Publications of Bruce W. Jentleson    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

We've launched a new site so please go to People & Research for current information on our faculty and staff.

%% Books   
@book{fds349796,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {Economic Sanctions: What Everyone Needs to
             Know},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   Year = {2021},
   Key = {fds349796}
}

@book{fds332325,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Peacemakers: Leadership Lessons from Twentieth-Century
             Statesmanship},
   Pages = {416 pages},
   Publisher = {W. W. Norton & Company},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {April},
   ISBN = {0393249573},
   Abstract = {The stories are fascinating: Henry Kissinger, Zhou Enlai,
             and the U.S.-China opening; Mikhail Gorbachev and the end of
             the Cold War; Dag Hammarskjöld’s exceptional
             effectiveness as United Nations secretary-general; Nelson
             Mandela and ...},
   Key = {fds332325}
}

@book{fds317754,
   Author = {Pauly, LW and Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Power in a complex global system},
   Pages = {1-260},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780415738798},
   Abstract = {© 2014 Louis W. Pauly and Bruce W. Jentleson, selection and
             editorial matter. Can twenty-first century global challenges
             be met through the limited adaptation of existing political
             institutions and prevailing systemic norms, or is a more
             fundamental reconstitution of governing authority
             unavoidable? Are the stresses evident in domestic social
             compacts capable of undermining the fundamental policy
             capacity of contemporary governments? This book, inspired by
             the work of the distinguished scholar Peter J. Katzenstein,
             examines these important and pressing questions. In a period
             of complex political transition, the authors combine
             original research and intensive dialogue to build on
             Katzenstein’s innovative insights. They highlight his
             seminal work on variations in domestic structures, on the
             role of ideologies of social partnership, on the regionally
             differentiated foundations of political legitimation, on
             diverse conceptions of "civilization," and on the idea and
             practice of power in a tenuous American imperium. Together,
             the chapters map the complex terrain upon which legitimate
             political authority and effective policy capacity will have
             to be reconstituted to address twenty-first-century global,
             regional and state-level challenges. The book will be of
             great interest to students and scholars in international
             organization, global governance, foreign policy analysis,
             and comparative politics.},
   Key = {fds317754}
}

@book{fds349802,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st
             Century (Fifth Edition)},
   Pages = {768 pages},
   Publisher = {W.W. Norton},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {July},
   ISBN = {0393919439},
   Abstract = {A balanced and contemporary introduction to U.S. foreign
             policy, with a built-in reader.},
   Key = {fds349802}
}

@book{fds47921,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st
             Century},
   Series = {New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 5th edition
             forthcoming},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds47921}
}

@book{fds155141,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson and Steven Weber},
   Title = {The End of Arrogance: America in the Global Competition of
             Ideas},
   Publisher = {Harvard University Press},
   Year = {2010},
   Key = {fds155141}
}

@book{fds212608,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st
             Century},
   Volume = {4th edition},
   Publisher = {W.W. Norton},
   Year = {2010},
   Key = {fds212608}
}

@book{fds349803,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Perspectives on American Foreign Policy Readings and
             Cases},
   Pages = {326 pages},
   Publisher = {W.W. Norton},
   Year = {2000},
   ISBN = {0393975649},
   Abstract = {The readings delve deeper into theoretical, historical and
             policy debates discussed in American Foreign Policy:
             Dynamics of Choice, and icons in the textbook margins link
             the broader points to related articles and case studies in
             ...},
   Key = {fds349803}
}

@book{fds47980,
   Title = {Opportunities Missed, Opportunities Seized: Diplomacy in the
             Post-Cold War World},
   Publisher = {Rowman and Littlefield and Carnegie Commission on Preventing
             Deadly Conflict},
   Editor = {B.W. Jentleson and editor and contributor},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds47980}
}

@book{fds19256,
   Title = {Encyclopedia of U.S. Foreign Relations, four
             volumes},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press and Council on Foreign
             Relations},
   Editor = {Bruce W. Jentleson and Thomas G. Paterson},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds19256}
}

