Psychology and Neuroscience Faculty Database
Psychology and Neuroscience
Arts & Sciences
Duke University

 HOME > Arts & Sciences > pn > Faculty    Search Help Login pdf version printable version 

Publications of Marc A. Sommer    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Journal Articles   
@article{fds351254,
   Author = {Akbar, N and Yarossi, M and Martinez-Gost, M and Sommer, MA and Dannhauer, M and Rampersad, S and Brooks, D and Tunik, E and Erdoğmuş,
             D},
   Title = {Mapping Motor Cortex Stimulation to Muscle Responses: A Deep
             Neural Network Modeling Approach.},
   Journal = {The ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies
             Related to Assistive Environments : PETRA ... International
             Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive
             Environments},
   Volume = {2020},
   Pages = {15},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {June},
   ISBN = {9781450377737},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3389189.3389203},
   Abstract = {A deep neural network (DNN) that can reliably model muscle
             responses from corresponding brain stimulation has the
             potential to increase knowledge of coordinated motor control
             for numerous basic science and applied use cases. Such cases
             include the understanding of abnormal movement patterns due
             to neurological injury from stroke, and stimulation based
             interventions for neurological recovery such as paired
             associative stimulation. In this work, potential DNN models
             are explored and the one with the minimum squared errors is
             recommended for the optimal performance of the M2M-Net, a
             network that maps transcranial magnetic stimulation of the
             motor cortex to corresponding muscle responses, using: a
             finite element simulation, an empirical neural response
             profile, a convolutional autoencoder, a separate deep
             network mapper, and recordings of multi-muscle activation.
             We discuss the rationale behind the different modeling
             approaches and architectures, and contrast their results.
             Additionally, to obtain a comparative insight of the trade-o
             between complexity and performance analysis, we explore
             different techniques, including the extension of two
             classical information criteria for M2M-Net. Finally, we find
             that the model analogous to mapping the motor cortex
             stimulation to a combination of direct and synergistic
             connection to the muscles performs the best, when the neural
             response profile is used at the input.},
   Doi = {10.1145/3389189.3389203},
   Key = {fds351254}
}

@article{fds349697,
   Author = {Yeung, AH-F and Subramanian, D and Desai, AD and Soltanian-Zadeh, S and Roy, A and Vajzovic, L and Sommer, M and Farsiu, S},
   Title = {Spatio-temporal image modulation for enhancing the quality
             of vision with potential application in patients with
             retinal prostheses},
   Journal = {INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE},
   Volume = {60},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {3 pages},
   Publisher = {ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {July},
   Key = {fds349697}
}

@article{fds343771,
   Author = {Yarossi, M and Quivira, F and Dannhauer, M and Sommer, MA and Brooks,
             DH and Erdoǧmuş, D and Tunik, E},
   Title = {An experimental and computational framework for modeling
             multi-muscle responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation
             of the human motor cortex},
   Journal = {International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering,
             NER},
   Volume = {2019-March},
   Pages = {1122-1125},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {May},
   ISBN = {9781538679210},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NER.2019.8717159},
   Abstract = {Current knowledge of coordinated motor control of multiple
             muscles is derived primarily from invasive
             stimulation-recording techniques in animal models. Similar
             studies are not generally feasible in humans, so a modeling
             framework is needed to facilitate knowledge transfer from
             animal studies. We describe such a framework that uses a
             deep neural network model to map finite element simulation
             of transcranial magnetic stimulation induced electric fields
             (E-fields) in motor cortex to recordings of multi-muscle
             activation. Critically, we show that model generalization is
             improved when we incorporate empirically derived
             physiological models for E-field to neuron firing rate and
             low-dimensional control via muscle synergies.},
   Doi = {10.1109/NER.2019.8717159},
   Key = {fds343771}
}

@article{fds338442,
   Author = {Clements, JM and Kopper, R and Zielinski, DJ and Rao, H and Sommer, MA and Kirsch, E and Mainsah, BO and Collins, LM and Appelbaum,
             LG},
   Title = {Neurophysiology of Visual-Motor Learning during a Simulated
             Marksmanship Task in Immersive Virtual Reality},
   Journal = {25th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User
             Interfaces, VR 2018 - Proceedings},
   Pages = {451-458},
   Publisher = {IEEE},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {August},
   ISBN = {9781538633656},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446068},
   Abstract = {Immersive virtual reality (VR) systems offer flexible
             control of an interactive environment, along with precise
             position and orientation tracking of realistic movements.
             Immersive VR can also be used in conjunction with
             neurophysiological monitoring techniques, such as
             electroencephalography (EEG), to record neural activity as
             users perform complex tasks. As such, the fusion of VR,
             kinematic tracking, and EEG offers a powerful testbed for
             naturalistic neuroscience research. In this study, we
             combine these elements to investigate the cognitive and
             neural mechanisms that underlie motor skill learning during
             a multi-day simulated marksmanship training regimen
             conducted with 20 participants. On each of 3 days,
             participants performed 8 blocks of 60 trials in which a
             simulated clay pigeon was launched from behind a trap house.
             Participants attempted to shoot the moving target with a
             firearm game controller, receiving immediate positional
             feedback and running scores after each shot. Over the course
             of the 3 days that individuals practiced this protocol, shot
             accuracy and precision improved significantly while reaction
             times got significantly faster. Furthermore, results
             demonstrate that more negative EEG amplitudes produced over
             the visual cortices correlate with better shooting
             performance measured by accuracy, reaction times, and
             response times, indicating that early visual system
             plasticity underlies behavioral learning in this task. These
             findings point towards a naturalistic neuroscience approach
             that can be used to identify neural markers of marksmanship
             performance.},
   Doi = {10.1109/VR.2018.8446068},
   Key = {fds338442}
}


%% Book Chapters   
@misc{fds334788,
   Author = {Abzug, ZM and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Supplementary Eye Fields},
   Booktitle = {Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral
             Psychology},
   Publisher = {Elevier},
   Year = {2017},
   ISBN = {9780128093245},
   Abstract = {The supplementary eye fields (SEFs) are located in
             dorsomedial frontal cortex and contribute to high-level
             control of eye movements. Recordings in the SEF reveal
             neural activity related to vision, saccades, and fixations,
             and electrical stimulation in the SEF evokes saccades and
             fixations. Inactivations and lesions of the SEF, however,
             cause minimal oculomotor deficits. The SEF thus processes
             information relevant to eye movements and influences
             critical oculomotor centers but seems unnecessary for
             generating action. Instead, the SEF has overarching, subtle
             functions that include limb-eye coordination, the timing and
             sequencing of actions, learning, monitoring conflict,
             prediction, supervising behavior, value-based decision
             making, and the monitoring of decisions.},
   Key = {fds334788}
}

@misc{fds334803,
   Author = {Middlebrooks, PG and Abzug, Z and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Studying metacognitive processes at the single-neuron
             level},
   Pages = {225-244},
   Booktitle = {The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition},
   Publisher = {Springer},
   Editor = {Fleming, SM and Frith, CD},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {June},
   ISBN = {978-3-642-45189-8},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_10},
   Abstract = {Over the past few decades, strides have been made toward
             understanding how higher level cognitive processes are
             mediated by neuronal spiking activity. Neuronal correlates
             of functions such as attention, executive control, working
             memory, decision-making, and reward processing have all been
             elucidated, to an impressive level of detail, at the single
             cell and circuit levels.},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_10},
   Key = {fds334803}
}

@misc{fds334802,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {The Dialogue between Cerebral Cortex and Superior
             Colliculus: Multiple Ascending Pathways for Corollary
             Discharge},
   Volume = {TBD},
   Pages = {TBD},
   Booktitle = {The New Visual Neurosciences},
   Publisher = {MIT Press},
   Address = {Cambridge, Massachusetts},
   Editor = {Leo M. Chalupa and Jack S. Werner},
   Year = {2014},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerWurtz-NewVisNeurosci-InPress.pdf},
   Key = {fds334802}
}

@misc{fds334824,
   Author = {Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Supplementary eye fields},
   Pages = {635-643},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Neuroscience},
   Publisher = {Academic Press},
   Address = {Oxford},
   Editor = {Squire, LR},
   Year = {2009},
   ISBN = {978-0-08-045046-9},
   url = {https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27738651/Publications/Sommer2009-SEFreview-EncyclOfNeurosci.pdf},
   Abstract = {The supplementary eye fields (SEFs) are located in
             dorsomedial frontal cortex and contribute to high-level
             control of eye movements. Recordings in the SEF reveal
             visual-, saccade-, and fixation-related activity, and
             stimulations in the SEF evoke saccades and fixations.
             Inactivations and lesions of the SEF, however, cause minimal
             oculomotor deficits. The SEF thus processes information
             relevant to eye movements and influences critical oculomotor
             centers but seems unnecessary for generating action.
             Instead, the SEF has overarching, subtle functions that
             include representing space in multiple ways, supervising
             behavior, monitoring conflict, prediction, learning,
             planning sequences, and coordination of the limbs and eyes.
             © 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/B978-008045046-9.01122-0},
   Key = {fds334824}
}

@misc{fds334820,
   Author = {Crapse, TB and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Corollary Discharge},
   Pages = {325-327},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Perception},
   Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
   Editor = {Goldstein, RB},
   Year = {2009},
   ISBN = {9781412940818},
   Key = {fds334820}
}

@misc{fds334821,
   Author = {Shin, SY and Crapse, TB and Mayo, JP and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Visuomotor Integration},
   Pages = {4354-4359},
   Booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Neuroscience},
   Publisher = {Springer},
   Editor = {Binder, MD and Hirokawa, N and Windhorst, U},
   Year = {2009},
   ISBN = {978-3-540-23735-8},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_6384},
   Doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_6384},
   Key = {fds334821}
}

@misc{fds334822,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {Single Neurons and Primate Behavior},
   Pages = {123-139},
   Booktitle = {Methods in Mind},
   Publisher = {MIT Press},
   Editor = {Senior, C and Russell, T and Gazzaniga, M},
   Year = {2009},
   ISBN = {9780262513432},
   Key = {fds334822}
}

@misc{fds207861,
   Author = {Wurtz, Robert H. and Sommer, Marc A.},
   Title = {Single Neurons and Primate Behavior},
   Pages = {123-139},
   Booktitle = {Methods in Mind},
   Publisher = {MIT Press},
   Address = {Cambridge, Massachusetts},
   Editor = {Carl Senior and Tamara Russell and Michael S.
             Gazzaniga},
   Year = {2006},
   ISBN = {978-0262195416},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/WurtzSommer_MethodsInMind2006.pdf},
   Abstract = {Understanding the brain mechanisms mediating cognitive
             behavior requires combining two experimental steps. First,
             the brain must actually be engaged in the cognitive behavior
             under study. Second, the brain activity must be measured
             during this behavior and the recording sufficiently
             described to permit replication of the experiment. There are
             a number of ways of meeting the second prerequisite, many
             discussed elsewhere in this volume; our chapter will address
             one with unsurpassed spatial and temporal resolution: the
             recording of the action potentials of single neurons.
             Recording single neurons in the brain is a mature technique
             that has been used extensively for over a quarter century.
             In outlining the technique requirements and comparing them
             to those of other techniques, we will focus on what has
             become a cornerstone for the study of brain mechanisms
             underlying cognitive behavior: single-neuron recording from
             awake monkeys trained on behavioral tasks. Our description
             and comments are based on our own experience in studying
             awake monkeys; we also provide references on specific
             technical points not addressed in this chapter.},
   Key = {fds207861}
}

@misc{fds207859,
   Author = {Sommer, Marc A. and Wurtz, Robert H.},
   Title = {The Dialogue between Cerebral Cortex and Superior
             Colliculus: Implications for Saccadic Target Selection and
             Corollary Discharge.},
   Volume = {2},
   Pages = {1466-1484},
   Booktitle = {The Visual Neurosciences},
   Publisher = {MIT Press},
   Address = {Cambridge, Massachusetts},
   Editor = {Leo M. Chalupa and Jack S. Werner},
   Year = {2004},
   ISBN = {978-0-262-03308-4},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerWurtz_TheVisualNeurosciences2004.pdf},
   Key = {fds207859}
}

@misc{fds349698,
   Author = {Wurtz, RH and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Identifying corollary discharges for movement in the primate
             brain},
   Pages = {47-60},
   Booktitle = {Progress in Brain Research},
   Publisher = {Elsevier},
   Year = {2004},
   ISBN = {9780444509789},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(03)14403-2},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0079-6123(03)14403-2},
   Key = {fds349698}
}

@misc{fds334846,
   Author = {Wurtz, RH and Basso, MA and Paré, M and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {The Superior Colliculus and the Cognitive Control of
             Movement},
   Pages = {573-587},
   Booktitle = {The New Cognitive Neurosciences},
   Publisher = {MIT Press},
   Editor = {Gazzaniga, MS},
   Year = {2000},
   ISBN = {9780262071956},
   Key = {fds334846}
}

@misc{fds334859,
   Author = {Smith, MA and Sadler, RH and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {The Macrophage as the Demyelinative Agent: A Role for
             Antimyelin Antibodies},
   Pages = {51-66},
   Booktitle = {Multiple Sclerosis: Current Status of Research and
             Treatment},
   Publisher = {Demos Publications},
   Editor = {Herndon, RM and Seil, FJ},
   Year = {1994},
   ISBN = {9780939957286},
   Key = {fds334859}
}


%% Papers Published   
@article{fds371675,
   Author = {Subramanian, D and Pearson, JM and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Bayesian and Discriminative Models for Active Visual
             Perception across Saccades.},
   Journal = {eNeuro},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {ENEURO.0403-ENEU22.2023},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0403-22.2023},
   Abstract = {The brain interprets sensory inputs to guide behavior, but
             behavior itself disrupts sensory inputs. Perceiving a
             coherent world while acting in it constitutes active
             perception. For example, saccadic eye movements displace
             visual images on the retina and yet the brain perceives
             visual stability. Because this percept of visual stability
             has been shown to be influenced by prior expectations, we
             tested the hypothesis that it is Bayesian. The key
             prediction was that priors would be used more as sensory
             uncertainty increases. Humans and rhesus macaques reported
             whether an image moved during saccades. We manipulated both
             prior expectations and levels of sensory uncertainty. All
             psychophysical data were compared with the predictions of
             Bayesian ideal observer models. We found that humans were
             Bayesian for continuous judgments. For categorical
             judgments, however, they were anti-Bayesian: they used their
             priors less with greater uncertainty. We studied this
             categorical result further in macaques. The animals'
             judgments were similarly anti-Bayesian for sensory
             uncertainty caused by external, image noise, but Bayesian
             for uncertainty due to internal, motor-driven noise. A
             discriminative learning model explained the anti-Bayesian
             effects. We conclude that active vision uses both Bayesian
             and discriminative models depending on task requirements
             (continuous vs categorical) and the source of uncertainty
             (image noise vs motor-driven noise). In the context of
             previous knowledge about the saccadic system, our results
             provide an example of how the comparative analysis of
             Bayesian versus non-Bayesian models of perception offers
             novel insights into underlying neural organization.},
   Doi = {10.1523/ENEURO.0403-22.2023},
   Key = {fds371675}
}

@article{fds369379,
   Author = {Daw, TB and El-Nahal, HG and Basso, MA and Jun, EJ and Bautista, AR and Samulski, RJ and Sommer, MA and Bohlen, MO},
   Title = {Direct Comparison of Epifluorescence and Immunostaining for
             Assessing Viral Mediated Gene Expression in the Primate
             Brain.},
   Journal = {Human gene therapy},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {5-6},
   Pages = {228-246},
   Year = {2023},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hum.2022.194},
   Abstract = {Viral vector technologies are commonly used in neuroscience
             research to understand and manipulate neural circuits, but
             successful applications of these technologies in non-human
             primate models have been inconsistent. An essential
             component to improve these technologies is an impartial and
             accurate assessment of the effectiveness of different viral
             constructs in the primate brain. We tested a diverse array
             of viral vectors delivered to the brain and extraocular
             muscles of macaques and compared three methods for
             histological assessment of viral-mediated fluorescent
             transgene expression: epifluorescence (Epi),
             immunofluorescence (IF), and immunohistochemistry (IHC).
             Importantly, IF and IHC identified a greater number of
             transduced neurons compared to Epi. Furthermore, IF and IHC
             reliably provided enhanced visualization of transgene in
             most cellular compartments (<i>i.e.</i>, dendritic, axonal,
             and terminal fields), whereas the degree of labeling
             provided by Epi was inconsistent and predominantly
             restricted to somas and apical dendrites. Because Epi
             signals are unamplified (in contrast to IF and IHC), Epi may
             provide a more veridical assessment for the amount of
             accumulated transgene and, thus, the potential to
             chemogenetically or optogenetically manipulate neuronal
             activity. The comparatively weak Epi signals suggest that
             the current generations of viral constructs, regardless of
             delivered transgene, are not optimized for primates. This
             reinforces an emerging viewpoint that viral vectors tailored
             for the primate brain are necessary for basic research and
             human gene therapy.},
   Doi = {10.1089/hum.2022.194},
   Key = {fds369379}
}

@article{fds363007,
   Author = {Goetz, SM and Howell, B and Wang, B and Li, Z and Sommer, MA and Peterchev,
             AV and Grill, WM},
   Title = {Isolating two sources of variability of subcortical
             stimulation to quantify fluctuations of corticospinal tract
             excitability.},
   Journal = {Clin Neurophysiol},
   Volume = {138},
   Pages = {134-142},
   Year = {2022},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2022.02.009},
   Abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Investigate the variability previously found with
             cortical stimulation and handheld transcranial magnetic
             stimulation (TMS) coils, criticized for its high potential
             of coil position fluctuations, bypassing the cortex using
             deep brain electrical stimulation (DBS) of the corticospinal
             tract with fixed electrodes where both latent variations of
             the coil position of TMS are eliminated and cortical
             excitation fluctuations should be absent. METHODS: Ten
             input-output curves were recorded from five anesthetized
             cats with implanted DBS electrodes targeting the
             corticospinal tract. Goodness of fit of regressions with a
             conventional single variability source as well as a dual
             variability source model was quantified using a Schwarz
             Bayesian Information approach to avoid overfitting. RESULTS:
             Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) through DBS of the
             corticospinal tract revealed short-term fluctuations in
             excitability of the targeted neuron pathway reflecting
             endogenous input-side variability at similar magnitude as
             TMS despite bypassing cortical networks. CONCLUSION:
             Input-side variability, i.e., variability resulting in
             changing MEP amplitudes as if the stimulation strength was
             modulated, also emerges in electrical stimulation at a
             similar degree and is not primarily a result of varying
             stimulation, such as minor coil movements in TMS. More
             importantly, this variability component is present, although
             the cortex is bypassed. Thus, it may be of spinal origin,
             which can include cortical input from spinal projections.
             Further, the nonlinearity of the compound variability
             entails complex heteroscedastic non-Gaussian distributions
             and typically does not allow simple linear averages in
             statistical analysis of MEPs. As the average is dominated by
             outliers, it risks bias. With appropriate regression, the
             net effects of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the
             targeted neuron pathways become noninvasively observable and
             quantifiable. SIGNIFICANCE: The neural responses evoked by
             artificial stimulation in the cerebral cortex are variable.
             For example, MEPs in response to repeated presentations of
             the same stimulus can vary from no response to saturation
             across trials. Several sources of such variability have been
             suggested, and most of them may be technical in nature, but
             localization is missing.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.clinph.2022.02.009},
   Key = {fds363007}
}

