Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies
Office of the Provost
Duke University
| |
Faculty Database Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies Office of the Provost Duke University |
|
| HOME > Provost > clacs > Faculty | Search Help Login |
|
| Publications of Eduardo Bonilla-Silva :chronological alphabetical combined listing:
%% Books
@book{fds333224,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Racism without Racists Color-Blind Racism and the
Persistence of Racial Inequality in America},
Pages = {376 pages},
Publisher = {Rowman & Littlefield},
Year = {2017},
Month = {June},
ISBN = {9781442276246},
Abstract = {The fifth edition of this provocative book makes clear that
color blind racism is as insidious now as
ever.},
Key = {fds333224}
}
@book{fds255277,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Racism without Racists (4th Edition)},
Pages = {384 pages},
Publisher = {Rowman & Littlefield Publishers},
Year = {2013},
Month = {July},
ISBN = {9781442220560},
Abstract = {In this fourth edition, Racism without Racists will continue
to challenge readers and stimulate discussion about the
state of race in America today.},
Key = {fds255277}
}
@book{fds255276,
Author = {Doane, AW and Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {White Out: The Continuing Significance of
Racism},
Pages = {344 pages},
Publisher = {Routledge},
Year = {2013},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9781136064661},
Abstract = {White Out brings together the original work of leading
scholars across the disciplines of sociology, philosophy,
history, and anthropology to give readers an important and
cutting-edge study of "whiteness".},
Key = {fds255276}
}
@book{fds255306,
Author = {Jung, MK and Vargas, J and Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The State of White Supremacy: Racims, Governance, and the
USA},
Publisher = {Stanford University Press},
Year = {2011},
Month = {February},
Key = {fds255306}
}
@book{fds255304,
Author = {Zuberi, T and Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {White Logic, White Methods: Race, Epistemology, and the
Social Sciences},
Publisher = {Rowman and Littlefield},
Year = {2008},
Month = {Summer},
Key = {fds255304}
}
@book{fds309969,
Title = {International Encyclopedia of the Social
Sciences},
Publisher = {Macmillan},
Editor = {Darity, W and Bonilla-Silva, E},
Year = {2007},
Key = {fds309969}
}
@book{fds255275,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-civil Rights
Era},
Pages = {223 pages},
Publisher = {Lynne Rienner Publishers},
Year = {2001},
ISBN = {9781588260321},
Abstract = {Bonilla-Silva (sociology, Texas AandM U.) addresses the
reasons that black Americans and other racial minorities lag
behind whites in terms of income, wealth, occupational and
health status, educational attainment, and other social
...},
Key = {fds255275}
}
%% Papers Accepted
@article{fds370895,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {It's not the rotten apples! Why family scholars should adopt
a structural perspective on racism},
Journal = {Journal of Family Theory and Review},
Volume = {15},
Number = {2},
Pages = {192-205},
Year = {2023},
Month = {June},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12503},
Abstract = {In this article, I urge family scholars to anchor their race
work on the structural racism perspective. First, I provide
some limitations of the prejudice problematic used by most
family scholars. Second, I discuss the basic components of
my structural theory, which I call the racialized social
system approach. Third, I bolster my original theorization
with a new conceptual map to make the structure
intelligible—to account for why actors, for the most part,
behave in ways that reproduce the racial order. In this
discussion, I highlight the importance of the “white
habitus” in shaping the lives and behaviors of White
people. Lastly, I conclude by summarizing my claims and
asking family scholars to continue deepening their work on
structural racism and families, as well as on fighting how
it shapes their own fields and lives.},
Doi = {10.1111/jftr.12503},
Key = {fds370895}
}
@article{fds370632,
Author = {Robertson, AD and Vélez, V and Hairston, WT and Bonilla-Silva,
E},
Title = {Race-evasive frames in physics and physics education:
Results from an interview study},
Journal = {Physical Review Physics Education Research},
Volume = {19},
Number = {1},
Year = {2023},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010115},
Abstract = {Mainstream physics teaching and learning produces material
outcomes that, when analyzed through the lens of Critical
Race Theory, point to white supremacy, or "the systemic
maintenance of the dominant position that produces white
privilege"(Battey & Levya, 2016). In particular, the
continued, extreme underrepresentation of People of Color in
physics and a growing number of first-person accounts of the
harm that People of Color experience in physics classrooms
and departments speak to a system that valorizes whiteness
and marginalizes People of Color. If we take Critical Race
Theory as a lens, we expect that maintaining white supremacy
in physics happens in part via discipline-specific
instantiations of broader mechanisms that reproduce
whiteness. In this study, we illustrate one such mechanism:
race evasiveness, a powerful ideology that uses race-neutral
discourse to explain away racialized phenomena, evading race
as a shaping force in social phenomena. We offer examples
from interviews with twelve university physics faculty,
showing what race-evasive discourses can look like in
physics and how physics epistemologies, discourses, and
stories reify race-evasive frames. This work aims to support
faculty in refusing race evasiveness in physics teaching and
learning, toward developing race-conscious analyses that can
help us challenge white supremacy in our
discipline.},
Doi = {10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010115},
Key = {fds370632}
}
@article{fds361875,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Peoples, CE},
Title = {Historically White Colleges and Universities: The Unbearable
Whiteness of (Most) Colleges and Universities in
America},
Journal = {American Behavioral Scientist},
Volume = {66},
Number = {11},
Pages = {1490-1504},
Year = {2022},
Month = {October},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027642211066047},
Abstract = {In this paper, we examine the academy as a specific case of
the racialization of space, arguing that most colleges and
universities in the United States are in fact historically
white colleges and universities (HWCUs). To uncover this
reality, we first describe the dual relationship between
space and race and racism. Using this theoretical framing,
we demonstrate how seemingly “race neutral” components
of most American universities (i.e., the history,
demography, curriculum, climate, and sets of symbols and
traditions) embody, signify, and reproduce whiteness and
white supremacy. After examining the racial reality of
HWCUs, we offer several suggestions for making HWCUs into
truly universalistic, multicultural spaces.},
Doi = {10.1177/00027642211066047},
Key = {fds361875}
}
@article{fds363812,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Color-Blind Racism in Pandemic Times},
Journal = {Sociology of Race and Ethnicity},
Volume = {8},
Number = {3},
Pages = {343-354},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2022},
Month = {July},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2332649220941024},
Abstract = {In this article the author examines how the frameworks of
color-blind racism have influenced many topics during the
pandemic. Using readily available material from popular
culture (TV shows, newspaper and magazine articles, and
advertisements) and from statements by government officials,
the author examines how color blindness has shaped our
national discussion on essential workers and heroes,
charity, and differential mortality. The main argument is
that color-blind racism is limiting our understanding of the
structural nature of the various racial problems coronavirus
disease 2019 has revealed, making it difficult to envision
the kinds of policies needed to address them. the author
concludes by summarizing what these ideological perspectives
block from view as well as addressing the nascent discursive
cracks that might be used to produce alternative frames for
interpreting matters and organizing collective
action.},
Doi = {10.1177/2332649220941024},
Key = {fds363812}
}
@article{fds355786,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {What Makes Systemic Racism Systemic?},
Journal = {Sociological Inquiry},
