Faculty Database Psychology and Neuroscience Arts & Sciences Duke University |
||
HOME > Arts & Sciences > pn > Faculty | Search Help Login |
| Publications of Ruth S. Day :chronological alphabetical combined listing:%% Journal Articles @article{fds251674, Author = {Day, RS and Hubal, RH and Byerly, WB}, Title = {Alternative representations of side effects}, Journal = {Applied Cognitive Psychology}, Year = {2010}, ISSN = {(reviewed and under revision)}, Keywords = {alternative representations, side effects, memory, knowledge structures}, Key = {fds251674} } @article{fds251675, Author = {Hubal, RC and Day, RS}, Title = {Informed consent procedures: an experimental test using a virtual character in a dialog systems training application.}, Journal = {Journal of biomedical informatics}, Volume = {39}, Number = {5}, Pages = {532-540}, Year = {2006}, Month = {October}, ISSN = {1532-0464}, url = {http://www.elsevier.com/locate/yjbin}, Keywords = {learning-by-doing • virtual reality • human-computer interaction • informed consent • psycholinguistics • comprehension}, Abstract = {Researchers are generally trained to administer informed consent by studying approved guidelines, but still can fail to satisfactorily answer questions from potential participants. An application using a virtual character allowed novice participants to practice administering informed consent. This character was designed to behave as a potential participant for a study and asked many of the questions research participants typically ask, such as queries about the study itself, the sponsor, timing, selection procedures, confidentiality, voluntariness, benefits and risks, and contact information. The user responded to the character's queries as if speaking with a true potential research participant. The application was effective even after only brief usage. In a laboratory experiment, novice participants who practiced with the virtual character were later more effective in conducting informed consent interviews with a human interviewee than those who were trained only with written materials. Thus, simulated learning-by-doing improved informed consent skills. Implications for related health dialog applications are discussed.}, Doi = {10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.006}, Key = {fds251675} } @article{fds251672, Author = {Day, RS}, Title = {Comprehension of prescription drug information: Overview of a research program}, Journal = {AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report}, Volume = {SS-06-01}, Series = {Argumentation for Consumer Healthcare}, Pages = {24-33}, Year = {2006}, Month = {August}, url = {http://aaai.org}, Keywords = {Medical cognition • Memory • Comprehension • Prescription drugs • Benefits and risks • Argumentation}, Abstract = {Both patients and healthcare professionals must understand information about prescription drugs to help them use medications in a safe and effective manner. However drug information materials can be difficult to understand - they can be long, detailed, technical, and complex. Comprehension problems can increase the chances that ineffective treatment or medication errors will occur. This paper presents an overview of a large-scale research program on how people understand drug information, especially benefits and risks. It describes basic cognitive principles used to evaluate drug information and shows ways to make it easier to understand and use. Two key concepts underlie this work, cognitive accessibility and alternative representations. They are described and illustrated with sample experiments on comprehension of pharmacy leaflets, TV ads, medication schedules, and side effects.}, Key = {fds251672} } @article{fds251673, Author = {Hubal, R and Day, RS}, Title = {Understanding the frequency and severity of side effects: Linguistic, numeric, and visual representations}, Journal = {AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report}, Volume = {SS-06-01}, Pages = {69-75}, Year = {2006}, Month = {August}, Abstract = {Side effects for prescription drugs vary in their severity and frequency of occurrence. Understanding the status of a given drug on both these dimensions is important for physicians during the prescribing process, for regulators and industry in the approval and safety review process, and for patients in the compliance process. There is a wide variety of terms used to describe severity and frequency information in both professional information sources (such as the approved label) and patient sources (such as pharmacy leaflets). The experiments reported here examine how people understand these terms, whether laypersons interpret them in the same ways as professionals, and the consequences of providing terms in alternative linguistic, numeric, and visual forms. This work holds implications for risk communication for healthcare providers and patients, the needs of low-literacy and low-numeracy audiences, and health literacy in general. Copyright © 2006, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.