Publications [#370315] of Eve S. Puffer

Papers Published

1. Satinsky, EN; Kakuhikire, B; Baguma, C; Cooper-Vince, CE; Rasmussen, JD; Ashaba, S; Perkins, JM; Ahereza, P; Ayebare, P; Kim, AW; Puffer, ES; Tsai, AC (2024). Caregiver preferences for physically harsh discipline of children in rural Uganda.. Journal of family violence, 39(5), 861-874. [doi]
   (last updated on 2026/01/18)

   Abstract:
   

   Purpose

   Physically harsh discipline is associated with poor developmental outcomes among children. These practices are more prevalent in areas experiencing poverty and resource scarcity, including in low- and middle-income countries. Designed to limit social desirability bias, this cross-sectional study in rural Uganda estimated caregiver preferences for physically harsh discipline; differences by caregiver sex, child sex, and setting; and associations with indicators of household economic stress and insecurity.

   Method

   Three-hundred-fifty adult caregivers were shown six hypothetical pictographic scenarios depicting children whining, spilling a drink, and kicking a caregiver. Girls and boys were depicted engaging in each of the three behaviors. Approximately half of the participants were shown scenes from a market setting and half were shown scenes from a household setting. For each scenario, caregivers reported the discipline strategy they would use (time out, beating, discussing, yelling, ignoring, slapping).

   Results

   Two thirds of the participants selected a physically harsh discipline strategy (beating, slapping) at least once. Women selected more physically harsh discipline strategies than men (b = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.54). Participants shown scenes from the market selected fewer physically harsh discipline strategies than participants shown scenes from the household (b = -0.51; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.33). Finally, caregivers selected more physically harsh discipline strategies in response to boys than girls. Indicators of economic insecurity were inconsistently associated with preferences for physically harsh discipline.

   Conclusions

   The high prevalence of physically harsh discipline preferences warrant interventions aimed at reframing caregivers' approaches to discipline.