 40
             cognitively impaired participants with and without CLBP.
             MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of traditional pain behaviors.
             RESULTS: Forty-six of the participants were pain free, and
             31 had CLBP. The internal consistency reliability
             coefficient of the five pain behaviors was 0.32, suggesting
             that a unidimensional scale did not exist. Multivariate
             analysis of variance analysis according to the independent
             variables pain status (pain free vs CLBP) and cognitive
             status (intact vs impaired) with the dependent variable
             frequency of pain behaviors found significant differences
             according to pain status (F[5,61]=3.06, P=.02) and cognitive
             status (F[5,61]=5.41, P<.001) but without evidence of an
             interaction (F[5,61]=1.14, P=.35). Participants with CLBP
             exhibited significantly higher levels of grimacing (P<.001)
             and guarding (P=.02) than pain-free participants. Intact
             subjects exhibited fewer guarding (P=.02) and rubbing
             behaviors (P<.001) but a higher number of bracing behaviors
             (P=.03) than cognitively impaired participants. CONCLUSION:
             These results support the utility of facial grimacing in
             assessing pain in patients with mild to moderate cognitive
             impairment and call into question the validity of guarding
             and rubbing in assessing pain in persons with mild to
             moderate cognitive impairment.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01831.x},
   Key = {fds273688}
}

@article{fds273687,
   Author = {Hunter, DJ and McDougall, JJ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The symptoms of osteoarthritis and the genesis of
             pain.},
   Journal = {Rheum Dis Clin North Am},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {623-643},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0889-857X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2008.05.004},
   Abstract = {Symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) causes substantial physical
             and psychosocial disability. This article delineates the
             characteristic symptoms and signs associated with OA and how
             they can be used to make the clinical diagnosis. The
             predominant symptom in most patients is pain. The remainder
             of the article focuses on what is known about the causes of
             pain in OA and factors that contribute to its severity. Much
             has been learned during recent years, but much of this
             puzzle remains unexplored or inadequately
             understood.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.rdc.2008.05.004},
   Key = {fds273687}
}

@article{fds273686,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Garst, J and McBride, CM and Baucom,
             D},
   Title = {Self-efficacy for managing pain, symptoms, and function in
             patients with lung cancer and their informal caregivers:
             associations with symptoms and distress.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {137},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {306-315},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17942229},
   Abstract = {This study examined self-efficacy for managing pain,
             symptoms, and function in patients with lung cancer and
             their caregivers, and associations between self-efficacy and
             patient and caregiver adjustment. One hundred and fifty-two
             patients with early stage lung cancer completed measures of
             self-efficacy, pain, fatigue, quality of life, depression,
             and anxiety. Their caregivers completed a measure assessing
             their self-efficacy for helping the patient manage symptoms
             and measures of psychological distress and caregiver strain.
             Analyses indicated that, overall, patients and caregivers
             were relatively low in self-efficacy for managing pain,
             symptoms, and function, and that there were significant
             associations between self-efficacy and adjustment. Patients
             low in self-efficacy reported significantly higher levels of
             pain, fatigue, lung cancer symptoms, depression, and
             anxiety, and significantly worse physical and functional
             well being, as did patients whose caregivers were low in
             self-efficacy. When patients and caregivers both had low
             self-efficacy, patients reported higher levels of anxiety
             and poorer quality of life than when both were high in
             self-efficacy. There were also significant associations
             between patient and caregiver self-efficacy and caregiver
             adjustment, with lower levels of self-efficacy associated
             with higher levels of caregiver strain and psychological
             distress. These preliminary findings raise the possibility
             that patient and caregiver self-efficacy for managing pain,
             symptoms, and function may be important factors affecting
             adjustment, and that interventions targeted at increasing
             self-efficacy may be useful in this population.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.010},
   Key = {fds273686}
}

@article{fds273685,
   Author = {Waters, SJ and Riordan, PA and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre,
             JC},
   Title = {Pain behavior in rheumatoid arthritis patients:
             identification of pain behavior subgroups.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {69-78},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18358682},
   Abstract = {This study used Ward's minimum variance hierarchical cluster
             analysis to identify homogeneous subgroups of rheumatoid
             arthritis patients suffering from chronic pain who exhibited
             similar pain behavior patterns during a videotaped behavior
             sample. Ninety-two rheumatoid arthritis patients were
             divided into two samples. Six motor pain behaviors were
             examined: guarding, bracing, active rubbing, rigidity,
             grimacing, and sighing. The cluster analysis procedure
             identified four similar subgroups in Samples 1 and 2. The
             first subgroup exhibited low levels of all pain behaviors.
             The second subgroup exhibited a high level of guarding and
             low levels of other pain behaviors. The third subgroup
             exhibited high levels of guarding and rigidity and low
             levels of other pain behaviors. The fourth subgroup
             exhibited high levels of guarding and active rubbing and low
             levels of other pain behaviors. Sample 1 contained a fifth
             subgroup that exhibited a high level of active rubbing and
             low levels of other pain measures. The results of this study
             suggest that there are homogeneous subgroups within
             rheumatoid arthritis patient populations who differ in the
             motor pain behaviors they exhibit.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.08.015},
   Key = {fds273685}
}

@article{fds273765,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Anderson, T and Lumley, M and Caldwell, D and Stainbrook,
             D and Mckee, D and Waters, SJ and Connelly, M and Affleck, G and Pope, MS and Weiss, M and Riordan, PA and Uhlin, BD},
   Title = {A randomized, controlled trial of emotional disclosure in
             rheumatoid arthritis: can clinician assistance enhance the
             effects?},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {137},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {164-172},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17923329},
   Abstract = {Emotional disclosure by writing or talking about stressful
             life experiences improves health status in non-clinical
             populations, but its success in clinical populations,
             particularly rheumatoid arthritis (RA), has been mixed. In
             this randomized, controlled trial, we attempted to increase
             the efficacy of emotional disclosure by having a trained
             clinician help patients emotionally disclose and process
             stressful experiences. We randomized 98 adults with RA to
             one of four conditions: (a) private verbal emotional
             disclosure; (b) clinician-assisted verbal emotional
             disclosure; (c) arthritis information control (all of which
             engaged in four, 30-min laboratory sessions); or (d)
             no-treatment, standard care only control group. Outcome
             measures (pain, disability, affect, stress) were assessed at
             baseline, 2 months following treatment (2-month follow-up),
             and at 5-month, and 15-month follow-ups. A manipulation
             check demonstrated that, as expected, both types of
             emotional disclosure led to immediate (post-session)
             increases in negative affect compared with arthritis
             information. Outcome analyses at all three follow-ups
             revealed no clear pattern of effects for either
             clinician-assisted or private emotional disclosure compared
             with the two control groups. There were some benefits in
             terms of a reduction in pain behavior with private
             disclosure vs. clinician-assisted disclosure at the 2-month
             follow-up, but no other significant between group
             differences. We conclude that verbal emotional disclosure
             about stressful experiences, whether conducted privately or
             assisted by a clinician, has little or no benefit for people
             with RA.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.031},
   Key = {fds273765}
}

@article{fds273777,
   Author = {Taylor, JL and Smith, PJ and Babyak, MA and Barbour, KA and Hoffman, BM and Sebring, DL and Davis, RD and Palmer, SM and Keefe, FJ and Carney, RM and Csik, I and Freedland, KE and Blumenthal, JA},
   Title = {Coping and quality of life in patients awaiting lung
             transplantation.},
   Journal = {J Psychosom Res},
   Volume = {65},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {71-79},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0022-3999},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18582615},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Patients with end-stage lung disease (ESLD)
             experience significant decrements in quality of life (QOL).
             Although coping strategies are related to QOL in patients
             with ESLD, the extent to which specific native lung disease
             moderates this relationship is unknown. METHODS: We
             investigated the relationship between coping, native lung
             disease, and QOL among 187 patients awaiting lung
             transplantation, including 139 patients with chronic
             obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 48 with cystic
             fibrosis (CF). Participants completed a psychosocial battery
             assessing psychological QOL, physical QOL, and coping
             strategies. RESULTS: For both COPD and CF patients, higher
             levels of Active Coping (P< .0001) and lower levels of
             Disengagement (P< .0001) were associated with better
             psychological QOL. For physical QOL, we observed a Native
             Disease x Coping interaction (P=.01) such that Active Coping
             was associated with better physical QOL in patients with
             COPD but not in patients with CF. CONCLUSIONS: The
             relationship between coping and QOL may vary as a function
             of native lung disease. Patients' native disease may need to
             be considered in order to develop effective interventions to
             help patients cope successfully with ESLD.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.04.009},
   Key = {fds273777}
}

@article{fds273683,
   Author = {Martire, LM and Schulz, R and Keefe, FJ and Rudy, TE and Starz,
             TW},
   Title = {Couple-Oriented Education and Support Intervention for
             Osteoarthritis: Effects on Spouses' Support and Responses to
             Patient Pain.},
   Journal = {Fam Syst Health},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {185-195},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946460},
   Abstract = {The purpose of this study was to determine whether a
             couple-oriented education and support intervention for
             osteoarthritis was more efficacious than a similar
             patient-oriented intervention in terms of enhancing spouses'
             support of patients and their positive and negative
             responses to patient pain. Repeated-measures analyses of
             covariance with the completers sample (N = 103 dyads) showed
             that at the postintervention assessment, patients in the
             couple-oriented intervention reported a greater decrease in
             their spouses' punishing responses (e.g., anger, irritation)
             than did patients in the patient-oriented intervention. In
             addition, a trend effect was observed in regard to the
             advantage of couple-oriented intervention for increasing
             spouses' attempts to distract patients from their pain. At
             the 6-month follow-up, patients in the couple-oriented
             intervention reported greater increased spouse support than
             those in the patient-oriented intervention. Findings
             illustrate the value of examining change in specific types
             of marital interactions targeted in a couples intervention,
             and the need to strengthen the impact of future
             couple-oriented interventions.},
   Doi = {10.1037/1091-7527.26.2.185},
   Key = {fds273683}
}

@article{fds273768,
   Author = {Pells, JJ and Shelby, RA and Keefe, FJ and Dixon, KE and Blumenthal, JA and LaCaille, L and Tucker, JM and Schmitt, D and Caldwell, DS and Kraus,
             VB},
   Title = {Arthritis self-efficacy and self-efficacy for resisting
             eating: relationships to pain, disability, and eating
             behavior in overweight and obese individuals with
             osteoarthritic knee pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {136},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {340-347},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764844},
   Abstract = {This study examined arthritis self-efficacy and
             self-efficacy for resisting eating as predictors of pain,
             disability, and eating behaviors in overweight or obese
             patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Patients
             (N=174) with a body mass index between 25 and 42 completed
             measures of arthritis-related self-efficacy, weight-related
             self-efficacy, pain, physical disability, psychological
             disability, overeating, and demographic and medical
             information. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were
             conducted to examine whether arthritis self-efficacy
             (efficacy for pain control, physical function, and other
             symptoms) and self-efficacy for resisting eating accounted
             for significant variance in pain, disability, and eating
             behaviors after controlling for demographic and medical
             characteristics. Analyses also tested whether the
             contributions of self-efficacy were domain specific. Results
             showed that self-efficacy for pain accounted for 14% (p=.01)
             of the variance in pain, compared to only 3% accounted for
             by self-efficacy for physical function and other symptoms.
             Self-efficacy for physical function accounted for 10%
             (p=.001) of the variance in physical disability, while
             self-efficacy for pain and other symptoms accounted for 3%.
             Self-efficacy for other (emotional) symptoms and resisting
             eating accounted for 21% (p<.05) of the variance in
             psychological disability, while self-efficacy for pain
             control and physical function were not significant
             predictors. Self-efficacy for resisting eating accounted for
             28% (p=.001) of the variance in eating behaviors. Findings
             indicate that self-efficacy is important in understanding
             pain and behavioral adjustment in overweight or obese OA
             patients. Moreover, the contributions of self-efficacy were
             domain specific. Interventions targeting both arthritis
             self-efficacy and self-efficacy for resisting eating may be
             helpful in this population.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.012},
   Key = {fds273768}
}

@article{fds372011,
   Author = {Baucom, DH and Dyo, S and Porter, LS and Kirby, JS and Gremore, TM and Pukay-Martin, N and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Body image and sexual functioning among women with early
             stage breast cancer: The impact of a couple-based
             intervention program},
   Journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {40-40},
   Publisher = {PSYCHOLOGY PRESS},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds372011}
}

@article{fds273684,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Somers, TJ and Martire, LM},
   Title = {Psychologic interventions and lifestyle modifications for
             arthritis pain management.},
   Journal = {Rheum Dis Clin North Am},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {351-368},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18638681},
   Abstract = {This article provides an overview of self-management
             interventions used to manage pain in patients who have
             arthritis. The article is divided in two major sections. The
             first section reviews psychologic interventions used to
             manage arthritis pain, including pain-coping skills training
             and cognitive behavioral therapy for pain management,
             emotional disclosure interventions, and partner-assisted
             interventions. The second section addresses lifestyle
             behavioral weight loss interventions used to reduce
             arthritis pain. In each section, the authors briefly
             describe the rationale and nature of the interventions,
             present data on their efficacy, and highlight potential
             future research directions.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.rdc.2008.03.001},
   Key = {fds273684}
}

@article{fds273786,
   Author = {Keefe, F and Abernethy, AP and Wheeler, J and Affleck,
             G},
   Title = {Don't ask, don't tell? Revealing placebo responses to
             research participants and patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {135},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {213-214},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18282661},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2008.01.009},
   Key = {fds273786}
}

@article{fds273682,
   Author = {Perri, LM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Applying centrality of event to persistent pain: a
             preliminary view.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {265-271},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096438},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: Living with persistent pain is a complex
             experience. Based on clinical observations, persistent pain
             is often described as a stressful life event that has
             significantly altered how patients view themselves and the
             world around them. The Centrality of Event Scale (CES)
             assesses how much a stressful life event serves as a turning
             point in the individual's life, forms a reference point for
             personal identity, and affects the attribution of meaning to
             other life experiences. In this study, 47 patients with
             persistent pain were asked to complete the CES using "the
             experience of persistent pain" as the designated stressful
             life event. Data analyses revealed patients scoring high on
             the CES (ie, those who viewed persistent pain as a central
             life event) were significantly more likely to experience
             higher levels of pain intensity (r = .35, P = .02), life
             interference due to pain (r = .50, P = .002), and
             psychological distress (r = .46, P = .001). Additional
             analyses revealed that the CES was a significant predictor
             of life interference due to pain and psychological distress
             even after controlling for the effects of age, sex,
             education, and pain intensity. PERSPECTIVE: The experience
             of persistent pain can serve as a major turning point in
             patients' lives, affect patients' interpretations of other
             life events, and become a key component of patients'
             identities. The results of this study indicate that
             centrality of event, a relatively new construct, could
             improve our understanding of persistent pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.019},
   Key = {fds273682}
}

@article{fds372012,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Baucom, DH and Hurwitz, H and Bendell,
             J},
   Title = {Spouse disclosure of cancer-related concerns: Associations
             with spouse and patient adjustment},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {35},
   Pages = {S171-S171},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds372012}
}

@article{fds273679,
   Author = {Naylor, MR and Keefe, FJ and Brigidi, B and Naud, S and Helzer,
             JE},
   Title = {Therapeutic Interactive Voice Response for chronic pain
             reduction and relapse prevention.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {134},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {335-345},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.11.001},
   Abstract = {We developed Therapeutic Interactive Voice Response (TIVR)
             as an automated, telephone-based tool for maintenance
             enhancement following group cognitive-behavioral therapy
             (CBT) for chronic pain. TIVR has four components: a daily
             self-monitoring questionnaire, a didactic review of coping
             skills, pre-recorded behavioral rehearsals of coping skills,
             and monthly personalized feedback messages from the CBT
             therapist based on a review of the patient's daily reports.
             The first three components are pre-recorded and all four can
             be accessed remotely by patients via touch-tone telephone on
             demand. Following 11 weeks of group CBT, 51 subjects with
             chronic musculoskeletal pain were randomized to one of two
             study groups. Twenty-six subjects participated in 4 months
             of TIVR, while a control group of 25 subjects received
             standard care only. The TIVR group showed maximum
             improvement over baseline at the 8-month follow-up for seven
             of the eight outcome measures; improvement was found to be
             significant for all outcomes (p<or=001). Between-group
             analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed significantly
             greater improvement for the experimental group at both 4-
             and 8-month follow-ups for most of the outcomes. Results
             demonstrate that TIVR can be used to decrease pain, improve
             coping and decrease likelihood of relapse into pain
             behavior. Preliminary analysis of medication usage suggests
             that the superior outcome of the TIVR group was unlikely to
             be a consequence of differential medication
             use.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2007.11.001},
   Key = {fds273679}
}

@article{fds273680,
   Author = {Malenbaum, S and Keefe, FJ and Williams, ACDC and Ulrich, R and Somers,
             TJ},
   Title = {Pain in its environmental context: implications for
             designing environments to enhance pain control.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {134},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {241-244},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18178010},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2007.12.002},
   Key = {fds273680}
}

@article{fds273681,
   Author = {Shaw, A and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Genetic and environmental determinants of postthoracotomy
             pain syndrome.},
   Journal = {Curr Opin Anaesthesiol},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {8-11},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0952-7907},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18195602},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pain after thoracic surgery may persist
             for up to a year or longer in as many as 50% of patients
             undergoing lung resection. There is currently no specific
             therapy, and our ability to predict who will develop a
             persistent pain syndrome is poor at best. Persistent pain
             after thoracotomy is not an acute somatic pain, rather it is
             a complex syndrome with many of the characteristics of
             neuropathic, dysesthetic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: The pain
             genetics field has been dominated by reports of single
             variants leading to severe phenotypes. These (Mendelian)
             diseases are not representative of the more common, complex
             phenotype that is characterized by the lay term 'pain
             threshold'. Recently, work describing the association of
             genetic variants with idiopathic pain disorders has appeared
             in the literature, and here the authors suggest that these
             concepts are applicable to postthoracotomy pain syndrome.
             SUMMARY: Postthoracotomy pain syndrome likely arises as a
             direct result of an environmental stress (surgery) occurring
             on a landscape of susceptibility that is determined by an
             individual's behavioral, clinical and genetic
             characteristics.},
   Doi = {10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f2daa2},
   Key = {fds273681}
}

@article{fds372588,
   Author = {Rumble, M and Keefe, FJ and Edinger, J and Affleck,
             G},
   Title = {Examining a comprehensive cognitive behavioral model of
             insomnia for breast cancer patients: A daily process
             analysis},
   Journal = {SLEEP},
   Volume = {31},
   Pages = {A226-A226},
   Publisher = {OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds372588}
}

@article{fds273689,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Carson, JW and Pells, JJ and Lacaille,
             L},
   Title = {Pain catastrophizing in borderline morbidly obese and
             morbidly obese individuals with osteoarthritic knee
             pain.},
   Journal = {Pain Res Manag},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {401-406},
   Year = {2008},
   ISSN = {1203-6765},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18958312},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: There is limited information about how morbidly
             obese osteoarthritis (OA) patients cope with the pain they
             experience. Pain catastrophizing is an important predictor
             of pain and adjustment in persons with persistent pain. This
             may be particularly relevant in the morbidly obese (body
             mass index [BMI] of 40 kg/m(2) or greater) OA population at
             risk for increased pain. The present study first examined
             whether borderline morbidly obese and morbidly obese OA
             patients report higher levels of pain catastrophizing than a
             sample of OA patients in the overweight and obese category
             (BMI between 25 kg/m(2) and 34 kg/m(2)). Next, it examined
             how pain catastrophizing is related to important indexes of
             pain and adjustment in borderline morbidly obese and
             morbidly obese OA patients. METHODS: Participants included
             43 individuals with knee OA who were borderline morbidly
             obese or morbidly obese (BMI of 38 kg/m(2) or greater).
             Participants completed self-report measures of pain
             catastrophizing, pain, psychological distress, quality of
             life, binge eating and eating self-efficacy. RESULTS: The
             sample of borderline morbidly obese and morbidly obese OA
             patients reported significantly higher levels of pain
             catastrophizing (P=0.007) than a comparison sample of
             overweight and obese OA patients. Results suggested that
             patients who engaged in a high level of pain catastrophizing
             reported having much more intense and unpleasant pain,
             higher levels of binge eating, lower self-efficacy for
             controlling their eating and lower weight-related quality of
             life (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Pain catastrophizing is
             related to pain and adjustment in borderline morbidly obese
             and morbidly obese OA patients. Clinicians working with this
             population should consider assessing pain catastrophizing in
             the patients they treat.},
   Doi = {10.1155/2008/652453},
   Key = {fds273689}
}

@article{fds372013,
   Author = {Carson, JW and Carson, KM and Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Shaw,
             H},
   Title = {YOGA FOR WOMEN WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER: RESULTS FROM A
             PILOT STUDY},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {33},
   Pages = {S30-S30},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds372013}
}

@article{fds372014,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Baucom, DH and Hurwitz, H and Bendell,
             J},
   Title = {GENDER DIFFERENCES IN CORRELATES OF GI CANCER PATIENTS'
             DISCLOSURE TO THEIR SPOUSES},
   Journal = {ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
   Volume = {33},
   Pages = {S27-S27},
   Publisher = {SPRINGER},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds372014}
}

@article{fds273776,
   Author = {Blumenthal, JA and Babyak, MA and Ironson, G and Thoresen, C and Powell,
             L and Czajkowski, S and Burg, M and Keefe, FJ and Steffen, P and Catellier,
             D},
   Title = {Spirituality, religion, and clinical outcomes in patients
             recovering from an acute myocardial infarction (vol 69, pg
             501, 2007)},
   Journal = {PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE},
   Volume = {69},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {826-826},
   Publisher = {LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0033-3174},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815adb80},
   Doi = {10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815adb80},
   Key = {fds273776}
}

@article{fds273677,
   Author = {Connelly, M and Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and Lumley, MA and Anderson, T and Waters, S},
   Title = {Effects of day-to-day affect regulation on the pain
             experience of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {131},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {162-170},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.002},
   Abstract = {Individual differences in the regulation of affect are known
             to impact pain and other symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis.
             However, no studies have yet used a rigorous daily diary
             methodology to address the question of whether current pain
             is reduced when positive or negative affects are effectively
             regulated. We used a prospective, repeated daily sampling
             design to infer the regulation of affect from day-to-day
             changes in affect intensity and examined how these changes
             in affect were prospectively related to pain from rheumatoid
             arthritis. Ninety-four adult patients diagnosed with
             rheumatoid arthritis completed daily measures of pain and
             positive and negative affect over a period of 30 days.
             Information on demographic and disease status variables was
             collected during a medical evaluation. Results of
             hierarchical linear model analyses indicated that the
             regulation of both positive and negative affect from the
             prior day to the current day predicted significantly greater
             decreases in pain that day, resulting in up to a 28%
             reduction in pain intensity. These findings were partly
             influenced by disease status and demographic variables. This
             study suggests that the day-to-day regulation of negative
             and positive affect is a key variable for understanding the
             pain experience of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis and
             is a potentially important target for intervention.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.002},
   Key = {fds273677}
}

@article{fds273678,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Porter, L},
   Title = {Pain catastrophizing in the context of satisfaction with
             spousal responses: New perspectives and new
             opportunities.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {131},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {1-2},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.016},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.016},
   Key = {fds273678}
}

@article{fds372015,
   Author = {Jeffery, DD and Reeve, BB and Tzeng, J and Weinfurt, KP and Flynn, KE and Keefe, FJ and Porter, LS and Hahn, EA and Cella, D},
   Title = {The sexual function domain of the NIHPROMIS: Preliminary
             report},
   Journal = {PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {S233-S233},
   Publisher = {JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds372015}
}

@article{fds273676,
   Author = {Martire, LM and Schulz, R and Keefe, FJ and Rudy, TE and Starz,
             TW},
   Title = {Couple-oriented education and support intervention: Effects
             on individuals with osteoarthritis and their
             spouses},
   Journal = {Rehabilitation Psychology},
   Volume = {52},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {121-132},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0090-5550},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.52.2.121},
   Abstract = {Objective: To determine whether a couple-oriented
             intervention for osteoarthritis (OA) was more efficacious
             than a patient-oriented intervention and whether each
             intervention was more efficacious than usual medical care.
             Research Design: 242 older adults with OA and their spouses
             were randomly assigned to patient-oriented education and
             support, couple-oriented education and support, or usual
             care. Results: Intent-to-treat analyses indicated no
             significant differences between the 3 study conditions in
             outcomes for individuals with OA or their spouses.
             Completers analyses showed that at the 6-month follow-up,
             contrary to prediction, individuals with OA who received the
             patient-oriented intervention reported greater reductions in
             pain and improvements in physical function than those who
             received the couple-oriented intervention. At the
             postintervention assessment, spouses who received the
             coupleoriented intervention reported greater reductions in
             stress and a trend toward less critical attitudes than
             spouses of individuals with OA who received the
             patient-oriented intervention. Moderator analyses indicated
             that female spouses and spouses with high marital
             satisfaction who received the couple-oriented intervention
             also experienced better outcomes in terms of depressive
             symptoms and caregiver mastery. Conclusions: A couples
             approach to education and support for OA may offer no
             advantage for individuals with OA but may prove helpful for
             spouses, thereby indirectly benefiting individuals with OA
             over time. © 2007 APA, all rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0090-5550.52.2.121},
   Key = {fds273676}
}

@article{fds273747,
   Author = {Carson, JW and Keefe, FJ and Lowry, KP and Porter, LS and Goli, V and Fras,
             AM},
   Title = {Conflict about expressing emotions and chronic low back
             pain: associations with pain and anger.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {405-411},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17276143},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: There has been growing interest among
             researchers and clinicians in the role of ambivalence over
             emotional expression (AEE) in adjustment to chronic illness.
             Because of the salience of anger in chronic low back pain,
             this condition provides a particularly good model in which
             to examine the role of AEE. This study examined the relation
             of AEE to pain and anger in a sample of 61 patients with
             chronic low back pain. Patients completed standardized
             measures of AEE, pain, and anger. Correlational analyses
             showed that patients who had higher AEE scores reported
             higher levels of evaluative and affective pain as well as
             higher levels of state and trait anger and the tendency to
             hold in angry thoughts and feelings. Mediational analyses
             revealed that most of the associations between AEE and pain,
             and AEE and anger, were independent of one another. These
             findings suggest that a potentially important relationship
             exists between AEE and key aspects of living with persistent
             pain. PERSPECTIVE: This preliminary study suggests that
             there is a relation between ambivalence over emotional
             expression and pain and anger in patients with chronic low
             back pain. Patients who report greater conflict with regard
             to expressing emotions may be experiencing higher pain and
             anger.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2006.11.004},
   Key = {fds273747}
}

@article{fds273785,
   Author = {Dixon, KE and Keefe, FJ and Scipio, CD and Perri, LM and Abernethy,
             AP},
   Title = {Psychological interventions for arthritis pain management in
             adults: a meta-analysis.},
   Journal = {Health Psychol},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {241-250},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0278-6133},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17500610},
   Abstract = {CONTEXT: The psychosocial impact of arthritis can be
             profound. There is growing interest in psychosocial
             interventions for managing pain and disability in arthritis
             patients. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis reports on the
             efficacy of psychosocial interventions for arthritis pain
             and disability. DATA SOURCES: Articles evaluating
             psychosocial interventions for arthritis were identified
             through Cochrane Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE,
             and Ovid PsycINFO data sources. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized
             controlled trials testing the efficacy of psychosocial
             interventions in arthritis pain management were reviewed.
             DATA EXTRACTION: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials
             were analyzed. Pain intensity was the primary outcome.
             Secondary outcomes included psychological, physical, and
             biological functioning. DATA SYNTHESIS: An overall effect
             size of 0.177 (95% CI=0.256-0.094) indicated that patients
             receiving psychosocial interventions reported significantly
             lower pain than patients in control conditions (combined
             p=.01). Meta-analyses also supported the efficacy of
             psychosocial interventions for the secondary outcomes.
             CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that psychosocial
             interventions may have significant effects on pain and other
             outcomes in arthritis patients. Ample evidence for the
             additional benefit of such interventions over and above that
             of standard medical care was found.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0278-6133.26.3.241},
   Key = {fds273785}
}

@article{fds273675,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Davis, D and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Attachment and pain: recent findings and future
             directions.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {128},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {195-198},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17321050},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2007.02.001},
   Key = {fds273675}
}

@article{fds273673,
   Author = {Carson, JW and Carson, KM and Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Shaw, H and Miller, JM},
   Title = {Yoga for women with metastatic breast cancer: results from a
             pilot study.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {331-341},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17349503},
   Abstract = {Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains a terminal illness
             for which major treatment advances are slow to appear, and
             hence it is crucial that effective palliative interventions
             be developed to reduce the cancer-related symptoms of women
             with this condition during the remaining years of their
             lives. This pilot/feasibility study examined a novel,
             yoga-based palliative intervention, the Yoga of Awareness
             Program, in a sample of women with MBC. The eight-week
             protocol included gentle yoga postures, breathing exercises,
             meditation, didactic presentations, and group interchange.
             Outcome was assessed using daily measures of pain, fatigue,
             distress, invigoration, acceptance, and relaxation during
             two preintervention weeks and the final two weeks of the
             intervention. Thirteen women completed the intervention
             (mean age=59; mean time since diagnosis=7 years; two African
             American, 11 Caucasian). During the study, four participants
             had cancer recurrences, and the physical condition of
             several others deteriorated noticeably. Despite low
             statistical power, pre-to-post multilevel outcomes analyses
             showed significant increases in invigoration and acceptance.
             Lagged analyses of length of home yoga practice (controlling
             for individual mean practice time and outcome levels on the
             lagged days) showed that on the day after a day during which
             women practiced more, they experienced significantly lower
             levels of pain and fatigue, and higher levels of
             invigoration, acceptance, and relaxation. These findings
             support the need for further investigation of the effects of
             the Yoga of Awareness Program in women with
             MBC.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.08.009},
   Key = {fds273673}
}

@article{fds273674,
   Author = {Stephenson, NLN and Swanson, M and Dalton, JA and Keefe, FJ and Engelke,
             M},
   Title = {Partner-delivered reflexology: Effects on cancer pain and
             anxiety (Oncology Nursing Forum (2007) 34,
             (127))},
   Journal = {Oncology Nursing Forum},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {280},
   Publisher = {Oncology Nursing Society (ONS)},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0190-535X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/07.ONF.275-280},
   Doi = {10.1188/07.ONF.275-280},
   Key = {fds273674}
}

@article{fds273672,
   Author = {Morley, S and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Getting a handle on process and change in CBT for chronic
             pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {127},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {197-198},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.025},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.025},
   Key = {fds273672}
}

@article{fds273756,
   Author = {Campbell, LC and Keefe, FJ and Scipio, C and McKee, DC and Edwards, CL and Herman, SH and Johnson, LE and Colvin, OM and McBride, CM and Donatucci,
             C},
   Title = {Facilitating research participation and improving quality of
             life for African American prostate cancer survivors and
             their intimate partners. A pilot study of telephone-based
             coping skills training.},
   Journal = {Cancer},
   Volume = {109},
   Number = {2 Suppl},
   Pages = {414-424},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0008-543X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17173280},
   Abstract = {African American men experience worse prostate cancer
             outcomes compared with those of Caucasian men, not only in
             incidence and mortality rates, but also in coping with the
             side effects of treatment. Unfortunately, African American
             men have been significantly under-represented in research
             evaluating the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for
             improving coping in prostate cancer survivors. This pilot
             study explored the feasibility and efficacy of coping skills
             training (CST), an intervention developed to enhance coping
             with treatment side effects in a sample of African American
             prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. The
             intervention was delivered in a telephone-based format
             designed to facilitate research participation. A total of 40
             couples were randomized to either 6 sessions of CST or usual
             care. Survivors completed measures of disease-specific
             quality of life (QOL) related to urinary, sexual, bowel, and
             hormonal symptom domains, as well as measures of global QOL
             (i.e., physical functioning and mental health). Partners
             completed measures of caregiver strain, mood, and vigor.
             Analysis of data from 30 couples (12 couples in CST, 18
             couples in usual care) indicated that CST produced moderate
             to large treatment effects for QOL related to bowel,
             urinary, sexual, and hormonal symptoms. Partners who
             underwent CST reported less caregiver strain, depression,
             and fatigue, and more vigor, with moderate effect sizes
             observed that approached conventional levels of statistical
             significance. These preliminary findings suggest that
             telephone-based CST is a feasible approach that can
             successfully enhance coping inAfrican American prostate
             cancer survivors and their intimate partners. Cancer 2007.
             (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.},
   Doi = {10.1002/cncr.22355},
   Key = {fds273756}
}

@article{fds273670,
   Author = {Stephenson, NLN and Swanson, M and Dalton, J and Keefe, FJ and Engelke,
             M},
   Title = {Partner-delivered reflexology: effects on cancer pain and
             anxiety.},
   Journal = {Oncol Nurs Forum},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {127-132},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0190-535X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/07.ONF.127-132},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of
             partner-delivered foot reflexology and usual care plus
             attention on patients' perceived pain and anxiety. DESIGN:
             The experimental pretest/post-test design included
             patient-partner dyads randomly assigned to an experimental
             or control group. SETTING: Four hospitals in the
             southeastern United States. SAMPLE: 42 experimental and 44
             control subjects comprised 86 dyads of patients with
             metastatic cancer and their partners, representing 16
             different types of cancer; 23% of patients had lung cancer,
             followed by breast, colorectal, and head and neck cancer and
             lymphoma. The subjects had a mean age of 58.3 years, 51%
             were female, 66% had a high school education or less, and
             58% were Caucasian, 40% were African American, and 1% were
             Filipino. METHODS: The intervention included a 15- to
             30-minute teaching session on foot reflexology to the
             partner by a certified reflexologist, an optional 15- to
             30-minute foot reflexology session for the partner, and a
             30-minute, partner-delivered foot reflexology intervention
             for the patient. The control group received a 30-minute
             reading session from their partners. MAIN RESEARCH
             VARIABLES: Pain and anxiety. FINDINGS: Following the initial
             partner-delivered foot reflexology, patients experienced a
             significant decrease in pain intensity and anxiety.
             CONCLUSIONS: A nurse reflexologist taught partners how to
             perform reflexology on patients with metastatic cancer pain
             in the hospital, resulting in an immediate decrease in pain
             intensity and anxiety; minimal changes were seen in the
             control group, who received usual care plus attention.
             IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Hospitals could have qualified
             professionals offer reflexology as a complementary therapy
             and teach interested partners the modality.},
   Doi = {10.1188/07.ONF.127-132},
   Key = {fds273670}
}

@article{fds273671,
   Author = {Hadjistavropoulos, T and Herr, K and Turk, DC and Fine, PG and Dworkin,
             RH and Helme, R and Jackson, K and Parmelee, PA and Rudy, TE and Lynn
             Beattie, B and Chibnall, JT and Craig, KD and Ferrell, B and Ferrell, B and Fillingim, RB and Gagliese, L and Gallagher, R and Gibson, SJ and Harrison, EL and Katz, B and Keefe, FJ and Lieber, SJ and Lussier, D and Schmader, KE and Tait, RC and Weiner, DK and Williams,
             J},
   Title = {An interdisciplinary expert consensus statement on
             assessment of pain in older persons.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {1 Suppl},
   Pages = {S1-43},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17179836},
   Abstract = {This paper represents an expert-based consensus statement on
             pain assessment among older adults. It is intended to
             provide recommendations that will be useful for both
             researchers and clinicians. Contributors were identified
             based on literature prominence and with the aim of achieving
             a broad representation of disciplines. Recommendations are
             provided regarding the physical examination and the
             assessment of pain using self-report and observational
             methods (suitable for seniors with dementia). In addition,
             recommendations are provided regarding the assessment of the
             physical and emotional functioning of older adults
             experiencing pain. The literature underlying the consensus
             recommendations is reviewed. Multiple revisions led to final
             reviews of 2 complete drafts before consensus was
             reached.},
   Doi = {10.1097/AJP.0b013e31802be869},
   Key = {fds273671}
}

@article{fds273669,
   Author = {Waters, SJ and McKee, DC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Cognitive behavioral approaches to the treatment of
             pain.},
   Journal = {Psychopharmacol Bull},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {74-88},
   Year = {2007},
   ISSN = {0048-5764},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18227779},
   Abstract = {How can cognitive-behavioral therapy benefit patients with
             persistent pain? The purpose of this review is to provide an
             overview of cognitive-behavioral treatment approaches to
             persistent pain. The review is divided into four sections.
             In the first section, we describe the conceptual back ground
             for cognitive-behavioral approaches to pain. In the second
             section, we describe the basic elements of a typical
             cognitive-behavioral treatment protocol used in pain
             management. In the third section, we address questions that
             health care professionals frequently ask about cognitive -
             behavioral treatment. In the fourth section, we discuss new
             clinical applications of cognitive-behavioral
             treatment.},
   Key = {fds273669}
}

@article{fds273775,
   Author = {Blumenthal, JA and Babyak, MA and Ironson, G and Thoresen, C and Powell,
             L and Czajkowski, S and Burg, M and Keefe, FJ and Steffen, P and Catellier,
             D and ENRICHD Investigators},
   Title = {Spirituality, religion, and clinical outcomes in patients
             recovering from an acute myocardial infarction.},
   Journal = {Psychosom Med},
   Volume = {69},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {501-508},
   Year = {2007},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17636153},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To assess the prospective relationship between
             spiritual experiences and health in a sample of patients
             surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with
             depression or low social support. METHODS: A subset of 503
             patients participating in the enhancing recovery in coronary
             heart disease (ENRICHD) trial completed a Daily Spiritual
             Experiences (DSE) questionnaire within 28 days from the time
             of their AMI. The questionnaire assessed three spirituality
             variables-worship service/church attendance,
             prayer/meditation, and total DSE score. Patients also
             completed the Beck Depression Inventory to assess depressive
             symptoms and the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory to
             determine perceived social support. The sample was
             subsequently followed prospectively every 6 months for an
             average of 18 months to assess all-cause mortality and
             recurrent AMI. RESULTS: Of the 503 participants who
             completed the DSE questionnaire at the time of index AMI, 61
             (12%) participants either died or sustained a recurrent MI
             during the follow-up period. After adjustment for gender,
             education level, ethnicity, and a composite medical
             prognosis risk score derived specifically for the ENRICHD
             trial, we observed no relationship between death or nonfatal
             AMI and total spirituality as measured by the DSE (p =
             .446), worship service attendance (p = .120), or frequency
             of prayer/meditation (p = .679). CONCLUSION: We found little
             evidence that self-reported spirituality, frequency of
             church attendance, or frequency of prayer is associated with
             cardiac morbidity or all-cause mortality post AMI in
             patients with depression and/or low perceived
             support.},
   Doi = {10.1097/PSY.0b013e3180cab76c},
   Key = {fds273775}
}

@article{fds273668,
   Author = {Wachholtz, AB and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {What physicians should know about spirituality and chronic
             pain.},
   Journal = {South Med J},
   Volume = {99},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1174-1175},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0038-4348},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17100061},
   Doi = {10.1097/01.smj.0000242813.97953.1c},
   Key = {fds273668}
}

@article{fds273764,
   Author = {Carson, JW and Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and Rumble, ME and Caldwell, DS and Beaupre, PM and Kashikar-Zuck, S and Sandstrom, M and Weisberg,
             JN},
   Title = {A comparison of conventional pain coping skills training and
             pain coping skills training with a maintenance training
             component: a daily diary analysis of short- and long-term
             treatment effects.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {615-625},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16942947},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: Pain coping skills training (PCST) has been
             shown to produce immediate improvements in pain and
             disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some
             patients have difficulty maintaining these gains. This study
             compared a conventional PCST protocol with a PCST protocol
             that included maintenance training (PCST/MT). Patients with
             RA (n = 167) were randomly assigned to either conventional
             PCST, PCST/MT, arthritis education control, or standard care
             control. Daily data were collected on joint pain, coping,
             coping efficacy, and mood. Multilevel analyses showed that
             at posttreatment, conventional PCST was superior to all
             other conditions in joint pain, coping efficacy, and
             negative mood, whereas PCST/MT was superior to all other
             conditions in emotion-focused coping and positive mood. At
             18 months follow-up, both PCST conditions were superior to
             standard care in joint pain and coping efficacy.
             Interpretation of follow-up outcomes was limited by higher
             dropout rates in the 2 PCST groups. For RA, a maintenance
             training component does not appear to produce significant
             improvements over conventional PCST. PERSPECTIVE: This
             article reports a trial evaluating a conventional pain
             coping skills training protocol and a similar protocol that
             included a maintenance training component. Overall, results
             indicate similar results for both the conventional and the
             modified protocols.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2006.02.008},
   Key = {fds273764}
}