Volume = {91},
Number = {3},
Pages = {513-533},
Year = {2021},
Month = {August},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soin.12420},
Abstract = {In this article, I clarify some components and expand a few
underdeveloped ideas of the racialized social system
approach to racial stratification. I divide the paper into
three parts. In the first section, I explore the limitations
of the figure of “the racist.” In the second part, I
examine the problem of change. In the third part, which is
the core of the paper, I discuss what makes “systemic
racism” systemic. My main contention in this article is
that the “systemic” in “systemic racism” means that
we all participate in the reproduction of the racialized
order. Furthermore, this reproduction depends fundamentally
on behavior and actions that are normative, habituated, and
often unconscious. Hence, systemic racism is the product of
the behavior and practices of regular White folks rather
than the “racists.” In the conclusion, I discuss the
implications of my claims for further theory-building,
research, and the struggle for racial justice.},
Doi = {10.1111/soin.12420},
Key = {fds355786}
}
@article{fds352800,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {There is no racism here?: Preliminary notes about racial
issues in the Americas},
Journal = {Revista de Humanidades},
Number = {42},
Pages = {419-443},
Year = {2020},
Month = {December},
Key = {fds352800}
}
@article{fds343397,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Toward a New Political Praxis for Trumpamerica: New
Directions in Critical Race Theory},
Journal = {American Behavioral Scientist},
Volume = {63},
Number = {13},
Pages = {1776-1788},
Year = {2019},
Month = {November},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764219842614},
Abstract = {The election of 45 brought significant questions about race
(and race-class) that merit theoretical consideration. My
goal in this article is to discuss how racial theory applies
to three main themes that followed the 2016 election: (a)
dealing with the “racists”?, (b) the anxieties of the
poor and white working class, and (c) hegemonic racism in
Trumpamerica. I also briefly outline where I think racial
theory needs to develop to combat racism in
Trumpamerica.},
Doi = {10.1177/0002764219842614},
Key = {fds343397}
}
@article{fds341342,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Feeling Race: Theorizing the Racial Economy of
Emotions},
Journal = {American Sociological Review},
Volume = {84},
Number = {1},
Pages = {1-25},
Year = {2019},
Month = {February},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122418816958},
Abstract = {In this presidential address, I advance a theoretical sketch
on racialized emotions—the emotions specific to racialized
societies. These emotions are central to the racial edifice
of societies, thus, analysts and policymakers should
understand their collective nature, be aware of how they
function, and appreciate the existence of variability among
emoting racial subjects. Clarity on these matters is key for
developing an effective affective politics to challenge any
racial order. After the sketch, I offer potential strategies
to retool our racial emotive order as well as our racial
selves. I end my address urging White sociologists to
acknowledge the significance of racism in sociology and the
emotions it engenders and to work to advance new personal
and organizational anti-racist practices.},
Doi = {10.1177/0003122418816958},
Key = {fds341342}
}
@article{fds340762,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {“Racists,” “Class Anxieties,” Hegemonic Racism, and
Democracy in Trump’s America},
Journal = {Social Currents},
Volume = {6},
Number = {1},
Pages = {14-31},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2019},
Month = {February},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2329496518804558},
Abstract = {In this address, I challenge dominant narratives explaining
the rise of Trumpism in America. Specifically, I dispute
four ideas that have emerged to account for Trump’s
election. First, I suggest that understanding his election
as the product of the political activities of the
“racists” severely limits our understanding of racism as
a collective phenomenon. Second, I question the notion that
Trump’s working class support was due to “class
anxieties.” Third, I argue that despite the rise in
old-fashioned racism in Trump’s America, the new racism
and its ideology of color-blindness are still hegemonic.
Last, I ask analysts and activists alike to realize that the
fight for democracy in the turbulent times we are living
cannot be equated with an effort to return to “politics as
usual,” politics that have maintained the matrix of
domination in place.},
Doi = {10.1177/2329496518804558},
Key = {fds340762}
}
@article{fds328920,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {What We Were, What We Are, and What We Should Be: The Racial
Problem of American Sociology},
Journal = {Social Problems},
Volume = {64},
Number = {2},
Pages = {179-187},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {2017},
Month = {May},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx006},
Doi = {10.1093/socpro/spx006},
Key = {fds328920}
}
@article{fds365187,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Reply to Professor Fenelon and Adding Emotion to My
Materialist RSS Theory},
Journal = {Sociology of Race and Ethnicity},
Volume = {2},
Number = {2},
Pages = {243-247},
Year = {2016},
Month = {April},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2332649216628300},
Abstract = {In this reply, I accept Professor Fenelon basic critique:
that I, as most “race scholars,” fail to take seriously
Indigenous accounts in my theorization. However, I challenge
several of his specific arguments about my work as well as
some of his historical claims. I also include in this reply
an unrelated section to Professor Fenelon’s critique of my
work on the topic of race and emotion. This addition to my
racial theory is crucial because although I still contend
that racism has a material foundation, humans cannot live of
bread alone–that is, race cannot exist without an
emotional bond.},
Doi = {10.1177/2332649216628300},
Key = {fds365187}
}
@article{fds318876,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The Structure of Racism in Color-Blind, “Post-Racial”
America},
Journal = {American Behavioral Scientist},
Volume = {59},
Number = {11},
Pages = {1358-1376},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2015},
Month = {October},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764215586826},
Abstract = {In this article, I describe the racial order of America in
the post–Civil Rights era. First, I discuss what racism is
all about and emphasize the centrality of conceiving the
phenomenon in a structural way. Second, I argue that the
“new racism,” or the set of mostly subtle,
institutional, and seemingly nonracial mechanisms and
practices that comprise the racial regime of
“post-racial” America, has all but replaced the old Jim
Crow order. Third, I describe the racial ideology of
color-blind racism and its component parts (i.e., frames,
style, and racial stories) and contend that, like the racial
order, this new ideology is slippery and has a “beyond
race” character. Fourth, I explain that the Obama moment
is part of the new racism, color-blind period and justify my
claim empirically. I conclude this essay pondering if people
of color will wake up and realize that the new, more
“civil” way of maintaining and justifying racial things
is a more formidable way of maintaining racial
domination.},
Doi = {10.1177/0002764215586826},
Key = {fds318876}
}
@article{fds365188,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {More than Prejudice: Restatement, Reflections, and New
Directions in Critical Race Theory},
Journal = {Sociology of Race and Ethnicity},
Volume = {1},
Number = {1},
Pages = {73-87},
Year = {2015},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2332649214557042},
Abstract = {Racism has always been “more than prejudice,” but
mainstream social analysts have mostly framed race matters
as organized by the logic of prejudice. In this paper, I do
four things. First, I restate my criticism of the dominant
approach to race matters and emphasize the need to ground
our racial analysis materially, that is, understanding that
racism is systemic and rooted in differences in power
between the races. Second, I reflect critically on my own
theorization on race (the racialized social system approach)
and acknowledge that I should have explained better the role
of culture and ideology in the making and remaking of race.
