Journal Articles

1. Ambridge, B; Rowland, CF; Theakston, AL; Tomasello, M, Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: 'What experimental data can tell us?'., Journal of child language, vol. 33 no. 3 (August, 2006), pp. 519-557 [doi].
   (last updated on 2026/01/17)

   Abstract:
   This study investigated different accounts of children's acquisition of non-subject wh-questions. Questions using each of 4 wh-words (what, who, how and why), and 3 auxiliaries (BE, DO and CAN) in 3sg and 3pl form were elicited from 28 children aged 3;6-4;6. Rates of noninversion error (Who she is hitting?) were found not to differ by wh-word, auxiliary or number alone, but by lexical auxiliary subtype and by wh-word+lexical auxiliary combination. This finding counts against simple rule-based accounts of question acquisition that include no role for the lexical subtype of the auxiliary, and suggests that children may initially acquire wh-word + lexical auxiliary combinations from the input. For DO questions, auxiliary-doubling errors (What does she does like?) were also observed, although previous research has found that such errors are virtually non-existent for positive questions. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.