@article{fds273667,
   Author = {Martire, LM and Keefe, FJ and Schulz, R and Ready, R and Beach, SR and Rudy, TE and Starz, TW},
   Title = {Older spouses' perceptions of partners' chronic arthritis
             pain: implications for spousal responses, support provision,
             and caregiving experiences.},
   Journal = {Psychol Aging},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {222-230},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0882-7974},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.222},
   Abstract = {This study of older patients with osteoarthritis and their
             spouses examined concordance between patients' and spouses'
             reports of patients' pain severity and the association of
             concordance with support and caregiving outcomes. Patients
             and spouses independently viewed videotapes of the patient
             performing simulated household tasks and provided ratings of
             patients' pain. Spousal overestimation of patients' pain was
             the most common type of nonconcordance. Spouses who were
             accurate in their perceptions of their partner's level of
             pain during a log-carrying task responded less negatively
             and provided emotional support that was more satisfying to
             patients. In addition, spouses who were accurate in their
             perceptions of their partner's pain during the log-carrying
             task reported less stress from providing support and
             assistance. Future research that uses such observational
             methods may be highly useful for understanding the effects
             of chronic illness on older couples.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.222},
   Key = {fds273667}
}

@article{fds273774,
   Author = {Blumenthal, JA and Babyak, MA and Keefe, FJ and Davis, RD and Lacaille,
             RA and Carney, RM and Freedland, KE and Trulock, E and Palmer,
             SM},
   Title = {Telephone-based coping skills training for patients awaiting
             lung transplantation.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {74},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {535-544},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16822110},
   Abstract = {Impaired quality of life is associated with increased
             mortality in patients with advanced lung disease. Using a
             randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment and
             blinded outcome assessment at 2 tertiary care teaching
             hospitals, the authors randomly assigned 328 patients with
             end-stage lung disease awaiting lung transplantation to 12
             weeks of telephone-based coping skills training (CST) or to
             usual medical care (UMC). Patients completed a battery of
             quality of life instruments and were followed for up to 3.4
             years to assess all-cause mortality. Compared with UMC, CST
             produced lower scores on perceived stress, anxiety,
             depressive symptoms, and negative affect and improved scores
             on mental health functioning, optimism, vitality, and
             perceived social support. There were 29 deaths (9%) over a
             mean follow-up period of 1.1 year. Survival analyses
             revealed that there was no difference in survival between
             the 2 groups. The authors conclude that a telephone-based
             CST intervention can be effectively delivered to patients
             awaiting lung transplantation. Despite the severity of
             pulmonary disease in this patient population, significant
             improvements in quality of life, but not somatic measures or
             survival to transplant, were achieved.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.535},
   Key = {fds273774}
}

@article{fds273762,
   Author = {Emery, CF and Keefe, FJ and France, CR and Affleck, G and Waters, S and Fondow, MDM and McKee, DC and France, JL and Hackshaw, KV and Caldwell,
             DS and Stainbrook, D},
   Title = {Effects of a brief coping skills training intervention on
             nociceptive flexion reflex threshold in patients having
             osteoarthritic knee pain: a preliminary laboratory study of
             sex differences.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {262-269},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.07.008},
   Abstract = {Studies have documented the efficacy of coping skills
             training (CST) for managing pain, distress, and disability
             in persons with arthritis. However, no laboratory studies
             have examined the effects of CST on descending modulation of
             nociception. This study used the nociceptive flexion reflex
             (NFR) to document pain and nociceptive responding among 62
             men and women with osteoarthritis of the knee (mean
             age=63.3+/-7.5 years). Before and after a 45-minute CST
             session, participants completed laboratory assessments of
             NFR threshold and questionnaires evaluating pain and state
             anxiety. Results indicated significantly increased NFR
             thresholds and decreased pain ratings following CST for men
             and women. A significant time by sex interaction was
             observed for state anxiety, with women reporting greater
             decreases in anxiety following CST than men. This is the
             first study to demonstrate effects of a CST protocol on a
             measure of descending inhibition of nociception among
             patients with osteoarthritic knee pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.07.008},
   Key = {fds273762}
}

@article{fds372589,
   Author = {Rumble, M and Keefe, FJ and Edinger, JD and Porter, LS and Garst, JL and Marcom, PK},
   Title = {Relationship of dysfunctional sleep-related thoughts and
             behaviors, pre-sleep arousal, cancer symptoms, and mood to
             sleep in breast and lung cancer patients with
             insomnia},
   Journal = {SLEEP},
   Volume = {29},
   Pages = {A251-A251},
   Publisher = {OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds372589}
}

@article{fds273801,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Hurwitz, H and Faber,
             M},
   Title = {Disclosure between patients with gastrointestinal cancer and
             their spouses.},
   Journal = {Psychooncology},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1030-1042},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1057-9249},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15712247},
   Abstract = {This study examined patterns of disclosure about
             cancer-related concerns between patients with GI cancer and
             their spouses, and associations between patient and spouse
             disclosure and patient adjustment, spouse adjustment, and
             aspects of relationship functioning. A sample of 47 patients
             and 45 of their spouses completed a measure of disclosure
             which included ratings of their level of disclosure and
             level of holding back from disclosure of cancer-related
             concerns. Patients completed a measure of quality of life,
             spouses completed a measure of caregiver strain, and all
             participants completed measures of psychological distress
             and relationship functioning (intimacy, empathy, and partner
             avoidance and criticism). Data analyses revealed that
             patients and spouses reported moderately high levels of
             disclosure and low levels of holding back, with patients
             reporting higher levels of disclosure than spouses. Among
             patients and spouses, low levels of disclosure and high
             levels of holding back were associated with poorer
             relationship functioning. There were also some indications
             that high levels of holding back, and to a lesser extent low
             levels of disclosure, were associated with increased
             psychological distress for both patients and spouses.
             However, there were no indications that patient or spouse
             disclosure was harmful for the other person. Considered
             overall, the results of this study suggest that levels of
             disclosure between cancer patients and their spouses may be
             important in understanding how they adjust as a couple to
             the demands of the patient's illness.},
   Doi = {10.1002/pon.915},
   Key = {fds273801}
}

@article{fds273741,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and Lipkus, I and Hurwitz,
             H},
   Title = {Ambivalence over emotional expression in patients with
             gastrointestinal cancer and their caregivers: associations
             with patient pain and quality of life.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {117},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {340-348},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16153771},
   Abstract = {This study examined the role of patient and caregiver
             ambivalence over emotional expression (AEE) in pain and
             quality of life (QOL) in a sample of 78 patients with
             gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Measures of ambivalence over
             emotional expression as well as ratings of patient pain and
             pain behavior were collected from patients and caregivers.
             Measures of pain catastrophizing, perceptions of social
             support, and QOL were obtained from patients. Data analyses
             revealed that patients high in AEE engaged in more
             catastrophizing and reported higher levels of pain behaviors
             and poorer QOL. In addition, patients whose caregivers were
             high in AEE engaged in more catastrophizing, had higher
             levels of pain and pain behavior, and reported lower
             emotional well-being. Patient catastrophizing mediated the
             effects of both patient and caregiver AEE on some patient
             outcomes. Taken together, these findings suggest that
             emotional regulation in both patients and their caregivers
             may be an important factor in understanding cancer patients'
             experience of and coping with symptoms such as
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.021},
   Key = {fds273741}
}

@article{fds273800,
   Author = {Carson, JW and Keefe, FJ and Lynch, TR and Carson, KM and Goli, V and Fras,
             AM and Thorp, SR},
   Title = {Loving-kindness meditation for chronic low back pain:
             results from a pilot trial.},
   Journal = {J Holist Nurs},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {287-304},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0898-0101},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16049118},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: Loving-kindness meditation has been used for
             centuries in the Buddhist tradition to develop love and
             transform anger into compassion. This pilot study tested an
             8-week loving-kindness program for chronic low back pain
             patients. METHOD: Patients (N = 43) were randomly assigned
             to the intervention or standard care. Standardized measures
             assessed patients' pain, anger, and psychological distress.
             FINDINGS: Post and follow-up analyses showed significant
             improvements in pain and psychological distress in the
             loving-kindness group, but no changes in the usual care
             group. Multilevel analyses of daily data showed that more
             loving-kindness practice on a given day was related to lower
             pain that day and lower anger the next day. CONCLUSIONS:
             Preliminary results suggest that the loving-kindness program
             can be beneficial in reducing pain, anger, and psychological
             distress in patients with persistent low back pain.
             IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians may find loving-kindness meditation
             helpful in the treatment of patients with persistent
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0898010105277651},
   Key = {fds273800}
}

@article{fds273666,
   Author = {Rumble, ME and Keefe, FJ and Edinger, JD and Porter, LS and Garst,
             JL},
   Title = {A pilot study investigating the utility of the
             cognitive-behavioral model of insomnia in early-stage lung
             cancer patients.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {160-169},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16125031},
   Abstract = {This pilot study investigated the utility of a
             cognitive-behavioral model in understanding insomnia in
             early-stage lung cancer patients. Nineteen patients meeting
             criteria for insomnia and a comparison group of 13 patients
             not meeting these criteria completed questionnaires
             assessing dysfunctional sleep-related thoughts, poor sleep
             hygiene, lung cancer symptoms, mood, quality of life, and
             insomnia symptoms. Participants also completed standard
             sleep logs and wore an Actiwatch while sleeping each day for
             7 days. Findings indicated that the insomnia group reported
             significantly more dysfunctional sleep-related thoughts,
             higher levels of pain and anxiety, and lower quality of life
             than those in the comparison group. Men in the insomnia
             group reported significantly higher levels of fatigue than
             men in the comparison group, whereas women demonstrated no
             group differences. These pilot findings support the utility
             of the cognitive-behavioral model in understanding insomnia
             in early-stage lung cancer patients and the hypothesis that
             insomnia is related to poor clinical status.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.02.013},
   Key = {fds273666}
}

@article{fds273744,
   Author = {Evans, DL and Charney, DS and Lewis, L and Golden, RN and Gorman, JM and Krishnan, KRR and Nemeroff, CB and Bremner, JD and Carney, RM and Coyne,
             JC and Delong, MR and Frasure-Smith, N and Glassman, AH and Gold, PW and Grant, I and Gwyther, L and Ironson, G and Johnson, RL and Kanner, AM and Katon, WJ and Kaufmann, PG and Keefe, FJ and Ketter, T and Laughren, TP and Leserman, J and Lyketsos, CG and McDonald, WM and McEwen, BS and Miller,
             AH and Musselman, D and O'Connor, C and Petitto, JM and Pollock, BG and Robinson, RG and Roose, SP and Rowland, J and Sheline, Y and Sheps, DS and Simon, G and Spiegel, D and Stunkard, A and Sunderland, T and Tibbits,
             P and Valvo, WJ},
   Title = {Mood disorders in the medically ill: scientific review and
             recommendations.},
   Journal = {Biol Psychiatry},
   Volume = {58},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {175-189},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.001},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to assess the
             relationship between mood disorders and development, course,
             and associated morbidity and mortality of selected medical
             illnesses, review evidence for treatment, and determine
             needs in clinical practice and research. DATA SOURCES: Data
             were culled from the 2002 Depression and Bipolar Support
             Alliance Conference proceedings and a literature review
             addressing prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis, and
             treatment. This review also considered the experience of
             primary and specialty care providers, policy analysts, and
             patient advocates. The review and recommendations reflect
             the expert opinion of the authors. STUDY SELECTION/DATA
             EXTRACTION: Reviews of epidemiology and mechanistic studies
             were included, as were open-label and randomized, controlled
             trials on treatment of depression in patients with medical
             comorbidities. Data on study design, population, and results
             were extracted for review of evidence that includes tables
             of prevalence and pharmacological treatment. The effect of
             depression and bipolar disorder on selected medical
             comorbidities was assessed, and recommendations for
             practice, research, and policy were developed. CONCLUSIONS:
             A growing body of evidence suggests that biological
             mechanisms underlie a bidirectional link between mood
             disorders and many medical illnesses. In addition, there is
             evidence to suggest that mood disorders affect the course of
             medical illnesses. Further prospective studies are
             warranted.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.001},
   Key = {fds273744}
}

@article{fds273802,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Ahles, TA and Sutton, L and Dalton, J and Baucom, D and Pope,
             MS and Knowles, V and McKinstry, E and Furstenberg, C and Syrjala, K and Waters, SJ and McKee, D and McBride, C and Rumble, M and Scipio,
             C},
   Title = {Partner-guided cancer pain management at the end of life: a
             preliminary study.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {263-272},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15781177},
   Abstract = {This preliminary study tested the efficacy of a
             partner-guided cancer pain management protocol for patients
             who are at the end of life. Seventy-eight advanced cancer
             patients meeting criteria for hospice eligibility and their
             partners were randomly assigned to a partner-guided pain
             management training intervention, or usual care control
             condition. The partner-guided pain management training
             protocol was a three-session intervention conducted in
             patients' homes that integrated educational information
             about cancer pain with systematic training of patients and
             partners in cognitive and behavioral pain coping skills.
             Data analyses revealed that the partner-guided pain
             management protocol produced significant increases in
             partners' ratings of their self-efficacy for helping the
             patient control pain and self-efficacy for controlling other
             symptoms. Partners receiving this training also showed a
             trend to report improvements in their levels of caregiver
             strain. Overall, the results of this preliminary study
             suggest that a partner-guided pain management protocol may
             have benefits in the context of cancer pain at the end of
             life. Given the significance of pain at the end of life,
             future research in this area appears warranted.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.06.014},
   Key = {fds273802}
}

@article{fds273803,
   Author = {Carson, JW and Keefe, FJ and Goli, V and Fras, AM and Lynch, TR and Thorp,
             SR and Buechler, JL},
   Title = {Forgiveness and chronic low back pain: a preliminary study
             examining the relationship of forgiveness to pain, anger,
             and psychological distress.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {84-91},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15694874},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: Clinical observations suggest that many patients
             with chronic pain have difficulty forgiving persons they
             perceive as having unjustly offended them in some way. By
             using a sample of 61 patients with chronic low back pain,
             this study sought to determine the reliability and
             variability of forgiveness assessments in patients and to
             examine the relationship of forgiveness to pain, anger, and
             psychological distress. Standardized measures were used to
             assess patients' current levels of forgiveness, forgiveness
             self-efficacy, pain, anger, and psychological distress.
             Results showed that forgiveness-related constructs can be
             reliably assessed in patients with persistent pain, and that
             patients vary considerably along dimensions of forgiveness.
             Furthermore, correlational analyses showed that patients who
             had higher scores on forgiveness-related variables reported
             lower levels of pain, anger, and psychological distress.
             Additional analyses indicated that state anger largely
             mediated the association between forgiveness and
             psychological distress, as well as some of the associations
             between forgiveness and pain. These findings indicate that
             forgiveness can be reliably assessed in patients with
             persistent pain, and that a relationship appears to exist
             between forgiveness and important aspects of living with
             persistent pain. PERSPECTIVE: This preliminary study
             suggests there is a relationship between forgiveness and
             pain, anger, and psychological distress in patients with
             chronic low back pain. Patients who report an inability to
             forgive others might be experiencing higher pain and
             psychological distress that are mediated by relatively
             higher levels of state anger.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2004.10.012},
   Key = {fds273803}
}

@article{fds273975,
   Author = {Applegate, KL and Keefe, FJ and Siegler, IC and Bradley, LA and McKee,
             DC and Cooper, KS and Riordan, P},
   Title = {Does personality at college entry predict number of reported
             pain conditions at mid-life? A longitudinal
             study.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {92-97},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15694875},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate
             whether personality traits, as assessed by the Minnesota
             Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), at time of college
             entry can predict the number of reported pain conditions at
             an approximate 30-year follow-up for 2332 subjects, 1834 men
             and 498 women, who were administered the MMPI on entry to
             the University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill) between 1964
             and 1966. In 1997, a follow-up was conducted in which
             subjects were administered a self-report questionnaire
             regarding whether they had experienced 1 or more chronic
             pain conditions. Analyses of the relationship between the
             MMPI clinical scales at college entrance and the report of
             number of chronic pain conditions at follow-up were
             conducted. Among male participants, elevations of Scales 1
             (Hypochondriasis), 3 (Hysteria), and 5 (Masculinity/Femininity)
             predicted increases in number of chronic pain conditions at
             follow-up. For female participants, elevations in Scales 1,
             3, and 6 (Paranoia) predicted increases in number of chronic
             pain conditions at follow-up. The current study suggests
             that a statistically significant relationship exists between
             MMPI responses at college entry and reports of chronic pain
             conditions at mid-life. PERSPECTIVE: This study found a
             small, but significant relationship between elevations on
             MMPI scales measuring hypochondriasis and hysteria and the
             report of chronic pain conditions at follow-up. The study is
             important because it is the first to examine how personality
             assessed in younger adults relates to the number of chronic
             pain conditions reported 30 years later.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.001},
   Key = {fds273975}
}

@article{fds372590,
   Author = {Rumble, M and Edinger, JD and Keefe, FJ and Porter, LS and Marcom,
             PK},
   Title = {A pilot study examining the utility of the
             cognitive-behavioral model of insomnia in early stage breast
             cancer patients},
   Journal = {SLEEP},
   Volume = {28},
   Pages = {A228-A228},
   Publisher = {OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds372590}
}

@article{fds273664,
   Author = {Ledley, DR and Huppert, JD and Foa, EB and Davidson, JRT and Keefe, FJ and Potts, NLS},
   Title = {Impact of depressive symptoms on the treatment of
             generalized social anxiety disorder.},
   Journal = {Depress Anxiety},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {161-167},
   Year = {2005},
   ISSN = {1091-4269},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.20121},
   Abstract = {Patients with depression are often excluded from studies on
             the treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD), leaving gaps
             in our knowledge about the impact of depressive affect on
             treatment for SAD. Patients participated in a randomized,
             placebo-controlled study of treatment for SAD. As in
             previous studies, patients were excluded from the study if
             they met criteria for major depressive disorder in the past
             6 months. This exclusion notwithstanding, patients who
             enrolled in the study exhibited a range of depressive
             symptoms, permitting an examination of the impact of
             depressive symptoms on treatment outcome for SAD. Assessment
             measures included the Clinical Global Impression Scale,
             Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Brief Social Phobia
             Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory. Higher levels of
             depressive symptoms were related to more severe social
             anxiety overall, and to less change in social anxiety
             symptoms over the course of the study. Patients who were
             deemed nonresponders to treatment had higher levels of
             depressive symptoms at pretreatment than those who
             responded. In addition, patients who dropped out of the
             study had higher levels of depressive symptoms at
             pretreatment than those who completed the study. These
             results suggest that modifications should be made to
             existing treatments to improve outcomes and decrease
             attrition in the substantial proportion of patients with SAD
             who also evidence depressive symptoms. Such modifications
             are likely to be more important when treating patients with
             SAD and comorbid major depressive disorder.},
   Doi = {10.1002/da.20121},
   Key = {fds273664}
}

@article{fds273665,
   Author = {Baucom, DH and Porter, LS and Kirby, JS and Gremore, TM and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast
             cancer.},
   Journal = {Breast Dis},
   Volume = {23},
   Pages = {103-113},
   Year = {2005},
   ISSN = {0888-6008},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/bd-2006-23114},
   Abstract = {The current paper reviews the literature regarding
             psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast
             cancer. The findings indicate that younger women with breast
             cancer experience a lower quality of life after cancer
             compared to older women. In part, this lower quality of life
             results from the effects of medical treatment. The effects
             of surgery and removal of the breast result in more negative
             feelings regarding body image, particularly for young women.
             With systemic treatment, many younger women experience the
             sudden onset of menopause, with the attendant symptoms of
             hot flashes, decreased sexual desire, and vaginal dryness.
             These physical effects along with a variety of relationship
             issues contribute to a high level of sexual concerns for
             young women. From a psychosocial perspective, breast cancer
             affects both females and their male partners. Both partners
             experience psychological distress including depression and
             anxiety. Within the relationship, emotional support from the
             partner is important in women's adjustment. In terms of
             psychosocial interventions for breast cancer, findings
             suggest that the most frequently employed interventions,
             which treat the woman without her partner, are not optimal.
             Initial findings provide encouraging evidence that
             couple-based psychosocial interventions for women and their
             partners might be of particular assistance to both
             partners.},
   Doi = {10.3233/bd-2006-23114},
   Key = {fds273665}
}

@article{fds273784,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Abernethy, AP and C Campbell and L},
   Title = {Psychological approaches to understanding and treating
             disease-related pain.},
   Journal = {Annu Rev Psychol},
   Volume = {56},
   Pages = {601-630},
   Year = {2005},
   ISSN = {0066-4308},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15709948},
   Abstract = {Psychologists are increasingly involved in the assessment
             and treatment of disease-related pain such as pain secondary
             to arthritis or cancer. This review is divided into four
             sections. In the first section, we provide a conceptual
             background on this area that discusses the limitations of
             the biomedical model of disease-related pain and traces the
             evolution of psychosocial theories of pain. In the second
             section, we discuss special issues and challenges involved
             in working with persons having disease-related pain,
             including the reluctance of some persons to report pain and
             to become involved in psychological treatments for pain.
             Section three provides an overview of psychosocial research
             conducted on arthritis pain and cancer pain that addresses
             both psychosocial factors related to pain and psychosocial
             interventions for pain management. In the final section, we
             describe important future directions, including strategies
             for disseminating psychosocial treatments and disparities in
             pain management.},
   Doi = {10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070302},
   Key = {fds273784}
}

@article{fds273763,
   Author = {France, CR and Keefe, FJ and Emery, CF and Affleck, G and France, JL and Waters, S and Caldwell, DS and Stainbrook, D and Hackshaw, KV and Edwards, C},
   Title = {Laboratory pain perception and clinical pain in
             post-menopausal women and age-matched men with
             osteoarthritis: relationship to pain coping and hormonal
             status.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {112},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {274-281},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15561382},
   Abstract = {The present study examined relationships between pain
             coping, hormone replacement therapy, and laboratory and
             clinical pain reports in post-menopausal women and
             age-matched men with osteoarthritis. Assessment of
             nociceptive flexion reflex threshold was followed by an
             assessment of electrocutaneous pain threshold and tolerance.
             Participants rated their arthritis pain using the Arthritis
             Impact Measurement Scales. To assess pain coping,
             participants completed measures of emotion-focused coping,
             problem-focused coping, and pain catastrophizing. Results
             indicated that women were more likely than men to report
             using emotion-focused pain strategies, and that
             emotion-focused coping was associated with more arthritic
             pain and lower electrocutaneous pain tolerance. Correlations
             between coping measures and pain reports revealed that
             catastrophizing was associated with greater arthritis pain
             and lower pain threshold and tolerance levels. However,
             catastrophizing was not related to nociceptive flexion
             reflex threshold, suggesting that the observed relationship
             between catastrophizing and subjective pain does not rely on
             elevated nociceptive input. A comparison of men (n=58),
             post-menopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy
             (n=32), and post-menopausal women not receiving hormone
             replacement therapy (n=42) revealed no significant group
             differences in arthritis pain, electrocutaneous pain
             threshold or tolerance, or nociceptive flexion reflex
             threshold. Thus, older adults with osteoarthritis do not
             exhibit the pattern of sex differences in response to
             experimental pain procedures observed in prior studies,
             possibly due to the development of disease-related changes
             in pain coping strategies. Accordingly, individual
             differences in clinical and experimental pain may be better
             predicted by pain coping than by sex or hormonal
             differences.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.007},
   Key = {fds273763}
}

@article{fds273806,
   Author = {Campbell, LC and Keefe, FJ and McKee, DC and Edwards, CL and Herman, SH and Johnson, LE and Colvin, OM and McBride, CM and Donattuci,
             CF},
   Title = {Prostate cancer in African Americans: relationship of
             patient and partner self-efficacy to quality of
             life.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {433-444},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15504620},
   Abstract = {This study examined the relationship between patient and
             partner ratings of self-efficacy for symptom control and
             quality of life (QOL) among 40 African American prostate
             cancer survivors and their intimate partners. Data analyses
             revealed that cancer survivors who had rated their
             self-efficacy for symptom control higher reported better QOL
             related to urinary, bowel, and hormonal symptoms and better
             general health QOL (i.e., better physical functioning and
             better mental health). Data analyses also revealed that
             partners who rated their self-efficacy for helping the
             patient manage symptoms as higher reported better QOL (i.e.,
             less negative mood and less caregiver strain). Finally,
             exploratory analyses indicated that higher self-efficacy in
             patients was associated with less anxiety and caregiver
             strain in partners, and higher self-efficacy in partners was
             associated with better adjustment to bowel and hormonal
             symptoms and better mental health in patients. The clinical
             implications of these findings are discussed and future
             directions for research on self-efficacy in African American
             prostate cancer survivors are identified.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.02.020},
   Key = {fds273806}
}

@article{fds273976,
   Author = {Smith, SJA and Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Romano, J and Baucom,
             D},
   Title = {Gender differences in patient-spouse interactions: a
             sequential analysis of behavioral interactions in patients
             having osteoarthritic knee pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {112},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {183-187},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.08.019},
   Abstract = {Theory and research suggest that spousal responses to
             displays of pain behavior can vary markedly. To our
             knowledge, observational research on spousal responses to
             pain behavior has been carried out only in chronic low back
             pain patients, but not in other populations. In this study
             systematic observations were conducted of interactions
             occurring between 50 married osteoarthritis patients (25
             male and 25 female) and their respective spouses.
             Observations were conducted as the patient and spouse
             performed three common household tasks: sweeping the floor,
             folding laundry, and carrying small, artificial logs from
             one side of the room to the other. Contrary to prior
             research on chronic low back pain this study found that in
             osteoarthritis patients spouse facilitative behavior
             preceded and followed patient pain behavior significantly
             more often than did spouse solicitous behavior. A gender
             difference in spousal responding to pain behavior also was
             observed in that wives were significantly more likely to
             show facilitative behavior preceding and following patient
             pain behavior than were husbands. The implications of these
             findings for future research and clinical interventions
             focused on patient-spouse interactions are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2004.08.019},
   Key = {fds273976}
}

@article{fds273805,
   Author = {Anderson, T and Carson, KL and Darchuk, AJ and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {The influence of social skills on private and interpersonal
             emotional disclosure of negative events},
   Journal = {Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {635-652},
   Publisher = {Guilford Publications},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.635.50747},
   Abstract = {This study examined the influence of social skills on
             emotional disclosure in private and interpersonal settings.
             Eighty-five women with either high or low social skills
             disclosed an emotionally painful event in private (i.e., to
             a tape recorder) orto another participant with either high
             or low social skills (interpersonal condition). Increases in
             negative affect were greatest when disclosure was in the
             private (vs. interpersonal) condition and also when the
             discloser had high social skill (vs. low social skill).
             Interestingly, increases in positive affect were greatest in
             the interpersonal condition where both discloser and
             facilitator had high social skills. However, these
             facilitators themselves experienced decreases in their
             positive affect. The authors propose that an interactive
             transfer of positive affect between individuals of high
             social skills can provide an interpersonal interaction
             conducive to self-disclosure.},
   Doi = {10.1521/jscp.23.5.635.50747},
   Key = {fds273805}
}

@article{fds304929,
   Author = {Davidson, JRT and Foa, EB and Huppert, JD and Keefe, FJ and Franklin,
             ME and Compton, JS and Zhao, N and Connor, KM and Lynch, TR and Gadde,
             KM},
   Title = {Fluoxetine, comprehensive cognitive behavioral therapy, and
             placebo in generalized social phobia.},
   Journal = {Arch Gen Psychiatry},
   Volume = {61},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1005-1013},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0003-990X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15466674},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Generalized social phobia is common, persistent,
             and disabling and is often treated with selective serotonin
             reuptake inhibitor drugs or cognitive behavioral therapy.
             OBJECTIVE: We compared fluoxetine (FLU), comprehensive
             cognitive behavioral group therapy (CCBT), placebo (PBO),
             and the combinations of CCBT/FLU and CCBT/PBO. DESIGN:
             Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING:
             Two academic outpatient psychiatric centers. PATIENTS:
             Subjects meeting a primary diagnosis of generalized social
             phobia were recruited via advertisement. Seven hundred
             twenty-two were screened, and 295 were randomized and
             available for inclusion in an intention-to-treat efficacy
             analysis; 156 (52.9%) were male, 226 (76.3%) were white, and
             mean age was 37.1 years. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment lasted for
             14 weeks. Fluoxetine and PBO were administered at doses from
             10 mg/d to 60 mg/d (or equivalent). Group comprehensive
             cognitive behavioral therapy was administered weekly for 14
             sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An independent blinded
             evaluator assessed response with the Brief Social Phobia
             Scale and Clinical Global Impressions scales as primary
             outcomes. A videotaped behavioral assessment served as a
             secondary outcome, using the Subjective Units of Distress
             Scale. Adverse effects were measured by self-rating. Each
             treatment was compared by means of chi2 tests and piecewise
             linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Clinical Global
             Impressions scales response rates in the intention-to-treat
             sample were 29 (50.9%) (FLU), 31 (51.7%) (CCBT), 32 (54.2%)
             (CCBT/FLU), 30 (50.8%) (CCBT/PBO), and 19 (31.7%) (PBO),
             with all treatments being significantly better than PBO. On
             the Brief Social Phobia Scale, all active treatments were
             superior to PBO. In the linear mixed-effects models
             analysis, FLU was more effective than CCBT/FLU, CCBT/PBO,
             and PBO at week 4; CCBT was also more effective than
             CCBT/FLU and CCBT/PBO. By the final visit, all active
             treatments were superior to PBO but did not differ from each
             other. Site effects were found for the Subjective Units of
             Distress Scale assessment, with FLU and CCBT/FLU superior to
             PBO at Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
             Treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: All active
             treatments were superior to PBO on primary outcomes.
             Combined treatment did not yield any further advantage.
             Notwithstanding the benefits of treatment, many patients
             remained symptomatic after 14 weeks.},
   Doi = {10.1001/archpsyc.61.10.1005},
   Key = {fds304929}
}

@article{fds273804,
   Author = {Lai, Y-H and Guo, S-L and Keefe, FJ and Tsai, S-L and Chien, C-C and Sung,
             Y-C and Chen, M-L},
   Title = {Effects of brief pain education on hospitalized cancer
             patients with moderate to severe pain.},
   Journal = {Support Care Cancer},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {645-652},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0941-4355},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0626-1},
   Abstract = {The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to
             assess the effects of a structured pain education program on
             the pain experience of hospitalized cancer patients.
             Eligible cancer pain patients were randomly assigned to
             either an experimental group (receiving pain education 10-15
             min per day for 5 days, n = 15) or a standard care control
             group (n = 15). The effects of the intervention on six
             pain-related variables were evaluated using three
             instruments. Pain intensity, pain interference with daily
             life, negative beliefs about opioids, beliefs about
             endurance of pain, pain catastrophizing (an individual's
             tendency to focus on and exaggerate the threat value of
             painful stimuli and negatively evaluate his or her own
             ability to deal with pain), and sense of control over pain
             were evaluated by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form
             Taiwanese version (BPI-T), Pain and Opioid Analgesic Beliefs
             Scale-Cancer (POABS-CA), and the Catastrophizing subscale
             and the sense of control over pain measure from the Coping
             Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). The results indicated that,
             after completing treatment, patients who had received
             structured pain education had significantly less pain
             intensity on average, negative pain beliefs regarding
             opioids, pain endurance beliefs, and pain catastrophizing
             than patients in the control group. In addition, patients in
             the pain education group showed a significant increase in
             their sense of control over pain. These preliminary results
             strongly suggest that structured pain education can
             effectively improve the pain experience of hospitalized
             cancer patients and should be further implemented
             clinically.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s00520-004-0626-1},
   Key = {fds273804}
}

@article{fds273808,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and France, CR and Emery, CF and Waters, S and Caldwell, DS and Stainbrook, D and Hackshaw, KV and Fox, LC and Wilson,
             K},
   Title = {Gender differences in pain, coping, and mood in individuals
             having osteoarthritic knee pain: a within-day
             analysis.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {110},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {571-577},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15288397},
   Abstract = {This study examined gender differences in prospective
             within-day assessments of pain, pain coping, and mood in men
             and women having OA, and analyzed gender differences in
             dynamic relations between pain, mood, and pain coping. A
             sample of 64 women and 36 men diagnosed as having pain due
             to osteoarthritis of the knee(s) rated their pain, pain
             coping, and mood two times each day (once in the afternoon
             and once in the evening) for 30 days using a booklet format.
             Two gender differences were found in between
             person-analyses: women used more problem focused coping than
             men, and women who catastrophized were less likely than men
             to report negative mood. Several within-day and across-day
             gender differences were noted. First, women were much more
             likely to show a significant increase in pain over the day.
             Second, men were more likely than women to experience an
             increase in coping efficacy over the day. Third, men were
             more likely than women to use emotion-focused coping when
             their mood was more negative. Finally, men were more likely
             than women to experience an increase in negative mood and a
             decrease in positive mood in the morning after an evening of
             increased pain. Taken together, these findings underscore
             the importance of obtaining multiple daily assessments when
             studying gender differences in the pain experience.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.028},
   Key = {fds273808}
}

@article{fds273809,
   Author = {Thorn, BE and Keefe, FJ and Anderson, T},
   Title = {The communal coping model and interpersonal context:
             problems or process?},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {110},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {505-507},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.006},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.006},
   Key = {fds273809}
}

@article{fds273977,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Blumenthal, J and Baucom, D and Affleck, G and Waugh, R and Caldwell, DS and Beaupre, P and Kashikar-Zuck, S and Wright, K and Egert, J and Lefebvre, J},
   Title = {Effects of spouse-assisted coping skills training and
             exercise training in patients with osteoarthritic knee pain:
             a randomized controlled study.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {110},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {539-549},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15288394},
   Abstract = {This study tested the separate and combined effects of
             spouse-assisted pain coping skills training (SA-CST) and
             exercise training (ET) in a sample of patients having
             persistent osteoarthritic knee pain. Seventy-two married
             osteoarthritis (OA) patients with persistent knee pain and
             their spouses were randomly assigned to: SA-CST alone,
             SA-CST plus ET, ET alone, or standard care (SC). Patients in
             SA-CST alone, together with their spouses, attended 12
             weekly, 2-h group sessions for training in pain coping and
             couples skills. Patients in SA-CST + ET received
             spouse-assisted coping skills training and attended 12-weeks
             supervised ET. Patients in the ET alone condition received
             just an exercise program. Data analyses revealed: (1)
             physical fitness and strength: the SA-CST + ET and ET alone
             groups had significant improvements in physical fitness
             compared to SA-CST alone and patients in SA-CST + ET and ET
             alone had significant improvements in leg flexion and
             extension compared to SA-CST alone and SC, (2) pain coping:
             patients in SA-CST + ET and SA-CST alone groups had
             significant improvements in coping attempts compared to ET
             alone or SC and spouses in SA-CST + ET rated their partners
             as showing significant improvements in coping attempts
             compared to ET alone or SC, and (3) self-efficacy: patients
             in SA-CST + ET reported significant improvements in
             self-efficacy and their spouses rated them as showing
             significant improvements in self-efficacy compared to ET
             alone or SC. Patients receiving SA-CST + ET who showed
             increased self-efficacy were more likely to have
             improvements in psychological disability. An intervention
             that combines spouse-assisted coping skills training and
             exercise training can improve physical fitness, strength,
             pain coping, and self-efficacy in patients suffering from
             pain due to osteoarthritis.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.022},
   Key = {fds273977}
}

@article{fds273807,
   Author = {Guilak, F and Fermor, B and Keefe, FJ and Kraus, VB and Olson, SA and Pisetsky, DS and Setton, LA and Weinberg, JB},
   Title = {The role of biomechanics and inflammation in cartilage
             injury and repair.},
   Journal = {Clin Orthop Relat Res},
   Volume = {423},
   Number = {423},
   Pages = {17-26},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0009-921X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15232421},
   Abstract = {Osteoarthritis is a painful and debilitating disease
             characterized by progressive degenerative changes in the
             articular cartilage and other joint tissues. Biomechanical
             factors play a critical role in the initiation and
             progression of this disease, as evidenced by clinical and
             animal studies of alterations in the mechanical environment
             of the joint caused by trauma, joint instability, disuse, or
             obesity. The onset of these changes after joint injury
             generally has been termed posttraumatic arthritis and can be
             accelerated by factors such as a displaced articular
             fracture. Within this context, there is considerable
             evidence that interactions between biomechanical factors and
             proinflammatory mediators are involved in the progression of
             cartilage degeneration in posttraumatic arthritis. In vivo
             studies have shown increased concentrations of inflammatory
             cytokines and mediators in the joint in mechanically induced
             models of osteoarthritis. In vitro explant studies confirm
             that mechanical load is a potent regulator of matrix
             metabolism, cell viability, and the production of
             proinflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide and
             prostaglandin E2. Knowledge of the interaction of
             inflammatory and biomechanical factors in regulating
             cartilage metabolism would be beneficial to an understanding
             of the etiopathogenesis of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and
             in the improvement of therapies for joint
             injury.},
   Doi = {10.1097/01.blo.0000131233.83640.91},
   Key = {fds273807}
}

@article{fds273810,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Rumble, ME and Scipio, CD and Giordano, LA and Perri,
             LM},
   Title = {Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of
             the science.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {195-211},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15162342},
   Abstract = {UNLABELLED: This article provides an overview of current
             research on psychological aspects of persistent pain. It is
             divided into 3 sections. In section 1, recent studies are
             reviewed that provide evidence that psychological factors
             are related to adjustment to persistent pain. This section
             addresses research on factors associated with increased pain
             and poorer adjustment to pain (ie, pain catastrophizing,
             pain-related anxiety and fear of pain, and helplessness) and
             factors associated with decreased pain and improved
             adjustment to pain (ie, self-efficacy, pain coping
             strategies, readiness to change, and acceptance). In section
             2, we review recent research on behavioral and psychosocial
             interventions for patients with persistent pain. Topics
             addressed include early intervention, tailoring treatment,
             telephone/Internet-based treatment, caregiver-assisted
             treatment, and exposure-based protocols. In section 3, we
             conclude with a general discussion that highlights steps
             needed to advance this area of research including developing
             more comprehensive and integrative conceptual models,
             increasing attention to the social context of pain,
             examining the link of psychological factors to pain-related
             brain activation patterns, and investigating the mechanisms
             underlying the efficacy of psychological treatments for
             pain. PERSPECTIVE: This is one of several invited
             commentaries to appear in The Journal of Pain in recognition
             of The Decade of Pain Research. This article provides an
             overview of current research on psychological aspects of
             persistent pain, and highlights steps needed to advance this
             area of research.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.576},
   Key = {fds273810}
}

@article{fds273978,
   Author = {McCracken, LM and Carson, JW and Eccleston, C and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Acceptance and change in the context of chronic
             pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {109},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {4-7},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.006},
   Abstract = {Research and clinical developments over the past 20 years
             are beginning to shed new light on thoughts, sensations,
             emotions, their role in influencing behavior, and the
             particular ways in which private experiences contribute to
             human suffering (e.g. Hayes et al., 2001). This has led to
             different approaches to treating a broad array of behavior
             problems, approaches that incorporate a partnership of
             acceptance and change. We have defined acceptance of chronic
             pain as an active willingness to engage in meaningful
             activities in life regardless of pain-related sensations,
             thoughts, and other related feelings that might otherwise
             hinder that engagement. It is about not engaging in
             unnecessary struggles with private experiences, struggles
             that often intensify the aversiveness of those experiences
             and enhance their life disrupting influences. What is novel
             about this approach is that it is not simply a new
             psychological variable but a description of a different set
             of processes of pain and suffering. This approach is fully
             situated within the broader empirical tradition of the
             behavioral and cognitive therapies. The examination of its
             potential merits is already underway.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.006},
   Key = {fds273978}
}

@article{fds273812,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Blumenthal, JA},
   Title = {Health psychology: what will the future bring?},
   Journal = {Health Psychol},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {156-157},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0278-6133},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15008660},
   Abstract = {This commentary highlights several important themes and
             trends in this series of articles focusing on the future of
             health psychology. First, the challenges posed by changes in
             populations will only be met if health psychologists can
             develop a contextual competency. Second, with increasing
             evidence for the efficacy of health psychology interventions
             comes heightened interest in testing the effectiveness of
             these interventions. Third, issues of cost-effectiveness of
             health psychology will become increasingly important.
             Fourth, the growing integration of technological advances
             (e.g., telehealth, the Internet) into health psychology has
             major implications. Finally, the numerous changes outlined
             in this series of articles will demand that health
             psychologists extend and refine their theoretical models
             including the biopsychosocial model.},
   Doi = {10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.156},
   Key = {fds273812}
}

@article{fds273979,
   Author = {Dalton, JA and Keefe, FJ and Carlson, J and Youngblood,
             R},
   Title = {Tailoring cognitive-behavioral treatment for cancer
             pain.},
   Journal = {Pain Manag Nurs},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {3-18},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1524-9042},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1524-9042(03)00027-4},
   Abstract = {Though it has been shown that cancer patients report
             cognitive, behavioral, and physiologic responses to pain,
             little attention has been paid to the benefits of
             cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) protocols tailored to
             patient characteristics. To determine whether a
             profile-tailored CBT treatment program was more effective
             than either standard CBT or usual care in changing outcomes
             for patients with cancer-related pain, 131 patients
             receiving treatment at four sites were randomly assigned to
             standard CBT, profile-tailored CBT, or usual care. CBT
             patients attended five 50-minute treatment sessions. When
             compared to standard CBT patients, profile-tailored CBT
             patients experienced substantial improvement from baseline
             to immediately post-intervention in worst pain, least pain,
             less interference of pain with sleep, and less confusion.
             From baseline to one-month post-intervention,
             profile-tailored patients saw greater improvement in less
             interference of pain with activities, walking,
             relationships, and sleep; less composite pain interference;
             and less mobility and confusion symptom distress. Standard
             CBT and usual care patients experienced little change.
             Compared to profile-tailored CBT patients, standard CBT
             patients showed greater improvement at six-months
             post-intervention with less average pain, less pain now,
             better bowel patterns, lower summary symptom distress,
             better mental quality of life, and greater improvement in
             Karnofsky performance status; usual care patients showed
             little change. More research is needed to refine the
             matching of cognitive-behavioral treatments to
             psychophysiologic patient profiles, and to determine a
             treatment period that does not burden those patients too
             fatigued to participate in a five-week program. Delivery of
             CBT by home visits, phone, or Internet needs to be explored
             further.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s1524-9042(03)00027-4},
   Key = {fds273979}
}

