Research Associates Database Economics Arts & Sciences Duke University |
||
HOME > Arts & Sciences > Economics > Research Associates | Search Help Login |
| Economics Research: Publications since January 2023List all publications in the database. :chronological alphabetical by author listing:%% @article{fds369683, Author = {Arbeev, KG and Bagley, O and Yashkin, AP and Duan, H and Akushevich, I and Ukraintseva, SV and Yashin, AI}, Title = {Understanding Alzheimer's disease in the context of aging: Findings from applications of stochastic process models to the Health and Retirement Study.}, Journal = {Mechanisms of Ageing and Development}, Volume = {211}, Pages = {111791}, Year = {2023}, Month = {April}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2023.111791}, Abstract = {There is growing literature on applications of biodemographic models, including stochastic process models (SPM), to studying regularities of age dynamics of biological variables in relation to aging and disease development. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is especially good candidate for SPM applications because age is a major risk factor for this heterogeneous complex trait. However, such applications are largely lacking. This paper starts filling this gap and applies SPM to data on onset of AD and longitudinal trajectories of body mass index (BMI) constructed from the Health and Retirement Study surveys and Medicare-linked data. We found that APOE e4 carriers are less robust to deviations of trajectories of BMI from the optimal levels compared to non-carriers. We also observed age-related decline in adaptive response (resilience) related to deviations of BMI from optimal levels as well as APOE- and age-dependence in other components related to variability of BMI around the mean allostatic values and accumulation of allostatic load. SPM applications thus allow revealing novel connections between age, genetic factors and longitudinal trajectories of risk factors in the context of AD and aging creating new opportunities for understanding AD development, forecasting trends in AD incidence and prevalence in populations, and studying disparities in those.}, Doi = {10.1016/j.mad.2023.111791}, Key = {fds369683} } @article{fds369841, Author = {Akushevich, I and Yashkin, A and Kovtun, M and Kravchenko, J and Arbeev, K and Yashin, AI}, Title = {Forecasting prevalence and mortality of Alzheimer's disease using the partitioning models.}, Journal = {Exp Gerontol}, Volume = {174}, Pages = {112133}, Year = {2023}, Month = {April}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2023.112133}, Abstract = {OBJECTIVES: Health forecasting is an important aspect of ensuring that the health system can effectively respond to the changing epidemiological environment. Common models for forecasting Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) are based on simplifying methodological assumptions, applied to limited population subgroups, or do not allow analysis of medical interventions. This study uses 5 %-Medicare data (1991-2017) to identify, partition, and forecast age-adjusted prevalence and incidence-based mortality of AD as well as their causal components. METHODS: The core underlying methodology is the partitioning analysis that calculates the relative impact each component has on the overall trend as well as intertemporal changes in the strength and direction of these impacts. B-spline functions estimated for all parameters of partitioning models represent the basis for projections of these parameters in future. RESULTS: Prevalence of AD is predicted to be stable between 2017 and 2028 primarily due to a decline in the prevalence of pre-AD-diagnosis stroke. Mortality, on the other hand, is predicted to increase. In all cases the resulting patterns come from a trade-off of two disadvantageous processes: increased incidence and disimproved survival. Analysis of health interventions demonstrates that the projected burden of AD differs significantly and leads to alternative policy implications. DISCUSSION: We developed a forecasting model of AD/ADRD risks that involves rigorous mathematical models and incorporation of the dynamics of important determinative risk factors for AD/ADRD risk. The applications of such models for analyses of interventions would allow for predicting future burden of AD/ADRD conditional on a specific treatment regime.}, Doi = {10.1016/j.exger.2023.112133}, Key = {fds369841} } @article{fds370816, Author = {Yashkin, AP and Gorbunova, GA and Tupler, L and Yashin, AI and Doraiswamy, M and Akushevich, I}, Title = {Differences in Risk of Alzheimer's Disease Following Later-Life Traumatic Brain Injury in Veteran and Civilian Populations.}, Journal = {The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation}, Year = {2023}, Month = {February}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/htr.0000000000000865}, Abstract = {<h4>Objective</h4>To directly compare the effect of incident age 68+ traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the risk of diagnosis of clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the general population of older adults, and between male veterans and nonveterans; to assess how this effect changes with time since TBI.<h4>Setting and participants</h4>Community-dwelling traditional Medicare beneficiaries 68 years or older from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).<h4>Design</h4>Fine-Gray models combined with inverse-probability weighting were used to identify associations between incident TBI, post-TBI duration, and TBI treatment intensity, with a diagnosis of clinical AD dementia. The study included 16 829 older adults followed over the 1991-2015 period. For analyses of veteran-specific risks, 4281 veteran males and 3093 nonveteran males were identified. Analysis of veteran females was unfeasible due to the age structure of the population. Information on occurrence(s) of TBI, and onset of AD and risk-related comorbidities was constructed from individual-level HRS-linked Medicare claim records while demographic and socioeconomic risk factors were based on the survey data.<h4>Results</h4>Later-life TBI was strongly associated with increased clinical AD risk in the full sample (pseudo-hazard ratio [HR]: 3.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.57-4.05) and in veteran/nonveteran males (HR: 5.31; CI: 3.42-7.94), especially those requiring high-intensity/duration care (HR: 1.58; CI: 1.29-1.91). Effect magnitude decreased with time following TBI (HR: 0.72: CI: 0.68-0.80).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Later-life TBI was strongly associated with increased AD risk, especially in those requiring high-intensity/duration care. Effect magnitude decreased with time following TBI. Univariate analysis showed no differences in AD risk between veterans and nonveterans, while the protective effect associated with veteran status in Fine-Gray models was largely due to differences in demographics, socioeconomics, and morbidity. Future longitudinal studies incorporating diagnostic procedures and documentation quantifying lifetime TBI events are necessary to uncover pathophysiological mediating and/or moderating mechanisms between TBI and AD.}, Doi = {10.1097/htr.0000000000000865}, Key = {fds370816} } @article{fds370204, Author = {Akushevich, I and Kravchenko, J and Yashkin, A and Doraiswamy, PM and Hill, CV and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Health Disparities Collaborative Group}, Title = {Expanding the scope of health disparities research in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Recommendations from the "Leveraging Existing Data and Analytic Methods for Health Disparities Research Related to Aging and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias" Workshop Series.}, Journal = {Alzheimer'S & Dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)}, Volume = {15}, Number = {1}, Pages = {e12415}, Year = {2023}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12415}, Abstract = {Topics discussed at the "Leveraging Existing Data and Analytic Methods for Health Disparities Research Related to Aging and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias" workshop, held by Duke University and the Alzheimer's Association with support from the National Institute on Aging, are summarized. Ways in which existing data resources paired with innovative applications of both novel and well-known methodologies can be used to identify the effects of multi-level societal, community, and individual determinants of race/ethnicity, sex, and geography-related health disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia are proposed. Current literature on the population analyses of these health disparities is summarized with a focus on identifying existing gaps in knowledge, and ways to mitigate these gaps using data/method combinations are discussed at the workshop. Substantive and methodological directions of future research capable of advancing health disparities research related to aging are formulated.}, Doi = {10.1002/dad2.12415}, Key = {fds370204} } | |
Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Economics * Faculty * Research * Staff * Master's * Ph.D. * Reload * Login |