Faculty Database Political Science Arts & Sciences Duke University |
||
HOME > Arts & Sciences > Political Science > Faculty | Search Help Login |
| Publications of Livia I. Schubiger :chronological alphabetical combined listing:%% Chapters in Books @misc{fds342320, Author = {Schubiger, L and Sulmont, D}, Title = {Civil Wars and their Consequences: The Peruvian Armed Conflict in Comparative Perspective}, Booktitle = {Politics after Violence Legacies of the Shining Path Conflict in Peru}, Publisher = {University of Texas Press}, Editor = {Soifer, H and Vergara, A}, Year = {2019}, Month = {January}, ISBN = {1477317317}, Abstract = {This collection of original essays by leading international experts on Peruvian politics, society, and institutions explores the political and institutional consequences of Peru’s internal armed conflict in the long 1980s.}, Key = {fds342320} } %% Journal Articles @article{fds357318, Author = {Schubiger, LI}, Title = {State violence and wartime civilian agency: Evidence from peru}, Journal = {Journal of Politics}, Volume = {83}, Number = {4}, Pages = {1383-1398}, Year = {2021}, Month = {October}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/711720}, Abstract = {How civilians respond to political violence profoundly shapes conflict processes and the legacies of civil war. Yet influential patterns of wartime civilian agency remain strikingly unexplored. This study investigates how exposure to state violence influences the organization of ordinary citizens into civil defense forces, a common and consequential type of mobilization that is still poorly understood. I argue that state violence marked by direct and collective targeting promotes community-based armed mobilization through the mechanisms of signaling and the militarization of local governance in irregular civil war. The analysis focuses on the Peruvian armed conflict during the 1980s. Based on an instrumental variable and a difference-in-differences approach, the results suggest that communities victimized by state forces were more likely to rise up against the insurgents at later stages. These counterintuitive findings underscore the relevance and complexity of grassroots collective action during war.}, Doi = {10.1086/711720}, Key = {fds357318} } @article{fds355719, Author = {Osorio, J and Schubiger, LI and Weintraub, M}, Title = {Legacies of Resistance: Mobilization Against Organized Crime in Mexico}, Journal = {Comparative Political Studies}, Volume = {54}, Number = {9}, Pages = {1565-1596}, Year = {2021}, Month = {August}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414021989761}, Abstract = {What are the legacies of armed resistance? Why do some communities engage in armed mobilization in response to violence, disorder, and insecurity, while others under very similar conditions do not? Focusing on mobilization against organized crime in contemporary Mexico, we argue that historical experiences of armed resistance can have lasting effects on local preferences, networks, and capacities, which can facilitate armed collective action under conditions of rampant insecurity in the long run. Empirically, we study the Cristero rebellion in the early 20th century and grassroots anti-crime mobilization in Mexico during recent years. Using an instrumental variables approach, we show that communities that pushed back against state incursions almost a century earlier were more likely to rise up against organized crime in contemporary times.}, Doi = {10.1177/0010414021989761}, Key = {fds355719} } @article{fds357383, Author = {Dill, J and Schubiger, LI}, Title = {Attitudes toward the Use of Force: Instrumental Imperatives, Moral Principles, and International Law}, Journal = {American Journal of Political Science}, Volume = {65}, Number = {3}, Pages = {612-633}, Year = {2021}, Month = {July}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12635}, Abstract = {What informs ordinary citizens' attitudes toward the use of force? Previous research identifies several key concerns in public opinion toward war, but does not directly evaluate the relative importance of these considerations. We articulate three distinct logics of war support—moral, legal, and instrumental—and use an experimental survey with 3,000 U.S. respondents to test how ordinary citizens make trade-offs among multiple competing imperatives relevant for decision making in war. Our design is the first to isolate to what extent substantive legal demands, instrumental military imperatives, and specific moral principles are reflected in respondents' preferences. Although all logics have some resonance, we find that respondents' preferences are remarkably consistent with several core demands of international law even though respondents are not told that the legality of the use of force is at stake. Only the imperative to minimize U.S. military casualties overwhelms both legal and moral demands.}, Doi = {10.1111/ajps.12635}, Key = {fds357383} } @article{fds346973, Author = {Fjelde, H and Hultman, L and Schubiger, L and Cederman, LE and Hug, S and Sollenberg, M}, Title = {Introducing the Ethnic One-Sided Violence dataset}, Journal = {Conflict Management and Peace Science}, Volume = {38}, Number = {1}, Pages = {109-126}, Year = {2021}, Month = {January}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0738894219863256}, Abstract = {This article introduces the Ethnic One-Sided Violence dataset (EOSV) that provides information on the ethnic identity of civilian victims of direct and deliberate killings by state and non-state actors from 1989 to 2013. The EOSV dataset disaggregates the civilian victims in the one-sided violence dataset from the Uppsala Conflict Data Program by identifying which ethnic group they belong to, using the list of politically relevant ethnic groups from the Ethnic Power Relations data. By providing information on the ethnic targets of violence, EOSV enables researchers to explore new questions about the logic and dynamics of violence against civilians.}, Doi = {10.1177/0738894219863256}, Key = {fds346973} } @article{fds348665, Author = {Cederman, LE and Hug, S and Schubiger, LI and Villamil, F}, Title = {Civilian Victimization and Ethnic Civil War}, Journal = {Journal of Conflict Resolution}, Volume = {64}, Number = {7-8}, Pages = {1199-1225}, Year = {2020}, Month = {August}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002719898873}, Abstract = {While many studies provide insights into the causes of wartime civilian victimization, we know little about how the targeting of particular segments of the civilian population affects the onset and escalation of armed conflict. Previous research on conflict onset has been largely limited to structural variables, both theoretically and empirically. Moving beyond these static approaches, this article assesses how the state-led targeting of specific ethnic groups affects the likelihood of ethnic conflict onset and the evolution of conflicts once they break out. Relying on a new data set with global coverage that captures the ethnic identity of civilian victims of targeted violence, we find evidence that the state-led civilian victimization of particular ethnic groups increases the likelihood that the latter become involved in ethnic civil war. We also find tentative, yet more nuanced, evidence that ethnic targeting by state forces affects the escalation of ongoing conflicts.