Announcements

The Duke International Travel Policy is now available online.

The Travel Policy is in effect as of January 22, 2008.

https://eruditio.aas.duke.edu/international/

News and Events

View the latest International News and Events on the Duke International homepage

Duke International Faculty Database

Explore the range of faculty engagement with world regions and global issues by browsing the Faculty Database System or by searching for particular keywords (major world area, country, research topic, etc).

While the Duke International website strives to provide a comprehensive listing of Duke faculty with international research interests, you may also find additional information by exploring school-specific faculty listings


Publications of Peter D. Feaver    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Books   
@book{fds249734,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Wasiolek, S and Crossman, A},
   Title = {Getting the Best Out of College (revised 2nd
             edition)},
   Publisher = {Ten Speed Press},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds249734}
}

@book{fds318525,
   Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
   Title = {Paying the human costs of war: American public opinion and
             casualties in military conflicts},
   Pages = {1-289},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {February},
   ISBN = {9780691139081},
   Abstract = {© 2009 by Princeton University Press. All Rights Reserved.
             From the Korean War to the current conflict in Iraq, Paying
             the Human Costs of War examines the ways in which the
             American public decides whether to support the use of
             military force. Contrary to the conventional view, the
             authors demonstrate that the public does not respond
             reflexively and solely to the number of casualties in a
             conflict. Instead, the book argues that the public makes
             reasoned and reasonable cost-benefit calculations for their
             continued support of a war based on the justifications for
             it and the likelihood it will succeed, along with the costs
             that have been suffered in casualties. Of these factors, the
             book finds that the most important consideration for the
             public is the expectation of success. If the public believes
             that a mission will succeed, the public will support it even
             if the costs are high. When the public does not expect the
             mission to succeed, even small costs will cause the
             withdrawal of support. Providing a wealth of new evidence
             about American attitudes toward military conflict, Paying
             the Human Costs of War offers insights into a controversial,
             timely, and ongoing national discussion},
   Key = {fds318525}
}

@book{fds318526,
   Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
   Title = {Paying the human costs of war: American public opinion and
             casualties in military conflicts},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {February},
   ISBN = {9780691139029},
   Abstract = {From the Korean War to the current conflict in Iraq,Paying
             the Human Costs of Warexamines the ways in which the
             American public decides whether to support the use of
             military force. Contrary to the conventional view, the
             authors demonstrate that the public does not respond
             reflexively and solely to the number of casualties in a
             conflict. Instead, the book argues that the public makes
             reasoned and reasonable cost-benefit calculations for their
             continued support of a war based on the justifications for
             it and the likelihood it will succeed, along with the costs
             that have been suffered in casualties. Of these factors, the
             book finds that the most important consideration for the
             public is the expectation of success. If the public believes
             that a mission will succeed, the public will support it even
             if the costs are high. When the public does not expect the
             mission to succeed, even small costs will cause the
             withdrawal of support.Providing a wealth of new evidence
             about American attitudes toward military conflict,Paying the
             Human Costs of Waroffers insights into a controversial,
             timely, and ongoing national discussion. © 2009 by
             Princeton University Press. All Rights Reserved.},
   Key = {fds318526}
}

@book{fds249733,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C and Reifler, J},
   Title = {Paying the Human Costs of War},
   Publisher = {Princeton},
   Year = {2009},
   Key = {fds249733}
}

@book{fds249732,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Wasiolek, S and Crossman, A},
   Title = {Getting the Best Out of College},
   Publisher = {Ten Speed Press},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds249732}
}

@book{fds249731,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
   Title = {Choosing Your Battles},
   Series = {Paperback Edition with new afterword},
   Publisher = {Princeton Press},
   Year = {2005},
   Key = {fds249731}
}

@book{fds15864,
   Author = {P.D. Feaver and Christopher Gelpi},
   Title = {Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and
             the Use of Force},
   Publisher = {Princeton: Princeton University Press},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds15864}
}

@book{fds249730,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military
             Relations},
   Publisher = {Cambridge: Harvard University Press},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249730}
}

@book{fds249729,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Guarding the Guardians},
   Publisher = {Cornell Press},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds249729}
}

@book{fds249725,
   Title = {Battlefield Nuclear Weapons: Issues and Options},
   Publisher = {University Press of America},
   Editor = {Feaver, P and Biddle, SD},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds249725}
}

@book{fds249724,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Assuring Control of Nuclear Weapons: The Evolution of
             Permissive Action Links},
   Publisher = {Lanham, MD: University Press of America},
   Editor = {Feaver, P and Stein, P},
   Year = {1987},
   Key = {fds249724}
}


%% Monographs   
@misc{fds249727,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Golby, J and Dropp, K},
   Title = {Military Campaigns: Veterans’ Endorsements and
             Presidential Elections},
   Publisher = {Center for New American Security},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds249727}
}


%% Book Reviews   
@article{fds8446,
   Author = {Michael C. Desh},
   Title = {Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security
             Environment},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds8446}
}

@article{fds18806,
   Author = {Terry Terriff},
   Title = {The Nixon Administration and the Making of US Nuclear
             Strategy},
   Journal = {Journal of American History},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds18806}
}

@article{fds18807,
   Author = {Mitchell Reiss},
   Title = {Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear
             Capabilities},
   Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {Spring},
   Key = {fds18807}
}


%% Other   
@misc{fds224085,
   Author = {P.D. Feaver},
   Title = {What do Policymakers Want From Academic Experts on Nuclear
             Proliferation?},
   Journal = {MonkeyCage, WashingonPost.com},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds224085}
}

@misc{fds224086,
   Author = {P.D. Feaver},
   Title = {Penalty Box: How Sanctions Trap Policymakers},
   Journal = {ForeignAffairs.com},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds224086}
}

@misc{fds249723,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Miller, C},
   Title = {Provocations on policymakers, casualty aversion and
             post-heroic warfare},
   Pages = {145-161},
   Booktitle = {Heroism and the Changing Character of War: Toward
             Post-Heroic Warfare?},
   Publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan UK},
   Editor = {Scheipers, S},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {April},
   ISBN = {9781137362520},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137362537},
   Doi = {10.1057/9781137362537},
   Key = {fds249723}
}

@misc{fds303772,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Wasiolek, S and Crossman, A},
   Title = {Guestposted a discussion on Freakonomics webpage in
             connection with the second edition of Getting the Best Out
             of College (http://www.freakonomics.com/2012/11/28/how-to-get-the-best-out-of-college-your-questions-answered/)},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {February},
   Key = {fds303772}
}