@article{fds357280,
   Author = {Caruso, VC and Pages, DS and Sommer, MA and Groh,
             JM},
   Title = {Compensating for a shifting world: evolving reference frames
             of visual and auditory signals across three multimodal brain
             areas.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {126},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {82-94},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00385.2020},
   Abstract = {Stimulus locations are detected differently by different
             sensory systems, but ultimately they yield similar percepts
             and behavioral responses. How the brain transcends initial
             differences to compute similar codes is unclear. We
             quantitatively compared the reference frames of two sensory
             modalities, vision and audition, across three interconnected
             brain areas involved in generating saccades, namely the
             frontal eye fields (FEF), lateral and medial parietal cortex
             (M/LIP), and superior colliculus (SC). We recorded from
             single neurons in head-restrained monkeys performing
             auditory- and visually guided saccades from variable initial
             fixation locations and evaluated whether their receptive
             fields were better described as eye-centered, head-centered,
             or hybrid (i.e. not anchored uniquely to head- or
             eye-orientation). We found a progression of reference frames
             across areas and across time, with considerable hybrid-ness
             and persistent differences between modalities during most
             epochs/brain regions. For both modalities, the SC was more
             eye-centered than the FEF, which in turn was more
             eye-centered than the predominantly hybrid M/LIP. In all
             three areas and temporal epochs from stimulus onset to
             movement, visual signals were more eye-centered than
             auditory signals. In the SC and FEF, auditory signals became
             more eye-centered at the time of the saccade than they were
             initially after stimulus onset, but only in the SC at the
             time of the saccade did the auditory signals become
             "predominantly" eye-centered. The results indicate that
             visual and auditory signals both undergo transformations,
             ultimately reaching the same final reference frame but via
             different dynamics across brain regions and time.<b>NEW &
             NOTEWORTHY</b> Models for visual-auditory integration posit
             that visual signals are eye-centered throughout the brain,
             whereas auditory signals are converted from head-centered to
             eye-centered coordinates. We show instead that both
             modalities largely employ hybrid reference frames: neither
             fully head- nor eye-centered. Across three hubs of the
             oculomotor network (intraparietal cortex, frontal eye field,
             and superior colliculus) visual and auditory signals evolve
             from hybrid to a common eye-centered format via different
             dynamics across brain areas and time.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00385.2020},
   Key = {fds357280}
}

@article{fds358004,
   Author = {Liu, S and Clements, JM and Kirsch, EP and Rao, HM and Zielinski, DJ and Lu, Y and Mainsah, BO and Potter, ND and Sommer, MA and Kopper, R and Appelbaum, LG},
   Title = {Psychophysiological Markers of Performance and Learning
             during Simulated Marksmanship in Immersive Virtual
             Reality.},
   Journal = {J Cogn Neurosci},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {1253-1270},
   Year = {2021},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01713},
   Abstract = {The fusion of immersive virtual reality, kinematic movement
             tracking, and EEG offers a powerful test bed for
             naturalistic neuroscience research. Here, we combined these
             elements to investigate the neuro-behavioral mechanisms
             underlying precision visual-motor control as 20 participants
             completed a three-visit, visual-motor, coincidence-anticipation
             task, modeled after Olympic Trap Shooting and performed in
             immersive and interactive virtual reality. Analyses of the
             kinematic metrics demonstrated learning of more efficient
             movements with significantly faster hand RTs, earlier
             trigger response times, and higher spatial precision,
             leading to an average of 13% improvement in shot scores
             across the visits. As revealed through spectral and
             time-locked analyses of the EEG beta band (13-30 Hz), power
             measured prior to target launch and visual-evoked potential
             amplitudes measured immediately after the target launch
             correlated with subsequent reactive kinematic performance in
             the shooting task. Moreover, both launch-locked and
             shot/feedback-locked visual-evoked potentials became earlier
             and more negative with practice, pointing to neural
             mechanisms that may contribute to the development of
             visual-motor proficiency. Collectively, these findings
             illustrate EEG and kinematic biomarkers of precision motor
             control and changes in the neurophysiological substrates
             that may underlie motor learning.},
   Doi = {10.1162/jocn_a_01713},
   Key = {fds358004}
}

@article{fds353025,
   Author = {Tremblay, S and Acker, L and Afraz, A and Albaugh, DL and Amita, H and Andrei, AR and Angelucci, A and Aschner, A and Balan, PF and Basso, MA and Benvenuti, G and Bohlen, MO and Caiola, MJ and Calcedo, R and Cavanaugh,
             J and Chen, Y and Chen, S and Chernov, MM and Clark, AM and Dai, J and Debes,
             SR and Deisseroth, K and Desimone, R and Dragoi, V and Egger, SW and Eldridge, MAG and El-Nahal, HG and Fabbrini, F and Federer, F and Fetsch, CR and Fortuna, MG and Friedman, RM and Fujii, N and Gail, A and Galvan, A and Ghosh, S and Gieselmann, MA and Gulli, RA and Hikosaka, O and Hosseini, EA and Hu, X and Hüer, J and Inoue, K-I and Janz, R and Jazayeri, M and Jiang, R and Ju, N and Kar, K and Klein, C and Kohn, A and Komatsu, M and Maeda, K and Martinez-Trujillo, JC and Matsumoto, M and Maunsell, JHR and Mendoza-Halliday, D and Monosov, IE and Muers, RS and Nurminen, L and Ortiz-Rios, M and O'Shea, DJ and Palfi, S and Petkov,
             CI and Pojoga, S and Rajalingham, R and Ramakrishnan, C and Remington,
             ED and Revsine, C and Roe, AW and Sabes, PN and Saunders, RC and Scherberger, H and Schmid, MC and Schultz, W and Seidemann, E and Senova, Y-S and Shadlen, MN and Sheinberg, DL and Siu, C and Smith, Y and Solomon, SS and Sommer, MA and Spudich, JL and Stauffer, WR and Takada,
             M and Tang, S and Thiele, A and Treue, S and Vanduffel, W and Vogels, R and Whitmire, MP and Wichmann, T and Wurtz, RH and Xu, H and Yazdan-Shahmorad, A and Shenoy, KV and DiCarlo, JJ and Platt,
             ML},
   Title = {An Open Resource for Non-human Primate Optogenetics.},
   Journal = {Neuron},
   Volume = {108},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {1075-1090.e6},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.027},
   Abstract = {Optogenetics has revolutionized neuroscience in small
             laboratory animals, but its effect on animal models more
             closely related to humans, such as non-human primates
             (NHPs), has been mixed. To make evidence-based decisions in
             primate optogenetics, the scientific community would benefit
             from a centralized database listing all attempts, successful
             and unsuccessful, of using optogenetics in the primate
             brain. We contacted members of the community to ask for
             their contributions to an open science initiative. As of
             this writing, 45 laboratories around the world contributed
             more than 1,000 injection experiments, including precise
             details regarding their methods and outcomes. Of those
             entries, more than half had not been published. The resource
             is free for everyone to consult and contribute to on the
             Open Science Framework website. Here we review some of the
             insights from this initial release of the database and
             discuss methodological considerations to improve the success
             of optogenetic experiments in NHPs.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.027},
   Key = {fds353025}
}

@article{fds350573,
   Author = {Cushnie, AK and El-Nahal, HG and Bohlen, MO and May, PJ and Basso, MA and Grimaldi, P and Wang, MZ and de Velasco Ezequiel and MF and Sommer, MA and Heilbronner, SR},
   Title = {Using rAAV2-retro in rhesus macaques: Promise and caveats
             for circuit manipulation.},
   Journal = {Journal of neuroscience methods},
   Volume = {345},
   Pages = {108859},
   Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108859},
   Abstract = {<h4>Background</h4>Recent genetic technologies such as opto-
             and chemogenetics allow for the manipulation of brain
             circuits with unprecedented precision. Most studies
             employing these techniques have been undertaken in rodents,
             but a more human-homologous model for studying the brain is
             the nonhuman primate (NHP). Optimizing viral delivery of
             transgenes encoding actuator proteins could revolutionize
             the way we study neuronal circuits in NHPs. NEW METHOD:
             rAAV2-retro, a popular new capsid variant, produces robust
             retrograde labeling in rodents. Whether rAAV2-retro's highly
             efficient retrograde transport would translate to NHPs was
             unknown. Here, we characterized the anatomical distribution
             of labeling following injections of rAAV2-retro encoding
             opsins or DREADDs in the cortico-basal ganglia and
             oculomotor circuits of rhesus macaques.<h4>Results</h4>rAAV2-retro
             injections in striatum, frontal eye field, and superior
             colliculus produced local labeling at injection sites and
             robust retrograde labeling in many afferent regions. In
             every case, however, a few brain regions with
             well-established projections to the injected structure
             lacked retrogradely labeled cells. We also observed robust
             terminal field labeling in downstream structures.<h4>Comparison
             with existing method(s)</h4>Patterns of labeling were
             similar to those obtained with traditional tract-tracers,
             except for some afferent labeling that was noticeably
             absent.<h4>Conclusions</h4>rAAV2-retro promises to be useful
             for circuit manipulation via retrograde transduction in
             NHPs, but caveats were revealed by our findings. Some
             afferently connected regions lacked retrogradely labeled
             cells, showed robust axon terminal labeling, or both. This
             highlights the importance of anatomically characterizing
             rAAV2-retro's expression in target circuits in NHPs before
             moving to manipulation studies.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108859},
   Key = {fds350573}
}

@article{fds352422,
   Author = {Bohlen, MO and McCown, TJ and Powell, SK and El-Nahal, HG and Daw, T and Basso, MA and Sommer, MA and Samulski, RJ},
   Title = {Adeno-Associated Virus Capsid-Promoter Interactions in the
             Brain Translate from Rat to the Nonhuman
             Primate.},
   Journal = {Human gene therapy},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {21-22},
   Pages = {1155-1168},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hum.2020.196},
   Abstract = {Recently, we established an adeno-associated virus (AAV9)
             capsid-promoter interaction that directly determined
             cell-specific gene expression across two synthetic
             promoters, Cbh and CBA, in the rat striatum. These studies
             not only expand this capsid-promoter interaction to include
             another promoter in the rat striatum but also establish AAV
             capsid-promoter interactions in the nonhuman primate brain.
             When AAV serotype 9 (AAV9) vectors were injected into the
             rat striatum, the minimal synthetic promoter JetI drove
             green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene expression
             predominantly in oligodendrocytes. However, similar to our
             previous findings, the insertion of six alanines into
             VP1/VP2 of the AAV9 capsid (AAV9AU) significantly shifted
             JetI-driven GFP gene expression to neurons. In addition,
             previous retrograde tracing studies in the nonhuman primate
             brain also revealed the existence of a capsid-promoter
             interaction. When rAAV2-Retro vectors were infused into the
             frontal eye field (FEF) of rhesus macaques, local gene
             expression was prominent using either the hybrid chicken
             beta actin (CAG) or human synapsin (hSyn) promoters.
             However, only the CAG promoter, not the hSyn promoter, led
             to gene expression in the ipsilateral claustrum and
             contralateral FEF. Conversely, infusion of rAAV2-retro-hSyn
             vectors, but not rAAV2-retro-CAG, into the macaque superior
             colliculus led to differential and selective retrograde gene
             expression in cerebellotectal afferent cells. Clearly, this
             differential promoter/capsid expression profile could not be
             attributed to promoter inactivation from retrograde
             transport of the rAAV2-Retro vector. In summary, we document
             the potential for AAV capsid/promoter interactions to impact
             cell-specific gene expression across species, experimental
             manipulations, and engineered capsids, independent of capsid
             permissivity.},
   Doi = {10.1089/hum.2020.196},
   Key = {fds352422}
}

@article{fds351415,
   Author = {Gamboa Arana and OL and Palmer, H and Dannhauer, M and Hile, C and Liu, S and Hamdan, R and Brito, A and Cabeza, R and Davis, SW and Peterchev, AV and Sommer, MA and Appelbaum, LG},
   Title = {Intensity- and timing-dependent modulation of motion
             perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual
             cortex.},
   Journal = {Neuropsychologia},
   Volume = {147},
   Pages = {107581},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107581},
   Abstract = {Despite the widespread use of transcranial magnetic
             stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical care, the
             dose-response relations and neurophysiological correlates of
             modulatory effects remain relatively unexplored. To fill
             this gap, we studied modulation of visual processing as a
             function of TMS parameters. Our approach combined
             electroencephalography (EEG) with application of single
             pulse TMS to visual cortex as participants performed a
             motion perception task. During each participants' first
             visit, motion coherence thresholds, 64-channel visual evoked
             potentials (VEPs), and TMS resting motor thresholds (RMT)
             were measured. In second and third visits, single pulse TMS
             was delivered at one of two latencies, either 30 ms before
             the onset of motion or at the onset latency of the N2 VEP
             component derived from the first session. TMS was delivered
             at 0%, 80%, 100%, or 120% of RMT over the site of N2 peak
             activity, or at 120% over vertex. Behavioral results
             demonstrated a significant main effect of TMS timing on
             accuracy, with better performance when TMS was applied at
             the N2-Onset timing versus Pre-Onset, as well as a
             significant interaction, indicating that 80% intensity
             produced higher accuracy than other conditions at the
             N2-Onset. TMS effects on the P3 VEP showed reduced
             amplitudes in the 80% Pre-Onset condition, an increase for
             the 120% N2-Onset condition, and monotonic amplitude scaling
             with stimulation intensity. The N2 component was not
             affected by TMS. These findings reveal the influence of TMS
             intensity and timing on visual perception and
             electrophysiological responses, with optimal facilitation at
             stimulation intensities below RMT.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107581},
   Key = {fds351415}
}

@article{fds349696,
   Author = {Gamboa, OL and Brito, A and Abzug, Z and D'Arbeloff, T and Beynel, L and Wing, EA and Dannhauer, M and Palmer, H and Hilbig, SA and Crowell, CA and Liu, S and Donaldson, R and Cabeza, R and Davis, SW and Peterchev, AV and Sommer, MA and Appelbaum, LG},
   Title = {Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial
             magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive visual cortex does
             not lead to changes in motion discrimination.},
   Journal = {Neurosci Lett},
   Volume = {730},
   Pages = {135022},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135022},
   Abstract = {The perception of visual motion is dependent on a set of
             occipitotemporal regions that are readily accessible to
             neuromodulation. The current study tested if paired-pulse
             Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ppTMS) could modulate
             motion perception by stimulating the occipital cortex as
             participants viewed near-threshold motion dot stimuli. In
             this sham-controlled study, fifteen subjects completed two
             sessions. On the first visit, resting motor threshold (RMT)
             was assessed, and participants performed an adaptive
             direction discrimination task to determine individual motion
             sensitivity. During the second visit, subjects performed the
             task with three difficulty levels as TMS pulses were
             delivered 150 and 50 ms prior to motion stimulus onset at
             120% RMT, under the logic that the cumulative inhibitory
             effect of these pulses would alter motion sensitivity. ppTMS
             was delivered at one of two locations: 3 cm dorsal and
             5 cm lateral to inion (scalp-based coordinate), or at the
             site of peak activation for "motion" according to the
             NeuroSynth fMRI database (meta-analytic coordinate). Sham
             stimulation was delivered on one-third of trials by tilting
             the coil 90°. Analyses showed no significant
             active-versus-sham effects of ppTMS when stimulation was
             delivered to the meta-analytic (p = 0.15) or scalp-based
             coordinates (p = 0.17), which were separated by 29 mm
             on average. Active-versus-sham stimulation differences did
             not interact with either stimulation location (p = 0.12)
             or difficulty (p = 0.33). These findings fail to support
             the hypothesis that long-interval ppTMS recruits inhibitory
             processes in motion-sensitive cortex but must be considered
             within the limited parameters used in this
             design.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135022},
   Key = {fds349696}
}

@article{fds350632,
   Author = {Gamboa Arana and OL and Palmer, H and Dannhauer, M and Hile, C and Liu, S and Hamdan, R and Brito, A and Cabeza, R and Davis, S and Peterchev, A and Sommer, M and Appelbaum, L},
   Title = {Dose-dependent enhancement of motion direction
             discrimination with transcranial magnetic stimulation of
             visual cortex},
   Year = {2020},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.14.151118},
   Abstract = {Despite the widespread use of transcranial magnetic
             stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical care, the
             underlying mechanisms-of-actions that mediate modulatory
             effects remain poorly understood. To fill this gap, we
             studied dose–response functions of TMS for modulation of
             visual processing. Our approach combined
             electroencephalography (EEG) with application of single
             pulse TMS to visual cortex as participants performed a
             motion perception task. During participants’ first visit,
             motion coherence thresholds, 64-channel visual evoked
             potentials (VEPs), and TMS resting motor thresholds (RMT)
             were measured. In second and third visits, single pulse TMS
             was delivered 30 ms before the onset of motion or at the
             onset latency of the N2 VEP component derived from the first
             session. TMS was delivered at 0%, 80%, 100%, or 120% of RMT
             over the site of N2 peak activity, or at 120% over vertex.
             Behavioral results demonstrated a significant main effect of
             TMS timing on accuracy, with better performance when TMS was
             applied at N2-Onset timing versus Pre-Onset, as well as a
             significant interaction, indicating that 80% intensity
             produced higher accuracy than other conditions. TMS effects
             on VEPs showed reduced amplitudes in the 80% Pre-Onset
             condition, an increase for the 120% N2-Onset condition, and
             monotonic amplitude scaling with stimulation intensity. The
             N2 component was not affected by TMS. These findings reveal
             dose–response relationships between intensity and timing
             of TMS on visual perception and electrophysiological brain
             activity, generally indicating greater facilitation at
             stimulation intensities below RMT.},
   Doi = {10.1101/2020.06.14.151118},
   Key = {fds350632}
}

