Duke International Faculty Database
Explore the range of faculty engagement with world regions and global issues by browsing the Faculty Database System or by searching for particular keywords (major world area, country, research topic, etc).
While the Duke International website strives to provide a comprehensive listing of Duke faculty with international research interests, you may also find additional information by exploring school-specific faculty listings
Publications of Peter D. Feaver :chronological alphabetical by type listing:
%%
@article{fds373626,
Author = {Urben, HA},
Title = {Book Review: Thanks for your service: The causes and
consequences of public confidence in the U.S.
military},
Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2023},
Month = {October},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327x231204048},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327x231204048},
Key = {fds373626}
}
@book{fds372965,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Thanks for your service: The causes and consequences of
public confidence in the US military},
Pages = {1-310},
Year = {2023},
Month = {July},
ISBN = {9780197681121},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197681121.001.0001},
Abstract = {A definitive study on the decades-long run of high public
confidence in the military and why it may rest on some shaky
foundations. What explains the high levels of public
confidence in the US military and does high confidence
matter? In Thanks for Your Service, the eminent
civil-military relations scholar Peter D. Feaver addresses
this question and focuses on what it means for the military.
Proprietary survey data show that confidence is partly based
on public beliefs about the military's high competence,
adherence to high professional ethics, and a determination
to stand apart from the bitter divisions of partisan
politics. However, as Feaver argues, confidence is also
shaped by a partisan gap and by social desirability bias,
the idea that some individuals express confidence in the
military because they believe that is the socially approved
attitude to hold. Not only does Feaver help us understand
how and why the public has confidence in the military, but
he also exposes problems that policymakers need to be aware
of. Specifically, this book traces how confidence in the
institution shapes public attitudes on the use of force and
may not always reinforce best practices in democratic
civil-military relations.},
Doi = {10.1093/oso/9780197681121.001.0001},
Key = {fds372965}
}
@article{fds358761,
Author = {Feaver, P},
Title = {What Not to Worry About in the Policy–Academy Gap Debate:
A Contrarian Take},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Volume = {49},
Number = {1},
Pages = {20-25},
Year = {2023},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X211038993},
Abstract = {This assessment of the “policy-academy” gap is part of a
special forum stimulated by Michael Desch’s book, Cult of
the Irrelevant. Those who write about the academy–policy
gap worry that the gap is too narrow, resulting in ethical
compromise, or too wide, resulting in marginalization of key
academic voices. I argue both concerns are overdrawn. In
particular, I argue that there is a healthy exchange between
academic specialists and the policy community, at least as
healthy as any during a mythical golden era. Moreover,
quantitative methods are not a bogeyman exacerbating the
gap; high-quality quantitative scholarship can make
important contributions. Finally, claims that academic
realists face unfair disadvantages in contributing to policy
are not well-supported by the evidence. In truth, there is a
fairly healthy marketplace of ideas in the policy community,
at least as healthy as what prevails in the
academy.},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X211038993},
Key = {fds358761}
}
@misc{fds363992,
Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
Title = {Getting grand strategy right},
Pages = {559-574},
Booktitle = {The Oxford Handbook of Grand Strategy},
Year = {2021},
Month = {September},
ISBN = {9780198840299},
Key = {fds363992}
}
@article{fds249736,
Author = {Dunlap, C},
Title = {Civil-Military Relations},
Volume = {2},
Number = {1},
Pages = {211-241},
Publisher = {Rowman & Littlefield Publishers},
Editor = {Nelson Polsby and et. al},
Year = {2021},
ISSN = {1094-2939},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000170829800011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {Who will guard the guardians? Political scientists since
Plato have sought to answer this, the central question of
the civil-military relations subfield. Although
civil-military relations is a very broad subject,
encompassing the entire range of relationships between the
military and civilian society at every level, the field
largely focuses on the control or direction of the military
by the highest civilian authorities in nation-states. This
essay surveys political science's contribution to our
understanding of civil-military relations, providing a rough
taxonomy for cataloguing the field and discussing the recent
renaissance in the literature as well as fruitful avenues
for future research. The essay focuses on theoretical
developments, slighting (for reasons of space) the many case
studies and empirical treatments that have also made
important contributions to our knowledge.},
Doi = {10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.211},
Key = {fds249736}
}
@article{fds359541,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {A Stormy but Durable Marriage},
Journal = {FOREIGN AFFAIRS},
Volume = {100},
Number = {5},
Pages = {232-235},
Year = {2021},
Key = {fds359541}
}
@book{fds358762,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Foreword},
Pages = {vii-x},
Year = {2020},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780197535493},
Key = {fds358762}
}
@article{fds354337,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Keohane, RO},
Title = {In Memoriam Ole R. Holsti},
Journal = {PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS},
Volume = {53},
Number = {4},
Pages = {816-816},
Year = {2020},
Key = {fds354337}
}
@article{fds342820,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Brands, H and Lissner, RF and Porter,
P},
Title = {Correspondence: The establishment and U.S. grand
strategy},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {43},
Number = {4},
Pages = {197-204},
Year = {2019},
Month = {April},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_c_00347},
Doi = {10.1162/ISEC_c_00347},
Key = {fds342820}
}
@article{fds346223,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Brands, H},
Title = {The Establishment and US Grand Strategy},
Journal = {INTERNATIONAL SECURITY},
Volume = {43},
Number = {4},
Pages = {197-199},
Publisher = {MIT PRESS},
Year = {2019},
Month = {April},
Key = {fds346223}
}
@article{fds339649,
Author = {Feaver, P},
Title = {Too many leaks},
Journal = {Foreign Affairs},
Volume = {97},
Number = {6},
Pages = {199-202},
Year = {2018},
Month = {November},
Key = {fds339649}
}
@misc{fds337151,
Author = {Cohn, L and Coletta, D and Feaver, P},
Title = {Civil-military relations},
Pages = {711-725},
Booktitle = {The Oxford Handbook of International Security},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
Year = {2018},
Month = {April},
ISBN = {9780198777854},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198777854.013.48},
Abstract = {<p>This chapter summarizes the theoretical basis for the
study of civil–military relations and then discusses the
military as a political actor in the United States, other
consolidated democracies, post-communist and other formerly
single-party states, and developing states. The maintenance
of healthy civil–military relations depends strongly on
the government’s overall legitimacy, which can be
threatened by changing technology, societal fragmentation,
or government weakness and incompetence. The domestic
civil–military relationship can affect international
security dynamics through its effects on domestic regime
stability and ability to reduce ungoverned spaces, foreign
policy decision-making, and relative military
capability.</p>},
Doi = {10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198777854.013.48},
Key = {fds337151}
}
@article{fds327708,
Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
Title = {The case for Bush revisionism: Reevaluating the legacy of
America’s 43rd president},
Journal = {Journal of Strategic Studies},
Volume = {41},
Number = {1-2},
Pages = {234-274},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2018},
Month = {February},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1348944},
Abstract = {This article reassesses the foreign policy legacy of George
W. Bush in light of the emerging historical record of his
administration. We conclude that, whereas Bush’s foreign
policy was in widespread disrepute when he left office in
2009, that reputation is likely to improve–perhaps
significantly–in the coming years. We identify six
particular arguments that lend credence to an emerging
‘Bush revisionism.’ To be clear, we do not necessarily
argue that the balance sheet on Bush’s foreign policy was
positive, but the arguments presented here are likely to
generate a more sympathetic and favorable historical
assessment of Bush’s presidency over time.},
Doi = {10.1080/01402390.2017.1348944},
Key = {fds327708}
}
@article{fds331121,
Author = {Golby, J and Feaver, P and Dropp, K},
Title = {Elite Military Cues and Public Opinion About the Use of
Military Force},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Volume = {44},
Number = {1},
Pages = {44-71},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2018},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16687067},
Abstract = {Do military endorsements influence Americans’ political
and foreign policy views? We find that senior military
officers have the ability to nudge public attitudes under
certain conditions. Through a series of large, survey-based
experiments, with nearly 12,000 completed interviews from
national samples, we find that participants respond to
survey questions in predictable ways depending on whether
they have been prompted with information about the views of
senior military leaders on the very same questions. When
told that senior military leaders oppose particular
interventions abroad, public opposition to that intervention
