Publications [#383809] of Kyle J. Lafata

Papers Published

1. Zhao, J; Vaios, E; Wang, Y; Yang, Z; Cui, Y; Reitman, ZJ; Lafata, KJ; Fecci, P; Kirkpatrick, J; Fang Yin, F; Floyd, S; Wang, C, Dose-Incorporated Deep Ensemble Learning for Improving Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery Outcome Prediction., Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 120 no. 2 (October, 2024), pp. 603-613 [doi]
   (last updated on 2026/01/15)

   Abstract:
   PURPOSE: To develop a novel deep ensemble learning model for accurate prediction of brain metastasis (BM) local control outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 114 brain metastases (BMs) from 82 patients were evaluated, including 26 BMs that developed biopsy-confirmed local failure post-SRS. The SRS spatial dose distribution (Dmap) of each BM was registered to the planning contrast-enhanced T1 (T1-CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Axial slices of the Dmap, T1-CE, and planning target volume (PTV) segmentation (PTVseg) intersecting the BM center were extracted within a fixed field of view determined by the 60% isodose volume in Dmap. A spherical projection was implemented to transform planar image content onto a spherical surface using multiple projection centers, and the resultant T1-CE/Dmap/PTVseg projections were stacked as a 3-channel variable. Four Visual Geometry Group (VGG-19) deep encoders were used in an ensemble design, with each submodel using a different spherical projection formula as input for BM outcome prediction. In each submodel, clinical features after positional encoding were fused with VGG-19 deep features to generate logit results. The ensemble's outcome was synthesized from the 4 submodel results via logistic regression. In total, 10 model versions with random validation sample assignments were trained to study model robustness. Performance was compared with (1) a single VGG-19 encoder, (2) an ensemble with a T1-CE MRI as the sole image input after projections, and (3) an ensemble with the same image input design without clinical feature inclusion. RESULTS: The ensemble model achieved an excellent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC: 0.89 ± 0.02) with high sensitivity (0.82 ± 0.05), specificity (0.84 ± 0.11), and accuracy (0.84 ± 0.08) results. This outperformed the MRI-only VGG-19 encoder (sensitivity: 0.35 ± 0.01, AUCROC: 0.64 ± 0.08), the MRI-only deep ensemble (sensitivity: 0.60 ± 0.09, AUCROC: 0.68 ± 0.06), and the 3-channel ensemble without clinical feature fusion (sensitivity: 0.78 ± 0.08, AUCROC: 0.84 ± 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Facilitated by the spherical image projection method, a deep ensemble model incorporating Dmap and clinical variables demonstrated excellent performance in predicting BM post-SRS local failure. Our novel approach could improve other radiation therapy outcome models and warrants further evaluation.