}, Key = {fds251673} } @article{fds251676, Author = {Hubal, R and Day, RS}, Title = {Understanding the Frequency and Severity of Side Effects: Patients vs. Medical Experts}, Journal = {American Association of Artificial Intelligence}, Year = {2006}, Abstract = {Terminology that describes side effects, used in prescription drug information literature such as the Physicians Desk Reference and patient leaflets, includes many frequency and severity terms. Decisions made by medical professionals regarding side effects depend on their interpretations of these terms. However, decisions made by patients regarding side effects depend on their interpretations, too. In this paper we describe experiments that examine patients’ understanding of frequency and severity information and compare their understanding with information in the medical literature. We present implications for systems designed to interact directly with patients as well as healthcare workers and caregivers.}, Key = {fds251676} } @article{fds251669, Author = {Hubal, RC and Guinn, CI and Sparrow, DC and Studer, EJ and Day, RS and Visscher, WA}, Title = {A synthetic character application for informed consent}, Journal = {AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report}, Volume = {FS-04-04}, Series = {Dialogue Systems for Health Communication}, Pages = {58-63}, Publisher = {ACM Press}, Address = {New York}, Year = {2004}, Month = {December}, Abstract = {We developed an application using synthetic character technology to allow users to practice administering informed consent. The target audience for this application is health communications researchers, field interviewers, and others who administer informed consent to research participants. The synthetic character was designed to simulate a potential participant/respondent in a study who has questions about the study, including many of the queries researchers typically get from research participants. These queries include questions about the sponsor, the content of the study, how respondents were selected, confidentiality, how much time the study is expected to take, benefits and risks, and who to contact for further information. The synthetic character appears on the monitor and asks the questions audibly. The users must respond to these queries correctly, using natural spoken language. The application was developed to be easily adaptable to different projects since each project will have different specific information to impart to participants during informed consent. We describe a brief test of the application and plans for further evaluation. Copyright © 2004, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.}, Key = {fds251669} } @article{fds6093, Author = {Day, R.S.}, Title = {Cognition experiments: Optimizing patient comprehension through medicine information}, Pages = {60-176}, Booktitle = {Optimizing patient comprehension through medicine information leaflets}, Publisher = {Rockville, MD: U.S. Pharmacopeia}, Editor = {A.G. Hartzema and S. Tolleson-Rinehart and B. L. Sleath and R. S. Day}, Year = {1999}, Key = {fds6093} } @article{fds251671, Author = {Day, RS}, Title = {Alternative representations}, Journal = {Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory}, Volume = {22}, Number = {C}, Pages = {261-305}, Booktitle = {The Psychology of Learning and Motivation}, Publisher = {Elsevier}, Editor = {G.H. Bower}, Year = {1988}, Month = {January}, ISSN = {0079-7421}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60043-2}, Abstract = {This chapter presents approaches for studying a comprehensive view of the role of representation in human cognition. The most fundamental problem confronting cognitive psychology is the way to represent theoretically the knowledge of a person. A popular approach in studying representation is to have subjects perform a task and then try to determine the representation they used. This approach is often useful, especially when the task is set up to examine the contrasting theories of representation. The chapter describes alternative representations for the same information to assess the way in which different formats affect performance. The types of representational formats include lists, matrices, outlines, tree diagrams, networks, and various types of spatial and pictorial formats. Research using the alternative representations approach may provide new ways to devise and test theories about the nature of human representation. © 1988, Academic Press Inc. All rights reserved.}, Doi = {10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60043-2}, Key = {fds251671} } @article{fds6094, Author = {Day, R. S.}, Title = {Knowledge vs. knowledge structures}, Volume = {26}, Pages = {35-56}, Booktitle = {National Issues in Higher Education}, Editor = {W. A Cashin}, Year = {1987}, Key = {fds6094} } @article{fds6096, Author = {Day, R. S.}, Title = {Verbal fluency and the language-bound effect}, Pages = {57-84}, Booktitle = {Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior}, Publisher = {New York: Academic Press}, Editor = {C. J. Fillmore and D. Kempler and W. S-Y. Wang}, Year = {1979}, Key = {fds6096} } @article{fds6095, Author = {Day, R. S.}, Title = {Systematic individual differences in information processing}, Pages = {5A-5D}, Booktitle = {Psychology and Life}, Publisher = {Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman}, Editor = {P. G. Zimbardo and F. L. Ruch}, Year = {1977}, Key = {fds6095} } @article{fds251670, Author = {Blechner, MJ and Day, RS and Cutting, JE}, Title = {Processing two dimensions of nonspeech stimuli: the auditory-phonetic distinction reconsidered.}, Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance}, Volume = {2}, Number = {2}, Pages = {257-266}, Year = {1976}, Month = {May}, ISSN = {0096-1523}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.2.2.257}, Abstract = {Nonspeech stimuli were varied along two dimensions--intensity and rise time. In a series of speeded classification tasks, subjected were asked to identify the stimuli in terms of one of these dimensions. Identification time for the dimension of rise time increased when there was irrelevant variation in intensity; however, identification of intensity was unaffected by irrelevant variation in rise time. When the two dimensions varied redundantly, identification time decreased. This pattern of results is virtually identical to that obtained previously for stimuli that vary along a linguistic and a nonlinguistic dimension. The present data, taken together with those from other studies using the same stimuli, suggest that the mechanisms underlying the auditory-phonetic distinction should be reconsidered. The results are also discussed in terms of general models of multidimensional information processing.}, Doi = {10.1037//0096-1523.2.2.257}, Key = {fds251670} } @article{fds251668, Author = {Wood, CC and Day, RS}, Title = {Failure of selective attention to phonetic segments in consonant-vowel syllables}, Journal = {Perception & Psychophysics}, Volume = {17}, Number = {4}, Pages = {346-350}, Publisher = {Springer Nature}, Year = {1975}, Month = {July}, ISSN = {0031-5117}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03199344}, Abstract = {Subjects performed a two-choice speeded classification task that required selective attention to either the consonant or the vowel in synthetic consonant-vowel (CV) syllables. When required to attend selectively to the consonant, subjects could not ignore irrelevant variation in the vowel. Similarly, when required to attend selectively to the vowel, they could not ignore irrelevant variation in the consonant. These results suggest that information about an initial stop consonant and the following vowel is processed as an integral unit. © 1975 Psychonomic Society, Inc.}, Doi = {10.3758/BF03199344}, Key = {fds251668} } @article{fds251677, Author = {R.S. Day and Wood, CC and Goff, WR and Day, RS}, Title = {Auditory evoked potentials during speech perception.}, Journal = {Science (New York, N.Y.)}, Volume = {173}, Number = {4003}, Pages = {1248-1251}, Year = {1971}, Month = {September}, ISSN = {0036-8075}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.173.4003.1248}, Abstract = {Neural responses evoked by the same binaural speech signal were recorded from ten right-handed subjects during two auditory identification tasks. One task required analysis of acoustic parameters important for making a linguistic distinction, while the other task required analysis of an acoustic parameter which provides no linguistic information at the phoneme level. In the time interval between stimulus onset and the subjects' identification responses, evoked potentials from the two tasks were significantly different over the left hemisphere but identical over the right hemisphere. These results indicate that different neural events occur in the left hemisphere during analysis of linguistic versus nonlinguistic parameters of the same acoustic signal.}, Doi = {10.1126/science.173.4003.1248}, Key = {fds251677} } @article{fds251667, Author = {Horowitz, LM and Day, RS and Light, LL and White, MA}, Title = {Availability growth and latent verbal learning.}, Journal = {The Journal of general psychology}, Volume = {78}, Number = {1 st Half}, Pages = {65-83}, Year = {1968}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1968.9710420}, Doi = {10.1080/00221309.1968.9710420}, Key = {fds251667} } @article{fds251666, Author = {Horowitz, LM and Norman, SA and Day, RS}, Title = {Availability and associative symmetry.}, Journal = {Psychological review}, Volume = {73}, Number = {1}, Pages = {1-15}, Year = {1966}, Month = {January}, ISSN = {0033-295X}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0022661}, Abstract = {This paper examines the concept of availability and its theoretical role in the cognitive processes. An item's availability (AV) is operationally defined by the probability that S could recall it after a 15-sec delay. (AV seems to grow fastest when S produces it from memory. It also grows, though not as fast, when S sees the item without producing it.) This definition is used to examine the principle of associative symmetry, and evidence is presented to support it. Sources of asymmetry in natural language are examined, and the concept's theoretical implications for memory and though are discussed. (38 ref.) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1966 American Psychological Association.}, Doi = {10.1037/h0022661}, Key = {fds251666} } %% Chapters in Books @misc{fds38477, Author = {Day, R.S.}, Title = {Cognitive accessibility of drug information: Mandatory medication guides and patient package inserts}, Publisher = {Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research}, Year = {2004}, Key = {fds38477} } | |
Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Postdocs * Reload * Login |