Psychology and Neuroscience
Arts & Sciences
Duke University
| |
Faculty Database Psychology and Neuroscience Arts & Sciences Duke University |
|
| HOME > Arts & Sciences > pn > Faculty | Search Help Login |
|
| Publications of Blair H. Sheppard :chronological combined listing:
%% Journal Articles
@article{fds315325,
Author = {SHEPPARD, BH},
Title = {3RD PARTY CONFLICT INTERVENTION - A PROCEDURAL
FRAMEWORK},
Journal = {Research in Organizational Behavior},
Volume = {6},
Pages = {141-190},
Publisher = {ACADEMIC PRESS INC JNL-COMP SUBSCRIPTIONS},
Year = {1984},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0191-3085},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1984SA57200004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Key = {fds315325}
}
@article{fds291336,
Author = {Vidmar, N and Sheppard, B},
Title = {Adversary Pretrial Procedures and Testimonial Evidence:
Effects of Lawyer's Role and Machavellianism},
Journal = {Journal of Personality & Social Psychology},
Volume = {39},
Number = {2},
Pages = {320-332},
Year = {1980},
ISSN = {0022-3514},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.39.2.320},
Abstract = {Examined in 2 studies the relative fact-finding efficacy of
2 legal procedural systems: adversary and nonadversary. 206
undergraduates played the roles of lawyers or witnesses in a
simulation of the pretrial processes. The witnesses saw a
fight, were subsequently interviewed by an adversary or
nonadversary lawyer, and testified 1 wk later about the
incident. Results support the prediction that witnesses
interviewed by adversary lawyers would bias their testimony
in favor of the lawyer's client, although lawyer
Machiavellianism served as an important moderating variable.
The bias transmitted in oral testimony had an influence on
the impressions of the factual evidence and responsibility
judgments of naive adjudicators, indicating a 3rd-order
(lawyer to witness to adjudicator) role-playing effect. (43
ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights
reserved). © 1980 American Psychological
Association.},
Doi = {10.1037//0022-3514.39.2.320},
Key = {fds291336}
}
@article{fds322770,
Author = {Lissak, RI and Sheppard, BH},
Title = {Beyond Fairness: The Criterion Problem in Research on
Dispute Intervention},
Journal = {Journal of Applied Social Psychology},
Volume = {13},
Number = {1},
Pages = {45-65},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {1983},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb00886.x},
Abstract = {Recent research has demonstrated that parties to a dispute
attend to, and make evaluations of, the procedures that are
used to resolve disputes. A central focus of this research
has been on procedural and distributive fairness. Two
studies were conducted in an attempt to identify criteria
used by parties to organizational disputes to choose and
evaluate dispute resolution procedures. Sixteen criteria
were identified, including fairness. In a third study, these
criteria were also found to be relevant to police officers
involved in crisis intervention. Discussion focuses on the
implication of these findings for theories of dispute
resolution, for general issues in the psychology of
fairness, and for practical concerns. Copyright © 1983,
Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved},
Doi = {10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb00886.x},
Key = {fds322770}
}
@article{fds350631,
Author = {Desanctis, G and Sheppard, B},
Title = {Bridging Distance, Time, and Culture in Executive MBA
Education},
Journal = {Journal of Education for Business},
Volume = {74},
Number = {3},
Pages = {157-160},
Year = {1999},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832329909601679},
Abstract = {This article summarizes student and instructor experiences
in an innovative MBA program designed for working
executives. We describe the social aspects of this learning
process, especially with regard to learning in the distance
mode. We note the challenges and opportunities of distance
learning for students and faculty, and we identify critical
components of learning success in programs that aim to link
traditional university education with corporate life at an
international level.},
Doi = {10.1080/08832329909601679},
Key = {fds350631}
}
@article{fds291342,
Author = {Shapiro, DL and Sheppard, BH and Cheraskin, L},
Title = {Business on a Handshake},
Journal = {Negotiation Journal},
Volume = {8},
Number = {4},
Pages = {365-377},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {1992},
Month = {October},
ISSN = {0748-4526},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1992KB61800006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1111/j.1571-9979.1992.tb00679.x},
Key = {fds291342}
}
@article{fds315327,
Author = {Lewicki, RJ and Sheppard, BH},
Title = {Choosing how to intervene: Factors affecting the use of
process and outcome control in third party dispute
resolution},
Journal = {Journal of Organizational Behavior},
Volume = {6},
Number = {1},
Pages = {49-64},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {1985},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0142-2774},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1985ABX4700004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of three
situational variables‐time pressure to resolve the
dispute, expectation of future relations between disputants
and range of impact of the settlement on future
conflicts—on a third party's style of managing a dispute.