increases; endorsements of support boost public support but
by a smaller magnitude. Subsequent causal mediation analysis
suggests that military opinion influences public opinion
primarily through its impact on a mission’s perceived
legitimacy and, to a lesser degree, it’s perceived
likelihood of success.},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X16687067},
Key = {fds331121}
}
@article{fds331122,
Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
Title = {The Case for Reassessing America's 43rd
President},
Journal = {Orbis},
Volume = {62},
Number = {1},
Pages = {76-90},
Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
Year = {2018},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2017.11.006},
Abstract = {Contemporary judgments of George W. Bush's foreign policy
were often quite harsh and polemical. In this article, we
argue that a moderate form of Bush revisionism is likely to
emerge in the coming years, as scholars take a more
dispassionate look at his achievements in global affairs and
the difficult circumstances under which his administration
labored. We offer the six most persuasive arguments in favor
of Bush revisionism; we then discuss the most reasonable
critiques of these arguments. The overall thrust of this
essay is not that Bush will someday be seen as one of
America's most successful statesmen, but simply that his
reputation should improve as partisan passions fade and new
evidence is considered.},
Doi = {10.1016/j.orbis.2017.11.006},
Key = {fds331122}
}
@article{fds326696,
Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
Title = {Was the Rise of ISIS Inevitable?},
Journal = {Survival},
Volume = {59},
Number = {3},
Pages = {7-54},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2017},
Month = {May},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1325595},
Abstract = {The most fateful American choice in the rise of ISIS was
also the oldest one: the 2003 decision to invade Iraq,
followed by the mismanagement of the occupation.},
Doi = {10.1080/00396338.2017.1325595},
Key = {fds326696}
}
@article{fds328896,
Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
Title = {Trump and terrorism: U.S. strategy after
ISIS},
Journal = {Foreign Affairs},
Volume = {96},
Number = {2},
Pages = {28-36},
Year = {2017},
Month = {March},
Key = {fds328896}
}
@article{fds321644,
Author = {Feaver, P},
Title = {Civil–Military Relations and Policy: A Sampling of a New
Wave of Scholarship},
Journal = {Journal of Strategic Studies},
Volume = {40},
Number = {1-2},
Pages = {325-342},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2017},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1254938},
Doi = {10.1080/01402390.2016.1254938},
Key = {fds321644}
}
@article{fds323680,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Resign in Protest? A Cure Worse Than Most
Diseases},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Volume = {43},
Number = {1},
Pages = {29-40},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2017},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16657321},
Abstract = {Advocates of cultivating a resignation-in-protest ethic
understate the costs and exaggerate the benefits. Military
officers who believe that the policymaking process is
heading in a bad direction already have ample recourse in
the form of advising within the chain of command. If their
advice is not heeded, it is exceedingly unlikely that the
country would be better served by senior officers provoking
a civil–military crisis to advertise their policy
differences with civilian leaders.},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X16657321},
Key = {fds323680}
}
@article{fds321645,
Author = {Brands, H and Feaver, P},
Title = {Stress-testing American grand strategy},
Journal = {Survival},
Volume = {58},
Number = {6},
Pages = {93-120},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2016},
Month = {November},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2016.1257199},
Doi = {10.1080/00396338.2016.1257199},
Key = {fds321645}
}
@misc{fds327013,
Author = {Feaver, P and Inboden, W},
Title = {Looking forward through the past: The role of history in
bush white house national security policymaking},
Pages = {253-280},
Booktitle = {The Power of the Past: History and Statecraft},
Year = {2016},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780815727125},
Key = {fds327013}
}
@article{fds325027,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Lorber, EB},
Title = {The sanctions myth},
Journal = {National Interest},
Volume = {2015},
Number = {July-August},
Year = {2015},
Month = {January},
Key = {fds325027}
}
@misc{fds224085,
Author = {P.D. Feaver},
Title = {What do Policymakers Want From Academic Experts on Nuclear
Proliferation?},
Journal = {MonkeyCage, WashingonPost.com},
Year = {2014},
Month = {July},
Key = {fds224085}
}
@misc{fds224086,
Author = {P.D. Feaver},
Title = {Penalty Box: How Sanctions Trap Policymakers},
Journal = {ForeignAffairs.com},
Year = {2014},
Month = {June},
Key = {fds224086}
}
@misc{fds249723,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Miller, C},
Title = {Provocations on policymakers, casualty aversion and
post-heroic warfare},
Pages = {145-161},
Booktitle = {Heroism and the Changing Character of War: Toward
Post-Heroic Warfare?},
Publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan UK},
Editor = {Scheipers, S},
Year = {2014},
Month = {April},
ISBN = {9781137362520},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137362537},
Doi = {10.1057/9781137362537},
Key = {fds249723}
}
@misc{fds303772,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Wasiolek, S and Crossman, A},
Title = {Guestposted a discussion on Freakonomics webpage in
connection with the second edition of Getting the Best Out
of College (http://www.freakonomics.com/2012/11/28/how-to-get-the-best-out-of-college-your-questions-answered/)},
Year = {2014},
Month = {February},
Key = {fds303772}
}
@misc{fds346868,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Proliferation theory and nonproliferation
practice},
Pages = {168-181},
Booktitle = {Twenty-First Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We
Ready?},
Year = {2014},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780714650951},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315039879-11},
Abstract = {Political science theory is policy relevant, consider two
ongoing academic debates on proliferation, the
'optimist-pessimist' debate, and the closely related
'managing proliferation' debate. The optimist-pessimist
debate concerns whether the spread of nuclear weapons leads
to greater geopolitical stability because nuclear weapons
are conducive to mutual deterrence. The second debate, how
to manage proliferation, grows out of the first and has more
interesting implications for policy makers. The
proliferation topic is particularly useful for teaching the
basics of political science methods because it is
intrinsically interesting and holds obvious prima facie
importance to students. It is something of a challenge to
convince students that they should care about the causes of
the First World War or the relative stability of bipolar
versus multipolar international systems. The
non-proliferation regime denies would-be proliferators
access to information and technology and forces them to
develop their weapons in great secrecy with minimal
testing.},
Doi = {10.4324/9781315039879-11},
Key = {fds346868}
}
@misc{fds224083,
Author = {P.D. Feaver},
Title = {Shadow Government},
Journal = {ForeignPolicy.Com},
Year = {2014},
Key = {fds224083}
}
@misc{fds309859,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Strategic Retrenchment and Renewal in the American
Experience},
Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
Year = {2014},
Key = {fds309859}
}
@misc{fds249664,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Eight Myths about American Grand Strategy},
Booktitle = {Forging American Grand Strategy: Securing a Path Through A
Complex Future},
Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
Year = {2013},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds249664}
}
@misc{fds376597,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Eight Myths about American Grand Strategy},
Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
Year = {2013},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds376597}
}
@misc{fds249712,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Golby, J and Dropp, K},
Title = {The Public Listens to Generals},
Journal = {Cleveland Plain Dealer},
Year = {2013},
Month = {April},
Key = {fds249712}
}
@misc{fds249728,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Golby, J and Dropp, K},
Title = {Listening to the Generals: How Military Advice Affects
Public Support for the Use of Force},
Publisher = {Center for New American Security},
Year = {2013},
Month = {April},
Key = {fds249728}
}
@misc{fds249711,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
Title = {Hagel and the Veteran Effect: Service Tempers Views on the
Use of Force},
Journal = {TheDailyBeast.com},
Year = {2013},
Month = {February},
Key = {fds249711}
}
@misc{fds304640,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Miller, C},
Title = {Provocations on Policymakers, Casualty Aversion, and
Post-Heroic Warfare},
Booktitle = {Heroism and the Changing Character of War: Toward
Post-Heroic Warfare?},
Publisher = {Palgrave},
Editor = {Scheipers, S},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds304640}
}
@misc{fds249659,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {“Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis: Old Lessons from
New History.”},
Booktitle = {Nuclear Weapons Security Crises: What Does History
Teach?},
Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
Editor = {Sokolski, H and Tertrais, B},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds249659}
}
@misc{fds249660,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Biddle, S},
Title = {"Assessing Strategic Choices in the War on
Terror"},
Booktitle = {How 9/11 Changed our Ways of War},
Publisher = {Sanford University Press},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds249660}
}
@misc{fds249661,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {"Has the Obama Response to the Arab Revolutions Been
Effective? Yes, Not Really, and Probably Too Soon to
Tell"},
Booktitle = {The Arab Revolutions and American Policy},
Publisher = {Aspen Strategy Group},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds249661}
