Marxism & Society Certificate : Publications since January 2023

%% Hardt, Michael   
@article{fds373497,
   Author = {Hardt, M},
   Title = {Standpoint theory and double abolition},
   Journal = {Cultural Dynamics},
   Volume = {35},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {252-257},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09213740231206103},
   Abstract = {I read Denise Ferreira da Silva’s Unpayable Debt as an
             experiment that adopts “the wounded captive body in the
             scene of subjugation” as an epistemological standpoint.
             This situates her project in line with a tradition of
             standpoint theories that adopt, for instance, the
             proletarian or the feminist standpoint in similar ways.
             These standpoints grant us not only a superior knowledge of
             the current social order, highlighting its hierarchies, but
             also provide a political ground for seeking to abolish the
             structures of domination. Ferreira da Silva’s argument
             diverges, however, in that her standpoint does not present a
             subject to be affirmed, as do the other theories, but rather
             one that must also be abolished. In this sense, I interpret
             the aim of da Silva’s book to be a double
             abolition.},
   Doi = {10.1177/09213740231206103},
   Key = {fds373497}
}

@book{fds372961,
   Author = {Hardt, M},
   Title = {The subversive seventies},
   Pages = {1-312},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {July},
   ISBN = {9780197674659},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197674659.001.0001},
   Abstract = {The 1970s was a decade of "subversives". Faced with various
             progressive and revolutionary social movements, the forces
             of order-politicians, law enforcement, journalists, and
             conservative intellectuals-saw subversives everywhere. From
             indigenous peasant armies and gay liberation organizations,
             to anti-nuclear activists and Black liberation militants,
             subversives challenged authority, laid siege to the
             established order, and undermined time-honored ways of life.
             Every corner of the left was fertile ground for subversive
             elements, which the forces of order had to root out and
             destroy-a project they pursued with zeal and
             brutality.},
   Doi = {10.1093/oso/9780197674659.001.0001},
   Key = {fds372961}
}

@article{fds372369,
   Author = {Hardt, M},
   Title = {The Politics of Articulation and Strategic
             Multiplicities},
   Journal = {Journal of Speculative Philosophy},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {243-270},
   Publisher = {The Pennsylvania State University Press},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.37.3.0243},
   Abstract = {A prerequisite for today’s most powerful social movements
             is not only to analyze the interwoven and mutually
             constitutive nature of different structures of power but
             also to discover the means to articulate in a coherent
             organizational project diverse struggles for liberation,
             including, among others, those focused on class, race,
             sexuality, and gender. This article focuses on the ways that
             activists and theorists in the 1970s framed and addressed
             the political problematic of multiplicity and articulation.
             In some respects, one can trace back to that period the
             beginnings of contemporary practices and paradigms, but, in
             other ways, the theorizing and organizing of the 1970s were
             actually ahead of us, and our task is to catch up to those
             earlier projects for liberation.},
   Doi = {10.5325/jspecphil.37.3.0243},
   Key = {fds372369}
}