These variables were systematically manipulated in two
different case scenarios and presented to respondents in
questionnaire form. It was hypothesized that these variables
would differentially affect the parties' willingness to
exert control over the outcome of the conflict and the
process by which the parties attempted to achieve
resolution. The predisposition of the respondents to adopt
one of four specific third party styles (adversarial
intervention, inequisitorial intervention, mediation and
providing impetus) was also measured, to determine both
overall preference for each style and preference as a
function of the independent variables. The results
demonstrate that respondents were significantly more likely
to employ outcome control strategies when they were under
time pressure, when the disputants would not be likely to
work together in the future, and when the settlement would
have broad impact on the resolution of other disputes.
Differences for the two case scenarios were also noted. The
disposition to use process control was stronger when the
third party did not expect the disputants to interact in the
future; the results for time pressure were less clear.
Finally, expressed preferences for particular third party
styles were consistent with the main effects noted for
outcome control, and ambiguous with regard to the effects
for process control. Respondents said that they clearly
preferred mediation as a third party style, but it is not
clear that the parties truly understood mediation versus
other forms of dispute management. Implications are drawn
for further examination of those factors which predispose
managers to use outcome or process control in dispute
intervention. Copyright © 1985 John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd.},
Doi = {10.1002/job.4030060105},
Key = {fds315327}
}
@article{fds315328,
Author = {Sheppard, BH},
Title = {Conflict research as schizophrenia: The many faces of
organizational conflict},
Journal = {Journal of Organizational Behavior},
Volume = {13},
Number = {3},
Pages = {325-334},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {1992},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0894-3796},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1992HX07900013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1002/job.4030130314},
Key = {fds315328}
}
@article{fds322131,
Author = {Putallaz, M and Hellstern, L and Sheppard, BH and Grimes, CL and Glodis,
KA},
Title = {Conflict, Social Competence, and Gender: Maternal and Peer
Contexts},
Journal = {Early Education and Development},
Volume = {6},
Number = {4},
Pages = {433-447},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {1995},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed0604_8},
Abstract = {The current study was designed to address two major
purposes. The first goal was to investigate the joint
influence of children's sociometric status and sex on their
conflict behavior, and the second goal was to explore the
similarities and differences in children's conflict behavior
across two contexts, specifically conflicts arising during
interactions with mothers and with peers. Forty-two
first-graders were videotaped playing with their mothers and
then with an unfamiliar peer partner. Conflict behavior
occurring in the mother-child context was quite different
from that occurring between children, reflecting the
contrast between the vertical and horizontal nature of these
relationships. Most striking were the large number of
sociometric status and sex differences in conflict behavior
found across both contexts. Further, it appears that
effective conflict behavior may differ for boys and girls.
Implications for future research are discussed. © 1995,
Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.},
Doi = {10.1207/s15566935eed0604_8},
Key = {fds322131}
}
@article{fds291337,
Author = {Kolb, DM and Sheppard, BH},
Title = {Do Managers Mediate, Or Even Arbitrate?},
Journal = {Negotiation Journal},
Volume = {1},
Number = {4},
Pages = {379-388},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {1985},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0748-4526},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1985.tb00328.x},
Doi = {10.1111/j.1571-9979.1985.tb00328.x},
Key = {fds291337}
}
@article{fds291334,
Author = {Sorrentino, RM and Sheppard, BH},
Title = {Effects of affiliation-related motives on swimmers in
individual versus group competition: A field
experiment},
Journal = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
Volume = {36},
Number = {7},
Pages = {704-714},
Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
Year = {1978},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0022-3514},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.704},
Abstract = {76 intercollegiate swimmers from 3 universities participated
in both an individual and group competition 200-yd freestyle
swim. Hypotheses were based on an expectancy-value approach,
which emphasizes the negative as well as positive
consequences of undertaking an activity. Achievement and
affiliation motives were assessed by J. W. Atkinson's
projective measures; Ss also completed the Test Anxiety
Scale and the Interpersonal Opinion Questionnaire, a
fear-of-social-rejection measure. It was found, as
predicted, that while approval-oriented swimmers had faster
swimming speeds in group than in individual competition,
rejection-threatened swimmers actually had slower swimming
speeds in group than in individual competition. This
significant Affiliation-Related Motives by Experimental
Conditions interaction was also greater for success-oriented
than failure-threatened swimmers and for males than females.
