|
Articles and Chapters
- Flanagan, O; Jackson, K, Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited,
in An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives
(January, 2016),
pp. 69-84 [doi].
(last updated on 2024/01/01)
Abstract: In 1958, G. E. M. Anscombe wrote, “It is not profitable for us at present to do moral philosophy; that should be laid aside at any rate until we have an adequate philosophy of psychology, in which we are conspicuously lacking” (186). Anscombe hinted (and she and many others pursued the hint) that the Aristotelian tradition was the best place to look for a richer and less shadowy conception of moral agency than either utilitarianism or Kantianism had provided.
|