@book{fds19257,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {With Friends Like These: Reagan, Bush and Saddam,
             1982-1990},
   Publisher = {New York: W.W. Norton and Co.},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds19257}
}

@book{fds19258,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Foreign Military Intervention: The Dynamics of Protracted
             Conflict},
   Publisher = {New York: Columbia University Press},
   Editor = {editor and contributor and Ariel Levite and Larry
             Berman},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds19258}
}

@book{fds19259,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Pipeline Politics: The Complex Political Economy of
             East-West Energy Trade},
   Publisher = {Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press},
   Year = {1986},
   Key = {fds19259}
}


%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds326878,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Global Governance, the United Nations, and the challenge of
             trumping Trump},
   Journal = {Global Governance},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {143-149},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02302001},
   Doi = {10.1163/19426720-02302001},
   Key = {fds326878}
}

@article{fds352368,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Refocusing US Grand Strategy on Pandemic and Environmental
             Mass Destruction},
   Journal = {The Washington Quarterly},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {7-29},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2020.1813977},
   Doi = {10.1080/0163660X.2020.1813977},
   Key = {fds352368}
}

@article{fds346523,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {Right-Sizing Foreign Policy},
   Journal = {Democracy},
   Volume = {54},
   Publisher = {Democracy: A Journal of Ideas},
   Year = {2019},
   Key = {fds346523}
}

@article{fds333291,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {'The Liberal Order Isn't Coming Back' What
             Next?},
   Journal = {Democracy: a Journal of Ideas},
   Year = {2018},
   Key = {fds333291}
}

@article{fds332326,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Strategic Recalibration: A Palmerstonian Middle East
             Strategy},
   Journal = {Order From Ashes: New Foundations for Security in the Middle
             East},
   Publisher = {The Century Foundation and Brookings Institution},
   Editor = {Hann, MW and Cambanis, T},
   Year = {2018},
   Key = {fds332326}
}

@article{fds332214,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Public Opinion and Donald Trump's Foreign Policy: Initial
             Assessment},
   Journal = {H Diplo/International Securities Study Forum},
   Volume = {Policy Roundtable},
   Number = {Public Opinion and the Trump administrat},
   Editor = {Kreps, S},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds332214}
}

@article{fds333292,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The United States and R2P: Challenges of Policy
             Prioritization, Bureaucratic Institutionalization, Strategy,
             and International Collaboration},
   Journal = {The Oxford Handbook on the Responsibility to
             Protect},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   Editor = {Bellamy, A and Dunne, T},
   Year = {2016},
   Key = {fds333292}
}

@article{fds269973,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Bridging the Gap Initiative and Programs},
   Journal = {Ps: Political Science & Politics},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {S1},
   Pages = {108-114},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {1049-0965},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096515000529},
   Doi = {10.1017/S1049096515000529},
   Key = {fds269973}
}

@article{fds269975,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Strategic Recalibration: Framework for a 21st-Century
             National Security Strategy},
   Journal = {The Washington Quarterly},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {115-136},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0163-660X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2014.893178},
   Doi = {10.1080/0163660X.2014.893178},
   Key = {fds269975}
}

@article{fds269983,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Accepting Limits: How to Adapt to a Copernican
             World},
   Journal = {Democracy: a Journal of Ideas},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {Winter},
   Key = {fds269983}
}

@article{fds317759,
   Author = {JENTLESON, BW},
   Title = {Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy: Iraq, 9/11, and
             Misguided Reform by Paul R. Pillar},
   Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
   Volume = {127},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {477-478},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165x.2012.tb02280.x},
   Doi = {10.1002/j.1538-165x.2012.tb02280.x},
   Key = {fds317759}
}

@article{fds317760,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming
             Global Turn},
   Journal = {Foreign Affairs},
   Volume = {91},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {173-173},
   Publisher = {COUNCIL FOREIGN RELAT IONS INC},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds317760}
}

@article{fds269981,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Global Governance in a Copernican World},
   Journal = {Global Governance},
   Volume = {17},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds269981}
}

@article{fds317758,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Theories of International Politics and Zombies. By Daniel W.
             Drezner. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. 136p.
             $14.95.},
   Journal = {Perspectives on Politics},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {212-213},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1537592711004749},
   Doi = {10.1017/s1537592711004749},
   Key = {fds317758}
}