Third, I describe some of the work I have done since this
early work. Fourth, I advance several new directions for
research and theory in the field of race
stratification.},
Doi = {10.1177/2332649214557042},
Key = {fds365188}
}
@article{fds318879,
Author = {Golash-Boza, T and Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Rethinking race, racism, identity and ideology in Latin
America},
Journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies},
Volume = {36},
Number = {10},
Pages = {1485-1489},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2013},
Month = {October},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.808357},
Abstract = {This special issue explores ideas of race and racial
hierarchy in Latin America in the twenty-first century. By
examining the intersection between racialization and
processes of identity formation, political struggle, as well
as intimate social and economic relations, these essays
question how and to what extent traditional racial
ideologies continue to hold true. In so doing, we consider
the implications of such ideologies for anti-racism
struggles. This collection of articles provides a unique
insight into the everyday lived experiences of racism, how
racial inequalities are reproduced, and the rise of
ethnic-based social movements in Latin America. The
qualitative nature of the projects allows the authors to
advance our understanding of how racial ideologies operate
on the ground level. The geographic diversity of the
articles - focusing on Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Costa
Rica and Cuba - enables a greater understanding of the
distinct ways that racial ideologies play out across
different settings. © 2013 Taylor & Francis.},
Doi = {10.1080/01419870.2013.808357},
Key = {fds318879}
}
@article{fds318881,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The last shall be first: Best books in the race field since
2000},
Journal = {Contemporary Sociology},
Volume = {42},
Number = {1},
Pages = {31-40},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2013},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094306112468718a},
Doi = {10.1177/0094306112468718a},
Key = {fds318881}
}
@article{fds318882,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The invisible weight of whiteness: the racial grammar of
everyday life in contemporary America},
Journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies},
Volume = {35},
Number = {2},
Pages = {173-194},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2012},
Month = {February},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.613997},
Abstract = {Racial domination, like all forms of domination, works best
when it becomes hegemonic, that is, when it accomplishes its
goal without much fanfare. In this paper, based on the
Ethnic and Racial Studies Annual Lecture I delivered in May
2011 in London, I argue there is something akin to a grammar
- a racial grammar if you will - that structures cognition,
vision, and even feelings on all sort of racial matters.
This grammar normalizes the standards of white supremacy as
the standards for all sort of social events and
transactions. Thus, in the USA one can talk about HBCUs
(historically black colleges and universities), but not
about HWCUs (historically white colleges and universities)
or one can refer to black movies and black TV shows but not
label movies and TV shows white when in fact most are. I use
a variety of data (e.g., abduction of children, school
shootings, etc.) to illustrate how this grammar works and
highlight what it helps to accomplish. I conclude that
racial grammar is as important as all the visible practices
and mechanisms of white supremacy and that we must fight its
poisonous effects even if, like smog, we cannot see how it
works clearly. © 2012 Taylor and Francis Group,
LLC.},
Doi = {10.1080/01419870.2011.613997},
Key = {fds318882}
}
@article{fds255311,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The Invisisble Weight of Whiteness: The Racial Grammar of
Everyday Life in America},
Journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies},
Volume = {34},
Number = {12},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds255311}
}
@article{fds255312,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Examining, Debating, and Ranting about the Obama Phenomenon:
Introduction to Special Section on Obama},
Journal = {Political Power and Social Theory},
Volume = {22},
Pages = {3-16},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds255312}
}
@article{fds255313,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Seamster, L},
Title = {The Sweet Enchantment of Color Blindness in Black Face:
Explaining the “Miracle,” Debating the Politics, and
Suggesting a Way for Hope to be “For Real” in
America},
Journal = {Political Power and Social Theory},
Volume = {22},
Pages = {105-139},
Publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
Year = {2012},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/s0198-8719(2011)0000022012},
Doi = {10.1108/s0198-8719(2011)0000022012},
Key = {fds255313}
}
@article{fds318883,
Author = {Seamster, L and Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Introduction: Examining, debating, and ranting about the
Obama phenomenon},
Journal = {Political Power and Social Theory},
Volume = {22},
Pages = {3-15},
Publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
Year = {2011},
Month = {December},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S0198-8719(2011)0000022007},
Abstract = {In this special section of Political Power and Social
Theory, we present the work of scholars from various
disciplines documenting and analyzing the Obama phenomenon.
The work in this section, including both theoretical and
empirical analysis, is an early step in the much-needed
academic discussion on Obama and racial politics in the
contemporary United States. We offer this compendium as a
call-to-arms to progressives and leftists, encouraging the
revivalof radical critique of Obama's discourse and policies
instead of the fulsome praise or confused silence that has
so far greeted Obama from the left. Copyright © 2011 by
Emerald Group Publishing Limited.},
Doi = {10.1108/S0198-8719(2011)0000022007},
Key = {fds318883}
}
@article{fds318884,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Dietrich, D},
Title = {The new racism: The racial regime of post-civil rights
America},
Journal = {Studies in Critical Social Sciences},
Volume = {32},
Pages = {41-67},
Year = {2011},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004203655.i-461.13},
Doi = {10.1163/ej.9789004203655.i-461.13},
Key = {fds318884}
}
@article{fds255301,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Review of Racial Justice in the Age of Obama in Ethnic and
Racial Studies by Roy L. Brooks},
Journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies},
Volume = {33},
Number = {9},
Pages = {1169-1170},
Year = {2010},
Month = {October},
Key = {fds255301}
}
@article{fds255314,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The hangover is still not over: Obamerica a Year
Later},
Journal = {Humanity and Society},
Volume = {34},
Number = {3},
Pages = {280-284},
Year = {2010},
Month = {Summer},
Key = {fds255314}
}
@article{fds318885,
Author = {Burton, LM and Bonilla-Silva, E and Ray, V and Buckelew, R and Hordge
Freeman, E},
Title = {Critical race theories, colorism, and the decade's research
on families of color},
Journal = {Journal of Marriage and Family},
Volume = {72},
Number = {3},
Pages = {440-459},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {2010},
Month = {June},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00712.x},
Abstract = {In the millennium's inaugural decade, 2 interrelated trends
influenced research on America's families of color: the need
for new knowledge about America's growing ethnic/racial
minority and immigrant populations and conceptual advances
in critical race theories and perspectives on colorism.
Three substantive areas reflecting researchers' interests in
these trends emerged as the most frequently studied topics
about families of color: inequality and socioeconomic
mobility within and across families, interracial romantic
pairings, and the racial socialization of children. In this
review, we synthesize and critique the decade's scholarly
literature on these topics. We devote special attention to
advances in knowledge made by family-relevant research that
incorporated ways of thinking from critical race theories
and the conceptual discourse on colorism. Copyright ©
National Council on Family Relations, 2010.},
Doi = {10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00712.x},
Key = {fds318885}
}
@article{fds184674,
Author = {Eduardo Bonilla-Silva},
Title = {The 2008 Elections and the Future of Anti-racism in 21st
Century Amerika or},
Journal = {Humanity and Society},
Year = {2010},
Key = {fds184674}
}
@article{fds255315,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The 2008 Elections and the Future of Anti-racism in 21st
Century Amerika Or How We Got Drunk with Obama’s Hope
Liquor and Failed to See Reality},
Journal = {Humanity and Society},
Volume = {34},
Number = {3},
Pages = {222-232},
Year = {2010},
Key = {fds255315}
}
@article{fds255318,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Mayorga, S},
Title = {Si Me Permiten Hablar: Limitations of the human rights
tradition to address racial inequality},
Journal = {Societies without Borders},
Volume = {4},
Number = {3},
Pages = {366-382},
Publisher = {BRILL},
Year = {2009},
Month = {October},
ISSN = {1871-8868},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187188609X12492771031654},
Abstract = {In this paper we address some of the major limitations of
the human rights tradition (HRT) in addressing issues of
racial inequality. We contend that the universalist and
individual-based framework of HRT fails to appreciate the
significance of society's racial structure. More
importantly, HRT ignores how race fractured the world system
creating differently valued human bodies. In addition to
addressing some of the shortcomings of HRT, we present
challenges for those in the tradition and advance several
alternatives for academics who want to work towards the
elimination of race-based inequality in the world. ©
Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2009.},
Doi = {10.1163/187188609X12492771031654},
Key = {fds255318}
}
@article{fds255317,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Are the Americas 'sick with racism' or is it a problem at
the poles? A reply to Christina A. Sue},
Journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies},
Volume = {32},
Number = {6},
Pages = {1071-1082},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2009},
Month = {July},
ISSN = {0141-9870},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000268183600009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {Christina A. Sue commented on my 2004 article in Ethnic and
Racial Studies on the Latin Americanization of racial
stratification in the USA. Almost all her observations hinge
on the assumption that racial stratification in Latin
American countries is fundamentally structured around 'two
racial poles'. I disagree with her and in my reply do three
things. First, I address three major claims or issues in her
comment. Second, I point out some methodological limitations
of American-centred race analysis in Latin America. Third, I
conclude by discussing briefly the Obama phenomenon and
suggest this event fits in many ways my Latin
Americanization thesis. © 2009 Taylor &
Francis.},
Doi = {10.1080/01419870902883536},
Key = {fds255317}
}
@article{fds255316,
Author = {Burton, L and Bonilla-Silva, E and Ray, V and Buckelow, R and Freeman,
E},
Title = {The Color of race and Ethnicity in American Families: A
Synthesis and Critique},
Journal = {Journal of Marriage and the Family},
Year = {2009},
Abstract = {This is a decade review of the family literature on race.