@article{fds304928,
   Author = {Waters, SJ and Keefe, FJ and Strauman, TJ},
   Title = {Self-discrepancy in chronic low back pain: relation to pain,
             depression, and psychological distress.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {251-259},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15010103},
   Abstract = {Self-discrepancies occur when patients' evaluations of their
             actual self differ from their views of who they ideally
             would like to be (ideal self) or feel they ought to be
             (ought self), or from patients' perceptions of how
             significant others wish they could be (ideal-other self) or
             ought to be (ought-other self). These self-discrepancies may
             be related to psychological functioning and adjustment to
             pain. This study sought to: 1) determine the reliability of
             self-discrepancy assessments in patients; 2) determine
             whether each of the four types of self-discrepancies (actual
             self vs. ideal self, actual self vs. ought self, actual self
             vs. ideal-other self and actual self vs. ought-other self)
             measure a distinct type of self-discrepancy; and, 3) examine
             the relationship of self-discrepancies to pain intensity,
             depression, and psychological distress in 93 chronic low
             back pain patients. A semi-structured questionnaire assessed
             self-discrepancies. Standardized measures were used to
             assess pain intensity, depression, and psychological
             distress. Results showed that self-discrepancies can be
             reliably assessed in patients with persistent pain.
             Furthermore, data analyses showed that patients who had
             large ought-other self-discrepancies reported more severe
             pain and higher levels of psychological distress. Patients
             who had large ideal self-discrepancies reported higher
             levels of depression and psychological distress. Taken
             together, these findings suggest that self-discrepancy can
             be reliably assessed in patients with persistent pain and
             demonstrate that self-discrepancies are related in
             meaningful ways to measures of pain, depression, and
             psychological distress in chronic low back pain
             patients.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.07.001},
   Key = {fds304928}
}

@article{fds273811,
   Author = {Dominick, KL and Bosworth, HB and Dudley, TK and Waters, SJ and Campbell, LC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Patterns of opioid analgesic prescription among patients
             with osteoarthritis.},
   Journal = {J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {31-46},
   Year = {2004},
   ISSN = {1536-0288},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15148007},
   Abstract = {This study describes patterns of opioid analgesic
             prescription during a one-year period among a sample of
             patients with osteoarthritis (OA). The study sample included
             3,061 patients with prior ICD-9 codes indicating a diagnosis
             of OA who were treated at a federal Veterans Affairs Medical
             Center. Specific opioid variables included: any opioid
             prescription, number of specific opioid drugs prescribed,
             total number of opioid prescriptions, total number of days
             supply of opioids, and daily opioid doses. We also examined
             relationships of demographic characteristics to opioid
             variables. Results revealed that 41% of patients received at
             least one opioid prescription. Opioids were prescribed
             significantly less frequently among African-Americans than
             Caucasians and the number of opioid prescriptions declined
             with increasing age. The mean annual supply of opioids was
             104 days. Days' supply of opioids was also lower for African
             Americans and older patients. Daily opioid doses were, on
             average, below recommended daily doses for the treatment of
             OA. Findings of this study suggest that opioids are
             frequently prescribed to individuals with OA and that these
             drugs may be gaining acceptability for the treatment of
             chronic musculoskeletal pain. Additional research is needed
             to examine reasons for racial differences in opioid
             prescribing, as well as the prescription of these
             medications at fairly low doses.},
   Doi = {10.1080/j354v18n01_03},
   Key = {fds273811}
}

@article{fds273980,
   Author = {Waters, SJ and Keefe, FJ and Strauman, TJ},
   Title = {Self-discrepancy in chronic low back pain: Relation to pain,
             depression, and psychological distress},
   Journal = {Journal of Pain and Symptom Management},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {253-261},
   Year = {2004},
   ISSN = {0885-3924},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15010103},
   Abstract = {Self-discrepancies occur when patients' evaluations of their
             actual self differ from their views of who they ideally
             would like to be (ideal self) or feel they ought to be
             (ought self), or from patients' perceptions of how
             significant others wish they could be (ideal-other self) or
             ought to be (ought-other self). These self-discrepancies may
             be related to psychological functioning and adjustment to
             pain. This study sought to: 1) determine the reliability of
             self-discrepancy assessments in patients; 2) determine
             whether each of the four types of self-discrepancies (actual
             self vs. ideal self, actual self vs. ought self, actual self
             vs. ideal-other self and actual self vs. ought-other self)
             measure a distinct type of self-discrepancy; and, 3) examine
             the relationship of self-discrepancies to pain intensity,
             depression, and psychological distress in 93 chronic low
             back pain patients. A semi-structured questionnaire assessed
             self-discrepancies. Standardized measures were used to
             assess pain intensity, depression, and psychological
             distress. Results showed that self-discrepancies can be
             reliably assessed in patients with persistent pain.
             Furthermore, data analyses showed that patients who had
             large ought-other self-discrepancies reported more severe
             pain and higher levels of psychological distress. Patients
             who had large ideal self-discrepancies reported higher
             levels of depression and psychological distress. Taken
             together, these findings suggest that self-discrepancy can
             be reliably assessed in patients with persistent pain and
             demonstrate that self-discrepancies are related in
             meaningful ways to measures of pain, depression, and
             psychological distress in chronic low back pain
             patients.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.07.001},
   Key = {fds273980}
}

@article{fds273981,
   Author = {Davidson, JT and Foa, EB and Huppert, JD and Keefe, FJ and Franklin, ME and Compton, JS and Zhao, N and Connor, KM and Lynch, TR and Gadde,
             KM},
   Title = {Fluxetine, comprehensive cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT)
             and placebo in generalized social phobia},
   Journal = {Archives of General Psychiatry},
   Volume = {61},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {1005-1013},
   Year = {2004},
   ISSN = {0003-990X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15466674},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Generalized social phobia is common, persistent,
             and disabling and is often treated with selective serotonin
             reuptake inhibitor drugs or cognitive behavioral therapy.
             OBJECTIVE: We compared fluoxetine (FLU), comprehensive
             cognitive behavioral group therapy (CCBT), placebo (PBO),
             and the combinations of CCBT/FLU and CCBT/PBO. DESIGN:
             Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING:
             Two academic outpatient psychiatric centers. PATIENTS:
             Subjects meeting a primary diagnosis of generalized social
             phobia were recruited via advertisement. Seven hundred
             twenty-two were screened, and 295 were randomized and
             available for inclusion in an intention-to-treat efficacy
             analysis; 156 (52.9%) were male, 226 (76.3%) were white, and
             mean age was 37.1 years. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment lasted for
             14 weeks. Fluoxetine and PBO were administered at doses from
             10 mg/d to 60 mg/d (or equivalent). Group comprehensive
             cognitive behavioral therapy was administered weekly for 14
             sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An independent blinded
             evaluator assessed response with the Brief Social Phobia
             Scale and Clinical Global Impressions scales as primary
             outcomes. A videotaped behavioral assessment served as a
             secondary outcome, using the Subjective Units of Distress
             Scale. Adverse effects were measured by self-rating. Each
             treatment was compared by means of chi2 tests and piecewise
             linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Clinical Global
             Impressions scales response rates in the intention-to-treat
             sample were 29 (50.9%) (FLU), 31 (51.7%) (CCBT), 32 (54.2%)
             (CCBT/FLU), 30 (50.8%) (CCBT/PBO), and 19 (31.7%) (PBO),
             with all treatments being significantly better than PBO. On
             the Brief Social Phobia Scale, all active treatments were
             superior to PBO. In the linear mixed-effects models
             analysis, FLU was more effective than CCBT/FLU, CCBT/PBO,
             and PBO at week 4; CCBT was also more effective than
             CCBT/FLU and CCBT/PBO. By the final visit, all active
             treatments were superior to PBO but did not differ from each
             other. Site effects were found for the Subjective Units of
             Distress Scale assessment, with FLU and CCBT/FLU superior to
             PBO at Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
             Treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: All active
             treatments were superior to PBO on primary outcomes.
             Combined treatment did not yield any further advantage.
             Notwithstanding the benefits of treatment, many patients
             remained symptomatic after 14 weeks.},
   Doi = {10.1001/archpsyc.61.10.1005},
   Key = {fds273981}
}

@article{fds273814,
   Author = {Lai, Y-H and Chang, JT-C and Keefe, FJ and Chiou, C-F and Chen, S-C and Feng, S-C and Dou, S-J and Liao, M-N},
   Title = {Symptom distress, catastrophic thinking, and hope in
             nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.},
   Journal = {Cancer Nurs},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {485-493},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200312000-00008},
   Abstract = {The purposes of this study were to explore symptom distress,
             catastrophic thinking (catastrophizing) and hope, and
             factors predicting hope in Taiwanese nasopharyngeal
             carcinoma (NPC) patients within 3 years of receiving
             radiation therapy (RT). Instruments used were the modified
             Symptom Distress Scale, disease catastrophizing scale
             (modified from Coping Strategies Questionnaire), and Herth's
             Hope Index. Adult NPC patients (N = 115; 33 undergoing RT,
             44 who completed RT within 1 year, and 38 who completed RT
             more than 1 year but less than 3 years) were recruited from
             an outpatient RT center in Northern Taiwan. Although
             participants' overall symptom distress was mild to moderate,
             they scored moderate level for several distressful symptoms:
             dry mouth, fatigue, hearing difficulty, loss of appetite,
             insomnia, and pain. Patients undergoing RT had greater
             symptom distress than subjects in the other 2 groups.
             Regression analysis revealed that catastrophizing was the
             only predictor of hope. Patients who engaged in
             catastrophizing reported much lower levels of hope.
             Particular care and attention are recommended to help NPC
             patients deal with the top distressful symptoms listed.
             Nursing interventions to reduce catastrophic thinking and
             enhance hope are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002820-200312000-00008},
   Key = {fds273814}
}

@article{fds273815,
   Author = {Williams, DA and Gehrman, C and Ashmore, J and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Psychological considerations in the surgical treatment of
             patients with chronic pain},
   Journal = {Techniques in Neurosurgery},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {168-175},
   Publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {1077-2855},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00127927-200308030-00005},
   Abstract = {Implantable pain management devices are becoming
             increasingly popular. The success of these devices, however,
             often depends on psychological factors being screened out
             prior to or addressed concomitantly with implanting the
             device. Currently there is little consensus in practice
             regarding the parameters of the screening process. A review
             of the literature is presented that reveals many
             psychological and behavioral risk factors for implanted pain
             management devices. However, little consistency exists in
             how these risk factors have been addressed, and a few
             attempts actually categorize the level of risk these factors
             pose to the neurosurgical procedures. Based on the
             literature review, this article provides recommendations for
             clinical decision making that transforms the psychological
             screening process into one that both facilitates patient
             selection, and enhances the development of a long-range
             treatment plan that can include preimplant preparation to
             help convert marginal implant candidates into those more
             likely to benefit from these procedures. Future practice in
             this arena will need to emphasize physicians' routine use of
             psychological screening prior to implantation, gaining
             comfort in recommending screening to patients, and
             integrating screening and preimplant preparation into
             practice. Future research in this area will need to include
             more randomized clinical trials of screening effectiveness,
             preimplant preparation effectiveness, and the development of
             uniform criteria for success. © 2003 Lippincott Williams &
             Wilkins, Inc.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00127927-200308030-00005},
   Key = {fds273815}
}

@article{fds273816,
   Author = {Campbell, LC and Clauw, DJ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Persistent pain and depression: a biopsychosocial
             perspective.},
   Journal = {Biol Psychiatry},
   Volume = {54},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {399-409},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0006-3223},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12893114},
   Abstract = {This review highlights recent research findings on the
             relationship between persistent pain and depression and
             discusses the implications of these findings for future
             research in persons who suffer from both pain and
             depression. First, we briefly discuss advances in theories
             of pain that underscore the important role that depression
             can play in the chronic pain experience. Second, we discuss
             depression in persons suffering from chronic pain from a
             biopsychosocial perspective that takes into account both
             biological and psychosocial mechanisms linking pain and
             depression. Third, we address biomedical, psychosocial, and
             combined medical-psychosocial approaches to treatment in
             persons with persistent pain and depression. We conclude by
             highlighting future directions for research related to
             screening and diagnosis of depression in persons having
             persistent pain, treatment of comorbid pain and depression,
             and individual and subgroup differences in the experience of
             persistent pain and depression.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00545-6},
   Key = {fds273816}
}

@article{fds273817,
   Author = {Jensen, MP and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Romano, JM and Turner,
             JA},
   Title = {One- and two-item measures of pain beliefs and coping
             strategies.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {104},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {453-469},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00076-9},
   Abstract = {Pain-related beliefs and pain coping strategies are central
             components of current cognitive-behavioral models of chronic
             pain, and have been found in numerous studies to be
             associated significantly with psychosocial and physical
             disability. However, the length of most measures of
             pain-related beliefs and coping restricts the ability of
             clinicians and researchers to perform a thorough assessment
             of these variables in many situations. The availability of
             very brief versions of existing scales would make possible
             the assessment of a range of important pain beliefs and
             coping strategies in settings where subject or patient
             assessment burden is an issue. In this study, one- and
             two-item versions of the subscales of several commonly used
             measures of pain beliefs and coping strategies were
             developed using both rational and empirical procedures. The
             findings support the validity of these brief subscales. The
             appropriate use and limitations of these measures are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00076-9},
   Key = {fds273817}
}

@article{fds273819,
   Author = {Greenwood, KA and Thurston, R and Rumble, M and Waters, SJ and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Anger and persistent pain: current status and future
             directions.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {103},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {1-5},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12749952},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00132-5},
   Key = {fds273819}
}

@article{fds273982,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lipkus, I and Lefebvre, JC and Hurwitz, H and Clipp, E and Smith, J and Porter, L},
   Title = {The social context of gastrointestinal cancer pain: a
             preliminary study examining the relation of patient pain
             catastrophizing to patient perceptions of social support and
             caregiver stress and negative responses.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {103},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {151-156},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12749969},
   Abstract = {A number of studies have shown that catastrophizing is an
             important predictor of pain and disability in persons having
             persistent pain conditions. The newly developed communal
             model of catastrophizing maintains that catastrophizing is a
             part of broader, interpersonal style of coping in which
             coping efforts are directed at interpersonal goals, rather
             than solely at pain reduction. This study examined the
             potential interpersonal correlates of pain catastrophizing
             in a sample of 70 patients having gastrointestinal cancers
             and their caregivers. Measures of pain catastrophizing,
             perceptions of social support, pain level, and pain behavior
             were obtained from patients. Caregivers completed measures
             that included their judgments about the patient's pain
             level, caregiver stress, and their tendency to engage in
             negative responses (critical or avoidant behaviors).
             Overall, patients who engaged in catastrophizing reported
             receiving higher levels of instrumental support. Caregivers
             of patients who catastrophized, rated the patient as having
             more pain and engaging in more pain behavior. Caregivers of
             patients who catastrophized, also reported higher levels of
             caregiver stress and critical behaviors. Taken together,
             these preliminary findings suggest that pain catastrophizing
             has interpersonal correlates and support the need for
             additional research examining the social context of pain
             catastrophizing.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00447-5},
   Key = {fds273982}
}

@article{fds273983,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Ahles, TA and Porter, LS and Sutton, LM and McBride, CM and Pope, MS and McKinstry, ET and Furstenberg, CP and Dalton, J and Baucom,
             DH},
   Title = {The self-efficacy of family caregivers for helping cancer
             patients manage pain at end-of-life.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {103},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {157-162},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12749970},
   Abstract = {This preliminary study examined the self-efficacy of family
             caregivers with regard to helping cancer patients manage
             pain at end of life. A sample of 63 family caregivers of
             hospice-eligible cancer patients with pain provided ratings
             of their self-efficacy in assisting the patient in pain
             management and rated their own mood and level of caregiver
             strain. Patients completed measures of pain and quality of
             life. Data analyses revealed that caregivers who rated their
             self-efficacy as high reported much lower levels of
             caregiver strain as well as decreased negative mood and
             increased positive mood. Caregiver self-efficacy in managing
             the patient's pain was related to the patient's physical
             well-being. In dyads where the caregiver reported high
             self-efficacy, the patient reported having more energy,
             feeling less ill, and spending less time in bed. Considered
             overall, the results of this study suggest that caregiver
             self-efficacy in pain management is important in
             understanding how caregivers adjust to the demands of caring
             for cancer patients who have pain at the end of
             life.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00448-7},
   Key = {fds273983}
}

@article{fds273818,
   Author = {Labus, JS and Keefe, FJ and Jensen, MP},
   Title = {Self-reports of pain intensity and direct observations of
             pain behavior: when are they correlated?},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {102},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {109-124},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00354-8},
   Abstract = {Meta-analytic techniques were utilized to investigate the
             relationship between self-reports of pain intensity and
             direct observations of pain behavior. Estimation of the
             overall effect size from 29 studies and 85 effect sizes
             yielded a moderately positive association, z=0.26. High
             variability across studies permitted a random-effects
             moderator analysis that determined chronicity of pain, the
             timing of the pain assessment, the use of global measures of
             pain behavior, and pain site significantly moderate the
             relationship between self-reports of pain intensity and
             direct observations of pain behavior. These findings
             indicate that self-reports of pain intensity and direct
             observations of pain behavior are more likely to be
             significantly related to each other when the individual
             being studied has acute pain (z=0.35), when the self-report
             of pain intensity data are collected soon after the
             observation of pain behavior (z=0.40), when global composite
             measures are used to quantify pain behavior (z=0.37), and
             when the person being observed suffers from chronic low back
             pain (z=0.30). Other factors not found to be significant
             moderators include: extent of observer training, relevance
             of the pain-inducing task, and pain behavior observation
             measure used. The implications of the findings for the
             assessment of pain are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00354-8},
   Key = {fds273818}
}

@article{fds304935,
   Author = {Martire, LM and Schulz, R and Keefe, FJ and Starz, TW and Osial, TA and Dew, MA and Reynolds, CF},
   Title = {Feasibility of a dyadic intervention for management of
             osteoarthritis: a pilot study with older patients and their
             spousal caregivers.},
   Journal = {Aging Ment Health},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {53-60},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360786021000007045},
   Abstract = {This study evaluated a novel intervention for older
             osteoarthritis (OA) patients and their spousal caregivers
             that consisted of standard patient education supplemented by
             information related to effectively managing arthritis as a
             couple. Twenty-four female OA patients and their husbands
             were randomly assigned to either an educational intervention
             that was targeted at both patient and spouse or to a patient
             education intervention that was targeted at only the
             patient. Findings revealed that both interventions were
             evaluated favorably but the couple intervention was better
             attended than the patient intervention. In addition,
             patients in the couple intervention experienced greater
             increased efficacy in managing arthritis pain and other
             symptoms. The findings of this pilot study point to the
             utility of a dyadic intervention approach to management of
             OA in late life.},
   Doi = {10.1080/1360786021000007045},
   Key = {fds304935}
}

@article{fds273813,
   Author = {McBride, CM and Pollak, KI and Garst, J and Keefe, F and Lyna, P and Fish,
             L and Hood, L},
   Title = {Distress and motivation for smoking cessation among lung
             cancer patients' relatives who smoke.},
   Journal = {J Cancer Educ},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {150-156},
   Year = {2003},
   ISSN = {0885-8195},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14512262},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Heightened distress at the time of a loved one's
             lung cancer diagnosis may motivate relatives to quit smoking
             or could undermine cessation. METHODS: Relatives of new lung
             cancer patients at Duke were surveyed by telephone to assess
             diagnosis-related depression, distress, and motivation for
             smoking cessation. RESULTS: Relatives who reported above
             average avoidant and intrusive thinking patterns, depressive
             symptoms or worry were more likely to report that the
             patient's diagnosis increased their intentions to quit than
             the less distressed. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed
             that encourage smoking cessation as a strategy for
             adaptively coping with a loved ones' lung cancer
             diagnosis.},
   Doi = {10.1207/S15430154JCE1803_08},
   Key = {fds273813}
}

@article{fds273820,
   Author = {Martire, LM and Schulz, R and Keefe, FJ and Starz, TW and Osial, TA and Dew, MA and Reynolds, CF},
   Title = {Feasibility of a dyadic intervention for management of
             osteoarthritis: A pilot study with older patients and their
             spousal caregivers},
   Journal = {Aging and Mental Health},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {55-62},
   Year = {2003},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360786021000007045},
   Abstract = {This study evaluated a novel intervention for older
             osteoarthritis (OA) patients and their spousal caregivers
             that consisted of standard patient education supplemented by
             information related to effectively managing arthritis as a
             couple. Twenty-four female OA patients and their husbands
             were randomly assigned to either an educational intervention
             that was targeted at both patient and spouse or to a patient
             education intervention that was targeted at only the
             patient. Findings revealed that both interventions were
             evaluated favorably but the couple intervention was better
             attended than the patient intervention. In addition,
             patients in the couple intervention experienced greater
             increased efficacy in managing arthritis pain and other
             symptoms. The findings of this pilot study point to the
             utility of a dyadic intervention approach to management of
             OA in late life.},
   Doi = {10.1080/1360786021000007045},
   Key = {fds273820}
}

@article{fds273984,
   Author = {Naylor, MR and Helzer, JE and Naud, S and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Automated telephone as an adjunct for the treatment of
             chronic pain: a pilot study.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {429-438},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2002.129563},
   Abstract = {The objective of this study was to test whether Interactive
             Voice Response (IVR) can be used to enhance the therapeutic
             outcome of patients receiving group cognitive behavioral
             therapy (CBT) for chronic pain. Ten subjects with chronic
             pain syndromes participated in 10 weeks of group CBT
             followed by 4 months of Therapeutic Interactive Voice
             Response (TIVR). Our specially designed TIVR is based on a
             computerized telephone system in which callers are asked
             questions and respond by using the telephone keypad. It was
             created to reinforce pain coping skills and to provide
             messages for relaxation, sleep induction, and emotional
             support that can be accessed by patients on demand.
             Within-subject analysis showed that maximum positive change
             for nearly all outcome measures was observed at the
             post-TIVR point. For some measures, improvement compared to
             baseline was significant after TIVR despite the fact it had
             not been significant after CBT. Measures showing this
             pattern included SF-36 Mental Health Composite Score (P <
             .0004), McGill Pain Questionnaire pain (P < .01), Coping
             Strategies Questionnaire Catastrophizing (P < .0006),
             Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey Total Pain Experience (P <
             .03), and Perceived Family/Social Disability (P < .02). Our
             preliminary results suggest that TIVR can be used to improve
             coping skills adherence and to prevent relapse into pain
             behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1054/jpai.2002.129563},
   Key = {fds273984}
}

@article{fds273985,
   Author = {Edwards, C and Keefe, F},
   Title = {New directions in research on pain and ethnicity: a comment
             on Riley, Wade, Myers, Sheffield, Pappas, and Price
             (2002).},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {100},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {211-212},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12467991},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00307-X},
   Key = {fds273985}
}

@article{fds273821,
   Author = {Lai, Y-H and Keefe, FJ and Sun, W-Z and Tsai, L-Y and Cheng, P-L and Chiou,
             J-F and Wei, L-L},
   Title = {Relationship between pain-specific beliefs and adherence to
             analgesic regimens in Taiwanese cancer patients: a
             preliminary study.},
   Journal = {J Pain Symptom Manage},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {415-423},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00509-2},
   Abstract = {This pilot cross-sectional study aimed to 1) explore pain
             beliefs and adherence to prescribed analgesics in Taiwanese
             cancer patients, and 2) examine how selected pain beliefs,
             pain sensory characteristics, and demographic factors
             predict analgesic adherence. Pain beliefs were measured by
             the Chinese version of Pain and Opioid Analgesic Beliefs
             Scale-Cancer (POABS-CA) and the Survey of Pain Attitudes
             (SOPA). Analgesic adherence was measured by patient
             self-report of all prescribed pain medicine taken during the
             previous 7 days. Only 66.5% of hospitalized cancer patients
             with pain (n = 194) adhered to their analgesic regimen.
             Overall, patients had relatively high mean scores in beliefs
             about disability, medications, negative effects, and pain
             endurance, and low scores in control and emotion beliefs.
             Medication and control beliefs significantly predicted
             analgesic adherence. Patients with higher medication beliefs
             and lower control beliefs were more likely to be adherent.
             Findings support the importance of selected pain beliefs in
             patients' adherence to analgesics, suggesting that pain
             beliefs be assessed and integrated into pain management and
             patient education to enhance adherence.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00509-2},
   Key = {fds273821}
}

@article{fds273986,
   Author = {Sutton, LM and Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Cancer pain at the end of life: a biopsychosocial
             perspective.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {99},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {5-10},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12237179},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00236-1},
   Key = {fds273986}
}

@article{fds273887,
   Author = {Porter, LS and Keefe, FJ and McBride, CM and Pollak, K and Fish, L and Garst, J},
   Title = {Perceptions of patients' self-efficacy for managing pain and
             lung cancer symptoms: correspondence between patients and
             family caregivers.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {98},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {169-178},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12098629},
   Abstract = {This study examined the degree of correspondence between
             lung cancer patients and their family caregivers in their
             perceptions of the patients' self-efficacy for managing pain
             and other symptoms of lung cancer, and the association of
             this correspondence to demographic, disease, and
             psychosocial variables. Thirty patients who were newly
             diagnosed with lung cancer and their primary family
             caregivers completed telephone interviews assessing the
             patient's symptoms, the patient's self-efficacy for managing
             symptoms, the quality of the relationship between the
             patient and caregiver, patient and caregiver psychological
             distress, and caregiver strain. Although patients and their
             caregivers showed a moderate degree of agreement in their
             perceptions of the patient's self-efficacy for managing pain
             and other symptoms, there was considerable variability in
             the degree of congruence. Factors that contributed to lower
             levels of congruence included low patient-rated
             self-efficacy, female gender of the patient, high patient
             psychological distress, and high caregiver strain.
             Caregivers were about evenly split in their tendency to
             overestimate versus underestimate the patient's
             self-efficacy. A poorer quality of relationship between the
             caregiver and the patient (as rated by the patient), high
             levels of patient-rated symptoms, and high levels of
             caregiver strain were associated with caregivers
             overestimating patient self-efficacy.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00042-8},
   Key = {fds273887}
}

@article{fds304926,
   Author = {Smith, TW and Kendall, PC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Behavioral medicine and clinical health psychology:
             introduction to the special issue, a view from the decade of
             behavior.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {459-462},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.459},
   Abstract = {This collection of articles follows prior special issues on
             behavioral medicine published in the Journal of Consulting
             and Clinical Psychology in 1982 and 1992. From the vantage
             point of the Decade of Behavior, the field has grown in
             scope, depth of basic science foundations, and evidence of
             applied utility. Yet many challenges remain-especially in
             addressing a wide range of health problems across diverse
             populations and in a health care context characterized by
             rapid changes in technology and by a growing concern with
             costs and evidence-based practice.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.459},
   Key = {fds304926}
}

@article{fds273660,
   Author = {AGS Panel on Persistent Pain in Older Persons},
   Title = {The management of persistent pain in older
             persons.},
   Journal = {J Am Geriatr Soc},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {6 Suppl},
   Pages = {S205-S224},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.50.6s.1.x},
   Doi = {10.1046/j.1532-5415.50.6s.1.x},
   Key = {fds273660}
}

@article{fds273823,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Smith, S},
   Title = {The assessment of pain behavior: implications for applied
             psychophysiology and future research directions.},
   Journal = {Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {117-127},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {1090-0586},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12206046},
   Abstract = {Persons who have pain engage in behaviors such as resting in
             bed, taking medication, moving in a guarded fashion, or
             grimacing that communicate the fact that pain is being
             experienced. Pain-related behaviors increasingly are viewed
             as an important target in pain assessment. Traditionally,
             pain behavior has been assessed through interview or
             self-recording methods (e.g. diary records). Pain behaviors,
             however, are overt and can be recorded through direct
             observation. Over the past 20 years, observation methods
             have been developed to assess pain behavior in patients
             having persistent pain conditions. Although these methods
             are not widely used in applied psychophysiological settings,
             they potentially could be quite useful. The purpose of this
             paper is to review the literature on such observation
             methods. The paper is divided into five parts. The first
             part provides a description of the basic elements of pain
             behavior observation protocols. The second part presents
             information on the psychometric properties of the most
             commonly used protocols. The third part highlights
             applications of pain behavior observation protocols. The
             fourth part briefly describes the strengths and limitations
             of pain behavior observation. The paper concludes with a
             discussion of the implications of pain behavior observation
             for applied psychophysiology and future directions for
             research and practice in this area.},
   Doi = {10.1023/a:1016240126437},
   Key = {fds273823}
}

@article{fds273987,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Buffington, ALH and Studts, JL and Rumble,
             ME},
   Title = {Behavioral medicine: 2002 and beyond.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {852-856},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12090388},
   Abstract = {This article highlights future directions for research and
             practice in behavioral medicine. Topics addressed include
             social and environmental issues, the role of technology,
             translational research, improving and developing
             interventions, and professional training and
             retraining.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.852},
   Key = {fds273987}
}

@article{fds273988,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Smith, SJ and Buffington, ALH and Gibson, J and Studts,
             JL and Caldwell, DS},
   Title = {Recent advances and future directions in the biopsychosocial
             assessment and treatment of arthritis.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {640-655},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12090374},
   Abstract = {This article provides an overview of the emerging literature
             on biopsychosocial assessment and treatment for two of the
             most common forms of arthritis: osteoarthritis and
             rheumatoid arthritis. The article is divided into 3 parts.
             In the 1st part, the basic elements of the biopsychosocial
             approach to assessing and treating persons having arthritis
             is described. In the 2nd part, the authors evaluate studies
             of biopsychosocial approaches to the assessment of arthritis
             pain and disability. Six research areas are reviewed:
             learned helplessness, depression, stress, pain coping,
             self-efficacy, and the social context of arthritis. The 3rd
             part of the article reviews studies that testing the
             efficacy of biopsychosocial treatment approaches for persons
             having osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.640},
   Key = {fds273988}
}

@article{fds304927,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and McKee, D and Lynch, T},
   Title = {Point of view.},
   Journal = {Spine (Phila Pa 1976)},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1237},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12045524},
   Doi = {10.1097/00007632-200206010-00018},
   Key = {fds304927}
}

@article{fds273825,
   Author = {Waters, SJ and McKee, DC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Cognitive behavioral approaches to the treatment of
             pain},
   Journal = {Economics of Neuroscience},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {57-63},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {February},
   Abstract = {How can cognitive-behavioral therapy benefit patients with
             persistent pain? The purpose of this review is to provide an
             overview of cognitive-behavioral treatment approaches to
             persistent pain. The review is divided into four sections.
             In the first section, we describe the conceptual background
             for cognitive-behavioral approaches to pain. In the second
             section, we describe the basic elements of a typical
             cognitive-behavioral treatment protocol used in pain
             management. In the third section, we address questions that
             healthcare professionals frequently ask about
             cognitive-behavioral treatment. In the fourth section, we
             discuss new clinical applications of cognitive-behavioral
             treatment.},
   Key = {fds273825}
}

@article{fds273822,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and McKee, D and Lynch, T},
   Title = {The Role of Depression Screening in Lumbar Disc Herniations
             and Spinal Stenosis: A Comment on Levy, Hanscom, &
             Boden},
   Journal = {Spine},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1237},
   Year = {2002},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12045524},
   Key = {fds273822}
}

@article{fds273824,
   Author = {Lefebvre, JC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Memory for pain: the relationship of pain catastrophizing to
             the recall of daily rheumatoid arthritis
             pain.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {56-63},
   Year = {2002},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200201000-00009},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The assumption that individuals are capable of
             accurately recalling past painful experiences has been a
             fundamental tenet of a number of cognitive-behavioral
             theories of pain, including the gate control theory.
             However, there has been very little research on the topic in
             the past, and the results have often been contradictory. A
             general conclusion that can be drawn is that memory for pain
             is variable, and there is need to identify what factors
             contribute to this variability in memory for pain. The
             current study examined the relation of catastrophizing to
             the recall of persistent pain associated with rheumatoid
             arthritis. METHODS: Participants in this study were 45
             individuals with persistent pain due to rheumatoid
             arthritis. Each participant was asked to complete a daily
             pain diary for a period of 30 days. Participants were
             subsequently asked to recall the pain they experienced over
             the entire period of time rather than provide a single,
             average rating. RESULTS: The results of a series of
             hierarchical regression analyses indicated that level of
             catastrophizing was related to the recall of both pain
             intensity and pain variability. This relation was
             statistically significant even after controlling for actual
             pain and variability and other background variables.
             CONCLUSIONS: Participants who scored higher on
             catastrophizing demonstrated better accuracy in the recall
             of general pain intensity and pattern over a 30-day diary
             period. The results of the study are discussed in terms of
             future studies as well as their potential clinical
             importance.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-200201000-00009},
   Key = {fds273824}
}

@article{fds273826,
   Author = {Smith, TW and Kendall, PC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Behavioral medicine and clinical health psychology: A view
             from the decade of behavior},
   Journal = {Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {459-462},
   Year = {2002},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.70.3.459},
   Abstract = {This collection of articles follows prior special issues on
             behavioral medicine published in the Journal of Consulting
             and Clinical Psychology in 1982 and 1992. From the vantage
             point of the Decade of Behavior, the field has grown in
             scope, depth of basic science foundations, and evidence of
             applied utility. Yet many challenges remain-especially in
             addressing a wide range of health problems across diverse
             populations and in a health care context characterized by
             rapid changes in technology and by a growing concern with
             costs and evidence-based practice.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006X.70.3.459},
   Key = {fds273826}
}

@article{fds273886,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lumley, MA and Buffington, ALH and Carson, JW and Studts,
             JL and Edwards, CL and Macklem, DJ and Aspnes, AK and Fox, L and Steffey,
             D},
   Title = {Changing face of pain: evolution of pain research in
             psychosomatic medicine.},
   Journal = {Psychosom Med},
   Volume = {64},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {921-938},
   Year = {2002},
   ISSN = {0033-3174},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12461198},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This article provides an overview of how
             psychosomatic research on pain has evolved over the past 60
             years as exemplified by studies published in Psychosomatic
             Medicine. METHODS: Each issue of Psychosomatic Medicine from
             1939 to 1999 was reviewed to identify papers that dealt with
             pain, painful medical conditions, or pain management. A
             total of 150 papers were identified and grouped into seven
             categories: 1) case studies; 2) studies of personality
             traits and other individual differences; 3)
             psychophysiological studies of pain; 4) studies using pain
             induction techniques; 5) studies examining the relation of
             relation of race, ethnicity, and culture to pain; 6) studies
             of pain unique to women; and 7) studies examining treatments
             for pain. RESULTS: A substantial number of studies on pain
             and painful conditions were published in the Journal in the
             1940s and 1950s, and that number has almost doubled in the
             most recent full decade of the Journal. Within the pain
             area, however, the topics of interest to psychosomatic
             researchers have been, and continue to be, quite diverse.
             Although publications on certain methods or topics (eg,
             psychodynamic case studies, physiological correlates of
             pain) have decreased over time, publications on other topics
             (eg, personality traits and individual differences) have
             remained relatively constant, and publications on still
             other topics (eg, studies using pain induction techniques;
             studies of race, ethnicity, and culture; women's pain; and
             treatment studies) have flourished recently. CONCLUSIONS:
             Considered overall, the results of our review suggest that
             the face of pain research published in PM has changed
             considerably in the past 60 years. Given the ongoing
             commitment of psychosomatic researchers to this area, we
             expect this evolution to continue in the years to
             come.},
   Doi = {10.1097/01.psy.0000038934.67401.ba},
   Key = {fds273886}
}

@article{fds273659,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lumley, M and Anderson, T and Lynch, T and Studts, JL and Carson, KL},
   Title = {Erratum: Pain and emotion: New research directions (Journal
             of Clinical Psychology (2001) 57 (587-607)},
   Journal = {Journal of Clinical Psychology},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1597},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0021-9762},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.1122},
   Doi = {10.1002/jclp.1122},
   Key = {fds273659}
}

@article{fds273889,
   Author = {Edwards, CL and Fillingim, RB and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Race, ethnicity and pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {94},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {133-137},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11690726},
   Abstract = {The current paper provides a brief overview of research on
             the effects of race and ethnicity on pain. More
             specifically, the article reviews the utility of the
             concepts of race and ethnicity for pain research, suggests
             operational definitions of race and ethnicity, reviews the
             literature on the effects of race and ethnicity on
             laboratory and clinical pain, and provides suggestions for
             future research.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00408-0},
   Key = {fds273889}
}

@article{fds273890,
   Author = {Thurston, RC and Keefe, FJ and Bradley, L and Rama Krishnan and RK and Caldwell, DS},
   Title = {Chest pain in the absence of coronary artery disease: a
             biopsychosocial perspective.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {93},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {95-100},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11427319},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00327-X},
   Key = {fds273890}
}

@article{fds273828,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and Lefebvre, J and Underwood, L and Caldwell,
             DS and Drew, J and Egert, J and Gibson, J and Pargament,
             K},
   Title = {Living with rheumatoid arthritis: the role of daily
             spirituality and daily religious and spiritual
             coping.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {101-110},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14622831},
   Abstract = {The objective of this preliminary study was to evaluate more
             fully the role of daily spiritual experiences and daily
             religious/spiritual coping in the experience of individuals
             with pain due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Thirty-five
             individuals with RA were asked to keep a structured daily
             diary for 30 consecutive days. The diary included
             standardized measures designed to assess spiritual
             experiences, religious and spiritual pain coping, salience
             of religion in coping, religious/spiritual coping efficacy,
             pain, mood, and perceived social support. The participants
             in this study reported having spiritual experiences, such as
             feeling touched by the beauty of creation or feeling a
             desire to be closer or in union with God, on a relatively
             frequent basis. These participants also reported using
             positive religious and spiritual coping strategies much more
             frequently than negative religious and spiritual coping
             strategies. Although most of the variance in these measures
             was due to differences between persons, each measure also
             displayed a significant variability in scores from day to
             day. Indeed, there was just as much (or more) variability in
             these measures over time as there was variability in pain.
             Individuals who reported frequent daily spiritual
             experiences had higher levels of positive mood, lower levels
             of daily negative mood, and higher levels of each of the
             social support domains. Individuals who reported that
             religion was very salient in their coping with pain reported
             much higher levels of instrumental, emotional,
             arthritis-related, and general social support. Coping
             efficacy was significantly related to pain, mood, and social
             support in that on days that participants rated their
             ability to control pain and decrease pain using
             spiritual/religious coping methods as high, they were much
             less likely to have joint pain and negative mood and much
             more likely to have positive mood and higher levels of
             general social support. Taken together, these results
             suggest that daily spiritual experiences and daily
             religious/spiritual coping variables are important in
             understanding the experience of persons who have RA. They
             also suggest that newly developed daily diary methods may
             provide a useful methodology for studying religious and
             spiritual dimensions of living with arthritis.},
   Doi = {10.1054/jpai.2001.19296},
   Key = {fds273828}
}

@article{fds273888,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lumley, M and Anderson, T and Lynch, T and Studts, JL and Carson, KL},
   Title = {Pain and emotion: new research directions.},
   Journal = {J Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {587-607},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0021-9762},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11255208},
   Abstract = {Recently, there has been growing interest in the relation
             between pain and emotion. Numerous recent studies have been
             conducted in this area. This article provides an
             introduction to this interesting area by highlighting
             selected research topics including studies on: stress and
             pain, negative emotional states and pain, catastrophizing
             and pain, the fear of pain, emotional regulation processes
             and pain, the effects of enhancing emotional regulation on
             pain, and the relation of emotional distress to treatment
             seeking in persons having pain. The article concludes with a
             discussion of important directions for future research in
             this area.},
   Doi = {10.1002/jclp.1030},
   Key = {fds273888}
}

