Publications of Allison Meyer    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds351198,
   Author = {Meyer, AE and Reilly, EE and Daniel, KE and Hollon, SD and Jensen-Doss,
             A and Mennin, DS and Muroff, J and Schuler, TA and White, BA and Teachman,
             BA},
   Title = {Characterizing evidence-based practice and training resource
             barriers: A needs assessment},
   Journal = {Training and Education in Professional Psychology},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {200-208},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tep0000261},
   Abstract = {© 2019 American Psychological Association. In the last two
             decades, evidence-based practices have become increasingly
             prioritized, and yet, adoption of evidence-based practices
             and principles is still limited. It is important then to
             characterize the contextual factors that facilitate or
             impede implementation and sustainment evidence-based
             practice. We conducted a needs assessment of diverse mental
             health providers (including clinical psychologists, social
             workers, and psychiatrists) to: (a) identify the most
             commonly perceived practical barriers to incorporating
             evidence-based practices into clinical care, (b) describe
             the most valuable features of existing resources that
             support evidence-based practice, and (c) offer suggestions
             for how those features can be leveraged to decrease
             challenges associated with integrating evidence-based
             principles into clinical practice. We present the results in
             this study of N = 476 clinical educators, practitioners, and
             trainees. Practicing in an evidence-based way was identified
             as a priority by most respondents and yet respondents noted
             time, cost, and access as barriers to training in, and
             ongoing engagement with, evidence-based practice. Assessing
             needs and desired resources helps create the roadmap toward
             sustainment of evidence-based care.},
   Doi = {10.1037/tep0000261},
   Key = {fds351198}
}

@article{fds328847,
   Author = {Meyer, AE and Curry, JF},
   Title = {Pathways from anxiety to stressful events: An expansion of
             the stress generation hypothesis.},
   Journal = {Clin Psychol Rev},
   Volume = {57},
   Pages = {93-116},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.003},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.003},
   Key = {fds328847}
}

@article{fds318740,
   Author = {Curry, JF and Meyer, AE},
   Title = {Can Less Yield More? Behavioral Activation for Adolescent
             Depression},
   Journal = {Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice},
   Volume = {23},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {62-65},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12141},
   Abstract = {© 2016 Society of Clinical Psychology. The report by
             Ritschel et al. (2016) demonstrates that Behavioral
             Activation (BA) has significant promise as an effective
             intervention for adolescent major depression. At a minimum,
             confirmation of this finding in controlled trials would
             increase the available treatments for depression in young
             people. BA may also be more attractive to adolescents,
             especially younger adolescents, than models of
             cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) that place greater emphasis
             on cognitive change. A more general attraction of BA is its
             relative simplicity, in comparison with the CBT models used
             in recent major trials, all of which involved multiple
             skill-training modules. The theoretical basis of BA lends
             itself to studies of mechanisms of therapeutic change, and
             may also prove to be useful within a Research Domain
             Criteria (RDoC) framework.},
   Doi = {10.1111/cpsp.12141},
   Key = {fds318740}
}

@article{fds227224,
   Author = {Curry, J.F. and Meyer, A.E.},
   Title = {Can Less Be More? Behavioral Activation for Adolescent
             Depression.},
   Journal = {Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.},
   Year = {2016},
   Key = {fds227224}
}

@article{fds318741,
   Author = {Hommer, RE and Meyer, A and Stoddard, J and Connolly, ME and Mogg, K and Bradley, BP and Pine, DS and Leibenluft, E and Brotman,
             MA},
   Title = {Attention bias to threat faces in severe mood
             dysregulation.},
   Journal = {Depression and Anxiety},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {559-565},
   Publisher = {WILEY},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.22145},
   Abstract = {BACKGROUND:We used a dot-probe paradigm to examine attention
             bias toward threat (i.e., angry) and happy face stimuli in
             severe mood dysregulation (SMD) versus healthy comparison
             (HC) youth. The tendency to allocate attention to threat is
             well established in anxiety and other disorders of negative
             affect. SMD is characterized by the negative affect of
             irritability, and longitudinal studies suggest childhood
             irritability predicts adult anxiety and depression.
             Therefore, it is important to study pathophysiologic
             connections between irritability and anxiety disorders.
             METHODS:SMD patients (N = 74) and HC youth (N = 42)
             completed a visual probe paradigm to assess attention bias
             to emotional faces. Diagnostic interviews were conducted and
             measures of irritability and anxiety were obtained in
             patients. RESULTS:SMD youth differed from HC youth in having
             a bias toward threatening faces (P < .01). Threat bias was
             positively correlated with the severity of the SMD syndrome
             and depressive symptoms; degree of threat bias did not
             differ between SMD youth with and without co-occurring
             anxiety disorders or depression. SMD and HC youth did not
             differ in bias toward or away from happy faces.
             CONCLUSIONS:SMD youth demonstrate an attention bias toward
             threat, with greater threat bias associated with higher
             levels of SMD symptom severity. Our findings suggest that
             irritability may share a pathophysiological link with
             anxiety and depressive disorders. This finding suggests the
             value of exploring further whether attention bias
             modification treatments that are effective for anxiety are
             also helpful in the treatment of irritability.},
   Doi = {10.1002/da.22145},
   Key = {fds318741}
}