}
@misc{fds249663,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Geers, K},
Title = {When the Urgency of Time and Circumstances Clearly Does not
Permit: Predelegation in Nuclear and Cyber
Scenarios},
Booktitle = {Cyber Analogies},
Editor = {Arquilla, J and Goldman, E},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds249663}
}
@misc{fds249710,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Shadow Government},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds249710}
}
@misc{fds376437,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {"Has the Obama Response to the Arab Revolutions Been
Effective? Yes, Not Really, and Probably Too Soon to
Tell"},
Publisher = {Aspen Strategy Group},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds376437}
}
@misc{fds376439,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Biddle, S},
Title = {"Assessing Strategic Choices in the War on
Terror"},
Publisher = {Sanford University Press},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds376439}
}
@misc{fds376438,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Geers, K},
Title = {When the Urgency of Time and Circumstances Clearly Does not
Permit: Predelegation in Nuclear and Cyber
Scenarios},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds376438}
}
@misc{fds376633,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {“Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis: Old Lessons from
New History.”},
Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds376633}
}
@misc{fds249709,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Golby, J and Urben, H and Dropp, K},
Title = {"Brass Politics: How Retired Military Officers are Shaping
Elections"},
Journal = {ForeignAffairs.com},
Year = {2012},
Month = {November},
Key = {fds249709}
}
@article{fds249719,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Review of Richard Betts’ American Force},
Journal = {H-Diplo/ISSF},
Year = {2012},
Month = {November},
Key = {fds249719}
}
@misc{fds249727,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Golby, J and Dropp, K},
Title = {Military Campaigns: Veterans’ Endorsements and
Presidential Elections},
Publisher = {Center for New American Security},
Year = {2012},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds249727}
}
@misc{fds249667,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {American Grand Strategy At the Crossroads: Leading From the
Front, Leading From Behind, or Not Leading at
All,”},
Booktitle = {America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the Next
Administration},
Publisher = {Center for New American Security},
Year = {2012},
Month = {May},
Key = {fds249667}
}
@misc{fds376440,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {American Grand Strategy At the Crossroads: Leading From the
Front, Leading From Behind, or Not Leading at
All,”},
Publisher = {Center for New American Security},
Year = {2012},
Month = {May},
Key = {fds376440}
}
@misc{fds249726,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis: Old Lessons From New
History},
Booktitle = {Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis},
Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds249726}
}
@book{fds249734,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Wasiolek, S and Crossman, A},
Title = {Getting the Best Out of College (revised 2nd
edition)},
Publisher = {Ten Speed Press},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds249734}
}
@article{fds249737,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {"Correspondence: Civilians, Soldiers and the Iraq Surge
Decision"},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {36},
Number = {3},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds249737}
}
@article{fds249738,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {"Epilogue: Coordinating Actors in Complex Operations and a
Third Way to Study Two Familiar Dualities"},
Journal = {Small Wars and Insurgencies},
Volume = {24},
Number = {2},
Pages = {370-372},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2012},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2013.778018},
Abstract = {The field has traditionally studied civil-military relations
in one of two domains: supreme command, where the great
questions of war and peace were decided by the top leaders,
or society, where the military institutions sought to
establish themselves in relations to the broader civilian
world. This special edition emphasizes a third domain: the
modern battlefield of complex operations. In that setting
the lines between civilian and military are even more
blurred than in traditional settings (where they were
already quite blurred), and concerns about effectiveness
cannot be ignored for the sake of the traditional focus on
control. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group,
LLC.},
Doi = {10.1080/09592318.2013.778018},
Key = {fds249738}
}
@misc{fds309858,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis: Old Lessons From New
History},
Booktitle = {Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis},
Publisher = {Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds309858}
}
@misc{fds346224,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Brands, H},
Title = {Common Fallacies and Uncommon Fixes in the American Grand
Strategy Debate},
Publisher = {RAND},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds346224}
}
@article{fds318522,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Peter D. Feaver replies},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {36},
Number = {3},
Pages = {191-199},
Publisher = {MIT PRESS},
Year = {2011},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds318522}
}
@article{fds249735,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
Title = {Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and
the use of force},
Journal = {Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and
the Use of Force},
Pages = {1-250},
Year = {2011},
Month = {October},
ISBN = {0691124272},
Abstract = {America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq
clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military
officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish
voices in government were civilians who had not served in
uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public
would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that
this civilian-military argument--which has characterized
earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is
typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has
shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new
afterword by Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi traces these
themes through the first two years of the current Iraq war,
showing how civil-military debates and concerns about
sensitivity to casualties continue to shape American foreign
policy in profound ways. © 2004 by Princeton University
Press. All Rights Reserved.},
Key = {fds249735}
}
@book{fds376441,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
Title = {Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and
the use of force},
Pages = {1-250},
Year = {2011},
Month = {October},
ISBN = {9780691124278},
Abstract = {America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq
clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military
officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish
voices in government were civilians who had not served in
uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public
would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that
this civilian-military argument--which has characterized
earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is
typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has
shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new
afterword by Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi traces these
themes through the first two years of the current Iraq war,
showing how civil-military debates and concerns about
sensitivity to casualties continue to shape American foreign
policy in profound ways.},
Key = {fds376441}
}
@article{fds249740,
Author = {Grieco, JM and Gelpi, C and Reifler, J and Feaver,
PD},
Title = {Let's Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and
American Public Support for War},
Journal = {International Studies Quarterly},
Volume = {55},
Number = {2},
Pages = {563-583},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {2011},
Month = {June},
ISSN = {0020-8833},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000291392800016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {Recent scholarship on international institutions has begun
to explore potentially powerful indirect pathways by which
international institutions may influence states' domestic
politics and thereby influence the foreign policy
preferences and strategies of state leaders. In this paper,
we provide evidence documenting the indirect impact of
institutional cues on public support for the use of force
through an analysis of individual-level survey data and a
survey-based experiment that examines support for a
hypothetical American intervention in East Timor. We find
that institutional endorsements increase support for the use
of force among members of the American public who value the
institution making the endorsement and among those who do
not have confidence in the president. These individual-level
analyses show that international institutions can affect
domestic support for military action by serving providing a
valuable "second opinion" on the proposed use of force. ©
2011 International Studies Association.},
Doi = {10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00660.x},
Key = {fds249740}
}
@article{fds249718,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Bruce Fleming’s Bridging the Military-Civilian Divide:
What Each Side Must Know about the Other—and about
Itself},
Journal = {Proceedings of the US Naval Institute},
Year = {2011},
Month = {April},
Key = {fds249718}
}
@article{fds249739,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The right to be right: Civil-military relations and the Iraq
surge decision},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {35},
Number = {4},
Pages = {87-125},
Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
Year = {2011},
Month = {Spring},