The focus of the review is on how color, as one element of
racial formation, matters in family matters.},
Key = {fds255316}
}
@article{fds255319,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {When Whites LOVE a Black Leader: Race Matters in
Obamerica},
Journal = {Journal of African American Studies},
Volume = {13},
Number = {2},
Pages = {176-183},
Publisher = {Springer Nature},
Year = {2009},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12111-008-9073-2},
Doi = {10.1007/s12111-008-9073-2},
Key = {fds255319}
}
@article{fds255307,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Dietrich, DR},
Title = {The latin americanization of racial stratification in the
U.S.},
Pages = {151-170},
Booktitle = {Race in the 21st Century},
Publisher = {Springer New York},
Address = {New York},
Editor = {Ronald Hall},
Year = {2008},
Month = {December},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79098-5_9},
Abstract = {Aside from what exists in the U.S. there is another layer of
complexity in Latin American racial stratification systems.
They include three racial strata, which are internally
designated by color. In addition to skin tone, phenotype,
hair texture, eye color, culture, education, and class
matter is the phenomenon known as pigmentocracy, or
colorism. Pigmentocracy has been central to the maintenance
of White power in Latin America because it has fostered: (a)
divisions among all those in secondary racial strata; (b)
divisions within racial strata limiting the likelihood of
within-strata unity; (c) mobility viewed as individual and
conditional upon whitening; and (d) white elites being
regarded as legitimate representatives of the nation even
though they do not look like the average member of the
nation. A related dynamic in Latin American stratification
is the social practice of Blanqueamiento, or whitening, not
a neutral mixture but a hierarchical movement wherein
valuable movement is upward. Racial mixing oriented by the
goal of whitening shows the effectiveness of the logic of
White supremacy. As a Latin America-like society, the United
States will become a society with more, rather than less,
racial inequality but with a reduced forum for racial
contestation. The apparent blessing of not seeing race will
become a curse for those struggling for racial justice in
years to come. We may become All Americans, as commercials
in recent times suggest, but paraphrasing George Orwell:
some will be more American than others. © 2008
Springer-Verlag New York.},
Doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-79098-5_9},
Key = {fds255307}
}
@article{fds255320,
Author = {E. Bonilla-Silva and Berry, B and Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {'They should hire the one with the best score': White
sensitivity to qualification differences in affirmative
action hiring decisions},
Journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies},
Volume = {31},
Number = {2},
Pages = {215-242},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2008},
Month = {January},
ISSN = {0141-9870},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000252455800001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {This paper uses innovative survey questions from the 1998
Detroit Area Study to examine how whites communicate their
views about racial matters across three affirmative action
hiring scenarios. Results suggest that most whites prefer
explanations for not hiring blacks based on the abstract and
decontextualized application of the principles of
liberalism. Justifications that were initially offered
emphasizing qualification thresholds, broad criteria, and
contextual concerns, usually in support of hiring the black
applicant, were largely withdrawn when the scenario was
changed from one with equal scores to one with scores
slightly favouring the white applicant. Concrete and
contextualized concerns about workforce homogeneity and the
slightness of score differences were raised in a
conciliatory manner when scores were equal, but then were
seldom maintained when scores favoured the white candidate.
Whites also more readily voiced opposition when the reason
for hire was changed from 'diversity' to 'make up for past
discrimination', offering 'reasonable' responses about 'the
past is the past' that don't deny concrete historical
events, but dismiss their connection to today's racial
order. Taken together, the evidence suggests that the
language of universalism and minimization of racism allow
most whites to communicate their views about affirmative
action using rhetorical strategies that seem reasonable and
moral.},
Doi = {10.1080/01419870701337619},
Key = {fds255320}
}
@article{fds154363,
Title = {(with David Dietrich). “New Racism”},
Booktitle = {In Covert Racism, edited by Rodney Coates. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds154363}
}
@article{fds154358,
Title = {Response to Comment on Latin Americanization
Thesis},
Journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies (2009 or 2010?)},
Year = {2008},
Abstract = {This is a response to a comment on my 2004 article in the
same journal where I articulated a prediction about the
future of racial stratification in the USA.},
Key = {fds154358}
}
@article{fds255300,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Review of Black and Blue, African Americans, the Labor
Movement, and the Decline of the Democratic Party by Paul
Frymer},
Journal = {Contemporary Sociology},
Volume = {38},
Number = {1},
Pages = {54-55},
Publisher = {American Sociological Association},
Year = {2008},
ISSN = {1939-8638},
Key = {fds255300}
}
@article{fds255302,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Where is the love? A Rejoinder on the Latin Americanization
Thesis},
Journal = {Race and Society},
Volume = {5},
Pages = {103-114},
Year = {2008},
Abstract = {This is a response to a comment on my 2004 article in the
same journal where I articulated a prediction about the
future of racial stratification in the USA.},
Key = {fds255302}
}
@article{fds255309,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Prejudice in Politics: Group Position, Public Opinion, and
the Wisconsin Treaty Rights Dispute By Lawrence D. Bobo and
Mia Tuan Harvard University Press, 2006. $40
(cloth)},
Journal = {Social Forces},
Volume = {86},
Number = {1},
Pages = {364-366},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
Year = {2007},
Month = {September},
ISSN = {0037-7732},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000251031500021&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Doi = {10.1353/sof.2007.0090},
Key = {fds255309}
}
@article{fds255310,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Embrick, DG},
Title = {"Every place has a Ghetto⋯": The significance of whites'
social and residential segregation},
Journal = {Symbolic Interaction},
Volume = {30},
Number = {3},
Pages = {323-345},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {2007},
Month = {June},
ISSN = {0195-6086},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000248488700003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Abstract = {The residential and social segregation of whites from blacks
creates a socialization process we refer to as "white
habitus". This white habitus limits whites' chances for
developing meaningful relationships with blacks and other
minorities spatially and psychologically. Using data from
the 1997 Survey of College Students' Social Attitudes and
the 1998 Detroit Area Study, we show that the spatial
segregation experienced by whites from blacks fosters
segregated lifestyles and leads them to develop positive
views about themselves and negative views about blacks.