@article{fds269980,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The John Holmes memorial lecture: Global governance in a
             Copernican world},
   Journal = {Global Governance},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {133-148},
   Publisher = {BRILL},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1075-2846},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01802001},
   Doi = {10.1163/19426720-01802001},
   Key = {fds269980}
}

@article{fds269982,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Obama Administration and R2P: Progress, Problems and
             Prospects},
   Journal = {Global Responsibility to Protect},
   Volume = {Winter 2012-13},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds269982}
}

@article{fds269984,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Beware the Duck Test},
   Journal = {The Washington Quarterly},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {137-149},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0163-660X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2011.588169},
   Doi = {10.1080/0163660X.2011.588169},
   Key = {fds269984}
}

@article{fds269985,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Remaking of the Middle East},
   Journal = {Duke Magazine},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {Summer},
   Key = {fds269985}
}

@article{fds269986,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Metternich of Arabia},
   Journal = {National Interest Online},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/metternich-arabia-5543},
   Key = {fds269986}
}

@article{fds269989,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW and Ratner, E},
   Title = {Bridging the Beltway-Ivory Tower gap},
   Journal = {International Studies Review},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {6-11},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {1521-9488},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00992.x},
   Abstract = {While some gap between the academic and policy worlds is
             inherent, it is neither necessary nor beneficial for the
             "Beltway-Ivory Tower" to be as wide as it is. Three
             principal factors explain the extent of the gap: academia's
             dominant organizational culture, which devalues policy
             relevance; increased role of think tanks as research
             transmission belts to the policy world; and limited interest
             of the policy community in academic research. The case for
             the value of greater policy relevance for the international
             relations scholarly community is based on the intellectual
             pluralism of bringing policy relevance in while not driving
             theory out, intellectual complementarity in the different
             relative strengths of scholars and policy professionals, and
             self-interest both in what individual scholars can learn and
             in being true to the mission of universities. We make three
             principal bridging the gap recommendations: increase
             disciplinary incentives for policy relevant scholarship,
             more programmatic and project-based connectivity, and more
             policy world experiential opportunities. © 2011
             International Studies Association.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00992.x},
   Key = {fds269989}
}

@article{fds203486,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Normative Future: A U.S. Perspective},
   Booktitle = {Transatlantic 2020: A Tale of Four Futures},
   Publisher = {SAIS Center for Transatlantic Relations (Brookings
             Institution Press)},
   Editor = {Daniel Hamilton and Kurt Volker},
   Year = {2011},
   Key = {fds203486}
}

@article{fds317762,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Lessons in Disaster: McGeorge Bundy and the Path to War in
             Vietnamby Gordon M. Goldstein},
   Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
   Volume = {124},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {540-541},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165x.2009.tb01906.x},
   Doi = {10.1002/j.1538-165x.2009.tb01906.x},
   Key = {fds317762}
}

@article{fds269988,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Atlantic Alliance in a Post-America World},
   Journal = {Journal of Trans Atlantic Studies},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds269988}
}

