Department of Mathematics
 Search | Help | Login | pdf version | printable version

Math @ Duke





.......................

.......................


Publications of Inmaculada C Sorribes Rodriguez    :chronological  alphabetical  combined listing:

%% Papers Published   
@article{fds348757,
   Author = {Ryser, MD and Mallo, D and Hall, A and Hardman, T and King, LM and Tatishchev, S and Sorribes, IC and Maley, CC and Marks, JR and Hwang,
             ES and Shibata, D},
   Title = {Minimal barriers to invasion during human colorectal tumor
             growth.},
   Journal = {Nature Communications},
   Volume = {11},
   Number = {1},
   Pages = {1280},
   Publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {March},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14908-7},
   Abstract = {Intra-tumoral heterogeneity (ITH) could represent clonal
             evolution where subclones with greater fitness confer more
             malignant phenotypes and invasion constitutes an
             evolutionary bottleneck. Alternatively, ITH could represent
             branching evolution with invasion of multiple subclones. The
             two models respectively predict a hierarchy of subclones
             arranged by phenotype, or multiple subclones with shared
             phenotypes. We delineate these modes of invasion by merging
             ancestral, topographic, and phenotypic information from 12
             human colorectal tumors (11 carcinomas, 1 adenoma) obtained
             through saturation microdissection of 325 small tumor
             regions. The majority of subclones (29/46, 60%) share
             superficial and invasive phenotypes. Of 11 carcinomas, 9
             show evidence of multiclonal invasion, and invasive and
             metastatic subclones arise early along the ancestral trees.
             Early multiclonal invasion in the majority of these tumors
             indicates the expansion of co-evolving subclones with
             similar malignant potential in absence of late bottlenecks
             and suggests that barriers to invasion are minimal during
             colorectal cancer growth.},
   Doi = {10.1038/s41467-020-14908-7},
   Key = {fds348757}
}

@article{fds348344,
   Author = {Sorribes, IC and Handelman, SK and Jain, HV},
   Title = {Mitigating temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma via DNA
             damage-repair inhibition.},
   Journal = {Journal of the Royal Society, Interface},
   Volume = {17},
   Number = {162},
   Pages = {20190722},
   Publisher = {The Royal Society},
   Year = {2020},
   Month = {January},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0722},
   Abstract = {Glioblastomas are among the most lethal cancers, with a 5
             year survival rate below 25%. Temozolomide is typically used
             in glioblastoma treatment; however, the enzymes
             alkylpurine-DNA-<i>N</i>-glycosylase (APNG) and
             methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) efficiently
             mediate the repair of DNA damage caused by temozolomide,
             reducing treatment efficacy. Consequently, APNG and MGMT
             inhibition has been proposed as a way of overcoming
             chemotherapy resistance. Here, we develop a mechanistic
             mathematical model that explicitly incorporates the effects
             of chemotherapy on tumour cells, including the processes of
             DNA damage induction, cell arrest and DNA repair. Our model
             is carefully parametrized and validated, and then used to
             virtually recreate the response of heteroclonal
             glioblastomas to dual treatment with temozolomide and
             inhibitors of APNG/MGMT. Using our mechanistic model, we
             identify four combination treatment strategies optimized by
             tumour cell phenotype, and isolate the strategy most likely
             to succeed in a pre-clinical and clinical setting. If
             confirmed in clinical trials, these strategies have the
             potential to offset chemotherapy resistance in patients with
             glioblastoma and improve overall survival.},
   Doi = {10.1098/rsif.2019.0722},
   Key = {fds348344}
}