@article{fds366058,
   Author = {Abzug, ZM and Sommer, MA and Beck, JM},
   Title = {Properties of decision-making tasks govern the tradeoff
             between model-based and model-free learning},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/730663},
   Abstract = {<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>When decisions must
             be made between uncertain options, optimal behavior depends
             on accurate estimations of the likelihoods of different
             outcomes. The contextual factors that govern whether these
             estimations depend on model-free learning (tracking
             outcomes) vs. model-based learning (learning generative
             stimulus distributions) are poorly understood. We studied
             model-free and model-based learning using serial
             decision-making tasks in which subjects selected a rule and
             then used it to flexibly act on visual stimuli. A factorial
             approach defined a family of behavioral models that could
             integrate model-free and model-based strategies to predict
             rule selection trial-by-trial. Bayesian model selection
             demonstrated that the subjects strategies varied depending
             on lower-level task characteristics such as the identities
             of the rule options. In certain conditions, subjects
             integrated learned stimulus distributions and tracked reward
             rates to guide their behavior. The results thus identify
             tradeoffs between model-based and model-free decision
             strategies, and in some cases parallel utilization,
             depending on task context.</jats:p>},
   Doi = {10.1101/730663},
   Key = {fds366058}
}

@article{fds341566,
   Author = {Toader, AC and Rao, HM and Ryoo, M and Bohlen, MO and Cruger, JS and Oh-Descher, H and Ferrari, S and Egner, T and Beck, J and Sommer,
             MA},
   Title = {Probabilistic inferential decision-making under time
             pressure in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).},
   Journal = {Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. :
             1983)},
   Volume = {133},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {380-396},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/com0000168},
   Abstract = {Decisions often involve the consideration of multiple cues,
             each of which may inform selection on the basis of learned
             probabilities. Our ability to use probabilistic inference
             for decisions is bounded by uncertainty and constraints such
             as time pressure. Previous work showed that when humans
             choose between visual objects in a multiple-cue,
             probabilistic task, they cope with time pressure by
             discounting the least informative cues, an example of
             satisficing or "good enough" decision-making. We tested two
             rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) on a similar task to assess
             their capacity for probabilistic inference and satisficing
             in comparison with humans. In each trial, a monkey viewed
             two compound stimuli consisting of four cue dimensions. Each
             dimension (e.g., color) had two possible states (e.g., red
             or blue) with different probabilistic weights. Selecting the
             stimulus with highest total weight yielded higher odds of
             receiving reward. Both monkeys learned the assigned weights
             at high accuracy. Under time pressure, both monkeys were
             less accurate as a result of decreased use of cue
             information. One monkey adopted the same satisficing
             strategy used by humans, ignoring the least informative cue
             dimension. Both monkeys, however, exhibited a strategy not
             reported for humans, a "group-the-best" strategy in which
             the top two cues were used similarly despite their different
             assigned weights. The results validate macaques as an animal
             model of probabilistic decision-making, establishing their
             capacity to discriminate between objects using at least four
             visual dimensions simultaneously. The time pressure data
             suggest caution, however, in using macaques as models of
             human satisficing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA,
             all rights reserved).},
   Doi = {10.1037/com0000168},
   Key = {fds341566}
}

@article{fds366059,
   Author = {Caruso, VC and Pages, DS and Sommer, MA and Groh,
             JM},
   Title = {Compensating for a shifting world: evolving reference frames
             of visual and auditory signals across three multimodal brain
             areas},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/669333},
   Abstract = {<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Stimulus locations
             are detected differently by different sensory systems, but
             ultimately they yield similar percepts and behavioral
             responses. How the brain transcends initial differences to
             compute similar codes is unclear. We quantitatively compared
             the reference frames of two sensory modalities, vision and
             audition, across three interconnected brain areas involved
             in generating saccades, namely the frontal eye fields (FEF),
             lateral and medial parietal cortex (M/LIP), and superior
             colliculus (SC). We recorded from single neurons in
             head-restrained monkeys performing auditory- and
             visually-guided saccades from variable initial fixation
             locations, and evaluated whether their receptive fields were
             better described as eye-centered, head-centered, or hybrid
             (i.e. not anchored uniquely to head- or eye-orientation). We
             found a progression of reference frames across areas and
             across time, with considerable hybrid-ness and persistent
             differences between modalities during most epochs/brain
             regions. For both modalities, the SC was more eye-centered
             than the FEF, which in turn was more eye-centered than the
             predominantly hybrid M/LIP. In all three areas and temporal
             epochs from stimulus onset to movement, visual signals were
             more eye-centered than auditory signals. In the SC and FEF,
             auditory signals became more eye-centered at the time of the
             saccade than they were initially after stimulus onset, but
             only in the SC at the time of the saccade did the auditory
             signals become <jats:italic>predominantly</jats:italic>
             eye-centered. The results indicate that visual and auditory
             signals both undergo transformations, ultimately reaching
             the same final reference frame but via different dynamics
             across brain regions and time.</jats:p><jats:sec><jats:title>New
             and Noteworthy</jats:title><jats:p>Models for
             visual-auditory integration posit that visual signals are
             eye-centered throughout the brain, while auditory signals
             are converted from head-centered to eye-centered
             coordinates. We show instead that both modalities largely
             employ hybrid reference frames: neither fully head-nor
             eye-centered. Across three hubs of the oculomotor network
             (intraparietal cortex, frontal eye field and superior
             colliculus) visual and auditory signals evolve from hybrid
             to a common eye-centered format via different dynamics
             across brain areas and time.</jats:p></jats:sec>},
   Doi = {10.1101/669333},
   Key = {fds366059}
}

@article{fds343467,
   Author = {Subramanian, D and Alers, A and Sommer, M},
   Title = {Corollary discharge for action and cognition},
   Journal = {Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and
             Neuroimaging},
   Volume = {4},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {782-790},
   Publisher = {Elsevier},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {May},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.010},
   Abstract = {In motor systems, a copy of the movement command known as
             corollary discharge is broadcast to other regions of the
             brain to warn them of the impending movement. The premise of
             this review is that the concept of corollary discharge may
             generalize in revealing ways to the brain’s cognitive
             systems. An oculomotor pathway from the brainstem to frontal
             cortex provides a well-established example of how corollary
             discharge is instantiated for sensorimotor processing.
             Building on causal evidence from inactivation of the
             pathway, we motivate forward models as a tool for
             understanding the contributions of corollary discharge to
             perception and movement. Finally, we extend the definition
             of corollary discharge to account for signals that may be
             used for cognitive forward models of decision-making. This
             framework may provide new insights into signals and circuits
             that contribute to sequential decision processes, the
             breakdown of which may account for some symptoms of
             psychiatric disorders.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.010},
   Key = {fds343467}
}

@article{fds346630,
   Author = {Bohlen, M and El-Nahal, H and Sommer, M},
   Title = {Transduction of Craniofacial Motoneurons Following
             Intramuscular Injections of Canine Adenovirus Type-2 (CAV-2)
             in Rhesus Macaques},
   Journal = {Frontiers in Neuroanatomy},
   Volume = {In Press},
   Pages = {84},
   Publisher = {Frontiers Media},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2019.00084},
   Abstract = {Reliable viral vector-mediated transgene expression in
             primate motoneurons would improve our ability to
             anatomically and physiologically interrogate motor systems.
             We therefore investigated the efficacy of replication
             defective, early region 1-deleted canine adenovirus type-2
             (CAV-2) vectors for mediating transgene expression of
             fluorescent proteins into brainstem motoneurons following
             craniofacial intramuscular injections in four rhesus monkeys
             (Macaca mulatta). Vector injections were placed into
             surgically identified and isolated craniofacial muscles.
             After a one- to two-month survival time, animals were
             sacrificed and transgene expression was assessed with
             immunohistochemistry in the corresponding motoneuronal
             populations. We found that injections of CAV-2 into
             individual craniofacial muscles at doses in the range of
             ~10^10 to 10^11 physical particles/muscle resulted in robust
             motoneuronal transduction and expression of
             immunohistochemically identified fluorescent proteins across
             multiple animals. By using different titers in separate
             muscles, with the resulting transduction patterns tracked
             via fluorophore expression and labeled motoneuron location,
             we established qualitative dose-response relationships in
             two animals. In one animal that received an atypically high
             titer (5.7 x 10^11 total CAV-2 physical particles)
             distributed across numerous injection sites, no transduction
             was detected, likely due to a retaliatory immune response.
             We conclude that CAV-2 vectors show promise for genetic
             modification of primate motoneurons following craniofacial
             intramuscular injections. Our findings warrant focused
             attention toward the use of CAV-2 vectors to deliver opsins,
             DREADDs, and other molecular probes to improve
             genetics-based methods for primate research. Further work is
             required to optimize CAV-2 transduction parameters. CAV-2
             vectors encoding proteins could provide a new, reliable
             route for modifying activity in targeted neuronal
             populations of the primate central nervous
             system.},
   Doi = {10.3389/fnana.2019.00084},
   Key = {fds346630}
}

@article{fds337180,
   Author = {Abzug, ZM and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Neuronal correlates of serial decision-making in the
             supplementary eye field},
   Journal = {Journal of Neuroscience},
   Volume = {38},
   Number = {33},
   Pages = {7280-7292},
   Publisher = {Society for Neuroscience},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3643-17.2018},
   Abstract = {Human behavior is influenced by serial decision-making: past
             decisions affect choices that set the context for selecting
             future options. A primate brain region that may be involved
             in linking decisions across time is the supplementary eye
             field (SEF), which, in addition to its well-known visual
             responses and saccade-related activity, also signals the
             rules that govern flexible decisions and the outcomes of
             those decisions. Our hypotheses were that SEF neurons encode
             events during serial decision-making and link the sequential
             decisions with sustained activity. We recorded from neurons
             in the SEF of two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta, one male,
             one female) that performed a serial decision-making task.
             The monkeys used saccades to select a rule that had to be
             applied later in the same trial to discriminate between
             visual stimuli. We found, first, that SEF neurons encoded
             the spatial parameters of saccades during rule selection but
             not during visual discrimination, suggesting a malleability
             to their movement-related tuning. Second, SEF activity
             linked the sequential decisions of rule selection and visual
             discrimination, but not continuously. Instead, rule-encoding
             activity appeared in a “just-in-time” manner before the
             visual discrimination. Third, SEF neurons encoded trial
             outcomes both prospectively, before decisions within a
             trial, and retrospectively, across multiple trials. The
             results thus identify neuronal correlates of rule selection
             and application in the SEF, including transient signals that
             link these sequential decisions. Its activity patterns
             suggest that the SEF participates in serial decision-making
             in a contextually-dependent manner as part of a broader
             network.},
   Doi = {10.1523/jneurosci.3643-17.2018},
   Key = {fds337180}
}

@article{fds334786,
   Author = {Abzug, ZM and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Serial decision-making in monkeys during an oculomotor
             task},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and
             Cognition},
   Volume = {44},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {95-102},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000154},
   Abstract = {Much of everyday behavior involves serial decision-making,
             in which the outcome of one choice affects another. An
             example is setting rules for oneself: choosing a behavioral
             rule guides appropriate choices in the future. How the brain
             links decisions across time is poorly understood. Neural
             mechanisms could be studied in monkeys, as it is known that
             they can select and use behavioral rules, but existing
             psychophysical paradigms are poorly suited for the
             constraints of neurophysiology. Therefore we designed a
             streamlined task that requires sequential, linked decisions,
             and trained two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to perform
             it. The task features trial-by-trial consistency, visual
             stimuli, and eye movement responses to optimize it for
             simultaneous electrophysiological inquiry. In the first
             stage of each trial, the monkeys selected a rule or a rule
             was provided to them. In the second stage, they used the
             rule to discriminate between two test stimuli. Our
             hypotheses were that they could use self-selected rules and
             could deliberately select rules based on reinforcement
             history. We found that the monkeys were as proficient at
             using self-selected rules as instructed rules. Their
             preferences for selecting rules correlated with their
             performance in using them, consistent with systematic,
             rather than random, strategies for accomplishing the task.
             The results confirm and extend prior findings on rule
             selection in monkeys and establish a viable, experimentally
             flexible paradigm for studying the neural basis of serial
             decision-making.},
   Doi = {10.1037/xan0000154},
   Key = {fds334786}
}

@article{fds334785,
   Author = {Rao, HM and Khanna, R and Zielinski, DJ and Lu, Y and Clements, JM and Potter, ND and Sommer, MA and Kopper, R and Appelbaum,
             LG},
   Title = {Sensorimotor Learning during a Marksmanship Task in
             Immersive Virtual Reality.},
   Journal = {Front Psychol},
   Volume = {9},
   Pages = {58},
   Year = {2018},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00058},
   Abstract = {Sensorimotor learning refers to improvements that occur
             through practice in the performance of sensory-guided motor
             behaviors. Leveraging novel technical capabilities of an
             immersive virtual environment, we probed the component
             kinematic processes that mediate sensorimotor learning.
             Twenty naïve subjects performed a simulated marksmanship
             task modeled after Olympic Trap Shooting standards. We
             measured movement kinematics and shooting performance as
             participants practiced 350 trials while receiving
             trial-by-trial feedback about shooting success.
             Spatiotemporal analysis of motion tracking elucidated the
             ballistic and refinement phases of hand movements. We found
             systematic changes in movement kinematics that accompanied
             improvements in shot accuracy during training, though
             reaction and response times did not change over blocks. In
             particular, we observed longer, slower, and more precise
             ballistic movements that replaced effort spent on
             corrections and refinement. Collectively, these results
             leverage developments in immersive virtual reality
             technology to quantify and compare the kinematics of
             movement during early learning of full-body sensorimotor
             orienting.},
   Doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00058},
   Key = {fds334785}
}

@article{fds334784,
   Author = {Caruso, V and Pages, D and Sommer, MA and Groh, J},
   Title = {Beyond the labeled line: variation in visual reference
             frames from intraparietal cortex to frontal eye fields and
             the superior colliculus},
   Journal = {Journal of Neurophysiology},
   Volume = {In Press},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1411-1421},
   Publisher = {American Physiological Society},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00584.2017},
   Abstract = {We accurately perceive the visual scene despite moving our
             eyes ~3 times per second, an ability that requires
             incorporation of eye position and retinal information. In
             this study, we assessed how this neural computation unfolds
             across three interconnected structures: frontal eye fields
             (FEF), intraparietal cortex (LIP/MIP), and the superior
             colliculus (SC). Single unit activity was assessed in
             head-restrained monkeys performing visually-guided saccades
             from different initial fixations. As previously shown, the
             receptive fields of most LIP/MIP neurons shifted to novel
             positions on the retina for each eye position, and these
             locations were not clearly related to each other in either
             eye- or head-centered coordinates (defined as hybrid
             coordinates). In contrast, the receptive fields of most SC
             neurons were stable in eye-centered coordinates. In FEF,
             visual signals were intermediate between those patterns:
             around 60% were eye-centered, whereas the remainder showed
             changes in receptive field location, boundaries, or
             responsiveness that rendered the response patterns hybrid or
             occasionally head-centered. These results suggest that FEF
             may act as a transitional step in an evolution of
             coordinates between LIP/MIP and SC. The persistence across
             cortical areas of mixed representations that do not provide
             unequivocal location labels in a consistent reference frame
             has implications for how these representations must be
             read-out.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00584.2017},
   Key = {fds334784}
}

@article{fds334787,
   Author = {Oh-Descher, H and Beck, JM and Ferrari, S and Sommer, MA and Egner,
             T},
   Title = {Probabilistic inference under time pressure leads to a
             cortical-to-subcortical shift in decision evidence
             integration},
   Journal = {NeuroImage},
   Volume = {162},
   Pages = {138-150},
   Publisher = {Elsevier},
   Year = {2017},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.069},
   Abstract = {Real-life decision-making often involves combining multiple
             probabilistic sources of information under finite time and
             cognitive resources. To mitigate these pressures, people
             “satisfice”, foregoing a full evaluation of all
             available evidence to focus on a subset of cues that allow
             for fast and “good-enough” decisions. Although this form
             of decision-making likely mediates many of our everyday
             choices, very little is known about the way in which the
             neural encoding of cue information changes when we satisfice
             under time pressure. Here, we combined human functional
             magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a probabilistic
             classification task to characterize neural substrates of
             multi-cue decision-making under low (1500 ms) and high (500
             ms) time pressure. Using variational Bayesian inference, we
             analyzed participants’ choices to track and quantify cue
             usage under each experimental condition, which was then
             applied to model the fMRI data. Under low time pressure,
             participants performed near-optimally, appropriately
             integrating all available cues to guide choices. Both
             cortical (prefrontal and parietal cortex) and subcortical
             (hippocampal and striatal) regions encoded individual cue
             weights, and activity linearly tracked trial-by-trial
             variations in amount of evidence and decision uncertainty.
             Under increased time pressure, participants adaptively
             shifted to using a satisficing strategy by discounting the
             least informative cue in their decision process. This
             strategic change in decision-making was associated with an
             increased involvement of the dopaminergic midbrain,
             striatum, thalamus, and cerebellum in representing and
             integrating cue values. We conclude that satisficing the
             probabilistic inference process under time pressure leads to
             a cortical-to-subcortical shift in the neural drivers of
             decisions.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.069},
   Key = {fds334787}
}

@article{fds334789,
   Author = {Rao, HM and Mayo, JP and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Circuits for presaccadic visual remapping.},
   Journal = {J Neurophysiol},
   Volume = {116},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {2624-2636},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00182.2016},
   Abstract = {Saccadic eye movements rapidly displace the image of the
             world that is projected onto the retinas. In anticipation of
             each saccade, many neurons in the visual system shift their
             receptive fields. This presaccadic change in visual
             sensitivity, known as remapping, was first documented in the
             parietal cortex and has been studied in many other brain
             regions. Remapping requires information about upcoming
             saccades via corollary discharge. Analyses of neurons in a
             corollary discharge pathway that targets the frontal eye
             field (FEF) suggest that remapping may be assembled in the
             FEF's local microcircuitry. Complementary data from
             reversible inactivation, neural recording, and modeling
             studies provide evidence that remapping contributes to
             transsaccadic continuity of action and perception. Multiple
             forms of remapping have been reported in the FEF and other
             brain areas, however, and questions remain about the reasons
             for these differences. In this review of recent progress, we
             identify three hypotheses that may help to guide further
             investigations into the structure and function of circuits
             for remapping.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00182.2016},
   Key = {fds334789}
}