@article{fds317761,
   Author = {Lorber, E and Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Military Power and the Capabilities-Utility Gap: Lessons of
             the 2006 Israel-Lebanon War},
   Year = {2009},
   Abstract = {In recent years, an emerging pattern in the use of military
             force has become apparent: though the capability gap between
             advanced powers and non-state and insurgent actors has
             increased, the efficacy of achieving strategic goals with
             this power has decreased. To name a few, the United States,
             Israel, and Ethiopia have used overwhelming military power
             to achieve their goals in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and
             Somalia. Yet, in each case, the result has been an inability
             to restore order, remove insurgent or terrorist forces, and
             establish responsive governments. What explains the
             inability of these stronger states to transform their power
             into outcomes? This paper explores this capability-increase/result-decrease
             dynamic and address its causes. Using George Kennan’s
             analytic framework of flaws in execution versus flaws in
             concept, we examine whether the inability to achieve these
             strategic goals with military force is a function of poor
             execution or inherent limits on hard, preponderant power. To
             the extent it is the former, this portends a focus on
             military reform and tactical adjustment, whereas if the
             latter, it suggests the need to rely more heavily on other
             forms of coercive diplomacy. We test these competing
             explanations using a representative case: Israeli’s use of
             force against Lebanon in the summer of 2006. Providing a net
             assessment of short, medium and long-term effects of the
             war, we find that though the Israeli Defense Forces did
             achieve limited successes, its inability to inflict
             long-term damage on Hezbollah decreased its overall level of
             deterrence vis-a-vis non-state actors. Using empirical data
             on combat operations as well as extensive accounts of the
             Israeli leadership’s decision-making processes, we
             conclude that though the IDF could have improved its
             operations on the margins, the Israeli leadership’s
             failure to consider Hezbollah’s response and international
             constraints complicating conflict escalation ultimately
             prevented Israel from achieving its goals of weakening
             Hezbollah and re-establishing its deterrent. These
             constraints, including international public opinion and the
             difficulty in waging a restricted war against an
             unrestricted enemy, are not limited to the Israeli case, but
             are rather key characteristics of many recent asymmetric
             military operations. We conclude with a discussion of the
             implications of our findings, focusing on the need to
             re-balance the use of force and diplomacy to achieve
             strategic goals.},
   Key = {fds317761}
}

@article{fds269990,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW and Weber, S},
   Title = {America's hard sell},
   Journal = {Foreign Policy},
   Volume = {169},
   Number = {169},
   Pages = {43-49},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0015-7228},
   Abstract = {For more than half a century, the United States ensured that
             five Big Ideas shaped international politics. Now, as the
             Big Ideas of the 21st century are formed, just who will
             corner the new global market of ideology is anyone's guess.
             One thing is certain, though: If the United States wants to
             remain a player, it's going to have to refine its sales
             pitch.},
   Key = {fds269990}
}

@article{fds269974,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Military force against terrorism: Questions of legitimacy,
             dilemmas of efficacy},
   Pages = {40-58},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {December},
   Abstract = {It is true that terrorism goes way back in history, "as far
             back as does human conflict itself," as Caleb Carr has
             written.1 It also is true that much of the world had been
             suffering from terrorism for a long time before September
             11.2 Still, the issue did change dramatically after the
             United States made it its top national security priority and
             the Bush administration decided on its particular "war on
             terrorism" approach, with its heavy emphasis on the use of
             military force. Copyright © 2007 the brookings institution.
             All rights reserved.},
   Key = {fds269974}
}

@article{fds269992,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {A responsibility to protect: The defining challenge for the
             global community},
   Journal = {Harvard International Review},
   Volume = {28},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {18-23},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0739-1854},
   Key = {fds269992}
}

@article{fds269991,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {America's global role after Bush},
   Journal = {Survival},
   Volume = {49},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {179-200},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {Fall},
   ISSN = {0039-6338},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396330701564802},
   Doi = {10.1080/00396330701564802},
   Key = {fds269991}
}

@article{fds269987,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Who 'Won' Libya? The Force-Diplomacy Debate and Its
             Implications for Theory and Policy},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {47-86},
   Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {Winter},
   ISSN = {0162-2889},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016228805775969582},
   Doi = {10.1162/016228805775969582},
   Key = {fds269987}
}

@article{fds269993,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Tough Love Multilateralism},
   Journal = {The Washington Quarterly},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {5-24},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {Winter},
   ISSN = {0163-660X},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016366003322596882},
   Doi = {10.1162/016366003322596882},
   Key = {fds269993}
}

@article{fds269979,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The need for praxis: Bringing policy relevance back
             in},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {169-183},
   Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {Spring},
   ISSN = {0162-2889},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016228802753696816},
   Doi = {10.1162/016228802753696816},
   Key = {fds269979}
}

@article{fds317763,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Strategic Coercion: Concepts and Cases. Edited by Lawrence
             Freedman. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. 400p.
             $92.00.},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {93},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1012-1013},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2586189},
   Doi = {10.2307/2586189},
   Key = {fds317763}
}