@article{fds273891,
   Author = {Sullivan, MJ and Thorn, B and Haythornthwaite, JA and Keefe, F and Martin, M and Bradley, LA and Lefebvre, JC},
   Title = {Theoretical perspectives on the relation between
             catastrophizing and pain.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {52-64},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008},
   Abstract = {The tendency to "catastrophize" during painful stimulation
             contributes to more intense pain experience and increased
             emotional distress. Catastrophizing has been broadly
             conceived as an exaggerated negative "mental set" brought to
             bear during painful experiences. Although findings have been
             consistent in showing a relation between catastrophizing and
             pain, research in this area has proceeded in the relative
             absence of a guiding theoretical framework. This article
             reviews the literature on the relation between
             catastrophizing and pain and examines the relative strengths
             and limitations of different theoretical models that could
             be advanced to account for the pattern of available
             findings. The article evaluates the explanatory power of a
             schema activation model, an appraisal model, an attention
             model, and a communal coping model of pain perception. It is
             suggested that catastrophizing might best be viewed from the
             perspective of hierarchical levels of analysis, where social
             factors and social goals may play a role in the development
             and maintenance of catastrophizing, whereas
             appraisal-related processes may point to the mechanisms that
             link catastrophizing to pain experience. Directions for
             future research are suggested.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008},
   Key = {fds273891}
}

@article{fds273831,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Kerns, RD and Rosenberg, R and Beaupre,
             P and Prochaska, J and Prochaska, JO and Caldwell,
             DS},
   Title = {Understanding the adoption of arthritis self-management:
             stages of change profiles among arthritis
             patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {87},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {303-313},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00294-3},
   Abstract = {Clinical observations and recent studies suggest that
             arthritis patients vary considerably in their involvement in
             self-management efforts. In the literature on health
             promotion, there is growing recognition that patients may be
             at different stages of change with respect to the adoption
             of self-management strategies. The major goal of the present
             study was to examine whether cluster analysis could be used
             to identify homogeneous subgroups of patients having
             persistent arthritis pain based on their responses to a
             stages of change questionnaire. Participants in this study
             (103 patients having rheumatoid arthritis and 74 patients
             having osteoarthritis) completed a stages-of-change measure
             specific to adoption of a self-management approach to their
             arthritis. A cluster analysis identified five distinct
             subgroups of arthritis patients: (1) precontemplation - 44%
             of the sample; (2) contemplation - 11% of the sample; (3)
             preparation - 22% of the sample; (4) unprepared action - 6%
             of the sample; and (5) prepared maintenance - 17% of the
             sample. These subgroups are generally consistent with what
             might be expected based on the transtheoretical model of
             stages of change by Prochaska and DiClemente (Prochaska JO,
             DiClemente CC. Towards a comprehensive, transtheoretical
             model of change: states of change and addictive behaviors.
             In: Miller WR, Heather N, editors. Applied clinical
             psychology, 2nd ed. Treating addictive behaviors, New York:
             Plenum Press, 1998. pp. 3-24.), and may have important
             clinical implications. For example, it is possible that the
             arthritis subgroups identified may predict arthritis
             patients' participation in and responsiveness to pain-coping
             skills training, exercise interventions, or other formal
             self-management training programs. Also, one may be able
             enhance the outcomes of self-management interventions for
             arthritis by tailoring treatment to the patient's particular
             stage.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00294-3},
   Key = {fds273831}
}

@article{fds273832,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Egert, JR and Affleck, G and Sullivan,
             MJ and Caldwell, DS},
   Title = {The relationship of gender to pain, pain behavior, and
             disability in osteoarthritis patients: the role of
             catastrophizing.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {87},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {325-334},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10963912},
   Abstract = {One hundred and sixty-eight patients with osteoarthritis
             (OA) of the knees participated in this study. Of the
             participants, 72 were men and 96 were women. All
             participants completed the Arthritis Impact Measurement
             Scales (AIMS), underwent a 10 min standardized observation
             session to assess their pain behavior, and completed the
             Catastrophizing Scale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
             (CSQ) and the Depression Scale of the Symptom Checklist 90
             Revised (SCL-90R). The study found that there were
             significant differences in pain, pain behavior, and physical
             disability in men and women having OA. Women had
             significantly higher levels of pain and physical disability,
             and exhibited more pain behavior during an observation
             session than men. Further analyses revealed that
             catastrophizing mediated the relationship between gender and
             pain-related outcomes. Once catastrophizing was entered into
             the analyses, the previously significant effects of gender
             were no longer found. Interestingly, catastrophizing still
             mediated the gender-pain relationship even after controlling
             for depression. These findings underscore the importance of
             both gender and catastrophizing in understanding the OA pain
             experience and may have important implications for pain
             assessment and treatment.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00296-7},
   Key = {fds273832}
}

@article{fds304103,
   Author = {Schanberg, LE and Sandstrom, MJ and Starr, K and Gil, KM and Lefebvre,
             JC and Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and Tennen, H},
   Title = {The relationship of daily mood and stressful events to
             symptoms in juvenile rheumatic disease.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {33-41},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0893-7524},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11094924},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was 3-fold: 1) to
             assess the feasibility of a daily diary for use with
             children with juvenile rheumatic disease (JRD), 2) to
             describe daily variation in mood, stressful events, and
             symptoms in children with JRD, and 3) to examine the extent
             to which daily mood and daily stressful events predict daily
             symptoms in children with JRD. METHODS: Twelve children with
             JRD completed a daily booklet for 7 days. The daily booklet
             included measures of daily mood, daily stressful events,
             daily symptoms, and daily function. The children also
             completed a visual analog scale for pain and the Children's
             Depression Inventory. RESULTS: Subjects showed good
             compliance with scheduled completion and return of the daily
             diaries. Results indicated that children with JRD showed
             variability in daily mood, frequency of daily stressful
             events, and daily symptoms across days. Multilevel fixed
             effects models showed that more negative daily mood and more
             daily stressful events significantly predicted increased
             reports of fatigue, stiffness, and cutting back on daily
             activities. Negative daily mood also correlated with
             increases in daily reported pain. CONCLUSIONS: These results
             indicate that daily diary research is both feasible and
             potentially informative in children with JRD. Our data
             emphasize the need for further investigation into the role
             of daily mood and daily stressful events on disease course
             in JRD.},
   Doi = {10.1002/1529-0131(200002)13:1<33::aid-art6>3.0.co;2-s},
   Key = {fds304103}
}

@article{fds372016,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and Lefebvre, J and Underwood, L and Caldwell,
             DS and Drew, J and Gibson, J and Pargament, K},
   Title = {Coping with arthritis pain: The role of daily spiritual
             experiences and religious and spiritual coping},
   Journal = {PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE},
   Volume = {62},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {149-149},
   Publisher = {LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds372016}
}

@article{fds372591,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Self-report of pain: Issues and opportunities},
   Journal = {SCIENCE OF SELF-REPORT},
   Pages = {317-337},
   Publisher = {LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC PUBL},
   Editor = {Stone, AA and Turkkan, JS and Bachrach, CA and Jobe, JB and Kurtzman,
             HS and Cain, VS},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-8058-2990-3},
   Key = {fds372591}
}

@article{fds372592,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Can cognitive-behavioral therapies succeed where medical
             treatments fail?},
   Journal = {PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH WORLD CONGRESS ON
             PAIN},
   Volume = {16},
   Pages = {1069-1084},
   Publisher = {INT ASSOC STUDY PAIN (IASP) PRESS},
   Editor = {Devor, M and Rowbotham, MC and WiesenfeldHallin,
             Z},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-931092-31-0},
   Key = {fds372592}
}

@article{fds273827,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain behavior observation: current status and future
             directions.},
   Journal = {Curr Rev Pain},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {12-17},
   Year = {2000},
   ISSN = {1069-5850},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10998710},
   Abstract = {Individuals who have pain engage in certain pain-related
             behaviors that tend to communicate their pain to others.
             There is growing recognition that the careful observation of
             such pain behaviors is an important component of a
             comprehensive pain assessment. This article provides an
             overview of the current status of behavioral observation
             methods used to assess pain behavior. The first half of this
             article describes and evaluates the most commonly used pain
             behavior observation methods. These include self-observation
             methods such as activity diaries, and direct observation
             methods such as the use of standard behavior sampling
             methods and naturalistic observation methods. The second
             half of the article discusses several important future
             clinical and research applications of pain behavior
             observation methods. The need to develop practical, clinical
             methods for incorporating pain behavior observation methods
             into practice settings is emphasized. Important future
             research topics include studying the social context of pain
             behavior (eg, by examining how spouses respond to displays
             of pain behavior), examining the predictive validity of pain
             behavior (ie, how observed pain behaviors predict future
             disability and impairment), and identifying pain behavior
             subgroups within heterogeneous chronic pain populations.
             Further development and refinement of pain behavior
             observation methods is likely to increase our understanding
             of the varied ways that patients adapt to persistent
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11916-000-0004-8},
   Key = {fds273827}
}

@article{fds273829,
   Author = {Kornguth, PJ and Keefe, FJ and Wright, KR and Delong,
             DM},
   Title = {Mammography pain in women treated conservatively for breast
             cancer.},
   Journal = {J Pain},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {268-274},
   Year = {2000},
   ISSN = {1526-5900},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2000.7884},
   Abstract = {In this study, pain during mammography in women treated
             conservatively for breast cancer was examined. It studied
             pain intensity and its relation to a variety of demographic,
             medical, and pain coping variables as well as to objective
             measures of breast compression. Ninety-nine women, treated
             with lumpectomy (with or without radiation) and undergoing
             follow-up screening mammography, were asked about strategies
             they use to cope with everyday pain and then were asked to
             report pain experienced during the mammogram. Treated and
             untreated breasts were rated separately and compared with a
             sample of 125 control women with no history of breast
             cancer. Women reported significantly greater pain in the
             treated breast (41% greater than the untreated breast and
             32% greater than the control group). There was no consistent
             relationship between mammography pain and pain coping.
             Average intensity of pain at last mammogram was the best
             predictor of pain in both breasts. Women treated
             conservatively for breast cancer experience significantly
             greater pain during mammography of their treated breast.
             Radiologists and technologists can identify women at risk
             for a painful mammogram by asking about the pain at last
             mammogram. By applying pain-reducing interventions, they
             might be able to make the mammography experience more
             tolerable for these women.},
   Doi = {10.1054/jpai.2000.7884},
   Key = {fds273829}
}

@article{fds273830,
   Author = {Drossman, DA and Leserman, J and Li, Z and Keefe, F and Hu, YJ and Toomey,
             TC},
   Title = {Effects of coping on health outcome among women with
             gastrointestinal disorders.},
   Journal = {Psychosom Med},
   Volume = {62},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {309-317},
   Year = {2000},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200005000-00004},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that the nature and quality
             of coping may positively or negatively affect health
             outcome; however, this relationship has not been well
             studied among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders.
             OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to study the effect of
             different coping strategies on the health outcome of women
             with GI disorders and how these coping strategies may modify
             the effects of education, GI disease type, neuroticism, and
             abuse severity on health outcome. METHODS: We followed 174
             patients in a referral GI clinic for 12 months to assess
             their health status as a derived variable of daily pain, bed
             disability days, psychological distress, daily dysfunction,
             number of visits to physicians, and number of surgeries and
             procedures. We obtained at baseline their GI diagnosis
             (functional vs. organic), neuroticism score (NEO Personality
             Inventory), sexual and/or physical abuse history, and scores
             on two coping questionnaires. Regressions analyses were used
             to determine the relative effect of the coping measures on
             health outcome and their modifying effects on education, GI
             disease type, neuroticism, and abuse severity. RESULTS: A
             higher score on the Catastrophizing scale and a lower score
             on the Self-Perceived Ability to Decrease Symptoms scale
             (Coping Strategies Questionnaire) predicted poor health
             outcome. Less education, a functional GI diagnosis, a higher
             neuroticism score, and greater abuse severity also
             contributed to poor health status. However, the effect of GI
             disease type and neuroticism on health outcome was
             significantly reduced by the coping measures. CONCLUSIONS:
             Maladaptive coping (eg, catastrophizing) and decreased
             self-perceived ability to decrease symptoms may adversely
             affect health outcome and may modify the effect of GI
             disease type and neuroticism on health outcome.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00006842-200005000-00004},
   Key = {fds273830}
}

@article{fds273833,
   Author = {Schanberg, LE and Jacobs, MR and Starr, K and Gil, KM and Lefebvre, JC and Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G},
   Title = {The relationship of daily mood and stressful events to
             symptoms in junvile rheumatic disease: A preliminary study
             using daily measures},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care & Research},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {33-41},
   Year = {2000},
   ISSN = {0893-7524},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11094924},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was 3-fold: 1) to
             assess the feasibility of a daily diary for use with
             children with juvenile rheumatic disease (JRD), 2) to
             describe daily variation in mood, stressful events, and
             symptoms in children with JRD, and 3) to examine the extent
             to which daily mood and daily stressful events predict daily
             symptoms in children with JRD. METHODS: Twelve children with
             JRD completed a daily booklet for 7 days. The daily booklet
             included measures of daily mood, daily stressful events,
             daily symptoms, and daily function. The children also
             completed a visual analog scale for pain and the Children's
             Depression Inventory. RESULTS: Subjects showed good
             compliance with scheduled completion and return of the daily
             diaries. Results indicated that children with JRD showed
             variability in daily mood, frequency of daily stressful
             events, and daily symptoms across days. Multilevel fixed
             effects models showed that more negative daily mood and more
             daily stressful events significantly predicted increased
             reports of fatigue, stiffness, and cutting back on daily
             activities. Negative daily mood also correlated with
             increases in daily reported pain. CONCLUSIONS: These results
             indicate that daily diary research is both feasible and
             potentially informative in children with JRD. Our data
             emphasize the need for further investigation into the role
             of daily mood and daily stressful events on disease course
             in JRD.},
   Key = {fds273833}
}

@article{fds273761,
   Author = {Affleck, G and Tennen, H and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Kashikar-Zuck, S and Wright, K and Starr, K and Caldwell,
             DS},
   Title = {Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis:
             independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain,
             mood, and coping.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {83},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {601-609},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00167-0},
   Abstract = {The effects of disease (form of arthritis) and gender on
             pain, mood, and pain coping strategies were examined in a
             prospective 30-day diary study of 71 patients with
             osteoarthritis (OA) and 76 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
             Diary instruments included joint pain ratings, POMS-B
             checklists for positive and negative mood, and the Daily
             Coping Inventory. Women's average daily pain was 72% greater
             than men's pain, and RA patients' average daily pain was 42%
             greater than OA patients' pain. Hierarchical Linear Models
             were estimated for (a) within-person associations between
             pain and next-day mood; coping and next-day pain; and coping
             and next-day mood; and (b) the independent effects of
             disease and gender on individual intercepts for pain, mood,
             and coping and on individual slopes for pain-coping-mood
             relations. Women, regardless of their disease, and RA
             patients, regardless of their gender, reported more daily
             pain. Women used more emotion-focused strategies each day
             than did men, regardless of their disease and even after
             controlling for their greater pain. Men were more likely
             than women to report an increase in negative mood the day
             after a more painful day. RA patients' pain worsened, but OA
             patients' pain improved, following a day with more
             emotion-focused coping. Implications for research and
             clinical practice are summarized.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00167-0},
   Key = {fds273761}
}

@article{fds273837,
   Author = {Weiner, D and Peterson, B and Ladd, K and McConnell, E and Keefe,
             F},
   Title = {Pain in nursing home residents: an exploration of
             prevalence, staff perspectives, and practical aspects of
             measurement.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {15},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {92-101},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10382922},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To help rectify the underdiagnosis of chronic
             pain in frail nursing home residents by developing a new
             feasible pain self-report instrument, the structured pain
             interview; to use this new tool to estimate pain prevalence
             and staff's knowledge of residents' pain in two nursing
             homes; and to compare the performance differences of the
             structured pain interview and the commonly used 0-10 scale.
             DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: One 120-bed
             VA-affiliated and one 125-bed university-affiliated,
             community-based nursing home in Durham, North Carolina.
             PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-eight chronic care nursing home
             residents without aphasia, acute illness, persistent
             vegetative status, or severe hearing impairment and 3 1
             nursing home nurses. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain prevalence
             according to resident self-report and nurse report;
             stability of response to the structured pain interview and
             0-10 scale over 1 month; agreement between residents and
             nurses on the structured pain interview and 0-10 scale.
             RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of the VA and 45% of the
             community nursing home residents reported pain. Forty-two
             percent at the VA and 20% at the community home were unable
             to respond to the 0-10 scale, compared with 7.5% and 14%
             using the structured pain interview. Stability of response
             to the structured pain interview at 1 month was 0.56 at the
             VA (nurse-resident agreement 0.38) and 0.72 in the community
             (nurse-resident agreement 0.07), which was very comparable
             to the 0-10 scale. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a highly
             feasible tool for examining pain prevalence in nursing
             homes. This tool uncovered considerable miscommunication
             regarding pain between residents and staff. Improvement in
             pain communication between nursing home residents and staff
             is needed, so that more effective pain treatment programs
             can be developed for this vulnerable population.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199906000-00005},
   Key = {fds273837}
}

@article{fds273839,
   Author = {Weiner, D and Peterson, B and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Chronic pain-associated behaviors in the nursing home:
             resident versus caregiver perceptions.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {80},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {577-588},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00249-8},
   Abstract = {Pain assessment in nursing home residents poses challenges
             since many of these individuals are too cognitively impaired
             to respond to traditional self-report instruments.
             Assessment of pain behavior in this population offers a
             logical alternative. The purpose of this study was to
             compare perceptions of behaviors identified as being
             pain-related in 42 nursing home residents with chronic pain,
             as reported by residents themselves, their nursing home
             caregivers and their family caregivers. Our specific
             research agenda was to identify the most salient behaviors
             that signal pain in nursing home residents; to determine the
             test-retest agreement of residents' self-perceived pain
             behaviors; to learn of the confidence that caregivers feel
             regarding assessment of residents' pain behavior; and to
             examine the agreement between caregivers and residents about
             pain behaviors in particular residents. We also wanted to
             compare residents' and caregivers' ratings of the residents'
             pain intensity. Finally, we explored the beliefs of nursing
             home staff about the influence of dementia on pain and pain
             assessment. Twenty-two of 26 pain-related behaviors
             identified by residents showed fair to perfect test-retest
             agreement (kappas 0.40-1). For the vast majority of
             pain-related behavior items, kappas for resident-caregiver
             agreement were <0.30. Agreement with regard to pain
             intensity was similarly poor (r = -0.19-0.34). Confidence in
             pain rating was high for both nurse (on average, 7.2 on a
             scale of 0-10) and family (on average, 6.7) caregivers.
             Seventy-one percent of nurses felt that pain assessment is
             more difficult in demented individuals, but that cognitive
             function does not influence pain prevalence. While nursing
             home residents with chronic pain and their caregivers have
             different perceptions regarding which behaviors are
             pain-related, additional studies are required to determine
             the underpinnings of these differing perceptions and to
             determine the extent to which formal pain behavior
             observation protocols will be useful for evaluating nursing
             home residents with chronic pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00249-8},
   Key = {fds273839}
}

@article{fds273841,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Baucom, D and Salley, A and Robinson, E and Timmons, K and Beaupre, P and Weisberg, J and Helms,
             M},
   Title = {Spouse-assisted coping skills training in the management of
             knee pain in osteoarthritis: long-term followup
             results.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {101-111},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {2151-4658},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199904)12:2<101::aid-art5>3.0.co;2-9},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of a
             spouse-assisted coping skills intervention in patients with
             osteoarthritis (OA) of the knees, and to evaluate how pre-
             to posttreatment changes in marital adjustment and
             self-efficacy relate to long-term improvements in pain,
             psychological disability, physical disability, pain coping,
             and pain behavior. METHODS: A followup study was conducted
             with 88 OA patients who had been randomly assigned to 1 of 3
             treatment conditions: 1) spouse-assisted coping skills
             training (spouse-assisted CST), 2) a conventional CST
             intervention with no spouse involvement, and 3) an arthritis
             education-spousal support (AE-SS) control condition. To
             evaluate long-term outcome, comprehensive measures of
             self-efficacy, marital adjustment, pain, psychological
             disability, physical disability, pain coping, and pain
             behavior were collected from these individuals at 6 and 12
             months posttreatment. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed that,
             at 6-month followup, patients in the spouse-assisted CST
             condition scored higher on measures of coping and
             self-efficacy than those in the AE-SS control group. At
             6-month followup, patients who received CST without spouse
             involvement showed a significantly higher frequency of
             coping attempts and reported higher levels of marital
             adjustment than those in the AE-SS control group. At
             12-month followup, patients in the spouse-assisted CST
             condition had significantly higher overall self-efficacy
             than those in the AE-SS control condition. In addition,
             patients in both the spouse-assisted CST and CST only
             conditions tended to show improvements in physical
             disability at the 12-month followup. Individual differences
             in outcome were noted at the 12-month followup. Patients in
             the spouse-assisted CST condition who reported initial (pre-
             to posttreatment) increases in marital adjustment had lower
             levels of psychological disability, physical disability, and
             pain behavior at 12-month followup. However, for patients in
             the conventional CST and AE-SS control conditions, increases
             in marital adjustment occurring over the initial phase of
             treatment were related to increases in pain and decreases in
             scores on the Pain Control in Rational Thinking factor of
             the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Finally, patients in
             the spouse-assisted CST condition who showed pre- to
             posttreatment increases in self-efficacy were more likely to
             show decreases in pain, psychological disability, and
             physical disability at 12-month followup. CONCLUSIONS: These
             findings suggest that spouse-assisted CST can enhance
             self-efficacy and improve the coping abilities of OA
             patients in the long term. Individual differences in the
             long-term outcome of spouse-assisted CST were noted, with
             some patients (those showing increases in marital
             satisfaction and self-efficacy) showing much better outcomes
             than others.},
   Doi = {10.1002/1529-0131(199904)12:2<101::aid-art5>3.0.co;2-9},
   Key = {fds273841}
}

@article{fds273842,
   Author = {Lefebvre, JC and Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and Raezer, LB and Starr, K and Caldwell, DS and Tennen, H},
   Title = {The relationship of arthritis self-efficacy to daily pain,
             daily mood, and daily pain coping in rheumatoid arthritis
             patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {80},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {425-435},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00242-5},
   Abstract = {There is an increasing awareness in the medical community
             that psychosocial variables such as beliefs in self-efficacy
             are important determinants of treatment outcome. However,
             before measures of self-efficacy are widely incorporated
             into clinical practice, there needs to be a better
             understanding of how they relate to daily pain, mood and
             coping. In the present study 128 rheumatoid arthritis
             patients completed diaries for 30 days in which they
             provided daily ratings of joint pain, negative and positive
             mood, the use of pain coping strategies, and coping
             efficacy. The patients then participated in an evaluation
             session during which measures of self-efficacy (the
             Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale (ASES)), demographic
             variables, and medical status were collected. A series of
             hierarchical regression analyses was conducted to determine
             the degree to which self-efficacy measures collected at the
             time of the evaluation session were related to daily diary
             measures collected during the 30 preceding days. The results
             revealed that self-efficacy was significantly related to
             daily ratings of pain, mood, coping and coping efficacy.
             Interestingly, the findings regarding self-efficacy were
             obtained even after taking into account the effects of
             important demographic and medical status variables. Taken
             together, these results suggest that self-efficacy ratings
             collected from arthritis patients at the time of an
             evaluation session may well be related to recent experiences
             of daily pain and mood, as well as the daily use and
             perceived effectiveness of pain coping strategies.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00242-5},
   Key = {fds273842}
}

@article{fds273838,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Bonk, V},
   Title = {Psychosocial assessment of pain in patients having rheumatic
             diseases.},
   Journal = {Rheum Dis Clin North Am},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {81-103},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0889-857X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70056-9},
   Abstract = {A variety of reliable and valid psychosocial assessment
             instruments have been developed. Many of these instruments
             are brief and easily incorporated into clinical practice
             settings. Measures of coping, self-efficacy, helplessness,
             and cognitive distortion are especially useful in
             understanding the pain experience in rheumatic disease
             populations. Information gleaned from psychosocial
             assessments is increasingly being used to guide pain
             treatment efforts. Recent research, suggests that treatment
             outcomes can be improved if one tailors psychosocial pain
             management protocols to address the particular problems
             identified by comprehensive psychosocial assessments.
             Considered overall, psychosocial assessment methods have
             much to offer the clinician working with patients having
             persistent pain. The current status of this field is
             promising, and as psychosocial assessment methods become
             even more fully integrated into clinical practice, they are
             likely to yield even greater insights into the pain
             experience of patients with rheumatic diseases.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70056-9},
   Key = {fds273838}
}

@article{fds273834,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Smith, SJ and Geisser, ME and Robinson,
             ME and Riley, JL},
   Title = {Catastrophizing research: Avoiding conceptual errors and
             maintaining a balanced perspective},
   Journal = {Pain Forum},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {176-180},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {This Commentary addresses some common conceptual errors and
             methodological issues raised by the Focus article by
             Geisser, Robinson, and Riley. One conceptual error, the
             problem of confounding coping with outcome, is evident in
             their assertion that catastrophizing is not a form of
             coping, but rather a maladaptive pain belief.
             Catastrophizing clearly fits current definitions of coping,
             even though it may be associated with negative outcomes. A
             second conceptual error is the tendency to oversimplify the
             coping process that is evident in the tendency to divide
             coping strategies into dichotomous categories (eg, active vs
             passive, adaptive vs maladaptive). Methodological issues
             raised by this article include: (1) the need to recognize
             the strengths of existing pain co ping instruments (eg, the
             Coping Strategies Questionnaire), and (2) the utility of new
             and alternative coping measures. This Commentary concludes
             with a discussion of important directions for future
             research on pain coping.},
   Key = {fds273834}
}

@article{fds273836,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and France, CR},
   Title = {Pain: Biopsychosocial mechanisms and management},
   Journal = {Current Directions in Psychological Science},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {137-141},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00032},
   Abstract = {Traditionally, pain has been viewed as a asensory event
             warning of tissue damage or illness. This explanation fails
             to account for many of the experiences of people suffering
             from clinically painful conditions. Over the past two
             decades, a new biopsychosocial perspective on pain has
             emerged. This perspective emphasizes that pain is a dynamic
             process that not only is influenced by biological,
             psychological, and social mechanisms of pain, but also
             produces biological, psychological, and social changes that
             can affect future responses to pain. This review presents
             findings from recent studies of the biological,
             psychological, and social mechanisms of pain and discusses
             the implications of these findings for pain research,
             assessment, prevention, and treatment, as well as for health
             care policy.},
   Doi = {10.1111/1467-8721.00032},
   Key = {fds273836}
}

@article{fds273835,
   Author = {Affleck, G and Tennen, H and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Kashikar
             Zuck, S and Wright, K and Starr, K and Caldwell, DS},
   Title = {Effects of Disease and Gender on Daily Pain, Mood, and
             Coping},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {83},
   Pages = {601-610},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds273835}
}

@article{fds273840,
   Author = {Dominick, KL and Gullette, EC and Babyak, MA and Mallow, KL and Sherwood, A and Waugh, R and Chilikuri, M and Keefe, FJ and Blumenthal,
             JA},
   Title = {Predicting peak oxygen uptake among older patients with
             chronic illness.},
   Journal = {J Cardiopulm Rehabil},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {81-89},
   Year = {1999},
   ISSN = {0883-9212},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10200913},
   Abstract = {PURPOSE: To compare three equations developed to predict VO2
             among patients diagnosed with one of two chronic diseases:
             essential hypertension (HTN), and fibromyalgia (FM). The
             equations included the American College of Sports Medicine
             (ACSM) equation, the FAST equation developed from the
             Fitness and Arthritis in Seniors Trial (FAST), and an
             equation developed by Foster et al. METHODS: One hundred
             twenty-two HTN subjects and 68 FM subjects completed a
             maximum exercise test according to the Duke/Wake Forest
             protocol. Measured peak VO2 was then compared with the VO2
             predicted by the ACSM, FAST and FOSTER equations, using
             several statistical methods. RESULTS: The ACSM equation
             overpredicted peak VO2 in the HTN group by 10.0 +/- 4.0
             mL/kg-1/min-1, and in the FM group by 8.6 +/- 4.9
             mL/kg-1/min-1 (P < 0.0001). The FAST equation, however,
             underestimated peak VO2 by 1.5 +/- 4.2 mL/kg-1/min-1 (P <
             0.01) and 1.0 +/- 3.3 mL/kg-1/min-1 (P < 0.0001) in the HTN
             and FM groups, respectively. The FOSTER equation
             overestimated peak VO2 by 2.3 +/- 3.6 mL/kg-1/min-1 in the
             HTN group and by 2.1 +/- 3.5 mL/kg-1/min-1 in the FM group
             (P < 0.0001). A large degree of variability was found for
             each of the equations. CONCLUSION: Results of this
             investigation indicate that all three equations produced
             peak VO2 values that were statistically different from
             measured values. Although the ACSM equation overestimated
             VO2 by more than 2 metabolic equivalents (METs) in each
             patient group, both the FAST and FOSTER equations produced
             differences that were less than 1 MET. Further research is
             needed to examine the FAST and FOSTER equations among other
             patient populations and with other exercise
             protocols.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00008483-199903000-00001},
   Key = {fds273840}
}

@article{fds273846,
   Author = {Sandstrom, MJ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Self-management of fibromyalgia: the role of formal coping
             skills training and physical exercise training
             programs.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {432-447},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0893-7524},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10030175},
   Abstract = {There has been growing interest in the use of formal
             self-management training programs for people with
             fibromyalgia (FM). In these programs, health care
             professionals serve as trainers and provide education about
             FM and guided instruction in specific self-management
             strategies. A review of the literature on formal
             self-management training programs for FM suggests that they
             can be divided into groups: 1) those emphasizing training in
             coping skills (e.g., relaxation, activity pacing, and
             problem-solving techniques), and 2) those emphasizing
             training in physical exercise (e.g., cardiovascular fitness,
             strength, and endurance training). In this article, we
             review studies that have tested the efficacy of both types
             of programs. In addition, we identify key individual and
             contextual variables that are related to outcome and
             highlight future directions in the research and development
             of self-management programs.},
   Doi = {10.1002/art.1790110603},
   Key = {fds273846}
}

@article{fds273657,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Cognitive processes and the pain experience},
   Journal = {Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {41-45},
   Publisher = {The Haworth Press},
   Editor = {S.R. Pillemer},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {1058-2452},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J094v06n03_08},
   Doi = {10.1300/J094v06n03_08},
   Key = {fds273657}
}

@article{fds273843,
   Author = {Weiner, DK and Peterson, BL and Logue, P and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Predictors of pain self-report in nursing home
             residents.},
   Journal = {Aging (Milano)},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {411-420},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0394-9532},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9932145},
   Abstract = {The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of
             cognitive function and other biopsychosocial factors on
             test-retest agreement, four-week variability, and intensity
             of self-reported pain using the verbal 0 to 10 scale and a
             pain thermometer in 115 nursing home residents over four
             weeks. Pain was assessed twice on three days during week 1,
             and once each during weeks 2, 3 and 4. A forward stepwise
             regression procedure was used to examine the influence of
             biopsychosocial parameters (age, race, gender, educational
             status, marital status, comorbidity, cognitive function,
             depression, social support, physical function and self-rated
             health) on pain intensity, test-retest agreement and
             variability. There was a quadratic association between
             cognitive function and test-retest agreement with the 0-10
             scale; residents with Folstein scores of 22-26 were more
             likely to show disagreement (50% of 34) than residents with
             scores < 22 or > 26 (7% of 71). Higher Folstein scores were
             also associated with greater pain intensity for both pain
             scales (p < 0.001). Baseline pain intensity was
             significantly related to pain variability (0-10 scale only).
             The clinician should be cognizant of these relationships
             when interpreting verbalizations of pain in long-term care
             facilities.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF03339888},
   Key = {fds273843}
}

@article{fds273845,
   Author = {Schanberg, LE and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Kredich, DW and Gil,
             KM},
   Title = {Social context of pain in children with Juvenile Primary
             Fibromyalgia Syndrome: parental pain history and family
             environment.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {107-115},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9647451},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe
             parental pain history and the family environment as it
             relates to the functional status of children with Juvenile
             Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome (JPFS). DESIGN AND OUTCOME
             MEASURES: Twenty-nine parents of children with JPFS
             completed a pain history questionnaire, Von Korff Chronic
             Pain Grading system, and the Family Environment Scale (FES).
             Twenty-one adolescents with JPFS completed the FES, the
             Visual Analogue Scale for Pain, the modified Fibromyalgia
             Impact Questionnaire for Children, the Arthritis Impact
             Measurement Scales, and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised.
             Correlational analyses were performed. RESULTS: Parents of
             children with JPFS reported multiple chronic pain
             conditions, including but not limited to fibromyalgia.
             Parental pain history and the family environment correlated
             with the health status of adolescents with JPFS. Children
             with JPFS perceived the family environment as significantly
             more cohesive than did their parents. Greater incongruence
             between parent and child responses on the FES positively
             correlated with greater impairment. CONCLUSIONS: These
             results suggest that family environment and parental pain
             history ày be related to how children cope with JPFS.
             Behavioral interventions targeting the family may improve
             the long-term functional status of children with
             JPFS.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199806000-00004},
   Key = {fds273845}
}

@article{fds273849,
   Author = {Weiner, D and Peterson, B and Keefe, F},
   Title = {Evaluating persistent pain in long term care residents: what
             role for pain maps?},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {76},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {249-257},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00059-1},
   Abstract = {The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the
             pain map as a pain assessment tool in frail nursing home
             residents. The study was conducted in two phases. In Phase
             1, nursing home staff's knowledge of the locations of
             resident pain complaints was examined. We found significant
             deficiencies in this knowledge. In Phase 2, we examined the
             following test characteristics of pain extensity (number of
             painful body areas annotated on pain map): (1) test-retest
             reliability, (2) convergent validity as compared with pain
             intensity measured by a pain thermometer (modified vertical
             verbal descriptor scale) and an 11 point numerical graphic
             rating scale (NGRS), and (3) predictive validity with
             depression, functional impairment and self-rated health.
             Pain map scoring was performed by counting the number of
             involved body areas (i.e., numbered segments) using an
             established scoring template. Test-retest reliability by
             body area was excellent. Pain extensity was modestly
             associated with pain thermometer-scored pain intensity but
             not with NGRS-scored pain intensity. Pain extensity also
             demonstrated modest predictive validity with self-rated
             health, but not with depression or functional impairment.
             The advantage of knowing where residents hurt is that this
             allows staff to target their assessment and thus determine
             the functional implications of residents' pain. It appears
             that pain maps add a useful dimension to pain assessment in
             residents of long term care facilities.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00059-1},
   Key = {fds273849}
}

@article{fds273848,
   Author = {Compas, BE and Haaga, DA and Keefe, FJ and Leitenberg, H and Williams,
             DA},
   Title = {Sampling of empirically supported psychological treatments
             from health psychology: smoking, chronic pain, cancer, and
             bulimia nervosa.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {66},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {89-112},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.66.1.89},
   Abstract = {Interventions in health psychology and behavioral medicine
             represent an integral area of research for the development
             of psychological therapies to enhance health behaviors,
             manage symptoms and sequelae of disease, treat psychological
             symptoms and disorders, prolong survival in the face of a
             life-threatening illness, and improve quality of life. A
             sampling of interventions in health psychology and
             behavioral medicine is offered that meet the criteria for
             empirically supported treatments for smoking cessation,
             chronic pain, cancer, and bulimia nervosa. Evidence for
             empirically supported treatments is identified, along with
             promising interventions that do not yet meet the criteria as
             outlined by D. L. Chambless and S. D. Hollon (1998).
             Evidence for the effectiveness and clinical significance of
             these interventions is reviewed, and issues in this area of
             research are outlined.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.66.1.89},
   Key = {fds273848}
}

@article{fds273844,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Current status and future directions of pain behavior
             observation},
   Journal = {Current Review of Pain},
   Volume = {2},
   Pages = {61-65},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds273844}
}

@article{fds273847,
   Author = {Barsky, and A, and Baszener, and I, and Bradley, and L, and Casey, and K, and Chapman, and R, C and Gracely, and R, and Haythornthwaite, and J, and Jackson, and Jensen, and M, and Keefe, and J, F and Liebeskind, and J, and Logan, and H, and McGrath, and P, and McGuire, and B, D and Melzack, and R, and Morris, and D, and Post, and G, S and Price, and D, and Rouse, and F, and Spro},
   Title = {Perspectives on pain-related suffering: presentations and
             discussions},
   Journal = {Advances in Mind-Body Medicine},
   Volume = {14},
   Pages = {167-203},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds273847}
}

@article{fds273856,
   Author = {Schanberg, LE and Lefebvre, JC and Keefe, FJ and Kredich, DW and Gil,
             KM},
   Title = {Pain coping and the pain experience in children with
             juvenile chronic arthritis.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {73},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {181-189},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9415504},
   Abstract = {This study examined the pain experience and pain coping of
             children with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). The purpose
             of the study was to describe present pain and the pain
             coping strategies utilized by children with juvenile chronic
             arthritis and examine pain coping strategies and pain
             efficacy as a predictor of pain intensity and distribution.
             Fifty-six children with JCA rated their present pain using
             two measures of pain intensity, the Oucher and the pain
             thermometer, and reported on the number of pain locations
             using a body map. In addition, each child completed the
             Child Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ-C)
             and health status was determined by a physician's disease
             activity rating. On average, children reported current pain
             in the low to middle range on the different pain scales,
             although there was considerable variability in pain ratings.
             Up to 30% of all children had pain ratings higher than or
             equal to the middle range on both the Oucher and the pain
             thermometer. On average, children reported pain in more than
             two body areas. Correlational analyses were conducted to
             examine how the composite factors on the CSQ-C (Pain Control
             and Rational Thinking, and Coping Attempts) related to
             variations in reported pain intensity and location. Children
             who scored higher on the Pain Control and Rational Thinking
             factor of the CSQ-C had much lower ratings of pain intensity
             and reported pain in fewer body areas. Hierarchical
             regression analyses indicated that disease activity and
             scores on the Pain Control and Rational Thinking factor of
             the CSQ-C each accounted for a unique, statistically
             significant proportion of variance in the measures of pain
             intensity and pain location. Behavioral and cognitive
             therapy interventions designed to increase pain coping
             efficacy may be useful adjuncts in treating pain in children
             with chronic arthritis.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00110-3},
   Key = {fds273856}
}

@article{fds273857,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Kashikar-Zuck, S and Robinson, E and Salley, A and Beaupre, P and Caldwell, D and Baucom, D and Haythornthwaite,
             J},
   Title = {Pain coping strategies that predict patients' and spouses'
             ratings of patients' self-efficacy.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {73},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {191-199},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9415505},
   Abstract = {This study examined the relationship of pain coping
             strategies to osteoarthritis patients' ratings of
             self-efficacy and to spouses' ratings of the patients'
             self-efficacy. Subjects, 130 individuals having
             osteoarthritis of the knees and persistent knee pain,
             completed a pain coping strategies measure (the Coping
             Strategies Questionnaire), a measure of self-efficacy (the
             Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale), and a measure of pain (the
             McGill Pain Questionnaire). Two sets of regression analyses
             were conducted, one examining the degree to which pain
             coping strategies predicted patients' self-efficacy ratings,
             and the other examining the degree to which coping
             strategies predicted spouses' ratings of the patients'
             self-efficacy. Several pain coping strategies were found to
             predict a significant proportion of variance in patients'
             ratings of self-efficacy: (i) ignoring pain sensations was
             related to higher self-efficacy for pain; (ii) coping self
             statements were related to higher self-efficacy for
             controlling other arthritis symptoms (e.g., fatigue or mood
             symptoms: and (iii) catastrophizing was related to lower
             self-efficacy for pain, and self-efficacy for other
             arthritis symptoms. Pain coping strategies were also found
             to predict a significant proportion of variance in spouses'
             ratings of the patients' self-efficacy. Specifically: (i)
             diverting attention was related to lower spousal ratings of
             self-efficacy for pain; (ii) praying or hoping was related
             to lower spousal ratings of self-efficacy for function; and
             (iii) catastrophizing was related to lower spousal ratings
             of self-efficacy for control of fatigue or mood symptoms.
             The findings regarding coping strategies were particularly
             interesting in that they were obtained even after
             controlling for pain intensity and demographic variables.
             The pain coping strategies identified are potentially
             important targets for cognitive-behavioral assessment and
             treatment efforts. Interventions designed to increase the
             use of adaptive pain coping strategies and decrease the use
             of maladaptive pain coping strategies could enhance
             self-efficacy, reduce pain, and improve the physical and
             psychological functioning of individuals having
             osteoarthritis.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00109-7},
   Key = {fds273857}
}