ISSN = {0162-2889},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000288849600003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1162/ISEC_a_00033},
Key = {fds249739}
}
@misc{fds249657,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {"Domestic Politics and the Long War"},
Booktitle = {Lessons of the Long War},
Publisher = {AEI},
Editor = {Donnelly, T},
Year = {2010},
Key = {fds249657}
}
@misc{fds249658,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Sharp, K},
Title = {"The Ultimate Balancing Act: Democratic Governance and
Nuclear Policy in the United States,"},
Booktitle = {Governing the Bomb: Civilian Control and Democratic
Accountability of Nuclear Weapons},
Year = {2010},
ISBN = {978-0-19-958990-6},
Key = {fds249658}
}
@misc{fds249665,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Lorber, E},
Title = {Coercive Diplomacy: Evaluating the Consequences of Financial
Sanctions},
Booktitle = {Legatum Institute},
Year = {2010},
Key = {fds249665}
}
@misc{fds376442,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Sharp, K},
Title = {"The Ultimate Balancing Act: Democratic Governance and
Nuclear Policy in the United States,"},
Year = {2010},
ISBN = {978-0-19-958990-6},
Key = {fds376442}
}
@misc{fds376443,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {"Domestic Politics and the Long War"},
Publisher = {AEI},
Year = {2010},
Key = {fds376443}
}
@misc{fds376598,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Lorber, E},
Title = {Coercive Diplomacy: Evaluating the Consequences of Financial
Sanctions},
Year = {2010},
Key = {fds376598}
}
@article{fds249742,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {In Memoriam: Samuel P. Huntington},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Volume = {35},
Number = {4},
Year = {2009},
Month = {July},
Key = {fds249742}
}
@article{fds318524,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Hehmeyer, AF},
Title = {The end of evil?},
Journal = {Foreign Policy},
Number = {172},
Pages = {12},
Year = {2009},
Month = {May},
Key = {fds318524}
}
@article{fds249741,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Competition and Compromise},
Journal = {Duke Alumni Magazine},
Year = {2009},
Month = {May},
Key = {fds249741}
}
@book{fds318525,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {Paying the human costs of war: American public opinion and
casualties in military conflicts},
Pages = {1-289},
Year = {2009},
Month = {February},
ISBN = {9780691139081},
Abstract = {From the Korean War to the current conflict in Iraq, Paying
the Human Costs of War examines the ways in which the
American public decides whether to support the use of
military force. Contrary to the conventional view, the
authors demonstrate that the public does not respond
reflexively and solely to the number of casualties in a
conflict. Instead, the book argues that the public makes
reasoned and reasonable cost-benefit calculations for their
continued support of a war based on the justifications for
it and the likelihood it will succeed, along with the costs
that have been suffered in casualties. Of these factors, the
book finds that the most important consideration for the
public is the expectation of success. If the public believes
that a mission will succeed, the public will support it even
if the costs are high. When the public does not expect the
mission to succeed, even small costs will cause the
withdrawal of support. Providing a wealth of new evidence
about American attitudes toward military conflict, Paying
the Human Costs of War offers insights into a controversial,
timely, and ongoing national discussion},
Key = {fds318525}
}
@book{fds318526,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {Paying the human costs of war: American public opinion and
casualties in military conflicts},
Year = {2009},
Month = {February},
ISBN = {9780691139029},
Abstract = {From the Korean War to the current conflict in Iraq,Paying
the Human Costs of Warexamines the ways in which the
American public decides whether to support the use of
military force. Contrary to the conventional view, the
authors demonstrate that the public does not respond
reflexively and solely to the number of casualties in a
conflict. Instead, the book argues that the public makes
reasoned and reasonable cost-benefit calculations for their
continued support of a war based on the justifications for
it and the likelihood it will succeed, along with the costs
that have been suffered in casualties. Of these factors, the
book finds that the most important consideration for the
public is the expectation of success. If the public believes
that a mission will succeed, the public will support it even
if the costs are high. When the public does not expect the
mission to succeed, even small costs will cause the
withdrawal of support.Providing a wealth of new evidence
about American attitudes toward military conflict,Paying the
Human Costs of Waroffers insights into a controversial,
timely, and ongoing national discussion. © 2009 by
Princeton University Press. All Rights Reserved.},
Key = {fds318526}
}
@article{fds318523,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Samuel P. Huntington},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Volume = {35},
Number = {4},
Pages = {625-627},
Publisher = {SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC},
Year = {2009},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X09336892},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X09336892},
Key = {fds318523}
}
@misc{fds249655,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Inboden, W},
Title = {“What Was the Point of SPIR? Strategic Planning in
National Security at the White House,”},
Booktitle = {Avoiding Trivia: The Role of Strategic Planning in American
Foreign Policy},
Publisher = {Brookings},
Editor = {Drezner, D},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds249655}
}
@misc{fds249656,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Seeler, E},
Title = {Before and After Huntington: The Methodological Maturing of
Civil-Military Studies},
Booktitle = {American Civil-Military Relations: Realities and
Challenges},
Publisher = {Johns Hopkins Press},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds249656}
}
@book{fds249733,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C and Reifler, J},
Title = {Paying the Human Costs of War},
Publisher = {Princeton},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds249733}
}
@article{fds249743,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Debating American Grand Strategy After Major
War},
Journal = {Orbis},
Volume = {53},
Number = {4},
Pages = {547-552},
Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
Year = {2009},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2009.07.009},
Doi = {10.1016/j.orbis.2009.07.009},
Key = {fds249743}
}
@misc{fds367025,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {THEORIES OF AMERICAN ATTITUDES TOWARD WARFARE},
Pages = {1-+},
Booktitle = {PAYING THE HUMAN COSTS OF WAR: AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION AND
CASUALTIES IN MILITARY CONFLICTS},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds367025}
}
@misc{fds367024,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {IRAQ THE VOTE: WAR AND THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF
2004},
Pages = {167-187},
Booktitle = {PAYING THE HUMAN COSTS OF WAR: AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION AND
CASUALTIES IN MILITARY CONFLICTS},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds367024}
}
@misc{fds373627,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {THE SOURCES AND MEANING OF SUCCESS IN
IRAQ},
Pages = {188-235},
Booktitle = {PAYING THE HUMAN COSTS OF WAR: AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION AND
CASUALTIES IN MILITARY CONFLICTS},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds373627}
}
@misc{fds373628,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDES TOWARD THE IRAQ WAR,
2003-2004},
Pages = {125-166},
Booktitle = {PAYING THE HUMAN COSTS OF WAR: AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION AND
CASUALTIES IN MILITARY CONFLICTS},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds373628}
}
@misc{fds373629,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ON ATTITUDES TOWARD MILITARY
CONFLICT},
Pages = {98-124},
Booktitle = {PAYING THE HUMAN COSTS OF WAR: AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION AND
CASUALTIES IN MILITARY CONFLICTS},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds373629}
}
@misc{fds373630,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {AMERICA'S TOLERANCE FOR CASUALTIES, 1950-2006},
Pages = {23-66},
Booktitle = {PAYING THE HUMAN COSTS OF WAR: AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION AND
CASUALTIES IN MILITARY CONFLICTS},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds373630}
}
@misc{fds373631,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {MEASURING INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDES TOWARD MILITARY
CONFLICT},
Pages = {67-97},
Booktitle = {PAYING THE HUMAN COSTS OF WAR: AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION AND
CASUALTIES IN MILITARY CONFLICTS},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds373631}
}
@misc{fds376444,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Inboden, W},
Title = {“What Was the Point of SPIR? Strategic Planning in
National Security at the White House,”},
Publisher = {Brookings},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds376444}
}
@misc{fds376445,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Seeler, E},
Title = {Before and After Huntington: The Methodological Maturing of
Civil-Military Studies},
Publisher = {Johns Hopkins Press},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds376445}
}
@article{fds325028,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Beyond the surge},
Journal = {COMMENTARY},
Volume = {126},
Number = {1},
Pages = {4-4},
Publisher = {AMER JEWISH COMMITTEE},
Year = {2008},
Month = {July},
Key = {fds325028}
}
@article{fds249744,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Rethinking Iraq: Anatomy of the surge},
Journal = {Commentary},
Volume = {125},
Number = {4},
Pages = {24-28},
Publisher = {AMER JEWISH COMMITTEE},
Year = {2008},
Month = {April},
ISSN = {0010-2601},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000254372900017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {Developing and implementing a workable strategy that can be