First, we document the high levels of whites' residential
and social segregation. Next, we examine how whites
interpret their own self-segregation. Finally, we examine
how whites' segregation shapes their racial expressions,
attitudes, cognitions, and even their sense of aesthetics as
illustrated by their views on the subject of interracial
marriage. © 2007 by the Society for the Study of Symbolic
Interaction.},
Doi = {10.1525/si.2007.30.3.323},
Key = {fds255310}
}
@article{fds318887,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Goar, C and Embrick, DG},
Title = {When whites flock together: The social psychology of white
habitus},
Journal = {Critical Sociology},
Volume = {32},
Number = {2-3},
Pages = {229-253},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2006},
Month = {June},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156916306777835268},
Abstract = {Residential and social hypersegregation of whites from
blacks furthers a socialization process we refer to as
"white habitus." "White habitus" geographically and
psychologically limits whites' chances of developing
meaningful relationships with blacks and other minorities.
Using data from the 1997 Survey of College Students' Social
Attitudes and the 1998 Detroit Area Study on White Racial
Ideology to make our case, we show that geographically,
whites' segregated lifestyles psychologically leads them to
develop positive views about themselves and negative views
about racial others. First, we document the high levels of
whites' residential and social segregation. Next, we examine
how whites interpret their own self-segregation. Finally, we
examine how whites' segregation shapes racial expressions,
attitudes, cognitions, and even a sense of aesthetics as
illustrated by whites' views on the subject of interracial
marriage. © Brill Academic Publishers 2006.},
Doi = {10.1163/156916306777835268},
Key = {fds318887}
}
@article{fds255297,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Towards a New Radical Agenda: A Critique of Mainstreamed
Sociological Radicalism},
Journal = {Contemporary Sociology},
Volume = {35},
Number = {2},
Pages = {111-114},
Editor = {Levine, R},
Year = {2005},
Abstract = {In this long review article (2,400 hundred words) I
challenge the radical Marxist project in American sociology.
First, I challenge its whiteness. Second, I challenge its
male orientation and blindness to the centrality of gender.
Third, I critique its class reductionism. Fourth, I
challenge its eurocentrism. Fifth, I criticize their anal
retentive focus on perfect theory and their concomitant
limited engagement in practical struggles. Lastly, I suggest
that their incorporation into the mainstream has had some
negative consequences–and most members of the cohort that
led the battle for Marxism to be part of mainstream
sociology seem unaware of the perils of incorporation.},
Key = {fds255297}
}
@article{fds255321,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Goar, C and Embrick, DG},
Title = {When Whites Flock Together: White Habitus and the Social
Psychology of Whites’ Social and Residential Segregation
from Blacks},
Journal = {Critical Sociology},
Volume = {32},
Number = {2-3},
Pages = {229-254},
Year = {2005},
Abstract = {I have this piece listed as "forthocming." I will get soon
the publication date for you.},
Key = {fds255321}
}
@article{fds318888,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Lewis, A and Embrick, DG},
Title = {"I did not get that job because of a black man. . .": The
story lines and testimonies of color-blind
racism},
Journal = {Sociological Forum},
Volume = {19},
Number = {4},
Pages = {555-581},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {2004},
Month = {December},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11206-004-0696-3},
Abstract = {In this paper we discuss the dominant racial stories that
accompany color-blind racism, the dominant post-civil rights
racial ideology, and asses their ideological role. Using
interview data from the 1997 Survey of College Students
Social Attitudes and the 1998 Detroit Area Study, we
document the prevalence of four story lines and two types of
testimonies among whites. We also provide data on
ideological dissidence among some whites (we label them
racial progressives) and blacks. We show that although these
stories, and the racial ideology they reinforce, have become
dominant, neither goes uncontested.},
Doi = {10.1007/s11206-004-0696-3},
Key = {fds318888}
}
@article{fds318889,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial
stratification in the USA},
Journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies},
Volume = {27},
Number = {6},
Pages = {931-950},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2004},
Month = {November},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000268530},
Abstract = {In this article I argue that the bi-racial order (white vs
non-white) typical of the United States is undergoing a
profound transformation. Because of drastic changes in the
demography of the nation as well as changes in the racial
structure of the world-system, the United States is
developing a complex, Latin America-like racial order.
Specifically, I suggest that the new order will have two
central features: three loosely organized racial strata
(white, honorary white, and the collective black) and a
pigmentocratic logic. I examine some objective, subjective,
and social interaction indicators to assess if the Latin
Americanization thesis holds some water. Although more
refined data are needed to conclusively make my case, the
available indicators support my thesis. I conclude this
article by outlining some of the potential implications of
Latin Americanization for the future of race relations in
the United States. © 2004 Taylor and Francis
Ltd.},
Doi = {10.1080/0141987042000268530},
Key = {fds318889}
}
@article{fds318890,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Racial attitudes or racial ideology? An alternative paradigm
for examining actors' racial views},
Journal = {Journal of Political Ideologies},
Volume = {8},
Number = {1},
Pages = {63-82},
Publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
Year = {2003},
Month = {February},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569310306082},
Abstract = {Most analysts of racism in the United States rely on surveys
to make sense of actors' racial views and are oriented by
methodological individualism. In contrast, a minority of
scholars study actors' views as part of a racial ideology
expressing their collective group interests. Nevertheless,
these latter analysts have not developed a conceptual
apparatus that can guide other researchers. My task in this
article then is advancing a formal conceptualization of
racial ideology and operationalizing it to facilitate using
it in research. Using data from the 1998 Detroit Area Study,
I illustrate the elements of this paradigm. In the
explication of the various components of this paradigm, I
discuss the central features of contemporary racial ideology
in the Unites States which I label 'colour blind racism'. I
conclude with a short discussion of the implications of this
paradigm and of colour blind racism.},
Doi = {10.1080/13569310306082},
Key = {fds318890}
}
@article{fds318891,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Where is the love? A rejoinder by Bonilla-Silva on the Latin
Americanization thesis},
Journal = {Race and Society},
Volume = {5},
Number = {1},
Pages = {103-114},
Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
Year = {2002},
Month = {December},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.007},
Abstract = {In this article I respond to the criticisms and comments of
the authors in this symposium on my Latin Americanization of
race relations thesis. After I respond to each participant,
I attempt to refine and clarify four central aspects of my
thesis, namely, the idea of a tri-racial system, the notion
of pigmentocracy, the concept of honorary white, and the
fractures of this new racial order. I conclude by
acknowledging that my ideas are bold and the data for some
of my claims somewhat thin, but I also point out that
because the racial terrain in the United States is shifting
rapidly, new frameworks and ideas are needed to comprehend
its new racial reality. Thus, despite the limitations of my
thesis, I suggest that it may help analysis to begin
thinking anew how race and racism will operate in the 21st
century. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights
reserved.},
Doi = {10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.007},
Key = {fds318891}
}
@article{fds318892,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {We are all Americans!: The Latin Americanization of racial
stratification in the USA},
Journal = {Race and Society},
Volume = {5},
Number = {1},
Pages = {3-16},
Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
Year = {2002},
Month = {December},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.008},
Doi = {10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.008},
Key = {fds318892}
}
@article{fds318893,
Author = {Aguirre, BE and Bonilla Silva and E},
Title = {Does race matter among Cuban immigrants? An analysis of the
racial characteristics of recent Cuban immigrants},
Journal = {Journal of Latin American Studies},
Volume = {34},
Number = {2},
Pages = {311-324},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
Year = {2002},
Month = {June},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X02006430},
Abstract = {Information on Cuban immigrants from the recent 'Measuring
Cuban Opinion Project' survey is used to determine the
extent to which race matters. We use multivariate binomial
logistic regression models to determine if race can be
predicted by key demographic and economic characteristics of
the respondents, their use of mass media outlets in Cuba,
their evaluation of and integration to the Cuban state and
their participation in the dissidence in the island. The
conclusion is reached that race cannot be predicted because
these immigrants are, in general terms, very similar.