@misc{fds224083,
   Author = {P.D. Feaver},
   Title = {Shadow Government},
   Journal = {ForeignPolicy.Com},
   Year = {2014},
   Key = {fds224083}
}

@misc{fds249712,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Golby, J and Dropp, K},
   Title = {The Public Listens to Generals},
   Journal = {Cleveland Plain Dealer},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds249712}
}

@misc{fds249728,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Golby, J and Dropp, K},
   Title = {Listening to the Generals: How Military Advice Affects
             Public Support for the Use of Force},
   Publisher = {Center for New American Security},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds249728}
}

@misc{fds249711,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
   Title = {Hagel and the Veteran Effect: Service Tempers Views on the
             Use of Force},
   Journal = {Thedailybeast.Com},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {February},
   Key = {fds249711}
}

@misc{fds249710,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Shadow Government},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds249710}
}

@misc{fds249709,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Golby, J and Urben, H and Dropp, K},
   Title = {"Brass Politics: How Retired Military Officers are Shaping
             Elections"},
   Journal = {Foreignaffairs.Com},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {November},
   Key = {fds249709}
}

@misc{fds249707,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Pentagon Funding? Bring it On},
   Journal = {Foreign Policy Online},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds249707}
}

@misc{fds249708,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Why We Went Into Iraq},
   Journal = {Weekly Standard},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds249708}
}

@misc{fds249706,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {MoveOn’s McCarthy Moment},
   Journal = {Boston Globe},
   Year = {2007},
   Key = {fds249706}
}

@misc{fds249700,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Fog of WMD},
   Journal = {Washington Post},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds249700}
}

@misc{fds249701,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Clinton Mind-set},
   Journal = {Washington Post},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds249701}
}

@misc{fds249702,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Keohane, R and Buchanan, A},
   Title = {Let UN Impose New Accountability},
   Journal = {Newsday},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds249702}
}

@misc{fds249703,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Go Negative On the Allies},
   Journal = {New York Times},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds249703}
}

@misc{fds249704,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C and Reifler, J},
   Title = {Iraq Messages Need Honing},
   Journal = {Newsday},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds249704}
}

@misc{fds249705,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Whose Military Vote?},
   Journal = {Washington Post},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds249705}
}

@misc{fds249692,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Time for Another Goldwater-Nichols? Military Reform for a
             New Strategic Era},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249692}
}

@misc{fds249693,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Halper, S},
   Title = {Dithering Over Detainees},
   Journal = {Washington Times},
   Pages = {B01-B01},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249693}
}

@misc{fds249694,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Axis of Rudeness},
   Journal = {Weekley Standard},
   Pages = {10-11},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249694}
}

@misc{fds249695,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Body Bags Alone Won’t Dampen American Morale},
   Journal = {Usa Today},
   Pages = {15-15},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249695}
}

@misc{fds249696,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Will the UN Really Help?},
   Journal = {Washington Post},
   Pages = {21-21},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249696}
}

@misc{fds249697,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Don’t Substitute Spy Services for Leadership},
   Journal = {Raleigh News and Observer},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249697}
}

@misc{fds249698,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Casualties Are the First Truth of War},
   Journal = {Weekly Standard},
   Pages = {17-18},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249698}
}

@misc{fds249699,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Winning Back Old Europe},
   Journal = {Weeklystandard.Com},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249699}
}

@misc{fds249690,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {No More Mocking the President},
   Journal = {Parliamentary Brief},
   Number = {10},
   Pages = {4-6},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds249690}
}

@misc{fds249691,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Allies in War, Not in Perspective},
   Journal = {Washington Post},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds249691}
}

@misc{fds249687,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Cold War II},
   Journal = {Weekly Standard},
   Pages = {18-19},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds249687}
}

@misc{fds249688,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {To Maintain that Support, Show Us What Success
             Means},
   Journal = {Washington Post},
   Pages = {B1-B1},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds249688}
}

@misc{fds249689,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, R},
   Title = {Civilian Control to the Forefront},
   Journal = {Raleigh News and Observer},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds249689}
}

@misc{fds249686,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Brits are All Right: Except for their Wobbly
             Elites},
   Journal = {Weekly Standard},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds249686}
}

@misc{fds249685,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {There’s a Good Reason Those Civilians Were on the
             Sub},
   Journal = {Wall Street Journal},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {February},
   Key = {fds249685}
}

@misc{fds249684,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Gore Steps on a Land Mine},
   Journal = {Washington Post},
   Pages = {19-19},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds249684}
}

@misc{fds249722,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil Military Gap and American
             National Security},
   Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
   Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds249722}
}

@misc{fds249683,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Malesky, E},
   Title = {A Compassionate Foreign Policy?},
   Journal = {Weekly Standard},
   Pages = {17-20},
   Year = {2000},
   Key = {fds249683}
}

@misc{fds249682,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
   Title = {How Many Deaths are Acceptable? A Surprising
             Answer},
   Journal = {Washington Post},
   Pages = {B-3},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {November},
   Key = {fds249682}
}

@misc{fds249680,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {I Love Zhu, Zhu Love Me: Clinton’s China
             Policy},
   Journal = {Weekly Standard},
   Pages = {27-29},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds249680}
}

@misc{fds249681,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gronke, P},
   Title = {Don’t be Complacent about Public Confidence in the
             Military},
   Journal = {Contra Costa Times},
   Pages = {F05-F05},
   Year = {1999},
   Key = {fds249681}
}

@misc{fds249679,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Lessons From Desert Storm: Iraqi Style},
   Journal = {Inter University Seminar Newsletter},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {Winter},
   Key = {fds249679}
}

@misc{fds249721,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Campbell, KM},
   Title = {Rethinking Key West: Service Roles and Missions after the
             Cold War},
   Booktitle = {The American Defense Annual},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds249721}
}

@misc{fds249678,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Why Sanctions Are an Iffy Remedy},
   Journal = {The Christian Science Monitor},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds249678}
}

@misc{fds249720,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Social Sources of Inadvertent Nuclear Use in the Former
             Soviet Union: Civil-Military Relations and the Black
             Market},
   Booktitle = {Implications of the Dissolution of the Soviet Union for
             Accidental/Inadvertent Use of Weapons of Mass
             Destruction},
   Publisher = {Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences},
   Editor = {Wedar, CA and Intriligator, M and Vares, P},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds249720}
}