handed over to Bush's successor is a big challenge. Although
key developments can be made during President Bush tenure,
his actions will all be carried out on the next
administration. A new and different strategy called "surge"
emerged out of a growing recognition over 2006 that critics
were right about the existing Iraq policy that is not
working. Critics said that there is a need to push Iraqi
government officials to come together politically and to
train Iraqi troops so that they could take over from
American forces. The military leader of surge, General David
Petraeus and America's chief diplomat in Iraq Ambassador
Ryan Crocker will report their second report to Congress on
the surge and its effects. After giving the first report,
the surge has bought precious time for the United States and
the Iraqi state to progress toward to five specific
objectives: (1) wiping out the inciters of sectarian
violence; (2) building up a larger, more capable, and more
integrated Iraqi Security Force; (3) giving Iraqis the
opportunity to create means of political accommodation
locally and from the bottom up; (4) making the central top
down government in Baghdad more responsive to the nation's
18 provinces by opening projects that will improve the
economic and living conditions of the country's citizenry at
large; and (5) pushing Iraqi politicians to pass
legislations on a number of important measures. After the
implementation, the strategy has exceeded everyone's
expectations.},
Key = {fds249744}
}
@misc{fds249654,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Interagency Perspective – Lessons},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2008 Unrestricted Warfare
Symposium},
Publisher = {The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
Laboratory},
Editor = {Luman, R},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds249654}
}
@misc{fds249707,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Pentagon Funding? Bring it On},
Journal = {Foreign Policy Online},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds249707}
}
@misc{fds249708,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Why We Went Into Iraq},
Journal = {Weekly Standard},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds249708}
}
@book{fds249732,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Wasiolek, S and Crossman, A},
Title = {Getting the Best Out of College},
Publisher = {Ten Speed Press},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds249732}
}
@misc{fds376559,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Interagency Perspective – Lessons},
Publisher = {The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
Laboratory},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds376559}
}
@article{fds249749,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Reifler, J and Feaver, P},
Title = {Iraq the vote: Retrospective and prospective foreign policy
judgments on candidate choice and casualty
tolerance},
Journal = {Political Behavior},
Volume = {29},
Number = {2},
Pages = {151-174},
Publisher = {Springer Nature},
Year = {2007},
Month = {Summer},
ISSN = {0190-9320},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000246521300002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {In this article, we model the effect of foreign policy
attitudes on both vote choice and casualty tolerance, using
survey data collected during the 2004 election. We show that
prospective judgments of the likelihood of success in Iraq
and retrospective judgments of whether the war in Iraq was
right are significant determinants of both vote choice and
casualty tolerance. The prospective judgment of success is
key in predicting casualty tolerance, while retrospective
judgment of whether the war was right takes precedence in
determining vote choice. In addition, there is an important
interaction between the two variables, so the effect of one
is conditional on the value of the other. We believe this is
compelling evidence that foreign policy matters, and that it
matters in reasonable ways. © Springer Science+Business
Media, LLC 2007.},
Doi = {10.1007/s11109-007-9029-6},
Key = {fds249749}
}
@misc{fds249706,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {MoveOn’s McCarthy Moment},
Journal = {Boston Globe},
Year = {2007},
Key = {fds249706}
}
@article{fds249748,
Author = {Aldrich, JH and Gelpi, C and Feaver, P and Reifler, J and Sharp,
KT},
Title = {Foreign policy and the electoral connection},
Journal = {Annual Review of Political Science},
Volume = {9},
Number = {1},
Pages = {477-502},
Publisher = {ANNUAL REVIEWS},
Year = {2006},
Month = {July},
ISSN = {1094-2939},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000238980300022&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {Public opinion is central to representation, democratic
accountability, and decision making. Yet, the public was
long believed to be relatively uninterested in foreign
affairs, absent an immediate threat to safety and welfare.
It had become conventional to say that "voting ends at
water's edge." We start the examination of the scholarly
understanding of the role of foreign affairs in public
opinion and voting at that low point of view. Much
subsequent development saw an increasing degree of holding
and using of attitudes and beliefs about foreign affairs
among the public. Moving in parallel with developments in
political psychology, theoretical and methodological
advances led to an increasingly widely shared view that the
public holds reasonably sensible and nuanced views, that
these help shape their political behaviors, and that these,
in turn, help shape and constrain foreign policy
making.},
Doi = {10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.111605.105008},
Key = {fds249748}
}
@article{fds249745,
Author = {Coletta, D and Feaver, PD},
Title = {Civilian monitoring of U.S. military operations in the
information age},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Volume = {33},
Number = {1},
Pages = {106-126},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2006},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0095-327X},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000244173100007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {Recent research on U.S. civil-military relations has applied
principal-agent logic to analyze the post-cold war friction
between civilian authorities and top military commanders.
This article proposes a greater emphasis on bargaining to
focus on the effects of new monitoring technologies
available to the civilian principal in the information age.
As monitoring capabilities increase and military agents
perceive their autonomy disappearing, tacit bargaining over
the president's level of resource commitment to a crisis
should become more prevalent. This idea receives support
from a comparison across case studies of the limited use of
force taken from different technological eras. A new style
of civil-military bargaining presents both challenges and
opportunities to the traditional conception of military
professionalism. © 2006, Inter-University Seminar on Armed
Forces and Society. All rights reserved.},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X05282530},
Key = {fds249745}
}
@article{fds249747,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD and Reifler, J},
Title = {Success matters - Casualty sensitivity and the war in
Iraq},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {30},
Number = {3},
Pages = {7-46},
Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
Year = {2005},
Month = {Winter},
ISSN = {0162-2889},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000235412000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1162/016228805775969573},
Key = {fds249747}
}
@book{fds249731,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
Title = {Choosing Your Battles},
Series = {Paperback Edition with new afterword},
Publisher = {Princeton Press},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds249731}
}
@article{fds249746,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Narine, S and Hikotani, T},
Title = {Civilian Control and Civil-Military Gaps in the United
States, Japan, and China},
Journal = {Asian Perspective},
Volume = {29},
Number = {1},
Pages = {233-271},
Year = {2005},
Abstract = {Three questions loom large in the study of civil-military
relations, and are fruitfully asked of the United States,
Japan, and China. What accounts for the subordination of the
military to political authority? To what extent is the
military reflective of societal values? How do civilian and
military leaders think about and manage the central function
of the military, namely the use of force? We find that
despite the very different record of civil-military
relations across these three cases, models and conceptual
tools originally developed to explain American
civil-military relations do have analytical leverage over
the Japanese and Chinese cases. These tools, however, must
be modified to adjust to the cultural and historical context
of each case, and lead to different conclusions about
prevailing civil-military relations in each
setting.},
Key = {fds249746}
}
@book{fds15864,
Author = {P.D. Feaver and Christopher Gelpi},
Title = {Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and
the Use of Force},
Publisher = {Princeton: Princeton University Press},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds15864}
}
@misc{fds249651,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Sharp, KT},
Title = {Democratic Governance and Nuclear Policy in the United
States},
Booktitle = {Governing Nuclear Weapons},
Editor = {Born, H},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249651}
}
@misc{fds249652,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gronke, P and Filer, D},
Title = {The Reserves and Guard: Standing in the Gap Before and After
9/11},
Booktitle = {The All-Volunteer Force: Thirty Years of
Service},
Editor = {Bicksler, BA and Gilroy, CL and Warner, JT},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249652}
}
@misc{fds249653,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C and Cohn, L},
Title = {American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of
Force},
Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of War and American Society},
Publisher = {Sage},
Editor = {Karston, P},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249653}
}
@misc{fds249700,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Fog of WMD},