These latter differences and the advantages of the
field-experimental situation are discussed in light of
current findings in the motivation area. (38 ref) (PsycINFO
Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1978
American Psychological Association.},
Doi = {10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.704},
Key = {fds291334}
}
@article{fds291341,
Author = {Saunders, DM and Sheppard, BH and Knight, V and Roth,
J},
Title = {Employee voice to supervisors},
Journal = {Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal},
Volume = {5},
Number = {3},
Pages = {241-259},
Publisher = {Springer Nature},
Year = {1992},
Month = {September},
ISSN = {0892-7545},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01385051},
Abstract = {This article reports the results of two studies examining
some factors that increase the likelihood that employees
will voice to their supervisors. The way employees perceive
that their supervisors manage employee voice was identified
as a major cause of the likelihood that employees will voice
upward. The Supervisor as Voice Manager Scale is presented
along with data demonstrating its reliability and validity.
Theoretical and applied implications of the results are
discussed. © 1992 Plenum Publishing Corporation.},
Doi = {10.1007/BF01385051},
Key = {fds291341}
}
@article{fds315322,
Author = {Sheppard, BH and Blumenfeld-Jones, K and Minton, JW and Hyder,
E},
Title = {Informal conflict intervention: Advice and
dissent},
Journal = {Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal},
Volume = {7},
Number = {1},
Pages = {53-72},
Publisher = {Springer Nature},
Year = {1994},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0892-7545},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02621060},
Abstract = {A disparity appears to exist between how managers are
advised to handle conflict and the intervention methods that
they utilize in actual practice. Normative advice tends to
agree that managers should adopt a facilitative,
mediatorlike role (e.g., Walton, 1987; Tjosvold, 1990),
while the empirical research suggests that managers are much
more controlling, often deciding how to resolve the problem
on their own (e.g., Kolb, 1986; Sheppard, 1983). The present
study focuses on two potential reasons as to why managers
utilize the methods they do: (1) They treat choices
instrumentally to achieve key goals and (2) they interpret
or frame conflicts in a form that suggests directive action.
One hundred and eighty managers were interviewed about a
recent effort to intervene in a dispute at work. The results
confirm that managers are very controlling when intervening
in disputes and relates this to both interpretive frame and,
to a lesser extent, managerial goals. A canonical analysis
appears to emphasize the pivotal role that frame plays in
influencing whether or not managers choose the solution.
Implications of these results for managerial action are
discussed. © 1994, Plenum Publishing Corporation. All
rights reserved.},
Doi = {10.1007/BF02621060},
Key = {fds315322}
}
@article{fds315329,
Author = {Sheppard, BH and Tuchinsky, M},
Title = {Interfirm relationships: A grammar of pairs},
Journal = {Research in Organizational Behavior},
Volume = {18},
Pages = {331-373},
Publisher = {JAI PRESS INC},
Year = {1996},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0191-3085},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1996BE88M00008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Key = {fds315329}
}
@article{fds291335,
Author = {Sheppard, BH},
Title = {Justice Is No Simple Matter. Case for Elaborating Our Model
of Procedural Fairness},
Journal = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
Volume = {49},
Number = {4},
Pages = {953-962},
Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
Year = {1985},
Month = {October},
ISSN = {0022-3514},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.953},
Abstract = {Past research has demonstrated that autocratic dispute
intervention procedures (i.e., when a third party actively
seeks out information about the dispute and then decides how
it ought to be resolved) are perceived as less fair than
arbitration procedures (i.e., when the third party makes a
decision based only on arguments and evidence given to them
by the disputants). From these findings, Thibaut and Walker
(1975)concluded that the North American legal system, which
is most similar to arbitration, should be perceived as more
fair than the continental European legal system, which is
purportedly most similar to autocratic procedures. Three
studies reported here test the effects of two features of
European legal systems that Damaska (1975)suggested mitigate
some of the problems with autocratic procedures. The results
suggest that (a) permitting disputants an opportunity to
present their positions and (b) the presence of an option to
appeal an unfair decision dramatically improve the perceived
fairness of the autocratic procedure. Implications of these
results for the study of procedural fairness and legal
procedure are discussed. © 1985 American Psychological
Association.},
Doi = {10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.953},
Key = {fds291335}
}
@article{fds291339,
Author = {Vollrath, DA and Sheppard, BH and Hinsz, VB and Davis,
JH},
Title = {Memory performance by decision-making groups and