However, some racial differences in mode of immigration and
likelihood of immigration were found.},
Doi = {10.1017/S0022216X02006430},
Key = {fds318893}
}
@article{fds318894,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The linguistics of color blind racism: How to talk nasty
about blacks without sounding ãƒÆ’ã‚¢ãƒÂ¢ã¢â€šÂ¬ã‚¡ãƒâ€¦ã¢â‚¬Å“racistãƒÆ’ã‚¢ãƒÂ¢ã¢â€šÂ¬ã‚¡ãƒâ€šã‚Â},
Journal = {Critical Sociology},
Volume = {28},
Number = {2},
Pages = {41-64},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2002},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08969205020280010501},
Abstract = {In this paper I argue that color blind racism, the central
racial ideology of the post-civil rights era, has a peculiar
style characterized by slipperiness, apparent nonracialism,
and ambivalence. This style fi ts quite well the normative
climate of the country as well as the central frames of
color blind racism. I document in the paper fi ve stylistic
components of this ideology, namely, (1) whites’ avoidance
of direct racial language, (2) the central rhetorical
strategies or ãƒÆ’ã‚¢ãƒÂ¢ã¢â‚¬Å¡ã‚¬ãƒâ€¦ã¢â‚¬Å“semantic
movesãƒÆ’ã‚¢ãƒÂ¢ã¢â‚¬Å¡ã‚¬ãƒâ€šã‚Â
used by whites to safely express their racial views, (3) the
role of projection, (4) the role of diminutives, and (5) how
incursions into forbidden issues produce almost total
incoherence among many whites. I conclude the paper with a
discussion on how this style enhances the ideological menace
of color blind racism. © 2002, Sage Publications. All
rights reserved.},
Doi = {10.1177/08969205020280010501},
Key = {fds318894}
}
@article{fds318895,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Embrick, DG},
Title = {Are Blacks color blind too? An interview-based analysis of
Black Detroiters' racial views},
Journal = {Race and Society},
Volume = {4},
Number = {1},
Pages = {47-67},
Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
Year = {2001},
Month = {December},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9524(02)00034-7},
Abstract = {Although the survey community almost unanimously agrees that
Blacks and Whites have vastly different views on central
matters, few qualitative studies have validated this claim.
Thus, in this study we examine Blacks' views with interview
data from the Detroit Area Study (1998). Specifically, we
assess whether Blacks use the frames of color blind
racism-the dominant ideology of the post-civil rights era-to
articulate their positions on racial issues. The data
suggests that although few Blacks are directly affected by
the frames of color blindness, these frames have shaped the
argumentative terrain in which they battle, blurred their
views on many issues, and blunted the oppositional character
of their counter views. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All
rights reserved.},
Doi = {10.1016/S1090-9524(02)00034-7},
Key = {fds318895}
}
@article{fds318896,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Baiocchi, G},
Title = {Anything but racism: How sociologists limit the significance
of racism},
Journal = {Race and Society},
Volume = {4},
Number = {2},
Pages = {117-131},
Publisher = {Elsevier BV},
Year = {2001},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9524(03)00004-4},
Abstract = {The academic declining significance of race did not begin
with William Julius Wilson's work in the late 1970s. In this
paper, we take a broad look at the methods mainstream
sociologists have used to validate Whites' racial common
sense about racial matters in the post-civil rights era. Our
general goal is to succinctly examine the major tactics
sociologists have used to minimize the significance of
racism in explaining minorities' plight. Specifically, we
survey how (1) most work on racial attitudes creates a
mythical view on Whites' racial attitudes, (2) the various
demographic indices used to asses post-civil rights' racial
matters miss how race affects minorities today, (3)
perspectives on the culture of minorities are based on
ethnocentric perspectives that tend to hide the centrality
of racially based networks, and (4) the way most
sociologists report their results distorts the significance
of racial stratification. We conclude by suggesting that
work on racial matters will need to be revamped if it is
going to have any practical use for those at the "bottom of
the well." © 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights
reserved.},
Doi = {10.1016/S1090-9524(03)00004-4},
Key = {fds318896}
}
@article{fds318897,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Forman, TA},
Title = {"I am not a racist but . . .": Mapping White college
students' racial ideology in the USA},
Journal = {Discourse and Society},
Volume = {11},
Number = {1},
Pages = {50-85},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {2000},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001003},
Abstract = {Survey-based research on Whites' racial attitudes in the USA
has characterized their views as either 'tolerant' or
'ambivalent'. We argue that surveys on racial attitudes have
systematically underestimated the extent of prejudice in the
White population. The legal and normative changes created by
the civil rights movement of the 1960s brought a new racial
ideology ('color blind racism'), with new topics and a new
form. These matters were examined by collecting survey and
interview data from college students in three universities.