Journal = {Washington Post},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249700}
}
@misc{fds249701,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Clinton Mind-set},
Journal = {Washington Post},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249701}
}
@misc{fds249702,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Keohane, R and Buchanan, A},
Title = {Let UN Impose New Accountability},
Journal = {Newsday},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249702}
}
@misc{fds249703,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Go Negative On the Allies},
Journal = {New York Times},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249703}
}
@misc{fds249704,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C and Reifler, J},
Title = {Iraq Messages Need Honing},
Journal = {Newsday},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249704}
}
@misc{fds249705,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Whose Military Vote?},
Journal = {Washington Post},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds249705}
}
@misc{fds376446,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Sharp, KT},
Title = {Democratic Governance and Nuclear Policy in the United
States},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds376446}
}
@misc{fds376447,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gronke, P and Filer, D},
Title = {The Reserves and Guard: Standing in the Gap Before and After
9/11},
Year = {2004},
Key = {fds376447}
}
@article{fds249750,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Special Section: The Civil-Military Gap in Comparative
Perspective},
Journal = {Journal of Strategic Studies},
Year = {2003},
Month = {June},
Key = {fds249750}
}
@article{fds318527,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The civil-military gap in comparative perspective},
Journal = {Journal of Strategic Studies},
Volume = {26},
Number = {2},
Pages = {1-5},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2003},
Month = {June},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390412331302945},
Doi = {10.1080/01402390412331302945},
Key = {fds318527}
}
@misc{fds249650,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Cohn, L},
Title = {Civil-Military Relations: Challenges and
Opportunities},
Booktitle = {Over the Horizon: U.S. Defense Issues for the 21st
Century},
Publisher = {London: Brasseys},
Editor = {Cimbala, S},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249650}
}
@misc{fds249692,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Time for Another Goldwater-Nichols? Military Reform for a
New Strategic Era},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249692}
}
@misc{fds249693,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Halper, S},
Title = {Dithering Over Detainees},
Journal = {Washington Times},
Pages = {B01-B01},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249693}
}
@misc{fds249694,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Axis of Rudeness},
Journal = {Weekley Standard},
Pages = {10-11},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249694}
}
@misc{fds249695,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Body Bags Alone Won’t Dampen American Morale},
Journal = {USA Today},
Pages = {15-15},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249695}
}
@misc{fds249696,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Will the UN Really Help?},
Journal = {Washington Post},
Pages = {21-21},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249696}
}
@misc{fds249697,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Don’t Substitute Spy Services for Leadership},
Journal = {Raleigh News and Observer},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249697}
}
@misc{fds249698,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Casualties Are the First Truth of War},
Journal = {Weekly Standard},
Pages = {17-18},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249698}
}
@misc{fds249699,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Winning Back Old Europe},
Journal = {WeeklyStandard.com},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249699}
}
@article{fds249716,
Author = {Feaver, P},
Title = {The Ghosts that Haunt Another Best and Brightest Generation:
A review of David Halberstam’s War in a Time of
Peace},
Journal = {International Studies Review},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249716}
}
@article{fds249717,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Case for the Defense, a book review of Rumsfeld: A
Portrait},
Journal = {Weekly Standard},
Pages = {34-35},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249717}
}
@book{fds249730,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military
Relations},
Publisher = {Cambridge: Harvard University Press},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds249730}
}
@book{fds309860,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American
National Security},
Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds309860}
}
@misc{fds376599,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Cohn, L},
Title = {Civil-Military Relations: Challenges and
Opportunities},
Publisher = {London: Brasseys},
Year = {2003},
Key = {fds376599}
}
@article{fds249766,
Author = {Gelpi, C and Feaver, PD},
Title = {Speak softly and carry a big stick? Veterans in the
political elite and the American use of force},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Volume = {96},
Number = {4},
Pages = {779-793},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {2002},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0003-0554},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000179963200007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {Other research has shown (1) that civilians and the military
differ in their views about when and how to use military
force; (2) that the opinions of veterans track more closely
with military officers than with civilians who never served
in the military; and (3) that U.S. civil-military relations
shaped Cold War policy debates. We assess whether this
opinion gap "matters" for the actual conduct of American
foreign policy. We examine the impact of the presence of
veterans in the U.S. political elite on the propensity to
initiate and escalate militarized interstate disputes
between 1816 and 1992. As the percentage of veterans serving
in the executive branch and the legislature increases, the
probability that the United States will initiate militarized
disputes declines. Once a dispute has been initiated,
however, the higher the proportion of veterans, the greater
the level of force the United States will use in the
dispute.},
Doi = {10.1017/S000305540200045X},
Key = {fds249766}
}
@misc{fds249690,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {No More Mocking the President},
Journal = {Parliamentary Brief},
Number = {10},
Pages = {4-6},
Year = {2001},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds249690}
}
@misc{fds249691,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Allies in War, Not in Perspective},
Journal = {Washington Post},
Year = {2001},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds249691}
}
@misc{fds249687,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Cold War II},
Journal = {Weekly Standard},
Pages = {18-19},
Year = {2001},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds249687}
}
@misc{fds249688,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {To Maintain that Support, Show Us What Success
Means},
Journal = {Washington Post},
Pages = {B1-B1},
Year = {2001},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds249688}
}
@misc{fds249689,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, R},
Title = {Civilian Control to the Forefront},
Journal = {Raleigh News and Observer},
Year = {2001},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds249689}
}
@misc{fds249686,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Brits are All Right: Except for their Wobbly
Elites},
Journal = {Weekly Standard},
Year = {2001},
Month = {September},
Key = {fds249686}
}
@misc{fds249685,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {There’s a Good Reason Those Civilians Were on the
Sub},
Journal = {Wall Street Journal},
Year = {2001},
Month = {February},
Key = {fds249685}
}
@misc{fds249684,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Gore Steps on a Land Mine},
Journal = {Washington Post},
Pages = {19-19},
Year = {2001},
Month = {January},
Key = {fds249684}
}
@article{fds249771,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Title = {Overview},
Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
Volume = {27},
Number = {2},
Pages = {177-182},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2001},
Month = {Winter},
ISSN = {0095-327X},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000168057200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X0102700201},
Key = {fds249771}
}
@misc{fds249647,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Title = {Conclusion: The Gap and What it Means for American National
Security},
Booktitle = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Gap Between the Military and
American Society and What it Means for National
Security},
Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Year = {2001},
Key = {fds249647}
}
@misc{fds249648,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gronke, P},
Title = {Uncertain Confidence: Civilian and Military Attitudes About
Civil-Military Relations},
Booktitle = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Gap Between the Military and
American Society and What it Means for National
Security},
Publisher = {Cambridge},
Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Year = {2001},
Key = {fds249648}
}
@misc{fds249649,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Title = {Introduction: The Gap Between the Military and Civilian in
the United States in Perspective},
Booktitle = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Gap Between the Military and
American Society and What it Means for National
Security},
Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Year = {2001},
Key = {fds249649}
}
@misc{fds249722,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil Military Gap and American
National Security},
Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
Editor = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Year = {2001},