@article{fds304102,
   Author = {Kashikar-Zuck, S and Keefe, FJ and Kornguth, P and Beaupre, P and Holzberg, A and Delong, D},
   Title = {Pain coping and the pain experience during mammography: a
             preliminary study.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {73},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {165-172},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9415502},
   Abstract = {This study examined how pain coping efficacy and pain coping
             strategies were related to reports of pain during
             mammography. Subjects were 125 women over the age of 50
             undergoing screening mammograms. Prior to their mammogram,
             all subjects completed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
             (CSQ) to assess how they cope with day-to-day pain
             experiences. Ratings of pain during the mammogram were
             collected using a 6-point pain/discomfort scale, a 100-mm
             Visual Analog Scale, the adjective checklist of the McGill
             Pain Questionnaire, and the Brief Pain Inventory. Up to 93%
             of the women reported the mammogram examination was painful.
             On average, women rated the mammography pain in the low to
             moderate range. Considerable variability in pain ratings was
             found, however, with some women reporting severe pain and
             others reporting little or no pain. Correlational analyses
             were conducted to examine how coping efficacy (CSQ ratings
             of ability to decrease pain and ability to control pain) and
             coping strategies (CSQ pain coping strategy subscales)
             related to variations in pain report. There was a pattern
             for ratings of ability to decrease pain to be related to
             lower ratings of current mammography pain. Women who rated
             their ability to decrease pain as high reported lower
             average levels of mammography pain, lower ratings on the
             mammography pain/discomfort scale, and were much more likely
             to report having had lower levels of pain during their last
             mammogram. These findings suggest that women who rate their
             coping efficacy in decreasing day-to-day pain as low may be
             at higher risk for having a painful mammogram. Individual
             pain coping strategies were not generally correlated with
             pain ratings. Behavioral interventions (e.g., patient
             controlled breast compression) and cognitive therapy
             interventions (e.g., training in the use of calming
             self-statements or distraction techniques) designed to
             increase coping efficacy potentially could be useful in
             reducing pain in women who are at risk for pain during
             mammography.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00114-0},
   Key = {fds304102}
}

@article{fds372017,
   Author = {Schanberg, LE and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Kredich, DW and Gil,
             KM},
   Title = {Pain coping and the pain experience in children with
             juvenile chronic arthritis.},
   Journal = {ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1172-1172},
   Publisher = {LIPPINCOTT-RAVEN PUBL},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds372017}
}

@article{fds372018,
   Author = {Schanberg, LE and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Kredich, DW and Gil,
             KM},
   Title = {Social context of pain in children with fibromyalgia:
             Parental pain history and family environment.},
   Journal = {ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {1518-1518},
   Publisher = {LIPPINCOTT-RAVEN PUBL},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds372018}
}

@article{fds372593,
   Author = {Jacobs, M and Lefebvre, J and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Negative pain-related thoughts in FM: Relationship to pain
             and fatigue.},
   Journal = {ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {14-14},
   Publisher = {LIPPINCOTT-RAVEN PUBL},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds372593}
}

@article{fds372594,
   Author = {Weiner, DK and Peterson, B and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Predictors of self-reported pain intensity and stability in
             the nursing home.},
   Journal = {JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY},
   Volume = {45},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {P218-P218},
   Publisher = {WILLIAMS & WILKINS},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds372594}
}

@article{fds273851,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Jacobs, M and Underwood-Gordon, L},
   Title = {Biobehavioral pain research: a multi-institute assessment of
             cross-cutting issues and research needs.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {91-103},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9186016},
   Abstract = {In 1994 ten NIH institutes sponsored an interagency workshop
             focusing on biobehavioral pain research. The workshop had
             three major goals: (1) to review the current status of
             biobehavioral pain research (2) to identify critical
             research needs, and (3) to enhance interdisciplinary and
             interagency cooperation in pain research. The purpose of
             this article is to summarize the presentations at this
             meeting and to highlight some of the key research
             recommendations. Research topics addressed include (a)
             understanding critical interfaces between biology and
             behavior; (b) pain, suffering, and emotion; (c) pain and
             behavior; (d) behavior-related interventions; (e)
             commonalities and differences in pain expression,
             experience, and treatment; and (f) pain in special
             populations. The article concludes with a summary of NIH
             pain research activities that have taken place since the
             workshop.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199706000-00003},
   Key = {fds273851}
}

@article{fds273852,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Maixner, W and Salley, AN and Caldwell,
             DS},
   Title = {Self-efficacy for arthritis pain: relationship to perception
             of thermal laboratory pain stimuli.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {177-184},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0893-7524},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9335629},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine how self-efficacy for arthritis pain
             relates to the perception of controlled laboratory pain
             stimuli. METHODS: Forty patients with osteoarthritis
             completed self-report measures of self-efficacy for
             arthritis pain. They then participated in a single
             experimental session in which measures of thermal pain
             threshold and tolerance were collected, as well as measures
             of the perceived intensity and unpleasantness of a range of
             thermal pain stimuli. RESULTS: Correlational analyses
             revealed that patients reporting high self-efficacy for
             arthritis pain rated the thermal pain stimuli as less
             unpleasant than those reporting low self-efficacy. When
             subjects scoring very high and very low in self-efficacy
             were compared, it was found that subjects scoring high on
             self-efficacy for arthritis pain had significantly higher
             pain thresholds and pain tolerance than those scoring low on
             self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that
             self-efficacy for arthritis pain is related to judgments of
             thermal pain stimuli. Implications for the understanding of
             arthritis pain and for future laboratory research are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1002/art.1790100305},
   Key = {fds273852}
}

@article{fds273850,
   Author = {Robinson, ME and Riley, JL and Myers, CD and Sadler, IJ and Kvaal, SA and Geisser, ME and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The Coping Strategies Questionnaire: a large sample, item
             level factor analysis.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {43-49},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-199703000-00007},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), a
             measure of coping in chronic pain patients, was subjected to
             item-level exploratory factor analysis. SUBJECTS: A sample
             of 965 chronic pain patients were used in the analysis.
             RESULTS: Principal components analysis using a varimax
             rotation procedure identified nine factors that accounted
             for 54.5% of the variance. Of these nine factors, the first
             five represent subscales of the original CSQ subscales. The
             catastrophizing subscale replicated with significant
             loadings for all six original items, and ignoring sensations
             replicated with five of six items. Factors representing
             reinterpreting pain sensations, coping self-statements, and
             diverting attention subscales also appeared. The items from
             the praying and hoping subscale split into separate praying
             and hoping factors (factors 6 and 8). When reliability
             coefficients were calculated, factors 7 through 9 had
             unacceptably low internal consistency and thus were not
             considered stable factors. Correlations between factors 1
             through 6 and other measures of psychological and physical
             functioning were calculated in the construct validation
             portion of this study. Previously found relationships were
             replicated in that the correlations between CSQ factor
             scores and measures of pain, depression, and disability were
             in the same direction in this data set as those previously
             reported.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199703000-00007},
   Key = {fds273850}
}

@article{fds273862,
   Author = {Weisberg, JN and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Methodological considerations for diagnosis of personality
             disorders in chronic pain patients},
   Journal = {PAIN FORUM},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {20-21},
   Publisher = {CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1058-9139},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1997WQ44300005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds273862}
}

@article{fds273859,
   Author = {Beaupre, P and Keefe, FJ and Lester, N and Affleck, G and Freedrickson,
             B and Caldwell, DS},
   Title = {A computer-assisted observational method for assessing
             spouses' ratings of osteoarthritis patients'
             pain},
   Journal = {Psychology, Health and Medicine},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {99-108},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13548509708400568},
   Abstract = {This article presents preliminary data on a new method for
             analysing spouses' ratings of their marital partner's pain.
             Subjects were 19 individuals with persistent osteoarthritic
             knee pain and their spouses. Spouses viewed a videotape of
             the patient engaging in a series of daily activities
             (sitting, walking, standing, and reclining) and
             simultaneously made continuous ratings of the patient's pain
             using a computer-controlled mouse. Ratings made by the
             spouse were directly compared to ratings of pain provided by
             the patient to establish agreement about both the mean level
             of pain as well as the temporal synchrony between patients'
             and spouses' ratings. There was a significant positive
             correlation between spouses' mean ratings of pain and the
             patient's mean ratings of their own pain. However, when
             individual patient-spouse dyads were examined separately
             using time series analyse's individual differences in
             synchrony were clearly apparent. In some couples there was
             very high synchrony between patient's and spouse's ratings,
             while in other couples there was very low synchrony between
             these ratings. The level of synchrony was found to be higher
             in couples where the spouse was female and in which the
             patient had pain for a shorter duration or lower levels of
             physical disability. Although these findings are
             preliminary, they suggest that further research using this
             approach is warranted.},
   Doi = {10.1080/13548509708400568},
   Key = {fds273859}
}

@article{fds273861,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Jacobs, M and Edwards, C},
   Title = {Persistent pain: Cognitive-behavioral approaches to
             assessment and treatment},
   Journal = {Seminars in Anesthesia},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {117-126},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0277-0326},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-0326(97)80023-2},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0277-0326(97)80023-2},
   Key = {fds273861}
}

@article{fds273863,
   Author = {Polatin, PB and Gatchel, RJ and Fishbain, DA and Weisberg, JN and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Personality disorders in the chronic pain population: Basic
             concepts, empirical findings, and clinical
             implications},
   Journal = {Pain Forum},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-21},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {Personality traits and characteristics have repeatedly been
             studied in the chronic pain literature. Accurate personality
             disorder diagnosis is now being conducted in the psychiatric
             literature through the use of semistructured interview
             techniques. There have been four studies to date that have
             used similar technology to diagnose personality disorders in
             chronicpain patients. Accurate personality disorder
             diagnosis can be beneficial if used appropriately to guide
             treatment decisions and to help treating clinicians work
             within a common paradigm. Unfortunately, there has yet to be
             a rigorous investigation of personality disorder diagnosis
             using semistructured instruments widely used in psychiatric
             research. The authors suggest that a diathesis-stress model
             may best help to explain the relatively high prevalence of
             personality disorder seen in the chronic pain
             population.},
   Key = {fds273863}
}

@article{fds273865,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS},
   Title = {Cognitive behavioral control of arthritis
             pain.},
   Journal = {Med Clin North Am},
   Volume = {81},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {277-290},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0025-7125},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9012765},
   Abstract = {Cognitive-behavioral approaches appear to offer a viable
             alternative for the management of arthritis pain. Controlled
             studies have documented the efficacy of CBT protocols for
             managing pain in individuals having OA and RA. Preliminary
             studies examining the efficacy of CBT for FM patients have
             also yielded encouraging results. A number of clinical and
             research issues need attention if CBT is to be incorporated
             into rheumatology practice settings. These issues include
             identifying the most important components of CBT, developing
             strategies for matching CBT interventions to patients'
             readiness for behavior change, testing the efficacy of
             different therapy formats (e.g., individual versus group),
             broadening the scope of CBT to address issues other than
             pain, and insurance reimbursement.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70515-0},
   Key = {fds273865}
}

@article{fds304930,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and Lefebvre, JC and Starr, K and Caldwell, DS and Tennen, H},
   Title = {Pain coping strategies and coping efficacy in rheumatoid
             arthritis: a daily process analysis.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {69},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {35-42},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9060010},
   Abstract = {Data from daily diaries were used to analyze pain coping
             processes in rheumatoid arthritis patients. For 30
             consecutive days, 53 individuals described the pain coping
             strategies they used that day and rated the efficacy of
             their coping, joint pain, and positive and negative mood.
             Relations among variables were examined across-persons and
             within-persons over time. At the across-persons level of
             analysis, (i) daily coping efficacy was unrelated to pain
             coping or pain intensity, and (ii) the more frequent daily
             use of a wide variety of pain coping strategies was
             correlated with greater pain. Within-person analyses
             provided unique information about the relations among
             coping, pain, and mood not apparent in the across-persons
             results. Specifically, these analyses showed that increases
             in daily coping efficacy were not only related to decreases
             in pain, but also to decreases in negative mood and
             increases in positive mood. Time-lagged effects of coping
             and coping efficacy were also found. Individuals who
             reported high levels of coping efficacy on one day had lower
             levels of pain on the subsequent day. The daily use of pain
             reduction efforts and relaxation strategies also contributed
             to an improvement in next-day pain and an enhancement of
             positive mood. The implications of these findings for the
             assessment of pain and coping in rheumatoid arthritis
             patients are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03246-0},
   Key = {fds304930}
}

@article{fds40986,
   Author = {Smarr, K.L. and Parker, J.C. and Wright, G.E. and Stucky-Ropp, R.C. and Buckelew, S.P. and Hoffman, R.W. and O'Sullivan, F.X. and Hewett,
             J.E.},
   Title = {The importance of enhancing self-efficacy in rheumatoid
             arthritis},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care and Research},
   Volume = {10},
   Pages = {18-26},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds40986}
}

@article{fds273853,
   Author = {Koenig, HG and Weiner, DK and Peterson, BL and Meador, KG and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Religious coping in the nursing home: a biopsychosocial
             model.},
   Journal = {Int J Psychiatry Med},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {365-376},
   Year = {1997},
   ISSN = {0091-2174},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9565732},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine psychosocial and physical health
             correlates of religious coping in medically ill chronically
             institutionalized older adults. Religious coping is defined
             as the extent to which persons use religious beliefs and
             practices to help them to cope. METHOD: This is a
             cross-sectional cohort study conducted in a 120 bed
             VA-affiliated and a 125 bed university affiliated
             community-based nursing home in Durham, North Carolina.
             Participants were 115 chronic care nursing home residents;
             mean age of the sample was seventy-nine years, 44 percent
             were women, and 17 percent were African Americans. Subjects
             were enrolled for a one-month period during which
             comprehensive psychosocial and health assessments were
             performed, including evaluation of cognitive function
             (Mini-Mental State Exam), physical function (Barthel index),
             severity of medical comorbidity (Cumulative Illness Rating
             Scale), self-reported physical pain (vertical verbal
             descriptor scale), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression
             Scale), social support (social network), and religious
             coping (Religious Coping Index). RESULTS: Over 43 percent of
             the sample scored in the depressed range of the Geriatric
             Depression Scale. Almost 60 percent reported they used
             religion at least to a large extent when coping with their
             problems; 34 percent said that it was the most important
             factor that enabled them to cope. Patients who used religion
             to cope had greater social support (p = .01), more severe
             medical illness (p = .04), and better cognitive functioning
             (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Religious beliefs and practices are
             frequently used by chronically institutionalized older
             adults to help them to cope. Religious coping is associated
             with more severe medical illness, higher social support, and
             better cognitive functioning.},
   Doi = {10.2190/M2D6-5YDG-M1DD-A958},
   Key = {fds273853}
}

@article{fds273854,
   Author = {Schwartz, CE and Chesney, MA and Irvine, MJ and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {The control group dilemma in clinical research: applications
             for psychosocial and behavioral medicine
             trials.},
   Journal = {Psychosom Med},
   Volume = {59},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {362-371},
   Year = {1997},
   ISSN = {0033-3174},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199707000-00005},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Clinical research on psychosocial and behavioral
             medicine interventions has burgeoned in the past two
             decades, so much so that sole reliance on standard
             no-treatment control conditions may no longer be appropriate
             or feasible. We discuss the ethical, theoretical,
             scientific, and statistical considerations that shape
             current clinical outcomes research for psychosocial and
             behavioral medicine interventions. METHOD AND RESULTS:
             Secondary analysis of a psychosocial randomized trial (N =
             127) illustrates some of these points. CONCLUSIONS: A new
             design for randomized clinical trials is described that does
             not require a no-treatment control group, and that reveals
             dose-response relationships between interventions and
             treatment outcomes.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00006842-199707000-00005},
   Key = {fds273854}
}

@article{fds273855,
   Author = {Kashikar Zuck and S and Keefe, FJ and Kornguth, P and Beaupre, P and Holzberg, A and Delong, D},
   Title = {Pain coping and the pain experience during
             mammography},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {73},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {165-172},
   Year = {1997},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9415502},
   Abstract = {This study examined how pain coping efficacy and pain coping
             strategies were related to reports of pain during
             mammography. Subjects were 125 women over the age of 50
             undergoing screening mammograms. Prior to their mammogram,
             all subjects completed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
             (CSQ) to assess how they cope with day-to-day pain
             experiences. Ratings of pain during the mammogram were
             collected using a 6-point pain/discomfort scale, a 100-mm
             Visual Analog Scale, the adjective checklist of the McGill
             Pain Questionnaire, and the Brief Pain Inventory. Up to 93%
             of the women reported the mammogram examination was painful.
             On average, women rated the mammography pain in the low to
             moderate range. Considerable variability in pain ratings was
             found, however, with some women reporting severe pain and
             others reporting little or no pain. Correlational analyses
             were conducted to examine how coping efficacy (CSQ ratings
             of ability to decrease pain and ability to control pain) and
             coping strategies (CSQ pain coping strategy subscales)
             related to variations in pain report. There was a pattern
             for ratings of ability to decrease pain to be related to
             lower ratings of current mammography pain. Women who rated
             their ability to decrease pain as high reported lower
             average levels of mammography pain, lower ratings on the
             mammography pain/discomfort scale, and were much more likely
             to report having had lower levels of pain during their last
             mammogram. These findings suggest that women who rate their
             coping efficacy in decreasing day-to-day pain as low may be
             at higher risk for having a painful mammogram. Individual
             pain coping strategies were not generally correlated with
             pain ratings. Behavioral interventions (e.g., patient
             controlled breast compression) and cognitive therapy
             interventions (e.g., training in the use of calming
             self-statements or distraction techniques) designed to
             increase coping efficacy potentially could be useful in
             reducing pain in women who are at risk for pain during
             mammography.},
   Key = {fds273855}
}

@article{fds273858,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Intervention specific response rates in behavioral
             treatments for chronic pain},
   Journal = {Mind-Body Medicine},
   Volume = {2},
   Pages = {190-196},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds273858}
}

@article{fds273860,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC},
   Title = {Pain: From mechanisms to management},
   Journal = {Health Psychology},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {307-309},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1997},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092701},
   Doi = {10.1037/h0092701},
   Key = {fds273860}
}

@article{fds273864,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Affleck, G and Lefebvre, JC and Starr, K and Caldwell, DS and Tennen, H},
   Title = {Pain coping strategies and coping efficacy in rheumatoid
             arthritis: A daily process analysis},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {69},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {43-48},
   Year = {1997},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9060010},
   Abstract = {Data from daily diaries were used to analyze pain coping
             processes in rheumatoid arthritis patients. For 30
             consecutive days, 53 individuals described the pain coping
             strategies they used that day and rated the efficacy of
             their coping, joint pain, and positive and negative mood.
             Relations among variables were examined across-persons and
             within-persons over time. At the across-persons level of
             analysis, (i) daily coping efficacy was unrelated to pain
             coping or pain intensity, and (ii) the more frequent daily
             use of a wide variety of pain coping strategies was
             correlated with greater pain. Within-person analyses
             provided unique information about the relations among
             coping, pain, and mood not apparent in the across-persons
             results. Specifically, these analyses showed that increases
             in daily coping efficacy were not only related to decreases
             in pain, but also to decreases in negative mood and
             increases in positive mood. Time-lagged effects of coping
             and coping efficacy were also found. Individuals who
             reported high levels of coping efficacy on one day had lower
             levels of pain on the subsequent day. The daily use of pain
             reduction efforts and relaxation strategies also contributed
             to an improvement in next-day pain and an enhancement of
             positive mood. The implications of these findings for the
             assessment of pain and coping in rheumatoid arthritis
             patients are discussed.},
   Key = {fds273864}
}

@article{fds304934,
   Author = {Lester, N and Lefebvre, JC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain in young adults--III: Relationships of three
             pain-coping measures to pain and activity
             interference.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {291-300},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-199612000-00008},
   Abstract = {The study had two purposes: (a) to examine the relationships
             among coping strategies measured by the Coping Strategies
             Questionnaire (CSQ) (1), the Vanderbilt Pain Management
             Inventory (VPMI) (2), and the Ways of Coping Inventory (WOC)
             (3) and identify the higher-order composite factors
             representing these relationships; and (b) to determine the
             degree to which individual coping scale scores and composite
             coping factor scores could explain variability in the pain
             intensity and pain-related activity interference reported by
             young adults. Measures of pain coping were collected from
             206 young adults using the CSQ, VPMI, and WOC, along with
             measures of pain intensity, pain location, and the extent to
             which pain interfered with daily activities. Results
             indicated considerable variability in the reported frequency
             of use of pain-coping strategies and in pain intensity,
             location, and activity interference. Principal components
             factor analysis identified three higher-order coping factors
             (Emotional and Other-Directed Coping, Active Cognitive
             Coping, and Self-Efficacy for Pain Control) that explained
             87% of the variance in individual coping scale scores. The
             degree to which individual scale scores and composite factor
             scores explained variability in pain intensity and activity
             interference variables was determined through a series of
             multiple regression analyses. The results revealed that
             individual scale scores, particularly the CSQ scales of
             catastrophizing and praying or hoping, were best able to
             explain the variance in measures of pain and activity
             interference. Taken together, these findings provide further
             support for the importance of coping variables in explaining
             the experience of pain and adjustment in young
             adults.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199612000-00008},
   Key = {fds304934}
}

@article{fds273867,
   Author = {Weiner, D and Pieper, C and McConnell, E and Martinez, S and Keefe,
             F},
   Title = {Pain measurement in elders with chronic low back pain:
             traditional and alternative approaches.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {67},
   Number = {2-3},
   Pages = {461-467},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8951942},
   Abstract = {Pain evaluation typically relies upon the use of self-report
             instruments. The validity of these tools is questionable in
             many older adults, however, particularly those with
             cognitive impairment. Rating of pain behavior (e.g.
             grimacing, sighing) by an objective observer represents an
             alternative pain assessment strategy which has been
             validated in subjects of heterogeneous ages. The purpose of
             this study was to examine, in a group of community-dwelling
             elderly with low back pain and lumbosacral osteoarthritis,
             the concurrent validity of observational pain behavior
             rating techniques as compared with self-report instruments
             and the degree to which pain and pain behavior relate to
             disability. Thirty-nine cognitively intact subjects, age >
             65 years, without depression, other sources of pain, or
             other known spinal pathology underwent the following
             measures: (1) pain self-report using the verbal 0-10 scale,
             vertical verbal descriptor scale, Arthritis Impact
             Measurement Scales and McGill Pain Questionnaire; (2) pain
             behavior was sampled during two protocols, one, identical to
             that used by Keefe and Block (Behav. Ther., 13 (1982)
             363-375), that required subjects to sit, stand, walk, and
             recline for 1-2 minute periods (which we have labelled the
             traditional protocol), and a second, more demanding protocol
             that was designed to simulate activities of daily living
             that place a premium on axial movement (the 'ADL' protocol);
             (3) disability was assessed using the Roland questionnaire,
             a 6 month global disability question and the Jette
             Functional Status Index; and (4) radiographic evaluation of
             the lumbosacral spine; osteoarthritis was quantitated using
             a previously validated scoring system. Interrelationships
             among pain, pain behavior and disability measures were
             tested using canonical correlations. Self-reported pain was
             associated with pain behavior frequency; the association was
             stronger when the ADL protocol was used, as compared with
             the traditional protocol. The association between pain and
             disability was modestly strong with both self-report
             instruments and pain behavior observation when the ADL
             protocol was used, but not when the traditional protocol was
             used. Our findings suggest that pain behavior observation is
             a valid assessment tool in the elderly. In addition, it
             seems that observation of elders during performance of
             activities of daily living may be a more sensitive and valid
             way of assessing pain behavior than observing pain behavior
             during sitting, walking, standing, or reclining.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(96)03150-8},
   Key = {fds273867}
}

@article{fds273868,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Kashikar-Zuck, S and Opiteck, J and Hage, E and Dalrymple,
             L and Blumenthal, JA},
   Title = {Pain in arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders: the role of
             coping skills training and exercise interventions.},
   Journal = {J Orthop Sports Phys Ther},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {279-290},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0190-6011},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8892142},
   Abstract = {There is growing recognition of the limitations of
             conventional, biomedical approaches to the management of
             pain in individuals having arthritis and musculoskeletal
             disorders. This article provides an overview of newly
             developed biopsychosocial approaches to the management of
             pain in this population. The presentation is divided into
             three sections. In the first section, a biopsychosocial
             model of pain is presented. This model highlights the role
             that biological factors (eg., disease severity, comorbid
             conditions), cognitive-behavioral factors (eg., thoughts,
             emotions, and behaviors), and environmental factors (eg.,
             spouse or family responses to pain behavior) can play in
             influencing the pain experience. In the second section, we
             provide an overview of two newly developed treatment
             protocols based on the biopsychosocial model of pain: a pain
             coping skills training protocol and an exercise training
             protocol. Practical aspects of implementing these protocols
             are illustrated by highlighting how they are applied in the
             management of patients having persistent osteoarthritic
             pain. In the final section of the article, we pinpoint
             several important future directions for research in this
             area. Future studies need to explore the utility of
             combining pain coping skills and exercise training
             protocols. In addition, there is a need to identify
             variables that predict patients' response to biopsychosocial
             treatments.},
   Doi = {10.2519/jospt.1996.24.4.279},
   Key = {fds273868}
}

@article{fds273869,
   Author = {Kornguth, PJ and Keefe, FJ and Conaway, MR},
   Title = {Pain during mammography: characteristics and relationship to
             demographic and medical variables.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {66},
   Number = {2-3},
   Pages = {187-194},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8880840},
   Abstract = {Reports of pain during mammography show that there is great
             variability in both the incidence of reported pain (0.2-62%)
             and the intensity of that pain. Much of that variability may
             be due to the measures used to rate mammography pain. This
             is the first study that has examined the incidence, quality
             and intensity of mammography pain using a variety of pain
             measures. A sample of 119 women undergoing screening
             mammography was studied using four pain scales, three
             well-validated measures frequently used in the pain research
             literature as well as a pain/discomfort measure frequently
             reported in the radiology literature. A large proportion (up
             to 91%) of women report having some degree of pain during
             mammography. The intensity of that pain was typically in the
             low to moderate range, but a small proportion of women (<
             15%) reported intense pain. The incidence of reported pain
             was related to the pain measure used. Pain measures that
             provided a woman with many options for reporting pain were
             associated with a higher incidence of pain than a scale that
             provided only one or two options. Thus, some of the
             variability in reported incidence of pain during mammography
             can be explained by the pain scale used in the study.
             Demographic and medical variables could explain 18-20% of
             the variance in mammography pain. Two of the variables that
             were shown to consistently predict a painful mammographic
             experience were (1) average pain at the last mammogram and
             (2) breast density. This study demonstrated that the pain
             measure selected for use in a particular study may depend on
             the population being studied. A college education was found
             to be an important predictor of pain scores on the McGill
             Pain Questionnaire. Thus, this pain measure may be of
             limited usefulness in studying a population of women with
             little formal education.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(96)03057-6},
   Key = {fds273869}
}

@article{fds273870,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Baucom, D and Salley, A and Robinson, E and Timmons, K and Beaupre, P and Weisberg, J and Helms,
             M},
   Title = {Spouse-assisted coping skills training in the management of
             osteoarthritic knee pain.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {279-291},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0893-7524},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8997917},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a spouse-assisted
             pain-coping skills training intervention on pain,
             psychological disability, physical disability, pain-coping,
             and pain behavior in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of
             the knees. METHODS: Eighty-eight OA patients with persistent
             knee pain were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: 1)
             spouse-assisted pain-coping skills training,
             (spouse-assisted CST), 2) a conventional CST intervention
             with no spouse involvement (CST), or 3) an arthritis
             education-spousal support (AE-SS) control condition. All
             treatment was carried out in 10 weekly, 2-hour group
             sessions. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed that at the
             completion of treatment, patients in the spouse-assisted CST
             condition had significantly lower levels of pain,
             psychological disability, and pain behavior, and higher
             scores on measures of coping attempts, marital adjustment,
             and self-efficacy than patients in the AE-SS control
             condition. Compared to patients in the AE-SS control
             condition, patients who received CST without spouse
             involvement had significantly higher post-treatment levels
             of self-efficacy and marital adjustment and showed a
             tendency toward lower levels of pain and psychological
             disability and higher scores on measures of coping attempts
             and ratings of the perceived effectiveness of pain-coping
             strategies. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that
             spouse-assisted CST has potential as a method for reducing
             pain and disability in OA patients.},
   Doi = {10.1002/1529-0131(199608)9:4<279::aid-anr1790090413>3.0.co;2},
   Key = {fds273870}
}

@article{fds273872,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Starr, KR},
   Title = {From the gate Control Theory to the neuromatrix - Revolution
             or evolution?},
   Journal = {PAIN FORUM},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {143-146},
   Publisher = {CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {1058-9139},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996UV44900011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds273872}
}

@article{fds273875,
   Author = {Schanberg, LE and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Kredich, DW and Gil,
             KM},
   Title = {Pain coping strategies in children with juvenile primary
             fibromyalgia syndrome: correlation with pain, physical
             function, and psychological distress.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {89-96},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0893-7524},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8970266},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to
             describe the coping strategies used by children with
             juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome (JPFS), and 2) to
             examine how pain coping relates to measures of pain,
             disability/function, psychological distress, and pain
             behavior. METHODS: Sixteen children with JPFS completed the
             Child Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
             (CSQ-C), the visual analog scale for pain, the McGill Pain
             Questionnaire, the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
             modified for children, the Arthritis Impact Measurement
             Scales 2, and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Subjects
             also also underwent pain behavior observation. Pearson's
             product moment correlations were conducted to examine the
             relationship of coping to measures of pain and disability.
             RESULTS: The Pain Control and Rational Thinking composite
             factor score on the CSQ-C correlated with measures of pain
             severity, functional disability, and psychological distress.
             Results supported the internal reliability of the CSQ-C in
             assessing pain coping. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest
             that the CSQ-C may provide a reliable measure for assessing
             variations in pain coping in JPFS patients. Behavioral
             interventions aimed at increasing the perception of pain
             control may be beneficial in treating JPFS.},
   Doi = {10.1002/1529-0131(199604)9:2<89::aid-anr1790090204>3.0.co;2-},
   Key = {fds273875}
}

@article{fds372595,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Holzberg, AD and Beaupre, PM},
   Title = {Contributions of pain behavior assessment and pain
             assessment to the development of pain clinics},
   Journal = {PAIN TREATMENT CENTERS AT A CROSSROADS},
   Volume = {7},
   Pages = {79-100},
   Publisher = {INT ASSOC STUDY PAIN (IASP) PRESS},
   Editor = {Cohen, MJM and Campbell, JN},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-931092-14-0},
   Key = {fds372595}
}

@article{fds372596,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Egert, JR},
   Title = {A cognitive-behavioral perspective on pain in cumulative
             trauma disorders},
   Journal = {BEYOND BIOMECHANICS},
   Pages = {159-175},
   Publisher = {TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD},
   Editor = {Moon, SD and Sauter, SL},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-7484-0321-3},
   Key = {fds372596}
}

@article{fds273866,
   Author = {Lester, N and Lefebvre, JC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain in young adults-III: Comparison of three coping
             assessment methods},
   Journal = {Clinical Journal of Pain},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {291-300},
   Year = {1996},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-199612000-00008},
   Abstract = {The study had two purposes: (a) to examine the relationships
             among coping strategies measured by the Coping Strategies
             Questionnaire (CSQ) (1), the Vanderbilt Pain Management
             Inventory (VPMI) (2), and the Ways of Coping inventory (WOC)
             (3) and identify the higher-order composite factors
             representing these relationships; and (b) to determine the
             degree to which individual coping scale scores and composite
             coping factor scores could explain variability in the pain
             intensity and pain-related activity interference reported by
             young adults. Measures of pain coping were collected from
             206 young adults using the CSQ, VPMI, and WOC, along with
             measures of pain intensity, pain location, and the extent to
             which pain interfered with daily activities. Results
             indicated considerable variability in the reported frequency
             of use of pain-coping strategies and in pain intensity,
             location, and activity interference. Principal components
             factor analysis identified three higher-order coping factors
             (Emotional and Other-Directed Coping, Active Cognitive
             Coping, and Self-Efficacy for Pain Control) that explained
             87% of the variance in individual coping scale scores. The
             degree to which individual scale scores and composite factor
             scores explained variability in pain intensity and activity
             interference variables was determined through a series of
             multiple regression analyses. The results revealed that
             individual scale scores, particularly the CSQ scales of
             catastrophizing and praying or hoping, were best able to
             explain the variance in measures of pain and activity
             interference. Taken together, these findings provide further
             support for the importance of coping variables in explaining
             the experience of pain and adjustment in young
             adults.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199612000-00008},
   Key = {fds273866}
}

@article{fds273871,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Goli, V},
   Title = {A practical guide to biobehavioral assessment and treatment
             of chronic pain},
   Journal = {Journal of Practical Psychiatry and Behavioral
             Health},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {151-161},
   Year = {1996},
   ISSN = {1076-5417},
   Abstract = {The authors describe the biobehavioral management of chronic
             pain. They first discuss how to conduct a thorough pain
             assessment that includes an evaluation of
             medical-psychiatric and cognitive-behavioral factors. They
             describe the most useful self-report measures as well as
             cognitive-behavioral techniques for assessing pain, such as
             diary records, behavioral observation, and the evaluation of
             pain coping strategies and negative pain-related cognitions.
             The second half of the article focuses on the biobehavioral
             treatment of chronic pain and includes a detailed review of
             both pharmacological and cognitive-behavioral treatment
             strategies.},
   Key = {fds273871}
}

@article{fds273873,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Cognitive behavioral therapy for managing
             pain},
   Journal = {The Clinical Psychologist},
   Volume = {49},
   Pages = {4-5},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds273873}
}

@article{fds273874,
   Author = {Fillingim, RB and Keefe, FJ and Light, KC and Booker, DK and Maixner,
             W},
   Title = {The influence of gender and psychological factors on pain
             perception},
   Journal = {Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {21-36},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds273874}
}

@article{fds372597,
   Author = {WEINER, DK and LADD, KE and PIEPER, CF and KEEFE,
             FJ},
   Title = {PAIN IN THE NURSING-HOME - RESIDENT VERSUS STAFF
             PERCEPTIONS},
   Journal = {JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {SA2-SA2},
   Publisher = {WILLIAMS & WILKINS},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds372597}
}

@article{fds372019,
   Author = {KEEFE, FJ and LEFEBVRE, JC and BEAUPRE, PM},
   Title = {THE MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY-INVENTORY IN CHRONIC
             PAIN - SECURITY BLANKET OR SOUND INVESTMENT},
   Journal = {PAIN FORUM},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {101-103},
   Publisher = {CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds372019}
}

@article{fds273880,
   Author = {Williams, DA and Urban, B and Keefe, FJ and Shutty, MS and France,
             R},
   Title = {Cluster analyses of pain patients' responses to the
             SCL-90R.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {61},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {81-91},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)00165-B},
   Abstract = {This study sought to identify distinct subgroups of chronic
             pain patients based on responses to the Symptom Checklist
             90-revised (SCL-90R), a measure of psychological distress.
             Two scoring methods were used: the standard scoring that
             accompanies the manual, and a scoring method based upon
             factor scores obtained in an earlier study using low back
             pain patients. Two separate cluster analyses assigned
             patients into 2 groups: one based on standard scores and one
             based on factor scores. Results of this study support the
             hypothesis that distinct and replicable subgroups of chronic
             pain patients can be identified using the SCL-90R. Depending
             upon group membership, patients significantly differed on
             measures of qualitative pain and quantitative pain report,
             depressive symptoms, medication usage, and pain-related
             behaviors. This study supports the use of SCL-90R factor
             scoring with pain patients as greater differentiation
             between clusters was found for pain report and pain-related
             behavior when this method was used. Guidelines for clinical
             application of SCL-90R cluster groups is
             provided.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(94)00165-B},
   Key = {fds273880}
}

@article{fds273879,
   Author = {Lefebvre, JC and Lester, N and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain in young adults. II: The use and perceived
             effectiveness of pain-coping strategies.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {36-44},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7787337},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The first goal of the study was to determine the
             internal reliability of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
             (CSQ) in young adults. The second goal was to examine the
             relation of the CSQ to reported pain levels. The third goal
             was to investigate the relationship between the CSQ and
             concomitant pain problems. The fourth goal was to compare
             young adults and different chronic pain samples in terms of
             the frequency of coping strategy use and perceived
             effectiveness of coping strategies. DESIGN: The study
             included 252 undergraduate students who were given the CSQ,
             a demographic and pain level questionnaire, and a
             concomitant pain problem survey. RESULTS: The results
             indicated that the CSQ was internally reliable when used to
             assess pain coping strategy use among young adults.
             Catastrophizing was found to be associated with both pain
             level and concomitant pain problems, with subjects reporting
             higher levels of catastrophizing having higher levels of
             pain and a higher frequency of both migraine headaches and
             low back pain. Finally, differences were found when
             comparing the perceived effectiveness in controlling and
             decreasing pain, and in the use of specific coping
             strategies in the young adult and chronic pain samples. The
             young adult sample reported a greater perceived efficacy in
             controlling and decreasing pain, compared to a sample of low
             back pain patients and a sample of myofacial pain patients.
             CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the CSQ is a reliable
             measure for the study of pain-coping strategies used in this
             population, and one that relates to differences reported in
             the experience of pain.},
   Key = {fds273879}
}

@article{fds273796,
   Author = {Main, CJ and Spanswick, CC and Bradley, LA and Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre,
             JC and Beaupre, PM and Turk, DC and Fernandez, E and Sanders,
             SH},
   Title = {Personality assessment and the Minnesota Multiphasic
             Personality Inventory: 50 Years on: Do we still need our
             security blanket?},
   Journal = {Pain Forum},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {90-96},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {Personality assessment has a long history in the
             investigation of pain problems, and perhaps it is time to
             reflect on its relevance in the context of understanding
             pain. Although number of different personality inventories
             have been developed recently, the Minnesota Multiphasic
             Personality Inventory (MMPI) is still the most widely used
             personality inventory and, in terms of detailed debate,
             particular emphasis will be placed on the MMPI and its
             successor, the MMPI-2. Although much of the subsequent
             discussion will be of a more general nature, the authors
             contend that its continued use is understandable, but no
             longer justifiable, and will argue that, even in its latest
             incarnation, the MMPI is overdependent on outdated concepts
             of psychopathology, and that the recent critiques of the
             MMPI, while illuminating, have failed to address a more
             fundamental set of problems with personality assessment,
             which inherently constrain and limit its
             utility.},
   Key = {fds273796}
}

@article{fds273878,
   Author = {Lane, JD and Lefebvre, JC and Rose, JE and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Perception of Thermal
             Pain},
   Journal = {Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {140-147},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1064-1297},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.3.2.140},
   Abstract = {The effects of cigarette smoking on pain perception were
             evaluated in 18 healthy smokers. Thermal pain stimuli were
             used to assess pain detection threshold and tolerance and to
             collect subjective ratings of the intensity and
             unpleasantness of painful stimuli. After overnight
             abstinence, pain perception was evaluated before and after 3
             experimental treatments. Participants smoked normal
             cigarettes, smoked denicotinized cigarettes, or remained
             abstinent. Smoking normal cigarettes produced relative
             increases in pain tolerance compared with abstinence.
             Smoking denicotinized cigarettes produced intermediate
             effects on tolerance not different from the other 2
             treatments. Effects were not detected for pain threshold or
             subjective pain ratings. Results suggest that cigarette
             smoking can have antinociceptive effects, which may depend
             both on nicotine and on other factors associated with
             smoking. © 1995 American Psychological Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037/1064-1297.3.2.140},
   Key = {fds273878}
}

@article{fds372598,
   Author = {KEEFE, FJ},
   Title = {CONTROL AND COMPARISON GROUPS IN BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT
             STUDIES OF ARTHRITIS PATIENTS},
   Journal = {PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {59-60},
   Publisher = {WILLIAMS & WILKINS},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds372598}
}

@article{fds273876,
   Author = {Edens, JL and Wilson, JJ and Gil, KM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Critical issues in pain management training for
             psychologists},
   Journal = {American Pain Society Journal},
   Pages = {14-17},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds273876}
}

@article{fds273877,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Lefebvre, JC and Beaupre, PM},
   Title = {The MMPI in chronic pain: Security blanket or sound
             investment},
   Journal = {Pain Forum},
   Volume = {4},
   Pages = {101-103},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds273877}
}

@article{fds273881,
   Author = {Lester, N and Lefebvre, JC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain in young adults: I. Relationship to gender and family
             pain history.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {282-289},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7858357},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVES/DESIGN: Two studies were carried out to examine
             how gender and family pain history related to pain and
             activity interference in young adults. The first study (n =
             252 college students) examined how gender and family pain
             history related to pain intensity and the second study (n =
             206 college students) examined how these variables related
             to pain intensity, location, and activity interference.
             Whenever possible, data from the two studies were combined
             for purposes of data analyses. RESULTS: Results indicated
             that more than half of the young adults studied reported
             experiencing some type of pain at the time of the
             investigation. The intensity of the pain was in the low
             range and the most frequent sites of pain were in the head
             and legs or feet. Gender differences were noted, with women
             reporting a greater number of sites of pain. Family pain
             history was found to be related to pain and activity
             interference. Subjects who had a strong family history of
             pain problems reported a greater number of pain sites, and
             higher levels of pain-related activity interference.
             CONCLUSIONS: Generalizability of results is limited due to
             the group of young adults studied, yet several conclusions
             relative to this group may be suggested. First, this group
             of young adults do appear to experience pain. Second, there
             may be gender differences in the types of pain they report
             and the ways they react to pain. Third, family history of
             pain may be related to the pain experiences of this group of
             young adults.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199412000-00007},
   Key = {fds273881}
}

