Faculty Database Political Science Arts & Sciences Duke University |
||
HOME > Arts & Sciences > Political Science > Faculty | Search Help Login |
| Publications of Genevieve Rousseliere :chronological combined listing:%% Books @book{fds355122, Author = {Rousselière, G and Elazar, Y}, Title = {Introduction: Republicanizing democracy, democratizing the republic}, Pages = {1-10}, Year = {2019}, Month = {January}, ISBN = {9781316517550}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108630153.001}, Doi = {10.1017/9781108630153.001}, Key = {fds355122} } @book{fds355121, Author = {Elazar, Y and Rousselière, G}, Title = {Republicanism and the future of democracy}, Pages = {1-298}, Year = {2019}, Month = {January}, ISBN = {9781316517550}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108630153}, Abstract = {Democracies are in crisis. Can republican theory contribute to reforming our political norms and institutions? The ʼneo-republican turn’ has seen scholars using the classical republican tradition in reconstructing and developing a vision of public life as an alternative to liberalism. This volume offers new perspectives from leading scholars on how republicanism can help transform democratic theory and respond to some of its most pressing challenges. Drawing on this recent revival of republican political thought, its chapters reflect on such issues as the republican definition of freedom as nondomination and its relation to democracy and populism, the ideal of the common good, domination in the workplace and in the family, republicanism in a globalized world, and radical republican politics. It will appeal to researchers and students in political theory, political philosophy and the history of ideas, and anyone interested in gaining greater insight into the prospects and challenges of republican democracy in today’s world.}, Doi = {10.1017/9781108630153}, Key = {fds355121} } %% Journal Articles @article{fds355368, Author = {Rousselière, G and Frank, J and McCormick, JP}, Title = {Labor Republicanism: Symposium on Alex Gourevitch’s From Slavery to the Cooperative Commonwealth: Labor and Republican Liberty in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, 2014}, Journal = {Political Theory}, Volume = {48}, Number = {4}, Pages = {496-527}, Year = {2020}, Month = {August}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591719890850}, Doi = {10.1177/0090591719890850}, Key = {fds355368} } @article{fds348534, Author = {Rousselière, G}, Title = {On political responsibility in post-revolutionary times: Kant and Constant's debate on lying}, Journal = {European Journal of Political Theory}, Volume = {17}, Number = {2}, Pages = {214-232}, Year = {2018}, Month = {April}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474885115588100}, Abstract = {In “On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy,” Kant holds the seemingly untenable position that lying is always prohibited, even if the lie is addressed to a murderer in an attempt to save the life of an innocent man. This article argues that Kant's position on lying should be placed back in its original context, namely a response to Benjamin Constant about the responsibility of individual agents toward political principles in post-revolutionary times. I show that Constant's theory of political responsibility, which sanctions the lie, is not based on expediency, but on principled realism, whereas Kant endorses a position that I describe as ‘political juridicism.’ This analysis enables us to uncover two plausible Republican theories of political responsibility in post-revolutionary times behind an apparently strictly ethical debate.}, Doi = {10.1177/1474885115588100}, Key = {fds348534} } @article{fds355369, Author = {Rousseliere, G}, Title = {Revolution and the Republic: A History of Political Thought in France Since the Eighteenth Century}, Journal = {HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT}, Volume = {34}, Number = {2}, Pages = {356-359}, Year = {2013}, Key = {fds355369} } @article{fds348535, Author = {Rousselière, G}, Title = {Rousseau on Freedom in Commercial Society}, Journal = {American Journal of Political Science}, Volume = {60}, Number = {2}, Pages = {352-363}, Year = {2016}, Month = {March}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12222}, Abstract = {Rousseau consistently declares that commercial society prevents us from being free because it makes us dependent on others and on endless desires in ways we cannot control. Yet, in Emile, Rousseau makes the surprising claim that it is possible for an elite to be free in commercial society. This possibility reveals a third way between the model of man and of citizen, that is, the model of natural man in society. I argue that it provides an original way of resisting dependence through a combination of distance from corrupt values and adaptation to the mechanisms of the economic market. Emile's ultimate function, however, is critical in addition to being practical and pedagogical. By following Emile's experiences, the reader learns the unbearably high cost of commercial society: Freedom within it is impoverished and available only to the few.}, Doi = {10.1111/ajps.12222}, Key = {fds348535} } @article{fds355367, Author = {Rousselière, G}, Title = {Rousseau's theory of value and the case of women}, Journal = {European Journal of Philosophy}, Volume = {29}, Number = {2}, Pages = {285-298}, Year = {2021}, Month = {June}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12575}, Abstract = {In Emile, Rousseau claims that the value of women ought to be determined by the opinion that men have of them. Women, contrary to commodities and men, escape what I call Rousseau's “dual theory of value.” According to the latter, the apparent value of commodities and men is determined by opinion and either unrelated or inverse to “real value,” which is assessed through objective criteria. The dual theory of value is the basis of Rousseau's critique of commercial society. However, women warrant an exception to this theory. As women's apparent worth is their real worth, women are the unique object in the world that ought to be subjected to the rule of opinion, which is the rule of commercial market that Rousseau so violently rejects. This article investigates why this is the case and locates three functions to the unique position of women in Rousseau's theory of value.}, Doi = {10.1111/ejop.12575}, Key = {fds355367} } | |
Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Political Science * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Master * Foreign Exchange * Reload * Login |