Key = {fds249722}
}
@misc{fds376560,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gronke, P},
Title = {Uncertain Confidence: Civilian and Military Attitudes About
Civil-Military Relations},
Publisher = {Cambridge},
Year = {2001},
Key = {fds376560}
}
@misc{fds376448,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Title = {Introduction: The Gap Between the Military and Civilian in
the United States in Perspective},
Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
Year = {2001},
Key = {fds376448}
}
@misc{fds376634,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Title = {Conclusion: The Gap and What it Means for American National
Security},
Publisher = {Cambridge: MIT Press},
Year = {2001},
Key = {fds376634}
}
@article{fds249770,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Harknett, R and Others},
Title = {The Risks of a Networked Military},
Journal = {Orbis},
Volume = {44},
Number = {1},
Year = {2000},
Month = {Winter},
Key = {fds249770}
}
@misc{fds249646,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Public’s Expectations of National Security},
Booktitle = {To Insure Domestic Tranquility, Provide for the Common
Defense},
Editor = {Manwaring, MG},
Year = {2000},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds249646}
}
@article{fds249769,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Title = {The Gap: Soldiers, Civilians and Their Mutual
Misunderstanding},
Journal = {National Interest},
Volume = {61},
Year = {2000},
Month = {Fall},
Key = {fds249769}
}
@misc{fds376600,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Public’s Expectations of National Security},
Year = {2000},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds376600}
}
@article{fds249768,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Correspondence: Is Anybody Still a Realist?},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {25},
Number = {1},
Year = {2000},
Month = {Summer},
Key = {fds249768}
}
@article{fds325029,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Hellmann, G and Schweller, RL and Taliaferro, JW and Wohlforth, WC and Legro, JW and Moravcsik, A},
Title = {Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm? (Or Was Anybody Ever a
Realist?)},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {25},
Number = {1},
Pages = {165-193},
Publisher = {MIT Press - Journals},
Year = {2000},
Month = {July},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016228800560426},
Doi = {10.1162/016228800560426},
Key = {fds325029}
}
@article{fds8446,
Author = {Michael C. Desh},
Title = {Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security
Environment},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Year = {2000},
Month = {June},
Key = {fds8446}
}
@article{fds249715,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Review of Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing
Security Environment by Michael C Desch},
Journal = {American Political Science Review},
Year = {2000},
Month = {June},
Key = {fds249715}
}
@misc{fds249683,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Malesky, E},
Title = {A Compassionate Foreign Policy?},
Journal = {Weekly Standard},
Pages = {17-20},
Year = {2000},
Key = {fds249683}
}
@article{fds325030,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kohn, RH},
Title = {Corps politics},
Journal = {NEW REPUBLIC},
Volume = {221},
Number = {25},
Pages = {6-6},
Publisher = {NEW REPUBLIC INC},
Year = {1999},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds325030}
}
@misc{fds249682,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gelpi, C},
Title = {How Many Deaths are Acceptable? A Surprising
Answer},
Journal = {Washington Post},
Pages = {B-3},
Year = {1999},
Month = {November},
Key = {fds249682}
}
@article{fds249767,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Theory-Policy Debate in Political Science and Nuclear
Proliferations},
Journal = {National Security Studies Quarterly},
Volume = {5},
Number = {3},
Year = {1999},
Month = {Summer},
Key = {fds249767}
}
@misc{fds249680,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {I Love Zhu, Zhu Love Me: Clinton’s China
Policy},
Journal = {Weekly Standard},
Pages = {27-29},
Year = {1999},
Key = {fds249680}
}
@misc{fds249681,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Gronke, P},
Title = {Don’t be Complacent about Public Confidence in the
Military},
Journal = {Contra Costa Times},
Pages = {F05-F05},
Year = {1999},
Key = {fds249681}
}
@article{fds249762,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Domestication of Foreign Policy},
Journal = {American Foreign Policy Interests},
Volume = {20},
Number = {1},
Pages = {13},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {1998},
Month = {February},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803920.1998.10391945},
Doi = {10.1080/10803920.1998.10391945},
Key = {fds249762}
}
@article{fds249763,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Crisis as shirking: An agency theory explanation of the
souring of American civil-military relations},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Volume = {24},
Number = {3},
Pages = {407-434},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {1998},
Month = {Spring},
ISSN = {0095-327X},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000074580700004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X9802400305},
Key = {fds249763}
}
@article{fds249764,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Modeling Civil-Military Relations: A Reply to Burk and
Bacevich},
Journal = {Armed Forces & Society},
Volume = {24},
Number = {4},
Pages = {595-602},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {1998},
Month = {Summer},
ISSN = {0095-327X},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000076082400008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X9802400409},
Key = {fds249764}
}
@article{fds249765,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Blowback: Information warfare and the dynamics of
coercion},
Journal = {Security Studies},
Volume = {7},
Number = {4},
Pages = {88-120},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {1998},
Month = {Summer},
ISSN = {0963-6412},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000077216600004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1080/09636419808429359},
Key = {fds249765}
}
@misc{fds249645,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {La Guerre de L’Information et le Controle Politique de la
Coercition},
Booktitle = {Les Problemes Militaires en Europe},
Publisher = {Paris: La Decouverte},
Editor = {Dandeker, C and Boene, B},
Year = {1998},
Key = {fds249645}
}
@misc{fds376449,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {La Guerre de L’Information et le Controle Politique de la
Coercition},
Publisher = {Paris: La Decouverte},
Year = {1998},
Key = {fds376449}
}
@article{fds249761,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Correspondence: 'Proliferation Pessimisim and Emerging
Nuclear Powers'},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {22},
Number = {2},
Year = {1997},
Month = {Fall},
Key = {fds249761}
}
@article{fds249760,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Neooptimists and the enduring problem of nuclear
proliferation},
Journal = {Security Studies},
Volume = {6},
Number = {4},
Pages = {93-125},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {1997},
Month = {Summer},
ISSN = {0963-6412},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1997XY04400004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1080/09636419708429323},
Key = {fds249760}
}
@misc{fds249644,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {El Control Civil en Pequeñas democracias: La Contribució
de las Ciencias Politicas},
Booktitle = {Relaciones Civico-Militares Comparadas: Entendiendo los
Mecanismos de Control Civil en Pequeñas Democracias
(América Latina)},
Publisher = {San José, Fundación Arias para la Paz y el Progreso
Hmano},
Editor = {Casas, K},
Year = {1997},
Key = {fds249644}
}
@article{fds325031,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Sagan, SD and Karl, DJ},
Title = {Proliferation Pessimism and Emerging Nuclear
Powers},
Journal = {International Security},
Volume = {22},
Number = {2},
Pages = {185-185},
Publisher = {JSTOR},
Year = {1997},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2539374},
Doi = {10.2307/2539374},
Key = {fds325031}
}
@misc{fds376450,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {El Control Civil en Pequeñas democracias: La Contribució
de las Ciencias Politicas},
Publisher = {San José, Fundación Arias para la Paz y el Progreso
Hmano},
Year = {1997},
Key = {fds376450}
}
@article{fds18806,
Author = {Terry Terriff},
Title = {The Nixon Administration and the Making of US Nuclear
Strategy},
Journal = {Journal of American History},
Year = {1996},
Month = {June},
Key = {fds18806}
}
@article{fds249714,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Review of The Nixon Administration and the Making of US
Nuclear Strategy by Terry Terriff},
Journal = {Journal of American History},
Year = {1996},
Month = {June},
Key = {fds249714}
}
@article{fds18807,
Author = {Mitchell Reiss},
Title = {Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear
Capabilities},
Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
Year = {1996},
Month = {Spring},
Key = {fds18807}
}
@article{fds249757,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Niou, EMS},
Title = {Managing nuclear proliferation: Condemn, strike, or
assist?},
Journal = {International Studies Quarterly},
Volume = {40},
Number = {2},
Pages = {209-234},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {1996},
Month = {Summer},
ISSN = {0020-8833},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996UL68300003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {The nonproliferation regime, which denies countries access
to critical materials, makes it more likely that defiant
proliferators will develop unsafe arsenals. In order to
manage proliferation, the U.S. could continue to uphold the
regime, hoping to persuade the proliferator to return to
non-nuclear status. It could attack, thereby ensuring that
the proliferator is unable to join the nuclear club. Or it
could concede the nonproliferation goal and render
assistance to address the attendant safety concerns. Through
a series of deductive models we argue that three factors are
important in determining the right option: (1) U.S.
