Department of Mathematics
 Search | Help | Login | pdf version | printable version

Math @ Duke





.......................

.......................


Publications of Yitzchak E. Solomon    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Papers Published   
@article{fds358805,
   Author = {Oudot, S and Solomon, E},
   Title = {Barcode embeddings for metric graphs},
   Journal = {Algebraic & Geometric Topology},
   Volume = {21},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {1209-1266},
   Publisher = {Mathematical Sciences Publishers},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/agt.2021.21.1209},
   Doi = {10.2140/agt.2021.21.1209},
   Key = {fds358805}
}

@article{fds361654,
   Author = {Wagner, A and Solomon, E and Bendich, P},
   Title = {Improving Metric Dimensionality Reduction with Distributed
             Topology},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {June},
   Abstract = {We propose a novel approach to dimensionality reduction
             combining techniques of metric geometry and distributed
             persistent homology, in the form of a gradient-descent based
             method called DIPOLE. DIPOLE is a dimensionality-reduction
             post-processing step that corrects an initial embedding by
             minimizing a loss functional with both a local, metric term
             and a global, topological term. By fixing an initial
             embedding method (we use Isomap), DIPOLE can also be viewed
             as a full dimensionality-reduction pipeline. This framework
             is based on the strong theoretical and computational
             properties of distributed persistent homology and comes with
             the guarantee of almost sure convergence. We observe that
             DIPOLE outperforms popular methods like UMAP, t-SNE, and
             Isomap on a number of popular datasets, both visually and in
             terms of precise quantitative metrics.},
   Key = {fds361654}
}

@article{fds361352,
   Author = {Solomon, E and Wagner, A and Bendich, P},
   Title = {From Geometry to Topology: Inverse Theorems for Distributed
             Persistence},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {January},
   Abstract = {What is the "right" topological invariant of a large point
             cloud X? Prior research has focused on estimating the full
             persistence diagram of X, a quantity that is very expensive
             to compute, unstable to outliers, and far from a sufficient
             statistic. We therefore propose that the correct invariant
             is not the persistence diagram of X, but rather the
             collection of persistence diagrams of many small subsets.
             This invariant, which we call "distributed persistence," is
             perfectly parallelizable, more stable to outliers, and has a
             rich inverse theory. The map from the space of point clouds
             (with the quasi-isometry metric) to the space of distributed
             persistence invariants (with the Hausdorff-Bottleneck
             distance) is a global quasi-isometry. This is a much
             stronger property than simply being injective, as it implies
             that the inverse of a small neighborhood is a small
             neighborhood, and is to our knowledge the only result of its
             kind in the TDA literature. Moreover, the quasi-isometry
             bounds depend on the size of the subsets taken, so that as
             the size of these subsets goes from small to large, the
             invariant interpolates between a purely geometric one and a
             topological one. Lastly, we note that our inverse results do
             not actually require considering all subsets of a fixed size
             (an enormous collection), but a relatively small collection
             satisfying certain covering properties that arise with high
             probability when randomly sampling subsets. These
             theoretical results are complemented by two synthetic
             experiments demonstrating the use of distributed persistence
             in practice.},
   Key = {fds361352}
}

@article{fds358753,
   Author = {Solomon, E and Wagner, A and Bendich, P},
   Title = {A Fast and Robust Method for Global Topological Functional
             Optimization},
   Journal = {24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and
             Statistics (Aistats)},
   Volume = {130},
   Pages = {109-+},
   Year = {2021},
   Key = {fds358753}
}

@article{fds361423,
   Author = {Maria, C and Oudot, S and Solomon, E},
   Title = {Intrinsic Topological Transforms via the Distance Kernel
             Embedding},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {December},
   Abstract = {Topological transforms are parametrized families of
             topological invariants, which, by analogy with transforms in
             signal processing, are much more discriminative than single
             measurements. The first two topological transforms to be
             defined were the Persistent Homology Transform and Euler
             Characteristic Transform, both of which apply to shapes
             embedded in Euclidean space. The contribution of this paper
             is to define topological transforms that depend only on the
             intrinsic geometry of a shape, and hence are invariant to
             the choice of embedding. To that end, given an abstract
             metric measure space, we define an integral operator whose
             eigenfunctions are used to compute sublevel set persistent
             homology. We demonstrate that this operator, which we call
             the distance kernel operator, enjoys desirable stability
             properties, and that its spectrum and eigenfunctions
             concisely encode the large-scale geometry of our metric
             measure space. We then define a number of topological
             transforms using the eigenfunctions of this operator, and
             observe that these transforms inherit many of the stability
             and injectivity properties of the distance kernel
             operator.},
   Key = {fds361423}
}

@article{fds361424,
   Author = {Oudot, S and Solomon, E},
   Title = {Inverse Problems in Topological Persistence},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {October},
   Abstract = {In this survey, we review the literature on inverse problems
             in topological persistence theory. The first half of the
             survey is concerned with the question of surjectivity, i.e.
             the existence of right inverses, and the second half focuses
             on injectivity, i.e. left inverses. Throughout, we highlight
             the tools and theorems that underlie these advances, and
             direct the reader's attention to open problems, both
             theoretical and applied.},
   Key = {fds361424}
}

@article{fds361425,
   Author = {Solomon, E},
   Title = {Stability of Extended Functional Persistence in Dimensions
             Zero and One},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {April},
   Abstract = {The stability result, as stated, is incorrect. In
             particular, the 1-dimensional extended persistence diagrams
             of a finely-triangulated simplicial complex X equipped with
             a continuous real-valued function f, and its one-skeleton
             graph G (also equipped with f), need not be close. To take
             an example, let X be a finely-triangulated disc of radius r
             and let f be the distance-to -the-boundary function, which
             increases radially from the boundary circle of X and is
             maximized at the center. The extended persistence diagram of
             (X,f) contains a point in 1-dimensional persistence of the
             form (0,r), whereas the 1-dimensional extended persistence
             diagram of its one-skeleton only has points near the
             diagonal.},
   Key = {fds361425}
}

@article{fds345762,
   Author = {Carter, P and Solomon, YE},
   Title = {Relaxing the integral test: A challenge for the advanced
             calculus student},
   Journal = {The College Mathematics Journal},
   Volume = {48},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {290-291},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4169/college.math.j.48.4.290},
   Abstract = {Illustrative, elementary counterexamples are hard to come
             by. In this note we propose an elementary, closed-form
             counterexample to a generalization of the classic integral
             test where the condition of monotonicity is relaxed. The
             analysis only uses techniques accessible to a
             second-semester calculus student.},
   Doi = {10.4169/college.math.j.48.4.290},
   Key = {fds345762}
}

 

dept@math.duke.edu
ph: 919.660.2800
fax: 919.660.2821

Mathematics Department
Duke University, Box 90320
Durham, NC 27708-0320