@article{fds269976,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW and Britton, RL},
   Title = {Still pretty prudent: Post-cold war American public opinion
             on the use of military force},
   Journal = {Journal of Conflict Resolution},
   Volume = {42},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {395-417},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042004001},
   Abstract = {Extending and further testing the theory advanced by Bruce
             Jentleson with post-cold war data, variations in U.S. public
             support for the use of military force are shown to be best
             explained by the principal policy objective for which
             military force is being used, with a third category of
             "humanitarian intervention" added to the previous two of
             "foreign policy restraint" and "internal political change."
             The principal policy objective theory is shown through a
             series of tests, including regression and logistic analyses,
             to offer the most powerful and parsimonious explanation,
             both directly superseding and indirectly subsuming such
             other alternative variables as interests, elite cues, risk,
             and multilateralism. These findings support the broader
             theoretical view of a rational public purposive and not
             purely reactive in its opinion formulation and have
             important implications for the basic dispositions of the
             types of military interventions the American public will and
             will not support in the post-cold war era.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0022002798042004001},
   Key = {fds269976}
}

@article{fds269977,
   Author = {Stein, JG and Barnett, M and Frankel, B and Gause, G and Gerner, DJ and Herrmann, R and Jentleson, BW and Kaye, DD and Lebow, RN and Lynch, M and Solingen, E and Spiro, DE and Sylvan, DA and Weber,
             S},
   Title = {Five scenarios of the Israel-Palestinian relationship in
             2002: Works in progress},
   Journal = {Security Studies},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {195-208},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0963-6412},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636419808429362},
   Doi = {10.1080/09636419808429362},
   Key = {fds269977}
}

@article{fds269978,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW and Kaye, DD},
   Title = {Security status: Explaining regional security cooperation
             and its limits in the Middle East},
   Journal = {Security Studies},
   Volume = {8},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {204-238},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0963-6412},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636419808429369},
   Doi = {10.1080/09636419808429369},
   Key = {fds269978}
}

@article{fds317766,
   Author = {JENTLESON, BW},
   Title = {EAST-WEST-TRADE AND THE ATLANTIC ALLIANCE - BALDWIN,DA,
             MILNER,HV},
   Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
   Volume = {106},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {733-735},
   Publisher = {ACAD POLITICAL SCIENCE},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds317766}
}

@article{fds317764,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American
             Opinion on the Use of Military Force},
   Journal = {International Studies Quarterly},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {49-49},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600916},
   Doi = {10.2307/2600916},
   Key = {fds317764}
}

@article{fds317765,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Philippines: U.S. policy during the Marcos years,
             1956–1986},
   Journal = {Government Publications Review},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {85-86},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9390(92)90113-p},
   Doi = {10.1016/0277-9390(92)90113-p},
   Key = {fds317765}
}

@article{fds317767,
   Author = {Sorenson, DS},
   Title = {Arms Control during the Pre-Nuclear Era: The United States
             and Naval Limitations between the Two World Wars. By Robert
             Gordon Kaufman. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
             289p. $40.00.},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {85},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {338-339},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1962958},
   Doi = {10.2307/1962958},
   Key = {fds317767}
}

@article{fds346635,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Conflicts Unending: The United States and Regional Disputes.
             By Richard N. Haass. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
             184p. $22.50.},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {85},
   Number = {01},
   Pages = {337-338},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds346635}
}

@article{fds317768,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Reagan Administration and Coercive Diplomacy:
             Restraining More Than Remaking Governments},
   Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
   Volume = {106},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {57-57},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {Spring},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2152174},
   Doi = {10.2307/2152174},
   Key = {fds317768}
}

@article{fds317770,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Discrepant Responses to Falling Dictators: Presidential
             Belief Systems and the Mediating Effects of the Senior
             Advisory Process},
   Journal = {Political Psychology},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {353-353},
   Publisher = {JSTOR},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791694},
   Doi = {10.2307/3791694},
   Key = {fds317770}
}

@article{fds317769,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Reflections on Praxis and Nexus},
   Journal = {Ps: Political Science & Politics},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {434-436},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1990},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/419802},
   Doi = {10.2307/419802},
   Key = {fds317769}
}