individuals},
Journal = {Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes},
Volume = {43},
Number = {3},
Pages = {289-300},
Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
Year = {1989},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0749-5978},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90040-X},
Abstract = {Four-person groups and individuals performed memory and
decision tasks in an investigation of the social processing
of information. As predicted, groups recalled and recognized
information better than individuals across a variety of
measures and decision conditions. Predictions from various
models of group decision-making and problem-solving were
compared to group and individual memory responses. No set of
predictions closely matched the observed data, suggesting
that memory tasks may foster a social process unlike those
observed heretofore. Memory responses also indicated that
groups check individual errors and exaggerate individual
response tendencies. © 1989.},
Doi = {10.1016/0749-5978(89)90040-X},
Key = {fds291339}
}
@article{fds291340,
Author = {Sheppard, BH and Saunders, DM and Minton, JW},
Title = {Procedural Justice From the Third-Party Perspective},
Journal = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
Volume = {54},
Number = {4},
Pages = {629-637},
Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
Year = {1988},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0022-3514},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.629},
Abstract = {We examined the effect of a concern for fairness on the
dispute intervention behavior of lay third parties. Three
hundred subjects, including parents, students, and managers,
participated in structured interviews probing their most
recent intervention in a dispute. Results suggest that lay
third parties are particularly likely to vary their behavior
at the early stages of the dispute resolution process as a
function of their concern for fairness. However, the
particular activities on which third parties with a high
concern for fairness focus appear to vary as a function of
the type of dispute in which they are involved. Theoretical
and practical implications are discussed.},
Doi = {10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.629},
Key = {fds291340}
}
@article{fds315331,
Author = {Putallaz, M and Sheppard, BH},
Title = {Social Status and Children's Orientations to Limited
Resources},
Journal = {Child Development},
Volume = {61},
Number = {6},
Pages = {2022-2027},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {1990},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0009-3920},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1990EU58300028&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {6‐year‐old children were paired according to their
sociometric status and then confronted with 3 situations in
which there was only 1 toy for the 2 children. Children's
responses to these limited‐resource situations were coded
in terms of a scheme reflecting the degree to which each
child focused on his or her own concerns and/or those of the
other child. Low status dyads were found to compete (i.e.,
focus on their own interests) more than high status dyads,
who exhibited orientations focused more on mutual benefit.
The implications of these results as well as the relations
among general orientations and dyadic affect are discussed.
Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights
reserved},
Doi = {10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03583.x},
Key = {fds315331}
}
@article{fds291344,
Author = {Dunn, SE and Putallaz, M and Sheppard, BH and Lindstrom,
R},
Title = {Social Support and Adjustment in Gifted Adolescents},
Journal = {Journal of Educational Psychology},
Volume = {79},
Number = {4},
Pages = {467-473},
Publisher = {American Psychological Association (APA)},
Year = {1987},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0022-0663},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.467},
Abstract = {We investigated the role of perceived social support in
facilitating adjustment to a residential high school for the
gifted in science and math. The relation between social
support and adjustment appeared to depend on the sex of the
student and the source of support, and the specific type of
adjustment examined. Successful overall adjustment to the
school environment was related to perceived support from
family, whereas psychological adjustment showed a clear
relation to perceived support in general. Perceived support
from peers related to psychological adjustment only for male
adolescents. Female adolescents appeared to seek other
sources of support when they perceived support from a
particular source to be low. Thus, adjustment problems for
female adolescents appeared to result only when they were
unable to locate other sources. © 1987 American
Psychological Association.},
Doi = {10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.467},
Key = {fds291344}
}
@article{fds315326,
Author = {Sheppard, BH},
Title = {The art and science of mediation},
Journal = {Negotiation Journal},
Volume = {4},
Number = {2},
Pages = {161-170},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {1988},
Month = {April},
