Hydrology & Fluid Dynamics Faculty Database
Hydrology & Fluid Dynamics
Pratt School of Engineering
Duke University

 HOME > pratt > CEE_HFD > Faculty    Search Help Login 

Publications [#58012] of Zbigniew J. Kabala

Papers Published

  1. Ruud, N.C. and Kabala, Z.J., Numerical evaluation of the flowmeter test in a layered aquifer with a skin zone, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 203 no. 1-4 (1997), pp. 101 - 108 [S0022-1694(97)00091-7]
    (last updated on 2007/04/09)

    Abstract:
    In this study, we used a two-dimensional groundwater flow model to numerically evaluate the single flowmeter test in a series of two-layer confined aquifers for a fully penetrating well with a skin zone (i.e. a disturbed zone, filter-pack envelope, etc.). The skin zone causes errors in estimates of the vertical distribution of horizontal hydraulic conductivity by acting as a channel for cross-flow between layers of contrasting hydraulic conductivity. The bias in measured layer discharge rates, Qi, is dependent on the ratios of the skin zone hydraulic conductivity to the layer hydraulic conductivities, Ks/Ki, and on the ratios of the skin zone thickness to the thickness of the individual layers, (rs - rw)/bi. For any given Ks/Ki, the cross-flow increased with increases in the skin zone radius relative to the well radius, rs/rw. The error in estimated Ki due to a skin zone of reduced hydraulic conductivity (Ks/Ki < 1) is greater than that of a skin zone of a correspondingly enlarged hydraulic conductivity (Ks/Ki > 1). As Ks/K1 increases, the ratios K over-bar 1/K1 and K over-bar 2/K2 converge approximately to the ranges 0.9-0.95 and 1.0-1.25, respectively. As Ks/K1 decreases from value 1, the ratios of K over-bar 1/K1 and K over-bar 2/K2 diverge from these asymptotic ranges. In all simulated flowmeter tests, where K1/K2 = 10, K over-bar 1 underestimates K1 and K over-bar 2 overestimated K2.

    Keywords:
    Flowmeters;Groundwater flow;Mathematical models;Hydraulic conductivity;


Duke University * Pratt * Faculty * Reload * Login
x