@article{fds334790,
   Author = {Oh, H and Beck, JM and Zhu, P and Sommer, MA and Ferrari, S and Egner,
             T},
   Title = {Satisficing in split-second decision making is characterized
             by strategic cue discounting},
   Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
             Cognition},
   Volume = {42},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {1937-1956},
   Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000284},
   Abstract = {Much of our real-life decision making is bounded by
             uncertain information, limitations in cognitive resources,
             and a lack of time to allocate to the decision process. It
             is thought that humans overcome these limitations through
             satisficing, fast but “good-enough” heuristic decision
             making that prioritizes some sources of information (cues)
             while ignoring others. However, the decision-making
             strategies we adopt under uncertainty and time pressure, for
             example during emergencies that demand split-second choices,
             are presently unknown. To characterize these decision
             strategies quantitatively, the present study examined how
             people solve a novel multi-cue probabilistic classification
             task under varying time pressure, by tracking shifts in
             decision strategies using variational Bayesian inference. We
             found that under low time pressure, participants correctly
             weighted and integrated all available cues to arrive at
             near-optimal decisions. With increasingly demanding,
             sub-second time pressures, however, participants
             systematically discounted a subset of the cue information by
             dropping the least informative cue(s) from their decision
             making process. Thus, the human cognitive apparatus copes
             with uncertainty and severe time pressure by adopting a
             “Drop-the-Worst” cue decision making strategy that
             minimizes cognitive time and effort investment while
             preserving the consideration of the most diagnostic cue
             information, thus maintaining “good-enough” accuracy.
             This advance in our understanding of satisficing strategies
             could form the basis of predicting human choices in high
             time pressure scenarios.},
   Doi = {10.1037/xlm0000284},
   Key = {fds334790}
}

@article{fds334794,
   Author = {Rao, HM and San Juan and J and Shen, FY and Villa, JE and Rafie, KS and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Neural network evidence for the coupling of presaccadic
             visual remapping to predictive eye position
             updating},
   Journal = {Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience},
   Volume = {10},
   Pages = {52},
   Publisher = {Frontiers Media},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {June},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00052},
   Abstract = {As we look around a scene, we perceive it as continuous and
             stable even though each saccadic eye movement changes the
             visual input to the retinas. How the brain achieves this
             perceptual stabilization is unknown, but a major hypothesis
             is that it relies on presaccadic remapping, a process in
             which neurons shift their visual sensitivity to a new
             location in the scene just before each saccade. This
             hypothesis is difficult to test in vivo because complete,
             selective inactivation of remapping is currently
             intractable. We tested it in silico with a hierarchical,
             sheet-based neural network model of the visual and
             oculomotor system. The model generated saccadic commands to
             move a video camera abruptly. Visual input from the camera
             and internal copies of the saccadic movement commands, or
             corollary discharge, converged at a map-level simulation of
             the frontal eye field (FEF), a primate brain area known to
             receive such inputs. FEF output was combined with eye
             position signals to yield a suitable coordinate frame for
             guiding arm movements of a robot. Our operational definition
             of perceptual stability was "useful stability,” quantified
             as continuously accurate pointing to a visual object despite
             camera saccades. During training, the emergence of useful
             stability was correlated tightly with the emergence of
             presaccadic remapping in the FEF. Remapping depended on
             corollary discharge but its timing was synchronized to the
             updating of eye position. When coupled to predictive eye
             position signals, remapping served to stabilize the target
             representation for continuously accurate pointing. Graded
             inactivations of pathways in the model replicated, and
             helped to interpret, previous in vivo experiments. The
             results support the hypothesis that visual stability
             requires presaccadic remapping, provide explanations for the
             function and timing of remapping, and offer testable
             hypotheses for in vivo studies. We conclude that remapping
             allows for seamless coordinate frame transformations and
             quick actions despite visual afferent lags. With visual
             remapping in place for behavior, it may be exploited for
             perceptual continuity.},
   Doi = {10.3389/fncom.2016.00052},
   Key = {fds334794}
}

@article{fds334793,
   Author = {Raghavan, RT and Prevosto, V and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Contribution of cerebellar loops to action
             timing},
   Journal = {Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences},
   Volume = {8},
   Pages = {28-34},
   Publisher = {Elsevier},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.01.008},
   Abstract = {Recent studies of sensorimotor processing have benefited
             from decision-making paradigms that emphasize the selection
             of appropriate movements. Selecting when to make those
             responses, or action timing, is important as well. Although
             the cerebellum is commonly viewed as a controller of
             movement dynamics, its role in action timing is also firmly
             supported. Several lines of research have now extended this
             idea. Anatomical findings have revealed connections between
             the cerebellum and broader timing circuits,
             neurophysiological results have suggested mechanisms for
             timing within its microcircuitry, and theoretical work has
             indicated how temporal signals are processed through it and
             decoded by its targets. These developments are inspiring
             renewed studies of the role of the cerebellar loops in
             action timing.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.01.008},
   Key = {fds334793}
}

@article{fds334791,
   Author = {Caruso, VC and Pages, DS and Sommer, MA and Groh,
             JM},
   Title = {Similar prevalence and magnitude of auditory-evoked and
             visually-evoked activity in the frontal eye fields:
             Implications for multisensory motor control},
   Journal = {Journal of Neurophysiology},
   Volume = {in press},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {3162-3173},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00935.2015},
   Abstract = {Saccadic eye movements can be elicited by more than one type
             of sensory stimulus. This implies substantial
             transformations of signals originating in different sense
             organs as they reach a common motor output pathway. In this
             study, we compared the prevalence and magnitude of auditory-
             and visually-evoked activity in a structure implicated in
             oculomotor processing, the primate frontal eye fields (FEF).
             We recorded from 324 single neurons while 2 monkeys
             performed delayed saccades to visual or auditory targets. We
             found that 64% of FEF neurons were active upon presentation
             of auditory targets and 87% were active during
             auditory-guided saccades, compared to 75% and 84% for visual
             targets and saccades. As saccade onset approached, the
             average level of population activity in the FEF became
             indistinguishable on visual and auditory trials. FEF
             activity was better correlated with the movement vector than
             with the target location for both modalities In summary, the
             large proportion of auditory responsive neurons in the FEF,
             the similarity between visual and auditory activity levels
             at the time of the saccade and the strong correlation
             between the activity and the saccade vector suggest that
             auditory signals undergo tailoring to roughly match the
             strength of visual signals present in the FEF, facilitating
             accessing of a common motor output pathway.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00935.2015},
   Key = {fds334791}
}

@article{fds334795,
   Author = {Rao, HM and Abzug, ZM and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Visual continuity across saccades is influenced by
             expectations.},
   Journal = {Journal of vision},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {7},
   Year = {2016},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/16.5.7},
   Abstract = {As we make saccades, the image on each retina is displaced,
             yet our visual perception is uninterrupted. This is commonly
             referred to as transsaccadic perceptual stability, but such
             a description is inadequate. Some visual objects are stable
             (e.g., rocks) and should be perceived as such across
             saccades, but other objects may move at any time (e.g.,
             birds). Stability is probabilistic in natural scenes. Here
             we extend the common notion of transsaccadic visual
             stability to a more general, ecologically based hypothesis
             of transsaccadic visual continuity in which postsaccadic
             percepts of objects depend on expectations about their
             probability of movement. Subjects made a saccade to a target
             and reported whether it seemed displaced after the saccade.
             Targets had varying probabilities of movement (ranging from
             0.1-0.9) that corresponded to their color (spectrum from
             blue to red). Performance was compared before and after
             subjects were told about the color-probability pairings
             ("uninformed" vs. "informed" conditions). Analyses focused
             on signal detection and psychometric threshold measures. We
             found that in the uninformed condition, performance was
             similar across color-probability pairings, but in the
             informed condition, response biases varied with probability
             of movement, and movement-detection sensitivities were
             higher for rarely moving targets. We conclude that subjects
             incorporate priors about object movement into their
             judgments of visual continuity across saccades.},
   Doi = {10.1167/16.5.7},
   Key = {fds334795}
}

@article{fds334792,
   Author = {Zielinski, DJ and Rao, HM and Potter, ND and Sommer, MA and Appelbaum,
             LG and Kopper, R},
   Title = {Evaluating the Effects of Image Persistence on Dynamic
             Target Acquisition in Low Frame Rate Virtual
             Environments},
   Journal = {3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2016 IEEE Symposium
             on},
   Pages = {133-140},
   Publisher = {IEEE},
   Year = {2016},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2016.7460043},
   Abstract = {User performance in virtual environments with degraded
             visual conditions due to low frame rates is an interesting
             area of inquiry. Visual content shown in a low frame rate
             simulation has the quality of the original image, but
             persists for an extended period until the next frame is
             displayed (so-called high persistence-HP). An alternative,
             called low persistence (LP), involves displaying the
             rendered frame for a single display frame and blanking the
             screen while waiting for the next frame to be generated.
             Previous research has evaluated the usefulness of the LP
             technique in low frame rate simulations during a static
             target acquisition task. To gain greater knowledge about the
             LP technique, we have conducted a user study to evaluate
             user performance and learning during a dynamic target
             acquisition task. The acquisition task was evaluated under a
             high frame rate, (60 fps) condition, a traditional low frame
             rate HP condition (10 fps), and the experimental low frame
             rate LP technique. The task involved the acquisition of
             targets moving along several different trajectories, modeled
             after a shotgun trap shooting task. The results of our study
             indicate the LP condition approaches high frame rate
             performance within certain classes of target trajectories.
             Interestingly we also see that learning is consistent across
             conditions, indicating that it may not always be necessary
             to train under a visually high frame rate system to learn a
             particular task. We discuss implications of using the LP
             technique to mitigate low frame rate issues as well as its
             potential usefulness for training in low frame rate virtual
             environments.},
   Doi = {10.1109/3DUI.2016.7460043},
   Key = {fds334792}
}

@article{fds334796,
   Author = {Mayo, JP and DiTomasso, AR and Sommer, MA and Smith,
             MA},
   Title = {Dynamics of visual receptive fields in the macaque frontal
             eye field.},
   Journal = {J Neurophysiol},
   Volume = {114},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {3201-3210},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00746.2015},
   Abstract = {Neuronal receptive fields (RFs) provide the foundation for
             understanding systems-level sensory processing. In early
             visual areas, investigators have mapped RFs in detail using
             stochastic stimuli and sophisticated analytical approaches.
             Much less is known about RFs in prefrontal cortex. Visual
             stimuli used for mapping RFs in prefrontal cortex tend to
             cover a small range of spatial and temporal parameters,
             making it difficult to understand their role in visual
             processing. To address these shortcomings, we implemented a
             generalized linear model to measure the RFs of neurons in
             the macaque frontal eye field (FEF) in response to sparse,
             full-field stimuli. Our high-resolution, probabilistic
             approach tracked the evolution of RFs during passive
             fixation, and we validated our results against conventional
             measures. We found that FEF neurons exhibited a surprising
             level of sensitivity to stimuli presented as briefly as 10
             ms or to multiple dots presented simultaneously, suggesting
             that FEF visual responses are more precise than previously
             appreciated. FEF RF spatial structures were largely
             maintained over time and between stimulus conditions. Our
             results demonstrate that the application of probabilistic RF
             mapping to FEF and similar association areas is an important
             tool for clarifying the neuronal mechanisms of
             cognition.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00746.2015},
   Key = {fds334796}
}

@article{fds334797,
   Author = {Grigsby, EM and Koval, MJ and Smith, MV and Mueller, JK and Deng, ZD and Peterchev, A and Grill, WM and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Neural Effects of rTMS: Single Neuron Recordings From a
             Rhesus Macaque},
   Journal = {JOURNAL OF ECT},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {E33-E33},
   Publisher = {LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS},
   Year = {2015},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds334797}
}

@article{fds334798,
   Author = {Zielinski, DJ and Rao, HM and Sommer, MA and Kopper,
             R},
   Title = {Exploring the Effects of Image Persistence in Low Frame Rate
             Virtual Environments},
   Journal = {Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference},
   Pages = {19-26},
   Publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
   Year = {2015},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/vr.2015.7223319},
   Abstract = {© 2015 IEEE. In virtual reality applications, there is an
             aim to provide real time graphics which run at high refresh
             rates. However, there are many situations in which this is
             not possible due to simulation or rendering issues. When
             running at low frame rates, several aspects of the user
             experience are affected. For example, each frame is
             displayed for an extended period of time, causing a high
             persistence image artifact. The effect of this artifact is
             that movement may lose continuity, and the image jumps from
             one frame to another. In this paper, we discuss our initial
             exploration of the effects of high persistence frames caused
             by low refresh rates and compare it to high frame rates and
             to a technique we developed to mitigate the effects of low
             frame rates. In this technique, the low frame rate
             simulation images are displayed with low persistence by
             blanking out the display during the extra time such image
             would be displayed. In order to isolate the visual effects,
             we constructed a simulator for low and high persistence
             displays that does not affect input latency. A controlled
             user study comparing the three conditions for the tasks of
             3D selection and navigation was conducted. Results indicate
             that the low persistence display technique may not
             negatively impact user experience or performance as compared
             to the high persistence case. Directions for future work on
             the use of low persistence displays for low frame rate
             situations are discussed.},
   Doi = {10.1109/vr.2015.7223319},
   Key = {fds334798}
}

@article{fds334799,
   Author = {Matthews, WJ and Terhune, DB and van Rijn, H and Eagleman, DM and Sommer, MA and Meck, WA},
   Title = {Subjective duration as a signature of coding efficiency:
             Emerging links among stimulus repetition, predictive coding,
             and cortical GABA levels},
   Journal = {Timing & Time Perception Reviews},
   Volume = {1},
   Pages = {11 pages},
   Publisher = {Brill Publishers},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {December},
   Abstract = {Immediate repetition of a stimulus reduces its apparent
             duration relative to a novel item. Recent work indicates
             that this may reflect suppressed cortical responses to
             repeated stimuli, arising from neural adaptation and/or the
             predictive coding of expected stimuli. This article
             summarizes recent behavioral and neurobiological studies
             linking perceived time to the magnitude of cortical
             responses, including work suggesting that variations in
             GABA-mediated cortical inhibition may underlie some of the
             individual differences in time perception. We suggest that
             the firing of cortical neurons can be modified using simple
             recurrent networks with time-dependent processes that are
             modulated by GABA levels. These local networks feed into a
             core-timing network used to integrate across stimulus
             inputs/modalities, thereby allowing for the coordination of
             multiple duration ranges and effector systems.},
   Key = {fds334799}
}

@article{fds334800,
   Author = {Mitchell, AS and Sherman, SM and Sommer, MA and Mair, RG and Vertes, RP and Chudasama, Y},
   Title = {Advances in understanding mechanisms of thalamic relays in
             cognition and behavior.},
   Journal = {The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the
             Society for Neuroscience},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {46},
   Pages = {15340-15346},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {November},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3289-14.2014},
   Abstract = {The main impetus for a mini-symposium on corticothalamic
             interrelationships was the recent number of studies
             highlighting the role of the thalamus in aspects of
             cognition beyond sensory processing. The thalamus
             contributes to a range of basic cognitive behaviors that
             include learning and memory, inhibitory control,
             decision-making, and the control of visual orienting
             responses. Its functions are deeply intertwined with those
             of the better studied cortex, although the principles
             governing its coordination with the cortex remain opaque,
             particularly in higher-level aspects of cognition. How
             should the thalamus be viewed in the context of the rest of
             the brain? Although its role extends well beyond relaying of
             sensory information from the periphery, the main function of
             many of its subdivisions does appear to be that of a relay
             station, transmitting neural signals primarily to the
             cerebral cortex from a number of brain areas. In cognition,
             its main contribution may thus be to coordinate signals
             between diverse regions of the telencephalon, including the
             neocortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and striatum. This central
             coordination is further subject to considerable extrinsic
             control, for example, inhibition from the basal ganglia,
             zona incerta, and pretectal regions, and chemical modulation
             from ascending neurotransmitter systems. What follows is a
             brief review on the role of the thalamus in aspects of
             cognition and behavior, focusing on a summary of the topics
             covered in a mini-symposium held at the Society for
             Neuroscience meeting, 2014.},
   Doi = {10.1523/jneurosci.3289-14.2014},
   Key = {fds334800}
}

@article{fds334801,
   Author = {Mueller, JK and Grigsby, EM and Prevosto, V and Petraglia, FW and Rao,
             H and Deng, Z-D and Peterchev, AV and Sommer, MA and Egner, T and Platt,
             ML and Grill, WM},
   Title = {Simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and
             single-neuron recording in alert non-human
             primates.},
   Journal = {Nat Neurosci},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1130-1136},
   Year = {2014},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3751},
   Abstract = {Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used,
             noninvasive method for stimulating nervous tissue, yet its
             mechanisms of effect are poorly understood. Here we report
             new methods for studying the influence of TMS on single
             neurons in the brain of alert non-human primates. We
             designed a TMS coil that focuses its effect near the tip of
             a recording electrode and recording electronics that enable
             direct acquisition of neuronal signals at the site of peak
             stimulus strength minimally perturbed by stimulation
             artifact in awake monkeys (Macaca mulatta). We recorded
             action potentials within ∼1 ms after 0.4-ms TMS pulses and
             observed changes in activity that differed significantly for
             active stimulation as compared with sham stimulation. This
             methodology is compatible with standard equipment in primate
             laboratories, allowing easy implementation. Application of
             these tools will facilitate the refinement of next
             generation TMS devices, experiments and treatment
             protocols.},
   Doi = {10.1038/nn.3751},
   Key = {fds334801}
}

@article{fds334804,
   Author = {Prevosto, V and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Cognitive control of movement via the cerebellar-recipient
             thalamus.},
   Journal = {Frontiers in systems neuroscience},
   Volume = {7},
   Pages = {56},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {October},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00056},
   Abstract = {The cognitive control of behavior was long considered to be
             centralized in cerebral cortex. More recently, subcortical
             structures such as cerebellum and basal ganglia have been
             implicated in cognitive functions as well. The fact that
             subcortico-cortical circuits for the control of movement
             involve the thalamus prompts the notion that activity in
             movement-related thalamus may also reflect elements of
             cognitive behavior. Yet this hypothesis has rarely been
             investigated. Using the pathways linking cerebellum to
             cerebral cortex via the thalamus as a template, we review
             evidence that the motor thalamus, together with
             movement-related central thalamus have the requisite
             connectivity and activity to mediate cognitive aspects of
             movement control.},
   Doi = {10.3389/fnsys.2013.00056},
   Key = {fds334804}
}