@misc{fds249674,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Wayda, M},
   Title = {The Risk of Letting the Warriors Run a War},
   Journal = {Christian Science Monitor},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds249674}
}

@misc{fds249675,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {What Colors Should Our Soldiers Be?},
   Journal = {L.A. Times},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds249675}
}

@misc{fds249676,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Generosity Begins Only After the Battle},
   Journal = {L.A. Times},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds249676}
}

@misc{fds249677,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Beschel, RP},
   Title = {Coup’s Lessons for Central Europe},
   Journal = {The Christian Science Monitor},
   Year = {1991},
   Key = {fds249677}
}

@misc{fds249669,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {An Assessment of the Survivability of Unmanned Air Vehicles
             Performing Target Acquisition for Battlefield Nuclear
             Forces},
   Publisher = {Institute for Defense Analyses, Memorandum Report,
             M-533},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds249669}
}

@misc{fds249670,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Vietnam’s Wrong Lesson in the Gulf},
   Journal = {Christian Science Monitor},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds249670}
}

@misc{fds249671,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Beschel, RP},
   Title = {Problem: Scare the Iraqis You Terrorize the Home
             Folks},
   Journal = {L.A. Times},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds249671}
}

@misc{fds249672,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Does Moscow Know Where Its Nukes Are?},
   Journal = {L.A. Times},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds249672}
}

@misc{fds249673,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Falkenberg, J},
   Title = {Meeting Soviet Citizens’ Spiritual Needs},
   Journal = {Christian Science Monitor},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds249673}
}

@misc{fds249668,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Stein, P},
   Title = {Who Needs PALs},
   Publisher = {Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute},
   Year = {1988},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds249668}
}


%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds342820,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Brands, H and Lissner, RF and Porter,
             P},
   Title = {Correspondence: The establishment and U.S. grand
             strategy},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {197-204},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_c_00347},
   Doi = {10.1162/ISEC_c_00347},
   Key = {fds342820}
}

@article{fds339649,
   Author = {Feaver, P},
   Title = {Too many leaks},
   Journal = {Foreign Affairs},
   Volume = {97},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {199-202},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {November},
   Key = {fds339649}
}

@article{fds327708,
   Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
   Title = {The case for Bush revisionism: Reevaluating the legacy of
             America’s 43rd president},
   Journal = {Journal of Strategic Studies},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {234-274},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1348944},
   Abstract = {© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis
             Group. This article reassesses the foreign policy legacy of
             George W. Bush in light of the emerging historical record of
             his administration. We conclude that, whereas Bush’s
             foreign policy was in widespread disrepute when he left
             office in 2009, that reputation is likely to
             improve–perhaps significantly–in the coming years. We
             identify six particular arguments that lend credence to an
             emerging ‘Bush revisionism.’ To be clear, we do not
             necessarily argue that the balance sheet on Bush’s foreign
             policy was positive, but the arguments presented here are
             likely to generate a more sympathetic and favorable
             historical assessment of Bush’s presidency over
             time.},
   Doi = {10.1080/01402390.2017.1348944},
   Key = {fds327708}
}

@article{fds331121,
   Author = {Golby, J and Feaver, P and Dropp, K},
   Title = {Elite Military Cues and Public Opinion About the Use of
             Military Force},
   Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
   Volume = {44},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {44-71},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16687067},
   Abstract = {© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. Do military endorsements
             influence Americans’ political and foreign policy views?
             We find that senior military officers have the ability to
             nudge public attitudes under certain conditions. Through a
             series of large, survey-based experiments, with nearly
             12,000 completed interviews from national samples, we find
             that participants respond to survey questions in predictable
             ways depending on whether they have been prompted with
             information about the views of senior military leaders on
             the very same questions. When told that senior military
             leaders oppose particular interventions abroad, public
             opposition to that intervention increases; endorsements of
             support boost public support but by a smaller magnitude.
             Subsequent causal mediation analysis suggests that military
             opinion influences public opinion primarily through its
             impact on a mission’s perceived legitimacy and, to a
             lesser degree, it’s perceived likelihood of
             success.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0095327X16687067},
   Key = {fds331121}
}

@article{fds331122,
   Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
   Title = {The Case for Reassessing America's 43rdPresident},
   Journal = {Orbis},
   Volume = {62},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {76-90},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2017.11.006},
   Abstract = {© 2017 Contemporary judgments of George W. Bush's foreign
             policy were often quite harsh and polemical. In this
             article, we argue that a moderate form of Bush revisionism
             is likely to emerge in the coming years, as scholars take a
             more dispassionate look at his achievements in global
             affairs and the difficult circumstances under which his
             administration labored. We offer the six most persuasive
             arguments in favor of Bush revisionism; we then discuss the
             most reasonable critiques of these arguments. The overall
             thrust of this essay is not that Bush will someday be seen
             as one of America's most successful statesmen, but simply
             that his reputation should improve as partisan passions fade
             and new evidence is considered.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.orbis.2017.11.006},
   Key = {fds331122}
}

@article{fds326696,
   Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
   Title = {Was the Rise of ISIS Inevitable?},
   Journal = {Survival},
   Volume = {59},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {7-54},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1325595},
   Abstract = {© 2017 The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
             The most fateful American choice in the rise of ISIS was
             also the oldest one: the 2003 decision to invade Iraq,
             followed by the mismanagement of the occupation.},
   Doi = {10.1080/00396338.2017.1325595},
   Key = {fds326696}
}

@article{fds328896,
   Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
   Title = {Trump and terrorism: U.S. strategy after
             ISIS},
   Journal = {Foreign Affairs},
   Volume = {96},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {28-36},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {March},
   Key = {fds328896}
}

@article{fds321644,
   Author = {Feaver, P},
   Title = {Civil–Military Relations and Policy: A Sampling of a New
             Wave of Scholarship},
   Journal = {Journal of Strategic Studies},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {325-342},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1254938},
   Doi = {10.1080/01402390.2016.1254938},
   Key = {fds321644}
}

