Publications [#253847] of James Shah

Journal Articles

1. Sassenberg, K; Brazy, PC; Jonas, KJ; Shah, JY (2013). When gender fits self-regulatory preferences: The impact of regulatory fit on gender-based ingroup favoritism. Social Psychology, 44(1), 4-15. [doi]
   (last updated on 2024/11/25)

   Abstract:
   Females are perceived to have less power than males. These differences in perceived power might render different self-regulatory strategies appropriate: Women should (as members of other low-power groups) care about security, whereas men should (as members of other high-power groups) strive for accomplishment. These regulatory implications of gender provide the basis for regulatory fit between individuals' gender and their regulatory focus. Higher fit should lead to stronger gender-based ingroup favoritism: Prevention- focused females and promotion-focused males were expected to show more ingroup favoritism than both sexes in the respective other regulatory focus. According to the regulatory fit hypothesis, this effect should occur for evaluative- but not for stereotype-based ingroup favoritism. Three studies supported these hypotheses. © 2013 Hogrefe Publishing.