@article{fds334805,
   Author = {Ashmore, RC and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Delay activity of saccade-related neurons in the caudal
             dentate nucleus of the macaque cerebellum.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {109},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {2129-2144},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0022-3077},
   url = {https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27738651/Publications/AshmoreSommer2013-CaudalDentateNucleus.pdf},
   Abstract = {The caudal dentate nucleus (DN) in lateral cerebellum is
             connected with two visual/oculomotor areas of the cerebrum:
             the frontal eye field and lateral intraparietal cortex. Many
             neurons in frontal eye field and lateral intraparietal
             cortex produce "delay activity" between stimulus and
             response that correlates with processes such as motor
             planning. Our hypothesis was that caudal DN neurons would
             have prominent delay activity as well. From lesion studies,
             we predicted that this activity would be related to
             self-timing, i.e., the triggering of saccades based on the
             internal monitoring of time. We recorded from neurons in the
             caudal DN of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) that made delayed
             saccades with or without a self-timing requirement. Most
             (84%) of the caudal DN neurons had delay activity. These
             neurons conveyed at least three types of information. First,
             their activity was often correlated, trial by trial, with
             saccade initiation. Correlations were found more frequently
             in a task that required self-timing of saccades (53% of
             neurons) than in a task that did not (27% of neurons).
             Second, the delay activity was often tuned for saccade
             direction (in 65% of neurons). This tuning emerged
             continuously during a trial. Third, the time course of delay
             activity associated with self-timed saccades differed
             significantly from that associated with visually guided
             saccades (in 71% of neurons). A minority of neurons had
             sensory-related activity. None had presaccadic bursts, in
             contrast to DN neurons recorded more rostrally. We conclude
             that caudal DN neurons convey saccade-related delay activity
             that may contribute to the motor preparation of when and
             where to move.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00906.2011},
   Key = {fds334805}
}

@article{fds334806,
   Author = {Smith, MA and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Spatial and temporal scales of neuronal correlation in
             visual area V4.},
   Journal = {The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the
             Society for Neuroscience},
   Volume = {33},
   Number = {12},
   Pages = {5422-5432},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0270-6474},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SmithSommer2013-SpatialTemporalCorrelationsV4.pdf},
   Abstract = {The spiking activity of nearby cortical neurons is
             correlated on both short and long time scales. Understanding
             this shared variability in firing patterns is critical for
             appreciating the representation of sensory stimuli in
             ensembles of neurons, the coincident influences of neurons
             on common targets, and the functional implications of
             microcircuitry. Our knowledge about neuronal correlations,
             however, derives largely from experiments that used
             different recording methods, analysis techniques, and
             cortical regions. Here we studied the structure of neuronal
             correlation in area V4 of alert macaques using recording and
             analysis procedures designed to match those used previously
             in primary visual cortex (V1), the major input to V4. We
             found that the spatial and temporal properties of
             correlations in V4 were remarkably similar to those of V1,
             with two notable differences: correlated variability in V4
             was approximately one-third the magnitude of that in V1 and
             synchrony in V4 was less temporally precise than in V1. In
             both areas, spontaneous activity (measured during fixation
             while viewing a blank screen) was approximately twice as
             correlated as visual-evoked activity. The results provide a
             foundation for understanding how the structure of neuronal
             correlation differs among brain regions and stages in
             cortical processing and suggest that it is likely governed
             by features of neuronal circuits that are shared across the
             visual cortex.},
   Doi = {10.1523/jneurosci.4782-12.2013},
   Key = {fds334806}
}

@article{fds334807,
   Author = {Mayo, JP and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Neuronal correlates of visual time perception at brief
             timescales.},
   Journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A},
   Volume = {110},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1506-1511},
   Year = {2013},
   Month = {January},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/MayoSommer2013-ReprintIncludingSupplInfo.pdf},
   Abstract = {Successful interaction with the world depends on accurate
             perception of the timing of external events. Neurons at
             early stages of the primate visual system represent
             time-varying stimuli with high precision. However, it is
             unknown whether this temporal fidelity is maintained in the
             prefrontal cortex, where changes in neuronal activity
             generally correlate with changes in perception. One reason
             to suspect that it is not maintained is that humans
             experience surprisingly large fluctuations in the perception
             of time. To investigate the neuronal correlates of time
             perception, we recorded from neurons in the prefrontal
             cortex and midbrain of monkeys performing a
             temporal-discrimination task. Visual time intervals were
             presented at a timescale relevant to natural behavior (<500
             ms). At this brief timescale, neuronal adaptation--time-dependent
             changes in the size of successive responses--occurs. We
             found that visual activity fluctuated with timing judgments
             in the prefrontal cortex but not in comparable midbrain
             areas. Surprisingly, only response strength, not timing,
             predicted task performance. Intervals perceived as longer
             were associated with larger visual responses and shorter
             intervals with smaller responses, matching the dynamics of
             adaptation. These results suggest that the magnitude of
             prefrontal activity may be read out to provide temporal
             information that contributes to judging the passage of
             time.},
   Doi = {10.1073/pnas.1217177110},
   Key = {fds334807}
}

@article{fds334811,
   Author = {Shin, S and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Division of labor in frontal eye field neurons during
             presaccadic remapping of visual receptive
             fields.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {108},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {2144-2159},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {October},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/ShinSommer2012.pdf},
   Abstract = {Our percept of visual stability across saccadic eye
             movements may be mediated by presaccadic remapping. Just
             before a saccade, neurons that remap become visually
             responsive at a future field (FF), which anticipates the
             saccade vector. Hence, the neurons use corollary discharge
             of saccades. Many of the neurons also decrease their
             response at the receptive field (RF). Presaccadic remapping
             occurs in several brain areas including the frontal eye
             field (FEF), which receives corollary discharge of saccades
             in its layer IV from a collicular-thalamic pathway. We
             studied, at two levels, the microcircuitry of remapping in
             the FEF. At the laminar level, we compared remapping between
             layers IV and V. At the cellular level, we compared
             remapping between different neuron types of layer IV. In the
             FEF in four monkeys (Macaca mulatta), we identified 27 layer
             IV neurons with orthodromic stimulation and 57 layer V
             neurons with antidromic stimulation from the superior
             colliculus. With the use of established criteria, we
             classified the layer IV neurons as putative excitatory (n =
             11), putative inhibitory (n = 12), or ambiguous (n = 4). We
             found that just before a saccade, putative excitatory
             neurons increased their visual response at the RF, putative
             inhibitory neurons showed no change, and ambiguous neurons
             increased their visual response at the FF. None of the
             neurons showed presaccadic visual changes at both RF and FF.
             In contrast, neurons in layer V showed full remapping (at
             both the RF and FF). Our data suggest that elemental signals
             for remapping are distributed across neuron types in early
             cortical processing and combined in later stages of cortical
             microcircuitry.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00204.2012},
   Key = {fds334811}
}

@article{fds334808,
   Author = {Mayo, JP and DiTomasso, A and Sommer, M and Smith,
             MA},
   Title = {An improved method for mapping neuronal receptive fields in
             prefrontal cortex},
   Journal = {Journal of Vision},
   Volume = {12},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {81-81},
   Publisher = {Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
             (ARVO)},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/12.9.81},
   Doi = {10.1167/12.9.81},
   Key = {fds334808}
}

@article{fds334810,
   Author = {Middlebrooks, PG and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Neuronal correlates of metacognition in primate frontal
             cortex.},
   Journal = {Neuron},
   Volume = {75},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {517-530},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {08966273},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/MiddlebrooksSommer2012-MetacogNeurons-TextSupplPreview.pdf},
   Abstract = {Humans are metacognitive: they monitor and control their
             cognition. Our hypothesis was that neuronal correlates of
             metacognition reside in the same brain areas responsible for
             cognition, including frontal cortex. Recent work
             demonstrated that nonhuman primates are capable of
             metacognition, so we recorded from single neurons in the
             frontal eye field, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and
             supplementary eye field of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) that
             performed a metacognitive visual-oculomotor task. The
             animals made a decision and reported it with a saccade, but
             received no immediate reward or feedback. Instead, they had
             to monitor their decision and bet whether it was correct.
             Activity was correlated with decisions and bets in all three
             brain areas, but putative metacognitive activity that linked
             decisions to appropriate bets occurred exclusively in the
             SEF. Our results offer a survey of neuronal correlates of
             metacognition and implicate the SEF in linking cognitive
             functions over short periods of time.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.028},
   Key = {fds334810}
}

@article{fds334809,
   Author = {Crapse, TB and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Frontal eye field neurons assess visual stability across
             saccades.},
   Journal = {The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the
             Society for Neuroscience},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {2835-2845},
   Year = {2012},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0270-6474},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/CrapseSommer2012.pdf},
   Abstract = {The image on the retina may move because the eyes move, or
             because something in the visual scene moves. The brain is
             not fooled by this ambiguity. Even as we make saccades, we
             are able to detect whether visual objects remain stable or
             move. Here we test whether this ability to assess visual
             stability across saccades is present at the single-neuron
             level in the frontal eye field (FEF), an area that receives
             both visual input and information about imminent saccades.
             Our hypothesis was that neurons in the FEF report whether a
             visual stimulus remains stable or moves as a saccade is
             made. Monkeys made saccades in the presence of a visual
             stimulus outside of the receptive field. In some trials, the
             stimulus remained stable, but in other trials, it moved
             during the saccade. In every trial, the stimulus occupied
             the center of the receptive field after the saccade, thus
             evoking a reafferent visual response. We found that many FEF
             neurons signaled, in the strength and timing of their
             reafferent response, whether the stimulus had remained
             stable or moved. Reafferent responses were tuned for the
             amount of stimulus translation, and, in accordance with
             human psychophysics, tuning was better (more prevalent,
             stronger, and quicker) for stimuli that moved perpendicular,
             rather than parallel, to the saccade. Tuning was sometimes
             present as well for nonspatial transaccadic changes (in
             color, size, or both). Our results indicate that FEF neurons
             evaluate visual stability during saccades and may be general
             purpose detectors of transaccadic visual
             change.},
   Doi = {10.1523/jneurosci.1320-11.2012},
   Key = {fds334809}
}

@article{fds334813,
   Author = {Basso, MA and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Exploring the role of the substantia nigra pars reticulata
             in eye movements.},
   Journal = {Neuroscience},
   Volume = {198},
   Pages = {205-212},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.08.026},
   Abstract = {Experiments that demonstrated a role for the substantia
             nigra in eye movements have played an important role in our
             understanding of the function of the basal ganglia in
             behavior more broadly. In this review we explore more recent
             experiments that extend the role of the substantia nigra
             pars reticulata from a simple gate for eye movements to
             include a role in cognitive processes for eye movements. We
             review recent evidence suggesting that basal ganglia nuclei
             beyond the substantia nigra may also play a role in eye
             movements and the cognitive events leading up to the
             production of eye movements. We close by pointing out some
             unresolved questions in our understanding of the
             relationship of basal ganglia nuclei and eye
             movements.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.08.026},
   Key = {fds334813}
}

@article{Sommer2009,
   Author = {Middlebrooks, PG and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Metacognition in monkeys during an oculomotor
             task.},
   Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and
             cognition},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {325-337},
   Year = {2011},
   Month = {March},
   ISSN = {0278-7393},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/MiddlebrooksSommer2011-MetacognitionInMonkeys.pdf},
   Abstract = {This study investigated whether rhesus monkeys show evidence
             of metacognition in a reduced, visual oculomotor task that
             is particularly suitable for use in fMRI and
             electrophysiology. The 2-stage task involved punctate visual
             stimulation and saccadic eye movement responses. In each
             trial, monkeys made a decision and then made a bet. To earn
             maximum reward, they had to monitor their decision and use
             that information to bet advantageously. Two monkeys learned
             to base their bets on their decisions within a few weeks. We
             implemented an operational definition of metacognitive
             behavior that relied on trial-by-trial analyses and signal
             detection theory. Both monkeys exhibited metacognition
             according to these quantitative criteria. Neither external
             visual cues nor potential reaction time cues explained the
             betting behavior; the animals seemed to rely exclusively on
             internal traces of their decisions. We documented the
             learning process of one monkey. During a 10-session
             transition phase, betting switched from random to a
             decision-based strategy. The results reinforce previous
             findings of metacognitive ability in monkeys and may
             facilitate the neurophysiological investigation of
             metacognitive functions.},
   Doi = {10.1037/a0021611},
   Key = {Sommer2009}
}

@article{fds334816,
   Author = {Mayo, JP and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Shifting attention to neurons.},
   Journal = {Trends Cogn Sci},
   Volume = {14},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {389},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.003},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.003},
   Key = {fds334816}
}

@article{fds334814,
   Author = {Crapse, T and Sommer, M},
   Title = {Translation of a visual stimulus during a saccade is more
             detectable if it moves perpendicular, rather than parallel,
             to the saccade},
   Journal = {Journal of Vision},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {7},
   Pages = {521-521},
   Publisher = {Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
             (ARVO)},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/10.7.521},
   Doi = {10.1167/10.7.521},
   Key = {fds334814}
}

@article{fds334815,
   Author = {Shin, S and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Activity of neurons in monkey globus pallidus during
             oculomotor behavior compared with that in substantia nigra
             pars reticulata.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {103},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1874-1887},
   Year = {2010},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0022-3077},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/ShinSommer2010.pdf},
   Abstract = {The basal ganglia are a subcortical assembly of nuclei
             involved in many aspects of behavior. Three of the nuclei
             have high firing rates and inhibitory influences: the
             substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), globus pallidus
             interna (GPi), and globus pallidus externa (GPe). The SNr
             contains a wide range of visual, cognitive, and motor
             signals that have been shown to contribute to saccadic eye
             movements. Our hypothesis was that GPe and GPi neurons carry
             similarly diverse signals during saccadic behavior. We
             recorded from GPe, GPi, and SNr neurons in monkeys that made
             memory-guided saccades and found that neurons in all three
             structures had increases or decreases in activity
             synchronized with saccade generation, visual stimulation, or
             reward. Comparing GPe neurons with GPi neurons, we found
             relatively more visual-related activity in GPe and more
             reward-related activity in GPi. Comparing both pallidal
             samples with the SNr, we found a greater resemblance between
             GPe and SNr neurons than that between GPi and SNr neurons.
             As expected from a known inhibitory projection from GPe to
             SNr, there was a general reversal of sign in activity
             modulations between the structures: bursts of activity were
             relatively more common in GPe and pauses more common in SNr.
             We analyzed the response fields of neurons in all three
             structures and found relatively narrow and lateralized
             fields early in trials (during visual and saccadic events)
             followed by a broadening later in trials (during reward).
             Our data reinforce an emerging, new consensus that the GPe
             and GPi, in addition to the SNr, contribute to oculomotor
             behavior.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00101.2009},
   Key = {fds334815}
}

@article{fds334817,
   Author = {Sommer, MA},
   Title = {How the visual system monitors where the eyes will
             move},
   Journal = {Journal of Vision},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {14},
   Pages = {13-13},
   Publisher = {Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
             (ARVO)},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/9.14.13},
   Doi = {10.1167/9.14.13},
   Key = {fds334817}
}

@article{fds334818,
   Author = {Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Corollary discharge circuits for stabilizing visual
             perception},
   Journal = {PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY},
   Volume = {46},
   Pages = {S9-S9},
   Publisher = {WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {September},
   Key = {fds334818}
}

@article{fds334819,
   Author = {Mayo, JP and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Monkey and human performance in a chronostasis task suitable
             for neurophysiology},
   Journal = {Journal of Vision},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {406-406},
   Publisher = {Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
             (ARVO)},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {August},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/9.8.406},
   Doi = {10.1167/9.8.406},
   Key = {fds334819}
}

@article{Crapse2009,
   Author = {Crapse, TB and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Frontal eye field neurons with spatial representations
             predicted by their subcortical input.},
   Journal = {The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the
             Society for Neuroscience},
   Volume = {29},
   Number = {16},
   Pages = {5308-5318},
   Year = {2009},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0270-6474},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/CrapseSommer2009_JNeurosci.pdf},
   Abstract = {The frontal eye field (FEF) is a cortical structure involved
             in cognitive aspects of eye movement control. Neurons in the
             FEF, as in most of cerebral cortex, primarily represent
             contralateral space. They fire for visual stimuli in the
             contralateral field and for saccadic eye movements made to
             those stimuli. Yet many FEF neurons engage in sophisticated
             functions that require flexible spatial representations such
             as shifting receptive fields and vector subtraction. Such
             functions require knowledge about all of space, including
             the ipsilateral hemifield. How does the FEF gain access to
             ipsilateral information? Here, we provide evidence that one
             source of ipsilateral information may be the opposite
             superior colliculus (SC) in the midbrain. We physiologically
             identified neurons in the FEF that receive input from the
             opposite SC, same-side SC, or both. We found a striking
             structure-function relationship: the laterality of the
             response field of an FEF neuron was predicted by the
             laterality of its SC inputs. FEF neurons with input from the
             opposite SC had ipsilateral fields, whereas neurons with
             input from the same-side SC had contralateral fields. FEF
             neurons with input from both SCs had lateralized fields that
             could point in any direction. The results suggest that
             signals from the two SCs provide each FEF with information
             about all of visual space, a prerequisite for higher level
             sensorimotor computations.},
   Doi = {10.1523/jneurosci.4906-08.2009},
   Key = {Crapse2009}
}

@article{Crapse2008a,
   Author = {Crapse, TB and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Corollary discharge circuits in the primate
             brain.},
   Journal = {Current opinion in neurobiology},
   Volume = {18},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {552-557},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0959-4388},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/CrapseSommer_CurrOpinionNeurobiology2008.pdf},
   Abstract = {Movements are necessary to engage the world, but every
             movement results in sensorimotor ambiguity. Self-movements
             cause changes to sensory inflow as well as changes in the
             positions of objects relative to motor effectors (eyes and
             limbs). Hence the brain needs to monitor self-movements, and
             one way this is accomplished is by routing copies of
             movement commands to appropriate structures. These signals,
             known as corollary discharge (CD), enable compensation for
             sensory consequences of movement and preemptive updating of
             spatial representations. Such operations occur with a speed
             and accuracy that implies a reliance on prediction. Here we
             review recent CD studies and find that they arrive at a
             shared conclusion: CD contributes to prediction for the sake
             of sensorimotor harmony.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.017},
   Key = {Crapse2008a}
}

@article{Mayo2008a,
   Author = {Mayo, JP and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Neuronal adaptation caused by sequential visual stimulation
             in the frontal eye field.},
   Journal = {J Neurophysiol},
   Volume = {100},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1923-1935},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0022-3077},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/MayoSommer2008-FEFadaptation.pdf},
   Abstract = {Images on the retina can change drastically in only a few
             milliseconds. A robust description of visual temporal
             processing is therefore necessary to understand visual
             analysis in the real world. To this end, we studied
             subsecond visual changes and asked how prefrontal neurons in
             monkeys respond to stimuli presented in quick succession. We
             recorded the visual responses of single neurons in the
             frontal eye field (FEF), a prefrontal area polysynaptically
             removed from the retina that is involved with higher level
             cognition. For comparison, we also recorded from small
             groups of neurons in the superficial superior colliculus
             (supSC), an area that receives direct retinal input. Two
             sequential flashes of light at varying interstimulus
             intervals were presented in a neuron's receptive field. We
             found pervasive neuronal adaptation in FEF and supSC. Visual
             responses to the second stimulus were diminished for up to
             half a second after the first stimulus presentation.
             Adaptation required a similar amount of time to return to
             full responsiveness in both structures, but there was
             significantly more neuronal adaptation overall in FEF.
             Adaptation was not affected by saccades, although visual
             responses to single stimuli were transiently suppressed
             postsaccadically. Our FEF and supSC results systematically
             document subsecond visual adaptation in prefrontal cortex
             and show that this adaptation is comparable to, but stronger
             than, adaptation found earlier in the visual
             system.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.90549.2008},
   Key = {Mayo2008a}
}