preferences on proliferation, whether purist or pragmatist;
(2) the proliferator's type, which can vary by size,
affinity, and risk tolerance; and (3) the phase in the
proliferation process to which the proliferator has
advanced: preweaponization, after weaponization but before
deployment, the deployment phase, and, finally, full
deployment. We analyze the special case of proliferation by
a small enemy of the United States such as North Korea as a
signaling game wherein each side attempts to push the
outcome toward its own preferred equilibrium. The North
Koreans prefer the equilibrium in which the United States
never attacks regardless of its type, whereas the United
States prefers the equilibrium in which North Korea never
deploys regardless of its type.},
Doi = {10.2307/2600957},
Key = {fds249757}
}
@article{fds249759,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and
the question of civilian control},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Volume = {23},
Number = {2},
Pages = {149-178},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {1996},
Month = {Winter},
ISSN = {0095-327X},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996WK86000002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1177/0095327X9602300203},
Key = {fds249759}
}
@misc{fds249679,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Lessons From Desert Storm: Iraqi Style},
Journal = {Inter-University Seminar Newsletter},
Year = {1996},
Month = {Winter},
Key = {fds249679}
}
@article{fds249758,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {An American Crisis in Civilian Control and Civil-Military
Relations? Historical and Conceptual Roots},
Journal = {The Tocqueville Review},
Volume = {17},
Number = {1},
Year = {1996},
Key = {fds249758}
}
@article{fds303773,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Reiss, M},
Title = {Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain their Nuclear
Capabilities.},
Journal = {Political Science Quarterly},
Volume = {111},
Number = {1},
Pages = {169-169},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {1996},
ISSN = {0032-3195},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2151937},
Doi = {10.2307/2151937},
Key = {fds303773}
}
@article{fds249756,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Optimists, Pessimists, and Theories of Nuclear Proliferation
Management},
Journal = {Security Studies},
Volume = {4},
Number = {4},
Pages = {754-772},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {1995},
Month = {Summer},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636419509347602},
Doi = {10.1080/09636419509347602},
Key = {fds249756}
}
@misc{fds249643,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Civil-Military Conflict and the Use of Force},
Booktitle = {U.S. Civil-Military Relations: In Crisis or
Transition?},
Publisher = {Center for Strategic and International Studies},
Editor = {Snider, D and Carlton-Carew, MA},
Year = {1995},
Key = {fds249643}
}
@misc{fds376451,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Civil-Military Conflict and the Use of Force},
Publisher = {Center for Strategic and International Studies},
Year = {1995},
Key = {fds376451}
}
@article{fds249755,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Politics of Inadvertence},
Journal = {Security Studies},
Volume = {3},
Number = {3},
Pages = {501-508},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {1994},
Month = {Spring},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636419409347559},
Doi = {10.1080/09636419409347559},
Key = {fds249755}
}
@misc{fds249642,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Use and Control of Military Power},
Booktitle = {Teaching About International Conflict and
Peace},
Publisher = {SUNY Press},
Year = {1994},
Key = {fds249642}
}
@article{fds249713,
Author = {Green, WC and Reeves, WR},
Title = {The Soviet Military Encyclopedia},
Journal = {Armed Forces and Society},
Year = {1994},
Month = {Spring},
Key = {fds249713}
}
@misc{fds376452,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Use and Control of Military Power},
Publisher = {SUNY Press},
Year = {1994},
Key = {fds376452}
}
@article{fds249753,
Author = {FEAVER, PD},
Title = {COMMAND AND CONTROL IN EMERGING NUCLEAR NATIONS},
Journal = {INTERNATIONAL SECURITY},
Volume = {17},
Number = {3},
Pages = {160-187},
Publisher = {MIT PRESS},
Year = {1993},
Month = {December},
ISSN = {0162-2889},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1993KD21800005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Key = {fds249753}
}
@article{fds318528,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Proliferation Optimism and Theories of Nuclear
Operations},
Journal = {Security Studies},
Volume = {2},
Number = {3-4},
Pages = {159-191},
Year = {1993},
Month = {June},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636419309347523},
Doi = {10.1080/09636419309347523},
Key = {fds318528}
}
@misc{fds249640,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Biographical chapter on Joseph S. Nye},
Booktitle = {American Political Scientists: A Dictionary},
Publisher = {Greenwood Press},
Year = {1993},
Key = {fds249640}
}
@misc{fds249721,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Campbell, KM},
Title = {Rethinking Key West: Service Roles and Missions after the
Cold War},
Booktitle = {The American Defense Annual},
Year = {1993},
Key = {fds249721}
}
@article{fds249754,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Proliferation Optimism and Theories of Nulcear
Operations},
Journal = {Security Studies},
Volume = {2},
Number = {3/4},
Year = {1993},
Key = {fds249754}
}
@misc{fds303771,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Campbell, KM},
Title = {Rethinking Key West: Service Roles and Missions after the
Cold War},
Booktitle = {The American Defense Annual},
Year = {1993},
Key = {fds303771}
}
@misc{fds376453,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Biographical chapter on Joseph S. Nye},
Publisher = {Greenwood Press},
Year = {1993},
Key = {fds376453}
}
@article{fds249752,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Kling, R and Plofchan, TK},
Title = {Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice.},
Journal = {Stanford law & policy review},
Volume = {4},
Pages = {211-220},
Year = {1992},
Month = {December},
ISSN = {1044-4386},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11652652},
Key = {fds249752}
}
@misc{fds249678,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Why Sanctions Are an Iffy Remedy},
Journal = {The Christian Science Monitor},
Year = {1992},
Key = {fds249678}
}
@misc{fds249720,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Social Sources of Inadvertent Nuclear Use in the Former
Soviet Union: Civil-Military Relations and the Black
Market},
Booktitle = {Implications of the Dissolution of the Soviet Union for
Accidental/Inadvertent Use of Weapons of Mass
Destruction},
Publisher = {Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences},
Editor = {Wedar, CA and Intriligator, M and Vares, P},
Year = {1992},
Key = {fds249720}
}
@book{fds249729,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Guarding the Guardians},
Publisher = {Cornell Press},
Year = {1992},
Key = {fds249729}
}
@misc{fds303770,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Social Sources of Inadvertent Nuclear Use in the Former
Soviet Union: Civil-Military Relations and the Black
Market},
Booktitle = {Implications of the Dissolution of the Soviet Union for
Accidental/Inadvertent Use of Weapons of Mass
Destruction},
Publisher = {Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences},
Editor = {Wedar, CA and Intriligator, M and Vares, P},
Year = {1992},
Key = {fds303770}
}
@article{fds249751,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Beschel, RP},
Title = {The Churches and the War},
Journal = {The National Interest},
Year = {1991},
Month = {Spring},
Key = {fds249751}
}
@misc{fds249674,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Wayda, M},
Title = {The Risk of Letting the Warriors Run a War},
Journal = {Christian Science Monitor},
Year = {1991},
Key = {fds249674}
}
@misc{fds249675,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {What Colors Should Our Soldiers Be?},
Journal = {L.A. Times},
Year = {1991},
Key = {fds249675}
}
@misc{fds249676,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Generosity Begins Only After the Battle},
Journal = {L.A. Times},
Year = {1991},
Key = {fds249676}
}
@misc{fds249677,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Beschel, RP},
Title = {Coup’s Lessons for Central Europe},
Journal = {The Christian Science Monitor},
Year = {1991},
Key = {fds249677}
}
@misc{fds249638,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Evolution of American Nuclear Doctrine},
Booktitle = {A Primer for the Nuclear Age},
Publisher = {Lanham, M.D.: University Press of America},
Editor = {Allison, G and al, E},
Year = {1990},
Key = {fds249638}
}
@misc{fds249669,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {An Assessment of the Survivability of Unmanned Air Vehicles
Performing Target Acquisition for Battlefield Nuclear
Forces},
Publisher = {Institute for Defense Analyses, Memorandum Report,
M-533},
Year = {1990},
Key = {fds249669}
}
@misc{fds249670,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Vietnam’s Wrong Lesson in the Gulf},
Journal = {Christian Science Monitor},
Year = {1990},
Key = {fds249670}
}
@misc{fds249671,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Beschel, RP},
Title = {Problem: Scare the Iraqis You Terrorize the Home
Folks},
Journal = {L.A. Times},
Year = {1990},
Key = {fds249671}
}
@misc{fds249672,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Does Moscow Know Where Its Nukes Are?},
Journal = {L.A. Times},
Year = {1990},
Key = {fds249672}
}
@misc{fds249673,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Falkenberg, J},
Title = {Meeting Soviet Citizens’ Spiritual Needs},
Journal = {Christian Science Monitor},
Year = {1990},
Key = {fds249673}
}
@misc{fds376454,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Evolution of American Nuclear Doctrine},
Publisher = {Lanham, M.D.: University Press of America},
Year = {1990},
Key = {fds376454}
}
@misc{fds249637,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Energy: Promise or
Peril},
Booktitle = {Target Earth},
Publisher = {Pasadena, CA: Global Mapping International},
Editor = {Jansen, FK},
Year = {1989},
Key = {fds249637}
}
@book{fds249725,
Title = {Battlefield Nuclear Weapons: Issues and Options},
Publisher = {University Press of America},
Editor = {Feaver, P and Biddle, SD},
Year = {1989},
Key = {fds249725}
}
@misc{fds376601,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Energy: Promise or
Peril},
Publisher = {Pasadena, CA: Global Mapping International},
Year = {1989},
Key = {fds376601}
}
@misc{fds249668,
Author = {Feaver, PD and Stein, P},
Title = {Who Needs PALs},
Publisher = {Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute},
Year = {1988},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds249668}
}
@book{fds249724,
Author = {Feaver, PD},
Title = {Assuring Control of Nuclear Weapons: The Evolution of
Permissive Action Links},
Publisher = {Lanham, MD: University Press of America},
Editor = {Feaver, P and Stein, P},
Year = {1987},
Key = {fds249724}
}