@article{fds323680,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Resign in Protest? A Cure Worse Than Most
             Diseases},
   Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
   Volume = {43},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {29-40},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16657321},
   Abstract = {© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016. Advocates of cultivating a
             resignation-in-protest ethic understate the costs and
             exaggerate the benefits. Military officers who believe that
             the policymaking process is heading in a bad direction
             already have ample recourse in the form of advising within
             the chain of command. If their advice is not heeded, it is
             exceedingly unlikely that the country would be better served
             by senior officers provoking a civil–military crisis to
             advertise their policy differences with civilian
             leaders.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0095327X16657321},
   Key = {fds323680}
}

@article{fds321645,
   Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
   Title = {Stress-testing American grand strategy},
   Journal = {Survival},
   Volume = {58},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {93-120},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2016.1257199},
   Doi = {10.1080/00396338.2016.1257199},
   Key = {fds321645}
}

@article{fds325027,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Lorber, EB},
   Title = {The sanctions myth},
   Journal = {National Interest},
   Volume = {2015},
   Number = {July-August},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds325027}
}

@article{fds249738,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Epilogue: Coordinating actors in complex operations and a
             third way to study two familiar dualities},
   Journal = {Small Wars & Insurgencies},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {370-372},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2013.778018},
   Abstract = {The field has traditionally studied civil-military relations
             in one of two domains: supreme command, where the great
             questions of war and peace were decided by the top leaders,
             or society, where the military institutions sought to
             establish themselves in relations to the broader civilian
             world. This special edition emphasizes a third domain: the
             modern battlefield of complex operations. In that setting
             the lines between civilian and military are even more
             blurred than in traditional settings (where they were
             already quite blurred), and concerns about effectiveness
             cannot be ignored for the sake of the traditional focus on
             control. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group,
             LLC.},
   Doi = {10.1080/09592318.2013.778018},
   Key = {fds249738}
}

@article{fds249719,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Review of Richard Betts’ American Force},
   Journal = {H Diplo/Issf},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {November},
   Key = {fds249719}
}

@article{fds249737,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {"Correspondence: Civilians, Soldiers and the Iraq Surge
             Decision"},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {3},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds249737}
}

@article{fds318522,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Peter D. Feaver replies},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {36},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {191-199},
   Publisher = {M I T PRESS},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds318522}
}

@article{fds249735,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
   Title = {Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and
             the use of force},
   Journal = {Choosing Your Battles: American Civil Military Relations and
             the Use of Force},
   Pages = {1-250},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {October},
   ISBN = {0691124272},
   Abstract = {America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq
             clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military
             officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish
             voices in government were civilians who had not served in
             uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public
             would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that
             this civilian-military argument--which has characterized
             earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is
             typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has
             shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new
             afterword by Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi traces these
             themes through the first two years of the current Iraq war,
             showing how civil-military debates and concerns about
             sensitivity to casualties continue to shape American foreign
             policy in profound ways. © 2004 by Princeton University
             Press. All Rights Reserved.},
   Key = {fds249735}
}

@article{fds249740,
   Author = {Grieco, JM and Gelpi, C and Reifler, J and Feaver,
             PD},
   Title = {Let's Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and
             American Public Support for War},
   Journal = {International Studies Quarterly},
   Volume = {55},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {563-583},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0020-8833},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000291392800016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Recent scholarship on international institutions has begun
             to explore potentially powerful indirect pathways by which
             international institutions may influence states' domestic
             politics and thereby influence the foreign policy
             preferences and strategies of state leaders. In this paper,
             we provide evidence documenting the indirect impact of
             institutional cues on public support for the use of force
             through an analysis of individual-level survey data and a
             survey-based experiment that examines support for a
             hypothetical American intervention in East Timor. We find
             that institutional endorsements increase support for the use
             of force among members of the American public who value the
             institution making the endorsement and among those who do
             not have confidence in the president. These individual-level
             analyses show that international institutions can affect
             domestic support for military action by serving providing a
             valuable "second opinion" on the proposed use of force. ©
             2011 International Studies Association.},
   Doi = {10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00660.x},
   Key = {fds249740}
}

@article{fds249718,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Bruce Fleming’s Bridging the Military-Civilian Divide:
             What Each Side Must Know about the Other—and about
             Itself},
   Journal = {Proceedings of the Us Naval Institute},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {April},
   Key = {fds249718}
}

@article{fds249739,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The right to be right: Civil-military relations and the Iraq
             surge decision},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {87-125},
   Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {Spring},
   ISSN = {0162-2889},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000288849600003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1162/ISEC_a_00033},
   Key = {fds249739}
}

@article{fds249742,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {In Memoriam: Samuel P. Huntington},
   Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {4},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds249742}
}

@article{fds318523,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Samuel P. Huntington},
   Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {625-627},
   Publisher = {SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X09336892},
   Doi = {10.1177/0095327X09336892},
   Key = {fds318523}
}

@article{fds318524,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Hehmeyer, AF},
   Title = {The end of evil?},
   Journal = {Foreign Policy},
   Number = {172},
   Pages = {12},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds318524}
}

@article{fds249741,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Competition and Compromise},
   Journal = {Duke Alumni Magazine},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds249741}
}

@article{fds249743,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Debating American Grand Strategy After Major
             War},
   Journal = {Orbis},
   Volume = {53},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {547-552},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2009.07.009},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.orbis.2009.07.009},
   Key = {fds249743}
}

@article{fds325028,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Beyond the surge},
   Journal = {Commentary},
   Volume = {126},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {4-4},
   Publisher = {AMER JEWISH COMMITTEE},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds325028}
}

@article{fds249744,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Rethinking Iraq: Anatomy of the surge},
   Journal = {Commentary},
   Volume = {125},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {24-28},
   Publisher = {AMER JEWISH COMMITTEE},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0010-2601},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000254372900017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Developing and implementing a workable strategy that can be
             handed over to Bush's successor is a big challenge. Although
             key developments can be made during President Bush tenure,
             his actions will all be carried out on the next
             administration. A new and different strategy called "surge"
             emerged out of a growing recognition over 2006 that critics
             were right about the existing Iraq policy that is not
             working. Critics said that there is a need to push Iraqi
             government officials to come together politically and to
             train Iraqi troops so that they could take over from
             American forces. The military leader of surge, General David
             Petraeus and America's chief diplomat in Iraq Ambassador
             Ryan Crocker will report their second report to Congress on
             the surge and its effects. After giving the first report,
             the surge has bought precious time for the United States and
             the Iraqi state to progress toward to five specific
             objectives: (1) wiping out the inciters of sectarian
             violence; (2) building up a larger, more capable, and more
             integrated Iraqi Security Force; (3) giving Iraqis the
             opportunity to create means of political accommodation
             locally and from the bottom up; (4) making the central top
             down government in Baghdad more responsive to the nation's
             18 provinces by opening projects that will improve the
             economic and living conditions of the country's citizenry at
             large; and (5) pushing Iraqi politicians to pass
             legislations on a number of important measures. After the
             implementation, the strategy has exceeded everyone's
             expectations.},
   Key = {fds249744}
}