@article{Crapse2008b,
   Author = {Crapse, TB and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom.},
   Journal = {Nature reviews. Neuroscience},
   Volume = {9},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {587-600},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {1471-0048},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/CrapseSommer_CDReview2008.pdf},
   Abstract = {Our movements can hinder our ability to sense the world.
             Movements can induce sensory input (for example, when you
             hit something) that is indistinguishable from the input that
             is caused by external agents (for example, when something
             hits you). It is critical for nervous systems to be able to
             differentiate between these two scenarios. A ubiquitous
             strategy is to route copies of movement commands to sensory
             structures. These signals, which are referred to as
             corollary discharge (CD), influence sensory processing in
             myriad ways. Here we review the CD circuits that have been
             uncovered by neurophysiological studies and suggest a
             functional taxonomic classification of CD across the animal
             kingdom. This broad understanding of CD circuits lays the
             groundwork for more challenging studies that combine
             neurophysiology and psychophysics to probe the role of CD in
             perception.},
   Doi = {10.1038/nrn2457},
   Key = {Crapse2008b}
}

@article{Mayo2008b,
   Author = {Mayo, JP and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Neuronal adaptation: Delay compensation at the level of
             single neurons?},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {31},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {210-212},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0140-525X},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/MayoSommer2008-BBScommentary.pdf},
   Abstract = {Saccades divide visual input into rapid, discontinuous
             periods of stimulation on the retina. The response of single
             neurons to such sequential stimuli is neuronal adaptation; a
             robust first response followed by an interval-dependent
             diminished second response. Adaptation is pervasive in both
             early and late stages of visual processing. Given its
             inherent coding of brief time intervals, neuronal adaptation
             may play a fundamental role in compensating for visual
             delays. © 2008 Cambridge University Press
             2008.},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0140525X08003944},
   Key = {Mayo2008b}
}

@article{Sommer2008a,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of
             movements.},
   Journal = {Annual review of neuroscience},
   Volume = {31},
   Pages = {317-338},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0147-006X},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerWurtz_AnnualRevNeurosci2008.pdf},
   Abstract = {Each movement we make activates our own sensory receptors,
             thus causing a problem for the brain: the spurious,
             movement-related sensations must be discriminated from the
             sensory inputs that really matter, those representing our
             environment. Here we consider circuits for solving this
             problem in the primate brain. Such circuits convey a copy of
             each motor command, known as a corollary discharge (CD), to
             brain regions that use sensory input. In the visual system,
             CD signals may help to produce a stable visual percept from
             the jumpy images resulting from our rapid eye movements. A
             candidate pathway for providing CD for vision ascends from
             the superior colliculus to the frontal cortex in the primate
             brain. This circuit conveys warning signals about impending
             eye movements that are used for planning subsequent
             movements and analyzing the visual world. Identifying this
             circuit has provided a model for studying CD in other
             primate sensory systems and may lead to a better
             understanding of motor and mental disorders.},
   Doi = {10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125627},
   Key = {Sommer2008a}
}

@article{Sommer2008b,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {Visual perception and corollary discharge.},
   Journal = {Perception},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {408-418},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0301-0066},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerWurtz2008-Perception.pdf},
   Abstract = {Perception depends not only on sensory input but also on the
             state of the brain receiving that input. A classic example
             is perception of a stable visual world in spite of the
             saccadic eye movements that shift the images on the retina.
             A long-standing hypothesis is that the brain compensates for
             the disruption of visual input by using advance knowledge of
             the impending saccade, an internally generated corollary
             discharge. One possible neuronal mechanism for this
             compensation has been previously identified in parietal and
             frontal cortex of monkeys, but the origin of the necessary
             corollary discharge remained unknown. Here, we consider
             recent experiments that identified a pathway for a corollary
             discharge for saccades that extends from the superior
             colliculus in the midbrain to the frontal eye fields in the
             cerebral cortex with a relay in the medial dorsal nucleus of
             the thalamus. We first review the nature of the evidence
             used to identify a corollary discharge signal in the
             complexity of the primate brain and show its use for guiding
             a rapid sequence of eye movements. We then consider two
             experiments that show this same corollary signal may provide
             the input to the frontal cortex neurons that alters their
             activity with saccades in ways that could compensate for the
             displacements in the visual input produced by saccadic eye
             movements. The first experiment shows that the corollary
             discharge signal is spatially and temporally appropriate to
             produce the alterations in the frontal-cortex neurons. The
             second shows that this signal is necessary for this
             alteration because inactivation of the corollary reduces the
             compensation by frontal-cortex neurons. The identification
             of this relatively simple circuit specifies the organization
             of a corollary discharge in the primate brain for the first
             time and provides a specific example upon which
             consideration of the roles of corollary activity in other
             systems and for other functions can be evaluated.},
   Doi = {10.1068/p5873},
   Key = {Sommer2008b}
}

@article{fds334831,
   Author = {Crapse, TB and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {The frontal eye field as a prediction map.},
   Journal = {Progress in brain research},
   Volume = {171},
   Pages = {383-390},
   Editor = {C. Kennard and R. J. Leigh},
   Year = {2008},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0079-6123},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/CrapseSommer_ProgressBrainRes2008.pdf},
   Abstract = {Predictive processes are widespread in the motor and sensory
             areas of the primate brain. They enable rapid computations
             despite processing delays and assist in resolving noisy,
             ambiguous input. Here we propose that the frontal eye field,
             a cortical area devoted to sensorimotor aspects of eye
             movement control, implements a prediction map of the
             postsaccadic visual scene for the purpose of constructing a
             stable percept despite saccadic eye movements.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0079-6123(08)00656-0},
   Key = {fds334831}
}

@article{Sommer2007a,
   Author = {Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Microcircuits for attention.},
   Journal = {Neuron},
   Volume = {55},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {6-8},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0896-6273},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/Sommer2007-NeuronCommentary.pdf},
   Abstract = {Researchers who study the neuronal basis of cognition face a
             paradox. If they extract the brain, its cognitive functions
             cannot be assessed. On the other hand, the brain's
             microcircuits are difficult to study in the intact animal.
             In this issue of Neuron, Mitchell et al. make use of a
             promising approach based on waveform analysis to reveal new
             details about neuronal interactions during visual
             attention.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.022},
   Key = {Sommer2007a}
}

@article{Sommer2007b,
   Author = {Sommer, MA},
   Title = {The feeling of looking.},
   Journal = {Nature neuroscience},
   Volume = {10},
   Number = {5},
   Pages = {538-540},
   Year = {2007},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {1097-6256},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/Sommer2007-FeelingOfLooking.pdf},
   Abstract = {Sensory cortex area 3a contains a map of the body. A new
             paper reports the location of eye position signals in this
             map which should allow researchers to test the functions of
             eye position signals and visual gain fields in more detail.
             © 2007 Nature Publishing Group.},
   Doi = {10.1038/nn0507-538},
   Key = {Sommer2007b}
}

@article{Sommer2006,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in
             frontal cortex.},
   Journal = {Nature},
   Volume = {444},
   Number = {7117},
   Pages = {374-377},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {November},
   ISSN = {0028-0836},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerWurtz2006_Nature_Reprint.pdf},
   Abstract = {Each of our movements activates our own sensory receptors,
             and therefore keeping track of self-movement is a necessary
             part of analysing sensory input. One way in which the brain
             keeps track of self-movement is by monitoring an internal
             copy, or corollary discharge, of motor commands. This
             concept could explain why we perceive a stable visual world
             despite our frequent quick, or saccadic, eye movements:
             corollary discharge about each saccade would permit the
             visual system to ignore saccade-induced visual changes. The
             critical missing link has been the connection between
             corollary discharge and visual processing. Here we show that
             such a link is formed by a corollary discharge from the
             thalamus that targets the frontal cortex. In the thalamus,
             neurons in the mediodorsal nucleus relay a corollary
             discharge of saccades from the midbrain superior colliculus
             to the cortical frontal eye field. In the frontal eye field,
             neurons use corollary discharge to shift their visual
             receptive fields spatially before saccades. We tested the
             hypothesis that these two components-a pathway for corollary
             discharge and neurons with shifting receptive fields-form a
             circuit in which the corollary discharge drives the shift.
             First we showed that the known spatial and temporal
             properties of the corollary discharge predict the dynamic
             changes in spatial visual processing of cortical neurons
             when saccades are made. Then we moved from this correlation
             to causation by isolating single cortical neurons and
             showing that their spatial visual processing is impaired
             when corollary discharge from the thalamus is interrupted.
             Thus the visual processing of frontal neurons is
             spatiotemporally matched with, and functionally dependent
             on, corollary discharge input from the thalamus. These
             experiments establish the first link between corollary
             discharge and visual processing, delineate a brain circuit
             that is well suited for mediating visual stability, and
             provide a framework for studying corollary discharge in
             other sensory systems.},
   Doi = {10.1038/nature05279},
   Key = {Sommer2006}
}

@article{fds334835,
   Author = {Wurtz, RH and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {A corollary discharge for perceptual stability},
   Journal = {PERCEPTION},
   Volume = {35},
   Pages = {10-11},
   Publisher = {SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD},
   Year = {2006},
   Month = {January},
   Key = {fds334835}
}

@article{fds334836,
   Author = {Wurtz, RH and Sommer, MA and Cavanaugh, J},
   Title = {Drivers from the deep: the contribution of collicular input
             to thalamocortical processing.},
   Journal = {Progress in brain research},
   Volume = {149},
   Pages = {207-225},
   Year = {2005},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0079-6123},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/WurtzSommerCavanaugh_ProgrBrainRes2005.pdf},
   Abstract = {A traditional view of the thalamus is that it is a relay
             station which receives sensory input and conveys this
             information to cortex. This sensory input determines most of
             the properties of first order thalamic neurons, and so is
             said to drive, rather than modulate, these neurons. This
             holds as a rule for first order thalamic nuclei, but in
             contrast, higher order thalamic nuclei receive much of their
             driver input back from cerebral cortex. In addition, higher
             order thalamic neurons receive inputs from subcortical
             movement-related centers. In the terminology popularized
             from studies of the sensory system, can we consider these
             ascending motor inputs to thalamus from subcortical
             structures to be modulators, subtly influencing the activity
             of their target neurons, or drivers, dictating the activity
             of their target neurons? This chapter summarizes relevant
             evidence from neuronal recording, inactivation, and
             stimulation of pathways projecting from the superior
             colliculus through thalamus to cerebral cortex. The study
             concludes that many inputs to the higher order nuclei of the
             thalamus from subcortical oculomotor areas - from the
             superior colliculus and probably other midbrain and pontine
             regions - should be regarded as motor drivers analogous to
             the sensory drivers at the first order thalamic nuclei.
             These motor drivers at the thalamus are viewed as being at
             the top of a series of feedback loops that provide
             information on impending actions, just as sensory drivers
             provide information about the external environment.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0079-6123(05)49015-9},
   Key = {fds334836}
}

@article{fds334838,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex. II. Role of
             the SC-MD-FEF pathway in corollary discharge.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {91},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {1403-1423},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00740.2003},
   Abstract = {One way we keep track of our movements is by monitoring
             corollary discharges or internal copies of movement
             commands. This study tested a hypothesis that the pathway
             from superior colliculus (SC) to mediodorsal thalamus (MD)
             to frontal eye field (FEF) carries a corollary discharge
             about saccades made into the contralateral visual field. We
             inactivated the MD relay node with muscimol in monkeys and
             measured corollary discharge deficits using a double-step
             task: two sequential saccades were made to the locations of
             briefly flashed targets. To make second saccades correctly,
             monkeys had to internally monitor their first saccades;
             therefore deficits in the corollary discharge representation
             of first saccades should disrupt second saccades. We found,
             first, that monkeys seemed to misjudge the amplitudes of
             their first saccades; this was revealed by systematic shifts
             in second saccade end points. Thus corollary discharge
             accuracy was impaired. Second, monkeys were less able to
             detect trial-by-trial variations in their first saccades;
             this was revealed by reduced compensatory changes in second
             saccade angles. Thus corollary discharge precision also was
             impaired. Both deficits occurred only when first saccades
             went into the contralateral visual field. Single-saccade
             generation was unaffected. Additional deficits occurred in
             reaction time and overall performance, but these were
             bilateral. We conclude that the SC-MD-FEF pathway conveys a
             corollary discharge used for coordinating sequential
             saccades and possibly for stabilizing vision across
             saccades. This pathway is the first elucidated in what may
             be a multilevel chain of corollary discharge circuits
             extending from the extraocular motoneurons up into cerebral
             cortex.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00740.2003},
   Key = {fds334838}
}

@article{fds334839,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex. I. Oculomotor
             signals sent from superior colliculus to frontal eye field
             via mediodorsal thalamus.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {91},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {1381-1402},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00738.2003},
   Abstract = {Neuronal processing in cerebral cortex and signal
             transmission from cortex to brain stem have been studied
             extensively, but little is known about the numerous feedback
             pathways that ascend from brain stem to cortex. In this
             study, we characterized the signals conveyed through an
             ascending pathway coursing from the superior colliculus (SC)
             to the frontal eye field (FEF) via mediodorsal thalamus
             (MD). Using antidromic and orthodromic stimulation, we
             identified SC source neurons, MD relay neurons, and FEF
             recipient neurons of the pathway in Macaca mulatta. The
             monkeys performed oculomotor tasks, including
             delayed-saccade tasks, that permitted analysis of signals
             such as visual activity, delay activity, and presaccadic
             activity. We found that the SC sends all of these signals
             into the pathway with no output selectivity, i.e., the
             signals leaving the SC resembled those found generally
             within the SC. Visual activity arrived in FEF too late to
             contribute to short-latency visual responses there, and
             delay activity was largely filtered out in MD. Presaccadic
             activity, however, seemed critical because it traveled
             essentially unchanged from SC to FEF. Signal transmission in
             the pathway was fast ( approximately 2 ms from SC to FEF)
             and topographically organized (SC neurons drove MD and FEF
             neurons having similarly eccentric visual and movement
             fields). Our analysis of identified neurons in one pathway
             from brain stem to frontal cortex thus demonstrates that
             multiple signals are sent from SC to FEF with presaccadic
             activity being prominent. We hypothesize that a major signal
             conveyed by the pathway is corollary discharge information
             about the vector of impending saccades.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.00738.2003},
   Key = {fds334839}
}

@article{fds334837,
   Author = {Wurtz, RH and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Identifying corollary discharges for movement in the primate
             brain.},
   Journal = {Progress in brain research},
   Volume = {144},
   Pages = {47-60},
   Year = {2004},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0079-6123},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/WurtzSommer_ProgBrainRes2004.pdf},
   Abstract = {The brain keeps track of the movements it makes so as to
             process sensory input accurately and coordinate complex
             movements gracefully. In this chapter we review the brain's
             strategies for keeping track of fast, saccadic eye
             movements. One way it does this is by monitoring copies of
             saccadic motor commands, or corollary discharges. It has
             been difficult to identify corollary discharge signals in
             the primate brain, although in some studies the influence of
             corollary discharge, for example on visual processing, has
             been found. We propose four criteria for identifying
             corollary discharge signals in primate brain based on our
             experiences studying a pathway from superior colliculus, in
             the brainstem, through mediodorsal thalamus to frontal eye
             field, in the prefrontal cortex. First, the signals must
             originate from a brain structure involved in generating
             movements. Second, they must begin just prior to movements
             and represent spatial attributes of the movements. Third,
             eliminating the signals should not impair movements in
             simple tasks not requiring corollary discharge. Fourth,
             eliminating the signals should, however, disrupt movements
             in tasks that require corollary discharge, such as a
             double-step task in which the monkey must keep track of one
             saccade in order to correctly generate another. Applying
             these criteria to the pathway from superior colliculus to
             frontal eye field, we concluded that it does indeed convey
             corollary discharge signals. The extent to which cerebral
             cortex actually uses these signals, particularly in the
             realm of sensory perception, remains unknown pending further
             studies. Moreover, many other ascending pathways from
             brainstem to cortex remain to be explored in behaving
             monkeys, and some of these, too, may carry corollary
             discharge signals.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0079-6123(03)14403-2},
   Key = {fds334837}
}

@article{fds334841,
   Author = {Sommer, MA},
   Title = {The role of the thalamus in motor control.},
   Journal = {Current opinion in neurobiology},
   Volume = {13},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {663-670},
   Year = {2003},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2003.10.014},
   Abstract = {Two characteristics of the thalamus--its apparently simple
             relay function and its daunting multinuclear structure--have
             been customarily viewed as good reasons to study something
             else. Yet, now that many other brain regions have been
             explored and neurophysiologists are turning to questions of
             how larger circuits operate, these two characteristics are
             starting to seem more attractive. First, the relay nature of
             thalamic neurons means that recording from them, like
             tapping into a wire, can reveal the signals carried by
             specific circuits. Second, the concentration of like relay
             neurons into nuclei means that inactivating or stimulating
             them can efficiently test the functions of the circuits.
             Recent studies implementing these principles have revealed
             pathways through the thalamus that contribute to generating
             movements and to monitoring one's own actions (corollary
             discharge).},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.conb.2003.10.014},
   Key = {fds334841}
}

