Sanford School of Public Policy
Duke University
Publications [#301160] of Kathryn Whetten
We've launched a new site so please go to People & Research for current information on our faculty and staff.
Journal Articles
- Whetten Goldstein, K; Kulas, E; Sloan, F; Hickson, G; Entman, S. ""Compensation for Birth-Related Injury: No-Fault Programs Compared With Tort System"." Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 153.1 (1999): 41-48. [doi]
(last updated on 2026/01/20)
Abstract:
Objective
To compare compensation systems for birth-related injuries.Design
Retrospective cohort study.Setting
Florida.Participants
Parents of children with birth-related injuries who filed claims that closed before August 1, 1995, with Florida's no-fault program (Neurological Injury Compensation Act [NICA]) or who filed tort claims that closed from January 1, 1986, to August 1, 1995.Main outcome measures
Compensation for medical and income losses due to birth-related injuries.Results
Families who received tort settlements were overcompensated for the injury, considering all sources of compensation. By contrast, NICA recipients broke even. Those who did not receive tort or NICA compensation lost nearly $75000 in the first 5 years following the birth. In the subsample of families of children with cerebral palsy, overcompensation by tort claim was even greater, whereas NICA recipients were undercompensated. The cost of care for cerebral palsy in both groups was the same. The difference between tort and NICA compensation levels was attributable to payment for income loss. Overall, NICA recipients were satisfied with compensation received.Conclusions
Medical expenses were adequately covered under NICA, but not income loss. A universal health insurance program for children would not cover income losses. Similar costs incurred in NICA and tort systems suggests no rationing of care by NICA. Finally, absent some sort of targeted compensation, the losses experienced by families of children with birth-related injuries were substantial.