@article{fds249749,
   Author = {Gelpi, C and Reifler, J and Feaver, P},
   Title = {Iraq the vote: Retrospective and prospective foreign policy
             judgments on candidate choice and casualty
             tolerance},
   Journal = {Political Behavior},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {151-174},
   Publisher = {Springer Nature},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0190-9320},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000246521300002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {In this article, we model the effect of foreign policy
             attitudes on both vote choice and casualty tolerance, using
             survey data collected during the 2004 election. We show that
             prospective judgments of the likelihood of success in Iraq
             and retrospective judgments of whether the war in Iraq was
             right are significant determinants of both vote choice and
             casualty tolerance. The prospective judgment of success is
             key in predicting casualty tolerance, while retrospective
             judgment of whether the war was right takes precedence in
             determining vote choice. In addition, there is an important
             interaction between the two variables, so the effect of one
             is conditional on the value of the other. We believe this is
             compelling evidence that foreign policy matters, and that it
             matters in reasonable ways. © Springer Science+Business
             Media, LLC 2007.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s11109-007-9029-6},
   Key = {fds249749}
}

@article{fds249745,
   Author = {Coletta, D and Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Civilian monitoring of U.S. military operations in the
             information age},
   Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {106-126},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0095-327X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000244173100007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Recent research on U.S. civil-military relations has applied
             principal-agent logic to analyze the post-cold war friction
             between civilian authorities and top military commanders.
             This article proposes a greater emphasis on bargaining to
             focus on the effects of new monitoring technologies
             available to the civilian principal in the information age.
             As monitoring capabilities increase and military agents
             perceive their autonomy disappearing, tacit bargaining over
             the president's level of resource commitment to a crisis
             should become more prevalent. This idea receives support
             from a comparison across case studies of the limited use of
             force taken from different technological eras. A new style
             of civil-military bargaining presents both challenges and
             opportunities to the traditional conception of military
             professionalism. © 2006, Inter-University Seminar on Armed
             Forces and Society. All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1177/0095327X05282530},
   Key = {fds249745}
}

@article{fds249748,
   Author = {Aldrich, JH and Gelpi, C and Feaver, P and Reifler, J and Sharp,
             KT},
   Title = {Foreign policy and the electoral connection},
   Journal = {Annual Review of Political Science},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {477-502},
   Publisher = {ANNUAL REVIEWS},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {1094-2939},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000238980300022&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Public opinion is central to representation, democratic
             accountability, and decision making. Yet, the public was
             long believed to be relatively uninterested in foreign
             affairs, absent an immediate threat to safety and welfare.
             It had become conventional to say that "voting ends at
             water's edge." We start the examination of the scholarly
             understanding of the role of foreign affairs in public
             opinion and voting at that low point of view. Much
             subsequent development saw an increasing degree of holding
             and using of attitudes and beliefs about foreign affairs
             among the public. Moving in parallel with developments in
             political psychology, theoretical and methodological
             advances led to an increasingly widely shared view that the
             public holds reasonably sensible and nuanced views, that
             these help shape their political behaviors, and that these,
             in turn, help shape and constrain foreign policy
             making.},
   Doi = {10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.111605.105008},
   Key = {fds249748}
}

@article{fds249746,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Hikotani, T and Narine, S},
   Title = {Civilian control and civil-military gaps in the United
             States, Japan, and China},
   Journal = {Asian Perspective},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {233-271},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {December},
   Abstract = {Three questions loom large in the study of civil-military
             relations, and are fruitfully asked of the United States,
             Japan, and China. What accounts for the subordination of the
             military to political authority? To what extent is the
             military reflective of societal values? How do civilian and
             military leaders think about and manage the central function
             of the military, namely the use of force? We find that
             despite the very different record of civil-military
             relations across these three cases, models and conceptual
             tools originally developed to explain American
             civil-military relations do have analytical leverage over
             the Japanese and Chinese cases. These tools, however, must
             be modified to adjust to the cultural and historical context
             of each case, and lead to different conclusions about
             prevailing civil-military relations in each
             setting.},
   Key = {fds249746}
}

@article{fds249747,
   Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
   Title = {Success matters - Casualty sensitivity and the war in
             Iraq},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {7-46},
   Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {Winter},
   ISSN = {0162-2889},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000235412000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1162/016228805775969573},
   Key = {fds249747}
}

@article{fds249750,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Special Section: The Civil-Military Gap in Comparative
             Perspective},
   Journal = {Journal of Strategic Studies},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds249750}
}

@article{fds318527,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The civil-military gap in comparative perspective},
   Journal = {Journal of Strategic Studies},
   Volume = {26},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {1-5},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390412331302945},
   Doi = {10.1080/01402390412331302945},
   Key = {fds318527}
}

@article{fds249716,
   Author = {Feaver, P},
   Title = {The Ghosts that Haunt Another Best and Brightest Generation:
             A review of David Halberstam’s War in a Time of
             Peace},
   Journal = {International Studies Review},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249716}
}

@article{fds249717,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Case for the Defense, a book review of Rumsfeld: A
             Portrait},
   Journal = {Weekly Standard},
   Pages = {34-35},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249717}
}

@article{fds249766,
   Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Speak softly and carry a big stick? Veterans in the
             political elite and the American use of force},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Volume = {96},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {779-793},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0003-0554},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000179963200007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Other research has shown (1) that civilians and the military
             differ in their views about when and how to use military
             force; (2) that the opinions of veterans track more closely
             with military officers than with civilians who never served
             in the military; and (3) that U.S. civil-military relations
             shaped Cold War policy debates. We assess whether this
             opinion gap "matters" for the actual conduct of American
             foreign policy. We examine the impact of the presence of
             veterans in the U.S. political elite on the propensity to
             initiate and escalate militarized interstate disputes
             between 1816 and 1992. As the percentage of veterans serving
             in the executive branch and the legislature increases, the
             probability that the United States will initiate militarized
             disputes declines. Once a dispute has been initiated,
             however, the higher the proportion of veterans, the greater
             the level of force the United States will use in the
             dispute.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S000305540200045X},
   Key = {fds249766}
}