@article{fds334840,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {The frontal eye field sends predictively remapped visual
             signals to the superior colliculus},
   Journal = {Journal of Vision},
   Volume = {3},
   Number = {9},
   Pages = {146-146},
   Publisher = {Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
             (ARVO)},
   Year = {2003},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/3.9.146},
   Abstract = {We perceive a stable visual world even though saccades often
             move our retinas. One way the brain may achieve a stable
             visual percept is through predictive remapping of visual
             receptive fields: just before a saccade, the receptive field
             of many neurons moves from its current location ("current
             receptive field") to the location it is expected to occupy
             after the saccade ("future receptive field"). Goldberg and
             colleagues found such remapping in cortical areas, e.g. in
             the frontal eye field (FEF), as well as in the intermediate
             layers of the superior colliculus (SC). In the present study
             we investigated the source of the SC's remapped visual
             signals. Do some of them come from the FEF? We identified
             FEF neurons that project to the SC using antidromic
             stimulation. For neurons with a visual response, we tested
             whether the receptive field shifted just prior to making a
             saccade. Saccadic amplitudes were chosen to be as small as
             possible while clearly separating the current and future
             receptive fields; they ranged from 5-30 deg. in amplitude
             and were directed contraversively. The saccadic target was a
             small red spot. We probed visual responsiveness at the
             current and future receptive field locations using a white
             spot flashed at various times before or after the saccade.
             Predictive remapping was indicated by a visual response to a
             probe flashed in the future receptive field just before the
             saccade began. We found that many FEF neurons projecting to
             the SC exhibited predictive remapping. Moreover, the
             remapping was as fast and strong as any previously reported
             for FEF or SC. It is clear, therefore, that remapped visual
             signals are sent from FEF to SC, providing direct evidence
             that the FEF is one source of the SC's remapped visual
             signals. Because remapping requires information about an
             imminent saccade, we hypothesize that remapping in FEF
             depends on corollary discharge signals such as those
             ascending from the SC through MD thalamus (Sommer and Wurtz
             2002).},
   Doi = {10.1167/3.9.146},
   Key = {fds334840}
}

@article{fds334842,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of
             movements.},
   Journal = {Science (New York, N.Y.)},
   Volume = {296},
   Number = {5572},
   Pages = {1480-1482},
   Year = {2002},
   Month = {May},
   ISSN = {0036-8075},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerWurtz2002.pdf},
   Abstract = {It is essential to keep track of the movements we make, and
             one way to do that is to monitor correlates, or corollary
             discharges, of neuronal movement commands. We hypothesized
             that a previously identified pathway from brainstem to
             frontal cortex might carry corollary discharge signals. We
             found that neuronal activity in this pathway encodes
             upcoming eye movements and that inactivating the pathway
             impairs sequential eye movements consistent with loss of
             corollary discharge without affecting single eye movements.
             These results identify a pathway in the brain of the primate
             Macaca mulatta that conveys corollary discharge
             signals.},
   Doi = {10.1126/science.1069590},
   Key = {fds334842}
}

@article{fds334845,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {Frontal eye field sends delay activity related to movement,
             memory, and vision to the superior colliculus.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {85},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1673-1685},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.85.4.1673},
   Abstract = {Many neurons within prefrontal cortex exhibit a tonic
             discharge between visual stimulation and motor response.
             This delay activity may contribute to movement, memory, and
             vision. We studied delay activity sent from the frontal eye
             field (FEF) in prefrontal cortex to the superior colliculus
             (SC). We evaluated whether this efferent delay activity was
             related to movement, memory, or vision, to establish its
             possible functions. Using antidromic stimulation, we
             identified 66 FEF neurons projecting to the SC and we
             recorded from them while monkeys performed a Go/Nogo task.
             Early in every trial, a monkey was instructed as to whether
             it would have to make a saccade (Go) or not (Nogo) to a
             target location, which permitted identification of delay
             activity related to movement. In half of the trials (memory
             trials), the target disappeared, which permitted
             identification of delay activity related to memory. In the
             remaining trials (visual trials), the target remained
             visible, which permitted identification of delay activity
             related to vision. We found that 77% (51/66) of the FEF
             output neurons had delay activity. In 53% (27/51) of these
             neurons, delay activity was modulated by Go/Nogo
             instructions. The modulation preceded saccades made into
             only part of the visual field, indicating that the
             modulation was movement-related. In some neurons, delay
             activity was modulated by Go/Nogo instructions in both
             memory and visual trials and seemed to represent where to
             move in general. In other neurons, delay activity was
             modulated by Go/Nogo instructions only in memory trials,
             which suggested that it was a correlate of working memory,
             or only in visual trials, which suggested that it was a
             correlate of visual attention. In 47% (24/51) of FEF output
             neurons, delay activity was unaffected by Go/Nogo
             instructions, which indicated that the activity was related
             to the visual stimulus. In some of these neurons, delay
             activity occurred in both memory and visual trials and
             seemed to represent a coordinate in visual space. In others,
             delay activity occurred only in memory trials and seemed to
             represent transient visual memory. In the remainder, delay
             activity occurred only in visual trials and seemed to be a
             tonic visual response. In conclusion, the FEF sends diverse
             delay activity signals related to movement, memory, and
             vision to the SC, where the signals may be used for saccade
             generation. Downstream transmission of various delay
             activity signals may be an important, general way in which
             the prefrontal cortex contributes to the control of
             movement.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.2001.85.4.1673},
   Key = {fds334845}
}

@article{fds334843,
   Author = {Wurtz, RH and Sommer, MA and Paré, M and Ferraina,
             S},
   Title = {Signal transformations from cerebral cortex to superior
             colliculus for the generation of saccades.},
   Journal = {Vision research},
   Volume = {41},
   Number = {25-26},
   Pages = {3399-3412},
   Year = {2001},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0042-6989},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/WurtzSommerPareFerraina2001.pdf},
   Abstract = {The ability of primates to make rapid and accurate saccadic
             eye movements for exploring the natural world is based on a
             neuronal system in the brain that has been studied
             extensively and is known to include multiple brain regions
             extending throughout the neuraxis. We examined the
             characteristics of signal flow in this system by recording
             from identified output neurons of two cortical regions, the
             lateral intraparietal area (LIP) and the frontal eye field
             (FEF), and from neurons in a brainstem structure targeted by
             these output neurons, the superior colliculus (SC). We
             compared the activity of neurons in these three populations
             while monkeys performed a delayed saccade task that allowed
             us to quantify visual responses, motor activity, and
             intervening delay activity. We examined whether delay
             activity was related to visual stimulation by comparing the
             activity during interleaved trials when a target was either
             present or absent during the delay period. We examined
             whether delay activity was related to movement by using a
             Go/Nogo task and comparing the activity during interleaved
             trials in which a saccade was either made (Go) or not
             (Nogo). We found that LIP output neurons, FEF output
             neurons, and SC neurons can all have visual responses, delay
             activity, and presaccadic bursts; hence in this way they are
             all quite similar. However, the delay activity tended to be
             more related to visual stimulation in the cortical output
             neurons than in the SC neurons. Complementing this, the
             delay activity tended to be more related to movement in the
             SC neurons than in the cortical output neurons. We conclude,
             first, that the signal flow leaving the cortex represents
             activity at nearly every stage of visuomotor transformation,
             and second, that there is a gradual evolution of signal
             processing as one proceeds from cortex to
             colliculus.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00066-9},
   Key = {fds334843}
}

@article{fds334844,
   Author = {Sommer, M and Wurtz, R},
   Title = {A subcortical source of visual input to the frontal eye
             field},
   Journal = {Journal of Vision},
   Volume = {1},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {259-259},
   Publisher = {Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
             (ARVO)},
   Year = {2001},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/1.3.259},
   Abstract = {Many neurons in the frontal eye field (FEF) exhibit visual
             responses and are thought to play important roles in
             visuosaccadic behavior. The FEF, however, is far removed
             from striate cortex. Where do the FEF's visual signals come
             from? Usually they are reasonably assumed to enter the FEF
             through afferents from extrastriate cortex. Here we show
             that, surprisingly, visual signals also enter the FEF
             through a subcortical route: a disynaptic, ascending pathway
             originating in the intermediate layers of the superior
             colliculus (SC). We recorded from identified neurons at all
             three stages of this pathway (n=30-40 in each sample): FEF
             recipient neurons, orthodromically activated from the SC;
             mediodorsal thalamus (MD) relay neurons, antidromically
             activated from FEF and orthodromically activated from SC;
             and SC source neurons, antidromically activated from MD. We
             studied the neurons while monkeys performed delayed saccade
             tasks designed to temporally resolve visual responses from
             presaccadic discharges. We found, first, that most neurons
             at every stage in the pathway had visual responses,
             presaccadic bursts, or both. Second, we found marked
             similarities between the SC source neurons and MD relay
             neurons: in both samples, about 15% of the neurons had only
             a visual response, 10% had only a presaccadic burst, and 75%
             had both. In contrast, FEF recipient neurons tended to be
             more visual in nature: 50% had only a visual response, none
             had only a presaccadic burst, and 50% had both a visual
             response and a presaccadic burst. This suggests that in
             addition to their subcortical inputs, these FEF neurons also
             receive other visual inputs, e.g. from extrastriate cortex.
             We conclude that visual activity in the FEF results not only
             from cortical afferents but also from subcortical inputs.
             Intriguingly, this implies that some of the visual signals
             in FEF are pre-processed by the SC.},
   Doi = {10.1167/1.3.259},
   Key = {fds334844}
}

@article{fds334849,
   Author = {Port, NL and Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {Multielectrode evidence for spreading activity across the
             superior colliculus movement map.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {84},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {344-357},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {July},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.344},
   Abstract = {The monkey superior colliculus (SC) has maps for both visual
             input and movement output in the superficial and
             intermediate layers, respectively, and activity on these
             maps is generally related to visual stimuli only in one part
             of the visual field and/or to a restricted range of saccadic
             eye movements to those stimuli. For some neurons within
             these maps, however, activity has been reported to spread
             from the caudal SC to the rostral SC during the course of a
             saccade. This spread of activity was inferred from averages
             of recordings at different sites on the SC movement map
             during saccades of different amplitudes and even in
             different monkeys. In the present experiments, SC activity
             was recorded simultaneously in pairs of neurons to observe
             the spread of activity during individual saccades. Two
             electrodes were positioned along the rostral-caudal axis of
             the SC with one being more caudal than the other, and 60
             neuron pairs whose movement fields were large enough to see
             a spread of activity were studied. During individual
             saccades, the relative time of discharge of the two neurons
             was compared using 1) the time difference between peak
             discharge of the two neurons, 2) the difference between the
             "median activation time" of the two neurons, and 3) the
             shift required to align the two discharge patterns using
             cross-correlation. All three analysis methods gave
             comparable results. Many pairs of neurons were activated in
             sequence during saccade generation, and the order of
             activation was most frequently caudal to rostral. Such a
             sequence of activation was not observed in every neuron
             pair, but over the sample of neuron pairs studied, the
             spread was statistically significant. When we compared the
             time of neuronal activity to the time of saccade onset, we
             found that the caudal neuronal activity was more likely to
             be before the saccade, whereas the rostral neuronal activity
             was more likely to be during the saccade. These results
             demonstrate that when individual pairs of neurons are
             examined during single saccades there is evidence of a
             caudal to rostral spread of activity within the monkey SC,
             and they confirm the previous inferences of a spread of
             activity drawn from observations on averaged neuronal
             activity during multiple saccades. The functional
             contribution of this spread of activity remains to be
             determined.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.344},
   Key = {fds334849}
}

@article{Tehovnik2000,
   Author = {Tehovnik, EJ and Sommer, MA and Chou, IH and Slocum, WM and Schiller,
             PH},
   Title = {Eye fields in the frontal lobes of primates.},
   Journal = {Brain research. Brain research reviews},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {2-3},
   Pages = {413-448},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0165-0173},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/TehovnikEtAl-2000_EyeFieldsInFrontalCortex-Review.pdf},
   Abstract = {Two eye fields have been identified in the frontal lobes of
             primates: one is situated dorsomedially within the frontal
             cortex and will be referred to as the eye field within the
             dorsomedial frontal cortex (DMFC); the other resides
             dorsolaterally within the frontal cortex and is commonly
             referred to as the frontal eye field (FEF). This review
             documents the similarities and differences between these eye
             fields. Although the DMFC and FEF are both active during the
             execution of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements, the
             FEF is more dedicated to these functions. Lesions of DMFC
             minimally affect the production of most types of saccadic
             eye movements and have no effect on the execution of smooth
             pursuit eye movements. In contrast, lesions of the FEF
             produce deficits in generating saccades to briefly presented
             targets, in the production of saccades to two or more
             sequentially presented targets, in the selection of
             simultaneously presented targets, and in the execution of
             smooth pursuit eye movements. For the most part, these
             deficits are prevalent in both monkeys and humans.
             Single-unit recording experiments have shown that the DMFC
             contains neurons that mediate both limb and eye movements,
             whereas the FEF seems to be involved in the execution of eye
             movements only. Imaging experiments conducted on humans have
             corroborated these findings. A feature that distinguishes
             the DMFC from the FEF is that the DMFC contains a
             somatotopic map with eyes represented rostrally and
             hindlimbs represented caudally; the FEF has no such
             topography. Furthermore, experiments have revealed that the
             DMFC tends to contain a craniotopic (i.e., head-centered)
             code for the execution of saccadic eye movements, whereas
             the FEF contains a retinotopic (i.e., eye-centered) code for
             the elicitation of saccades. Imaging and unit recording data
             suggest that the DMFC is more involved in the learning of
             new tasks than is the FEF. Also with continued training on
             behavioural tasks the responsivity of the DMFC tends to
             drop. Accordingly, the DMFC is more involved in learning
             operations whereas the FEF is more specialized for the
             execution of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye
             movements.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00092-2},
   Key = {Tehovnik2000}
}

@article{fds334848,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {Composition and topographic organization of signals sent
             from the frontal eye field to the superior
             colliculus.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {83},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {1979-2001},
   Year = {2000},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.1979},
   Abstract = {The frontal eye field (FEF) and superior colliculus (SC)
             contribute to saccadic eye movement generation, and much of
             the FEF's oculomotor influence may be mediated through the
             SC. The present study examined the composition and
             topographic organization of signals flowing from FEF to SC
             by recording from FEF neurons that were antidromically
             activated from rostral or caudal SC. The first and most
             general result was that, in a sample of 88 corticotectal
             neurons, the types of signals relayed from FEF to SC were
             highly diverse, reflecting the general population of signals
             within FEF rather than any specific subset of signals.
             Second, many neurons projecting from FEF to SC carried
             signals thought to reflect cognitive operations, namely
             tonic discharges during the delay period of a
             delayed-saccade task (delay signals), elevated discharges
             during the gap period of a gap task (gap increase signals),
             or both. Third, FEF neurons discharging during fixation were
             found to project to the SC, although they did not project
             preferentially to rostral SC, where similar fixation neurons
             are found. Neurons that did project preferentially to the
             rostral SC were those with foveal visual responses and those
             pausing during the gap period of the gap task. Many of the
             latter neurons also had foveal visual responses, presaccadic
             pauses in activity, and postsaccadic increases in activity.
             These two types of rostral-projecting neurons therefore may
             contribute to the activity of rostral SC fixation neurons.
             Fourth, conduction velocity was used as an indicator of cell
             size to correct for sampling bias. The outcome of this
             correction procedure suggested that among the most prevalent
             neurons in the FEF corticotectal population are those
             carrying putative cognitive-related signals, i.e., delay and
             gap increase signals, and among the least prevalent are
             those carrying presaccadic burst discharges but lacking
             peripheral visual responses. Fifth, corticotectal neurons
             carrying various signals were biased topographically across
             the FEF. Neurons with peripheral visual responses but
             lacking presaccadic burst discharges were biased laterally,
             neurons with presaccadic burst discharges but lacking
             peripheral visual responses were biased medially, and
             neurons carrying delay or gap increase signals were biased
             dorsally. Finally, corticotectal neurons were distributed
             within the FEF as a function of their visual or movement
             field eccentricity and projected to the SC such that
             eccentricity maps in both structures were closely aligned.
             We conclude that the FEF most likely influences the activity
             of SC neurons continuously from the start of fixation,
             through visual analysis and cognitive manipulations, until a
             saccade is generated and fixation begins anew. Furthermore,
             the projection from FEF to SC is highly topographically
             organized in terms of function at both its source and its
             termination.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.1979},
   Key = {fds334848}
}

@article{Sommer1999,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Tehovnik, EJ},
   Title = {Reversible inactivation of macaque dorsomedial frontal
             cortex: effects on saccades and fixations.},
   Journal = {Experimental brain research},
   Volume = {124},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {429-446},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {February},
   ISSN = {0014-4819},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerTehovnik1999-DMFCinactivation.pdf},
   Abstract = {Neural recording and electrical stimulation results suggest
             that the dorsomedial frontal cortex (DMFC) of macaque is
             involved in oculomotor behavior. We reversibly inactivated
             the DMFC using lidocaine and examined how saccadic eye
             movements and fixations were affected. The inactivation
             methods and monkeys were the same as those used in a
             previous study of the frontal eye field (FEF), another
             frontal oculomotor region. In the first stage of the present
             study, monkeys performed tasks that required the generation
             of single saccades and fixations. During 15 DMFC
             inactivations, we found only mild, infrequent deficits. This
             contrasts with our prior finding that FEF inactivation
             causes severe, reliable deficits in performance of these
             tasks. In the second stage of the study, we investigated
             whether DMFC inactivation affected behavior when a monkey
             was required to make more than one saccade and fixation. We
             used a double-step task: two targets were flashed in rapid
             succession and the monkey had to make two saccades to
             foveate the target locations. In each of five experiments,
             DMFC inactivation caused a moderate, significant deficit.
             Both ipsi- and contraversive saccades were disrupted. In two
             experiments, the first saccades were made to the wrong place
             and had increased latencies. In one experiment, first
             saccades were unaffected, but second saccades were made to
             the wrong place and had increased latencies. In the
             remaining two experiments, specific reasons for the deficit
             were not detected. Saline infusions into DMFC had no effect.
             Inactivation of FEF caused a larger double-step deficit than
             did inactivation of DMFC. The FEF inactivation impaired
             contraversive first or second saccades of the sequence. In
             conclusion, our results suggest that the DMFC makes an
             important contribution to generating sequential saccades and
             fixations but not single saccades and fixations. Compared
             with the FEF, the DMFC has a weaker, less directional, more
             task-dependent oculomotor influence.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s002210050639},
   Key = {Sommer1999}
}

@article{Chou1999,
   Author = {Chou, IH and Sommer, MA and Schiller, PH},
   Title = {Express averaging saccades in monkeys.},
   Journal = {Vision research},
   Volume = {39},
   Number = {25},
   Pages = {4200-4216},
   Year = {1999},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0042-6989},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/ChouEtAl1999-ExpressAveragingSaccades.pdf},
   Abstract = {When monkeys are presented simultaneously with multiple
             stimuli, they can make one of two types of response. Either
             they make averaging saccades, that land at intermediate
             locations between the targets, or target-directed saccades,
             that land close to one of the targets. The two types of
             saccades occur at different latencies and are thought to
             reflect different processes; fast reflexive averaging and
             slower target selection. We investigated the latency of
             averaging saccades in five monkeys, with particular emphasis
             on 'express' latency saccades, which are thought to be
             inhibited by target selection. Express averaging saccades
             were made prolifically by the two monkeys that made both
             express and regular latency saccades, but only when no
             specific instruction was given regarding the saccade target.
             When these monkeys had to choose one of the targets, on the
             basis of its color, they still made averaging saccades.
             However, the endpoints formed two distributions close to the
             targets as opposed to one single distribution centered
             between the targets, as was the case when targets were
             identical; also, express saccades were almost entirely
             absent. We conclude that express averaging saccades are a
             form of spatial and temporal optimization of gaze
             shifting.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00133-9},
   Key = {Chou1999}
}