@article{fds317771,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Deadly Paradigms: The Failure of U.S. Counterinsurgency
             Policy. By D. Michael Shafer. Princeton: Princeton
             University Press, 1988. 331p. $34.50.},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {83},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {705-706},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1989},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1962481},
   Doi = {10.2307/1962481},
   Key = {fds317771}
}

@article{fds317772,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {American commitments in the Third World: theory vs.
             practice},
   Journal = {International Organization},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {04},
   Pages = {667-704},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {September},
   Abstract = {Amidst their other differences, the defeats suffered by the
             United States in Vietnam, Iran, and Lebanon have a common
             explanation. In all three cases American strategy was based
             on “global commitments theory.” Interests were to be
             defended and global credibility strengthened by the making,
             maintaining, reinforcing, and sustaining of American
             commitments to Third World allies. However, the core
             assumptions on which the logic of global commitments theory
             rests are plagued with inherent fallacies. These fallacies
             can be identified analytically as patterns of dysfunction
             along four dimensions of foreign policy: decision-making,
             diplomacy, military strategy, and domestic politics. They
             also can be shown empirically to have recurred across the
             Vietnam, Iran, and Lebanon cases. The central theoretical
             conclusion questions the fundamental validity of global
             commitments theory as it applies to the exercise of power
             and influence in the Third World. Important prescriptive
             implications for future American foreign policy are also
             discussed.},
   Key = {fds317772}
}

@article{fds317773,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {American commitments in the Third World: Theory vs.
             practice},
   Journal = {International Organization},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {667-704},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027648},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0020818300027648},
   Key = {fds317773}
}

@article{fds317774,
   Author = {JENTLESON, BW},
   Title = {THE POLITICAL BASIS FOR TRADE IN UNITED-STATES-SOVIET
             RELATIONS},
   Journal = {Millennium: Journal of International Studies},
   Volume = {15},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {27-47},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {Spring},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298860150010401},
   Doi = {10.1177/03058298860150010401},
   Key = {fds317774}
}

@article{fds317777,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Strategic Choices and Dangerous Traps},
   Journal = {Ps},
   Volume = {19},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {69-69},
   Publisher = {JSTOR},
   Year = {1986},
   Month = {Winter},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/419296},
   Doi = {10.2307/419296},
   Key = {fds317777}
}

@article{fds317778,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {The Making of America's Soviet Policy. Edited by Joseph S.
             NyeJr. (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984. Pp. x
             + 369. $27.50.)},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {79},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {271-272},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1985},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1956215},
   Doi = {10.2307/1956215},
   Key = {fds317778}
}

@article{fds317779,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {From consensus to conflict: the domestic political economy
             of East-West energy trade policy},
   Journal = {International Organization},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {04},
   Pages = {625-660},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {September},
   Abstract = {Changes in the domestic politics of East-West energy trade
             policy indicate a more general transformation of the
             domestic politics of American foreign policy. In the postwar
             period the basic, consensual pattern of congressional
             bipartisanship, executivebranch unity, interest-group
             collaboration, and a supportive public has been replaced by
             the conflictual pattern of an assertive Congress, a
             fragmented executive branch, antagonistic interest groups,
             and a divided public. These contrasting patterns are
             manifestations of structural changes in the domestic
             political economy. Along both political and economic
             dimensions, and differentiated according to whether the
             locus of pressure was group-specific or more general, what
             had been basic foundations of consensus became by the early
             1970s fissures of conflict. Of particular significance were
             the weakening of the macropolitical foundations (the basic
             accord on foreignpolicy objectives and strategies) in the
             wake of both Vietnam and detente and the increased marginal
             value of the economic costs, both diffuse (macroeconomic)
             and particularistic (microeconomic), to be paid for economic
             coercion. In this transformed context, the state's
             support-building instruments of ideology and economic
             compensation were insufficient to build consensus. As a
             result, in this issue area and perhaps more generally, high
             levels of domestic constraints on the conduct of American
             foreign policy have become the rule rather than the
             exception.},
   Key = {fds317779}
}