@article{fds249771,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Title = {Overview},
   Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
   Volume = {27},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {177-182},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {Winter},
   ISSN = {0095-327X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000168057200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1177/0095327X0102700201},
   Key = {fds249771}
}

@article{fds249770,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Harknett, R and Others},
   Title = {The Risks of a Networked Military},
   Journal = {Orbis},
   Volume = {44},
   Number = {1},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {Winter},
   Key = {fds249770}
}

@article{fds249769,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Title = {The Gap: Soldiers, Civilians and Their Mutual
             Misunderstanding},
   Journal = {National Interest},
   Volume = {61},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {Fall},
   Key = {fds249769}
}

@article{fds249768,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Correspondence: Is Anybody Still a Realist?},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {1},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {Summer},
   Key = {fds249768}
}

@article{fds325029,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Hellmann, G and Schweller, RL and Taliaferro, JW and Wohlforth, WC and Legro, JW and Moravcsik, A},
   Title = {Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm? (Or Was Anybody Ever a
             Realist?)},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {25},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {165-193},
   Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016228800560426},
   Doi = {10.1162/016228800560426},
   Key = {fds325029}
}

@article{fds249715,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Review of Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing
             Security Environment by Michael C Desch},
   Journal = {American Political Science Review},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds249715}
}

@article{fds325030,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Title = {Corps politics},
   Journal = {New Republic},
   Volume = {221},
   Number = {25},
   Pages = {6-6},
   Publisher = {NEW REPUBLIC INC},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {December},
   Key = {fds325030}
}

@article{fds249767,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Theory-Policy Debate in Political Science and Nuclear
             Proliferations},
   Journal = {National Security Studies Quarterly},
   Volume = {5},
   Number = {3},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {Summer},
   Key = {fds249767}
}

@article{fds249736,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Civil-military relations},
   Journal = {Annual Review of Political Science},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {211-241},
   Publisher = {ANNUAL REVIEWS},
   Editor = {Nelson Polsby and et. al},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {1094-2939},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000170829800011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {Who will guard the guardians? Political scientists since
             Plato have sought to answer this, the central question of
             the civil-military relations subfield. Although
             civil-military relations is a very broad subject,
             encompassing the entire range of relationships between the
             military and civilian society at every level, the field
             largely focuses on the control or direction of the military
             by the highest civilian authorities in nation-states. This
             essay surveys political science's contribution to our
             understanding of civil-military relations, providing a rough
             taxonomy for cataloguing the field and discussing the recent
             renaissance in the literature as well as fruitful avenues
             for future research. The essay focuses on theoretical
             developments, slighting (for reasons of space) the many case
             studies and empirical treatments that have also made
             important contributions to our knowledge.},
   Doi = {10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.211},
   Key = {fds249736}
}

@article{fds249762,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The domestication of foreign policy},
   Journal = {American Foreign Policy Interests},
   Volume = {20},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {13},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803920.1998.10391945},
   Doi = {10.1080/10803920.1998.10391945},
   Key = {fds249762}
}

@article{fds249763,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Crisis as shirking: An agency theory explanation of the
             souring of American civil-military relations},
   Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {407-434},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {Spring},
   ISSN = {0095-327X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000074580700004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1177/0095327X9802400305},
   Key = {fds249763}
}

@article{fds249764,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Modeling Civil-Military Relations: A Reply to Burk and
             Bacevich},
   Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
   Volume = {24},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {595-602},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0095-327X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000076082400008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1177/0095327X9802400409},
   Key = {fds249764}
}

@article{fds249765,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Blowback: Information warfare and the dynamics of
             coercion},
   Journal = {Security Studies},
   Volume = {7},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {88-120},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0963-6412},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000077216600004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1080/09636419808429359},
   Key = {fds249765}
}

@article{fds249761,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Correspondence: 'Proliferation Pessimisim and Emerging
             Nuclear Powers'},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {2},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {Fall},
   Key = {fds249761}
}

@article{fds249760,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Neooptimists and the enduring problem of nuclear
             proliferation},
   Journal = {Security Studies},
   Volume = {6},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {93-125},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0963-6412},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1997XY04400004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1080/09636419708429323},
   Key = {fds249760}
}

@article{fds325031,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Sagan, SD and Karl, DJ},
   Title = {Proliferation Pessimism and Emerging Nuclear
             Powers},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {22},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {185-185},
   Publisher = {JSTOR},
   Year = {1997},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2539374},
   Doi = {10.2307/2539374},
   Key = {fds325031}
}

@article{fds249714,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Review of The Nixon Administration and the Making of US
             Nuclear Strategy by Terry Terriff},
   Journal = {Journal of American History},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {June},
   Key = {fds249714}
}

@article{fds249757,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Niou, EMS},
   Title = {Managing nuclear proliferation: Condemn, strike, or
             assist?},
   Journal = {International Studies Quarterly},
   Volume = {40},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {209-234},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {Summer},
   ISSN = {0020-8833},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996UL68300003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Abstract = {The nonproliferation regime, which denies countries access
             to critical materials, makes it more likely that defiant
             proliferators will develop unsafe arsenals. In order to
             manage proliferation, the U.S. could continue to uphold the
             regime, hoping to persuade the proliferator to return to
             non-nuclear status. It could attack, thereby ensuring that
             the proliferator is unable to join the nuclear club. Or it
             could concede the nonproliferation goal and render
             assistance to address the attendant safety concerns. Through
             a series of deductive models we argue that three factors are
             important in determining the right option: (1) U.S.
             preferences on proliferation, whether purist or pragmatist;
             (2) the proliferator's type, which can vary by size,
             affinity, and risk tolerance; and (3) the phase in the
             proliferation process to which the proliferator has
             advanced: preweaponization, after weaponization but before
             deployment, the deployment phase, and, finally, full
             deployment. We analyze the special case of proliferation by
             a small enemy of the United States such as North Korea as a
             signaling game wherein each side attempts to push the
             outcome toward its own preferred equilibrium. The North
             Koreans prefer the equilibrium in which the United States
             never attacks regardless of its type, whereas the United
             States prefers the equilibrium in which North Korea never
             deploys regardless of its type.},
   Doi = {10.2307/2600957},
   Key = {fds249757}
}