@article{fds345752,
   Author = {Sorribes, IC and Moore, MNJ and Byrne, HM and Jain,
             HV},
   Title = {A Biomechanical Model of Tumor-Induced Intracranial Pressure
             and Edema in Brain Tissue.},
   Journal = {Biophysical Journal},
   Volume = {116},
   Number = {8},
   Pages = {1560-1574},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {April},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.02.030},
   Abstract = {Brain tumor growth and tumor-induced edema result in
             increased intracranial pressure (ICP), which, in turn, is
             responsible for conditions as benign as headaches and
             vomiting or as severe as seizures, neurological damage, or
             even death. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that
             tracking ICP dynamics may offer improved prognostic
             potential in terms of early detection of brain cancer and
             better delimitation of the tumor boundary. However,
             translating such theory into clinical practice remains a
             challenge, in part because of an incomplete understanding of
             how ICP correlates with tumor grade. Here, we propose a
             multiphase mixture model that describes the biomechanical
             response of healthy brain tissue-in terms of changes in ICP
             and edema-to a growing tumor. The model captures ICP
             dynamics within the diseased brain and accounts for the
             ability/inability of healthy tissue to compensate for this
             pressure. We propose parameter regimes that distinguish
             brain tumors by grade, thereby providing critical insight
             into how ICP dynamics vary by severity of disease. In
             particular, we offer an explanation for clinically observed
             phenomena, such as a lack of symptoms in low-grade glioma
             patients versus a rapid onset of symptoms in those with
             malignant tumors. Our model also takes into account the
             effects tumor-derived proteases may have on ICP levels and
             the extent of tumor invasion. This work represents an
             important first step toward understanding the mechanisms
             that underlie the onset of edema and ICP in cancer-afflicted
             brains. Continued modeling effort in this direction has the
             potential to make an impact in the field of brain cancer
             diagnostics.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.bpj.2019.02.030},
   Key = {fds345752}
}

@article{fds348760,
   Author = {Sorribes, IC and Basu, A and Brady, R and Enriquez-Navas, PM and Feng,
             X and Kather, JN and Nerlakanti, N and Stephens, R and Strobl, M and Tavassoly, I and Vitos, N and Lemanne, D and Manley, B and O’Farrelly,
             C and Enderling, H},
   Title = {Harnessing patient-specific response dynamics to optimize
             evolutionary therapies for metastatic clear cell renal cell
             carcinoma – Learning to adapt},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {February},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/563130},
   Abstract = {Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the ten most common and
             lethal cancers in the United States. Tumor heterogeneity and
             development of resistance to treatment suggest that
             patient-specific evolutionary therapies may hold the key to
             better patients prognosis. Mathematical models are a
             powerful tool to help develop such strategies; however, they
             depend on reliable biomarker information. In this paper, we
             present a dynamic model of tumor-immune interactions, as
             well as the treatment effect on tumor cells and the
             tumor-immune environment. We hypothesize that the
             neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a powerful biomarker
             that can be used to predict an individual patient’s
             response to treatment. Using randomly sampled virtual
             patients, we show that the model recapitulates patient
             outcomes from clinical trials in RCC. Finally, we use in
             silico patient data to recreate realistic tumor behaviors
             and simulate various treatment strategies to find optimal
             treatments for each virtual patient.},
   Doi = {10.1101/563130},
   Key = {fds348760}
}

@article{fds345753,
   Author = {Poole, MI and Sorribes, I and Jain, HV},
   Title = {Modeling hepatitis C virus protein and p53 interactions in
             hepatocytes: Implications for carcinogenesis.},
   Journal = {Mathematical Biosciences},
   Volume = {306},
   Pages = {186-196},
   Year = {2018},
   Month = {December},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2018.10.003},
   Abstract = {Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has reached epidemic
             proportions worldwide. Individuals with chronic HCV
             infection and without access to treatment are at high risk
             for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a liver
             cancer that is rapidly fatal after diagnosis. A number of
             factors have been identified that contribute to HCV-driven
             carcinogenesis such as scarring of the liver, and chronic
             inflammation. Recent evidence indicates a direct role for
             HCV-encoded proteins themselves in oncogenesis of infected
             hepatocytes. The viral protein HCV core has been shown to
             interact directly with the host tumor suppressor protein
             p53, and to modulate p53-activity in a biphasic manner.
             Here, biochemically-motivated mathematical models of HCV-p53
             interactions are developed to elucidate the mechanisms
             underlying this phenomenon. We show that by itself, direct
             interaction between HCV core and p53 is insufficient to
             recapitulate the experimental data. We postulate the
             existence of an additional factor, activated by HCV core
             that inhibits p53 function. We present experimental evidence
             in support of this hypothesis. The model including this
             additional factor reproduces the experimental results,
             validating our assumptions. Finally, we investigate what
             effect HCV core-p53 interactions could have on the capacity
             of an infected hepatocyte to repair damage to its DNA.
             Integrating our model with an existing model of the
             oscillatory response of p53 to DNA damage predicts a
             biphasic relationship between HCV core and the
             transformative potential of infected hepatocytes. In
             addition to providing mechanistic insights, these results
             suggest a potential biomarker that could help in identifying
             those HCV patients most at risk of progression to
             HCC.},
   Doi = {10.1016/j.mbs.2018.10.003},
   Key = {fds345753}
}