ISSN = {0748-4526},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1988N998300008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1007/bf01000577},
Key = {fds315326}
}
@article{fds291343,
Author = {Sheppard, BH and Sherman, DM},
Title = {The grammars of trust: A model and general
implications},
Journal = {Academy of Management Review},
Volume = {23},
Number = {3},
Pages = {422-437},
Publisher = {Academy of Management},
Year = {1998},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926619},
Abstract = {In this article we contend that trust can be conceptualized
as four distinct and ordered forms - shallow dependence,
shallow interdependence, deep dependence, and deep
interdependence - determined by the nature of the
interdependence between trusting parties. We argue that both
the risks that trusting parties assume and the mechanisms
for mitigating those risks emerge as a function of the form
of interdependence in the relationship. By reviewing
research in which trust is a central component, we
illustrate the elements of this model and examine its
implications.},
Doi = {10.5465/AMR.1998.926619},
Key = {fds291343}
}
@article{fds315330,
Author = {Sheppard, BH and Hartwick, J and Warshaw, PR},
Title = {The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past
Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future
Research},
Journal = {Journal of Consumer Research},
Volume = {15},
Number = {3},
Pages = {325-325},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {1988},
Month = {December},
ISSN = {0093-5301},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1988R287500004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1086/209170},
Key = {fds315330}
}
@article{fds291338,
Author = {Sheppard, BH and Lewicki, RJ},
Title = {Toward general principles of managerial fairness},
Journal = {Social Justice Research},
Volume = {1},
Number = {2},
Pages = {161-176},
Publisher = {Springer Nature},
Year = {1987},
Month = {June},
ISSN = {0885-7466},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01048014},
Abstract = {The present study identified the principles employees use
for judging a broad range of managerial actions. A
cross-sectional sample of 44 executives were asked to
describe recent fair and unfair treatment in seven areas of
management responsibility: planning, staff development,
delegating, motivating, coordinating, daily activities, and
representing the organization to the public. These responses
were coded to yield 16 rules guiding judgments about
perceived managerial fairness. Aggregation of these rules
yielded six major clusters of fairness concerns. The paper
describes these clusters in detail and highlights their
potential usefulness to a broader understanding of the
complex nature of procedural fairness judgments in
organizations. © 1987 Plenum Publishing
Corporation.},
Doi = {10.1007/BF01048014},
Key = {fds291338}
}
@article{fds315324,
Author = {Minton, JW and Lewicki, RJ and Sheppard, BH},
Title = {Unjust Dismissal in the Context of Organizational
Justice},
Journal = {The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
Science},
Volume = {536},
Number = {1},
Pages = {135-148},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {1994},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0002-7162},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:A1994PM42200011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {The issue of unjust dismissal is best understood by placing
it in the broader context of a comprehensive model of
organizational justice. This article presents such a model
based on the application of two perceived principles of
justice (balance and correctness) in an organization’s
pursuit of three goals (performance, community, and
dignity), at three organizational levels (outcome,
procedure, and system). For perceived fairness to exist, the
system must be adequate at each level. The theory of
organizational justice is applied to the creation,
implementation, and interpretation of disciplinary policies
and rules. The article concludes by providing prescriptive
advice for the design and operation of discipline and
discharge systems, based on the model presented, and
suggests that they include written warnings, the opportunity
of a hearing, the right to be represented, the right to
appeal, and reinforcement of the system through a broad
statutory framework. © 1994, SAGE Periodicals Press. All
rights reserved.},
Doi = {10.1177/0002716294536001011},
Key = {fds315324}
}
%% Chapters in Books
@misc{fds338634,
Author = {Lind, EA},
Title = {Social Involvement, Justice Judgments, and the Psychology of
Negotiation},
Pages = {125-139},
Booktitle = {Research on Negotiation in Organizations},
Publisher = {Jai Press},
Editor = {Lewicki, R and Bies, R and Sheppard, B},
Year = {1999},
Key = {fds338634}
}
@misc{fds315323,
Author = {Houde, LD and Sherman, DM and White, TB and Sheppard,
BH},
Title = {The four faces of trust: An empirical study of the nature of
trust in relational forms},
Pages = {287-308},
Booktitle = {Relational Models Theory: A Contemporary
Overview},
Publisher = {PSYCHOLOGY PRESS},
Year = {2004},
Month = {July},
ISBN = {9781410611413},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781410611413},
Doi = {10.4324/9781410611413},
Key = {fds315323}
}
| |
Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Faculty * Staff * Grad * Postdocs * Reload * Login | ||