@article{fds249759,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and
             the question of civilian control},
   Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {149-178},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {Winter},
   ISSN = {0095-327X},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996WK86000002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Doi = {10.1177/0095327X9602300203},
   Key = {fds249759}
}

@article{fds249758,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {An American Crisis in Civilian Control and Civil-Military
             Relations? Historical and Conceptual Roots},
   Journal = {The Tocqueville Review},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {1},
   Year = {1996},
   Key = {fds249758}
}

@article{fds303773,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Reiss, M},
   Title = {Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain their Nuclear
             Capabilities.},
   Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
   Volume = {111},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {169-169},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {1996},
   ISSN = {0032-3195},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2151937},
   Doi = {10.2307/2151937},
   Key = {fds303773}
}

@article{fds249756,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Optimists, Pessimists, and Theories of Nuclear Proliferation
             Management},
   Journal = {Security Studies},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {754-772},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1995},
   Month = {Summer},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636419509347602},
   Doi = {10.1080/09636419509347602},
   Key = {fds249756}
}

@article{fds249755,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Politics of Inadvertence},
   Journal = {Security Studies},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {501-508},
   Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {Spring},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636419409347559},
   Doi = {10.1080/09636419409347559},
   Key = {fds249755}
}

@article{fds249713,
   Author = {Green, WC and Reeves, WR},
   Title = {The Soviet Military Encyclopedia},
   Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {Spring},
   Key = {fds249713}
}

@article{fds249753,
   Author = {FEAVER, PD},
   Title = {COMMAND AND CONTROL IN EMERGING NUCLEAR NATIONS},
   Journal = {International Security},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {160-187},
   Publisher = {M I T PRESS},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0162-2889},
   url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993KD21800005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
   Key = {fds249753}
}

@article{fds318528,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Proliferation Optimism and Theories of Nuclear
             Operations},
   Journal = {Security Studies},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {3-4},
   Pages = {159-191},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636419309347523},
   Doi = {10.1080/09636419309347523},
   Key = {fds318528}
}

@article{fds249754,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Proliferation Optimism and Theories of Nulcear
             Operations},
   Journal = {Security Studies},
   Volume = {2},
   Number = {3/4},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds249754}
}

@article{fds249752,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Kling, R and Plofchan, TK},
   Title = {Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice.},
   Journal = {Stanford Law & Policy Review},
   Volume = {4},
   Pages = {211-220},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1044-4386},
   url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11652652},
   Key = {fds249752}
}

@article{fds249751,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Beschel, RP},
   Title = {The Churches and the War},
   Journal = {The National Interest},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {Spring},
   Key = {fds249751}
}


%% Chapters in Books   
@misc{fds337151,
   Author = {Cohn, L and Coletta, D and Feaver, P},
   Title = {Civil-military relations},
   Pages = {711-725},
   Booktitle = {The Oxford Handbook of International Security},
   Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {April},
   ISBN = {9780198777854},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198777854.013.48},
   Abstract = {<p>This chapter summarizes the theoretical basis for the
             study of civil–military relations and then discusses the
             military as a political actor in the United States, other
             consolidated democracies, post-communist and other formerly
             single-party states, and developing states. The maintenance
             of healthy civil–military relations depends strongly on
             the government’s overall legitimacy, which can be
             threatened by changing technology, societal fragmentation,
             or government weakness and incompetence. The domestic
             civil–military relationship can affect international
             security dynamics through its effects on domestic regime
             stability and ability to reduce ungoverned spaces, foreign
             policy decision-making, and relative military
             capability.</p>},
   Doi = {10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198777854.013.48},
   Key = {fds337151}
}

@misc{fds327013,
   Author = {Feaver, P and Inboden, W},
   Title = {Looking forward through the past: The role of history in
             bush white house national security policymaking},
   Pages = {253-280},
   Booktitle = {The Power of the Past: History and Statecraft},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   ISBN = {9780815727125},
   Key = {fds327013}
}

@misc{fds249664,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Eight Myths about American Grand Strategy},
   Booktitle = {Forging American Grand Strategy: Securing a Path Through A
             Complex Future},
   Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds249664}
}

@misc{fds304640,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Miller, C},
   Title = {Provocations on Policymakers, Casualty Aversion, and
             Post-Heroic Warfare},
   Booktitle = {Heroism and the Changing Character of War: Toward
             Post-Heroic Warfare?},
   Publisher = {Palgrave},
   Editor = {Scheipers, S},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds304640}
}

@misc{fds249659,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {“Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis: Old Lessons from
             New History.”},
   Booktitle = {Nuclear Weapons Security Crises: What Does History
             Teach?},
   Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
   Editor = {Sokolski, H and Tertrais, B},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds249659}
}

@misc{fds249660,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Biddle, S},
   Title = {"Assessing Strategic Choices in the War on
             Terror"},
   Booktitle = {How 9/11 Changed our Ways of War},
   Publisher = {Sanford University Press},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds249660}
}

@misc{fds249661,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {"Has the Obama Response to the Arab Revolutions Been
             Effective? Yes, Not Really, and Probably Too Soon to
             Tell"},
   Booktitle = {The Arab Revolutions and American Policy},
   Publisher = {Aspen Strategy Group},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds249661}
}

@misc{fds249663,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Geers, K},
   Title = {When the Urgency of Time and Circumstances Clearly Does not
             Permit: Predelegation in Nuclear and Cyber
             Scenarios},
   Booktitle = {Cyber Analogies},
   Editor = {Arquilla, J and Goldman, E},
   Year = {2013},
   Key = {fds249663}
}

@misc{fds249667,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {American Grand Strategy At the Crossroads: Leading From the
             Front, Leading From Behind, or Not Leading at
             All,”},
   Booktitle = {America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the Next
             Administration},
   Publisher = {Center for New American Security},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {May},
   Key = {fds249667}
}

@misc{fds249726,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis: Old Lessons From New
             History},
   Booktitle = {Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis},
   Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds249726}
}

@misc{fds309858,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis: Old Lessons From New
             History},
   Booktitle = {Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis},
   Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
   Year = {2012},
   Key = {fds309858}
}

@misc{fds249657,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {"Domestic Politics and the Long War"},
   Booktitle = {Lessons of the Long War},
   Publisher = {AEI},
   Editor = {Donnelly, T},
   Year = {2010},
   Key = {fds249657}
}