The main findings were that White respondents appear to be
more prejudiced in the interviews than in the survey, use a
new racetalk to avoid appearing 'racist', and that the
themes and arguments that they mobilize are congruent with
what other analysts have labeled as 'laissez faire' or
'competitive' racism.},
Doi = {10.1177/0957926500011001003},
Key = {fds318897}
}
@article{fds318898,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {"This is a white country": The racial ideology of the
western nations of the world-system},
Journal = {Sociological Inquiry},
Volume = {70},
Number = {2},
Pages = {188-214},
Publisher = {WILEY},
Year = {2000},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2000.tb00905.x},
Abstract = {In this paper I argue that the racial ideology of the
Western nations of the world-system has converged over the
past twenty years. This new ideology or, as many analysts
call it, the "new racism," includes: (1) the notion of
cultural rather than biological difference, (2) the abstract
and decontextualized use of the discourse of liberalism and
individualism to rationalize racial inequality, and (3) a
celebration of nationalism that at times acquires an
ethnonational character. I contend that this ideological
convergence reflects the histories of racial imperialism of
all these countries, the fact that they have all developed
real - although different - racial structures that award
systemic rewards to their "White" citizens, and the
significant presence of the "Other" (Black, Arab, Turk,
aboriginal people, etc.) in their midst. I use the cases of
Germany, France, the Netherlands, and New Zealand to
illustrate my point.},
Doi = {10.1111/j.1475-682X.2000.tb00905.x},
Key = {fds318898}
}
@article{fds318899,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation},
Journal = {American Sociological Review},
Volume = {62},
Number = {3},
Pages = {465-480},
Publisher = {SAGE Publications},
Year = {1997},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657316},
Abstract = {The study of race and ethnic conflict historically has been
hampered by inadequate and simplistic theories. I contend
that the central problem of the various approaches to the
study of racial phenomena is their lack of a structural
theory of racism. I review traditional approaches and
alternative approaches to the study of racism, and discuss
their limitations. Following the leads suggested by some of
the alternative frameworks, I advance a structural theory of
racism based on the notion of racialized social
systems.},
Doi = {10.2307/2657316},
Key = {fds318899}
}
%% Articles and Chapters
@article{fds44653,
Author = {Eduardo Bonilla-Silva and David G. Embrick},
Title = {“‘Every Place Has a Ghetto…’: The Significance of
Whites’ Social and Residential Segregation.”},
Journal = {Journal of Symbolic Interaction},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds44653}
}
%% Book Reviews
@article{fds154364,
Title = {Frymer, Paul. Black and Blue, African Americans, the Labor
Movement, and the Decline of the Democratic Party.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.},
Journal = {Contemporary Sociology},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds154364}
}
%% Book Chapters
@misc{fds372982,
Author = {Fairfax, FG and McFalls, E and Rogers, A and Kwesi, J and Washington,
AN and Daily, SB and Peoples, CE and Xiao, H and Bonilla-Silva,
E},
Title = {Work In Progress: A Novel Approach to Understanding
Perceptions of Race among Computing Undergraduates},
Journal = {ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference
Proceedings},
Year = {2023},
Month = {June},
Key = {fds372982}
}
@misc{fds366154,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Yamashita, L},
Title = {The Problem of Racism in “Post-Racial”
America},
Pages = {23-35},
Booktitle = {Systemic Racism in America: Sociological Theory, Education
Inequality, and Social Change},
Year = {2022},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9781032124940},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003225324-4},
Abstract = {In this chapter, Eduardo Bonilla-Silva and Liann Yamashita
explain the danger of conceptualizing racism as something
based primarily in individual actions instead of as a system
that we all participate in, whether as victims or as
benefactors. Bonilla-Silva and Yamashita outline “new
racism” practices in housing, banking, and everyday life
and explain how these practices reproduce existing racial
inequalities. Finally, they examine color-blind racism in
America and explore the various strategies White Americans
use to discuss race in a color-blind manner. These include
abstract liberalism, in which the impact of discrimination
is ignored and arguments to maintain the racial status quo
are argued in “moral” terms, cultural racism, which
posits that racial disparities are the fault of minority
groups, and verbal strategies such as rhetorical
incoherence. Bonilla-Silva and Yamashita conclude by
explaining why racism is so difficult for many White people
to talk about and demonstrate the necessity of becoming
anti-racist to effectively counteract racism in all its
forms.},
Doi = {10.4324/9781003225324-4},
Key = {fds366154}
}
@misc{fds367689,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {What Makes Systemic Racism Systemic?},
Pages = {829-845},
Booktitle = {Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader: Third
Edition},
Year = {2022},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780367623678},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003276630-62},
Doi = {10.4324/9781003276630-62},
Key = {fds367689}
}
@misc{fds354958,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {From bi-racial to tri-racial},
Pages = {652-668},
Booktitle = {Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader: Second
Edition},
Year = {2020},
Month = {August},
ISBN = {9780415412537},
Key = {fds354958}
}
@misc{fds356465,
Author = {Hordge-Freeman, E and Mayorga, S and Bonilla-Silva,
E},
Title = {xposing Whiteness Because We Are Free: Emancipation
Methodological Practice in Identifying and Challenging
Racial Practices in Sociology Departments},
Pages = {95-122},
Booktitle = {Rethinking Race and Ethnicity in Research
Methods},
Year = {2016},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9781611320008},
Abstract = {Race-related research presents a number of unique challenges
that must be addressed so the integrity of the research
process as well as the validity and reliability of the data
can remain strong. Race as a category is a dehumanizing
process because for hundreds of years it has pressed us to
live out the lie that some people are 'better than' or 'less
than' others, based only on phenotypical characteristics.
The case study as a method of inquiry has a long tradition
in psychology and anthropology. Narrative analysis of
interview transcripts and organizational documents help find
the deeper meaning of participants' stories. A value of
focus group methodology is the opportunity to gather a
collective story from a number of people talking together
that would not arise if the people were interviewed
separately. Anthropologists and sociologists have long been
using interviews to obtain information from research
participants for clinical diagnosis, counseling, and
psychological testing.},
Key = {fds356465}
}
@misc{fds318877,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Brookshire Childers and T},
Title = {The pitfalls and possibilities of prophetic race theory:
Cultivating leadership: Race matters in “postracial”
Obamerica and how to climb out of the Rabbit
Hole},
Pages = {22-48},
Booktitle = {Repositioning Race: Prophetic Research in a Postracial Obama
Age},
Year = {2014},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9781438450858},
Key = {fds318877}
}
@misc{fds318878,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Ray, VE},
Title = {Getting over the obama hope hangover: The new racism in
‘post-racial’ America},
Pages = {57-73},
Booktitle = {Theories of Race and Ethnicity: Contemporary Debates and
Perspectives},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
Year = {2014},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780521763738},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139015431.007},
Abstract = {As Obama’s presidency enters its second term, it is more
than time to get over the Obama-induced hangover and realize
that his real ‘audacity’ has been to carry out a
centre-right political agenda while doing absolutely nothing
on the race front. In this chapter, I provide a much-needed
aspirin to help readers regain their critical faculties,
understand how and why a black man like Obama was elected
and assess the likely repercussions of having this black man
heading the American political machine. In previous work
(Bonilla-Silva 2010; Bonilla-Silva and Ray 2009), I have
suggested that the claim that Obama’s election is clear
and convincing evidence of racism’s declining significance
in the country is based on a flawed conceptualization of the
nature of racism in general as well as of its specific
articulation in the post–civil rights era. Theoretically,
I contend that racism is, more than anything else, systemic
or institutionalized (Bonilla-Silva 1997), hence the crux of
the matter (with or without a black president) is assessing
whether we have practices, mechanisms, traditions and
institutions in place that produce and reproduce racial
privilege. Traditional racism, and the practices associated
with it, have changed and become covert, subtle and
seemingly non-racial. These new racial practices are the
central cogs behind modern-day racial domination in
America.},
Doi = {10.1017/CBO9781139015431.007},