%% Other   
@misc{fds347385,
   Author = {Sorribes Rodriguez and I},
   Title = {Gliomas diagnosis, progress, and treatment: a mathematical
             approach},
   Editor = {Jain, H},
   Year = {2019},
   Month = {May},
   Abstract = {The diagnosis and treatment of gliomas continue to pose a
             significant challenge for oncologists who not only have to
             contend with managing acute neurological symptoms, but also
             the almost inevitable development of resistance to
             treatment. Indeed, the last 25 years have produced minimal
             advancements in treatment efficacy, even though significant
             efforts and resources have been invested in the quest for
             breakthroughs. This effort has not been restricted only to
             clinicians or oncologists, with mathematical modeling also
             playing an increasingly important role. A variety of models
             aimed at providing new insights into glioma growth and
             response to treatment have been proposed. Initially designed
             to capture fundamental behavior of tumor cells, such as
             growth and motility, these models quickly became
             well-established and multiple extensions have since been
             introduced. However, as increasing biological details of how
             tumor cells respond to treatment at cellular and subcellular
             levels are revealed, mathematical models need to include
             this state of the art knowledge. The work presented in this
             thesis seeks to do this by refocusing our attention back to
             the most fundamental question: why are gliomas fatal?
             Biologically, it is known that glioma lethality is driven by
             a fast growth that increases intracranial pressure resulting
             in lethal neurological damage, which current treatments fail
             to prevent due to tumor cell resistance to treatments such
             as chemotherapy. By creating mathematical models inspired by
             these key elements of glioma malignancy, the work presented
             here seeks to elucidate what drives resistance to
             chemotherapy and how to overcome or mitigate it, as well as
             how malignancy correlated with intracranial pressure
             dynamics. Thus, the work comprises two main parts: (1) in
             silico optimization of treatment strategies using
             chemotherapy coupled with novel cell-repair inhibitors
             currently in various stages of the clinical trial; and (2) a
             study of tumor-induced intracranial pressure and edema in
             gliomas of grade I-IV. A wide variety of mathematical
             modeling techniques are used, that incorporate
             biomechanical, biochemical, pharmacokinetics, and
             pharmacodynamics aspects, and include a level of detail
             hitherto unconsidered. The proposed models are validated and
             analyzed by employing a diverse set of mathematical tools
             that range from structural identifiability, parameter
             estimation, to global and local sensitivity analysis. As a
             result of this work, we propose a treatment strategy that
             showed a 30% improvement in patient survival time over
             conventional treatment when treating heterogeneous brain
             tumors in silico. Moreover, the second part of this work
             demonstrates how the spatio-temporal dynamics of
             tumor-induced intracranial pressure correlate with cancer
             grade, providing a better understanding of the mechanisms
             that underlie increased intracranial pressure onset. Both
             projects come together as a first step towards a better
             understanding of the poor survival rates of patients
             afflicted with gliomas. They raise new questions about what
             characterizes the malignancy of primary brain tumors and how
             clinicians can fight it. Continued modeling effort in these
             directions has the potential to make an impact in the field
             of brain cancer diagnostics and treatment.},
   Key = {fds347385}
}

 

dept@math.duke.edu
ph: 919.660.2800
fax: 919.660.2821

Mathematics Department
Duke University, Box 90320
Durham, NC 27708-0320