Religious Studies Grad: Publications since January 2023

%%    
@article{fds373414,
   Author = {Eslicker, JT},
   Title = {Jordan Daniel Wood, The Whole Mystery of Christ: Creation
             as Incarnation in Maximus Confessor},
   Journal = {Anglican Theological Review},
   Volume = {105},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {370-372},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00033286231174054},
   Doi = {10.1177/00033286231174054},
   Key = {fds373414}
}

@article{fds371150,
   Author = {El Houkayem and M},
   Title = {Orientalism, Disorientation, and the “Other Side of the
             World”},
   Journal = {Studies in Late Antiquity},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {171-183},
   Publisher = {University of California Press},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sla.2023.7.2.171},
   Abstract = {<jats:p>This paper examines orientalism and its
             repercussions in the field of Late Antiquity. Instead of
             treating orientalism as a textual phenomenon, I argue that
             it is a continuous experiential process that comes as a
             result of encountering texts, objects, and others. I take
             examples from familiar academic practices and
             institutions—translations, editions, archeology, museums,
             digitization, etc.—all of which are related to access to
             this field. Discourses on progress sometimes cloud the
             ethical and moral issues of these practices, which we have
             inherited from older generations of Western scholars. I show
             how modern efforts and approaches remain insufficient in
             some cases, and more importantly how they primarily benefit
             scholars from or located in the West. This article, thus,
             aims to point out their shortcomings and critique the
             prevailing optimistic narrative of justice and progress in
             the hopes of inciting a more productive dialogue about
             access and knowledge production.</jats:p>},
   Doi = {10.1525/sla.2023.7.2.171},
   Key = {fds371150}
}

@article{fds370001,
   Author = {Villegas, I},
   Title = {Vigils in the Borderlands},
   Pages = {61-72},
   Booktitle = {Worship and Power: Liturgical Authority in Free Church
             Traditions},
   Publisher = {Cascade Books},
   Editor = {Johnson, SK and Wymer, A},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {March},
   ISBN = {9781666732931},
   Key = {fds370001}
}

@article{fds367613,
   Author = {Porter, NE},
   Title = {An Augustinian response to Bruce McCormack},
   Journal = {Anglican Theological Review},
   Volume = {105},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {83-86},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00033286221128228},
   Doi = {10.1177/00033286221128228},
   Key = {fds367613}
}

@article{fds362314,
   Author = {Porter, N},
   Title = {Letter as Spirit in Cyril of Alexandria: Typology and the
             Defense of Literal Exegesis},
   Journal = {Journal of Early Christian Studies},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {2},
   Publisher = {Johns Hopkins University Press},
   Year = {2023},
   Abstract = {Cyril of Alexandria, often regarded as a mediating voice
             between Antiochene and Alexandrian exegetes, frequently
             cites his distinctively unitive Christology as warrant for
             literal interpretations of the Old Testament. That is, what
             scholars have regarded as rapprochement with Antiochene
             exegetes was partly motivated by a Christology with which
             they were at odds. For Cyril, Christological interpretation
             underwrites the integrity of the literal sense, for he holds
             that a typological connection with the self-humbling of the
             Word is very often good reason also to accept the truth of
             the ἱστορία. I consider several passages from
             Cyril's writings on the Old Testament, but special attention
             is given to a narrative that troubled many patristic
             commentators: the prophet Hosea’s marriage to Gomer. Cyril
             maintained that it must be interpreted literally, precisely
             because Hosea’s union with Gomer reflects the incarnate
             humility of Christ. To insist on the prophet’s moral
             purity would, in Cyril’s language, be to demand that Hosea
             be “holier than the all-holy God.” This reading appears
             to be unique among patristic commentators, and I will argue
             that this should be attributed specifically to Cyril’s
             opposition to Antiochene dual-subject Christologies.},
   Key = {fds362314}
}