Key = {fds318878}
}
@misc{fds318880,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {“New racism,” Color-Blind racism, and the future of
whiteness in America},
Pages = {271-284},
Booktitle = {White Out: The Continuing Significance of
Racism},
Publisher = {Routledge},
Year = {2013},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9780203412107},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203412107},
Doi = {10.4324/9780203412107},
Key = {fds318880}
}
@misc{fds255296,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Ashe, A},
Title = {The End of Racism? Colorblind-Racism and Popular Media in
Post-Civil Rights America},
Pages = {57-82},
Booktitle = {Colorblind Screen},
Publisher = {NYU Press},
Editor = {Nilsen, S and Turner, SE},
Year = {2013},
Key = {fds255296}
}
@misc{fds255295,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Are the Americas ‘Sick with Racism’ or is it a Problem
at the Poles? A Reply to Christina A. Sue},
Booktitle = {Latino Identity in Contemporary America},
Publisher = {Rouledge},
Editor = {Bulmer, M and Solomos, J},
Year = {2012},
Key = {fds255295}
}
@misc{fds255290,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {La verdadera historia de la caza: hacia una sociología con
consciencia de raza de la estratificación
racial},
Booktitle = {Debates sobre ciudadanía y políticas raciales en las
Américas Negras.},
Publisher = {Colección CES, serie Idcarán del Centro de Estudios
Sociales de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas},
Editor = {Mosquera, C},
Year = {2011},
Key = {fds255290}
}
@misc{fds255291,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {¿Qué es el racismo?},
Booktitle = {Debates sobre ciudadanía y políticas raciales en las
Américas Negras},
Publisher = {Colección CES, serie Idcarán del Centro de Estudios
Sociales de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas},
Editor = {Mosquera, C},
Year = {2011},
Key = {fds255291}
}
@misc{fds255292,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Exposing Whiteness Because We Are Free: Emancipation
Methodological Practice in Identifying and Challenging
Racial Practices in Sociology Departments},
Pages = {95-122},
Booktitle = {Rethinking Race and Ethnicity in Research
Methods},
Publisher = {Left Coast Press},
Editor = {Stanfield, J},
Year = {2011},
Key = {fds255292}
}
@misc{fds255293,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Beyond Obama’s Historical Symbolism: The Heavy Weight of
Being Black/Brown in a Racist Society: A Conversation with
Eduardo Bonilla-Silva.},
Pages = {147-160},
Booktitle = {Rethinking Race, Class, Language, and Gender: A Dialogue
with Noam Chomsky and Other Leading Scholars},
Publisher = {Rowman and Littlefield},
Editor = {Orelus, P},
Year = {2011},
Key = {fds255293}
}
@misc{fds255294,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Race Matters In “Post-Racial” Obamerica and How to Climb
Out Of the Rabbit Hole”},
Booktitle = {Edited by Sandra Barnes, Past President of
ABS},
Year = {2011},
Key = {fds255294}
}
@misc{fds318886,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Ray, V},
Title = {It's real! Racism, color blindness, Obama, and the urgent
need for social movement politics},
Volume = {17},
Pages = {47-58},
Booktitle = {Studies in Critical Social Sciences},
Year = {2010},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {9789004179486},
Key = {fds318886}
}
@misc{fds255288,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {The Latin Americanization of US Race Relations: A New
Pigmentocracy},
Pages = {40-60},
Booktitle = {Shades of Difference},
Publisher = {Stanford University Press},
Editor = {Glenn, EN},
Year = {2009},
Key = {fds255288}
}
@misc{fds255283,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, and Embrick, DG},
Title = {Fight the Power! Racism, Revolution, and the Role of
Education in the Anti-Racism Movement},
Pages = {334-336},
Booktitle = {Everyday Antiracism: Concrete Ways to Successfully Navigate
the Relevance of Race in School},
Publisher = {New Press (From New School)},
Editor = {Pollack, M},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds255283}
}
@misc{fds255298,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Dietrich, D},
Title = {New Racism},
Pages = {56-76},
Booktitle = {Covert Racism},
Publisher = {Oxford University Press},
Editor = {Coates, R},
Year = {2008},
Key = {fds255298}
}
@misc{fds362486,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Baiocchi, G},
Title = {Anything but Racism: How Sociologists Limit the Significance
of Racism},
Pages = {79-100},
Booktitle = {Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research},
Year = {2007},
Month = {January},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70845-4_6},
Doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-70845-4_6},
Key = {fds362486}
}
@misc{fds255285,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Look, A Negro! Reflections on the Human Rights Approach to
Racial Justice},
Booktitle = {Race, Human Rights & Inequality},
Publisher = {Rowman and Littlefield},
Editor = {Hattery, A and Smith, E and Embrick, DG},
Year = {2007},
Key = {fds255285}
}
@misc{fds44656,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva and K. Glover},
Title = {`We are all Americans!’ The Latin Americanization of Race
Relations in the USA.”},
Booktitle = {The Changing Terrain of Race and Ethnicity: Theory, Methods
and Public Policy},
Editor = {Russell Sage},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds44656}
}
@misc{fds44658,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva and K. Glover},
Title = {`We are all Americans!’ The Latin Americanization of Race
Relations in the USA.”},
Booktitle = {The Changing Terrain of Race and Ethnicity: Theory, Methods
and Public Policy},
Editor = {Russell Sage},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds44658}
}
@misc{fds44659,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva and David G. Embrick},
Title = {“Fight the Power! Racism, Revolution, and the Role of
Education in the Anti-Racism Movement”},
Booktitle = {Everyday Antiracism: Concrete Ways to Successfully Navigate
the Relevance of Race in School},
Publisher = {New Press (From New School)},
Editor = {Mica Pollack},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds44659}
}
@misc{fds44660,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva and David G. Embrick},
Title = {“Black, White, and ‘Other’ Latinidades: How Will the
Multiple Racial Identities of Latinos Impact America’s
Racial Future.” (Tentative)},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds44660}
}
@misc{fds44661,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva and David G. Embrick},
Title = {“Black, White, and ‘Other’ Latinidades: How Will the
Multiple Racial Identities of Latinos Impact America’s
Racial Future.” (Tentative)},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds44661}
}
@misc{fds44663,
Title = {) “Introduction.”},
Booktitle = {Critical Pedagogy and Race.},
Publisher = {London: Blackwell.},
Editor = {In Leonardo and Z. (Ed.).},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds44663}
}
@misc{fds44664,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva and David G. Embrick},
Title = {. “Racism Without Racists: ‘Killing Me Softly’ With
Color Blindness.”},
Booktitle = {Re-inventing Critical Pedagogy: Widening the Circle of
Anti-Oppression Education},
Publisher = {Rowman and Littlefield},
Editor = {Cesar Rossatto and Ricky L. Allen and Marc
Pruyn},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds44664}
}
@misc{fds255278,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, and Embrick, DG},
Title = {Black, Honorary White, White: The Future of Race in the
United States?},
Pages = {33-49},
Booktitle = {Negotiating the Color Line: Doing Race in the Color-Blind
Era and Implications for Racial Justice},
Publisher = {Lynn Rienner},
Editor = {Brunsma, D},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds255278}
}
@misc{fds255279,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, and Embrick, DG},
Title = {The Race Problem in the Critical Pedagogy
Community},
Pages = {21-35},
Booktitle = {Re-inventing Critical Pedagogy: Widening the Circle of
Anti-Oppression Education},
Publisher = {Rowman and Littlefield},
Editor = {Rossatto, C and Allen, RL and Pruyn, M},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds255279}
}
@misc{fds255280,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E},
Title = {Introduction—‘Racism’ and 'New Racism’—The
Contours of Racial Dynamics in Contemporary
America},
Pages = {1-36},
Booktitle = {Critical Pedagogy and Race},
Publisher = {Blackwell},
Editor = {Leonardo, Z},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds255280}
}
@misc{fds255281,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, and Embrick, DG},
Title = {The (White) Color of Color Blindness in 21st Century
Amerika},
Pages = {1-26},
Booktitle = {Race, Ethnicity, and Education (Volume 4: Colorblind Racism:
Racism/Anti-racist Action),},
Publisher = {Praeger},
Editor = {Ross, EW and Pang, VO},
Year = {2005},
Key = {fds255281}
}
@misc{fds255284,
Author = {Bonilla-Silva, E and Glover, KS},
Title = {"We are all americans": The Latin Americanization of race
relations in the United States},
Pages = {149-183},
Publisher = {RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION},
Editor = {Krysan, M and Lewis, AE},
Year = {2004},
Month = {January},
ISBN = {0-87154-491-1},
url = {http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000229113400006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=47d3190e77e5a3a53558812f597b0b92},
Key = {fds255284}
}
| |
Duke University * Faculty * Staff * Reload * Login | ||