@article{fds273882,
   Author = {Buckelew, SP and Parker, JC and Keefe, FJ and Deuser, WE and Crews, TM and Conway, R and Kay, DR and Hewett, JE},
   Title = {Self-efficacy and pain behavior among subjects with
             fibromyalgia.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {59},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {377-384},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90024-8},
   Abstract = {Given the lack of objective physical measures for assessing
             fibromyalgia syndrome (FS), the role of pain assessment is
             particularly important. The role of psychological factors is
             controversial among FS patients. This study was designed to
             better understand the relationship between pain behaviors
             and psychological variables. Specifically, this study (1)
             refined a pain behavior observation (PBO) methodology for
             use with FS patients, (2) determined whether stretching is a
             valid pain behavior, and (3) assessed whether psychological
             variables including self-efficacy and/or depression can
             predict pain behaviors after controlling for disease
             severity and age. The 73 FS subjects meeting the American
             College of Rheumatology classification system completed
             questionnaires measuring self-efficacy, depression, and
             pain. Trained physicians conducted tender-point
             examinations. Subjects were video-taped using a standardized
             procedure. Two trained raters independently coded all pain
             behaviors. Kappa coefficients and correlations among pain
             behaviors and self-reported pain indicated that the PBO
             method was both reliable and valid. However, the newly
             defined pain behavior 'stretching' was found to be
             negatively associated with self-reported pain. Hierarchical
             multiple regression (MR) analyses revealed that depression
             did not predict pain behavior over and above myalgic scores
             and age; however, in 3 separate MR analyses, self-efficacy
             for function, pain, and other symptoms each predicted pain
             behavior over and above myalgic scores and age. This study
             indicated that the original pain behavior scoring
             methodology is appropriate for use with the FS population
             and should not be modified to include the pain behavior
             'stretching'. Self-efficacy was related to pain behavior
             while depression was not among this FS sample.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(94)90024-8},
   Key = {fds273882}
}

@article{fds273883,
   Author = {Geisser, ME and Robinson, ME and Keefe, FJ and Weiner,
             ML},
   Title = {Catastrophizing, depression and the sensory, affective and
             evaluative aspects of chronic pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {59},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {79-83},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90050-7},
   Abstract = {Research has shown that catastrophizing is related to
             increased depression and chronic pain. However, some
             researchers have questioned the utility of catastrophizing
             as a separate construct, suggesting that it may just be a
             symptom of depression. The present investigation used path
             analysis to determine if catastrophizing was related to
             McGill Pain Questionnaire scores when controlling for
             depression as assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory in a
             group of 85 chronic pain patients. According to Fields'
             model of the relationship between pain and depression, we
             predicted that catastrophizing would mediate the the
             relationship between depression and the evaluative and
             affective aspects of pain, but not the sensory aspect. The
             resulting path coefficients appear to support these
             predictions. The results suggest that catastrophizing is a
             separate construct which may impact on pain perception and
             treatment. The data also provide some support for Field's
             neurobiological model of the relationship between depression
             and pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(94)90050-7},
   Key = {fds273883}
}

@article{fds273885,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Hauck, ER and Egert, J and Rimer, B and Kornguth,
             P},
   Title = {Mammography pain and discomfort: a cognitive-behavioral
             perspective.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {56},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {247-260},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8022619},
   Abstract = {Although some women report having little pain or discomfort
             during mammography, other women find mammography to be a
             painful and uncomfortable experience. Cognitive and
             behavioral factors may influence the perception of pain and
             discomfort during mammography. This review critically
             evaluates the research on mammography pain from a
             cognitive-behavioral perspective. The review is in three
             sections. The first reviews studies measuring pain and
             discomfort in women who have recently had mammograms and
             studies investigating the relative importance of pain and
             discomfort in influencing women's decisions to have a
             mammogram. The second section presents a
             cognitive-behavioral model of mammography pain that is based
             on theories of behavior and self-regulation developed by
             Kanfer and Hagerman (1987). The review concludes with a
             discussion of the implications of the cognitive-behavioral
             perspective for clinical management and research on
             mammography pain and discomfort.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(94)90163-5},
   Key = {fds273885}
}

@article{fds304933,
   Author = {Giorgino, KB and Blaloc, SJ and Devellis, RF and Devellis, BM and Keefe,
             FJ and Jordan, JM},
   Title = {Appraisal of and coping with arthritis‐related problems in
             household activities, leisure activities, and pain
             management},
   Journal = {Arthritis & Rheumatism},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {20-28},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {2151-4658},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1790070106},
   Abstract = {Purpose. We examined whether or not there are systematic
             differences in how people appraise different types of
             illness‐related problems and in how they cope with these
             problems. Methods. Two hundred thirty‐five adults with
             recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis completed a mailed
             questionnaire followed by a telephone interview. A series of
             stress appraisal and coping variables were assessed in
             relation to three areas: household activities, leisure
             activities, and pain management. Results. Pain Differed
             significantly from household and leisure activities with
             regard to several appraisal and coping variables.
             Participants reported the least control over problems with
             pain, while attaching the most importance to pain control.
             Leisure activities also stood out as unique on several
             variables. Participants perceived greater ability and were
             more satisfied with their ability in relation to leisure
             activities. Conclusion. These findings show that, at least
             early in the disease, appraisal and coping strategies differ
             across the areas of household activities, leisure
             activities, and pain management. Copyright © 1994 American
             College of Rheumatology},
   Doi = {10.1002/art.1790070106},
   Key = {fds304933}
}

@article{fds372599,
   Author = {KEEFE, FJ and LEFEBVRE, J},
   Title = {PAIN BEHAVIOR CONCEPTS - CONTROVERSIES, CURRENT STATUS, AND
             FUTURE DIRECTIONS},
   Journal = {PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH WORLD CONGRESS ON
             PAIN},
   Volume = {2},
   Pages = {127-147},
   Publisher = {INT ASSOC STUDY PAIN (IASP) PRESS},
   Editor = {Gebhart, GF and Hammond, DL and Jensen, TS},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0-931092-07-8},
   Key = {fds372599}
}

@article{fds273884,
   Author = {Giorgino, KB and Blalock, SJ and DeVellis, RF and DeVellis, BM and Keefe, FJ and Jordan, JM},
   Title = {Appraisal and coping with rheumatoid arthritis related
             problems across three areas: Household activities, leisure
             activities, and pain management},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care and Research},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {20-28},
   Year = {1994},
   ISSN = {2151-4658},
   Abstract = {Purpose. We examined whether or not there are systematic
             differences in how people appraise different types of
             illness-related problems and in how they cope with these
             problems. Methods. Two hundred thirty-five adults with
             recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis completed a mailed
             questionnaire followed by a telephone interview. A series of
             stress appraisal and coping variables were assessed in
             relation to three areas: household activities, leisure
             activities, and pain management. Results. Pain differed
             significantly from household and leisure activities with
             regard to several appraisal and coping variables.
             Participants reported the least control over problems with
             pain, while attaching the most importance to pain control.
             Leisure activities also stood out as unique on several
             variables. Participants perceived greater ability and were
             more satisfied with their ability in relation to leisure
             activities. Conclusion. These findings show that, at least
             early in the disease, appraisal and coping strategies differ
             across the areas of household activities, leisure
             activities, and pain management.},
   Key = {fds273884}
}

@article{fds304932,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Van Horn and Y},
   Title = {Cognitive-behavioral treatment of rheumatoid arthritis pain:
             maintaining treatment gains.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care Res},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {213-222},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {2151-4658},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1790060408},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: This paper critically reviews research studies
             examining the long-term effects of cognitive-behavioral
             therapy interventions for managing pain in rheumatoid
             arthritis patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The first section
             of the paper evaluates long-term results obtained in studies
             of cognitive-behavioral therapy, arthritis education
             interventions, and combined cognitive-behavioral
             therapy-arthritis education interventions. These studies
             show that although some rheumatoid arthritis patients are
             able to maintain initial improvements in pain and
             disability, other rheumatoid arthritis patients do not. In
             the second section of this review, a cognitive-behavioral
             model of maintenance of pain coping skills is presented.
             This model may be useful in increasing our understanding of
             the relapse process and in planning interventions to enhance
             and prolong cognitive-behavioral therapy treatment gains.
             The final section of this paper addresses important future
             directions for research. The need for empirical studies of
             relapse and maintenance processes is underscored.
             CONCLUSIONS: Controlled studies are needed to test the
             utility of new cognitive-behavioral interventions designed
             to enhance the long-term maintenance of treatment gains in
             RA patients. We suggest that a focus on issues of relapse
             and maintenance may be just as important for medical and
             surgical interventions for rheumatoid arthritis pain, as it
             is for cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions.},
   Doi = {10.1002/art.1790060408},
   Key = {fds304932}
}

@article{fds273893,
   Author = {Parker, JC and Bradley, LA and DeVellis, RM and Gerber, LH and Holman,
             HR and Keefe, FJ and Lawrence, TS and Liang, MH and Lorig, KR and Nicassio,
             PM},
   Title = {Biopsychosocial contributions to the management of arthritis
             disability. Blueprints from an NIDRR-sponsored
             conference.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Rheum},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {885-889},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780360703},
   Abstract = {The contributions of MACs and RRTCs to the generation of
             arthritis-related biopsychosocial research over the last 15
             years have been enormous. However, the assimilation of
             biopsychosocial concepts into mainstream clinical practice,
             professional education, and public awareness will require a
             sustained national effort.},
   Doi = {10.1002/art.1780360703},
   Key = {fds273893}
}

@article{fds273894,
   Author = {Tota-Faucette, ME and Gil, KM and Williams, DA and Keefe, FJ and Goli,
             V},
   Title = {Predictors of response to pain management treatment. The
             role of family environment and changes in cognitive
             processes.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {115-123},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0749-8047},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8358134},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to examine
             factors that influence individual differences in treatment
             response after multidisciplinary pain management. DESIGN:
             Pre-post assessment design. PATIENTS: 119 chronic pain
             inpatients. MAIN MEASURES: Outcome measures included pain
             report from the McGill Pain Questionnaire, emotional
             distress from the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised, and activity
             discomfort from the Activity Discomfort Scale. Process
             measures included the Family Environment Scale, the Coping
             Strategies Questionnaire, and the Inventory of Negative
             Thoughts in Response to Pain. RESULTS: Results indicated
             that pretreatment family environment, cognitive coping
             strategies, and negative thinking accounted for small yet
             significant proportions of the variance in outcome. The
             proportion of variance accounted for by the changes in
             cognitive coping and negative thinking was somewhat higher.
             An increase in pain control and rational thinking was
             related to decreases in depression and anxiety, pain report,
             and activity discomfort. Decreases in negative social
             cognitions were related to decreased depression at
             posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in coping strategies and
             negative thinking may be important mechanisms related to
             improvement, or lack of improvement, in a range of outcome
             measures. Patients from families who are controlling and
             disorganized, and patients high on negative thinking at
             pretreatment may represent high-risk groups in need of
             further individually tailored interventions.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199306000-00006},
   Key = {fds273894}
}

@article{fds273892,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Van Horn and Y},
   Title = {Cognitive-behavioral treatment of rheumatoid arthritis pain:
             Understanding and enhancing maintenance of treatment
             gains},
   Journal = {Arthritis Care and Research},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {213-222},
   Year = {1993},
   ISSN = {2151-4658},
   Abstract = {Objective. This paper critically reviews research studies
             examining the long-term effects of cognitive-behavioral
             therapy interventions for managing pain in rheumatoid
             arthritis patients. Methods and Results. The first section
             of the paper evaluates long-term results obtained in studies
             of cognitive-behavioral therapy, arthritis education
             interventions, and combined cognitive-behavioral
             therapy-arthritis education interventions. These studies
             show that although some rheumatoid arthritis patients are
             able to maintain initial improvements in pain and
             disability, other rheumatoid arthritis patients do not. In
             the second section of this review, a cognitive-behavioral
             model of maintenance of pain coping skills is presented.
             This model may be useful in increasing our understanding of
             the relapse process and in planning interventions to enhance
             and prolong cognitive-behavioral therapy treatment gains.
             The final section of this paper addresses important future
             directions for research. The need for empirical studies of
             relapse and maintenance processes is underscored.
             Conclusions. Controlled studies are needed to test the
             utility of new cognitive-behavioral interventions designed
             to enhance the long-term maintenance of treatment gains in
             RA patients. We suggest that a focus on issues of relapse
             and maintenance may be just as important for medical and
             surgical interventions for rheumatoid arthritis pain, as it
             is for cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions.},
   Key = {fds273892}
}

@article{fds273897,
   Author = {Wilkie, DJ and Keefe, FJ and Dodd, MJ and Copp, LA},
   Title = {Behavior of patients with lung cancer: description and
             associations with oncologic and pain variables.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {51},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {231-240},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90264-C},
   Abstract = {Although reflexes are recognized as protective responses to
             noxious stimuli, less is known about voluntary behavioral
             responses to cancer pain, which could provide clinicians
             with important diagnostic and therapeutic information.
             Forty-five patients with lung cancer were studied in their
             homes on 2 occasions to identify pain behaviors and to
             examine relationships between behaviors and selected
             variables. Patients completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire
             (MPQ) and Visual Analogue scale (VAS). Using a videotape
             observation method, patients sat, stood, walked, and
             reclined for 10 min. Videotapes were scored using 5
             position-related and 31 pain-related behavior definitions.
             Within 3 days scored behaviors were described to patients
             who reported whether each scored behavior was performed: to
             express pain; because pain prevented usual behavior; to
             control pain; or as a habit. Patients reported that pain was
             controlled by 42 different behaviors; the number of
             different pain-reduction behaviors was correlated with pain
             intensity (r = 0.44) and pain quality (r = 0.64).
             Simultaneous multiple regression indicated that length of
             time pain was experienced, number of pain sites, pain
             quality, and pain intensity accounted for 41% of the
             variance in the number of pain control behaviors. None of
             the taped behaviors was reported as performed to express
             pain, and few of the patients reported that pain prevented
             behavior during the video session. Results clarify the
             pain-behavior construct, provide insight about the
             multidimensional nature of lung cancer pain, and suggest
             directions for behavioral interventions to augment
             pharmacological therapy for lung cancer pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(92)90264-C},
   Key = {fds273897}
}

@article{fds273898,
   Author = {Blalock, SJ and DeVellis, BM and DeVellis, RF and Giorgino, KB and Sauter, SV and Jordan, JM and Keefe, FJ and Mutran,
             EJ},
   Title = {Psychological well-being among people with recently
             diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. Do self-perceptions of
             abilities make a difference?},
   Journal = {Arthritis Rheum},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {11},
   Pages = {1267-1272},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0004-3591},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780351105},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Satisfaction with abilities and perceived
             importance of abilities are 2 factors involved in the
             process of self-evaluation. We examined the role that these
             factors play in adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
             METHODS: Data were collected, via telephone interview and
             mailed questionnaire, from 234 individuals with recently
             diagnosed RA. Disease severity information was obtained from
             participants' physicians. RESULTS: Consistent with study
             hypotheses, satisfaction was associated with psychological
             well-being only among those who viewed as very important the
             abilities being evaluated. CONCLUSION: These findings
             increase understanding of the conditions under which low
             levels of satisfaction are likely to be associated with
             psychological distress.},
   Doi = {10.1002/art.1780351105},
   Key = {fds273898}
}

@article{fds273907,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Salley, AN and Lefebvre, JC},
   Title = {Coping with pain: conceptual concerns and future
             directions.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {51},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {131-134},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90253-8},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(92)90253-8},
   Key = {fds273907}
}

@article{fds273900,
   Author = {Beckham, JC and Caldwell, DS and Peterson, BL and Pippen, AM and Currie,
             MS and Keefe, FJ and Weinberg, JB},
   Title = {Disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis: relationships of
             plasma tumor necrosis factor-alpha, soluble interleukin
             2-receptor, soluble CD4/CD8 ratio, neopterin, and fibrin
             D-dimer to traditional severity and functional
             measures.},
   Journal = {J Clin Immunol},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {353-361},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0271-9142},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1430106},
   Abstract = {Rheumatoid arthritis is a complex inflammatory disease of
             unknown cause. Although various laboratory and clinical
             measurements are useful in managing these patients, there is
             a need for better tests to quantitatively assess disease
             activity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the
             association of certain immune and inflammation (I-I)
             parameters with four traditional disease severity measures
             and a functional measure in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A
             single set of patient blood samples was analyzed, and four
             traditional disease severity measures and patient functional
             statuses were determined from 64 consecutive outpatients
             with rheumatoid arthritis. Plasma tumor necrosis
             factor-alpha (TNF), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R),
             sCD4 and sCD8 (and the sCD4/sCD8 ratio), neopterin, and
             fibrin D-dimer were analyzed in relationship to Westergren
             erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), physician assessment
             of disease activity, joint pain count, grip strength, and
             Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS) scores. Rheumatoid
             arthritis patients had higher mean levels of all I-I
             measures (except sCD4) compared to healthy subjects. Initial
             significant correlations between TNF, sIL-2R, and D-dimer
             and several disease severity and functional measures were
             detected. When we controlled for the covariates age, gender,
             race, and medications, regression analyses indicated that,
             as a group, the I-I measures were significantly related to
             grip strength, physician disease severity rating, ESR, and
             total joint pain. When the predictive values of the I-I
             measures were tested controlling for the covariates and ESR,
             D-dimer was independently and significantly associated with
             variability in grip strength, physician disease severity,
             and AIMS physical disability, while TNF was associated with
             a significant amount of variability in total joint
             pain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF00920793},
   Key = {fds273900}
}

@article{fds273901,
   Author = {Von Korff and M and Ormel, J and Keefe, FJ and Dworkin,
             SF},
   Title = {Grading the severity of chronic pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {133-149},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4},
   Abstract = {This research develops and evaluates a simple method of
             grading the severity of chronic pain for use in general
             population surveys and studies of primary care pain
             patients. Measures of pain intensity, disability,
             persistence and recency of onset were tested for their
             ability to grade chronic pain severity in a longitudinal
             study of primary care back pain (n = 1213), headache (n =
             779) and temporomandibular disorder pain (n = 397) patients.
             A Guttman scale analysis showed that pain intensity and
             disability measures formed a reliable hierarchical scale.
             Pain intensity measures appeared to scale the lower range of
             global severity while disability measures appeared to scale
             the upper range of global severity. Recency of onset and
             days in pain in the prior 6 months did not scale with pain
             intensity or disability. Using simple scoring rules, pain
             severity was graded into 4 hierarchical classes: Grade I,
             low disability--low intensity; Grade II, low
             disability--high intensity; Grade III, high
             disability--moderately limiting; and Grade IV, high
             disability--severely limiting. For each pain site, Chronic
             Pain Grade measured at baseline showed a highly
             statistically significant and monotonically increasing
             relationship with unemployment rate, pain-related functional
             limitations, depression, fair to poor self-rated health,
             frequent use of opioid analgesics, and frequent pain-related
             doctor visits both at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Days
             in Pain was related to these variables, but not as strongly
             as Chronic Pain Grade. Recent onset cases (first onset
             within the prior 3 months) did not show differences in
             psychological and behavioral dysfunction when compared to
             persons with less recent onset. Using longitudinal data from
             a population-based study (n = 803), Chronic Pain Grade at
             baseline predicted the presence of pain in the prior 2
             weeks. Chronic Pain Grade and pain-related functional
             limitations at 3-year follow-up. Grading chronic pain as a
             function of pain intensity and pain-related disability may
             be useful when a brief ordinal measure of global pain
             severity is required. Pain persistence, measured by days in
             pain in a fixed time period, provides useful additional
             information.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4},
   Key = {fds273901}
}

@article{fds273902,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Dunsmore, J and Burnett, R},
   Title = {Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral approaches to chronic
             pain: recent advances and future directions.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {60},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {528-536},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1506501},
   Abstract = {Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral approaches to chronic
             pain are receiving increasing attention from researchers and
             clinicians. This article reviews and highlights recent
             research advances and future research directions. Assessment
             research reviewed includes studies examining the social
             context of pain, the relationship of chronic pain to
             depression, cognitive variables affecting pain, and
             comprehensive assessment measures. Treatment outcome studies
             reviewed are those evaluating the effects of behavioral and
             cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain. These
             studies focus on comparisons of behavioral treatment with
             control conditions, comparisons of two behavioral
             treatments, and prevention of chronic pain. Future
             directions for assessment and treatment research are
             outlined.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.60.4.528},
   Key = {fds273902}
}

@article{fds273906,
   Author = {Buckelew, SP and Conway, RC and Shutty, MS and Lawrence, JA and Grafing,
             MR and Anderson, SK and Hewett, JE and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Spontaneous coping strategies to manage acute pain and
             anxiety during electrodiagnostic studies.},
   Journal = {Arch Phys Med Rehabil},
   Volume = {73},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {594-598},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0003-9993},
   Abstract = {Electrodiagnostic studies produce both anxiety and pain,
             which can prevent adequate examination and limit the
             usefulness of test results. This study examined the
             spontaneous coping strategies used to manage the pain and
             anxiety experienced during electrodiagnostic testing. Fifty
             patients (26 women and 24 men) evaluated in our
             electrodiagnostic laboratory were administered visual
             analogue scale (VAS) pain and anxiety measures and the
             Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before the
             procedure. Immediately after the procedure, subjects
             reported pain, anxiety, and coping strategies used during
             electrodiagnostic testing using the VAS, the STAI, and a
             situation-specific version of the Coping Strategies
             Questionnaire (CSQ-S). The CSQ-S appears to be a valid and
             reliable measure of spontaneous coping strategies.
             Multiple-regression analyses revealed that frequent use of
             catastrophizing, diverting attention, and coping
             self-statement strategies was significantly and positively
             correlated with pain, whereas reinterpreting pain was
             significantly and negatively associated with pain. Judgments
             of control over pain were also significantly and negatively
             associated with anxiety experienced during electrodiagnostic
             studies. Physicians' ratings of pain and anxiety were highly
             correlated with patients' self-reports. This study suggests
             that ineffective coping strategies may enhance the pain and
             anxiety experienced during electromyography. Alternatively,
             teaching subjects active self-control skills and increasing
             patients' self-efficacy beliefs may help manage this
             situation-specific acute anxiety and, possibly, the
             associated pain.},
   Key = {fds273906}
}

@article{fds273896,
   Author = {Holroyd, KA and Holm, JE and Keefe, FJ and Turner, JA and Bradley, LA and Murphy, WD and Johnson, P and Anderson, K and Hinkle, AL and O'Malley,
             BW},
   Title = {A multi-center evaluation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire:
             results from more than 1700 chronic pain
             patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {301-311},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90077-O},
   Abstract = {We argue that the conflicting results reported in previous
             studies examining the factor structure of the McGill Pain
             Questionnaire Pain Rating Index (PRI) can be explained by
             differences in the patient samples and statistical analyses
             used across studies. In an effort to clarify the factor
             structure of the PRI, 3 different factor models were
             compared using confirmatory factor analysis in 2 samples of
             low-back pain patients (N = 1372) and in a third sample of
             patients suffering from other chronic pain problems (N =
             423). A 4-factor model, similar to those obtained in
             previous studies where multiple criteria were used to
             determine the number of factors extracted, best explained
             covariation among PRI subclasses. However, relatively high
             interfactor correlations (approximately two-thirds of the
             variance explained by the best fitting factor structure was
             common variance) cast doubt on the discriminant validity of
             PRI subscales; examination of relationships between the PRI
             and MMPI subscales also failed to provide evidence of the
             discriminant validity or clinical utility of PRI subscales.
             Reducing the information from the 10 PRI sensory subclasses
             to a single subscale score may seriously limit the
             usefulness of the PRI. Alternate methods of using PRI data
             are suggested.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(92)90077-O},
   Key = {fds273896}
}

@article{fds273903,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Dunsmore, J},
   Title = {The multifaceted nature of pain behavior},
   Journal = {APS Journal},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {112-114},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1058-9139},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1058-9139(92)90039-F},
   Doi = {10.1016/1058-9139(92)90039-F},
   Key = {fds273903}
}

@article{fds273904,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Dunsmoret, J},
   Title = {Pain behavior concepts and controversies},
   Journal = {APS Journal},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {92-100},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1058-9139},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1058-9139(92)90035-B},
   Abstract = {This article summarizes recent research on pain behavior
             observation and highlights a number of controversial issues
             involved in applying this approach to the assessment of
             chronic pain patients. The article is divided into two major
             sections. In the first section, a number of observation
             methods used to record pain behavior in standardized
             situations and naturalistic settings are described. The
             reliability and validity of these observation methods, and
             their advantages and disadvantages, are discussed. The
             second section addresses five criticisms of the pain
             behavior construct. These criticisms include: the pain
             behavior construct is too simplistic, the focus on pain
             behavior denies the existence of pain, the questions of
             whether pain behavior is an expression of pain or a coping
             response, the measures of pain behavior may not be useful in
             clinical settings, and the notion that pain behavior has
             been oversold. The criticisms are evaluated from a
             behavioral perspective and the discussion highlights the
             potential utility of the pain behavior construct. The paper
             concludes with suggestions for future research. ©
             1992.},
   Doi = {10.1016/1058-9139(92)90035-B},
   Key = {fds273904}
}

@article{fds273895,
   Author = {Linton, SJ and Keefe, FJ and Jansson, O and Aslaksen,
             K},
   Title = {The Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire: Preliminary findings
             from a sampe of actue pain patients},
   Journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {163-170},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1992},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16506079209455911},
   Abstract = {This paper examines the test-retest reliability, internal
             validity, and compliance to complete the Outcome Evaluation
             Questionnaire (OEQ) with a sample of patients seeking care
             for acute musculoskeletal problems. The OEQ is a brief
             questionnaire designed to provide a basic measure of
             behavioral and cognitive responses. Participants were asked
             to complete the form during a visit to an occupational
             health care facility. Results showed that all patients
             completed the questionnaire and compliance to answer
             properly each individual item ranged from 84% to 100%. Items
             that required patients to provide frequency estimates had
             the lowest compliance rates. Test-retest reliability was
             high for most items and ranged between.42 and.96. An
             intercorrelation matrix showed several moderate
             relationships which may indicate internal consistency as
             well as show that the items do not tend to measure the same
             entity. Taken together with previous findings, the OEQ
             appears to be a reliable and valid instrument which may be
             helpful in conducting cognitive-behavioral assessments of
             patients having pain. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group,
             LLC.},
   Doi = {10.1080/16506079209455911},
   Key = {fds273895}
}

@article{fds273899,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Robinson, E},
   Title = {Psychological and behavioral aspects of pain},
   Journal = {Current Opinion in Anaestheosiology},
   Volume = {5},
   Pages = {698-704},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds273899}
}

@article{fds273905,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Linton, SJ and Lefebvre, JC},
   Title = {The Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire: Description and
             initial findings},
   Journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {19-33},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1992},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16506079209455886},
   Abstract = {This paper describes the Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
             (OEQ) and presents preliminary OEQ data gathered from a
             sample of 147 chronic pain patients. The OEQ is designed to
             provide a basic measure of behavioral and cognitive
             responses to pain. It includes items measuring pain, pain
             medication intake, sleep problems, mood, negative
             cognitions, and functional impairment. The OEQ is relatively
             brief (14 items) and easy to score. Results of this study
             provide support for the validity of OEQ items measuring pain
             intensity, sleep quality/sleep onset difficulties,
             depression, irritability and negative cognitions (negative
             thoughts of worthlessness and pain interference). OEQ items
             that required patients to provide fequency estimates (e.g
             number of pain-free days, days out of work) were problematic
             in that they were generally skewed in this chronic pain
             population. With further refinements the OEQ could provide a
             practical method for conducting cognitive-behavioral
             assessments of patients having pain. © 1992 Taylor &
             Francis Group, LLC.},
   Doi = {10.1080/16506079209455886},
   Key = {fds273905}
}

@article{fds273908,
   Author = {Wilkie, DJ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Coping strategies of patients with lung cancer-related
             pain.},
   Journal = {Clin J Pain},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {292-299},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-199112000-00007},
   Abstract = {Previous findings in patients with nonmalignant pain
             indicate a relationship between pain coping strategies and
             psychological factors. Although coping strategies have been
             explored in patients with cancer pain, relationships with
             such factors have not been reported. We wished to examine
             relationships between selected pain and psychological
             variables and the use of pain coping strategies. Forty-five
             patients with pain related to lung cancer indicated how they
             expressed their pain to others and completed the
             McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), State-Trait Anxiety
             Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale of pain intensity, and the
             Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). Forty-two percent of
             the patients reported that they tried not to let others know
             they had pain, and 40% indicated they told others when they
             had pain. Preferences for not telling others was associated
             with more frequent pain coping attempts for all CSQ
             subscales but those of catastrophizing and reinterpreting
             pain sensation. State anxiety demonstrated positive
             correlation with catastrophizing coping strategies (r =
             0.48) and negative correlation with ability to control (r =
             -0.50) and decrease (r = -0.50) pain. The number of pain
             sites was correlated with coping self-statements (r = 0.34).
             Pain intensity and state anxiety demonstrated similar
             relationships. Pain quality as measured with the MPQ
             demonstrated moderately strong correlation with diverting
             attention, praying and hoping, catastrophizing, and
             increased activity. Interventions aimed at reinforcing or
             expanding a patient's pain coping repertoire should be
             developed with consideration given to the patient's anxiety
             level, pain intensity, pain quality, and pain expression
             preference.},
   Doi = {10.1097/00002508-199112000-00007},
   Key = {fds273908}
}

@article{fds304104,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Martinez, S and Nunley, J and Beckham, J and Williams, DA},
   Title = {Analyzing pain in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pain coping
             strategies in patients who have had knee replacement
             surgery.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {46},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {153-160},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1749638},
   Abstract = {This study used the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) to
             investigate pain coping strategies in 52 rheumatoid
             arthritis patients who reported having knee pain 1 year or
             more following knee replacement surgery. Data analysis
             revealed that, as a group, these patients were active copers
             in that they reported frequent use of a variety of pain
             coping strategies. Pain coping strategies were found to be
             related to measures of pain and adjustment. Patients who
             rated their ability to control and decrease pain high and
             who rarely engaged in catastrophizing (i.e., who scored high
             on the Pain Control and Rational Thinking factor of the CSQ)
             had much lower levels of pain and psychological disability
             than patients who did not. Coping strategies were not found
             to relate to age, gender, obesity status or
             disability/compensation status. Taken together, these
             results suggest that an analysis of pain coping strategies
             may be helpful in understanding pain in arthritis patients
             who have pain following joint replacement
             surgery.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(91)90070-E},
   Key = {fds304104}
}

@article{fds273910,
   Author = {Williams, DA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Pain beliefs and the use of cognitive-behavioral coping
             strategies.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {46},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {185-190},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90074-8},
   Abstract = {Patients' beliefs about chronic pain, such as how long it
             will last and whether it is a mysterious experience, have
             been shown to be related to compliance with treatment
             programs. The present study examined whether these pain
             beliefs related to a specific component of pain management,
             namely the frequency of use and the perceived effectiveness
             of cognitive and behavioral coping strategies. One hundred
             twenty chronic pain patients were administered the Pain
             Beliefs and Perceptions inventory (PBAPI) and the Coping
             Strategies questionnaire (CSQ). A cluster analysis of 2 pain
             beliefs (that pain is enduring and that pain is mysterious)
             was conducted revealing 3 distinct subgroups of patients
             based upon these 2 beliefs. Multivariate analysis of
             variance was used to detect whether the use of
             cognitive-behavioral pain coping strategies differed in
             patients in the 3 pain beliefs subgroups. The results
             indicated that patients belonging to the group characterized
             by the belief that pain was enduring and mysterious were
             less likely to use cognitive coping strategies (e.g.,
             reinterpretation of pain sensation), more likely to
             catastrophize, and less likely to rate their coping
             strategies as effective in controlling and decreasing pain
             than patients believing their pain to be understandable and
             of short duration. The implications of these results for
             understanding the patient's choice of and compliance with
             treatment and coping efforts is discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(91)90074-8},
   Key = {fds273910}
}

@article{fds273913,
   Author = {Beckham, JC and Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Brown,
             CJ},
   Title = {Biofeedback as a means to alter electromyographic activity
             in a total knee replacement patient.},
   Journal = {Biofeedback Self Regul},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {23-35},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0363-3586},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2012824},
   Abstract = {This paper presents a single case controlled study of a
             75-year-old male having bilateral total knee replacement.
             Baseline EMG recordings demonstrated differential levels of
             vastus medialis and vastus lateralis muscle activity in both
             knees during exercise, with increased vastus lateralis
             activity compared to vastus medialis activity. The purpose
             of the study was to use electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback
             training to train the patient to equalize vastus medialis
             and vastus lateralis EMG activity during exercise. After 11
             and 13 training sessions for the left and right knees,
             respectively, differences between vastus medialis and vastus
             lateralis activity had markedly decreased. Following the
             termination of biofeedback training, EMG activity during
             exercise showed a return toward baseline levels. Several
             concomitant changes in psychological and physical function
             were noted. These results suggested that EMG biofeedback can
             be used to train vastus medialis and vastus lateralis
             activity in total knee replacement patients, and that
             biofeedback training may produce positive benefits in other
             functional areas.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF01000443},
   Key = {fds273913}
}

@article{fds273793,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Editorial},
   Journal = {Annals of Behavioral Medicine},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {ii},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds273793}
}

@article{fds273911,
   Author = {Beckham, JC and Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Roodman,
             AA},
   Title = {Pain coping strategies in rheumatoid arthritis:
             Relationships to pain, disability, depression and daily
             hassles},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {113-124},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80249-7},
   Abstract = {The present study investigated the relation of pain coping
             strategies to physical disability, pain, psychological
             disability, depression and daily hassles in rheumatoid
             arthritis (RA) patients. Subjects were 65 RA patients
             recruited from an outpatient rheumatology clinic. Each
             subject completed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ),
             The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS), the Beck
             Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Hassles Scale.
             Correlational analyses indicated that the Pain Control and
             Rational Thinking (PCRT) factor of the CSQ was strongly
             related to measures of adjustment. Regression analyses
             revealed that after controlling for demographic variables
             (age, gender) and medical variables (functional
             classification, disability support status), the PCRT factor
             of the CSQ explained a significant proportion of variance in
             physical disability, pain, psychological disability,
             depression, and hassles severity. Patients scoring high on
             the PCRT factor had lower levels of physical disability,
             pain, psychological disability, depression and hassles
             severity. Taken together, these findings suggest that pain
             coping strategies in RA patients are significantly related
             to pain and disability. © 1991 Association for Advancement
             of Behavior Therapy. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80249-7},
   Key = {fds273911}
}

@article{fds273909,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Fillingim, RB and Williams, DA},
   Title = {Behavioral assessment of pain: Non-verbal measures in
             animals and humans},
   Journal = {Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources
             News},
   Volume = {33},
   Pages = {3-13},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds273909}
}

@article{fds273912,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Martinez, S and Nunley, J and Beckham, J and Williams, DA},
   Title = {Analyzing pain in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Pain coping
             strategies in patients who have had knee replacement
             surgery},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {46},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {154-160},
   Year = {1991},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1749638},
   Abstract = {This study used the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) to
             investigate pain coping strategies in 52 rheumatoid
             arthritis patients who reported having knee pain 1 year or
             more following knee replacement surgery. Data analysis
             revealed that, as a group, these patients were active copers
             in that they reported frequent use of a variety of pain
             coping strategies. Pain coping strategies were found to be
             related to measures of pain and adjustment. Patients who
             rated their ability to control and decrease pain high and
             who rarely engaged in catastrophizing (i.e., who scored high
             on the Pain Control and Rational Thinking factor of the CSQ)
             had much lower levels of pain and psychological disability
             than patients who did not. Coping strategies were not found
             to relate to age, gender, obesity status or
             disability/compensation status. Taken together, these
             results suggest that an analysis of pain coping strategies
             may be helpful in understanding pain in arthritis patients
             who have pain following joint replacement
             surgery.},
   Key = {fds273912}
}

@article{fds273914,
   Author = {Lawson, K and Reesor, KA and Keefe, FJ and Turner,
             JA},
   Title = {Dimensions of pain-related cognitive coping:
             cross-validation of the factor structure of the Coping
             Strategy Questionnaire.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {195-204},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(90)91073-R},
   Abstract = {Previous research has demonstrated a relationship between
             cognitive pain coping activity and adjustment in pain
             patients. The empirically derived dimensions of coping
             activity, as measured by scales from the Coping Strategy
             Questionnaire (CSQ), however, have varied across
             investigations. The purpose of this investigation was to
             determine both the content and number of dimensions of the
             CSQ and to explore the potential moderating influence that
             sociodemographic and patient history variables may have on
             the latent structure of the CSQ. A total of 620 patients
             from 5 different chronic pain patient samples were used to
             assess the generalizability of the dimensions across
             samples. Confirmatory factor analytic procedures identified
             a 3-factor solution in most of the samples that was robust
             across various demographic characteristics. Two factors
             appeared particularly robust: one reflected conscious use of
             cognitive coping strategies (with high loadings on ignoring
             pain and coping self-statements) and another reflected
             self-efficacy beliefs concerning pain (with high loadings on
             ability to control and decrease pain). A third factor, which
             was somewhat less stable, appeared to reflect avoidance of
             pain by attention to non-pain-related mental activity (with
             high loadings on diverting attention and praying and
             hoping). Scales reflecting catastrophizing cognitions and
             behavioral coping strategies did not consistently load on
             the above dimensions. Issues concerning the
             conceptualization and measurement of pain-related cognitive
             coping dimensions are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(90)91073-R},
   Key = {fds273914}
}

@article{fds273920,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Williams, DA},
   Title = {A comparison of coping strategies in chronic pain patients
             in different age groups.},
   Journal = {J Gerontol},
   Volume = {45},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {P161-P165},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0022-1422},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2365972},
   Abstract = {This study examined the effects of age on the frequency of
             use and perceived effectiveness of coping strategies in
             patients having chronic pain. Subjects were chronic pain
             patients in four age groups (young, middle, older, and
             geriatric). All subjects completed the Coping Strategies
             Questionnaire, which measures the use and perceived
             effectiveness of a variety of cognitive and behavioral
             coping strategies in controlling and decreasing pain.
             Subjects also completed measures of pain, depression, and
             psychological distress. Data analysis revealed that there
             were no significant age differences in either the use or
             perceived effectiveness of pain coping strategies.
             Correlational analyses based on data combined from the
             different age groups suggested that, while certain pain
             coping strategies appear to be adaptive (e.g., coping
             self-statements), other coping strategies appear to be
             maladaptive (e.g., catastrophizing, diverting attention,
             increasing behavioral activities). Patients who rated their
             ability to decrease pain as relatively high, reported lower
             levels of depression and pain. These findings are consistent
             with a contextual perspective on coping which postulates
             that few, if any, age differences in coping are to be
             expected when individuals are coping with a similar life
             event.},
   Doi = {10.1093/geronj/45.4.p161},
   Key = {fds273920}
}

@article{fds273918,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Crisson, J and Urban, BJ and Williams,
             DA},
   Title = {Analyzing chronic low back pain: the relative contribution
             of pain coping strategies.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {293-301},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2139204},
   Abstract = {Sixty-two chronic low back pain patients were administered
             the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) to assess the
             frequency of use and perceived effectiveness of a variety of
             cognitive and behavioral pain coping strategies. Analysis of
             individual variables revealed that CSQ factors, gender,
             physical examination findings, and chronicity of pain had
             significant effects on one or more of a series of pain,
             psychological distress or behavioral measures. To assess the
             relative contribution of each of these variables
             hierarchical stepwise regression analyses were carried out.
             These analyses revealed that the Helplessness factor of the
             CSQ explained 50% of the variance in psychological distress
             (Global Severity Index of the SCL-90R), and 46% of the
             variance in depression (Beck Depression Inventory). Patients
             scoring high on this CSQ factor had significantly higher
             levels of psychological distress. None of the demographic or
             medical status variables explained a significant proportion
             of variance in the psychological distress measures. The
             Diverting Attention and Praying factor of the CSQ explained
             a moderate (9%), but significant amount of variance in pain
             report. Patients scoring high on this factor had higher
             scores on the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Coping strategies
             were not strongly related to pain behavior measures such as
             guarding or uptime. A consideration of pain coping
             strategies may allow one to design pain coping skills
             training interventions so as to fit the needs of the
             individual low back pain patient.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(90)91126-4},
   Key = {fds273918}
}

@article{fds273919,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Beckham, JC},
   Title = {Behavioral assessment of chronic orofacial
             pain.},
   Journal = {Anesthesia progress},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {2-3},
   Pages = {76-81},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0003-3006},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2085202},
   Abstract = {Orofacial pain is usually evaluated and treated from a
             biomedical perspective. There is no question that the large
             majority of individuals having acute orofacial pain benefit
             from timely and appropriate medical intervention. When
             orofacial pain persists, however, the likelihood that this
             pain can influence and be influenced by behavioral factors
             increases. While some individuals are able to adapt and cope
             with chronic orofacial pain, others develop significant
             behavioral problems. These problems may include an overly
             sedentary lifestyle, dependence on habit-forming narcotic
             medications, or severe depression or anxiety. The hallmark
             of the behavioral perspective on chronic pain is the
             insistence that a careful assessment and treatment of such
             behavioral problems is just as important as appropriate
             biomedical intervention.(1)},
   Key = {fds273919}
}

