Journal Articles
Abstract:
This is a reply to Geoffrey Hodgson's Comment on an earlier paper by Caldwell (Hodgson on Hayek: a critique). Though certain areas of agreement are noted, differences in interpretation concerning Hayek's views on the Malthus-Darwin relationship, on cultural evolution, on the extent to which Hayek may be characterised as an ontogenist, and on methodological individualism remain. © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2004; all rights reserved.