%% Other
@misc{fds139484,
Author = {Rann Bar-On and Paul Bendich and Benjamin Cooke and Michael Gratton and Timothy Lucas and Michael Nicholas and Nicholas Robbins and Abraham
Smith, Joseph Spivey},
Title = {Graduate Calculus Curriculum Review, Spring
2007},
Year = {2007},
Month = {March},
url = {http://www.math.duke.edu/~adsmith/proposal.pdf},
Abstract = {This document is the end result of a several-month-long
study of the calculus curriculum by a group of experienced
graduate instructors. Herein, we propose specific changes to
each course as well as significant changes to the curriculum
as a whole. We arrived at these proposals after carefully
considering the mathematical content of each class, its
intended audience, and the mathematical requirements of the
various physical, biological, and social sciences. In the
course of gathering this information, we interviewed
graduate instructors, teaching faculty, and teachers of
concurrent courses in many other departments. <p> For each
of 25L, 26L, 31L, 32L and the multivariable courses, we
suggest shifting the position or emphasis of various topics,
and we suggest alterations to specific lab assignments. In
several cases, we have replacement labs in concept or in
outline, and expect to write the new labs during Spring and
Summer. <p> Most significantly, we propose replacing 32 and
41 with 41L, a course we designed specifically for incoming
freshmen who have gained AP credit for 31. The course is a
careful balance of rigorous mathematics, computational
techniques, and physical applications.},
Key = {fds139484}
}
|