@misc{fds249658,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Sharp, K},
   Title = {"The Ultimate Balancing Act: Democratic Governance and
             Nuclear Policy in the United States,"},
   Booktitle = {Governing the Bomb: Civilian Control and Democratic
             Accountability of Nuclear Weapons},
   Year = {2010},
   ISBN = {978-0-19-958990-6},
   Key = {fds249658}
}

@misc{fds249665,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Lorber, E},
   Title = {Coercive Diplomacy: Evaluating the Consequences of Financial
             Sanctions},
   Booktitle = {Legatum Institute},
   Year = {2010},
   Key = {fds249665}
}

@misc{fds249655,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Inboden, W},
   Title = {“What Was the Point of SPIR? Strategic Planning in
             National Security at the White House,”},
   Booktitle = {Avoiding Trivia: The Role of Strategic Planning in American
             Foreign Policy},
   Publisher = {Brookings},
   Editor = {Drezner, D},
   Year = {2009},
   Key = {fds249655}
}

@misc{fds249656,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Seeler, E},
   Title = {Before and After Huntington: The Methodological Maturing of
             Civil-Military Studies},
   Booktitle = {American Civil-Military Relations: Realities and
             Challenges},
   Publisher = {Johns Hopkins Press},
   Year = {2009},
   Key = {fds249656}
}

@misc{fds249654,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Interagency Perspective – Lessons},
   Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2008 Unrestricted Warfare
             Symposium},
   Publisher = {The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
             Laboratory},
   Editor = {Luman, R},
   Year = {2008},
   Key = {fds249654}
}

@misc{fds249651,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Sharp, KT},
   Title = {Democratic Governance and Nuclear Policy in the United
             States},
   Booktitle = {Governing Nuclear Weapons},
   Editor = {Born, H},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds249651}
}

@misc{fds249652,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gronke, P and Filer, D},
   Title = {The Reserves and Guard: Standing in the Gap Before and After
             9/11},
   Booktitle = {The All-Volunteer Force: Thirty Years of
             Service},
   Editor = {Bicksler, BA and Gilroy, CL and Warner, JT},
   Year = {2004},
   Key = {fds249652}
}

@misc{fds249650,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Cohn, L},
   Title = {Civil-Military Relations: Challenges and
             Opportunities},
   Booktitle = {Over the Horizon: U.S. Defense Issues for the 21st
             Century},
   Publisher = {London: Brasseys},
   Editor = {Cimbala, S},
   Year = {2003},
   Key = {fds249650}
}

@misc{fds249647,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Title = {Conclusion: The Gap and What it Means for American National
             Security},
   Booktitle = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Gap Between the Military and
             American Society and What it Means for National
             Security},
   Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
   Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds249647}
}

@misc{fds249648,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Gronke, P},
   Title = {Uncertain Confidence: Civilian and Military Attitudes About
             Civil-Military Relations},
   Booktitle = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Gap Between the Military and
             American Society and What it Means for National
             Security},
   Publisher = {Cambridge},
   Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds249648}
}

@misc{fds249649,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Title = {Introduction: The Gap Between the Military and Civilian in
             the United States in Perspective},
   Booktitle = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Gap Between the Military and
             American Society and What it Means for National
             Security},
   Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
   Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
   Year = {2001},
   Key = {fds249649}
}

@misc{fds249646,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Public’s Expectations of National Security},
   Booktitle = {To Insure Domestic Tranquility, Provide for the Common
             Defense},
   Editor = {Manwaring, MG},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {October},
   Key = {fds249646}
}

@misc{fds249645,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {La Guerre de L’Information et le Controle Politique de la
             Coercition},
   Booktitle = {Les Problemes Militaires en Europe},
   Publisher = {Paris: La Decouverte},
   Editor = {Dandeker, C and Boene, B},
   Year = {1998},
   Key = {fds249645}
}

@misc{fds249644,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {El Control Civil en Pequeñas democracias: La Contribució
             de las Ciencias Politicas},
   Booktitle = {Relaciones Civico-Militares Comparadas: Entendiendo los
             Mecanismos de Control Civil en Pequeñas Democracias
             (América Latina)},
   Publisher = {San José, Fundación Arias para la Paz y el Progreso
             Hmano},
   Editor = {Casas, K},
   Year = {1997},
   Key = {fds249644}
}

@misc{fds249643,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Civil-Military Conflict and the Use of Force},
   Booktitle = {U.S. Civil-Military Relations: In Crisis or
             Transition?},
   Publisher = {Center for Strategic and International Studies},
   Editor = {Snider, D and Carlton-Carew, MA},
   Year = {1995},
   Key = {fds249643}
}

@misc{fds249642,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Use and Control of Military Power},
   Booktitle = {Teaching About International Conflict and
             Peace},
   Publisher = {SUNY Press},
   Year = {1994},
   Key = {fds249642}
}

@misc{fds249640,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Biographical chapter on Joseph S. Nye},
   Booktitle = {American Political Scientists: A Dictionary},
   Publisher = {Greenwood Press},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds249640}
}

@misc{fds303771,
   Author = {Feaver, PD and Campbell, KM},
   Title = {Rethinking Key West: Service Roles and Missions after the
             Cold War},
   Booktitle = {The American Defense Annual},
   Year = {1993},
   Key = {fds303771}
}

@misc{fds303770,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {Social Sources of Inadvertent Nuclear Use in the Former
             Soviet Union: Civil-Military Relations and the Black
             Market},
   Booktitle = {Implications of the Dissolution of the Soviet Union for
             Accidental/Inadvertent Use of Weapons of Mass
             Destruction},
   Publisher = {Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences},
   Editor = {Wedar, CA and Intriligator, M and Vares, P},
   Year = {1992},
   Key = {fds303770}
}

@misc{fds249638,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Evolution of American Nuclear Doctrine},
   Booktitle = {A Primer for the Nuclear Age},
   Publisher = {Lanham, MD: University Press of America},
   Editor = {Allison, G and al, E},
   Year = {1990},
   Key = {fds249638}
}

@misc{fds249637,
   Author = {Feaver, PD},
   Title = {The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Energy: Promise or
             Peril},
   Booktitle = {Target Earth},
   Publisher = {Pasadena, CA: Global Mapping International},
   Editor = {Jansen, FK},
   Year = {1989},
   Key = {fds249637}
}