@article{fds273922,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Bradley, LA and Crisson, JE},
   Title = {Behavioral assessment of low back pain: identification of
             pain behavior subgroups.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {153-160},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2137905},
   Abstract = {A hierarchical cluster analysis procedure was used to
             identify homogeneous subgroups of low back pain patients who
             show similar pain behavior patterns during a videotaped
             behavior sample. Subjects, 106 chronic low back pain
             patients, were divided into 2 samples. The cluster analysis
             procedure identified 4 very similar subgroups in sample 1
             and sample 2. The first subgroup showed a low or moderate
             level of guarding and a low level of other pain behaviors.
             The second subgroup showed a high level of guarding and a
             moderate level of rubbing of the painful area. The third
             subgroup showed high levels of guarding and moderate levels
             of bracing and rubbing. The fourth subgroup exhibited a very
             high level of rubbing and moderate levels of bracing. The
             subgroups identified may require somewhat different
             approaches to pain assessment and treatment. The results of
             this study suggest that the variability in pain behavior
             evident in low back pain populations may be due to the fact
             that within these populations there are homogeneous
             subgroups of patients who differ in the motor pain behaviors
             they display.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(90)90066-M},
   Key = {fds273922}
}

@article{fds273915,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Williams, DA and Gil, KM and Mitchell, D and Robertson, C and Martinez, S and Nunley, J and Beckham, JC and Helms,
             M},
   Title = {Pain coping skills training in the management of
             osteoarthritic knee pain-II: Follow-up results},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {435-447},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80357-0},
   Abstract = {This study examines six months follow-up data obtained from
             osteoarthritic knee pain patients participating in a study
             comparing pain coping skills training, arthritis education,
             and a standard care control condition. At the time of
             follow-up, patients receiving pain coping skills training
             had: 1) significantly lower levels of psychological and
             physical disability than patients receiving arthritis
             education, and 2) marginally lower levels of psychological
             disability (p<.052) and physical disability (p<.13) than
             patients in the standard care control condition. Although
             patients receiving pain coping skills training showed
             deterioration in their initial gains in psychological
             disability from post-treatment to follow-up, it was the only
             treatment group that showed a strong trend (p=.051) towards
             improvements in physical disability over time. Variability
             in outcome was noted; some patients showed better
             maintenance of treatment effects than others. Correlational
             analyses revealed that patients' scores on the Pain Control
             and Rational Thinking (PCRT) factor of the Coping Strategies
             Questionnaire were related to outcome at six months
             follow-up. Patients receiving pain coping skills training
             who scored high on the PCRT factor at the end of treatment
             had lower levels of pain, physical disability, and pain
             behavior at six months follow-up. The implications of these
             findings for future research on cognitive-behavioral
             interventions for arthritis pain and disability are
             discussed. © 1990 Association for Advancement of Behavior
             Therapy.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80357-0},
   Key = {fds273915}
}

@article{fds273916,
   Author = {Gil, KM and Williams, DA and Keefe, FJ and Beckham,
             JC},
   Title = {The relationship of negative thoughts to pain and
             psychological distress},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {349-362},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80336-3},
   Abstract = {This study examines the degree to which negative thoughts
             during flare-ups of pain are related to pain and
             psychological distress in three pain populations, sickle
             cell disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic pain.
             One-hundred eighty-five subjects completed the Inventory of
             Negative Thoughts in Response to Pain (INTRP), a pain rating
             scale, the Symptom Checklist 90-R, and the Coping Strategies
             Questionnaire. Factor analysis of the INTRP revealed three
             factors: Negative Self-Statements, Negative Social
             Cognitions, and Self-Blame. High scorers on Negative
             Self-Statements and Negative Social Cognitions reported more
             severe pain and psychological distress. Patients with
             chronic daily pain had more frequent negative thoughts
             during flare-ups than patients having intermittent pain
             secondary to sickle cell disease or rheumatoid arthritis.
             Data suggest that the INTRP has adequate internal
             consistency and construct validity, and appears to be a
             useful tool for assessing negative throughts in response to
             pain. © 1990 Association for Advancement of Behavior
             Therapy. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80336-3},
   Key = {fds273916}
}

@article{fds273917,
   Author = {Ahles, TA and Coombs, DW and Jensen, L and Stukel, T and Maurer, LH and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Development of a behavioral observation technique for the
             assessment of pain behaviors in cancer patients},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {449-460},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80358-2},
   Abstract = {The present study assessed the reliability and validity of a
             behavioral observation technique designed to assess pain
             behaviors in cancer patients. Data supported the reliability
             of the procedure in that the level of interobserver
             agreement was quite acceptable. The validity of the
             technique was supported in that the pain behavior scores
             correlated significantly, as predicted, with the Sickness
             Impact Profile-Physical Scale and the Global Adjustment to
             Illness Scale, but not with the Sickness Impact
             Profile-Psychosocial Scale. Pain behavior scores and ratings
             of pain intensity, as measured on a visual analogue scale,
             were not significantly correlated. Additional support for
             the construct validity of the measure was provided in that
             nurses' and students' judgments of pain intensity correlated
             highly with pain behavior scores. Therefore, the behavioral
             observation method holds promise as a reliable, valid
             measure of pain behavior in a cancer pain population. ©
             1990 Association for Advancement of Behavior
             Therapy.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80358-2},
   Key = {fds273917}
}

@article{fds273921,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Williams, DA and Gil, KM and Mitchell, D and Robertson, C and Martinez, S and Nunley, J and Beckham, JC and Crisson,
             JE and Helms, M},
   Title = {Pain coping skills training in the management of
             osteoarthritic knee pain: A comparative study},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {49-62},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80188-1},
   Abstract = {The purpose of this study was to determine whether a
             cognitive-behavioral intervention designed to improve pain
             coping skills could reduce pain, physical disability,
             psychological disability, and pain behavior in
             osteoarthritic knee pain patients. Patients in this study
             were older adults (mean age=64 years) having persistent pain
             (mean duration=12 years), who were diagnosed as having
             osteoarthritis of the knee on the basis of medical
             evaluation and x-rays. Patients were randomly assigned to
             one of three conditions: pain coping skills training,
             arthritis education, or a standard care control condition.
             Patients in the pain coping skills training condition (n=32)
             attended 10 weekly group sessions training them to recognize
             and reduce irrational cognitions and to use attention
             diversion and changes in activity patterns to control and
             decrease pain. Arthritis education subjects (n=36) attended
             10 weekly group sessions providing them with detailed
             information on osteoarthritis. Standard care control
             subjects (n=31) continued with their routine care. Measures
             of coping strategies, pain, psychological disability,
             physical disability, medication use, and pain behavior were
             collected from all subjects before and after treatment.
             Results indicated that patients receiving pain coping skills
             training had significantly lower levels of pain and
             psychological disability post-treatment than patients
             receiving arthritis education or standard care.
             Correlational analyses revealed that patients in the pain
             coping skills training group who reported increases in the
             perceived effectiveness of their coping strategies were more
             likely to have lower levels of physical disability
             post-treatment. Taken together, these findings indicate that
             pain coping skills training can reduce pain and
             psychological disability in osteoarthritis patients. Future
             studies should examine whether behavioral rehearsal or
             spouse training can strengthen the effects of pain coping
             skills training in order to reduce physical disability and
             pain behavior as well as pain and psychological disability.
             © 1990 Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy. All
             rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80188-1},
   Key = {fds273921}
}

@article{fds273923,
   Author = {Gil, KM and Abrams, MR and Phillips, G and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Sickle cell disease pain: relation of coping strategies to
             adjustment.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {57},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {725-731},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.57.6.725},
   Abstract = {This study examines pain coping strategies in a relatively
             neglected pain population, sickle cell disease (SCD)
             patients. Seventy-nine patients diagnosed with SCD were
             given a structured interview to assess pain, activity level,
             and health care use during painful episodes. Patients also
             completed the SCL-90-R as an index of psychological distress
             and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Regression analyses
             controlled for age, sex, and disease severity measures.
             Results indicated that the coping strategies factors were
             important predictors of pain and adjustment. Individuals
             high on Negative Thinking and Passive Adherence had more
             severe pain, were less active and more distressed, and used
             more health care services. Individuals high on Coping
             Attempts were more active during painful
             episodes.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.57.6.725},
   Key = {fds273923}
}

@article{fds273925,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Brown, GK and Wallston, KA and Caldwell,
             DS},
   Title = {Coping with rheumatoid arthritis pain: catastrophizing as a
             maladaptive strategy.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {51-56},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2726278},
   Abstract = {The present study examined catastrophizing in rheumatoid
             arthritis (RA) patients. Subjects were 223 RA patients who
             were participants in a longitudinal study. Each patient
             completed the Catastrophizing scale of the Coping Strategies
             Questionnaire (CSQ) on 2 occasions separated by 6 months
             (time 1, time 2). The Catastrophizing scale is designed to
             measure negative self-statements, castastrophizing thoughts
             and ideation (sample items = 'I worry all the time about
             whether it will end,' 'It is awful and I feel that it
             overwhelms me'). Data analysis revealed that the
             Catastrophizing scale was internally reliable (alpha = 0.91)
             and had high test-retest reliability (r = 0.81) over a 6
             month period. Correlational analyses revealed that
             catastrophizing recorded at time 1 was related to pain
             intensity ratings, functional impairment on the Arthritis
             Impact Measurement scale (AIMS), and depression at time 2.
             Predictive findings regarding catastrophizing while modest
             were obtained after controlling for initial scores on the
             dependent variables, demographic variables (age, sex,
             socioeconomic status), duration of pain, and disability
             support status. Taken together, these findings suggest that
             catastrophizing is a maladaptive coping strategy in RA
             patients. Further research is needed to determine whether
             cognitive-behavioral interventions designed to decrease
             catastrophizing can reduce pain and improve the physical and
             psychological functioning of RA patients.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(89)90152-8},
   Key = {fds273925}
}

@article{fds273924,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Williams, DA},
   Title = {New directions in pain assessment and treatment},
   Journal = {Clinical Psychology Review},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {549-568},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0272-7358},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(89)90011-1},
   Abstract = {Psychological and behavioral methods have played an active
             role in shaping current approaches to the assessment and
             treatment of pain. This article assumes familiarity with the
             more traditional forms of psychological intervention for
             pain and reviews the developments of the past 3-5 years. The
             pain assessment section focuses on epidemiological
             approaches to chronic pain, objective measures of pain
             behavior, analysis of social and emotional factors, and
             analysis of cognitive factors affecting pain. The treatment
             section of the article focuses on early intervention for
             chronic pain, pain management in children, and
             cognitive-behavioral treatments for arthritis pain. Each
             section concludes with comments and potential directions for
             the future. © 1989.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0272-7358(89)90011-1},
   Key = {fds273924}
}

@article{fds273928,
   Author = {Crisson, JE and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The relationship of locus of control to pain coping
             strategies and psychological distress in chronic pain
             patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {147-154},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3237429},
   Abstract = {Although behavioral scientists have long been interested in
             how an individual's locus of control relates to coping and
             adjustment, basic information remains to be gathered on the
             relevance of locus of control to adaptation to persistent
             pain. This study examined the relationship of locus of
             control orientation to pain coping strategies and
             psychological distress in chronic pain patients. Subjects
             were 62 chronic pain patients. All patients were
             administered: (1) the Multidimensional Health Locus of
             Control Scales to assess locus of control, (2) the Coping
             Strategies Questionnaire to evaluate pain coping strategies,
             and (3) the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised to assess
             psychological distress. Correlational analyses revealed that
             patients who viewed outcomes as controlled by chance factors
             such as fate or luck tended to rely on maladaptive pain
             coping strategies and rated their abilities to control and
             decrease pain as poor. They also exhibited greater
             psychological distress. Regression analyses indicated that
             patients having a chance orientation toward locus of control
             were more likely to report depression, anxiety, and
             obsessive-compulsive symptoms and to have higher overall
             levels of psychological distress. Chance locus of control
             also predicted greater reliance on diverting attention and
             praying/hoping in dealing with their pain. In addition,
             patients high on chance locus of control reported feeling
             helpless to deal effectively with their pain problem.
             Clinicians evaluating chronic pain patients need to be aware
             that patients who view outcomes as controlled by external
             factors such as chance may have deficits in pain coping
             strategies and may report greater psychological distress
             than patients who do not have this locus of control
             orientation.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(88)90222-9},
   Key = {fds273928}
}

@article{fds273927,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Gil, KM and Williams, DA},
   Title = {Pain management programs. Clinical and research
             perspectives.},
   Journal = {N C Med J},
   Volume = {49},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {526-529},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds273927}
}

@article{fds273929,
   Author = {Anderson, KO and Keefe, FJ and Bradley, LA and McDaniel, LK and Young,
             LD and Turner, RA and Agudelo, CA and Semble, EL and Pisko,
             EJ},
   Title = {Prediction of pain behavior and functional status of
             rheumatoid arthritis patients using medical status and
             psychological variables.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {25-32},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90199-6},
   Abstract = {This study examined the extent to which the psychological
             variables of depression, anxiety, and helplessness predicted
             the pain behavior and functional status of 64 rheumatoid
             arthritis (RA) patients beyond what could be predicted on
             the basis of demographic and medical status variables. Pain
             behavior was evaluated using a standardized observation
             method, and functional status was assessed using a modified
             Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) and rheumatologists'
             ratings. Regression analyses revealed that a modified
             rheumatoid activity index and/or disease duration were
             significant predictors of levels of guarding, rigidity, and
             total pain behavior. The psychological variables examined
             did not predict independently RA pain behavior. The
             rheumatoid activity index explained a significant proportion
             of the variance in functional status ratings and MHAQ daily
             function scores. Age, disease duration and depression also
             were independent predictors of functional status ratings.
             Thus, depression had a significant relationship with
             physician ratings of functional status but not with patient
             self-reports of disability. Psychological factors not
             examined in this study that might influence RA pain behavior
             and self-reports of functional status are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(88)90199-6},
   Key = {fds273929}
}

@article{fds273933,
   Author = {Morrell, EM and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The actometer: an evaluation of instrument applicability for
             chronic pain patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {265-270},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90036-X},
   Abstract = {Three experiments were conducted to determine the
             reliability and validity of an activity measurement device,
             the actometer, as an index of ambulation for chronic pain
             patients. In experiment I, correlations between yoked
             actometers during ambulation showed the instrument to be
             internally reliable. In experiment II, actometer readings
             covaried very strongly with distance, showing the device to
             be valid during single trial assessment. However, experiment
             III found the device to show poor reliability over time
             (i.e., substantial measurement variability for the identical
             distance on 3 separate days). The results suggest that, for
             the chronic pain population, the actometer may not be a
             useful instrument for reliably assessing changes in walking
             activity over time.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(88)90036-X},
   Key = {fds273933}
}

@article{fds273930,
   Author = {Romano, JM and Syrjala, KL and Levy, RL and Turner, JA and Evans, P and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Overt pain behaviors: Relationship to patient functioning
             and treatment outcome},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {191-201},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(88)80042-X},
   Abstract = {Two related studies examined the relationship of overt pain
             behaviors to measures of patient functioning and treatment
             outcome. In Study 1, overt pain behaviors of 45 chronic low
             back pain patients beginning inpatient pain treatment were
             assessed, and self-report measures of pain, pain behaviors,
             and physical and psychosocial disability were also obtained.
             Frequency of observed pain behaviors was significantly
             associated with patient ratings of pain, pain behaviors, and
             physical disability, but not psychosocial functioning. In
             Study 2, changes in observed pain behaviors and self-report
             measures of pain, pain behaviors, and depression following
             inpatient treatment were examined. Observed pain behaviors
             and self-reported pain, pain behaviors, and depression
             decreased significantly pre- to posttreatment. Decreases in
             observed pain behaviors were significantly associated with
             decreases in depression, but not with changes in
             self-reported pain or pain behaviors. Results support the
             use of both observational and self-report measures in the
             comprehensive evaluation of chronic pain problems. © 1988
             Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy. All rights
             reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(88)80042-X},
   Key = {fds273930}
}

@article{fds273932,
   Author = {Gil, KM and Keefe, FJ and Sampson, HA and McCaskill, CC and Rodin, J and Crisson, JE},
   Title = {Direct observation of scratching behavior in children with
             atopic dermatitis},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {213-227},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(88)80044-3},
   Abstract = {This study examines scratching behavior in children with
             atopic dermatitis (AD). Thirty children with severe AD and
             one parent of each child were observed for a 10-minute
             observation period during a five-minute structured and
             five-minute unstructured task. Observers coded child and
             parent behaviors. Data analyses revealed that children
             engaged in more scratching behavior during the unstructured
             than structured task. Furthermore, regression analyses
             indicated that parent responses to scratching behavior in
             children were important predictors of scratching behavior
             even after controlling for demographic and medical status
             variables, such as serum IgE level and percentage of body
             area affected by AD. These results have important
             implications for health care professionals working with
             children who have AD. Suggestions for future behavioral
             treatment studies are discussed. © 1988 Association for
             Advancement of Behavior Therapy. All rights
             reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(88)80044-3},
   Key = {fds273932}
}

@article{fds273926,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Dolan, EA},
   Title = {Correlation of pain behavior and muscle activity in patients
             with myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome.},
   Journal = {J Craniomandib Disord},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {181-184},
   Year = {1988},
   Key = {fds273926}
}

@article{fds273931,
   Author = {Dolan, EA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Muscle activity in myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome
             patients: a structured clinical evaluation.},
   Journal = {J Craniomandib Disord},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {101-105},
   Year = {1988},
   Key = {fds273931}
}

@article{fds273934,
   Author = {Anderson, KO and Bradley, LA and McDaniel, LK and Young, LD and Turner,
             RA and Agudelo, CA and Gaby, NS and Keefe, FJ and Pisko, EJ and Snyder,
             RM},
   Title = {The assessment of pain in rheumatoid arthritis: disease
             differentiation and temporal stability of a behavioral
             observation method.},
   Journal = {J Rheumatol},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {700-704},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0315-162X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1987K037600011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {An observation method for the assessment of pain behaviors
             in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been
             developed. We investigated the extent to which the
             frequencies of pain behaviors differentiated patients with
             RA and patients with chronic low back pain from depressed
             and nondepressed, pain free, control subjects. The
             reliability of the pain behavior frequencies of patients
             with RA across 2 observation sessions also was determined.
             Total pain behavior scores clearly differentiated patients
             with RA and low back pain from depressed and nondepressed,
             pain free, control subjects. Pain behavior observed in
             patients with RA showed a high degree of stability over
             time. The results of our study suggest that the behavioral
             observation method will prove useful in the assessment of RA
             pain in clinical and research settings.},
   Key = {fds273934}
}

@article{fds273937,
   Author = {Gil, KM and Keefe, FJ and Crisson, JE and Van Dalfsen,
             PJ},
   Title = {Social support and pain behavior.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {209-217},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(87)91037-2},
   Abstract = {Research has shown that social support is generally
             associated with better adaptation to chronic disease.
             However, the role that social support plays in adjustment to
             chronic pain syndromes has received less research attention.
             The present study was designed to examine the relation of
             high versus low levels of social support to pain behavior in
             chronic pain patients. Fifty-one patients with chronic pain
             completed the Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ) and the
             McGill Pain Questionnaire. Patients were also observed using
             a standard observation system to assess pain behaviors. In
             order to compare pain behaviors displayed by subjects with
             high versus low levels of social support, a median split was
             performed on the 2 dimensions of the SSQ: satisfaction with
             support, and availability of people for support. The results
             indicated that pain behavior varied as a function of level
             of satisfaction with social support. Individuals reporting
             high satisfaction with social support exhibited
             significantly higher levels of total pain behavior and
             higher levels of individual pain behaviors such as guarding,
             rubbing, and bracing. There was no significant difference in
             total pain behaviors between those high versus low in terms
             of level of availability of support. There also were no
             differences between high versus low social support groups in
             total pain ratings as measured by the McGill Pain
             Questionnaire. The results are discussed in terms of an
             operant conditioning perspective on social support.
             Individuals who are satisfied with the quality of their
             social support may be satisfied because they receive
             positive reinforcement from the social environment when they
             engage in pain behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(87)91037-2},
   Key = {fds273937}
}

@article{fds273938,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Queen, KT and Gil, KM and Martinez, S and Crisson, JE and Ogden, W and Nunley, J},
   Title = {Pain coping strategies in osteoarthritis
             patients.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {55},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {208-212},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.55.2.208},
   Abstract = {The present study investigated the relation of pain coping
             strategies to pain, health status, and psychological
             distress in a group of osteoarthritis patients with chronic
             knee pain. Fifty-one patients completed the Coping
             Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), the McGill Pain
             Questionnaire, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale
             (AIMS), and the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90 R).
             Medical status variables included roentgenograph (x-ray)
             findings, obesity measures, disability status, and
             chronicity of pain. Factor analysis of the CSQ revealed two
             factors (Coping Attempts, Pain Control and Rational
             Thinking) that accounted for 60% of the variance in CSQ
             responses. Regression analyses controlling for demographic
             and medical variables identified the Pain Control and
             Rational Thinking factor as a significant predictor of the
             outcome measures. Patients scoring high on this factor had
             lower pain levels, better health status, and lower levels of
             psychological distress. © 1987 American Psychological
             Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.55.2.208},
   Key = {fds273938}
}

@article{fds273939,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Caldwell, DS and Queen, K and Gil, KM and Martinez, S and Crisson, JE and Ogden, W and Nunley, J},
   Title = {Osteoarthritic knee pain: a behavioral analysis.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {309-321},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(87)90066-2},
   Abstract = {This study used behavioral assessment techniques to analyze
             pain in osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Eighty-seven OA
             patients having chronic knee pain served as subjects. Pain
             behavior was evaluated using a standard observation method
             and functional impairment was assessed using the Arthritis
             Impact Measurement Scales. Data analysis revealed that pain
             and limitations in physical activities were the most common
             functional impairments and that the most frequently observed
             pain behavior was guarded movement. Predictive analyses
             indicated that disability support status and scores on a
             Pain Control and Rational Thinking factor of the Coping
             Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) were predictive of functional
             impairment. Patients receiving disability support payments
             were much more functionally limited than those not receiving
             this financial support. Patients scoring high on the Pain
             Control and Rational Thinking factor of the CSQ were much
             less functionally impaired, walked a 5 m course more rapidly
             and moved from a standing to a sitting or reclining position
             more quickly than patients scoring low on this factor. The
             implications of these results for behavioral treatment of OA
             knee pain are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(87)90066-2},
   Key = {fds273939}
}

@article{fds273940,
   Author = {Anderson, KO and Bradley, LA and McDaniel, LK and Young, LD and Turner,
             RA and Agudelo, CA and Keefe, FJ and Pisko, EJ and Snyder, RM and Semble,
             EL},
   Title = {The assessment of pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Validity of
             a behavioral observation method.},
   Journal = {Arthritis Rheum},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {36-43},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0004-3591},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1987F990900005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {It is difficult to objectively measure pain in rheumatoid
             arthritis (RA). A behavioral observation method for the
             assessment of RA pain has been developed. In this study,
             videotapes were made of 53 RA patients while they performed
             standardized maneuvers. Trained raters viewed the videotapes
             and recorded the frequencies of 7 pain behaviors. Clinical
             and laboratory measures of rheumatoid disease activity also
             were recorded for each patient. Rheumatology fellows viewed
             20 randomly chosen video recordings of the patients and made
             global estimates of the intensity and unpleasantness of
             pain. Significant positive correlations were found between
             total pain behavior scores and measures of disease activity.
             The fellows' estimates of the intensity and unpleasantness
             of the patients' pain also were significantly and positively
             correlated with the total pain behavior scores. The
             behavioral observation method may be useful in the
             assessment of RA pain and may be included as an objective
             outcome measure in clinical trials with RA
             patients.},
   Doi = {10.1002/art.1780300105},
   Key = {fds273940}
}

@article{fds273935,
   Author = {Gil, KM and Keefe, FJ and Sampson, HA and McCaskill, CC and Rodin, J and Crisson, JE},
   Title = {The relation of stress and family environment to atopic
             dermatitis symptoms in children.},
   Journal = {J Psychosom Res},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {673-684},
   Year = {1987},
   ISSN = {0022-3999},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3430430},
   Abstract = {The relation of stress and family environment to symptom
             severity in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) was
             examined. Forty-four children with severe AD and their
             families completed questionnaires measuring life events,
             chronic everyday problems and family environment. Measures
             of symptom severity were collected during medical evaluation
             and included an estimate of body surface affected by AD,
             course of AD symptoms over time, medication usage, and
             scratching intensity during the day and night. Regression
             analyses indicated that the measures of stress and family
             environment were important predictors of symptom severity
             even after controlling for demographic and medical status
             variables such as age and serum IgE level. These results
             have important implications for health care professionals
             working with children who have AD. Future research
             directions in the area of stress and AD are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0022-3999(87)90016-x},
   Key = {fds273935}
}

@article{fds273936,
   Author = {Manuel, GM and Roth, S and Keefe, FJ and Brantley,
             BA},
   Title = {Coping with cancer.},
   Journal = {J Human Stress},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {149-158},
   Year = {1987},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1987.9936808},
   Abstract = {This study examined coping strategies in head and neck
             cancer patients. The relationships between the use of
             approach and avoidant coping strategies and the physical and
             emotional distress of 35 newly diagnosed head and neck
             cancer patients during the early stages of cancer treatment
             were evaluated. Patients were categorized on the basis of
             coping strategy at the time of diagnosis and then evaluated
             twice during the course of their treatment at four- to
             six-week intervals. Cancer patients who predominantly
             employed either approach or avoidant strategies had lower
             initial levels of emotional distress than patients who did
             not use either of these strategies. Although symptoms of
             distress decreased in patients using approach or avoidance,
             symptoms increased for those patients who did not use these
             strategies. The level of stress for this cancer population
             is highest at the point of confirmed diagnosis and recedes
             during the course of treatment. The theoretical and clinical
             implications of these findings are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1080/0097840X.1987.9936808},
   Key = {fds273936}
}

@article{fds273941,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Gil, KM},
   Title = {Behavioral concepts in the analysis of chronic pain
             syndromes.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {54},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {776-783},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.54.6.776},
   Abstract = {Behavioral and psychological concepts currently applied to
             the assessment and treatment of a variety of chronic pain
             syndromes are reviewed. Operant conditioning principles are
             commonly used to analyze and modify maladaptive overt
             behavior patterns such as excessive dependence on narcotics,
             on bedrest, and on family or health-care professionals.
             Psychophysiologic concepts that are widely used include the
             stress-pain hypothesis, the pain-muscle spasm-pain cycle,
             and the neuromuscular pain model. Interventions for pain
             based on these concepts include relaxation and biofeedback
             training. Concepts from cognitive psychology are
             increasingly being used to evaluate subjective responses to
             persistent pain. The advantages and disadvantages of these
             concepts are discussed. Suggestions are also proposed for
             future research designed to enhance our understanding of
             chronic pain. © 1986 American Psychological
             Association.},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.54.6.776},
   Key = {fds273941}
}

@article{fds273943,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Castell, PJ and Blumenthal, JA},
   Title = {Angina pectoris in type A and type B cardiac
             patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {211-218},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3797016},
   Abstract = {The type A behavior pattern is characterized by excessive
             competitive drive, a sense of time urgency, enhanced
             aggressiveness, hostility and a persistent desire for
             recognition. Type A behaviour is widely recognized as a risk
             factor in coronary heart disease. This study investigated
             whether type As and Bs differ in their experience of pain
             and pain coping efforts. A group of type A (n = 35) and a
             group of type B (n = 19) cardiac disease patients served as
             subjects. All subjects underwent diagnostic treadmill
             testing and were compared on a variety of pain measures.
             There were no differences between type As and Bs in age,
             sex, presence of state or trait anxiety or severity of
             cardiac disease. Type A patients, however, were much more
             likely than type Bs to be classified on the New York Heart
             Association (NYHA) functional angina scale as having more
             severe pain and functional limitation. Type As were also
             less likely to use pain coping strategies to deal with their
             pain. Those who assess pain and functional impairment in
             cardiac patients using the NYHA scale should be aware that
             type A personality characteristics may affect their
             assessments. Type A patients who tend to make little use of
             pain coping strategies may benefit from systematic training
             in pain control methods. Additional research is needed to
             examine whether type A-B differences in pain and pain coping
             strategies may affect risks of coronary morbidity and
             mortality.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(86)90212-5},
   Key = {fds273943}
}

@article{fds273942,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Wilkins, RH and Cook, WA and Crisson, JE and Muhlbaier,
             LH},
   Title = {Depression, pain, and pain behavior.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {54},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {665-669},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0022-006X},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2945848},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.54.5.665},
   Key = {fds273942}
}

@article{fds273946,
   Author = {Crisson, J and Keefe, FJ and Wilkins, RH and Cook, WA and Muhlbaier,
             LH},
   Title = {Self-report of depressive symptoms in low back pain
             patients.},
   Journal = {J Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {42},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {425-430},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0021-9762},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2940266},
   Abstract = {Two studies designed to examine the self-report of
             depressive symptoms in low back pain patients are presented.
             Symptoms of depression were assessed with the Beck
             Depression Inventory. In the first study, a sample (N = 134)
             of patients who presented for neurosurgical evaluation were
             evaluated. In the second study, a subgroup of patients found
             to have lumbar disc protrusion were compared to a subgroup
             with few or no positive physical findings at the time of
             physical examination. If the cut-off scores recommended by
             Beck were used, patients in both studies would be classified
             as mildly depressed. Both studies found that patients were
             significantly more likely to report somatic than cognitive
             symptoms of depression. Patients with multiple physical
             findings or a disc abnormality at the time of operation were
             not found to be more likely to report somatic symptoms than
             patients with few physical findings.},
   Doi = {10.1002/1097-4679(198605)42:3<425::aid-jclp2270420304>3.0.co},
   Key = {fds273946}
}

@article{fds273947,
   Author = {McDaniel, LK and Anderson, KO and Bradley, LA and Young, LD and Turner,
             RA and Agudelo, CA and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Development of an observation method for assessing pain
             behavior in rheumatoid arthritis patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {165-184},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1986A374200004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Four studies examined the reliability and validity of a
             behavioral observation method for the assessment of pain
             associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The major purpose
             of experiment 1 was to evaluate the interobserver
             reliability of the observation method. Two observers
             recorded the frequencies of pain behaviors displayed by 20
             RA patients. Each of 3 types of reliability estimates
             indicated that the pain behavior could be reliably observed.
             The purpose of experiment 2 was to examine the concurrent
             validity of the observation system by correlating 53
             patients' self-reports of pain with the frequencies of their
             pain behaviors. Significant and positive correlations were
             found between patients' total pain behavior and 3
             self-report measures of pain and functional disability.
             Furthermore, unlike the self-reports of pain, total pain
             behavior was only minimally related to self-report of
             depression. Experiment 3 was performed in order to assess
             the observation method's construct validity. Naive observers
             viewed video recordings of 25 RA patients and made global
             estimates of patients' pain severity and unpleasantness.
             Highly significant and positive correlations were found
             between these global estimates and total pain behavior. In
             experiment 4, the pain behaviors of 11 RA patients were
             recorded prior to and immediately following
             cognitive-behavioral treatment for the reduction of RA pain.
             There was a significant decrease in total pain behavior from
             pretreatment to posttreatment. The data indicate that the
             observation method provides a reliable, valid, and
             relatively objective measure of RA patient pain behavior.
             Future validation studies of the observation method are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(86)90039-4},
   Key = {fds273947}
}

@article{fds273945,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Gil, KM and Rose, SC},
   Title = {Behavioral approaches in the multidisciplinary management of
             chronic pain: Programs and issues},
   Journal = {Clinical Psychology Review},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {87-113},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0272-7358},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(86)90007-3},
   Abstract = {Psychological, social, and behavioral factors appear to play
             an important role in determining how patients adapt to
             chronic pain. There is a growing consensus among physicians
             that traditional diagnostic approaches to chronic pain must
             be expanded to address these factors. Innovative,
             multidisciplinary programs designed to change behavioral and
             psychological functioning in chronic pain patients have
             recently been developed. Disciplines involved include
             nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychology,
             psychiatry, anesthesiology, neurosurgery, and orthopedics.
             These programs are interesting because they successfully
             treat many chronic pain patients who previously failed to
             respond to conventional treatments. This article provides a
             selective review of behaviorally oriented,
             multidisciplinary, chronic pain treatment programs. It
             begins with a consideration of the conceptual foundations of
             these programs-the mechanisms of chronic pain. Basic
             elements of several major programs as well as outcome data
             are described. The paper concludes with a discussion of
             clinical issues important in evaluating these programs. ©
             1986.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0272-7358(86)90007-3},
   Key = {fds273945}
}

@article{fds273948,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Dolan, E},
   Title = {Pain behavior and pain coping strategies in low back pain
             and myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome
             patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {49-56},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(86)90025-4},
   Abstract = {Pain behavior and pain coping strategies were systematically
             measured in a group of 32 chronic low back pain (LBP) and 32
             myofascial pain dysfunction (MPD) syndrome patients. Both
             groups reported high levels of psychological distress on the
             SCL-90R. The LBP patients were significantly less active,
             took more narcotic and sedative-hypnotic medications, and
             showed higher levels of motor pain behavior (guarding,
             rubbing, and bracing) than the MPD patients. The LBP
             patients used attention diversion, and praying or hoping as
             pain coping skills to a much greater extent than the MPD
             patients. The relationship of these findings to prior
             research is described, and future research needs in this
             area are identified.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(86)90025-4},
   Key = {fds273948}
}

@article{fds273944,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Crisson, JE and Maltbie, A and Bradley, L and Gil,
             KM},
   Title = {Illness behavior as a predictor of pain and overt behavior
             patterns in chronic low back pain patients.},
   Journal = {J Psychosom Res},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {543-551},
   Year = {1986},
   ISSN = {0022-3999},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(86)90026-7},
   Abstract = {This study examined the relationship of self-reports of
             illness behavior to pain ratings and overt pain behaviors in
             a group of chronic low back pain patients referred for pain
             management. Illness behavior was measured using the Pilowsky
             and Spence Illness Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ) and pain
             behavior was recorded using a standard behavioral
             observation method. Multivariate regression analyses
             revealed that scores on the IBQ were highly predictive of a
             variety of indices of pain and pain behavior. These results
             were obtained even after controlling for significant
             demographic and medical status variables. The findings of
             this study support the utility of the IBQ in the behavioral
             assessment of chronic pain patients.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0022-3999(86)90026-7},
   Key = {fds273944}
}

@article{fds273949,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Manuel, G and Brantley, A and Crisson,
             J},
   Title = {Pain in the head and neck cancer patient: changes over
             treatment.},
   Journal = {Head Neck Surg},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {169-176},
   Year = {1986},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890080308},
   Abstract = {The incidence, severity, and location of pain was evaluated
             in 30 head and neck cancer patients prior to treatment after
             the first phase of their treatment and upon the completion
             of treatment. The incidence of pain was relatively high
             (40%-70%) and tended to increase slightly over treatment.
             Patients having advanced disease (stage III or IV) had a
             higher incidence of pain. Pain severity ratings were stable
             over treatment. Pain was located close to tumor or incision
             sites, and a trend for patients to report a greater number
             of pain sites over treatment was noted. While medical status
             variables (disease stage and site) were found to predict
             pain status after the initial phase of cancer treatment,
             initial pain measurements were more likely to predict pain
             status at the completion of treatment.},
   Doi = {10.1002/hed.2890080308},
   Key = {fds273949}
}

@article{fds273950,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Brantley, A and Manuel, G and Crisson,
             JE},
   Title = {Behavioral assessment of head and neck cancer
             pain.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {327-336},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(85)90002-8},
   Abstract = {Behavioral evaluations of pain were carried out on a sample
             of 30 head and neck cancer patients before, at the midpoint,
             and at the end of their treatment. Observations of patients'
             behavior as they carried out functional activities revealed
             that patients tended to display their pain primarily through
             facial expression and to a lesser extent through guarded
             movement. During the period of treatment there were
             significant increases in the number of simple daily
             activities that increased pain, in the time spent sitting
             each day, and in the number of patients using narcotics.
             There was also a strong tendency for patients to lose weight
             and to use a greater number of pain relieving methods. A
             behavioral dysfunction index based on scores on each of the
             behavioral measures was clearly related to pain ratings.
             Measures of pain taken before treatment were highly
             predictive of behavioral dysfunction index scores recorded
             at the completion of cancer treatments.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(85)90002-8},
   Key = {fds273950}
}

@article{fds273951,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Hill, RW},
   Title = {An objective approach to quantifying pain behavior and gait
             patterns in low back pain patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {153-161},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(85)90285-4},
   Abstract = {Patterns of walking and concomitant pain behavior were
             compared in a group of chronic low back patients (n = 18)
             and normal controls (n = 18). Subjects were asked to walk a
             5 m course. A transducer placed in the subjects' shoes
             produced a force proportional signal that permitted
             measurement of walking parameters. Subjects were videotaped
             in order to record the occurrence of 5 specific pain
             behaviors: guarding, bracing, rubbing the painful area,
             grimacing, and sighing. Data analysis revealed significant
             differences in walking patterns of the patients and
             controls. Patients walked more slowly, took shorter steps
             and did not show the symmetrical gait patterns evident in
             normal controls. Patients also exhibited much higher levels
             of pain behavior. The gait of patients receiving disability
             payments or taking narcotics differed significantly from
             those who were not. Patients receiving disability payments
             had significantly longer stride lengths and swing time than
             patients not receiving disability/financial compensation
             payments. Patients taking narcotics showed longer single
             limb support time for the left leg than those who were not.
             By combining objective measures of gait and motor pain
             behaviors, clinicians and researchers may be able to more
             objectively evaluate factors that may affect patient
             behavior and measure the effects of interventions designed
             to modify behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(85)90285-4},
   Key = {fds273951}
}

@article{fds273952,
   Author = {Urban, BJ and Keefe, FJ and France, RD},
   Title = {A study of psychophysical scaling in chronic pain
             patients.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {157-168},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(84)90097-6},
   Abstract = {Chronic pain patients were asked to psychophysically scale
             two sets of word descriptors (intensity and unpleasantness)
             using a crossmodality matching procedure with line length
             and numerical estimates. In 22 patients (group I) descriptor
             scaling was performed once, in another 20 patients (group
             II) the procedure was repeated 3 times. 72.7% of patients in
             group I obtained a correlation of 0.9 or higher when scaling
             intensity descriptors, but only 18.2% obtained this
             correlation when scaling unpleasantness words. In group II,
             an average of 85% of patients reliably scaled intensity
             words, but only 50% could do so for the unpleasantness
             descriptors. Patients who reliably judged unpleasantness
             descriptors generally exhibited a higher level of
             psychological distress (SCL-90 R). Numerical estimates
             assigned by patients to individual word descriptors showed a
             smaller range than obtained from experimental pain studies.
             There was unequal spacing of values of adjacent descriptors
             with clustering of words in the low and high ends of the
             continuum and large gaps in midrange. Results indicate that
             chronic pain patients in general show a higher incidence of
             impairment in rendering proportional judgments than a
             healthy population. In addition, they are more likely to
             judge pain reliably on an intensity than on an
             unpleasantness dimension. The difference in performance
             between scales persists in spite of training and could not
             be explained by medical history, drug intake, or demographic
             characteristics. Patients who are unable to render reliable
             judgments are easily identified. For optimal clinical use
             words clustering close together should be combined and
             additional words should be added describing midrange
             intensities. Conversely, psychophysical scaling techniques
             may be used to calibrate category or analogue scales of
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(84)90097-6},
   Key = {fds273952}
}

@article{fds273953,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Wilkins, RH and Cook, WA},
   Title = {Direct observation of pain behavior in low back pain
             patients during physical examination.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {59-68},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(84)90811-X},
   Abstract = {Trained observers measured the occurrence of 5 behaviors
             (guarding, bracing, rubbing, grimacing, and sighing) in a
             group of 80 low back pain patients undergoing physical
             examination. Bracing was frequently displayed, rubbing,
             guarding, and grimacing were moderately frequent and sighing
             was infrequent. Pain behaviors were much more likely to
             occur when patients were moving than when they were in a
             static position. The rate of guarding, bracing, and total
             pain behavior was predicted by physical examination findings
             and/or number of prior operations. Patients having longer
             pain histories were also more likely to show guarded
             movement. Topics for future research in this area are
             identified, and the utility of behavioral observation for
             clinicians is discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(84)90811-X},
   Key = {fds273953}
}

@article{fds372020,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Psychological approaches to the management of
             pain},
   Journal = {Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental
             Psychiatry},
   Volume = {15},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {88-89},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(84)90133-2},
   Doi = {10.1016/0005-7916(84)90133-2},
   Key = {fds372020}
}

@article{fds273954,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Bradley, LA},
   Title = {Behavioral and psychological approaches to the assessment
             and treatment of chronic pain.},
   Journal = {Gen Hosp Psychiatry},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {49-54},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0163-8343},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(84)90059-8},
   Abstract = {This article briefly reviews behavioral and psychologic
             methods currently used to assess chronic pain patients.
             Assessment techniques designed to measure pain report, overt
             behavior patterns, and psychologic functioning are
             described. A variety of behavioral treatment procedures for
             chronic pain are also discussed. Treatment techniques can be
             grouped into two major categories: operant conditioning
             methods, and self-management strategies. Critical needs for
             future research are briefly identified.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0163-8343(84)90059-8},
   Key = {fds273954}
}