@article{fds317780,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Economic Coercion and U.S. Foreign Policy: Implications of
             Case Studies from the Johnson Administration. Edited by
             Sidney Weintraub. (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1982. Pp.
             xvii + 234. $23.00.)},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {78},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {576-577},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963459},
   Doi = {10.2307/1963459},
   Key = {fds317780}
}

@article{fds317781,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {From Consensus to Conflict: The Domestic Political Economy
             of East-West Energy Trade Policy},
   Journal = {International Organization},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {625-660},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {1984},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026898},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0020818300026898},
   Key = {fds317781}
}


%% Chapters in Books   
@misc{fds349798,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {Weaponized Interdependence, The Dynamics of 21st Century
             Power, and U.S. Grand Strategy},
   Booktitle = {The Uses and Abuses of Weaponized Interdependence},
   Publisher = {Brookings Institution Press},
   Editor = {Drezner, D and Farrell, H and Newman, A},
   Year = {2020},
   Key = {fds349798}
}

@misc{fds348882,
   Author = {Jentleson, B and Levite, A and Berman, L},
   Title = {Protracted foreign military intervention: A structured,
             focused comparative analysis},
   Pages = {229-254},
   Booktitle = {Diplomacy, Force, and Leadership: Essays in Honor of
             Alexander L. George},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {0813317452},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429037535-15},
   Abstract = {This chapter focuses on a larger study involving several
             case studies, covering the several stages of intervention in
             each case, as well as cross-case assessments on each of the
             stages. It explains key concepts and definitions to
             establish the basis for the comparative case analysis. The
             chapter considers the significance of the study, both with
             respect to the prospects of military intervention in the
             post-Cold War era and in defining a broader continuing
             research agenda related to force and diplomacy. It focuses
             on three clusters of factors: The international (strategic,
             regional), the domestic (intervening state), and the
             indigenous (target state). The target countries have been
             both distant ones and neighbors. The local allies have been
             both incumbent regimes and insurgents. The key commonality
             is that each involved a protracted foreign military
             intervention —longer, more costly, and less successful
             than expected based on the power preponderance of the
             intervenor.},
   Doi = {10.4324/9780429037535-15},
   Key = {fds348882}
}

@misc{fds345653,
   Author = {Frankel, B and Levite, A and Hamza, K and Jentleson,
             B},
   Title = {Middle east arms control and regional security
             dilemmas},
   Pages = {195-204},
   Booktitle = {Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of
             Mass Destruction},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {April},
   ISBN = {0415925959},
   Key = {fds345653}
}

@misc{fds317757,
   Author = {Jentleson, BW and Pauly, LW},
   Title = {Political Authority, Policy Capacity, and
             Twenty-First-Century Governance},
   Pages = {3-16},
   Booktitle = {Power in a Complex Global System},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780415738798},
   Key = {fds317757}
}

@misc{fds189081,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Effective Multilateralism: US Perspectives},
   Booktitle = {Effective Multilateralism: Through the Looking Glass of East
             Asia},
   Publisher = {Palgrave MacMillan},
   Editor = {Jochen Prantl},
   Year = {2011},
   Key = {fds189081}
}

@misc{fds155145,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Coercive Diplomacy: Scope and Limits, Theory and
             Policy},
   Booktitle = {The Routledge Companion to Security Studies},
   Editor = {Victor Mauer and Myriam Dunn Cavelty},
   Year = {2009},
   Key = {fds155145}
}

@misc{fds155146,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Policy Planning: An Integrative Executive Branch
             Strategy},
   Booktitle = {Avoiding Trivia: The Role of Strategic Planning in American
             Foreign Policy},
   Publisher = {Brookings Institution Press},
   Editor = {Daniel W. Drezner},
   Year = {2009},
   Key = {fds155146}
}

@misc{fds155148,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {“Force and Legitimacy: Terrorism Scenarios”},
   Booktitle = {Force and Legitimacy in the Evolving International
             System},
   Publisher = {Brookings Institution Press},
   Editor = {Ivo H. Daalder},
   Year = {2007},
   Key = {fds155148}
}

