![]() |
Secondary Appointments Database Religious Studies Arts & Sciences Duke University |
|
HOME > Arts & Sciences > Religious Studies > Secondary Appointments | Search Help Login |
| Religious Studies Secondary: Publications since January 2024List all publications in the database. :chronological alphabetical combined listing:%% Aers, David @book{fds294538, Author = {Aers, D}, Title = {Community, Gender, and Individual Identity: English Writing 1360-1430}, Pages = {1-215}, Publisher = {Routledge}, Year = {2024}, Month = {January}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003576280}, Abstract = {David Aers explores the treatment of community, gender, and individual identity in English writing between 1360 and 1430, focusing on Margery Kempe, Langland, Chaucer, and the poet of Sir Gawain. He shows how these texts deal with questions about gender, the making of individual identity, and competing versions of community in ways which still speak powerfully in contemporary analysis of gender formation, sexuality, and love. Making wide use of recent research on the English economy and communities, and informed by current debates in the theory of culture and gender, the book will be of interest to those concerned with medieval studies, Renaissance studies, and women’s studies.}, Doi = {10.4324/9781003576280}, Key = {fds294538} } @article{fds378382, Author = {Aers, D}, Title = {The Letter Kills but the Spirit Gives Life (2 Corinthians 3:6): Or, What Happened to Enemy Love?}, Pages = {275-292}, Booktitle = {Form and Power in Medieval and Early Modern Literature}, Year = {2024}, Key = {fds378382} } %% Hacohen, Malachi H. @misc{fds381142, Author = {Hacohen, MH}, Title = {Austrian identity and the modern life of empire}, Pages = {17-28}, Booktitle = {Austrian Identity and Modernity Culture and Politics in the 20th Century}, Year = {2025}, Month = {February}, Key = {fds381142} } %% Matory, J. Lorand @article{fds375074, Author = {Matory, JL}, Title = {‘On the backs of Blacks’: the fetish and how socially inferior Europeans put down Africans to prove their equality with their own oppressors}, Journal = {History of European Ideas}, Volume = {50}, Number = {4}, Pages = {666-669}, Publisher = {Informa UK Limited}, Year = {2024}, Month = {May}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2023.2277644}, Doi = {10.1080/01916599.2023.2277644}, Key = {fds375074} } %% Surin, Kenneth J. @article{fds379311, Author = {Surin, K}, Title = {THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND MEDICO-CYBER-POLITICAL DISCOURSE}, Pages = {52-65}, Booktitle = {Pandemic Event and the Immanence of Life Critical Reflections on Covid 19}, Year = {2024}, Month = {January}, Abstract = {The discourses on viruses and virality have hitherto typically been dominated by the spheres of the medical (virology) and communication (the ‘contamination’ of communicative networks, e.g. by computer viruses). The Covid-19 pandemic has introduced alternative, and more complicated, theoretical and practical spaces likely to challenge this dichotomous situation. In virology, the medical discourses are dominated by putative treatments and prophylactics such as vaccines – such as Regeneron (at $96,000 per course of treatment, used recently on Donald Trump), steroids such as dexamethasone (also used to treat Trump). In the realm of communicative-network viruses, any invocation of steroids (say) would amount to an egregious category mistake, and the discourse here swivels around the security afforded by programs such as McAfee, Kaspersky, and Malwarebytes, which remove spyware, malicious cookies, and so on. The Covid-19 pandemic has breached such dichotomous lines of thought. If anything, it is clear that the medical science involved, merely by being politicized, has entered the realm of political (as opposed to purely medical) discourse. This is a medico-political discourse, straddling both science and politics. This chapter will draw on Deleuze and Guattari’s use of Louis Hjelmslev’s semiotics to map out and analyze this new discursive terrain.}, Key = {fds379311} } %% Wharton, Annabel J. @article{fds381054, Author = {Wharton, AJ}, Title = {Postmortem Architect}, Journal = {Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians}, Volume = {83}, Number = {4}, Pages = {465-480}, Year = {2024}, Month = {December}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2024.83.4.465}, Abstract = {This article assesses the role of the female cadaver in the design of 16 Great Windmill Street in London, the house/museum/anatomy theater complex built in 1767 by Robert Mylne, student of Piranesi, and William Hunter, man-midwife, physician to the queen of England, and first professor of anatomy at the Royal Academy. The focus on the female cadaver exposes the rigid gendering of emergent spaces of modern Western science. More important, this investigation suggests that the subaltern subject of a building might act less as a passive object and more as an active agent in the generation of the building’s program. Considering the cadaver as a participant in the planning of structures that exhibited her might prompt a broader, more critical consideration of the design role of animate objects in other building types, including abattoirs and prisons, and of the societies that produce them.}, Doi = {10.1525/jsah.2024.83.4.465}, Key = {fds381054} } | |
Duke University * Arts & Sciences * Religious Studies * Faculty * Secondary * Affliates * Staff * Grad * Reload * Login |