}, Doi = {10.1177/0022002719898873}, Key = {fds348665} } @article{fds338085, Author = {Steele, A and Schubiger, LI}, Title = {Democracy and civil war: The case of Colombia}, Journal = {Conflict Management and Peace Science}, Volume = {35}, Number = {6}, Pages = {587-600}, Year = {2018}, Month = {November}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0738894218787780}, Abstract = {We argue that scholarship on the Colombian civil war can fertilize the research program on political violence and democracy in two ways. First, the Colombian case demonstrates that the scholarly research agenda on electoral violence should expand to incorporate a broader focus on democratic institutions. In the context of an ongoing civil war, democratic reforms in Colombia had a substantial impact on the dynamics of wartime violence. Second, the Colombian case showcases an overlooked danger of decentralization that, if implemented under the wrong conditions, can facilitate the capture of democratic institutions by political and criminal armed groups. These insights have important implications for the study of wartime democratic governance and state-building relevant both for the peace process between the Colombian government and the FARC, and for cases beyond Colombia.}, Doi = {10.1177/0738894218787780}, Key = {fds338085} } @article{fds335631, Author = {Osorio, J and Schubiger, LI and Weintraub, M}, Title = {Disappearing dissent? Repression and state consolidation in Mexico}, Journal = {Journal of Peace Research}, Volume = {55}, Number = {2}, Pages = {252-266}, Publisher = {SAGE Publications}, Year = {2018}, Month = {March}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343318751035}, Abstract = {Does violent repression strengthen the state? In this article we explore the legacies of repression by the Mexican government on subsequent patterns of state consolidation. We investigate how a particular form of state repression, forced disappearances of alleged leftist dissidents during the ‘Dirty War’, had path-dependent consequences for different dimensions of state capacity nearly 50 years later. To do so, we rely on data gathered from suppressed Mexican human rights reports of forced disappearances which, to our knowledge, have not been analyzed by social scientists before. Controlling for a rich set of pre-disappearances covariates we find that forced disappearances are positively correlated with contemporary measures of fiscal, territorial, and bureaucratic capacity. However, historical forced disappearances do not help the state to provide security, to consolidate its monopoly over the use of force, or to provide welfare-related public goods in the long run. Moreover, disappearances are negatively correlated with various measures of trust in the government. Forced disappearances committed by the state appear to have long-term yet heterogeneous effects on state consolidation.}, Doi = {10.1177/0022343318751035}, Key = {fds335631} } @article{fds335632, Author = {Gleditsch, KS and Hug, S and Schubiger, LI and Wucherpfennig, J}, Title = {International Conventions and Nonstate Actors: Selection, Signaling, and Reputation Effects}, Journal = {Journal of Conflict Resolution}, Volume = {62}, Number = {2}, Pages = {346-380}, Publisher = {SAGE Publications}, Year = {2018}, Month = {February}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002716650924}, Abstract = {Whether international humanitarian norms are respected during and after civil conflict depends on the behavior of both governments and nonstate actors (NSAs). However, international conventions on the protection of civilians generally do not address NSAs, as such conventions are open only to the representatives of states. In a pioneering initiative, the nongovernmental organization Geneva Call has started to address this problem by soliciting NSAs to sign “deeds of commitment” to ban particular activities violating humanitarian norms. Focusing on the case of antipersonnel mines, we examine why NSAs would choose to sign conventions that limit their autonomy, and whether such conventions can change the behavior of governments and nonstate armed groups. We propose a game-theoretic model of how the interaction between governments and NSAs shape their incentives to commit to and comply with international humanitarian norms. Our empirical evidence highlights the importance of these interdependencies between governments and NSAs in the realm of humanitarian engagements.}, Doi = {10.1177/0022002716650924}, Key = {fds335632} } @article{fds335633, Author = {Schubiger, LI and Zelina, M}, Title = {Ideology in Armed Groups}, Journal = {Ps: Political Science & Politics}, Volume = {50}, Number = {4}, Pages = {948-951}, Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, Year = {2017}, Month = {October}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517001056}, Doi = {10.1017/S1049096517001056}, Key = {fds335633} } @article{fds335634, Author = {Jentzsch, C and Kalyvas, SN and Schubiger, LI}, Title = {Militias in Civil Wars}, Journal = {Journal of Conflict Resolution}, Volume = {59}, Number = {5}, Pages = {755-769}, Publisher = {SAGE Publications}, Editor = {Jentzsch, C and Kalyvas, SN and Schubiger, LI}, Year = {2015}, Month = {August}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002715576753}, Abstract = {Militias are an empirical phenomenon that has been overlooked by current research on civil war. Yet, it is a phenomenon that is crucial for understanding political violence, civil war, post-conflict politics, and authoritarianism. Militias or paramilitaries are armed groups that operate alongside regular security forces or work independently of the state to shield the local population from insurgents. We review existing uses of the term, explore the range of empirical manifestations of militias, and highlight recent findings, including those supplied by the articles in this special issue. We focus on areas where the recognition of the importance of militias challenges and complements current theories of civil war. We conclude by introducing a research agenda advocating the integrated study of militias and rebel groups.}, Doi = {10.1177/0022002715576753}, Key = {fds335634} } | |
Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Political Science * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Master * Foreign Exchange * Reload * Login |