@article{fds334853,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Wurtz, RH},
   Title = {Frontal eye field neurons orthodromically activated from the
             superior colliculus.},
   Journal = {Journal of neurophysiology},
   Volume = {80},
   Number = {6},
   Pages = {3331-3335},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3331},
   Abstract = {Frontal eye field neurons orthodromically activated from the
             superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 3331-3333, 1998.
             Anatomical studies have shown that the frontal eye field
             (FEF) and superior colliculus (SC) of monkeys are
             reciprocally connected, and a physiological study described
             the signals sent from the FEF to the SC. Nothing is known,
             however, about the signals sent from the SC to the FEF. We
             physiologically identified and characterized FEF neurons
             that are likely to receive input from the SC. Fifty-two FEF
             neurons were found that were orthodromically activated by
             electrical stimulation of the intermediate or deeper layers
             of the SC. All the neurons that we tested (n = 34)
             discharged in response to visual stimulation. One-half also
             discharged when saccadic eye movements were made. This
             provides the first direct evidence that the ascending
             pathway from SC to FEF might carry visual- and
             saccade-related signals. Our findings support a hypothesis
             that the SC and the FEF interact bidirectionally during the
             events leading up to saccade generation.},
   Doi = {10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3331},
   Key = {fds334853}
}

@article{fds334852,
   Author = {Nichols, AM and Ruffner, TW and Sommer, MA and Wurtz,
             RH},
   Title = {A screw microdrive for adjustable chronic unit recording in
             monkeys.},
   Journal = {Journal of neuroscience methods},
   Volume = {81},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {185-188},
   Year = {1998},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0165-0270},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/NicholsRuffnerSommerWurtz_JNeuroscienceMethods1998.pdf},
   Abstract = {A screw microdrive is described that attaches to the grid
             system used for recording single neurons from brains of
             awake behaving monkeys. Multiple screwdrives can be mounted
             on a grid over a single cranial opening. This method allows
             many electrodes to be implanted chronically in the brain and
             adjusted as needed to maintain isolation. rights
             reserved.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0165-0270(98)00036-3},
   Key = {fds334852}
}

@article{Tehovnik1997a,
   Author = {Tehovnik, EJ and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Electrically evoked saccades from the dorsomedial frontal
             cortex and frontal eye fields: a parametric evaluation
             reveals differences between areas.},
   Journal = {Experimental brain research},
   Volume = {117},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {369-378},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {0014-4819},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/TehovnikSommer1997.pdf},
   Abstract = {Using electrical stimulation to evoke saccades from the
             dorsomedial frontal cortex (DMFC) and frontal eye fields
             (FEF) of rhesus monkeys, parametric tests were conducted to
             compare the excitability properties of these regions. Pulse
             frequency and pulse current, pulse frequency and train
             duration, and pulse current and pulse duration were varied
             to determine threshold functions for a 50% probability of
             evoking a saccade. Also a wide range of frequencies were
             tested to evoke saccades, while holding all other parameters
             constant. For frequencies beyond 150 Hz, the probability of
             evoking saccades decreased for the DMFC, whereas for the FEF
             this probability remained at 100%. To evoke saccades readily
             from the DMFC, train durations of greater than 200 ms were
             needed; for the FEF, durations of less than 100 ms were
             sufficient. Even though the chronaxies of neurons residing
             in the DMFC and FEF were similar (ranging from 0.1 to 0.24
             ms) significantly higher currents were required to evoke
             saccades from the DMFC than FEF. Thus the stimulation
             parameters that are optimal for evoking saccades from the
             DMFC differ from those that are optimal for evoking saccades
             from the FEF. Although the excitability of neurons in the
             DMFC and FEF are similar (due to similar chronaxies), we
             suggest that the density of saccade-relevant neurons is
             higher in the FEF than in the DMFC.},
   Doi = {10.1007/s002210050231},
   Key = {Tehovnik1997a}
}

@article{Sommer1997b,
   Author = {Sommer, MA},
   Title = {The spatial relationship between scanning saccades and
             express saccades.},
   Journal = {Vision research},
   Volume = {37},
   Number = {19},
   Pages = {2745-2756},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {October},
   ISSN = {0042-6989},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/Sommer1997-ScanningAndExpressSaccades.pdf},
   Abstract = {When monkeys interrupt their saccadic scanning of a visual
             scene to look at a suddenly appearing target, saccades to
             the target are made after an "express" latency or after a
             longer "regular" latency. The purpose of this study was to
             analyze the spatial patterns of scanning, express, and
             regular saccades. Scanning patterns were spatially biased.
             Express saccade patterns were biased, too, and were directly
             correlated with scanning patterns. Regular saccade patterns
             were more uniform and were not directly correlated with
             scanning patterns. Express saccades, but not regular
             saccades, seemed to be facilitated by preparation to scan.
             This study contributes to a general understanding of how
             monkeys examine scenes containing both unchanging and
             suddenly appearing stimuli.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00078-3},
   Key = {Sommer1997b}
}

@article{Sommer1997a,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Tehovnik, EJ},
   Title = {Reversible inactivation of macaque frontal eye
             field.},
   Journal = {Experimental brain research},
   Volume = {116},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {229-249},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {September},
   ISSN = {0014-4819},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerTehovnik1997.pdf},
   Abstract = {The macaque frontal eye field (FEF) is involved in the
             generation of saccadic eye movements and fixations. To
             better understand the role of the FEF, we reversibly
             inactivated a portion of it while a monkey made saccades and
             fixations in response to visual stimuli. Lidocaine was
             infused into a FEF and neural inactivation was monitored
             with a nearby microelectrode. We used two saccadic tasks. In
             the delay task, a target was presented and then
             extinguished, but the monkey was not allowed to make a
             saccade to its location until a cue to move was given. In
             the step task, the monkey was allowed to look at a target as
             soon as it appeared. During FEF inactivation, monkeys were
             severely impaired at making saccades to locations of
             extinguished contralateral targets in the delay task. They
             were similarly impaired at making saccades to locations of
             contralateral targets in the step task if the target was
             flashed for < or =100 ms, such that it was gone before the
             saccade was initiated. Deficits included increases in
             saccadic latency, increases in saccadic error, and increases
             in the frequency of trials in which a saccade was not made.
             We varied the initial fixation location and found that the
             impairment specifically affected contraversive saccades
             rather than affecting all saccades made into head-centered
             contralateral space. Monkeys were impaired only slightly at
             making saccades to contralateral targets in the step task if
             the target duration was 1000 ms, such that the target was
             present during the saccade: latency increased, but increases
             in saccadic error were mild and increases in the frequency
             of trials in which a saccade was not made were
             insignificant. During FEF inactivation there usually was a
             direct correlation between the latency and the error of
             saccades made in response to contralateral targets. In the
             delay task, FEF inactivation increased the frequency of
             making premature saccades to ipsilateral targets. FEF
             inactivation had inconsistent and mild effects on saccadic
             peak velocity. FEF inactivation caused impairments in the
             ability to fixate lights steadily in contralateral space.
             FEF inactivation always caused an ipsiversive deviation of
             the eyes in darkness. In summary, our results suggest that
             the FEF plays major roles in (1) generating contraversive
             saccades to locations of extinguished or flashed targets,
             (2) maintaining contralateral fixations, and (3) suppressing
             inappropriate ipsiversive saccades.},
   Doi = {10.1007/pl00005752},
   Key = {Sommer1997a}
}

@article{Tehovnik1997b,
   Author = {Tehovnik, EJ and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Effective spread and timecourse of neural inactivation
             caused by lidocaine injection in monkey cerebral
             cortex.},
   Journal = {Journal of neuroscience methods},
   Volume = {74},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {17-26},
   Year = {1997},
   Month = {June},
   ISSN = {0165-0270},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/TehovnikSommer1997-LidocaineInactivation.pdf},
   Abstract = {We studied the effective spread of lidocaine to inactivate
             neural tissue in the frontal cortex of the rhesus monkey.
             Injections of 2% lidocaine at 4 microl/min were made while
             units were recorded 1 or 2 mm away. To inactivate units 1 mm
             away from the injection site 100% of the time, 7 microl of
             lidocaine had to be injected. To inactivate units 2 mm away
             from the injection site 100% of the time, 30 microl of
             lidocaine were required. Units were maximally inactivated
             around 8 min after the start of a lidocaine injection, and
             they gradually recovered, regaining most of their initial
             activity by around 30 min after the start of an injection.
             The volume of lidocaine required to inactivate neurons > 90%
             of the time could be estimated by the spherical volume
             equation, V = 4/3 pi (r)3. To prolong the inactivation, a
             slower infusion of lidocaine subsequent to an initial bolus
             was effective. Saline control injections had no effect.
             These results allow both a prediction of the timecourse of
             neural inactivation and an estimate of the spread of neural
             inactivation following injection of lidocaine into the
             monkey cerebral cortex.},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0165-0270(97)02229-2},
   Key = {Tehovnik1997b}
}

@article{Tehovnik1996,
   Author = {Tehovnik, EJ and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Compensatory saccades made to remembered targets following
             orbital displacement by electrically stimulating the
             dorsomedial frontal cortex or frontal eye fields of
             primates.},
   Journal = {Brain research},
   Volume = {727},
   Number = {1-2},
   Pages = {221-224},
   Year = {1996},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {0006-8993},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/TehovnikSommer1996.pdf},
   Abstract = {If the eye-position signal during visually-evoked saccades
             is dependent on the dorsomedial frontal cortex (DMFC), one
             would expect that saccades generated to briefly presented
             visual targets would be disrupted after displacement of the
             eyes via electrical stimulation of this cortical area.
             Compared are compensatory saccades evoked to brief targets
             following stimulation of the DMFC and frontal eye fields
             (FEF). Compensatory saccades produced to brief targets
             following perturbation via the DMFC were not affected.
             Accordingly, electrical stimulation of the DMFC does not
             disrupt the eye-position signal during the execution of
             visually-evoked saccades.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0006-8993(96)00475-1},
   Key = {Tehovnik1996}
}

@article{SOMMER1994,
   Author = {Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Express saccades elicited during visual scan in the
             monkey.},
   Journal = {Vision research},
   Volume = {34},
   Number = {15},
   Pages = {2023-2038},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {0042-6989},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/Sommer1994.pdf},
   Abstract = {Monkeys trained to saccade to visual targets can develop
             separate "express" and "regular" modes in their distribution
             of saccadic latencies. The purpose of this study was to
             determine whether this occurs under more natural viewing
             conditions, when targets are suddenly presented in a
             structured visual field during visual scan. It was found
             that scanning saccades stopped appearing 60 msec after a
             target's onset, and subsequent saccades, which were directed
             toward the suddenly appearing target, had a bimodal
             distribution of latencies. Express saccades were more likely
             to occur as the target was presented later in a fixation.
             Regular mode saccades were more likely to occur with longer
             target durations. Scanning saccades made to stimuli of the
             structured visual field always had unimodal inter-saccadic
             interval distributions. All these effects were apparent
             after only 2-3 days of training. These findings, taken
             together with recent physiological results, suggest that the
             visuomotor cells of the superior colliculus mediate latency
             bimodality.},
   Doi = {10.1016/0042-6989(94)90030-2},
   Key = {SOMMER1994}
}

@article{RICHARDS1994,
   Author = {Richards, W and Wilson, HR and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Chaos in percepts?},
   Journal = {Biological cybernetics},
   Volume = {70},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {345-349},
   Year = {1994},
   Month = {January},
   ISSN = {0340-1200},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/RichardsWilsonSommer1994_BiologicalCybernetics.pdf},
   Abstract = {Multistability in perceptual tasks has suggested that the
             mechanisms underlying our percepts might be modeled as
             nonlinear, deterministic systems that exhibit chaotic
             behavior. We present evidence supporting this view,
             obtaining an estimate of 3.5 for the dimensionality of such
             a system. A surprising result is that this estimate applies
             for a rather diverse range of perceptual
             tasks.},
   Doi = {10.1007/bf00200331},
   Key = {RICHARDS1994}
}

@article{fds334862,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Schiller, PH and McPeek, RM},
   Title = {What neural pathways mediate express saccades?},
   Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {589-590},
   Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP): STM Journals},
   Year = {1993},
   Month = {September},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00031824},
   Doi = {10.1017/S0140525X00031824},
   Key = {fds334862}
}

@article{fds334863,
   Author = {Sommer, MA and Forno, LS and Smith, ME},
   Title = {EAE cerebrospinal fluid augments in vitro phagocytosis and
             metabolism of CNS myelin by macrophages.},
   Journal = {Journal of neuroscience research},
   Volume = {32},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {384-394},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {July},
   ISSN = {1097-4547},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerFornoSmith_JNeurosciRes1992.pdf},
   Abstract = {Previous studies from this laboratory have shown that CNS
             myelin is phagocytized and metabolized by cultured rat
             macrophages to a much larger extent when myelin is
             pretreated with serum containing antibodies to myelin
             constituents than when it is left untreated or pretreated
             with non-specific serum. In this study the effect of
             cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from rabbits with experimental
             allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) in promoting myelin
             phagocytosis was examined. Fourteen rabbits were immunized
             with purified myelin in Freund's complete adjuvant, seven of
             which developed clinical EAE symptoms. Serum and CSF were
             collected from EAE and control rabbits, and the CSF was
             centrifuged to remove cells. Sera and CSF from these rabbits
             and from Freund's adjuvant-immunized controls and untreated
             controls were measured for IgG content by radial diffusion
             assay, their myelin antibody characteristics were analyzed
             by immunoblots, and the ability of these serum and CSF
             samples to promote myelin phagocytosis when used for myelin
             opsonization was examined. The ability of a CSF sample to
             enhance radioactive myelin uptake and phagocytosis by
             cultured macrophages as measured by the appearance of
             radioactive cholesterol ester was linearly proportional to
             its total IgG titer, and correlated approximately both with
             clinical symptoms of the animal and the presence of antibody
             against the myelin constituents myelin basic protein,
             proteolipid protein, and galactocerebroside. The cholesterol
             esterification activities of EAE sera correlated to a lesser
             extent with IgG levels and clinical symptoms.(ABSTRACT
             TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)},
   Doi = {10.1002/jnr.490320310},
   Key = {fds334863}
}

@article{fds334864,
   Author = {Smith, ME and Sommer, MA},
   Title = {Association between cell-mediated demyelination and
             astrocyte stimulation.},
   Journal = {Progress in brain research},
   Volume = {94},
   Pages = {411-422},
   Year = {1992},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61768-9},
   Doi = {10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61768-9},
   Key = {fds334864}
}

@article{fds334866,
   Author = {Sadler, RH and Sommer, MA and Forno, LS and Smith,
             ME},
   Title = {Induction of anti-myelin antibodies in EAE and their
             possible role in demyelination.},
   Journal = {Journal of neuroscience research},
   Volume = {30},
   Number = {4},
   Pages = {616-624},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {December},
   ISSN = {1097-4547},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SadlerSommerFornoSmith_JNeurosciRes1991.pdf},
   Abstract = {Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis is characterized by
             invasion of lymphocytes and macrophages into the central
             nervous system resulting in inflammation, edema, and
             demyelination. Sera from Lewis rats from 7-95 days after
             immunization with purified guinea pig CNS myelin were
             examined with respect to their ability to opsonize myelin.
             This was correlated with the appearance of antibody
             components and the relative amounts of antibody to myelin
             basic protein (MBP) and proteolipid protein (PLP). Sera from
             rats 10-95 days after immunization preincubated with
             purified myelin induced phagocytosis of myelin by cultured
             macrophages with the resulting production of cholesterol
             ester. This opsonization activity as measured by the
             percentage of cholesterol esterified reached a peak at 26-27
             days after immunization but remained significantly elevated
             up to 95 days post-immunization compared to the activity of
             serum from the Freund's adjuvant-injected controls.
             Immunoblots of the sera revealed a gradual increase in
             antibody activity against myelin components. ELISA assays
             for MBP and PLP antibody showed a similar pattern. Antibody
             to galactocerebroside (GC) was not detected by immunostains
             nor by the ELISA assay. Areas of demyelination were observed
             histologically by luxol-fast blue stained spinal cords up to
             60 days post-immunization. These results indicate that
             antibodies to myelin protein when given access to myelin
             through or within the blood brain barrier could initiate or
             enhance the phagocytic response by peripheral or resident
             macrophages.},
   Doi = {10.1002/jnr.490300404},
   Key = {fds334866}
}

@article{fds334865,
   Author = {Hrushesky, WJ and Fader, DJ and Berestka, JS and Sommer, M and Hayes, J and Cope, FO},
   Title = {Diminishment of respiratory sinus arrhythmia foreshadows
             doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy.},
   Journal = {Circulation},
   Volume = {84},
   Number = {2},
   Pages = {697-707},
   Year = {1991},
   Month = {August},
   ISSN = {00097322},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/HrusheskyFaderBerestkaSommerHayesCope_Circulation1991.pdf},
   Abstract = {<h4>Background</h4>The development of a microcomputer-based
             device permits quick, simple, and noninvasive quantification
             of the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) during quiet
             breathing.<h4>Methods and results</h4>We prospectively and
             serially measured the radionuclide left ventricular ejection
             fraction and the RSA amplitude in 34 cancer patients
             receiving up to nine monthly bolus treatments with
             doxorubicin hydrochloride (60 mg/m2). Of the eight patients
             who ultimately developed symptomatic doxorubicin-induced
             congestive heart failure, seven (87.5%) demonstrated a
             significant decline in RSA amplitude; five of 26 subjects
             without clinical symptoms of cardiotoxicity (19.2%) showed a
             similar RSA amplitude decline. On average, significant RSA
             amplitude decline occurred 3 months before the last planned
             doxorubicin dose in patients destined to develop clinical
             congestive heart failure.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Overall, RSA
             amplitude abnormality proved to be a more specific predictor
             of clinically significant congestive heart failure than did
             serial resting radionuclide ejection fractions.},
   Doi = {10.1161/01.cir.84.2.697},
   Key = {fds334865}
}

@article{fds334867,
   Author = {Sommer Marc and A and Berestka John and B},
   Title = {RSA -- Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia: A new measure of
             cardiac health},
   Journal = {Medical Electronics},
   Pages = {112-114},
   Year = {1987},
   Month = {April},
   ISSN = {0149-9734},
   url = {https://dl.dropbox.com/u/27738651/Publications/SommerBerestka_MedElectronics1987.pdf},
   Key = {fds334867}
}


Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Postdocs * Reload * Login