@article{fds273955,
   Author = {Houpt, JL and Keefe, FJ and Snipes, MT},
   Title = {The Clinical Specialty Unit: the use of the psychiatry
             inpatient unit to treat chronic pain syndromes.},
   Journal = {Gen Hosp Psychiatry},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {65-70},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(84)90061-6},
   Abstract = {The authors describe a 15-bed psychiatry inpatient unit, the
             Clinical Specialty Unit (CSU), designed to treat patients
             with chronic pain syndromes. They argue that the use of
             psychiatry beds for this purpose is appropriate, given the
             nature of the chronic pain disorder, but is not without its
             liabilities. The administrative structure and roles of the
             multidisciplinary team are described.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0163-8343(84)90061-6},
   Key = {fds273955}
}

@article{fds273956,
   Author = {France, RD and Urban, BJ and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Long-term use of narcotic analgesics in chronic
             pain.},
   Journal = {Soc Sci Med},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1379-1382},
   Year = {1984},
   ISSN = {0277-9536},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(84)90027-3},
   Abstract = {The use of narcotic analgesics have been avoided by
             clinicians in patients with chronic pain syndromes.
             Uncertainty as to the etiological cause of chronic pain,
             development of addiction and habituation and associated
             psychological and behavioral symptoms found in chronic pain
             states which are not amenable to narcotic medications are
             the major reasons narcotics are not prescribed. This
             communication describes the long-term use of low dose
             narcotic analgesics as a treatment component of a
             comprehensive pain management program and addresses the
             questions of whether or not narcotic efficacy is maintained
             in long-term use, improvement of patients' function is
             continued and side effects develop as a result of this
             treatment.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0277-9536(84)90027-3},
   Key = {fds273956}
}

@article{fds273958,
   Author = {Rosenstiel, AK and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain
             patients: relationship to patient characteristics and
             current adjustment.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {33-44},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(83)90125-2},
   Abstract = {Cognitive and behavioral pain coping strategies were
             assessed by means of questionnaire in a sample of 61 chronic
             low back pain patients. Data analysis indicated that the
             questionnaire was internally reliable. While patients
             reported using a variety of coping strategies, certain
             strategies were used frequently whereas others were rarely
             used. Three factors: (a) Cognitive Coping and Suppression,
             (b) Helplessness, and (c) Diverting Attention or Praying,
             accounted for a large proportion of variance in
             questionnaire responses. These 3 factors were found to be
             predictive of measures of behavioral and emotional
             adjustment to chronic pain above and beyond what may be
             predicted on the basis of patient history variables (length
             of continuous pain, disability status, and number of pain
             surgeries) and the tendency of patients to somaticize. Each
             of the 3 coping factors was related to specific measures of
             adjustment to chronic pain.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(83)90125-2},
   Key = {fds273958}
}

@article{fds273957,
   Author = {Surwit, RS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The blind leading the blind: problems with the
             "double-blind" design in clinical biofeedback
             research.},
   Journal = {Biofeedback Self Regul},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1-8},
   Year = {1983},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0363-3586},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6882807},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF01000531},
   Key = {fds273957}
}

@article{fds273961,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Behavioral assessment and treatment of chronic pain: current
             status and future directions.},
   Journal = {J Consult Clin Psychol},
   Volume = {50},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {896-911},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.50.6.896},
   Doi = {10.1037//0022-006x.50.6.896},
   Key = {fds273961}
}

@article{fds273959,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Block, AR},
   Title = {Development of an observation method for assessing pain
             behavior in chronic low back pain patients},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {363-375},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1982},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(82)80001-4},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(82)80001-4},
   Key = {fds273959}
}

@article{fds273960,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Miniseries on behavioral analysis of chronic
             pain},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {13},
   Pages = {363-375},
   Year = {1982},
   Key = {fds273960}
}

@article{fds273964,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Block, AR and Williams, RB and Surwit,
             RS},
   Title = {Behavioral treatment of chronic low back pain: clinical
             outcome and individual differences in pain
             relief.},
   Journal = {Pain},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {221-231},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0304-3959},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6459557},
   Abstract = {The response of 111 chronic low back pain patients to a
             comprehensive behavioral treatment program emphasizing
             relaxation procedures is examined. Over the course of
             treatment, significant reductions were obtained on measures
             of subjective tension, EMG activity, and pain. Many patients
             also decreased their intake of analgesic/narcotic agents and
             reported an increase in activity level. In order to examine
             individual differences in pain relief, the 28 patients who
             had the greatest decreases in pain were compared to those
             who had the least decreases in pain. Patients who had the
             best outcome in terms of pain relief were significantly more
             likely to show improvements in other outcome measures. In
             addition, these patients rated their pain initially as more
             severe, had continuous pain for fewer years, and were less
             likely to be on disability or to have had multiple surgical
             procedures. These results are discussed in the light of
             recent data from other behavioral treatment studies with
             chronic low back pain patients and implications for
             behavioral assessment and treatment are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0304-3959(81)90007-5},
   Key = {fds273964}
}

@article{fds273962,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Surwit, RS and Pilon, RN},
   Title = {Collagen vascular disease: can behavior therapy
             help?},
   Journal = {J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {171-175},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0005-7916},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7276192},
   Abstract = {This study examined the efficacy of a simple autogenic and
             biofeedback treatment package in the management of Raynaud's
             Phenomenon secondary to diagnosed collagen vascular disease.
             The patient, diagnosed as suffering from mixed connective
             tissue disease, had an average of 6.3 vasospastic attacks
             per day during a 2 week baseline period. The frequency of
             daily attacks dropped to 4.2 after 10 weeks and 2.5 attacks
             after 1 yr of training. In addition, the patient displayed a
             gradual improvement in the ability to maintain digital skin
             temperature in the presence of ambient cold
             stress.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0005-7916(81)90013-6},
   Key = {fds273962}
}

@article{fds273963,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Schapira, B and Williams, RB},
   Title = {EMG-assisted relaxation training in the management of
             chronic low back pain},
   Journal = {American Journal of Clinical Biofeedback},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {93-103},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {This study examines the short and long-term effects of
             EMG-assisted relaxation training in a series of 18 chronic
             low back pain patients. All patients had a minimum of six
             laboratory training sessions and were asked to practice on
             their own what they were learning in the laboratory. The
             results indicated that patients showed significant decreases
             in EMG activity within and across sessions as a function of
             training. Significant decreases in subjective ratings of
             tension were obtained within and across training sessions
             and there was a significant drop in daily ratings of tension
             taken outside of the lab environment over the course of
             treatment. The patients also showed a significant decrease
             in levels of pain within each training session. While there
             was a tendency for daily pain ratings to decrease over the
             course of treatment, this did not reach statistical
             significance. However, by the end of the first six
             laboratory sessions, 15 out of 18 patients reported
             experiencing regular decreases in pain while practicing
             their relaxation skills outside of the lab. At one year
             follow-up, 9 out of 13 patients responding had maintained
             initial therapeutic gains.},
   Key = {fds273963}
}

@article{fds372021,
   Author = {KEEFE, FJ},
   Title = {BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE - PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH-CARE
             - MELAMED,BG, SIEGEL,LJ},
   Journal = {CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {929-929},
   Publisher = {AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC},
   Year = {1981},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds372021}
}

@article{fds273966,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Blumenthal, JA},
   Title = {The life fitness program: A behavioral approach to making
             exercise a habit},
   Journal = {Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental
             Psychiatry},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {31-34},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1980},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7916},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(80)90048-8},
   Abstract = {Difficulty in maitaining exercise regimens over long time
             periods is a common problem. This study examined the
             efficacy of a combination of stimulus control and self-
             reinforcement procedures in the acquisition and maintenance
             of a walking exercise program using a multiple baseline
             design. The intervention strategy was introduced
             sequentially to each of three middle-aged, overweight males.
             Levels of exercise increased in a regular and gradual
             fashion following introduction of the behavioral treatment
             techniques. Improvement was maintained over a two-year
             period. © 1980.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0005-7916(80)90048-8},
   Key = {fds273966}
}

@article{fds273965,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Surwit, RS and Pilon, RN},
   Title = {Biofeedback, autogenic training, and progressive relaxation
             in the treatment of Raynaud's disease: a comparative
             study.},
   Journal = {J Appl Behav Anal},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {3-11},
   Year = {1980},
   ISSN = {0021-8855},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6988380},
   Abstract = {Twenty-one female patients suffering from diagnosed
             idiopathic Raynaud's Disease were trained to raise digital
             skin temperature using either autogenic training,
             progressive muscle relaxation, or a combination of autogenic
             training and skin temperature feedback. Patients were
             instructed in the treatment procedures in three one-hour
             group sessions spaced one week apart. All patients were
             instructed to practice what they had learned twice a day at
             home. Patients kept records of the frequency of vasospastic
             attacks occurring over a four-week baseline period, and
             during the first four weeks and the ninth week of training.
             In addition, patients underwent four laboratory cold stress
             tests during which they were instructed to maintain digital
             temperature as the ambient temperature was slowly dropped
             from 26 degrees to 17 degrees C. Cold stress tests were
             given during week 1 of baseline and during weeks 1, 3, and 5
             of training. No significant differences between the three
             behavioral treatment procedures were obtained. In addition,
             the ability of patients to maintain digital temperature
             during the cold stress challenge showed significant
             improvement from the first to the last tests. Symptomatic
             improvement was maintained by all patients nine weeks after
             the start of training. The implications of these findings
             for the behavioral treatment of Raynaud's Disease are
             discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1901/jaba.1980.13-3},
   Key = {fds273965}
}

@article{fds273792,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Surwit, RS and Pilon, RN},
   Title = {A 1-year follow-up of Raynaud's patients treated with
             behavioral therapy techniques.},
   Journal = {J Behav Med},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {385-391},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0160-7715},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/548581},
   Abstract = {The purpose of this study was to assess to what degree
             learned control of digital temperature and vasospastic
             attacks can be retained by Raynaud's patients over a full
             year period. Subjects were 19 patients suffering from
             diagnosed idiopathic Raynaud's disease who had undergone
             behavioral training. These patients had been trained to
             increase digital temperature using either autogenic
             training, biofeedback, or a combination of autogenic
             training and temperature biofeedback. Results indicated that
             the mean number of vasospastic attacks per day occurring 1
             year after training was approximately equal to the number
             occurring at the end of the initial training (1.2-1.3 per
             day). Patient satisfaction with the treatment program was
             above average (3.5 on a 5-point scale). The patients'
             ability to maintain digital temperature during the cold
             stress challenge was imparied, however. At 1-year follow-up,
             digital temperature readings taken in the laboratory were
             identical to baseline levels.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF00844742},
   Key = {fds273792}
}

@article{fds273969,
   Author = {Gordon, SB and Lerner, LL and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Responsive parenting: an approach to training parents of
             problem children.},
   Journal = {Am J Community Psychol},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {45-56},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00893162},
   Abstract = {Two behavior modification groups for parents of problem
             children between the ages of two and ten were conducted
             along the lines of the Responsive Teaching Model. The two
             groups met for 10 and 8 weeks, respectively, with six
             families represented in each group. In Responsive Parenting
             (RP), parents are taught to observe and measure their
             children's problematic behavior. Subsequently, each parent
             develops a home project designed to modify this behavior; 11
             of the 12 parents developed a successful home project. In
             addition, the attendance was approximately 90% and the
             completion of weekly assignments was close to 100%.
             Paper-and-pencil measures revealed that the parents were
             very satisfied with the parent-training group and rated
             their children as improved on a bipolar adjective checklist.
             These results are discussed with regard to implications for
             the delivery of mental health services for children. Future
             research directions are delineated.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF00893162},
   Key = {fds273969}
}

@article{fds273968,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Gardner, ET},
   Title = {Learned control of skin temperature: Effects of short- and
             long-term biofeedback training},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {202-210},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1979},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80037-4},
   Abstract = {Two studies assessed the extent to which learned control
             over finger temperature could be developed. In Experiment I
             subjects received a short-term (five-session) biofeedback
             training regimen to decrease or increase temperature.
             Analyses of temperature data for the training periods
             revealed highly significant between-group differences.
             Subjects in the Increase condition displayed increases of up
             to 2.5°F, while subjects in the Decrease condition
             displayed decreases of up to 2.9°F. Ability to produce the
             required changes in temperature was found to improve as a
             function of training. Experiment II evaluated the effect of
             longer term training to increase temperature (20 sessions).
             Significant within-session increases in finger temperature
             were obtained after 3 days of training. There was no
             significant improvement in temperature control with further
             training, however. These studies indicate that voluntary
             control over digital temperature can be established, but
             that the magnitude of temperature changes is small even with
             extended feedback training. © 1979 Association for
             Advancement of Behavior Therapy.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80037-4},
   Key = {fds273968}
}

@article{fds273967,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Surwit, RS and Pilon, R},
   Title = {A one-year follow-up of Raynaud's patients treated with
             behavior therapy techniques},
   Journal = {Journal of Behavioral Medicine},
   Volume = {2},
   Pages = {285-291},
   Year = {1979},
   Key = {fds273967}
}

@article{fds273973,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Biofeedback vs. instructional control of skin
             temperature.},
   Journal = {J Behav Med},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {383-390},
   Year = {1978},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00846694},
   Abstract = {The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine the
             effects of instructions vs. biofeedback on the development
             of skin temperature self-control and (2) to assess how well
             learned control over temperature can be retained over time.
             Sixty female subjects were assigned to one of six groups:
             (1) response-specific instructions plus feedback, (2)
             thermal suggestions plus feedback, (3) instructions to rest
             plus feedback, (4) response-specific instructions without
             feedback, (5) thermal suggestions without feedback, and (6)
             instructions to rest without feedback. All subjects
             participated in five training sessions on 5 consecutive days
             and two follow-up sessions spaced 1 week and 2 weeks after
             training. Subjects given either feedback and
             response-specific instructions, feedback and thermal
             suggestions, or no feedback and thermal suggestions were
             able to produce significant increases in digital skin
             temperature consistently after three training sessions.
             Subjects in these groups retained the ability to control
             skin temperature both 1 and 2 weeks after training. Subjects
             in the remaining conditions showed no evidence of learned
             control over skin temperature.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF00846694},
   Key = {fds273973}
}

@article{fds273971,
   Author = {Rosen, RC and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {The measurement of human penile tumescence.},
   Journal = {Psychophysiology},
   Volume = {15},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {366-376},
   Year = {1978},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01393.x},
   Abstract = {The techniques of penile measurement have been developed in
             numerous laboratories in Europe, Australia, and the United
             States. Most researchers now use either circumference or
             volumetric devices, depending on the research rationale.
             Thermistors have not been adequately evaluated. This paper
             reviews the important measurement issues associated with
             each device, as well as relevant construction information.
             Examples of applied research are provided. With respect to
             overall efficacy of the transducers, the authors recommended
             volumetric procedures where precision of measurement is of
             critical importance. However, for efficacy and ease of use
             the circumference devices, particularly the
             mercury-in-rubber gauge, appear optimal. Penile tumescence
             measurement is of fundamental importance in determining
             basic parameters of the psychophysiological process of human
             sexual arousal.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01393.x},
   Key = {fds273971}
}

@article{fds273972,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Surwit, RS},
   Title = {Electromyographic biofeedback: behavioral treatment of
             neuromuscular disorders.},
   Journal = {J Behav Med},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {13-24},
   Year = {1978},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0160-7715},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/556109},
   Abstract = {Electromyographic biofeedback is becoming widely used to
             help patients regain voluntary control of specific muscles
             affected by neuromuscular disorders. Electromyographic
             feedback training has been employed in the rehabilitation of
             patients affected by poliomyelitis, cerebrovascular
             accident, torticollis, nerve injury, temporomandibular joint
             syndrome, bruxism, and other disorders. While EMG
             biofeedback appears to be a promising treatment technique,
             the research literature on its effectiveness consists mainly
             of uncontrolled case reports and clinical trials. It is
             concluded that new studies with more sophisticated design
             and more careful control are needed to demonstrate that EMG
             biofeedback makes a unique contribution to the treatment of
             neuromuscular disorders. Research is needed to identify
             relevant patients characteristics predictive of success,
             specify appropriate muscle groups for the treatment of
             particular disorders, determine how feedback can be most
             efficiently combined with more conventional techniques in
             achieving a therapeutic effect, and establish meaningful
             criteria of success in the treatment of neuromuscular
             disorders.},
   Doi = {10.1007/BF00846583},
   Key = {fds273972}
}

@article{fds304931,
   Author = {Surwit, RS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Frontalis EMG feedback training: An electronic
             panacea?},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {779-792},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1978},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(78)80008-2},
   Abstract = {Studies dealing with the application of frontalis EMG
             feedback to the treatment of a variety of disorders are
             reveiwed. Successful applications of frontalis EMG feedback
             training have been reported in the treatment of muscle
             contraction headaches, asthma, essential hypertension,
             insomnia, chronic anxiety, phobias, and cerebral palsy.
             While available evidence does suggest that frontalis EMG
             feedback training may be helpful in the treatment of these
             disorders, these effects are equivalent but not superior to
             those that can be obtained using more conventional and less
             costly treatment techniques such as relaxation training. In
             addition, there appears to be a lack of clear rationale for
             the use of frontalis as a training site in treatment of
             these disorders. It is concluded that claims made about the
             clinical advantages of frontalis EMG biofeedback as compared
             to other methods of relaxation are not scientifically
             justified. © 1978 Association for Advancement of Behavior
             Therapy.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(78)80008-2},
   Key = {fds304931}
}

@article{fds273970,
   Author = {Surwit, RS and Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Frontalis EMG biofeedback: An electronic
             panacea?},
   Journal = {Behavior Therapy},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {779-792},
   Year = {1978},
   ISSN = {0005-7894},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(78)80008-2},
   Abstract = {Studies dealing with the application of frontalis EMG
             feedback to the treatment of a variety of disorders are
             reveiwed. Successful applications of frontalis EMG feedback
             training have been reported in the treatment of muscle
             contraction headaches, asthma, essential hypertension,
             insomnia, chronic anxiety, phobias, and cerebral palsy.
             While available evidence does suggest that frontalis EMG
             feedback training may be helpful in the treatment of these
             disorders, these effects are equivalent but not superior to
             those that can be obtained using more conventional and less
             costly treatment techniques such as relaxation training. In
             addition, there appears to be a lack of clear rationale for
             the use of frontalis as a training site in treatment of
             these disorders. It is concluded that claims made about the
             clinical advantages of frontalis EMG biofeedback as compared
             to other methods of relaxation are not scientifically
             justified. © 1978 Association for Advancement of Behavior
             Therapy.},
   Doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(78)80008-2},
   Key = {fds273970}
}

@article{fds273974,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Conditioning changes in differential skin
             temperature.},
   Journal = {Percept Mot Skills},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {283-288},
   Year = {1975},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1975.40.1.283},
   Abstract = {8 male Ss were presented with visual and auditory analog
             feedback regarding the difference between forehead and
             finger temperature. 4 Ss were instructed to raise the
             temperature of their finger in comparison with the forehead,
             while a second group of 4 Ss was instructed to lower the
             temperature of their finger in comparison with the
             temperature of the forehead. After 12 15-min. training
             sessions all Ss were able to produce changes in differential
             skin temperature in the specified direction. Differential
             changes in skin temperature correlated highly with changes
             in absolute finger temperature. These results are discussed
             as relevant to the clinical application of skin temperature
             control.},
   Doi = {10.2466/pms.1975.40.1.283},
   Key = {fds273974}
}


%% Papers Published   
@article{fds137767,
   Title = {Fillingim, R.B., Keefe, F.J., Light, K.C., Booker, D.K., &
             Maixner, W. The influence of gender and psychological
             factors on pain perception. Journal of Gender, Culture, and
             Health, 1996, 1, 21-36.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137767}
}

@article{fds137768,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J. Cognitive behavioral therapy for managing pain.
             The Clinical Psychologist, 1996, 49, 4-5..},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137768}
}

@article{fds137769,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Lefebvre, J., & Starr, K. From the gate control
             theory to the neuromatrix: Revolution or evolution. Pain
             Forum, 1996, 5, 143-145.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137769}
}

@article{fds137770,
   Title = {Kornguth, P.J., Keefe, F.J., & Conaway, M.R. Pain during
             mammography: Characteristics and relationship to demographic
             and medical variables. Pain, 1996, 66,187-194.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137770}
}

@article{fds137771,
   Title = {Weiner, D., Pieper, C., McConnell, E., Martinez, S., &
             Keefe, F. Pain measurement in elders with chronic low back
             pain: Traditional and alternative approaches. Pain (1996),
             67,461-468.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137771}
}

@article{fds137772,
   Title = {Schwartz, C.E., Chesney, M.A., Irvine, J., & Keefe, F.J. The
             control group dilemma in clinical research: Applications for
             psychosocial and behavioral medicine trails. Psychosomatic
             Medicine (in press)},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137772}
}

@article{fds137773,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Lefebvre, J.C., Maixner, W., Salley, A.N., &
             Caldwell, D.S. Self-efficacy for arthritis pain:
             Relationship to perception of thermal laboratory pain
             stimuli. Arthritis Care and Research (in
             press).},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137773}
}

@article{fds137774,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., & Caldwell, D.S. Cognitive behavioral
             interventions. In S.Wegener, B. Belza, & E. Gall (Eds.)
             Primer on Clinical Care in Rheumatoid Disease. Atlanta, GA:
             Arthritis Foundation, 1996, Ch. 10, pp. 59-64.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137774}
}

@article{fds137791,
   Title = {Schanberg, L.E., Keefe, F.J., Lefebvre, J.C., Kredich, D.W.,
             & Gil, K.M. Pain coping strategies in children with juvenile
             primary fibromyalgia syndrome: Correlation with pain,
             physical function, and psychological distress. Arthritis
             Care and Research, 1996, 9, 89-96.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137791}
}

@article{fds137792,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J. & Goli, V. A practical guide to biobehavioral
             assessment and treatment of chronic pain. Journal of
             Practical Psychiatry and Behavioral Health 1996, 3,
             151-161.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137792}
}

@article{fds137793,
   Title = {Francis J. Keefe, David S. Caldwell, Donald Baucom, Al
             Salley, Elwood Robinson, Kelly Timmons, Pat Beaupre, James
             Weisburg, and Michael Helms. Spouse-assisted coping skills
             training in the management of osteoarthritis knee pain.
             Arthritis Care and Research 1996, 9, 279-291.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137793}
}

@article{fds137794,
   Title = {Francis J. Keefe, Susmita Kashikar-Zuck, Julie Opiteck,
             Elizabeth Hage. Lorien Dalrymple, and James Blumenthal. Pain
             in arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders: The role of
             coping skills training and exercise interventions. Journal
             of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 1996, 24,
             279-290.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137794}
}

@article{fds137795,
   Title = {Beaupre, P., Keefe, F.J., Lester, N., Affleck, G.,
             Frederickson, B, & Caldwell, D.S. A Computer-assisted
             observational method for assessing spouses' judgments of
             osteoarthritis patients' pain. Psychology, Health, &
             Medicine (in press)},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137795}
}

@article{fds137796,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J. & Caldwell, D.S. Cognitive behavioral control of
             arthritis pain. Medical Clinics of North America (in
             press)},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137796}
}

@article{fds137797,
   Title = {James Weisberg & Francis J. Keefe. Personality disorders in
             the chronic pain population: Basic concepts, empirical
             findings, and clinical implications. Pain Forum (in
             press).},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137797}
}

@article{fds137798,
   Title = {Lester, N. , Lefebvre, J.C. & Keefe, F.J. Pain in young
             adults-III: Comparison of three coping assessment methods.
             Clinical Journal of Pain (in press).},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137798}
}

@article{fds137799,
   Title = {Weisberg, J.N., & Keefe, F.J. Methodological considerations
             for diagnosis of personality disorders in chronic pain
             patients. Pain Forum (in press)},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137799}
}

@article{fds137800,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Affleck, G., Lefebvre, J.C., Starr, K.,
             Caldwell, D.S., & Tennen, H. Coping strategies and coping
             efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: A daily process analysis.
             Pain (in press).},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137800}
}

@article{fds137801,
   Title = {Fillingim, R.B., Maixner, W., & Keefe, F.J. Ischemic but not
             thermal pain sensitivity varies across the menstrual cycle.
             Psychosomatic Medicine (in press).},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137801}
}

@article{fds137802,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J. & Egert, J. A cognitive-behavioral perspective
             on patients with cumulative trauma disorders. In S.L. Sauter
             & S.D. Moon. Psychosocial Aspects of Musculoskeletal
             Disorders in Office Work. Durham, N.C.: Taylor & Francis
             (1996), p. 159-176.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137802}
}

@article{fds137803,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Beaupre, P.M., & Gil, K.M. Group therapy for
             patients with chronic pain. In D.C. Turk & R.J. Gatchel
             (Eds.) Psychological Treatments for Pain: A Practitioner's
             Handbook New York: Guilford Pressm, 1996.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137803}
}

@article{fds137804,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Holzberg, A.D., & Beaupre, P.M. Contributions
             of pain behavior assessment and pain assessment to the
             development of pain clinics. In M.J.M. Cohen & J.N. Campbell
             (Eds.) Pain Treatment Centers: A Practical and Conceptual
             Reappraisal. Progress in Pain Research and Management.,
             1996,Vol., 7., 79-100.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137804}
}

@article{fds137805,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Beaupre, P.M., Weiner, D.K., & Siegler, I.C.
             Pain in older adults: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. In
             B.R. Ferrell, & B. Ferrel (Eds.) Pain in the Elderly.
             Seattle, WA: IASP Press, 1996, p. 11-20.},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137805}
}

@article{fds137806,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Kashikar-Zuck, S., & Caldwell, D.S. Coping
             strategies for the patient with osteoarthritis. In M.
             Doherty, K. Brandt, & S. Lohmander. Textbook on
             Osteoarthritis. Oxford University Press (in
             press).},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds137806}
}

@article{fds137762,
   Title = {Williams, D.A., Urban, B., Keefe, F.J., Shutty, M.S., &
             France, R. Cluster Analyses of Pain Patients' Responses to
             the SCL-90R. Pain, 1995, 61, 81-91..},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137762}
}

@article{fds137763,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Lefebvre, J.C., & Beaupre, P.M. The MMPI in
             chronic pain: Security blanket or sound investment. Pain
             Forum, 1995, 4, 101-103.},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137763}
}

@article{fds137764,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J. & Goli, V. A practical guide to biobehavioral
             assessment and treatment of chronic pain. Journal of
             Practical Psychiatriy and Behavioral Health (in
             press)},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137764}
}

@article{fds137765,
   Title = {In Press Chapters},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137765}
}

@article{fds137766,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., & Caldwell, D.S. Cognitive behavioral
             interventions. In S.Wegener, B. Belza, & E. Gall (Eds.)
             Primer on Clinical Care in Rheumatoid Disease. Atlanta, GA:
             Arthritis Foundation (in press.)},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137766}
}

@article{fds137782,
   Title = {Lefebvre, J.C., Lester, N., & Keefe, F.J. Pain in young
             adults-II: The use and perceived effectiveness of pain
             coping strategies. Clinical Journal of Pain , 1995, 11,
             36-44.},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137782}
}

@article{fds137783,
   Title = {Lane, J.D., Lefebvre, J., Rose, J.E., & Keefe, F.J. Effects
             of cigarette smoking on responses to thermal pain.
             Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1995, 3,
             140-147.},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137783}
}

@article{fds137784,
   Title = {Edens, J.L., Wilson, J.J., Gil, K.M., & Keefe, F.J. Critical
             issues in pain management training for psychologists.
             American Pain Society Journal (in press)},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137784}
}

@article{fds137785,
   Title = {Kornguth, P.J., Keefe, F.J., & Conaway, M.R. Pain during
             mammography: Characteristics and relationship to demographic
             and medical variables. Pain (in press)},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137785}
}

@article{fds137786,
   Title = {Lester, N. & Keefe, F.J. Coping with chronic pain. In A.
             Baum, C. McManus, S. Newman, J. Weinman, & R. West.
             Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine.
             Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press (in
             press).},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137786}
}

@article{fds137787,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J. & Egert, J. A cognitive-behavioral perspective
             on patients with cumulative trauma disorders. In S.L. Sauter
             & S.D. Moon. Psychosocial Aspects of Musculoskeletal
             Disorders in Office Work. Durham, N.C.: Taylor & Francis (in
             press).},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137787}
}

@article{fds137788,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Beaupre, P.M., & Gil, K.M. Group therapy for
             patients with chronic pain. In D.C. Turk & R.J. Gatchel
             (Eds.) Psychological Treatments for Pain: A Practitioner's
             Handbook New York: Guilford Press (in press)},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137788}
}

@article{fds137789,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Beaupre, P.M., Weiner, D.K., & Siegler, I.C.
             Pain in older adults: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. In
             B.R. Ferrell, & B. Ferrel (Eds.) Pain in the Elderly.
             Seattle, WA: IASP Press.},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137789}
}

@article{fds137790,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J., Kashikar-Zuck, S., & Caldwell, D.S. Coping
             strategies for the patient with osteoarthritis. In M.
             Doherty, K. Brandt, & S. Lohmander. Textbook on
             Osteoarthritis. Oxford University Press (in
             press).},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds137790}
}

@article{fds137779,
   Title = {Keefe FJ, Hauck ER, Egert J, Rimer B, Kornguth P:
             Mammography pain and discomfort: A cognitive-behavioral
             perspective. Pain 56: 247-260, 1994.},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds137779}
}

@article{fds137780,
   Title = {Giorgino KB, Blalock SJ, DeVellis RF, Devellis BM, Keefe FJ,
             Jordan JM: Appraisal and coping with theumatoid arthritis
             related problems across three areas: Household activities,
             leisure activities and pain management. Arthritis Care and
             Research 7: 20-28, 1994.},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds137780}
}

@article{fds137781,
   Title = {Keefe, F.J. & Lefebvre, J. Pain behavior concepts:
             Controversies, current status, and future directions. In G.
             Gebhart, D.L., Hammond, & T.S. Jensen (Eds) Proceedings of
             the VIIth World Congress on Pain. New York: Elsevier (1994)
             pp. 127-148.},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds137781}
}

@article{fds137761,
   Title = {Keefe FJ, Van Horn Y: Cognitive-behavioral treatment of
             rheumatoid arthritis pain: Understanding and enhancing
             maintenance of treatment gains. Arthritis Care and Research
             6: 213-222, 1993.},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds137761}
}

@article{fds137777,
   Title = {Tota-Faucette ME, Gil KM, Williams DA, Keefe FJ, Goli V:
             Predictors of response to pain management treatment: The
             role of family environment and changes in cognitive
             processes. Clinical Journal of Pain 9: 115-123,
             1993.},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds137777}
}

@article{fds137778,
   Title = {Parker JC, Bradley LA, Devellis RM, Gerber LH, Holman HR,
             Keefe FJ, Lawrence TS, Liang M, Lorig KR, Nicassio PM,
             Revenson TA, Rogers MP, et al. Biopsychosocial contributions
             to the management of arthritis disability: Proceedings from
             an NIDRR-sponsored conference. Arthritis and rheumatism 36:
             885-889, 1993.},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds137778}
}

@article{fds137776,
   Title = {Keefe FJ, Dunsmore J, Burnett R: Behavioral and
             cognitive-behavioral approaches to chronic pain: Recent
             advances and future directions. Journal of Consulting and
             Clinical Psychology 60: 528-536, 1992.},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds137776}
}

@article{fds137775,
   Title = {Keefe FJ, Caldwell DS, Williams DA, Gil KM, et al.: Pain
             coping skills training in the management of osteoarthritic
             knee pain: A comparative study. Behavior Therapy 21: 49-62,
             1990.},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds137775}
}

@article{fds137760,
   Title = {Keefe FJ, Manuel JC, Brantley AB, Crisson JE: Pain in the
             head and neck cancer patient: Changes over treatment. Head
             and Neck Surgery 8: 169-176, 1986.},
   Year = {1986},
   Key = {fds137760}
}

@article{fds137759,
   Title = {Rosentiel AK, Keefe FJ: The use of coping strategies in
             chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient
             characteristics and current adjustment Pain 17: 33-44,
             1983.},
   Year = {1983},
   Key = {fds137759}
}

@article{fds137758,
   Title = {Keefe FJ, Block AR: Development of an observation method for
             assessing pain behavior in chronic low back pain patients.
             Behavior Therapy 13: 363-375, 1982.},
   Year = {1982},
   Key = {fds137758}
}


%% Chapters in Books   
@misc{fds322761,
   Author = {Somers, TJ and Keefe, FJ and Kothadia, S and Pandiani,
             A},
   Title = {Dealing with cancer pain: Coping, pain catastrophizing, and
             related outcomes},
   Booktitle = {Cancer Pain: From Molecules to Suffering},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {June},
   ISBN = {9780931092817},
   Key = {fds322761}
}

@misc{fds330873,
   Author = {Lester, N and Keefe, FJ and Rumble, ME},
   Title = {Coping with chronic pain},
   Pages = {50-55},
   Booktitle = {Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine,
             Second Edition},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780511543579},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543579.012},
   Abstract = {Chronic pain is a problem that affects millions of
             individuals every year. Much of chronic pain is associated
             with significant progressive degenerative disease. Such
             diseases include arthritis and cancer, and involve prolonged
             severe pain which may be only partially ameliorated through
             the use of analgesic medication. This chapter examines the
             ways in which individuals cope with chronic pain. We
             describe how pain coping is conceptualized and measured and
             discuss what has been learned about adaptive and maladaptive
             methods for coping with chronic pain. We conclude with an
             exploration of new directions for research in this area.
             Coping with chronic pain Coping has been defined as the
             process of managing stressful situations, either external or
             internal, that are viewed as taxing an individual’s
             adaptive resources (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). The ways in
             which individuals view or appraise potentially stressful
             situations is an important component of this process
             definition of coping. In chronic pain, the ways in which a
             patient views pain are particularly important in their
             reactions to pain. Individuals may view pain as
             unpredictable and feel very little control over pain flares.
             Conversely, they may view pain as a constant irritation but
             one that can often be dealt with successfully. Coping with
             pain can be thought of as cognitions and behaviours that
             serve to manage or decrease the sensation of pain and
             distress caused by pain. Within this basic framework,
             researchers have formulated several models of
             pain-coping.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511543579.012},
   Key = {fds330873}
}

@misc{fds330874,
   Author = {Waters, SJ and Dixon, KE and Perri, LC and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Pain assessment},
   Pages = {300-304},
   Booktitle = {Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine,
             Second Edition},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780511543579},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543579.065},
   Abstract = {Over the past four decades, approaches to the assessment of
             chronic pain have evolved substantially within the field of
             behavioural medicine. During this time, it has become
             apparent that what we label as ‘pain’ is the result of
             complex interactions among biological, psychological and
             social factors. The gate control theory of pain (Melzack &
             Wall, 1965) supports this paradigm in that it confirms that
             pain is a complex experience involving sensory–discriminative,
             evaluative–cognitive and affective–motivational
             components, thus emphasizing the role of the central nervous
             system in nociceptive perception and processing. Further,
             the gate control theory provides a foundation for the
             development and refinement of integrated pain assessment
             models, such as the biopsychosocial model of pain (Turk,
             1996). The biopsychosocial model of pain acknowledges that
             the experience of pain often is the result of physiological
             changes occurring after peripheral nociceptive stimulation
             (Turk, 1996). However, this model also emphasizes that the
             pain experience is modulated by individual differences in
             various cognitive, affective, behavioural and social
             factors. People with the same level of underlying
             nociceptive stimulation may differ in their pain experience
             depending on the importance of any factor at any given time
             during the course of the disease or condition (Asmundson &
             Wright, 2004). Thus, assessing pain necessitates the
             examination of relations among various factors across a
             variety of levels (Stoney & Lentino, 2000). During the
             latter part of the twentieth century, Melzack (1999)
             proposed an expanded model of pain which further highlights
             the role of psychological processes in pain.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511543579.065},
   Key = {fds330874}
}

@misc{fds355633,
   Author = {Bennell, KL and Wrigley, TV and Keefe, FJ and Hinman,
             RS},
   Title = {Behavioral rehabilitation approaches in osteoarthritis},
   Pages = {649-678},
   Booktitle = {The Handbook of Behavioral Medicine},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781118453995},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118453940.ch31},
   Abstract = {Exercise and weight loss if overweight or obese are key
             components in the management of osteoarthritis (OA), but
             attention to adherence is important for long-term benefits.
             Conservative behavioral strategies for OA include patient
             education, use of braces, orthotics, gait aids, and
             appropriate footwear. Gait retraining to reduce knee load
             requires further research before it can be recommended in
             clinical practice. Of the psychological interventions,
             pain-coping skills training, with and without spouse
             involvement, has been shown to be effective in people with
             knee OA.},
   Doi = {10.1002/9781118453940.ch31},
   Key = {fds355633}
}

@misc{fds328088,
   Author = {Naylor, MR and Seminowicz, DA and Somers, TJ and Keefe,
             FJ},
   Title = {Pain imaging},
   Pages = {439-467},
   Booktitle = {Handbook of Pain and Palliative Care: Biobehavioral
             Approaches for the Life Course},
   Publisher = {Springer New York},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9781441916501},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1651-8_27},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-1-4419-1651-8_27},
   Key = {fds328088}
}

@misc{fds372587,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Acute Pain: A Psychosocial Perspective},
   Pages = {41-52},
   Booktitle = {Acute Pain Management},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {April},
   ISBN = {9780521874915},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511576706.006},
   Doi = {10.1017/cbo9780511576706.006},
   Key = {fds372587}
}

@misc{fds273574,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ},
   Title = {Acute pain: A psychosocial perspective},
   Pages = {41-52},
   Booktitle = {Acute Pain Management},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780521874915},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576706.005},
   Abstract = {Our understanding of the psychosocial aspects of pain has
             advanced considerably since the early 1980s. Much has been
             learned about psychosocial factors that influence pain and
             psychosocial interventions that can enhance pain control.
             Recently, there has been growing interest in applying the
             psychosocial perspective to enhance our understanding and
             ability to treat acute pain. This chapter focuses
             specifically on psychosocial aspects of acute pain. The
             chapter is divided into four sections. The first section
             provides a conceptual background on psychosocial aspects of
             acute pain. The second section highlights research on the
             role of psychosocial factors in acute pain. The third
             summarizes the results of recent studies testing the
             efficacy of psychosocial interventions for acute pain. The
             chapter concludes with a discussion of future directions for
             work in this important area. Conceptual Background:
             Traditionally, acute pain has been understood using a
             biomedical model. According to this model, acute pain is a
             warning signal that results from nociceptive input as a
             result of tissue damage or injury. In the biomedical
             approach, careful assessments are conducted to identify
             sources of tissue damage or injury that are causing pain.
             Medical and/or surgical interventions designed to correct or
             ameliorate underlying tissue damage or injury are then
             carried out to eliminate or reduce pain. In the biomedical
             model, psychosocial factors play a secondary role in that
             they are viewed simply as responses to pain
             itself.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511576706.005},
   Key = {fds273574}
}

@misc{fds273575,
   Author = {Keefe, FJ and Abernethy, AP and Wheeler, JL and Somers,
             TJ},
   Title = {Psychological interventions for cancer pain},
   Pages = {343-353},
   Booktitle = {Cancer Pain: Assessment and Management, Second
             Edition},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780521879279},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642357.019},
   Abstract = {Over the past 15 years, psychological interventions have
             emerged as a useful adjunct to medical approaches to cancer
             pain management. Psychological interventions offer several
             advantages in cancer pain management. First, they can
             enhance patients' sense of self-efficacy (i.e., confidence)
             in their own abilities to control pain. Increased
             self-efficacy for pain control has been linked to lower
             psychological distress, less interference of pain with daily
             activities, and improved quality of life. Second,
             psychological interventions teach patients skills that can
             be applied to many of the day-to-day challenges of living
             with persistent pain, such as coping with pain flares,
             managing emotional reactions to pain (e.g., anxiety, fear,
             depression), and maintaining an active and rewarding life
             despite having pain. Third, psychological interventions and
             pain medications may have synergistic effects for cancer
             patients and produce an array of benefits (e.g., decreased
             pain, improved mood, enhanced interpersonal interactions)
             that may not be achieved by alone. Finally, psychological
             interventions may offer a viable pain management option for
             patients who respond poorly or have difficulty tolerating
             pain medications. This chapter provides an introduction to
             psychological approaches to managing cancer pain. The
             chapter is divided into three sections. The first section
             highlights the challenges of cancer pain. This section
             emphasizes the fact that psychological interventions for
             pain are delivered in the context of multiple ongoing
             challenges faced by persons having cancer
             pain.},
   Doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511642357.019},
   Key = {fds273575}
}

@misc{fds330871,
   Author = {Patton, LL and Griffiths, PJ},
   Title = {Foreward},
   Pages = {xi-xii},
   Booktitle = {Brannon M. Wheeler's Applying the Canon in Islam: The
             Authorization and Maintenance of Interpretive Reasoning in
             Hanafi Scholarship},
   Publisher = {Albany: State University of New York Press},
   Year = {1996},
   ISBN = {9780128005385},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978012800538506001-5},
   Doi = {10.1016/B978012800538506001-5},
   Key = {fds330871}
}


Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Postdocs * Reload * Login