@misc{fds155149,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Yet Again: Humanitarian Intervention and the Challenges of
             'Never Again'},
   Booktitle = {Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided
             World},
   Publisher = {U. S. Institute of Peace Press},
   Editor = {Chester Crocker and Fen Osler Hampson and Pamela
             Aall},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds155149}
}


%% Book Reviews   
@article{fds349799,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {Roundtable 11-8 on The Back Channel: A Memoir of American
             Diplomacy and the Case for Its Renewal},
   Journal = {Review by Bruce W. Jentleson, Duke University},
   Publisher = {The International Security Studies Forum},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds349799}
}

@article{fds212610,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Theories of International Relations and Zombies, Daniel
             Drezner},
   Journal = {Perspectives on Politics},
   Volume = {March 2012},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds212610}
}

@article{fds212611,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {How We Fight: Crusades, Quagmires and the American Way of
             War, Dominic Tierney},
   Journal = {H-DIPLO/ISSF,},
   Volume = {Vol. III, No. 9 (March 2012)},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds212611}
}


%% Op-eds   
@misc{fds356344,
   Author = {Jentleson, B and Goldgeier, J},
   Title = {A Democracy Summit Is Not What the Doctor
             Ordered},
   Journal = {Foreign Affairs},
   Publisher = {Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds356344}
}

@misc{fds356345,
   Author = {Jentleson, B and Goldgeier, J},
   Title = {The United States Needs a Democracy Summit at
             Home},
   Journal = {Foreign Affairs},
   Publisher = {Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds356345}
}

@misc{fds356346,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {American Foreign Policy and the 2020 Presidential
             Election},
   Journal = {Strategic and Defense Studies Center},
   Publisher = {Australia National University, Coral Bell School of Asia
             Pacific Affairs, Strategic and Defence Studies
             Center,},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds356346}
}

@misc{fds356347,
   Author = {Jentleson, B and Goldgeier, J},
   Title = {The United States Is Not Entitled to Lead the
             World},
   Journal = {Foreign Affairs},
   Publisher = {Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds356347}
}

@misc{fds356348,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {Lincoln, FDR and Sizing Up Donald Trump},
   Publisher = {The Globalist},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds356348}
}

@misc{fds349797,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {Burying and Unburying History: American Strategy in a
             Faulknerian World},
   Publisher = {War on the Rocks},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds349797}
}

@misc{fds349800,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {That Post-Liberal Order International World: Some Core
             Characteristics},
   Publisher = {Lawfare},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds349800}
}

@misc{fds349801,
   Author = {Jentleson, B},
   Title = {Millennials are so over US domination of world
             affairs},
   Publisher = {The Conversation},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds349801}
}

@misc{fds317753,
   Author = {Pauly, LW and Jentleson, BW},
   Title = {Preface},
   Journal = {Power in a Complex Global System},
   Volume = {1-2},
   Pages = {xiii-xiv},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780415738798},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444345148},
   Doi = {10.1002/9781444345148},
   Key = {fds317753}
}


%% Monographs   
@misc{fds212609,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson and A. Exum et al},
   Title = {Strategic Adaptation: Towards a New U.S. Strategy in the
             Middle East},
   Volume = {June 2012},
   Publisher = {Center for a New American Security (CNAS)},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds212609}
}

@misc{fds155147,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Strategic Leadership: Framework for a 21st Century National
             Secuirty Strategy},
   Publisher = {Phoenix Initiative},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://www.cnas.org/PhoenixInitiative},
   Key = {fds155147}
}

@misc{fds52350,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Coercive Diplomacy: Scope and Limits in the Contemporary
             World},
   Series = {Policy Analysis Briefs},
   Publisher = {The Stanley Foundation},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds52350}
}

@misc{fds52349,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {Sanctions Against Iran: Key Issues},
   Journal = {Century Foundation Report},
   Publisher = {Century Foundation},
   Year = {2006},
   Key = {fds52349}
}


%% Other   
@misc{fds203493,
   Author = {B.W. Jentleson},
   Title = {The Bi-Sectoralists},
   Year = {2011},
   Key = {fds203493}
}

Bruce W. Jentleson