Header image: Architectural widgetsSociology at Duke
Navigation bar: People









  
 

Publications [#255516] of Mark Chaves

Publications

  1. Chaves, M; Gorski, PS, Religious Pluralism and Religious Participation, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 27 no. 1 (2001), pp. 261-281, ANNUAL REVIEWS, ISSN 0360-0572 [eLvHCXMwVV09C8IwEA2C4OJS0Kz-gZR8eDE3F4uDIIiCjr1LMhbE_n9MSwUd33Ic3PFuee-eEDuTibN1hOSBjDsQQHYeYW-QItp_Q9gPm7eVWKR-I-7t8dac1BwGoDpbzpbKZJA96cAcSmnPjG58bpg4UtSJMURIwbNLjsZsa9LOQrRICIEB2GzFuhtF4_0wmcuiFMtcJpzkyLqydCDF6oHN-Xm5zrD6wvo9OaDq1yALyU8LokytP66-OcE], [doi]
    (last updated on 2025/06/15)

    Abstract:
    For more than a decade, sociologists of religion have been debating the answer to a basic question: What is the relationship between religious pluralism and religious vitality?? The old wisdom was that the relationship was negative, that pluralism undermines vitality. This view has been challenged by advocates of a supply-side model of religious vitality. They argue that the relationship is positive-—that pluralism increases vitality-—and this empirical claim has become foundational to the larger project of applying economic theory to religion. We review the relevant evidence and reach a straightforward conclusion: The empirical evidence does not support the claim that religious pluralism is positively associated with religious participation in any general sense. We discuss this conclusion's theoretical implications, and we identify potentially productive directions for future research on religious pluralism, church-state relations, and religious competition.


People Graduate Program Undergraduate Program Resources Home Duke University Home